Slashdot Mirror


Book on NR-1

snStarter writes "Hyman Rickover created NR-1 for a variety of purposes, one of which included doing science from a nuclear-powered vessel capable of sustained deep operations. Back in the '70s I really wanted to be on the crew of this puppy but all crew members were required to qualify as second class divers and that was hopeless for me. A new book, and web site, discusses NR-1 and is the most complete information on the boat I've seen in one place."

202 comments

  1. Creepy... by peterb · · Score: 5, Insightful


    It must take a very special sort of soldier to submit to the claustrophobic surroundings and lack of freedom inherent in being in a submarine. I can only wonder what that's like when you're in a submarine that nobody knows about.

    Watching Das Boot was as close as I ever want to get to that.

    1. Re:Creepy... by korgull · · Score: 3, Funny

      Staying at home reading /. all the time might give you the same feeling.

    2. Re:Creepy... by Tyler+Eaves · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually, the nuclear boats are a hell of a lot more comfortable than the WWII era boats. (For rounds numbers, 2x the crew with 9x the interior volume)

      --
      TODO: Something witty here...
    3. Re:Creepy... by Wonko+the+Sane · · Score: 3, Informative

      You would be correct for every nuclear boat _except_ the NR-1. It's tiny. It is more cramped than the WWII era boats.

    4. Re:Creepy... by Ponty · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The problem is the nuclear-ness means that it stays underwater for a _long_ time. The WWII boats had to come up, which meant a walk in the sun or the fresh air every so often.

      Really cool, nonetheless. It must have been thrilling to be looking out the funky viewports at things that no human had ever seen before at the bottom of the ocean.

    5. Re:Creepy... by Wonko+the+Sane · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      It must take a very special sort of soldier to submit to the claustrophobic surroundings and lack of freedom inherent in being in a submarine

      Actually, we're all f*cking crazy. Just think of the people who join the Navy (or any branch for that matter). At least 3/4 of people who join do so right out of college because they

      1 could not afford college
      2 could not finish college (too much partying, etc.)
      3 could not get accepted to a college

      You would be very worried if you got to see the kind of people I work with...

    6. Re:Creepy... by Tyler+Eaves · · Score: 1

      Well, the original poster wasn't referring to the NR-1 specifically. Plus, I would imagine the NR-1, at the least, had refrigirated food storage, proper air purifiers, and some degree of temperature control, all things the U-Boats lacked.

      --
      TODO: Something witty here...
    7. Re:Creepy... by Macgruder · · Score: 1

      Well... I'll accept crazy, only in comparison to the general populace. A more accurate statement would be to say that our norm for sanity is based on different criteria. We are square pegs that fit in finely machined holes, with little tolerance for errors.

      Actually, I joined the Navy before college. Had the money, just not the desire. Being a bubblehead was the best adventure of my life, except for when it was mind-numbingly dull.

      --
      I'm not crazy,I'm actively irresponsible.
    8. Re:Creepy... by Wonko+the+Sane · · Score: 1

      I suppose your experence depends on your rate. The workload varies quite a bit depending on who you compare...

      Also if you were in back during the cold war, things were a lot different then.

    9. Re:Creepy... by Wonko+the+Sane · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't go so far as to say that a 688 has proper air purifers...

    10. Re:Creepy... by Deadstick · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They seem to get it together somehow. A good illustration is to watch aircraft being parked as they land on an aircraft carrier. When a highly trained Annapolis officer taxis an airplane toward the edge of a wet, rolling deck until he's about 10 feet out over the water and looks back for a 19-year-old kid to tell him with hand gestures when to turn, he seems to be showing a certain confidence.

      rj

    11. Re:Creepy... by Bork · · Score: 0

      except for when it was mind-numbingly dull.

      with brief instances of being scared shitless wondering if you are going to feel it. Walking down to the mess after shaking so bad you are unable to hold a cup. A-ganger asking you "what's up?" and I reply "Nothing much, same old stuff."

    12. Re:Creepy... by bobtheprophet · · Score: 1

      A haiku
      You would be correct
      About most nuclear boats
      But not for this one.

      --
      Don't give me none of this "nature theme" business.
    13. Re:Creepy... by Deadstick · · Score: 2, Informative

      If you want to see cramped, have a look at U-1 (launched 1906) in the Deutsches Museum in Munich. It's a full-fledged diesel-electric boat, but it looks like something about halfway between a WW2 U-Boat and the Hunley.

      rj

    14. Re:Creepy... by Bork · · Score: 0

      There is that odor that is uniquely submarine that takes months to age to perfection that only a submariner can appreciate. Gag...

    15. Re:Creepy... by maddogdelta · · Score: 5, Interesting
      I spent 4 years active duty on a submarine, and I will say that the toughest it really got was when the ice cream machine broke.

      NR-1 was never designed for long duration operations. It was designed more as an ego booster for Rickover. The other nukes were small, but you still had about the same personal space as one would have on a destroyer. My vote for those people who had it toughest were the people who either (a) get shot at more often than submariners (army/marine corps infantry) or (b) operate such high power machinery that they only have a 75% chance of living to retirement age (air force/naval/marine/army aviators).

      Pass the caramel sauce!

      --
      -- There are 10 kinds of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
    16. Re:Creepy... by Wonko+the+Sane · · Score: 1

      I hate that. You never get the smell out of your clothes. I hate the fact that people can tell where I work based on the smell...

    17. Re:Creepy... by barzok · · Score: 2

      That's why the US submariner corps is volunteer-only and applicants have to pass a pretty thorough psych evaluation (last I heard).

    18. Re:Creepy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "It must take a very special sort of soldier to submit to the claustrophobic surroundings and lack of freedom inherent in being in a submarine."

      The kind who can touch themselves? thats not very special at all...

    19. Re:Creepy... by Wonko+the+Sane · · Score: 1

      Most of us learn our jobs, but there always those select few... As less and less senior people decide to stay in they start promoting faster and faster and the average expirence level lowers...

    20. Re:Creepy... by Tteddo · · Score: 1

      You know, I passed that, and it was no big deal. Common sense on how to keep yourself and your buddy alive.

    21. Re:Creepy... by Desert+Raven · · Score: 5, Informative

      Heh, I love this line of thinking.

      I spent 6 months on a helicopter carrier. It was often weeks between times I got out on the surface decks, and I was allowed to. Not just any schmuck can waltz out on the weather decks when it pleases them. The vast majority of the time, only those folks whose jobs require it are allowed out there. Most folks spend the entire time inside. Thus, the difference is that the surface ships are almost always pitching and rolling, as opposed to the subs, which are pretty stable unless doing vigorous maneuvering.

    22. Re:Creepy... by Macgruder · · Score: 2, Informative

      Tail end of the cold war... Joined in '88. Was a sonar tech. Did my share of WESTPACs.

      --
      I'm not crazy,I'm actively irresponsible.
    23. Re:Creepy... by Macgruder · · Score: 1

      Or when your family on the pier could SMELL the boat, long before it came 'round the point?

      --
      I'm not crazy,I'm actively irresponsible.
    24. Re:Creepy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      88... that was back when having your fish meant something, wasn't it? Back when they didn't just give them away so they could keep their precious silver dolphin flag.

    25. Re:Creepy... by Macgruder · · Score: 1

      Snap rolls, anyone?

      --
      I'm not crazy,I'm actively irresponsible.
    26. Re:Creepy... by Macgruder · · Score: 1

      That's hard to believe... We had the flag, and man were our nubs in so much shit to get qualified so we could get it back. But giving them away? Never in my years did anyone get graped off.

      --
      I'm not crazy,I'm actively irresponsible.
    27. Re:Creepy... by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 2
      It must take a very special sort of soldier to submit to the claustrophobic surroundings and lack of freedom inherent in being in a submarine. I can only wonder what that's like when you're in a submarine that nobody knows about.
      Aw! Comeon. I've been dreaming of going on a sub for ages; when I did visit an operational (diesel) one, I didn't stop dreaming about that even when I saw the cramped conditions inside.

      The funny thing is that by looking at the configuration and the control/gauges, I managed to guess the operationnal characteristics of the sub, and it was obvious by the crew's faces when I asked them to confirm my suspicions ("sorry, that's classified"), I managed to guess correctly...

    28. Re:Creepy... by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 5, Funny
      I spent 4 years active duty on a submarine, and I will say that the toughest it really got was when the ice cream machine broke.
      Chode: What the hell have you been fixing those past three days?
      Gus: The transdigital freon converted.
      - And what's that for?
      - It makes ice cubes.
    29. Re:Creepy... by AndroidCat · · Score: 2

      I guess the pilot is rarely allowed to do donuts on the bottom with the wheels... :^)

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    30. Re:Creepy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It happens now. They are so desperate for people that they'll keep anyone.

    31. Re:Creepy... by eyegor · · Score: 2

      The people who are accepted into the submarine program are generally considered to be the cream-of-the-crop. They're pretty carefully screened to ensure you don't get a major nutcase.

      I've only seen a few people who truely didn't fit, and they didn't last long before they were transfered to the surface Navy.

      Eyegor (plankowner, SSN-689, SSN-711)

      --

      Don't anthropomorphize computers, they don't like it.
    32. Re:Creepy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      They say that a lot, and maybe it used to be true but there is no way you can reasonably say that they "carefully screen" people anymore.

      The fact is that submarine life sucks. A lot. Most people get out after their first enlistment, which means that we're hurting for senior, experenced people.

      I know first hand that to make E6, all you have to do is sign you name correctly on the test. When you have advancement exams with 80%+ advancement rates, then you aren't screening shit.

      We keep a lot of people who whould never had made it this far 10 years ago simply because we have to have enough warm bodies to fill up the watchbill.

    33. Re:Creepy... by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 2
      Are they as risky as I hear jet carrier decks are? People who walk in the wrong place tend to lose their heads... literally.

      Bruce

    34. Re:Creepy... by eyegor · · Score: 2

      Well.... It used to be true anyway... I was in from 76 through 82. I got out as an STS1(SS) (and it wasn't THAT hard to make first class).

      I really loved what I did, but if you want a REAL life and a chance at a good marriage, you didn't want to be in boats. Most of the married guys I knew ended up getting divorced.

      Joining the Navy was the second best thing I ever did. Getting out was the best (not counting having kids).

      Eyegor (the geek formerly known as "Jake")

      --

      Don't anthropomorphize computers, they don't like it.
    35. Re:Creepy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, they've designed these special safety helmuts and new jet engines so that when people get sucked through the engines (because it does happen ocationally) survive most of the time. They don't feel too good afterwards, though...

    36. Re:Creepy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're not supposed to be able to even SEE the gauges. Thems CLASSIFIED!!! Turn yourself in at once!! :)

    37. Re:Creepy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was an entirely different navy back then. You were in when fast attacks had a real job to do, not like now when all we do is ORSE or carry around tomahawks like some kind of mini-boomer

    38. Re:Creepy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      were you on the Baton Rouge (or maybe the San Francisco)? I remember a bork that played D&D a lot with guido and company.....

    39. Re:Creepy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The psych test is not that big a deal.

      I mean, *I* passed it.

    40. Re:Creepy... by nounderscores · · Score: 2

      Captain: How could they find us?! We engaged the silent but deadly drive...

    41. Re:Creepy... by Elroy+Jetson · · Score: 1
      I remember my first night onboard as a nub. Met the boat in Chinhae, left port the same day. Torpedo room bunk, foward starboard, all the way inboard. Had a nice, thick steel beam about a foot above my head.

      I've got a 2" scar on my hairline as a permanent reminder of the first time I ever heard a "water slug".

    42. Re:Creepy... by crawling_chaos · · Score: 4, Interesting
      True, but at the depths NR-1 is capable of operating at, the pressure is so great that small leak comes in with enough force to sever a finger or even an arm like a band saw would. It's designed for deeper diving than the typical fast-attack, although not as deep as a specialized deep-diver like Alvin.

      Neither job is for the risk-adverse, I'm afraid.

      --
      You can only drink 30 or 40 glasses of beer a day, no matter how rich you are.
      -- Colonel Adolphus Busch
    43. Re:Creepy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Heh. I was thinking the same thing. Either that, or they only keep the people that failed :).

      ~~~

    44. Re:Creepy... by old_n_anal · · Score: 1
      I spent 4 years active duty on a submarine, and I will say that the toughest it really got was when the ice cream machine broke.

      Lucky you.

      Not sure this is the typical experience (unless you're on a brand-new boat, and probably a ballitic missle sub at that... stinkin boomer fags...)

      In eight years split between two boats:
      - 3 major flooding incidents
      - 4 fires
      - 3 collisions with various things (usually ice)

      What's the old saw? Something about hours of terminal boredom punctated by short spans of abject terror.

    45. Re:Creepy... by Desert+Raven · · Score: 1

      It's not quite as bad. The only jet aircraft are the Harriers, and their intakes are high enough that getting sucked in is not a serious risk. Helicopter rotor blades are also well over your head. The biggest risk comes from the rotor-wash of the CH-53 (Heavy-lift helicopter). I got knocked on my butt when one came in for a fast landing and I wasn't braced for it. I was over 50 feet from the outside of the rotor path at the time. It would be real easy to get blown off the deck by one.

      Ironically, the jet column the Harrier rides on when doing verticals is so focused that you could easily stand ten feet from one landing vertically, and all you'd have to do is widen your stance a little bit.

      The biggest daily risks come from more mundane things, like tripping over tie-down chains. The non-skid on the carrier deck is like very uneven volcanic rock. Falling on it will tear through clothing and remove a few square inches of skin quite easily.

    46. Re:Creepy... by maddogdelta · · Score: 1
      Nope, not a boomer puke. Fast and Black, USS Billfish.

      However, we had a series of good CO's who made sure the ship was well maintained and run. We got to chase bad guys in the Med and on 'special ops'.

      Sure we had some excitement, but never a moment when I thought that my life passed in front of my eyes and there was nothing I could do about it.

      What I consider 'tough' are things getting shot, having the machine break up in flight test, etc. Ever since the Thresher/Scorpion incidents, there have been very few fatalities in submarines. OTOH, on surface ships, aviation, and in the infantry, there are plenty of opportunities to buy your own piece of the farm.

      As far as 'not seeing the sun'. There are plenty of people on surface ships that only see flourescent lighting for 6 months at a time.

      That's why I claim that it wasn't that tough for me. (then again, I'm not claustrophobic,either)

      Basically, I did my bit, and I don't regret it. But before someone makes me into some hero, look at the people that were doing the fighting and dying while I was cursing the lack of fresh milk!. Those people are the heros.

      --
      -- There are 10 kinds of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
  2. About the Book by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
    Operating alone and unarmed on the bottom of the sea, the U.S. Navy's smallest nuclear-powered submarine is one of its biggest weapons. Tied up at a pier, the boat with the bright orange sail looks absolutely minuscule, innocent and out of place beside its big brothers, the fleet's huge missile-carrying and attack submarines, but it can dive deeper, stay down for a month, and accomplish missions far beyond the capabilities of any of them. The ship has been cloaked in mystery. It wasn't commissioned or given a name, and even today it is hardly known beyond a select fraternity of sailors and scientists. They simply call it the NR-1.

    The little submarine was born in controversy, served in secrecy, survived potential catastrophe on numerous occasions, and is still in operation almost forty years after being concieved. It was and remains the only one of its kind ever built.

    The story of the NR-1 is told against the tense background of the Cold War and peopled with such rich characters as the acerbic Admiral Hyman Rickover, ocean scientist Robert Ballard (who found the Titanic), the designers and builders who faced almost impossible tasks to give life to the ship, the unique officers and sailors who took the little boat down into depths on covert missions, and the families who waited for them on shore, unaware that there would be no escape if the boat ran into trouble.

    "Dark Waters: An Insider's Account of the NR-1, the Cold War's Undercover Nuclear Sub" is a thrill-a-minute book of submarine adventure, imminent danger, personal bravery, technological wonder and historic discovery. It will be a proud addition to the shelves of readers who love stories of the sea, history and intrigue.

    1. Re:About the Book by Ponty · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The excerpt is fantastic! First of all, the think had wheels and could roll along on the floor of the ocean. Check this out:
      -----------
      Maurer added still more water to the forward ballast tanks, which brought the bow down and put both wheels back in contact. Unfortunately, the extra ballast made the boat so heavy that the maximum upward force from the combined fore-and-aft thrusters would not be able to lift it. We rolled ahead.

      Wruble suddenly noticed a slight change in the character of the ocean floor, and then saw what looked like the edge of the world crawl beneath the little window. The front wheel ran off a precipice and Wruble heard a loud whummpp as the boat lurched and his head smacked some overhead pipes that sliced a cut in his scalp. The sound he heard was the bottom of the NR-1 scraping along a canyon rim. Blood ran down his face as he yelled into his microphone, "Go back! Go back! We're going over the edge!"

      But our forward, downward momentum made that impossible and over we went, slowly sinking into an unknown cavern. Wruble felt his stomach turn over, as if he was falling from a great height, for he saw nothing but blackness below. The weight that had glued us to the bottom now pulled us inexorably into the void, nose first. The submarine was a half mile deep, nearly a ton too heavy, and falling.

    2. Re:About the Book by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 2
      Wruble suddenly noticed a slight change in the character of the ocean floor, and then saw what looked like the edge of the world crawl beneath the little window. The front wheel ran off a precipice and Wruble heard a loud whummpp as the boat lurched and his head smacked some overhead pipes that sliced a cut in his scalp. The sound he heard was the bottom of the NR-1 scraping along a canyon rim. Blood ran down his face as he yelled into his microphone, "Go back! Go back! We're going over the edge!"
      Sounds like a clip from " Voyage to see the bottom "...
  3. Obligatory submarine joke... by rob-fu · · Score: 4, Funny

    What's long, hard and full of seamen?

    (ducks)

    1. Re:Obligatory submarine joke... by Myco · · Score: 2

      It doesn't work when you type it, you know.

    2. Re:Obligatory submarine joke... by rgmoore · · Score: 1

      I don't know. Given the typical quality of spelling on /., you can never be sure if the answer is what you're expecting or not.

      --

      There's no point in questioning authority if you aren't going to listen to the answers.

    3. Re:Obligatory submarine joke... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >What's long, hard and full of seamen?

      A PENIS!!!

    4. Re:Obligatory submarine joke... by Myco · · Score: 2

      Touchay.

    5. Re:Obligatory submarine joke... by AndrewRUK · · Score: 1

      I really hope you were being ironic there...

    6. Re:Obligatory submarine joke... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Touche'

    7. Re:Obligatory submarine joke... by Vendekkai · · Score: 1

      Well, actually, if yours is, better go see a doctor. He may have some surgery to do.

      Your semen should normally be in your seminal vesicles, and only, _briefly_, in transit through your penis.

      But considering your post, and the fact that you read slashdot...

    8. Re:Obligatory submarine joke... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's long, hard and full of seamen?

      Your esophagus.

    9. Re:Obligatory submarine joke... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I really hope that spelling was intentional. LOL

    10. Re:Obligatory submarine joke... by Myco · · Score: 2

      Yeah. I actually went back and forth for a while trying to come up with a plausible-yet-recognizable misspelling of "touché."

  4. And the rest of the story --- by Bork · · Score: 1, Insightful

    And if you want the rest of the story of the US Submarine operations that we could not talk about, read Blind Mans Bluff.

    Its the the book that allowed me explane what I did while in the Navy but could not tell her.

    SS

    1. Re:And the rest of the story --- by Bork · · Score: 0

      Should have been - .. Explane to my wife what I did...

    2. Re:And the rest of the story --- by Macgruder · · Score: 1

      BTDT.

      --
      I'm not crazy,I'm actively irresponsible.
    3. Re:And the rest of the story --- by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      I explained what I did to your wife with "Cum Hungry Slutz IV."

    4. Re:And the rest of the story --- by theedge318 · · Score: 1

      That book really makes you appreciate what submariners have done for our country. From laying cable taps in the middle of Mother Russia to delivering little black men to foreign shores.

      I can't wait to read the NR-1 book.

      BTW, I asked my recruiting officer, the current admiral no longer interviews sub skippers by having them wait in his coat closet for an hour. Rickover may have been a little nuts, and he made sure he had the same kind of nuts people driving his boats. (i.e. Anal-Retentive Detail-Oriented nuclear engineers)

      The most random trivia fact about the older subs versus the new boomers has to be, is that the missle bays are long enough to excerise the crews eyes to infinite so that they never loose their depth perception (the vision is restored quickly upon return to shore-or so I understand)

      BZ to all those who served in the Silent Service

      --
      Sig Nazi- "No Sig for you, come back 1 year."
  5. NR and underwater Archaeology by tcd004 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Read about this a while back. This is really interesting. After the end of the cold war, the navy deployed this shop in the Mediterranean to search for greek ship wrecks. They found thousands of ships, cargo, etc, all well-preserved after thousands of years by the cold depths of the medi.

    A UVic researcher is among a National Geographic Society team of oceanographers, engineers and archeologists that used a nuclear submarine to discover the largest concentration of ancient shipwrecks ever found in the deep sea. Dr. John Peter Oleson (Greek and Roman Studies) viewed the site off southern Italy and examined artifacts retrieved from 2,500 feet beneath an ancient Mediterranean Sea trade route by the remotely operated submersible Jason.

    More on it here.

    Then read about Richard Gere's Ass Zoo!

    tcd004

  6. Incompetent pilot? by MystikPhish · · Score: 3, Interesting

    From the book excerpt: The ship was so stable that it automatically tried to keep itself level, which meant that as we came down the slope, the bow tended to rise and stay even with the stern. Only the rear wheel was touching the mud as the forward part of the boat angled slightly higher. That pointed the forward television cameras up too far to see anything on the bottom. That separation of the bow from the bottom also limited the effectiveness of the sonar.

    Maurer added still more water to the forward ballast tanks, which brought the bow down and put both wheels back in contact. Unfortunately, the extra ballast made the boat so heavy that the maximum upward force from the combined fore-and-aft thrusters would not be able to lift it. We rolled ahead.



    Why didn't the idiot pilot add a little water to the bow tanks and release some from the aft tanks? He was either totally incompetent (highly unlikely) or this "teaser" is made up... oh well..

    --
    "I'm about to drop the hammer and dispense some indiscriminate justice!"
    1. Re:Incompetent pilot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have an alternate theory: you don't know what you are talking about. Maybe adjusting the trim on a submarine is a little more complicated than you think.

    2. Re:Incompetent pilot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've put in 4 years with 4 more left to go. I've done my share of deployments. Who left on a med run to CENTCOM with a full load of tomahawks 9/26/01? I bet it wasn't you. I would meet you, but you sound like a fucking dumb coner anyway...or else you are just a stupid troll, I'm not sure which is worse.

    3. Re:Incompetent pilot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FUCK YOU dipshit I put in 8 goddamn years in the US NAVY and a SHITLOAD of time in a class B nuclear submarine

      Man, the last time I saw anything that frightening, I had to pay $8.00 to get in, plus popcorn and soda.

    4. Re:Incompetent pilot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Somehow, I get the feeling that NIS wouldn't approve of your discussion of the weapons loadout carried on a particular deployment on a particular date. Nonetheless, I suggest you drop an RPM on your foot in penance for that "dumb coner" jab.

      ~~~

    5. Re:Incompetent pilot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're probably right about the NIS. I was trying to illistrate that we did deploy to do more than ORSE workup based on the date, but I suppose I should have been more thoughtful.

      My comment about coners still stands though :)

    6. Re:Incompetent pilot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      s/NIS/NCIS -- get with the times.

    7. Re:Incompetent pilot? by Macgruder · · Score: 1

      Welcome to the club. On my first WESTPAC we went to the Gulf with all warshots, 12 birds in VLS, and 27 MK 48's and did blockade work for Desert Shield. We were on point when it became Desert Storm. Pucker factor was pretty tight.

      --
      I'm not crazy,I'm actively irresponsible.
    8. Re:Incompetent pilot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      The problem is that the nukes think the only reason a sub exists is so they can make steam and the "nosecone" is the place they shit and eat.

      The truth of the matter is that the nukes exist so we can find the bad guys and stuff a torpedo up their asses (and maybe get a little tail from that cute nuke nub).... heh

  7. Not Soldier....Sailor....Not Sailor....A Nuke.... by Cheesemeister · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It takes a special kind of Nuke to ride NR-1....and the damn thing was never a secret...I personally have known about the thing for years....not only because I was a Nuke but because it has been in National Geographic a whole bunch of times. "If only we could harness this power for evil!"

    --
    If only I could harness this power for evil...
  8. submariner joke by lord13 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    In a submarine, 100 guys go down, and 50 couples come up.

    1. Re:submariner joke by Wonko+the+Sane · · Score: 1

      I wish we only took 100 people underway with us...it would give us a lot more room.

    2. Re:submariner joke by vegetablespork · · Score: 1

      You can enjoy that room while you're standing port and starboard!

      --

      Call (206) 338-5780 COLLECT for information about a genuine BA, BS, MA, MS, MBA, or Ph.D.

    3. Re:submariner joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Like you know. The closest thing you've ever seen to a sub is that turd you left in the toilet. You know, the one you blasted apart with your "gun" by pissing on it making "boosh!" sounds.

    4. Re:submariner joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As long as it's only coners that are port and stbd...

    5. Re:submariner joke by vegetablespork · · Score: 1
      As long as it's only coners that are port and stbd...

      True, it's important to take enough nukes for three section--that engine room bilge gets awfully dirty. Anyway, aren't there some high chlorides somewhere you should be attending to? I'll be in my rack if anything important happens.

      --

      Call (206) 338-5780 COLLECT for information about a genuine BA, BS, MA, MS, MBA, or Ph.D.

    6. Re:submariner joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nope, just the AEA

    7. Re:submariner joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      that engine room bilge gets awfully dirty

      Only because the AOW can't clean up after himself when he clean the drain strainers every midwatch. I'm tired of cleaning midrats out of TGLO bay

    8. Re:submariner joke by Bork · · Score: 0

      until the weekly all hands drill followed with the 8 hour field day.

      Mount trashmore in the RC grows one more foot with Kimi-wipes.

    9. Re:submariner joke by vegetablespork · · Score: 1

      8 hours?! Was the president getting ready to visit or something? I think my record was 5. Lots more than one all-hands drill per week, though.

      --

      Call (206) 338-5780 COLLECT for information about a genuine BA, BS, MA, MS, MBA, or Ph.D.

    10. Re:submariner joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Vulcan Death Watches...

    11. Re:submariner joke by Wonko+the+Sane · · Score: 1

      I bet you didn't have an HMCM as a cob...

    12. Re:submariner joke by vegetablespork · · Score: 1

      D'oh! No--MMCM in both cases.

      --

      Call (206) 338-5780 COLLECT for information about a genuine BA, BS, MA, MS, MBA, or Ph.D.

    13. Re:submariner joke by Wonko+the+Sane · · Score: 1

      We went from probably the bast COB on the waterfront to an HMCM. How's that for a letdown?

      Think "hospital clean"

    14. Re:submariner joke by vegetablespork · · Score: 1

      We had a great COB. Saved my ass from going to mast once from going to mast by sticking up for me. Amazing what one remembers.

      --

      Call (206) 338-5780 COLLECT for information about a genuine BA, BS, MA, MS, MBA, or Ph.D.

    15. Re:submariner joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That post makes sense after deleting one "from going to mast."

    16. Re:submariner joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Our COB is still wrestling with difficult concepts like "berthing bills should be posted prior to stationing the maneuvering watch" and "Watchbills should be posted prior to getting underway"

      Way too many underways started off with:

      "Section 2 has the startup brief tomorrow at 0500"

      "Who's in section 2?"

      "Um..."

    17. Re:submariner joke by Macgruder · · Score: 1

      No one EVER gets it right. It's "100 men go down, 51 couples come up."

      Somebody's ALWAYS cheating.

      --
      I'm not crazy,I'm actively irresponsible.
  9. So easy to use... by Istealmymusic · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...no wonder its NR-1!

    --
    "The lesson to be learned is not to take the comments on slashdot too literally." --Vinnie Falco, BearShare
  10. Re:Not Soldier....Sailor....Not Sailor....A Nuke.. by Wonko+the+Sane · · Score: 1

    not only because I was a Nuke
    What rate?

  11. Re:Not Soldier....Sailor....Not Sailor....A Nuke.. by Cheesemeister · · Score: 1

    ELT1....via the Evilprison....

    --
    If only I could harness this power for evil...
  12. Re:First "Underway on nuclear power" post. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
    Only a non-qual dink nub would mod that down. Go get some sigs and quit sucking up my qualified air!

    ~~~

  13. So you are a seemen eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    nice attitude d00d

    grow up

    1. Re:So you are a seemen eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Be careful... or he'll... I dunno. Beat your ass in an art museum, or something.

  14. Re:First "Underway on nuclear power" post. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fucking diggit...

  15. What the sub was probably REALLY used for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    http://www.nr-1-book.com/images/CableLife.jpg

    Gee, I WONDER what the sub was doing around that cable! Yep, they were just wheelin' along and "Whoa! Look at that! A trans-atlantic phone cable! How'd we get near one of those with all this fancy nav gear?"

    Oceanography, indeed. Note all the comments about sonar systems being used to "identify" and "home in on" objects. I think we've just found the sub that was rumored to be able to splice into various undersea cables. Seriously- what do you need 300+ day run capability, secure comm equipment, and more types of sonar than you can shake a stick at?

    Does anyone actually believe that this thing was built because the USN wanted to take pretty pictures of crabs? If so, where's all the scientific equipment for measuring ocean conditions, collecting samples(I've always been a big fan of those critter-slurpers), all the normal "Zeee heello, I am Jacques Cousaeu!" stuff?

    Sorry, the thing has "spy toy" written all over it. Pathetic that our tax dollars went into it. Sounds to me like someone's trying to justify the money. "Well...uh....look! Some of the pictures have crabs in them! We did some oceanography while we were tapping that line!"

    1. Re:What the sub was probably REALLY used for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course it is a "spy toy" what else did you think the NR-1, Jimmy Carter and that old 637 whose name I can't recall offhand were built for?

    2. Re:What the sub was probably REALLY used for by twidget · · Score: 1

      Parche. They told us the NR-1 was Rickover's escape pod. He'd use it when the world ended in a nuclear holocaust.
      "But where would he go, COB?"
      "Shut the fuck up, non-qual"

    3. Re:What the sub was probably REALLY used for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rickover wanted to build a whole fleet of those things.. he was just mad that his ORSE teams couldn't come on board whenever they wanted on boats that had just been on specop's

      This "2 minutes since last comment" crap is bullshit.

    4. Re:What the sub was probably REALLY used for by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      I wonder what they were doing in Hudson's Bay. Checking for empty vodka bottles?

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    5. Re:What the sub was probably REALLY used for by jericho4.0 · · Score: 2

      Uhhhh. Well, yeah. That's why it was a secret. Of course it was a spy-toy. It was the cold war. Youre tax dollars are now being spent on other spy toys.

      --
      "A language that doesn't affect the way you think about programming, is not worth knowing" - Alan Perlis
    6. Re:What the sub was probably REALLY used for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They had a show about this submarine on either the Discovery Channel or the History Channel (of course, this being /. I wouldn't expect anyone to have seen it...) about secret submarines etc. and the NR-1, or something very very much like it, was one of the features. And tapping lines was exactly what it was used for. The Russians, being security geniuses, decided that sending unencrypted, top-secret transmissions was perfectly fine, as long as they did it in the surrounding ocean. Smart idea? Not really. Chances are the timex on your arm wouldn't have drowned by the time you dived deep enough to get to these cables. The US simply sent subs like the NR-1 over there with big tape recorders and some splicing equipment once or twice a month and picked up all the juicy russian gossip.

      And please, if you're going to complain about spending tax money on wierd spy-toys, let's not forget about the Glomar Explorer...

    7. Re:What the sub was probably REALLY used for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The fabled sub that could splice into undersea cables was the USS Seawolf (SSN 575). Read all about it in this excellent book. There was a second sub with this capability, but can't remember it at the moment.

  16. Re:Not Soldier....Sailor....Not Sailor....A Nuke.. by Wonko+the+Sane · · Score: 1

    ELT's have the best job on the boat. You can never find them: they're either in the rack at sea or gone by 9:00 in port...

  17. Re:First "Underway on nuclear power" post. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Damn--is this place overrun with squids or what? Diggit? Hardly. I am a member of the CLIP! CA(SS) -- CA = Civilain Apprentice.

    ~~~

  18. I have to ask... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's an ELT?

    1. Re:I have to ask... by DredPirateRoberts · · Score: 3, Funny

      An Engineering Laboratory Technician... an enlisted nuclear chemist and radiological controls technician. If you have a spill of readioactive fluid, get yo'self one or two, they'll whine but they'll take care of the problem.

      --
      "All animals are created equal, but some animals are more equal than others." - George Orwell
    2. Re:I have to ask... by Dolly_Llama · · Score: 1

      ELT, aka Easy Livin' Technician

      --

      Somewhere, something incredible is waiting to be known. -- Carl Sagan

  19. Re:Not Soldier....Sailor....Not Sailor....A Nuke.. by DredPirateRoberts · · Score: 1

    Not where I come from... oh the "rack at sea" comment I'll go with, but we always felt lucky to get out before 2 in the afternoon in port. Of course, that was on the most evil ship on the waterfront, the EVILprise. Maybe it's better elsewhere.

    --
    "All animals are created equal, but some animals are more equal than others." - George Orwell
  20. Re:First "Underway on nuclear power" post. by Wonko+the+Sane · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Damn--is this place overrun with squids or what?
    You noticed that too?

  21. Re:Not Soldier....Sailor....Not Sailor....A Nuke.. by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 2

    Nah - RM's and NavET's always beat the ELT's ashore.

    --
    I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
  22. Re:Not Soldier....Sailor....Not Sailor....A Nuke.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm sorry, I had no idea. :)

    So how many primary to secondary leaks do you have right now?

  23. Re:Not Soldier....Sailor....Not Sailor....A Nuke.. by Wonko+the+Sane · · Score: 1

    On shore, but if you are deployed with a battlegroup and spend 16 hours/day at PD, then RM's are quite busy.

  24. Re:Not Soldier....Sailor....Not Sailor....A Nuke.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Speaking as a NavET, I concur. Often, the brow would not yet be quite down as we were leaving. See you at the Victoria!

    ~~~

  25. Re:First "Underway on nuclear power" post. by cryofan2 · · Score: 0, Redundant


    Ah, the timeless need of the young male to feel a part of some society, some culture, some group, where they are above some and below others. And of course, you need to be able to make those below you know their place, right?

    That is one reason why I got off the boat as quickly as possible--the smothering embrace of The Crew, of the hierarchy.

    That, and the wretched smell of the damn thing....the crew didn't smell too damn nice, either....

  26. Re:First "Underway on nuclear power" post. by vegetablespork · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If you're intelligent enough to be that far above the process, you're certainly intelligent enough to have done your research before volunteering for submarine duty, no? And once there, honorable enough to have honored your commitment to serve and aware enough to realize that lots of it is bullshit (as in life darned near anywhere), and to just deal?

    --

    Call (206) 338-5780 COLLECT for information about a genuine BA, BS, MA, MS, MBA, or Ph.D.

  27. Perfect for cable operations by Zeddicus_Z · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Considering its directly-downward crew viewport, and a claw manipulator capable of lifting roughly 1000 pounds (id wager there is a seperate claw control set right near the viewport), NR-1 would be perfect for tapping and/or interfearing with deep-water communications cables.

    Even today, when America has almost nothing in the way of global powers about which to spread FUD and justify massive military spending on a project such as this, NR-1 would still be extremely useful as an intelligence gatherer operating against foreign corporates in the interests of American compaines, via taps on shallow and deep-water data lines.

    Kind of makes you wonder if all those cable cuts in the north of Australia were really caused by ships anchors, or by FUBAR'd operations by boats such as the NR-1

    --
    Janie took my gun...
    1. Re:Perfect for cable operations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or intentional operations...

    2. Re:Perfect for cable operations by AllynM · · Score: 1

      ...so you're saying that a sub with a very blunt claw is going to grab a multi fiber cable bundle with like a thousand fibers and tap select cables (underwater) without interefering at all with the communications that said fiber is carrying? I hate to say it, but even the Navy is not capable of such a feat.

      --
      this sig was brought to you by the letter /.
    3. Re:Perfect for cable operations by snStarter · · Score: 1

      Boy, you've been reading "Cryptonomicon" way too much and not thinking about the problems involved in cable tapping either. Sure you can get to where the cable IS, doing something with the cable itself is a very different kettle of fish.

  28. Re:Not Soldier....Sailor....Not Sailor....A Nuke.. by DredPirateRoberts · · Score: 1

    None, I'm a civilian now! hahahahaha... sweet freedom...

    --
    "All animals are created equal, but some animals are more equal than others." - George Orwell
  29. Re:Not Soldier....Sailor....Not Sailor....A Nuke.. by bswrchrd · · Score: 1

    hey you could have been a Nuke ET like me, all we did was sit in the AC and complain about that...

  30. Re:Not Soldier....Sailor....Not Sailor....A Nuke.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now its open and used for research, but when it was first put in service. The idea and concept was something totally new.

    If this interests you in the least you have to read:

    "Blind Man's Bluff"

  31. Re:Not Soldier....Sailor....Not Sailor....A Nuke.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    You got pro pay, quit whining :).

    ~~~

  32. Re:Not Soldier....Sailor....Not Sailor....A Nuke.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't know what boat you were on, but we (RC div) are always the last ones to leave every day.

  33. Re:Not Soldier....Sailor....Not Sailor....A Nuke.. by cryofan2 · · Score: 1

    You musta been on a different boat than me (old fast attack)--all the nukes, even we twidgets, worked our asses off, mostly cleaning the AMS, NI cabinets, etc etc etc etc....

  34. Re:Not Soldier....Sailor....Not Sailor....A Nuke.. by Wonko+the+Sane · · Score: 1

    We don't get pro pay. Coners get fined $100 per month for being stupid. :)

  35. It's SUB-mariner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Or tuber.

    Or sewer-pipe sailor.

    At least they're better than Coasties. Woo hoo, the puddle police!

    1. Re:It's SUB-mariner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      (disclaimer: I have the utmost respect for the rescue and costal patrol mission performed by the USCG)

      So, you're in the Coast Guard. It rained yesterday--did you get sea pay?

      ~~~

    2. Re:It's SUB-mariner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One thing most people don't know about Coast Guard vessels...

      They don't carry life preservers... They use hip waders!!

  36. Re:Not Soldier....Sailor....Not Sailor....A Nuke.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just how many nuke ET's read slashdot anyway?

  37. Interesting tidbit by AllynM · · Score: 3, Interesting

    NR-1 is one (if not THE) smallest portable nuclear reactor in the world. The Army tried their hand at this back in the day. They wanted to make some tiny portable field power unit. Unfortunately all they managed to do was pin some poor sap to the ceiling with a control rod.
    Luckily the Navy builds their reactors in a safer fashion. ...yet another 2 cents...

    --
    this sig was brought to you by the letter /.
    1. Re:Interesting tidbit by Wonko+the+Sane · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Only because that "poor sap" was a complete idiot.

      The army actually had a wide range of working small nuclear reactors of various sizes. They stopped only because the Vietnam war sucked up all the available money and there wasn't funds left over to continue non-war related research.

    2. Re:Interesting tidbit by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      You got a link on that nuclear mishap? As you can see from my sig, nukes are a sort of hobby of mine.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    3. Re:Interesting tidbit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      are you a nuke ET?

    4. Re:Interesting tidbit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You could google for it. Most of what I know comes from our training material which discusses various accidenta that have happened (3 mile island, chernobyl, etc.) I can't really give you any of those details, since it is all classified.

    5. Re:Interesting tidbit by MrWa · · Score: 3, Informative
      That was SL-1 and it demonstrates that not following procedures and, even worse, not understand WHY, can be a very dangerous thing. Making a nuclear reactor go supercritial (basically: the reactor is not only self-sustaining, but each reaction causes the reactor power to increase!) is a bad thing.

      Short story - someone purposely pulled a control out of a shutdown reactor too far, causing the reactor to become supercritial, emit a lot of steam, and impale him on the ceiling. The Army - since they didn't have Adm. Rickover (say what you want about him, he did make a very safe, very successful nuclear power program in the Navy) - should not be messing with nuclear power.

    6. Re:Interesting tidbit by AllynM · · Score: 1

      http://www.radiationworks.com/sl1reactor.htm

      --
      this sig was brought to you by the letter /.
    7. Re:Interesting tidbit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not quite, a supercritical reactor just means that power is increasing. There is nothing wrong with being supercritical. I believe the term you are looking for is "prompt critical". Without getting into details, a prompt critical is so supercritical that is not controllable by any means. You get an explosion - not a nucleal explosion, but a steam explosion. The fuel gets so hot so quickly that the steam pressure generated approaches that of the shock wave made by a high explosive. This is what happened to SL-1 and also Chernoybel.

    8. Re:Interesting tidbit by AugustFalcon · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Nah....
      What actually happened with the control rod was in fact an accident. That plant was shut down and was cold and depressurized. They were doing some maintenance on the rod drive mechanisms and were attempting to reinstall one of the rod drive mechanisms. To do so required that the control rod be raised a very short distance to reengage the mechanism. The rod stuck when he tried to move it. He pulled harder and it came unstuck and moved a short distance quite rapidly. Unfortunately the amount of reactivity from control rod movement is a function of the speed with which the rod is moved. The speed here caused the reactor to go critical just in the portion of the core at the bottom of this control rod which generated a very high localized temperature causing the moderator, i.e., the water at the bottom of the control rod channel to turn to superheated steam which because the rod mechanism was not installed served to eject the rod rapidly from the core and impale this poor guy on the ceiling far above.

      When I went through Naval Nuclear Power training this was one of the accidents we studied. They had pictures. The funniest one was the poor guy who had his mop head go critical when he mopped up a uranium containing solution (I think it was uranium hexaflouride) and then put it in the bucket's squeezer. The mop actully went critical and heated up to the point of steaming. He died a slow death over the next few days from the massive radiation dose.

    9. Re:Interesting tidbit by jimhill · · Score: 2

      "Making a nuclear reactor go supercritial ... is a bad thing."

      Oh, bullshit. You can't get a reactor from zero power to greater-than-zero power without going supercritical. Sheesh.

      "Captain! We're approaching the prompt jump!"

      "AIEEE! Abandon ship!"

      --
      Learn to spell: nickel, missile, lose, solely, amendment, speech, kernel, probably, ridiculous, deity, hierarchy, versus
    10. Re:Interesting tidbit by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      Thanks... That's sure something they don't often mention in history books. I guess it would have been classified until recently.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    11. Re:Interesting tidbit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think it's actually pretty well known. There's a whole myth built up around the SL-1 accident. Supposedly, the guy pinned to the ceiling by the control rod was making time with the other guy's wife, so he decided to do a little penetrating of his own.

    12. Re:Interesting tidbit by N2UX · · Score: 1

      From the time I was 6 until I was 11 (1969 to 1974) I lived on an army base with a reactor. The reactor was the SM-1A reactor at Ft. Greely, Alaska. This plant provided power and heating for the base and was also used for 'research' purposes. The plant was basically a navy design, and, as I recall, The Master Chief who lived next door to us was very involved in its operation. I eventually grew up to become a Navy Nuke myself and was stationed on both a Ballistic Missle Sub and a Fast Attack Sub.

    13. Re:Interesting tidbit by TheAncientHacker · · Score: 2

      the amount of reactivity from control rod movement is a function of the speed with which the rod is moved

      Nope. It is the presence or absence of a neutron absorbing material (in a damping control rod design) that determines reactivity. You aren't going to change accelleration of neutrons no matter how fast you are at pulling a rod. The guy killed pulled the rod out too far. It wouldn't have mattered if it took him a tenth of a second or a week.

      I'm guessing the Navy training you got may have slipped a bit over the years.

    14. Re:Interesting tidbit by TheAncientHacker · · Score: 2

      Exactly. Moving the control rods is equivalent to pressing on the accelerator in a car. Saying that going supercritical is bad is like saying that you'd never want to make a car accelerate.

    15. Re:Interesting tidbit by N2UX · · Score: 1

      I seem to remember a reactivity rate componant in the Startup Rate equation I was taught in Nuke School. I'd enter the equation here, but then I'd have to kill you....

    16. Re:Interesting tidbit by TheAncientHacker · · Score: 2

      Not enough at human speeds to make a difference with pulling out a control rod. (And, don't tell me)

  38. Challenger Question by spacechicken · · Score: 1

    Wasn't NR-1 used to recover parts of Challenger's SRBs from the floor of the Atlantic?

    1. Re:Challenger Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. They also recovered a lost phoenix missile prototype that fell into the ocean while they were testing it.

      They did a lot of things that the public will never know about, as well.

  39. A submarine is... by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 2
    I long metal tube filled with semen... I mean seamen!

    Bruce

    1. Re:A submarine is... by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 1
      I would goof my own joke. OK, take two:

      A submarine is... a long tube filled with seamen.

      I'll go away now.

      Bruce

  40. Call 1-800-SOSUS by Genady · · Score: 2

    Have you boys never heard of SOSUS? Yeah, I'm sure that it was probably also used to tap 'secure' Soviet communications lines, but it was also probably a SOSUS repair truck.

    --


    What if it is just turtles all the way down?
    1. Re:Call 1-800-SOSUS by TheAncientHacker · · Score: 2

      I knew someone connected with that program who said they used to be able to hear Soviet subs leave the Baltic from their station at Tristan da Cunha in the South Atlantic. (About 6000 miles away)

  41. Nuclear cars by Cheese+Cracker · · Score: 2

    They wanted to make some tiny portable field power unit. 15 years ago, I read an article about how East German (during the cold war) scientists had tried to build a nuclear car. The scientists failed because they couldn't isolate the nuclear reactor without the car being too heavy. Maybe it was for the best that they never managed to get these rolling nukes out on the streets. :)

  42. "No Escape" by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 2
    OK, something I don't understand here. How was this boat special in that there was no escape if it got into trouble? I've seen the big training ascent tank back east, but how many sailors have actually made that trip and lived after damage to a sub?

    Bruce

    1. Re:"No Escape" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know of any cases. We only get cursory escape training when we get to the boat. They tell us the the escape trunks are only there to make your mom feel better.

    2. Re:"No Escape" by eyegor · · Score: 4, Informative

      I've heard that it's possible to escape from a couple hundred feet, but the odds of your survival are pretty slim. The longer it takes from the time you begin to pressurize the escape trunk to when you begin your assent, the more likely it is that you're going to get a very bad case of the bends. If that doesn't get you, there's also a VERY good chance you'll hold your breath just a tiny bit and blow out a lung due to overpressurization during your assent.

      In spite of what happened to the guys on the Kursk, most of the ocean is so fricking deep that your ship will crush LONG before you hit the bottom.

      Hence, escape training is largly a waste of time.

      When the ship crushes, the volume inside the ship gets VERY small, very quickly (think diesel engine). Everything bursts into flame, then you get hit in the face with a thousand piece of equipment, then the fire gets put out a split second later by tons of seawater. Fun...

      Beats being shot and laying in a muddy ditch with your guts hanging out.....

      --

      Don't anthropomorphize computers, they don't like it.
    3. Re:"No Escape" by old_n_anal · · Score: 1
      The escape trunks are rated for survival from 600 feet. They exist for two purposes:
      1) To make your mom feel better
      2) To quietly deliver and retrieve nasty looking gun toting individuals to/from foreign shores.

      Standard operating procedures for US Navy subs (at least used to) state that you cannot submerge the boat with fewer than 100 fathoms of water beneath the keel. The rule is supposed to help prevent you from bouncing off the bottom (or any interesting uncharted bits sticking up from the bottom).
      So let's see... escape trunks good to 600 feet. A fathom is 6 feet. Can't dive with less than 100 fathoms. Whoops.

  43. it's been done, without the damn claw by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    the uss halibut, uss seawolf, and uss parche tapped russian cables in okhotsk and the barents. instead of some gay-ass claw they snuck in and used deep-sea divers to place a tap, waited a while (or left), and then retrieved the tap's tapes.

    all this and more in Blind Man's Bluff: The Untold Story of American Submarine Espionage

  44. The SL-1 incident by Animats · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Read the official report. While there's still some controversy over exactly how the accident occured, just reading the documentation is scary. Check "Table V - Control Rod Sticking Summary". 45 major stuck control rod incidents in two years. On three occasions, they couldn't get a control rod to go in at all. And this was in a 5-rod reactor that went critical with one rod out. Aargh. Even if they hadn't had an accident (some people think suicide or sabotage) while someone was working on a control rod drive, that reactor was an accident waiting to happen.

    The people working on the design knew it, and the reactor control rod system was being redesigned when the accident occured. This was a little reactor, developed as a crash program for a military project, and deliberately installed in the middle of nowhere so that should the worst-case accident occur, the effects wouldn't affect anybody other than those directly involved at the test site.

  45. Re:Not Soldier....Sailor....Not Sailor....A Nuke.. by herohog · · Score: 1

    I was stationed on AR-16 USS Tringa, a Sub Rescue ship at the Nuke Sub base in Grotton CT. back when the NR1 was HIGHLY CLASSIFIED (mid 70's). We towed it to Scottland and all we ever saw of it was... NOTHING! We met another ship in tha Atlantic, they gave us the end of a tow line and we pulled it across the ocean! When we got to port, a crew set up a floating tarp with a zipper in the middle. The NR-1 came up under the tarp, unzipped it from below and departed the sub. Armed Marines were posted on the the NR-1's pier with orders to shoot ANYONE nearing the vessle. Fast foward 25 years, I pick up a Readers Digest and there, in color, with cut-away views and everything but blueprints, is the NR-1! My how things have changed.

    Alfred "Speedy" Mercer
    USN Engineman 3rd Class (Dissabled Vet.)

    --
    Hero Hog AKA: Speedy, Dr. Speed 01000111011001010110010101101011
  46. HOW TO SIMULATE SUBMARINE LIFE AT HOME by bubblegoose · · Score: 5, Interesting

    OK, I spent a couple of years on a bigger submarine (LA class Fast Attack) Here's how you can get a feel for this stuff at home.

    Surround yourself with a few people you don't like. Close all windows and doors tightly, close curtains. Seal any openings to the outside world with a proper vault. Unplug all radios and TV sets to cut yourself off completely from news, football games, Saturday Night Live, the Muppet Show, etc.

    Hourly monitor all operating home appliances, if not in use, log as secured. If using the bathroom, do not flush toilet for first two days to simulate smell of blowing sanitaries and venting inboard. Then flush daily.

    Wear only approved FBM coveralls, or proper Navy uniforms. No hats, special T-shirts, etc. Cut your hair once a week ensuring that you make it look like hell. Work 18-hour day intervals to ensure your body really gets confused. Listen to the same cassette over and over until you can't stand it anymore, and then put in one that you can't even listen to without acute nausea setting in. Set your alarm to go off just as you fall asleep, with alarm set at loud, or buy a special alarm clock with various settings, (i.e., "Man Battle Stations, Fire, Flooding in the Basement").

    Prepare food with a blindfold on to simulate what real submarine cooks do. Then take the blindfold off and try to get your dog to eat it. Then break out a can of tuna and/or peanut butter.

    Cut your bed in half, and enclose all but one side using the dimensions of a small casket as a reference. When not in bed, make up blankets properly so no one will see or care.

    Periodically, for want of excitement, open main power breaker and run around yelling, "Reactor Scram", until you are sweating profusely, then restore power. Buy yourself a snorkel and mask, and again, periodically, just for want of nothing else to do, put it on and pretend you're in a smoke filled room with no way out. For added variety, hook up the garden hose and pressurize it.

    To enable yourself to handle anything, constantly study wiring diagrams and operating instructions for various home appliances (stove, refrigerator, can opener). For no reason at all, at specified intervals (monthly, weekly, etc.) tear one item apart, just in case it was going to break down.

    Paint everything around you gray (Navy FSN gray, no substitutes) or off-white. To be sure you are living in a clean and happy environment, every Friday, set alarm on loud for a short but hated drill sound, then get up and manned with only a bucket and sponge and greeny, clean one area over and over, even if it was already spotless. Then make out a discrepancy list.

    Once a day, after normal programming hours, plug in TV and watch one movie being careful that it is (a) at least five years old, (b) made long enough prior to showing to be sure that you've seen it at least once before, or (c) be so bad you have to install a seatbelt in your chair to keep you there until it is over.

    Since no doctor will be available, stockpile Band-Aids, aspirin, and Actifed as these are proven cure-alls. Practice if necessary on your dog (surgery, dentistry, or death).

    When commencing this test simulation, lock your family, friends, and anything that means anything to you outside. Tests will run for at least two months with no end in sight.

    --
    I hope that someday we will be able to put away our fears and prejudices and just laugh at people. - Jack Handey
    1. Re:HOW TO SIMULATE SUBMARINE LIFE AT HOME by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Coming this close to Veterans' Day, I probably speak for quite a few overfed, over-indulged civvy Slashdotters when I say, in all seriousness, "Thanks for putting up with all that crap on behalf of the rest of us."

    2. Re:HOW TO SIMULATE SUBMARINE LIFE AT HOME by Wonko+the+Sane · · Score: 1

      Yes, that all sounds about right...

    3. Re:HOW TO SIMULATE SUBMARINE LIFE AT HOME by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Someone posted this the last time there was a sub story on slashdot.

      Regards

      AC

    4. Re:HOW TO SIMULATE SUBMARINE LIFE AT HOME by ChaoticLimbs · · Score: 1

      You forgot- every month or so you may exit the home through the chimney. Upon return to your home, salute the quarterdeck, present your ID and enter through the chimney.

  47. He needs to by mtec · · Score: 1

    Mast abate.

    --
    Cake or Death? Cake Please!
  48. Re:"class B nuclear submarine"??? by Elroy+Jetson · · Score: 1
    "class B nuclear submarine"???

    I've been out for a while, but I thought classes of submarines were named after either the first ship of that style (i.e., "Skipjack" class, "Los Angeles" class), or the hull number of the first ship (i.e. "637", "688"). Of course, the exception to that rule is the Permit class, since nobody really wanted to say they were on a "Thresher class" boat after it failed to keep the dive:rise ratio at 1:1.

    Alternately, you could be refering to the type of reactor. But --again, correct me if I'm wrong-- I thought the common nomenclature looked more like "S5W" rather than "Class B".

    I entered "class B nuclear submarine" as a string into Google and turned up zero hits. Please, enlighten me: name a couple "class B nuclear submarines" so that I know what you're talking about.

  49. NR-1 by ayb11 · · Score: 1

    Clearly I am surrounded by submarine dig-its on slashdot, so I'll try not to hurt anyone's feelings. NR-1 was originally an ego booster for Hyman Rickover. After all, as the head of the Bureau of Naval Reactors (part of the Department of Energy), why couldn't he have a namesake? The president has Air Force 1. Why couldn't he have NR-1. NR-1 is a pretty old submarine, and it is TINY. It is occasionally referred to as the "trash can reactor". You wouldn't catch me volunteering to be on that thing-- the guys I knew gave up the opportunity to shower regularly to lead a fairly miserable life for the periods of time they were submerged. Compared to life on even a Los Angeles class submarine, NR-1 life is substandard. All of the stupid "100 people go down, 50 couples come up" jokes are pretty lame. For the most part, a submarine crew consists of sharp, extremely heterosexual guys that spend their time doing the right thing and busting each other's balls. If anyone admits a weakness or that something bothers them, everyone will do their best to push that button and drive him to insanity. When the crew's favorite movie is "Wild Things", it is hard to say they're all a bunch of homos. The life of a submariner is anything but easy. Men on real operational submarines (i.e. the "fast attack", Los Angeles class submarines) often spend more than half of the year away from home. I've said my peace.

    1. Re:NR-1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      You wrote:

      "learly I am surrounded by submarine dig-its on slashdot"

      Looks like it

      "or the most part, a submarine crew consists of sharp, extremely heterosexual guys that spend their time doing the right thing and busting each other's balls. If anyone admits a weakness or that something bothers them, everyone will do their best to push that button and drive him to insanity. "

      Very good description. TO go further, the closest parallel to submarine life on the outside is prison life. Sometimes, on the sub, the men turn on each other, much as prisoners do. Any idiosyncrasies or weaknesses of a person are grist for the submarine society.

  50. Re:A submarine is... a big, long, phallus joke? by geoswan · · Score: 2
    I long metal tube filled with semen... I mean seamen!

    And how can you tell that Santa Claus is really a potent male fertility symbol?

    Well, what else can you think of that keeps sliding up and down long, dark, warm, hidden vertical passages, leaving presents at the bottom?

    (No, I didn't make this up, I heard author Margaret Visser say this in a TV interview.)

    (Yeah, I know this is off-topic, but what the heck, I have a few extra karma points.)

    Oh yeah, Bruce, thanks for your terrific contributions in the open source movement.

  51. Class B Nuke? by Gekko · · Score: 2

    I only know of two class b submarines. Both were non nuclear. The USS Bass(SS-164) was a US Class B sub, and the Brits had a class B costal sub. You must be old as hell pops. The Bass was used for target practice in 1945, and the british class b was builit in 1904.

    --
    I mod down any one who says "I'm sure I will get modded down for this"
  52. Father served on NR-1 by ScreamingSlave · · Score: 1

    My father served on the NR-1 as storekeeper (SKCM) for a number of years. Luckily this did not required him to go out with the sub as it was so tiny anyone who wasn't needed didn't go on the patrols. He was on many subs in the USN for 20+ years. A few of them were the USS Sam Rayburn, USS Whale, USS George Marshall, and USS Phoenix.

  53. EOOW by craenor · · Score: 1

    When I spent time as an RO (Reactor Operator) and an instructor in the Navy, I always wanted to go to NR-1 so I could qualify as EOOW (Engineering Officer of the Watch).
    This qualification is normally limited to officers in the submarine community.
    Craenor

  54. RN thinks different by hughk · · Score: 2

    The Royal Navy still has an escape tower filled with water at their training centre in Gosport and to get your submariner rating, you had to practice there. Escapes are definitely considered survivable from 100 metres which is why there is training.

    --
    See my journal, I write things there
    1. Re:RN thinks different by eyegor · · Score: 2

      I believe it's possible to escape from deeper depths as well. I was always taught that we shouldn't say the ship can go any deeper than 400 feet. Hence, I tend to fudge a bit when discussing depths.

      As a SCUBA diver, I have a pretty good handle on the physics involved and I'm pretty sure that as long as I don't have to worry about hytothermia, I'd be a surviver.

      We had to do escape training while in Sub School in Groton, CT. I thought it was a hoot. I wanted to do it again.

      --

      Don't anthropomorphize computers, they don't like it.
    2. Re:RN thinks different by hughk · · Score: 2
      I would observe that I definitely wouldn't like to do this, I didn't like coming up from 10 metres when I took my PADI Open Water.

      The reason this came to light was when the Kursk went down. The discussion was that the RN was one of the few fleets to still train all their sub crews to do this and to carry the escape equipment. The Russians were in the past (at least the subs had escape compartments), but the USN didn't consider this option as they have DSVs for rescue.

      OTOH, coming up in the Barents sea definitely wouldn't be nice.

      --
      See my journal, I write things there
    3. Re:RN thinks different by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      beats staying down....

      All in all... death sucks (of course, I'm just assuming...)

  55. Grapes by svzurich · · Score: 1

    That whole flag crap really pissed me off back in the day. I had to work to get my fish in 1995, only to see kids knowing half of what I did being handed them from 1996-2000. It was sad the "Great Dolphin Giveaway" was in full force. I received my checkouts from the A-Gang LPO, and the kids just found a belowdecks qualed MM2 to grape them. At least I knew what to do in a casualty!

    Disgruntled former STS2/SS

  56. By definition it was an intelligence submarine! by MtViewGuy · · Score: 2

    It's obvious that given the sub had a nuclear powerplant it was going to be used on clandestine, secret operations in Soviet territorial waters to monitor Soviet Navy movements. NR-1 was probably the best submarine to quietly monitor the home bases of the Northern Fleet, the Soviet Navy's primary fleet for operations against NATO.

    What's interesting is that the Soviets never built anything like NR-1. The Soviets had built a series of miniature submarines for Spetsnaz operations in Norwegian fjords but they never did build anything akin to NR-1, even though Soviet submarine designers could have easily designed and built such a craft. Maybe the poor state of Soviet nuclear reactor design prevented the NR-1'ski from being built?