Slashdot Mirror


Corel Cuts 220 Jobs to Save $12M

Cecil writes "Just saw this story on the City of Ottawa's website: 'The Software maker Corel Corp. is cutting 220 jobs - more than a fifth of its workforce - in a bid to reduce costs and return to profitability amid weak technology spending.'" Of course, this stinks for those who are laid off, but hopefully Corel can turn things around.

294 comments

  1. Shame.. by Walterk · · Score: 0, Troll

    It was a nice company, well, it tried to be, and now it's going down the drain..

    1. Re:Shame.. by Anonymous+Cowrad · · Score: 1

      When was it ever a nice company?

      I thought 99.99% of their appeal is based on the fact that they aren't Microsoft.

      "Sure, Word Perfect blows, but at least it isn't Word."

      That sort of thing.

      I'm pretty sure Corel is already down the drain, not in the process of going there. Raise your hand if you bought their latest office suite. Anyone? Anyone?

      Res Ipsa Loquitor.

      --

      --
      pants ahoy
    2. Re:Shame.. by CanadaDave · · Score: 2
      I thought 99.99% of their appeal is based on the fact that they aren't Microsoft.

      No way, WordPerfect was way better because of the "reveal codes" feature. I'm not sure if that feature still exists. I was using Wordperfect 2000 I think it was called... I think it still had this feature. The software wasn't very stable, it sometime crashed and the like. But reveal codes rules. It's sort of like editing a Latex document or something (bad example).

    3. Re:Shame.. by mkoenecke · · Score: 2, Informative

      WordPerfect's current version is 10, and the beta for 11 is coming out soon. It is quite stable, still has Reveal Codes, still has myriad advantages over Word, and can publish to PDF natively.

      --
      TANSTAAFL
    4. Re:Shame.. by cyberdog6 · · Score: 1

      Corel products have always sucked. in this market those companies who've been hanging on with a substandard product hoping no one would notice are biting the dust.

      no one is going to experiment with a non-standard interface and confusing tools when they can get a sure thing from Adobe.

      --
      Evil is the money of all root....
  2. Sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    They can try to compete against Microsoft, which is pretty much a loosing battle given the commercial monopoly Microsoft has on the Office application suite, or they can compete against the OSS office application suites, in which case its pretty tough to compete against no-cost development. I predict they hang around a bit longer, but only selling to those buying PCs bundled with Windows and Corel where the buyers don't know much about Office software and want to squeeze an extra couple of pennys off the price of their machine.

    1. Re:Sure by panaceaa · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Actually, Corel isn't making any money from bundling their productivity suite with PCs. They're planning on using the OEM bundling to show off WordPerfect, without any support, in the hopes that customers will like it and follow the upgrades. In this sense, they're competing head-on with the no-cost model of OSS's OpenOffice.

      However, financial analysts point out that when customers of low-cost PCs upgrade their productivity software, they probably still won't want to pay. They're likely to try other low-cost alternatives instead. This could boost usage of OpenOffice and other OSS word-processing applications.

    2. Re:Sure by finarfinjge · · Score: 1

      Were you aware that not too long ago, Microsoft infused a couple of million into Corel to keep them afloat? As such they are a partially owned subsidiary of Microsoft, NOT a competitor

    3. Re:Sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      54k/yr means those people sucked any way

    4. Re:Sure by edxwelch · · Score: 1

      If you go to HPs website you can configure what SW you want on your PC. You save $100 if you choose WordPerfect instead of MS Word. Sounds good to me, if I'm buying a PC that only costs $500 to start with. Although I heard Coral make sweet f-all out out of this sale.

    5. Re:Sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Were you further aware that Microsoft holds 0% of the voting shares in the company? Furthermore, they plan to sell the non-voting stock they got in the deal (which they paid $135 million for) ASAP.

  3. Not The City Of Ottawa Web Site by petele · · Score: 5, Informative

    That isn't the city of Ottawa web site, thats a local news web site. If you want the City Of Ottawa's web site, check out http://www.city.ottawa.on.ca/

    1. Re:Not The City Of Ottawa Web Site by Korivak · · Score: 1

      TLD's go to countries, not states. The .ca TLD stands for Canada.

    2. Re:Not The City Of Ottawa Web Site by legojenn · · Score: 1

      Huh? Ottawa has recently registered ottawa.ca in addition to Ottawa.on.ca. Ottawa.com is owned by Canwest, a TV and newspaper conglomerate.

      --
      I make a reasonable middle-class wage by going to work and not spamming blogs with scams.
    3. Re:Not The City Of Ottawa Web Site by IncohereD · · Score: 1

      We _are_ talking about Ottawa, Ontario, Canada here. Not all tech companies are in California.

      Ottawa is well known as 'Silicon Valley North', and is the capital of the country. Wake up.

    4. Re:Not The City Of Ottawa Web Site by FFCecil · · Score: 1

      Sorry! I've been to both and know the difference, but I must have had a temporary lapse of sanity. Thanks for pointing that out!

  4. A bigger suprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    If you think you were surprised to find out Corel was laying off 220 people. Then imagine my surprise to find that they are still in business.

    Who buys this stuff?

    1. Re:A bigger suprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or that they employed even 220 people total...

    2. Re:A bigger suprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The CorelDRAW suite is nice and considerably less expensive than PhotoShop and Illustrator. So there is some market for that. There is no market for Linux anything, that was a huge mistake that they are paying for now.

    3. Re:A bigger suprise by nelsonal · · Score: 2, Informative
      Who buys this stuff?
      Dell, Gateway, and HP all licensed their Office suite. I haven't used the newest one but the last one wasn't too bad. I have heard that their software is popular in the legal industry, where there exists all manner of legal templates that were never switched over to MS Office.
      --
      Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
    4. Re:A bigger suprise by Ozymandias_KoK · · Score: 1

      There's quite a few of these in the medical fields as well.

    5. Re:A bigger suprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Who buys this stuff?

      Have you tried their stuff? I use WordPerfect and the Draw Suites and they are top notch products.
      It's really too bad that so many people nowadays won't have a chance to even try it.

    6. Re:A bigger suprise by SN74S181 · · Score: 1

      The sad thing, for someone like me who was a big fan of Micrografx Designer, was that Corel bought out Micrografx about a year ago, it seems primarily to extinguish them. I remember back in the day that the lighter-weight people used Corel Draw and the rest of us used Designer. (not that either was ever 'heavy weight' software- it ran on Windows 3 for gawds sake!)

    7. Re:A bigger suprise by rbook · · Score: 1

      Who buys this stuff?

      People who like WordPerfect and don't like MS-Word. Like me, for example. ;-)

      I've bought both the Windows version and the Linux version.

  5. Inevitable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Corel used to hold a huge share of the market with products like Corel Draw. Now, Adobe Illustrator and Macromedia Freehand fill that niche. Corel is dying. I think Corel Linux was their swan song, now it's just a wait until they finally go under.

    1. Re:Inevitable by Locutus · · Score: 2

      that 150 million they got from Microsoft to give up their future didn't seem to go very far. .Nyet anyone? ;/

      LoB

      --
      "Anyone who stands out in the middle of a road looks like roadkill to me." --Linus
    2. Re:Inevitable by rocjoe71 · · Score: 2
      I think Corel Linux was their swan song


      Actually, a "swan song" actually has to be something beautiful, which Corel Linux was not-- I believe the cliche you're looking for is: "death knell".

      --
      Height: 38U, Weight: 0 Newtons, Eyes: #0000FF, OS: Gray Matter 1.0 (Alpha)
  6. Not surprising... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Cash strapped and confused as Corel may seem, this move would appear to me to be a consolidation and focusing of Corel's main products (those being WordPerfect Office Suite et al.)

    In fact, having a former life in the photographic industry, I could never figure out what Corel was doing in the stock photographic / images business anyhow. The quality of their libraries were fairly well below the industry normals in addition to some fairly draconian and muddled contract agreements.

    In particular, there was an instance where a former employer of mine used some Corel stock images for their catalog. The photographer who actually took the shots summarily attempted to sue my former employer. When Corel was contacted, we learned that certain images in the library were still property of the original artist.

    This caused us some deal of confusion since this is not the not the norm for stock photographic images.

    This is a prime example of a company getting into a business they really didn't understand (Corel), its about time they started dumping their ancillary business and focusing on software development, rather than services like stock imagery.

    1. Re:Not surprising... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Their stock photos were /terrible/. Some of the disks had such huge hue shifts I could hardly believe it. Some shots out of focus and all kinds of cinsistancy problems. And though less important, the framing of the negative scans was all over the map. It just looked bad. They ended up selling them off cheap at CompUSA and elsewhere and they were only barely quality enough for that.

    2. Re:Not surprising... by God!+Awful · · Score: 4, Insightful


      This is a prime example of a company getting into a business they really didn't understand (Corel),

      Getting into businesses they don't understand is the norm for Corel. In the last 10 years, they have jumped on every single bandwagon that has come along (and been burned every time):

      - WordPerfect (it's been through so many hands, it deserves its own bandwagon)
      - Java (e.g. the ill fated WP port)
      - Network Appliances (a.k.a. Internet Toaster)
      - Linux
      - The Silicon Valley lifestyle ($50 million company Christmas parties)

      I was offered a job there about 10 years ago. They bragged about the office suite strategy in the interview. I thought it sounded like a pipe dream.

      -a

    3. Re:Not surprising... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I couldn't agree more.

      I had one of those 10-15 disc Corel graphics and font CD sets. I ended up throwing out everything but the font disc. That's how bad it sucked. The images were utterly unusable by _anybody_ for _any_ project.

  7. Understaffing by SexyKellyOsbourne · · Score: 0, Insightful

    At every job in America today, fewer workers are being used to work more hours -- often in states with no overtime laws, and/or under salaried pay -- simply for the sake of CEO's profits and short-term stock gains.

    Where does management think that, by understaffing every company, outsourcing every IT job to India, exporting entire factories to neo-colonial slave labor camps in China and Mexico, understaffing the jobs that actually remain, and so forth will save their company?

    They're killing the geese that lay their golden eggs by seeing wages as unnecessary expenses and firing every American worker in sight.

    The MBAs of Wharton and Harvard who run the country are going to have a lot of explaining to do once the economy truly crashes and burns, as they have gutted the entire American industrial base with their selfish management.

    1. Re:Understaffing by Alan+Shutko · · Score: 4, Funny

      I don't see why the "MBAs of Wharton and Harvard who run the country" should have to explain about a Canadian company laying off workers....

    2. Re:Understaffing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Very nice, already up to +4. But why are they firing american workers in Canada?

    3. Re:Understaffing by Auckerman · · Score: 4, Insightful
      "The MBAs of Wharton and Harvard who run the country are going to have a lot of explaining to do once the economy truly crashes and burns, as they have gutted the entire American industrial base with their selfish management."

      I've always thought that an economic slump is the BEST time to agressive hire the best workers so that when the times change, they are in a great position by having the best on staff in place. People without money (cause they lost jobs) won't buy half ass products (due to having smaller staffs working on them). It's as simple as that. Times like this is when companies should be MORE aggressive and buy every good idea and worker, because they will sell for less and be more likely to be grateful when times turn around.

      Whatever, it's not like I studied economic theory...

      --

      Burn Hollywood Burn
    4. Re:Understaffing by MisterFancypants · · Score: 3, Funny
      Very nice, already up to +4. But why are they firing american workers in Canada?

      Why'd you have to go and sully up a perfectly good karma whoring with your FACTS and LOGIC?

      Jackass...

    5. Re:Understaffing by TechnoGrl · · Score: 3, Funny

      Hear! Hear!
      Succintly and very well put!

      Almost all my formerly well paid and experienced friends are out of work now, having been "laid off" and replaced by either far lower paid wage-slaves (in the fullest sense of the word) visa workers or simply by much less experienced and lower paid people.

      A great many IT workers are getting OUT of that rat race (including myself) and going back to school to learn other professions. I COMPLETELY agree with you that the greedy CEOs and other board members have completely gutted their own companies and transferred the money to themselves and I completely AGREE that the Dot-Com crash of 2001 is only a portent of things to come with the overall American economy.

      As for me, I COMPLETELY refuse to work my butt off (no matter how highly paid) for the Fortune 500 any more in order to increase the value of the stock options of some schmuck at the top. I just got a job at a lower salary (half of what I used to make which is still pretty good) at a non-profit and am going to night school to be an RN.

      When the economy crashes in another 7 ot 10 years look for me at the bottom of the sky-scrapers selling hot-dogs to the crowd as they watch those assholes come flying out the windows.

      Yeah...I'll be smiling too :)

      --
      ----- In Your Cubicle No One Can Hear You Scream...
    6. Re:Understaffing by livio · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Welcome to globalization! :-)

      In a lot of third world or developing countries these kind of work conditions are very common. In Brazil, for example, a lot of our economically active people are not in a "legally" contracted.

      This is just recently hitting America and Europe and people there are starting to loose jobs and/or work for low salaries... but that's just the way capitalism and globalization works... the lowest price always gets the deal.

      The tendency to remove economic barriers between countries is becoming stronger, and these are the consequences... just be glad you weren't unlucky to be born in one America's/Europe's economic "colonies".

    7. Re:Understaffing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'll play Devil's advocate here.

      American workers are expensive. Not only in wages, which are maybe a third of the total cost of an employee. Health benefits, unions, severance pay, etc: I'm not arguing against these things, but from an employer's standpoint, they add up quickly.

      Throw in the current structure of American law, which places enormous liabilities upon employers, which makes hiring employees like playing russian roulette. Many modern hiring practices (contractors, part-time workers) are only used to eliminate part of this risk.

      Which would you do?
      A) Employ 100 american workers. Be prepared for a potential lawsuit. Deal with union problems every 2-5 years.
      B) Employ 25 American workers to manage things + 150 overseas guys (@ 1/3 the price) and cut the risk of lawsuits by ~50%. Have the extreme gratitude of the overseas workers.

      I'm not choosing one over another, but the situation is certainly more open to debate than you make it out to be.

    8. Re:Understaffing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, so that's how Karma whores & trolls do it... emotional, semi-on-topic bullshit posted early in a discussion. Funny, considering that over time laws are federal, not state, and that corel is a candaian company.

      I must say, good job.

    9. Re:Understaffing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Another beautiful troll by SexyKellyOsbourne. Keep up the great work.

      I'd like to nominate SexyKellyOsbourne for Slashdot's Troll of the Year. Perhaps it will be televised, with TV's Patrick Duffy as host?

    10. Re:Understaffing by Monkelectric · · Score: 2

      My thoughts exactly. Companies need a large and healthy middle class *TO BUY THEIR PRODUCTS*. They're busy killing the kinds of jobs that allow people to buy their products. When the middle class has shrunk enough no one will be able to afford a college education (who can afford 30k tuition and to be unemployed for 4 years), and we will have made ourselves into a 3rd world country.

      --

      Religion is a gateway psychosis. -- Dave Foley

    11. Re:Understaffing by BluedemonX · · Score: 2

      We saw this in the mid-90s. Heck, I was fresh out of school in 1993 just as NOONE was hiring. So I retrained as a programmer analyst to find that every shop in sight was outsourcing to Bangalore (gotta love how cheap Canadians can be). Of course, within a few years it went from scrounge what you can get to the boom of 1999.

      This too will pass. Sucks if you're unemployed, but it's part of the rhythm of life. Eventually these guys'll realise that if there isn't anyone to buy the products, noone'll buy them, and the money dries up no matter how low you drive the interest rate. That's when employment will pick up again as they spur capital spending to build new products and try to gain market share.

      --

      --- Jump!! Fire!! Bullet time!! - Lego version of the Matrix
    12. Re:Understaffing by dan+the+person · · Score: 2

      America is rich enough to look after a few overpaid IT workers who lose their job.

      Moving these jobs to equally talented humans who were born into poorer nations is a great idea.

      Hell, maybe if india gets richer, then it will increase trade with other nations in the region.

      Hell, maybe if other nations in the region get an economic boost, from supplyings goods and services to rich indians, they might actually be able to feed their citizens instead of leaving them to die of starvation.

      So in conclusion, moving IT jobs offshore is a good thing for humanity.

    13. Re:Understaffing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, know what? If you weren't so busy trying to be a smartass, you might have noticed the POINT.

      -5 idiot.

    14. Re:Understaffing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Posting AC to keep my job, as we just announced "Right Sizing" , makes you feel all warm in side, doesnt it?

      We had this nice pie chart, and it said how we could reduce expenses. 45% was FIXed expenese, rent, loans repayments, etc... Then about another 45% was wages, and it was the only area they could reduce even more (and keep ceo bonuses.) So they need to chop 12% to stay afloat, so that means they need to fire about 20% of the company.

      The started by switching everyone to salary, and reclassifing everyone to a job title that L&I would claim is a salary position. Then they fire all the contractors for pet projects(unless its a VP pet project...) They downsize (opps right size) the IT department, let some operations people go, fire 1/3 of the engineers(or shuffle, its hard to tell), and make all the customer care reps work 5 12 hour days, and come in on thier days off for extra training (at no cost).. They just announced if we work over 18 hours a day, we can have the next day off! And you know how it is, if your a sys-admin, a server goes down, you fix it, then you leave. So if I only work 16 hours, I get to come back for another 16 tomorrow, nice isnt it. Of course all of us didnt join the telco union, ys-admins dont join unions...

      Booze and a paycheck...

      =
      I wont say our company name, but "Can you hear me now?"

    15. Re:Understaffing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Allow me to note, for recent history makes it
      clear to almost everyone, that the main objective
      of the CEO is not for the company to proper or
      maximize profits. Their interest, like the interest of any sane person, is to profit
      themselves! "The objective of the company is
      to make money", like all the impressionable youngesters
      of slashdot are quick to post as an undispitable assumption,
      like a fact that is, is almost always not true. Anything
      goes, only when the CEO and board can miximize
      their prosperity.

    16. Re:Understaffing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ahh altho more reason im proud to be union.
      and about screwing up the economy..dont believe the media there was no strike the ports locked us out.

    17. Re:Understaffing by nomadic · · Score: 2

      Nobody wants to admit the root of the problem is this insane move towards growth. Rather than build up a company slowly, maintaining profitability even if it means they don't get every single customer they can get, they overextend themselves constantly, then go on a hysterical firing spree.

    18. Re:Understaffing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Y'know, I think that sounds a lot like my company's high-level strategy. We've recently bought out several competitors (with much headache for us who have to support the integration) and yet they're cutting over 2000 jobs and dumping the extra workload on current employees.

      Makes sense to me, but only when I've been drinking..

    19. Re:Understaffing by Moridineas · · Score: 2

      Yes, Corel a Canadian company, is clearly indicative of American MBA's who are laying off workers to buy golden yachts. Idiot, do you KNOW ANYTHING about Corel?

    20. Re:Understaffing by RabidOverYou · · Score: 1

      > just as NOONE was hiring
      > noone'll buy them

      What is this mysterious Noone Corporation, that's hiring and buying? Oh, you mean no one.

      How could you bollox that, but get you're and it's and even guys'll right?

    21. Re:Understaffing by Wee · · Score: 2
      If you lived in a world where any off-kilter thought from otherwise idle mind is considered insightful, it's perfectly reasonable.

      The original poster thinks /. karma somehow matters. He just likes to see himself type and get moderated up (most likely by himself). He can be safely ignored.

      -B

      --

      Ash and Hickory, straight-grained and true, make excellent bludgeons, dandy for the cudgeling of vegetarians.

    22. Re:Understaffing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, that truely is a badtime for you.
      Let's see. Unemployed from ATT Broadband since Sep. 1. Selling house before the real hits in unemployments arrive here in denver. Denver is a wonderful place for jobs right now. FCC allows 2 f'ing huge monopolies to merge (of which the FTC announcement of Texas Style accounting on comcast is being held up by the current admin), Steal the jobs back east, but will not allow Echo/Hughes merge that would actually encourage more competition in media distribution.
      How about try moving to India, China, or Russia and see how they are doing?
      Count your blessings that you are working.

    23. Re:Understaffing by antirename · · Score: 2

      That's true. First people are laid off, then the cost of health care gets transferred to the employees, then the core team left gets all the work. Members of that core team (that didn't bail) would feel guilty if they left and screwed their coworkers even more, so they keep looking for the light at the end of the tunnel. That's where I'm at. You know what? I'm willing to bet that the beancounters decide that "we did this with X number of people back in the bad old recession days, why do we need more?" once the economy comes back. Then they lose the core team, but they're just names on paper, right? Accountants look at salary and cost savings, not lost experience. Yeah, anyone can be replaced, but plan on them taking a year or two to get up to speed. I'm staying where I am if I can, but I give it 50/50 odds that I feel like a moron for doing so a couple of years down the road. Damn that ethics class!

    24. Re:Understaffing by antirename · · Score: 2

      If you think IT is bad you should take a look at what's happening in blue-collar American manufacturing. If skills like programming are cheaper in India, what do you think happens when riveters are cheaper in Mexico? The company moves. A service industry based economy is a recipe for destruction, in my opinion.

    25. Re:Understaffing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, a high percentage of American workers are complete lardasses, who can barely waddle to the toliet in order to plug it up with an enormous mcdonalds dump, much less do any decent amount of work.

      Meanwhile, most Indians are skinny and don't eat that much. They also have few hobbies, don't watch much TV, and enjoy work.

      Even so, the US leads the world in productivity. Just imagine how competitive we will be once we eliminate all of the fat people jobs.

    26. Re:Understaffing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The MBAs of Wharton and Harvard who run the country are going to have a lot of explaining to do once the economy truly crashes and burns, as they have gutted the entire American industrial base with their selfish management."

      Don't worry, we will turn it around. It's nice to see that people still don't understand the meaning of "cyclical". Do you fear an ice age every time fall comes around?

    27. Re:Understaffing by Jonathan · · Score: 2

      Hey, I work for a Canadian company, but it's run by an Harvard MBA -- they run Canada too.

    28. Re:Understaffing by antirename · · Score: 2

      I agree... but on the other hand, what are high school councilors going to do? "No, don't become a programmer, don't become an engineer, take Burger King management classes." Policies that protect jobs have some merit. God knows it's hard to compete with what the liberal American academic institution puts out. I once met a high school graduate from Bosnia who had more Calculus in high school than I had in college, and I went through cal 4.

    29. Re:Understaffing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      No, when he ultimate goal is to grab all the
      money you can, preferably as early as possible,
      your utlimate goal has been achieved. That is
      the idea. Why worry if the middle has money still
      in its pockets, when it seems best to grab it
      now forever? There is no need to wait, and
      obviously there is no need to give them your
      money so they might buy their product.


      The whole idea is toatal capitulation for the
      middle class, the capitalistic philosophy at work!
      And if the middle class it (!), well, they have
      always been idiots.

    30. Re:Understaffing by BluedemonX · · Score: 2

      Well, I would gather that I bollocksed it by a mechanism called a typographical error.

      Sorry mate, it won't happen again.

      --

      --- Jump!! Fire!! Bullet time!! - Lego version of the Matrix
  8. Nothing new... by EverStoned · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I haven't heard of any Corel developments for a looonng time, it was inevitable that the company would start to go under, what with better, and often free, or even open source programs.

    1. Re:Nothing new... by stevejsmith · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      WHOA! I know you!

    2. Re:Nothing new... by sfritsche · · Score: 1

      what with better, and often free, or even open source programs

      Right. Wake me up in ten years when there's an open source word processor that comes close to the capabilities of WordPerfect. Actually, wake me up when there's ANY word processor that does.

      As for the rest of their "average to good" product catalog, I can't argue with you.

      --
      "I'd horsewhip you if I had a horse." -- Groucho Marx
  9. Corel back to their old mistakes by Space+Coyote · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Not that they aren't the same ones made by a good many other companies in times of losses. Borrowing from the future will come back to burn them badly, I just hope they don't try to squeeze too much more out of the people who are left. I've heard some horror stories from Ottawa friends about working for them.

    IMO, if somebody were to come in with a good amount of cash and try to take them private, they might be able to leverage it into a powerful software maker again, without having to worry about quarterly finances quite so much.

    --
    ___
    Cogito cogito, ergo cogito sum.
  10. wow; expensive jobs too by lingqi · · Score: 4, Interesting

    average out to be 54k / person.

    which means that if we bell curve it, there are some highly paid individuals being cut. probabbly software engineers, maybe some management.

    I have heard somewhere that when a company start cutting engineers, then the company REALLY is not doing so well. I wish them luck regardless, though. They make some nice software.

    but then the 12M may not be all from job cuts, though - so I am just blabbing, actually.

    --

    My life in the land of the rising sun.

    1. Re:wow; expensive jobs too by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 2

      Little more than half of the cost of an employee is his/her wage. Benefits, payroll taxes, training costs, facility costs, and administrative and support costs make up the rest.

    2. Re:wow; expensive jobs too by larry+bagina · · Score: 1
      average out to be 54k / person.

      Keep in mind that salary is only 50-75% of what it costs to employ a person. I can't speak for Canada, but in the US, the employer pays 7.5% for social security, maybe a few hundred for health insurance (not applicable in canada?), unemployment tax, training costs, other benefits, regulation compliance, etc.

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    3. Re:wow; expensive jobs too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      $54,000/person in Canadian money is like $12,000/person US...

    4. Re:wow; expensive jobs too by topham · · Score: 2

      In Canada the amount the employer pays is very likely to be much higher than 7%

      and yes, in some provinces extra health coverage may be payed by your exmployer. (mine does for instance)

    5. Re:wow; expensive jobs too by pmz · · Score: 2

      I have heard somewhere that when a company start cutting engineers, then the company REALLY is not doing so well.

      It depends on the proportions. When you see the core talent leaving...that is the sign of trouble. Who wants to be left behind in a company that lost the people who knew everything leaving everyone else to feel pretty damn clueless about what to do next? Only the people remaining at Corel will truly know where the company stands.

  11. Brain Drain by Mark4ST · · Score: 2, Troll
    Canada in having a problem with brain drain, and this situation is only going to contribute to it. The only people who benefit from the drain are the actual (Canadian) employees who do it. The Canadian workforce suffers because the overall skill levels drop. The middlingly-abled American has to compete for jobs with Uber-Canadian expatriots.

    It's seems like a loose-loose situation to me.

    1. Re:Brain Drain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's seems like a loose-loose situation to me.


      So who is looser? An American, or a Canadian expatriot? The Canadian because their values are so lose that they moved to the States.

    2. Re:Brain Drain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's seems like a loose-loose situation to me.

      Was your brain drained, or is "loose-loose" some kind of new expression I haven't heard before?

    3. Re:Brain Drain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You leave him alone. So what if he can't spell. It's still an interesting comment, and something I didn't personally know about.

    4. Re:Brain Drain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Part of writing is to get the point across as clearly and succinctly as possible. Bad spelling and grammar obscure the point and make the post hard to understand.

      People may understand your point despite the fact that you write poorly, but if you write well, they will understand your point more easily. Given the same point made by a poster with good grammar and one with bad grammar, the poster who has good grammar is more likely to be taken seriously.

      If you have a problem with that, I suggest you spend your time teaching others proper grammar, so bad grammar becomes less prevalent, and corrections to that bad grammar become less prevalent as well.

    5. Re:Brain Drain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, actually all of Canada benifits from us. Lets face it, there aren't too many jobs in Canada, and the more that move to the US and take a good job there (and STILL pay canadian taxes!), the more money flows into Canada. I live in Windsor,On and work in Detroit. I make a lot more there than I could ever hope for in Canada, and I spend a LOT of money in Canada. Anything I pay for here (car,house,bills, savings account etc.) is all money that is flowing from the US to Canada.

      How is this bad for Canucks?

    6. Re:Brain Drain by CanadaDave · · Score: 3, Interesting
      I have never talked to any Canadian who wants to go down to the States. I guess it must happen once in a while, but only out of necessity. It is actually more common I think, in fields like nursing and medicine.

      We can't forget about the thousands of Iranians, Indians, Russians, and Chinese who come to Canada all the time. (did I leave out any significant minority there?).

      And NO Canadians benefit from the brain drain. Living in Canada is much better than living in the States (based on opinion surveys). Just look at stuff like the UN statistics on the best cities in the world to live (you'll find Vancouver near the top), as well as other surveys and you'll find this is the case.

    7. Re:Brain Drain by palpatine · · Score: 1

      Funny you mentioned Vancouver. It doesn't matter how nice a city is, if you can't find a job there, it sucks. I was in Vancouver for over a year without a job at all until I realized that the problem was not me, but where I was. So I moved away and I live better than I ever could in Vancouver, or anywhere else in Canada for that matter.

    8. Re:Brain Drain by legoboy · · Score: 2

      Lots of Canadians want to live in the States. They're simply not the ones you hear marching in the streets over US foreign policy.

      I was greatly amused to see the results of a poll which came out in late October, 2001. I've forgotten the polling company, but it can probably be found in the archives at www.cric.ca.. I couldn't find it just now, but it definitely is out there.

      Apparently, in the aftermath of the WTC terrorism, a majority of Canadians would *not* move to the US when given the chance. Some moron (Sheila Copps, no doubt) was crowing about this, despite the fact that it was the first time such a result had ever been found.

      Enough said on the matter, in my opinion. The other 45% were, of course, still quite willing to move to the nation with a supposed target on its ass. (I am one of them - I live quite comfortably in Canada, but would move to the states in an instant if it weren't such a pain (because I am established in my community, not because I would be denied permanent entry).)

      --
      If a tree falls on an anonymous coward yelling 'first post' in the forest, does anybody hear?
    9. Re:Brain Drain by CanadaDave · · Score: 2

      Yes Vancouver can suck a bit in terms of jobs. At least that's my opinion, being a high-tech worker (not software, though hardware, which is even worse in Vancouver). I know a lot of people who don't have the greatest job in Vancouver, I mean they could move to Silicon Valley or Ottawa and easily get paid way more and have a more exciting job...but they prefer Vancouver for other reasons. So it's a bit of a tradeoff. Waterloo-Kitchener, Ottawa, and various other places have good high tech sectors, but the weather usually sucks, there is no good skiing and no ocean nearby. Actually I'd say Alberta is second best, personally, I've only been there once. The weather sucks, but they have the strongest economy in Canada, no sales tax, some decent high tech starting up and close to mountains and pretty nice cities.

    10. Re:Brain Drain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      loose loose ?

      your Canadian Eh?

    11. Re:Brain Drain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Living in Canada is much better than living in the States (based on opinion surveys).

      Actually, it's not. See the article "Calculus of Happiness" on page 32 of the November 2002 issue of Scientific American. Americans rate an 87 out of 100 in subjective well-being, while Canadians are an 84.

    12. Re:Brain Drain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Apparently, in the aftermath of the WTC terrorism, a majority of Canadians would *not* move to the US when given the chance. Some moron (Sheila Copps, no doubt) was crowing about this, despite the fact that it was the first time such a result had ever been found.

      I have a dollar that says this has to do with the fact that Canadians don't get the standard TV placation the US population enjoys, 100% due to these guys.

      3 million Canadians can't be wrong!

  12. Typical corporate stupidity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    They could've cut 12 executives and saved $24M.

    1. Re:Typical corporate stupidity by dan+the+person · · Score: 2

      Do they really have 12 executives earning $2M?

      Last i heard their CEO received 100 cents renumeration for the year.

    2. Re:Typical corporate stupidity by yomegaman · · Score: 0

      The word is "remuneration", vocabulary-boy. Next time stick to "pay" instead of trying to show off.

      --
      ...wearing a skin-tight topless leather jumpsuit, with cutaway buttocks and transparent crotch panel.
  13. Sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I have to say that as an ex Corel Linux employee who saw what happened inside the organization that it is grossly inaccurate to say they dropped it on the marketplace and expected it to sell itself. They did run paper advertisments and were dedicating half or more of stand space to Linux and it's (wine'd) Office suite (Draw et al having the other half).

    I think the reason they didn't get very far is:

    1. They didn't have any money
    2. The only allies they could hope for (hackers) didn't go for it at all thanks to the incompatible libraries (though I updated a machine successfully to Debian 2.2 leaving behind the samba only, but then again maybe their internal network just suited well).
    3. They didn't have any money

    What could they do in the face of this? Could they re-write all the incompatible sections to placate us....NO they couldn't afford to. Could they change from wine for Linux apps... NO they couldn't afford to, they weren't getting money from Linux so in the face of the cost cutting required it was hard to justify expenese on Linux that might actually produce money from Draw/WP 10.

    Where next......well after their minor success with their unix WP7/8 and an old draw I think they will be back to the Linux marketplace with a native app, the only questions are how long must we wait, will it be worth it or have MS killed it?

    Ultimately I cannot see many/any traditional shrink-wrap software companies converting well into Linux land, they can't comprehend the underlying concept of using the GPL (not just LGPL) stuff out there and releasing products based on support et al rather than licensing revenue. Why didn't Corel just port their whole App suite to Gnome/KDE2 on all platforms rather than work on KDE and wine?

    All of their problems probably would have been solved had it not been for the change in relative stock prices of Corel and Borland between the initial merger announcement and the critical dates. What was an attractive deal for both sides become a wholly unappealing deal for Borland shareholders and Corel lost a stay of execution AND the combined "powerhouse" that should have arrived on the Linux platform.

    Disclaimer. The above are the conclusions I have drawn from my observations.....not the facts cause I don't know them....as if you all couldn't tell :-)

    1. Re:Sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would be nice to see Corel back with a native Linux App but I don't see this happening either.

      There are other options such as Open Office and office suites based on Open Office.

      I have a CD that came bundled with a motherboard purchased recently called "Supreme Office Suite" from ThizLinux.com. Based on Open Office it's gotta be pretty cheap to bundle.

      I also understand StarOffice 6 has been bundled with hardware now also. With these developments I can't see Corel getting more bundling deals unless the cost was much lower - or in other words too low to be profitable.

      Am I surprised that Corel has all this trouble and cannot get profitable - no; but as a Canadian I would have liked to see them succeed.

      On another note I saw a televised interview with Micheal Cowpland a few months before the announcement came out that he had "resigned" and told my freinds that I was watching the interview with that I thought Micheal was leaving.

  14. Idea for New Microsoft Ruling by cmeans · · Score: 2
    Given this (from the linked article you've not read yet):

    That appointment was made permanent after he orchestrated a $135-million US investment by arch rival Microsoft Corp., which provided Corel with enough cash to ride out a period of declining revenues while it worked to develop a new business strategy and products.

    Maybe we should just make Microsoft Corp. give (not invest) $135-million US to all the major companies (an Open Source projects) in trouble due to the economy...they can afford it...and it certainly would be good PR!

    1. Re:Idea for New Microsoft Ruling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe we should just make Microsoft Corp. give (not invest) $135-million US to all the major companies (an Open Source projects) in trouble due to the economy...they can afford it.

      I bet you think making the rich pay 90% of their income to the government is a great idea too. Socialists tend to think redistributing wealth will make everyone happy.

      Good thing your political leaders just got spanked at the polls - we'll have some sense in government for at least two years, and hopefully six.

  15. Good bye great Office Suite by pardasaniman · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I think that Corel's failure was the fact that people pirate MS Office, and don't care to try out less expensive office suites.

    In my opinion Corel Office was much more intuitive, yet, in my school, there is not one person excluding myself who doesn't pirate software. In fact teachers indirectly encourage students to get MS Office off Kazaa or "to borrow it from a friend"

    It is really really sick.

    We must stop piracy in the education system, it'll save good companies like Corel.

    1. Re:Good bye great Office Suite by saskboy · · Score: 1

      Amen!
      What is better:
      Supporting a company from your home country or Microsoft?
      Supporting Canadians, or Americans [by pirating their software].
      Paying Corel $50, or Microsoft $300?
      Using a more intuitive and backward/forward compatible WP, or Word?

      --
      Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
    2. Re:Good bye great Office Suite by garcia · · Score: 2

      Why would teachers encourage that? You can most likely get it for $10 from your institution.

    3. Re:Good bye great Office Suite by BluedemonX · · Score: 5, Informative

      There was that big hullaballoo over the government going for Office rather than Corel's offering. They yanked the civil servant responsible for the decision off his fishing holiday to explain why he wasn't buying Canadian.

      To which the servant coldly replied that their demo crashed multiple times and their products simply didn't do what the contract required. Whereas Microsoft showed up to their demo on time, prepared, with working products that met the requirements. Any questions? Have a good day.

      Dude, Corel tried to GIVE away Corel Office to every city government in the Ottawa area. ALL of them turned it down in favor of BUYING office. Waving the flag doesn't sell a crap product.

      --

      --- Jump!! Fire!! Bullet time!! - Lego version of the Matrix
    4. Re:Good bye great Office Suite by CanadaDave · · Score: 2
      Ha, did you ever hear the famous quote from Corel's Michael Cowpland? He said that Corel would not be where it is today were it not for software piracy. ie. people pirating Corel's software, which generates more interest, and stimulates more people to actually buy it. He was one of the few company heads to ever come out and admit to the advantage of piracy, as a sort of advertising.

      I wish I had the quote exactly. It was on CBC Newsworld or some other Canadian network channel a few years ago.

    5. Re:Good bye great Office Suite by Cid+Highwind · · Score: 1

      I think that Corel's failure was the fact that people pirate MS Office, and don't care to try out less expensive office suites.

      It wouldn't help. When I was in high school, the computer applications class (yes, I *had* to take it, stop giggling!) was taught with WordPerfect (the godawful 6.0 for windows release, even). I still hate it. Wordperfect may be more intuitive, but it's also more likely to crash and eat your assignment. The only thing I learned was "save early, save often" because WP crashed an average of about 3 times per class period.

      --
      0 1 - just my two bits
    6. Re:Good bye great Office Suite by Moridineas · · Score: 2

      It's clearly done so much good for Corel too :p

      I'm one of the ones that bought a copy (though I rather wish I had just pirated MS Office instead now...)

    7. Re:Good bye great Office Suite by tillemetry · · Score: 1

      Wordperfect is a good program. Have not used it lately. It had over 75% of the market at one time. It worked, and still works for the legal industry, especially for large documents, and does what it is supposed to do.

      Anything over 20 pages in Word can be a nightmare. You lose a hidden formatting character, and you are screwed (start over). In WP it was never a problem. Reveal codes, and fix it!

      Wordperfect died the way Lotus died. At M$, when writing dos, with every revision, the alleged unspoken motto was "it just ain't done, til Lotus won't run". With Windows "it just ain't done til Wordperfect don't run".

      Having a monopoly on operating systems can make these things easy. Just rewrite the libraries a little, and patch all your own stuff first. Then release the next version, and watch the competition crash.

      If you are a vendor or doing 3rd party support, do you really want to sell anything but Microsoft? You spend all your time working for free fixing software that should have worked when you "upgraded" your clients operating system.

      Of course now they may do this to force obsolete their own software, but hey, according to the government, they don't abuse their monopoly. Oh wait, they don't have to, they can just do it with their licensing agreements.

    8. Re:Good bye great Office Suite by CanadaDave · · Score: 2

      I pirated 5.1, 6.0, and then bought Wordperfect 2000 a few years later for cheap, student edition for $25. I don't know why anyone buys MS Office. It is the easiest software in the world to pirate. You can use any CD copier software. They should have at least used some sub-channel data like Blizzard did with Diablo II. That was a bitch, until I discovered CloneCD.

    9. Re:Good bye great Office Suite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I used WP 6 for about 3 years, and never saw it crash. Of course, that was on VMS, not buggy windows.

      What was MS's motto back then? Oh yeah, "Windows ain't done/till Lotus won't run." So they managed to induce bugs, and you didn't get the patches for the right version. Sounds like a problem with you or MS, not Corel.

    10. Re:Good bye great Office Suite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You lose a hidden formatting character, and you are screwed (start over). In WP it was never a problem. Reveal codes, and fix it!

      You must be confused. There are no "hidden characters" in Word -- all formatting is attached the object (character, paragraph) that it is applied to, and thus works naturally with most people's way of thinking.

      "Hidden Codes" are completely retarded in a GUI application. In WordPerfect's case, it basically means that you have to unhide the codes all the time. Your whole "hidden character" example is classic WordPerfect and never happens in Word.

      Just look at GUI HTML editors -- there's not a single one that can produce decent markup. Well, that's exactly what WP does -- unless you do manual markup (editing codes). There's absolutely no reason for that if you have a proprietary binary file format.

      WordPerfect got popular back in the daisywheel days when people rarely if ever used any formatting. The only place people use WP today is the legal industry where the standard is all 12pt Courier. WordPerect, with it's codes, never adapted to the GUI-model, and that's why it's a failed product.

    11. Re:Good bye great Office Suite by SN74S181 · · Score: 1

      people pirate MS Office, and don't care to try out less expensive office suites.

      I'm mailing my mom a copy of OpenOffice on CD this week. People are willing to try out alternatives (she asked me for 'Word' awhile ago) if you encourage it.

    12. Re:Good bye great Office Suite by tmark · · Score: 2

      He said that Corel would not be where it is today were it not for software piracy. ie. people pirating Corel's software, which generates more interest, and stimulates more people to actually buy it.

      So what you and Cowpland are saying is, software piracy is responsible for the dire straits Corel now finds itself in ?

    13. Re:Good bye great Office Suite by CanadaDave · · Score: 2

      No, he meant Corel would not be where it is today, as in, Corel would NOT be as successful as it is today. So he meant that if it weren't for software piracy they would be in a worse position or worser yet, bankrupt. The quote was said in brighter times you see, when Draw was still fairly popular and Wordperfect was doing decent.

    14. Re:Good bye great Office Suite by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 2

      I'll admit that it's been several years since I used WP, but while writing a proposal in Word this week, I have to say I really miss it. It makes a world of difference once you are writing something over five pages!

      It's a shame that they wasted away, despite having so many good products and ideas. How many /. people here fell in love with the netwinder?! (concept, anyway.)

      Oh well, RIP Corel.

    15. Re:Good bye great Office Suite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >all formatting is attached the object (character, paragraph) that it is applied to, and thus works naturally with most people's way of thinking.

      Interesting.

      Why does it insist on making a solid line that's near impossible to delete when I insert three dashes (cenetered)? And why does it insist on reformatting my work into a list when I only want one item on a line?

      Natual thinking? I think not.

      And hey, I haven't even thouched on floating text boxes and graphics... Ugggh...

    16. Re:Good bye great Office Suite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, I could list 101 ways that Microsoft ruined their one great product with stupid annoying crap, but at least they've had the sense up to this point not to ruin the conceptual model by introducing hidden formatting codes!

      (although this may change when they go XML...)

    17. Re:Good bye great Office Suite by mkoenecke · · Score: 1

      Quite so: WordPerfect 6 for Windows really, really stank -- but that was the fault of the WordPerfect Corporation. That caused unbelievable damage to WordPerfect's reputation, which is still unrepaired. WordPerfect 6.1, however, was to WP 6 as Windows 3.1 was to Windows 3.0. 6.1 was stable, fast, and useful. Since then, Novell and then Corel have followed a pattern of releasing a buggy version that, once a service pack or two come out, turns out to be pretty good.

      --
      TANSTAAFL
    18. Re:Good bye great Office Suite by mkoenecke · · Score: 1

      If you knew what you were talking about you could discuss stream-based formatting (WordPerfect) intelligently. What stream-based formatting does is allow extremely precise control of document formats and presentation. Objects (including text) in WordPerfect can be positioned to 1/1200". When one has to divide a document into units of letters, words, sentences, paragraphs, and pages, each unit of which has pointers to the header in which the formatting information is placed, that makes for an unwieldy and corruption-prone document, as compared with one where formatting simply starts and ends in places. That's why the code is viewable in WordPerfect. WordPerfect, unlike Word, is flexible enough to do things Word's way (i.e., Styles based) as well.

      Oh yes, and if you want to talk "retarded," consider the wisdom of Word's practice of embedding macros within documents, thus creating virus possibilities. WordPerfect only allows macros to be embedded within clearly-designated templates. All other macros are their own files, easily transferrable and editable (unless you remove the source code).

      --
      TANSTAAFL
    19. Re:Good bye great Office Suite by BluedemonX · · Score: 2

      Well, what it boils down to is this:

      Mike Cowpland came out with a good idea, built a business, and made some good money. Bought a vacant lot in the nicest part of town, built a copper-glassed Red Lobster style building with the tackiest, most garish white trash decorating imaginable (the two homes either side went on the market rather shortly after) and at the same time got a trophy wife whose bottle blonde self once made a notable appearance in a skintight leather sheath dresse with an enormous diamond over one nipple - a cross between Pamela Anderson, Ivana Trump and Anna Nicole Smith.

      Thereafter, suddendly (between his sambo and okinawan karate classes through personal tutors) decided he was God's Gift to Software and called out Bill Gates. A VERY dumb thing to do, considering Microsoft is not hampered by Canadian taxes and has control over the operating system MS and Corel would compete for space on. As well as having a huge war chest.

      So suddenly this little photoshop clone company decides it's in the stock photo business, the crappy office suite business, etc. Diversify massively, buying out failing companies with limited market share. Overextend, fall flat on ass, and then decide Linux is the answer.

      Gates eats at Dick's and drives a second hand American car from what I gather. Cowpland drives a bevy of outrageously expensive vehicles and spends money like water. Eventually, reduced to whining that the government of an impoverished nation like Canada SHOULD buy his software on patriotic grounds and being the town joke (what color did we dye our toy poodle today?)

      --

      --- Jump!! Fire!! Bullet time!! - Lego version of the Matrix
  16. Now would be the time for Apple to step in... by 2nd+Post! · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Infuse, say, $20M into the company with a promise for Corel WordPerfect for OS X, and maybe stronger ties between Corel's graphic products and OS X...

    1. Re:Now would be the time for Apple to step in... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple would only do that for Adobe. After all, Corel doesn't make any optimized filters to help "dispel the MHz myth."

    2. Re:Now would be the time for Apple to step in... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Erm...ouch! Don't know why you're still at 0 -- that was a damn witty post.

    3. Re:Now would be the time for Apple to step in... by JudasBlue · · Score: 3, Insightful

      And that would be about the time that Apple committed suicide.

      It is critical to Apple that MS keep making Office for the Mac. It isn't anywhere near as critical for MS to keep the Mac marketshare of Office. I have seen people argue (and I am not sure that I don't agree with them) that the x86 port of Darwin was simply to keep some leverage with MS on this one issue.

      While you might not like Office or MS (and don't look at me, I am exclusively Linux) from a business perspective Apple cannot afford to mess with this relationship.

      --

      7. What we cannot speak about we must pass over in silence.

    4. Re:Now would be the time for Apple to step in... by Eric+Smith · · Score: 4, Interesting
      I have seen people argue [...] that the x86 port of Darwin was simply to keep some leverage with MS on this one issue.
      How does that work? Why does MS care whether Darwin runs on the x86? Even in some hypothetical alternate universe in which Apple releases a complete OS X for x86, MS doesn't have anything to worry about from Apple.
    5. Re:Now would be the time for Apple to step in... by JudasBlue · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Debatable. The thing that keeps MS in their monopoly and Apple in the margins, the argument goes, is that Apple is a hardware company that happens to ship an OS. If Apple on the other hand decided they were going to start acting like an OS company, they might be able to give MS a run.

      Personally, I think there is some merit to this argument, but not much. However, I really do think that MS way doesn't want to even think about that right now. Linux is causing them enough trouble. Linux isn't taking over anything but the geekiest desktops right now, but they are eating into the back office space like beavers on meth, and the logic of free (as in beer) could put them on some more desktops in the very near future as soon a few issues get dealt with, and at the speed of Linux evolution over the last few years, I don't think Redmond is laughing at the threat. They think they can win it, but they are starting to take the idea seriously.

      In that light, I think they don't want any hassles with Apple. Even if you think you can win a fight, that doesn't mean you want to fight it.

      --

      7. What we cannot speak about we must pass over in silence.

    6. Re:Now would be the time for Apple to step in... by bartok · · Score: 1

      Apple doesn't have $20M to burn. 2003 will be financially rough for apple until IBM releases the PowerPC 64bits.

  17. Two corrections by mike449 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Since I live in Ottawa, I can correct two errors in the story:
    1. ottawa.com does not belong to City of Ottawa. It belongs to GlobalWest Communications Corp., as well as canada.com and many other similar domain names.
    2. Slashdot crew, update the Corel logo!

    1. Re:Two corrections by djcatnip · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      2. Slashdot crew, update the Corel logo!

      Dude, they won't even update our effing 12 striped American flag icon. Don't get your hopes up. That kind of administrative stuff is just too boring to bear. :)

      --
      I make these: http://beatseqr.com
    2. Re:Two corrections by Soko · · Score: 2

      *sigh* Ottawa - where my tax dollars go to die.

      Anyway, our intrepid (Score:4, Informative) poster has a glaring error - ottawa.com and canada.com are owned and operated by CanWest Interactive, a division of CanWest Global Communications Corp. I should know - my immediate supervisor (I work there) registered the domains.

      The City of Ottawa's web site is at http://www.city.ottawa.on.ca/, just like most any other Canadian city (use www.city.cityname.xx.ca, where xx is the abriviated province name).

      Soko

      --
      "Depression is merely anger without enthusiasm." - Anonymous
    3. Re:Two corrections by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't live in Ottawa, and I got that information doing a WHOIS.

      So THERE. HA! =P

    4. Re:Two corrections by dzym · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      First get them to fix the US flag. :)

  18. Re:Understaffing - Eh? by saskboy · · Score: 1

    Er, uh, Corel is a Canadian company, why the rant about American jobs?
    I don't think the sweat shops in India are producing too much software code, but that could explain things about Windows, if they are outsourcing to sweatshops.

    --
    Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
  19. Re:What is this, F****edcompany? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Considering that that happens only once every few months while thousands of buisneses adopt Windows for the same purpose in the same time period, you're not going to get much.

  20. Well, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is this not the point of open source!

  21. Cringe - another WP post by slasher999 · · Score: 1

    I have to imagine the WP folks were among those hardest hit. It's a shame, but I can honestly say that I've had more issues with WordPerfect 10 than I've had with any version of WordPerect since 6.0 for Windows (and I've used them all except 7.0). Not sure if sp3 (for WPO2002) is helping yet or not. However, if Corel can't release solid code in a version 10 product I'd question if it makes sense to continue with the product.

    1. Re:Cringe - another WP post by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 2

      I've had more issues with WordPerfect 10 than I've had with any version of WordPerect since 6.0 for Windows

      Whoa. That's saying something. I was a 100% rock-ribbed Word Perfect user up until 5.2. Then they came out with that HORRIBLE 6.0 release, and it drove me try out Word. The rest is history... Word was a much, much better product.

      --
      Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    2. Re:Cringe - another WP post by CanadaDave · · Score: 2

      I don't remember 5.2, but 5.1 rocked! Back in the days of the "Wordperfect Corp." I think the fact that Wordperfect changed hands so many times really hurt the software (Borland, Lotus?, Corel). I think they should release the codebase into a GPL or variant, and then sell a commercial version with support. I mean clearly Corel is not great at making Wordperfect Office a competive suite, and making it perfectly reliable, but maybe they can make some decent coin from giving support. Maybe if they did this it would take over OpenOffice.org as the most popular open-source office suite. -

    3. Re:Cringe - another WP post by buckeyeguy · · Score: 2
      Around 5 years ago, in the state agency where I worked, I had to not only support WordPerfect apps (including 6.0 for Windows, which was as bad as advertised), but Netware 4 (including GroupWise mail) and TokenRing to 400 desktops, in addition to my Unix sysadmin duties.

      Happily, after a minor nervous breakdown, I am now only a Unix sysadmin. ;)

      WP... oh the horror ....

      --
      I'd have a personalized plate on my car, but "toxic bachelor" won't fit into 7 letters.
  22. Corel by MisterFancypants · · Score: 1
    It sucks to see people losing their jobs, but this is hardly surprising. I mean, what has Corel ever actually created that anyone has found worthwhile?

    Well, there's CorelDRAW.... And that's about it. All of their other flagship products like WordPerfect, Quattro, Bryce, and so on were aquired from other companies and Corel has never really done much to improve upon what they purchased in any significant way.

    I know I won't be shedding a tear for Corel if/when they go out of business. Just because they competed directly against Microsoft doesn't change the fact that the vast majority of their software offerings are blown away by competing products.

  23. Keeping in touch by MagPulse · · Score: 5, Interesting

    As I hear about these continual massive layoffs, I wonder if the ex-employees are keeping in touch. Most of them probably haven't looked for a job lately, so it will take them a little time to get back in to it. Also it's important for them not to feel bad about it. They will go through a life-changing event, and there will be hundreds or thousands of people going through the same thing in a conveniently small geographical area, so it would be great for them to help each other and at least use each other for networking.

    I guess I'm just proposing something like www.exemployees-forum.com.

    1. Re:Keeping in touch by x+mani+x · · Score: 2

      I guess I'm just proposing something like www.exemployees-forum.com.

      Or www.fuckedcompany.com =)

      -Mani

    2. Re:Keeping in touch by x98chn · · Score: 1

      Actually there's this story & link from the Ottawa business Journal. Dunno if it is anything like Not Nortel or not, but it may be a start for them...

    3. Re:Keeping in touch by MagPulse · · Score: 1

      Cool, that is exactly what I had in mind. I was thinking after my post that you could just use Yahoo! Groups as an online meeting place, and CommunityZero seems to be similar.

  24. Re:What is this, F****edcompany? by Korivak · · Score: 1

    Corel used to be a major player, which is more than I can say for most .coms. Plus, Corel has been in the news lately, so there is a certain precident for Corel news. Hell, Slashdot even has a logo just for them.

  25. Re:Brain Drain QWZX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's impossible. The American-hating Slashbots keep telling me how bad the US is and how much it sucks to live here. Clearly there is NOBODY in the world who would actually leave their socialist paradises to come to the US.

    Clearly the parent post is under some drug-induced delusion.

  26. Are you dissing the Indian Children that made XP by pardasaniman · · Score: 1

    > outsourcing every IT job to India, exporting entire factories to neo-colonial slave labor camps in China and Mexico, understaffing the jobs that actually remain, and so forth will save their company?
    It worked for Nike!

  27. To CowboyNeal: by Simon+Garlick · · Score: 2
    hopefully Corel can turn things around.

    Why do you care? Seriously.

    1. Re:To CowboyNeal: by flatt · · Score: 1

      I can't speak for CowboyNeal, but I think any time MS has a decent competitor, we all win. This is the slashdot people you are talking to after all.

      I can't even say I especially like anything Corel but I would still hope they do well.

  28. corel isnt dead you insensitive clods by daemonjon · · Score: 3, Interesting

    and here are just a few reasons why: gateway, dell, hp and sony. all announced in the last year that they are beginning to bundle various forms of corel office with new computers. a wonderful way in itself to renew the user base; hook em while they're young! for a first time pc buyer (read: gateway) get the software in their hands even if you have to lose money. as opposed to say MS[sometimes]Works im sure that liscensing costs are less for the pc distributors which will definately give corel some legs (oh yeah and that article thing we are supposed to be talking about, i think it said they found a way to save a few dollars somewhere....). plus it seems they have a niche in a niche market (osx) that will still pay some of the bills. they did a very wise thing by being one of the first developers if not the first into every product market they have on macOSX when the big boys (read: adobe) were taking a wait and see approach. as much as i personally use their software (none) im not sure why i always keep up with their camp but i think all you naysayers will have a long time to write the obituary yet.

    1. Re:corel isnt dead you insensitive clods by panaceaa · · Score: 1

      It is nice that they'll get a user base from the deals with Gateway, Dell, et al., but what kind of user base is it? The people choosing Corel Office are people that don't want to pay for a productivity suite. How does that translate into customers later on when Sun's giving away OpenOffice? It's not like Corel Office has proprietary document formats that lock users in.

      Yesterday, C-Net wrote a very good article explaining why Corel Office bundling will be a failure. I'd suggest reading it if you're interested in the subject.

  29. From what I gather by BluedemonX · · Score: 2, Troll

    this is really going to start putting Ottawa in the shit.

    First off, houses in places like Beacon Hill, even, are going for at least a quarter mil, thanks to a massive influx of greed and dot com wannabes.

    Now, Nortel is tanking, Entrust doesn't seem to be doing so well, and Corel? Well, apart from giving Ottawans yet another interestingly white trash tacky overpriced outfit to look at at every new gallery opening or whatever, it isn't doing much apart from being a big copper eyesore next to the Queensway.

    Man, I feel for those employees - but it looks like Ottawa's basket is rapidly emptying of eggs.

    --

    --- Jump!! Fire!! Bullet time!! - Lego version of the Matrix
    1. Re:From what I gather by CanadaDave · · Score: 2

      This isn't any different from anywhere else. Every city in Canada is going through this. The ones that had less to begin with probably have a harder time. I'll be glad when Nortel finally packs it in. They were way too big anyways, and was crappy place to work. Ottawa is actually somewhat lucky in that they have a lot of other sectors going on, like the public sector and military which will never go away. They also get a lot of attention from the federal government (every heard of the capital commission) so it will always be a great city to live in, and will have no problem recovering, once the economy, markets, and ventrue capital start to recover.

    2. Re:From what I gather by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nortel tanked a while ago. It's beginning to recover, if anything. Still, it's employing fewer people here than it has in 30 years right now, so saying it's recovering isn't saying much. JDS Uniphase is pretty much pulling out of the city, though Strauss is doing his best to stop that from happening. Alcatel laid off a bunch here recently. Corel laying off 220 hurts, but not nearly as much as the rest.

      - laid off 2 weeks ago in Ottawa.

    3. Re:From what I gather by crivens · · Score: 1

      Ottawa's been in the shit for ages. I know people who were laid off a year ago, and they just managed to get a job. When I left Ottawa in 2001, people were getting laid off and being told by the agencies to not contact them for 9 months. The market there just died really badly.

    4. Re:From what I gather by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah well, at least not all Ottawa tech companies are tanking. QNX Software Systems is making a profit (kind of hard to prove it since they're a private company, but trust me, they are...and there was a story in some news paper recently (the Herald?) where that information was made public knowledge). But yeah, there doesn't seem to be a lot of success stories here right now (at least with public companies, who knows with the private ones...)

    5. Re:From what I gather by x98chn · · Score: 1

      I'm sure there's something ironic about QNX being just off Michael Cowpland Drive... I just can't pinpoint it quite yet...

    6. Re:From what I gather by freeweed · · Score: 2

      I dunno, here in Winnipeg we're still making $12,000 a year and liking it!

      --
      Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
    7. Re:From what I gather by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 2

      QNX Software Systems is making a profit

      How long will this last when Linux takes over the embedded-OS market?

    8. Re:From what I gather by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 2

      First off, houses in places like Beacon Hill, even, are going for at least a quarter mil, thanks to a massive influx of greed and dot com wannabes.

      So if the high-tech companies are tanking, then why is there still a housing shortage in Ottawa?

    9. Re:From what I gather by rikkards · · Score: 1

      The housing market is about to start to feel it. The problem why it hasn't yet is there needs to be a reason to move from Ottawa but the job market is not much better. Key is finding a city where neither Nortel and JDS did not have an office. Since they basically grew so fast and then lopped off all those people they are the ones you contend with. Nortel was so bad with expansion in Ottawa we used to make the joke of them being the high-tech Starbucks since there was a campus on every corner.

  30. CHEAP jobs. by unicorn · · Score: 4, Informative

    Lets see. Factor in the exchange rate, and you're down to $35,000US a year. Then when you remember that the annual cost of an employee is alot more than their base salary alone. Typically youy can assume that an employee costs about twice his salary, with taxes, overhead, benefits, etc. Now we're down to 17,500 roughly. That's $8.75/hr.

    The Starbucks the next block over, is hiring Barista's for $9.

    --
    "Politicians are interested in people. Not that this is always a virtue. Fleas are interested in dogs." P.J. O'Rourke
    1. Re:CHEAP jobs. by Monkelectric · · Score: 2
      The Starbucks the next block over, is hiring Barista's for $9.

      I know some application developers who make 9$ an hour (sellers markert!)

      --

      Religion is a gateway psychosis. -- Dave Foley

    2. Re:CHEAP jobs. by Flagbrew · · Score: 1

      Schweet. Not only do I make around three bucks an hour owning half a brewpub, but throw in roughly two additional dollars per hour as a hosting provider. Thanks for the tip on $tarbucks. Oh, I forgot, my town actually does have *real* cafes, owned by locals.

    3. Re:CHEAP jobs. by yomegaman · · Score: 0

      I love the way the Starbuck's ads refer to their employees as "barristas". Is that Italian for "cashier"? LOL.

      --
      ...wearing a skin-tight topless leather jumpsuit, with cutaway buttocks and transparent crotch panel.
    4. Re:CHEAP jobs. by feldkamp · · Score: 1

      The 12 million is in US dollars, so you figure it's 54.5k per employee...

      Corel probably had a pretty good cost/salary, say 60% of an employee's salary. That would put them at ~ 33k/year average.

      Not horrible, but no CEOs...

    5. Re:CHEAP jobs. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      mod the parent down.
      The $12M figure is in USD.
      At least 170/220 laid off employees were paid in CANADIAN dollars.
      so that's $84.2K per head, which sounds reasonable considering benefits.

    6. Re:CHEAP jobs. by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Factor in the exchange rate, and you're down to $35,000US a year.

      Or, if you go by the purchasing power parity, you get US$42.6K/year. Unless you want to buy all of your stuff, including food & housing, from the US. Then you'd pay the exchange rate.

    7. Re:CHEAP jobs. by Anonymous+Custard · · Score: 2

      Typically youy can assume that an employee costs about twice his salary, with taxes, overhead, benefits, etc. Now we're down to 17,500 roughly. That's $8.75/hr.

      Had they just dropped each employee cold turkey, those numbers would work. But you also must factor in pensions, severance pay, etc. Laying off an employee does not necessarily save you 100% of what you'd been paying him in cash and benefits. It saves you (employee's total compensation - severance - pension ( - employee's sales power if he's a salesman))

      This is real bad news. Any company that lays off workers gets severely crippled for years; often never returning to its original capability. Who do you think will step up to compete with MS Office now?

  31. Why the buyin? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Of course, this stinks for those who are laid off, but hopefully Corel can turn things around.

    Doesn't this stink for more than just the people who got laid off? Does the idea that a corporation can layoff dedicated workers not meet with challenge these days? The anti-union attitudes of /. editors is astouding sometimes.

    What ever happened to the idea that if you dedicate a major portion of your life to a company, you deserve something a little more than just money for 40 hrs/week--like job stability for example.

    The US has gone from a "right to work" country to a "right to get fired" country, almost within a few years. The focus on "keeping corporations profitable EVERY SINGLE YEAR" is absurd.

    1. Re:Why the buyin? by aussersterne · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Part of the problem is that all of the young hotshot twenty-somethings don't yet realize that they're on the block next.

      These kids went to school, got headhunted, got a $40k salary and got stock options just like that without ever really having to think about anything. Sure, they think they're working hard, but there's just no comparison, for example, to the much more grim and realistic world experienced by kids graduating from college during the Carter years (to chose an epoch at random). The economic slide hasn't hit the current group of young adults hard enough yet; they still believe it's the nature of existence to have cash in hand and food on table and they basically consider anyone who doesn't to be a lazy bum or an idiot. They have no connection whatsoever to the concept that one can be qualified, willing, and actively searching for work and yet still end up starving.

      Give it a few years. If this economic downturn starts to hit enough dotcom kids, you'll begin to hear Athese same anti-union love-Bush American kids begin to cry like babies and maybe even have some sympathy not only for laid off Americans but also for other peoples around the world, who even today in the first world are struggling much harder in many places.

      --
      STOP . AMERICA . NOW
    2. Re:Why the buyin? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right on, man. I toughed it out during the
      recessions of the 70s, and during the VERY
      hard Reagan recession. (Tip to young kids:
      Yes, Reagan has a recession. Research his
      first years in office. It was not all fun
      and Michael-Jackson-in-the-Whitehouse.)

      These kids don't know what it's like to be
      faced with a mortgage, hungry family, and
      the inability to even get a job bussing
      tables or pumping gas (yes, that used to
      be job, and not something just done in Oregon
      or New Joisey).

      They'll see. A few more tax breaks for the
      rich from the "Borrow and Spend" repubs, a
      good, expensive war that none of the allies
      want to pay for (unlike the Gulf War), and
      we'll have a good ol' HARD recession.

      Consider that the Feds only real ammo against
      inflation is to lower interest rates, which
      are ALREADY at 2%. With interest rates at 0%,
      what ammo will they have to stop inflation?
      Monetary supply? Ha. We'll see a recession
      that only their grandparents (from the '30s)
      can relate to.

    3. Re:Why the buyin? by Metrol · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The anti-union attitudes of /. editors is astouding sometimes

      A company is not a social program. Once more, a company is not a social program.

      A company, any company, exists to provide a product or service that results in what most folks hope is a positive cash flow. If that is the result, it will grow. In that growth will certainly be newer jobs.

      The reverse is also true. If a company has proven that it cannot make money, it will shrink. In it's shrinking, fewer employment opportunities exist.

      No union, legislation, or any other happy thoughts can change this basic economic fact. When a company, like Corel, is no longer producing products that customers wish to buy, fewer jobs will result. How can you maintain staffing rates of old when you no longer have the cash to pay them?

      The US has gone from a "right to work" country to a "right to get fired" country, almost within a few years. The focus on "keeping corporations profitable EVERY SINGLE YEAR" is absurd.

      Nevermind the fact that we're actually talking about CANADA here. There has never been, in ANY nation a "right to work". Oh sure, there have been lofty attempts with subsequent failures, but the concept simply doesn't exist in the wild.

      First off, a "right" is not what someone does for you. A "right" is what the government can not do to you. Just as true in Canada as the US, or any other country for that matter. At most, something a government does for you could only be described as a "social program".

      Please refer to the beginning of this post... repeat as needed.

      --
      The line must be drawn here. This far. No further.
    4. Re:Why the buyin? by Metrol · · Score: 2

      If this economic downturn starts to hit enough dotcom kids

      Where have you been the last two years? Those dotcom kids you so lovingly refer to WERE the hardest hit sector of the economy.

      They have no connection whatsoever to the concept that one can be qualified, willing, and actively searching for work and yet still end up starving.

      A little tip you might wish to take to heart, assuming starving isn't something you wish to do. You, the employee, are worth precisely the amount it takes to replace you, and not a penny more.

      No economic system in existance works around this basic fact. If after 20 years on the job your qualifications equate to that of that "dotcom kid" fresh out of college, you will go hungry. You can be pro-union, anti-union, socialist, communist, capitalist, and it just won't matter. If someone else can do the same job you're doing at half the cost, you're gonna be out of work!

      This isn't some evil corporate scheme designed to pound down the little guy. It's a basic natural law of the relationship between an employer and employee. The only reason an employer hires anyone at all is in the belief that the person in question can make more revenue for that company. Whether you're talking about IBM, Microsoft, or the local coffee shop, this basic fact doesn't go away.

      --
      The line must be drawn here. This far. No further.
    5. Re:Why the buyin? by kevcol · · Score: 1

      The anti-union attitudes of /. editors...
      ...The US has gone from a "right to work" country to a "right to get fired" country

      The definition of a "right to work" state is one where a person can't be compelled to become a union member or similar group to get or keep a job. IOW, unions are usually not very welcome.

    6. Re:Why the buyin? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      A company is not a social program. Once more, a company is not a social program.

      You are stating your opinion about what companies should be, not what they must be. Once more, you are stating your opinion about what companies should be, not what they must be.

      What is a company? A legal fiction of an individual? A registered organization that does business and is run by a set of bylaws on file the secretary of state? Is it more than that?

      A company is anything the legislature (state or federal) says it is. There's no inherent right of companies. By contrast, there are inherent rights that people posses. (Our founding documents called these "inalienable rights", meaning that we cannot by contract abrogate them. E.g., you cannot literally sell yourself into slavery even voluntarily, because the freedom you have is part of your humanity, and is not a mere interest or state in property.)

      Anyway, the elevation of companies to individual status is a long process, but nearly complete. You can be sued for slandering a company (and are more likely to than slandering an individual!). A company has rights to due process, often more than individuals who are poor.

      And now on /., we see the growing opinion that companies have the right to be left alone by the very state that gives them ANY life or existence.

      Well not on my watch. New flash: COMPANIES ARE CREATIONS OF THE STATE. They are fictions; they exist only so long as they do what the state tells them to do. They have no "inherent" rights to fuck over workers. When it comes to priorities, I place a greater priority on the rights, wellbeing and dignity of people, and less on the "rights" of companies to engage in sharp practices, screw over workers, pay outrageous bonuses to dishonest management, and fire the workers when, for a few years, things are not profitable.

      In our society, at one time, and perhaps once again someday, goverment serves the needs of the PEOPLE, and not the corporations that dominate donations and fund raising.

    7. Re:Why the buyin? by aussersterne · · Score: 2

      You don't seem to understand that there are times when many, many people do not have jobs. It isn't a matter of you or I being less qualified than someone else; it is a matter of the jobs in this or that sector having gone way almost entirely because of the near-failure of the capital markets. This can and does and has happened, even in the US at times.

      When this happens, you suggest that we should essentially let everyone starve because that's better for the pocketbooks of those who do still happen to be able to find work or those who happen to be independently wealthy. Of course, you're also thinking that this will always be you, because naturally you plan to keep your skills up.

      Well good luck to you. (i.e. "What a simpleton!")

      This kind of brutal capitalism may sound good on paper, but when your own children are the ones going without adequate nutrition, education or medical care in spite of the fact that you have kept your skills up, and nobody will hire you at any wage, you will feel differently, I promise you. Ask anyone who lived though the great depression. And if you don't feel differently -- if you say "well, damn it, let my children go without medical care, that's better for the market!" then you are simply beyond saving (and so, in all likelihood, are your children for that matter).

      In short, you proved my point entirely: you are so sure that income is a simple matter of personal skill, deservedness and "a few unlucky souls here or there" that you'll suggest that those in trouble should be merely ignored or pitied rather than helped. This is because it hasn't yet been you or your family and friends suffering. This kind of thinking simply doesn't hold up well when the population of struggling people begins to reach into the tens of millions, as often happens during times of economic hardship.

      Eventually, many people begin to find that the hardship hits close to home, you see... and then, as I implied before, they begin to vote differently...

      --
      STOP . AMERICA . NOW
    8. Re:Why the buyin? by Samrobb · · Score: 1
      You are stating your opinion about what companies should be, not what they must be.

      No... he's stating what the current reality is , and has been in the US and Canada since the first European colonists landed on these shores and decided to stay. You are the one stating an "opinion about what companies should be".

      Aside from that, your argument is fairly clear and your points well made. What's there is weakened by the fault in the introduction, though. You probably would have been better off with an opening line like:

      You are right - companies are not social programs. They way that they deal with employees is reprehensible, though, and at least in part enabled by a convenient (for corporations) legal fiction that a corporation is an individual, and has the same rights as the employees they treat so callously...
      --
      "Great men are not always wise: neither do the aged understand judgement." Job 32:9
    9. Re:Why the buyin? by Metrol · · Score: 2

      Seeing as how you've posted anonymously, most folks probably won't see the post. For this reason I'll quote the bulk of it here.

      You are stating your opinion about what companies should be, not what they must be. Once more, you are stating your opinion about what companies should be, not what they must be.

      Not at all. I am stating what they are.

      Many an organization can perform essentially the task of a social program. These are called charities, or non-profit organizations. By and large, we usually don't refer to them as companies.

      What is a company? A legal fiction of an individual? A registered organization that does business and is run by a set of bylaws on file the secretary of state? Is it more than that?

      This greatly depends on what kind of company that we're talking about. If you are referring to a corporation that can be publicly traded and invested in, then you are essentially correct. A proprietary business or simple partnership would not fall within the guidelines you are suggesting.

      A company is anything the legislature (state or federal) says it is. There's no inherent right of companies.

      It may sound like I'm nit picking at terminology, but the terms in question are quite important to understand.

      First off your use of the term "right" does not apply here. A "right" is only that which the government cannot do. A company can only fall within regulations at varying levels of government.

      Secondly, you keep saying company throughout your post, when it seems what you really mean is corporation. There is a distinct difference between the two concepts.

      By contrast, there are inherent rights that people posses. (Our founding documents called these "inalienable rights", meaning that we cannot by contract abrogate them. E.g., you cannot literally sell yourself into slavery even voluntarily, because the freedom you have is part of your humanity, and is not a mere interest or state in property.)

      The term "inalieanable rights" has nothing at all to do with slavery. Your inability to sell yourself, or to purchase a person, is not a right. This is a regulation added to the constitution. A fine one at that. Should have been in the first draft!

      Anyway, the elevation of companies to individual status is a long process, but nearly complete. You can be sued for slandering a company (and are more likely to than slandering an individual!). A company has rights to due process, often more than individuals who are poor.

      Again, you mean "corporation". Furthermore, this wasn't something that was legislated into being. A number of Supreme Court decisions lead us to where we are today, overriding the laws in place at both the state and local levels.

      And now on /., we see the growing opinion that companies have the right to be left alone by the very state that gives them ANY life or existence.

      Not true in the slightest. Assuming you are still referring to corporations, there are a number of things given up in order to become one. One of the primary things is that the company must disclose all of it's financial status publicly. It also falls under a number of strict laws that a proprietary business isn't.

      Well not on my watch. New flash: COMPANIES ARE CREATIONS OF THE STATE. They are fictions; they exist only so long as they do what the state tells them to do.

      Perhaps this was true about 100 years ago, using the original concept of what a corporation was.

      They have no "inherent" rights to fuck over workers. When it comes to priorities, I place a greater priority on the rights, wellbeing and dignity of people, and less on the "rights" of companies to engage in sharp practices, screw over workers, pay outrageous bonuses to dishonest management, and fire the workers when, for a few years, things are not profitable.

      So, what you would suggest is that a company, corporation, whatever, should retain a staff it can no longer afford to pay? HOW?

      Look, I'm not saying that pay scales are exactly perfect these days. There's an obvious sucking sound at the top of a lot of these failed companies we've seen over the last few years. It would be highly advantageous for you to actually understand the problems that you apparently feel passionate about.

      All your last paragraph amounted to was a stack of leftist propaganda. Whether it's correct or not gets lost in the rhetoric of shallow emotional button pushing.

      In our society, at one time, and perhaps once again someday, goverment serves the needs of the PEOPLE, and not the corporations that dominate donations and fund raising.

      What mythical time was this? What country? Which corporations??

      For instance, do you know which interest groups pay into the political process? How much? To which parties? Again, these are things you should bother to find out rather than allowing yourself to just parrot Ralph Nader rhetoric.

      Your heart is in the right place, but it's in desperate need of facts over rhetoric.

      --
      The line must be drawn here. This far. No further.
    10. Re:Why the buyin? by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 2

      How can you maintain staffing rates of old when you no longer have the cash to pay them?

      You borrow the money to pay them, and then you go bankrupt. Oh, wait, that doesn't maintain their jobs very long.

    11. Re:Why the buyin? by Metrol · · Score: 2

      You borrow the money to pay them, and then you go bankrupt. Oh, wait, that doesn't maintain their jobs very long.

      Wow, are you ever wrong!
      You borrow the money to balloon payment the executives. Geeesh, I'm never letting you run any company of mine! :)

      --
      The line must be drawn here. This far. No further.
    12. Re:Why the buyin? by shepd · · Score: 1

      >First off, a "right" is not what someone does for you. A "right" is what the government can not do to you.

      Okay.

      What is the proper name for the poster at work titled "Your rights as an employee in Ontario" (or something to that effect -- I know "rights" is in there) that, in part, explains must be paid for statutory holidays, even though I'm sitting on my butt at home watching TV?

      Not a nitpick, just a valid question.

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    13. Re:Why the buyin? by Metrol · · Score: 2

      "Your rights as an employee in Ontario"

      It's a cute poster title. We have similar kinds of governmental posters down in the US as well.

      In reality, these are regulations defining the relationship between employer and employee. If an employer doesn't pay you for those holidays, then he/she would be in violation of employment regulations, not your "rights".

      A better example of rights would be your "right" to a lawyer. Essentially, the state cannot prosecute you without providing for, or allowing you to procure, a proper defense.

      Being that a "right" is a pretty powerful thing when defining the relationship between the state and an individual, the term gets over used. It's a similar issue with a word like "war", where it's used for effect rather than accuracy.

      --
      The line must be drawn here. This far. No further.
    14. Re:Why the buyin? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Read Seutonious. Learn the art of rhetoric.
      LEAD with an exaggeration, and then back up
      points with very reasonable arguments. Repeat
      the exaggeration on closing.

      The average listener is left with the impression
      that you've proven something. They remember
      only their head-nods in the middle, and the
      catchy one-liner you used in intro/conclusion.

      It's called a tag phrase in debate, but
      Seutonius provides the best early Roman
      examples of this technique.

    15. Re:Why the buyin? by Samrobb · · Score: 1

      Except that he didn't lead with an exaggeration - he lead with a statement that was obviously false. It doesn't draw the reader in; instead, it makes them more likely to read the rest of his comments in a negative light. Also, his points didn't back up his lead statement. What he was really trying to do was switch the topic of the debate. I think that's a different situation from the one you describe.

      That said, I've not read Seutonious, nor been formally trained in the art of rhetoric... few people are these days :-/

      I'll have to see about broadening my horizons.

      --
      "Great men are not always wise: neither do the aged understand judgement." Job 32:9
    16. Re:Why the buyin? by Pinball+Wizard · · Score: 2
      In our society, at one time, and perhaps once again someday, goverment serves the needs of the PEOPLE, and not the corporations that dominate donations and fund raising.

      What mythical time was this? What country? Which corporations??

      How about the United States, circa 1776? Early corporations were to serve the interests of the people, they all had a charter, and if they stepped outside their bounds they were slapped hard by the feds. See here for some more details.

      By allowing corporate power to grow out of control we have allowed ourselves to revert from democracy to feudalism.

      --

      No, Thursday's out. How about never - is never good for you?

    17. Re:Why the buyin? by Metrol · · Score: 2

      How about the United States, circa 1776?

      As I stated in my post, you'd have to go back over 100 years to get a glimpse of the original concept of a corporation. We do not disagree on this point. The reasoning for my series of questions was to encourage the person I was addressing to look these kinds of things up for him/herself.

      they were slapped hard by the feds

      My understanding of this time frame was that corporate charters were usually handed out by local and state governments. Rarely did the federal government get involved. At least at that time.

      As the article you pointed out states, the nature of what a corporation is was decidedly changed through decisions at the Supreme Court.

      I do want to make one point very clear. I am not arguing in favor of either 17th or 20th century corporations. There's simply no way within the confines of a Slashdot post to discuss the matter fully enough to provide a coherent argument for either.

      What I take exception to are the blind accusations by those who clearly do not have a basic grounding in what a "corporation" means. It's also not helpful to the discussion, either pro or con, to leave out basic economic facts. Ignoring profits while demanding lifetime employment for workers is nothing more than an empty emotional plea.

      Like in any problem solving equation we must first establish the basic facts. From there we can discuss the pros and cons of one form or another.

      Thanks for providing the link. It's at least a little bit of background information to this subject.

      --
      The line must be drawn here. This far. No further.
    18. Re:Why the buyin? by LaughingMoon · · Score: 1
      A company is not a social program. Once more, a company is not a social program.

      Yes, you're right. But: Any corporation has responsibilities reaching beyond a monthly pay-check. (Disclaimer: I don't have the slightest idea about Coral current finacial situation. I suppose they're in big trouble..). One of these responsibilities is loyalty toward their employees (yes, this word is out of fashion). This is not only a social responsibility, since it can be applied vice-versa.
      As Naomi Campbell stated, when corporations show publicly that all they care about is money, then the employees will look at the whole employment-thing the same way. Funny enough, the highly educated people are still sought after (at least in Germany, J2EE-Specialists anyone?), and corporations ask for loyalty from their best employees, a plea which is no longer sustainable since everyone knows that a large number of corporations won't wait a second to fire you as soon as the shareholders feel that a company isn't making enough money anymore.

      A company, any company, exists to provide a product or service that results in what most folks hope is a positive cash flow. If that is the result, it will grow. In that growth will certainly be newer jobs.

      And hopefully stash away some money, since worse times are sure to come....

      The reverse is also true. If a company has proven that it cannot make money, it will shrink. In it's shrinking, fewer employment opportunities exist.

      Well since they stowed away money in better times istead of paying immoraly high bonuses to anyone with a 'c' in his title or buying some almost bankrupt companies for growths sake, it is still possible to support a high number of employees until the economy improves.

      No union, legislation, or any other happy thoughts can change this basic economic fact. When a company, like Corel, is no longer producing products that customers wish to buy, fewer jobs will result. How can you maintain staffing rates of old when you no longer have the cash to pay them?

      Loyalty goes a long way. An example I experienced in the company i used to work for: Like most companies in the IT-business, that company faced rough times. The only possibility to suvive was to cut costs, as usual cutting down wages. Instead of firing a lot of people, the wages were cut down by 10% for 'normal' employees, and up to 20% for better earning employees in management. No bonuses were paid.
      Nobody was happy about that (having children, paying mortgages, etc. pp.), but at least the company still exists (I don't work for them anymore, but for different reasons). And yes, some layoffs followed later, but i really do think they were inevitable.
      The point i'm trying to make is: There are many ways to save a corporation, massive layouts is the worst way.

      First off, a "right" is not what someone does for you. A "right" is what the government can not do to you. Just as true in Canada as the US, or any other country for that matter. At most, something a government does for you could only be described as a "social program".

      No objections to this

  32. Re: Point #2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They started getting pay checks. Have you seen the pics of Chris DiBona's house on his website? Not too shabby for posting some polls every now and again.

  33. Corel's problems... by markv242 · · Score: 5, Insightful
    IMHO, Corel has gotten itself into this rut because it has tried to create too much with too little.

    Draw, Wordperfect, Office, etc etc. All the while they're creating ports of .Net to FreeBSD (that won't generate any revenue) and other various frivolous projects. This is a little bit like the plight of Sonic Foundry; getting into video and creating five different audio suites really dilutes the manpower to create great applications.

    What Corel needs to do is concentrate on one product and make sure it's the best in the business. Go after Photoshop. Go after Office (well, on second thought, don't). But don't go after both at the same time.

    1. Re:Corel's problems... by frank249 · · Score: 2

      Your right. Microsoft's illegal monopolist business practices probally had no effect on Corel and it is all their fault.

      --

      Today's vices may be tomorrow's virtues.

    2. Re:Corel's problems... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People like you continue to wave that magic 'Monopoly' wand around like it automatically wins an argument.

      It doesn't.

      End of game. Insert quarter to play again.

  34. For those of you who like economics... by Swanktastic · · Score: 1

    The fact that the Canadian dollar is completely and utterly in the toilet SHOULD be helping them out. Apparently it's not. Things really must be bad...

    1. Re:For those of you who like economics... by Quarters · · Score: 3

      Huh?

      The Canadian Dollar hasn't changed valuation in quite some time, at least in comparison to the US dollar.

      The exchange rate between Canada and the US has been .64 for at least five years now.

    2. Re:For those of you who like economics... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...the Canadian dollar is completely and utterly in the toilet...

      Maintaing a constant ratio to the US dollar *DOES* mean that the Canadian dollar is going down the toilet! :-)

    3. Re:For those of you who like economics... by Swanktastic · · Score: 2
      The exchange rate between Canada and the US has been .64 for at least five years now.

      I don't know how you figure this considering it was at .75 in 1997, .70 in 1998, .68 in 2000, and .64 this year. Thats pretty terrible for people trying to pay off US college loans but fantastic for companies exporting from Canada into the US.

  35. Why teachers sometimes encourage piracy by pardasaniman · · Score: 1

    I live in an upper-middle class right-wing Canadian Neighborhood. Kids have access to High speed, and many of the teachers do to.
    My neighborhood was the first to figure out Kazaa and other such things.

    Thus, teachers hear students asking if they can do their art/movie/fancy multimedia projects on computer. OF course, teachers can't refuse. Many will ask that student the name of the software and pirate it at home to try it out.

    I have one teacher who tells all his students to use photoshop for their multimedia assignments.

    The teachers use MSOffice even though they have access to Corel for a low price from the board!

    Meanwhile students will pirate anything they can get their hands on, even though they smell of money in school.

    1. Re:Why teachers sometimes encourage piracy by mc6809e · · Score: 2

      "I live in an upper-middle class right-wing Canadian Neighborhood. Kids have access to High speed, and many of the teachers do to.
      My neighborhood was the first to figure out Kazaa and other such things."

      Teachers are often middle-class left-wing, wherever they teach.

    2. Re:Why teachers sometimes encourage piracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not trying to troll, but you're american right?

      In British Columbia, Canada elementary and high school teachers have wages that are above average, good benefits,and job security is virtually guaranteed after they have completed their first year of union work.

      Add to this the fact that a teacher's working hours are condusive to allowing both parents to work and have kids then you begin to understant how a teacher can be upper-middle class.

    3. Re:Why teachers sometimes encourage piracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      teachers in the US have GREAT job security, especially those worthless fucks that have been there for several years.

    4. Re:Why teachers sometimes encourage piracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...and *MUCH* lower pay than average.

    5. Re:Why teachers sometimes encourage piracy by shepd · · Score: 1

      >Teachers are often middle-class left-wing, wherever they teach.

      You just described 99% of Canadians (at least by the American perspective).

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
  36. What was that??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Of course, this stinks for those who are laid off, but hopefully Corel can turn things around


    A hint of corporate sympathy, on /.???????

  37. Re:Here's the equation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, but not all of us are personally related to the prime minister and/or working for Bombardier, asshole.

  38. Re:MOD GREAT-GRANDPARENT DOWN! by slantyyz · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    [sarcasm]I'm confused. How can troll be sexy?[/sarcasm]

  39. I don't shop there... by unicorn · · Score: 1

    I just walk past it on the way to the office every day.

    Hell, I don't even drink the free coffee here. I'm relatively caffiene free, and damn glad.

    --
    "Politicians are interested in people. Not that this is always a virtue. Fleas are interested in dogs." P.J. O'Rourke
  40. not sad by asv108 · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Frankly, I could care less for corel, they rank right up there with MS when it comes to unnecessary upgrades. I started using coreldraw about 10 years ago when version 3 came out. It was a really solid program until version 6, which seemed to be real buggy and rushed. Then corel started pushing upgrades out every year, which out any real value, but you were forced to get it in order to be compatible with clients. They really blew a big opportunity with version 7, which Photopaint was ranked higher than latest photoshop offering at the time by just about every magazine.

    The other reason i hate Corel is they buy really good products and ruin them. A good example is Fractal Painter, which is a really cool product, tons of features. The best part was the integration with tablets. Corel bought painter and it has fallen in to obscurity.

    1. Re:not sad by stud9920 · · Score: 1
      Frankly, I could care less for corel,
      You meant : "I could *not* care less".
    2. Re:not sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The phrase "I could care less" in common usage implies a continuation of the phrase, to the effect of "I could care less, but it would be very difficult to do so", or "I could care less, but not much less." Although "I could not care less" would be correct in both syntax and semantics, that is not the idiom as it is found in common usage.

  41. Troubling Revelation by screwballicus · · Score: 2

    News forum Slashdot.org, this evening, in a reader-submitted story, revealed shocking allegations and supporting evidence substantiating the claim that someone actually reads the city of ottawa's website.

    1. Re:Troubling Revelation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      fuck off, pal. you know jack shit about anything.

  42. Welcome to the morgue boys by Cheese+Cracker · · Score: 2

    Michael Cowpland took the right direction at the wrong time when he rode on the Linux revolution.
    I believe Linux is the way, but he put too much of the business on doing stuff for a market that wasn't
    ready for it. Even though Michael is not a part of Corel anymore, the damage from this decision still
    affects Corel to this day. I hope they'll return to profit one day.

    The 220 who got pinkslips can look forward to a long period of unemployment since there are about
    30-35,000 unemployed techies in Ottawa. Home Depot recently announced that they wanted to hire
    80 people for a new outlet, and got nearly 30,000 people applying. (techies and non-techies) The only
    way out of this unemployment trap is either to move or to start up your own company.

    1. Re:Welcome to the morgue boys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Finally I can afford to buy a house!

      An employed techie!

  43. Time for a new business model? by Alethes · · Score: 2

    Why isn't Corel releasing the source for their whole office suite, then selling plugins, service, and other add-ons for the base product? Selling their base product isn't working, right? This isn't a rhetorical question. I really want to know if there is a real problem with them going with a different model a la Netscape.

    1. Re:Time for a new business model? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, yeah... Look at how much money Netscape is raking in now!

    2. Re:Time for a new business model? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why isn't Corel releasing the source for their whole office suite, then selling plugins, service, and other add-ons for the base product?

      Because gimme-gimmes like you wouldn't even buy the support or the plugins. You'd wait for free plugins developed using the source, instead of supporting the company that gave you the source code for free. You want everything for free, and expect people to give you the fruits of their hard work for nothing but love.

      Love doesn't buy you food, nor does it pay the rent. Welcome to capitalism.

  44. So what?! by yalla · · Score: 3, Informative

    Siemens in Germany is laying off ten thousands of workers; the whole telecommunication biz in Germany is on the ground. So why are a couple of hundred workers at Corel are worth a headline at /.?

    Nobody is talking about the thousands at Marconi, Alcatel, AT&T, Siemens, name a company.

    Sorry, i might be a bit pissed of, but sometimes i don't get the point about selective recognition.

    Alex.

    --
    You look like a million dollars. All green and wrinkled.
    1. Re:So what?! by Ozymandias_KoK · · Score: 1

      Maybe you should submit an article about it then?

  45. ToPICS by inertia187 · · Score: 0
    Let's see how good Slashdot topic picks are these days:

    • AMD 7.23 +0.43
    • AOL 16.29 +0.52
    • AAPL 17.22 +0.32
    • CORL 1.01 -0.04
    • HPQ 17.51 +0.37
    • IBM 81.54 +0.01
    • INTC 19.15 +0.80
    • MSFT 57.03 +0.35
    • SGI 1.06 +0.23
    • SUNW 3.57 +0.40


    Wow, not bad, for the day.

    (Quote data provided by Reuters. Quotes are delayed 20 minutes.)
    --
    A programmer is a machine for converting coffee into code.
  46. linux has hurt a lot of good people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's a shame to see yet another company brought down by the commercial failure of linux. So many good people out of jobs. Linux is the worst thing to happen to the computer industry in 10 years. Instead of innovating on the solid free BSD source base, we've wasted countless programming lives rewriting nothing new. No wonder linux and all those who hitch their wagons to it are failing or have already failed.

  47. Two things... by UpnAtom · · Score: 1

    1. Should clones have rights too?
    2. Couldn't they see that one Steve Jobs was enough for any company?

  48. Re:I dunno... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Troll? More like spot on.

  49. hmmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    or the execs could just take a pay cut.

    riiiggghhhttt...

  50. Isn't this was Stallman has been planning?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No one should be allowed to earn a living from programming, it must all be for free? A person should only be allow to profit from selling manuals or technical support?

  51. Re:What is this, F****edcompany? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes and wasn;t the latest Linux Hippie chant about some skateboard rental shop using it?

  52. I'm not going to criticize by symbolic · · Score: 2

    (though there's plenty there to work with), but I just hope that if worse comes to worst, they find Painter a good home. I'd sure hate to see that proggie's untimely demise.

  53. 220? Not quite true by rikkards · · Score: 1

    Guy I know got let go today. He said the actual count was 270. Sounds like they may be playing with the numbers to make it sound less traumatic.

    Course this is secondhand knowledge that is not substantiated

  54. Corel Products Rank Among the Best by FFFish · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Let's take an overview of what Corel sells:

    - WordPerfect. Matches every feature of Word, and throws in a few more: Reveal Codes, and a SGML mode, plus frame placement that actually works.

    - Paradox. An awesome database engine. Far better than Access, last I read from the pointy-heads that know this sort of thing.

    - Quattro. At least up to Office 97, it matched Excel for features. I haven't the foggiest what either company has added (or even could add!) to the spreadsheets, so I don't know how they compare now.

    - Ventura Publisher. Its only competition is FrameMaker. It has far better typographic controls and UI, plus it comes with a database publisher that simply rocks, and XML import that appears to be more powerful than FrameMaker's.

    - Corel Draw. It is awesome. I think it can be argued that it's the best general-purpose vector illustration program out there.

    - PhotoPaint. It's easily as good as Photoshop. It does have a rather different UI, but the power is there.

    - XMetaL. From the recent SoftQuad purchase, it is one of the best XML creation/maintenance engines out there. Coupled with Ventura for publishing to print, and it's beyond compare.

    - iGrafx. From another recent purchase, these are a set of Process/Workflow tools that are incredible.

    - Painter. From its Metacreations purchase, Painter is an incredible "natural media" simulation. It's a world apart from Draw and Paint, and a helluva lot of fun.

    I think that pretty much covers their major product list.

    Each and every one of those products ranks in the top three for its category in terms of functionality.

    Unfortunately, Corel has several things going against it:

    - Major (and foolish) Mac bias in the graphics/publishing market.

    - An incompetant marketing department.

    - A history of buggy product releases (though the inevitable service packs always help a lot).

    And, of course, there's always the harsh reality that the best products don't always come out on top... and we're all familiar with some really crappy products that are dominating the market.

    --

    --
    Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
    1. Re:Corel Products Rank Among the Best by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > A history of buggy product releases (though the inevitable service packs always help a lot).

      Funny story about this....( a while back)
      I used WordPerfect and it worked fine until I updated windows. Then, all of a sudden it started behaving strangely. Then a service pack later fixed it again. This is kind of a weird coincident.

    2. Re:Corel Products Rank Among the Best by megaduck · · Score: 2

      Unfortunately, Corel has several things going against it:


      - Major (and foolish) Mac bias in the graphics/publishing market.

      Huh? How do Macs fit in to Corel's decline? Corel offers all of its' major graphics programs on the Mac, they just don't sell very well. I think you have "Mac" mixed up with "Adobe".

      --
      This .sig for rent.
    3. Re:Corel Products Rank Among the Best by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it is so well-established that threre exists a pro-"Mac bias in the graphics/publishing market", isn't it Corel's foolishness to choose to neglect the platform?

    4. Re:Corel Products Rank Among the Best by shepd · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Seriously, I _love_ Corel's software, but there's no way to convince these people in "the industry" to move away from Adobe.

      Case in point: Last conversation I had with a graphics arts teacher I mentioned that I thought CorelDraw was an awesome DTP program, and wondered why not a single machine there has a copy of it (this all stemmed from a problem of people at the College receiving CorelDraw 9.0 files but the College not having anything more recent than CorelDraw 3.0). Her answer? A flat out "Nobody in the art industry anwhere uses CorelAnything whatsoever for anything".

      Well, la-di-da, with that attitude, you guys never will use it, either. That still doesn't stop the Student Association from receiving many various CorelDraw files when they fill up the ad section of the student calendar.

      You know... I think I just realised something. When I have that "M$ is garbage" attitude, I make users who actually find Microsoft's software decent feel just like that. Like "maybe the reason you don't like xyz is because zyx is just too EASY for you!".

      Bummer. Now I feel sad. Strong sad.

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    5. Re:Corel Products Rank Among the Best by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Nobody in the art industry anwhere uses CorelAnything whatsoever for anything"

      That's true. 99.5% of the art industry does not use anything from Corel. It's a good thing the art dept doesn't do people a disservice by teaching it. The guy who does ads for College Liquors on his 486 with a 7 year old version doesn't count.

      Just look at the box of CorelDraw. Some crappy balloon with a rainbow on it. It just screams I'm a Amateur Clipart Jockey Who Likes Unicorns and Mirror Effects and CareBears LaLaLaLaLa. Completely unprofessional to reflect the userbase -- That's Corel marketing for ya.

    6. Re:Corel Products Rank Among the Best by shepd · · Score: 1

      >It's a good thing the art dept doesn't do people a disservice by teaching it.

      Yup, because artists never come up with new ideas, ways of thinking, and ways of doing things when they're presented with an alternate tool, rather than using the same ones they'd been using for their entire life.

      It's not like I'd suggest they spend a lot of time using CorelDraw. But I think it deserves a week or two of them experiencing it. Who knows! Some of them might enjoy it. The rest of them would be happy to have experienced whatever the art community thinks is bad with the software.

      This isn't much different from how we learned Cobol and RPG in programming. By teaching us those tools, we learned how good the new ones were. Not to mention the experience is something that employers will appreciate, even if it is useless to them.

      >Just look at the box of CorelDraw. Some crappy balloon with a rainbow on it. It just screams I'm a Amateur Clipart Jockey Who Likes Unicorns and Mirror Effects and CareBears LaLaLaLaLa. Completely unprofessional to reflect the userbase -- That's Corel marketing for ya.

      Yeah, that's why I didn't read all those boring English books in high school. They made us use generic books with boring covers that were either plain green or had a shoddily drawn glued-on picture of the bard on them. That's shakespeare for you! Totally unprofessional and not even worth opening to read. That cover taught me everything I needed to learn in English, like "always judge a book by its cover".

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    7. Re:Corel Products Rank Among the Best by smyle · · Score: 2
      I'm not anti-Corel or pro-Microsoft, but this post has a few *ahem* inaccuracies I'd like to address...

      - WordPerfect. ... plus frame placement that actually works.

      As long as you don't change printers. Whenever you change your printer it "helps" you by shuffling things around - even if the margins and paper sizes are all the same.

      - Paradox. An awesome database engine. Far better than Access, last I read from the pointy-heads that know this sort of thing.

      A sorry excuse for a database (not saying Access is any better). The worst week of my school year is when the computer applications class covers databases and uses Paradox to do so. Half the time they won't open, and no way to relocate your files once they're saved (within Paradox itself - you can always use the OS).

      Quattro. At least up to Office 97, it matched Excel for features. I haven't the foggiest what either company has added (or even could add!) to the spreadsheets, so I don't know how they compare now.

      Are you on crack?!? Quattro Pro is the primary reason for movine *away* from Corel. Try importing text - braindead. Charts & Graphs are pathetic and inflexible. OpenOffice beats Quattro Pro by a mile, and it's not even quite to the level of Excel.

      If you're using your spreadsheet as a glorified calculator, sure, but any real work will have you dumping Quattro Pro quickly.

      --

      Sleep is just a poor substitute for caffeine, anyway. -Bob Lehmann

  55. Brilliant idea by dh003i · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    If cutting 220 jobs will save you $12 million, why not cut 440, as it'll save you $24 million? Why not cut 22,000, as that'll save you $1.2 billion? Hell, why not fire everyone...surely, that'll save you several TRILLION!!

    Why not cut jobs by 120%? You can cut the additional 20% by firing out-contractors. Hell, if you cut jobs by 1000%, surely, you'll save ALL THE MONEY IN THE WORLD!! Wow!

    1. Re:Brilliant idea by sam+i+am · · Score: 1

      Sorry, Nortel already tried that! And look where it got them.

      http://seanm.ca:70/00/stuff/nortel.txt

    2. Re:Brilliant idea by dh003i · · Score: 2

      Why do the posts I submit intending to be funny always get modded down to flamebait? Oh well, maybe I'm just not that funny.

  56. Friend of a friend of a friend... by Wiwi+Jumbo · · Score: 2

    Guy I know, knows someone in his class who's on a workterm at Corel...

    Turns out that as of noon today he was the only one left on his *floor* that still had a job.

    *Everyone* he knew at Corel was laid off today.

    He's not quite sure what he's going to do tomorrow. :)

    --
    Wiwi
    "I trust in my abilities,
    but I want more then they offer"
  57. Wait... by 2nd+Post! · · Score: 2

    I'm not advocating the death of Office, but you're saying that increased competition in the Office Suite arena in Macland is a bad thing?

    I imagine having two competent office suites would drive down costs for the consumer, increase features and support for the consumer, and in general increase the capability of OS X fitting into a business environment with the added application support.

    You're saying it's better for Apple to bend over for Microsoft than to invite Corel to play in the sandbox?

    1. Re:Wait... by mgkimsal2 · · Score: 2

      You're saying it's better for Apple to bend over for Microsoft than to invite Corel to play in the sandbox?

      That's exactly what he's saying. MS has pretty much nothing to lose by not releasing any future MS Office for Mac. Just the prospect of that will be enough to prevent people from buying Macs. Doesn't matter what it is - the majority of people at the present time and in the near forseeable future won't make purchasing commitments unless MS Office is available for that system.

      I'm not talking Joe Art Guy who is a hardcore Mac fan - he's going to buy one or two machines. I'm talking larger institutions with art departments. If a company has to outfit and update Mac machines for a dept, but they can't exchange Office docs with them, they'll probably just force them to run Intel hardware with Windows. Why not? Photoshop runs on that just fine.

      Apple potentially has much more to lose than MS by inviting other players in to develop office suites for OSX.

  58. The Brain Drain is very real by gatesh8r · · Score: 2

    And it's not going to stop unless the exchange rates start to change -- why work for 50000 CDN for example if someone in the US is paying 65000 USD? *shrugs* That's mostly, if not all of the problem. It's very very common in the medical field and certainly isn't suprising that CS and IT are getting hit badly as well.

    --
    Karma whorin' since 1999
    1. Re:The Brain Drain is very real by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 2

      And it's not going to stop unless the exchange rates start to change -- why work for 50000 CDN for example if someone in the US is paying 65000 USD?

      A factor to consider when looking at exchange rates and salaries is where you plan to spend the money. You'll get a lot more bang for your buck if you go to the US, pile away the cash, and then go to Canada and spend it there. The exchange rate is CA$1.00 == US$0.64, but the purchasing power parity is CA$1.00 == US$0.79. So, for every US$0.64 you spend in Canada, you get US$0.79 worth of generic goods & services. (Note: PPP includes sales taxes, and if you're an American resident, you even get a refund on the Canadian GST.)

    2. Re:The Brain Drain is very real by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 2

      Here is some interesting additional reading on living/spending in Canada vs. the US.

  59. Corel the red-headed stepchild of the industry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They get beaten around like the proverbial red-headed step child that they are. Even that C looks like the affro of an ugly red-head.

  60. On related news... by Jungle+guy · · Score: 1

    AMD is also planing lay offs. They have to cut US$ 350 million in costs, and some of these will come from lost jobs.

  61. Re:$40k salaries? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, she's got to pay off that loan on her tits somehow.

  62. Personal Experience With WP... by Tsali · · Score: 2

    Not to sound trollish on Corel, but...

    Personal experience with WP 2002 is that it runs sluggishly and I can expect it to crash every time I run it. Furthermore, the VBA module to automate WP is poorly documented at best.

    We were trying to merge documents of different sizes and orientations into a single file per a client request... something MS Word is horrible with due to the alternating headers. Acrobat was not an option because they did not a document they couldn't alter/cut/paste and all that jazz.

    After an entire week of development, we found that if you used late binding on some of the objects to activate a hidden parameter, you would get the desired effect of pasting a bunch of documents together. If you used early binding, the program would crash horrifically. The app is full of stuff like that.

    Further parsing and automation via WP has been a nightmare. I honestly don't know why the law profession is still using it, other than the fact that the legal profession seems to stay behind the curve with technology anyways. It seems legal partners are not eager to blow money on IT. If someone could explain it to me, I'd appreciate it.

    I'm surprised Corel is still around. They might not be around in another couple years if they don't fix their WP app quickly. OpenOffice is more stable and you can't beat the price. How can you compete with free or with Microsoft?

    I don't think its possible.

    --
    This space for rent.
    1. Re:Personal Experience With WP... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I honestly don't know why the law profession is still using it, other than the fact that the legal profession seems to stay behind the curve with technology anyways. It seems legal partners are not eager to blow money on IT. If someone could explain it to me, I'd appreciate it."

      Three reasons I see...

      Templates and scripts from previous versions.
      SGML support and reveal codes.
      Investment in training and WP being a tradition.

      But ya I agree that the Word Perfect Suite just keeps getting worse and the bug fixes are just ludicrous. Sad thing is I can see the need for them to ship it as is or perish and it really sucks.

    2. Re:Personal Experience With WP... by PizzaFace · · Score: 2
      I honestly don't know why the law profession is still using it, other than the fact that the legal profession seems to stay behind the curve with technology anyways. It seems legal partners are not eager to blow money on IT. If someone could explain it to me, I'd appreciate it.
      Reveal Codes. Legal pleadings are highly structured and stictly formatted to conform to court rules governing margins, type size, caption format, page numbering, everything. WordPerfect's Reveal Codes window makes it easier to see exactly how the document is formatted, and to change the formatting in fine detail. With Word, you have to create styles for each formatting rule, and when a document has many styles in it, perhaps copied and pasted from numerous other documents, a formatting problem can be hard to debug. When a pleading has to be filed in 30 minutes, and a footnote has italicized itself sua sponte, you do not want to start debugging styles by trial and error.
    3. Re:Personal Experience With WP... by Tsali · · Score: 1

      So I wonder what MS's lawyers use? :-)

      --
      This space for rent.
  63. Been there, Done that by pardasaniman · · Score: 1

    My friend hated OpenOffice since he had used MSOffice all his life (pirated of course)

  64. Oh Corel by smcavoy · · Score: 1

    why you forsaken customers, at the expense of share holders. I don't quite understand what has happened to them. They rode Linux like it was the winner at the kentukey derby. They they put it out to pasture (for them) as a platform because it didn't bring direct revenue. They seem like a fish out of the frying pan (that was the tech bust), it flops around a few times before it lays dead. I truly hoped it would make something of itself and wordperfect, what it would take the shap as, I don't know know. As this has faded into the imagination of Michael Cowpland, I fear this once rich and power *Canadian* company will fall into bankruptcy, or get bought by another company (MS anyone), and be a blip on the MS Radar. There could be hope if it abandons all prospects of Microsoft Office compatibility and foucses soley on Publishing. Otherwise it will face t the same fate Netscape did. If yout competition is MS, then you've already lost. If you created a product similiar in function, but not in competition with MS, then you have a chance.

    Bah, nevermind all this, I'm way, way to drunk to put together a real thought.

  65. Designer is alive by Digital+Believer · · Score: 1

    Corel bought out Micrografx about a year ago, it seems primarily to extinguish them.

    Not at all. Corel has no intention of "extinguishing" Micrografx Designer; rather, its high-end technical drawing niche is an integral part of Corel's play for enterprise-level process-management vertical markets. Note the high profile of designer on this automotive and aerospace enterprise solutions profile.

    It's obviously uncertain whether they can do it, but Corel is making a pretty convincing attempt to become a credible source of some really fancy XML-driven combinations of graphics and data. Technical or creative illustrations with built-in live ties to a database, that sort of thing. It's both in cooperation and competition with .NET.

    --
    We can reduce ideas to bits and people to genes, but "can" does not imply "should".
  66. There's no room for 'creativity' in legal stuff by pedro · · Score: 2

    That's why Wordperfect has persisted for so long.
    Legal documents are primarily "Text Only", as they should be.
    And always will be!

    --
    Brak: What's THAT?
    Thundercleese: A light switch.. of TOTAL DEVASTATION!
    1. Re:There's no room for 'creativity' in legal stuff by minkwe · · Score: 1

      Name one area appart from market share in which the latest MSWord is better than the latest WordPerfect. I've used both and believe me WordPerfect is a better tool for the job IMO, and I don't mean just legal stuff.

      --
      "Fighting terrorists with millitary might is like killing a mosquitor on your Dad's forehead with a rifle."
  67. Utter BS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Compared to places like malaysia or india the american worker might be expensice, but in general we are the cheapest in the first world. Why do you think Mercedes et all open manufacturing in TN and such. As for IT workers, we're expensive because we earned our keep by making businesses more efficient.

    1. Re:Utter BS by abmurray · · Score: 1
      Why do you think Mercedes et all open manufacturing in TN and such. As for IT workers, we're expensive because we earned our keep by making businesses more efficient.

      Actually, Mercedes is in Alabama, and South Carolina got BMW.

      Here in Tennessee we only have Nissan.
  68. i wonder... by sjwt · · Score: 1

    IF the workers would of preferd
    to all take a 25% pay cut?

    Do these companys ever ask around
    before slashing there wrokforce??

    say maybe 10-20 ppl may just want
    to leave of there own ocorde...

    Id love to see the day when big bussines
    consultes with its own workforce...

    --
    You have 5 Moderator Points!
    Which Helpless Linux zealot/MS basher do you want to mod down today?
  69. Re:Corel Products Rank Among the *most* mediocre by ultramk · · Score: 3, Interesting

    - Corel Draw. It is awesome. I think it can be argued that it's the best general-purpose vector illustration program out there.

    Yep, it could be argued. Of course, the person arguing this position would be wrong, but I guess that's beside the point...

    I used to do a lot of portfolio evaluation at the ad agency I work at. People would get pissed when I made a comment like "hmmmm, you must really like Corel, eh?" It's one of those graphics programs which taints every project it touches with its own "feel." Too many gradients, too many too-bright colors. Tacky.

    It's only "awesome" if you don't know any better. Which, apparently, you don't.

    For professional vector illustration, Adobe Illustrator (like Photoshop) is the standard. If you can't use it, well, we won't hire you. Flaws it certainly has, but each revision is better (with the possible exception of 9, which I more or less skipped).

    - Major (and foolish) Mac bias in the graphics/publishing market.

    Okaaaaaaay. You don't like Macs. Congratulations, you're part of the moral majority. Bully for you.

    However, there's a very simple reason that Macs rule in design and publishing: Adobe software runs better on the Mac that it does on Windows, and Adobe software is the engine that drives this industry. You can deny it, and you may dislike it, but it's an established fact.

    Painter? A toy. Always has been. Like you said, "helluva lot of fun." I'm not in this for fun. I'm doing this stuff to please my clients, beat deadlines, and sell product. Having fun is great, but it's more important to get the job done, and get it done right. I'd rather finish my projects early, get off work early and ride a bike or something.

    Corel is failing because too many of its apps are mediocre. It's the Plymouth of the software industry. The only people who buy this stuff are shopping at Office Depot at the time, and pick it because of the pretty box.

    - PhotoPaint. It's easily as good as Photoshop. It does have a rather different UI, but the power is there.

    It's an interesting little world you live in, isn't it? I think maybe next time you should wait until the pails on the lunchbox tree are ripe before you tuck in...

    m-

    --
    You catch enchiladas by picking them up behind the head and holding them underwater until they don't kick anymore -VeGas
  70. Re:Time for a new business model?-I agree. by flamelord · · Score: 1

    Since corel is a small company they don't get enough retail exposure. So they should start offering low end versions and high end version directly for sale from the company website.

    Maybe sell ulta cheap stripped down versions of WP that expire in a year or two.

    More aggressive marketing in any case. Corel gives consumers little incentives to go out there any try or buy their programs.

  71. Save some jobs and dollars by not naming a stadium by capedgirardeau · · Score: 2, Funny



    Maybe they could save a few bucks by not paying to have the Ottawa Senators stadium named after them.

    The Corel Center naming rights must cost a few bucks.

    http://www.corelcentre.com/index2.aro

    February 27, 1996 The Palladium is renamed the "Corel Centre" in a 20 year, multi-million dollar agreement with the internationally-known, Ottawa-based software company. The new identity positions the Corel Centre as the highest-technology sports and entertainment facility in the world.

    My condolances to those that lost their jobs.

    --
    Wax on, wax off baby!
  72. Photopaint (CPP) vs. Photoshop (PS) by Qbertino · · Score: 2

    - PhotoPaint. It's easily as good as Photoshop. It does have a rather different UI, but the power is there.

    Well, not quite actually. PS rulez through filters. That's why PS is the industry standard. For good reasons too. CPPs filters just plain suck.

    But I do agree that workspace management and the tools are on par with PS and Corel Script kicks the crap outta PS-automation.

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
  73. sacking in times of trouble by shomon2 · · Score: 2

    I read this and thought: Great way to increase profitability: sack loads of people. Get the rest of the people to just work more - I'm sure the rest of the people at corel are delighted... Sometimes yes, there isn't really anything else you can do, and maybe it's even part of a downsizing plan so that the others don't really do more, and you're just cutting out middlemen.

    A cool solution when the problem is just that the company will go bust if you don't close a section or start to decimate the employees is one I read a while back about how a recession was managed in the 80s in denmark I think: they just cut jobs in half and made it easier to work part time.

    This was done at a government level though: it meant people could have 2 part time jobs and make the same or a little less than they used to, and also couples or families could both work part-time and get the same salary as if only one was working full. And it meant people could have one big cash job that might be boring, and another low cash job that was what they actually wanted to do. It apparently worked really well, and now they are an example of how you can save money and help people at the same time. Just vague memory of this though so I hope someone else can be more precise!

    Ale

  74. Re:How about some pics of Cowpland's wife? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I'd hate to see her up close. "

    yeah, you might piss your pants getting that close to a woman...freakn geeks...go watch star trek, loser...

  75. redundencies in Canada? by DABANSHEE · · Score: 2

    Here in Oz an employer has to give a months wages for every year worked when a worker's made redundent.

    Plus 2 or 3 months paid long service leave that accumelates every 5 years

    & any of the 4 or 5 weeks annual paid leave that doesn't get used accumalates every year too (5 weeks for shift workers).

    Ontop of which some awards permit the acumelation of unused sickies, which at 15 sickies a year means if one worked somewhere for 10 years, taking just 5 sickies a year, that's 100 days of sickies left. This means that 3 months before redundency they just have to get a doctors certificate for depression or a bad back (no big deal) & 100 days worth of sickie pay gets added to the redundency pay.

    So if Corel was in Oz & one had worked there for 10 years & only used 5 sickies a year, one would leave with redundency payout of 10 months pay + accured unused paid sickleave of 100 days (pending sickness certificate - has anyone met a doctor who's refused to write one?) + 2 or 3 months paid long service leave (it depends on the award, plus the 1st 5 years arn't counted) + accured unused annual leave.

    Mind you some awards have a 'use it or lose it' setup for sickies & annual leave. But with such jobs employers have to schedule the full 4 or 5 weeks annual leave to you every year. With other awards where you can accumalate what you don't use, you still have to use at least a week of it every year.

  76. Corel and the rest by PegQuin · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The biggest problem I see with the major software companies is that the majority of the high paid MBA types in those organizations don't have any working knowledge of the products they make. I deal with these companies day in and day out and have for more years than I care to divulge. Corel has some good product but if the executives don't have a solid grasp on how to use the software, professionally, how can they have any vision to foster the direction of the software into professional environments? What follows from the executive level is a trickle effect and it typically boils down to the person(s) who has the greatest working knowledge of any given application, or suite of applications, the person(s) who have the greatest potential for vision in the developemnt of those applications, they have the least amount of say in the matter. Adobe is the same as well as those other guys.

    --
    PegQuin--I've got a sneakin' suspicion
  77. NOT CHEAP! No, DON'T factor in the exchange rate! by Interrobang · · Score: 2

    Factor in the exchange rate

    No, you don't factor in the exchange rate when it's a home-currency transaction! $50K is $50K is $50K, as long as that $50K is staying on the same side of the border where it started.

    I guarantee that a $50K/a job buys you every bit as much whatever as you could want in Canada as it does in the US (some goods and services are more expensive, but I don't pay half my salary to Kaiser Permanente every month like a friend of mine in Baltimore does). When it comes to cost-of-living, in general, prices in Ontario are comparable to or cheaper than most places in the US.

    But the key point is, again, you don't use the exchange rate when the money is staying on the same side of the border where it started. The ONLY time (and I repeat) ONLY time the exchange rate applies is when the transaction is cross-border. Since Corel is a Canadian company spending Canadian dollars in Canada, the equivalence should be understood as roughly 1:1 (based on cost of living and other indices) and not 2:1.

    Sighh...

  78. Exactly, DON'T factor in the exchange rate.... by gregfortune · · Score: 2

    Yes, thank you :) Either you don't factor the exchange rate in, or you have to run it both ways. Thos Barista's at Starbucks would have to be making $15 an hour here to compare with a $9 an hour job in Canada.

  79. A Company IS a Social Program by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A long long time ago, it was standard thinking that a healthy economy meant workers paid enough to afford to buy the products the companies they worked for made. It's still true...

  80. Last Post! by alpg · · Score: 1

    VI:
    A hungry dog hunts best.
    A hungrier dog hunts even better.
    VII:
    Decreased business base increases overhead.
    So does increased business base.
    VIII:
    The most unsuccessful four years in the education of a cost-estimator
    is fifth grade arithmetic.
    IX:
    Acronyms and abbreviations should be used to the maximum extent
    possible to make trivial ideas profound. Q.E.D.
    X:
    Bulls do not win bull fights; people do.
    People do not win people fights; lawyers do.
    -- Norman Augustine

    - this post brought to you by the Automated Last Post Generator...