Slashdot Mirror


Next Generation of Holographic Images

suman28 writes "Imagine being able to view an image from all sides and have it interact with you. Scenes or images pop-out at you and change on the fly and are viewable in full color. Best of all, you don't need head-gear or any wearable device to make this possible. They are generated by a computer with two cameras that track your eye movement and there is a transparent LCD screen between you and the display that makes the pictures come alive. Though it may be a while before this becomes part of our daily lives, it is interesting to see what the kind of research being done on this. "

72 of 183 comments (clear)

  1. here we go... by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 5, Funny

    *insert obligatory 3D pr0n reference here*

    1. Re:here we go... by buswolley · · Score: 4, Funny
      But its the double whamo of 3D Pr0n & Forced feedback gloves.

      With these, you might be doing more inserting than just: * *insert obligatory 3D pr0n reference here*

      --

      A Good Troll is better than a Bad Human.

    2. Re:here we go... by noshellswill · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Saw it already gents - 1978 at the Franklin Institute in Phila. ... As I remember it was a gal (+ bathing suit) tumbling in the surf ...

  2. Just imagine! by Anonymous+Cowtard · · Score: 5, Funny

    Real-world pop-ups!!! The JOY!

    </sarcasm>

    1. Re:Just imagine! by Kyeo · · Score: 2, Funny

      Better than pop-under ads.

      Ah, what the hell is that?!?!

      ...-1, Bad humor

  3. Research, right... by mrgrey · · Score: 5, Funny

    it is interesting to see what the kind of research being done on this. "

    "Research". So that is what pr0n is called now....

    --
    -Tolerate my intolerance
    1. Re:Research, right... by Trogre · · Score: 5, Insightful

      A fact little-known on slashdot, but:
      Not everyone is obsessed with pornography.

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    2. Re:Research, right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      ... no, not unless Linux or BSD is somehow involved.

    3. Re:Research, right... by Trogre · · Score: 2

      Not meaning to make it sound like you were one of the aforementioned obsessed persons.
      Apologies if the comment appeared otherwise :)

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    4. Re:Research, right... by Tharsis · · Score: 2

      No.. just about 50% of the population

  4. Doritos by name_already_in_use · · Score: 4, Funny

    Imagine the implications for Dorito's.

    --


    Rake Free + Mac Poker: CardCrusade
  5. Left Thumbs? by thrillbert · · Score: 3, Funny

    after all, millions of video game players would give their left control-pad thumbs...

    I knew there was a reason why other people seemed to be better than I was at Quake. But knowing they had more than one LEFT THUMB makes me realize how handicapped I was in those games...

    Cool technology though.. I guess we are getting to that future we were wondering about 10 years ago..

    ---
    Schizophrenia beats being alone.

    1. Re:Left Thumbs? by gpinzone · · Score: 3, Funny

      You're using a gamepad to play Quake? Uh, there might be another explination. :)

  6. The problem with 3D by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    more often than not 3D is distracting rather than engaging. the best way to make use of 3D is in applications where we EXPECT a 3D image.

    when we drive down the street, since everything is behind glass anyway, it sort of reduces the 3d-ness, doesn't it?

    1. Re:The problem with 3D by Wrexen · · Score: 2

      Not to offend our one-eyed readers, but some of us have this thing called depth perception that does, in fact, make driving a 3d experience.

      Hey moderators -- don't bogart that fine product you're smoking. Share!

    2. Re:The problem with 3D by qwertyphobia · · Score: 4, Informative
      People with only one eye still have depth perception - they just don't posess stereo depth perception.

      There are many different cues that contribute to our perception of depth: stereo, perspective, parallax, overlapping objects, shading and shadows and changes in accommodation and convergence of the eyes.

      Those with one eye lack stereo (the strongest cue), but still have a decent amount of depth perception for surviving in the real world. It is only when attempting to use devices that rely soley on stereo to generate a pseudo-3D image that they have problems.

      See this page for a more detailed discussion.

  7. Buck Rodgers by Syncdata · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It may not be the flying car, but I'm amazed by the technologies that I was convinced not long ago, were decades out on the horizon. Holograms, Cybernetic prosthesis, cheap lasers, and common genetic alteration. Good times. Seriously though, here's to hoping the flying car is next.

    --
    "Inattention makes clowns of us all" -Bean
    1. Re:Buck Rodgers by texchanchan · · Score: 5, Funny

      How do helicopters and other personal aircraft _not_ qualify as flying cars?

      Because there's not one in my garage.

    2. Re:Buck Rodgers by kin_korn_karn · · Score: 2

      do you have a helicopter? Do you commute in it, piloting yourself? that's what I thought.

    3. Re:Buck Rodgers by mgv · · Score: 2

      How do helicopters and other personal aircraft _not_ qualify as flying cars?

      Because there's not one in my garage.


      You know, just when we are getting to terms with how poorly we handle technology, we go wishing for a better one.

      Its taken us decades to build safer roads, invent seatbelts, crumple zones, anti lock braking, all wheel drive and air bags.

      Now we are here wanting to be able to personally lift tonnes of metal kilometers into the sky so that 18 year olds can do laps of the city whilst drunk hoping to impress girls by how close they can swoop a building?

      Can't you see that we do have flying vehicles, they aren't terribly expensive (esp. ultralight aircraft), and that nobody in their right mind would suggest that they gain mass acceptance.

      Having said all that, do you really want to have one in your garage (and everyone else's, too)?

      My 2c

      Michael

      --
      There is no cryptographic solution to the problem where the intended receiver and the attacker are the same entity.
  8. The NYU System and multiple users by Hayzeus · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I wonder how the NYU system would manage with multiple users? Can the "alternating bars" system be adjusted for more than a single user at a time?

    1. Re:The NYU System and multiple users by ngoy · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I was tihnking the same thing but for regular monitors. They already sell those fruity 3D lcd shutter glasses anyways. So if a monitor refreshes at 85 to 120 Hz, you could theoretically show 2 people different screens at 42.5 to 60 Hz by showing each an interleaved screen that was synced to their glasses. So if you could get Quake, UT, etc... to work with a simpler control device, you could have two or more people play with the same system.

      I don't think the computing power is there though to accomadate running the same program twice on the same computer, although really you are just performing the tasks that the programmed AI would do for a character in the game, so maybe giving more manual control isn't a big deal.

      ngoy

      --
      --ngoy
    2. Re:The NYU System and multiple users by uberdave · · Score: 2

      Many people go to the cinema and watch movies at 24Hz for hours.

  9. Another impractical "3D device of the future". by raehl · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "Alright guys, we have 3D that anyone wearing inexpensive, lightwieght glasses can see. I think if we put a special screen between the image and the viewer and add two expensive cameras that must be able to see and track the viewer's eye movements, we will have brought 3D imaging into the future!"

    Poppycock.

    New ways to do 3D rendering are cool, but they're never going to escape the lab unless they do something not otherwise available in a more economical package.

  10. Driving technology by Charlton+Heston · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Still the diffraction pattern from just one high-resolution hologram can easily use up more than a terabyte of data--enough to fill 1,600 compact discs

    This is the kind of technology that pushes the speed of technology forward. Not only will gigantahumongous hard drives be required to hold this data, but extremely large memories, fast processors, and fast video systems will be needed. For a few years now computers have been quite fast enough. The web only needed a certain amount of horsepower, and as much as Microsoft has tried, there really a limit to how bloated and slow IE can be made. The newer chips eat IE for lunch. That's bad news for chipmakers, because it's hard to sell faster computers to customers who are satisfied.

    This technology is not just going to help whoever develops and sells it, it's going to indirectly help everyone. Get ready for the next tech bubble in the next few years - except this time, when Greenspan says the magic words "irrational exhuberance" sell that shit.

    --
    Get your stinking paws off me you damn dirty ape
    1. Re:Driving technology by jpmorgan · · Score: 2

      Not only will gigantahumongous hard drives be required to hold this data Or perhaps the holographic storage that always seems to be just beyond the horizon? ;)

  11. I think, in respect to games, this is progress. by buswolley · · Score: 3, Insightful
    That new visual, physical interfaces need to be devloped inorder for Games to really become interesting.

    For years now we have been playing games in 2D,(ok sometimes shitty 3D) and a controller with several buttons.

    All that has improved, in all these years is graphics quality, and bigger, more-in-depth games. But we continue to use the same interface to the game, therefore all games can be summed into, push this button to do x, push this button to do Y, or combinations etc.. Games have become boring to me.

    But to get real innovation in games, we need interfaces such as this hologram tech, or forced feedback suits etc.

    When I can manipualte a 3D object(like an apple)with my hands and fingers, and I can feel it, spin it etc. That is when games can become really interesting as escapes from reality.

    I know there are people working on these things, and I know that there are quite a few difficulties but, I think only then will Gaming come into its own, ESPECIALly INTERACTIVE GAMING.

    --

    A Good Troll is better than a Bad Human.

  12. star pr0n? by EngMedic · · Score: 5, Funny

    combining the Windows Messenger popup post with this one, we get:
    [popup] if you want to see the rest of Princess Leia's message, click here![/popup]
    gak.

    --
    filter: +3. Hey, look! all the trolls went away!
  13. Tag line is so true by burgburgburg · · Score: 2
    "The big problem with television isn't that it's flat," Benton says. "It's that they canceled Twin Peaks after two seasons."

    Still the diffraction pattern from just one high-resolution hologram can easily use up more than a terabyte of data--enough to fill 1,600 compact discs.

    Just think what holographic pr0n would do data storage business.

  14. Stick this technology by Bobtree · · Score: 5, Interesting

    in the arcades where it belongs!

    Since home game systems have caught up with arcade hardware at low cost, there isn't a sufficient technology advantage to keep arcade gaming advantageous and afloat.

    Serious holographic displays on arcade machines would be fantastic, and home consoles wouldn't be able to touch it for many years since TV/monitor standards are so slow and entrenched.

    Note: please allow 3+ years for development and adoption, and keep your fingers crossed that arcades still exist then.

  15. a worthwhile upgrade by WhiteChocolate42 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Finally, something worth moving up to from my 12 inch CGA.

    mirror at http://www.msu.edu/~brownd41/mirror/3D/index.html

  16. Re:More than one viewer? by Jonny+Ringo · · Score: 3, Funny

    It was designed that way since the majority of people watch porn alone.

  17. A Cure for Cancer! by scottennis · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I love "technical" articles that start out by announcing a new technology's potential in finding a cure for cancer. This is a sure sign that the article was written (or underwritten) by someone who is trying to sell more than advertising space (pop-up or otherwise).

    If you think this article is sincere, here are some more of today's headlines for you:
    • Microsoft Profit, Sales Up, Shares Rise on News of Windows-based Cancer Cure
    • Indonesia Appears to Signal Anti-Terror Resolve as Indonesian Doctors Close in on Cancer Cure
    • 'Rosie' Magazine Shuttered, 120 Jobs Slashed, Cancer Research Reporters Kept On
    • Jazz Forward Malone Mulls Retirement, Plans to Become National Spokesperson for American Cancer Society
  18. I don't like having my eye movement tricked. by handybundler · · Score: 5, Interesting

    So do they think that people with 20/20 vision can actually view this for any length of time without casuing major eye strain, vertigous reaction, and any other focusing issue?

    --


    a/s/l here. Sorry, adding domain tags to your s
  19. More than one viewer? by sssmashy · · Score: 5, Insightful
    The cameras can easily isolate the viewer's bright pupils, enabling them to track the eyes and adjust the location of the shifting stripes so that they always block the image in a way that sustains the stereoscopic effect.

    Sounds wonderful, but one limitation that jumps immediately to mind is that the 3d effect is limited to a single viewer. I was reminded of the scene in "Minority Report" which shows Tom Cruise watching 3d video of his deceased wife, and then the eerie image distorion of the wife as the camera shifts from Cruise's POV to circle behind the projection.

  20. Re:Make your own hologram by Dr+Caleb · · Score: 2, Redundant
    peek into where the light comes out while it's on...

    ...and never see out of that eye again!

    Flipping moron. Stare into a class IIIb laser for a while. While you're at it, stare at a solar eclipse and do some MIG welding without glasses.

    I am convinced that PhysicsScholar is both a bot and candidate for a Darwin Award.

    --
    "History doesn't repeat itself, but it does rhyme." Mark Twain
  21. not really by _avs_007 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Even though everything is "behind glass", you are still seeing 3D. Afterall, the glass is transparent, it's not like the glass is "producing" the images...

    Besides, driving down the street, you will want some *depth* perception. What's funky are those prescription windshields... Try being a passenger in one those cars. You almost need to be stoned/drunk to survive that without a migrain.

  22. Super Computing? by pixelpusher220 · · Score: 3, Funny

    churning through 20 terabytes worth of information every second would require extraterrestrial technology Mental note to self: must get more hampsters...

    --
    People in cars cause accidents....accidents in cars cause people :-D
  23. When will Dale get out of the Black Lodge? by burgburgburg · · Score: 2
    When they start making his favorite gum again?

    And what of Bob?

  24. Back in my day... by dubiousmike · · Score: 2

    quote from article: "The big problem with television isn't that it's flat," Benton says. "It's that they canceled Twin Peaks after two seasons."

    Well, I think the bigest problem is how outdated his reference is. Next he will be complaining about how the CHiPs didn't get picked up for an additional season.

  25. Research application: proteins and molecules by f97tosc · · Score: 5, Insightful

    A lot of research goes into undertanding how proteins and other bio molecules fold and fit together.

    This can be difficult to understand for a researcher that is looking at a flat screen. Also hard disk needs for doing this 3D would not that ridiculous, as the view from different angles can be calculated from scratch based on the chemical composition (rather than stored than having the computer storing the information of each possible angle).

    Tor

  26. Gamer's Paradise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I already play 3d games where I view an image from all sides and it fully interacts with me. Scenes or images, in living colour, pop-out at me and change on the fly. Even better, I can interact with friends in a dynamic playing environment where different, continously moving, fully realized 3d images are viewable by all participants from all possible angles.

    It's called "sports". Get off the couch, fatties.

    1. Re:Gamer's Paradise by syrinx · · Score: 3, Funny

      Next time you interact with orcs, demons, and can shoot people, get back to me, if you're just running and throwing a ball around, don't bother.

      --
      Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur.
    2. Re:Gamer's Paradise by falzer · · Score: 2

      > I already play 3d games where blah blah blah...
      > It's called "sports". Get off the couch, fatties.

      I'd rather play Grand Theft Auto.

  27. Re:More than one viewer? by russianspy · · Score: 2

    Actually it does work for more than one viewer. Have you ever seen of those hologram pictures? It works on a similar principle.

  28. Or not by Morgahastu · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "Though it may be a while before this becomes part of our daily lives"

    If ever, probably never.

    Holographic projection systems will never become part of our daily lives until its actually a 3d image being projected into the air that EVERYONE can see, not just one person with two camera looking at him.

  29. Virtual Boy Reference by Q3vi1 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I wonder if it'll give me the same headaches? I mean, after all that 3D pr0n, I'd already expect a headache, but what about when I'm just doing research? *sig*

  30. Ah, the marvels of technology by Brandeissansoo · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Imagine being able to view an image from all sides and have it interact with you" Wow! That's exactly like what I see every single day!

  31. I'd rather have... by Audacious · · Score: 2, Funny

    ..the fog machine version. At least then you can cool the computer, yourself, your popsicle, etc.... while you play. This one you probably need bifocals in order to use it. ;-)

    --
    Someone put a black hole in my pocket and now I'm broke. :-)
  32. Creative use of image by andkaha · · Score: 2

    Did you notice that the images in the top left corner of the article web pages were the one and the same on all five pages, just cropped and scaled a bit?

    Does anyone else have better images of this thing?

    --
    It's 11pm, do you know what your deamons are up to?
  33. IANASWG. by raehl · · Score: 2

    And the mispelling makes sure everyone knows.

  34. The future is 30 years ago by katarac · · Score: 3, Funny

    Man, they've been doing this kind of stuff since the 70's. Why, I'd bet that everytime me and the gang would be investigating a mystery, some embittered ex-carnival employee, or some crooked investor would use this exact same technology to project a ghost or some other apparition to scare away people who might horn in on his fortune. Oh wait... lines... between fantasy and reality... becoming clearer....forget what I just said.

  35. Speculation by Trogre · · Score: 2

    I wonder if they might look something like the holo-pictures in these shots in this scene from the Attack of the Clones DVD.

    --
    "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
  36. Clippit running around your desk by texchanchan · · Score: 5, Funny
    Now we can get
    • Little holographic characters (Clippit and his friends)...
      • Geysering out of your computer screen into your personal space
      • Cavorting around on your keyboard singing about Chevrolets or cold drinks or overdue upgrades
      • Acting out tiny love scenes or fight scenes to grab your attention
    • Or a full-sized holographic hand reaching out to hold yours, saying "Would you like suggestions on style? May I recommend the Palatino font?"
    • at which a printer, complete with leather apron, leaps out holding up a proof sheet using YOUR doc's words
    • until a Tyrannosaurus Rex bounds upon the scene and gobbles all the other holograms, only to turn to you and say "Hey, [YOUR NAME], tired of intrusive software? Get NO-Zilla the holo killa! Only $39.95!"


  37. Re:More than one viewer? by f97tosc · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Sounds wonderful, but one limitation that jumps immediately to mind is that the 3d effect is limited to a single viewer.

    Yes, but is this really that much of a limitation? Obviously for most computer work (or play) there is only one user so then it does not matter. In fact, it could even be an advantage, since the guy next to you on the airplane would not realize that you are watching pr0...er, see your sensitive business documents. For other uses, say family video night, you would have to replace one screen with several of these devices. That would not have to be very expensive, especially not compared to getting one of those enormous TVs that everybody has these days.

    Tor

  38. The Next Generation? by Dannon · · Score: 2

    I thought we were supposed to have large rooms which could holographically take on the appearance of any environment by The Next Generation, complete with lifelike artificial characters? Not to mention warp drives, food replicators, and a sentient android....

    --
    Good judgment comes from experience.
    Experience comes from bad judgment.
  39. Minority Report, 3D by serutan · · Score: 3, Funny

    Transparent panel between you and the display... like maybe a Store Window?

    Busty Babe in Store Window: "Hi, [your name], I notice you like walking. How about a pair of Nike PaveHuggers?"
    You: Huh?
    Babe [tracking your eye movement]: Oh, do you like my boobs? Check out my personal website. I just sent the URL to your PDA. [Licks lips] Will I see you later?

    1. Re:Minority Report, 3D by Howzer · · Score: 2
      And sadly, that whole idea was the cleverest, most breathtaking thing in the film.

      But that didn't stop it somehow being rated Top 250 by imdb (#91 when I looked).

      What is up with that? Even Mr Cranky didn't entirely hate it.

      Bad Idea for the Morning: Hey! I should do a review site and post how much this movie sucked. Or maybe I should just get another Oola-flavoured-beverage and shut the fskc up. Yeah. The second one.

  40. Holography stereoscopic 3D by rufusdufus · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Holograms do more than simply stereoscopic 3D. A hologram encodes the entire wavefront of the image, not just two positions like 3d goggles or other cheesy steroscopic devices.

    This differences is substantial: the amount of information presented to the eye is vastly larger than simple stereoscopic methods. In a simple stereoscopic image, all objects and surfaces appear to be in the same focus plane. Holographic images essentially gain a 3rd axis of resolution by adding a very large number of focus points in 3 space.

    This also allows for true perspective wherein different viewpoints provide different information. You can 'look behind' objects in a hologram, which you cannot do with steroscopic tricks.

    Thus, true holograms provide a qualitativly better experience over existing 3d methods.

  41. Re:More than one viewer? by guidobot · · Score: 2, Informative
    one limitation that jumps immediately to mind is that the 3d effect is limited to a single viewer

    That's only the NYU system and the article says later that they're working on that. The MIT true-holograph system can produce the 3D images for multiple viewers, but is limited by the massive quantities of processing power needed. Meanwhile the NYU system runs on a pc but only gives the effect to one person, though:

    "The group is also working on a system that would simultaneously provide 3-D views to multiple observers, such as a team of surgeons debating the best approach to a difficult procedure or a group of video game players competing on a shared monitor"

  42. Haven't they learned anything from Trek? by Tablizer · · Score: 5, Funny

    Holodeks always break down and take over the ship or house with weird characters out of books.

    Stop this stuff now!

  43. Oh, you mean in games like this...? by ashitaka · · Score: 2
    --
    If you don't want to repeat the past, stop living in it.
  44. "I think George Lucas is gonna sue somebody!" by xanadu-xtroot.com · · Score: 2

    Imagine being able to view an image from all sides and have it interact with you.

    Help me, Obi-Wan Kanobi, you're are only hope.

    --
    I'm not a prophet or a stone-age man,
    I'm just a mortal with potential of a super man.
  45. What has happened to Slashdot? by jonr · · Score: 2

    Are 90% of the audience of Beavis and Butthead intelligence? A real breakthrough appears in 3D technology, and most of the comments are stupid remarks regarding Star Wars, 3D in real life (DUH!) and how this would be great in the porn industry!
    If you don't have anything to say, that is on topic, STFU!
    J.

  46. Note: these aren't technically holograms by psyconaut · · Score: 2, Informative

    Sorry to be pedantic, but holograms are created with interference patterns using a laser on specially treated photographic materials.

    What's referred to here are not, infact, holograms by definition. It's merely a 3D display technology.

    (Holography is a hobby of mine...it's amazing how much fun a guy in his bathroom can have with a laser and some chemicals!).

    -psyco

    1. Re:Note: these aren't technically holograms by bytesmythe · · Score: 2
      holograms are created with interference patterns using a laser on specially treated photographic materials

      How is the main technique described in the article not a hologram? It specifically involves shining a split laser through a material that contains an interference pattern. The only difference is the interference pattern is created by calculated soundwaves passing through a stack of tellurium-oxide crystals, instead of using film.

      No one ever said the depicted object has to actually exist for it to be a hologram...

      --
      bytesmythe
      Hypocrisy is the resin that holds the plywood of society together.
      -- Scott Meyer
  47. Bite me by r_j_prahad · · Score: 2

    Go suck on a bog-lolly, urinal-breath.

  48. practical for invisibility by cowtamer · · Score: 2

    So this brings us one step closer to an invisibility cloak. Simply plaster these displays on the sides of a box, find a "victim" (i.e., person to whom you want to be invisible), track his movements and pipe the stereo image that would be behind you...

    If we get thisworking with multiple people, I'm sure people might pay for this. Otherwise it might be a nice parlor trick...

    (perhaps I should patent this idea...but here it is on slashdot as 'prior art')

  49. Back to the Future by Arcturax · · Score: 2

    Just great, bad enough I get pop ups in my browser, the possibility of popup spam on the Wintel box at work, but now I may have to put up with pop up sharks from Jaws XI like poor Marty McFly did in Back to the Future.

    Seriously though, while this is fairly cool, it could also lead to some extremely annoying street advertisements on the sides of buildings. Its bad enough to have billboards everywhere, but now ones which can actively annoy you in 3D? UGH!

    That and maybe all bartenders being replaced by the Max Headroom version of Ronald Reagan.

    --

    --Won't that be grand? Computers and the programs will start thinking and the people will stop. - Dr. Walter Gibbs
  50. Re:More than one viewer? by russianspy · · Score: 2

    Ooops, communication problem.

    I was talking about the first article where they create a real hologram in some material (I forget now what that was - some kind of plastic?). THAT technology is cool.

  51. Yeah... by Conspiracy_Of_Doves · · Score: 2

    That's what I thought until I READ THE FCUKING ARTICLE. You might want to try that occasionally.

    Because the new video holograms produce fully 3-D images that float in space near the viewing screen, they can be examined from different angles by multiple viewers.

  52. Cool... by cr0sh · · Score: 2
    I know I am super late on this, but what the hell...

    This is cool technology, and does have obvious practical uses as outlined in the article. But it will never replace the potentials offered by HMDs (Head Mounted Displays).

    HMDs offer the the one thing you can't get from a 3rd person perspective - immersion. Unfortunately, HMDs still have some serious drawbacks, the greatest of which is the fixed focus. Some HMDs are supposedly focused at "infinity", but they are still fixed focus in that there is no way to create the different levels of focus that the real world offers the eyes - everything is at the same distance. Thus, your eyes do not change focus as they do in the real world, which leads to eye strain. Once this issue is overcome, and issues relating to FOV (field of view) vs. resolution (namely you can't get a big FOV with high resolution yet for any reasonable amount of money - it is always a trade off) are surmounted, the ability to work and play in simulated VEs (virtuals environments) for long periods of time will become a reality.

    That is what I am waiting for...

    --
    Reason is the Path to God - Anon