Slashdot Mirror


Danger's HipTop Renamed and Released

FireMage writes "According to this press release from Danger, their cheap, cool, consumer targeted, cellphone/PDA "convergance device", the HipTop is now avalible nationwide as the T-Mobile SideKick, as in you should actually be able to buy one today. They've even revived one of their nifty-mysterious original flash splash pages to announce it. I'm all for clever hacks, but it's nice to finally see what seems to be a well thought out product in this arena. (The HipTop was first mentioned on Slashdot and again in a review .)" I have a review unit on my desk, and am super impressed. A larger impression piece will be coming out just as soon as I have time to write it.

156 comments

  1. Where is the Nokia 9200? by Scothoser · · Score: 1

    Interesting that T-Mobile (was Voicestream) has dropped the Nokia 9290 for this product and the Pocket PC Phone Edition. Too bad.

    1. Re:Where is the Nokia 9200? by BigDaddyJ · · Score: 1
      The 9290 doesn't have vibrate or, more importantly, GPRS. It's a throwback device, unfortunately.

      --bdj

    2. Re:Where is the Nokia 9200? by HughsOnFirst · · Score: 2

      Never mind the the Nokia 9290 , they ought to sell the Nokia 9290 .
      Digital Music Player and Recorder, Software for copying personal CD's, organizing and downloading music files from a compatible PC to the Nokia 5510, FM stereo radio, full keyboard for fast text input, 5 games, WAP, multiple chat, multiple SMS sending, and it looks like , well I'm not quite sure, maybe a Game Boy Advance with an extra 30 buttons ?

    3. Re:Where is the Nokia 9200? by HughsOnFirst · · Score: 2

      darn..
      shoulda been Nokia 5510 .

  2. "Closed platform" by henben · · Score: 2, Insightful
    The Register said this was a "closed platform" - does this mean that you can't install whatever software you like on a HipTop?

    If so, that's very bad, because T-Mobile's WAP service (in the UK) is unusably poor, due to their badly thought out menu layouts. I wouldn't buy it if I couldn't configure it how I liked.

    1. Re:"Closed platform" by buzzdecafe · · Score: 1

      The Reg article lives here.

      "And open vs closed is something we'll hear more of, as the HipTop succeeds. Writing HipTop apps shouldn't be difficult, as they're pure Java. Rubin describes his role as providing a menu to carriers who can pick and choose which apps they include in the bundle."

      etc.

    2. Re:"Closed platform" by buzzdecafe · · Score: 1

      I guess I should've previewed before submitting.
      Here's the missing URL of the Reg article:

      http://www.theregus.com/content/54/26465.html

    3. Re:"Closed platform" by gclef · · Score: 2

      See, this is the only thing that's holding me back from really wanting one. I'd really want to write (or at least be able to add) an ssh client and maybe an ear-training program to this thing. If I'm dependent on the carriers to add that, I'll be waiting until hell freezes over, since they're congenital morons about small interest stuff.

      sigh.

  3. Missing some key features by cmeans · · Score: 4, Insightful
    I was initially impressed with this device, and I've been waiting for it for almost a year now.
    However, not having a touch screen I think hampers it immensly, and not being able to dial a number (one that's not already in your address book) without openning it and punching the number in using the keyboard is going to limit it.

    I know it's not being targetted to business types, but I think that it's the business types who can really make it popular.

    I'm hopful that the next version of this will have those issues taken care of.

    1. Re:Missing some key features by FooBarney · · Score: 1

      True, true.

      I have to say, though ... I'm quite impressed with the feature set they managed to include for the money.

      The trick to making a $200 device is to include good, cool, cheap features that get the job done, and leave out expensive, nice, but not strictly necessary features.

      Yes, the phone's hard to dial (although you CAN dial without opening it, it just requires a lot of scrolling-and-clicking with the wheel). But probably 95% of my calls are made from the address book ANYWAY (for which the Sidekick has a very nice interface), so I'm not worried about it.

      And the features they left IN are excellent. The interface on the phone is quite good, the keyboard is easy to type on (i reached acceptable AIM speed after only a day of use), the web browser, aim, and email clients are very well designed, the ringtones are great, and the 24-bit-color scroll wheel is just plain cool. (not incredibly useful, but cool nontheless).

      What's more, the device FEELS solid. It's well weighted, the keys have a good responsive click, and the screen rotates cleanly. If you're at all intersted, I'd lay hands on one before you count it out completely. It's a really nice device.

    2. Re:Missing some key features by cmeans · · Score: 1
      If the economy wasn't as down as it is right now, I'd jump on it just so I could play with a new toy. On the whole I do like what I see, though I've not got my hands on one to really get a feel for it. Tried for the beta but didn't make it :(

      I'll wait and see how the SDK fleshes out, before I take a longer look at it...this way I can encourage my boss to buy one for development reasons. And keep my pocket money for other toys...

    3. Re:Missing some key features by BigDaddyJ · · Score: 1
      On the flip side, not having a touch screen makes it much sturdier. As such, it's designed to appeal to the teen generations, etc. that might treat it roughly.

      --bdj

    4. Re:Missing some key features by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank god that it doesn't have a touch screen! I have had PDA's (3 actually)in the past and all of them cracked by strange ways. Me being bumped against cement cracked the screen, another time I just had the thing in my front pocket and I take it out to find the touch screen was cracked. It get's really annoying and I much rather have a durable screen that can take the abuse the that mobility demands instead of some extreemly fragile touchscreen that costs too much to replace.

    5. Re:Missing some key features by antler · · Score: 1

      I've had mine almost 24 hours and have not missed the touch screen at all. The clickable scroll wheel is very intuitive and the UI is quite cleverly designed to take good advantage of it.

      You can dial a custom number without the keyboard -- there's a button that pops up an onscreen keypad, which you move around in with the wheel. It's not too fast, but it works. And anyway, flipping open the screen takes one second and is so fun to do that I don't mind in the least :-)

      Besides, this is the 21st century. Weren't we supposed to stop having to type raw phone numbers by now? A raw phone number is kind of like a raw IP address.

  4. Yes, but read the details. by SplendidIsolatn · · Score: 4, Informative

    As quoted from their rate plan site:

    - After 1st year, unlimited becomes 15MB/month, $3.50/additional MB.

    Coverage not available in all areas. Limited time offer and cannot be combined with any other promotions. Credit approval and 12 month service ageement required with $200 fee for early termination. Terms and condidtions include mandatory arbitration provision. Customer billing address must be within and offer valid only in the following T-Mobile (VS) markets: Denver, Colorado Springs, Las Cruces, Portland, Boise, Albequerque, Santa Fe, Chicago, Milwaukee, Atlanta, and all VS markets in the following states: Texas, Oklahoma, and Kansas. Incoming and outgoing calls are rounded up and billed in full minute increments from the time the network begins to process the call (before the call rings or is answered) through its termination of the call. All allocated airtime minutes must be used in the month provided and do not carry over.


    In other words, after the first year, you are paying $3.50 a meg after 15 per month (that's 500K a day...)

    Not to mention you can't even get this thing unless you live in a certain area.

    I've been pining over this thing for months now, get the great news, happen to live in PA, and now I'm royally pissed off. Way to go...

    --
    sig--we don't need no goddamn sig
    1. Re:Yes, but read the details. by shepd · · Score: 3, Interesting

      >In other words, after the first year, you are paying $3.50 a meg after 15 per month (that's 500K a day...)

      That's hundreds of times better than RIM Blackberry service charges.

      Rogers charges $25/month for 70,000 characters of service per month in RIM's hometown. Even after converting that to American dollars, it's still an insane cost to send emails -- it works out more per email than the cost of sending snail mail there.

      I might be interested at rates like those for HipTop, though.

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    2. Re:Yes, but read the details. by MemRaven · · Score: 2

      One reason why you can't actually get it yet is that IIRC it relies almost exclusively on GPRS for transmission by design, and those are the only markets that T-Mobile/VS have actually deployed GPRS wide-scale. If and when other markets (like San Francisco? Hello?) get GPRS, you should be able to get it there. Of course that was a risky move since when they got started GSM was barely around in the US, much less GPRS, but there you go.

    3. Re:Yes, but read the details. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That explains it. I went to a Best Buy in Minnesota last night and asked one of the crew at their mobile tech station if they had any idea when the T-Mobile Sidekicks were going to be on sale. The guy looked at me like I'd just shined a flashlight in his eyes. He hadn't heard of any such thing.

      I don't think the price is too bad, even considering the $3.50 per meg after a year clause. With the text sites I'd like to have mobile access to, that'll get me about 80-90 views for $3.50, and I wouldn't be stuck with the annoying cell phone keypad text entry like I am now. I suppose I could get a Treo, but I'd been waiting for the Sidekick. Too bad they don't want my money.

    4. Re:Yes, but read the details. by TheTomcat · · Score: 2

      In other words, after the first year, you are paying $3.50 a meg after 15 per month (that's 500K a day...)

      That would actually be a GOOD deal, here.

      Our GPRS carrier (in Montreal), Microcell Fido, has 3 plans:
      1) $50 unlimited (the only reasonable plan)
      2) $25 for 2MB, then "only" $10/MB
      3) $0.03/KB ($30.72 per MB)

      30 bucks a meg? heh.. RIIIIGHT.

      S

    5. Re:Yes, but read the details. by BigDaddyJ · · Score: 1
      Not true. T-Mobile has deployed GPRS everywhere they have service, including San Francisco.

      --bdj

    6. Re:Yes, but read the details. by llin · · Score: 1

      Remember that your contract is only 1 year. If by the time my year is up, this is still the best deal around, I'll stick with it, but if not, hey, there's competition. Now if only the FCC will get in gear w/ Telephone Number Portability

  5. yeah... by ElQuesoEsViejo · · Score: 1, Funny

    but can you use it to frag your buddies in UT while on you're driving to work?

    --

    "...more and more of our imports come from overseas." - G.W. Bush

    1. Re:yeah... by sfgoth · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Sure, when you crash your car into their's while checking your email as you pull into the parking lot.

      -pmb

  6. Re:I had a really good first post. But.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Guess we'll just have to put up with your really lame 9th post then.

  7. With all this technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    available to everyone around the clock, how come no one has a FUCKING CLUE how to spell?

    "convergance"? I mean FUCK, that can't even be PRONOUNCED properly.

    All this memory, all this processing power, no one has a fucking iSpell somewhere? Preferably something that gives electric shocks whenever vowels are substituted (flexable, rediculous, definately, etc ad nausem), and a siren goes off when you substitute consonants.

    1. Re:With all this technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Ahem, that would be "ad nauseam".

    2. Re:With all this technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am being shocked by a siren as we speak, kind sir...

      AAAEIEIEIIIEEE BZZZZT WOOOOOOWOOOOOOO !!!!

    3. Re:With all this technology by axmonkey · · Score: 1, Interesting

      No one has a clue because English has illogical rules and is inconsistent. A simple demo: read, is it "reed" or "red" you don't know unless it's in a context. Great language, my 5 and 7 years olds are learning to read (or is it "red"), and it pains me to explain to them that this word or that word can't by sounded out phonetically, you just have to memorize it. Any intelligent person will spell things wrong because that's how they sound. Unless you have a great memory or an on-line spell checker forget it. Although I do believe the lead (or is it "led") posts should should be spell checked just so the site appears a little more professional. Please ignore any spelling mistakes, I have a brain, while english does not.

    4. Re:With all this technology by SirSlud · · Score: 1

      No argument here.

      English is the bastard son of all languages, which is what makes it the lazy language for everyone to use (since it borrows from so many other languages), but a pain in the ass to learn. Exceptions up the ying yang. Korea apparently has the lowest illiteracy rate in the world, and apparently their written language is so synonymous with the spoken language that once you learn to read, apparently you will never mispronounce or misinterpret a written word .. even if you've never seen it before. I vote we all learn Korean (if only cause Korean chicks are hot!)

      I feel sorry for these spelling nazis. It's sort of pitiful that they often get so worked up by small spelling mistakes that they commit a few errors themselves in their little diatribes.

      Anyhow, the idiots arn't the ones that can't spell .. they're the ones that don't punctuate. ;)

      --
      "Old man yells at systemd"
    5. Re:With all this technology by tswinzig · · Score: 2

      Preferably something that gives electric shocks whenever vowels are substituted (flexable, rediculous, definately, etc ad nausem)

      I love it when someone bitches about spelling, and then spells a word wrong in the diatribe.

      It's ad nauseum, but you probably already knew that?

      --

      "And like that ... he's gone."
    6. Re:With all this technology by gvonk · · Score: 2

      Any intelligent person will spell things wrong because that's how they sound.

      Did that excuse work on your teachers in grade school?

      I think you meant to say any idiot will spell things wrong because that's how they sound.

      --


      El Karma: excelente(principalmente la suma de moderación hecha a los comentarios de los usuarios)
    7. Re:With all this technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who corrects the correctors?

      Ad nauseam, actually.

      And the whole point is that I'm having a fit over here, so one letter disappearing is not as bad as someone submitting a story world-wide and not bothering to hit CTRL-K before submitting...

    8. Re:With all this technology by Dirk+Pitt · · Score: 2
      I love it when someone bitches about someone who bitches about spelling, and then spells a word wrong in the diatribe.

      It's ad nauseam, but you probably already knew that? ;-)

    9. Re:With all this technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but I'm not the one submitting a story on a web site. (web sight? THAT one bothers me a LOT, alot?)

      If this site had a Plastic-style spell checker, that would be a big help.

      You have to admit that a typo on a Latin phrase is not as bad as a typo on a common word, no?

      PS: It's "aren't". See what I mean?

    10. Re:With all this technology by SirSlud · · Score: 1

      C'mon .. technology lets us flap our lips, writing down whatever comes to mind without thinking about it or pondering the consequences of expressing a particular opinion.

      Spelling is the least of my concerns when it comes to content posted to the web; the habit of stopping and thinking about what you're saying is the more important victim of msg-board style communities. Spelling is secondary, and unless its some written formal report where presentation and credibility of said views is actually important, I'm not going to care much if people mispell words.

      --
      "Old man yells at systemd"
    11. Re:With all this technology by MadLibs · · Score: 1

      ah, give them a break.. "ad nauseam" is latin...not english -- therefore perfectly acceptable ;)

    12. Re:With all this technology by OSSturi · · Score: 1

      Well, substituting vowels isn't a big problem regarding understandability. To say it with Steven Pinker: YXX CXN RXXD WXRDS WXTHXXT VXWXELS.

    13. Re:With all this technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But it's easier with vowels.

    14. Re:With all this technology by i0lanthe · · Score: 1

      Anonymous Coward, you are my new hero!

      --
      "The Crystal Wind is the Storm, and the Storm is Data, and the Data is Life"
    15. Re:With all this technology by Moofie · · Score: 2

      Conversely, why would you bother typing something if you don't care about how or whether people interpret it?

      Anytime you communicate without thinking about how the audience is going to receive and process your communication, you're only doing half your job.

      Spelling is important, if only because it minimizes the number of things that people trip on as they read through your idea. My job as a writer is to optimally stream my ideas to another person, and spelling errors make that stream less than optimal. Certainly, I'll use colloquialisms or clever spelling to underscore a point, but when I'm just trying to get ideas across spelling errors get in the way. They're distracting.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    16. Re:With all this technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      don't you mean "aren't"?
      You sad bunch of lazy nazis; how do you espect 'merica to retain its intelleggtual superiority if'n...
      (kidding)

    17. Re:With all this technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ahem, that would be "ad nauseam."

    18. Re:With all this technology by PortWineBoy · · Score: 1

      Isn't "e" a vowel? I mean, you do have to pay for it on "Wheel of Fortune" don't you?

      --

      this sig deleted by another sig

    19. Re:With all this technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only if you're a colonial.

  8. Uh ... did I miss something? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You put the screen on your cheek to talk on the phone? Um, isn't this a bad idea?

  9. More linkage by slothdog · · Score: 5, Informative

    More info, including reports of people getting activated and having trouble getting activated, can be read at the DangerInfo Forums.

    1. Re:More linkage by bugz99 · · Score: 1

      This site has a nice video clip of it in action. This link goes right to the story: http://www.feedroom.com/index.jsp?auto_band=x&fr_s tory=FEEDROOM39902

  10. Convergence device != answer by plover · · Score: 5, Insightful
    For years, first as a Palm owner then as a Visor owner, I wanted a combination device so I wouldn't have to carry two different things on me.

    Then I got to trying some of the available combo devices, such as the QualComm PDQ, the VisorPhone and the Kyocera. None were good enough at both tasks for me to ever want to use one again.

    The screens are way too small on the dedicated phones. The PDQ was a great innovator, and a damn fine doorstop. The bolt-on radio made the Visor too big and heavy to fit comfortably in a pocket, and the speaking position is surprisingly clumsy. The Kyocera is just a very large phone with a very tiny PDA.

    I've finally come to recognize that they are two different devices used for different purposes that have an occasional need for convergence. Any hardware combination is going to be a compromise that makes the usability of both suffer. I think the best answer now is going to be bluetooth communications between two separate devices. Bluetooth will also come in handy with future consumer controls (think TV remotes that don't rely on an under powered IR or a cordless phone base that talks to your cell phone's earpiece, etc.,) so it has the potential to be used much more widely than just pocket to earpiece communicatons.

    Let's just say that the news of this device is two years late and mostly underwhelming.

    --
    John
    1. Re:Convergence device != answer by rearden · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Having gone the same route I have to agree. So, to resolve the problem I went and got a SonyEricsson T-Mobile T-68 with bluetooth and use the bluetooth to connect to my iPAQ. Now I can check mail, check news, send instant messages (wish Trillian had a PocketPC version) and get the info I need. I even went and got a Belkin bluetooth adapter for my laptop and use it with the T68 when I am on the road.

      The best part of having the two separate items is that when I need only one, I carry only one. There are a lot of cases where I want my phone, but dont need the blulky Palm/PocketPC. And there are even more cases where I want to be "unavailable" but need my PocketPC.

      Despite all the talk about convergence, I have to say it is nice to have two devices- especially when the battery dies in one!

      --
      Huh?
    2. Re:Convergence device != answer by SirSlud · · Score: 5, Interesting

      One word: modules!

      Until we have some sort of physical module standard, we'll never get to have all the best-of-breed things in one device.

      But I imagine a time where you buy a 'display' platform - a screen and some input mechanisms (keyboard, speaker, mic). Then, you plug in the GSM-on-a-card, or the organizer-on-a-card, or the .. well, you get the idea.

      There's no reason why there couldn't be one physical device if the tech industry could get it into their head that physical interoperability is going to be just as important in the future as software interoperability as consumers demand that they don't have to carry around 5 physical devices to get the best implementations of the various devices you list.

      I think if you seperate the passive technologies (the screen, the inputs, outputs, storage), you could easily have these manufacturers competate for best-of-breed implementations without the consumer having to carry around X number of seperate devices ..

      Or maybe this gets even easier, as you say, with bluetooth. You keep all the functionality in your bag or pocket in the from of bluetooth enabled modules that speak to the central display and I/O device.

      That way the market diferentiates between your interface layer (the physical device you view and provide input to), and the tasks it can accomplish, and consumers arn't left compromising functionality for the interface, or the interface for the functionality.

      --
      "Old man yells at systemd"
    3. Re:Convergence device != answer by PainKilleR-CE · · Score: 2, Interesting

      All that I can really see a combo device being useful for is the shared address/phone book and not having to carry two things around. The first could be solved with a standard for the storage of the address/phone information and simple communications protocols, whether bluetooth or firewire, it doesn't really matter, as long as you could synch the information reliably (and in a non-destructive manner).

      Then again, people look at me strange because I don't have a cell phone or a pager, so maybe I'm underestimating the usefulness of combining devices that I don't have.

      --
      -PainKilleR-[CE]
    4. Re:Convergence device != answer by Freedom+Bug · · Score: 2

      "Or maybe this gets even easier, as you say, with bluetooth"

      Exactly. Bluetooth is "cable replacement". The point of bluetooth is that it is your hardware interconnect standard.

      You can buy bluetooth earpieces, for example.

      Bryan

    5. Re:Convergence device != answer by Freedom+Bug · · Score: 3, Insightful

      But at some point in time, convergance devices become "good enough" and the benefit of carrying one device outweighs the negative.

      Myself, I've got a Treo and I love it. It fits in my pocket (my old Visor didn't, and my old phone was uncomfortable there). Sure, there's things I don't like about it, but it's a heck of a lot better than carrying two gadgets around.

      Let's face it, Palm's and phones are mature technologies. The biggest differentiator between two different non-wireless Palms or two different GSM phones is LOOKS. Other differences are minor.

      Even if Bluetooth delivered on it's promise, I'd still be using a Treo, because I'd be only carrying around one gadget rather than two.

      Bryan

    6. Re:Convergence device != answer by blazer1024 · · Score: 1

      The biggest problem I see (so far) is that you can't use both at the same time. Say someone calls you and asks if you have a number for so-and-so.. because hey, you're the one with the PDA, so you have all the info.. but you gotta move the phone away from your head to look up the number (or on some, the phone is actually an APPLICATION on the pda, so that it hangs up if you switch to the address book.. this only applies to PalmOS devices, though).. so you can't read the number to them easily.. a device intended to be convenient becomes less convenient.

      Not only can you not read off numbers, but you can't enter in the info they're telling you, write down the appointment you're making, etc. You gotta carry around a notepad and a pen to do that, and that defeats the whole point.

    7. Re:Convergence device != answer by plover · · Score: 2
      Oh, absolutely, convergent devices are the right answer for the right user. I guess I wasn't clear in explaining that it's my personal usage and my personal judgement that finds single devices are too awkward.

      Anyway, the Treo's screen is still substantially smaller than my Visor's. If I'm using a handheld, I want as much screen as I can get for no more than about 5.5 oz. I like the Unix idea of one thing doing one job well: a phone for communicating and a PDA for PDAing, and if one needs the other then they establish a pipe between them. With Bluetooth (or at least the promise of Bluetooth) the handheld will be able to use the phone in my pocket without my having to touch that other device. And with the Bluetooth headset, I may never have to handle the phone ever. It'll just be a communications base-camp hanging from my belt, which I think would be the ideal peripheral. It'd even get those nasty 926MHz waves away from my cranium :-)

      --
      John
    8. Re:Convergence device != answer by angst_ridden_hipster · · Score: 2

      Ah, let me let you in on the secret of 'leet Gadgetism.

      I have a Kyocera Smartphone. It's a Palm device / digital cellphone combo. It does nice things like keeping your address book in one place, along with your schedule, and whatever else you happen to have in the 8 meg of memory.

      The real advantage of this device, aside from the convenience, is 'leet Gadgeteer Points.

      Some smarmy exec puffs out his chest in a meeting because he has a tiny, slick cell phone, and you can show that your phone, while bigger, contains a PalmOS device.

      Some other marketroid shows off her wireless Palm device, and you demonstrate you can make phone calls on yours.

      Some geek shows you that he can do email via his Blackberry, and you show him that you can ssh into his server from yours.

      Some cute thing shows off that she can play silly games on her Nokia, you get her addicted to Jewelbox or something (with graphics!) on your phone.

      You get into a debate about whether or not Balrogs have wings with a LoTR fan, and you can bring up the eText on your device in real time to bolster your argument.

      Now, if you're a secure person, and don't need the ego strokes, you'll find that either it's a useful device because it keeps all your information together with your phone, or it's just another extraneous gadget to clutter your life, depending upon your personality.

      --
      Eloi, Eloi, lema sabachtani?
      www.fogbound.net
    9. Re:Convergence device != answer by Dubber · · Score: 1

      Of course the real fun begins when two people get close enough for their bluetooth enabled modules to talk to each other's central displays & I/O devices.
      It would be fun to send "I love you" notes from someone else's equipoment because of mere proximity.
      Talk about confusion. The other user would be wondering how all that propagnda got inserted into their *nix sysadmin cover letter .

      --
      Your complaints about being offended offend me.
    10. Re:Convergence device != answer by axneck · · Score: 1

      >Not only can you not read off numbers, but you can't enter in the info they're telling you, write down the appointment you're making, etc. You gotta carry around a notepad and a pen to do that, and that defeats the whole point. er, no. i'm using a treo and i can do anything else while speaking. (ie.. while having a conversation i switch out to take memos, check spreadsheets, play games, etc. works great.)

    11. Re:Convergence device != answer by stu42j · · Score: 1

      Yeah, away from your cranium and closer to your ... uhm ... belt.

    12. Re:Convergence device != answer by plover · · Score: 2
      I see that those of you who don't have all your kids yet might be concerned.... Perhaps some pseudoscience will allay your fears.

      The problem with the antenna by the head is that 1/2 the wavelength of 928MHz is 161cm, or 6.3 inches, fairly close to the diameter of the interior of the skull, making the brain case a resonance cavity.

      Now, if we moved the phone to the ... uhm ... belt, then a full wavelength antenna would be 12.6 inches. Perhaps the best advice I can give you is you may not want to make a phone call if your antenna is fully extended.

      --
      John
  11. Just Imagen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Imagen a beowulf cluster of these!

    1. Re:Just Imagen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IMAGINE being able to spell? IMAGINE a fucking Beowulf of DICTIONARIES?

  12. SDK by wishus · · Score: 2

    Is there an SDK for it? I looked but couldn't find anything. You would think they would take a lesson from Palm and encourage 3rd party applications.

    1. Re:SDK by slothdog · · Score: 2
      There will be eventually, but Danger isn't saying exactly when or what the licensing details will be. From their FAQ:

      Danger's objective is to make the hiptop application platform open to all developers. At this time, we are working with select developers on an individual basis. We intend to launch our formal developer program in early 2003. If you're interested in becoming a developer for Danger, please email us: developer@danger.com.
    2. Re:SDK by HughsOnFirst · · Score: 2

      Q. What Operating System does the hiptop device use? A. Danger has developed its own virtual machine operating environment. Applications written for the hiptop platform can be developed using industry standard development tools such as Metrowerks CodeWarrior-J(TM) and Microsoft Visual J++(TM), (???) and then automatically converted to execute in Danger's lightweight and optimized environment.

      Geez, I hope there is something a bit more current and available than J++.

    3. Re:SDK by wishus · · Score: 2

      Geez, I hope there is something a bit more current and available than J++

      Yeah, no joke. Why not just go for J2ME. It's not like it's brand new or anything... Then people could develop for it in a text editor, instead of having to purchase an IDE. You can bet I'm not going to buy a HipTop if I have to buy an IDE to develop for it.

    4. Re:SDK by interociter · · Score: 1

      I met one of the developers on a plane a few months back, and spent the entire flight pestering him with questions. The word is that there will be an SDK, but they were focused on building and shipping the damn thing.

      Make sense to me:
      1) Build product
      2) Make sure product works
      3) Release product
      (meta: marketing types may wish to study 2 & 3, it's not a typo)
      4) Build tools for other developers

      Wait a few months, and there will be an SDK. The flood of shareware and third-party apps will hit around next Xmas, I'm sure.

      --
      Interociter
      -=What do I want? I'm an American. I want more.
  13. Java apps for this device... by FyRE666 · · Score: 2

    As I'm sure anyone else who's dealt with the "standard" Java API on mobile phones call attest, I hope this one follows the MIDP a bit closer than... well... all the others. This has been a nightmare for me - unless you have the emulators/hardware to test every single new phone, there's no way you can guarauntee anything about the Java implementation. The Seimens M50 resizes all image canvases to fit the screen (so, scrolling is "problematic"), the Nokia 3410 has a clipping bug, plus can't create image canvases over 255x255 pixels. The list is endless, and not helped by the various proprietory extensions that are practically mandatory if you wish to get anything done.

    Phone makes trying to grab the market by twisting a standard into something non-standard? Hmm, sounds like some other company...

  14. Oops... by FyRE666 · · Score: 1

    s/Phone makes/Phone makers/;

    (must remember to preview first...)

  15. Excuse me... by iamacat · · Score: 0, Troll
    But why exactly is it news for nerds? There are already scores of Palm phones (Samsung, Treo) that look way better than that. Toshiba also makes a Pocket PC gadget. Did I miss an article about slashdot doing product placements now? I for one, can think about more interesting things to read than a "larger impression piece".

    On the other hand, if I am missing something please educate me. Is that thing running Linux (Palm/PPC phones already run Java)? Or is it dirt cheap? There must be some explanation here...

    1. Re:Excuse me... by FooBarney · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Waddayamean, why?

      It's really cool ... that's why.

      It's VERY reasonably priced ($200 + $40/month) for the feature set, comes with UNLIMITED data including AIM, email, and the Web, and has what's purported to be a fantastic HTML parser for small screens. Plus, if the SDK ever actually ships, it should be pretty easy to write your own apps for it. Plus, it's a decent phone ... plus, the industrial design with the fliparound screen is fantastic.

      Isn't that exactly what /. is FOR?

    2. Re:Excuse me... by iamacat · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, have a look here and tell me how this thing is better? For Palm phones, you can already download thousands of applications and write your own ones. No waiting for the "future SDK". Some of them (Kyocera) are in the same price range. I mean, this is like opening a automotive magazine and seeing a Hyundai on the front page. Sure, some people might decide to buy it, but it's hardly what anyone would want with a free choice. For example, a grayscale LCD really sucks for reading your UNLIMITED data, no matter how good is your fantastic HTML parser.

    3. Re:Excuse me... by RedX · · Score: 2
      Some of them (Kyocera) are in the same price range

      Perhaps the 6035 is in the same price range, but only because it's been discontinued for a few months now. The 6035 is also grayscale. You also cannot get unlimited data with the 6035. The Samsung i300 is color, but it's also over $350, isn't available with unlimited data, and Samsung has yet to release the SDK for it. The PalmOS devices that best compare to the Sidekick are the Treo's because they offer full-text keyboards. But, yet again, they don't come with unlimited data plans, and the only Treo that is in the same price-range as the Sidekick is grayscale. I've used several different combo phone/PDA units, and each is going to have several pros and a cons. I've yet to see even anything coming in the next year or so that will be the "killer" combo unit, although a few like the upcoming Samsung i500 and Kyocera 7135 "flip" Palm units as well as the Sony/Ericsson P800 unit are interesting.

    4. Re:Excuse me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For example, a grayscale LCD really sucks for reading your UNLIMITED data, no matter how good is your fantastic HTML parser.

      Yup, if you can't read color text, there's just no point, right? This thing is like the first Palm Pilot: small, cheap, no color display, limited memory, and it does what most people need. You could always blow $600 on some color piece of MS crap with Bluetooth and EroticVibraphone.

    5. Re:Excuse me... by iamacat · · Score: 1

      Actually it's not about color text, it's about white background. Did you actually try reading slashdot in dark-green on light-green screen? Palm V has the highest contrast LCD I have ever seen, but you still don't want to read it for more than a few minutes. And by the way, most people occasionally go to parties or meetings and need a vibrating phone.

  16. Bluetooth plans? by JHromadka · · Score: 2

    Are there any plans for Bluetooth or SyncML support in future Danger products? I would really love to use something like this with iSync.

    --
    "The objective of securing the safety of Americans from crime and terror has been achieved." -- John Ashcroft
    1. Re:Bluetooth plans? by FooBarney · · Score: 1

      Bluetooth was mentioned on the Danger Info a week or two back.

  17. Welcome to the walled garden by Wesley+Felter · · Score: 3, Interesting

    There probably is an SDK, but us lowly users can't get our hands on it. In the cell phone universe, the carrier only lets you run apps written by their "strategic partners".

    Also, if you could write apps then you might use more bandwidth than T-Mobile has budgeted for, putting them in the same pinch that P2P file sharing put the broadband ISPs in.

    Option value is good and end-to-end is good; maybe someday the service providers will even figure it out.

  18. Re:Beowulf Cluster? by lpret · · Score: 1

    Someone already did you blind idiot...you're almost as bad as him -- he can't spell.

    --
    This is my digital signature. 10011011001
  19. For you in Canada by Midnight+Thunder · · Score: 1

    One thing which is interesting is that T-Mobile has an address in Canada, even it does redirect to their USA web site. Maybe they have plans for north of the Border? Or maybe they just bought up the address just in case.

    It would be nice to be able to buy their phone for use up here.

    --
    Jumpstart the tartan drive.
  20. What, no Jabber? by neutralstone · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    AOLî Instant Messengerï (AIMî) Service

    Now your Buddy Listï goes where you go. Whether you're a hack or a poet - you can now chat instantly, anywhere using AIM.


    Ok, granted, the open source AIM transport for Jabber isn't quite prime-time quality yet, but that's no excuse. I think they've unnecessarily limited themselves in this respect.

    1. Re:What, no Jabber? by FooBarney · · Score: 1

      Oh, piffle.

      Jabber is great. No question. It's exactly what I'd design if I wanted to make an open-source instant message transport protocol. It's multiplatform, it's multiservice ... it's good stuff.

      But on a device small enough to fit into your pocket, you want a minimum of technical complexity -- as few "Settings" options as possible. A huge percentage of IM users use AIM, and all you need to worry about is a username and password. You can even modify your Buddy List from a desktop if you want to. Clean, simple, effective -- it provides exactly what the vast majority of potential users want at a minumum of cost and fuss.

    2. Re:What, no Jabber? by neutralstone · · Score: 1

      Oh, piffle.

      I piffle your piffle :p

      But on a device small enough to fit into your pocket, you want a minimum of technical complexity -- as few "Settings" options as possible.

      Agreed. The UI for the device should be as simple as possible. But if a majority of my contacts primarily use MSN, Yahoo, and/or Jabber (and this happens to be true for me), I'm probably used to entering my username/password for those services. Furthermore, why should I have to configure the device by using its UI? It syncs with a PC, so I should be able to configure it with the more life-size UI on the desktop, which means it would not be more difficult than using all those IM systems on the desktop.

      You can even modify your Buddy List from a desktop if you want to.

      Such a feature is not IM system-dependent. They could have set it up for Jabber just as well.

      Technical superiority need not be accompanied by a difficult-to-use UI. Take MacOSX 10.2 for example---people who said for years that UNIX wouldn't work on the desktop are eating their words now. The fact that most Jabber clients today have crappy UIs only means that their authors haven't thought much about the importance of a well-designed UI.

    3. Re:What, no Jabber? by Wonko42 · · Score: 2
      Furthermore, why should I have to configure the device by using its UI? It syncs with a PC...

      Actually, from what I've read, it doesn't. Until it does, I certainly won't be buying one.

    4. Re:What, no Jabber? by FooBarney · · Score: 1

      It doesn't sync with contacts managers, but you can adjust almost anything you can set on the Sidekick (address book, calendar, settings, etc.) from the T-Mobile website.

      AK

  21. IMAP? by Matt2000 · · Score: 2

    Does anyone know if it can do IMAP in the email client?

    Also, I'm a java programmer and I've read some asides in articles that say that although it's has a JVM, you can't install programs directly on the phone, is that true?

    Thanks.

    --

    1. Re:IMAP? by FooBarney · · Score: 1

      It does not do IMAP, I'm afraid -- just POP3.

      From early reports, the POP3 checks every 15 minutes or so, while the @tmobile.com address pretty much beeps your phone as soon as the email arrives. I'm just going to set my accounts to forward to @tmobile.com and be done with it.

      Maybe in the next version.... ;)

  22. Re:With all this technology (pot/kettle) by gosand · · Score: 3, Insightful
    (flexable, rediculous, definately, etc ad nausem)

    Don't you mean "ad nauseam"?

    *ducks*

    --

    My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

  23. My woes with the Hiptop & VoiceStream by Brento · · Score: 3, Informative

    I've been a T-Mobile customer for more than a year. I subscribed to the MobileStar mobile internet service back before T-Mobile bought them. I'm a gadget freak, and I telecommute full time. I'm the perfect target for this device.

    I spoke to my local Houston T-Mobile sales office last week and again yesterday, dying to get my hands on one. They said they had 'em, but couldn't sell 'em to me until Oct 1. Fine, no problem. I showed up this morning at 9am to meet them when they opened the front doors, concerned that I wouldn't be the first in line to grab one. Turns out T-Mobile didn't even have them anywhere in Houston.

    I ran over to the Galleria CompUSA, where I'd already seen the boxes, and asked to buy one. Sure, they said, but it's $450. I explained to the clerk that that was the price without activation, and that it was $250 with activation. They had to call two different reps to figure out I was right - but the T-Mobile reps actually told the clerks not to sell the devices because the service wasn't ready.

    I then had to call the local T-Mobile store, get them on the phone with CompUSA (all over my Verizon cell phone) and get them to agree that yes, they could sell it to me, yes, the service was active. But CompUSA still wouldn't lower the price from $450. Even worse, they couldn't activate it at the store - I had to hoof it back over to T-Mobile again.

    At that point, I walked out of the store, went over to Verizon, and renewed my existing contract for another two years. I want to make sure I don't tempt myself and try that messy service again.

    --
    What's your damage, Heather?
    1. Re:My woes with the Hiptop & VoiceStream by FooBarney · · Score: 1

      Yeah ... that kind of sucks. I wouldn't get too angry, though ... that kind of craziness accompanies just about every product launch. If you walked into a store next week, they'd probably have their act together.

      I actually got my hands on one last week in Atlanta -- the T-Mobile reps were very courteous and even tried (and failed) to activate it for me before the launch. In the end, they let me out of the store with the Sidekick, but it won't be "turned on" until this afternoon.

      Plug for those in Atlanta -- the T-Mobile store in Peachtree Center is good people. Ask for Monique. :)

    2. Re:My woes with the Hiptop & VoiceStream by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Worked for me at CompUSA. I went last night and bought/activated the phone. The $425 dropped by $175 when I did the activation with them (Service agreement credit). Then they have a $100 rebate for cell phones this week.

  24. Remembering my Latin from so many years ago... by sulli · · Score: 2
    It's ad nauseam.

    nausea is the nominative case of the Latin for "disgust"; nauseam is the accusative (direct object) case, which is what is used after the preposition ad (to, towards).

    HTH, HAND. (How do I say that in Latin?)

    --

    sulli
    RTFJ.
  25. pretty slick by grue23 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    i had to chance to play with one of these a couple months ago; i have a friend that works for danger and they've all had prototypes for a while now. the UI is extremely well thought out and easy to use - there's a little scrollwheel that lets you flip between menus more easily than most cellphone type things i've used. it's also fairly compact, lightweight, and cheap, compared with similar convergence devices.

    the version my friend had also had a telnet client on it! he's since told me that won't be available with the release and may not ever be available for the actual product.

  26. I want to buy one!! by ealar+dlanvuli · · Score: 2

    But I have some questions

    From who? What service can I get? Where can I get coverage? Why something? When can I get it?

    --
    I live in a giant bucket.
    1. Re:I want to buy one!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.racowireless.com/sidekick.htm

      We can get you hooked up. Service is anywhere on the Tmobile nationwide network. Call for any details. AVAILABLE NOW.

      Enough advertising though, this product is actually really great for the price point. You can't beat $200. It is sleeker and better than a Treo and the GPRS connectivity is great! I know everyone is overwhelmed with the PDA/Phone hybrids right now but this product is unique because of the price. The Nokia 9290 and Pocket PC Phone Edition will each run over $500 w/activation.

    2. Re:I want to buy one!! by jimmcq · · Score: 2

      From who? What service can I get? Where can I get coverage? Why something? When can I get it?

      You can get the Sidekick from T-Mobile today.

      For information on the service, coverage, and where to get it, see their website.

  27. Size Matters by mistermoonlight · · Score: 1
    Have you seen the dimensions? It's 4.5" x 2.6" x 1.1"


    Over and inch thick?! You're better with a Kyocera SmartPhone or a VisorPhone or a Treo Communicator for size!

  28. When will they realise.... by Mac+Degger · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...tha this, and only this, is what I'll buy a new device for:

    -PalmOS
    -integrated mobile phone (fromfactor: any old palm III or V with the speaking/ers part on the back->this means on the other side of the screen so I don't mess up the screen with my stubble)
    -colour, highres screen
    -removable storage
    -wifi or bluetooth

    And that's it...I already have a good phone (nokia 7110) and my current PDA (IIIc) suffice for everyday life. Only if my demands are met will I upgrade. I couldn't care less about an integrated mp3 player or removable storage on its own, especially if that means I don't get my phone/pda.

    --
    -- Waht? Tehr's a preveiw buottn?
    1. Re:When will they realise.... by yasth · · Score: 1

      PalmOS is a horrible interface for a Smartphone, it doesn't have support for the kind of multitasking needed to run IM, email checks, etc. in background. Without that, what is the point?

      --
      I'd do something interesting, but my server can't handle a slashdotting.
  29. Go to the store, not the website. by TheKodiak · · Score: 3, Informative

    I checked the website - by the time I had put together my order, I was up to $284, plus a $35 activation fee, and a $50 mail-in-rebate.

    Decided I couldn't wait to get my hands on it, went to a local store - walked out for $216 (with tax) and a $25 activation fee.

    Part of the difference was I didn't get the headset (since it comes with an earbud, which is all I really wanted anyway) and I didn't get the AC adapter ($20, they didn't have it in yet). But I also didn't have to deal with the mail-in-rebate hassle.

    Down side is they don't have the plan in the PoS, yet, so they have to call it in manually... But it'll probably still be activated before I would have gotten it shipped to me.

    --
    -=Best Viewed Using [INLINE]=-
  30. I _so_ almost want this! by jht · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Okay - I haven't seen a real one yet, but it's reasonably small. It comes with an OK voice plan, and a very good data plan. The built-in applications are pretty slick-looking, and it can handle e-mail attachments. Battery life is allegedly decent. The screen appears to be pretty nice.

    Not to mention I'm a gadget freak. I have a Palm Vx, a Zaurus, an old Newton MessagePad 2100 (got it used for cheap about a month ago), a couple of Macs, and a bunch o' PC's. I have an iPaq 3700 series that I got last year, and I use a Blackberry for work. I've got a nice little cellphone (A Moto T193), and I used to use OmniSky with my Palm when the service first started up, though I've since ditched it.

    I ought to be the perfect target market for a gizmo like this.

    But I don't want it. Here's why.

    First off, there doesn't appear to be any real mechanism for extending it with more apps so far. Give me SSH, even, and I could get some good business use out of it.

    Then, the phone functionality seems awkward. There's no way to dial with the screen closed.

    Finally, the service plan they're offering is only a teaser. I want all-you-can-eat wireless data, even if it costs a little more to get it. Per-MB pricing sucks, since you don't have great control over how much data a given website will transfer, for instance. Data can't be metered by the end-user that effectively, especially on a mobile platform.

    The biggest reason I won't get it, though, is that my wife would have me sleeping on the patio for the entire year of unlimited data! Not worth it at all...

    --
    -- Josh Turiel
    "2. Do not eat iPod Shuffle."
    1. Re:I _so_ almost want this! by TheKodiak · · Score: 3, Informative

      "Then, the phone functionality seems awkward. There's no way to dial with the screen closed."

      That is incorrect.

      You can use the wheel to dial (not so bad if you're used to using a wheel) a number that's not in your recent history or speed dial, or use the wheel to select one of those numbers.

      --
      -=Best Viewed Using [INLINE]=-
    2. Re:I _so_ almost want this! by unDees · · Score: 1

      Can you use the wheel to send touch-tone numbers while you're in a call (e.g., "For English, press 1. Para espan~ol, marque el nu'mero 2.")?

      --
      "I call a baby goat a 'goatse.'" -- my non-Internet-savvy 6-year-old stepdaughter
    3. Re:I _so_ almost want this! by TheKodiak · · Score: 2

      Sure can. It's definitely slower that a 10-key style number pad, though. Some automated assistants might time out on you during 16-digit entries.

      --
      -=Best Viewed Using [INLINE]=-
  31. Word from the Front Lines by WaveDave · · Score: 1

    ... from a friend of mine who works at Danger:

    --snip--
    Actually, I'm at the palo alto tmobile store now cheering on customers waiting in line!

    Cool that we're on slashdot. I'll have to check it out on my hiptop.
    --snip--

  32. No unlimited data ? by Corey2K · · Score: 1

    this is weak... i get 50-75 emails per day... i'm sticking with my Blackberry.

    1. Re:No unlimited data ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It does have unlimited data (at least for the first year). Just not unlimited voice.

  33. Interview with Danger CEO Andy Rubin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    SiliconValley.com has audio of one of their reporter's interviews with Danger CEO Andy Rubin. Interesting stuff...

  34. Doesn't sync, therefore doesn't swim by Devlin-du-GEnie · · Score: 1

    This device is unutterably Cool. I played with a working prototype more than a year ago. I'll buy one when it plays nice with others.

    Right now, once you put data in, there's no easy way to get it back out. The OS is proprietary and there are no Palm or PC conduits to sync data with your favorite PIM.

    Without synchronization, you might as well go back to pen and paper. Your traveling address book will never match your home book either way.

  35. I'm underwhelmed by RatBastard · · Score: 2

    Can't say that this thing excites me at all. But I'm probably not the market they want: I don't have, or want, a cell phone, and after 10-months of trying to find a use for my Palm M100, it now sits, forgotten, in my sock drawer.

    --
    Boobies never hurt anyone. - Sherry Glaser.
    1. Re:I'm underwhelmed by xactoguy · · Score: 1

      Can I have your Palm M100, then? ;)

      --


      And so we go, on with our lives
      We know the truth, but prefer lies
      Lies are simple, simple is bliss
  36. More details on this device by BovineOne · · Score: 4, Informative

    Check out Danger Info's unofficial forums or their main page. Note that they are not officially affiliated with Danger Inc.

    Another unofficial website that says up to date with Danger info is at hiptop411.com

    --
    Don't waste those cycles! Put them to use! http://www.distributed.net/
  37. Got mine this morning by Royster · · Score: 2

    I'm typing this message on it.

    Already I like it better than the Sharp Zaurus. The keyboard is bigger and easier to use. An autocorrect feature capitalizes the first word of a sentance which already makes it easier to use.

    The internet connection is much faster than my CDPD account and it looks like it's going to be very usable for email and occasional web use.

    Oh and it's a phone, too.

    --
    I have discovered a truly marvelous sig, unfortunately the sig limit is too small to contain i
    1. Re:Got mine this morning by Wonko42 · · Score: 2
      An autocorrect feature capitalizes the first word of a sentance which already makes it easier to use.

      Looks like it doesn't have a spellchecker though. Too bad.

    2. Re:Got mine this morning by Royster · · Score: 2

      Does your browser have a spellchecker?

      I could add an auto-correct to change sentance to sentence. But I'd probably run out of RAM if I put all of my common mistypings in.

      --
      I have discovered a truly marvelous sig, unfortunately the sig limit is too small to contain i
  38. Not great if you swap SIMs with other GPRS devices by shadowj · · Score: 1

    T-Mobile imposes several limitations when you activate the Sidekick plan. In particular, they do something mysterious to your account that makes GPRS data non-functional if you use the SIM card in other data devices (like the Handspring Treo). I got this firsthand from a T-Mobile rep, and it's confirmed here. I use several phones, including a GPRS-updated Treo 180, and switch among them to suit my needs, so this puts a damper on my enthusiasm... as do the limited voice minutes in the plan.

    --

    --Larry

    Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by incompetence

  39. you know what I want by machine+of+god · · Score: 1

    I want a PDA, with cell phone capability, solely though a handsfree headset. I don't want to have to hold my laptop up to my head to make a call, and I don't want to have to compromise any functionality from my pda so that it can be a phone too.

  40. EBAY:Sidekick+Creed+Year of Service by cliffjumper222 · · Score: 1

    Do search on ebay for "sidekick creed" current bid looks to be arounf $800.

    Shameless paste from ebay site:

    T-Mobile Sidekick & T-Mobile Rocks the Rock

    Can you walk the walk and talk the talk? Well, how about this...T-Mobile and Danger, Inc. want to know if you and your sidekick can Rock the Rock!

    T-Mobile Rocks the Rock with an historic concert event on Alcatraz Island in San Francisco, California to celebrate the nationwide "break out" of T-Mobile wireless service across the U.S.

    Winners of this auction Get More from T-Mobile with this once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to hear special musical guest Creed as T-Mobile Rocks the Rock. Only 1,500 people will go to T-Mobile Rocks the Rock, being held October 10 on Alcatraz Island.

    The winner of this auction will receive the following:

    Be one of the first to own a T-Mobile Sidekick--autographed by internationally renowned actress and T-Mobile Global Spokeswoman, Catherine Zeta Jones.
    One year of free mobile service for the T-Mobile Sidekick
    Two tickets to the T-Mobile Rocks the Rock event, held on Alcatraz, October 10th, 2002
    Round trip airfare for you and your sidekick (U.S. only)
    One night stay in San Francisco
    Introducing the T-Mobile Sidekick

    It's your wireless everything

    As in, everything you need for communication, information, and entertainment. Web browser, mobile snapshots, AOL® Instant Messenger(TM) Service, e-mail, full featured mobile phone, games, calendar, address, and more!

    The Golden Gate National Parks Association

    All proceeds of this auction will go to the Golden Gate National Parks Association. The Golden Gate National Parks Association is a nonprofit membership organization dedicated to the preservation and public enjoyment of the Golden Gate National Parks, including Alcatraz Island.

  41. GSM ? What Gsm, 900 ? 1800 ? 1900 ? by rasjani · · Score: 2

    The prochure and the website says its just "GSM". Like, i dont know how things are in US with gsm networks but as far as i know, GSM network can operate on atleast 3 different bands which are 900, 1800 and 1900.

    For the hell of it, i might even try to purchase one but before that i need to know on which band it works.

    --
    yush
  42. Check out the Kyocera 7135 by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 2

    Not sure exactly what you mean with your form factor comment, but other than that, the Kyocera 7135 sounds like what you want. WiFi/bluetooth via SDIO.

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    1. Re:Check out the Kyocera 7135 by mfago · · Score: 1

      Ok, I had to see what you meant. The Kyocera 7135 does indeed look pretty cool.

      I think they are the _first_ people to get a formfactor for a phone/PDS that I think might really be useable. I am a bit worried about the interoperability of the phone/PDA though. I'd have to try it out.

      Of course, what I really wish is that the Sony Clie NR70 had a cellphone too. I mean they have the form factor right (if a bit large for a phone)!

      Just don't ever ask me to use a PocketPC-based phone or PDA. Isn't ever gonna happen.

    2. Re:Check out the Kyocera 7135 by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 2

      They do integration VERY well.

      I have their current offering, the 6035 - It is EXCELLENT and the phone/PDA integration works very well.

      http://www.smartphonesource.com/ has excellent discussion boards for 6035 owners. (Who are all drooling over the upcoming 7135)

      --
      retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
  43. All I want by ooglek · · Score: 1

    I want contact list, exportable and importable in any which way intelligently, a calendar with alerts, and that's about it. I don't need apps like SSH and IMAP and crap. If I can make calls that sound good, look up contacts, call people and get alerts for calendar events, that's enough. And enough memory so I don't have to delete old events to add new ones!

  44. And this is news why? by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 2

    There have been plenty of other convergence devices released in the past (Handspring Treo, Kyocera 6035).

    How is this one special? It's got a proprietary OS (no installing your favorite PalmOS apps), and from the pictures I've seen on the DangerInfo forum, its form factor is horrible. Yet another "PDA first, then phone" like the Samsung I300.

    The market has shown that only "Phone first, then PDA" devices succeed as convergence devices, and usually only Palm-based units. (A few Nokias being the exception.)

    HipTop - DOA. Good luck taking on the Kyocera 7135, due out in a month or two.

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
  45. Where did GPS go? by Ilan+Volow · · Score: 2

    this article on slashdot 8 months ago mentioned that Danger devices would incorporate GPS. I look on their site, and no mention of GPS whatsoever. What gives? I'm kind of dissapointed; I thought I would finally have the problem of "where in the hell did I park my car at the mega-mall" licked.

    --
    Ergonomica Auctorita Illico!
  46. Renaming Issues by Rayonic · · Score: 2

    From what I gather, it was renamed from "Danger's Hiptop" to "T-Mobile Sidekick."

    I propose the best of both worlds, and say they should name it "Danger's Sidekick" . That should boost their sales by 15% on name alone.

  47. hiptop enabled site: by Prep · · Score: 1

    A few hiptop enabled sites for those picking up their Sidekicks today:

    http://hiptop.bixworld.com
    http://hiptop411.com
    http://www.dangerinfo.com/sidekick

    --
    This comment was not generated by Uber Elephants...
  48. Re:GSM ? What Gsm, 900 ? 1800 ? 1900 ? by rgbscan · · Score: 1

    It's GSM 900/1900.

    rgbscan

  49. Re:GSM ? What Gsm, 900 ? 1800 ? 1900 ? by Matt2000 · · Score: 2

    Nice sig, I wonder where you got it?

    --

  50. you can't take notes while you're on the phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    unless you always carry a headset with you

  51. What, even larger than that? by merriam · · Score: 1
    ... am super impressed. A larger impression piece...

    Such as "am mostly super impressed"?

  52. handspring treo by jchristopher · · Score: 1
    I currently use a Handspring Treo, which I love. Can I sign up for the Danger plan (which is currently the cheapest way to get flat rate GPRS) and then swap the SIM card into my Treo?

    I could care less about the device, I only want the service. Or maybe Voicestream will make this plan available to non-danger users?

    1. Re:handspring treo by RedX · · Score: 2

      From what I've heard, the SIM used in the Sidekick can only be used in a Sidekick. Sorry, can't offer much proof on this, but it does make sense for TMobile to do this to prevent people from getting unlimited data on non-Sidekick devices.

    2. Re:handspring treo by jchristopher · · Score: 1

      Clearly they CAN limit the plan to sidekick devices. The question is why would they want to? Don't they want to sell as much service as possible?

    3. Re:handspring treo by RedX · · Score: 2
      Don't they want to sell as much service as possible?

      They don't necessarily want to sell as much service as possible, they want to make as much money from selling their services as possible. The Sidekick is being marketed mostly to non-corporate types, ie. geeks, teens, and college students. The Treo is marketed to corporate-types and road warriors, usually people whose company is picking up the tab. Thus T-Mobile has decided that they can get $40/month for unlimited Sidekick service from people that probably wouldn't be paying much for data service otherwise, whereas they're likely getting much more than that from people using the Treo and other data devices.

      To give you an example, my company recently purchased a couple of SprintPCS 3G PCMCIA cards and isn't batting an eye that they'll likely be paying several hundred dollars per month for each card so that executives can have email access at any time when on the road. Don't get me wrong, I bet T-Mobile and the other wireless carriers would sell a heck of a lot of unlimited data plans, but they probably wouldn't make as much money as they do now by having caps for the high-usage corporate customers.

  53. I'm using one now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The UI is intuitive, the keyboard is easy to use, and having phone, IM, email, and web at my fingertips is way cool. Web browsing is a bit challenged on a small screen. /. Comes up fine but not another site I tried. The closed OS doesn't bother me since it comes with all that I need.

  54. Got mine! by gad_zuki! · · Score: 2

    I just finished playing with mine and so far it feels like great device. Be forewarned this will not play well with anyone who is into open formats. Everything is proprietary and email, calender data, etc is mirrored on their servers not on your PC. There is no sync to Outlook, Notes, etc options (yet? theres a USB cable for restores and future applications).

    The interface is very, very nice. Embedded people take note - this is how its done. Web surfing is the disaster you'd expect it to be. Think Lynx with grayscale jpgs. AIM works very nicely on here. My free camera is defective, all I'm getting is black. The email client is nice, but I still haven't figured out how often it will check external POP email boxes. Someone estimated 15 minutes or so and that's really unacceptable. The tmail.com account check is dynamic, so I'll probably just forward mail there and be done with it.

    Phone works fine. I don't get the complaints about talking with the screen extended. The screen hides behind your hand so it more or less looks like you're holding a normal phone (not to mention all cell phones look silly anyway) at least to us lefties.

    Everyone is getting speaker pops/shorts. Not cool. How did these get off the production line like this?

    I'm sure a firmware upgrade or two will fix the initial problems us early adopters are getting. There's so much room for potential here, its going to be interesting to see where this goes. I'm stuck with it for 12 months. Here's to a ssh client or PDA like synching.

  55. Re:GSM ? What Gsm, 900 ? 1800 ? 1900 ? by rasjani · · Score: 2

    Yup, i *STOLE* it but i had that idea allready before i saw it at your messages ;))

    --
    yush
  56. When? by marktoml · · Score: 1

    Can we expect someone to boot a linux kernel on it (and get Apache up and running)?

    "What's that on your hip?"
    "My webserver"

  57. GSM 1900 only in this model... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your right the word up until last month was a dual band 900/1900 device, then all notes were ammended and it appeared as a single band 1900 phone.

    Danger indicates the device would be useless outside the USA untill they strike agreements abroad.

    I suppose they fear a grey market developing and T-Mobile wanted to cut cost. Eeh, why would a under 34 year old person want to use their phone outside of the USA. They don't travel on Business...

    Think again Marketing. How many Americans go abroad for a Semester Abroad. Mummy and Daddy would pay that bill...

    How many young kids are sent here and there on business as an up and comming gofer that they can work to the bone...

    Granted they aren't CEO's and VP's unless they are running a surviving Dot.com

  58. I bought a SIdekick and here's what I think. by ucribido · · Score: 1

    I went out and bought a SideKick yesterday and have been playing with it ever since. In a nutshell: I like it. It suits my needs perfectly which are:
    - Access my web site to make sure it's up and to use my admin tools if necessary.
    - Check email and send email: The Sidekick allows to set up multiple POP accounts which is very useful.
    - AOL instant messaging to communicate with co-workers and others when I am not in from of my pc. This is great for trouble shooting and having multiple conversations at once to co-ordinate activities if necessary.

    The phone features work great and nicely integrated into the address features to allow for quickly getting to numbers and dialing.
    The over all information architecture is smooth and intuitive, I didn't have to look in the manual to figure anything out.

    Getting the service up and running was a snap. The only glitch was when creating an account on the Sidekick you are then invited to T-Mobile's web site to log in with your new account, but when I tried I was informed that I had no account. Not sure what happened there but it's not important anyway with repect to getting full use out of the Sidekick.
    Other fun stuff is the various noises it makes when you are doing something with the device and the flashing lights in the scroll wheel is a nice touch. Adds to the "friendlyness" of it.
    Typing messages is not a problem for me on the key board either for shortish messages. It's definitely a tool to be used when away from your main information input device.

    The service plan is a pretty great deal at $40/month unlimited data transfer that' what sold me. Now if they could build in BlueTooth that would rock.

  59. what about webmin w/ the hiptop? by vjl · · Score: 1
    So, does running webmin via https provide the 'real' security that a normal w3 client provides? Ie: https://myserver:10000/ via mozilla provides 128-bit encryption. From the dangerinfo.com site, I've found that the hiptop *does* allow https:// URLs, but is the data from danger's servers to the hiptop just as secure?

    The lack of an ssh client would mean that webmin would be the only 'secure' way to admin a unix-based server via the hiptop. Here's hoping for an ssh app! [and IMAP/SSL!].

    /vjl/

  60. Whaaaaaa!!!! by interociter · · Score: 1
    Whaaaah! Version 1.0 of a new product doesn't have every fucking feature available on every other established competing product plus an SDK so you can write your own.

    Yeah yeah yeah, no SDK, no third-party apps. Maybe, just maybe, that's because Danger entered the marketplace all of 72 hours ago. Why is there more software for the Palm? Maybe because Palm have a 6 year lead. If you'll remember, Windows 1.0 was a big pile, Linux 1.0 didn't have what you'd call a complete feature set, and Palm 1.0 wasn't all that amazing either.

    Honestly, I've been salivating over the Sidekick for about 3 months. I'm still on the fence about it, but the lack of an SSH client, an SDK, and an interociter isn't going to enter into the decision process.

    --
    Interociter
    -=What do I want? I'm an American. I want more.
  61. Last Post! by alpg · · Score: 1

    > I'm an idiot.. At least this [bug] took about 5 minutes to find..
    We need to find some new terms to describe the rest of us mere mortals
    then.
    -- Craig Schlenter in response to Linus Torvalds's

    - this post brought to you by the Automated Last Post Generator...