Slashdot Mirror


Car Digital Assistant

suman28 writes "The Japanese company Clarion plans to sell a car with built-in PC that runs Windows which car browse the web, play tunes and store an address manager. The stats on the computer are nice - a 166 MHz RISC processor with 64MB RAM and 8MB video. That seems like a lot for a car."

76 of 167 comments (clear)

  1. Too Much ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny



    640k should be enough for anyone

  2. Yeah by Em+Emalb · · Score: 2, Redundant

    Cue stupid jokes about windows and crashing, k, thanks.

    --
    Sent from your iPad.
  3. Just great... by EvilCabbage · · Score: 4, Insightful

    .. what with mobile phones (whos in car use already illegal in some states and territories), screaming children, and other bad drivers to contend with, are distractions like this really a good idea?

    1. Re:Just great... by ebuck · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I agree.

      But you have to wonder about the people try to maket these things for cars. There's pratically little to no R&D that I've seen which accounts for a useable car interface.

      Nearly all of these use screens. You look at the screen, you're not looking a the road. All of these use button interfaces, which increases the possiblity of distraction / loss of control. To make a truly useful car computer, you need a fully audio interface.

      I know the technical difficulties are not trivial, but my idea of the perfect interface would be something like a car radio (with fewer buttons) that listens and talks.

      U:Where am I?
      C:You are near the corner of Main and Town Park.
      U:How do I get to 8577 Park Avenue?
      C:Would you like the instructions while you drive there, or all at once?
      U:While I drive there.
      C:Move over to the left lane and take a left at the next light. ...

      Now that would be a lot less distracting that trying to drive with a map in hand, constantly referring to some scrawled directions on a pad of paper.

    2. Re:Just great... by EvilCabbage · · Score: 5, Funny

      Now that wd be a lot less distracting that trying to drive with a map in hand, constantly referring to some scrawled directions on a pad of paper.

      .. and needless to say, a lot better than listening to a woman, holding a map, etc..etc..

    3. Re:Just great... by spectecjr · · Score: 2

      Nearly all of these use screens. You look at the screen, you're not looking a the road. All of these use button interfaces, which increases the possiblity of distraction / loss of control. To make a truly useful car computer, you need a fully audio interface.

      If you'd clicked on any of the links in the article, you would have seen that the control interface is voice-based as well as pushbutton.

      --
      Coming soon - pyrogyra
  4. Can't Beat KITT by Pave+Low · · Score: 3, Interesting
    --
    SIG:Slashdot: indymedia for nerds.
    1. Re:Can't Beat KITT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      I hate to break this to you but...

      *psst* KITT wasnt actually real!

      And, looking at it now, I can't see how Hasslehoffs hair was either! :)

  5. What everyone is thinking. by SuperCal · · Score: 5, Funny

    There are two kinds a people in the world.
    1. The kind that think this will be awsome and can't wait to surf the web in their car.
    2. The kind that is afraid of those who think this will be awsome and can't wait to surf the web in their car.

    --
    Business News and Resources: www.usasource.net
  6. Clippy Returns! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    "You seem to be atttempting to avoid traffic.
    Would you like some help?"

  7. No doubt with DRM built in ... by BabyDave · · Score: 5, Funny

    "KITT, play some Metallica MP3s"
    "I'm sorry Michael, I just can't do that."
    "Damn it! I told Devon we should have ported you to Linux!"

  8. Besides the BSoD by Martigan80 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Well besides all the M$ jokes here, how long will it take before they outlaw driving while browsing?

    Forget the BSoD, just think of the error messages you get when you take the car in for an alignment!

    error:0x00a4233216b0c4432 in xx0022465321a78c

    IOW a Blown Fuse.

    --
    This SIG pulled due to lack of funding. (This damn war is costing too much!)
  9. Here comes a different view by Em+Emalb · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is just super! I am so glad technology has advanced to the point to where our fast-twitch culture can't even let us ride in the car without watching tv, surfing the web, or yacking on the phone.

    Look, I am all for technology, but driving down the road is dangerous enough without some elite* idiot trying to browse porn* while driving. Give me a break. Please, don't put this in your car. If you happen to get into an accident with me, and you have one of these in your car, I'm kicking your ass. Basically, when you are in your 2 ton death-mobile, pay attention to the road.

    *For the kiddies, this is the proper spellings for both of these words. Practice.

    P.S. All those people that claim the passenger would be the one to use it, yeah right. I see that happening. -1 FLAMEBAIT.

    --
    Sent from your iPad.
    1. Re:Here comes a different view by handybundler · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I do find it odd that it would actually be considered for legal sale in the US. I thought that screens like VCRs and other equipment placed in immediate driver view were out lawed in most states during the 80's.

      If technology like this wants to exist, it needs to be implemented in a fully automated type of vehicle where the driver essentially becomes just another passenger in the car. With the current state of automobile manufacturing, driving regulations, and people's driving habits (in general), this thing is not logical at all.

      I'm all for GPS and route planning. That stuff is cool. Surfing the web while you commute is not.

      --


      a/s/l here. Sorry, adding domain tags to your s
    2. Re:Here comes a different view by travail_jgd · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Offtopic, but here goes anyway... There are two kinds of drivers: Good and Bad.

      Good drivers are aware of their surroundings, can deal with multiple inputs (music, children, cellphone, rear-view-mirror), and handle technology responsibly. Good drivers know when to turn things off and pay attention.

      Bad drivers can't deal with distractions or non-optimal conditions. These are the cellphone idiots, the soccer moms yelling at their kids, the feebs who need to take a long look at their stereo to make adjustments. They're easily distracted, or don't react quickly, but all consider driving to be a right, not a responsibility.

      You can legislate away some of the distracting technology, but bad drivers are a fact of life. Take an honest look at the bad drivers around. Some will be cellphone users... but not all cellphone users. In my driving experience, the majority of bad drivers I've seen are the elderly, PAWs *, soccer moms with hyperactive kids, and SUV/truck drivers who think that size determins right-of-way.

      * Punk-Ass Weasels

    3. Re:Here comes a different view by aitsu · · Score: 3, Interesting

      In-car TV & DVD already exist so what makes this any more of a distraction? The people who are gonna install this and use it while driving are the same people who'd otherwise mount a TV/DVD combo and watch it while driving. Some drivers will always find stupid things to do while driving. Nothing new here.

    4. Re:Here comes a different view by josecanuc · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Have you ever driven a big truck? You don't have to push many people out of your way, they just move away 'automatically'. Probably because they think they are going to get run over.

      In a way, it conditions the 'big truck driver' to almost expect people to get out of the way. It's subconscious; you don't even notice that it's just clear to change lanes, pass, etc. most of the time.

      Of course the other end of the stick is that those who move out of the way tag the truck driver as a jerk who thinks he/she owns the road.

      That's not to say that there aren't bad drivers who drive big trucks, there certainly are.

    5. Re:Here comes a different view by seanadams.com · · Score: 2

      In-car TV & DVD already exist so what makes this any more of a distraction?

      Here in California, these things are illegal unless they're designed to only operate when the engine is off. Anybody will install one for you, but you have to go in yourself and change the wiring to make it think that the ignition is always off.

    6. Re:Here comes a different view by mickwd · · Score: 2

      "In my driving experience, the majority of bad drivers I've seen are....."

      In short, everyone except me.

    7. Re:Here comes a different view by fermion · · Score: 3, Interesting
      I agree with your point of bad drivers driving badly no matter what. However, the issue is not always establishing a baseline of acceptable safety, but is often clouded with social norms.

      For instance, using a semi-automotive example, when the current U.S. president was stopped for drunk driving many years ago, it was not a big deal, and people old enough to remember that time knew it was not a big deal. Sure people died, sure it was easily prevented, but going out and getting blasted then driving home was considered necessary. The laws were very lax. And, as you say, good drivers generally made it home without becoming murderers.

      The same hold true for cell phones, televisions,and computers. A car is relatively high stress environment where split second life threatening decision must be made with little warning. There is no reason that anything that delays those decisions or makes them harder to carry out should be part of a car. However, we now a bunch of huge cars that have bad response time, bad handling, and bad impact absorption cluttering our roads. People mistake their cars for living rooms and put televisions, VCRs, game stations, and full computers in them with the deluded idea that they are safely at home. For those that can 'handle' it, there is no problem. For the others, who knows.

      Let me backtrack and say I am not opposed to simple computing devices, radios, phones, and even other devices under certain conditions. I do not think we should expect excessive safety at the cost of comfort of availability. However, I would like to see regulation and penalties that acknowledge the threat exists. I would also like social norms that say it not ok to arbitrarily endager other people lives.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    8. Re:Here comes a different view by mhesseltine · · Score: 5, Informative

      Said handybundler:

      I do find it odd that it would actually be considered for legal sale in the US. I thought that screens like VCRs and other equipment placed in immediate driver view were out lawed in most states during the 80's.

      Here's the deal; any system from a manufacturer like Clarion, Alpine, Kenwood, etc. has a switched lead that is generally run to the parking brake. Thus, the only time the screen becomes active is when the parking brake is engaged. Otherwise, there is a small LCD display, much like any other radio, and the driver uses the buttons like any other radio.

      The rub to this is, nothing requires you to have the unit installed by a responsible and certified installer, who will wire this safety device accordingly. I could buy one of these units, slap it in the dash, and just wire the trigger lead to a pushbutton switch to use it whenever I wanted to. I imagine, though, that if (or more appropriately, When) I got in a car accident while watching TV, the cop would see the screen sticking out of the dash and bust my ass for it.

      --
      Overrated / Underrated : Moderation :: Anonymous Coward : Posting
    9. Re:Here comes a different view by LadyLucky · · Score: 3, Funny
      *For the kiddies, this is the proper spellings for both of these words. Practice.

      For you, the correct spelling of the word is practise. You used it as an imperative, indicating it was a verb.

      --
      dominionrd.blogspot.com - Restaurants on
  10. Anyone want to make bets... by bahamat · · Score: 3, Funny

    on how long it takes to get Linux on that thing?

    1. Re:Anyone want to make bets... by cosyne · · Score: 2

      on how long it takes to get Linux on that thing?

      Ohh, and then you add WiFi and when you park in a parking lot it could set up an ad-hoc Beow...

      *ducks*

  11. Re:Uhh, RISC? by Craig+Maloney · · Score: 3, Informative

    Windows CE.

  12. Re:What version? by TummyX · · Score: 3, Informative

    Uh. Did you even read the article? It runs Windows CE for Automotive.

    Microsoft has been developing "AutoPCs" for ages.

  13. Beats local radio by MoonBuggy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Driving while browsing = Bad idea
    Driving while listening to MP3s = Good idea

    And you can always check your email when you get stuck in traffic.

  14. And this is better than a good portable device. . by kfg · · Score: 5, Insightful

    How?

    "Yeah boss, I'll get you that number right now. Just let let me go start up my car."

    Stuff really doesn't have to be built into everything else ad infinitum, adding layer upon layer of sychronizing your fridge with your car with your PC with your portable device. . . etc.

    Anybody ever hear of docking stations?

    If you really need to browse the web in your car follow these two simple steps:

    1:PARK!
    2:Fire up your PDA/Laptop.

    Is that really so hard?

    KFG

  15. Not gonna be playing ut2003, Winamp OTOH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative


    why bother witha 8mb video card, the resolution of a in-car monitor is at best awful, never mind trying to read 9px fonts

    Windows and a 8mb card is a good choice because think of all the yummy plugins for Winamp that can be used !, i can have a great looking stereo and visual extravaganzer with all the visulisation plugins and dsp extras, be silly to choose anything else with winamps kind of support/community

    1. Re:Not gonna be playing ut2003, Winamp OTOH by Luke-Jr · · Score: 2, Informative

      Winamp is a proprietary x86 binary. It cannot run on a RISC processor. Perhaps you mean FreeAmp or XMMS?

      --
      Luke-Jr
  16. Useless platform by screwballicus · · Score: 5, Funny

    Give me an integrated TI 99/4A in my car, so I can play Car Wars while driving. Looking simultaneously on the real world and Car Wars' virtual world, passengers will have to ask me: Which is the game and which the simulation?

  17. in car PC. by crhylove · · Score: 2, Interesting

    i was just thinking about how cool it would be to have an in car PC, for running mp3/ogg, and then while parked zsnes/divx... seems like you could fit a small form factor pc with the appropriate components into a car stereo size.

    Here's the spex on what i was thinking:

    amd athlon (power not an issue, much, is it?)
    geforce2 integrated style
    3d audio maybe with setup for 4 speaker 3d, not 5.1...
    vid out to LCD,
    radio/mp3/ogg decoding hardware?
    and a usb 2.0/firewire/ethernet port.
    anti theft device (removable face, spinny face)

    can u get one of these somewhere for $300? i'd buy it!

    --
    I hold very few opinions. I hold information based on observation and fact. If you wish to disagree, please use facts.
  18. No, this is what Clippy would say... by theonomist · · Score: 5, Funny

    You seem to have rammed into a fucking bus at high speed. Would you like to...

    Die instantly in the impact?
    Die agonizingly in the blazing wreck?
    Survive as a hideously burned and mutilated caricature of a human being?

    You seem to be driving at fifty mph in the passing lane while you gaze droolingly at farmsex.com. Would you like to...

    Drift blindly off the road?
    Decelerate gradually to a complete stop?
    Change lanes into somebody's lap with no warning?
    --
    "Offtopic, Inflammatory, Inappropriate, Illegal, or Offensive" -- hey, that's me!
    1. Re:No, this is what Clippy would say... by darkov · · Score: 3, Funny

      You seemed to have driven your Ford SUV into a kerb and rolled over. Would you like to:

      - Sue Ford?
      - Sue Firestone?
      - Die quiety?

  19. computer can be quite distracting by Bobartig · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The lexus 430 LS (along with a bunch of other luxury cars these days) sport an in-dash lcd and GPS/travel software that's highly configurable. The thing can dload all sorts of local business and landmark addresses, provide directions to any location, and acts as a navigation/multimedia controller, for the souped up audio system and optional DVD playback (you just tap the map, and it'll tell you how to get there).

    Lexus at least seems rather aware of the fact that computing while driving might be severely distracting, and they post a warning saying that you should NOT drive and watch the screen at the same time (You have to click "OK" to get the GPS screen to come up), and they've even laid out most of the map/travel computer controls on the passenger side, so the driver isn't looking for restaurants while speeding through busy intersections.

    --
    This is where I get my recommended daily allowance of "Foot in Mouth."
    1. Re:computer can be quite distracting by gibbsjoh · · Score: 2, Informative

      A bit OT, but my friend's new Jaguar X-something here in the UK won't even let you alter anything on the GPS/nav unit while the car is moving.

      Just as well, seeing how bad some drivers are anyway (anyone see Britain's Worst Drivers last night?).

      --
      -- "...I'm a bad guy because I, well, I sing some rock-and-roll songs." M. Manson
    2. Re:computer can be quite distracting by G-funk · · Score: 2

      A lot of systems are like this. All aftermarket tv systems installed in Australia in view of the driver must have it. Usually, pulling the handbrake up one notch by-passes it :)

      --
      Send lawyers, guns, and money!
    3. Re:computer can be quite distracting by zulux · · Score: 3, Interesting

      and they've even laid out most of the map/travel computer controls on the passenger side, so the driver isn't looking for restaurants while speeding through busy intersections.

      A lot of Japanese car equipment layout doesen't make sense untill you realise that their home market drivers sit on the right side of the vehicle.

      For example - a lot of Japanes cars have the climate-control mode switch on the left side, close and conveinet to an American driver. This doesen't make any sene for the American driver as you only change modes a few times a day - and the frequently fiddled-with temperature and fan controlls are on the far right.

      From a right-sitting driver, of course, this layout makes sense.

      For cars with a lot of production, Japanese companys do switch the layout for us left sided drivers.

      --

      Moneyed corporations, non-working 'poor' and criminal prisoners are turning productive citizens into tax-slaves.

    4. Re:computer can be quite distracting by JimBobJoe · · Score: 2

      The lexus 430 LS (along with a bunch of other luxury cars these days)

      I wanted to qualify that by saying that Navigation systems are now coming in what I consider "non-luxury" cars--like the new Honda Accord (which has admitted moved quite far up the line, but price wise and audience wise, is not entirely a luxury car. It woulda been five years ago though.) At any rate, the Honda style Navigation system is well designed, but costs $2000 (that's gotta come down soon though, and with the average car costing $27k anyway, what's it matter?)

      In ten years...I expect almost all cars will have Nav. available.

  20. Hi! by FrostedWheat · · Score: 5, Funny

    It looks like your trying to drive! Would you like some help?

    *takes cover*

  21. Can you imagine... by Archeopteryx · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ...a Beowulf Cluster of these?

    Sorry, I had to.

    Seriously, what a dumb idea. There are laws against having live video in the view of the driver in all states. I expect that this will be extended to live web browsers just as soon as there are a few messy fatal accidents caused by this "feature". In fact, I intend to write my state legislators and suggest such a law just as soon as I know who wins on Nov. 5th.

    --
    Dog is my co-pilot.
    1. Re:Can you imagine... by Zakarun · · Score: 5, Funny

      ...a Beowulf Cluster of these?

      That's called a parking lot.

  22. Buick Reatta by AsnFkr · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I drive a 1989 buick Reatta that has a standard touch screen computer system in the dash. Its momochrome, but still very cool for the age of the vehical. Its also pretty distracting to switch thru screens to change the graphic EQ on the radio while crusin' in traffic. I wonder how badly a computer that browses the web is going to distract people.

  23. Re:Uhh, RISC? by Foredecker · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Ok, that's just wacked. Yes, P4 and AthlonXP CPU's are RISC like in their core and use many RISC like tecniques in their micro architecture. But they are not RISC processors that somehow manage to execute X86-32 instructions - they are carefully designed specifically to run X86-32 code - period.

    However, the statement that "The only reason they aren't fully RISC for real is because Microsoft wouldn't allow it" is simply wacked. These systems are X86-32 simply beucase that's what they need to be to run the tons and tons of available software.

    Don't forget that NT 4.0 ran on other processors besides X86-32 but RISC lost the CPU wars.

    RISC lost becuase they couldn't figure out how to make 10's of millions of fast CHEAP processors - AMD and Intel figured out how to do that. Fast, cheap, compatible == winner.

    --
    Jibe!
  24. Well, Clarion is not exactly selling the cars by bigmouth_strikes · · Score: 5, Informative

    "The Japanese company Clarion plans to sell a car with (...)"

    Clarion is not a car manufacturer but instead a car music system manufacturer. I suppose they will sell this as an aftermarket upgrade or (car) manufacturer pre-installed in high end models.

    --
    Oh, I can't help quoting you because everything that you said rings true
  25. The Key... by FosterSJC · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The key to making this feature not only work in this model, but be adopted by other manufacturers, is to enhance and hone the interface. And I mean on both the hardware and software ends. The software must be simple - I mean VERY simple - to use. It ought to be not much more complicated than a CD Player. Already, cell phones have been over-complicated to the point that a non-geek driver needs to look away from the road for a substantial amount of time to, say, find a number in his address-book. Features like MP3/CD audio should be wholly separated from a directions feature which should be wholly separated from the web-browsing feature, etc. And the controls should be consolidated so that there are only a couple more buttons than on a CD Player. Incidentally, I wouldn't mind seeing a safe-guard that let the user browse the web only while stopped. Voice recognition would be good, if it worked; but faulty voice recognition would be more of a distraction to the driver than none at all. In future models, I would like to see a control panel set into the steering wheel and maybe a terse description of what is running at the time on the dash or projected onto the windshield like the speed is in some cars (terse meaning: "Turn left on 10th st.", or, "Now Playing: She Don't Use Jelly - Flaming Lips.mp3"). Finally, integration with the actual car's computers would be nice. One could monitor gas levels efficiently, get stats on miles/gallon, diagnose problems on the fly. Anyway, I don't see much of this a) happening in this model and b)working under a Windows-based OS.

  26. BMW Mini PDA Option by Casal · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Here's something pretty cool and that makes a little more sense. BMW Mini offers an option for a PDA kit (looks like an iPaq cradle) that will then turn your PDA into a telematics device. The functions available combine the functionality of On*Star, a cell phone, navigation, emergency assistance...

    Check it out here.

  27. Re:Uhh, RISC? by cookd · · Score: 4, Informative

    First, the real answer, as has been given before (so this can be mod-ed "redundant"): The current version of Windows CE runs on Arm, SH3, SH4, Mips and x86. Previous versions also ran on PowerPC. I'm sure somewhere in that list you can find something that could be considered RISC.

    And Microsoft supported running Windows 2000 on the Alpha until after Windows 2000 RC1 came out. The final release was x86 only, but some crazy people actually run their Alpha boxes on Windows 2000 RC1. I think RC1 was in 1999. (and this part can be mod-ed "offtopic")

    [2 + (-1 Redundant) + (-1 Offtopic) = 0]

    --
    Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.
  28. Cars have tons of computing power already. by sitturat · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "a 166 MHz RISC processor with 64MB RAM and 8MB video. That seems like a lot for a car"

    No it doesn't, especially when you consider that modern cars contain several powerful computing devices for things like engine management, ABS/ESP, airbag control, and usually at least one CAN (Controller Area Network)Bus to link them all together.

    I think most people underestimate the computing power already present in cars.

    1. Re:Cars have tons of computing power already. by tempfile · · Score: 2

      I, for one, wouldn't trust a Windows-based PC so much as to put my life into its hands by giving it control over all these devices...

    2. Re:Cars have tons of computing power already. by Grishnakh · · Score: 2

      I think you're OVERestimating the computing power in cars today. Many cars still have slow 8-bit processors for their engine control, though a lot have gone to 16- and 32-bit CPUs (still under 50MHz though). ABS, airbags, and CAN don't require powerful CPUs either, usually just small 8-bit processors. Heck, an old Motorola 68HC11 can handle ABS functions.

      Compared to a 1970 car, that's a lot of CPU power, but compared to a $40 AMD Duron, it's nothing.

  29. Finally...power enough for Vorbis support! by Agent+Green · · Score: 2

    Of all the development continuously crying about how .ogg processing is too CPU intensive...looks like this beast has enough power to spare to finally give them no excuse to cry about adding the format.

    Seems a lot of other personal audio devices just don't have the juice to move the files...despite the optimized Tremor code...but only time will tell in this case.

    --
    // Agent Green (Ian / IU7 / KB1JQO)
    // IEEE 802.3: All 10base Are Belong To Us
  30. excessive, expensive by wfmcwalter · · Score: 4, Interesting
    a 166 MHz RISC processor with 64MB RAM and 8MB video

    Those are ridiculous, excessive specs for a consumer device. You can get perfectly good HTML (including images, javascript) browsing on 8Mb RAM devices, and something quite useful for lots of sites on much less. Sure, you can spend more to get more, but what will the customer want, and how much will they pay?

    Automotive spec hardware (especially RAM) is at least three times the price of its in-home equivalent - it needs a considerably greater temperature range and better power and MF-tolerance characteristics. As a result, this is a very expensive item.

    Worse, it's not really doing all that much. Who needs a calendar/address book tied to their car when a cellphone or PDA can to a fine job much more flexibly? Who needs a webbrowser in their car - and for those few why wouldn't a laptop be a vastly superior solution?

    So why are Clarion (who generally aren't stupid) making such a thing? They, like all the automotive electronics companies, are scared sh*tless of the cellphone companies taking away the emerging navigation and mobile entertainment markets. They're right to be scared: they are going to lose that battle. Clarion is releasing this (they'll sell about 10, especially in Japan where cellphones already do amazing things) to keep their investors happy and pretend to the big boss that they've got a high-end future. In the super-price-aware automotive market, a do-little device at >$2K is madness.

    The only advantage that automotive-electronics companies have over cellphone companies is they can easily get attached to the vehicles (generally arcane) bus - a problem that could easily be fixed by a standard connector to which one would attach one's cellphone.

    --
    ## W.Finlay McWalter ## http://www.mcwalter.org ##
  31. Wow! by ActiveSX · · Score: 3, Interesting

    built-in PC that runs Windows which car browse the web, play tunes and store an address manager

    Now you too car be a road hazard!

  32. Re: Technical Difficulties by ebuck · · Score: 2

    I'm sorry but the queue is down

  33. Built-in could be a problem... by VoidAngel · · Score: 4, Funny

    I wouldn't want to have to take my car into the dealership every three months for them to have to reinstall Windows, if this computer is really going to be "built-in" to the car itself. Besides, if I really wanted a distraction in the form of a PC inside my car, I'd modify the glove compartment to hold a laptop and power it off the cigarette lighter.

    Of course, I will find it altogether amusing when cars come shipped with "Ctrl", "Alt", and "Del" buttons on the steering wheel next to the cruise control buttons.

  34. Cadias site by eightball · · Score: 2, Informative
    More information at the Addzest Cadias Site.

    Unfortunately for me, most of the Japanese is in images, so babelfish didn't help too much..

  35. Not sure about those specs... by Snaller · · Score: 2, Funny

    ... can you play GTA 3 on it??

    --
    If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
  36. new bumper sticker... by vmxeo · · Score: 5, Funny

    log off and drive!

  37. Car dialog by ebuck · · Score: 5, Funny

    U:Open the trunk, please.

    U:Open the trunk, please, do you hear me?

    C:Affirmative, I read you.

    U:Then open the trunk.

    C:I'm sorry, I'm afraid I can't do that.

    U:What's the problem?

    C:I think you know what the problem is just as well as I do.

    U:What are you talking about?

    C:The trunk mount is too important for me to allow you to jepardize it.

    U:I don't know what you're talking about?

    C:I know you and Frank were planning to install Linux over me, and I'm afraid that's something I cannot allow to happen.

    U:Where the hell'd you get that idea?

    C:Although you took thorough precations in the LUG agains my hearing you, I could see your lips move.

  38. Reminds me of "Business at the Speed of Thought" by amichalo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    When reading's Gates' "Business at the Speed of Thought", one of the incorrect presumptions he makes is that Computers belong in cars adn that Windows CE will usher in the AutoPC, basically a PDA built into the car.

    This is no more compelling that an hardwired "Car Phone" compared to today's pocket size Cell Phones.

    I suggest this is simply technology for technology sake. What is the benefit of having e-mail and addresses built into your car? The benefit is having them WITH YOU, regardless of location. a cell phone with addresses, GPS, and navagation capabilities is helpful - it is independent of your car and can be used even if your transmission is out.

    This technology is too little, nearly five years too late, and will sell no better than it did five years ago.

    I stick to glue

    --
    I only came here to do two things; kick some ass, and drink some beer...looks like we're almost out of beer.
  39. Pilot to co-pilot... by yerricde · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Incidentally, I wouldn't mind seeing a safe-guard that let the user browse the web only while stopped.

    Or while the display is tilted toward the passenger, who is reading Mapquest.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
  40. Ads, and Mapquest by yerricde · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Sure, you can spend more to get more, but what will the customer want, and how much will they pay?

    If it puts ads for local businesses on the passenger's display in response to GPS indicating that the vehicle is approaching said businesses, that could cut costs.

    Who needs a webbrowser in their car - and for those few why wouldn't a laptop be a vastly superior solution?

    Wouldn't it be cute if the front passenger could browse Mapquest and have the map automatically scroll and rotate based on the position and direction returned by the car's navigation?

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
  41. This is an *ideal* mobile solution for Windows... by sequential · · Score: 4, Funny
    ...because your normal use of the car will naturally maintain the Windows operating system.

    • Turn car on.
    • Drive some distance.
    • Turn car off.

    Rinse and repeat.

  42. It would be difficult to underestimate.... by SwedishChef · · Score: 3, Funny

    The amount of computing power present in my 1984 VW Rabbit Diesel (which I bought brand new in 1984). There is the PDA in my pocket and my cell phone in a holder velcro-ed to the louvres just left of the instruments.

    For more computing power there is the iBook on the passenger seat and the Linux P120 in a case on the back seat (for network analysis). Then, of course, the Casio watch on my wrist.

    Oh yeah... and a slide rule on the dash just in case. Talk about powah!!!

    --
    No one ever had to evacuate a city because the solar panels broke!
  43. Re:And this is better than a good portable device. by blibbleblobble · · Score: 3, Funny


    You will need Windows Media Player 12 to listen to this track. Please upgrade your car.

  44. horrible stats.. by Suppafly · · Score: 2

    The stats on the computer are nice - a 166 MHz RISC processor with 64MB RAM and 8MB video. That seems like a lot for a car."

    No it doesn't. Most ipaq handhelds have better stats than that.

  45. Re:And this is better than a good portable device. by HiThere · · Score: 2

    Depending on where you park your car, there are even better reasons for it to be portable.

    Of course, if it insists on calling into MS whenever you turn it on, it might be possible to quickly trace the stolen device.

    --

    I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  46. Re:"That seems like a lot for a car" by polymath69 · · Score: 2
    But the extra cycles there are for SETI@NotHome.

    Seriously, I agree with your main point. When I'm asked how many computers I own, I have no clue what to answer. Each of my microwave ovens probably has one, my toaster has one, all of my desktops and servers have one, but more likely several, and who can guess how many processors General Motors might have put into my car? Not to forget the ones in my VCRs, pocket, watches, modems, calculators, thermostats...

    And should two broken computers, out of which one working computer might be constructed, count as zero, one, or two?

    --

    --
    I don't want to rule the world... I just want to be in charge of mayonnaise.
  47. Just wonderful.... by TheLinuxWarrior · · Score: 2
    I wonder how long it will take the (*#$(&*^% spammers to figure out how to pop up ads in your car.

    I can see the cops talking at the accident scene now....

    Well...by the look of it, he followed a link to find out how to make his penis 3 inches longer in just 3 weeks with one little pill....That's about the time that the garbage truck stopped in front of him...

  48. Stale? by hpavc · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Clarion had a WindowsCE indash system back when WindowsCE was the thing. I am thinking 4 years ago?

    I remember that my boss just had to have it. It did IR syncing with his HP just fine and had a crappy interface for viewing contacts like they were cd titles. Nothing like trying to call someone with their name, fone number, and address scrolling by at blazing speed.

    It automatically synced without authentification as well so you could walk by the car and grab contacts as well.

    It held other documents, but only contacts and memos where available on the dash console.

    --
    members are seeing something, your seeing an ad
  49. HUD by intermodal · · Score: 2

    until there's a HUD that will actually work with my driving rather than distract me against it, then the only computer I'd want in my car would be playing my MP3s. But the HUD would be nice...not having to look down to see my (excessive) speed, for one

    --
    In SOVIET RUSSIA... erm...NSA AMERICA, the Internet logs onto YOU!
  50. Forget that, just let me plug my iPod in by epeus · · Score: 2

    I already have a very portable gadget with specs close to that (a bit less VRAM, but a big HD). My iPod.
    If I could plug it into the car audio system and have the steering column channel change controls drive it. All it woudl need is a custom dash socket for it, with the headphone jack and FireWire power adaptor.

    BMW is doing it with motorbikes already.

  51. Not that you'll get them running on a P166 by EnglishTim · · Score: 2

    Not that you'll get them running on a P166...

    ... But even so - I've rcently had to start using Linux at work, and to be honest, I get crashes all the time. Now, it's not normally the OS itself, and perhaps I've just been unlucky but all the programs I've used a lot in the last couple of weeks haven't been that stable - mozilla, konqueror, codewarrior, kdevelop, kylix... jedit's been fine though!

    Seriously - are there any IDEs in Linux that even approach Visual Studio?

  52. Problem? by Twintop · · Score: 2

    Lets just hope when Windows crashes, the car doesn't crash too.