Slashdot Mirror
Stanford Researchers Trying to Protect P2P Networks
dirvish writes "New Scientist has a story about efforts from researchers at Stanford to protect peer to peer networks from attacks that could be permitted by the proposed Berman Bill. Neil Daswani and Hector Garcia-Molina of the Database Research Department at Stanford University have mathematically modeled the Gnutella network to discriminate between nodes and supernodes. They then tested the nodes to find which rules could be applied to best avoid a malicious node on the network thus conserving bandwidth."
Maybe the goal of all of these legal machinations is to make it all so much work that it is no longer worth the effort to take the short cut.
Homer: Facts are meaningless, you can use facts to prove anything that's remotely true!
Circumventing attacks technologically is a good thing.
But stopping Congress from passing bad laws is equally as important. Join the Electronic Frontier Foundation and help build a lobbying group that can defend our rights. Her's more info about what your money can do for all of us.
"We're sorry, but the website you're trying to reach has been disconnected."
The riaa/mpaa are going about the whole P2P debacle the wrong way. Havent they learnt the lesson from what happened when they shut down napster? How many P2P services popped up in it's place? and they were even more sophisticated.
You can't cut the head off the p2p snake, you try and at least two or three take it's place.
RIAA/MPAA should be looking at other alternatives rather than going in guns'a blazin'
Be you Admins? nay, we are but lusers!
More importantly, Join the ACLU. The EFF has practices that unfortunetly go against practicality. The ACLU is an old and established group that fights for our rights. They do fight for our first amendment rights anywhere, including on the web. Lobbying againt the right wing republicans and ashcroft is a good thing
This technology seems to be a bit limiting from the story, would someone be able to provide more detail? I'm a bit concerned that it would significantly reduce the ability of a normal node to request files indenpendently of everyone else. It seems right now alot of P2P services suffer from "Me too" style networks, where if it is new and popular, everyone has it. But if it is even remotely indie, it seems you're the only one looking.
(as a slightly off-topic aside) Maybe that's just my bad luck, but I've been noticing that trend for awhile now. I wonder if that was the work of the *AAs...plague diverse and robust information exchange systems with a monomeme. Hmmmm....
Zech Harvey, MCSE, MCDBA, CCNA
GNU/EFF?
If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
If you can see it, and you can hear it, somebody will figure out a way to copy it
Any fighting back is simply bad business for the RIAA. They need to embrace the Internet, and include it in their business model in a much larger way. Gone are the days where people spend $20 on a cd, at least most people.
The reason Santa is so jolly is that he knows where all the bad girls live.
I thought Freenet - http://www.freenetproject.org/ - is supposedly designed with DOS attacks etc... in mind.
/. effect after the 0.5 announce, but things are improving.
Yes, it apparently suffered from
Though they are researching ways to prevent attacks on the network, who says they're going to use it to actually protect them?
The chances are good that the researchers are going to want to keep their funding to their college from their corporate masters, and the knowledge is going to be given to the record companies to be used AGAINST the p2p networks.
It's one thing for the Industry to have legal sway to launch attacks... but I wonder if they realize the potential for retaliation that awaits them?
If the RIAA or another group knows more about how p2p works then everyone else they will have an advantage.
If other groups do research at least it will be a fair fight.
Maybe if looking at different types of attacks methods to protect against them will be found. If effective means can be found to validate requests this could go a long way to reducing all types of DOS attacks.
Attacking defending p2p networks is just a special case. This sort of research may be widely applicable.
Naah, tech defences are better. Who gives a shit about US laws? I mean, apart from Americans, and they've hardly been very successful in stopping legal attacks on free speech.
"Land of the free" indeed. You guys need a new slogan.
Fisrt off, I'm not even going to bother arguing about the copyright issues, that seems to be heading towards becoming a collorary to Goodwin's Law.
All I want to point out is that the analogy with the car cloner wasn't exactly fitting. After all, the people who have been copying cd's or software have never complained about it. It's the manufacturers who have a problem with it, and I do believe the auto companies would be quite upset if people stopped buying cars. (Of course, in such a scenario, all they would need to do would be to 'borrow' the car cloner and see if it works on large piles of cash....)
-Space for rent
How about five years in prison for propsing/implementing a copying/p2p technology? Or the threat of a huge $100000 fine?
Strangely mostly people will be put right off. And peer-to-peer requires a peer to peer to...
The man with the lone telephone has no-one to call...
---- The Open Source Record Label : : LOCARECORDS.COM
It seems the most vicious and lawful attacks are the ones that go _noticed. They also come along with large costs and could shut the whole network down. These attacks are from music industry and hollywoood based corporations. Not only that but they probably pay malicious hackers to carry out real attacks.
How to respond: find those loopholes and exploits in the legal system. Patch and re-open with a new and improved legal proof network. Continue the work at Stanford.
Analytic & algebraic topology of locally Euclidean meterization of infinitely differentiable Riemmanian manifold
Nothing will stand inbetween a geek and his porn.
Nothing like earning a Masters/Ph.D that has practical business application.
Tournament Management Online &
Can we classify P2P networks as Good and record companies as bad? Record companies want too much money for their music, that's bad (they're thieves). (most) People on (most) P2P networks are sharing this music (they're thieves). I think they're both bad....
Someone needs to come up with a network that has file-rights management that lets you literally *share* your music. Once every device is wireless, even with DRM, you can just own say 25 CDs, and you can allow them to be shared into the network, so long as you lose the right to listen to them as they're being played on someone else's device. Because you (currently) legally own the right to share it (ie, give it away temporarily, as you would a pressed CD), once you've listened to a song, it's released back into the system for someone else to borrow.
Basically, the system will allow you to legally borrow on a song by song basis. This should meet all current legal issues, because you will not be able to listen to a song while someone else is. But, because everyone doesn't listen to the same song at the same time, not everyone has to own every CD.
Even if DRM is implemented, there must be a way to transfer a file from device to device (assumably removing it from one device) This "system" will just facilitate that transfer on a temporary, song-by-song basis, and keep track of who permenently owns an individual song.
Think of it as a "universal library."
I would love to see the record companies try to find some problems with this. I think the supreme court would smack em on their collective asses.
Wireless+"True Sharing"+Lending Distributer = Totally legal way to screw the record companies.
Lobbying againt the right wing republicans and ashcroft is a good thing
That is your opinion, and you have every right to it. It just really bothers me when people say their opinions as facts that everyone else should acknowledge. Personally, I signed a petition showing my support for Ashcroft, which I would sign it again today if it was needed. He agrees with a lot of the things that I agree with. And, Yes, that is my opinion. The ACLU fights for the rights they believe in. Granted, not ever group can defend all of our rights. That is why you should support the group that most aligns with your own ideals. In my case, it would be the EFF, and Ashcroft. The two are made up of- and are people just like you and I. Just as we don't agree, in some cases, they don't either. Such is life.
visit my free wallpaper collection, wp.erasei.com
In the long term, the most that you can say about the proposed bill, and research into protecting p2p, is that it will simply turn into a technological arms-race.
That will continue indefinetly, the real answer is not to allow such a blatantly stupid and damaging bill to be passed, and if it is passed, to get it struck down as soon as possible. Passing the technological edge back and forward in a war between the media monopolies and their p2p opponents, might sound fun to some, but its not the real answer.
Anyone who considers arithmetical methods of producing random numbers is, of course, in a state of sin.-John von Neumann
Everyone knows that the ACLU is hardly an unbiased organization. They support the first amendment, but only to the extent that it doesn't impede their own leftist agenda. Meanwhile, other important rights, like self defense and religion, are ignored or even attacked.
Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
And, of course, Jack Valenti has known Pelosi throughout her career and reminds, "She makes sure that our highest priority is protection of copyrights."
Whenever I see his face, it just makes me think 'What a fucking tool'
http://www.house.gov/berman/
rofl. god i hope he hasn't 'contributed' to our gene pool..
That is why you should support the group that most aligns with your own ideals. In my case, it would be the EFF, and Ashcroft.
I support Eldred. Those who support AG Ashcroft are Sonny and Cher fans.
Will I retire or break 10K?
"which I would sign it again today if it was needed"
No comment required on the above. These are indeed Asscraft's constituents.
The above story describes a classic example of a technical fix for what is essentially a political problem. That congress would even consider a bill legalizing such nefarious activity on the part of a corporate elite speaks volumes about who these people in Washington really are. Though I do believe that the difference between Republicans and Democrats is only a matter of degree, I must say that Asscraft has taken political demagoguery to a level heretofore unknown since the invention of writing.
"Lobbying against the rightwing Republicans and Ashcroft is a good thing."
I would only amend this to say that "lobbying against the rightwing" politicians of whatever party "is a good thing." I would also dare to suggest that lobbying against leftwing politicians who have fallen under the charm of massive corporate campaign contributions to the extent that they support bozo legislation that can only lead to a technological spy-vs-spy series of escalating dirty tricks is a good thing.
Hic iacet Arthurus, rex quondam rexque futurus.
The RIAA needs to figure out that they can capitalize on the piracy, because whether pirating music is ethical or not, it's going to happen. I wouldn't be surprised to find out that the pre-release bootleg copies of The Eminem Show were really part of a stealth marketing campaign or something.
Eagles may soar, but weasles don't get sucked into jet engines...
"The P2P Piracy Prevention Act, proposed by Senator Howard Berman, is currently being redrafted following severe criticism and is not likely to be introduced in any form until January 2003 at the earliest."
So this basically means that it's being rewritten and filled with all sorts of terms that most of the people in the senate aren't familiar with, and that most of them could care less about. It's all about misdirection. People went up in arms about the original bill, because they understood what it was talking about. The redraft, will more than likely be the same identical document. The only difference between the two, is that the second will have 40 pages of filler information that is there to confuse and misdirect those reading it, so that it becomes more of a hassle to read and comprehend it, than to just pass it along. That's just my opinion anyway.
If you're looking here for something insightful or thought provoking, you're probably looking in the wrong place.
A republican is bitching because someone used that new, innovative (hint: it's only been around since the greeks, and they're probably just the first ones to write it down) rhetorical device of stating opinion as fact?
Pot. Kettle. Black.
"Land of the free" indeed. You guys need a new slogan.
Comrad, you need to report to a re-education camp.
Those who would give up liberty in exchange for security and DRM should switch to Microsoft Palladium!
By copying music or software, you are not stealing physical but intellectual stuff.
It's not cause a Ferrari is overpriced expensive that you have the right to steal him.
Anyway, music and software CD's are not expensive. I was used to pay 1000 of US $ for my MS Word 2.0 now it's only a few bucks for their latest version.
And you morons don't have a life so you are all not aware of something as inflation.
Almost everything was less expensive 30 years ago, including your welfare check. Now music CD's do have a lower price currently than 20 years ago and this while everything else is raised.
I'll explain it in moron-understandable language:
30 years ago you could buy 20 CD's with your welfare check
Present time you can buy 60 CD's with your welfare check.
Your welfare check increased, the price of CD's remained the same and even dropped.
Anyway, all those morons who think copying is cool, are now left with...Britney Spears !
Whahahaha.
If the government makes a law that says you can't use missiles to blow up other cars in traffic, then the engineers have to abide by that law, even if they have access to plenty of knowhow and missiles. If the engineers want to blow up traffic with their missiles, they have to lobby legislators.
Explain to me again why similar logic should not apply to these stanford computer scientists?
If they are indeed working on systems to which the law does not apply, then that's one thing. That's scientific progress and appropriate technology policy needs to be formulated. But trying to tell legislators "we know better than you" is immoral.
Competition (or oppression) has been known to improve the breed. It happened when they shut down Napster's servers, we don't need them anymore, and It'll happen again when we have to make it node sensing and again when we have to encrypt it and again.... BTW, anyone know why my Kazaa started crashing yesterday? ;^)
History will show this to be true. I just hope he doesn't do too much
damage while he is there.
Although outrageous sentences may make people wary for a time it will require convictions for the offence to turn people off completely. IMO even if found guilty of pirating the latest pop drivel a court would have a hard time sending someone to prison for it.
I joined them two days ago. With a credit
card, it is really easy to do and with a
>= USD 65 payment you even get a cool t-shirt
(well ok haven't seen it yet) and >= USD 100
a baseball cap. And an anonymizer trial
(6 months for = USD 100).
Anyone here actually making a living trying to code ways to bring down a P2P network?
I had no opinion of Ashcroft until the good people of Missouri, who presumable know him best, voted for a dead man instead of him.
If Slashdot were chemistry it would look like this:Cadaverine
Seriously, that is so perfect. I've not often seen a description of some people's desire for artificial scarcity put into words so eloquently. Thank you.
That your arguments make the (false) assumption that IP is valueless in all instances. Sure, the cost to copy digital information is (virtually) nothing, but that information itself has an inherent cost.
My brother is an independent recording artist. He's not signed to a label, but has a decent following. When he wants to produce a CD, the manufacture of tracks, mixing, engineering those tracks cost money. Hiring and paying engineers and additional musicians is not free. Even if you remove all barriers in distribution (ie distribute digitally; no record company) The actual recorded material has an inherent cost-- and therefore an inherent value.
While you're saying buzzwords like "rethinking the paradigms" perhaps you should be considering more than the distribution method.
While the most extreme of cyber-communists point to the open-source and free-software movements as an example of how "information should be free" They neglect to realize that the media created is a drop in the bucket compared to commercial software-- especially entertainment. Name one open source or free software game that can come close to competing with Grand Theft Auto or Age of Empires or Black and White or Resident Evil. They can't.
So, until the entire world becomes a communist state, where there is no money, and no motivation to work other than the betterment of mankind, (and this includes cleaning the toilets and laying the asphalt) people will be motivated by money, will need to be paid for their work, which will give an inherent value to IP.
I'll consider joining the EFF as soon as they stop considering getting in bed with gator. Any friend of those crooks is a public enemy.
How ya like dat?
The government cares more about shuting down distributed, encyrpted, p2p system, that provides anonymity more than they do ones that act as strictly a client-server model, such as napster. Why do I say this you ask, well it's simple, government's desire for control over the flow of infomation trumps out any over any other consideration. No amount of lobbying will help, joining ACLU or EFF is futile, government interest are too great. One only needs to look at their latest campaign finance law, to see how much they care for "the people". This war on terrorism, will be their excuse to shut down p2p's and demand complete control over the code on the internet, and people are so damn blined by lies that they will go along with it. Everyone with a brain knows that doing this will not help any anti-terrorism efforts, just as Jesus spoke in parables, so that people didn't see, the "terrorist" will use whatever architecture that the government lays down and just "say it in code".
Legislators make laws. Engineers build missiles.
The engineers also tell the legislators if their laws need adjusting
Explain to me again why similar logic should not apply to these stanford computer scientists?
The same logic does apply. There are no laws against p2p networks, so why shouldnt these standford computer scientists be free to build their "missiles" of p2p network defense.
If they are indeed working on systems to which the law does not apply, then that's one thing. That's scientific progress and appropriate technology policy needs to be formulated. But trying to tell legislators "we know better than you" is immoral.
The ability to tell legislators that "we know better then you" is a right given to us by the people that founded our country, which is sole reason why we still do have freedoms here in the US.
IMMORAL YOU SAY?? So was it immoral for the millions of people who basicly told legislators that that the people know better them them throughout our history to gain various rights we now take for granted today?
The goal of computer science is to build something that will last at least until we've finished building it.
"with their freedom lost all virtue lose" - Milton
Attach it to something that the administration really wants, like the bill that would make the tax cut permanent. Expect Berman to try this; it would be really hard for the Republicans to fail to pass a bill that made the tax cut permanent, and harder for Bush to veto it.
No, I will not join the ACLU. IMO, they're just leftist bigots instead of right wing ones.
The EFF, OTOH, is someone I believe people on both sides of the aisle can support and so I do support them.
and for a damn good reason. Do you really think that the p2p systems won't code an a way for these attacks to be tharwted? I think having unique rotating modules (like the one for apache that prevents ddos attacks) could be incorporated into p2p's, so when the IPDroids figure out how to attack one model, the p2p system would figure out it's "under attack" and switch to a different module.
NOTICE TO GOVERNMENTS AND IPDROIDS, YOUR EFFORT IS FUTILE, CODE IS LAW AND WEST COAST CODERS WILL ALWAYS WIN, BECAUSE THEIR DESIRE FOR FREEDOM, EXCEEDS YOUR DESIRE TO CONTROL!
"But trying to tell legislators "we know better than you" is immoral."
I think you mispelled "is..the whole point of a democracy". Or should we just we as we are told by our elders and betters? in which way does your idea differ from the pharoahs and kings of 2 thousand+ years ago?
why not attack these networks? I mean, they'll just get more resiliant that way, so in a sense, it's a good thing.
Lobbying againt the right wing republicans and ashcroft is a good thing
I don't think it's the republicans you have to worry about. The democrats have been the ones pushing this legislation. A couple recent examples including the p2p bill in question:
CBDTPA (Consumer Broadband and Digital Television Promotion Act) - Sponsored by Sen. Hollings (D-SC), co-sponsored by 4 other dems and one republican.
P2P Bill - Sponsered by Rep. Howard Berman (D-Cal)
Also take a look at how the Music/Movie industry spends their money. 17 of the top 20 recipients are Democrat.
TV/Movies/Music: Top 20 Recipients
Now who would you say is in the back pocket of the Movie/Music business?
Or maybe the engineers will just kill the legislators with their missiles and avoid the problem entirely. It's hard to pass laws when you're dead.
But trying to tell legislators "we know better than you" is immoral.
Yes, god forbid we should tell our elected representatives what we want them to do. Who the hell do we think we are? Citizens?
More importantly, Join the ACLU. The EFF has practices that unfortunetly go against practicality. The ACLU is an old and established group that fights for our rights. They do fight for our first amendment rights anywhere, including on the web. Lobbying againt the right wing republicans and ashcroft is a good thing
I belong to both. I first joined the ACLU, but then I noticed that while they do alot of excellent work, they get alot of their money and support from wealthy people in the media industries. It therefore seemed there were certain issues, relating to copyrights and intellectual property, for which the EFF seemed more aligned with my interests.
I think both are excellent organizations.
-- p
Here's a proposal that I put up a while ago on Slashdot for preventing malicious nodes from attacking the network (and for preventing "fake shares", etc).
I've also put up a few proposals for avoiding the "download slot saturation" attacks that the RIAA/MPAA was originally considering.
It's too bad that P2P people don't have a centralized forum for the discussion of this. Sure, groups like the GDF are good, but a lot of these ideas would be useful to multiple P2P groups, and everyone would benefit from a more attack-resistant, less exploitable network.
May we never see th
Can we classify P2P networks as Good and record companies as bad?
Answer: Yes.
People on (most) P2P networks are sharing this music (they're thieves).
People are just doing what they do. People want to listen to music. P2P provides it at acceptable cost vs. the RIAA.
People used to enjoy free music on this thing called Radio. But that has been corrupted, and it seems to not be enjoyed so much.
I think they're both bad....
Did you know that not watching television commercials is stealing. The people who skip the commercials, and the people who make them: I think they're both bad.
They are not thieves. They are copyright infringers. This is not the same thing as if I take your television set.
Thieves? Yep, I'm depriving the artist of a few cents, and the record company executives of a new sports car. I feel so baaaad!
The RIAA is a victim of their own monopoly pricing. (Or more properly cartel or perhaps oligarchy, I'm not an econ major.) They are the victim of their own making every bit as much as Microsoft is with Open Source. On at least two occaisions the RIAA has gotten into trouble for price fixing.
Open source in its modern form probably would have never emerged if a thriving competitive rich software environment existed with reasonable prices, as is the case with computer hardware. Do you think Napster would have emerged if everyone was happily buying reasonably priced music without any arm twisting? (No "album filler".)
(OT: I have a friend who laments how open source hurts Microsoft. I just tell him that Open Source is of Microsoft's own making.)
The people are revolting. The Boston tea party! Those thieves! Stealing the king's tea and dumping it into the river. Refusing to pay the tax. Refusing to comply and be subjugated. Changing culture to do away with tea drinking, and do away with "tea time" in America. The gall!
They are worse then thieves. They are terrorists! They took up arms against the king's soldiers.
Maybe everything isn't quite as black and white as seen through idealistic niave eyes.
Naaah! Nevermind.
P2P users are thieves, not copyright infringers, and should get the full punishment of any thief. Or maybe it is good that the crime of copyright infringement should have a much stiffer jail time than, say robbing a convenience store, after all copyright infringers are thieves of the worst kind!
Those who would give up liberty in exchange for security and DRM should switch to Microsoft Palladium!
Of course, the ACLU fight blindly for the constitution, which can be a dangerous thing.
The constitution in and of itself is by no means a perfect document, and fighting blindly for it...
I'll pass on this one and opt for common sense instead.
Good gods, Max Baucus is on the list? Would someone like to explain to me how contributions from big media have anything to do with the interests of the citizens of *Montana*??!
~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
If you pay me a million dollars for a can of Mt.Dew the inherent value of that can of Mt.Dew isn't one million dollars. It may be worth that to YOU, but it is not inherently worth anything. Ditto for your CD.
Seems to me the good people at Stanford should be worried about being sued or thrown in jail, since they came up with some cool new technology that could be construed to circumvent copyrights... (yes, I'm rolling my eyes right now, but in a half serious way.)
The rare/indie/hard-to-find stuff I make sure I share, because I knew how much trouble I went to trying to get it. So then there will at least be one more node with it
Romeo & Juliet for 1337 hax0rz! http://www.redcoat.net/pics/romjul.swf
It is rather a sad state of affairs when university researchers are actively working to circumvent a (potential) new law. The government should really be wondering if this new law is a good thing, when a major, well-respected university is already fighting it!
I could give a crap if this is considered simplistic trollbait, but the FACT that minorities and women overwhelmingly vote Democrat year after year proves I'm on the right side. Sure maybe they are all lemmings, but to completely buy that argument you would need to believe that women and minorities just aren't intelligent enough to be able go decide which party best represents them. Personally I don't buy that and think women and minorities sure as shit know which party represents them, and which party wants to kick them to the side of the road.
As far the guy above admitting he supports
Asscraft, well lets just say anyone who supports a strong central authority who wants to invade every nook and cranny of my privacy is not on the same side as me.
Isn't that the kicker though? The Republicans for all their "less government in our lives mantra" sure are hell bent on not only telling everyone what they can and can't do to their body, but they want a MASSIVE government agency perpetually monitor our personal space as well.
I could go on and on why I'm shocked why anyone but white farmers with no exposure to minorities vote Republican, but suffice to say the "every man for himself/less taxes for the ultra wealthy" doctrine that the Republicans offer up year after year disgusts me. We live in a Community and for better or worse are "all stuck in this together". The sooner we all start realizing that and work on things like Full national health-care and tax laws which benefits more than the wealthiest citizens(elimination of capital gains and inheritance tax anyone?) the better off we will ALL be.
Its not like the Democrats are some perfect party who never sell out or aren't tagging along with some of Bush's proposals (what do you mean we have to support some of this crazy homeland security stuff to get reelected?), but when push comes to shove I'll take the party that better supports women, minorities, non-Christians, and in general the labor class.
You Republicans are now free to accuse me of waging class warfare, but remember your the ones whose policies encourge it.
If you wanna get rich, you know that payback is a bitch
It reminds me of the opposition to the war. All these left wing democrats were attacking Republicans while it was the Republicans, not the Democrats, who were often the ones raising the difficult questions.
I will be honest. I hate knee jerk party politics. Those who say "ACLU no matter what" or "Democrat no matter what" or "Republican no matter what" or what ever really irritate the hell out of me. It turns politics into a debate about what team you are on rather than an effective discussion of ideas and their implementation. As soon as someone falls into those categories I'm almost always inclined to tune them out because I know all I'll hear are strawmen designed to help their team. It's like a pep rally from High School. "Go team go!"
Damn. What happened to politics being about effective service.
I can think of lots of rights that the ACLU doesn't fight for. If you worry about your rights, work with all sides and try to see all perspectives.
Now who would you say is in the back pocket of the Movie/Music business?
I would say both parties are, as is the case with any large business. Otherwise, why aren't more repubs opposing this indefensible legislation?
However, to the extent that it makes sense to differentiate between the parties, all the blame for the next two years' hideous legislation can be placed on the GOP, as they now control the entire federal government.
Just trying to open someone's head! I mean "mind!" Open someone's mind, um, to the possibilities! With explosives!
Al-Akhwan Jihad Academy,
South Kandahar,
Afghanistan
Salary:
free religious training & Stock Options in Heavenly pleasures (cashable upon death - shaheed)
Special perk: **FREE AK-47**
A caveman dreams of being us, the incalculable power and riches. We dream of being Q, then what?
-Craig
Corollary to Clarke's Third Law: Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced.
... Look at what happened to Prohibition
The people have the Right to refuse to comply with laws, otherwise Prohibiton would still be in effect. That's why jails are nice and comfortable - because nice people end up there too like Kevin Mitnick and the DeCSS guy.
Police even put gay people in prison just for being gay, WHY DO YOU THINK WARFTP WAS WRITTEN? Here's why. The rest of the gory details are buried elsewhere on his site.
A caveman dreams of being us, the incalculable power and riches. We dream of being Q, then what?
If RIAA attacks P2P networks with the stated intention of protecting their copyright, wouldn't systems for countering that specific threat be in violation of the DMCA?
It would seem defensible if it were framed as an effort to make P2P more robust in general, but to describe it as a hedge against actions of the copyright holders, IMHO, opens them up for some serious deep-pocket litigation.
Tell that to the people of Missouri. In 2000 they voted for a man three weeks dead (Gov. Mel Carnahan) rather than elect John Ashcroft to the Senate. To quote a recent episode of The West Wing, sometimes "there are worse things than being dead."
~Idarubicin
While a cloning machine might work very well with physical things, such as cars or food, ect. When it comes to intellectual property, if you allow people to clone it for free, your neighbor for example, you are not only hurting the company, you are hurting yourself in the long run. By allowing people to copy that property, you take money from the pockets of the artists who produce it, and if they are unable to support themselves by making their art (music, movies, etc) then they are better off finding another job. Once they quit their jobs as artists you wont have any new art to enjoy, and isnt it funny how much we appreciate new art and we take it for granted that it will be produced? If you believe I'm being unreasonable, look at Russia. Before it bacame a communist state, it had one of the richest cultures in the world and had many artists which produced beutiful works of art. But once Russia became a communist state, all motivation to produce was taken away and very, very little came out of communist Russia as a result. Is that what you want? This is why it IS COOL that these companies/artists do have an inherent right to exist.
"There's no way to rule innocent men. The only power any government has is the power to crack down on criminals."
You're just pissed 'cause the whole technological world is fighting over something your country didn't invent.
Computers, america.
movies, america.
mpeg encoding, america.
networking, america.
P2P networks, america.
IP NETWORKING, US Navy
THE GOD DAMN INTERNET, america.
Wouldn't it be nice if the world was still fighting over silk, or tea, or spices?
"Prediction: within 10 years, Windows will be a Linux distribution." Me, 7-6-2016
Right... So you agreed with effectively signing away your fourth ammendment rights?
Keep in mind the ACLU gets lots of $$ from the entertainment industry and wealthy individuals who made their fortunes in this industry. While they (these contributors) have a vested interested in keeping Hollywood censor-free, it would be amusing to see the wiggling if the ACLU ever came fully out in favor of defending P2P.
Not that the ACLU is a bad organization, just helps to keep a perspective sometimes
If your children ever found out how lame you are, they'd murder you in your sleep
I believe the DMCA only applies to circumventing encryption used for copy protection.
It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
At least one prominent board member/fundraiser for the influential Southern California chapter of the ACLU has publicly advocated *any* measure, technological or legal, that impedes casual IP replication. This is a chapter whose primary benefici*cough* donor list reads almost verbatim from the MPAA and RIAA member lists. Given that this important part of ACLU administration and financing is supportive of DRM and DMCA-style tactics, it's likely that any effort by the ACLU to defend our rights will, in this instance, be half-hearted or non-existant (read: it's not a Bill of Rights issue, we don't care).
Now, do you really want to give your money to the ACLU for issues like these?
Notice that I wrote "in this instance". The ACLU does some good work. However, they tend to get very timid where the profits of Hollywood are concerned.
The ACLU has shown about ZERO interest in standing up on any Internet issue that doesn't involve, say, installing filtering software on library computers that kids use.
The ACLU didn't speak up strongly against the DMCA. They still don't. They didn't speak up against the SSSCA or CBDTPA. They seem to be almost completely unaware of, or unconcerned about, the Copyright Clause and First Amendment and other implications of such things.
The EFF may not be as organized as ACLU, and they don't always have a clue, but at least they're wandering in the right direction.
Your post is getting slightly OT. I think it might be worth reminding you that Berman is a Democrat and that the vast majority of the Hollywood/Entertainment industry are Democrats as well.
As for Ashcroft, and the rest of the republicans, they follow big money just as much as the Democrats.
Again, support the EFF.
"Teachers leave us kids alone
I do not believe that art will quit being created as soon as the artist loses the "incentive" to create. Creation is its own incentive, as any artist out there will tell you. Will the Britney Spears and N'Syncs of the world disappear... maybe, but I bet we still even have quite a few pop stars left. They just won't be controlled by record companies anymore.
How many artists died destitute only to be posthumously considered some of the greatest of all time? Edgar Allen Poe comes to mind, as does Emily Dickinson. Real artists with a passion to create will create, and those that are good will get played by radio and develop cult followings and sell concert tickets. How much airplay does Phish get, and how do their concerts sell? On basically no airplay they sell out huge shows. Pearl Jam has had little radio attention for years, but they have a following because their talent shows. This is the future of music. Record companies are only delaying the inevitable.