Slashdot Mirror


Kite Aerial Photography

SethJohnson writes "People have been attaching cameras to kites for quick-and-dirty aerial photographs for almost a hundred years. Hobbyists have progressed the art far beyond it's quick-and-dirty origins to produce stunning results. NASA even has a fairly detailed how-to using a disposable camera. Looks like a fun science fair project for those dads out there with kids."

85 of 183 comments (clear)

  1. Quick and dirty! by the_other_one · · Score: 4, Funny

    Over the nudist beach!

    --
    134340: I am not a number. I am a free planet!
    1. Re:Quick and dirty! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Seriously, this sounds like an incredible boon for the paparazzi.

      Surely it's much less obtrusive than hiding in the bushes. Plus it must give you a far better chance of getting away from any nearby bodyguards should they realize what it is that you're up to.

    2. Re:Quick and dirty! by rmohr02 · · Score: 2

      Wide-angle or zoom lens?

    3. Re:Quick and dirty! by the_other_one · · Score: 4, Funny

      Both

      1. Wide angle for targeting

      2. Zoom lens for...

      --
      134340: I am not a number. I am a free planet!
    4. Re:Quick and dirty! by the+way,+what're+you · · Score: 3, Funny

      2. Zoom lens for... sausages?

      --
      example.org - powered by Linux!
    5. Re:Quick and dirty! by augros · · Score: 5, Funny

      Wouldn't that be kite aerial pornography?

    6. Re:Quick and dirty! by fyonn · · Score: 4, Informative

      Wide-angle or zoom lens

      while I've never done KAP, I have flown kites before (ie, big kites) and you need quite a big kite to hoist a decent camera. the reason disposables are so often used is because a) they're cheap and b) they're light.

      the kind of camera's that have zoom lenses are heavy beggars, and how do you control the zoom? wires? remote control? thats all more weight. now a big power/traction ktie can carry alot but it's hardly secure.

      with a light camera you can tie it down so that as long as you keep the kite steady then it should be good. with a heavier parcel then the weight will be harder to tie down as although a bi kite can undoubtedly take the weight, it's all concentrated in one spot which is bad news for a parawing style kite.

      you can of course use something like a big delta too, but they are harder to carry around.

      I'm no expert a KAP though, I have to admit, I did some reading on it a few years ago but never tried it. some of the KAP images I've seen in the last have been pretty stunning though.

      dave

      PS. current kites: pbsk warrior and VP (favourite 2 line kites ever flown), spirit of air omega xs, elliot ekko 2.8, revolution EXP (would love a speed series one day, esp if resailed by peter betancourt), a nice Rok and a few others

    7. Re:Quick and dirty! by plover · · Score: 2
      while I've never done KAP, I have flown kites before (ie, big kites) and you need quite a big kite to hoist a decent camera. the reason disposables are so often used is because a) they're cheap and b) they're light.

      How about c) they're disposable.

      I have a team Hawaiian (well over a pound) that would seriously cause injury to any victim standing beneath it in a power dive. And it has shown that it is perfectly capable of dragging my 200+ pound butt across a plowed field.

      While I believe it would have no problem hoisting my old Pentax with its hefty ancient Tamron zoom lens (3 pounds total camera+lens weight) I'm not sure I'd want to risk either damage to the camera or to any innocent bystander if either should decide they suddenly want to drop from the sky.

      Also, if I were to duct-tape some kind of jury-rigged timer to a camera, it'd be nice if someone else had to clean off the duct-tape glue when I was done with it. :-)

      --
      John
  2. nifty! by MoceanWorker · · Score: 4, Funny

    now all i need are a couple of hot models to move in next door and sun bathe naked for test objects and i'll be good to go!!

    oh wait.. that's the whole purpose of my roof ;-)

    plus it's november.. so i guess i better put this idea off..

    --


    "The ones who dont do anything are always the ones who try to pull you down" -- Henry Rollins
    1. Re:nifty! by Rolo+Tomasi · · Score: 5, Funny

      You know, there's a thin line between "Score:5, Funny" and "Score:-1, Pervert".

      --
      Did you know you can fertilize your lawn with used motor oil?
    2. Re:nifty! by MoceanWorker · · Score: 2

      heh.. i just got all "excited" when i read this article..

      wait.. that didn't sound right..

      --


      "The ones who dont do anything are always the ones who try to pull you down" -- Henry Rollins
    3. Re:nifty! by ayjay29 · · Score: 4, Funny

      No wonder geeks have a hard time getting laid...

      Model 1: We've been here nearly an hour. I'd have thought he'd have poped round to introduce himself. Whats he up to?

      Model 2: It's hard to tell, he's running round franticly trying to fix something with a bin bag, some sticks and a piece of string.

      Model 1: Just our luck, we've moved in next door to a System Adminidtrator.

      --
      Offtopic, Inflammatory, Inappropriate, Illegal, or Offensive comments might be moderated up.
  3. Return Policy... by Quaoar · · Score: 5, Funny

    I have a feeling many cameras will be returned to the store for "spontaneously fragmenting."

    --
    I'll form my OWN solar system! With blackjack! And hookers!
  4. Re:Oh yeah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    you mean areola photos?

  5. I've done it... it's easy by AntiPasto · · Score: 5, Informative
    Check out my house! This was done with the LASS system... VERY satisfying hobby, and I encourage more to do it! Kite stability (an oxymoron for those who fly kites, as the fun is that they go all over) is really key. The line has a lot of vibration, and it can be scary seeing your investment bobbing around in the sky, or heading for the ground!

    Those along waterfronts know that daily patterns of onshore and offshore breezes can aid in getting good wind.

    Brooks Leffler pioneered the art with a magazine (!!!) that he still has back issues of. He even sells stabilizing tails. The most stunning pictures in my opinion have been by the vastly-experienced Chris Benton... he inspired my finally getting into this. $100 for the kite, $80 for the camera, $100 radio+misc, and you're up and going.

  6. balloons? by orangeaaron · · Score: 2, Interesting

    how about a timer-controlled camera on a helium balloon. it could take a picture every 10 seconds or something... the only tricky part would be getting the camera back after it had floated off. maybe you could promise whoever found it that you would send them reprints :)

    1. Re:balloons? by AntiPasto · · Score: 2

      A lot of people use ballons (or blimps) for similar low-altitude pictures. Helicopters and remote control airplanes... whatever coincides with your other hobbies ;p

  7. Scary by dolo666 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I don't want to think about all the lawsuits that could arise from a curious kid with a camera on a kite! *shudder*

    1. Re:Scary by jimson · · Score: 3, Funny

      .....*shudder*

      You mean shutter......

    2. Re:Scary by dolo666 · · Score: 2

      STOP THE PRESSES!
      Every movie star in the world should move to Finland! Safe haven from the public eye! :)

  8. dad ==> kid by the+way,+what're+you · · Score: 5, Funny
    ...for those dads out there with kids.

    As opposed to... ?

    --
    example.org - powered by Linux!
  9. Sounds all well and good... by Rayonic · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...but how will all those cameras affect Charlie Brown's kite-eating tree? I'd imagine they're not too healthy.

    Okay, that wasn't funny. It's late. Night night.

  10. Introducing.... by tevenson · · Score: 4, Funny

    Remember when you used to play wargames as a kid? Now you can do it with your very own Spy Satellite.

    "Now you'll know all of your enemies moves; where they're keeping the water ballon stash, how many they have, and if that teenage girl in the house across the street is sun bathing topless again."

    1. Re:Introducing.... by Tablizer · · Score: 2

      Remember when you used to play wargames as a kid?

      Yeah, my big brother always made *me* be the grenade. I especially hated it when he pulled my "pin" out.

  11. Estes Rocket by SirCrashALot · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There is/was an estes rocket that did this. Two of my friends had them... One never recovered the rocket(typical of our launches) and the other pictures came out great!
    It's not as controlled as a kite, but you get great landscape pictures.

    1. Re:Estes Rocket by AntiPasto · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I looked into these, radio controlled airplanes, and others. Kites are a) very cool b) very broad in design c) what spawned aircraft. It's also fairly cheap combined with the amount of control. You can go up to SLR cameras (any may do) and I've seen enough sadness in my dad's RC plane buddies to know that losing a plane *and* a camera would be devistating. Kites of course need wind, and in lack of wind there's always balloons, but I felt in my study of all of this that it was less risky than other low-altitude photography.

    2. Re:Estes Rocket by UniverseIsADoughnut · · Score: 2

      I had one of those as well. It did a good job. Really need to find the pictures. I still have the rocked all ready to go. It's been launched a few times. I forget the details about it since this was ages ago. I seam to remember the film being some wacky formate, so that could be a problem.

      Ah yes model rockets, experaince being nasa. they explode, go off course, don't work, catch a breeze and go a mile off course. get the wings on wrong the spiral at you. shoot them with the wind at 45degrees and never see them again. Also the branch hobby from this rocket powered anything else. Rocket boats were fun. Those engine work under water to. Seeing your boat go under water and a glow then pop up out of the water like a missile from a sub is fun to.

    3. Re:Estes Rocket by MsWillow · · Score: 2
      Actually, Estes used to make a movie camera called the "Cineroc". You can see both of them here.

      I always wanted them both, but never had the cash. By the time I had the cash, they were gone :(

      --

      Lemon curry?
  12. Scenario 46 by Tablizer · · Score: 2

    "Okay, I'm getting a signal now. Wait. Is this a screen-saver image?
    It looks like an under-water sce.......DAMN!"

  13. Kite are advancing by stonezone · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Kites have become the sport of choice lately, not only with photography, but with wakeboarders, surfers and skiers. Take a look at the popularity of kitesurfing on water and snow. Kites have evolved a long way in 20 years, from paragliders, to leading edge inflatables that relaunch when you drop them in the water.I have heard that guys are getting 50m high and 30sec air on skis now in the alps, and here in hawaii, kitsurfing in the winter surf is pretty nuts. Guys around here have been flying kites over the waves to take photos for at least 5 years, although rarely.

    huh?

  14. We don't need no stinkin' kite! by AmigaAvenger · · Score: 5, Interesting
    We've sent our little 35mm's up to 112,000 feet! try that with a kite!

    High Alt Balloon Group

    1. Re:We don't need no stinkin' kite! by AmigaAvenger · · Score: 3, Informative

      It is entirely a hobby for us, everyone is 100% volunteering for it, most of us do it for the thrill of the chase! (imagine the Twister scene, looks about the same...) We do carry scientific missions also, most recently upper atmosphere mercury sampling.

      Wind doesn't matter too much, the balloon isn't tethered, and has gps and radio telemetry on it for recovery. EVERY package except for #1 has been recovered, and that one was more of a platform test/throwaway anyway.

    2. Re:We don't need no stinkin' kite! by mstyne · · Score: 2

      At the risk of a -1 Redundant, thanks for the link. That was really interesting and very cool. And ... on topic!! Surely this spells the end of Slashdot!

      --
      mstyne: real name, no gimmicks
    3. Re:We don't need no stinkin' kite! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative
      It's not the altitude that is important in KAP. Most practitioners of KAP fly well under 500 feet and the really interesting pictures are taken below 200 feet. As KAPers we are not trying to take pictures that can be used for geological surveys, but pictures that show objects and scenes from an unusual perspective. The majority of KAPers are use KAP to produce artistically pleasing photographs, some have even won photography contests competing against ground-based photographers.

      For those not interested in KAP for its artistic merits, KAP is being used in archeology, in the earth sciences as a supplement to satellite images to resolve finer details, to help study plant and animal habitats, and as a tool for crime scene investigators.

      KAP is definitely a nerdy endevour. For the most part all equipment is made by hand and involves a modest level of mechanical and electronic skills

      David Hunt
      Editor, KAPER

  15. You sexist pig! by updog · · Score: 2

    Looks like a fun science fair project for those dads out there with kids.

    What about all all of those moms out there with kids? Are they not allowed to geek it out too?

  16. Re:dad + mom == kid [various] by MacAndrew · · Score: 2

    How about moms?

    You didn't say "dads with sons" so presumably being old and female is the handicap? I went to school down the road from MIT and met plenty of women gifted with the geeky arts. ;-)

  17. how about X10 by lingqi · · Score: 5, Funny

    real-time video feed from kite

    sure is a lot cheaper than a remote control helicopter. =)

    --

    My life in the land of the rising sun.

    1. Re:how about X10 by AntiPasto · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yup! They do it too! ... of course not x10 specifically, but still cool. What is nice is using video through the view finder (or close thereof) to get better still photos from the camera on the rig.

    2. Re:how about X10 by Rolo+Tomasi · · Score: 4, Interesting

      This guy has some interesting info & footage.

      --
      Did you know you can fertilize your lawn with used motor oil?
    3. Re:how about X10 by fthomas64 · · Score: 2, Funny

      That's a great idea! But... how do I learn more about X10 products? I sure wish they had advertisements that showed up while I was browsing the web. Curses!

  18. Re:dad == kid by scott1853 · · Score: 3, Funny

    As opposed to... ?

    A pimp-daddy.

    You know the pirates around here do some slave trading on the weekends. Gotta supplement the ol' VCD business in order to support that luxurious case-modder lifestyle with the $400 a month video card habit.

  19. And I thought they could get a patent by wiresquire · · Score: 2, Funny

    for the predator BTW, I wonder if anyone's attached an Hellfire to a kite?

    --

    So does Anonymous Coward have good karma?

  20. Don't you mean... by Eric_Cartman_South_P · · Score: 3, Funny
    *shutter* ?

    1. Re:Don't you mean... by dolo666 · · Score: 2

      For a split second I thought I had mixed them up. *THEN* I got it. :)

      You made me open word and check the damn thesaurus!

      *shutter* [sic(k)]

  21. Interesting Rigging for Stability by AntiPasto · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Most interesting is the rigging! This suspention reduces flopping about as the whole thing would have to lift and spin to tip sideways. Ingenious! Although, a very old idea...

  22. From a kite flyer by MxTxL · · Score: 5, Informative

    I run a kite site and am fanatical about the sport, so i should hope to have a little authority on the subject. While i haven't done any KAP myself, i've read extensively on the subject. There are some amazing photos coming back from people lofting cameras on their kites. There is also some interesting tech going into the works too. I've seem plans for radio controlled microcontrollers that will depress the camera trigger, hold it till a beep for the camera to focus, then press the trigger harder to take the photo. There are setups using small video cameras and transmitters that allow the user to see what he's about to take a photo of. There are a bunch of pan-rotate-zoom setups using servos and the like. It's mostly R/C tech, but still quite cool.

    My fav site for KAP is here.
    My website (in sig) doesn't have much for KAP resources, but it is useful to look at to see some of the other spiffy stuff.

    By the way, the kite obelisk folks are still at it, planning an even bigger lift, and with period materials. Should be exciting, but I don't have the full scoop, they are keeping it quiet until they pull it off.

    1. Re:From a kite flyer by MxTxL · · Score: 2

      For those of you who don't remember the kite obelisk project, slashdot has run a couple of stories about it. It's basically an idea that ancient egyptians *could* have used kites to do some of their heavy lifting for them.

  23. Kite photography at my High School by nkrumm · · Score: 3, Interesting

    At my high school (http://rhs.seattleschools.org) we have an after school club that builds rigs for kite arial photography. The trick is making the rig lightweight, yet strong enough that it doesnt suddenly snap 500 ft above the surface. Our mentor will be traveling to Antarctica this winter, and he will be taking a few of the rigs we have built. The Drachen Foundation has more info.

  24. Re:dad == kid by Rolo+Tomasi · · Score: 4, Funny
    As opposed to... ?

    Dads whose kids were killed by 40 pound kites with sharp metal parts attached falling out of the sky.

    --
    Did you know you can fertilize your lawn with used motor oil?
  25. What camera would you suggest attaching? :) by timothy · · Score: 2

    I see this one (the tiny l'espion camera), but see no supplier in the U.S. (anyone know of one?), which appears inexpensive and very light (40 grams!).

    There's also the SiPix StyleCam Blink, which is about $40, and slightly larger but takes higher-res pictures, too.

    What other tiny ones would be suitable for tossing on a kite (whether or not the two I've named would be), and what would be the best way to trigger them?

    timothy

    --
    jrnl: http://tinyurl.com/c2l8yr / foes: http://tinyurl.com/ckjno5
    1. Re:What camera would you suggest attaching? :) by MxTxL · · Score: 4, Informative

      While it's a good idea to keep things light, it's not the over-riding factor. The kites being used for KAP are usually capable of lifting considerable weights. There are quite a few kites out there (in the $300 or more price range) that need about 250-300 pounds of sand anchors to be safely operated. I've heard of large inflatable show kites that will pull two dumpsters full of sand across the beach.

      As for control, it's all R/C servos. It can be done with as little as one servo to pull the trigger but most people like to be able to at least pan some, so that's another servo. There are also some triggers out there that are just timer based... you set the timer, and hope you can get the rig up to altitude and pointing at the target by the time the trigger goes off... not flexible, but cheap and effective.

  26. Re:dad == kid by the+way,+what're+you · · Score: 2

    the way, what're you goin' didactic on yo ass!

    --
    example.org - powered by Linux!
  27. 'earth from above' by Jean-Pierre · · Score: 2, Interesting

    yann arthus-bertrand's absolutely tremendous photography was on display in chicago late this summer. yann took his images from a helicopter so i can imagine they are a bit more costly than its little brother kite. these images are nothing short of amazing.

    chicago department of cultural affairs: earth from above
    elexon presents: earth from above
    fujifilm presents: earth from above
    yann arthus-bertrand

  28. Pencam - much smaller, lighter, and easier by pm · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I attach a small, cheap, 1.3MP digital Pencam to my R/C planes for aerial shots. Aiptek makes a 1.3MP "pencam" that weighs about 50grams. (without batteries) that works pretty well. The pictures out of the CMOS sensor and the cheap lens aren't as nice as conventional photographs - even from disposable cameras - but you can take a lot of them, and the really bad ones don't cost anything to develop.

    The camera is ~US$60-70 at Walmart and Circuit City.

    The official Pencam web site

    And a picture taken with my pencam from my R/C plane

  29. Re:Penguin kites by MxTxL · · Score: 2
  30. If only my kites would fly... by Blimey85 · · Score: 3, Interesting
    This sounds like a great idea. I've done something similar using model rockets but had pretty lousy results. With model rockets there is exhaust vapors that you have to contend with and since the camera was aimed down the tube, most of the picture was blurry/smokey. I have two kites and I could mount a camera on either one pretty easy as they both have strong frames.. the only problem is that I've no success getting them to fly. Either it hasn't been windy enough or I'm doing something wrong.

    I used to fly kites a lot as a kid (was also when I did the model rocket photography) and never had a problem but now that I have these so called stunt kites, all that I'm ever able to do is a nose dive.

    The more I think about this, the more I like the idea though. If I get a better kite (that's a lot easier to fly and requires less wind), and I use a small wireless camera transmitting to my laptop, I wonder what kind of images I could get... could be quite impressive.

    How come all of the good ideas involving the outdoors seem to come around when the rainy season hits? I live in Seattle and the rainy season is upon us... I'll have to wait until the beach has some people worth photographing and then I'll give this a try. What's a very cheap wireless camera that can survive slamming into the ground repeatedly when the kite crashes? Any ideas?

    --
    How is it that one careless match can start a forest fire, but it takes a whole box to start a campfire?
    1. Re:If only my kites would fly... by MxTxL · · Score: 3, Interesting

      If you are having trouble, you are in luck living where you do. There are a large number of kite flyers living in Washington state. One of the best stunt kite makers are based out of Seattle. There are quite a few kite flyers in that area and an active kite club as well. These people will be more than happy to help you figure out what you are doing wrong, and better yet, will lend you there kites... the best of friends.

  31. De-Classified by Grip3n · · Score: 5, Funny

    Looks like NASA has finally declassified it's old 1960's reconnaissance techniques...

    --
    To make a pun demonstrates the highest understanding of a language
  32. cheap form of air reconassance? by SystematicPsycho · · Score: 3, Funny

    don't laugh, some 3rd world countries are using this technique for air reconassance.

    In modern countries, ppl are using it to spy on there neighbors. Must we wait before there is a kiteonacamera.com ? "Kites flown over hollywood celebrities residences, 100% legal. For $5.95 a month you can have 24hr aerial vision of a hollywood supermodels".

    --
    Analytic & algebraic topology of locally Euclidean meterization of infinitely differentiable Riemmanian manifold
    1. Re:cheap form of air reconassance? by MxTxL · · Score: 3, Informative

      Even first world countries have long used kites for reconaissance. A lot of kiting development has taken place for military applications. Check this page for more details.

  33. LOL! Mod this UP as Funny by Mustang+Matt · · Score: 2
    --
    The man who trades freedom for security does not deserve nor will he ever receive either. - Benjamin Franklin
  34. Obligatory feminist gripe... by g33kgirl · · Score: 5, Funny

    Looks like a fun science fair project for those dads out there with kids.

    *ahem* And moms. :p

    --
    You don't have to be the person you've become.
    1. Re:Obligatory feminist gripe... by SethJohnson · · Score: 2

      Totally deserved gripe. Sorry about excluding the moms out there. I got caught up in the reference after reading the Charles Benton's site (linked in the original post) where he talks about building a KAP rig for his son's science fair project. I know a lot of moms are out there also doing their children's science fair projects for them. They're just as guilty as the dads. I thought it was pretty ironic that Benton was essentially doing his son's science fair project and he's a professor of Architecture @ UC Berkeley! No knock on him, though. He did a tremendous job on his site and is an accomplished Kite Aerial Photographer.
  35. Predator kite by Cheese+Cracker · · Score: 2

    Maybe the military would be interested if you just add a bomb under it and have a longer wire.

  36. Slippery slope! by DEBEDb · · Score: 2

    Omigod, slippery slope! Quick, someone
    call ACLU! Who knows how long until they
    start using kites with cameras
    to snoop on everybody!

    (In ye olde days, an obFUD would be included
    here. So it is, by implication :)

    --

    Considered harmful.
  37. Photos for slide rules by gafferted · · Score: 2

    Note that Charles Benton (The guy who runs the first site listed) is offering a particular geeky barter: exchanging photos for slide rules)

  38. Don't forget rockets! by NerveGas · · Score: 3, Interesting

    There are also plenty of people who take pictures and/or videos from high-power rockets as well - and I'm not talking about the cheap Estes camera rockets. The preferred way to get still-shots is to use a decent-enough "point-and-shoot" with auto-advance, and wire a timer to the contacts of the button which takes the picture, although others use a servo to actuate the button, like this example.

    It seems like even more people take videos, however - everything from a tiny "X10"-style camera with a transmitter to the full monty, where multiple digital video cameras are mounted inside the rockets. One of the founders of Xircom, Dirk Gates, has some very high-quality DV videos of his rocket flights at http://gbrocketry.com/movie_theater.htm.

    --
    Oh, you're not stuck, you're just unable to let go of the onion rings.
  39. dads can have no kids by SethJohnson · · Score: 2


    A dad can have children which are not kids. My dad has no kids because I am now 33 years old. My dad has no kids, and therefore, has no science fair project responsibilities. I agree with the other posters that I shouldn't have excluded the moms out there from science fair responsibilities. Sorry, moms.
    1. Re:dads can have no kids by MacAndrew · · Score: 2

      No, worse: her "baby" ;-)

      I've met no small number of people in their 30's and older whom many would classify as a child. (Me too.)

      Don't you just hate smart-alecks who go running for the dictionaries right about now? Well, I'm not like that, I...

      kid

      n 1: a young person of either sex (between birth and puberty); "she writes books for children"; "they're just kids"; "`tiddler' is a British term for youngsters" [syn: child, youngster, minor, shaver, nipper, small fry, tiddler, tike, tyke, fry, nestling] ... 3: a human offspring (son or daughter) of any age; ...

  40. Photoplane by mirko · · Score: 2

    There's also Photoplane who published similar works (taken from a motorized model plane) on GNUArt.net

    --
    Trolling using another account since 2005.
  41. Good business idea... by ctar · · Score: 2

    This hobby could pay for itself. People like having photos of their houses from the sky; especially rich people with nice houses and land.

    If you get the owners with their dogs in there, I bet they'd pay double!

  42. Radio-Controlled Trigger and Advance? by Kaz+Riprock · · Score: 3, Interesting


    Are there any camera/trigger combo mechanisms which could take more than one picture per flight? I mean if I let a kite out for 6 minutes, it's going to get a great shot from really high up...but then I have to reel the kite back in to take another picture.

    Anybody have any ideas on a fairly easy way to hook up something like an RC button to both shoot the picture and advance the film...or maybe a lightweight camera that auto-advances...so the RC motor only has to hit the exposure button...?

    --
    Mordor...a magical, mythical land where women are more rare than dragons--but where every man would rather find a dragon
  43. Broken cameras - digital cameras by dsfd · · Score: 3, Interesting

    For an outsider like me, it seems that the risk of ending with a totally broken camera is high. How often does it happen ?

    I've browsed the pages and they dont seem to mention digital cameras. Is it because they are too expensive to risk them ? (my aim is NOT to reopen the passionate discussion about digital/conventional cameras !)

    1. Re:Broken cameras - digital cameras by drinkypoo · · Score: 2
      You know if you got a little CCD camera (~$50) which runs off a battery pack (~$5) and goes to a generic transmitter (~$50)... it's all very small stuff, solidly made. If you put it in the middle of a good-sized -- say five foot span -- delta stunt kite (I dunno what kind of kite you'd actually want to use, I'm only talking about what I know and haven't read the article) it would be pretty unlikely to break it. The nose of the kite will always hit first and you just have to mount it in such a way that it is not *directly* connected to the main nose-to-back spar which will absorb most of the damage.

      That's just for video though. A cheap-ass digital camera (no moving parts, soldered memory) will probably be plenty reliable. The passionate discussion about digital/conventional cameras IS worth opening here though; I've flown an ordinary boring diamond kite of about normal size to the limit of the string; ~500 yd. It was up pretty high, too. At the kind of heights we're talking about the amount of information you'll get back from a digital is pretty paltry.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  44. Re:Priceless.... by fyonn · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Nice Kite: $100

    $100? hohoho, spot the guy who doesn't fly em :)

    if you're making it yourself then thats 10 times too much, and if you're buying a nice kite from a shop then thats not enough :)

    my pbsk warrior standard was over $300, although, to be fair, thats a damn nice kite.

    if you're talking commerical parafoil's (ie the ones that look like james bond style controllable parachutes) then really you're talking up to and over $1000 depending on how big and what make, although the second hand market can get you some good deals, my best friend recently bought an 11.8 metre (yes, metre) wipika waterkite for a few hundred quid

    dave

  45. Re:Priceless.... by CharlieO · · Score: 2, Informative

    Nice Kite: $100

    Not if you get a good quality proper kite, maybe if you buy from Toys 'R' Us. A Revolution 1.5 or FlexiFoil 10 is around 200UKP/300USD - course these arn't great for KAP, but its what I fly currently and serves to show that kiting is not as cheap as you might expect (cos you go and get kites for different conditions and challanges) but it is serious fun :)

    New Digital Camera

    And thats why people use simple 35mm autowinders, or cheapo all in one CMOS digitals to start with.

    Crashing it into the ground on your first try

    And thats why you practise until you become and expereinced kite pilot before you take up KAP to extend the enjoyment of your hobby.

    Seriously you'll find the kite is probably the most expensive part of the rig.

  46. ah- photography by nightsweat · · Score: 2
    I swear to God, at first I thought this said aerial kite pornography.

    And the scarier thing is - I was intrigued.

    --

    the major advances in civilization are processes which all but wreck the societies in which they occur - A.N. White
  47. Please don't try this at home by 4of12 · · Score: 2

    Looks like a fun science fair project for those dads out there with kids."

    Editors modification: those responsible dads

    Otherwise, our publication will be sued when the inevitable mishap occurs.

    You know the one, that starts innocently like

    "Gosh, dad, the camera won't stay on straight and it's hard to control up there from down here!"

    "Hmmm. You're right, son. Here, you hold the camera.

    This is a pretty good-sized kite - how much do you weigh, again?

    I can't run very fast, but the car can..."
    --
    "Provided by the management for your protection."
  48. Older than a Hundred Years by Cy+Guy · · Score: 3, Informative

    People have been attaching cameras to kites for quick-and-dirty aerial photographs for almost a hundred years.

    Either this story has been in the queue for way too long, or you need to verify your sources.

    Kite Aerial Photograhy began at least as early as the late 1880's with the work of Arthur Batut in Labruguiere, France - including this 1889 image of the city. He went so far as to use an altimeter to automatically adjust the focal length of the camera

    ~~~~~~

    KAP seems like a great application for one of those X10 wireless cameras. Outdoors they have a range of maybe 200 feet and that could probably be enhanced with a directional antenna.

  49. Watch out for the cops? by bear_phillips · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I have been doing kite aerial photography for a while. pictures here.

    After 911 the cops have given me much more problems. On more than one occasion I have the police come up and ask me what I have hanging from my kite. Usually after I explain things it is cool with them, but I have heard stories of people having the cops pull guns on them thinking they are distributing anthrax or other badness.

    --
    http://www.windmeadow.com/
  50. An even more interesting site... by dcigary · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Phillipe Hurbain, a fellow panoramic/spherical panoramic photographer in France, has a site up on how he took a full-spherical panoramic picture from a kite. He's obviously much braver than me to put a $800 camera hanging underneath a kite!

    Pretty cool, and the panoramas are literally like you're floating in mid-air.

    http://philohome.free.fr/kitephoto/kapp.htm

    --
    ...my Karma ran over your Dogma...
  51. X10? Hellloooo? by Mulletproof · · Score: 2

    Wait, NASA actually has a page for rigging a cheasy disposible camera to a kite, but nothing along the lines of an X10? China IS going to beat us back to the moon at this rate...

    --
    You need a FREE iPod Nano
  52. X-10 XCam by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 2

    Bringing new meaning to the product name...

    Although given X-10's marketing strategy, I'm not sure if it is really a new meaning...

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
  53. how to protect your digital camera. by twitter · · Score: 2
    Make a foam enclosure for it, like this. I rigged that holder with a 9 volt battery, a flashing christmas tree light and a solenoid moved piece of music wire to push the button. Action Movie! (Yeah, yeah, my cameras put out crappy AVI files.)The camera used was very light and made of reasonable plastic so crashes like this did not ruin it. My second holder was built for a Sipix, which takes compact flash and has 2.1M pixels. I opened that up and soldered in an earplug jack which proved more reliable than the music wire, but was not too ugly. See how here.

    You slashdotted your cable box, you bastard!

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

  54. Not really. Scary by twitter · · Score: 2

    It would only be scary if you published a recognizable image of someone without their consent. The disreputable state of your backyard, or you as you sunbathe there, can be seen by anyone in any small aircraft. Technology claimed that expectation of privacy long ago.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.