Slashdot Mirror


Careers After Tech?

theinfobox asks: "Is anyone else burned out on tech jobs? Or, has anyone tired of the never ending hunt for tech position? I know a lot of people who have and they are now looking at other career fields. I am almost at that point myself. What career fields are you considering after leaving the tech industry?"

150 comments

  1. Law School by DorianGre · · Score: 2, Funny

    In good times and bad, they have a job.

    1. Re:Law School by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      As a student in a non-law school grad. program who is taking a law-school class, i can tell you that law schools definitely have very many very fine women. And what else is there, really?

    2. Re:Law School by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hookers? hookers with big fuckin' tits?

    3. Re:Law School by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Ah, so you hate your job huh? There is a support group for that, its called EVERYONE, We meet at the bar.

    4. Re:Law School by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, not all lawyers have steady work or are wealthy. Law schools cost a hell of a lot more than grad school (~$50,000 / semester). Just like every downturn in the economy, incuding now, law schools have too many applicants. You really need a 4.0 now to get into law school. What's also suprising is the drop out rates of law school, especially concidering the high cost of it. I don't have exact figures or anywhere you can look it up, but I have a friend who's trying to enter a law school, and he told me some of these numbers but I forget them now.

    5. Re:Law School by RobertNotBob · · Score: 1
      My brother went to law school, then passed the exam. Now he is a lawyer. I got a 2 year associates degree and a handfull of computer certifications. Now I make 20% more money than he does and as soon as he pays off his student loans (in 4 more years) he intends to take computer classes.

      IANAL ; Your milage may vary

      --
      ___ I don't respond to Anonymous Cowards, and I Never Mod them UP.
    6. Re:Law School by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Law school does not make financial sense unless you go to a top ten school and go to a top law firm after graduating. The grass is not greener on the other side of the fence. Most people who go to law school end up working as temps with no benefits making 25 bucks an hour.

    7. Re:Law School by broody · · Score: 1

      You might want to read this and this before considering trying to become a lawyer.

      --
      ~~ What's stopping you?
  2. my experience... good then (hopefully) bad by vsync64 · · Score: 3, Interesting
    After being laid off from Wego Systems I hunted around in vain for another tech job, eventually landing in the pit of despair that is Office Depot. I just recently quit and hunted around for another 3 months, finally today (yay) getting a job at a hotel. I start out as the night desk clerk, then get promoted to night auditor. We'll see how it works out.

    My advice: stay away from retail at all costs. Try something secretarial, in hospitality, or even manual labor. Anything is better than being told all day why your reservations about hard-selling extended warranties are invalid, and that if a product is carried by the company, there can't ever be anything wrong with it, etc. Keep your dignity at all costs.

    Oh, and find a job with consistent shifts, if it's hourly. Nothing sucks more than noon one day, 8am the next, 3pm the next. Especially when instead of giving you the schedule the Wednesday before, like you were promised, they decide that Sunday morning is a better time.

    I'm optimistic, personally... 23:00-07:00 5 nights a week, with a 2-day break, and no micromanaging bosses.

    --
    TO BUY A NEW CAR WOULD MAKE YOU SEXUALLY ATTRACTIVE.
    1. Re:my experience... good then (hopefully) bad by nelsonal · · Score: 1

      One summer I worked as a checker at my local wal-mart, and it was not that bad. The worst parts in my memory were the constant butt kissing, and terrible attitudes of the other employees. The schedual did shift around a bit, there were 2 shifts for 8 hour days early and late, we did not have a supercenter at the time. Although it was more robotic you were paid to get people out of the store as quickly and accurately as possible, we did not have to hard sell much of anything there. I sort of enjoyed it. My favorite job in college was working as the tractor driver in an orchard. All you can eat fresh fruit, I was out doors, and I bulked up quite a bit, lifting the cherry bins all day. I made great money for the month harvest was going, too. A friend worked as a night auditor at a resort, and loved it, he eventually got his accounting degree and still enjoys the field.

      --
      Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
    2. Re:my experience... good then (hopefully) bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My God, you are a loser. What type of job did you have at Wego Systems? Coffee distribution engineer?

      To go from that to Night Desk Clerk is embarrassing. You shouldn't have posted, now you have thousands of nerds laughing at you.

    3. Re:my experience... good then (hopefully) bad by vsync64 · · Score: 1

      Perhaps, but I'm getting paid for posting this comment, and I don't even have to look busy.

      --
      TO BUY A NEW CAR WOULD MAKE YOU SEXUALLY ATTRACTIVE.
  3. marketing management by thilmony · · Score: 1

    never finished my degree before. now i am in the middle of my major for marketing management. I think I will try to do something with real estate.

    how do you like them apples?

    --
    YES, there is a McDonald's in Hanoi Square.
  4. Good Riddance... by BitGeek · · Score: 5, Insightful


    The dotcom "boom" saw a lot of weenies with MCSE's and dipshit "IT guys" like the one in the new apple switch advert "I used to hate macs, now I are one", vinnie pipsqueek.

    If you're considering going elsewhere because of the tech slump, I say, good riddance. Too many idiots who didn't understand technology got jobs in the boom anyway. Companies were so desperate for warm bodies that they lowered the bar for hiring to such a level that it was pathetic.

    IF you aren't a real engineer-- and by real engineer, I mean someone who learns new technologies in their spare time, someone who wouldn't be cought dead without a computer at home-- then you won't considering leaving.

    I worked with a guy once who didn't even have a home computer. He called himself a programmer. Yeah, sure, and I'm a lawyer. He was proud of the fact that he didn't have a computer.

    And given the postings of many of the people on slashdot, I think there are a lot of such posers here. (If you think a x86 gets as mauch work done in a clock cycle as a powerpc, you qualify as "not a technical person")

    Go back to working retail and leave the entry level jobs for real engineers who simply lack experience (like college students etc.)

    --
    Yeah, and you guys panned the ipod too: http://apple.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/10/23/ 1816257
    1. Re:Good Riddance... by BitGeek · · Score: 5, Insightful


      In my rant, I misspoke.

      Basically, Real Engineers are sticking around for the long haul. We were here before the boom and we will be here afterwards. And those of use who are too young to have been here before the boom are seeing the bust as an opportunity to fine tune our skills and are NOT considering doing anything else.

      People "burned out by tech jobs" are people who got into "tech jobs" because it was hot. Because it was the thing. Because companies were so desperate they didn't care, and were often run by unqualified people doing the hiring. One could argue that part of the reason so many of these companies failed is they had incompetent engineering staff (and incompetent management and marketing staff) and provided crappy, and thus, non-profitable services to people.

      To all those people who jumped on the tech bandwagon and are not engineers / hackers / competant. (EG: if your title or qualification is "MCSE" or "Web Designer" or you never built a computer or operating system in high school (or something even more geeky like my roomates railgun)) then I say good riddance.

      What were you doing sticking around trying to get our jobs anyway? The boom is bust, the party is over, the bandwagon got overloaded and there's no room for you.

      If you don't have enough conviction that you're actually considering doing "something non-technical" I say, good riddance.

      Those who worked hard and have the financial freedom to go live on a desert island-- YOU have earned the right to be "burned out" on technology and I wish you well.

      But the party is definitely over, and if there's any question in your mind, then you do NOT belong in a tech job.

      --
      Yeah, and you guys panned the ipod too: http://apple.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/10/23/ 1816257
    2. Re:Good Riddance... by spencerogden · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I think you are being a little harsh. It is possible for someone to change their mind about what they want to do you know...

    3. Re:Good Riddance... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow. I didn't know that the Platonic form of the _volklisch_, tech-chauvinist engineer could actually manifest itself in linear spacetime.

      Dude, in case you haven't heard: The world is full of people who more intelligent and full-featured than either of us and who can consequently (a) switch industries and professions with absolute ease and (b) be successful at pretty much anything they put their minds to, including your job. When they want to switch, they simply pop back into college or law school or whatever for a couple of years and come out with a shiny new piece of paper and a shiny new set of interests. These are the guys who didn't OSes in their spare time in high school because they were too busy, say,
      playing violin.

      I know of couple of this last sort (or more accurately, their downmarket consumer versions) personally, and it is a privilege.

    4. Re:Good Riddance... by Captain+Pedantic · · Score: 1
      The world is full of people who more intelligent and full-featured than either of us and who can consequently (a) switch industries and professions with absolute ease and (b) be successful at pretty much anything they put their minds to, including your job.
      Yes, these people exist, but as a rule they don't Ask Slashdot to see if they are making the right decision.
      --

      None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free. Johann Wolfgang von Goethe.
    5. Re:Good Riddance... by BitGeek · · Score: 5, Insightful


      Sure. Its hard to generalize without also catching people you don't intend to in the net.

      People who sincerely wanted to be tech workers (and I know some myself) but who are having trouble becoming engineers (and I use that word broadly) I got no beef with. Even if they try for awhile and then give up.

      But there are a LOT of people who jumped into the arena with dollar signs in their eyes and wanted to jump on the band wagon *without being technical*.

      I got no beef with anyone who's still learning, or is just inexperienced if they are sincere. Its the insincere money chasers to whom I say "Good riddance".

      --
      Yeah, and you guys panned the ipod too: http://apple.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/10/23/ 1816257
    6. Re:Good Riddance... by BitGeek · · Score: 2


      I'm not talking about engineers without side interests-- what engineer doesn't? My current one is sailing. In the past I've had other outside interests.

      But I've spent my life learning and that doesn't mean I spent it in school.

      The multi-talented uber-geeks that you are talking about were always, and will always be geeks-- even if they open a motorcycle shop in their early retirement, they will write their own customer tracking system, etc.

      What I'm talking about is the wannabes who don't really have an interest or desire to learn technology. The non-technical tech workers, who for a long time blocked the avenues for actual true geeks to get jobs. (And I'm not bitter because I was one of those blocked-- I Was well employed and well compensated.)

      I saw a lot of companies- hell WORKED for some of them-- hire foolishly. Soemtimes buying someone with a degree but no engineering skill and passing over an excellent hacker (who comments their code) because they spent the four years after high school BUILDING THINGS rather than in a classroom learning 1980s era "Technology".

      Yeah, I'm harsh on colleges as well- their agenda does not seem to be about bringing out the engineer and making them an excellent one. They are about McSkills and a piece of paper that gives a false sense of legitimacy. (OH, and making money-- not that there's anything wrong with that-- they just don't do it by providing great service to their customers.)

      ANYONE can be successful at pretty much anything they put their minds to- especially when it comes to engineering, a category that doesn't require you to be fully able bodied and that you can teach yourself without spending much money at all.

      The guy you linked to was a geek from the day he was born. He's not the group I'm talking about.

      --
      Yeah, and you guys panned the ipod too: http://apple.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/10/23/ 1816257
    7. Re:Good Riddance... by Perdo · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      It is a good thing you qualified that with per "clock cycle".

      You know I would have stepped up to bat to point out that you have made sacrifices for mac that Apple is collecting.

      I've collected a few more benchmarks if you care for another go.

      --

      If voting were effective, it would be illegal by now.

    8. Re:Good Riddance... by BitGeek · · Score: 1, Flamebait


      Oh, like the RC5 cracking that showed 800MHz powerPCs almost twice as fast as 2.8GHz x86s?

      No, I'm not interested in discussing this with you. This is the kind of "I think I know what I'm talking about" pseudo-techie junk I was ranting against.

      AS to collecting sacrifices, if you're referring to the quoe stuffed in my bio (for handy access) there is a critical distinction: I did business with Apple out of free choice, after rationally evaluating all the options. I did not do it out of some sense of collective obligation. (IF you weren't referring to it, then I don't know what you're talking about. I got the best deal out there, and I'm surprised that people will get emotionally invested in bad money decisions.)

      --
      Yeah, and you guys panned the ipod too: http://apple.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/10/23/ 1816257
    9. Re:Good Riddance... by DF5JT · · Score: 1

      " It is a good thing you qualified that with per "clock cycle". You know I would have stepped up to bat to point out that you have made sacrifices for mac that Apple is collecting." Hint: Apple is not what techies have in mind when they talk PowerPC.

    10. Re:Good Riddance... by Perdo · · Score: 2

      Read some of BitGeeks posts. He was talking about Apple PPC. He is the non-techie with a bitgeek@mac.com address.

      --

      If voting were effective, it would be illegal by now.

    11. Re:Good Riddance... by heikkile · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Basically, Real Engineers are sticking around for the long haul. We were here before the boom and we will be here afterwards [...] People "burned out by tech jobs" are people who got into "tech jobs" because it was hot.

      Not me! I have been in the business since 1975, and I have been "burned out" several times since. I have not left the field, but I have left a number of bad companies behind me.

      Unless you are a real technophobe, I fail to see how the tech in itself would make you burn out. Much more likely people burn out because of stress, unreasobale expectations, and bad management.

      Stress and bad management may be unusually common among tech jobs, but they certainly exist in all walks of life.

      --

      In Murphy We Turst

    12. Re:Good Riddance... by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 2

      Blah. You shouldn't have even responded. I'm cringing now, just thinking about what it would be like trying to explain what a register is, or how the PPC has 4 times as many of them (general purpose).

      And if you pointed out how even a compiler that optimizes poorly still sees big advantages from this, he'd probably look at you condescendingly and chuckle, only to claim it's impossible, because VB can't generate code for the Motorola chip.

    13. Re:Good Riddance... by dthable · · Score: 1

      but there is a VB for Macs and somewhere in the world another engineer sheds a tear....

    14. Re:Good Riddance... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, these people exist, but as a rule they don't Ask Slashdot to see if they are making the right decision

      No, we don't.
    15. Re:Good Riddance... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      I love the tech part of my job. The reason I would think about going into a different field is because I am tired of dealing with 40 year old tax dodging peices of shit that still live at home with there moms and rock themselves like monkeys in psyc experiments that were given the wire mother.

      I am sick of people not bathing, brushing their teeth. I am sick of them farting all of the time. Hell one time a co-worker almost puked on me( I had to jump out of the way ) we had just gone out for indian food and I thought it might have been to spicy for him. I asked "are you o.k.?" he says it was a buffet I just ate to much.

      I worked with a guy who rubbed boogers all over his cube. I worked with ... I could go on. All of the stereotypes are true - everywhere I worked. These guys were all good programmers. As long as teh project was small enough that you did not have to colaberate.

      Hell I am a geek, but I am having a hard time dealing with the other geeks.

    16. Re:Good Riddance... by MagnetarJones · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually he is NOT being too harsh.

      Yes people can change their minds and move on to something else, but what BitGeek is trying to say is that the real "techies" spend too much time (investing in their future) learning about technology and new things, that moving on is NOT an option.

      My wife doesn't understand why I come home from work and immediately jump on a computer and then spend another couple of hours (outside of work) on it.

      Its a full time job - outside of your full time job - to stay proficient in this industry.

      --


      Signus X-1
    17. Re:Good Riddance... by tzanger · · Score: 5, Insightful

      People "burned out by tech jobs" are people who got into "tech jobs" because it was hot.

      You must be a bazillionaire, you can read people's minds so well.

      I've been in tech for probably 10-12 years now. Hardware, Software, Firmware... design, research, you name it. I'm considering leaving the tech industry. Why? I want some more people contact, frankly.

      It didn't make itself known back then. Hacking away for all hours, tweaking this and that, learning the ins and outs of anything I could get my hands on... that's all I wanted. Now that I've had a taste for sales support (i.e. field applications engineering) I'm thinking that that is where my future lies. Going places, talking to people, solving problems, applying my knowledge -- not sticking around in a room and designing widgets, living like some lab rat and never seeing what impact what I make has on the world around me. I've been there and done that, and I want some more interaction. Maybe I'll keep my hardcore tech lust for my own projects now, which may make it fun again.

      So because I want to do this, leave the hardcore tech industry, I am suddenly incompetent? Only there because it was cool at the time? Leaving because the party's over? I think you've overinflated your cranial cavity. Not everything happens the way you expect it to, and not everything happens because of how you claim it to.

    18. Re:Good Riddance... by tzanger · · Score: 5, Insightful

      My wife doesn't understand why I come home from work and immediately jump on a computer and then spend another couple of hours (outside of work) on it.

      And you know what, my wife asks the same thing. I gave the same excuses. Now (with 3 kids) I see her point. What the fuck good is keeping that honed, that general a knowledge at the risk of losing your family, friends and life?

      I spent a good portion of my youth and young adult years learning this shit inside and out, backward, frontward and sideways. There's things I haven't touched on in ages but give me an hour and I'll be in the 95th percentile on proficiency. When it comes to computing, electronics and software things just do not change that much. You got 'em down once, you'll get them down much more quickly the second time. There's no need to spend 10 hours at work and another 5 or 6 at home on it.

      personally I've got it down to about 8 at work and 2 or 3 at home, and planning on getting it down further yet.

    19. Re:Good Riddance... by rf600r · · Score: 1

      REAL engineers are actually people who have a degree in Engineering. The rest of us just stole that title.

    20. Re:Good Riddance... by theinfobox · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I agree with some of what you say. I also know many people who jumped into tech just for the cash. I know a few that don't have home computers and many who have only one. Then they come to my house and are bewildered as to why I have 15 computers in my office... and the OSes range from Amiga to Windows XP (yes, including Linux and more).

      I thrive on tech. I love it. I always told my friends that were making half as much as me in other jobs that I was just lucky that what I love happened to pay very well.

      I will never let tech out of my life. But I am tired of the current environment. I currently have a job which would be great if not for the jerks in management. Before they were bad, but know they think they can demand anything because us techies have no where to go. This is of course in Silicon Valley which has been really hit hard by the dot com bust.

      And they are right... I would love to quit and find another job, but the market sucks. Everyone wants the exact requirements of the job to be matched by your resume. I am at the point in my career where I can pick up any piece of software/hardware or whatever and be proficient with it in a couple of days. And of course... Now everyone wants you to have a degree. They don't care that I have been programming and building computers/networks since I was 7 years old(back in 1978).

      I thought I could enhance my resume by picking up certifications or completing my degree on line, but that sucks when you work 60-85 hours in a week and then have a family. I was learning at work, but now they seem to find more crap jobs. (Like clean up the IT storage room).

      So am I ready to leave tech... NO. But do I feel I might have to... YES. I think of it this way... it will be like a sabbatical. I will get out of the industry during this crap, but still get paid enough to at least put a roof over my kid's head and food on the table.

      The problem is I don't know what else to do besides tech. It is all I have ever done and the only thing I really like. I am hoping to come up with another career that I could possible involve computers in. I also thought about trying the consulting business, but that is probably a worse situation than what I am in.

      So I go back to my original question... What other careers might be suited to an ex-techie? Any ideas?

    21. Re:Good Riddance... by MagnetarJones · · Score: 1

      I was just making a general statement - I believe you need to spend an amount of time outside of work (whenever possible) to brush-up or do research, etc.

      I usually get home from work, check my e-mail, hang out with the family for a couple of hours and then later (after everyone is in bed) I get back on the computer. I usually only get 5 hours sleep a night.

      Family first, career second...

      --


      Signus X-1
    22. Re:Good Riddance... by checkyoulater · · Score: 2, Informative

      People who sincerely wanted to be tech workers (and I know some myself) but who are having trouble becoming engineers

      Why do you throw around the word engineer so much? You are using that term out of context. Are you saying that a highly skilled tech person automatically becomes an engineer? I know of many people who will disagree with you.

      Last I checked, to be an "Engineer", you need to be accredited as such from a recognized institution. By recognized I of course mean a respected university, not a technical certification.

      --
      Is that a real poncho? I mean, is that a Mexican poncho or is that a Sears poncho?
    23. Re:Good Riddance... by pthisis · · Score: 2

      IF you aren't a real engineer-- and by real engineer, I mean someone who learns new technologies in their spare time, someone who wouldn't be cought dead without a computer at home

      That's BS. A lot of good programmers I know don't have computers at home, intentionally. It's a matter of getting balance in your life. Mine serves only as a centralized Vorbis repository and music visualization center. I write TCP servers and search indexing programs for a living and sit in front of a computer more than 8 hours a day. I'm more than happy to _not_ do the same at home. Once in a great while I get an off week at work where I'm stuck in pure maintenance hell or other non-learning positions and I'll dust off the keyboard at home and write some code, but for the most part I'm pretty happy to leave that to work and limit my home involvement to the odd tech book and the whiteboard.

      Overrated: How abusive moderators avoid getting caught in metamoderation.

      No, it's how moderators work around the fact that there's no "Incorrect" or "Misinformative" category.

      Sumner

      --
      rage, rage against the dying of the light
    24. Re:Good Riddance... by krizerry · · Score: 1

      I'd consider leaving the tech industry because of the insane amount of inconsiderate people in it. Case-in-point, this discussion thread. It's sad to see that people get flamed on a board for posting their own opinion, and state that it's going to happen in the first sentence of their post.

      "Don't know if I'll get applauded or flamed for this but oh well."

      Come on people, grab some maturity and kindness for a change.

      -Kerry
    25. Re:Good Riddance... by chez69 · · Score: 0

      Geez, When I get home, there are many times I don't want to be near a computer. There is a hell of a lot more to life then your job and the damn computer.

      And Yes, I am a programmer.

      --
      PHP is the solution of choice for relaying mysql errors to web users.
    26. Re:Good Riddance... by Telastyn · · Score: 2

      Odd... see, I'm not terribly social, and have very little desire to be social. Understanding this I'm with a girl with similar social aspirations. We both come home from work and spend 3-4 hours on our home machines.

      It isn't gaining proficiency as much as doing what one enjoys.

    27. Re:Good Riddance... by BitGeek · · Score: 2

      Last I checked, to be an "Engineer", you need to be accredited as such from a recognized institution. By recognized I of course mean a respected university, not a technical certification.

      Now that is misusing the world.

      Quoth Dictionary.com:
      engineer n.
      1. One who is trained or professionally engaged in a branch of engineering.
      2. One who operates an engine.
      3. One who skillfully or shrewdly manages an enterprise.

      Nothing says there that one has to join your little club or guild to call themselves an engineer.

      --
      Yeah, and you guys panned the ipod too: http://apple.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/10/23/ 1816257
    28. Re:Good Riddance... by llamalicious · · Score: 2

      I'm sorry, did you even READ Magnetars' entry before you posted...? He said "a couple hours."
      You state you spend 2-3 (and are working on lowering it.)

      All MJ stated was that many people ("Real Engineers" as far as bitgeek's concerned) have a vested interest in their industry. They just jump on the dotcom bandwagon just for the ride, they're in it because its:

      1. What they like to do and are interested in.
      2. What they chose as their career.
      3. What they were doing before the dotcom boom even occurred.

      They're more likely to be around right through the ups and downs of the industry, and won't be jumping ship like a rat.

      MJ just happened to mention that his wife has a tough time with the concept of getting back on the computer when he just spent a workday on it.
      My wife wonders the same thing, sometimes, but she does the same thing in her industry, and she understands.

      It's amazing that you make a (somewhat) personal affront about losing family and friends due to time spent in front of a computer, while going on to state you _still_ do the same thing, come on, get a fucking life. I'm still not sure how your troll of a post managed a 5-insightful.

      While you're right, it's not worth it to be glued to your computer for hours on end when you've got family to attend to, a couple hours after work isn't hurting anyone (did Magnetar even state that he was having problems because of it? Nope.)

    29. Re:Good Riddance... by BitGeek · · Score: 2


      Why is it people seem to think you have to choose between "Family" and "Career"? And often they are pooh-poohing achievement because it means you "neglected your family". WTF? Where does that come from?

      We have no problem working non-stop 3 or 4 months, until a project is finished. When it is, we take off out of town for a weekend, or go out on the boat. My partner is happy, and I don't buy this argument that by working I'm neglecting my family-- they certainly are working as well.

      I think there's a general agenda that downplays achievement. As if non-achievement is superior-- yes, its better to be a slacker. Cause this idea that you can't be successful AND spend quality time with your family is just bullshit.

      You know, sometimes "The good things in life" really are ENGINEERING ACHIEVEMENTS. Not going out and communing with nature, though I do that as well.

      Any friend who leaves you because you work to much is not a friend.

      --
      Yeah, and you guys panned the ipod too: http://apple.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/10/23/ 1816257
    30. Re:Good Riddance... by BitGeek · · Score: 2

      There is a hell of a lot more to life then your job

      See, if you really were a programmer, you wouldn't think of it as a job-- it would be your hobby as well. By programmer, I mean a programmer by spirit, by trade, by genes. I don't mean someone who calculated a lucurative career doing something they can do so-so but it will always just be a "job" to them.

      Sure there are times you don't want ot be near a computer... true for everyone. But to pooh-pooh people who spend their off hours programming (for the fun of it) and to say there is more to life-- as if they were missing out on it-- tells me you're not a programmer.

      --
      Yeah, and you guys panned the ipod too: http://apple.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/10/23/ 1816257
    31. Re:Good Riddance... by checkyoulater · · Score: 1

      Nothing says there that one has to join your little club or guild to call themselves an engineer.

      All right then. Write down on your resume that you are an engineer. Then apply for a job which requires you to be a professional mechanical engineer. Then explain to the interviewer why you think you are qualified to do that job.

      I can't believe you are trivializing the significance of university-educated engineers.

      --
      Is that a real poncho? I mean, is that a Mexican poncho or is that a Sears poncho?
    32. Re:Good Riddance... by BitGeek · · Score: 2

      I don't see how being a sales support person or engineering support person is leaving the tech industry.

      Obviously, you are not who I was talking about. You enjoy engineering, and you don't seem to want to leave the industry to boot.

      --
      Yeah, and you guys panned the ipod too: http://apple.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/10/23/ 1816257
    33. Re:Good Riddance... by BitGeek · · Score: 2


      Your problem is that you can't find a decent company to work for. You're spending too much time with blown dry idiots (by definition anyone who ignores 30 years of engineering because you don't have 4 years of college is a baffoon.)

      I think the solution to this is to form a company. You live in the vally- last time I was there you coldn't cough without running into 4 guys who wanted to start a business. NOW IS THE TIME. Resources are cheap, and hopefully you've learned from the mistakes of the dotcoms.

      It doesn't sound like you really want to stop being an engineer. It sounds like you really just don't like your job and are having trouble finding a good one.

      I can understand that. Personally, I will stay unemployed or turn down jobs with companies that don't meet my expectations-- even in this environment. Life is too short to work for a someplace like amazon.com.

      But it also sounds like working for tech companies, rather than the tech industry is the issue. Maybe working for an insurance company or a major auto parts dealership would be a better environment for you-- all these industries need programmers.

      --
      Yeah, and you guys panned the ipod too: http://apple.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/10/23/ 1816257
    34. Re:Good Riddance... by BitGeek · · Score: 2

      That's BS. A lot of good programmers I know don't have computers at home, intentionally.

      Apparently you have a computer at home.

      No, this isn't BS. Its a stone cold truism. And person calling themselves a programmer who has been employed for more than 3 months who does not have a computer at home, should not be hired.

      They are in it for the money and their code will likely suck. When there are lots of great programmers out there, why hire a poser who is looking for easy cash?

      I never said you had to use your computer all the time at home. Nothing about having a computer throws your life out of balance. But someone who calls themselves a programmer and NEVER FINDS A NEED TO USE A COMPUTER AT HOME. No, they are not a programmer. Dusty- fine. Rather old computer- fine. USed for games- Fine. Spend your weekends sailing- fine, I do too. But to not have ever bought one, or to think that by not having a computer you're somehow adding balance to your life? Bullshit.

      And any programmer who admits it is someone without at least the judgment to know that he's telling everyone he doesn't really like to program and isn't going to have any interest in it when he isn't getting paid. He's telling everyone that not only is he just after easy money, but that he's probably doing a poor job of it as well.

      --
      Yeah, and you guys panned the ipod too: http://apple.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/10/23/ 1816257
    35. Re:Good Riddance... by BitGeek · · Score: 2

      everywhere I worked

      Interestingly enough the behaviour you describe seems to be manifested in low skill dos and windows programmers, not in engineers or people with high engineering skill.

      In my epxerience, people who knew high level languages might periodically suffer from one issue or another, but never suffer from a lot of them.

      Low level windows "programmers"- say someone who only knows visual basic-- seem to fit the description you gave.

      Certainly not what I've seen at "every company". I think you need to find a better class of company.

      AS to tax dodging, I say more power too them. I do everything legal I can to dodge taxes-- after all %90 of the money is wasted.

      --
      Yeah, and you guys panned the ipod too: http://apple.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/10/23/ 1816257
    36. Re:Good Riddance... by BitGeek · · Score: 2


      I hear people who wasted four years and $40,000 or more saying that a lot.

      But Dictionary.com disagrees with them.

      Since a degree in engineering says nothing about what your skill level is, and lacking one certainly doesn't, then it is irrelevant to whether someone can call themselves an engineer.

      I've taught people with engineering degrees a thing or two many times over the years, and they've taught me things they picked up because they had a good prof.

      But to say they are a "Real engineer" and I'm not is idiotic-- especially since the ones just out of school are about half as capable as I am.

      --
      Yeah, and you guys panned the ipod too: http://apple.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/10/23/ 1816257
    37. Re:Good Riddance... by BitGeek · · Score: 1, Flamebait


      Someone who posts an email address in the clear is the lowest form of scum.

      you attack my skills - nevermind that you've never been able to back up your positions with facts- and then post my email address in the clear?

      When I find yours, I'll be sure to route all my spam your way, pussy.

      --
      Yeah, and you guys panned the ipod too: http://apple.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/10/23/ 1816257
    38. Re:Good Riddance... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure, just after you stop trivializing real-world experience and raw personal talent and desire.

    39. Re:Good Riddance... by Perdo · · Score: 2

      your bitgeek@mac.com address is in the clear in 90 kuro5hin posts, 300 usenetposts, 650 slashdot posts, some domesteading posts, queerit, various seattle goth pages and slashdot meetup seattle.

      Jesus, man. Don't let it all hang out there and then act like an asshole. The way you talk to people, you will be lucky to not have someone beat you with a baseball bat at the slashdot meetup. Not because you are gay and use macs, but because you are an asshole.

      Don't place your ego so close to your position that when your position goes, your ego goes with it.

      Be nice on slashdot or don't participate. You have never written a post that was not in some way abusive. You are consistently abusive.

      No one likes to hear that. Maybe you'll change. Maybe you'll just get madder without ever evaluating yourself.

      In a public, face to face forum, you would not say the things you do. Why say it here?

      --

      If voting were effective, it would be illegal by now.

    40. Re:Good Riddance... by BitGeek · · Score: 2



      Lets see, he called me an ass. And then he says he doesn't know if he'll get flamed or not.

      I respond by ignoring that he called me an ass and explaining my position further. I did not flame him, did not call him names, did not criticize him and I couched my words with terms like "maybe".

      Yeah, my initial post was a rant-- "posting their own opinion" as you described it, and I have been flamed. But other than Perdo who posted my email address in the clear, people have been generally mature.

      --
      Yeah, and you guys panned the ipod too: http://apple.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/10/23/ 1816257
    41. Re:Good Riddance... by NoBeardPete · · Score: 5, Insightful


      You seem to be assuming that the only reason one would have for not having a computer at home is that they don't like computers, or doesn't like to program. This is incorrect.


      I don't have a computer at home, nor a TV for that matter. The problem isn't that I dislike these things, it's actually quite the opposite. I find when I have access to a computer, all I will do is sit in front of the computer. Taking the larger view of my life, I don't want to sit in front of a computer all the time. A convenient way to do this is to not bother buying a computer for my home.


      My not having a computer at home may not add balance to my life, per se, but it sure does make it easier for me to live a balanced life. It makes it harder for me to loose track of time and blow a whole evening. It makes it easier for me to do a wider variety of the stuff I'd like to do, instead of doing a whole lot of just one thing.


      You seem to be claiming that no one who really likes technology or computers could possibly burn out on them. Consider that perhaps some people are burning out not because of the actual tech, but because of the blowhards like yourself that infest the field.

      --
      Arrr, it be the infamous pirate, No Beard Pete!
    42. Re:Good Riddance... by tzanger · · Score: 2

      It's amazing that you make a (somewhat) personal affront about losing family and friends due to time spent in front of a computer, while going on to state you _still_ do the same thing, come on, get a fucking life. I'm still not sure how your troll of a post managed a 5-insightful.

      Perhaps because I wasn't tripping over myself, trying to prove how fuckwitted the guy I was responding to was? I mean seriously did you read my post before tagging me a foe and replying?

      I said nothing about losing family/friends due to spending time in front of the computer -- I said that spending most of your waking hours honing your career doesn't do a whole fuck of a lot of good for your social life. To some, that doesn't mean shit and that's fine -- it doesn't make my point any less correct.

      While you're right, it's not worth it to be glued to your computer for hours on end when you've got family to attend to, a couple hours after work isn't hurting anyone (did Magnetar even state that he was having problems because of it? Nope.)

      No, but he did state "Its a full time job - outside of your full time job - to stay proficient in this industry." -- sounds like it's more than a "couple hours after work" to me.

      The whole gist of my reply to him was to refute that a) it's a full time job to keep up on the tech and that b) the original poster WAS being too harsh.

      I didn't claim that spending a couple hours on the computer after work would ruin your life. Don't put words in my mouth.

    43. Re:Good Riddance... by tzanger · · Score: 2

      Why is it people seem to think you have to choose between "Family" and "Career"? And often they are pooh-poohing achievement because it means you "neglected your family". WTF? Where does that come from?

      <blink> I stated any of those things? Are you reading the same comment that I wrote?

      We have no problem working non-stop 3 or 4 months, until a project is finished. When it is, we take off out of town for a weekend, or go out on the boat. My partner is happy, and I don't buy this argument that by working I'm neglecting my family-- they certainly are working as well.

      Well Bully for you. You've found something that works. I don't recall saying anything to that effect was impossible.

      Cause this idea that you can't be successful AND spend quality time with your family is just bullshit.

      Being successful does not mean spending 2/3 of your day in your career. Personally I plan on working under 30 hours a week and being successful. It takes some upfront work though, and I've got most of that done.

      You know, sometimes "The good things in life" really are ENGINEERING ACHIEVEMENTS.

      Amen -- I agree with you. But not all good things in life (which admittedly you are not stating).

      Any friend who leaves you because you work to much is not a friend.

      By the same token, any friend who works too much can't be much of a friend. I mean realistically where is the time to be friends?

    44. Re:Good Riddance... by tzanger · · Score: 2

      I don't see how being a sales support person or engineering support person is leaving the tech industry.

      Perhaps it's a perception -- I've always been into hardcore engineering -- systems design, reverse engineering, research. Moving towards FAE is kind of a big jump in that context. :-)

    45. Re:Good Riddance... by ScourgeOfGod · · Score: 1

      I agree that we would be better off without those who entered the field because they thought they could make a quick buck.

      You say that 'Real Engineers' are 'sticking around for the long haul.' Who elected you spokesman? How do you know? You can love technology and chose to do non-technical work for a variety of reasons, mostly having to do with paying the bills. There are fewer jobs than job seekers and the person doing the hiring is as likely to be an MBA with a hairdo than someone with a clue as to who is competent. Your analysis seems to suggest that Economics has no bearing on decisions related to technology and in that regard you may be closer to the dot-bomb biz-dev twinks than you care to admit.

      --
      If you're happy and you know it, think again!
    46. Re:Good Riddance... by BitGeek · · Score: 2


      Why would I want a mechanical engineering job? I'm a programmer.

      I don't put the word engineer on my resume-- my resume is full of accomplishments, kudos and experience. It doesn't have any lables except for the job titles I've had.

      Course I could change "Director of Research and Development" to "Chief Engineer" and then I'd have the word engineer on my resume, but I don't see the point.

      I am not trivializing the education people get when they get it. I'm merely pointing out that many colleges do a poor job of educating.. and that there is nothing that says that engineers who learned their job in the trade are not real engineers.

      --
      Yeah, and you guys panned the ipod too: http://apple.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/10/23/ 1816257
    47. Re:Good Riddance... by BitGeek · · Score: 2


      Oh, that's great. I'm causing your burnout.

      Whatever.

      The point is, people who don't learn technology in their spare time-- especially those who are proud of the fact that they don't-- are often correlated with those who jumped onto the tech bandwagon because the money seemed easy, and of course now that the money is hard, they are looking for a way out.

      --
      Yeah, and you guys panned the ipod too: http://apple.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/10/23/ 1816257
    48. Re:Good Riddance... by BitGeek · · Score: 2


      Actually, I'm not abusive. I'm just opinionated, and some people-- such as yourself- can't stand to hear someone with self confidence express their opinions.

      Sheesh.

      --
      Yeah, and you guys panned the ipod too: http://apple.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/10/23/ 1816257
    49. Re:Good Riddance... by BitGeek · · Score: 2

      By the same token, any friend who works too much can't be much of a friend. I mean realistically where is the time to be friends?

      That's why god created weekends.

      --
      Yeah, and you guys panned the ipod too: http://apple.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/10/23/ 1816257
    50. Re:Good Riddance... by BitGeek · · Score: 2


      Actually good economics is why the real engineers are sticking around. That was part of my point.

      The tech industry did not end when flooz went out of business.

      --
      Yeah, and you guys panned the ipod too: http://apple.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/10/23/ 1816257
    51. Re:Good Riddance... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I don't call using the law to your benefit tax dodging. This guy just does not file and takes 6 or 7 exemptions. He has been doing it for years. I makes it hard for me to justify paying my taxes when they don't come after him.

      As for the guys that have issues. They are all pretty good( not vb turds ). They just seem like the kind of people who got into tech to avoid human interaction and it shows. The thing is you can work with 10 great people, but if 3 are booger collectors it kills the whole experience.

    52. Re:Good Riddance... by 198348726583297634 · · Score: 1

      heh.. there is another alternative - that people can just decide to do something different with their lives.

      Hey, original poster, try this: become an apprentice cabinet-maker to start to learn a trade, then learn to build things, and then go into artistic woodworking. Decent money, and at the end of the day you've really built something. People will appreciate the things you've built, and some may keep them around for generations if they're good.

      Or try music - learn an instrument, dedicate yourself to it, and in a few years you'll be able to start gigging for cash. Later you can give lessons for more cash.

      Other career options - law enforcement. Turns out, despite what many people on the internet say, that most cops really are decent people and really believe that they're doing good. (And you know what? most people would say that cops _are_ doing good.)

      Social work? Do you like people?

    53. Re:Good Riddance... by ukyoCE · · Score: 2

      I agree with you 100%. You can see it really easily at colleges. At my college the intro level courses are HUGE, and there are almost as many hot girls as there are geeky looking guys.

      I don't mean to say that girls can't do tech jobs, and would love nothing more to see a bunch of hot girl geeks who know their way around a computer...but my point is there are a lot of boys and girls who have no genuine interest in computers, but are trying to go into computer science for the money.

      They drop like flies, however, past the first "programming syntax" course. I think the figure quoted was something like 65% drop out at the first 2000-level course. And that was before the huge influx of dot-com-wannabees.

      Then again, we're probably just jealous that a bunch of "normal" people, who had all the things we didn't (friends, popularity, no acne, etc.) are trying to take over the one thing we take the most pride in (brains+computers). So of course we're now rubbing it in their faces as they retreat, confirming that we are indeed "superior" to them, at least in some way.

    54. Re:Good Riddance... by El_Nofx · · Score: 2

      Ohh man, tell me about it, I went to a junior college for a CIS degree, there were 50 people in that program, only 10 could format a harddrive and by the time it was all said and done only 3 of us knew what was going on. It was really sad.

      I transfered to NDSU and I don't see that so much here, maybe a little in EE, there are designated weeder coursed in that major , like logic design and entry level programming. Most people decide they want to be accountants after taking Digital Systems and getting an F. Hehe

      --
      It's not the OS it's the user that sucks. If it's user friendly, you get stupider people. - clinko
    55. Re:Good Riddance... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >>>What the fuck good is keeping that honed, that general a knowledge at the risk of losing your family, friends and life?
      >>>

      Ummm.. I don't have any family, friends or life. If I am not hacking away on one of my computers I am at work or asleep.

    56. Re:Good Riddance... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You dumb shidiot. A mechanical engineer wouldn't have a clue about software engineering, and a train operator wouldn't know the first thing about netware.

      It's just a generic term for 'skilled technician'.

    57. Re:Good Riddance... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I also worked at AT and I do remember that guy! He couldn't keep his finger out of there! When I first started I was in his cube and reached over to move his mouse. My hand returned with a souvineer.

    58. Re:Good Riddance... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All right I take back some of the things I said. You are alright.

    59. Re:Good Riddance... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So because I want to do this, leave the hardcore tech industry, I am suddenly incompetent?
      Yes, moron!

    60. Re:Good Riddance... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      In your original post, you pretended to be an engineer. Now it turns out you're just a programmer.

      Thats the same thing as a MCSE pretending to be an engineer.

      You'll be out of a job in less than a year.

  5. Powweb is better than WazooWeb. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Powweb is better than WazooWeb.

  6. Wow, you're an ass (Re:Good Riddance...) by matt_maggard · · Score: 3, Insightful


    Don't know if I'll get applauded or flamed for this but oh well.

    I have no doubt that your are a bigger "techie" than me. I have never hand built a computer, I didn't learn to code anything in grade school and I've never had anything to do with a railgun. I do however enjoy the things that computers help me accomplish. That's why I'm a graphic designer (and html programmer -a not always easy job that is not very respected around here). I moved into tech because the idea of interactive and functional design appealed to me a lot more than static pretty pictures in a magazine or on the side of a box.

    But you know what? This industry drove the joy of design out of me. I'm sick of the mess that every project becomes. I'm sick of rushing through everything to get it out the door. I'm sick of political in-fighting between departments.

    I'm hoping that this 'tech" guy can leave the industry behind and let me start enjoying design work that I do for my own fulfillment. In my opinion, the tech industry takes a lot more out of you than it gives back.

    Whoever said that you should turn your hobby into a career should be shot. All that does is turn your hobby into work and all that entails (manager, deadlines, 8 hours a day of your "hobby"). I'd prefer my hobbies to stay enjoyable.

    As for what I'm turning to, teaching. I'm going back to school for my teaching certificate so I can teach graphic design and adobe apps to high school kids. Maybe a little down tha line, a law degree or my own (non-design) business.

    -matt

    1. Re:Wow, you're an ass (Re:Good Riddance...) by BitGeek · · Score: 4, Insightful


      It's certainly not about knowing more than you. There are people who know more than me. People I went to high school with who now have doctorates from MIT and design systems far above my ability.

      I suspect you're going to be in for a rude awakening when you start teaching and you find it is more of a joyless grind than tech jobs. Teaching is fraught with politics, and by definition, is an environment suffering from an unresponsive, oppressive, CYA style bureaucracy which insures that all the money stays at the top in overhead and none of the joy gets down to the teachers. (which is the case for all taxpayer , rather than customer, funded organizations.) There's no incentive in it- lots of people don't have more valuable (as in economically) skills than to teach and so there are lots of teachers to grind thru.

      Its like nursing. A very important job but they waste nurses- they use them up and throw them away.

      The tech industry is not going away. It is not dying or shrinking. What we've seen is a slowdown in GROWTH. It will continue to grow and it will grow faster in the future. You're a creative person, learn java. Its the nature of reality that some ways of expressing yourself are more profitable than others. Painting is profitable for very few, java is profitable for far more, and the gap will get wider, not smaller.

      Deadlines and 8 hour days are the nature of business. Politics is the nature of people. You're going to find those anywhere that people actually expect you to be productive for some business purpose (including teaching.)

      You may be one of the people I was ranting about if you got into the tech industry because you thought you'd get easy money for your hobby. But I got no beef with you if you recognize the economic realities and learn the skills necessary to be viable, whatever those are for you. They may merely be how to cope with a deadline driven environment and 8 hour days, while still providing high quality results.

      Or how to find companies that will provide an environment that allows that.

      With any job you're going to get out of it something akin to what you put into it. Its not the industry that takes more out of you than it gives... it could be poor choice of companies, or non-investment in yourself that caused that.

      --
      Yeah, and you guys panned the ipod too: http://apple.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/10/23/ 1816257
    2. Re:Wow, you're an ass (Re:Good Riddance...) by tzanger · · Score: 2

      Whoever said that you should turn your hobby into a career should be shot. All that does is turn your hobby into work and all that entails (manager, deadlines, 8 hours a day of your "hobby"). I'd prefer my hobbies to stay enjoyable.

      +5 Insightful

      *clap*clap*clap*clap*clap*clap*clap*clap* Amen, brother. I wished I have learned that 8 years ago.

    3. Re:Wow, you're an ass (Re:Good Riddance...) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Its like nursing. A very important job but they waste nurses- they use them up and throw them away.


      I take it you, dear poster, have not observed the nursing field in the past 5-8 years. In some areas, nurses are getting $15k signing bonuses and reasonable pay. Supply and demand -- supply is short since nursing has some undesirable aspects, demand is only increasing with the aging boomer populace. Nursing's not as hot as tech was in the late gay 90's yet, but it's only going to get hotter.

      Despite the current theme in this thread which I summarize as "denigrate the people who are considering a change in careers since obviously they only got into it during the bubble ... they are manly tech's", there are valid reasons to leave the tech sector. Here's one for your consideration. Take some AC (me?) who has a doctoral degree in a pure science. Many pure science people can kick most pure techie peoples' butts at tech things because: 1) the pure techie loves technology for technology's sake and they often get side tracked into figuring out how to use the latest and greatest and 2) the pure science people learn computing as an occupational hazard and as a result program to get things done. I jumped into the tech fray for a few years to help me finish mastering some aspects of large sw project organization and it didn't hurt to make some $$$ for a few years. Sure I made good money but about a year and a half ago it was time to get back to doing more pure science. According to you the tech industry is better off without me, that makes me wonder why I get phone calls every couple of months from my tech sector employer asking me to come back. Face it, for most tech jobs it amounts to just pushing bits which ain't all that exciting as a long term career path.

    4. Re:Wow, you're an ass (Re:Good Riddance...) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Many musicians wish the same thing.

  7. I like making pizza. by qurob · · Score: 2, Funny


    You end up smelling like pizza, but it's an easy job, and you get to eat a lot of pizza. 'Managers' only make $10 an hour but it's better than a lot of other jobs. Besides, it factors 'food' right out of your monthly expenses.

    1. Re:I like making pizza. by deetintx · · Score: 1

      With a diet like this don't forget to factor in health problems.

    2. Re:I like making pizza. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must be one fat bitch if you're eating pizza every day... damn.

  8. My Retirement Plan by Zarf · · Score: 3, Interesting

    For retirement I plan on being a crotchety old geek that teaches mathematics and computer programming in a community college somewhere nice. I figure it would be good to teach night courses since I hate mornings and I would be giving real world experience and direction to kids and young adults who really need it.

    If tech doesn't work out in the near term, I'm planning on trying to "retire early" and getting a teaching certificate. Most fun I ever had was teaching a College level Programming class to freshmen. I might not get the college freshmen with a certificate but maybe I could get the High School seniors?

    --
    [signature]
    1. Re:My Retirement Plan by FortKnox · · Score: 1

      Ditto here. Although I may start teaching night school in community college soon, and when I retire I'd like to be a math/physics/computer teacher in a local high school.

      --
      Good quote, too many chars. Seriously, the slashdot 120 char limit sucks!
  9. So what you're saying by partingshot · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    So you're saying that you can't have a life and be a programmer at the same time? Do you really think that's true, and how long do you think you can continue to hold two full time jobs (as you put it)?

    --
    Anonymous posts are filtered.
  10. Ebb and flow of tech workers by AtariDatacenter · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I kind of think along the lines of BitGeek (above). Over a decade ago, my area of the country was flooded with unemployeed workers from the oil industry. They were doing the same things... getting jobs at Sears, etc. But for the most part, it wasn't your more skilled petroleum engineers who delivered results that were placed on the sidelines.

    There WERE a lot of marginal hacks that were hired over the past few years and tried to pass themselves off as computer professionals. For the most part, you're seeing them as the ones losing their jobs, and having trouble finding new ones. "You can't do that to me! I am an Internet Professional!!!" (For some reason, I'm reminded of a scene from the Internet personality Ben Brown here.)Your better employees aren't having as much problem.

    And people who are hiring right now know that the market is flooded with B-list players. They're common, and generally unwanted. It is only a matter of time before they give up and look for jobs elsewhere. Really, this isn't a bad thing.

    1. Re:Ebb and flow of tech workers by BitGeek · · Score: 3, Insightful


      Part of the problem is that to discern a quality engineer from one who is a B-list player, as you put it, exceeds the skills of every HR professional I've ever known.

      Since the HR industry is even more overwhelmingly staffed by b-list people, they are completely unable to tell an engineer from a "Internet Professional" So it is bad for the good people too-- until their resume manages to randomly hit the desk of someone who can tell and engineer from a resume writer, the market is tough.

      But this problem cuts both ways-- if the hiring that was done in the boom had been done correctly in the first place, the hacks wouldn't have gotten hired and the boom probably wouldn't have busted as bad.

      The HR profession is close to cops and lawyers on my list. Not as corrupt and evil, but just as incompetent. (Which is not to say I haven't met competent ones. They are just few and far between.)

      --
      Yeah, and you guys panned the ipod too: http://apple.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/10/23/ 1816257
    2. Re:Ebb and flow of tech workers by coyote-san · · Score: 2

      I've seen the senior developers (10+ years) hit hardest. A lot of good ones were released because their companies collapsed entirely, or at least cut entire projects and divisions, and there just isn't enough new business to fill the leadership roles that senior developers naturally fit into.

      It's easy to say that it should be easy for us to fill more junior roles - just swallow our pride and accept lower pay - but in truth even if we can get past the HR gatekeeper few people are comfortable hiring a senior person for a junior position. The perception is that we're either going to immediately jump to a better job (yeah, we all know how easy it is to find jobs today!) or try to get their job. In fact, if you're worried about keeping your house it doesn't look so bad to just "sit" at a job for a few years while things stabilize both personally and in the industry.

      --
      For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong. -- H L Mencken
  11. Teaching English as a Foreign Language by dazdaz · · Score: 3, Informative

    http://www.tefl.com/
    http://www.teflasia.com/
    ht tp://www.asiatefl.com/

    1. Re:Teaching English as a Foreign Language by StandardDeviant · · Score: 2

      My ex is teaching english in Japan right now and having a blast. Apparently you do have to be really careful which company you go with, she and her best friend have had very good experiences working for AEON. Apparently NOVA sucks.

  12. After we sell the company by pheonix · · Score: 2

    After we sell this company, with any luck, I'll have the money to essentially "retire" at 27 and get a job as a Journeyman Union Electrician here in Detroit. Sparkys are always needed, and I've been doing it as a hobby for some time. I could work light hours (about 20 hours per week) and make reasonable money, enough to live on, so I can save my "sales" money for down the road. That's what I want to do when I grow up. Quite frankly, 10 years in IT is long enough for me :)

  13. Same question by partingshot · · Score: 2

    Again, all of your time is spent on the computer except for "a couple of hours". How long do you expect to be able to keep this up? Why would you want to do something that deprives you of becoming a well rounded person?

    --
    Anonymous posts are filtered.
    1. Re:Same question by MagnetarJones · · Score: 1

      You probably shouldn't assume you know me or what I do - day in and day out - just by a few comments I've posted on this topic.
      Just apply my comments to the original thread and how they relate to that, not how my comments somehow give you a look at my well-roundedness...

      Thanks, its been fun.

      --


      Signus X-1
    2. Re:Same question by BitGeek · · Score: 1

      Why would you want to do something that deprives you of becoming a well rounded person?


      What possible justification can you have for claiming this deprives him of being a well rounded person?

      How in the hell can you say that?

      You have no clue, and you really are speaking out of turn.

      I could say to you-- why do you advocate that people do half assed jobs and spend their time laying around accomplishing nothing?

      But I won't.

      --
      Yeah, and you guys panned the ipod too: http://apple.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/10/23/ 1816257
    3. Re:Same question by llamalicious · · Score: 2

      You mis-read his statement.

      It's "spending a couple hours after work."
      NOT "only having a couple hours left in my day."

    4. Re:Same question by partingshot · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      This is what he said, that's how the hell I can say that:

      "I usually get home from work, check my e-mail, hang out with the family for a couple of hours and then later (after everyone is in bed) I get back on the computer. I usually only get 5 hours sleep a night. "

      "My wife doesn't understand why I come home from work and immediately jump on a computer and then spend another couple of hours (outside of work) on it."

      "Its a full time job - outside of your full time job - to stay proficient in this industry."

      p.s. you're a moron. Come back & I'll smack you around some more.

      --
      Anonymous posts are filtered.
    5. Re:Same question by BitGeek · · Score: 2


      Thats even worse. You're taking one example and claiming its true for the whole world.

      Brilliant.

      --
      Yeah, and you guys panned the ipod too: http://apple.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/10/23/ 1816257
  14. In addition by partingshot · · Score: 2

    You have to pass a test. A respected test, not a technical certification test.

    And you have to have apprenticed for a period of several years under another licensed engineer.

    Programmers are not engineers.

    --
    Anonymous posts are filtered.
    1. Re:In addition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Programmers are not engineers.

      Neither are neurologists. What's your point?

    2. Re:In addition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      umm..you dipshit. i have an Electrical Engineering degree and ive gone thru the IEEE certifications which makes me a real Engineer. and hey .. guess what..i cant find a friggin job. for the last 11 months. and im thinking about shifting to another field after getting my Masters and Bachelors in engineering AND spending over 8 years in the industry.
      - Pissed at Engineering now soon to be ex-engineer.

    3. Re:In addition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      EEs are certified by the state, not IEEE.

      Obviously you can't find a job because you are stupid.

    4. Re:In addition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      neurologists arent proctologists, whats your point?

    5. Re:In addition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lot's of programmers call themselves engineers. Not a lot of neurologists call themselves engineers. Me? I'm a sanitation engineer, but only until I get my ChemE degree.

    6. Re:In addition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IEEE sets the examination asshole. you cant appear for the state examination (which is written by the IEEE BTW) without being an IEEE member and passing thru the IEEE cert process.

  15. Don't forget who you are talking to. by partingshot · · Score: 1

    A lot of script kiddies and other people that have never programmed professionally in their lives.

    --
    Anonymous posts are filtered.
  16. Lighten up by 0x0d0a · · Score: 2

    Actually, an x86 can get *more* work done in a clock cycle than a PPC. Depends on how well the task adapts to each chip's SIMD capabilities, whether or not your chip ends up doing any branch mispredictions, whether you're using data/code that's too large to fit in your PPC's cache but does fit in your Xeon's cache...

    Of course, you don't see *me* calling *you* a poser.

    Lighten up. Even Linus goes on beer hikes.

    1. Re:Lighten up by BitGeek · · Score: 2



      Sure it *can*.

      Who said anything about not going on beer hikes?

      Hell, I was volksmarching in the late 70s and drinking beer afterwards. Nothing like german forests-- they seem to be unique in my experience.

      --
      Yeah, and you guys panned the ipod too: http://apple.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/10/23/ 1816257
  17. Burn-Out by turgid · · Score: 2

    I hear a lot of negative comments from people here saying that you must be some kind of loser to start with, but I disagree strongly.
    It's easy to feel "burned-out" and stressed working for the wrong sort of company i.e. two-bit operations and places where they expect you to do absolutely everything, work in the evenings at home, weekends on unrealistic projects, unrealistic deadlines etc. I've been there myself, and here's what I did.
    My degree is in Astrophysics, but I've been a computer geek since I was 8 years old.
    After my degree I got some losy jobs contracting with some small IT companies that were going no where and burning me out too. So, I exited stage left and got a job as a Reactor Physics Engineer at a nucelar powerstation.
    It was very different. Sensible, intelligent people, realistic deadlines and workload, reasonable pay, long holidays, sensible overtime. I stayed there for nearly 5 years, being trained in all maner of technical subjects (reactor physics theory) right down to occupational safety.
    In the meantime I was running Linux at home, improving my coding, learning C++, etc. Then, when a better job came up at a big computer systems company I was all set.
    I have no regrets at all. It's not just about you, it's about who you're working for.

    1. Re:Burn-Out by BitGeek · · Score: 2


      I can't agree more-- demand that the comapnies you work for be decent. Don't be a petulant irrational child as many engineers are, yet at the same time put up with stuff that you really shouldn't put up with.

      Provide excellence and expect it in return. Be a class act and your employer will know that without treating you like one he'll be likely to loose you.

      Make the deadlines realistic and then deliver on them-- it cuts both ways.

      --
      Yeah, and you guys panned the ipod too: http://apple.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/10/23/ 1816257
  18. Farming? by DamienMcKenna · · Score: 1

    If my tech career bombs out I could always take up my dad's farm :-)

    1. Re:Farming? by mini+me · · Score: 1

      That's what I would do as well...

  19. After tech, my only other interest..... by deetintx · · Score: 1

    p0rn

  20. What are you, 15 or something? by partingshot · · Score: 2

    Soon, you will understand the world of work.

    7-8: get ready for work/ drive to work
    8-5: work
    5-7: drive home/ eat
    7-9: "hang out with the family for a couple of hours"
    9-2: "get back on the computer"

    "I usually only get 5 hours sleep a night"

    --
    Anonymous posts are filtered.
    1. Re:What are you, 15 or something? by llamalicious · · Score: 2

      How did you know?

  21. whoa by sulli · · Score: 3, Funny
    you've got some attitude there, my friend.

    What were you doing sticking around trying to get our jobs anyway?

    Sounds like a Teamster pissed at the non-union competition. Who made you the one to say whose jobs they are? If someone wants to work in tech, great, let 'em. If you're more qualified, you'll get the job instead, right? In the words of the late Clara Peller, where's the beef?

    --

    sulli
    RTFJ.
    1. Re:whoa by BitGeek · · Score: 2, Insightful


      Oh, my beef isn't that I didn't get jobs-- I got great jobs.

      My beef is that there were a lot of inexperienced, yet dedicated, engineers who didn't get jobs because more experienced b-rate people took them becuase the sector was "hot".

      As to unions, they're just another name for the mob.

      IF you have the skills get the job. But if you went chasing easy money, you don't get sympathy from me.

      --
      Yeah, and you guys panned the ipod too: http://apple.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/10/23/ 1816257
    2. Re:whoa by kiwimate · · Score: 2

      No, I don't think your beef is that you didn't get jobs, either.

      I think it's that you're an elitist jerk whose superiority complex forces you to demean anyone who (in your short-sighted view) doesn't meet up to your standards. And, just maybe, part of it is simply that you're too frightened to admit that perhaps there's more to life.

      Step out of that smug new-world ivory tower for a minute or two, and see if you can remember how to smell the roses.

    3. Re:whoa by BitGeek · · Score: 2



      Ah, I see. You're a bigot.

      Its funny how I'm so elitist the people I'm defending are those without experience and with less knowledge.

      Those are the people who were denied jobs because posers took them.

      But its also interesting that the mere fact you disagree with me forces you to put me into this bigoted little idea of the world you have. Somehow I suspect that it is you, and not me, who needs to, as you say, "get a life".

      --
      Yeah, and you guys panned the ipod too: http://apple.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/10/23/ 1816257
  22. Repeat after me. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Would you like to Super-Size it?"

  23. Delivery drivers make good short-term income by Weasel+Boy · · Score: 1

    Pizza delivery driver was the best-paying job I ever had pre-BS, at least in the short term. In the long term, it netted out to zero due to car maintenance and increased insurance premiums. But when you're 18, taking an advance against future earnings isn't such a bad proposition.

  24. Military by reef127 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Join the military. Not only do you have a stable job, you get to play with some cool ass toys you'll never see in the civilian world. Funding is always there for a lab, and new projects. And best of all you get to travel, and party with a bunch of cool people.

    --
    Oh, you hate your job? Why didn't you say so? There's a support group for that. It's called EVERYBODY!!!
    1. Re:Military by Al+Scagnetti · · Score: 1

      Please tell me this is intended to be a sarcastic post. If it's not, then it's obvious you've never actually been in the military.

      Employment is stable, but the job isn't. Depending on the branch of service, you could be a Network Admin one week, and picking up trash off the street the next. As for playing with cool ass toys, that's not going to happen either. You see, the funding you think is always out there for new projects is non-existent. It's hard sometimes just to get post-it notes and pens, let alone new hardware and software. There's more green screens out there than I'd care to discuss here.

      The part that you got half right is the traveling and partying with cool people. You will encounter some exemplary people in the military; however, a good majority are unmotivated and/or unfortunate individuals that didn't have the gumption or means to go to college. Finally, yes, you will do some partying and travelling, especially if you consider tossing back a rationed bottle of coke in the middle of the desert a good time.

      --
      'Round and 'round the mulberry bush...
    2. Re:Military by mlh1996 · · Score: 1

      You forgot the getting shot at.

      --
      Lack of creativity is no excuse for not having a .sig
    3. Re:Military by lposeidon · · Score: 0

      HOOAH!! speaking from experience.... travel, yes. sweet ass toys, yes. hell lot of computers not availabe anywhere else, hell yes. money for new toys, yes. the only way i get shot at is playing quake at work. :) LAN party over gigabit fiber lines. on $100,000 servers with 8 processors with 16GB of memory. :) oh forgot to mention the OC192 connection to the web.... as long as you stick to the communications field.

      --
      Lizard "Never let them set limits on your mind!"
    4. Re:Military by reef127 · · Score: 1

      I'm not saying there aren't some bad assignments, you sign to join the military. Right now my budget is in the millions to install a new fiber network. Tell me where you can find that in the business world.

      --
      Oh, you hate your job? Why didn't you say so? There's a support group for that. It's called EVERYBODY!!!
  25. Teacher? Good choice (Re:Good Riddance...) by phorm · · Score: 2

    This was going to be my secondary choice of occupation. After dealing with the same-'ol' same-'ol IT job for a decade or so, I've noticed some IT people moving towards more of a teaching than application role.

    And the thing is, they're good at it. In college we had a prof who used to be a programmer for one of the local large corps. He turned out to be one of the best teachers in the program.
    While I won't say that all IT people have an ability to teach, it can also be said that a lot of them are better than somebody who dabbler who also has a teaching degree. We had some of these guys too, and they SUCKED. There's nothing worse than having some weiner with a B. English who just learned how to code last year trying to teach a class of people who have a geniune interest in learning IT.

  26. I'm going to be a firefighter! by mlh1996 · · Score: 1

    No, really. I'm taking the test next week.

    --
    Lack of creativity is no excuse for not having a .sig
  27. Yes, it is brilliant. by partingshot · · Score: 2

    I'm NOT claiming that its true. I want the OP to either recognize that it is futile or to admit that he really doesn't spend that much time.

    --
    Anonymous posts are filtered.
    1. Re:Yes, it is brilliant. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's lying. He spends that time reading slashdot and masturbating, just like you.

      You've got mail!
      You've got mail!
      You've got mail!
      YAAAAAAAAY!

  28. What the high flyers will be doing next by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 3, Funny

    Bill Gates - philanthropist (we can only hope)
    Steve Ballmer - dance instructor (he can only hope)
    Steve Jobs - playboy billionaire by day, super spy by night (he always gets the cool gigs)
    Paul Allen - sporting magnate (congrats Paul, you're already there)
    Larry Ellison - interior designer (daaling, I just love what you've done with the house)
    Philippe Kahn - TV chef (a good cook who knows how to make things from nothing is priceless)
    Carly Fiorina - take over the Martha Stewart empire (because it needs to re"invent" itself)
    Michael Dell - pro surfer (dude, you're getting a board!)
    Jean-Louis Gassee - paranoid schizophrenic (why won't they just let him Be?)

    --

    "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
    1. Re:What the high flyers will be doing next by vaguelyamused · · Score: 1

      Bill Gates is already a philanthropist. Whatever your opinion is on MS he is gives away more money to charitable causes than any other of the tech magnates and probably more than almost anyone else in the world. www.gatesfoundation.org

      --
      STOP ROCK VIDEO
    2. Re:What the high flyers will be doing next by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 3, Interesting

      When you have billions giving away a few million is nothing.

      When you have $50 billion (give or take), $100 million is only 0.2 percent of your net worth. It's like a guy who has $1000 giving away $2.

      Granted, the Gates Foundation is bigger than that (according to their annual report they gave $1 billion in grants last year) but some of their reporting is misleading - a considerable proportion of their education-based aid is in the form of Microsoft software and/or has other Microsoft-related terms and conditions applied to it.

      How much does a copy of Office notionally cost? $800? Well, give away 100,000 copies to education and there's $80 million already. And let's not forget Encarta, etc.

      And while $1 billion dollars might sound like a lot, it's probably less than what the foundation earns in annual interest alone.

      Don't get me wrong, I'm glad that the foundation is there and that it's doing something to help fight AIDs, improve literacy, etc, it's just that I don't like their accounting practices - a copy of Office isn't as valuable as a couple of hundred TB vaccinations.

      --

      "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
    3. Re:What the high flyers will be doing next by vaguelyamused · · Score: 1

      According to their website their endowment is $24 billion. That would be in cash and other securities, no copies of Office, etc. Gates presumably donated most of it, that's considerably more than $100million or 0.2% of his net worth. Whatever your problems with Gates and his company are he has donated a pretty substancial chunk of money, far more it seems than most people at that level of affluence, and deserves some credit.

      --
      STOP ROCK VIDEO
  29. I decided to teach by Raiford · · Score: 2
    This may be an option for you if you hold an advanced degree in the technology area in which you were working. I have an engineering degree and worked as a practicing engineer for quite a few years. I got tired and burned out and decided to teach. It sure is a lot more rewarding and less stressful. The pay is less but that is the way of the world and if you didn't buy a house that you couldn't afford and several sports cars during the dot.com boom then it may be an option for you.

    1.) A lot will depend on your background. If you don't have a degree and are looking for another tech job then you will meet with a lot of resistance right now and probably forever more.

    2.) If you have a non-tech degree and happened upon a tech position and are looking for another well then see # 1 above.

    3.) If you have a technology degree (not an engineering or computer science degree, i.e., you never took a calculus course) then strongly consider a non-tech profession. Things will be rough going getting back into tech now if not forever more.

    4.) If you have an engineering or computer science degree then you worked pretty hard and you should stick it out. You will eventually get back in the game.

    --
    "player 4 hit player 1 with 0 stroms"
  30. So do... by kiwimate · · Score: 2

    In good times and bad, they have a job.

    So do pub-owners. And they get to drink the profits away.

    Plus, there's the added entertainment value of watching the more inebriated customers trying desperately to chat up the other patrons and not realizing just how dreadful their pickup lines really sound.

    Bliss.

  31. spoken like a true Samurai by guybarr · · Score: 2

    As to unions, they're just another name for the mob

    Spoken like a true samurai. Confidant in your (I assume) competance as an individual Techy, you restrict all employer-employee interacion to single combat^H^H^H^H^H^H programer-employer negotiations, implying that organized-workers are immoral (they are just "mob").

    immoral they may or may not be, but don't forget one thing ... the samurai lost, eventually .

    And are unions, BTW, worse than employing corporations, which are also large armies^H^H^H^H^H organizations, usually quite a bit more powerful than a single hacker ?

    don't get me wrong, I'm a techy myself (Math, C.S. and Phys. at different academic levels), and I think a man should be paid per his own worth. But I also belive that the notion of a free market, and free choice for workers, is many times more of a myth than reality. A myth which does NOT benefit the workers in the long run.

    I think unions suck. But there has to be a balancing force to raw capitalism, or the peasents will revolt against the equity lords ... to the eventual loss of both.

    To put a gross mathematical picture, capitalism and progress are driven by a high derivative of the income distribution. Too uniform a distribution and society suffocates, as in comunism. Too much inequality, however, and the "mob", i.e. most of the people, will revolt, throwing down the system. So balance should to be reached before that point, and what will be the returning force from the over-capitalistic side ?

    I see no such balancing powers today, and do not know if there are other options than worker-unions. I can't think of any. I hope someone will. But either way, careful consideration of the notions of organized labor is needed also for tech workers, not an over simplistic (IMHO) moral rejection.

    --
    Working for necessity's mother.
    1. Re:spoken like a true Samurai by BitGeek · · Score: 2


      People have human rights-- they have the right to form a union.

      Unfortuantely, that's not what we have here. Unions don't work to get people a "fair deal" they are an organization that merely extorts a cut of your job. If you don't pay the protection money, you loose your job.

      That's why they are the mob-- they are a protection racket pure and simple.

      AS to negotiating better terms for you-- they make that HARDER.

      Without a union a dozen or so people can form a group and negotiate their terms. With a union, EVERYBODY must agree to the terms the union bosses "negotiate" for you--- which is great for companies-, they just pay off the union bosses and they have their workforce back.

      Which is why, in the end, what unions negotiate is the best deal for THE UNION, for the bosses, not for the workers they claim to represent.

      AS to the free market being mythical, thats akin to saying gravity is mythical.

      The only way a free market can not work is if people refuse to participate-- otherwise by definition you have a free market. Before you discount the free market so quickly-- you should look at what you see as really wrong with it-- and I'm confident you will discover that whats' really causing the distortions you don't like are government interference. Not problems with the free market.

      AT its root, people who hate the free market fall into two camps: Those who want tyranny and want slaves instead of free people, and those who think they want free people but at the same time want people to not be responsible for their own actions. I suspect you fall into the latter.

      TANSTAAFL.

      --
      Yeah, and you guys panned the ipod too: http://apple.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/10/23/ 1816257
    2. Re:spoken like a true Samurai by guybarr · · Score: 2

      Unfortuantely, that's not what we have here. Unions don't work to get people a "fair deal" they are an organization that merely extorts a cut of your job. If you don't pay the protection money, you loose your job.

      That's why they are the mob-- they are a protection racket pure and simple.


      There is much truth in what you say. However, let me ask you this: what caused the shortenning of the average work-day from 14 to 9 hours ? and why do tech workers work so much more than average workers ? And this is true not just for workoholics, but for people wishing for more balance ..

      Also, do you think that children-labor was stoped using free-market means, or by workers organization ?

      You say unions are a mob in that they take protection-fees. That they are corrupt and self-serving. To this I agree very much, how ever, the problem is that workers DO need protection against employers, not just the "mob". Workers DO need stable, uncorrupted pension plans, health insurance, and other social benefits. What can give them these things, except some sort of a union ?

      Unless you have another answer (I don't), the resulting conclusion, IMHO, is that unions are like governments: they are a usefull servant and a horrible master, one has to be vigilant to keep them in check, but throwing them alltogether is not a good solution either.

      AS to negotiating better terms for you-- they make that HARDER.

      harder when times for workers are good, and workers are in short supply. Easier when times are bad, and work is in short supply. What is more important ?

      AS to the free market being mythical, thats akin to saying gravity is mythical

      For a single electron at room temperature, gravity is mythical i.e. it's effects is negligible ...

      What I ment by this is the following: when a single employee plans how much he wants to work, He CANNOT market his working hours per his choice, and their market-value.

      This means that when his work demands from him a 70-Hr week, week after week, he cannot practically tell his boss: "I want to work just 50-Hrs a week, pay me less if that's what you think I deserve, but this is what I'm willing to give"

      This kind of negotiation practically can usually be done only by MANY workers when united.

      This is what I mean when I say that in some scales a free market is mythical: some freedoms (like the freedom to LIMIT your work-time, even at a financial cost) cannot usually be achieved

      The only way a free market can not work is if people refuse to participate-- otherwise by definition you have a free market. Before you discount the free market so quickly-- you should look at what you see as really wrong with it-- and I'm confident you will discover that whats' really causing the distortions you don't like are government interference. Not problems with the free market.

      What is wrong with it, is that a completely free market can lead to less free people , like the above example. And I do not see how governments are the cause of this, I'll be glad to be enlightended in this matter.

      AT its root, people who hate the free market fall into two camps:

      I do not hate the free market. I consider it's pros and cons, and find it a flawed nescecity, like unions. I hate limiting the freedom of people. Both unions and large employers are needed, but are needed to be kept in check.

      fall into two camps: Those who want tyranny and want slaves instead of free people, and those who think they want free people but at the same time want people to not be responsible for their own actions. I suspect you fall into the latter.

      It is a good salesman which restricts every question into just 2 options ...

      I do think I want free people. I want people to be free to tell their employer: you cannot fire me just because I refuse to work more than we bargained for. For most people, especially those who have families, security INCREASES freedom.

      I, in short, wants a balance: I don't want communism, where security abolishes freedom and productivity, but I don't want unchecked capitalism, where lack of security practically abolishes freedom.

      I want people to have ambition, to strive to improve their life and their children's prospects, and to have freedom to do so. I also want them to have the freedom to say: enough. My ambition goes obly so far, and I want to spend 2-3 hours a day with my wife and kids. If the consequence is a lesser pay, than they have that choice. If they cannot do that w/o getting fired, then they do not have that choice, and are practically NOT responsible for their own time.

      does that sound unreasonable in any way ?

      --
      Working for necessity's mother.
    3. Re:spoken like a true Samurai by DaytonCIM · · Score: 2

      It is a good salesman which restricts every question into just 2 options ...

      Bravo. Excellent observation.

    4. Re:spoken like a true Samurai by BitGeek · · Score: 2

      I want to work just 50-Hrs a week, pay me less if that's what you think I deserve, but this is what I'm willing to give

      I find that amusing-- as I've seen people do this regularly in high tech jobs. From my boss who took time off when his kid was born, to a co-worker who had a side project she wanted to finish. I've done this myself as well, and my request was met.

      Furthmore, as a matter of policy, in tech companies when you work overtime, you get comp-time in response. This has been the case in all of the tech companies I've worked in recent years. On top of this, tech companies tend to give good vacation benefits, etc.

      It doesn't take a union, it takes a couple people representing the majority to go to bosses and say "Hey, you're going X and a better solution would be Y." Whether its a poor technology choice or the working environment, bosses are amenable.

      You acknowledge the problems with unions, but it is you that see it as two choices: large corrupt, mob run unions, or no freedom.

      Well, we can have freedom without unions-- in a given company which would be better- one union that can deliver the employees to the bosses, or a dozen unions all representing different groups of employees? The latter will get you better deal, and if your union doesn't represent you well, then you can switch unions.

      The way it is now, the laws are such tat the union can get you fired if you don't join (this happened to a father of 4 I know about recently.) What it boiled down to was: "Pay us %15 of your salary, or you loose your job." He didn't, they fired him.

      THAT is what should be illegal-- extortion. He has the fundamental human right to make an agreement with his employer that does not require the unions approval. Laws that allow and support violation of that human right are my issue.

      Did unions give us the 40 hour work week? No. The 40 hour work week exists in non-union shops... and in general, it is more realistic in non-union shops.

      Did they eliminate child labor? No, legislators did that.

      But this is rehashing old stuff. whats really interesting to me is this idea that the free market eliminates freedom for people.

      How can you say that in the face of the clear example of unions making an unfree market and as a result, a father now has no job to feed his kids. Not because there isn't a job, not because he can't do the job, not because they don't want to hire him, not because he doesn't want to work there- but because the union-- backed by state laws-- forced him out of his job, violating both his and his employers rights.

      I think by definition free markets mean freedom for people.

      And I hear this claim that free markets and capitalism make people slaves.

      But whenever that claim is made- NO EXAMPLES Are ever given to back it up.

      For instance, the example that you didn't articulate but referenced makes no sense-- you go work for a company that pays you a salary and in exchange you work 40 hours a week (or 50 if that's the agreement.) If they violate the agreement, you are due compensation (and companies will compensate you.) If you don't like the deal, you can go work somewhere else. You bring this up in your negotiations with them after they make an offer and they are going to work with you.

      I went so far as to make a spreadsheet that had a formula that balanced vacation time, stock options (and their market value, factoring in the risk that they would be worth nothing) the average work week in hours, the amount of weekends needed, etc so that for any given set of terms, I could give 3 or 4 alternatives that met the forumula at different salary levels. I found employers that were cash poor were happy to trade stock options for salary, or vacation for salary, etc. And when unexpected things come up, like my friends newborn, they worked out a compromise that allowed him to take significant time off, maintain his job, and they weren't paying for someone who wasn't going to be there months at a time.

      You also said:I want to work just 50-Hrs a week, pay me less if that's what you think I deserve, but this is what I'm willing to give

      Well, will you be willing to also give up the right to leave the job without their permission? You're demanding that they can't fire you when you refuse to do your job, will you give up the contrary?

      You have the right to leave your job. They have the right to fire you. It doesn't matter if you have cause to leave your job (they ask you to work too many hours) or they have cause to fire you (you stole money). IF you just don't like the personalities involved you can end the employment, and so can they. That is what is known as at will employment.

      IF you're going to demand that they cannot fire you, are you going to also give up the legal right to leave the job?

      IF you have an agreement about the hours you're going to work and they are asking you to work more on a continual basis, simply go to them with the
      issue and ask for redress. Every business thats' still going to be around in 3 years will work something out with you. Either extra vacation, extra pay, or a limitation on the time they are expecting you to work. And any business that won't-- wouldn't be around in a couple years to give you job security anyway, cause they won't be able to retain enough quality employees to compete in the marketplace. Either that or your demands exceed your market value, and simple economics tells you that whenever you have that condition, a company that meets your demands will be going under soon.

      Unions are good at maximizing their benefit-- the company is bleed dry and eventually goes bankrupt while the employees keep jobs for awhile (eventually to be laid off) and the union bosses get really, REALLY rich.

      This is the condition with Boeing and is why even though they had record plane orders in recent years they could barely keep their head above water.

      Nothing stops 10 employees, union or not, from bargaining collectively -- except when a union has a collective bargaining agreement which TAKES AWAY THAT RIGHT. And 10 employees will get what they want, or a compromise that meets both parties needs, if they are reasonable.

      --
      Yeah, and you guys panned the ipod too: http://apple.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/10/23/ 1816257
    5. Re:spoken like a true Samurai by guybarr · · Score: 2

      I find that amusing-- as I've seen people do this regularly ... On top of this, tech companies tend to give good vacation benefits, etc.

      let me ask you this: was this before or during the current economical crisis ?

      Restraints on employers is not such a big deal when employees are in high demand, it is when unemployment is high that such restraints are really important.

      You acknowledge the problems with unions, but it is you that see it as two choices: large corrupt, mob run unions, or no freedom

      please read what I wrote more carefully. I did not say there's no other choice, I only said I cannot think of one, and I'll be glad to find a better one. But a better option must, IMHO, provide balancing forces for raw capitalism.

      Well, we can have freedom without unions-- in a given company which would be better- one union that can deliver the employees to the bosses, or a dozen unions all representing different groups of employees? The latter will get you better deal, and if your union doesn't represent you well, then you can switch unions.

      So, is what you're saying not that unions are inherently bad, but that a single, monopolistic union is bad for workers ? Good point, I agree.

      For instance, the example that you didn't articulate but referenced makes no sense-- you go work for a company that pays you a salary and in exchange you work 40 hours a week (or 50 if that's the agreement.) If they violate the agreement, you are due compensation (and companies will compensate you.) If you don't like the deal, you can go work somewhere else. You bring this up in your negotiations with them after they make an offer and they are going to work with you.

      This is again, naive. My g.f. went to work for a biotech company. They agreed on a 45 HR week, but the standard agreement is that the employer should devote hours "as much as the job demands". No one in this field employs w/o this malicious clause, and they know very well why. The average work-day there was 11-12 hours. And those that did not agree to this were promptly laid off. Official reason being they "did not fit", but everybody knew ...
      And this is my point: sometimes you cannot immidiately go work someplace else. Protection for workers at that (much more common today) state is needed.

      Well, will you be willing to also give up the right to leave the job without their permission? You're demanding that they can't fire you when you refuse to do your job, will you give up the contrary?

      no, but the situation is NOT symmetric.

      You have the right to leave your job. They have the right to fire you. It doesn't matter if you have cause to leave your job (they ask you to work too many hours) or they have cause to fire you (you stole money). IF you just don't like the personalities involved you can end the employment, and so can they. That is what is known as at will employment.

      First, it's not so simple, the right to employ and to fire is not w/o restraints: for example see sexual harassment laws, or mandatory natal vacation (In my country, an employer cannot legally fire a mother because she has kids and takes 3-month vacation after birth).

      Laws, by definition, are social norms backed up by remedies. Employers and employees are NOT equal, and the law does (IMHO, should) not treat them as such. Also, it is naive to think that the judicial system is the only effective means of conflict-solving in society. Laws have their place, but something has to create social norms.

      As an example, do you think mandatory natal vacation would have existed, or kept, unless there were active organizations keeping that right ?

      (and don't think this is obvious, I personally know a professor (woman, BTW), which ASKS her prospective (female) students if they plan to have kids during their PHD ... Rights who are not actively protected can swiftly be eroded)

      IF you're going to demand that they cannot fire you, are you going to also give up the legal right to leave the job?

      This is the same question, and I'll give the same answer. No. but the question is biased: the situations are assymetric.

      IF ... simply ... ask for redress. Every business thats' still going to be around in 3 years will work something out with you ... . And any business that won't-- wouldn't be around in a couple years to give you job security anyway, cause they won't be able to retain enough quality employees to compete in the marketplace.

      nice theory. What about temp workers ?

      Either that or your demands exceed your market value, and simple economics tells you that whenever you have that condition, a company that meets your demands will be going under soon.

      1) So according to you, since many people united have higher market value, simple economics tells you they'll get a better deal => unions (or some other form of collective) are needed.

      2) Again, you neglect other social processes. Economics, simple or not, is a part of the social dynamics. Marksists were wrong to treat it as the full model. So are fanatic capitalists.

      Summary:

      1) IMHO, the situation of (large) employers and a single employee is no more symetric than that of microsoft and a single consumer. Hence restraints should be put on employers.
      2) IMHO, free-market restraints are not enough. This is harshly demonstrated in times of economical crisis.
      3) Civil (or criminal) law is not a sufficient tool for all human, or even employment conflict solving.
      4) Laws and other norms are not made or kept w/o social movements and organizations pushing for them. Hence the need for some kind of balancing force to raw capitalism mandates some forms of collective movements of workers.
      5) Unions, like governemnts (or corporations) are a good servant and an evil master. There must be checks and balances for them as well. Perhaps, as you sugested, competition between unions is a good way to go. I'm not sure it'll work, but it may be worth a try ...
      6) I'm open to any other reasonable suggestion.

      --
      Working for necessity's mother.
    6. Re:spoken like a true Samurai by BitGeek · · Score: 2


      Yes, it is the monopoly of unions that I oppose. I didn't realize you were not in the US, I apologize.

      Here they have collective bargaining agreements which are state enforced laws preventing people from working outside the agreement. This violates human rights.

      Nobody has a "right" to be employed-- the way I see it, any company that wants to have as a policy that women who become pregnant loose their jobs has the right to have that policy. There is a fundamental human right involved- and that is fredom of association, which says that you can employ who you want when you want. There is no fundamental human right to have a kid and still get paid for it.

      If people- and I mean companies and employees-- want to support women having kids, they can have alternative employment terms. but any country that enacts that as a law (As yours has and as the US has) is an oppressive, anti-human rights country in that regard.

      These things you talk about as good things, I will concede are good things, but they are not human rights-- one simple test is that anything that violates a human right is not a human right.

      The "cannot fire" rule that you advocate IS symmetric with a "cannot quit" rule. There are two parties and asking one to give up rights should require the other to give up a comperable right.

      Your thinking is biased by the perception that companies are "Rich" and therefore owe people something (I'm assuming)... and that is why you think they are not symmetric, but what if your employer is just a guy-- say you're a mechanic and he has a garage. Does he not have the right to fire you, but you can leave him in the lurch (Say you're starting your own garage)?

      I completely reject the idea (that I think you were making) that there's some societal need or requirement that forces companies to have a certain employment policy. All employement is at will, unless mutually agreed upon otherwise.

      --
      Yeah, and you guys panned the ipod too: http://apple.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/10/23/ 1816257
  32. Even Good Guys Are Leaving Tech by HunahpuMonkey · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Everyone seems to be saying "good riddance" to the people leaving the tech sector, but what is sad about the recent turn down is even really good people are leaving technical fields. I can think of several people from the two companies that I worked for that closed their doors last year.

    One in particular started out as a sys admin for both companies and eventually went on the lead the entire IT departments for them. After the last company shutdown, he had had enough. He just started law school this semester. That is a sad loss to the industry. He was one of the best. In fact, I still call him up for advice when messing around on my home network.

    I guess for me, I'm torn. Part of me is jealous and the other part is sad for the loss. I'm jealous because I wish I could simply say goodbye to the godforsaken industry. However, I could never do that because I simply do not know anything else. But, mostly I'm just sad for the loss. I hate to see good people leave.

    1. Re:Even Good Guys Are Leaving Tech by HunahpuMonkey · · Score: 1

      Re-reading my own post, how many times can I say the words "sad loss." Oh well. I Should have read it over once it before I posted it. Can anyone guess what my point was. :)

  33. I love coding by robdonnellan · · Score: 1

    But as far as work goes it's time to move on. I've been in dp for nearly 20 years. The dp job I have now will be my last. I'm moving to a home based business where I'm the boss. Where the business depends on me, not someone I'm carrying on my back who fancies themselves some sort of power broker. I'm in my 10th company now doing software and only 3 of the companies I've been in are still solvent. In the future when I'm on a death march it will be for myself. And it won't be in dp.
    It's sad. I really love coding...

  34. Re: Lawyers and Teachers are the problem by benzapp · · Score: 1
    As for what I'm turning to, teaching. I'm going back to school for my teaching certificate so I can teach graphic design and adobe apps to high school kids. Maybe a little down tha line, a law degree or my own (non-design) business.


    There we go. The problem is, he is not a creative person. What does he want to do? Teach or become a lawyer. It is the art of bullshitting. Those who can, do those who can't teach or go to law school.

    Please, try and CONTRIBUTE something to society. Anyone who is a true geek did not learn a damn thing from school. You are just going to be part of the problem. Hindering young children's minds with your own impotence or abusing the system of justice to feed off your laziness is simply disgusting. I mean come on, can anyone honestly say they learned anything about Photoshop from a teacher??? Sheesh. Photoshop is the quintessential program you need to sit down and LEARN by experimentation, like everything else in this world.
    --
    I don't read or respond to AC posts
  35. Re: Lawyers and Teachers are the problem by matt_maggard · · Score: 1


    Obviously you can go ahead and think what you want. My point was not that teaching or law would be incredibly fun. It was that I would prefer to spend my creative energy on my own projects on my own time. I stated that in my original post. I believe that work and interests/hobbies should be separate.

    Its hard to know if you are compatible with a job until you learn more or try it out. Its quite possible that law would not hold my interest. a teacher however seems promising to me mainly because of the interaction with interested students. Personally I am photoshop self taught, but I had many friends in my major in college that would have liked to learned photoshop. Unfortunately at my school, my major didn't offer it and it is a very overwhelming app for non techy people.

    Re: contributing to society - if you don't think that teachers contribute to society, then that's a shame. on the flip side, I don't feel that working for a year as a designer/coder on a huge project for a now bankrupt e-commerce site has really made a contribution to society.

    At the end of the day, I can be happier teaching kids than helping a head-up-its-ass corporation. But thats just me - a non-contributer. And to be honest, we are all just trying to be happy. If it is true that "those who can't do teach" then they are probably happier when they realize it and that's all anyone should hope for another.

    -matt

  36. Re: Lawyers and Teachers are the problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually one teacher in a bad school in the poorest district of a 3rd world country contributes more in one day than YOU will contribute in your whole career doing whatever it is that you do.

  37. Start your own business. I did. by plasticquart · · Score: 1
    When you finally get tired of the rat-race... when you can't stand the 9 to 5 any more... then it is time to do your own thing.

    I build custom computers. They kick serious ass. Please, check us out.