Slashdot Mirror


Korea World Leader in Broadband/Technology at Home

bozoman42 writes "67% of Korean Internet users are connected to broadband, some at 32Mbps! In fact, according to the Guardian Article, Korea is leading in nearly all walks of a modern high tech life. But there may be downsides. (Especially as covered here last week.)"

109 of 298 comments (clear)

  1. But there may be downsides... by MattRog · · Score: 5, Funny

    Yeah, like living next to North Korea.

    --

    Thanks,
    --
    Matt
    1. Re:But there may be downsides... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      How did you know they were talking about South Korea?

      maybe by reading the fucking article.

      "Not many people would have bet on South Korea becoming the world's leading nation..."

    2. Re:But there may be downsides... by User+956 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      How did you know they were talking about South Korea? I noticed this during the world cup. Since when did South Korea become Korea?

      Probably around the same time Taiwan became officially recognized as "China", by the US Government

      --
      The theory of relativity doesn't work right in Arkansas.
    3. Re:But there may be downsides... by Billly+Gates · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Fortunately, the Mexicans or Texas do not have weapons of mass destruction or have interests to invade my country and possibly use them. Former President Clinton called the North Korea/South Korea border the scariest place on Earth.

    4. Re:But there may be downsides... by thegrommit · · Score: 2

      Yes, shame the poster and "editor" forgot to mention that the article is talking about South Korea. The situation is rather different in North Korea.

    5. Re:But there may be downsides... by ergo98 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It's sort of a given, isn't it? Good things=South Korea. Bad things=North Korea. I'd call that a stereotype if it weren't for the fact that it's completely true.

    6. Re:But there may be downsides... by Zordak · · Score: 2, Funny
      Hmmm, you've never actually BEEN to Texas, have you? Apparently, neither has Clinton, because if he had ever put his pants back on long enough to come here, I promise you, he would have been right scared.

      --

      Today's Sesame Street was brought to you by the number e.
    7. Re:But there may be downsides... by ergo98 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I think its great that North Korea doesn't adhere to America's demands. Not doing so doesn't make them bad.

      North Korea is much like a homeless person desperately committing violent crimes on street corners: They have nothing to lose. That is the reason why much of the world is fearful of NK with nukes: Israel, the UK, Russia, the US- All have "something to live for", so to speak, so their nukes largely are retaliatory. Mutually assured destruction, if you will. North Korea, on the other hand, seems like the kind of nutbar country that would take action knowing full well that it would be obliterated: What's there to lose?

      If you're looking for a great example of anti-Americanism, I would hardly consider North Korea a good choice: A despotic, shithole of a country where millions continue to starve to death while the leadership builds giant monstrosity of buildings in a desperate attempt to portray itself as a successful nation.

    8. Re:But there may be downsides... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      [i]I think its great that North Korea doesn't adhere to America's demands. Not doing so doesn't make them bad. [/i]

      No, I think the mass starvations, dicatorship, killings, recruiting from orphanages at the age of 6 for SF troops, terrorist bombings of jetliners, kidnapping of foriegn citizens, and sending death squads into South Korea is what makes them 'bad'.

  2. Multiplayer games are HUGE in Korea. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Multiplayer games are absolutely huge in Korea, people have played themselves to death. And there are examples in real life beatings because of stuff that happens in multiplayer games.

    SIG: Don't support Redhat until they support basic democracy in the dictatorship China vs democratic Taiwan issue. It's an evil company.

    1. Re:Multiplayer games are HUGE in Korea. by keyed · · Score: 3, Insightful

      There are two reasons why there are real life beatings because of the multiplayer games: 1. They take the games very seriously. 2. Korea's a densely populated and relatively small country (compared to the US) so they can physically meet the person they're playing with/against. I'm sure that there are people in the US who would do this, but it's kinda expensive to catch a plane to go beat up some other kid. Not everyone can get a wad of cash like Jay and Silent Bob ;) I remember reading an article on this and the police had a term for these beatings, an "offline PK."

    2. Re:Multiplayer games are HUGE in Korea. by vicviper · · Score: 2

      Where was that guy that played himself to death?

  3. Slight rewording by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    67% of Korean HOUSEHOLDS are connected to broadband. There's a big difference there, and it's very impressive. I'll bet that 67% of Mexican Internet users are connected to broadband, and it's around 0.1% of their population.

    1. Re:Slight rewording by plone · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The article said that 67% of Korean HOUSEHOLDS are connected to broadband, not 67% of Korean Internet USERS. That means that 67% of the homes are wired with broadband. The actual percentage of population of people who have access to broadband is therefore much higher than 67% since Households usually constitute more than a single person.

    2. Re:Slight rewording by comic-not · · Score: 2, Informative

      Uhh ... no. For the mathematically challenged, if an average household equals 2 persons, then 67% of the persons have the access, not 134% as you seem to be indicating. Of course, the percentage may change if there is a clear correlation between household size and migration to broadband, but it does not depend on household size as such.

      --
      Existence usually comes as a surprise (Idem)
    3. Re:Slight rewording by Velox_SwiftFox · · Score: 2

      Nope. Assuming all households have the same number of residents, 67% of households = 67% of population.

      In fact, if poorer South Koreans tend to live in households crowded with more members, and tend not to be able to afford broadband, that could represent a lower percentage of the population.

    4. Re:Slight rewording by evilviper · · Score: 2, Funny
      The article said that 67% of Korean HOUSEHOLDS are connected to broadband, not 67% of Korean Internet USERS.

      That's all well and good, but I don't need broadband to my house, or to me... Where I'd really like it, is connected to my computer. Thanks.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  4. That would be North Korea... by ethnocidal · · Score: 2, Interesting
    As opposed to South Korea, the focus of the article.

    Or did you mean the United States' potential development of new nuclear arms in violation of a Congressional ban?

    Funny old world!

  5. Re:They lead? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    South Korea is leading in nearly all walks of a modern high tech life.

    North Korea is involved in the development of nuclear weapons in violation of international treaty?

    Please read the article and your link again, as there is a big difference between the two countries.

  6. Maybe the "free" market ain't all that by release7 · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Last week, they published a report highlighting a number of Korea's advantages. These include the government's vision and commitment...

    Ingredients for happy society:
    Add: one ounce of capitalism, one ounce of socialism, a pinch of communism

    Not everything in the world is black and white, especially when it comes to determining which "ism" makes the greatest number of people happy.

    --

    <a href="http://www.joblessjimmy.com">Work is dumb and so is Jobless Jimmy.</a>

    1. Re:Maybe the "free" market ain't all that by sql*kitten · · Score: 2

      Add: one ounce of capitalism, one ounce of socialism, a pinch of communism

      Umm, the Communist half of Korea is one of the poorest and most repressive places on Earth. The article is about South Korea, which is effectively a different country. Think east and west Germany before the Berlin Wall came down.

    2. Re:Maybe the "free" market ain't all that by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 2

      Umm, the Communist half of Korea is one of the poorest and most repressive places on Earth.

      You're not getting it. The implication is that the various 'isms' should be mixed together. North Korea can be considered to represent the totalitarianism and poverty of Communism in isolation. America could be considered to represent the plutocracy ("corporatocracy") of Capitialism in isolation (though America is mildly or more-than-mildly socialistic in a number of ways). In fundamental ways, plutocracy is not that different from Communism, except that the leaders are not even theoretically concerned with the welfare of the people.

      For successful blends of the three, think Canada, Australia, or Western Europe. Do you think that the average American is happier than the average citizen of these other places? Think again.

    3. Re:Maybe the "free" market ain't all that by sql*kitten · · Score: 2

      You're not getting it. The implication is that the various 'isms' should be mixed together.

      But North Korea has everything to gain from the South in terms of prosperity and freedom, and it is unclear what, if anything, the South would gain from the North. Really, the North Korean leadership have no bargaining chips apart from their army; their country is destitute and dependent on foreign aid to prevent mass starvation. Why do you think North Koreans frequently attempt to defect to the South but no-one wants to go the other way?

      For successful blends of the three, think Canada, Australia, or Western Europe. Do you think that the average American is happier than the average citizen of these other places? Think again.

      It's hard to say. In the short term it's very easy to buy the voter's favour with subsidies and welfare, even the ancient Romans knew this, but they called it "bread and circuses". The question is a long term one; how happy will the heavily taxed Western Europeans be when they reach their own retirements and find that the cupboard is bare?

  7. Theres a huge demand for broadband in the UK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Unfortunatley BT refuses to upgrade rural exchanges for ADSL, and people are very angry at this. The town of todmorden recently made the headlines for being the first town to reach the threshhold of being upgraded. I live in an 'unupgraded' town, but I dont really care about BT, because Im happy with my cable modem from telewest. The cable companies are more determined than BT to supply broadband, but they can only cover where their cable network goes.

    Satilite broadband is becoming popular too, but its expensive, one way and low latency.

    1. Re:Theres a huge demand for broadband in the UK by cruachan · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Satellite's now two way. I'm in the Scottish Highlands with a satellite connection courtesy of Bridge Broadband (a reseller of course, Hughes Satellite Systems underneath).

      Bandwidth is 512kbs UNCONTENDED down and 2Mbs burst contended. Only 150kbs up, but that should improve soon. It's expensive to put in, but with a pipe that size share the connection with a few neighbours and it's no more expensive than BT's ADSL offering.

      Latency is only a problem if you want to play games. Notice that because the line is uncontended I've actually got considerably more bandwidth than you get in practise from ADSL.

    2. Re:Theres a huge demand for broadband in the UK by digithed · · Score: 5, Interesting

      You are correct when you say that there is a huge demand for broadband in the UK, but the really sad thing is that what is being offered to fill the demand is already out of date. In this day and age ADSL can hardly be described as 'broadband' as it is in most cases only 512Kb/sec. The UK government is dreaming if they really believe that everyone having an ADSL connection will make the UK the most competative place in Europe for e-business. By the time they have managed to roll out ADSL to the majority of the population, most of the rest of Europe will already have installed fiber networks and consumers will have 10Mb/sec connections. Sadly, at the moment, the UK governement either doesn't have a clue or doesn't have the inclination to even start talking about fiber networks.

      I am from UK, but I live in Sweden in a town of approximately 120,000 people (small by UK standards) and I have a 10Mb/sec ethernet connection in my appartment for which I pay 300kr per month (about £25 or $30). ADSL costs the same as this in UK and in most cases is 20 times slower. Why can't UK get its act together? And before people start talking about BTs monoply causing problems please considered that Telia in Sweden also have about the same kind of monopoly position as BT in UK but this does not seem to have hindered the roll out of high speed consumer broadband in Sweden!

      --
      Steve Brammer
      (From UK but currently living in Västerås, Sweden)

    3. Re:Theres a huge demand for broadband in the UK by Chicane-UK · · Score: 2

      This is very true.

      I remeber when BT were first flexing their 'Broadband' initiative. I live in one of the cities which they actually advertised specifically as being broadband enabled, yet my exchange was not. They did practically the whole city, yet overlooked my exchange completely - and every time they gave me an estimate date for getting the exchange done, it came and went without any news. How the hell can they specifically use the name of my city in advertising, as a 'broadband enabled city' when it actually wasn't?

      After waiting a YEAR AND A HALF on dialup, ntl: began their huge cable rollout.. they dug up our street and posted leaflets about their service. So I took up broadband with them and I couldn't be happier! I have been running their 512k service for over a year and it has only ever been down 3 times.

      Screw BT.. they can never get anything right, and they are responsible for the shameful state of the UK's internet ability - they should have been busted up by the government a long time ago :|

      --
      "Hey! Unless this is a nude love-in, get the hell off my property!!"
    4. Re:Theres a huge demand for broadband in the UK by timeOday · · Score: 2
      Only 150kbs up, but that should improve soon.
      That's OK. All the US cable internet companies have reduced upstream at 128kbps. For whatever reason they prefer us to stick with downloading.
    5. Re:Theres a huge demand for broadband in the UK by a_n_d_e_r_s · · Score: 4, Informative

      Telia also is privatized and has responsibilities to its shareholders.

      The reason it exists cheap broadband in Sweden is that an entrepreneur startad a company called Bredbandsbolaget (The broadband company) and started to connect people with 10Mbit/s broadband.

      Others followed suit...

      This message was brought to you by a broadband user in Väasterås, Sweden.

      --
      Just saying it like it are.
  8. It's obvious why they're doing this... by Rui+del-Negro · · Score: 2, Funny

    They're doing it so that people can die at home, surrounded by their family, instead of at internet cafes.

    RMN
    ~~~

  9. They may be on to something by Haxx · · Score: 5, Funny

    In 2000, the government launched its Cyber 21 program, to train a million housewives in IT use in 18 months

    -Haxx calls Korean Airlines for a flight to korea to find a wife.

    Imagine discussing port security during intercourse.

    1. Re:They may be on to something by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 2
      Imagine discussing port security during intercourse.
      In Korean...
  10. Why is this shocking!? by prichardson · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is not shocking due to some basic differencews between the US and South Korea.

    1)The South Korean government is encouraging technological growth, while the US is still realing from P2P networks and people exercising free speach.

    2)South Korea is relatively new, like Europe and Japan, South Korea recently (relativel) rebuilt its industrial base. The US has NEVER had a serious conflict close enough to home to neccesatate major rebuilding. This means that our stuff is old compared to theirs.

    So you see, it is not only explainable, it is logical that South Korea would lead the US, and the rest of the world, in the people having cool toys and making cool tech toys.

    --
    Help I'm a rock.
    1. Re:Why is this shocking!? by tomstdenis · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "P2P and free speach [sic]."

      Why are these always used in combination? Pirating products is not free speech.

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    2. Re:Why is this shocking!? by jandrese · · Score: 3

      No, but stopping pirating has the side effect if stifling free speech. You don't think everybody is out fighting for their right to pirate Warcraft III do you?

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    3. Re:Why is this shocking!? by tshak · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This is not shocking due to some basic differencews between the US and South Korea.

      You forgot:
      3) South Korea is smaller then the average US state and therefore very easy to wire for broadband.

      --

      There is no longer anything that can be done with computers that is nontrivial and clearly legal. -- Paul Phillips
    4. Re:Why is this shocking!? by sam_handelman · · Score: 2

      The US has NEVER had a serious conflict close enough to home to neccesatate major rebuilding. This means that our stuff is old compared to theirs.

      I hate to nitpick, and I agree that it has little impact on your infrastructure-rebuilding argument, but are you familiar with a little tiff we like to call our civil war? Certainly, it didn't destroy any outdated telephone lines, but, NEVER is a STRONG word.

      --
      The good and new comes from no quarter where it is looked for, and is always something different from what is expected.
    5. Re:Why is this shocking!? by Izeickl · · Score: 3, Informative

      Alot of Europe has very old infrastructure, far more so than the US, think about it, the US is basically European expats + some other continents. The US on the whole does NOT have a long history compared to a great deal of the world, + it has a huge land mass for building new infrastructure, the US can afford to build new while keeping the old, places like the UK which is basically the size of Florida -have- to reuse old buildings as we can not afford to demolish all/rebuild and dont have the space for simply building all new extra. Also although countries in Europe etc were more involved in getting hit by Wars the rebuilding was done 50 years ago and it was not a total desimation of citys thus requireing total city rebuild.

  11. Re:They lead? by sam_handelman · · Score: 5, Funny

    He means South Korea.

    I got these Korea at a glance, 15 Fun Facts! Let me tell you, there are a lot of reasons to move there aside from the high bandwidth penetration:

    1) Korean women are hot.
    2) Don't look at me like that. Seriously, they are muy en fuega.
    3) I'm not chauvenistic. The female anatomy is a thing of beauty. Especially in Korea.
    4) It's not a fetish thing. Sheesh.
    5) They have lots of technology and stuff, unlike Thailand. Also, Thai women (while hot) have AIDS. Seriously, man, you're risking your life.
    6) Government less fascist than Singapore or China, and getting less fascist every day (unless it's more, I forget). Although, there's this one Singapore chick who does this really funny webcomic. I would totally do her.
    7) No, it's the Japanese who are into the cartoon porn.
    8) Whoah! Evidently, Koreans also like the cartoon porn.
    9) Korean cartoon porn is totally nasty.
    10) Anyway, Korea doesn't look like a giant mall. Japan creeps me out - stainless steel fucking everywhere.
    11) All Koreans are nerds, and totally bad ass at the same time. Swear to god, I knew this one guy in my engineering class who could do a backflip and kick out ceiling fixtures - he was 27 and he'd never kissed a girl. They won't even notice how much of a nerd you are. Swear to god.
    12) No, he was totally not gay. His parents had arranged a marriage for him with... holy shit, he was so gay. How could I not have seen it? God damn, we were like in the locker room together all the time.
    13) I don't have a problem with it! He's a cool guy. Leaves more Korean women for me, heh?
    14) What?
    15) In Korea, you can pick up chicks by playing video games and drinking soda that's been laced with speed. I swear, that's what pickup joins are like in Korea. Dude, I read it in the nytimes.

    --
    The good and new comes from no quarter where it is looked for, and is always something different from what is expected.
  12. Wow... by SIGBUS · · Score: 2, Funny

    No wonder spammers like South Korea so much. I keep wondering if I'm going to have to blackhole all of Korea on the mail server that I run.

    --
    Oh, no! You have walked into the slavering fangs of a lurking grue!
    1. Re:Wow... by cloudmaster · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yes, blackhole all of Korea (North and South). That cut a bunch of spam out of *my* mail servers...

  13. The leaders in broadband... by kevcol · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...and all their boxes are routing SPAM TO ME!

  14. Interesting to Note... by Eidolon909 · · Score: 5, Informative


    I live and work in Seoul and while its true that most people seem to have broadband at home it doesn't seem like they use it all that much. Its also incredibly affordable, very fast and extremely reliable.

    With that said, Internet Cafes (PC Bangs) are a huge business here. They are literally everywhere. Its very difficult not to walk in a busy area and not see multiple PC bangs. So while all these people have internet at home, they still go out to the Internet Cafe to play games and spend extra money when they could easily do so at home.

    I'm sitting in a PC Bang now, it has about 40 stations and half of them are in use. Mostly men in their early to late twenties. Most of them are playing Starcraft: Broodwar or one of numerous Diablo II clones. The handful of women in here are playing cards or using chat software. I will play Warcraft myself shortly.

    Anyhow, my point is that all these homes are wired yet people still flock to these cafes unnecessarily. I mean, in the afternoons these places are filled with middle and high-school kids and then with adults all through the night. Most are open 24 hours.

    So 67% of Korean homes may be wired, but I'd say an even greater percentage of the population are internet users, I don't know a single korean who doesn't have an e-mail address or an IM id.

    1. Re:Interesting to Note... by Eidolon909 · · Score: 2, Informative


      You can get a job with a foreign company quite easily, the IT job market here is very good. In all sectors. It does depend on your skills though and what are you want to work in. But there are plenty of programmers and other professionals that don't speak a lick of Korean.

      It usually just needs to be a foreign company though, or a Korean company that deals in foreign business. Domestic trade and you'll need korean.

      By the way, farang is thai for foreigner, in Korea you're a waygook.

    2. Re:Interesting to Note... by zenyu · · Score: 2

      I don't know a single korean who doesn't have an e-mail address or an IM id.

      I ran into an old friend a few years ago on the subway, we chatted it up and then as her train was leaving I asked for her e-mail so I could get back in touch with her. She said she didn't have one and I was so befudled that I didn't catch her phone number as a the train pulled out.

      That is I could also almost say that in the US, even though millions of Americans don't even have e-mail. Hell I only know a couple people without broadband, even though most people don't have it here yet.

    3. Re:Interesting to Note... by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 2

      Mostly men in their early to late twenties. Most of them are playing Starcraft: Broodwar or one of numerous Diablo II clones. The handful of women in here are playing cards or using chat software.

      Ah, so this is insidious government plan plan for population control: turn all the young men into computer geeks.

  15. I don't doubt that they watch VOD more by keyed · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Having got broadband internet, Koreans use it much more. Dr Heejin Lee, a lecturer at Brunel University, says Koreans rack up an average of 1,340 minutes per month, which compares with the UK average of 382 minutes. The high usage stems partly from it being fast enough for video on demand: people can use it to time-shift TV programmes, or catch up with episodes of soaps they have missed. Also, 54% of Koreans play online games.
    Their TV stations do VOD the right way. You can watch any show up to that they've aired for up to a week and without commercials. My mother, who lives in San Antonio, TX, and knows nothing about computers, watches these after she gets home from work. The quality of the video streaming isn't that good at times, but that probably has more to do with the fact that it's being streamed from Korea. It doesn't bother my mom too much as she watches the news and old style music shows that she liked when she left Korea 20+ years ago.
  16. Weird world of Korea by Ektanoor · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There is some strange paradox here. Korea in fact is two Koreas. They started just in the same line and nearly with the same problems but today they seem to make a difference like Earth and Moon. We have the North with its rich resources but backward economy, its hunt for nukes, militarisation and lack of Internet (probably with exception of some bureaucrates). And we have the South that was considered to be more poor in resources, but which, in the end, is becoming the top technocratic country in the world. Yes, the South was also highly militarised and had nukes from the US. But the same went for the North with USSR.

    I just wonder what will happen when someone will try a real reunification. What will happen when a North, which still cannot give up its dependency on someone else, with an economy in shambles and one of the biggest armies in the world meets a South which a big part of the world depends on, an economy that gives envy to anyone and carrying a more pacifist mood than ever?

    North - What do you mean by "using Internet"?
    South - What do you mean by "not using Internet"?

    1. Re:Weird world of Korea by ergo98 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      For a historical example, just take a peek at East and West Germany, or virtually all of the Eastern Bloc countries, and the reunification thereof. While there was much doom and gloom about the trouble that would result, it looks like they did a pretty good job, and much of Eastern Germany got pulled up by its bootstraps to a similar level that West Germany had enjoyed.

    2. Re:Weird world of Korea by Ektanoor · · Score: 2, Offtopic

      Europe never went the same way as some other countries. Even the huge backslash in Russia is nothing compared to what happened in some other places. The blistering fury, which blowed while Eastern block tried to reach its Western brothers/cousins, was mainly due to the fact that they were not so backward as it seems. Frankly, in the first years after Perestroika, things changed so fast that people joked that in this mood we "will reach and overcome America in its own remedy - Capitalism" (this didn't happen but that's another story). Besides, Europe was always crazy about technowars and the main problem was that a good part of it went once again in the technowar run after having a good dose of it in WWII. Europeans are very much alike and that's a reason why they don't love each other. But that's also the reaons why they can understand each other faster than anyone else.

      However Korea is something completely different. They were for long under the grip of Imperial Japan. They suffered two of the most bloody wars of the 20th Century. One of them nearly turned the whole world again into war. Besides, Korea was not top in Science neither Technology. When South started its Long March it had a population in misery, ruled by one of the most bloody dictatorships and suffered several drawbacks from it. Its economy suffered from several problems and it had frequently serious inflationary hickes. It also as an endemic social/political conflict that frequently rises to clashes. Its politicians are also known to be severly corrupted and fall frequently into scandals.

      However it is a fact that Korea is one of today's economic world powers, sometimes it even overshadows its past colonist, Japan. And its technological progress is on the top among many countries. Not many countries managed to reach such level. So I take the hat to these guys.

  17. Fast and impressive, but is it free? by twitter · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Are these networks free or gimped like US? Can the average Korean set up web, email, ftp, cvs services at the end of that fat pipe? If so, they will surely kick the world's ass in software development. If not, entertianment is nice but their net will be disipative.

    Here in the US, broadband "internet" is becoming more and more like cable TV. Unilaterally changeable service contracts ban useful services, ports are blocked and upload rates are artificailly reduced. It's mostly because of bad laws which alowed the regional bells to stomp fledgling DSL competition and other bad laws which essentially give cable operators exclusive franchises in huge areas. Rather than embracing the communications possibilities of wires in our homes and networks we have built, we plod along with pay per minute, voice only, long distance telephony.

    Has Korea learned from our mistakes or will they repeat them?

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    1. Re:Fast and impressive, but is it free? by ahfoo · · Score: 4, Informative

      What you're saying has been true so far, but probably won't stay that way. There are already nationwide ISPs like Congent willing to offer 100Meg ethernet for about a thousand a month and this isn't DSL, it's real ethernet and it's the same speed up and downstream. It's true the existing players have done just that --played the American consumer for a sucker. But it will change and the most likely candidate for that change is wireless mesh networks. Seeing as how Taiwan is gearing up to push down prices on wireless hardware this should be happening in the next year or two.
      Of course until then, this story is a sad testiment to the lies perpetuated by the scandalous telecoms players in the US. It's too bad the American people are too complacent to elect leaders that represent their interests. Here I refer, among other things, to the recent commerce department attempts to force the FCC to limit all 802.11 products to indoor use. That is a scandal that goes right to the Bush administration. Give that guy enough rope and he'll hang us all.

  18. This is offtopic (sorta) but interesting! by Joey7F · · Score: 3, Informative

    http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/image/0011/earthl ights2_dmsp_big.jpg

    If you think the Koreas are anything alike, look at that picture to see what communism does to a country. The divide almost looks too perfect.

    --Joey

    1. Re:This is offtopic (sorta) but interesting! by xjerky · · Score: 2

      And never is the world without the sun shining on at least a part of it at any time :)

      --
      A sentence you'll never see on an Internet discussion board: "You know what? You're right."
    2. Re:This is offtopic (sorta) but interesting! by Fnkmaster · · Score: 2
      Okay, I don't know if you are trolling, but what you are saying is outrageous and false. First of all, your country isn't the USSR since it doesn't exist anymore. Perhaps you mean Russia, perhaps Belarus, Ukraine, etc. The old USSR was not some sort of idealistic Marxist state, it was more or less the most brutal dictatorship around at the time, running under the facade of Communism. Russia, at least, is certainly pretty fouled up these days, mostly due to the same cronyistic system from the Communist era being applied to assign ownership of previously nationalized factors of production to a tiny subset of the population, and the fact that Russia's economy was built to produce domestically and could never compete in a globalized arena (free flow of goods and services) because of the fact that most goods produced during the Soviet era were markedly substandard.


      There is a reason (okay, many reasons) that Communism fell. It should stay dead, frankly. Your countrymen need to pull themselves out of the broken way of thinking and working they are stuck in, shut down organized crime, and work on evening out the standard of living while encouraging REAL entrepreneurship and innovation. Trying to retreat back into the shell of Communism is unlikely to achieve this - it's possible, but quite difficult to run away from the global economy once plugged in.

  19. Re:They lead? by comic-not · · Score: 2, Funny

    high bandwidth penetration



    Is this some secret korean technique, perhaps vividly depicted in those korean cartoon pr0n magazines you refer to?

    --
    Existence usually comes as a surprise (Idem)
  20. Statistics like this... by Recca · · Score: 2, Interesting

    are probably why North Korea is giving strange information that seems contradictory to other policies before. They're trying to change to a more open and capitalist government. North Korea has made other announcements besides nuclear weapons. They also disclosed the abduction of Japanese during the 70's and early 80's. Information here. Anyway, back on topic, North Korea has realized that nuclear weapons do not serve any good day-to-day purpose, because unlike video games using nuclear weapons in a recreational manner is highly illegal and non-productive in a down economy.

  21. More S.Korean Stats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    For those who are interested and not overtly offended by the source of the information, the CIA Fact Book for South Korea is available.

  22. Jack Schofield??? Nooooooooo not him! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Why you listen to anything that this guys says.

    If he isn't being paid by M$ he should be. Read his other articles...

    A hard sell for cuddly new XP

    The mother of all operating systems

    Sun sues Microsoft from inside a glass house

    To name a few ... I don't think you'll find a bad word said about Microsoft. Nice to know.

  23. Gosu ^^ by jedie · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Think about the fact that Korean gamer's can become official "sportsmen" with corporate sponsorship etc.

    Game finals are even brought live on TV there.

    Gaming IS a sport there, look at "starcraft" the prizes you can win in the rounaments are insane.

    But that trend is starting to rise in the west too: think of CPL for instance, it's a worldwide event with international clans fighting for the first place (internationally!) in FPS games. And some clans even have dedicated fans nowadays, some players even have groupies (I kid you not: pretty girls, who take pictures with their webcams ofthemselves in their bra's holding a paper with the name of their favourite CS player for instance).



    In a way I think that's a logical evolution in the world of sports: why would sport have something to do with only the physical? Look at chess, and snooker etc.



    I mean, dedicated gamers even behave like real life jocks: they have the whole "yeah we're so 1337" thing going and act real tough (online that is ;))

    --
    "The majority is always sane, Louis." -- Nessus
    http://slashdot.jp
    1. Re:Gosu ^^ by prelelat · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You know what I think it would be kind of cool to watch some FPS games and other RPG games on tv. You could even call it Unreal TV. I'm sure that some Network will come up with it here in some respect in the future. It would probably be a big thing. Host tournaments to see who gets to be on the show and then have a big game of ctf or CS with some of the best players in the world(the internet allows for anyone to play).

      I would go and watch that anyways.

      What do I know I don't even run linux anymore...

  24. So what? by Omkar · · Score: 2, Insightful

    In urban India (where I'm unfortunately banished), the internet has become just another method of communication. Access is taken for granted. his despite the average computer here is a pentium1 with hardware sold under false pretenses. Broadband is unheard of. Most people access the internet at cybercafés How does pervasive broadband access measurably improve on this situation? Sure, flashy content is enabled, but I don't think anything fundamentally changes.

  25. Re:Measuring the speed of light by BabyDave · · Score: 2
    Great idea ... but sadly not original - several people have already had the same idea. Don't let that stop you having a go though. See for example this paper on arXiv for hints on how to do it. Or try a Google search - leads to many helpful resources.

  26. Re:Corea not Korea by Ektanoor · · Score: 2, Offtopic

    Uuuu. Just a note near-offtopic but which I think it deserves attention. "C and "K", in many European languages, have nearly the same intonations. For Spanish, Portuguese and French the correct name is Corea. At least for Russians is "Koreya". Germans seem to use the term Korea. English don't make a big difference between "C" and "K" but they seem to highly prefer to use "K" in names.

    The correct name for Japan is Nippon and it seems that this is the way Japanese name its country. Besides Koreans and Japanese have completely different alphabets and intonations from us, Eurasians. So I don't get the reason why Japanese would be so pecky with one letter. I know that Japan and Korea have lots of problems between each other. However this story seems to have a reason completely different from what you state. The first europeans to reach East Asia were the Portuguese. So they named it Corea. But that was nearly 450 years ago and a lot of water went on since then. Today English is the main language in the world and Russian had lots to do with Korea (the Russian "C" is latin "S" btw). So I wouldn't be admired to see that this was the reason for the shift.

  27. Re:I guess that explains the spam by Caradoc · · Score: 3, Redundant

    So Korea leads the world in broadband connections... They also lead the world in open relays and in spamming people with messages they can't even read.

    My own mailserver doesn't accept incoming connections from Korea - at the time I inserted korea.blackholes.us into the dnsbl list, I had received ONE legitimate e-mail from Korea, and over four thousand spams from Korea.

    "Buh-bye, Korea." I'll take them out of the filters as soon as the logs indicate less than once bounce per week instead of 30-50 bounces per day.

    --
    Specialization is for insects. - R.A.H.
  28. This would never work by Nazmun · · Score: 2, Interesting

    For one thing Light isn't moving in a straight line in fiber optic cable so the speed of light is considerably slower when moving from one place to another.

    Also the ping utility would be terribly innacurate for someting like this. It would also involve delays in processing at each computer, the slightest delay would be extremely harmful for something like this.

    --
    Hmmm... Pie...
  29. Korea sounds more sensational than Japan by wyndigo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Japan launched 3G phones first, and broadband is equally prevasive here. Obviously, the author didn't check their facts. I probably just sounds better to say Korea, which has a back water image for some reason, than to compare to Japan. Still its more accurate to say large parts of asia (taiwan, korea, singapore, japan) are now significantly ahead of the west as far as being wired goes. Its easy here because due to population density the last mile problem disappears.

    --wyn

    1. Re:Korea sounds more sensational than Japan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yeah I just thought I'd post and add to this. I've lived in Korea for the last 5 years.
      Yeah Japan had 3G phones first. I don't think broadband is quite as pervasive in Japan, but I don't have any hard statistics. And yeah the population density has a lot to do with the ease of implementation. But it's still damn fast. I usually snicker at my friends back in Canada when they tell me about their ADSL services.

      You can run web,ftp, etc etc services from your home end.

      The spam is a big problem, the government is trying to figure out solutions to it. Though it's the government, so don't expect a speedy (or logical) response to the problem.

      I didn't bother creating an account, cause man I'm dumber than a post and rarely even read the forums here.

    2. Re:Korea sounds more sensational than Japan by ahfoo · · Score: 2

      No, it's not just a density isue. It's about the market in the States being screwed by a collusion of government and telecoms monopolies. I now live in the far northern tip of Taiwan miles from any small town and I still get 512K DSL for thirty bucks a month and no hassles. Next year we're supposed to be upgraded to 1.5Meg just like they upgraded us from 256K earlier this year. This is not limited to high density areas by any means.
      The funny thing is I know so many people in the States who are under the illusion that there's some technical limitation that's preventing them from getting cheap broadband. It's like the people who thought the California electricity crisis was about the costs of power generation. Guess again.

    3. Re:Korea sounds more sensational than Japan by evilviper · · Score: 3, Insightful
      are now significantly ahead of the west as far as being wired goes.

      Can we watch the lingo here? Everyone seems to be saying... 'Because the use of technology X, this other country is better than us'. The fact is, cynicism is a good thing. The fact that Koreans, Japanese, et al., ar willing to spend great gobs of money on hi-tech devices and services does not say that they are doing better than anywhere else.

      I think the total number of people with internet access (period) could be used as mark of technological advancement, but that's because there is a great deal of information available online. Just because Koreans can now watch streaming video, and play UT on big pipes, does not make them better off. In fact, their tendency to irationally spend money seems to make them much worse off IMHO.

      The same could be said of cell-phones. The coverage of cell technologies might indicate the communications level of a country, the number of Gs only means that people are willing to pay more for toys.

      Before anyone mentions how useful technology can be for some, we are talking about the populous here. You know, the people that spend $600 for an iPaq so they can have a battery-sucking MP3 player with a color screen... The people that pay several-hundred dollar cell-phone bills, so they can talk to their friends while they are driving to work.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  30. The slashdot summary is incorrect... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    If you read the article this points to, some broadband connections are 8mbs not 32mbs, and they hope to have 20mbs connections out by 2005.

  31. Spam spam and spam by mosschops · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I wish they'd spend as much time and money controlling the amount of spam leaving Korean networks, rather than getting more (ab)users hooked up with insanely fast connections.

    I still use Spamcop to report most spam I get, but it's hard to know whether it actually does any good for mail originating in the Far East. Do they not have any responsibility to their peering networks?

  32. Re:Umm the downside is.. by Suppafly · · Score: 2

    its not a troll, nor flamebait. Its true.. Living in Korea sucks. I know several people from Korea and several of my profs are from Korea. It sucks.

  33. Now, this explains why... by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 2

    ... I get so much spam in Korean!!!!

  34. We need that here, by HanzoSan · · Score: 5, Insightful



    It would improve the social enviornment in the USA, and give kids a place to go.

    --
    If you use Linux, please help development of Autopac
    1. Re:We need that here, by kamapuaa · · Score: 2, Insightful
      It would improve the social enviornment in the USA, and give kids a place to go.

      I live in the USA and they have a couple near my place. I haven't done any studies but it seems like a bunch of humbug teenagers smoking and drinking, and in practical terms is the same environment as an arcade - which I wouldn't really view as good or bad.

      I think the reason a place like that exists is I live in a Chinatown. Non-asians maybe don't like going to public computer places, or arcades, because it's more economical just to use their computer at home.

      --
      Slashdot: providing anti-social weirdos a soapbox, since 1997.
    2. Re:We need that here, by HanzoSan · · Score: 2



      We need to put them in ghettos not suburbs. ChinaTown? China Town is a Chinese Ghetto, I think the other Ghettos need to catch onto this idea.

      Non Asians who arent rich usually dont have a computer.

      You live in Chinatown so I already know you arent rich, perhaps you have a computer but my point is if these little clubhouses were everywhere it would help alot of these kids who have no parents watching them.

      They'd be safer online than on the streets.

      --
      If you use Linux, please help development of Autopac
  35. Shows effects of US intervention too.... by Brian_Ellenberger · · Score: 4, Interesting

    And if it weren't for the *EVIL* United States, there would be a single Korea and it would be one massive hellhole instead of half hellhole and half really nice place to live.

    Right now the US has tens of thousands of troops right now helping the South Koreans hold of a million man North Korean army. With the news that North Korea has broken the treaty that gave them economic aid in exchange for giving up nukes, it should be increasingly obvious that the current US foreign policy that is heavy in, ahem, consequences, is not so naive after all. What is naive is the idea that you can solve all your problems with mean people by just talking nice to them.

    I wonder how if South Vietnam would be doing as well as South Korea of the US had succeeded in defending it.

    Brian Ellenberger

    1. Re:Shows effects of US intervention too.... by maw · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Your conclusion may be true, but your reasons for it are suspect.

      You assume that the only reason North Korea is the way it is is because it's a "communist" country. That may be the case, but it may also be the case that they are they way they are in a reaction to events and people around them.

      In other words, would they be in the same situation if they had been left alone? Maybe, but it's hardly given.

      --
      You're a suburbanite.
  36. You act as if capitalism is any diffrent? by HanzoSan · · Score: 2



    Capitalism is currently leading to Socialism anyhow, big companies, big government, class warfare.

    --
    If you use Linux, please help development of Autopac
  37. (OT) Re:But there may be downsides... by timmyf2371 · · Score: 4, Insightful
    That is the reason why much of the world is fearful of NK with nukes

    You do realise that there is only one nation which has actually used nuclear weapons in war - and its not any of the countries in the so-called 'axis of evil'.

    If you still don't know the answer, visit this site

    Tim

    --

    Backup not found: (A)bort (R)etry (P)anic
    1. Re:(OT) Re:But there may be downsides... by RestiffBard · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I am well aware that the United States is the only nation to ever use nuclear weapons in was. Hiroshima and Nagasaki. We do remember that. Trust me. There is a shitload that the United States has done that I'm not totally copacetic with. There is also a shitload that I'm totally thrilled about and proud of.

      Why is it that when people try to down the United States they forget instantly all the good shit we've done?

      I figure we should get mege kudos for ending ww I and WW II. So next time someone reminds me that the unites states eneded ww II with two nuclear bombs I'll remind them that we did exactly that. ended those wars.

      fuck did anyone forget that with out the united states Germany would most certainly be what we call europe now?

      are we about to start a war in Iraq? No. We're going to finish one. Do I like bush? hell no. Do I hate Saddam? yeah, I kinda do.

      sorry. got pissed off.

      --
      - /* dead coders leave no comments */
    2. Re:(OT) Re:But there may be downsides... by kir · · Score: 2

      OK. Boom.

      But, I'm sure you realize that the U.S. then REBUILT Japan (where I now live). For Christ's sake -- comparing the nukes in WWII to Bush's "axis of evil" is ridiculous.

      The U.S. dropped a bunch of bombs AND A BUNCH OF FOOD in Afghanistan. You do realize they're the only ones to actually ever do that (as far as I can tell).

      --
      3cx.org - A truly bad website.
    3. Re:(OT) Re:But there may be downsides... by jxs2151 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      The one sure way to get marked "Troll". Disagree with some long-haired, leftist freak extolling the virtues of North Korea and other repressive regimes while bashing the very guaranteers of their 'right' to speak freely.

      Imagine a world without the US, assholes.....I mean really imagine, not just imagine what Chomsky tells you it will be like but really imagine a world run by Hitler and Stalin and Kim Il Jung. Prefer that?

      Troll my ass, go back to Internet school and learn what troll means.

  38. LOL Not a troll! by Tokerat · · Score: 2

    My girlfriend is Korean and when she read this she died laughing. She printed your post and it's haning on her wall in her dorm room!

    Oh yea, she promised to show me what "Korean High-Bandwidth Penetration" is all about later tonight...

    --
    CAn'T CompreHend SARcaSm?
  39. Re:They lead? by zebs · · Score: 2

    I got these Korea at a glance, 15 Fun Facts! Let me tell you, there are a lot of reasons to move there aside from the high bandwidth penetration

    Penises have higher bandwidth than cable modems What? They cum more than everyone else?

  40. nukes are bad. full stop. by fantomas · · Score: 2

    Is it better to kill people the old fashioned way using explosives that obliterate them into scattered pieces?


    Yes, you don't poison the land and seas for thousands of years to come and create the massive problems that a hideously irradiated planet would have to face up to. All weapons are bad for sure (they reckon it will take 400 years to clear Cambodia of landmines at the present rate), but some are really, really bad.


    Mind you some people make *lots* of money out of selling them.



    1. Re:nukes are bad. full stop. by ProfessorPuke · · Score: 2

      Have you been to Hiroshima lately? It looks pretty good- in fact, it looks better than some other Japanese cities because all the buildings are less than 50 years old*.

      There's no detectable radioactivity- a simple fission blast is moderately clean, as far as nukes go. It does NOT turn the target into an uninhabitable wasteland. In fact, the damage from a nuclear power-plant meltdown would be much longer-lasting than from an atomic bomb. (The shear volume of radioactive material is so much greater).

      (*Ok, honestly, Japanese buildings were never meant to last. Plenty of other cities got 100% flattened by conventional weapons, too)

    2. Re:nukes are bad. full stop. by Afrosheen · · Score: 2

      Yeah, but without Hiroshima and Nagasaki, we wouldn't have a million Anime epics depicting massive destruction via a mushroom cloud or the ever-popular white semi-sphere of death.

      You gotta wonder just how deeply ingrained those bombings are in the current Japanese collective unconcious.

  41. "Dear Leader" Kim Jong Il by mrbrown1602 · · Score: 3, Funny

    According to South Korean intel reports, North Korean leader Kim Jong Il has a IQ in the genius range (150-160) and is a computer wizard. I'm sure he's a multiplayer fanatic.

    1. Re:"Dear Leader" Kim Jong Il by Afrosheen · · Score: 2

      Yeah, he's that punk-ass that used to play Urban Terror using OGC to wallhack and autofire/autoaim. I think he went by |raped-your-ass| or something like that.

      I hate that guy.

  42. Re:Bullcrap by jandrese · · Score: 2

    Because I'm being trolled I'll be brief:

    <sarcasm> Yeah, I agree, we should wait until we're living in an opressive regime similar to China or Cuba before we do anything. </sarcasm>

    Free speech isn't an issue that you can wait until it gets bad before you address (because once you have no free speech, you loose your ability to address problems). That is why it is important to keep these problems contained before they get out of control.

    --

    I read the internet for the articles.
  43. Koreans and open source by 0x0d0a · · Score: 2

    I've always wondered about this. For a long time Korea has had extremely high amounts of online time spent per-user. Presumably, that means lots of experienced techies from dicking around with computers so much.

    Yet I hear surprisingly few Korean names among major open-source developers. Korea has a name for pirated software, and that's about it.

    Why no *good* benefits coming from all that online time?

  44. Hmm, which statistic is correct? by 5lash · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Ok there's a big difference between "Some 67% of Korean households now have broadband" (As said in the article), and "67% of Korean Internet users are connected to broadband" (As said in the /. post). Anyone know which is correct? I heinously doubt that 67% of Koreans have broadband, its more likely 67% of internet users.

    1. Re:Hmm, which statistic is correct? by Isle · · Score: 2

      It is 67% of households, you always measure in percentage households. I recently read (properbly the same survey) that Denmark and Sweden yet again was the two countries with the highish internet connectivity. But the number of households with internet is still in the area of 70-80%.
      This must mean that in S.Korea around 100% of all internet connections are broadband.

  45. The CIA offends? by 0x0d0a · · Score: 2

    Why would the CIA World Factbook offend anyone? it's a tremendously good resource.

    One thing the US government is really good about is putting out lots of free data archives that it's spent money building. There are *excellent* resources available to the world:

    The USGS puts out really great maps and elevation maps for free. Not something you can produce on your own easily.

    NASA puts out some of my favorite stuff -- images, huge quantities of data.

    The Farm Security Administration has some really nice old photographs.

    The Library of Congress has tons of really nice stuff.

    The Smithsonian is one of the greatest museums I can imagine.

    The US government is one of the most steady and highest-quality provider of useful content (and ad-free!) available to the Internet.

    I kind of wish there was some site that listed all the US government sites as a sort of tree...make it easier to browse through them.

  46. What about Japan? by arjscott · · Score: 2, Informative

    Although the technology mentioned in this article is still far from the reach of most western countries, Japan already has it all.

    High-speed internet access has been common for many years. 10 megabit cable is now common for home users. 100 megabit is also available.

    NTT Introduced FOMA 3G mobile services way back in early 2001.

    HDTV has been available for at least 4 years. I first saw an HDTV broadcast in 1998.

  47. nukes are not clean by fantomas · · Score: 2

    How come all those servicemen who were at nuclear tests are putting in legal cases? How come all those people died in terrible agony? Have you read any stories from the survivors (and yes I know the Allies were responsible for another charming act of war atrocity with conventional weapons at Dresden).


    I really, really hope this never happens, but I'd be interested to hear your position about how you'd feel about somebody letting off one in your country. It could happen, the world is crazy enough and there are enough poor people with not enough to lose, as another poster has commented.


    It does strike me as very ironic that the one country that's used nuclear weapons is one of the most keen to make sure other people aren't allowed to possess them, while they reserve the right to maintain their own arsenal. Lots of people find that a bit hypocritical to say the least.


    1. Re:nukes are not clean by Alien+Being · · Score: 2

      "It does strike me as very ironic that the one country that's used nuclear weapons is one of the most keen to make sure other people aren't allowed to possess them, while they reserve the right to maintain their own arsenal. Lots of people find that a bit hypocritical to say the least."

      Ironic, maybe. Hypocritical, perhaps. But to allow Iraq and/or NK to get their hands on nukes would be insane.

    2. Re:nukes are not clean by Afrosheen · · Score: 2

      I have an idea.

      Quiz the nations bordering or within striking distance of a tactical nuke if they'd trust Iraq, North Korea, or any other rogue nation if they want that country to possess nuclear arms. I doubt you'll get a "yessir, that's a fine idea" out of anyone. We tend to be somewhat responsible with nukes in the US while other countries with nothing to lose don't really give a shit about Mutually Assured Destruction. The fact that we lit a pair off when the technology was new says nothing about what we've not done since that time.

      Hypocracy and government are as tightly entwined as Calvin and Hobbes. Whatever country you live in, no matter where it is, I can guarantee that your government doesn't shine very brightly under the light of scrutiny. Everyone's guilty of something, and no government is perfect. Strong nationalism on the public's part can lead to denial which generates the 'idea' that their government is perfect and everything's dandy, yet the reality remains in striking contrast.

  48. Re:North Korea invaded without provocation... by maw · · Score: 2
    I'll repeat myself: my problem was not with your conclusion, but with how you arrived to it. In other words, I think communism would probably suck to live in, but I also think that faulty logic sucks, and sometimes I call people on it. (If False then True is logically consistent.)

    Are you actually arguing that South Korea would have been better off had we just let the North invade and take over?

    No. Where did you get that idea?

    We tried isolationism in the earth 20th century. For outcomes see World War I and World War II.

    Oh yeah, how could I forget that US isolationism was the cause of the world wars? Come on.

    --
    You're a suburbanite.
  49. Here's why by ChrisWong · · Score: 2

    Here's why South Korea is so wired:

    1. 80% of the population live in urban areas.

    2. About half of these live in humongous high-rise housing complexes.

    That pretty much explains why it was so easy to wire up the place for broadband.

  50. But they're all SPAMMING FAGGOTS by vandan · · Score: 2

    Why do I get so much spam from kornet.net and other Korean networks?
    The reason they all have broadband is that a handful of stupid Westerners (I'd say they would be Americans) are replying to their spam and buying penis enlargements and such, and funding the broadband explosion.
    I am maintaining a list of IP address of spammers, which can be found at: http://enthalpy.homelinux.org/spammers.txt and I assure you, they are 90% Korean arse-lickers.
    The other 10% are from UUNet.

  51. Well, duhhh... by billstewart · · Score: 2

    Just because 67% of the homes have broadband doesn't mean that 67% of the homes have good system administrators :-) Actually, the early problems weren't homes, but schools, which ran a standard software distribution that had lots of holes in it.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  52. First Order Logic... by Brian_Ellenberger · · Score: 2

    If you going to start getting First Order Logic about it then please at least define the predicates.

    Basically this is my argument. North Korea and South Korea pretty much started out the same. Same people, same general geographic local, same wartorn post-WWII state. One adopted a communist economy, one a non-communist economy. The communist one is a hellhole. The non-communist one isn't.

    Of course one country does not make a proof. Maybe it was a freak occurance. But a similar thing happened in Eastern Europe. And there is a wealth of documented evidence that communism makes your country a hellhole. I don't see which proposition you think is false.

    Brian

  53. Ease of serving content is the real diff, plus TV. by billstewart · · Score: 2

    One difference is that broadband internet lets you get more TV-like services, compared to the limited range of opinions on government and corporate TV, though satellites have already done much of that. But the more important difference is that having a broadband connection at home means you can easily put up your own web site, and distribute as much content as you've got disk drive for. In some places, like parts of the US, the broadband companies discourage this, but in most of the world you can run your own servers.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  54. hmmm.. comic strip time... by fantomas · · Score: 2

    The term "rogue nation" concerns me, it is just too comic strip/ kids playground language to be taken seriously. The idea that some of the most powerful decision makers in the world think we're playing cowboys and injuns or cops 'n robbers is downright scary. I think you make a fine analogy by mentioning Calvin and Hobbes. The USA is a damn sight better option than most of these countries, but is sure aint perfect. I think we're in agreement, we have a responsibility to keep our elected representatives accountable, to remind them that they are representing us, not just being voted in to be let loose with a lot of toys. Democracy shouldn't mean a once every four years (or how often you vote for your reps) responsibility, and then you throw away any personal involvement.


    As you well mention, it would be a far better option to find a way to make sure the 'other countries' have something to lose. I think a lot of the craziness in the world is coming from people who have been so f**ked over by the big boys that they just have nothing to lose any more.

    1. Re:hmmm.. comic strip time... by Afrosheen · · Score: 2

      Actually 'rogue nation' is a valid diplomatic/governmental term. Sure, it may sound childish after hearing it on CNN for the 8 millionth time, but it's still a valid descriptor of nations who either don't have a stable, recognized government in place, or who choose to ignore UN and other requests for various things. Being rogueish means doing your own thing (like plotting against your neighbors and stockpiling biochemical weapons) and not really giving 2 shits about what anyone says.

  55. rogue as a correct term - interesting by fantomas · · Score: 2

    Ok, serious request, not just a wind up. Do you have a URL reference to where it is used in a serious context, e.g. UN documents etc. Over here (UK) it has just been taken as part of the comic strip language that Bush uses (and scares the hell out of us). All part of the blurring between b-movies and b-movie language to describe very real, very serious situations. Trouble is the word simplifies things too far.


    This will probably annoy you (so apologies in advance) but one of the reasons Bush etc don't do themselves any favours with some of their allies, like in Europe, is they belittle their value by using this language. For example, to be technically correct, your example "Being rogueish means doing your own thing (like plotting against your neighbors and stockpiling biochemical weapons) and not really giving 2 shits about what anyone says." could actually apply to the USA. The USA stockpiles weapons of mass destruction and terror, definitely has plotted against and overthrown its neighbours on several occasions, and does not really give 2 shits about what anyone says. I think most of us want to believe in the USA, but the people at the top could try a little harder in their words and actions. Remember a lot of Europeans and people of other nations of Bush's age have had first hand experience of war as a terrible experience in their own home town, have been on the receiving end of terror-wars, and so are a lot less inclined to simplistic movie- language to describe these encounters.