Slashdot Mirror


Libraries Are 31337

tiltowait writes In response to the incredulity expressed in this story about the technical prowess of libraries, I'd like to present a short essay titled "Librarians: We're Not What You Think" - read on for more. Update: 10/20 18:15 GMT by M : The author has also put up his essay on his own webpage. From the spinster librarian in It's a Wonderful Life to the crochety archivist in Attack of the Clones, librarians are often portrayed (in everything from movies, musicals, children's books, literature, science fiction, comics and cartoons to pornography - yes, pornography) as something less than noble or admirable. The perception of librarians has been a popular topic recently, with several articles focusing on the fringe-type librarians (ska, rockabilly, bellydancing, modified, bodybuilding, laughing, and lipstick). Although something of an anti-stereotype, these people illustrate the range of librarian personalities.

Many people may hold the image of a librarian as a shushing school marm who does little more than stamp and shelve books because that's all they've seen librarians do. Well think again - that's about as inaccurate as believing that Alan Greenspan is nothing more than a glorified bank teller. The job titles may change but the mission of the profession remains the same: organize information and help people find it. Libraries have been around a lot longer than the Internet, and even library technology can hold its own with the best out there. For example, Google's savvy results ranking was hardly the birth of citation analysis (next up: metadata - cough, cataloging, cough), and there are enormous library systems that also predate the Internet.

Although library geeks and technology nerds may have contrary images, in today's world the boundary between the career of the librarian and the information technologist is disappearing. Librarians today not only administer Web servers and dynamic databases to help manage large digital collections and thousands of electronic resources, they teach people how to use library systems. And just as enlightened computer engineers are advocates of noncommercial software and campaign for online rights, the library profession has a long history of staunchly defending freedom - from book burnings to the FBI's Library Awareness Program to the latest copyright battles and almost all other current issues in intellectual freedom.

Check out LISNews.com (recognize the format?) and some library blogs if you're interested in reading more about real librarians.

212 comments

  1. Too long by I'm+not+a+script · · Score: 5, Funny

    Can someone summarize this in one sentence, I'm not going to read all that.

    --
    kthx
    1. Re:Too long by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Can someone summarize this in one sentence, I'm not going to read all that.

      A librarian who is upset by all the "librarians are losers" stereotypes wishes for us to read a brief article which, contrary to the nerdy librarian's expectations, does nothing to dispel said stereotypes.

    2. Re:Too long by khuber · · Score: 1
      1. Librarians are technically incompetent.

      2. Most librarians can barely even read.

      -Kevin

    3. Re:Too long by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bleh, memepool had a more interesting tidbit the other day or so about 'modified' librarians. They were much more interesting :)

    4. Re:Too long by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Librarians r0xXx0r.

    5. Re:Too long by baldass_newbie · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Librarians are technically incompetent.

      Yeah, but his site didn't get /.'ed.
      That's gotta be good for something.

      --
      The opposite of progress is congress
    6. Re:Too long by khuber · · Score: 1
      Yeah, but his site didn't get /.'ed. That's gotta be good for something.

      Yes, apparently hostway.com, his hosting service, can run a web server :).

      -Kevin

    7. Re:Too long by buswolley · · Score: 1

      Apparently he included everything in the header. no need to go elsewhere.

      --

      A Good Troll is better than a Bad Human.

  2. call em information broker by davids-world.com · · Score: 5, Interesting

    call them information broker, and the jobs sounds fancy again.

    librarians are old-fashioned only as long as they stick to storing information on paper instead of creating networked, digital libraries. the first will protect there jobs, probably, the latter is going to save us researchers/users/customers more and more time.

    1. Re:call em information broker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Putting all of our paper collections in digital form would take either decades of time or tens of billions of dollars.

      Either way, librarians would do very well for themselves in the process, and gain thousands of jobs.

      The reason we haven't gone to all-digital collections is that it would cost a tremendous amount of money that we don't as a society want to spend, and the resulting benefit would be tiny in comparison. (A marginal increase in researching speed in exchange for a massive societal investment.)

      Real research - vs. just typing terms into Google - is an intensive process that takes real time, and using a print library actually increases the efficiency of that research.

      This post is simply lazy, lazy thinking.

    2. Re:call em information broker by Gonzoman · · Score: 2, Informative

      I agree. Google is a wonderful tool, but it cannot compare with information that is actually cataloged. The other reason for not going completely digital is that information stored digitally is not stable. Just think how easy it would be for someone like Ashcroft to change history if there were no hard copy records. Or when we find out our 30 year cd's crap out after five years.

    3. Re:call em information broker by zeugma-amp · · Score: 2, Informative

      Another reason we haven't gone further in converting the dead trees to bits is because copyright is just so darn long.

      99%+ of everything ever published is under copyright now that it has become pretty much perpetual.

      Project Gutenberg's site has some information about this. They've also managed to scan thousands of books that existed prior to 1920. I think they are up to about 6 or 7 new books posted per month.

      There are also other efforts out there doing essentially the same thing. You might want to check out the Online Books Page for even more titles.

      The progress made so far in this effort despite the efforts of corporate interests to destroy the very concept of the Public Domain are really pretty astounding.

      --
      This is an ex-parrot!
    4. Re:call em information broker by MoneyT · · Score: 2

      Besides, ever try to read an online text book? It's a hell of a lot easier to read when the words aren't refreshing at 80Hz

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
    5. Re:call em information broker by RollingThunder · · Score: 2

      Actually, I've read the first two Honor Harrington novels on my Visor, using Mobipocket, and it was quite enjoyable. No idea what the refresh rate is on a Visor screen, though.

    6. Re:call em information broker by timeOday · · Score: 2
      No, what's hard to read is the book or article your library doesn't own, which is the usual case unless you have access to the Library of Congress.

      In fact, with citeseer.org really taking off, it seems I suddenly have far better access than through any library I've tried, and all from the comfort and convenience of (wherever I happen to be).

    7. Re:call em information broker by MoneyT · · Score: 2

      IIRC, Visor screens are active matrix screens, meaning that essentialy the refreshrate is 0 while the state of the screen is not changing.

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
  3. Agree in Houston - libraries going wireless by Brento · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Here in Houston, the public library system is on the cutting edge of rolling out free public 802.11b access in all their libraries. A guy from the library system regularly comes to our Houston Wireless user group meetings, and that alone speaks volumes, because I don't see any companies sending representatives.

    --
    What's your damage, Heather?
    1. Re:Agree in Houston - libraries going wireless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      why would any companies send representatives?

      ....you have no point.

    2. Re:Agree in Houston - libraries going wireless by Om242 · · Score: 2, Informative

      How very odd that I read this on here. I happen to work for the very library that the representative is from. :)

      I work at Harris County Public Library (www.hcpl.net), in the the information technology area. Basically the central office where all 27 branches are connected to throughout Houston.

      Personally, I'm their 'Linux guy' to make my job description short. I admin a small Linux network that works alongside the Windows network which provides various functions for the network as a whole. Network monitoring (using MRTG/RDDTools for display on a web page), IDS (using Snort and Demarc) and backups (backup sendmail server, and web server)

      What my collegue and I are attemping to do, is utlilize some freeware software called Nocat (runs on Linux, www.nocat.net) which will allow patrons to the various libraries to walk in with a laptop (and a wireless card), turn it on, and open up IE. The NoCat system which is running as an 'open network' will send DHCP info, and route the http Post to an authentication server, and send the user a login box, which will then (if login succesful) relax the firewall to allow that particular DHCP address to access you're regular ports (80 for the web, and whatever else we feel like allowing them).

      I wont get into any more details, but, in my opinion, this really does have interesting implications that I just started to grasp as I was working on this project.

      A PUBLIC ISP?

      Think about that a bit... seems pretty neat to me as wireless gets more powerful.

      ++John

    3. Re:Agree in Houston - libraries going wireless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What Kind Of Hardware Are You Using?
      I dont think you mentioned the hardware you wanted to use for this setup. How will contain this access into the building...? Will there be a constant watch of log-ins matching up with some type of sign in sheet...? You certainly dont want people sitting right outside the library bumming your little fre ISP. These are just a few questions I would consider first.

  4. librarian image? by EvilStein · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Many people may hold the image of a librarian as a shushing school marm who does little more than stamp and shelve books because that's all they've seen librarians do"

    I'm obviously not many people, because whenever I think of a librarian, I keep seeing Britney Spears in various stages of undress while surrounded by books...and wearing glasses. You know, *those* glasses.. the ones that say "I'm the HEAD librarian."

    Yeah, those...

    1. Re:librarian image? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice mental image. I'll file it right next to my mpeg of Christina Aguilera - Dirty

    2. Re:librarian image? by peter · · Score: 1

      > Nice mental image. I'll file it right next to my mpeg of Christina Aguilera - Dirty

      How well does using MPEG for your mental images work? Does it help you remember more stuff without filling up your brain so much?

      --
      #define X(x,y) x##y
      Peter Cordes ; e-mail: X(peter@cordes , .ca)
  5. So... by Em+Emalb · · Score: 0

    Librarians are people?

    I thought they were all weird and stuff.

    Hmm, appears I am wrong.

    --
    Sent from your iPad.
  6. l33t? no. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Coming from a guy that works in a library, Librarians are abuot as l337 as the people that feel is cool to type in l337.

    1. Re:l33t? no. by darekana · · Score: 1

      dont worry there will be grammr cheking in and spell checking in web forms in IE7.

    2. Re:l33t? no. by BurningDog · · Score: 1

      Now that needs to be modded up.

  7. Librarian from Tom Cats by kelv · · Score: 1

    Am I the only one who still has the image of the librarian from the movie Tomcats in their mind?

    1. Re:Librarian from Tom Cats by aiabx · · Score: 1

      yes, because no one else has seen the movie.
      -aiabx

      --
      Just this guy, you know?
    2. Re:Librarian from Tom Cats by Grax · · Score: 1

      Their loss. It was a terrific movie. When we went the theater was packed and everybody was laughing their heads off. I don't know why the rest of the world didn't pick up it.

    3. Re:Librarian from Tom Cats by certron · · Score: 1

      "I don't know why the rest of the world didn't pick up it."

      Because it was rated R and had less nudity than Logan's Run (rated PG, surprisingly. but made in the 1970s)

      Hehe, just my opinion on the matter. Watch the credits if you want a little boobage from the movie.

      --

      fair.org counterpunch.com truthout.com indymedia.org salon.com
      eff.org guerrilla.net debian.org gentoo.org
    4. Re:Librarian from Tom Cats by Wolfrider · · Score: 1

      Actually the first thing that came to mind was the librarian from Ghostbusters - the movie...
      .

      --
      .
      == WolfriderV6 == I'm willing to admit that *I just might* be wrong... Are you??
  8. libraries are most certainly 31337... by bani · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... script kiddies love using them to launch attacks from ...

    1. Re:libraries are most certainly 31337... by hackstraw · · Score: 1

      I worked at a library, and yeah, we would get a couple of complaints like this a year. For web wierdness we has a proxy server that logged all web requests. So we could trace from the log what machine generated the request. The "hot spots" were often dark corners of the library with a computer or 2 there. Sometimes ppl got caught "with their pants down", litterally :)

    2. Re:libraries are most certainly 31337... by timbong · · Score: 1

      Nah, you got it wrong. Script kiddies couldn't write their 31337 c0d3 to attack things without their visual basic libraries. Thats how libraries are 1337.

  9. librarians by papasui · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I instantly flashbacked to the Ghostbuster's scene with the chick and she turns into a monster, but seriously libraries are great resource. Mine has a pretty good selection of computer books that I normally would have to pay $50 for (no cisco though), as well as a lot of new DVDs and VHS tapes. I go there and check out anime all the time, compare that to fighting for a tape at Hollywood Video or Blockbuster and paying $4.00 for it. I plan on donating some money to my area library this year, I hope you will too.

    1. Re:Librarians by The+Original+Yama · · Score: 2

      I say we have a World Grand Master Librarian (if such a title doesn't exist then hurry up and make one) vs Google tournament.

    2. Re:Librarians by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you might find working on the tech side of Knowledge management particularly useful, as you have both the tech skills, and importantly the classification skills needed in organising knowledge.

    3. Re:librarians by Angry+White+Guy · · Score: 2

      It's been my experience that the library will get more mileage out of books, especially ones with relevant information. Instead of selling off my university material, I donated it to the public libraries so that not everyone in the world would be forced to buy course material.
      A lot of a library's budget goes to popular reading, so very technical books often get overlooked.

      --
      You think that I'm crazy, you should see this guy!
    4. Re:librarians by edmcw · · Score: 5, Informative

      Disturbing fact: A number of years ago, I worked as a library custodian; my responsibilities included throwing away the donated books the librarians didn't think they could sell. It frequently amounted to several hundred books a week, many of them very cool. (My personal library certainly benefitted.) I doubt this is true of all libraries, but at that particular library, donated books never made it into the stacks. I've been a lot less enthusiastic about donating ever since.

    5. Re:Librarians by hey! · · Score: 3, Insightful

      As these special searching mechanisms are made into algorithms, I think librarians will become tenders of technology and book shelvers

      You mean the way musicians have become tenders of electronic equipment?

      Really, this is not likely to happen until the AI and natural language capabilities of computers reach the point where they understand what we mean and can figure out what we should be looking for.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    6. Re:librarians by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm coerced into donating every year through my taxes. I feel compelled to go to the library every now and then to see what kind of whacked out shit their buying with my tax dollars.

    7. Re:librarians by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I work at a library. Ask someone at your library if there is a place to request a book to be bought. At my library you can ask for whatever you want, and we will probably buy it and have it on the shelves in a few weeks.

    8. Re:Librarians by Omkar · · Score: 1

      There's a vast difference between the arts and searching. Machines are already good at searching (google). Although I vaguely remember reading something about a machine that composed classical music, machines have no aesthetic sense. Finally, we will adapt to the machines faster than they adapt to us. Searching will become (and is rapidly becoming) a skill, while natural language processing is still a joke. Specialized searching is also more precise, so I believe it will become more common, then perhaps fade as computer become smarter.

    9. Re:librarians by Reziac · · Score: 2

      It's apparently true for the Los Angeles County system, tho at least in the Lancaster branch, they go to the "Friends of the Library" outfit to hawk at their small shop and their annual book sale.
      AFAICT they don't even check whether the library needs that title or not.

      I'm pleased to have an ongoing source of 50 cent books, but it does make one wonder about the value of donating books to libraries.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    10. Re:librarians by Brother+Fjordhr · · Score: 1

      More support of this. This is also true where I live and as a result I will not donate books to libraries.

      I once found a couple of matched and new books on the used book shelf, out of interest I opened them, and the letter from the publisher offering them as complimentary copies was still in the books. These were new well bound books.

    11. Re:librarians by kurtz25 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, when I was at my first college, an alum I knew wanted to donate all his theatre books--books on acting, books on directing, tons and tons of scripts--so I hauled the boxes in, was thanked, and told the theatre department that there was a substantial new collection of theatre texts available in the library. Then, about a month later, the little book-selling cart was laden with books I recognized. It was the entire collection, selling ro $2 a pop. Since I was a theatre major, I had wanted all those books but had done the alum's bidding and offered them to the public. Now I found myself in the ludicrous position of having to buy back the books I donated if I wanted to read them. When I confronted the head librarian, he said that they didn't think they belonged in the collection (in a school that was well-known for its theatre department). I said that if that was the case, I'd like them back. He said no. So I stole them all and gave them to my friends. Never give books to libraries.

    12. Re:librarians by smagruder · · Score: 2
      I plan on donating some money to my area library this year, I hope you will too.

      Another great way to help your library is to donate all your unwanted books to them. They will then decide whether they go onto the shelves or into their occasional book sales. Either way, you're helping your library (and thus your community) in a financially painless manner.

      --
      Steve Magruder, Metro Foodist
    13. Re:librarians by smagruder · · Score: 1
      Never give books to libraries.

      OK, then give them to charities where there's no hope of them going into a public resource. Sheesh.

      --
      Steve Magruder, Metro Foodist
    14. Re:librarians by phatlipmojo · · Score: 5, Interesting
      Yeah, I'm a librarian, and we throw out a lot of books that won't circulate and/or won't sell at the book sale. There are a great many reasons why:
      1. 90% of book donations are people who are essentially bringing their garbage to the library and expecting a thank-you note, a tax write-off, a pat on the back, a guarantee that they will see it on the shelf, and maybe a blowjob. The vast majority of books we get are old, moderately-to-very damaged, and have some variety of higher invertebrate living in them (you would not believe how many roaches can live in a medium sized box of old, dusty, rotting books). But thanks so much for the donation.
      2. We already have it or nobody is going to read it. Books take up physical space, which is--believe it or not--limited. We don't like it, but we have no choice but to prioritize based on what will get checked out. One reason for this is that we get way less money from taxes than you think we do. Way less (supressing rant about the jerk who yelled that he pays my salary the other day). Most of our money comes from charitible foundations. Charitible foundations who base the amount of money they give us on the number of books that get checked out. As a result, we get a lot of copies of the new Danielle Steel book, and we get a lot of educated people yelling that we're discriminating against them. The worst part is, as an educated person myself, I can't say I disagree with them.
      3. It's not worth the trouble. Sad, but true fact: if you round up some zealots and pester the library enough, you too can effect a change in what they keep on the shelf. Case in point: this week, we got an excellent donation (one of our patrons evidently reviews books; we get a lot of brand-new, good stuff from her. As a result, she sees a lot of her donations end up on our shelves) that included an anatomy book for artists, complete with hundreds of pages of photographs of attractive, very naked people. A neighborhood artist has been asking if we were going to get anything like that for a long time. But we can't put it on the shelf because the neighborhood Baptist church has already displayed its willingness to send in its members one by one to complain about such things (or even steal them so nobody else can check them out). Between them and the crop of 14 year-old boys who know where the anatomy section is and aren't too proud to tear out a few pages, the book wouldn't last a week. The only thing I could do was call the artist and give it to her. It works out for her, but what about the other artists?
      4. Which reminds me. A substantial number of the donations we get are propaganda. Books about why Jews are evil, why Gorbachev is the antichrist, etc., etc., etc. ad nauseum.

      So you see, it's not that simple. If you're thinking of bringing a pile of damaged, marked up, dirty books to the library so you can feel like you've done some kind of public service, save yourself the trouble. We're already understaffed and underpaid, and we don't really have much in the way of spare time to sort through your garbage so you can feel like a champion of philanthropy. If you have good, clean, undamaged books, CDs, videos, DVDs, software (especially certification test materials--that stuff gets stolen so fast you wouldn't believe it), by all means, bring them in; we'll even send you a thank-you note. But don't act like it entitles you to dictate what becomes of them or like that one donation should exempt you from overdue fees for life.

      -phatty 2x4
      --

      Nice things are nicer than nasty ones.
    15. Re:Librarians by oscitant · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I doubt it. Someone still has to understand the standards, how it all fits together. Your library catalog might have a slick user interface, but there's a lot more to library science than just the dewey decimal system. (If you don't believe me, knock yourself out reading MARC standards, for starters). Librarians will do more and more with technology, but somebody needs to understand at a deep level how the technology maps to the underlying standards and practices, and if AI has taught us anything, it's that it's a lot harder to encode human expertise than you might think. Knowing how to (re)search is far from a trivial skill, and knowing how to assign meaning or metadata to data is something I think computers will never be able to do as well as humans.

    16. Re:Librarians by Leo+Giertz · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You forget one quite important thing, and that's the fact that in order to find what you're looking for, you have to know what you're looking for. This is where the librarians are a great asset, and this is probably where they won't be replaced with algorithms, at least not within the nearest 50 years.

    17. Re:librarians by Pike65 · · Score: 1

      Totally.

      And I can get away with handing books back as late as I want as well, because my girlfriend works at the library and can doctor the system that sends spots late returns and demands money when you finally bring them back ; )

      On a vaguely related point, five or so years ago (before the whole ripping thing took off) my mate used to get all his music from the library. They'd only charge you £8 if you 'lost' CDs that you'd normally have to pay £12 to buy. You can see where I'm going with this, can't you . . .

      Still, they changed that after he almost completely cleared out the punk section.

      --
      "If being a geek means being passionate about something, then I pity those who aren't geeks." - Pike65
    18. Re:Librarians by chaserfromva · · Score: 1

      What skills do you use with your library job? How useful was the technological stuff you learned in everyday library life? Also, asking as one who is thinking of doing the same, what school did you go to?

    19. Re:Librarians by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nothing against librarians, but if you're in one long enough eventually you pick up the system. I knew my college library better than 95% of the people who worked there; not the full librarians I mean, but the hordes of students they hired to shelve books. I can't remember ever having to ask for help, I mean they're organized pretty simply.

    20. Re:librarians by blisspix · · Score: 1
      yeah. I'm a librarian too, and I've got to work out how to dispose of a very large management/HR/marketing collection. I'd love to make a bequest to a small library, academic or otherwise, but being in the profession I know the likelihood of it ending up in the bin. My fiancee also has a large gemstone collection to find a home for.

      You forgot to mention the cost of cataloguing the items, and maintaining bequests. A collection at my alma mater is now costing a fortune to maintain because they have to now collect other books to maintain the appeal of the collection to researchers and ensure its uniqueness, and pay large amounts of money on preservation. I don't think I've ever seen anyone use it.

    21. Re:librarians by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Speaking as another librarian who handles gifts, I also feel forced to add that gift books are *expensive* to add to the collection.

      A gift of a physical book only covers *part* of the cost of putting it on the shelf. If I remember correctly, the average cost of each gift book after you consider the money it takes to hire the people who process it, label it, place it on the shelf, etc. comes to about $50 a book (this was an actual study that I'm too lazy to go look for right now, I said I was a librarian, not a good one!).

  10. Bob Dole and Dog. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sitting at one of the tables in the library is Bob Dole himself, looking at Brittany the Librarian, asking his dog to quit barking.

  11. what every library needs is... by mattbland · · Score: 5, Insightful

    the freedom to take a digital copy of the book, leaving the original on the shelf for someone who is not able to use a digital copy.

    In modern day life every town/city library could present the books electronically for the benefit of it's citizens, or indeed the world.

    But because of copyright this will never be allowed to happen to the majority of books.

    People in this communitity have only recently (in the last five to ten years) started to wake up and realise that technology is not a limiting factor anymore, the legal system is. Librarians probably knew this all along and have not been worried about becoming redundant.

    If anything the Internet and libraries can probably learn more from each other than you realise.

    Librarians may be depicted in a less than flattering way in the media, but how many people actually visit libraries outside of schooling these days? I myself visit Borders book store, browse, listen to music, have a coffee and chat with my friends most saturdays, but in a library I wouldn't be able to find the latest titles or enjoy myself. Compared to retail a library is a staid boring authoritarian place, which is why the staff of these valuable institutions are depicted in this way.

    If they want to change their perception let's encourgage them to change their work place.

    --
    Sadly, whilst we value knowledge, it will be limited, rationed and paid for. When we cease to value knowledge we will have no use for it.
    (me)

    --
    /usr/bin/awake/too/long
    1. Re:what every library needs is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      If libraries are too boring for you, and the titles not "current" enough, I assure you those of us who do need them won't miss you.

    2. Re:what every library needs is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's a combined internet cafe + bookstore/library at Prague, planet-something, can't remember the name though... A nice place.

    3. Re:what every library needs is... by mccalli · · Score: 5, Interesting
      the freedom to take a digital copy of the book, leaving the original on the shelf for someone who is not able to use a digital copy.

      Almost, but not quite, like Project Gutenberg, in fact.

      Your point about copyright is still valid, but Project Gutenberg is making the rest possible.

      I worked on a project to digitise every book in the French National Library (EBPF, or Every P****** Book in France, as our overworked scanner operators used to call it. A worthwhile thing - not only did it allow multiple people to look at the same book simultaneously, but it also allowed rare books to be preserved - they weren't handled anymore, so they weren't damaged.

      how many people actually visit libraries outside of schooling these days?

      Quick question - are you a parent? If not, I can understand this question. If you are, then I'd be surprised if your kid didn't use the library in some form. I used to as a kid, and even though our daughter is currently only eight months' old, we go to the library and pick out baby books for her. This works well - she gets bored of things really quickly, so being able to return the books and pick new ones is a big bonus.

      Cheers,
      Ian

    4. Re:what every library needs is... by mccalli · · Score: 1
      French National Library (EBPF...)

      Err...sorry, should have been EPBF.

      Cheers,
      Ian

    5. Re:what every library needs is... by WeaponOfChoice · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But because of copyright this will never be allowed to happen to the majority of books

      I'd just like to point out that this is because of the publishers application of their copyright rights, rather than because of copyright itself. They have chosen to restrict supply of their property to only people who can acquire a physical copy (be it bookstore or library), with a bias towards people who pay for it.

      Having made extensive use of libraries when I was younger I can appreciate their immense value (I still think of them as smaller, slower internets from before the day...) but also appreciate what a digital library would mean to publishers. Most of the solutions I can think of only involve crippling digital distribution to match the shortcomings of print distribution, not an acceptable way of dealing with changing technology but one we seem to be stuck with in lieu of creative new business plans from publishers.

      For the record, I think librarians are cool, 'cause if they are I stand a better chance of also being cool one day...

      --


      It's not that I'm Anti-American - I'm Pro-Freedom
    6. Re:what every library needs is... by mattbland · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Actually I'm not a parent. But I have rarely visited a library since finishing school.

      When I was a student I used the college library a lot, mainly because it was the only place I could use Apple Mac's at the time (Mac Pluses!).

      I also used the school library a lot, amazingly because I found it better than the local public library (I was lucky to go to a very successful boy's Grammar school).

      Recently I was asked by my boss to find some information for his kids' homework using the net at work. A fact which reinforced my view that kids don't use the library much anymore. When you've got Encarta on a cd/dvd at home and a net connection it's a hundred times quicker and useful for a school kid than actually visiting a library. If I were a kid again I bet I'd be online just as much as I am nowdays as an IT professional.

      One of the reasons that libraries are useful is that they are free and open up access to knowledge
      and learning to those without the funds to pay for the books. I wouldn't mind paying for the priviledge to use the library more if they had a better selection of books.
      The current library system here in the UK is supported by the local authority, which means that our local taxes pay for the books. If no one visits the library there isn't much justification for paying for nice new books.

      --
      /usr/bin/awake/too/long
    7. Re:what every library needs is... by Silverlock · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Using digital copies is somewhat dangerous, IMHO. One of the purposes of libraries is simply to warehouse information. If they were to emphasize the digital copies and not the hardcopy, eventually the digital versions would degrade or the media would become obsolete. Imagine going to your local library to find a book and discovering that they only have it on 8.5" floppy disks. Obviously files could be copied but it would require constant upkeep. Paper, on the other hand, lasts MUCH longer. Personally, I am far more concerned about the information existing than in ease of access..

    8. Re:what every library needs is... by mccalli · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Recently I was asked by my boss to find some information for his kids' homework using the net at work...If I were a kid again I bet I'd be online just as much as I am nowdays as an IT professional.

      I entirely agree for research into factual items. My fiancee has recently 'gone back to school' and put herself through a four-year college course to become a qualified dispensing optician. Day release, so she had to wait a week between asking questions of her tutors. In this situation, the net was invaluable - we found online optics papers all over the place (quite a lot at the University of Texas, I seem to remember, and we're in the UK).

      There's always fiction however. That doesn't yet lend itself to web publishing, in my opinion. Well, at least not online reading anyway - you could always download and print. Just as important as factual research is the broadening of the mind that comes with reading a 'good' piece of fiction. Your definition of good might be different to mine, but I'm sure you'll see what I mean.

      Cheers,
      Ian

    9. Re:what every library needs is... by IIRCAFAIKIANAL · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Librarians may be depicted in a less than flattering way in the media, but how many people actually visit libraries outside of schooling these days? I myself visit Borders book store, browse, listen to music, have a coffee and chat with my friends most saturdays, but in a library I wouldn't be able to find the latest titles or enjoy myself. Compared to retail a library is a staid boring authoritarian place, which is why the staff of these valuable institutions are depicted in this way.

      I visit the local libraries here in Calgary, AB all the time. We have great libraries with great programs and classes, computers for students and the less fortunate, an excellent selection of books (both old and new) - and I believe that there are even coffee shops attached to some of the newer ones (one I know of downtown, anyhow).

      I was poor (by Canadian standards) growing up and if it hadn't been for libraries, I would not be in the line of work I am - there is no way I could have bought all the programming and computer books I took out on loan. Being able to access the Internet was also quite useful.

      Now that I make a disproportionately large amount of money for my age (double income, no kids) my better half and I donate many of the books we buy every year to the local libraries (at least 50 this year). Before you bemoan the lack of books at your local library, why not donate some books?

      And don't even get me started on the staff of your average retail bookstore. They are often the most unhelpful group of slackers I have ever met (at least in the three large bookstores I frequent).

      I'll take staid, boring, authoritarian, and useful over useless and costly anyday.

      In any case, a lot of people use libraries for things unrelated to school. Just because a hip, young, modern guy like you won't be caught dead in one doesn't mean the rest of us don't recognise the value of such an institution.

      One last thing you forgot - libraries are pretty much the last place you can find many examples of old information - old newspapers, out of print books, etc.

      (This isn't a flame - I just think that you haven't been in a library for quite awhile or the libraries in your town are a bit behind the times - pretend I peppered this text with winky smiley's, k?)

      --
      Robots are everywhere, and they eat old people's medicine for fuel.
    10. Re:what every library needs is... by NineNine · · Score: 1

      Librarians may be depicted in a less than flattering way in the media, but how many people actually visit libraries outside of schooling these days?

      I do. No kids at all. I go there because I get the books I want to read for fun for free, and I go for research (usually business related).

      Screw digital. Electronic books have been tried and have been abject failures because nobody wants to read a book, or any significant amount of text on a computer screen. It's that simple. The day that libraries stop having actual *books* is the day our civilization starts it's decline.

    11. Re:what every library needs is... by NineNine · · Score: 1

      Just because a hip, young, modern guy like you won't be caught dead in one doesn't mean the rest of us don't recognise the value of such an institution.

      As a formerly single, hip, young modern guy, I also discovered that libraries are *great* places to pick up women. Smart, cool women. Guys may him may not think they're cool, but hey, that's great. More for the guys who have enough of a brain to actually go to libraries.

    12. Re:what every library needs is... by SN74S181 · · Score: 1

      not only did it allow multiple people to look at the same book simultaneously, but it also allowed rare books to be preserved - they weren't handled anymore, so they weren't damaged.


      Actually, in many cases when books are digitized, they use a razor blade to slit the spine off the book, they make a bad scan that completely wipes out the illustrations, then the loose pages are shredded and converted to pulp.

      It borders on fascism, and it definitely ranks right up there with bookburning.

    13. Re:what every library needs is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is uninformed. Paper most certainly is not a safe archive medium and book bindings generally last less time than the paper. While digitial media may also have a short life under uncontrolled conditions it can easily be copied onto fresh media at a given interval and most importantly it costs much much less. Digital storage is so much cheaper that it makes redundant copies possible where expensive paper storage would not. Redundanct digital copies of media stored in proper facilities cannot even be compared to books on a library shelf as a secure form of storage. Your opinion is humble indeed.

    14. Re:what every library needs is... by cduffy · · Score: 2

      I'd just like to point out that this is because of the publishers application of their copyright rights, rather than because of copyright itself.

      I'd argue that it's rather because of Congress extending copyrights such that publishers have the ability to withhold the texts they purchase from the public domain for so long. Short copyright terms resolves the publisher issue -- they have their exclusive rights for a short time (I'd go back to the original 17-year terms), and then the work is available to everyone. Pity that won't likely happen here.

    15. Re:what every library needs is... by fermion · · Score: 5, Interesting
      A library is not just a place to get free books. There may be a time in the future where libraries will check out electronic books, unfortunately with some sort of DRM, in the same way that they now provide patrons with access to research databases and online articles, but I do not see it as a priority. The most important part of a library is to have a number of librarians with a range of degrees and experience so they can help patrons find the information they need.

      As a casual reader of books, I appreciate when a book is at the library. If a book is not at the library, I can generally ask a library to hold it for me when it comes back. The value of a library is that it has a range of free books, not that it has every book you want every time you want it.

      As a researcher, books are not so critical. Most information in books is old, and there is generally some redundancy among books, so one can generally come up with an appropriate book at a well stocked library. The real information for research is in journals, which are generally not allowed to circulate, and can be copied for a minimal fee.

      So yes, digital books might make the library nicer, but not to the degree that you assert. The library is about freedom of information, and the freedom to acquire information, and it fulfills that duty quite well. Free books are a part of that mandate, and possible the most visible part of that mandate, but not important to the degree you assert.

      The reason that people do not think of think of libraries in a positive light is because they take them for granted. People just assume that they have a right to free help to get the information they need, and then be protected when the government comes to interrogate a librarian about a patrons reading practices. By making such suggestion:
      People in this community have only recently (in the last five to ten years) started to wake up and realize that technology is not a limiting factor anymore, the legal system is. Librarians probably knew this all along and have not been worried about becoming redundant.
      you validate the concept that a library is nothing but a storage of books, and total ignore the underlying principle present in out modern libraries. You minimize the importance of a library and insult the degreed and highly trained proffesional necessary to make such institutions possible.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    16. Re:what every library needs is... by mccalli · · Score: 5, Informative
      We used to guilletine standard books (ie. those still in print), because they were easily replaceable. They'd then be fed through an automatic document feeder, converted to 300dpi TIFFs, then the book would be restiched by another company involved in the contract.

      For the rare stuff, like original Isaac Newton Principalia Optica and the French Academy of Science journals from the 1700s, we'd take photographs of every page, then scan the photographs. The original book never went through and scanner, as it was too frail.

      Sounds a bit less destructive than the process you're describing.

      Cheers,
      Ian

    17. Re:what every library needs is... by kirkjobsluder · · Score: 1

      Librarians may be depicted in a less than flattering way in the media, but how many people actually visit libraries outside of schooling these days? I myself visit Borders book store, browse, listen to music, have a coffee and chat with my friends most saturdays, but in a library I wouldn't be able to find the latest titles or enjoy myself. Compared to retail a library is a staid boring authoritarian place, which is why the staff of these valuable institutions are depicted in this way.

      Just about every library over the last 5 years has more social meeting space than the bookstores. In most public libraries, the casual space is the norm with a silent reading room for those who want quiet (which is useful for days when I can't deal with the chatter.) At my local library there is always at least one workgroup and gaming group.

      The biggest problem with bookstores is you can't take books home, and you can't photocopy pages. As a result, the library is the place I go to browse periodicals that I don't want to spend money on but occasionally have useful bits I want to take home.

      A third reason why I like libraries is that search engines like google are becoming less and less valuable resources the more junk gets piled into it. The ratio of non-english texts to english texts is becoming a bit high, and 95% of the results are incomplete, poorly researched, out of date, decontextualized, badly written, comlete BS or any mixture of the above. One advantage to print publishing over web publishing is that someone other that the auhor has the opportinity point out the worst flaws. Too much information is as bad a problem as too little information.

      This is where I find the added value of libraries and librarians, if I'm researching in a topic that is new to me, I'll ask a librarian to find the best ways to search.

    18. Re:what every library needs is... by KenSeymour · · Score: 1

      I saw a documentary on television where they talked about the challenge of keeping up digital records at the National Archives and Records Administration.
      The problem there was that the volume of digital data produced every year grew geometrically.
      And challenge of keeping up with all the formats that have been produced over the last thirty years.

      I think they first started having trouble with 9 track digital tapes (which may only last 5 years or so).
      Then there is the problem of keeping computer hardware and software that reads all the formats.

      They face a task of constantly converting an ever increasing amount of data.

      Keeping digital copies is only cheaper than paper once you have digitized the paper.
      A book printed on acid free paper can last a couple of hundred years.
      Your multiple redundant digital copies made 10 years ago on 1/4 inch tapes would have to be converted from the non-HTML hypertext format they
      thought was really cool at the time to HTML/SGML/XML or whatever we think is cool now and then stored on to our CDRW/DVD/what have you.
      Multiply this by every book published in the last 10 years.
      Then keep the hardware/software around for 10 years too so you can continue to read them.
      Do this 20 times to get the same results of keeping an archival book on the shelf for 200 years.

      --
      "We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them." -- Albert Einstein
    19. Re:what every library needs is... by Brother+Fjordhr · · Score: 1

      I do not donate books to the library because I do not want to see them sold 3/$1usd instead of being shelved. I would rather give them away to friends and people at church.

      The library, at least where I live, does not shelve donated books. They sell them. I have asked the librarian about this practice and I was told that they do not have the time to look at donated books the see if they want them and if they are of sufficient quality to shelve.

      By way of example of this I once found a couple of new books, with quality binding, in the book sale pile. I opened one of them and it still contained a letter from the publisher asking them to shelve that book. They clearly hadn't even opened the book to look at it. If they had then they would have seen the letter.

    20. Re:what every library needs is... by schlach · · Score: 2

      This is uninformed. Paper most certainly is not a safe archive medium and book bindings generally last less time than the paper. While digitial media may also have a short life under uncontrolled conditions it can easily be copied onto fresh media at a given interval and most importantly it costs much much less. Digital storage is so much cheaper that it makes redundant copies possible where expensive paper storage would not. Redundant digital copies of media stored in proper facilities cannot even be compared to books on a library shelf as a secure form of storage.

      I've heard the argument before, that paper lasts longer than digital. I anecdotally remember that the Vatican was looking into the problem, and decided against converting their library to digital, due to the short lifespan of the available physical media. This was a few years ago, maybe they've become more enlightened since then...

      Gotta worry about their ability to grasp the complex dilemmas of modern morality when they don't even understand bitspace... *rimshot*

      ok sorry sorry take it back oh powerful one with the wrath and the smite-ing and hey =)

    21. Re:what every library needs is... by wizzums · · Score: 1
      One last thing you forgot - libraries are pretty much the last place you can find many examples of old information - old newspapers, out of print books, etc.

      The college I'm currently at doesn't have a beautiful, massive library like my last university. But I still love it. Do a quick search for something you're interested in and then go peruse the stacks and find something that didn't come up in the search that's much more interesting. Recently I've been checking out a lot of stories written by folks who visited Japan in the 50's and 60's. Some of them are translations of Japanese literature, some are more like historic accounts in story form. Definitely not the kind of stuff I would find looking around in a bookstore. It wouldn't sell.. not enough people care about everything for it to be a good profit. Libraries are awesome for niche and older literature.

      Besides, old books are sexy :P They always make the reading experience so much better :>

    22. Re:what every library needs is... by sconeu · · Score: 2

      Recently I was asked by my boss to find some information for his kids' homework using the net at work.

      1. It's not part of your job description (or does your job include "flunky"?).

      2. It defeats the purpose of the assignment, which is for the KID to learn how to find stuff.

      3. Did you do it?

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    23. Re:what every library needs is... by mattbland · · Score: 1

      one thing i forgot to mention is that i'm in the UK. My home town is a small boring out of the way place with nothing going for it. I now live 'in the big city', London at the moment.

      It quite one thing to think that all libraries are dull and quite another to say that most are.

      I hope to see more interesting and engaging libraries in the future, the same goes for museums, galleries, etc.

      The science museum in london is great, and so it the tate modern if any of you that live outside london plan to visit, make sure you give them a go.

      --
      /usr/bin/awake/too/long
    24. Re:what every library needs is... by smagruder · · Score: 1
      I do not donate books to the library because I do not want to see them sold 3/$1usd instead of being shelved. I would rather give them away to friends and people at church.

      So, the purchasers of your books at 3/$1 won't read them and make good use out of them? So, the library isn't helped by this by being able to purchase more books they see fit to place onto the shelves?

      ...and it still contained a letter from the publisher asking them to shelve that book...

      So, a publisher's request for shelving a book is a contract to do such? So, a library cannot decide what books are appropriate to shelf and which are not? Remember, a lot of *junk* is published, so not placing every possible books on the shelves is a Good Thing (TM).

      --
      Steve Magruder, Metro Foodist
    25. Re:what every library needs is... by krisguy · · Score: 1

      My local library belongs to NetLibrary, a wonderful way to distribute content online.

      I sign up at the library, and then can get exclusive use of books that my library has or has purchased rights to distribute and can exclusively check that electronic copy of the book out for a predetermined amount of time (my library sets it at 4 hours). And it is web-based, so you can reference books anywhere.

      I also do plan to donate more books and CD's to my library in the future.

      --
      I'm a hamker. Hams, hackers, same ethos, different medium. == 73 de KB0STG
    26. Re:what every library needs is... by peter · · Score: 2

      > There's always fiction however.

      If you have a laptop with a decent screen, you can curl up with it almost as well as a book. A pager like less works fine with a flat text file, but it lacks the ability to save bookmarks across sessions. If your laptop can suspend or hibernate, that's not a problem.

      Someone should make a text viewer with a "screen" made from that e-ink stuff. (ink in a ball controlled by electrostatic forces to turn on or off. draws zero current when idle (with image displayed), very high resolution.) That way you could have a flexible screen. It could have some RAM and a USB connection so you could send web pages or man pages or other docs to it, for reference while using your computer monitor's real estate for other things. Besides that, the RAM would let you store a couple books in it to read away from the computer. e-ink would mean a lot of pixels, so a decent CPU would be needed, maybe an ARM.

      --
      #define X(x,y) x##y
      Peter Cordes ; e-mail: X(peter@cordes , .ca)
    27. Re:what every library needs is... by mccalli · · Score: 3, Insightful
      If you have a laptop with a decent screen, you can curl up with it almost as well as a book.

      I have a laptop with a 1600x1200 screen, and it doesn't remotely replace a book. The resolution is still too low (even with sub-pixel anti-aliasing - ClearType on XP), it's heavy, it's warm, the fan comes on every so often, it runs out of batteries, I can't use it one-handed one the London Underground...

      Nope. Still books for the moment.

      Cheers,
      Ian

    28. Re:what every library needs is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you say you visit borders, have coffee and chat. but not in a lib.
      hey, wake up and smell the coffee -- outside the bookstore. go to a decent-sized library and note that many now have coffe shops.

      but in a library, you "wouldn't be able to enjoy yourself." c'mon. sounds like you're stuck in an old stereotype yourself. have you visited a library any time during this century?

      and if your own local lib really doesn't offer any of the newer stuff, maybe it's because people who have old notions stuck in their heads won't give them any money. coffee counters and computers ain't cheap, ya know. taxes aren't usually enough. if you want better service, cough up some money and give libraries a chance to compete with big business.

    29. Re:what every library needs is... by peter · · Score: 2

      > it's warm, the fan comes on every so often

      I've got an old 486 clunker that doesn't have either of those problems. An Apple laptop would be quiet and cool(er). If you have a good font, and use full-screen text mode, it can be very readable. Of course, if you really like books, get them from the library just like usual. They are a lot more portable, which is one of the reasons I phrased my opinion the way I did :)

      I'm not saying we should scan our books and burn the paper, I'm just saying that the laptop option is worth trying, for those that haven't already.

      --
      #define X(x,y) x##y
      Peter Cordes ; e-mail: X(peter@cordes , .ca)
  12. Memepool.com was talking about this... by PDHoss · · Score: 5, Informative

    ... a while back. Right from their site:

    "Although the general public often seems surprised when librarians don't fit their pre-conceived image, the profession has celebrated its own differences for years. Librarians are funny, irreverent, interesting, and often radical people. Though popular culture includes considerable library material, it often ignores those on the fringe."

    PDHoss

    --
    ======================================
    Writers get in shape by pumping irony.
  13. Librarians by Omkar · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Librarians can access information more efficiently since they know how to search.
    As these special searching mechanisms are made into algorithms, I think librarians will become tenders of technology and book shelvers (unless that's automated as well), not the guides that they were years ago and, to some extent, are today. This situation kinda resembles the Kramnik/Fritz thing...

  14. Just So by Selanit · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Librarians do one heck of a lot more than we, as patrons, see them do. I never really appreciated how much until my mother got a job as a school librarian. She spends long hours working on catalogues, organizing book fairs, and doing research to help teachers find the best supplementary material for their classes.

    Not only that, she is frequently coopted to help with IT problems, since the IT manager doesn't have a staff. One time, she had to manually recover three days worth of circulation info when some moron from the school district turned off the server without shutting everything down properly.

    It scares me when she talks about how much she loves cataloguing, though.

  15. Librarians are criminals by The+Original+Yama · · Score: 5, Funny

    Librarians use photocopiers, and help others to do likewise. Photocopiers can copy whole books, which is in breach of copyright laws.

    Stop the pirate rings! Gaol all librarians!

  16. Librarians by yar · · Score: 5, Informative

    I have a library degree.
    In "library school" things I learned about included information architecture, web design, HTML, XML, Javascript and CSS, metadata, authentication and authenticity, network and information security, databases (Access, mySQL) how to install and run Linux, and most importantly how to organize and present information. It was library school that introduced me to Open Source adn Free Software. The basic fuctions and principles of libraries and librarians are probably the most useful of the bunch, even in my current tech job.

  17. Not like the libraries I know back home by tuxedo-steve · · Score: 5, Funny
    from the internet-is-just-a-giant-library dept.
    I don't know what kind of libraries you tend to frequent, Roblimo, but it seems to me that no library I've even been to is 90% porn. The place you live in must seriously r0xx0r!
    --
    - SMJ - (It's not just a name: it's a bad aftertaste.)
    1. Re:Not like the libraries I know back home by Roblimo · · Score: 5, Funny

      Or maybe you and I frequent different Internets? :)

      - Robin

  18. Librarians.. and the Afternow. (lil offtopic) by Hey_bob · · Score: 5, Interesting

    There is a online radio show, called "Tales from the Afternow" which is being told by a Librarian from the future, where everything is copyrighted by mega corps, and he (the librarian) is a criminal for sharing info freely.
    www.theafternow.com

    Give a listen, all the episodes are free and in MP3 format.

  19. Anyone ever seen Unseen University? by El+Jynx · · Score: 2, Funny

    That bloody orang-utan is just about the 133735t librarian that exists. Masters of knowledge they are, yesss preciousss! Jynx

    --
    A positive attitude may not solve all your problems, but it will annoy enough people to make it well worth the effort.
  20. I can't help but... by BitwizeGHC · · Score: 2, Funny

    be reminded of this image. Wouldn't want to mess with her cataloguing skillz.

    --
    N4st0r, trixx0r h0bb1tz0rz! Th3y st0l3 0ur pr3c10uzz!
  21. ALA by alexc · · Score: 4, Informative

    A good thing about the American Library Assocition, there are against DMCA and other potential laws that reduce fair use. That is a good thing for open source.

    1. Re:ALA by tswinzig · · Score: 3, Funny

      A good thing about the American Library Assocition, there are against DMCA and other potential laws that reduce fair use. That is a good thing for open source.

      Exactly! Praise ALA!

      --

      "And like that ... he's gone."
  22. Isaac Asimov's hero was a librarian! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I wonder if anyone has read the Foundation series of
    books. Maybe a little too old-fashioned. Also the computers are quite funny.

  23. Has anyone read the fine print??? by twoslice · · Score: 5, Funny

    These primary historical documents reflect the attitudes, perspectives, and beliefs of different times. The Library of Congress does not endorse the views expressed in these collections, which may contain materials offensive to some readers.

    I think they cut and pasted this from a PrOn site!

    (Score:6, unfuckingbelievable)

    --

    From excellent karma to terible karma with a single +5 funny post...
  24. Libraries don't need to be "elite" by MagPulse · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ...for the same reason serious Linux users don't use Linux to be cool.

    Every dollar spent on technology is a dollar that doesn't go toward buying another book. It pained me to hear librarians who, when asked on a local radio show what they would do with $100,000, would spend it all on IT when their book collections are so modest.

    Sharing the Internet with the public is a worthy goal, but for most avenues of knowledge, books and periodicals are still the way to go. When authors decide to spend the years it takes to create a great book, they publish it on paper so they can make money, not on the web. Librarians realize this and focus their efforts on creating collections of printed works that are carefully catalogued and chosen for their intellectual value.

    Sharing local collections with the world is being undertaken by the Library of Congress in two separate projects. National works of art are at http://memory.loc.gov/, and the LOC is helping other countries with putting their materials online at http://international.loc.gov/.

    1. Re:Libraries don't need to be "elite" by aiabx · · Score: 2, Interesting

      There are circumstances where a bit of 1337ness wouldn't hurt. My wife works at the Faculty of Music library at a major Canadian university. She convinced a friend of ours to donate a large collection of ancient 78's left to him by his father to the school. When the archivist was asked if he could convert these old recordings to MP3's so that students could listen to them for research purposes without damaging the original recordings, he replied - and this is true - that he didn't want to convert the recordings to MP3 because he couldn't listen to them in a blackout. So now they gather dust in a locked room, and no one ever listens to them whether the power is on or not.
      -aiabx

      --
      Just this guy, you know?
    2. Re:Libraries don't need to be "elite" by sydb · · Score: 2

      Surely someone could have told him he didn't have to actually melt the 78s after conversion?

      --
      Yours Sincerely, Michael.
    3. Re:Libraries don't need to be "elite" by MagPulse · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I should add that money isn't the only incentive to publish on paper. Being published itself is a sort of validation that most in academia need to survive, as well as those outside of it can use to further their career. It also insures that your work will sit in libraries for hundreds if not thousands of years to come, which web publishing can't guarantee. And finally, it usually means more people will read your work, take it more seriously, and refer it to others.

    4. Re:Libraries don't need to be "elite" by hey! · · Score: 2

      It pained me to hear librarians who, when asked on a local radio show what they would do with $100,000, would spend it all on IT when their book collections are so modest.

      As much as I am in sympathy with you, you have to look at who the library serves. Not everyone has access to the Internet at work and home; for those of us that do, having a $100,000 more books would be great. But for those who do not have access to the Internet, it would be a good investment.

      People around here have short memories, apparently not predating the advent fo Google. Now you can't trust everything, or even msot things on the Internet, but you can zero in on things you need to investigate more. If I had an internet connected computer and an encyclopedia standing next to each other, I'd start my investigation on Google and finish it in the encyclopedia. Also, there are many things that a typical small library does not have. I can find Lord Macaulay's seminal 1842 speech on copyright extension in less than thirty seconds, whereas I'd be lucky if I could find it in my local library at all.

      For us, the marginal value of $100,000 worth of books far outweighs the marginal value of the next $100,000 of technology in our libraries. We already have plenty technology, but we really can't have enough books. For the less fortunate, you might split that $100,000 50/50 for technology and books. For a library with a modest existing collection and no technology serving people who also have no technology (possibly a very likely combination), it might not be reasonable to spend it all on technology.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    5. Re:Libraries don't need to be "elite" by psychopracter · · Score: 1

      Why would a library want to spend $100k on tech and not books?

      Because with a modern information backbone, library staff and patrons can be connected to more information (books, sound, video, government websites) than that $100k will buy.

      --
      OS X:*nix for the real world.
    6. Re:Libraries don't need to be "elite" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What school administrator could resist the thought of dropping some $s from the budget to ditch the 78s once there were "superior" digital copies?

      Have you seen the quality of the microfilms at your local library system? The contextual info contained in a broad sheet is gone, the pictures are muddy blobs and much of the text borders on illegible. That's okay, because they are just copies. You can always go to the originials, right? Wrong. The originals may have hung around for a few years. But a budget crunch hits or perhaps a new director is just looking to pinch a penny or maybe the storage space is coveted for a new project. The newspaper archive is auctioned off. Sometimes the library even pays someone to take it away!

      Who buys them? The people who will sell you a genuine framed newspaper front page from the day you were born. Anyone who thinks they might be able to make a buck from cutting out the good parts and selling them.

      Check it out.

      So, no, he doesn't "have to actually melt the 78s after conversion". Not yet at least. And someone else will do that for him when the time comes.

    7. Re:Libraries don't need to be "elite" by hey! · · Score: 2

      Realistically, most libraries these days, if they had $100,000, would do well to use it to extend their hours.

      In any case, to equip a single branch suburban library with Internet acces and a number of workstations, $100,000 is too much. For an urban library with perhaps as many as ten branches, it is barely enough, especially if you want to set aside some money to endow the future operating costs (pay the connection bill).

      Which goes to my point -- whether it makes sense or is a senseless waste of money depends on the library.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  25. Librarians by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You seem to be missing a step. In the libraries that deploy technology effectively, it's not the librarians who are responsible for the technology: it's the library technician. The position can have many titles: Systems Support, Electronic Support, Computer Manager, All Powerful Guru, etc. These are the people who make effective technology in the libraries.

    You can send your kudos to the local LIBRARY for their "3733t" tech, but take it from one who is there: give the props to the library tech staff.

    Most libraries don't have techs, and those libraries tend to be little but spam relays and porno repositories. Would be nice to convince all those libraries they need a tech. That's a lot of jobs out there, if you're wondering.

  26. I often... by iamatlas · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Have to attend for the purposes of work conventions of librarians. Specificlaly, there are the Medical Library Association and Science Library association. They are by far, outside the the technical IT etc. community the most technically proficient binch around. They are often os "up" on technology as i am.

    I also worked IT support for a large university for a while, and can further attest to the technical proficiency of librarians with the following: Not only were the professional librarians some of the easiest customers to work with they had difficulties, they rarely, if ever had the same problem twice, if the problem in question was something that could be resolved by simpl having watched and asked me about what I was doing. Made for easy library server maintenance. They wanted them down less than I did.

    1. Re:I often... by Shimbo · · Score: 2

      Have to attend for the purposes of work conventions of librarians. Specifically, there are the Medical Library Association and Science Library association. They are by far, outside the the technical IT etc. community the most technically proficient bunch around

      Some 31337 medical librarians at work in this news story.

  27. you can tell this story was written by a librarian by affenmann · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...by the number of references (a.k.a links) in the text.

  28. example of librarians' prowess by joe094287523459087 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    check out the New York Public Library Desk Reference. from the foreword: "the 82 branch libraries of the NY public Library answer more than 5 million reference questions each year. " i didn't realize that you can call up a library and ask them questions - sort of a poor man's google :) amazon - http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0786868465/ qid=1035121055/sr=2-1/ref=sr_2_1/103-7596475-97742 49

    1. Re:example of librarians' prowess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      calling the lib is a "poor man's google"? I'd call it a "smart man's google." what's so great about getting 12,000 hits? you wanna sift through that? call the lib and get 1 correct hit and you're done.

      BTW many libs have email and chat for questions too. the human search engine beats google any day!

  29. Re:Librarians.. and the Afternow. (lil offtopic) by cHiphead · · Score: 0

    ALL HAIL SEAN K and CIMMERIAN, for they shall lead us to the promise land. TFtAN is a great show and unfortunately SeanKTFM had to stop making them for a while b/c like most of us he's too broke to put in the time and effort required to make them as kick ass as they are. Maybe a few good slashdot posts linking them will inspire.

    -=sNake

    --

    This is my sig. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
  30. 1337 librarians? by BluBrick · · Score: 3, Funny

    As soon as I saw "Libraries are 31337", I was immediately reminded of The Crimson Permanent Assurance.

    --
    Ahh - My eye!
    The doctor said I'm not supposed to get Slashdot in it!
  31. We have the technology.... by tiltowait · · Score: 5, Informative

    the freedom to take a digital copy of the book, leaving the original on the shelf for someone who is not able to use a digital copy.

    The biggest impediment to the type of access you describe nowadays isn't the technology, it's capitalism and all its derivatives, such as copyright.

    Case in point: A few years ago, the ebook vendor netLibrary offered an offline reader. This product was removed due to publisher paranoia. Currently you can only view netLibrary titles one page at a time while connected to the Internet. Furthermore, despite the medium, only one patron per purchasing library can check out a book at any given time. But never fear, now they're offering - for an extra fee - the ability to use a (somewhat) DRM crippled offline reader.

    Publishers are about as up to date with technology and new pricing models as the RIAA. Copyrights disputes have been cited as the reason several publishers have pulled their titles from full-text databases. So instead of moving towards the single search box method for library resources, we now have hundreds of competing library database vendors, each with different coverage and search interfaces. It is the most difficulty time in history to do library research (and the slack that Google is picking up is a detriment to research skills) not just because of varying library materials formats, but because of copyright.

    Libraries Are 31337

    1. Re:We have the technology.... by nmg · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry, if I knew that any book I wrote would be given away for free at a library and copied endlessly between everyone and their friends, I wouldn't even bother to write. I know it's spiffy cool to think that making money is evil no matter what, in the real world people need to eat.

      You want the "freedom" to get things for free and give them to all your friends. What about my freedom to control what happens to the things I produce?

    2. Re:We have the technology.... by aronc · · Score: 2

      What about my freedom to control what happens to the things I produce?

      Sorry, Ideas by their very nature cannot be controlled once they are released. This is why copyright is a granted power. If you want complete control over ideas you generate you have only the option of keeping them to yourself, period.

      --

      jello.
      aka aron.
    3. Re:We have the technology.... by nmg · · Score: 1

      It's not from the intangible "ideas" that authors are granted their right to life, it's the profit from the books that they write them down in--which is exactly what giving away free digital books would deprive the authors of.

    4. Re:We have the technology.... by aronc · · Score: 2

      It's not from the intangible "ideas" that authors are granted their right to life, it's the profit from the books that they write them down in--which is exactly what giving away free digital books would deprive the authors of.

      Unless the free digital books are out of copyright and have already givin their authors any financial benefit they should see. Which should happen in something to the tune of 30-40 years, imho.

      --

      jello.
      aka aron.
    5. Re:We have the technology.... by nmg · · Score: 1

      Oh, I agree. I'm talking about taking the latest Stephen King bestseller and putting it out on the 'net. Copyrights definitely should have an expiration date (whereupon they can be renewed if desired).

    6. Re:We have the technology.... by cduffy · · Score: 1

      Even then, I can't see anyone wanting to actually read a King novel online -- at least, not anyone with the ability to pay for their reading material. Even with the ability to "check out" a digital copy, having ones' own personal bookshelf full of well-loved dead tree fragments is well worth paying for.

      That said, I agree that having a relatively short, fully honored, copyright term is the Right Way to do things; technology (ie. digital paper) may eliminate some of the practical incentives for buying traditional books inside the next 10 or 20 years or so. 'Twill be a shame, however, when one can no longer how well-loved a novel is by looking at its bindings, but needs to view some electronic "page count" instead -- and worse than a shame if DRM brings things to the point where I can no longer loan my favorite novel to a friend.

    7. Re:We have the technology.... by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 1
      I'm sorry, if I knew that any book I wrote would be given away for free at a library and copied endlessly between everyone and their friends, I wouldn't even bother to write.

      Good. If the only reason you're writing is to make a monetary profit, your words are sure to be a waste of paper (or whatever medium is involved).

      Sure, if we allow artist to profit then they can create more. (However, a monopoly on copying is no longer - if it was ever - a sensible way to do that.) But any real artist is going to engage in some acts of creation regardless of monetary concerns.

      What about my freedom to control what happens to the things I produce?

      You have no such freedom. You've never even had a semblance of such a freedom; all copyright ever created was an artificial right to a monopoly on making copies, which is a far cry from "control".

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    8. Re:We have the technology.... by nmg · · Score: 1

      Good. If the only reason you're writing is to make a monetary profit, your words are sure to be a waste of paper (or whatever medium is involved).

      That's bullshit, and you know it. No one becomes a writer just to make money (ask any author, they'll tell you it's not a very profitable business unless you're someone like Stephen King). However, to tell an author that they can't make money because it deprives everyone else of their right to copy whatever the author writes is ridiculous. How else will the author survive?

      If someone wants to write just to make money, that should be their right. But if they actually want to make money, they better be a damn good writer--and, if that's true, what difference does their motive make?

      You have no such freedom. You've never even had a semblance of such a freedom; all copyright ever created was an artificial right to a monopoly on making copies, which is a far cry from "control".

      I have the freedom to allow my publisher exclusive rights to make copies, which I most certainly would do because they have the capability to have the book actually produced. That's infinitely more control than having it taken by whomever wants it.

    9. Re:We have the technology.... by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 1
      No one becomes a writer just to make money

      Your original post claimed that this would be your sole motivation.

      How else will the author survive?

      Most authors and musicians and artists of all stripes currently survive by working day jobs. It may be that, as technology creates the ability for that majority of artists to have their work seen by a wider auidience, it may destroy the possibility for a tiny minority to "strike it rich". (I doubt it, though; if enough people love an artists work, that artist will do fine regardless of restrictions on copying.)

      OTOH, I've suggested for a while now that copyright should be replaced with a right to royalties; that copying a work should be treated similarly to the way that performing a song is today, that mechanical royalties for for-profit copying should be imposed.

      But finally, it doesn't matter too much what you or I think should happen. Digital media is here, copying is inevitable. Copyright is dead, it just hasn't stopped moving yet; and the sooner we all accept that, the sooner we can get on to building a post-copyright way to "promote the useful arts and sciences".

      I have the freedom to allow my publisher exclusive rights to make copies,

      You have an artificially-created legal temporary monopoly on copies. Don't confuse that with a freedom.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    10. Re:We have the technology.... by Robotech_Master · · Score: 2

      Fortunately, not all publishers are so inclined. (And y'know, if I'd had to choose one to be good about digital copying and stuff, I think Baen would have been the one I would have chosen anyway--since it publishes science fiction and fantasy, and not all the boring tripe that usually ends up on best-seller lists.)

      --
      Editor Emeritus and Senior Writer, TeleRead.org
    11. Re:We have the technology.... by zeugma-amp · · Score: 1

      Well, I've been to the Baen site and checked out several of their books. I just want to say for the record, that the idea of having books available for free in the manner that they are doing it is an absolutely evil idea.

      Used to be, I could walk into a bookstore and check for new releases by the authors I'm interested in reading fairly quickly. I could generally leave without breaking the bank. No more! Since going to Baen's site, I have this huge backlog of books by authors that I'd most likely never have read that I have to buy.

      They need to stop this free distribution of their books so I can save my bank account!

      --
      This is an ex-parrot!
  32. Just Call it a LIBRARY, Please! by ackthpt · · Score: 5, Interesting
    The geniuses at the college I worked at decided to rename the college library 'Learning Resources Center' Hey, guess how often some student would wander down past my office asking where they could find the 'Library'

    Same went for other impressive efforts to rename things: PE -&gt LLW Life Long Wellness, Admissions Office -&gt Welcome Center, etc.

    A true professional should know how to position themselves so the public can find them. Confusing, euphemistic titles are as bad as Political Correctness in my book. If anyone thinks otherwise, try running a bond issue on a ballot for something other than Library and see how many votes it nets you.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:Just Call it a LIBRARY, Please! by davids-world.com · · Score: 2, Insightful

      you're completely right. somehow i got the impression, some people missed the irony in my post, pardon: in the first part of it...

    2. Re:Just Call it a LIBRARY, Please! by fermion · · Score: 1
      Absolutely. Libraries are confusing enough to the average person without complicating the issues with arbitrary names.

      A library is a library, and even people who never have been in one know enough to know that they can go to the library for a book, or ask a referenece librarian a question.

      I taught at a community college where the bozos called thier library some whacky name, probably to gain a bit of validity. Confusing as hell.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    3. Re:Just Call it a LIBRARY, Please! by zoward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I think the reason that you are seeing more and more libraries given titles like "resource information center" is because most people think of a library as nothing more than a book repository. Many libraries today also have microfiche, videotapes, CD's, DVD's, software, and a network of computers with high-speed internet. Since many people will never discover any of this other good stuff because they think of the library as a place to go if you're looking for books, some libraries have taken to changing their title to more accurately reflect what they are.

      --
      "Can't you see that everyone is buying station wagons?"
    4. Re:Just Call it a LIBRARY, Please! by edunbar93 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Confusing, euphemistic titles are as bad as Political Correctness in my book

      Correction: Confusing, euphemistic titles ARE political correctness.

      I could go on, but I probably shouldn't. :)

      --
      "No problem. I have the capacity to do infinite work so long as you don't mind that my quality approaches zero."-Dilbert
    5. Re:Just Call it a LIBRARY, Please! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Libraries are confusing


      e.g. Periodicals == magazines

    6. Re:Just Call it a LIBRARY, Please! by ixache · · Score: 1
      I think the reason that you are seeing more and more libraries given titles like "resource information center" is because most people think of a library as nothing more than a book repository. Many libraries today also have microfiche, videotapes, CD's, DVD's, software, and a network of computers with high-speed internet. Since many people will never discover any of this other good stuff because they think of the library as a place to go if you're looking for books, some libraries have taken to changing their title to more accurately reflect what they are.

      Exactly. That's why in France they changed the old "bibliothèque" (libraries--biblio means book and thèque, I don't know. Maybe shelf or repository?) into the fancy new "médiathèque" (where média stands for, well, media, duh).

      Xavier

      --
      Do I make sense? Please report if not.
  33. Ook by MicklePickle · · Score: 1

    I prefer librarians that are orange and go 'OOK".

    --
    -- main(s){printf(s="main(s){printf(s=%c%s%c,34,s,34) ;}",34,s,34);} $p='$p=%c%s%
  34. Librarians? by RickHunter · · Score: 3, Funny

    "Many people may hold the image of a librarian as a shushing school marm who does little more than stamp and shelve books because that's all they've seen librarians do"

    Seriously, who have they been talking to? Any geek worth his (or her) salt should, upon hearing the word "Librarian" immediately think "simian". (Not, note, monkey. That would be a very painful thought) Why this has not caught on among the general populace is a mystery. Perhaps they have simply not ventured deeply enough into the more obscure sections of their "local" library...

  35. little point in visiting a library by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The most current programming books in our university library are those I donated 20 years ago. Bah. This is an engineering school. The EEs, MEs, CEs have the same complaint.

    OTOH, I've just gotten into Heinlein, Hemmingway, and Huxley. I'm the first to check them out in 30 years (they use that stamped slip in the back). Nice for them to archive classics. You really should read "Chrome Yellow."

  36. Fictionwise Electronic Lending Library by henben · · Score: 2

    http://library.fictionwise.com/fll/

  37. Re:Librarians.. and the Afternow. (lil offtopic) by Hey_bob · · Score: 1

    that was the plan..

  38. s/page count/view count/ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    oops!

  39. I respectfully disagree! by Multics · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I've worked with librarians all over the midwest (USA) and as a group they're far far behind on nearly every basis.

    It is clear that just as computer geeks naturally select themselves as computer people, librarians do the same. They like books, research, and then tend to be very rigid in their outlook on work and life.

    In addition to their natural tendancies, the American Library Association has not helped matters. It is controlled by a bunch of introspective, vision-less, and rigid nay-sayers. Go to the ALA web site and see what kinds of literature they are currently offering! See anything about how to design cataloging systems? See much about information management? nope. Then, beyond that, ALA's been very successful locking up big chunks of their corner of the world with locking up job descriptions to ALA accreditation which requires a visionless curriculum.

    I think it is hopeless until most current library managers a retired and a new crop that is not afraid of innovation and change come to the fore front.

    So do I wish Librarians would come to the information party in a contemporary way? Absolutely! Alas I have very little hope that it will happen anytime in the near future.

    -- Multics

    P.S. at a recent conference I attended, one of the speakers argued "partner with a librarian!" (for research projects, not p0rn) Several of us talked with him after his presentation and said that we'd tried, but they were too far out-of-touch and he replied that his experience was clearly the exception.

  40. Wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The laws allow for personal use of all material. It is the DMCA that is causing problems by removing the personal use clause.

  41. Doesnt she eat the darned books? by Kenneth+Stephen · · Score: 2

    Quite frankly it had never occurred to me to borrow books from the library for my son. Just as well. At the age of 8 months, his favourite form of information processing was to chew on the books. I shudder to think of the fines I would have had to pay if those were library books.

    --

    There is no such thing as luck. Luck is nothing but an absence of bad luck.

    1. Re:Doesnt she eat the darned books? by mccalli · · Score: 2
      Err...she tries, but we keep an eye out.

      These books are unlikely to win the Nobel Prize for Literature. They are things like "Elmer's Day", where Elmer (a patchwork elephant) wakes up, has a bath in the river, and goes back to to sleep again. Total: about five pages, and those pages are card, not paper. They're about 95% pictures too.

      You also get ones with textures in them - you know, "feel my furry tummy" with a picture of a teddy bear and a tuft of fabric for the baby to touch. Then there's the glittery ones...that kind of thing.

      It's not really to teach her to read, more to get her used to the idea of books and also to the idea of someone reading to her.

      Cheers,
      Ian

    2. Re:Doesnt she eat the darned books? by nomadic · · Score: 2

      These books are unlikely to win the Nobel Prize for Literature. They are things like "Elmer's Day", where Elmer (a patchwork elephant) wakes up, has a bath in the river, and goes back to to sleep again. Total: about five pages, and those pages are card, not paper. They're about 95% pictures too.

      It's obviously a metaphor for the patchwork of conflicting worldviews foisted upon us everyday. The river symbolizes this as a rapid flow which Elmer (representing "everyman") fights against, before finally deciding to go back to sleep (symbolizing death, of course).

  42. curmudgeon take on libraries and technology by bap · · Score: 1

    Curmudgeon take on libraries and technology:
    http://www.cs.unm.edu/~bap/library-in fo-commons.ht ml

  43. And a side point by coupland · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Although I'm not a librarian I think people sometimes lose sight of the fact that libraries are in many ways a foundation of democracy and freedom.

    A bit over the top, you say? Well, libraries go hand-in-hand with free education, which most people consider a basic right. They also provide free access to information, often information critical of government or other establishments. Libraries provide uninhibited access to information for rich or poor, white or black. Many of us take for granted the ability to buy a $20 book and read it at our leisure, but just because we're largely a rich society does not magically make your local Barnes & Noble a "noble" enterprise. But your local library is.

    In fact, readers of Slashdot who believe in freedom of information should be vehemently in support of libraries as the original source of the concept that information should be freely available to the populace. Recent copyright laws attack the library establishment as much as they do individuals. While the concept of rows of dust-covered tomes my be getting a bit outdated, libraries are actually about education and access to information, not just books...

    1. Re:And a side point by oscitant · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Exactly. A librarian once told me, "If we're not pissing somebody off, we're not doing our job." Libraries are and should be a source of controversy and a haven for dissent. You can't have a democracy without giving people the opportunity to know what their choices are, what the unpopular opinion is.

  44. Every dev group should have a librarian by jrst · · Score: 5, Interesting

    One of the first things I did when I took on the responsibility of managing a dev team was to hire a librarian. (A real, trained librarian, not a "code librarian".)

    It was the best investment I ever made. It didn't take long before virtually everyone's first stop with a question was the library/librarian. Reference material, competitive info, standards, you name it... the librarian knew how to take piles of information in whatever form and organize it, make it accessible, and make it far more usable to everyone.

    If you have a dev group of more than 15-20, your dev group is wasting time and money by not having a professional librarian on the team. It's a job that's part administrivia, part science, and part art. I have yet to find any other discipline that blends those parts as effectively as library science.

    (I have to admit I've always had a soft spot for librarians, probably because I spent so much time in libraries. I have also been extremely impressed by librarians understanding of applying technology for information management, and the very progressive ideas that came out of library sciences. That doesn't always translate to high tech libraries or systems, but that's more often than not a funding issue.)

  45. Behind the scenes at a library. by psychopracter · · Score: 3, Informative

    I work as a Library Asst III for the state of Nevada. I'm soon to be a Library Technican I. The time I spend on the reference desk answering questions is only some of what I do, although what I do there is also very important. I'm expected to know how to use a large variety of specialized subject databases to help patrons find information. I'm expected to know how to use a large variety of paper indexes to help people find information that predates the PC age. I am my department's technical writer. I will shortly maintain several in-house databases for collections that have no cataloging. I also write and maintain webpages. I am also the co-expert on the university's microforms collection. I have to know which collections are cataloged, which aren't, and what finding tools are avalible. Though I have my areas of specialization, I'm also expected to be something of a polymath and know enough about all subjects to get *anybody* started on research. And I don't even have the MLS or MLIS. A lot more is expected from those who do. And even in the pre internet age, library staff did a lot behind the scenes to make their collections as accessable as possible to people.

    --
    OS X:*nix for the real world.
  46. You must not have checked out the books I did then by edunbar93 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Because before I had a computer of my own, Libraries were by and large my *only* source of porn.

    Of course, they didn't have a lot of pictures of Nekkid Wimmin, but like a certain magazine likes to say, they have "Porn for nerds. Babes that matter."

    Authors like Anais Nin, Henry Miller, D.H. Lawrence, Camille Paglia, and Nancy Friday are the ones I can remember right off the top of my head, and I've also found a whole host of compilations of erotic short stories by a vast number of authors.

    And on top of the porn there's also tons of truly informative stuff on human sexuality in public libraries. "The New Kinsey Report," "Female sexual awareness," and "The Erotic Mind," are books that helped enlighten me, and there are now literally hundreds of newer titles can be found just by using my library's web page search engine.

    Perhaps the library doesn't have *as much* porn as the Internet does, but 99% of what's on the net is crap, and what the library has is all the truly worthwhile stuff. No credit card required! ;)

    --
    "No problem. I have the capacity to do infinite work so long as you don't mind that my quality approaches zero."-Dilbert
  47. SLightly OT:, then back ontopic of Library Fringe by mekkab · · Score: 2

    Between Memepool, obscurestore.com, and slashdot, i frequently can find the same information in three places. Mostly between obscurestore and memepool.

    Kind of supports the whole idea of memes.

    To get back ON TOPIC: I found the Rockland County, NY library system to be a fabulous wealth of fringe information. Everything from great cyberpunk ("storming the reality studio" is the collection that all should own) and just plain wierd ("High wierdness by mail"- SOOO outof date now, but a great and entertaining book!) for those who can read and like to think the library can offer a great opportunity for having a good time and learning about cool stuff.

    Yeah, I guess that makes me El Primo Geeko, #1.

    --
    In the future, I would want to not be isolated from my friends in the Space Station.
  48. They recieve training to avoid this by Brother+Fjordhr · · Score: 1

    I worked as a copier technician (a fun job, gears chains, and electronics. All in one little box) and we were trained in fair use and regularly provided instruction in fair use to customers. Fair use is, in simple terms, the rules under which one can make copies of copyrighted materials.

  49. Bug? by Twintop · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    This might be slightly offtopic, but did anyone else notice the lack of quotes around this story's italicized parts?

  50. Next up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Libertarians: We're Not What You Think...

  51. Librarians fight to keep information free by ChaosDiscord · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I've always respected librarians. They dedicate their lives to sharing information with people as freely as possible. I cheer the American Library Associationprotect individual's privacy and confidentiality, and fight against free limiting legislation like the Children's Internet Protection Act, the DMCA (PDF), and the Copyright Term Extension Act of 1998. They've been fighting to keep information free longer than the internet has been around. Democracy requires an educated citizenry, and libraries make it their mission to spread knowledge to everyone, regardless of race, social status, or wealth. Library's are a geek's best friend.

  52. What?!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    $ ls -lA /usr/lib|wc -l
    2641

  53. the best library... by wingman+at+techmonke · · Score: 1

    ...is libc *rolling eyes* ok, so much for your spelling crew...

  54. Library Science by gekman · · Score: 2, Interesting

    My daughter earned an MLS (Masters of Library Science) degree a few years ago and is now finishing up a doctorate in Cognitive/Information Science. Until she entered the field I had no idea how different the Library Science curriculam of today is from what the "school-marmishish" librarians of the past were taught.

    My first reaction to my daughter's decision on an MLS was "What? Why?" She had a shiny new BS in microbiology and has always been a computer freak; most of her friends are programmers/sysadmins. Once she entered the MLS program (at Rutgers) I realized just how technology-oriented the field has become. A number of her courses required the design of web sites as part the grade, and she worked as a TA teaching an undergrad course in web searching.

    Still, some of today's older MLS students don't have a clue about the uses of technology. Worse, they don't want to know anything about it. The libraries in which they work aren't using any modern tools and don't have plans to use any. Sad, but true.

    --
    Look at all the happy creatures dancing on the lawn...
  55. Databases of gold by certron · · Score: 3, Informative

    If you want a reason to go to a library, do it for the online databases they subscribe to. Most impressive to me were the image databases, specifically the art museums and the AP photo archive (you can even search by predominant hue of the photo).

    Check out www.libraries.rutgers.edu for an example of how much stuff is out there. Some of them are subscription-only, so see if there is a large school near you that has the same services. They have remote access capabilities, but I'll leave that up to the reader to figure out.

    I'm not afraid to say it, librarians can be quite l33t. If you look at it from a pseudo-hacker perspective, they have access and control over massive massive amounts of data, information, knowledge, and wisdom. They can help you find what you are loking for, too! Can it get bettter than that? Well, uh... Don't answer that one. :-)

    Although it is amusing to see what happens to be filed under "throbbing elbow" on google, it can't always compete with all the specialized databases out there that your library might subscribe to. Give it a shot, worst thing that happens is that someone things you are a geek for going to the library. But hey, you are reading this comment, so what does that make you? :-) (a reader of this comment, nothing more)

    --

    fair.org counterpunch.com truthout.com indymedia.org salon.com
    eff.org guerrilla.net debian.org gentoo.org
    1. Re:Databases of gold by jafuser · · Score: 1
      you can even search by predominant hue of the photo

      Oh, you mean a hue like 0x10, such as in #AE7D60? =)

      --
      Please consider making an automatic monthly recurring donation to the EFF
  56. Huh? by wandernotlost · · Score: 2

    Man, I thought they were talking about code libraries! (*.a *.so)

  57. They Are Cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The thing about librarians is they are not just trained to check books out and in. What you learn in library school is what are the different types of information and to organize it. It's like CS school -- you aren't just learning particular applications but the basic principles. So when you ask a reference librarian a question, he or she knows where to look to find the answer.

    That is why a lot of web resource companies hire librarians, it is because they know how to help them get information, organize it, and put it up in a way that is easy for people to use and find what they want.

  58. but they still need a sign by myowntrueself · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    that reads "Masturbating is *not* allowed in a public library!" Well, *American* libraries apparently need such signs, since its not illegal to surf bestiality & child porn at the local library. Its even *illegal* for libraries to stop that sorta naughtiness (the surfing, not the wanking; its probably ok for a librarian to stop someone jacking off. In the library). Oh yeah and its Iraq, North Korea and Libya who are on the axis of evil isnt it? Talk about the pot calling the kettle black!

    --
    In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
  59. Libraries are... by rorifer · · Score: 5, Insightful
    "Library" is the word for a an institution providing collectively financed information to a community of users. There is nothing archaic about this idea.

    Right now the best way to access scholarly information (in those thousands of academic journals) is through full text databases such as Ebscohost, Proquest, and Infotrac. These databases contain millions of articles. A fraction of a percent of this informaiton is available on the free web. By comparison, the free web looks like crap.

    You can not simply pay to use these databases as an individual user, either by subscription or on a pay-per-view basis (though there are a couple of minor exceptions to this). As a rule, access to these databases is through libraries. If you are a student, faculty or staff member at a university, you have access to dozens of these databases through the library. That's right, it's the library that enters into contracts to provide access to these databases to users. (And that access is usually remote, via passwords.)

    There are versions of these databases that provide high-quality information for the general public, rather than specifically for acadmic use, and again it's mainly companies like ProQuest, Infotrac and EbscoHost who create these databases. The public-oriented versions of these databases are available for free at your public library. Again, they make the "free" web look like crap.

    It's not only because these databases are paid for by libraries that they are part of the library world; it's also because these companies employ librarians, and also because they incorporate strong indexing according to standards developed in the library world to make the right information easily accessible.

    Libraries are electronic to a much higher degree than most posters here seem to realize. It goes far beyond having internet access available at the library, though that is a good thing. It is to the point where a large and growing portion of the information that libraries pay for (using your tax money or tuition fees) IS electronic.

    But I say this at the risk of discounting the present importance of books. While I think most written communication will "go electronic" eventually, librarians know that we are far from there now. What is valuable about books isn't the fact that they are on paper; it's the fact that they represent comprehensive intellectual effort and an investment of time that you don't find in journal and magazine articles. And at present, they are rarely published electronically. So, at present, it's incumbent upon librarians to provide information in book form.

    I am a librarian (who uses linux at home).

    I have a short manifesto about the value of libraries, at http://libr.org/Juice/manifesto.html.

    I'd also like to direct your attention to an article from the journal Progressive Librarian which argues the importance of keeping paper, called "Why Do We Need to Keep This in Print? It's on the Web...": A Review of Electronic Archiving Issues and Problems, by Dorothy Warner: http://libr.org/PL/19-20_Warner.html. I'm sure that it could create a good discussion here in its own right, as many of you would disagree with it strongly. I post it here to point out that librarians who have not joined the "information party" they way that young techies have have reasons for their reluctance and are thoughtful in their criticism. But I can't say that without remarking that librarians are also a diverse group, which includes luddites and young techies alike.

  60. Book Exchange by cyberformer · · Score: 2
    Goodwill does the same thing. A lot of the stuff they get is junk, of course, but they throw out lots of good books too, just because there isn't shelf space in the store.


    My local library has a "book exchange", where people are free to give and take old books that would otherwise be thrown out. (No tax write-off, of course.) It's a good idea, even if it does sometimes fill up with non-book items like political leaflets and AOL CDs.

  61. Guide to problematical Boston Public Library use by donsaklad · · Score: 1

    Guide to problematical Boston Public Library use
    Contents
    href="http://GuideToProblematicalLibraryUse.WebLog s.com/stories
    Updates
    http://zork.net/~dsaklad

  62. Question: What is 31337??? by terraformer · · Score: 2, Funny

    I know, I am a newbie! But what is 31337? It is not a valid zip and not in /etc/services so I am stumped.

    --
    Who are you? The new #2 Who is #1? You are #617565. I am not a number, I am a free man! Muhahaha.
    1. Re:Question: What is 31337??? by g0bshiTe · · Score: 0
      Ok I'll byte. On good faith that you don't actually know, I'll 'xplain it to you.

      • 31337
      Is a reference to the hacker counter culture. Meaning ELITE or ELEET. Figure out the rest.
      --
      I am Bennett Haselton! I am Bennett Haselton!
  63. That Jedi Librarian by WillWare · · Score: 2

    completely fit the stereotype, as far as I could see. I don't expect SW movies to grapple with social issues, even trivial ones, but it would have been interesting to see Lucas fire another three neurons and come up with an idea there.

    --
    WWJD for a Klondike Bar?
  64. Censoring. Boston Public Library. by donsaklad · · Score: 1

    Our Boston Public Library departments censor their very own documents like curatorial reports and consultants' studies reporting on collections for the purpose of long range development. BPLers have been for the most part adamant in violating the spirit of state FOI freedom of information and sunshine open meeting principles of intellectual freedom. BPL President Bernie Margolis delegated Assistant Director Ruth Kowal to provide accessibility but instead of removing red tape hurtles, additional punishing fees are extorted.

    Our cities' public libraries should involve greater public participation in long range planning beginning with ensuring access to whatever legitimately public documentation there is on the very same institution.

    See also
    Weblog guide to problematical Boston Public Library use
    Updates
    http://zork.net/~dsaklad
    Contents
    http://GuideToProblematicalLibraryUse.WebLogs.com/ stories

  65. From a workstudy student... by dabblah · · Score: 1

    "I went to my job today, and you think of a librarian and you think of some nice little old lady. No, man, library people are WEIRD!!!"

    Being the son of two people with their MLS, I knew that already...

  66. Backstage. Behind the scenes. Our cities libraries by donsaklad · · Score: 1

    How to learn about our cities' public libraries backstage, behind the scenes...

    Read the annual report and budget documents. Check out the long range plan of your city public library. Ask for department heads' reports and library consultants' studies and reports.

    If necessary use your state FOI freedom of information public records and sunshine open meeting principles
    http://nfoic.org

    Visit your city public library board meetings.

  67. Municipal government documents. Boston Public Lib by donsaklad · · Score: 1

    At our Boston Public Library municipal government documents department , curator Gail Fithian fails to acquisition and accession Boston City Hall Departments' documents save the few representative specimens. Even the Boston Public Libraries Department of city government produces documentation that needs to be acquisitioned and accessioned as historic records. It's not entirely the curator's fault. Does City of Boston need a records management program?...

    See also
    http://www.state.ma.us/sec/arc/arcaac/aacintro.htm

  68. well, i don't know about busting stereotypes, by thedbp · · Score: 1

    but this sure had some great links to stereotypical busts!

    did you guys check out those pornography links? oh man, i think i found a new fetish!

    thank you benevolent librarian, thank you!

  69. Re:librarians-Idoit posters. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did you even read what he posted? HE SAID THAT THEY TOOK THE BOOKS HE DONATED AND PUT THEM UP FOR SALE!! SHEESH YOURSELF! Either way those books were NOT going to be a PUBLIC RESOURCE.

  70. Librarians, please don't change by marko123 · · Score: 2

    If you lost the stereotypical stuffy demeanour, I couldn't enjoy porn like this:

    http://www.riverofdata.com/librariana/porn/

    --
    http://pcblues.com - Digits and Wood
  71. My wife's a librarian... by haaz · · Score: 2

    and she's got a blog. (and hates that term. I'm not fond of it myself.) And this item may come in very handy for her grad school paper on how libraries and librarians are changing with technical evolution. so, uh, thanks.

    --
    -- haaz.
  72. librarians and the revolution by loveandpeace · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Go ask Michael Moore what he thinks of librarians. Not only are we anti-censorship champions, but according to him, we are also subversive. You think they're just sitting there at the desk, all quiet and everything. They're like plotting the revolution, man. i'm not one to disagree.

    and Neal Stephenson certainly had quite a different and powerful image in snowcrash.

    love and peace,
    the librarian
  73. allus found em to be cute by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    salute to to all you librarian girls. ive always found them very cute. some were pretty cuddly too. Ooooooooo!!!

  74. Re:librarians-Idoit posters. by smagruder · · Score: 2

    I read every word. The funds still helped the library. Therefore, it's still a good thing. Maybe the guy donated books the librarians deemed "unshelvable". I trust their judgment.

    --
    Steve Magruder, Metro Foodist
  75. Re:Guide to problematical Boston Public Library us by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This person is a notorious fruitcake. Please disregard.

  76. Don't tell me you think they only have books! by himself · · Score: 1

    >
    > Are you a parent?
    >
    Yup, and we got to the library at least once a week. There's DVDs and VHS tapes that we can borrow free for a week (take that, Blockbuster & Mr. H. Wayne Huizenga!); there's PC's (feh) with software that I can use for try-before-you-buy; there's interlibrary loan for materials that'll _never_ be on the web (no matter how much I love Project Gutenberg, it still can't touch the stuff under copyright and some people will never OCR the WWII primary sources I'm looking for); there's free web access; there's copies of Consumer Reports (which geeks ought to read) that I can read without a subscription; there's passes for museums and the zoo that I can borrow for free to get reduced admission; and the annual used book sale -- it starts this Thursday! -- is a great source of books for a quarter each.
    But before we had kids, did I still go to the library every week? Damn betcha I did, because there was *all this stuff* for free, in one place, and the people who ran it did their best to help me use every bit of it.
    For example, I got a call on Sunday that I book I requested several weeks ago is now in; God knows where they scrounged up a copy, but I'm headed over tonight to pick it up. Three cheers for the Cumberland Library staff! I can even submit Reference Desk questions on the web at http://www.cumberlandlibrary.org/ !

  77. NAVEWEISS IS LOOKING FOR A GIRLFRIEND by Elkobim · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Help him find one. K? thx.

    --

    I want tender love now!
    Elkobim
  78. Re:call em information broker sugarbitch by MoneyT · · Score: 2

    FYI, TFT is active matrix. You're probably thinking HPA.

    --
    T Money
    World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
  79. Last Post! by alpg · · Score: 1

    The POP3 server service depends on the SMTP server service, which
    failed to start because of the following error:
    The operation completed successfully.
    -- Windows NT Server v3.51

    - this post brought to you by the Automated Last Post Generator...