Slashdot Mirror


Europe Goes To Venus; Mars Comes to Us

JamesO writes "The BBC says that the ESA is going to Venus, reusing the Mars Express design. Also here. Launch seems to be expected in 2005." And knownsense writes "Space.com is reporting that Mars is coming to closer to Earth. It will be closer by around 191 million miles and will end up 85 times brighter about August next year. This apparently is the first time it's been this close since the Neanderthals."

172 comments

  1. Metrics by trans_err · · Score: 5, Funny
    Remember NASA miles not kilometers!

    ps. 1 mile = 1.6 km

    1. Re:Metrics by GoatPigSheep · · Score: 3, Insightful

      yeah, that was a real shame what happened. It would be nice if the USA caught up with the rest of the world and started using the metric system.

      --
      GoatPigSheep, the 3 most important food groups
    2. Re:Metrics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting
      > Remember NASA miles not kilometers!

      #1. Dumb, old, lame joke. +4 Funny?? don't waste my time. The signal to noise ratio around here is pitiful of late. why, back in my day, +5 funny was lethal and used against the germans (but with great care of course)..
      (nod to our german friends: the US is now run by an autocratic and jingoistic cabal, playing off the peoples' fears and emotions to promote their agenda of world domination. We even have an office of Fatherland Security. how times change.. go figure. )

      #2. ESA not NASA. The stupid joke doesn't even apply. Pay attention!

      ps. 1 mile = 1.609344 km. You just went splat.

      pps. It was really a engineers vs. scientists breakdown. Most engineers of the older generation still work in imperial units. The spacecraft was built by engineers at Lockhead Martin (or the like). It was run by Scientists at NASA, who by in large use metric for everything. Culture clash played a large role in a really dumb mistake. (I'd like to see you write a bugless program that has to work flawlessly the first time it is trialed in a real situation. )

      Conclusion: The metric system is unpatriotic.
      Damn the french! They've been planning for dominance on Mars for centuries!

      Criticism Part II: The slashdot story:
      It will be closer by around 191 million miles and will end up 85 times brighter about August next year.


      This reads like a perscription drug ad. 85 times brighter than what?? 191 million miles closer to where? Considering the Earth is about 92.5 million miles from the sun on average, and Mars is about 140 million miles out from the sun, and a mars year is approx 2 earth years, what's the big deal here?? We pass by close to Mars every 1.75 earth years or so.

      I guess I should stop posting RTFA.

    3. Re:Metrics by Guppy06 · · Score: 2

      Could be worse. If the ESA did that, not only would they have egg on their face but they'd likely face stiff EU fines for using non-metric units.

    4. Re:Metrics by fredrik70 · · Score: 1

      IIRC NASA does use metrics, it was a third party developer which used imperial.

      --
      if (!signature) { throw std::runtime_error("No sig!"); }
    5. Re:Metrics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not unless you are working for Swedish projects, then 1 milk = 10 km

    6. Re:Metrics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Make that mile and NOT milk (oops)

    7. Re:Metrics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +5 funny lethal and used against the germans? i'd have to guess that that was a monty python ref...

    8. Re:Metrics by SILIZIUMM · · Score: 1

      Just like the Anonymous Coward said above, 1 mile is 1,609344 km. That's a difference of 0,009344 km for every km. Over a small distance, say from you to your neighbor, the difference is not quite important. But in this case we work with stuff in space, the distances are huge and that little difference would for sure cause the probe to miss its target.

    9. Re:Metrics by Wolfier · · Score: 2

      We're not talking about NASA here, but USA in general. The Imperial System should just DIE.

      Good:
      km. kg. Nm. kW. degree K.

      Bad:
      miles. pounds. lb/ft. horsepower. degree F.

    10. Re:Metrics by fredrik70 · · Score: 1

      oops, sorry, me misreading...
      But true anyway, metrics makes more sense, might be because I grown up with it though

      --
      if (!signature) { throw std::runtime_error("No sig!"); }
    11. Re:Metrics by Wolfier · · Score: 2

      Metrics makes more sense not just because we grow up with it. It makes more sense when formula are used - with the Imperial system one has to throw in a conversion or a magic constant once in while during calculations.

      SI units all based on 7 fundamental unit (IIRC).
      Formula make exact physical sense without redundant conversion steps or constants that come from nowhere.

  2. Faked Venus Landings? by malarkey · · Score: 5, Funny

    The US doesn't have any faked landing of Venus that we're covering up, I hope. If that's the case, Venus express will never make it.

    1. Re:Faked Venus Landings? by Guppy06 · · Score: 3, Funny

      "The US doesn't have any faked landing of Venus that we're covering up, I hope. If that's the case, Venus express will never make it."

      All the footage from the Venera "spacecraft," on the other hand, was filmed outside Novosibirsk.

    2. Re:Faked Venus Landings? by mijok · · Score: 0

      Yes, and it was still received by NASA's Deep Space Network without anybody figuring that out.

      --
      Karma. Moderation. Is my .sig good now?
    3. Re:Faked Venus Landings? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I spoke to the Mars Express team the other day (they just finished thermal-vacuum testing their spacecraft a couple of days ago, and I work in that general area). I suggested that given the large amount of evidence that someone is shooting down Mars probes, they should consider mounting a cannon on theirs. They would take it under consideration ;-)

  3. how will this affect me? by zelphi · · Score: 5, Insightful

    But will any geek actually get off his/her ass and look outside?

    Also, now that Life may exist on venus, will this lead to more interest in the oft' forgotten planet?

    1. Re:how will this affect me? by JesusPGT · · Score: 2, Interesting

      But will any geek actually get off his/her ass and look outside?

      Screw all that "outside" nonsense, get all the mars you want right here, straight from the Mars Orbital Camera. Note, requires a special program to view the files, but it's free.

    2. Re:how will this affect me? by colonelteddy · · Score: 1

      But will any geek actually get off his/her ass and look outside?

      Well, I don't know about you, but I am certainly getting off my arse (or ass, if you prefer) and getting out to Ceduna for the total solar eclipse in december.
      Admittedly, this is fairly easy due to living only about 8 hours away (This is Australia, 8 hours isn't considered very far)

      I'm fairly certain It would help to be outside to see the sun, although being inside would certainly stop me going blind!

      --
      c - a blessed +5 grain of salt
    3. Re:how will this affect me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NASAView is a Planetary Data System archive product display tool that runs on Sun/Solaries, Windows/NT/95, and PowerMac platforms with a common look-and-feel Graphical User Interface (GUI).

      Oh well, no Linux support.

      Glad to see they support Solaris tho

  4. Very Welcome News... by trotski · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This is very welcome news!

    Just the other day I was talking to a friend about why there is so much more interest in Mars than there is in Venus. There are plenty of difficult questions that more missions to Venus could answer.

    I'm very interested in what the results of this mission well be, there is after all so much to learn.

    Of course, we need an obligatory Simpsons quote here:

    "mmmmmmm..... gummie Venus"

    --

    "Entropy is the bad-guy, and he is everywhere"
    1. Re:Very Welcome News... by stefanlasiewski · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Well, Mars isn't necessarily more interesting, it's just more accessible.

      We can see the surface of Mars pretty well, probes that we send to the surface Mars will survive for more then a few hours, and it's possible that humans may go to Mars in the next 20 years.

      With Venus, sure she's pretty, but she'll turn you into a cinder really quickly.

      --
      "Can of worms? The can is open... the worms are everywhere."
    2. Re:Very Welcome News... by Pyromage · · Score: 3, Interesting

      "she'll turn you into a cinder"

      Sounds like someone I know.

      But seriously, this is why it is worth doing! Nothing ever got done by taking the easy way out! While I'm all for the Mars trip, and it probably should be first, I think we must go to Venus, because there is much there to learn, and because it is hard. The moon was hard once, and we did it. We can do it again!

      I know we won't get there soon, but I want to see us accomplish this by the time I die.

      The thing with Mars is that we know how to do it: We make a big enough ship with enough fuel to get there and back (Which we can do, it'd just be a lot). You put some hydroponics on board. It's tech we have.

      Venus would require the same, and a lot more to stay alive there. It's truly a new frontier; Mars is merely a barren one. There is something romantic about Mars, but Venus' environment will fight tooth and nail to keep us away from her.

      I don't know about you guys, but that makes me wonder that much more what color her panties are.

    3. Re:Very Welcome News... by DocStout · · Score: 2, Funny

      There's a joke in here somewhere about geeks, women being from Venus, and men being from Mars, but I'm too busy hiding from girls here in my computer room to phrase it properly... *smirk*

      --
      Si Hoc Legere Scis Nimium Eruditionis Habes
    4. Re:Very Welcome News... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hmmm....'I have a truly marvelous demonstration of this proposition which this margin is too narrow to contain' --Pierre de Fermat

      Very clever, almost didn't catch it

  5. Holst anyone? by T-Kir · · Score: 5, Funny

    appear more than six times larger and shine some 85 times brighter than it appears now...

    Does that mean we can play Holst's "The Planets" 6 times louder and have a valid reason for when the neighbours complain?

    --
    Are you local? There's nothing for you here!
    1. Re:Holst anyone? by Gluteus+Minimus · · Score: 1

      Or blast the Gladiator soundtrack... Hans Zimmer ripped off Holst pretty darned well, especially the theme from Mars, Bringer of War. But he did it in a cool way, so he's forgiven.

      --
      My sig's name is Sigmund, but you may call it "Siggy."
    2. Re:Holst anyone? by LordLucless · · Score: 2, Funny

      Nah, you play it 85 times louder on speakers 6 times bigger.

      --
      Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't an invisible demon about to eat your face
  6. Then why... by thinmac · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Aren't we sending people there?!? If we're so close, then wouldn't this be an opertune time to take the next step in human exploration of space? I've gotten to the point where I seriously doubt the intent of NASA to ever send a manned mission further than the moon. They've become so addicted to safe, academic research in orbit or from afar that they've forgotten how to take that leap into the unknown which was (in my opinion) what made the early space program (Murcury, Gemini, and Apollo) truly great.

    1. Re:Then why... by updog · · Score: 1

      does the fact that it'll be closer really make a difference when considering whether or not to send a mission to the planet? i wouldn't think so... i do agree with you, however, that nasa has abandoned their early pioneering spirit, and they should consider a manned mission to other planets.

    2. Re:Then why... by JesusPGT · · Score: 3, Informative

      This is just my guess, but I think that Radiation is a big factor. There was a story posted relatively recently on space.com about how astronauts on the ISS are getting more radiation exposure than they originally thought. And the ISS has earth's magnetic field to shield some of the effects, the trip to mars and back would likely give the astronauts radiation poisoning. Not to mention all the problems with being in microgravity for a year or more.

    3. Re:Then why... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh god, please tell me that the pictures on your website aren't about YOU getting a big ugly tattoo on your calf... it's so goddamn ugly.

    4. Re:Then why... by gl4ss · · Score: 2

      think of the technological possibilities after 50 more years, or heck, 500 more years, antimatter, fusion and such buzzwords.

      i've pretty much given up on sending manned spacecraft to mars/titan/whatever in next 20 years.

      luckily my life expectance goes 30y+ years.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    5. Re:Then why... by RunzWithScissors · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately NASA missions cost Money, LOTS of it. And recently Congress has seen fit to cut their budget. Even the once untouchable International Space Station budget has seen significant cuts. I don't think it's neccessarily that it's NASA wanting to not take risks, but more that they don't have the funding to properly take on a manned exploritory flight.

      Well, I guess they really could, I mean do Astronaughts really need suits, seat belts, and for that matter seats, food, happy O-ring seals, etc? They could always get off a mission to Mars Rocket Man style!

      -Runz

  7. "85 times brighter"? by I-man · · Score: 5, Funny

    Is it just me or does that figure seem a little high?

    "Auggh, my eyes! Damn you, Mars, damn you right to hell!"

    1. Re:"85 times brighter"? by brc007 · · Score: 1

      seems high.

    2. Re:"85 times brighter"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's nothing better than having an image of a planet permanently burned into your retinas after looking at it through a telescope.

    3. Re:"85 times brighter"? by freeweed · · Score: 5, Informative

      Is it just me or does that figure seem a little high?

      Not really. Astronomical brightness measurements are logarithmic, and they have to be in order for us to notice any difference. A small bright point in the sky that's twice as bright as another one.. the human brain/eyes sees them both the same brightness (for the most part).

      To really notice a difference, you need something on the range of 10X (or more) brighter. 85X from its usual appearance isn't THAT different, it'll just make Mars (normally a small red dot) look a bit brighter than Jupiter (a slightly larger red dot). If you've never watched Mars over the seasons, you may not be aware that it does this every coupla years, just not to this extent - the last time it got really bright was in the mid 80's - when Mars was almost as close (to within 2 million miles) as it will be this time around.

      It's happened before, it's been measured, and yes, it really DOES get a lot brighter.

      --
      Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
    4. Re:"85 times brighter"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative
      It goes something like this:
      • Mars will get 1.20 times closer to the Sun. That makes it 1.20^2 = 1.44 times brighter.
      • Mars will get 6.54 times closer to the Earth. That makes it 6.54^2 = 42.77 times brighter.
      • Mars is currently a 72% crescent, but will become ~100% full, which means 1/0.72 = 1.39 times brighter.
      1.44 * 42.77 * 1.39 = 85 times brighter.

      You can compare the solar system diagrams:
      today
      08/27/2003
    5. Re:"85 times brighter"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "This apparently is the first time it's been this close since the Neanderthals."

      Yet...

      "the last time it got really bright was in the mid 80's - when Mars was almost as close"

      I always thought some of the kids I went to school with weren't as high on the evolutionary ladder.

    6. Re:"85 times brighter"? by panurge · · Score: 5, Informative
      Er, no, your 10x is wrong.

      Most people think "an order of magnitude" is a factor of 10. This is actually wrong, and I think it is the origin of your mistake. An order of magnitude is the old naked eye astronomer estimate of the just reliably distinguishable difference in brightness of two stars. A real astronomical order of magnitude is actually the FIFTH ROOT OF 100, which is a factor of almost exactly 2.5.

      If objects differ in brightness by a factor of 2, you can easily tell which is the brightest if you can see them both together.

      The factors influencing the brightness of Mars are:

      • Its distance from the sun (inverse square law)
      • Our distance from Mars (inverse square law)
      • The portion of the illuminated surface which we see - the variation is much less than with the moon or Venus because the orbit of Mars is outside our orbit.
      I rather think this adds up to a TOTAL POSSIBLE variation in the brightness of Mars of 85:1. It will not be 85 x brighter under optimum conditions, just 85 x brighter than when it is as its dimmest. So don't expect a supernova effect.
      --
      Panurge has posted for the last time. Thanks for the positive moderations.
    7. Re:"85 times brighter"? by ErikZ · · Score: 3, Informative


      Well, that's reasonable to say that the astronomical "order of magnitude" = 2.5.

      But the reason most people think "order of magnitude" is x10 is because that's the basic definition of "order of magnitude".

      http://whatis.techtarget.com/definition/0,,sid9_ gc i527311,00.html

      --
      Democrats or Republicans. They are both taking us to the same place and they are not afraid of us anymore.
    8. Re:"85 times brighter"? by I-man · · Score: 1

      So I can't torture my enemies by forcing their gaze to the night sky?

      Spoilsports.

  8. NEATO by werdnattarp · · Score: 3, Informative

    Astronomy is my passion, tech and computers always second. Although planetary exploration is not my forte, I have been paying close attention to all the recent probes/satellites/additions to ISS. Seems to me space agencies are pretty good at getting stuff done even though they're one of the first budgets cut. Cassini will soon arrive at Saturn and I am anxiously awaiting the flood of images from said sattellite.

    1. Re:NEATO by MacAndrew · · Score: 2

      Cassini -- not to mention the Titan probe it will be dropping off. I hadn't even heard of that until the first Saturn pictures were sent back. I have trouble keeping track of the alphabet-soup of probes, but when they start sending back data, wow. One of the single strongest images I have from being a kid was the Viking shot of the Martian surface on the cover of National Geographic.

      The NASA site has some excellent images, and individual project pages for people like me who need brushing up.

      "Neat-o."

    2. Re:NEATO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cassini will soon arrive at Saturn and I am anxiously awaiting the flood of images from said sattellite.

      This one tiny sentence tacked onto a totally worthless and self-serving paragraph is deserving of a 3:Informative? WTF?

  9. mama mia... by updog · · Score: 2, Funny
    The Italian contribution to Venus Express will chiefly consist of a series of spare parts for various spacecraft components and a financial contribution.

    cool, a spacecraft with a fiat engine!

    seriously though, this article seems biased... why is focus on italy; e.g., quote "the italian problem"? doesn't that kind of thing (one nation not contributing as much as everyone else) happen all the time?

    1. Re:mama mia... by The+Cydonian · · Score: 2
      cool, a spacecraft with a fiat engine! .... why is focus on italy; e.g., quote "the italian problem"?

      Actually, I don't care if they use Fiat or Vespa, as long as they don't use their legendary charm and steal Venus... oh wait, Michelangelo already beat us to it.

      But to answer your question, yes this thing of one team member not contributing as much as everyone else happens in all teams, whether they're intra-company, inter-state or international.

      In fact, this phenomenon is so common that the equivalent "good guy" response, complaining about non-working team-mates, is also equally common.

    2. Re:mama mia... by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 1

      Lets hope it doesn't have Fiat brakes or steering.

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
  10. Why indeed... by T-Kir · · Score: 5, Funny

    [joke]

    Well it must be because NASA are waiting for the current schlock of Hollywood movies to wrap, so they can hire some of the biggest sound stages ;)

    [/joke]

    --
    Are you local? There's nothing for you here!
    1. Re:Why indeed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0



      Oh, yes . . . indeed.

  11. Correction by Artifex · · Score: 4, Funny

    Actually, it got much closer in 1951...

    Seriously, though, I hope NASA and ESA and the Chinese and private firms have planned well in advance to take advantage of this situation.

    --
    Get off my launchpad!
  12. Shouldn't we be exploring Saturn instead? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If the sun's going poof soon, why would anybody want to move closer to it?

  13. Please... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't be an ass.

  14. Coincidences and coincidences by TechnoWitch · · Score: 3, Funny

    And just think, just in time for a Neanderthal's party to win in the U.S. midterm elections!

    Coincidence? I don't think so!

    -----
    Paid for by "The Committee to Elect Edward D Wood Jr, Posthumously"

  15. The Neanderthals by Liquidity · · Score: 5, Funny
    "This apparently is the first time it's been this close since the Neanderthals"

    Yeah, and look what happened to them!

    1. Re:The Neanderthals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bet the Neanderthals supported their war-mongering imperialist president also...

    2. Re:The Neanderthals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What? what happened to them? ... ..

      OH SHIT!!

    3. Re:The Neanderthals by Grizzlysmit · · Score: 2, Funny
      Who says we're all gone?

      Ooops -- that was a bit of a give away, quick agggrocck damage contol.

      --
      in my life God comes first.... but Linux is pretty high after that :-D
      Francis Smit
    4. Re:The Neanderthals by LPetrazickis · · Score: 1

      FYI: The Neanderthals had a greater average brain capacity than modern humans. They also had cool brow ridges. Jealous?:)

      --
      Is this a sigs-optional kind of place? 'Cause I am totally down with that if you know what I mean.
  16. Script Idea! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    . . . most recent one took place in September 1988, when Mars passed to within 36.5 million miles (58.7 million kilometers) of Earth.

    I can already see those wacky little hollywood screenwriters now. Churning out the next disaster movie epic about some pesky group of misfits that have to learn to work together to save the Earth from certain destruction.

    By 2004 we should have three versions of the same movie coming out. Guaranteed one will have all three qualities:

    A. Be produced by Jerry Bruckheimer and/or directed by Michael Bay

    B. Star Will Smith

    C. Cost $190 million

  17. not all that rare, really by Xzzy · · Score: 2

    The article states that next August, when mars gets the closest to it has ever been, it will be 34.6 million miles away from earth. The article later goes on to say that in 1988, Mars went through a similar (though less extreme) event that closed the distance to earth to 36.5 million miles.

    Now I know the 2 million miles is still a huge distance when you think about it, but that's barely a 6% difference. All the numbers about the planet being 6 times larger or 85 times brighter, when you get down to it, won't be perceptible by the average joe unless he's shown two pictures pointing out the difference.

    Unless mars starts to compete with the moon for being the brightest object in the sky, who really cares beyond some numbers geek being impressed at winning a celestial lottery? ;)

    1. Re:not all that rare, really by MacAndrew · · Score: 2

      1988 was 14 years ago! I don't know how rarely something has to occur to be rare, but this seems pretty rare to me. Not Halley's Comet rare, but rare enough to be a rare opportunity.

      Celestial lottery -- well, when is the next syzygy? Rare enough for ya? :) (Not terribly useful but interesting.)

      Speaking of timing, the Voyager probes were launched as a time particularly suitable for a "Grand Tour" of the solar system. Really remarkable, the way they used gravitational slingshots and careful alignment to visit all the gas giants with a small amount of fuel. I can imagine the calculations for getting to the Moon and back, but interplanetary probes -- wow.

    2. Re:not all that rare, really by Tablizer · · Score: 5, Informative

      The article states that next August, when mars gets the closest to it has ever been, it will be 34.6 million miles away from earth. The article later goes on to say that in 1988, Mars went through a similar (though less extreme) event that closed the distance to earth to 36.5 million miles.....Now I know the 2 million miles is still a huge distance when you think about it, but that's barely a 6% difference.

      Agreed. This is mostly a "numerical anomally" rather than something that is visually signficant. Close approaches happen about every 15 years or so, and most of these are probably within a few percent points of this coming distance.

      Although, it would be cool to come out side one night and see Mars close enough to find the missing Polar Lander with the naked eye :-)

      Mars is often a tough telescope target. Your eye has to be trained to see any significant detail on the disk. Otherwise it will just look like a small orange disk, roughly the size of a penny held at arms length through the scope, with maybe one or two dark but vague splotches and maybe light areas that mark one or both poles or some high clouds. A "slightly dirty pencil eraser edge on" is how I would describe the view.

      I was disappointed to see it at the city observatory at the last close approach. My little 60mm scope actually showed more detail (probably because I waited for a better time when it was higher in the sky.)

      I would suggest picking a good Saturn night if you ever go to a town observatory. Saturn, the moon, and Jupiter (in this order) make the most impressive viewing targets IMO. Mars will probably disappoint you visually. But it is cool to know you are looking at Mars, dispite the poor view.

      However, Saturn varies over time because of the ring tilt from our perspective. If you go during a year with a non-tilt, you won't see much ring detail. Similarly with the moon: it goes through phases (lighting angle), and some phases are not that great in a telescope. Jupiter is probably the only consistent object WRT appearence and appearent size. It won't shrink, darken, or tilt funny on you. Even the Sun's disk changes in activity every 11 years (if you view it through a filter and projection). Although it is true that Jupiter's red spot does fade in and out depending on the type of clouds it is next to, or if it goes behind the planet. But there is more to Big Jup than just the red spot. You can usually see 4 of its moons quite easily (as starlike specs) and at least 2 tannish cloud bands on the planet.

    3. Re:not all that rare, really by tanveer1979 · · Score: 2
      "Mars will probably disappoint you visually. But it is cool to know you are looking at Mars, dispite the poor view. "

      Not exactly. Mars disappoints very rarely. It has a distinctive red tinge. Infact when the sky is slightly hazy(due to vapour) like when all start are slightly dim, at that time mars is noticable because red light gets scattered the least. The best time is after it has rained and skys gone clear, the pollution leves are low, but water vapour content is high. Then you see the planed of war shine.

      Infact there is an interesting story. During WW2 over europe, Mars was very very visible!

      --
      My Aurora : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o91ZsGwJYyg
      FB : https://www.facebook.com/TanveersPhotography
    4. Re:not all that rare, really by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Not exactly. Mars disappoints very rarely. It has a distinctive red tinge.

      I meant from a *telescopic* perspective. Yes, the color is quite distinct, but you can see that just with your naked eye and brighter yet with bonoculars.

      My personal experience is that the telescope does not enhence the color any from what the eye sees. (Unless bad optics make pretty rainbow tinges.) Then again, such things tend to be subjective.

      If you like red, then there are some nice red stars also. These are interesting because most are in their later stages of life, which our Sun will someday do also. IOW, looking at a red star is like looking at our solar system's future. Awe-inspiring and frightening at the same time.

      It would be like when people reach 70 years old, they bloat up into a big red blob, stay that way for a year or two, and then suddendly burst open violently. The old-folks home would be a bit more complicated to manage if that was the case.

    5. Re:not all that rare, really by scharkalvin · · Score: 2

      I had built my own 6" telescope out of commerically made parts back in the 70's when mars was also at a close opporsition and well visiable. I think I was able to see the polar ice caps and some surface detail at 200X. Not too bad from NYC with a scope mounted on a home brew equatorial mount made out of pipes. I now have two 7" glass disks and hope to grind a mirror for a new scope, hope I can complete the project in time for mars in August. (If not mars will be close again in two more years, though not quite as good).

  18. perseverance by torre · · Score: 2, Funny

    You gota love Nasa's Moto... If you don't succeed the first time, spend millions more in another attempt.... :)

  19. Max is going to Mars, by WetCat · · Score: 0, Troll

    Valera - to Venera...

  20. Re:Europe - The Final Countdown by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I loved that mothafuckin' song you sloppy dick licking anus!

    I bet you 20,000,000 these mofos mod this to (-1 Offtopic). That is what they rate everything unless you speak on Linux, Sun, Anti-Microsoft, or do not shower.

  21. Tour Mars by MacAndrew · · Score: 2

    We can kind of imagine ourselves living on Mars -- not that it will happen anytime soon -- while Venus really is a hellhole. They've had trouble getting spaceships to withstand the pressure, never mind the temperature, and the atmosphere has lots of nasty stuff in it.

    But Mars -- we can send cute little rovers to Mars, and it's that cool color.

    1. Re:Tour Mars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Said something similar the other day: "I can kind of imagine myself living in Canada -- not that it will happen anytime soon -- while Texas really is a hellhole."

  22. Get it straight... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    NASA did not make an error converting units! Rather, units were unlabeled in a file delivered by the contractor (Lockheed-Martin). The forces were expected to be listed in particular metric units, and those units were assumed.

    Note that even if solely metric units had been used, the same problem could have occured! It could have happened if the forces had been given in millinewtons but were unlabeled, and newtons were assumed.

    Noone made a mistake converting units!!! Rather, it was not realized that the units needed conversion.

    (Since Mars Climate Orbiter was lost, I have been completely unforgiving of the students in physics courses I TA who forget to label units. I was usually pretty brutal about it, but now I'm an unholy terror.)

    Now, the deep problem was that no error checking and simulation detected the problem. But, that's a post for another day. :)

    1. Re:Get it straight... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ..and those units were assumed.

      rule #1 when doing (rocket) science: never assume

      Therefore, the people to blame are those who assumed.

  23. Re:Europe - The Final Countdown by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i thought you're a troll? why the insightful and accurate comments lately, honey?

  24. Not much point right now... by stefanlasiewski · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Well, there's not much point in sending humans to Venus right now.

    What would humans do in orbit around Venus that can't be done from a remote station here on earth?
    "Hello Mission Control, the Venesian atmosphere is cloudy, and I cannot see a thing. I am about to launch the Venus probe with it's IR/UV/Radio-scannerthingamagig. BTW, I am still stuck in this tin can. I haven't experienced gravity in over a year, and my bones are disintigrating. The air is stale, the food is boring and I am about to go crazy."

    Before you even start thinking about sending someone to another planet, there's a zillion other things to think about first. How to build a ship, how to feed the crew, what are the long term effects of space travel, etc. We still have a ways to go. A Satellite could go there now.

    Remove satellites can do it far cheaper then a manned mission. If we're going to send humans anywhere, let send them someplace where they could acually walk.

    --
    "Can of worms? The can is open... the worms are everywhere."
    1. Re:Not much point right now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrong planet there tough guy. Mars will be closer, not Venus. Try to think before you go off flaming.

    2. Re:Not much point right now... by Tiro · · Score: 0, Redundant

      You wouldn't call it a "satellite" if your sending it out of our orbit...

    3. Re:Not much point right now... by G-funk · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Always with the "what are the long term effects of space travel" argument... You know the only way we'll ever know about this is to *gasp* send somebody on a long mission.... I don't know about you, but I'd be very happy to be a guinea pig for such science, and I'm damn sure there's a pile of people actually qualified to do it who feel the same way.

      --
      Send lawyers, guns, and money!
    4. Re:Not much point right now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WTF is your point? I never said we should send humans to Venus or Mars because it's 'closer'. I said we should send humans to the planet where they could actually do something.

      I said there's nothing a human could do in orbit around venus that couldn't be done from here...

    5. Re:Not much point right now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok smartass, what do you call it then?

      It's ok to criticise, but then be constructive about it...

      And you didn't even complain about his spelling... shame on you!

  25. Two things... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    One, it's not that much closer than usual. It's not a big enough deal to merit immediately sending humans. (But, the two sweet Mars rovers the US is sending next year, and probes from Europe and Japan, will take advantage of the close proximity of Mars to Earth on this orbit to increase data rates slightly.)

    Second, NASA doesn't set the priorities for what it does. It doesn't have much flexibility in how it uses its budget. Its missions and expenditures are determined by Congress in each year's budget. I assure you that there are many people inside NASA who are chomping at the bit to break humans out of Earth orbit (including many very high-ranking people inside the agency). But, Congress has to unleash NASA, and fund any mandate it approves.

    I'm with you, though, man. I want Americans to have the capability to go whereever the hell we want in the Solar System. :) (I'll settle for routine travel to Mars, though. :)

    1. Re:Two things... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what do you mean not that much closer than usual???
      the article says that mars will be 34 million miles from earth, which is 191 million miles closer. that seems a LOT closer than usual to me.

    2. Re:Two things... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I mean it won't be much closer than it gets on a typical orbit. Every year we make a close pass of Mars. The distance of closest approach is always in the ballpark of 80 million km (50 million miles).

      The article say Mars will be 191 million miles closer than it currently is. We're on almost the opposite side of the Sun from Mars right now, and by next summer (a little more than half a year) we'll be on the same side.

      The article is very poorly written... they don't explain their distances very well. Severals maps of the Solar System, one for now, one for next summer and one showing the variation in separations between various closest approachs of the planets, would really help explain what's going on.

    3. Re:Two things... by jc42 · · Score: 2

      I want Americans to have the capability to go whereever the hell we want in the Solar System. :)

      I think the US government's priorities are currently a bit different than that. First we gotta go to Iraq. Then there are all those other countries that just won't follow orders.

      Once we get them all in line, maybe we'll think about conquering the rest of the Solar System.

      OTOH, maybe if we could convince Dubya that we were threatened by Mars or Callistans or Titanians or whatever, he'd have troops on the way as soon as Congress rubber-stamped his request for conquest.

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
  26. Four... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    D. Profit!

    1. Re:Four... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nice

  27. Not again... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See this. The same problem could have happened if purely metric units had been used!

  28. Mars Express by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    (+5 Insightful)


    Imagine a bewolf cluster of those!

  29. Sooo - Mars is getting closer... by mtec · · Score: 1

    think maybe - it wants to - uh - snuggle?

    --
    Cake or Death? Cake Please!
  30. Imagine... by WetCat · · Score: 1

    A collison between Mars to Venera...
    What a good nightmare!

  31. Popup ads everywhere! by whereiswaldo · · Score: 2, Interesting


    I hereby make a request that Slashdot should prohibit linking of any sites in a front page story which use popup or popunder ads.

    All those in favour, say "I".

    (Note to moderator: a little leeway, please)

    1. Re:Popup ads everywhere! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The commies will mod you down if you question athority. Hemos (Homos) is watching. Do you fucking-a know how much assfucking money those silly little pop-up companies made on being linked in /.?

      I am going to start a website, have 100,000 popup ads ($$$pay per click$$) and write a Linux article on it. Slashdot will link to it.

      1.get Website

      2.get popups

      3.post linux story

      4.profit

    2. Re:Popup ads everywhere! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or rather, say "Mozilla" and disable all unrequested popup windows.

    3. Re:Popup ads everywhere! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fucking A, I.

    4. Re:Popup ads everywhere! by Tablizer · · Score: 2

      Popup ads everywhere!

      And they are larger than ever before since the Neanderthals walked the Earth.

    5. Re:Popup ads everywhere! by mdechene · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure you meant

      1. Get Website
      2. Get Popups
      3. Post Linux Story
      4. ???
      5. Profit!$

      --

      Karma: Not Particularly Funny.
    6. Re:Popup ads everywhere! by ottffssent · · Score: 2

      I hereby make a request that people who habitually complain about popup ads get off their lazy duff and *do* something about it for a change. You seeing popups is your fault, not the /. editors' and if you can't be bothered to use a browser that turns them off, you obviously don't mind them that much.

      --
      Blissfully unaware of popups since Mozilla 0.9.3

    7. Re:Popup ads everywhere! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hereby make a request that you too ditch IE and start using a sane browser that blocks popups.

    8. Re:Popup ads everywhere! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Use Mozilla. There is an option to remove the javascript open window function.

      Extremeley effective against pop up-unders.

    9. Re:Popup ads everywhere! by whereiswaldo · · Score: 2

      Use Mozilla. There is an option to remove the javascript open window function.

      I'm using Netscape 7, by the way.

      So far almost everyone has suggested that I block popups. Is that a good solution for spam as well? Just block it? Or would you rather see it obliterated?

      Why I ask that Slashdot not link to sites which use popups is to curb people sending in stories just to make money (I'm sure it's happening). Popups are also an annoyance, but that's not my main motivation for bringing up this issue.

  32. orbital mechanics by PhreakOfTime · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If we're so close, then wouldn't this be an opertune time to take the next step in human exploration of space

    Actually, orbital mechanics are a bit more complicated than just being 'close'. Going to mars is not a straight-line shot, as it might seem. It involves more of a elliptical shape originating at the earth. Remeber, when you want to go to mars, you have to aim at where the planet will be in 18 months when you get there, not aim at where it is when you leave. If your in a moving car with a pumpkin and happen to be coming upon your ex's mailbox, do you throw the pumpkin at where the mailbox is when you release it, or where the mailbox will be when the pumpkin gets there.

    No, Im not a professor or anything, and no I have no links to prove my point, and Im sure a little googling would turn up a better answer, with some pretty pics too. Maybe I just watched Mechanical Universe too much as a child

    -SiliconFool
  33. Close as the neanderthals? by gnovos · · Score: 2

    I don't remember the Neanderthals being that close to us... well evolutionarily, of course, i'll give you that.

    --
    "Your superior intellect is no match for our puny weapons!"
  34. Re:THE LONE GUNMEN ARE DEAD!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    motherfucker! It is only 12:00 California time here . . . it did not air over here yet!!



    You ruined it! Damn you slashdot . . . . Damn you all to hell!

  35. um - dick in *his* pants by mtec · · Score: 1

    sorry

    --
    Cake or Death? Cake Please!
    1. Re:um - dick in *his* pants by Vann_v2 · · Score: 1

      It's ok for you to admit it. Every President does it!

  36. But... by djupedal · · Score: 1

    ....then these so-called researchers and quasi-space agencies wouldn't have any excuse to suck down huge slices of budgetary bread, now, would they.

    While I agree that there are perhaps better ways to collect aggregate data that we don't now have, the drill seems to be the same...propose fancy manned mission off-planet and request huge budget.

    Seems to leave room for other countries to eat their Galileon lunch, eh?

  37. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  38. Why are we going to venus? by gnovos · · Score: 2

    You don't know? Ever read the book "Men are from mars, Women are fom Venus"? Well, let's just say it translated poorly over here in Europe... and you know what happens when you get an Italian hooked on an scheme to get a woman.

    --
    "Your superior intellect is no match for our puny weapons!"
  39. Mars Express by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That is good, but does it run Linux?

  40. Re:this war-mongering imperialist president by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    this pants.

    His dick is in YOUR pants???

  41. Re:this war-mongering imperialist president by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He didn't outsmart, he manipulated.

    Yeah that's what we want, a stupid fucking cowboy with his finger on the button.

    He's about to kill people for some fucking oil, and you're treating him like he's a war hero.

    Better pray that you're not in the next city that the terrorists are gonna bomb...

  42. 100 times further than the moon by kninja · · Score: 0

    Mars will then be 100 times further than the moon from our planet. The moon is about 350,000 miles from earth, and mars will be about 35 million. It took about 3 days to get to the moon, on the Apollo 8 Mission.

    This means it would take about 300 days to get to Mars, one way (assuming similar rates of travel). I guess you could use more fuel in the beginning to get a higher inital velocity and maybe cut that time down.

    Anyone else care to speculate/correct my estimations?

    1. Re:100 times further than the moon by cheezehead · · Score: 1

      Anyone else care to speculate/correct my estimations?

      Since you asked...

      The moon is about 384,000 km (239,000 miles) from earth.

      --

      MSN 8: Now Microsoft even has bugs in their ad campaigns.

    2. Re:100 times further than the moon by geoswan · · Score: 2
      Mars will then be 100 times further than the moon from our planet. The moon is about 350,000 miles from earth, and mars will be about 35 million. It took about 3 days to get to the moon, on the Apollo 8 Mission.

      This means it would take about 300 days to get to Mars, one way (assuming similar rates of travel). I guess you could use more fuel in the beginning to get a higher inital velocity and maybe cut that time down.

      Woah cowboy!

      If you are using a traditional rocket, not a Star Trek warp drive, the route from Earth to Mars is not a straight line.

      Draw two concentric circles on a piece of paper, representing the orbits of the Earth and Mars. Now imagine an ellipse, with one foci the same as the focus of the two concentric circles. If you adjust the size of that ellipse so that it is tangent to the inner circle at one end, and tangent to the outer circle at the other end, I believe that ellipse would represent the minimum fuel path to Mars orbit.

      If you follow this route you won't travel 35 million miles, you will travel something like a bit more than 300 million miles. How long will it take? There are 365 days in an Earth year, and IIRC about 650 Earth days in a Martian year. An object following that elliptical route from the Earth's orbit to Mars's orbit would take something like 500 days to complete its own orbit around the Sun. So about 250 days, which is close to your guess, but only coincidentally.

      Of course arriving at Mars orbit isn't enough. You have to schedule your launch from the Earth so you arrive there at the point where you are tangent to Mars's orbit when Mars is at that point in its orbit.

      This is further complicated by the orbit of the Earth and Mars not being circular. They are ellipses too. The Earth's distance from the Sun varies by 2 or 3 percent throughout the year. I don't know whether the bulges in their respective orbits are close to one another, or on opposite sides of their orbits.

      250 days? So if the bulges in orbits lined up, your ideal launch window would be when the Earth was at its farthest distance from the sun, and Mars was 250 days away from its closest distance from the Sun. The probe should arrive not when we are at our closest approach to Mars, but when the Earth has travelled about 60 degrees past the point where Mars meets the probe -- about 100 million miles.

      If the bulges don't line up, it gets even more complicated. Which orbit is less circular matters. And the greater gravitational attraction the probe will experience when it is closer to the Sun also plays a factor.

  43. Fridge note to Martians by Tablizer · · Score: 2, Funny

    If you are a Martian, than this will be the best time to order Earth pizza delivery for a good while. Better get your order in now in case there is a rush.

    It will also be a good time to give back all that junk that NASA keeps crashing on your planet.

  44. Oh sure, it's just mars, RIIIIIIGHT! by Gldm · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Hey! That looks like a giant flaming meteor headed straight for earth!"

    "No no, that's just mars. Mars is supposed to be extra bright this year. See how red it is?"

    "Are you sure? It looks like a life-exterminating meteor to me."

    "Nope, just mars. Definately mars. Nothing to worry about here. By the way, we'll be heading off to venus for awhile."

    "Venus? Why? What's over there?"

    "Oh nothing, nothing. Incredibly boring place actually, just clouds and all. Don't worry, the earth is perfectly safe, we'll be back later."

    "Are you sure about that whole not being a meteor thing?"

    "Of course. Got to be going now, want to have a good view."

    "View?"

    "Er I meant I'll be seeing you. After I'm back... from venus.... later."

    --

    Introducing the new Occam Fusion! Now with sqrt(-1) fewer blades!

    1. Re:Oh sure, it's just mars, RIIIIIIGHT! by orkysoft · · Score: 1

      This is one of the funniest post I've read here lately :-)

      --

      I suffer from attention surplus disorder.
  45. THIS IS FUNNY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    even if it is a troll...

  46. Re:SHORTEST BOOKS EVER WRITTEN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What about "Polish Engineering" or "Jewish Sports Legends"

  47. Re:this war-mongering imperialist president by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Next time it'll be an industrial city. And it'll be a dirty bomb of some kind. They'll either set it off in an industrial park or a shopping mall.

    At least, that would be the logical thing to do if you were terrorists truely trying to do damage to a country, rather than just get some news coverage.

    You shouldn't kill executives, nobody will miss them. Kill regular people. They have more friends that will mourn.

    It's sad, but I see it coming. Why don't the idiot warmongering people that also live in this country also see it?

    Have I truely been made superior by refusing to watch television? I fear this may be the case.

  48. Re:Reverse Recursion? by The+Cydonian · · Score: 2
    Aren't we sending people there?!? If we're so close, then wouldn't this be an opertune time to take the next step in human exploration of space?

    I believe our reluctance to go to Mars is proof of NASA being filled with geeks. I mean, when was it last that a self-respecting geek stepped out of his geekroom?

  49. Caught between a rock and a hard place. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just as we're going to Venus, Mars has to swing around and hit us from the rear.

  50. Re:the slashdot effect: a new form of terrorism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Propaganda like this makes me sick.

  51. Since the Neanderthal? by surfcow · · Score: 2

    The Neanderthals went belly up about 35,000 years ago. The article says that Mars hasn't been this close in 70,000 years. Therefor, Mars hasn't been this close since *two* Neanderthals ago.

    Neanderthal: the new unit of measure.

  52. What was that flash in the sky? by NewtonsLaw · · Score: 2

    If only Orson Welles were alive to see this ;-)

  53. Neanderthals! by MrEd · · Score: 2
    *cue "2001: A Space Odyssey", 6 times louder*


    On a side note, whoever put the monolith up on the grassy knoll in Seattle on new years' 2001 has a priceless sense of humor. And they say Americans are no fun... ;)

    --

    Wah!

    1. Re:Neanderthals! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kubrick, eh?

      How about a little of the old Ludwig Van then, oh my brother?

  54. You must have meant... by robinjo · · Score: 1

    4. crash

  55. What is the relevance? by BerntB · · Score: 1
    Why are americans so fascinated with politicians' personal lifes?

    As long as it's not illegal (and/or nepotism and/or misuse of public funds), what is the problem?

    I just don't get it.

    --
    Karma: Excellent (My Karma? I wish...:-( )
  56. Mars: The God of War. by jericho4.0 · · Score: 1
    If we were ancient Romans we would be having orgys in the streets by now.

    I see dead people.....

    --
    "A language that doesn't affect the way you think about programming, is not worth knowing" - Alan Perlis
    1. Re:Mars: The God of War. by jericho4.0 · · Score: 2

      How does a post get modded overrated as the first mod?? Why are people with mod points so willing to mod down but not up?

      --
      "A language that doesn't affect the way you think about programming, is not worth knowing" - Alan Perlis
  57. In other news... by grahamsz · · Score: 2, Offtopic

    slashdot moderator michael actually manages correct use of a semicolon.

  58. Invasion? by codexus · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This apparently is the first time it's been this close since the Neanderthals.

    So that's the best time for the martians to launch their invasion fleet?

    --
    True warriors use the Klingon Google
    1. Re:Invasion? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Er, don't you mean the follow-up? They must have been curious about how we did against the Neanderthals.

  59. Steps to Space Exploration... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone else catch the ad on the right, "Five small steps for a giant leap"? I think they missed a couple of steps:

    1. Terrestial Tours
    2. Zero G
    3. Edge of Space
    4. Suborbital
    5. Orbital
    6. ???
    7. Profit!

    Okay, you heard it... :)

  60. seriously.. ./ gotta do something about this SHIT by chajath · · Score: 1

    never click that shitty link and, ./ should do something about it! why don't u just delete it? I'm mentally wounded from that shitty link.
    OMG.
    Freedom is good. but there are so many f_cking dickheads what the freedom is there for.

  61. Oh really? by Hektor_Troy · · Score: 3, Funny
    Nothing ever got done by taking the easy way out!
    Then how do you explain the wheel? That sure as hell is taking the easy way out.
    --
    We do not live in the 21st century. We live in the 20 second century.
  62. It says "ESA" not "NASA" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's short for European Space Agency. We all work with metrics just fine, thank you.

    Funny story: a couple of years ago I was evaluating compilers (for a new project), so I asked manufacturers for a sample. Borland happily obliged; we already had a Microsoft compiler, but IBM...

    I sent them email, explaining who I was and what I wanted. I never even thought to identify ESA as "European Space Agency", and the IBM people didn't think to ask. After a couple of days I had a phone call that went something like this:

    IBM guy: "We have evaluated your request and decided we will not send you a compiler. You are just too small an account for us to bother with. We cannot send samples to any startup out there."

    Me: "Oh-kay. Thank you for your time, then."

    IBM guy: "So what's ESA stand for anyway?"

    Me: "European Space Agency. We employ a couple of thousand people throughout a dozen or so countries, we mostly do space science projects with budgets running into the hundreds of millions, and we have a pretty nice space launch capability. You may have heard of us."

    IBM guy: "I guess... I should have known that."

    Me: "I guess you should. Have a nice day."

    Today, five years later, the project compiles just fine, using gcc.

  63. Europe Goes To Venus; Mars Comes to US by otisaardvark · · Score: 0

    I bet Australia lands up with Pluto (-:

    1. Re:Europe Goes To Venus; Mars Comes to US by Rip!ey · · Score: 1

      Europe Goes To Venus; Mars Comes to US; I bet Australia lands up with Pluto

      Actually, down here on the 'arse end of the world' we're aiming for Uranus.

      Relax, have a laugh. I'm Australian and proud of it.

  64. Russia went to Venus in the 70's... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nobody seems to ever talk about this... but the Soviet Union sent over two dozen probes to Venus from the 60's and early 80's, many of which included surface photographs beamed back to Earth. This "forgotten history" is well documented and also well forgotten due to the cold war.

    http://www.russianspaceweb.com/spacecraft_planetar y_venus.html

    Here are photos, including VENUTIAN SURFACE PHOTOS, from the Venera missions, including lots of photos of the Russian probes. Sorted by mission number.

    http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/planetary/venera.html

  65. just a probe again by iso9660 · · Score: 1

    Why not send a manned mission to Venus? This planet is sending far too few people on interplanetary missions. I can't believe we still don't have a functioning lunar base!

    How is this planet going to survive on its own? IMO, we really need to start building settlements on other planets.Mars is probably a better choice than venus though, because of the somewhat less harsh atmospheric and temperature conditions.

    Nasa and Esa and the other ones are not daring enough. They should be given bigger budgets. Space is the future of the human race.

    --

    I wish that my brain could do SMP...

  66. Dragonriders by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's all well and good to discuss the theory of relative brightness, but who's asking the real questions? What's the status on the Dragonriders? Are they ready for this new wave of Threadfall? With the Red Planet being so close, no one else is concerned?

  67. Allready done by the Ruskies by NitroAir · · Score: 1

    This I seem to recall was allready done by the Russians sometime in the 70's unfortunately due to the -- SULFURIC RAIN -- the drone lasted about 30 minutes or so before being disintegrated by the sulfuric acid. It sent back a few pictures before this however and that is all we have of that mission.

    1. Re:Allready done by the Ruskies by NitroAir · · Score: 1

      Sorry forgot to mention that the planet was Venus

  68. Close is bad by roystgnr · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If you want to send people on the most fuel-efficient path to Mars possible (which is almost necessary just to get them there at all, unless you're using a rocket better than anything we've ever built), you use a Hohmann transfer orbit, an ellipse which is tangent to the inner circular orbit (Earth's) at one end and to the outer orbit (Mars') at the other end. Even with a nuclear or better propulsion system, you wouldn't just point the rocket towards Mars and fire, you'd take advantage of your existing velocity in Earth's orbit to cut a sort of diagonal path between the two.

    Either way, an extra-close approach of Mars wouldn't cut very much time off the trip.

    They've become so addicted to safe, academic research in orbit or from afar that they've forgotten how to take that leap into the unknown which was (in my opinion) what made the early space program (Murcury, Gemini, and Apollo) truly great.

    Although I agree that NASA isn't what it used to be, I think you're missing the most important difference between 1960s' NASA and today's NASA: funding with blank checks.

  69. Re:*sigh* How easily you all buy into their lies. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    PLEASE tell me that this website is a spoof, a joke, a satire, a pun or some other NON-REAL subsitute!!!!!

  70. Look out! Mars, bringer of war is coming! by Whammy666 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Let's see, Mars (God of war) is due to make its closest approach within a year and Bush is determined to start a war in the middle east also within a year. Coincidence? Maybe we should rethink this astrology thing.

    --
    When all else fails, run.
  71. No. by Flamerule · · Score: 2

    Submitters think up the titles; Michael had nothing to do with it.

  72. Uh, Yes. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Hahaha! You used a semi-colon in your post, like it was funny!

    Except there were 2 submitters, so Michael did have to create the title, probably.

  73. Earthquakes and volcanos??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm curious if the unusual proximity will cause any earthquakes or related phenomena here or on mars. No mention in the article.

  74. For the love of God no .... by Tjp($)pjT · · Score: 2

    This apparently is the first time it's been this close since the Neanderthals.

    Now they can come back again ... And we will be the Neanderthals this time ...

    --
    - Tjp

    I am in wallow with my inner money grubbing capitalistic pig. ... Oink!

  75. What is this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How does this contribute to the discussion? I for one anm tired of reading "How is [Insert article subject] going to effect me?" or "Thats nice, but what commercial applications will this have?" It ranks right down there with "Imagian a Beowulf cluster of these!"

  76. Why? by xenocytekron · · Score: 1

    This is all fine and good, but we may ask ourselves, why? What is the point of going to the moon and mars and venus? Are we going to learn anything useful? We're spending millions if not billions of dollars on this space program, when that money could be used on SO MANY BETTER THINGS. I'm not being a troll, I'm sincerely curious.

    --
    This is my .sig, if you don't like it, it will eat you.
  77. Women are from Venus by codeButcher · · Score: 2

    Good enough reason to send a mission there....

    --
    Free, as in your money being freed from the confines of your account.
  78. Last Post! by alpg · · Score: 1

    (6) Men employees will be given time off each week for courting
    purposes, or two evenings a week if they go regularly to church.
    (7) After an employee has spent his thirteen hours of labor in the
    office, he should spend the remaining time reading the Bible
    and other good books.
    (8) Every employee should lay aside from each pay packet a goodly
    sum of his earnings for his benefit during his declining years,
    so that he will not become a burden on society or his betters.
    (9) Any employee who smokes Spanish cigars, uses alcoholic drink
    in any form, frequents pool tables and public halls, or gets
    shaved in a barber's shop, will give me good reason to suspect
    his worth, intentions, integrity and honesty.
    (10) The employee who has performed his labours faithfully and
    without a fault for five years, will be given an increase of
    five cents per day in his pay, providing profits from the
    business permit it.
    -- "Office Worker's Guide", New England Carriage Works, 1872

    - this post brought to you by the Automated Last Post Generator...