Slashdot Mirror


OEone New Releases and Review

Mike Potter writes "After our initial launch, we received a ton of requests asking for support for RedHat 7.3 and Mandrake 8.2. OEone is happy to announce that HomeBase DESKTOP is now available as a free download for those two platforms. There's a great review of OEone DESKTOP at Linux Orbit."

168 comments

  1. :((( EULA with DRM... by WetCat · · Score: 5, Interesting

    That OE wants to install DRManagement module
    with itself.
    No thanks. I do not want to install any DRM crap on my comoputer.
    I did NOT agree with their EULA.

  2. Open-source... GPL... better. by SimpleSphere · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Yep, that's what I think... soon enough, someone will look at this, and start an open-source, GPL'd, community project to rival it. Hopefully, however, instead of separating users even more (as DEs such as GNOME and KDE have done) it will unite them... is this possible? Hmm...

    1. Re:Open-source... GPL... better. by Vic · · Score: 2

      Major portions are already open-sourced. See:
      http://www.oeone.com/developers/

      Also, you can visit the #penzilla IRC channel on irc.openprojects.net to speak directly to developers.

      And, you can join the development mailing list here:
      https://mail.oeone.com/mailman/listinfo/developers

      Cheers,
      Vic

    2. Re:Open-source... GPL... better. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah ok, so what do all the grandmas use until this happens?

      You dumb geeks, you guys cant stand something dummied down. This OEone desktop looks like a step in the right directions.

    3. Re:Open-source... GPL... better. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which is exactly why smart companies are avoiding the Linux user base like the plague.

      Think about it. OS X is a much better replacement for Linux than it is for Windows, even though it's a fine replacement for Windows. The UNIX foundation of OS X really appeals to the geeks of the world, the sort of people who already use Linux. But is Apple trying to convince Linux users to switch? Hell, no. Because they know if Linux users saw something in OS X they liked, they'd just try to steal the intellectual property and build their own communist "one for all and all for all" version. It's already happened with so-called "themes" for so-called "desktops" like KDE and Gnome. Somebody saw a UI they liked, so they decided to just steal it, rather than buying it from Apple. Apple put a stop to that, but you can be sure it cost them a pretty penny in legal fees.

      I mean, look at those communist bastards at Ximian! They took a look at Outlook and said to themselves, this is pretty neat. This is a product we'd like to use. But did they buy licenses from Microsoft like they should have? No, instead they just stole the idea for Outlook, right down to the user interface, and made their own program, arrogantly called "Evolution."

      Even iTunes, the humble MP3 player program from Apple, isn't safe. The bastards who stole it from Apple copied every aspect of iTunes, right down to the brushed metal appearance. They at first even called it "xTunes," in a shameless act of trademark infringement. Now, those arrogant punks call it "Sue me." What a bunch of assholes.

      Name one thing that Linux users have ever created from scratch. KDE and Gnome are shameless and pitiful attempts to copy the Windows desktop, right down to the "Start" menu. Open Office is a direct clone of Microsoft Office. Evolution is Outlook. "Sue me" is iTunes. Mozilla is Netscape 4. Apache is NCSA httpd. PostgreSQL is Oracle. The list goes on and on.

      Trying to sell to Linux users is suicide. If your product is great, the Linux communists will just steal what's great about it and try to make their own version. Even though their version will be buggy, unstable, and a pain to use, it'll still cut into your sales by diluting your brand and confusing your customers.

      Linux users are death for software companies. The very best thing a software company can hope for is to be ignored by the Linux communists. Let them go on writing their thirty-sixth window manager, or fifteenth command shell, and forget your product ever even existed.

    4. Re:Open-source... GPL... better. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where is the "Get a clue -1" moderator option?

    5. Re:Open-source... GPL... better. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am by far the most clueful person posting to Slashdot. Rather than trying (and failing) to be glib, just refute any one of the things I said here.

      (crickets)

    6. Re:Open-source... GPL... better. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Someone please Mod this up! The points, while somewhat off-topic are valid in many respects and should be discussed. Linux does have a history of begging, borrowing, or stealing from other products!

    7. Re:Open-source... GPL... better. by Azghoul · · Score: 1

      Uhhhhhhhh, isn't that what competition / the free market is all about?

      Would you rather have patents and copyrights locking every innovation down so there is only one of each? Hmm...

      I expect you believe we should all be driving Model T Fords then eh?

      Name one thing that has been produced that hasn't been copied. Now, I'll grant you that there are probably plenty of things created in the last few months that haven't been yet, but anything older?

      I don't think so.

    8. Re:Open-source... GPL... better. by Drakonite · · Score: 1

      Apple and Microsoft have a history of begging, borrowing, or stealing from other products as well. Good artists borrow, great artists steal.

      --
      Shoot Pixels, Not People!
    9. Re:Open-source... GPL... better. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The point is, Linux as a community needs to do better. Surely, with all of the passion and skill out there, someone or some group can come up with something that has not been seen before under an MS, Apple, NeXT, or Xerox badge. I am not saying there are no innovations in Linux, just that as a general rule, the OS apps that capture the spotlight are the ones that were created in response to something MS did, or Apple tried, etc. You can never hope to change the world when we are doing nothing more than copying Outlook and MS Word. For shame I say. Show me some innovation. Show me a novel approach to the desktop. Show me something that does not remind me of MS and I will be happy.

    10. Re:Open-source... GPL... better. by Azghoul · · Score: 1

      Well I certainly don't have any earth-shattering ideas... :)

      I don't disagree with your more reasoned point here: it would be great if we could point at something and say, "Look, MS doesn't have that!" but I'm not going to be angry / disappointed if it doesn't happen for a while.

    11. Re:Open-source... GPL... better. by SimpleSphere · · Score: 1

      Yeah... I don't think that guy/gal is as smart as he/she thinks. People are stealing from Mac and Microsoft. Well, call Xerox and ask them what they think about their idea of a "GUI". Stolen. Call the guy who wrote DOS and ask him how he feels about his $50K fortune. Stolen.

      Microsoft/Apple bullying the Linux community for "stealing" anything (All of which is free and/or open source to begin with! So... WTF?) is ridiculous... that's defenitely a pot calling a kettle black...

    12. Re:Open-source... GPL... better. by Drakonite · · Score: 1

      Atleast Apple and Microsft both had "their" ideas they stole stolen by someone else. But poor Xerox... Poor NeXt... Poor guy who got rich when he should have gotten richer.
      Atleast xerox can be blamed for showing off the stuff before they even released it and that guy DID get something...

      -1 Offtopic.....



      AAAHHH!!! Power failure! lights are off! Alarm clock is off! Cordless phone charger quit chargine. Wait a second... Hmmm... My computer is still on... WTF?!?!?

      --
      Shoot Pixels, Not People!
  3. Bought it, used it, dumped it! by BigBir3d · · Score: 3, Informative

    It is just a screwed with install of RedHat, minus some important libraries. Takes forever to start the machine, and it is not nearly as configurable of a desktop as KDE or Gnome, or any number of other "smaller" GUI's.

    1. Re:Bought it, used it, dumped it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...and it is not nearly as configurable of a desktop as KDE or Gnome

      No shit! Really? I never would have thought so!

    2. Re:Bought it, used it, dumped it! by avalys · · Score: 2

      You know, if you're going to bash a piece of software without even using it, get your freaking facts straight.

      OEone is a desktop environment, not a distribution.

      For Christ's sake, you could've figured that out from the Slashdot summary alone!

      --
      This space intentionally left blank.
    3. Re:Bought it, used it, dumped it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get your freaking facts straight. OEone is most certainly available as a distribution.

  4. I'm not sure I see the point.... by Deth_Master · · Score: 1

    ...of having an OS on top of a browser. That seems a little strange to me. Why not just make an OS that has the features of the browser that you want? True, it might be more efficient to use mozilla's code to enhance the OS, but to run it on top of....I'm not sure this is wise. I think I'll stick with KDE for now.

    After thought...
    can you run Mozilla inside this OS, then run the OS again on top of Mozilla, then run Mozilla inside that OS, etc.
    The worlds only recursive Operating System! :P

    --
    find ~your -name '*base* | xargs chown :us
    1. Re:I'm not sure I see the point.... by cdrobbins · · Score: 1

      It's funny, I was going to post the same question. I don't see the point. The web-page looks flashy and all, but KDE (I don't use KDE, but *shrug*) does all this and more already

      Downloading it now... I really have to see what all the hoo-haa is about. hmmm.

    2. Re: I'm not sure I see the point.... by timmyf2371 · · Score: 2, Informative
      You're not running the OS on top of the browser. I've used OEOne for two weeks (it's not really my cup of tea) and how it works is this:

      OS (Redhat/Mandrake)
      --> Operating Environment (in this case OEOne. but could be KDE/Gnome/whatever takes your pick)

      Also, it's not running on top of a browser. It's an operating environment which is powered by mozilla (XUL/Gecko/Mail/etc) with what looks like the Abiword plugin for mozilla.

      From my two weeks of testing, that's how it appears to work. Also, I tried numerous times to load or install Mozilla, and it always came up with an error.

      If I'm completely way off base here, let me know and add any relevant info.

      Tim

      --

      Backup not found: (A)bort (R)etry (P)anic
    3. Re:I'm not sure I see the point.... by Dalcius · · Score: 1

      Well, I'm pretty happy with my nested logins, although I rarely use them.

      command: gdmflexiserver --xnest

      A new desktop login in a window. Multiple desktops. *sigh* Linux puts Windows to such shame.

      --
      ~Dalcius
      Rome wasn't burnt in a day.
    4. Re:I'm not sure I see the point.... by Gerv · · Score: 2

      I think I'll stick with KDE for now.

      If you're the sort of person who reads Slashdot, then OEOne Homebase isn't for you anyway. This is your grandmother's Linux UI. And it's very good at removing complexity while retaining power.

      Gerv

  5. Is it an acronym? by Wee · · Score: 2
    Why is "DESKTOP" capitalized? Is it an acronym? While I'm asking, why is ANYWHERE in all caps? SUITE is as well. Why the caps? Is it to make the product names stand out? If so, they do so far too much; it makes the web site hard to read. Not that this is an interview or anything, just curious...

    -B

    --

    Ash and Hickory, straight-grained and true, make excellent bludgeons, dandy for the cudgeling of vegetarians.

    1. Re:Is it an acronym? by TKinias · · Score: 1

      Wee wrote:

      Why is "DESKTOP" capitalized? Is it an acronym?

      I suspect it's to suggest a trademark. See, for example, Hormel's insistance on writing `SPAM' (the food) in uppercase and `spam' (unsolicited commercial e-mail) in lowercase, so as to preserve Hormel's trademark. OEone doesn't use a `TM' symbol by `DESKTOP', but they may be hinting at a trademark anyway.

      FWIW, Corel uses something similar in its product names (CorelDRAW!, CorelPHOTOPAINT, etc.)

      It is pretty lame, though.

      --
      In principio creauit Linus Linucem.
    2. Re:Is it an acronym? by aardvarkjoe · · Score: 3, Funny

      If you say the name out loud, you are required to shout the word "DESKTOP." It's in the EULA.

      --

      How can we continue to believe in a just universe and freedom to eat crackers if we have no ale?
    3. Re:Is it an acronym? by blixel · · Score: 2

      I suspect it's to suggest a trademark.

      Psh... that's as lame as the 1-click patent. Sadly though, you are probably right.

  6. Gee, you shouldn't have. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    No, really. I mean you shouldn't have. Sure it's pretty and all. But, I can't really compare this to KDE 3.0.3 on RedHat 7.3 with Star Office 6.0.

    Now, maybe if my grandmother was still alive and I was going to setup a mail station for her, maybe I would use it. But, as she's dead, you shouldn't have gone to all that trouble. I myself will never use it.

  7. No mention of Mandrake 8.2 on the website... by Archie+Steel · · Score: 2

    ...yet the announcement tends to indicate that there is a version available for my favorite distro. Does that mean that I can use the RedHat version on my Mandrake system? Or just that I didn't look in the right place?

    I'm really eager to try this. This looks like it could really be useful for my Mom, who's completely computer illiterate but wants to surf the Internet and send e-mail.

    --

    Reminder: find a new sig
    1. Re:No mention of Mandrake 8.2 on the website... by SimpleSphere · · Score: 1

      Are you sure? OEone main page Look again. Bold red letters... ring a bell?

    2. Re:No mention of Mandrake 8.2 on the website... by Archie+Steel · · Score: 2

      Aha! But it's not on this page. As I said, they seem to say that they have a version for Mandrake, but on the download page it only mentions RedHat...Anyoned tried it on Mandrake yet?

      --

      Reminder: find a new sig
  8. Add these features: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Palm support and financial software. Then maybe it'd be worth something.

    1. Re:Add these features: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is PALM support.

    2. Re:Add these features: by stealthman · · Score: 1

      Actually, it has palm support built in, and it allows you to install other apps (try GnuCash for your finances).

  9. Thats cool and all... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thats cool and all, but it would be nice if someone would come up with a Aqua style GUI (like in MAC OS X http://www.apple.com/macosx/). KDE, Gnome and OE just aren't doing it for me yet.

    In all fairness to KDE and Gnome it's getting there but there is still much work to be done.

  10. oeone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why are we supporting these people? They're obviously trying to leech off the Open Source community. See how they have used Linux and Mozilla already and contributed nothing back. People complain about Lindows, why not oeone?

    1. Re:oeone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Beacuse we'll leech right back off them ;)

    2. Re:oeone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where did you hear that?? They created and maintain the Mozilla Calendar http://www.mozilla.org/projects/calendar/ AbiMoz http://abimoz.mozdev.org/ and MozStreamer http://www.oeone.com/developers/mozstreamer.html projects.

    3. Re:oeone by IamTheRealMike · · Score: 2

      That's bollocks, and I hope it gets modded as a troll. Actually OEone have contributed loads back to the community, for instance take the Calendar component of Mozilla - their code, they have somebody paid to hack on it. They've also contributed LOTS of bugfixes to Mozilla itself.

  11. plz make it stop!!! by jaxdahl · · Score: 5, Funny

    oh man.. look at this bastardization of Tux, the pengiun we all know and love and hate
    pic here

    1. Re:plz make it stop!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Looks like they fed Tux after midnight!

  12. From the Orbit review: by mstyne · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The install script

    lynx -source http://install.oeone.com/ |sh

    is run in a terminal window as root.


    Hahahaha.... NO. What bigger motivation is there for some misguided soul to go buck wild and compromise that server? People will be running remote code as root, hoping to get this shiny new software. Er, no thanks. The review doesn't mention it, but there HAS to be a better way to install it than this.

    --
    mstyne: real name, no gimmicks
    1. Re:From the Orbit review: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Where were you when Gnome and Helixcode were doing this for the past two years? Oh.. wait.. that was a chosen one. They're allowed to do it because they're all about bringing down KDE and the MAN, huh?

      Slashdot users never change.

    2. Re:From the Orbit review: by mstyne · · Score: 2

      Where were you when Gnome and Helixcode were doing this for the past two years?

      I was using KDE.

      --
      mstyne: real name, no gimmicks
    3. Re:From the Orbit review: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So was I.. but.. again :) *heh.* The "Go*" type script has been around for years. It's nothing new to see it done.

    4. Re:From the Orbit review: by matman · · Score: 2

      This is not much different from any downloaded system update. Kernel.org anyone? Sure, you have the opportunity to check signatures, but few desktop users would bother. Bigger distribution tools don't often even do a good job at verification - I don't believe that apt-get even does it (I do love apt-get, however). Most users will take the risk and trust install.oeone.com, for better or worse. Windows users download shareware constantly - people don't seem to have a problem trusting joe-blow server for non-mission-critical machines :)

    5. Re:From the Orbit review: by blwrd · · Score: 1

      wget it, read it, run it.

    6. Re:From the Orbit review: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      What's the difference here to running some install script (that requires root priviliges) from a package you've downloaded from some random site? If the site is compromised the packages can be messed with just as well.

      Not like you're going to read through the install scripts anyway (which you could do just as well in the case of Orbit by downloading the contents of http://install.oeone.com before running the script)...

    7. Re:From the Orbit review: by ari_j · · Score: 2

      Better yet, it includes large chunks of uuencoded executables.

    8. Re:From the Orbit review: by diamondc · · Score: 1

      You have to trust somebody if you want to get a usable operating system on your computer. I'm pretty sure the oeone people have locked down that webserver, anyways.

      Just wget install.oeone.com/index.html and check out the script for yourself.

      --
      "I keep looking in the want-ads under 'revolutionary' but there don't seem to be any listings.. "
    9. Re:From the Orbit review: by asv108 · · Score: 2

      Well it has seemed to work fine for Ximian for quite some time. I haven't heard about anyone compromising go-gnome.

    10. Re:From the Orbit review: by nvrrobx · · Score: 1

      Funny, you install Ximian Desktop like this:

      lynx -source http://go-gnome.org | sh

      in a terminal window as root.

      I haven't heard anyone complain about that....

    11. Re:From the Orbit review: by Shemp · · Score: 1

      There is a better way.

      lynx -source http://install.oeone.com > install.sh
      vi install.sh

      If there's something in there you don't trust, then don't run it. It's a shell script, not a binary. Just look at it.

    12. Re:From the Orbit review: by silvaran · · Score: 2

      How about registering domains like www.oeone.org, www.oone.com, www.oone.com or www.oe-one.com? Any permutations or slight modifications of the original domain would be enough to catch a few users. , this is a horrible way to do things. Whatever happened to the days of downloadable installers? I would expect that people who install Linux would have enough sense to choose a link off a website related to their distribution. This is how Ximian does it on their download page. I think they still provide the old lynx -source http://? | sh method as well.

    13. Re:From the Orbit review: by Azghoul · · Score: 1

      Why would someone mod this as informative?

      Who is it informing?

      How is it helpful to the conversation?

      Now, buried in the pile of snide there is a point that Gnome/Helix/Ximian were doing this for quite some time and the original poster didn't notice, but the abject rudeness blows it all away. Thanks.

    14. Re:From the Orbit review: by Drakonite · · Score: 1

      Emerge checks the md5 sums against what they should be (downloaded off of the portage mirrors I believe) I assume that would be verification correct? And I consider gentoo a bigger distribution.

      --
      Shoot Pixels, Not People!
    15. Re:From the Orbit review: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok, so just consider this a complaint.

      Back then, I also thought it was a stupid thing to do. If you want any security, you don't just run random stuff as root.

    16. Re:From the Orbit review: by matman · · Score: 2

      I'm just trying to say that many desktop users put as much trust in most servers they download from.

    17. Re:From the Orbit review: by jorleif · · Score: 1

      In what way is it safer to run (presumably) binary only installers as root on your system instead of remote shell scripts? I'm not saying it's safe to run remote shell scripts but a binary only installer could be used to compromise a system in exactly the same ways.

  13. I'm sorry to hear about your grandmother by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    But you should have told me before I wrote it. It took me a long time to write it, you know. If I had known that your grandmom had passed away, I could have saved myself a lot of time.

    Thanks for nothing, pal.

  14. Negatives. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Alright, since there's quite a lot wrong with this thing, why not start a list? The two that I've heard mentioned most (outside Slashdot) so far are the following:

    1) Digital rights management a requirement of the EULA (details are sketchy, I haven't read it yet).

    2) Doesn't support resolutions above or below 1024x768 yet (no, I'm NOT joking).

    Anyone else?

    1. Re:Negatives. by ArmorFiend · · Score: 1

      > 2) Doesn't support resolutions above or below 1024x768 yet (no, I'm NOT joking).

      Dude, its a feature.

      Remember, they are NOT MAKING A PRODUCT FOR YOU. They're making it for your grandma. Her vision isn't the best. If something's too small, she's not going to dig through the app for a font preference, she's going to throw up her hands and demand back her WebTV. OEOne desktop is not trying to take over the world. Just trying to take over a small slice of the newbie market.

      I run at 1600x1200 and I'm always getting fucked by some app or web page coming up using 5 point utopia-ultra-tiny. I agree the old mac approach is best: never allow the user anything other than 72 DPI. But failing that, for an icon based UI that takes over the whole screen, what do you want them to do? They made a reasonable decision given the audience they are trying to reach.

    2. Re:Negatives. by inthehacker · · Score: 2, Informative

      The next major upgrade will include support to resize the environment. That was one of our most requested features after we launched a few weeks ago.
      Mike

    3. Re:Negatives. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But failing that, for an icon based UI that takes over the whole screen, what do you want them to do?

      use fucking SVG like the rest of the goddamn world.

    4. Re:Negatives. by ArmorFiend · · Score: 1

      It would be nice, and lord knows their icons look silly anyway, so SVGing them wouldn't hurt them too much. But given linux's tendancy to make fonts rediculously small for no reason, and have a different font pref for every application, I think they made the right call. Esp on a beta product.

    5. Re:Negatives. by Drakonite · · Score: 1

      If their reason for supporting only one resolution had anything to do with grandma's poor vision they would have chosen 800x600. My not-so-blind grandmother has a 19" monitor, and I doubt many grandmothers would have a bigger one, and she often has to look closely to read at 800x600. That aside, I do agree with you that only supporting the one resolution is not a bad thing.

      --
      Shoot Pixels, Not People!
  15. OEone install experiences by ArmorFiend · · Score: 5, Informative

    In the last year I've moved both my mother, and my father and his girlfriend to linux. My mother I did first, and I set her up with a window-maker/gnome desktop. She's smart, but also lazy and never bothered to learn her way around the linux file system. She always relied on me for support, and never felt like it was "her" computer. That was important to her and she eventually blew $2000 on an iMac with OS X.

    My father and girlfriend don't have the money to burn, and also are more easily befuddled by technology. I set them up with a fresh install of OEOne. What OEOne does well is make you feel like you own your computer. They're so far very happy.

    There is a dark side to OEOne desktop, however. Its not really a prodcut, but a PR attemt to sucker geeks like us into using it and giving it mindshare. It has no built in modem control applet / internet wizard. They've written one for their set top box, but pulled it from desktop, basically to keep it from being a useful product.

    Remember, OEOne is written for grandma, and grandma doesn't ever want to miss a call because she's on the net. She sure doesn't want to be unable to call out because she forgot to power down her comp. The mailbug has a really good connection manager, basically you never know the mailbug uses the modem because it does all its stuff when it senses you're not using the phone.

    The user interface is decent, but a little clunky. Its got a lot of tiny mystery meat icons, scattered in unintuitive locations. They need to pay their graphic designers more or something.

    Overall though its not a bad choice. The lack of a window manager is a big win for newbs. Instead there is a task bar and you swap back and forth between tasks. If the task isn't running it starts it up automatically. This is a good idea. I wonder when the condesending bone heads working on windowmaker will figure this out. :P

    If you don't have the $2k for OS X, but you do have access to a geek willing to spend 3 days installing it, I think I'd recommend OEOne desktop. I worry about their committment to open source, blah blah blah. Not offering free security updates is somewhat worrisome too. Oh well.

    1. Re:OEone install experiences by inthehacker · · Score: 2, Informative

      You get free updates by running oe-update from the command line, and the project is completely open source, with details at http://www.oeone.com/developers/
      Mike

    2. Re:OEone install experiences by SamBeckett · · Score: 1

      .. My mother I did first ...

      What does your girlfriend say about that arrangement?

    3. Re:OEone install experiences by GusherJizmac · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Overall though its not a bad choice. The lack of a window manager is a big win for newbs. Instead there is a task bar and you swap back and forth between tasks. If the task isn't running it starts it up automatically. This is a good idea. I wonder when the condesending bone heads working on windowmaker will figure this out. :P

      This is a really important point, and this is the behavior of the oft-maligned OS X Dock. You see application icons in the Dock. You click them to use the application. If the application isn't running, it starts. It almost totally abstracts the user from the concept of which applications are running (much like a Palm interace). I would love to have this on Linux. Seperating out launchers from running tasks just makes no sense to me. You can see the major desktops starting to realize this. Both Windows and Gnome (maybe KDE?) are going towards rolling windows from the same task into the same taskbar entry. Now, if we can just make those entries the launchers (like it sounds like OEOne and OS X do), that would be great!

      --
      http://www.naildrivin5.com/davec
    4. Re:OEone install experiences by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      oh it's his father's gf... so.. um!? fscking confusers...

    5. Re:OEone install experiences by spencerogden · · Score: 2

      I think the reason to seperatelaunchers and taskbars is that many users have many more apps than they would run at any given time. The concept you mention, having a button that either starts the app or brings up an already running instance works when you have less than say ten tasks, email, wordprocessing,spreadsheet, browser, etc. But for many people there isn't enough room along the bottom of the desktop to have every app have its own icon. Maybe I am missing something. However I do agree that it is a good idea for computers with a narrow set of tasks.

    6. Re:OEone install experiences by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the last year I've moved both my mother, and my father and his girlfriend to linux.

      I'm sorry. How unfortunate for them.

      My mother I did first

      Hmmm... one of those kinds of families eh? Kidding... couldn't resist.

      That was important to her and she eventually blew $2000 on an iMac with OS X.

      Your mom is smarter than you are. Not everyone is a geek dude. For many of us, time is more valuable than how much we know about the internal workings of our computers. I've said it before and I'll say it again... Pick something that you just want to work and don't care about (like your car probably) and you'll know how non geeks feel about their O/S. They could give a crap less if it's Open Source. If it doesn't look as cool/trendy as the neighbors setup, is difficult to use, or is incompatible with 99% of the available applications, they aren't going to use it.

      They need to pay their graphic designers more or something.

      Pay? I thought you were a Linux guy? That word doesn't exist in your dictionary.

      If you don't have the $2k for OS X, but you do have access to a geek willing to spend 3 days installing it, I think I'd recommend OEOne desktop.

      Now that made sense. I take back everything I said that sounded negative. You really are a smart guy after all. No, that's not sarcasm.

      Linux on the Desktop is fine for your mom or grandma as long as you live next door and are actually willing to go over there every time they want to use their computer.

    7. Re:OEone install experiences by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the reason to seperatelaunchers and taskbars is that many users have many more apps than they would run at any given time.

      Surely you have a top 10 list of apps? E-mail, browser, word processor, video game (oops... Linux, no games, sorry), etc... Your other 900 apps could be burried in your start menu.

    8. Re:OEone install experiences by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OS X media $129.00
      refurb imac with 128 megs of ram $450.00

      Making someone who thinks it costs $2,000.00 to run os X look like a retard:

      priceless

    9. Re:OEone install experiences by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fully loaded G4 = $6,000 (which by the way is only 1/3 as powerful as a PC)
      Fully loaded PC = $2,000
      Actual value of college degree for Mac advocates. Obviously worthless.

    10. Re:OEone install experiences by asv108 · · Score: 2

      Yeah have you ever tried running running OSX on an imac with 128 megs of ram? You might as well put windowsXP on a 486. Making a clueless mac zealot look like a retard priceless.

    11. Re:OEone install experiences by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you don't have the $2k for OS X,

      Not to be mean, but you don't have to spend $2k for an OSX-worthy computer, and if you or your mother thought so, you're dumb. Try finding a decent $1100 PC with a flat tube 17" monitor... good luck!

    12. Re:OEone install experiences by GusherJizmac · · Score: 2
      That is true. OS X solves this by showing icons for running apps AND apps you've chosen to be in the Dock. When an app is running, you can right-click and say "Keep in Dock", meaning to keep the icon there for quick reference later. I guess the idea is that you will not have very many applications running at once that you cannot fit all their icons along the bottom, and that you will have much fewer "quick-launch" icons than you would total applications in your system, so the number would be manageable. For apps you rarely run, you wouldn't have a quick-launch icon for it.

      I dunno, I find myself accidentally running apps twice on Windows and Linux, because I go to click on the app's icon in all cases.

      --
      http://www.naildrivin5.com/davec
    13. Re:OEone install experiences by Azghoul · · Score: 1

      What is the purpose of the snide "no games" comment?

      How does it add to the conversation?

      How does it help prove any point?

    14. Re:OEone install experiences by symbolic · · Score: 2

      The user interface is decent, but a little clunky. Its got a lot of tiny mystery meat icons, scattered in unintuitive locations. They need to pay their graphic designers more or something.

      A small clarification...that's probably exactly what they did, and if it is, they got what they paid for.

    15. Re:OEone install experiences by Drakonite · · Score: 1

      * AMD ATHLON XP 2000+ * 256MB DDR PC2700 * 40GB 7200rpm ATA133 * nVidia MX400 AGP 64MB * Goldstar 32x10x40 CD-RW * Windows XP Home * 90 Days DIT Online Free * One year part and labor warranty Includes 17" Flat Screen monitor $800 available from my local computer store, DIT. Oh, I guess that $1100 mac you talked about had dvd, DIT will upgrade to include the dvd for $49. Which still leaves the PC $250 cheaper for a better machine. Thanks for the luck, but I didn't need it. PCs are cheaper than you think.

      --
      Shoot Pixels, Not People!
    16. Re:OEone install experiences by dr_zeus · · Score: 1

      I know this is an old story and thread, but I wanted to comment anyway. :) I saw OEone a few weeks ago, and wanted to try it out, but I use Mandrake 8.2 and didn't feel up to installing Redhat just to see OEone.

      Now that they've released it for Mandrake, I have to say that this is pretty much exactly what I expected. It's not something I'd use, but I highly recommend it for the computer newbie. Not necessarily the linux newbie, because a little Windows experience will go a long way in a KDE or Gnome environment.

      The look and feel are unique, everything is point and click and works like you would expect it to, and it has a nice common theme, so it feels like you are running a single application, not playing with windows in a cluttered desktop.

      Overall, I'm impressed. I think this would be great for grandparents, etc, and it's just fun to try something different.

    17. Re:OEone install experiences by WWWWolf · · Score: 1
      This is a really important point, and this is the behavior of the oft-maligned OS X Dock. You see application icons in the Dock. You click them to use the application. If the application isn't running, it starts. [...] I would love to have this on Linux.

      Now, where did OS X dock got this feature from? NeXT, of course! And what is the best way to relive the NEXTSTEP experience on Linux?

      WINDOW MAKER! WOOHOO!

      The dock works just as you describe: If the app is running, a double-click brings it forth; if not, it's launched.

    18. Re:OEone install experiences by GusherJizmac · · Score: 2

      Maybe I should check it out again, but the WindowMaker dock was always really hard to use. It was hard to get applications into it that weren't there, and hard to customize. It has been a while for me, though.

      --
      http://www.naildrivin5.com/davec
  16. Sounds like... by jukal · · Score: 2
    ...windows marketing speech.

    Powerful, easy to use, with unparalleled functionality - what more can you ask for in an Operating Environment? More than a standard operating system.

  17. Somebody please explain this to me... by psxndc · · Score: 2
    Why a startup like this can offer 100 MB of space for $19.95 USD/year and a giant like Apple charges $100 USD/year for .Mac. Remote, hosted backups is to me what is most valuable. I realize these guys don't do website hosting/publishing like .Mac, but does it really cost the extra $80 to do so, Apple?

    psxndc

    --

    The emacs religion: to be saved, control excess.

    1. Re:Somebody please explain this to me... by mgkimsal2 · · Score: 2

      They're doing it all on $5k Xserve boxes, instead of $500 x86 whiteboxes. Considering that, you're getting a bargain. The $5k servers are justified because it's so much easier for them to administrate.

    2. Re:Somebody please explain this to me... by hendridm · · Score: 1

      > The $5k servers are justified because it's so much easier for them to administrate.

      Yeah, that fact alone will make it easier for me to part with my $100 - to make their job easier. I do agree you get what you pay for, for the most part, but $100/year seems very steep.

    3. Re:Somebody please explain this to me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      No e-mail service, no local backup utility (the backup program that comes with .Mac will back up to an iDisk or DVD/CD media), no virus protection, and (as you noted) no website hosting or publishing. It's not as simple as "Apple charges $80 more for a network disk."

      I will now wait for the "well, what if I don't want the extra services" replies.

      mrg

    4. Re:Somebody please explain this to me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The extra $80 is for the "Mac experience." It's just like the Ford Expedition and Lincoln Navigator: the same vehicle, but the Lincoln costs thousands of dollars more for the "Lincoln experience."

    5. Re:Somebody please explain this to me... by psxndc · · Score: 1
      I will now wait for the "well, what if I don't want the extra services" replies.

      Nope. You raise valid points. I had forgotten about the mail and the virus protection (though really, how many mac virii are there?). The email is a big service and requires a fair amount of disk space, bandwidth, and admin'ing. I think we should get backup as part of the OS though. I have to have a .Mac subscription to backup to CDs?? C'mon. I think they offer a good service, I just don't agree with what they charge for what you get. Given that I was not taking the extras into account, the $20 vs $100 not as valid a point as I had originally tried to make. Still, I think the extras aren't worth the extra $80. I _almost_ did it at $50 (assuming all services came down. Not just $20 for space and the others are worth only $30).

      psxndc

      --

      The emacs religion: to be saved, control excess.

    6. Re:Somebody please explain this to me... by Pengo · · Score: 2

      .MAC is an accessorization to their hardware sales.

      If your dumping $2.5k into a machine, whats another hundred bucks that make better use of your iApps.

      I personally won't be splurdging on it as I have already got a dedicated unix server I use for email, webhosting, developoment, etc. I suppose if I didn't have that, maybe I would consider it.

    7. Re:Somebody please explain this to me... by benedict · · Score: 2

      Ask yourself two questions:

      1) Why is Apple a "giant"?
      2) What are this startup's chances of being
      around in five years?

      --
      Ben "You have your mind on computers, it seems."
    8. Re:Somebody please explain this to me... by Drakonite · · Score: 1

      (though really, how many mac virii are there?)

      Not as many as windows, but from my experience doing tech support for my school... A lot more than you think there are.

      --
      Shoot Pixels, Not People!
  18. Versions... by tubabeat · · Score: 1

    support for RedHat 7.3 and Mandrake 8.2

    Gee thats nice, good job Mandrake 9 isn't due any time soon. Daresay RH8 won't be far behind either.

    --
    "Linux is a serious competitor"
    - Steve Ballmer, Chief Executive Microsoft Corp.
    1. Re:Versions... by Vic · · Score: 3, Informative

      You didn't hear this from me, but the Mandrake 9 version is just around the corner.

      But don't tell anyone I told you. ;-)

      Cheers,
      Vic

    2. Re:Versions... by tubabeat · · Score: 1

      I won't - if you don't tell anyone thats what I was linking to... ;)

      --
      "Linux is a serious competitor"
      - Steve Ballmer, Chief Executive Microsoft Corp.
    3. Re:Versions... by swv3752 · · Score: 1

      Noooooooooo. Now I won't be able to download it now that the secret is out.

      --
      Just a Tuna in the Sea of Life
  19. Reviewer by abigor · · Score: 3, Funny

    The fact that it was reviewed by a guy named Gonzo John certainly lends it an air of credibility.

    1. Re:Reviewer by Wumpus · · Score: 1

      Hey, it's not the guy's fault if mama and papa John were cruel to him, and named him Gonzo...

    2. Re:Reviewer by ejunek · · Score: 1

      At yet most of us religiously read (and take the advice of) posts by the likes of CmdrTaco...

    3. Re:Reviewer by Darmox · · Score: 2, Funny
      Could be really cool if it was by Dr. Gonzo...
      "We has two bags of grass, seventy-five pellets of mescaline, five sheets of high-powered blotter acid, a salt shaker half-full of cocaine and a whole galaxy of multicolored uppers, downers, screamers, laughers.... A quart of tequila, a quart of rum, a case of Budweiser, a pint of raw ether and two dozen amyls..."
      and a linux desktop to review... We can't stop here, this is daemon country!
      --
      If I was that drunk, I would have remembered it -- H. Simpson
  20. Re::((( EULA with DRM... by Zwack · · Score: 4, Informative

    Read the EULA.

    It doesn't say that you have to use any DRM it says that third party DRM modules may be used with OEOne and that if you do use such third party DRM modules then you are agreeing that OEOne has nothing to do with it.

    In other words "If you want to use something that has DRM and the DRM screws your machine over then take that out on the person who provided you with the DRM not us."

    It seems fair enough to say that to me.

    Doesn't mean that I'm having anything to do with the software though.

    Z.

    --
    -- Under/Overrated is meta-moderation, and therefore is Redundant.
  21. You'll still need to request a key, but... by lute3 · · Score: 2, Interesting
    The install script's job is to checks to see if your OS is one of the RedHat or Mandrake distros just added to the support list. Once it finishes this validation, it downloads the installer binary. Here its just in case you'd like to try it out on a distro like Gentoo or SuSE.

    installer-rpm-glibc2.2-i386.gz

  22. The search for the perfect desktop boggles my mind by sawilson · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's just applications and a way to run
    them. All I do anymore is install kde libs
    and gnome libs, blackbox, bbconf, bbkeys,
    and link to the applications I like/need/etc.
    Too many people hop from one thing to another
    as soon as something new is announced in the
    hopes that it's going to be the next big perfect
    thing instead of taking the time to actually
    learn how to configure what they had.

  23. Sure, why not by mao+che+minh · · Score: 1

    I am currently using a collection of rather memory intensive (when considering my hardware specs) to do alot of mundane tasks. If this does what it promises, I could maybe save some resources. I think that I will give this a try, see if it helps - I'm always down to throw a little support a company's way that writes Linux apps.

  24. just use windows by verch · · Score: 1

    I mean, seriously, why bother crippling a perfectly good operating system like linux? If you want a system that won't really let you do anything but browse the web, just use Windows.

  25. Re::((( EULA with DRM... by I_redwolf · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't it be even cooler if they just didn't say anything? DRM isn't a law you know. People need to stop treating it as such.

  26. Eid Eid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't know about this company. A lot of ex. Corel engineers I know hate this man for what he did at Corel. In fact, they used to called him Eid Amin behind his back (relates to Idi Amin Dada). I hope this isn't another Loki in the making.

  27. At the very least... by iiioxx · · Score: 1

    ... they can check "Looks Cool" off their TODO list. It LOOKS pretty darn slick.

    As for how good it is, I'd say that depends on your application. For a kiosk or home Linux computer for non-geeks (which I believe is the point) I think it'll serve nicely. If you want a customized "power desktop" move on, there's nothing here to see. In fact, why'd you even bother clicking the link? We already know what you are going to say:

    "Why do you need this desktop? <INSERT WM HERE> is way better and far more customizable, and <INSERT GUI HERE> totally rocks! Besides, it's not <INSERT LICENSE HERE> so it isn't really Free."

  28. slashdot for sale? by tps12 · · Score: 1, Interesting

    This is the second story on a boring, non-Free program we've seen today. If this product were under the GPL and available on Sourceforge, then we wouldn't be seeing a story about it here. The same goes for Trolltech's Ogg Vorbis CD ripper.

    Is it that someone trying to make money writing Linux software is newsworthy? Or is Slashdot getting a piece of the action?

    --

    Karma: Good (despite my invention of the Karma: sig)
    1. Re:slashdot for sale? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Peter Bojanic
      We have licensed Penzilla and its applications under the same tri-license (GPL/LPGL/MPL) that Mozilla uses to make it easy for developers to reuse. HomeBase DESKTOP is therefore a free product.
    2. Re:slashdot for sale? by markhb · · Score: 1, Troll
      If this product were under the GPL and available on Sourceforge, then we wouldn't be seeing a story about it here.

      If this product were under the GPL and on Sourceforge, then it would probably consist of nothing more than a manifesto and three screenshot prototype PNGs.
      --
      (NB: The rest of my .sig reads, "make up the majority of voters.")
      --
      Save Maine's economy: write stuff down. All comments are exclusively my own, not my employer.
  29. ACK!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It looks kind of like AOL, and that's not good.

    1. Re:ACK!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How is that not good? Aol is so easy to use and now with 9.0 it is so easy to use even a blind midget with arthritis can surf for pr0n!

  30. MDk 9 is already out by azzy · · Score: 1

    It's out now! But hush... it's not all official yet

  31. Re::((( EULA with DRM... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    its not a law....yet. it probably will be soon.

  32. Re::((( EULA with DRM... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    No. The words are NOT so mild.

    "6. DIGITAL RIGHTS MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS ("DRMs"). The Software may include third party DRMs as Plug-in components which are subject to their own license agreements. DRMs are designed to manage and enforce intellectual property rights in digital content purchased over the Internet. You may not take any action to circumvent or defeat the security or content usage rules provided or enforced by either the DRM or the Software. DRMs may be able to revoke your ability to use applicable content. OEone is not responsible for the operation of the DRM in any way, including revocation of your content. OEone is not responsible for any communications to or from any third party DRM provider, or for the collection or use of information by third party DRMs. You consent to the communications enabled and/or performed by the DRM, including automatic updating of the DRM without further notice, despite the provisions of section 5(b). You agree to indemnify and hold harmless OEone for any claim relating to your use of a third party DRM."
    "

    So it claims that it
    1) already may contain DRMs
    2) I should consent to that DRM operations
    3) that DRM modules could update itself.

  33. Simple Office Users by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If they could integrate a better Office Suite (like OpenOffice or StartOffice), then I think this could be a good choice of desktop for secretatries, receptionists and the like.

    Ofcourse, I doubt this would be the choice for techubergeeks, but that's not actually the target of this product.

  34. embedded in my living room PeeCee by SubtleNuance · · Score: 2

    Ive got a little box I run in the living room - this seems very usefull. With an IM client of some kind, this would be great - browse my home-intranet, send/recieve emails / IM etc... and it looks cool.

    only problem is it "requires" RH - what are the REAL requirements? the bare actual libs etc that it needs?

    Id hate to have to do a whole RH install (w/ SysV init etc) just to drop into this GUI...

    anyone have info?

  35. Re:The search for the perfect desktop boggles my m by iiioxx · · Score: 1

    This actually stems from a quiet dissatisfaction with what they have. It is my belief that there are a lot of people using Linux because they think that somehow that makes them cooler, better, smarter, etc than everyone else. They don't use it because they actually *like* it, they use it because it is the "geek" thing to do.

    Before I get flamed, let me state that there are a lot of people who use Linux because they truly love it for one reason or another. It's usually pretty easy to tell the two apart:

    Geek 1: Reads email in Pine and has been running Slackware for like 8 years (without a reboot!).

    Geek 2: Switches distros every time a new one hits the FTP servers and boots into Windows XP to play Neverwinter Nights when no one is watching.

  36. WELL, FUCK THAT WITH A TEN FOOT GREASED POLE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


  37. Re:just use windows Yes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone I know running ALinux does nothing other than mail, usenet and web. Maybe some chat and CD ripping.

    There is not one single thing that either Linux or Mac does that Windows cannot. But there are tons of things that Windows does that neither Mac nor Linux do.

    Yeah, I'm talking about apps stupid.

  38. New Microsoft ad: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do you want this guy running your servers?

  39. WHY a desktop like this is needed by |_uke · · Score: 3, Insightful

    As I write this I think maybe only one person who has posted actually understands why something like this is not only usefull, but important.

    No most geeks do not need something like this. However you have to consider the fact that, 98 percent of your computer users are not geeks. On top of that, a good chunk of those people can hardly use their computer.

    Example... My grand parents where set up with a computer last year. They love their computer... but they are VERY timid with it. They are afraid to break things.

    Right now they are using windows ME. Actually I think XP might have been a better choice but at the time it was not really an option.

    Many of the things on their desktop, they dont know how to use. Not only that, they dont WANT to figure out what these things do. They would rather spend their time trying to remember how you go about accessing stock quotes, or reading email than learning new functionality.

    What most people dont understand is the fact that things like window management is intimidateing! Why do I need to worry about what size some window is... how I make it full screen... how to get it back once I clicked some button and made it disapear!

    The idea behind OEone's desktop is not actually a new one. However it is quite a good idea. (and urgh... Microsoft is in the process of developing their own version of this... they have been for a while actually.) The user should not need to know which applications do what... let alone know how to MANAGE the applications, Instead the user is presented with documents and tasks. If the user wants to browse a web page... thats all they should have to deal with. The web page should become their interface. If the user wants to make a document, their computer nees to BE a word processor.

    Anyways, sorry for being a bit ranty. I did not sleep at all last night and Im quite tired =)

    --
    Luke
  40. It *is* free by Vic · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I hate repeating myself on Slashdot, but please check OEone's open source release page:
    http://www.oeone.com/developers/

    Source code is available via anonymous CVS. OEone also has an IRC channel (#penzilla on irc.openprojects.net) and a developers mailing list:
    https://mail.oeone.com/mailman/listinfo/developers

    Cheers,
    Vic

  41. Re:The search for the perfect desktop boggles my m by benbean · · Score: 1

    Well I ran Slackware for years (now use Gentoo/Debian/Redhat in various different systems), read my mail in mutt, and reboot into Windows XP to play one of several favourite games. I use Linux because I like it and because it's the geek thing to do. Guess that makes me Geek number 3? :-)

    --
    It's a Unix system - I know this.
  42. Re:The search for the perfect desktop boggles my m by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I ran Slackware for years (now use Gentoo/Debian/Redhat in various different systems)

    Still searching for that perfect system I see ;)

  43. Woa! by miffo.swe · · Score: 1

    The more desktops that comes out for linux the better! As in nature the most popular/best will probably win in the end. Those who dont like them use something else.

    It looks a bit silly to me but for a newb it's a real winner. A bit more polishing and its ready for prime time.

    --
    HTTP/1.1 400
  44. enlightenment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does it work with Enlightenment?

  45. Re: All I do... by hendridm · · Score: 1

    > All I do anymore is install kde libs and gnome libs, blackbox, bbconf, bbkeys, and link to the applications I like/need/etc.

    LOL. I'll alert the blue shirts at Best Buy and let them know there is an alternative. Their customers will appreciate not having to buy Windows.

  46. Re:Stalin, Mao Tse Sung, Lenin, Marx, Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey! Thats great! Have a twinkie... it's leftist, you know...

  47. Did they write the website copy over the phone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    links -source http://install.oeone.com | sh
    (from <a href="http://www.oeone.com/developers/porting.html ">http://www.oeone.com/developers/porting.html</a> )

    my god.

  48. OEone not viewable in IE? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone else find their website unviewable in IE because of microscopic font sizing problems?

  49. Re::((( EULA with DRM... by ejunek · · Score: 1

    Under the guise of "geek" or "open source advocate," I would have to agree that this seems like a rather questionable element of the EULA. That said, I also realize that this is a piece of software designed for my grandmother and that questionable licensing, although a pertinent subject to the future of software development and use, is not even a conscious thought to Jane and Joe Windowsuser. People will use software that works for them regardless of the EULA. The fact that more people have Microsoft and KazAa on their desktops than Linux should be proof of that. People should be supportive of a company trying to offer Windows/Mac users a viable Linux alternative than concerned with the specifics of their license agreement.

  50. Re:just use windows Yes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes. Your writing speaks volumes about your intelligence. I am glad to call you chimp.

    Please take your "thousands of apps" jive somewhere else. People here are trying to think.

    Have a twinkie!

  51. Re:The search for the perfect desktop boggles my m by iiioxx · · Score: 1

    Well, it's a wide spectrum... :^) Those were just two examples at opposite ends.

  52. Re::((( EULA with DRM... by WetCat · · Score: 1

    Tend to agree. BTW I realized that they are trying
    to defend theirselves legally from DRM module
    suppliers' wraith - for example from RealPlayer's.
    If they didn't put that clause - they could lose RealPlayer
    compatibility, which is semi-essential for
    grandmother's computer (a lot of songs are in
    real player format).

  53. HERESY! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You blasphemed 'apt-get' on slashdot!

  54. StarOffice 5.x by poltrup · · Score: 1

    Ya know... The 5.x series of StarOffice did the very same thing and all I heard on the wire was get rid of the desktop feature in 6.0... (I personally liked the desktop feature, on occasion, and it was quite turn-offable). The only difference I see here are the pretty icons. hmmmm...

  55. Hey, it's Microsoft Bob for Linux! by ninejaguar · · Score: 1

    This will bomb just like Microsoft Bob did.

  56. No, dumbass. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Links is a text based browser too. Lynx is a symlink to Links in most new distros anyway. Don't jump on the bandwagon when you have no idea what you're talking about.

  57. Re::((( EULA with DRM... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Open Source hippies need to realize that the rest of the world will accept DRM. There is no opposition. DRM is deemed a good thing by Joe User when the advertising is crafted right - and it will be.

  58. Re: All I do... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Grr... they don't carry boxed procesors anymore even though the website told me I could pick it up in the store....

    But on a serious note, tell them all you want, they never help the customers anyway so the customers will never hear of it..

    Signed... Someone that happens to start their new job at best buy in 3 days :p

  59. Re:The search for the perfect desktop boggles my m by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe he is, maybe I am too. Right now, I am running Debian on a laptop, OpenBSD on the gateway, RH 7.3 on my main server, Win2K just so I can stay on top of it for jobs, and RH Null. Sometimes QNX makes an appearance, and I usually have FreeBSD on the system where the null beta now resides. As far as I can tell, their is no perfect system for me, but Debian comes damn close and RH Null looks promising. Even said, neither of them will ever be likely to replace my OpenBSD gateway simply because none of the above take security as seriously as OpenBSD. In fact, of the systems I have mentioned, Open is the only one that does anything perfectly, and that is act as the most descrimanating firewall in existence. Beats the living hell out of the 18K Cisco PIX at work, any day of the week. So I will keep looking for the perfect system...maybe it is a G4? Not that I have that kind of money to spend, but I would like to try it some day and if it were not produced by Apple (I have some issues with them) I would more than likely already tried it.

  60. Right click? by jmorris42 · · Score: 1

    > When an app is running, you can right-click and
    > say "Keep in Dock", ....

    Eh? How does one right click a 1-button mouse?

    --
    Democrat delenda est
    1. Re:Right click? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's Option-Click on Macs or Click-and-Hold to open popup menus. He wrote "Right-Click" because everybody understands that without explanations.

    2. Re:Right click? by GusherJizmac · · Score: 2
      There are two ways:

      1) Remove one-button mouse and replace with 2 (or more) button mouse

      2) Ctrl-Click

      --
      http://www.naildrivin5.com/davec
  61. Re::((( EULA with DRM... by Peter+Harris · · Score: 4, Funny
    ... I realized that they are trying to defend theirselves legally from DRM module suppliers' wraith ...
    I knew DRM was evil. Now companies using it are sending out their undead minions to enforce the EULA. If it was just zombies or even ghouls, we would be OK I suppose...
    --

    -- What do you need?
    -- Gnus. Lots of Gnus.
  62. What a crap article! by Keith_Beef · · Score: 1

    I just read the Linux Orbit article. It is so badly written, that it was almost physically painful to get through it....

    • The article start by assuming that the reader already knows what the product is.
    • The article is littered with grammer, syntax and spelling errors.
    • The article reads almost like sales blurb for the product.


    Needless to say , LinuxOrbit is not in my bookmarks!

  63. Re:Stalin, Mao Tse Sung, Lenin, Marx, Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Death and misery are the results of birth.

  64. Re:The search for the perfect desktop boggles my m by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's two kinda of people in this world son, there's these fucking idiots who always categorize people into two groups and then there's the rest of us.

  65. Re: All I do... by hendridm · · Score: 1

    > Signed... Someone that happens to start their new job at best buy in 3 days :p

    Funny you should say that. I start my job at Best Buy on Saturday, 3 days from now! :) I'm in Wisconsin, where are you?

  66. Last Post! by alpg · · Score: 1

    * Joey should not write changelog entries at 5:30am
    * DFSC Free cgi library
    What's that? DFSC?
    Debian Free Software mroooooCows
    -- Seen on #Debian

    - this post brought to you by the Automated Last Post Generator...