Slashdot Mirror


Updating Quickbooks Forces Online Membership?

garyebickford asks: "I've been using Quickbooks 2001 for a long time, sending out invoices via email. A couple of months ago it asked if I wanted to do an online update - these occurred occasionally and I agreed. There was no information regarding what the update would do, although IIRC there was some mention of 'new features' and 'improvements'. Since that time, it is now impossible to either fax or email an invoice without signing up for Quickbook's 'Online Business Member' program since it appears to use their own mail server. Membership is free for now, but the required click-agreement forces me to agree in advance to any future fees! I have no interest in letting Intuit know about my invoices and other financial information. As a result, this software is essentially useless and I must find a new accounting package. I've looked at various OSS packages but haven't found one that has developed far enough to use in this way. But there are many out there and I haven't kept up to date, so maybe someone else out there can suggest something. I'd prefer using it on Linux, of course. I'd also be interested if this loss of functionality would be sufficient to consider a class action suit to recover costs of conversion." The issue at hand is that commercial software has started to force consumers to fall into such schemes to maintain features that they already had. Today it is Quickbooks, but what about tomorrow?

175 of 441 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Easy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Good luck finding the patches. Once they fall to a forced use scenario, it's common practice to only allow previous patches to include the forced use option.

  2. Re:Easy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Well, that sounds all well... but Quickbooks itself, also updates all of the Tax Forms, along with all other State / Federal tax filing information.

    You have to keep that information updated.

  3. I use 'FirstEdge' for OS X... by otis+wildflower · · Score: 4, Informative

    .. Largely because it's good enough for what I need, and it runs in OS X. There's annoying bugs (print to PDF, then attach to email, since they haven't kept up with Jaguar's Mail api), but I don't have to go sign up for no dumbass thing to use it.

    Also, TimeSlice for OS X is very nice, it itemizes your billing time (if you bill per hr) and exports it into CSV..

    There's also AccountEdge for OS X, but it's overkill and overpriced for my simple needs.

    Is there anything comparable for Xwindows? Good Q..

  4. Workaround by yesman · · Score: 3, Informative

    Use a program like PDFmailer to send quotes and such.

    1. Re:Workaround by 1u3hr · · Score: 5, Interesting
      Another workaround:
      Can you force it to use your SMTP server of choice? Look in the exe and its other files for a string that looks like a mail server, (say smtp.quickbooks.com). If you find that, go to your hosts file and make a line
      smtp.quickbooks.com aa.bb.cc.dd
      where aa.bb.cc.dd is the IP of the mailserver you want to use (eg on your ISP). No guarantee but worth a try. If it really is SMTP, then the commands to send should be universal.

      Otherwise, as the above poster, create a PDF and email it yourself -- there are free ways. It's not difficult to work out automated methods if you have any volume.

  5. I've noticed this myself... by kaxman · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...and I'm not even a "business" customer. I like to hunt up old versions of programs, especially older shareware stuff that I might use a couple times a year, simply because it isn't as 'crippled' as today's version, or because nowadays the company making it requires that you give them a valid email and a reason for being interested in the software. And I'm not talking about finding old programs because they're easier to find cracks for; I actually do pay and have paid for many programs I find useful, and send money along fairly frequently for the free programs that deserve it. But for stuff that just strives to annoy, I'm having none of it.

    --
    Everyone on slashdot has a journal.
  6. Easy by unterderbrucke · · Score: 3, Funny
  7. Re:Common sense by Tteddo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Because when you update the program, it updates your data file to the new version, and you can't go back. I still use QB99 for this reason.

  8. TurboTax for 2002 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Has a similar scheme. I find I'm forced to spend a lot of time explaining this all to clients; they sure are pissed. Open Source tax/acctng sware would be very useful. And an AOL client...

    1. Re:TurboTax for 2002 by swv3752 · · Score: 2

      you mean like PengAOL

      Yeah, it is not official. The official one is Gamera, but lots of luck finding it now.

      --
      Just a Tuna in the Sea of Life
  9. scary side effect by phr2 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Having the invoices from millions of small businesses all go through the same server in the same format makes that server a VERY juicy source for the Office of Total Information Awareness. This kind of centralization has to be resisted.

    1. Re:scary side effect by pongo000 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Think of the millions who use on-line bill payment services! Talk about juicy: A company could build quite a marketable portfolio about you based upon your bill-paying habits.

      Unfortunately, the masses are sucked in by the slick marketing, and never give a thought as to the middleman through which they're routing all their personal financial information.

      Can you imagine posting all of your income tax information on the web? Apparently someone is willing to do this!

    2. Re:scary side effect by Black+Copter+Control · · Score: 2
      Imagine if you will the day someone hacks this mail server.

      You don't even have to hack directly into the server... Just hack one of the routers leading into them..... redirect a copy of the flow and pick your data out of that (carnivore style).
      (and I'm betting that the data isn't encrypted...)

      --
      OS Software is like love: The best way to make it grow is to give it away.
    3. Re:scary side effect by motardo · · Score: 2

      they can track your habits even without doing on-line bill payment services. I don't see how this is any different.

    4. Re:scary side effect by vanyel · · Score: 2

      Unless you pay by cash, online bill payment adds nothing on top of the federal reserve system through which all checks are processed already. And automatic payment is the only way my bills get paid on time ;-)

    5. Re:scary side effect by nahdude812 · · Score: 2
      Unless you pay by cash, online bill payment adds nothing on top of the federal reserve system through which all checks are processed already


      But the FRS isn't a commercial entity who could (and would) sell marketing information about you. It's also a terribly ominous system to try to hack, it would take a lot more balls than most hackers have to try to do that, versus a corporate network. Also, it represents a duplication of information at the FRS, and at the software vendor, representing two independant points of failure for the same information.

  10. Long live spreadsheets... by Eric_Cartman_South_P · · Score: 5, Informative
    I own a small business (yeah, me, can you believe it?) doing productivity consulting and stuffs. Although it takes me longer than it would if things were automatic, I use SPREADSHEETS for everything financial. I own it, it's mine, and I can do what I want.

    I looked at QuickBooks, MS Money, etc and for complete control, nothing can match using spreadsheets for all the tracking, etc. One master spreadsheet for accounting gets numbers from all the other spreadsheets (sales, expenses, etc). Will I need something stronger a year or two from now? Yeah, and I'll be reading the posts right here for an idea on what I will do then. But for anyone who is a one-h@x0r shop up to a couple of employees, spreadsheets fit the bill just fine. Oh, and of course online banking (Citibank is pretty sweet and reasonable fees for corporate account).

    Good luck!

    1. Re:Long live spreadsheets... by gmhowell · · Score: 3, Funny

      How much software do you actually need to order some buckets of shit and hire some Mexican kids to fling it around?

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
  11. Quickbooks disabled? noooooo...... by Thu+Anon+Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    We had the same thing happen a few years ago to us. We were using it at the start of the new year wrapping up previous years finance stuff, a message came up saying that since they didn't want us to get in trouble, they were going to disable the tax tables in 30 days time so we couldn't use them. We would have to purchase new tax table info from Intuit, EVEN IF THE DAMN TAX TABLES HADN'T CHANGED!

    No tax tables makes Quickbooks about as useless as tits on a boar hog. Our CPA switched us over to Netledger at Netledger.com

    --



    I'm good with numbers - .45, 7.62, 9.....
    1. Re:Quickbooks disabled? noooooo...... by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 5, Funny
      "No tax tables makes Quickbooks about as useless as tits on a boar hog."

      Clearly, you have never owned a boar hog ;-)

    2. Re:Quickbooks disabled? noooooo...... by kuroth · · Score: 2, Interesting

      NetLedger Small Business Suite: $1200 per year

      Upgrades Required To Use Quickbooks Tax Tables:
      - Do-It-YourSelf Payroll: $169 per year
      - Upgrade To Current Quickbooks Version: $100 one-time

      Great CPA you have there.

    3. Re:Quickbooks disabled? noooooo...... by Thu+Anon+Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      there were a few other issues that demanded a move. but as for Netledger, we don't pay for it since he gets a special deal him being a licensed re-seller and all. and before you say anything else, Yes, I have seen my monthly CPA bills. they aren't more than they were before. one of the other problems was that QB data files were getting a bit too unwieldy to carry around or send via the Internet since we both work on the data files from different aspects. that and keeping them properly updated since we had to constantly work with them while he needed them for a few days each time. Netledger made a whole lot more sense, even if the interface can be a PITA to deal with

      --



      I'm good with numbers - .45, 7.62, 9.....
    4. Re:Quickbooks disabled? noooooo...... by steve_l · · Score: 4, Interesting

      When people complain about MS business practices, I think these people have never used quicken. I wanted to get (UK) quicken 95 to be y2k compliant, all they would offer me was a (small) discount on a current version. Instead I acquired a friend's copy, only to discover that it was chock-a-block with 'value added services' that were essentially trying to generate sales bounties for intuit.

      I would never touch any of their products again.

    5. Re:Quickbooks disabled? noooooo...... by Reziac · · Score: 2

      Would you like to hear my rant about how TurboTax 2001 forcibly installed IE5.5 and fubar'd my system but good? I'd really like to bill Intuit for all the time that wasted (it broke DUN, wouldn't uninstall cleanly, and even IEradicating IE5.5 didn't completely undo all the damage it did -- for the first time *ever* I am probably going to have to reinstall Windows.. used to be this system ran for several weeks before needing a restart; since TurboTax, the max is about 3 days.)

      To add insult to injury, I couldn't find ANY way to contact Intuit other than the basic support email (which garnered NO response). What I *really* wanted was to call their sales dept. and give 'em an earful about why NEXT year, I'll be buying some *other* tax package. I've already inquired about the tax software from H&R Block, and guess what -- no forced IE.

      The upshot is -- Intuit lost a good customer that day. I will NEVER buy any of their products again. EVER. Period.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  12. What about tomrrow? by nurb432 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Tomorrow all commercial software will pull this sort of stunt. To get to full 'pay per use' models.

    They will have to, once the unwashed masses become technically educated enough that they realize what is going on with this constant upgrade cycle and stops buying new products since what they have 'works well enough for me'.

    The entire market is based on this deceit. and will suddenly implode..

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:What about tomrrow? by Dunkirk · · Score: 5, Insightful

      No... They're going to get most everyone moved over before people realize they've been had. Probably 3/4th's of my friends and family have computers, and there are only a handful that would even *know* the difference between owning a piece of software and "renting" it over the wire, let alone *care*. It's hopeless. Just like spam, if companies can continue to make money from practices that are - to people like Slashdot readers - basically bait-and-switch tactics, they're going to do it. All the more reason to move to OSS ASAP. Spend your money there and do without paid software. I tell you, I used to think Stallman was a certifiable nut, but the further the copyright holders take their position in today's electronic society, the more I think that his view is the only one that will stem the tide. Just say no to closed source.

      --
      Acts 17:28, "For in Him we live, and move, and have our being."
  13. Caught in the headlights of a major trend ... by LL · · Score: 3, Informative

    ... where access to the customer is being treated and fungible (and thus marketable). I can point to a whole string of court cases starting with CompuServe v Cyber Promotions, Ebay v Bidder's Advantage, Intel v Hamadi, etc which have basically ruled that companies who "own" the infrastrcuture for communications effectively are private networks (think cable) and courts are relunctant to impose common-carrier, anti-competition or even anti-competition rules on them. Companies are not stupid, if they can't get lock in one way, they'll try another legit mechanism and in effect, vertically coordinate their services (software, middleware, skinware = GUI/web layout, tangleware = EULA + legal entanglements) to capture business.

    Is it legal? ... yes
    Is it proper? ... debateable
    Is it worthwhile? ... depends on the customer whether they cna get satisfaction for service

    Perhaps you should write a little letter to your fair-trading rep or competition commissioner requesting investigation into unfair trading practices based on their market power to exclude future competitors (say ASPs).

    LL

  14. Try GNUcash... by chupar · · Score: 5, Informative

    I used Quickbooks a *long* time ago to help out with my father's small business. For myself, I've been using GNUcash for about a year, and I'm fairly pleased. Some of the reporting options could use some work, but it keeps track of all my data, and that's the important part. Quick look at their website indicates a new stable version is on the way, with some things that might help you, although the faxing/emailing features don't seem to be on the radar...

    - Small Business Accounting Features:
    GnuCash now can be used for Customer and Vendor tracking, Invoicing and Bill Payment,
    and using different Tax and Billing Terms in a small business.
    - OFX Import:
    GnuCash is the first free software application to support the Open Financial Exchange
    protocol that many banks and financial services are moving to use. The development of
    OFX and HBCI support has also resulted in an improved transaction matching system that
    more accurately picks duplicate transactions.

    1. Re:Try GNUcash... by adminispheroid · · Score: 2
      Notice to potential adopters: before you look into GNUCash you should know that it is Linux only.

      Nearly but not quite true. gnucash.org has binary distros for Solaris and Irix. Gnucash requires Gnome 2, so you'd have a shot at getting it going anyplace Gnome 2 has been ported.

    2. Re:Try GNUcash... by adminispheroid · · Score: 2

      Oops, I'm an idiot. Gnucash requires Gnome 1.4, not Gnome 2.

    3. Re:Try GNUcash... by Daniel+Phillips · · Score: 2

      I used Quickbooks a *long* time ago to help out with my father's small business. For myself, I've been using GNUcash

      I last looked at Gnucash about three years ago, and at the time I found it:

      - Tricky to install, with lots of dependencies
      - Pretty rough user inteface

      but, and this is the important thing, under active development. Just now I did apt-get install gnucash, and two minutes later I'm in the tutorial. Wow, big difference. The interface is GTK, which in my experience tends to imply slower project progress on the gui front, but leaves you with much shorter startup times and snappier response, compared to the same thing in QT/KDE, and runs fine under KDE, which suits me just fine.

      The new user manual is a work in progress, but the parts that are done are really nice to look at, loaded with screen shots just like a commercial product. But of course, not loaded with nags and advertisements, unlike a commercial product.

      I didn't go deeper than taking a quick look at the docs, but my impression from what I've heard people say about it is, it's usable. That's good enough for me. Once any OSS project gets to "usable", you know it's just going to keep getting better from there. Plus, this is the kind of code I like to build from source and do a little hacking on. I suppose that if somebody hasn't already done it by the time I need it, making a nice interface for printing cheques would be fun. What I'd be thinking in terms of is:

      One-time setup:

      - Scan in the blank cheques so they can be usedas wallpaper for a print preview

      - Switch to a forms view of the cheque table with the scanned cheques as the wallpaper.

      - Drag the amount field etc into proper position against the wallpaper

      Now, to do a print a cheque run:

      - First, get the whole cheque run into a table view, so you can see all the cheques and the
      effects on account balances

      - Now flip to the forms view with the cheque wallpaper. You should be able to page up/down
      to see each cheque that's going to be printed

      - Load the cheques in the printer and go

      - In case of something mis-printed, you need to be able to cancel the obliterated cheques in
      the database as "spoiled" and issue new ones, with new numbers but otherwise identical. This
      happens all the time, so it has to be efficient to get back on track here. Of course, the accounts
      have to be seen to be correct after all this!

      So, the idea it's all wysiwyg, which is just the space I like to be in when I'm doing something as dull as accounting. I.e., I'd rather spend a week coding up a drool-mindless easy interface, once, than waste a minute or two fiddling around with a crude interface every time, especially the first time, trying to get the fields in the right places.

      Anyway, crude cheque printing or not, this package looks like it's ready for real work.

      --
      Have you got your LWN subscription yet?
    4. Re:Try GNUcash... by HiThere · · Score: 2

      Is this really true? Not currently, but in a more permanent way?

      The reason that I ask is that CygWin nearly has KDE up on my Win98 system. (I assume that it would actually be up if I had Win2000 or some such.) And this seems to run many Linux applications already. If KDE were running, I doubt that gtklib wouldn't work. etc.

      Mind you, I think that using it on Linux is a superior idea...

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  15. Re:Workaround -- Uh, why pay to generate a pdf? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Use a free pdf print driver and print the quote from quickbooks to pdf, then send to client. I agree this quickbooks change sucks, but while you're looking for a replacement this should work fine, it has for me.

  16. Forcing updates by RuXc · · Score: 5, Informative

    I am switching Quickbooks after I send out W2's this year for very similar reasons. Quickbooks will stop allowing you to do payroll if the TaxTables get too out of date. This normally wouldn't bother me, but they offer absolutely no way (that I know of) to manually enter the tax data, the payroll functionality get killed.

    To get the new TaxTables, they have really upped their subscription price to more than I think is reasonable. Also, they periodically force an update to the Quickbooks software to be able to use the new TaxTables format. So, for me to keep using Quickbooks, I would have to pay for a new (higher) TaxTable subscription and also update to a new version, which I can't justify.

    I have looked at PeachTree, and it seems very usable. It's Tax Table like subscription is about the same as Intuits (around $150), but they do allow you to manually enter details if you need to.

    I hate to see Inuit stoop to this, I really like their product. I used Quickbooks at version 5, and liked it. (I don't need any features now that version 5 didn't have). I just can't justify them doing these kind of things to customers, though.

    1. Re:Forcing updates by fishbowl · · Score: 2

      I can think of several reasons why an accountant would want to
      calculate payroll based on prior-year tax tables! I would go as far as to say it should be a REQUIRED capability!

      I certainly want the ability to recalculate my personal tax returns for prior years. If a business can't use the software to validate past data, that's a bug, plain and simple.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
  17. Try Compiere by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Read lots of good stuff about this, but as yet haven't had time to try it out. Looks like it could do what you need it to:

    http://www.compiere.org

  18. AppGen MyBooks by goldid · · Score: 5, Informative

    I haven't had time to fully use this yet, but I am considering purchasing: AppGen MyBooks (www.appgen.com) which has a Windows/OS X/Linux accounting program. Looks nice to me.

  19. Here's an idea... by tmark · · Score: 5, Insightful

    it is now impossible to either fax or email an invoice ...since it appears to use their own mail server.

    Couldn't you just do something like print the invoices to a PDF then email that through the mailer of your choice ? Sure beats having to move your operation and data to a new system, and with the convenient plus that if you want, as some do, you can always have a copy of the invoice exactly as it was printed.

    1. Re:Here's an idea... by vondo · · Score: 2

      Good idea. In fact, combine GNUCash as mentioned above with kprinter (the KDE printing panel) and you can directly mail PDF files as a "printer" device.

    2. Re:Here's an idea... by dossen · · Score: 2, Interesting

      How about adding an entry to your host file, pointing the intuit mailserver to some other mailserver? That is if you are sure you want to stay with Quicken, rather than follow the advice (and good advice it is) of my fellow /.'ers and change to an oss solution.

  20. It's true by IamTheRealMike · · Score: 5, Interesting
    The issue at hand is that commercial software has started to force consumers to fall into such schemes to maintain features that they already had. Today it is Quickbooks, but what about tomorrow?

    It's true actually... when I started my job back in September I was using Windows XP, and as there didn't seem to be any chance to switch to Linux coming soon I settled back into life as a Windows user, at work at least. Despite not really needing much software, I found I needed a truckload of commercial utilities to get anything done. We have a slightly dodgy connection, so a download manager that supported resuming (as neither mozilla nor IE appear to support this) was a must. On goes Download Accelerator. We need WinZip of course. Hmm, WindowBlinds FX looks nice (and it is nice). The BBC only streams in RealAudio so to save myself going insane I put on RealPlayer so I can listen to the radio while working.

    After a month or so, I realised if I could get the Adobe SVG plugin in IE working under Linux I could switch over to it, and so I got CrossOver (patched Wine to fix some bugs [sigh]) and was very happy.

    A week or so ago I rebooted into Windows, and was assaulted by raw commercialism. WindowBlinds had come to the end of its trial and popped up a window on every boot asking me to buy it. RealOne insisted on popping up adverts for its new features and offers, while cleverly not appearing to be running. WinZip of course has a nag screen whenever you run it. Download Accelerator inserts a blinking lightbulb into the system tray. It was almost physically unpleasant battering my way through all this garbage to get to what I wanted. I had become desensitised to it as I started using Windows again, then going back to it after so long was a real shock.

    After a while, you realise that seemingly every Windows app comes with some extra code whos only purpose is to try and make you spend money, or sell your eyeballs for a bit. It has nothing to do with enhancing the app, and this is true even for basic must have utilities like decompression programs and audio decoders. I wish I could suggest an alternative to Quickbooks but I don't really use programs like that. Except I know support was recently added to Wine for it.

    1. Re:It's true by Repugnant_Shit · · Score: 2, Informative

      You can use LeechFTP for FTP resuming. I think it supports HTTP downloads too.

      There are *lots* of free zip utilities. (Personally I think WinRAR is much better and worth the money).

      For an alternative to RealPlayer...hmmm. You got me there :)

      WindowBlinds makes it clear that it is a demo, so complaints about it expiring are just lame. The LiteStep devs are working on skinning, and I think I saw a WindowBlinds FX clone recently (try Shell Extension city).

      Its possible to find lots of freeware for Windows, you just have to look harder. Look at GNUWin II for some open source apps.

      And make sure to download Ad-Aware to hunt down those evil spy programs.

    2. Re:It's true by yasth · · Score: 4, Funny

      RealOne Enterprise Desktop is a nice alternative to RealPlayer.

      --
      I'd do something interesting, but my server can't handle a slashdotting.
    3. Re:It's true by pVoid · · Score: 3, Interesting
      What are you complaining about?

      You downloaded each and everyone of those applications you call 'necessities'. *You* are the one who made the choice.

      I personally installed RealPlayer a long time ago, and then said "no thanks", and have never used it since. Same for netscape mind you. But also, until Quicktime fixed it's horrendous interface and constant nagging, I didn't use it either.

      When I setup a new Win box, I get a fixed list of administration tools for FREE (as in beer) from sysinternals.com, I get Winrar/Winzip for free with a proper nag screen that doesn't hog memory, just gently reminds you that you have been using it for the 400th consecutive day without paying. And a few open source things like wget and netcat and the like from google.

      I have yet to get nags on my screen.

      All I have to say is be careful what you complain about as a user, because what you want you just might get...

      (Stupid) People complained about "DLL Hell" for the longest time, and now we are ALL cursed with Windows File Protection - a hybrid 'security' scheme set up so that even administrators couldn't replace/delete critical files (why? because all the stupid people ran as admin).

      Complain about nagware, and who knows, maybe free stuff like Winzip and winamp will disapear too, and enter the world of Web Services.

    4. Re:It's true by timeOday · · Score: 2
      Oh really? I paid for Windows and it still came plastered with ads for online services and such.

      My company paid for Acrobat Reader, but it still nags me "Acrobat isn't just a reader! Buy the whole suite!"

      The whole topic of this slashdot story is a guy who paid for quickbooks, but now it demands the inside scoop on all his business doings.

      I'll bet slashdotters can think of lots of commercial apps that are similarly obnoxious.

    5. Re:It's true by ErikTheRed · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Try using QuickBooks. They p1mp so many (grossly overpriced) services in their software it's sick. Doing my accounting is about as annoying as browsing pr0n sites with IE. This with software I shelled out ~$200 for, plus the tax table subscription.

      --

      Help save the critically endangered Blue Iguana
    6. Re:It's true by samdu · · Score: 2

      Instead of Download Accelerator, try LeechGet. Instead of WinZip, try UltimaetZip. Both are as good or better than their counterparts, yet never resort to these shenanigans.

    7. Re:It's true by marauder404 · · Score: 2

      What are you complaining about? Using Windows doesn't resign yourself to using commercial software. You can find an open source or free version of just about every utility that you require. I use Windows every day but I use tons of open source software: Emacs, Cygwin, gcc, random utilities, etc. Sometimes it's not as well developed as their Linux/Unix counterparts, but most of the time, they work just as well. Finding precompiled binaries is convenient, but they're hard to find sometimes. The market for Windows machines running open source software is even smaller than open source software running on an open source OS.

      Regarding the "commercialism," of COURSE it's filled with commercialism -- you haven't paid for the software. They're trying to get you to pay them for it, as you probably agreed to in the license agreement. You can pay for it make it go away or you can discontinue the trial. If you don't like the model or the software, find an alternative -- a packaged piece of commercial software or a free version.

    8. Re:It's true by 5KVGhost · · Score: 2

      Each of the examples you note is a well known shareware application. The intent of the nag screens is to get you to pay for the app after the trial period has expired. If you buy them, the nag screens go away. If you don't want to buy them and are offended by nag screens then use freeware alternatives instead. (Or, in the case of WinZip, just use the basic functionality built into XP.) Don't install shareware and then get upset because it's shareware.

  21. Lie to them by Qrlx · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Why don't you call Intuit support and come up with some reason as to why their new software won't work for you. Like your small office has only one phone line and there's no ISP in your area, or your ISP went out of business or something.

    Or maybe that you live on a boat, and you can easily send mail via USPS but to use the Internet requires a trip to the local cybercafe, since you can't get internet access on your cell phone?

    1. Re:Lie to them by ameoba · · Score: 2

      Not to mention that many ISPs don't allow you to connect to SMTP servers other than their own, as a method of trimming back on spam. MSN, for example, is one of the major ISPs that block SMTP.

      --
      my sig's at the bottom of the page.
    2. Re:Lie to them by penguinboy · · Score: 2

      It would be fairly trivial for QB to get around port 25 blocking, by using an alternate port and/or encapsulating the data between QB and the Intuit server.

  22. My bad experience with Inuit products by systemapex · · Score: 5, Informative

    I purchased Quicken Deluxe about this time last year. It came with a free downloadable version of QuickTax. I decided to download and install QuickTax around January so I could get a headstart on my taxes. Around this time, I upgraded my computer and had to re-install Windows. I re-installed Quicken Deluxe no problem but when it came time to re-install QuickTax I was notified that I could not do it. A version of the software had already been installed on a different computer! I was told to call their tech support line if this was not the case. So I did. I called their non-toll-free number long distance and was notified that their office was closed and would be until Monday (this was late Friday afternoon). So, I could not do my taxes that weekend. I waited until Monday and phoned their tech support line. I had to answer some questions to verify my identity and was told that if there ever was a next time, I would have to fax them with appropriate documentation verifying my identity! So, 3 days and 2 long-distance charges later I was left with a program that would only last until my next reformat. No thanks. I will never buy another Intuit product because of stories like my own and this one. Moreover, experiences like this helped push me to going 100% Linux/OSS - I've been doing so since late August with much less problems than I expected I would have.

    1. Re:My bad experience with Inuit products by systemapex · · Score: 2

      GNUcash so far. It took me a few tries to get my Quicken data imported but once it was, I found GNUcash far more intuitive from an accounting perspective - I have some high school-level accounting experience under my belt.

    2. Re:My bad experience with Inuit products by lpret · · Score: 2

      Dude, I had the same problem with OfficeXP. Microsoft's just as bad if not worse.

      --
      This is my digital signature. 10011011001
    3. Re:My bad experience with Inuit products by Dirtside · · Score: 5, Funny

      Look, just because the Inuit live in a relatively primitive society doesn't mean you have to denigrate them. I mean, come on, have you ever even tried seal blubber soup?

      Wait... did you mean Intuit? Oh, well, that's different then.

      --
      "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
    4. Re:My bad experience with Inuit products by systemapex · · Score: 2

      But that's precisely why this whole episode was ridiculous. Tax software is typically used only once or twice by individuals. The one time I went to use the software,I had to jump through hoops to prove I had a legitimate license. Moreover, if I support this type of activation, I might find it cropping up all over the place. What is a nuisance now could become a major hassle if it became popular amongst software publishers.

      I realize my case is a special one because I reformatted, but there was no prior warning of this product activation behaviour. I would never have installed it the first time around if I had known it had this. At least MS gives warning and a toll-free, easy method of contacting them for activation.

    5. Re:My bad experience with Inuit products by acceleriter · · Score: 2, Funny
      . . . I have some high school-level accounting experience under my belt.

      Not me. I learned my accounting on the street.

      --

      CEE5210S The signal SIGHUP was received.

  23. Appgen by protek · · Score: 5, Informative

    I'd suggest checking out Appgen's MyBooks,

    http://www.appgen.com/products/mybooks.html

    It works on Windows, Linux, and Mac, will import your Quickbooks data, and you can try it free for 30 days. I've downloaded it, but haven't played with it much. Maybe other Slashdoters can attest to its usefulness.

    Regards,

    Chris

    1. Re:Appgen by acceleriter · · Score: 2
      For added entretainment, Microcenter has a no refund policy on opened software.

      Did you pay with a credit card? It may not get you your money back, but it would at least cost Micro Center some if you disputed the charge.

      If you live within 50 miles of Micro Center, purchased a product with which you have a problem, and made a good faith attempt to solve your problem with them, the Fair Credit Billing Act is on your side.

      --

      CEE5210S The signal SIGHUP was received.

  24. No AOL Client Needed. by fmaxwell · · Score: 2

    And an AOL client...

    NO!!! If AOL refuses to follow industry standards, then they should pay the price. If enough AOL users get tired of things not working, perhaps an end can be put to the AOL juggernaut.

    1. Re:No AOL Client Needed. by fmaxwell · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What industry standards has AOL refused to follow? Just curious.

      POP3, SMTP, and even basic system logons, to name a few. If they followed industry standards, you would not need to use their proprietary CD to gain access to AOL, would you? You could simply configure the phone number, name, and password like you do with any normal ISP.

      The above list is not intended to complete, but is just some examples.

    2. Re:No AOL Client Needed. by DrXym · · Score: 2
      But you do have access to your mail through IMAP, not to mention via webmail.


      The reason AOL software configures your dialup is pretty obvious when you look at who it's intended for and the hundred and one ways they could fuck things up. I guess AOL would rather do it for you than have their telephone support centres double in size.

    3. Re:No AOL Client Needed. by fmaxwell · · Score: 2

      The reason AOL software configures your dialup is pretty obvious...

      That's the point: They don't just configure your dial-up, which would be fine. Instead, they put an entire set of proprietary tools in place, some of which, at least in the past, have made it impossible for neophyte users who were using AOL on a trial basis to connect with other ISPs. If you try to remove the AOL software with an uninstall, countless droppings remain on your disc, desktop, and menus.

  25. change in software paradigm? by ryochiji · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I wonder if tying in of software with (potentially non-free) online services is a transition phase in changes in the software paradigm. It seems like M$ (and others) are starting to look at software as services, potentially bringing it all online at some point. By tying in stand alone software with online services, I wonder if vendors are trying to blur the line between stand alone software packages and online services.

    1. Re:change in software paradigm? by kaxman · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If they treat it that way I swear to all that is good I'll write my own. Software should not, with few exceptions perhaps, be a service. That's awful. I can see it now, pay-per-page Word usage. I still use Windows, entirely for games, but every day I get closer to dual-booting.

      I pay for the software, just like I pay for...I don't know...a stereo. I can open up the stereo and tinker with it, but it is already illegal for me to do that with software. I don't even own software that I buy nowadays.

      Boy, the free-software ideal seems more and more attractive with every day that passes.

      --
      Everyone on slashdot has a journal.
    2. Re:change in software paradigm? by leonbrooks · · Score: 2
      If they treat it that way I swear to all that is good I'll write my own.

      Please do.

      Boy, the free-software ideal seems more and more attractive with every day that passes.

      It will also help existing suck^H^H^H^Hcustomers if you let Intuit know you're doing that, and why ('You made me do it; if you'd treated your customers decently there would be no free QuickBooks clone'). And call your OSS package something like `QuackBooks' to drive the point home. (-:

      --
      Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
    3. Re:change in software paradigm? by Malc · · Score: 2

      It's also a logical way of combanting software piracy, if you're a commercial software company. Quicken products are some of the most copied that I've seen. Up there with Windows and Office. I could only install Quick Tax last year on one computer. This was very annoying as I wanted to use it on different ones, not just the one at home. By tying the product to online services, people can copy the software as much as they like. This means people have to use hacked software, which probably decreaes the number of people using it illegally - even if it's a small amount, it results in more revenues for Intuit.

    4. Re:change in software paradigm? by dubl-u · · Score: 2

      Software should not, with few exceptions perhaps, be a service.

      That's a reasonable thing to say. Of course, it's also reasonable to want your software to be kept current. And it's also reasonable to say that if it turns out you don't need a product, it sucks to have paid a lot of money for it. Alas, these notions, individually reasonable, don't go together.

      Personally, I'm pretty fed up with the way a lot of companies, especially Microsoft, try to keep people on the upgrade treadmill. And I never know what to do for expensive programs that I know I'll use rarely: if I could pay $5/day for Photoshop the two times a year I really need it, I would. And I'm sick to death with the marketing bullshit used to trick people into laying out a lot of money for what turns out to be crappy software.

      Usage-based pricing and subscription pricing can better align the interests of companies and of programmers. It's not a panacea, and it doesn't suit everybody, but you shouldn't dismiss it out of hand.

    5. Re:change in software paradigm? by mpe · · Score: 2

      Yes, business is all addition and subtraction, but that simplicity might deceive you. What works for personal finance, that might work for a small family business or even a 2-partner law firm, will not work for a construction company, a factory, a gas well completion contractor, a hospital, or a casino.

      There is also the issue that accounting and taxation laws are specific to geography. With things getting especially complex where a transnational plays games to avoid taxation.

    6. Re:change in software paradigm? by Coppit · · Score: 2
      I wonder if tying in of software with (potentially non-free) online services is a transition phase in changes in the software paradigm. It seems like M$ (and others) are starting to look at software as services, potentially bringing it all online at some point. By tying in stand alone software with online services, I wonder if vendors are trying to blur the line between stand alone software packages and online services.
      Actually, MS wants software to be a utility that you pay for each month. Pay your electric bill... Pay your software bill...
    7. Re:change in software paradigm? by HiThere · · Score: 2

      That's what they're trying. But in the process they appear to be testing just how much value for the end user they can remove. I'm glad I've already switched to Linux for active work, or I'd be feeling rather paranoid right now.

      (Actually, the switch was because I read the license a couple of years ago, and decided that I didn't want to agree with that. Then I compared what it said, with earlier versions, and decided that I didn't like the direction things were headed. So I got out while the getting was good. After the first year, I've never regretted it.)

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    8. Re:change in software paradigm? by WNight · · Score: 2

      The problem with payment options for software is that people don't really understand that it's not at all like a physical product and they keep trying to price it like one.

      If you rent a car for a day, nobody else can use it. If you didn't really need it and just let it sit by the curb you'd still be depriving the company of a car. It makes sense to charge you full price (except perhaps wear and tear) because you represent a missed opportunity to rent to someone else.

      Software isn't like this. If I pay for a one-day use of Photoshop and don't use it, all I cost was some bits in a billing spreadsheet, or the up-front cost of sending the package. My not using it means they don't need to do anything and thus they don't have any real costs. But you know the pricing model isn't going to reflect this.

      It's similar to the piracy loons who claim that every copy of Photoshop selling for $1 in Asia is ($799) on the books of Adobe, as if someone who wasn't going to pay anyway costs them a sale.

      Back to the "Of these three, pick any two" topic... It's not unreasonable to expect a product to stay current, to have a return policy, and to be your property.

      It's how shareware works. You get to try the product, often in a very full-featured way, you usually get any updates they release in the near future, so you don't get stuck with an old version, there's a subscription (cheaper purchase for owners of old versions) to allow you to keep current, and it's yours, they can't take it away and don't try.

      In fact, the ideal shareware model seems to be to only lightly cripple, or perhaps just nag past low usage limit / day. This lets a person use it fully and actually become dependent on it so that they really want to buy it.

      I expect companies won't ever realize this. Commercial software tends to get more painful to use as time goes on, as if they don't even realize that it's the lowly despicable users who in the end, are their source of revenue.

  26. Have you considered... by endquotedotcom · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ...sending your rant to them, instead of /.? I'm sure a quick search would come up with OSS alternatives, but I'm sure you'd prefer to stick with what you're used to. If you emailed them, and then followed up with a phone call to voice your concerns, I'm sure you wouldn't be the only one. If they become aware that some users actually do read their click-throughs, changing their ways would set a precedent for other companies.

    1. Re:Have you considered... by MacAndrew · · Score: 2

      Yep, i was wondering that, too. Except I wouldn't start off with a rant. :) Maybe give them a link here...

      I agree this sort of game is offensive and damaging. They should try to make good for your reasonable understanding that you weren't sacrificing functionality in exchange for the upgraded features.

      But customer service does occasionally ... serve. Good luck, and next time take your dollers elsewhere to a more ethical company ... that is, until they pull the same stunt ... but you won't be suckered twice, will you?

      I avoid upgrades for as long as possible on the Luddite theory "if it ain't broke, don't fix it."

    2. Re:Have you considered... by rw2 · · Score: 2

      .sending your rant to them, instead of /.?

      I have. Several times.

      They don't give a shit.

    3. Re:Have you considered... by Reziac · · Score: 2

      I *did* send MY rant (covered above in brief) to Intuit, or at least to the only contact email I could locate (nominally for tech support). No response.

      I wasn't going to call to complain at MY expense, and AFAICT they have no 800 contact number.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    4. Re:Have you considered... by dlur · · Score: 2

      Not to try to side with Intuit, but this is clearly a false statement above. I was able to find the page with their toll free phone support numbers in approximately 1.2 seconds. It's right here on this page.

      Just because it says that the phone line is only for installation help, upgrade assistance, and product defects (this update system is surely a defect in my eyes), doesn't mean you can't call them up, ask to talk to a manager and start explaining how much money you've spent on their software, and how you're never going to spend another dime on it again because of this feature. If enough folks were to do that, not just not buy the software, but call the company and let them know why they _might_ actually rethink their strategy. Doubtfull, but you don't know unless you try. So everyone who owns Quickbooks, please call (888) 320-7276 and let them know how you feel. Or even if you were thinking of purchasing quickbooks, but after reading this were inclined not to purchase it, give them a call and let them know why.

      --
      Duris MUD - The best pkill MUD. Ever.
    5. Re:Have you considered... by Reziac · · Score: 2

      Thanks for the info ... it didn't occur to me to look on quickbooks.com for a Turbotax problem!! I went to the main Intuit site and dug around for some time without finding a phone number. (Or at least an 800 #, I don't remember by now. I wasn't about to complain on MY nickel.) No idea how much their site's been redone since then, either.

      But since 8 mnths later I'm STILL not done being mad about it (because every time I really work this system, I get reminded how much better it performed before) .. so they're gonna hear from me.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  27. Does this remind anyone of .mac ? by Billly+Gates · · Score: 2

    I am also very skeptical of Microsoft's rental scheme and the "one big application" motto which the Win32 world is heading where each application is an additional component with a monthly access fee.

    These schemes sound like the rent-to-own scams that were popular a decade ago where customers paid 4x times the worth of various products through rental schemes. If you rented a couch for example through rent=to-own and refused to pay anymore, you would lose the couch and pay a fine for breaking the contract and all the money you invested already in it is gone. Most customers just paid through the roof so they would not lose there invested money and still retain good credit. However with proprietary file formats you lose all your data if you decide to not use the application anymore. In other words your screwed.

    1. Re:Does this remind anyone of .mac ? by bfree · · Score: 2








      Just because a file format is XML does not mean it is in the slighest bit useful! Now if the file format is an open specification of XML you should be fine. The above example is silly, but isn't .doc now XML and it hasn't imrpoved things in the slightest for bodies looking to write .doc compatible programs.

      --

      Never underestimate the dark side of the Source

  28. Whoa, here... by NineNine · · Score: 2, Redundant

    You're talking about using their servers for a service. If course you're gonna have to pay. Just because you didn't pay in the past doesn't mean that you won't have to later. You're not entitled to use their servers for free. I use Quickbooks daily, and I can press print and drop a PO or an invoice on a fax machine just fine. I can also export and email 'em if I really, really want to. You're paying for the convenience of using their service. Nobody said you *had* to use their service at all.

    1. Re:Whoa, here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Hehe sure. Wait until you get nailed with your payroll feature locked down unless you pay for tax tables from them. THey did this in the Canadian version - no pay, then no payroll feature, it becomes disabled and no way to manually use it or manually update your tax rates.

    2. Re:Whoa, here... by rollingcalf · · Score: 2, Informative

      The problem is that they *are* trying to force you to use their service, by gradually removing features that previously would run on your standalone PC.

      --
      ---------
      There is inferior bacteria on the interior of your posterior.
  29. Intuit is no longer a Good company. by bluephone · · Score: 4, Informative

    I helped a customer migrate from an ancient version of ACCPAC for DOS (Computer Associates product) to Quickbooks 99, and the upgrade to 2000. During the upgrade to 2000, we notices a much stricter set of rules for use, registration (which has always been over the top), and even simple networking of multiple systems. And the updates process was a nightmare, with more hoops to jump through than a Sigfreid and Roy show. When the customer bought 2001, and brought me back in to upgrade, the noose tightened further. Despite having several hundred dollars invested in QB over the years, I recommended heavily that they find another product to move to, because I could see how harshly Intuit was trying to keep it's small business accounting marketshare. Despite the cost and commplexity of Peachtree, I did recommend that over QB again, or moving off of a Windows based platform altogether. I still recomend this to all small businesses. Intuit is no longer the good Quicken company they were...

    --
    jX [ Make everything as simple as possible, but no simpler. - Einstein ]
  30. Intuit installing spyware? by Hollins · · Score: 5, Informative

    This message was recently posted to alt.comp.financial.quicken. It appears Turbotax 2002 may be installing and starting a spyware service without any notice. I just checked my machine, where I installed Turbotax last week, and indeed, this service is running:

    --
    Recently I found a running Service named C-DillaCdaC11BA on my Windows XP Pro system. Being an individual interested with Internet Security (viruses, etc), I naturally became concerned that my system may have become compromised. Starting my investigation revealed the associated file (called "CDAC11BA.EXE") located in the Windows\System32\Drivers directory. In addition, I found a hidden directories under the C drive. This first directory was named C_DILLA" and below it was a directory named "SafeCast Product Licenses". Contained within this directory was a single file called "BD6FD000.DAT".

    I traced the dates/times the files and directories were created to the same date/time I had installed this years version of Intuit's TurboTax. This is interesting because last year's version of TurboTax did not install this application and nowhere in this year's installation did it make mention of installing it, a third-party application that attempts to hide itself and runs as an additional service! A search of Google for C-DILLA revealed the following article, entitled "C-Dilla! "Copy Protection or Spyware?". It's located at http://www.tswn.com/modules/news/article.php?item_ id=45

    Nowhere on Intuit's website does it offer a description of this service or appropriate removal instructions. Is it really copyright protection or is Intuit utilizing spyware with their latest version of TurboTax?

    1. Re:Intuit installing spyware? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      C-Dilla is a software-lock copy protection scheme. It's like a software based dongle. 3ds max has been using C-Dilla since version 4.

      It isn't spyware and no spyware finding software (that I am aware of) will report it as installed spyware.

      Without the C-Dilla service running any program that authenticates through it will fail to start.

    2. Re:Intuit installing spyware? by Fable · · Score: 5, Informative

      SafeCast is a copy protection scheme. A company I recently worked for used SafeCast to regulate the usage of pre-release software - we made video games, and when we sent a pre-release version of our game to a member of the press (for a preview), SafeCast would require that the user register with our license server in order to preview the game. That way, we could see exactly who was playing what, and where. If the disc ended up in someone elses hands (this was a no-no), we could trace it back to the original user. If the user did not register, they could not use the software.

      So, does intuit track your usage? probably. That is exactly what we used it for.

    3. Re:Intuit installing spyware? by gilroy · · Score: 2
      Blockquoth the poster:

      SafeCast is a copy protection scheme.

      and

      So, does intuit track your usage? probably. That is exactly what we used it for.

      Um, that makes it spyware -- and that makes your company a dealer in spyware. It's particularly irksome because (a) they started running a service (which can costs cycles, for example) and (b) they didn't tell anyone. That makes it wrong... The company should be up-front about whatever resources they intend to consume. I know that I'm less likely to buy something that installs a spyware module, even if it's "only" to track legitimate usage.
    4. Re:Intuit installing spyware? by Reziac · · Score: 2

      I don't know about this C-DILLA, but I can tell you for a fact that the version of IE5.5 that TurboTax 2001 forcibly installed IS ET-ware. When I finally got DUN working again and went online, the VERY FIRST ding on my firewall, not ten seconds later, was FROM a M$ IP address, which I recognised as being within their block, and *verified* with whois. I already knew that FP98 goes around ZoneAlarm, so it wasn't really any surprise that IE5.5 apparently had as well (unless you've got a better explanation for why a M$-owned server instantly began trying to peek into some port they have no business going near).

      This part wasn't exactly Intuit's fault, but if TurboTax hadn't forcibly installed IE5.5 (and there was no advance hint that it would do so, nor could the install be interrupted) it could not have happend in the first place.

      More ranting in my post above, re all the time and aggravation TTax cost me. And after that, no way in hell will I *ever* buy another Intuit product.

      So, all you companies who are hellbent on forcing us into the subscription model and telling us which features we can or can't install and/or use, not to mention doing so on the sly -- don't be surprised when after a couple rounds of this horseshit, your market share begins to shrink. Even ordinary users can recognise when they've been bent over a barrel once too often.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  31. Business plan... by LucidityZero · · Score: 3, Funny

    1. Create popular software program
    2. Sell popular software program
    3. Force fees on users after the fact
    4. ????
    5. Profit!!!

    Actually, I guess in this cause you can skip number 4 entirely. :)

    --
    Sig.i>
  32. quickbooks sucks... yes sucks by jmd! · · Score: 2

    We use quickbooks at work, at I was excited when they went to an online version... great, I don't need Windows to run the client anymore. Wrong.

    The new web version requires Windows. Yes, Windows. Not even Mac users can use it. It uses ActiveX for no apperent reason. All of the functionality could have easily been done in HTML with a tiny bit of JS. But they made ActiveX a requirement.

    If it's so obviously unnecessary, why would they limit their available customers and produce a seperate Mac version? Here's why.

    Quickbooks want's to be an ASP. It's in fashion. They start to design a web version. Microsoft threatens them (because it's in fashion), as there are millions of computers that payed $300 for Windows just so they can run Quickbooks on top of it. Quickbooks ensures Windows will still be required, by an ActiveX dependency.

    Microsoft maintains monopoly. User gets screwed.

    1. Re:quickbooks sucks... yes sucks by kennylives · · Score: 2

      Yes, but it's still Mozilla on WINDOWS

      --

      Where the value of X-Mailer: is the true measure of a man...

  33. From the company bringing you product activation.. by emarkp · · Score: 2

    In other Intuit news, I've been a TurboTax user for about 4-5 years (both federal and state). Since they're putting in 'Product Activation' this year, now I have to figure out which competitor to use.

    You'd think they'd learn that this crap is losing customers.

  34. I been foolin wit these jokers for a while now... by dnoyeb · · Score: 2

    I have had my taste of intuit for a while now. I use plain old Quicken. They mislead you with 'extreme prejudice' into thinking you need the online junk. Its part of the install. You never click cancel during the install right? But you gotta know when the install is over and the garbage begins...

    In any event, you can usually get the updates from their website if you are 'Sherlock' enough. Thus, you don't have to use the auto- weputyourfinancialinfointoourbagoftricks update junk.

    Of course this is with Quicken and YMMV.

    I just can't believe you have to do _anything_ online to use your non-online software.

    Perhaps they subverted you into using an online version? I think intuit has online versions of all their money packages and sometimes the offline versions turn themselves into web-forwarders to the online versions if you are not careful.

    Why in the living HELL would I wan't to _PUT_ my money online????? I mean my whole portfolio? I simply can't imagine why.

  35. This is nothing... by Locky · · Score: 5, Informative

    After losing information crucial to QuickBooks operation (ex-wife) I reinstalled QB99 on a new machine and called Intuit for my serial keys only to find out they don't support calls related to any product over 2 years old. They refused to give me my keys (which they had on file) and essentially forced me to fork out $400 for a new version of QuickBooks. Somwhere along the line they also threathened to take me to court after I demanded they give me what I legally own. Needless to say I will never buy an Intuit product again and encourage others to do the same.

  36. If you had read Ed Foster's column in InfoWorld... by mbstone · · Score: 5, Informative

    ...you'd have known all about Intuit's anti-consumer practices months ago:

    Twist in Intuit's crippleware techniques doubles the cost of its tax-table service (4/27/01)

    Intuit is up to its old tricks: Adding taxing burdens on its QuickBooks clients (3/17/00)

    There is another column by Foster -- the #1 and only consumer IT columnist of whom I am aware -- on the practice of making QuickBooks users transmit invoices using Intuit's servers but you'll have to find it yourself.

  37. Peachtree Accounting by Deathlizard · · Score: 2

    I'd have to recommend Peachtree over many other accounting apps out there. Although it has a slight learing curve it's very powerful and reliable.

    It is unfortunate that Intuit is alienating its customers to the point of them turning to other accounting apps. When that happens most companies tend to migrate to the most visable Platform out there, which is usually Microsoft. It wouldn't suprise me if in two years Intuit Sues Microsoft for being a accounting software monopoly instead of Intuit listening to their own customers and giving them what they want.

  38. zerg by Lord+Omlette · · Score: 3, Funny
    I have no interest in letting Intuit know about my invoices and other financial information.
    Only a terrorist would not be willing to share their personal financial data with a good, honest, patriotic company like Intuit. You're not a terrorist... are you?
    --
    [o]_O
  39. Always have a fallback plan. by Spudley · · Score: 2

    This story highlights one thing I've always said: When it comes to a 'mission-critical' system, you should always always always have a fallback plan in case the current system lets you down.
    That goes as much for home accounting as it does for the space shuttle's life support.
    There is a difference between using a computer system and relying on one. As soon as you rely on it, you open yourself up to disaster if it stops being reliable.
    In most cases, you don't have to actually buy the alternative solution straight up; the important thing is being prepared for a situation where you might need it.

    --
    (Spudley Strikes Again!)
  40. Why upgrade? by pla · · Score: 5, Informative

    I really do not understand people's "need" to always have the newest version of a program.

    I upgrade *ONLY* when I encounter either a major bug (meaning "uncircumventable") in what I already have, or what I have simply cannot do what I need it to.

    For my web-surfing machine, I run W2K. I will *not*, *ever*, upgrade to XP simply because it doesn't do anything "new". Perhaps I will need to upgrade to the next version of Windows someday, but considering Microsoft's (and most companys') release habits, I doubt I'll need to for at least a few more versions. Hell, I only upgraded from NT4 because it had poor PNP and high-end multimedia support (which I don't really consider a "good" reason, technologically speaking, but when I couldn't run 90% of modern games or get any new hardware, I didn't have much choice). Before NT4, I used DOS (the entire Win95 line quite simply sucked, and amazingly, seemed to get progressively *worse*, not better).

    For email, I use Calypso (well, mostly, I use Elm, but for my junkmail account I find it easier to get it via POP and just let the nice filters strip out 99% of the spam). Calypso, for those who don't know it, still uses a text-only interface (basic support for HTML/RTF, but the only email I get in HTML consists of spam, so I don't really care 'bout that).

    For compiling under windows, I still use Borland C++ 5. I suspect I'll have to upgrade when 64-bit chips hit the mainstream in a year or two, but at the moment, that 6-year-old compiler does the job just as well as anything I could go out and buy today.

    The "solution" here seems obvious. "If it ain't broke, don't fix it".

    Don't get me wrong, I have no strong love for "retro" computing (except classic console video game emulation ). But of the programs I regularly use, not a single one has made any real improvement in half a decade.

    And now, we see companies moving toward *decreased* functionality in their programs, along with non-permanant licenses to use them. Explain how that benefits me?

    1. Re:Why upgrade? by BradleyUffner · · Score: 3, Insightful
      I upgrade *ONLY* when I encounter either a major bug (meaning "uncircumventable") in what I already have, or what I have simply cannot do what I need it to.
      That's all well and good until you start dealing with programs like accounting packages. These programs using tax tables and rules that need to be up to date to even function. If you don't update them then the program dies. The problem then comes if the "update" removed functionality that already existed in the old version.
  41. updates are not optional by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative
    If you don't install the updates, you can't use the updated tax tables you purchased, which means you can't issue your own payroll checks, which makes the program useless in a matter of 45 days, along with 10 years of historical data. Besides, Intuit almost demands you use its very expensive payroll services, instead. It costs as much as another headcount, a big hit for an org employing less than 10 people.


    Ever price QuickBooks checks? 4 times as expensive as generic Quill. Fun, eh?


    There is *NO* substitute for QuickBooks. We can't get the Linux based developers off their KDE vs Gnome kick, so we are stuck. Has any Linux developer ever finished any project?

    1. Re:updates are not optional by mkoenecke · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Sure there's a substitute for Quickbooks. I'm still quite happily using Peachtree Accounting version 7, which still lets you update your own tax tables. Later versions wipe this out, which is the only reason I have refused to "ugrade."

      Someday all these chickens will come home to roost, as more and more people realize that "upgrading" means being required to buy into a glorified leasing program to keep functionality. More and more people will stick with what they have in lieu of surrendering ones autonomy to ones software provider.

      --
      TANSTAAFL
  42. I went through exactly the same thing by kfg · · Score: 5, Insightful

    And if you want to take the time and trouble you can hack spreadsheets to be just as automatic as Quicken in any modern Office Suite, like, say-Open Office. Frankly, since I understand the math involved, I'm not sure why anyone would bother with propriatary accounting systems.

    Roll your own. If you don't understand the math it will force you to learn it. In my opinion you *should* understand the math of handling your money, especially if it's a business.

    What's more, commnand line spreadsheets are readily available ( Visicalc itself is now available for download) so even people, businesses or nonprofits with little or no capital can run a spreadsheet on free antique hardware that Quicken would choke on.

    I highly recommend the book "Elements of Spreadsheet Style" by John Nevison. Out of print but available used through Amazon for under ten bucks.

    An older Edition of the classic book "Small Time Operator" known as the "Computer Edition" includes complete Visicalc code for all of your bookeeping needs. This is also available used through Amazon but will set you back twentysix bucks. Cheap price for avoiding the propriatary rat race and a hell of a book for anyone just getting started in their first business.

    KFG

    1. Re:I went through exactly the same thing by ergo98 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Frankly, since I understand the math involved, I'm not sure why anyone would bother with propriatary accounting systems.

      And I understand how to make hash tables and red-black trees, so I don't understand why anyone would bother with RDMBS when all they need is a C compiler and the gumption to "roll their own".

      Of course that is absolutely, positively ridiculous. A complex program like Quickbooks isn't simply a couple of spreadsheets rolled together to give you a total, but is complete business management system.

    2. Re:I went through exactly the same thing by mpe · · Score: 2

      So let me get this straight: I'm supposed to tell my father, who flunked a simple PDP-8 programming class back when the PDP-8 was cutting edge and ended up starting his own small non-IT business, to waste hours of time (and thus loads of money) writing his own spreadsheets to do his accounting instead of using QuickBooks? And then waste hours of my time (and thus loads of my money) fixing them for him? No thanks, I'd rather have him buy something pre-packaged that he can blame if any of the math goes wrong (preferably not QuickBooks, which I will urge him to jump off at the earliest opportunity.)

      If he gets accused of fraud or tax evasion blaming some piece of proprietary software is unlikely to do much good anyway.

    3. Re:I went through exactly the same thing by HiThere · · Score: 2

      I have no knowledge of QuickBooks, so I may be overrating them, but I believe that in addition to accounting they provide many reports, and help one stay within the bounds of some very peculiar and unexpetedly unreasonable laws. (And I can't tell you what they are, because I don't know them.)

      Just consider, however, the intricacies of ADA when you are building a web page, and then realize that the same people who wrote that have been writing laws to govern businesses since the country started.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  43. hard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative
    You never have posession of the patches. They are a download through IE (only, Netscape will not work) and auto installed. Obviously, you've never used Koday image editing software for the cameras.


    Quickbooks is not a real app, it is a collection of scripts that runs in an IE window. Using 98lite to uninstall IE ruins your QB install.


    Now get off your ass and help write a Linux equivalent. +3 my dying backside, you're a nitwit.

    1. Re:hard by Narcissus · · Score: 2

      Just because a program uses IE does not make it "not a real app... a collection of scripts".

      Come on, a little more credit, please! It has embedded HTML, yes, and requires IE to display them, yes, but it doesn't just have IE show the pages and be it.

      Quickbooks has special tags in the HTML that it then hooks into to add features to the HTML. And if it's anything like Quicken you'll even find links to the actual application through HTTP (eg. http://qw.exe/ ). You can't deny the fact that most of the work is done within the application itself, and only some of the data is represented in HTML. To start with, I'd compare the features presented in HTML (and the work required to present those features!) with those done within the "old-school" application itself.

      And besides: who cares, even if it is a collection of scripts? I can't find a better product, so I use it. And if you would deny using the best product simply for the fact that it's a script, then you obviously would prefer to use your computer as a form of self-congratulating toy than a tool to get the job done. Not that there's anything wrong with that, but you do seem to infer that there's something wrong with any other alternative.

      And I love the trolling "get off your ass and help write a Linux equivalent". Is that a "help me write" or "help write me" a Linux equivalent?

      If it's the former, why post AC: how are we going to help you if we don't know who you are? And if it's the latter, you can just get stuffed.

  44. I may have solved this problem... by Scratch-O-Matic · · Score: 2

    My Quickbooks started bugging me about updating...it said I couldn't do any payroll functions until I updated. Unfortunately the update it download bombed every time. I was stuck. Turns out the .inf file had a 'check payroll update' line that I could change manually, and it stopped bugging me after that. I don't use the tax tables, but there might be a similar solution for your problem.

    --


    Evil is the money of root.
  45. replacement for Quicken on OS X by austad · · Score: 2

    Does anyone know of a good replacement for quicken on mac OS X? I bought Quicken 2003, and I'm fairly unhappy with it, especially since it crashes for no reason. I'd like something which has some scripting capabilities to pull down data from my bank, or remove duplicates in .qif files (like a .qif from a bill pay service, and the corresponding check on the bank .qif).

    I would assume it's possible to make GNUCash work, but last time I tried to compile that beast under linux and make all the deps work, it was nearly impossible. Probably would take a couple days or more under OSX.

    Preferably I could find something not chocked full of ads or something that does not contact it's maker for any reason. Why can't companies make good solid software anymore without trying to screw their clients into upgrading or buying services?

    --
    Need Free Juniper/NetScreen Support? JuniperForum
  46. Maybe one reason... by StarTux · · Score: 2

    Why they never will make a Linux port, because they worry about the reputation Linux has for being Open Source, and also because we're percieved at being a minute userbase, especially on the Desktop.

    Hopefully this makes sense...never good to post on Slashdot... ...When tired that is :).

  47. Re:Common sense by sourcehunter · · Score: 2
    One problem with that - once you update you can never go back - not even through reinstalling. Quickbooks automatically "updates" its company data file with the new version - even incremental patches. Once it has done that, the file can never be used on a previous version.

    Quickbooks is a very evil program. I still use it only because I have little choice. It is cheap and we don't have time to develop our own.

    --

    quis custodiet ipsos custodes - Juvenal
  48. Article on Linux Accounting Pkgs by gatch · · Score: 4, Informative

    It's about 6 months old, but here is an article you may find useful on Linux Accounting systems. I am in the process of completing part 2 which should be available soon: http://l4sb.com/portalarticle_search

  49. Re:Easy... by AntiNorm · · Score: 4, Funny

    Uninstall, reinstall, patch up to the level that caused the problem, and be happy with it.

    You mean like what you do with Windows?

    --

    I pledge allegiance to the flag...
    of the Corporate States of America...
  50. Write your own or pay up. by MikeFM · · Score: 2

    If you don't like it then write your own. If your just bitching cus they don't have enough money then try coughing up a donation to pay for the work they've done. If you use an opensource program or think you might in the future then get off your arse and send them a payment. Donating $5 per program you'd have to pay for otherwise would be a good start.

    --
    At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
    1. Re:Write your own or pay up. by stephanruby · · Score: 4, Interesting
      If you don't like it then write your own. If your just bitching cus they don't have enough money then try coughing up a donation to pay for the work they've done. If you use an opensource program or think you might in the future then get off your arse and send them a payment. Donating $5 per program you'd have to pay for otherwise would be a good start.

      I am an open souce developer and working on a project that happens to be open source doesn't give me the right not to have my work criticized.

      As a software user, if I'm going to try out new software, I'd like to know everyone's opinion on it, good or bad, before I install it. It doesn't matter if the software is free and it doesn't matter if the software is open -- I don't want to create myself the hassle and the frustration of installing a software that won't work on my machine. I, for one, am glad he told us about the sound card issue (my FreeBSD machine doesn't have a sound card either) and now I can use the time he saved me to evaluate the remaining options.

      Stephan
      PS: As noble as your intentions may be, simply donating money may not be the most practical option for every user out there.

    2. Re:Write your own or pay up. by MikeFM · · Score: 2

      I'm a developer also and I didn't mean not to criticize. I mean not to bitch. There is a big difference.

      It certainly is useful to list the real pros and cons of using a given program. It is not useful to bash the programmers because you think they are not well enough funded.

      Requiring a sound card to run an accounting program seems an odd decision to me. My first question is if that is an option that can be disabled when configuring for compilation. I'd assume it would be. That's the way I'd do it at least if I was the developer.

      Besides donating money to projects that you use, which is very useful, I'd suggest getting a LinuxFund credit card as that allows you to donate to projects without having to make any significant effort. It may not be practical to donate to every project you use but it certainly wouldn't hurt to donate to one or two. If you don't have the money then donate you skills. If your a coder donate code, if your an artist donate art, if you can read and write then donate documentation. If nothing else go down and donate your help to your local food kitchen. It doesn't donate directly to opensource but at least your giving something back.

      --
      At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
  51. Richard Stallman told you this would happen. by paynter · · Score: 5, Funny

    And everyone called him a radical.

    1. Re:Richard Stallman told you this would happen. by Our+Man+In+Redmond · · Score: 2

      Well, that's because he is a radical. But, radicals are occasionally right.

      --
      Someone you trust is one of us.
  52. A lot more to come by attobyte · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I think software companies are going this way because it secures income. I think you will see this a lot more then we have been.

    I guess Opensource software has to win to fight this problem.

    Atto

    --
    I didn't use the preview button, so get over it!!!!

    Mike

  53. Re:From the company bringing you product activatio by emarkp · · Score: 2
    When did you stop beating your wife? (Common example of similar logical fallacy.)

    Yes, I have purchased TurboTax each year. I'm also too lazy to send in the rebates. What happens in 2 years when Intuit goes belly-up and I need to check some of the calculations? Oops, they're not around to let me use the product I purchased, and the IRS doesn't care.

    When a company starts treating all its customers as potential theives first and customers second, it will lose customers. Just as Intuit lost this one.

    Additionally, if I were to use TurboTax and then sell it used in the same tax year, this would be a problem. (Note: I have never done this, but AFAICT it is totally within my legal rights.)

  54. Re:From the company bringing you product activatio by emarkp · · Score: 2
    In order to bring 2001 tax info forward into the 2002 software, you have to have both versions of the program installed.
    Are you sure of this? That hasn't been the case in the past.
  55. Time to quit. by SloWave · · Score: 2

    OK You guys convinced me. I guess it's time for me to break my 12 year Quicken habit.

  56. easy switch to a real accounting package by Lumpy · · Score: 2

    Quickbooks is and always has been a joke in the accounting world. Thereare many MANY real accounting systems out ther that most businesses use. Check with some of them. If you want to run linux and can get your hands on the program that allows yourto run Xenix software in linux try Excalibur. It's 10,000 times better than anything quickbooks can even try to accomplish, allows POS terminals to be cheap text terminals, and like other real accounting packages, allow you to update your tax and other tables by hand. I strongly suggest that you learn how to do all that by hand and get a full grasp instead of relying on some program to do it all magically for you... The IRS is not going to take an excuse that quickbooks mis-calculated it..

    finally there are at least 30 dos based systems that are far better than any windows accounting systems. (you want speed and accuracy instead of pretty icons right?)

    I have helped at least 20 businesses switch away from quickbooks.. and they now have a better grasp of their companies financial picture because they now understand every aspect of it instead of the dumbed-down picture that quickbooks paints.

    Switch away.. you will be much happier in the long run... and more profitable!

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    1. Re:easy switch to a real accounting package by Lumpy · · Score: 2

      It's not to hard to find. I typed dos accounting package into google and found this

      the one I have seen that is the best of the lot is Champion controller. for intel/windows and it looks like they made a windows client for their software package. Remember you do NEED to actually start learning and understanding your business accounting to use the aoftware packages that are more powerful. you do need to understand the basics and a little bit of the advanced accounting (taxes lie squarely in the advanced, but are not too difficult if you take your time and learn a bit of the accounting... I do my 1040 long every year, and I did moy 1040 long form when I had my business.)

      you don't need a $75,000.00 a year accountant, not even Fortune 500 companies hire that expensive of an accountant. you really DO need one during tax time no matter what software you use.

      Linux based accounting.... it does exist....

      this is a non-open-source accounting package. I have not used it. I personally absolutely loved the package for Sco Xenix called Excalibur Premiere. it was a $1000.00 per module package that allowed you to create any form possible plus used a real SQL backend, but I do not know if it exists anymore.... they may have made a dos/windows version of it now.

      Basically, I have seen that almost every company that is serious about their accounting package they do NOT use any of the windows based products. many of the larger businesses still use thier Unix accounting systems they bought in the early 80's.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  57. SQL Ledger and Nola by nurb432 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Both solid, and useable, although still in process of development so they arent perfect..

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  58. Solution: by iCEBaLM · · Score: 2

    Uninstall it and reinstall it, when asked if you want to do any updates in the future click "No".

    -- iCEBaLM

  59. more luck needed. by twitter · · Score: 2

    He'll never get that far. You don't think the unistall will work, do you? It will leave some kind of register doo-doo behind, if not in the data itslelf.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

  60. Re:Quickbooks try Peachtree by T5 · · Score: 2

    My CPA does, and they're fairly reputable. They don't recommend that you upgrade QB or QB Pro; they haven't upgraded theirs since 2000. Convenient, though. Just drop your DB onto media, hand it and a check over, and all your financial worries disappear!

    Guess it's time to stir the pot with my accountant and see what they recommend next.

  61. Re:Easy... by isorox · · Score: 3, Funny

    Yeah, I lost my Dos 5.0 disks though :(

  62. Re:Easy... by DivideX0 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Are you using Windows XP? If so, then check an see if the Quicking Update was caught by the System Restore feature under Start | Programs | Accessories | System Tools. If so, then roll back your system to before the Quicken Update and you should be all set.

    Of course back up all your Quicken files, blah, blah, blah.

    --
    My next Slashdot post will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and see it early!
  63. Re:QuickBook Registration Requirements by base3 · · Score: 2

    American Express has a similar service, called Private Payments. The number's no good after the first billing--I absolutely love it. The ability to limit the amount charged on a per number basis sounds even better, though--I'll have to look into that.

    --
    One CPU cycle wasted on digital restrictions management is ONE TOO MANY.
  64. This is only the beginning by D.+Book · · Score: 3, Informative

    Intuit's sister program, Quicken, is headed down the same course. Here's the situation with the Australian version of Quicken 2002, which is produced by the local distributor Reckon:

    1) Forced registration and machine-specific activation, or the program stops running after X times.
    2) Forced collection of personal details during registration. In fact, if you just tell it your phone number, their automated system will tell you your address (unless you have an unlisted number).
    3) Forced telephone reactivation upon reinstallation. You can't reactivate over the Internet (this only works for the first installation).
    4) No right to sell your legitimate, boxed copy of the software to someone else if you no longer wish to use it (Kapital is the same in this regard, despite the company's claims).

    If you give them a fake name and address, you'd better remember them, otherwise you won't be able to reactivate. And, for your information, there is no QUICKEN.INI workaround in the Australian version, and no "cracks" available.

    Don't be surprised if us Aussies are a test market for this, and the rest of the world is next. I switched to GnuCash, but as far as I can tell, most other users have been perfectly willing to take it up the arse.

  65. Good bye Intuit by mtm_king · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Good bye Intuit,

    I loved you for years. I used to use you to see how to write a great UI for a GUI back when I was going from programing for DOS to Window$. I also thought the world of you cause back in the 80's you were very well done, lean and mean, and you were a cheap date, and NOT married to Micro$oft - even though the Feds had to stop the marriage.

    We have been together for years - you sent out many thousands of dollars of invoices for me and kept the old check book under control. Quicken, Quickbooks, and TurboTax have been on every PC I have had over these many years.

    But when I upgraded from some 90's version of yourself to Quicken 2003 Premier Home and Business things did not feel like they used to. I did not need Quickbooks anymore, and I felt like your were not a part of my life as much as you were after my money (now you wanted to know my total net worth.)

    AND YOU REJECTED MY MAIL IN REBATE.

    Good bye Intuit

    --
    world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  66. Re:Quicken 2003 is now subscription based! by steve_l · · Score: 2

    If they dropped the annual price to say, $30, then the subscription would make sense. But instead they are saying 'you must buy a new copy of our app every year'. I am so glad these people dont make cars, they'd just crash a year after purchase in order to make you buy a new one. Oh, wait a minute, didnt ford explorers do that...

  67. I used to work for Intuit by ChaoticLimbs · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I used to do tech support for the Quickbooks and Quickbooks Pro line back in version 4+5. At that time they were a very fun, if low-paying job to have. They moved their entire operations to Tucson, AZ. They closed down the center in Rio Rancho, NM. They catered a big luncheon in a tent and sent all the temps home. The rest of us had to work 90 days more to get our severance pay. I always thought it was an odd way to announce a closure. Other than that, though, I always thought it was a great company. My supervisor, Travis Wheeler, even shaved his head on site after losing a bet. (kinda a dumb stunt, but he's at least honest when he loses a bet he shouldn't have made). He also got us some Nerf Crossbows so we could entertain ourselves by foam-fragging each other in the middle of important calls. I never saw them use this kind of method before. I don't approve. I will say, though, that QB is a great product, but Peachtree has really progressed since 1997 and should probably be checked out as a result of this new tactic. Sorry, Intuit. It was great while it lasted, but only Microsoft could get away with this kind of noncompetitive crap.

  68. Web Based Accounting Software by el_chicano · · Score: 3, Informative

    If you are willing to move your accounting over to a webapp, check out NOLA. It uses PHP and MySQL and is free and GPLed. I looked at it a few months ago and it seemed promising, I need to grab the current code and see how it looks now...

    --
    A man who wants nothing is invincible
  69. Re:Easy... by ErikTheRed · · Score: 3, Informative

    Oh no, it's much, much worse. I'm in the exact same boat as the sumitter with my business. My experience with Quicken / Quickbooks updates in the past has been that the software tags the data files (and may make other changes, but I haven't bothered trying to hack them) with the version / patch number currently in use. If you reinstall Quickbooks, it will refuse to use the data file until the software has been patched up the level that the data files were last used at.

    I've also been looking for a good OSS solution, but have come up short (I'll post separately on that subject).

    --

    Help save the critically endangered Blue Iguana
  70. Registration bypass key by onyxruby · · Score: 5, Informative
    The following tells quicken it's registered. Just copy and past into a text file, rename as a .reg and merge with registry. Walaa, Quicken thinks it's registered. Did I just break the DMCA?


    For other than XP:


    [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Intuit\QAgent\Guide \C :|Program Files|QUICKENW|INET|COMMON|QCHANNEL.DAT]
    "AppID"= "1"
    "AppName"="Quicken for Windows"
    "AppVer"="11.0.0.0"
    "Enable"="Yes"
    "Mo de"="Idle"
    "SubAppID"="2"


    For Windows XP"


    [HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\TypeLib\{4E2B30D0-E0A2-11D2-9 E1 1-00105A26F05D}]
    [HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\TypeLib\{4E2B 30D0-E0A2-11D2-9E1 1-00105A26F05D}\1.0]
    @="Quicken 1.0 Type Library"
    [HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\TypeLib\{4E2B30D0-E0A 2-11D2-9E1 1-00105A26F05D}\1.0\0]
    [HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\TypeLib \{4E2B30D0-E0A2-11D2-9E1 1-00105A26F05D}\1.0\0\win32]
    @="C:\\PROGRA~1\\Qui cken\\QWAPP.DLL"
    [HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\TypeLib\{4E2B 30D0-E0A2-11D2-9E1 1-00105A26F05D}\1.0\FLAGS]
    @="1"
    [HKEY_CLASSES_R OOT\TypeLib\{4E2B30D0-E0A2-11D2-9E1 1-00105A26F05D}\1.0\HELPDIR]
    @="C:\\PROGRA~1\\Qui cken\\"

    1. Re:Registration bypass key by mattr · · Score: 2

      no jack, ass.

      nice circumvention.

  71. Related topic: by smittyoneeach · · Score: 2

    Are there any open source tax preparation packages? I hear about this or that checkbook program, but the thought of doing my taxes warms me as much as a binary Repository for system configuration.
    If we can balance our own books through Open Source software, maybe we can pressure the government to balance its own. Uncle Sam's accounting 'quirks' make MCI's vanish into--and I've heared this used in real conversations around DC-- 'decimal dust'.

    --
    Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
  72. OT: Re:No AOL Client Needed. by ComputerSlicer23 · · Score: 2
    You could simply configure the phone number, name, and password like you do with any normal ISP.

    AOL doesn't want to be another normal ISP. They don't want to provide you with straight dialup. That's not their business plan. They don't follow the standards, because they don't want to be a commodity service. They want a differentiated service. A lot of people use AOL specifically because once you get the CD, it's easy to install, and it has a good user experience. It's much simpiler then configuring the various pieces of software that you might want. It gives them something to compete on besides just price. If all you want is lowcost dialup, go someplace else, AOL isn't what you are looking for.

    They want to make accessing their service, easy, simple, fun, and unique. Anybody can do straight dialup, what AOL provides is much harder to do. Not that I want it, but it is harder.

    I've never had AOL, I never want AOL. However, I know people who have it, and they love it. If you don't like AOL, send the CD's to those crazy people who are going to dump them on AOL's front lawn.

    Kirby

    1. Re:OT: Re:No AOL Client Needed. by fmaxwell · · Score: 2

      No argument with anything you said and it was not news to me.

      But I happen to feel that standards are a good thing and I do not want to encourage those who would deviate from them. If AOL's non-standard interface to the Internet breaks things, that's great as far as I am concerned. I want people who choose AOL to regret their choice and transition over to a standards-based service. After all, the Internet is successful because of standards.

      AOL has millions of users. If I sell a POP3-based e-mail spam filtering product, that's millions people who can't use it. It's countless tech support calls from AOL users that don't understand why it won't work. It's hassles from stores that sell the product because AOL users keep returning it. No thanks. I'd rather have standards. If AOL wants to differentiate themselves, they can provide client-side software that does that without breaking everything at the network level.

    2. Re:OT: Re:No AOL Client Needed. by mentin · · Score: 2
      AOL has millions of users. If I sell a POP3-based e-mail spam filtering product, that's millions people who can't use it. It's countless tech support calls from AOL users ...

      Absolutely wrong. AOL users are people who don't want to buy/install/manage spam filtering software. Instead they pay AOL for internet access and filtering their e-mails. Of course, they don't have a choice of filtering software - only AOL's own, but AOL's users don't care. They want to access internet, they don't want to be system/mail administrators.

      It is like conferencing capability of your home phone line - some people prefer to buy their own conferencing hardware, but most would pay their phone provider. Only businesses pay for their own conferencing hardware. Of course, businesses don't buy AOL.

      --
      MSDOS: 20+ years without remote hole in the default install
    3. Re:OT: Re:No AOL Client Needed. by fmaxwell · · Score: 2

      Absolutely wrong. AOL users are people who don't want to buy/install/manage spam filtering software.

      It was just an example. I could have just as easily mentioned some other kind of software -- like financial management software.

      You need to stop taking examples so literally.

  73. This is the sort of crap that lead me to Linux by ONOIML8 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    First they suckered you into "upgrades", then they force you into them.

    I started with Quicken. That was such a wonderful program thru about V3.0. The next couple of "upgrades" had lots of bells and whistles that seemed nice, but I got lost in the toys and wasn't paying attention to the actual accounting. Ouch.

    Then there was the matter of the "upgraded" programs crashing all the time. Sometimes I lost data, sometimes not. In any case it was a pain in the arse.

    A few years later, after I had become a *nix convert, I went to work for a small company. When I started they had zilch for an accounting system. Scraps of paper. That's no joke. So the owner hires a wiz bang accountant who promptly insists on Quickbooks.

    I yelled, screamed, jumped up and down.

    We purchased and installed Quickbooks. The accountant punched in the data and we were off and running. No sooner did we get things running and, wouldn't you know it, the network portion quits on us.

    You guessed it.....gotta buy a network license upgrade.

    So the owner takes a loan from her mom, gets the upgrade and we're back in bidness. Until tax time.

    Manditory tax "upgrade". Isn't that like a tax tax?

    So she shells out more of the green, gets the tax upgrade and everything is fine for a few more months. Or so I thought.........

    The boss calls me in and wants to know why my department is only doing 57% of goal. I look at her numbers, from Quickbooks, and they don't match my invoices. Not trusting Quickbooks I tracked my own department in spreadsheets too (StarOffice 5.2). Sure it was double the "paperwork" but it proved worth it.

    I never did find out the whole reason that Quickbooks was losing transactions. Didn't care. That's Intuit's problem, right? Not according to them it aint.

    All that money you pay them and if "nobody else is having this problem" then you get zilch, zip, nada for tech support.

    Don't get me wrong, I'm not picking on Intuit here. IMHE they are just par for the course in the windows world.

    But didn't they start out as a Mac product?

    --
    . Quit playing Monopoly with Bill. Switch to one of many non-Microsoft products today.
  74. Too bad GNUcash isn't up to speed yet. by Mustang+Matt · · Score: 2

    I think someday GNUcash might be a pretty good alternative. We're using QBPro 99 and I've often thought about upgrading but they charge an arm and a leg so I haven't.

    I tried using GNUcash on a personal level but it was missing some vital features so I'll wait until it's got some more functionality.

    --
    The man who trades freedom for security does not deserve nor will he ever receive either. - Benjamin Franklin
  75. So you are saying... by cnelzie · · Score: 2, Insightful


    That you are using out of date tax code for your city/state? That's not a very wise thing to do, unless there is some method of manually updating that information and you perfectly update the tax codes and tax forms in your Quickbooks 99 software.

    If you were looking to do business as an account for my company and I found out that you weren't using the updates to keep your tax code information up to date, you wouldn't be my accountant.

    --
    If you ignore the other uses of a tool, does that make the tool less useful, or you less useful?
  76. There isn't a "real" OSS solution for accounting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    As the CTO of a mid-sized accounting firm, I can let you know there really is no open source solution - and most of the commercial solutions are pretty lacking themselves. The main question you really need to ask yourself is what specific needs do you have, how important to you are they, and how much value they will provide.

    What specifically are you looking for? If its a time and billing solution there are some choices that I'm sure others have opinions about that might be suitable. But if your looking for a more advanced system - one that handles tax processing and time and billing and does this for multiple clients (i.e. handling the T&B for several individual seperate buisnesses and all of their tax liabilities), your pretty much SOL if you want an OSS. The main reason for this isn't the creation of a database and then publishing it as open source, the problem is maintaining it with respect to changes in tax law. Changes that happen continually at the international, federal, state, and local levels. If you've got a client base spread accross 8 countries and 44 states, this becomes a significant problem in that you just cannot write the code once and plug and chug from there, the code itself has to continually be changed to fit the current legal environment.

    I myself experiemented with the idea of producing our own system in-house to solve this problem, and began searching for possible open source solutions. It is an impossibility. Realistically, a truely robust accounting system requires that you have 1) a group dedicated to doing nothing but keeping up with the constantly changing tax laws of basically EVERYWHERE, be it a change in the Fed, a change in tax law in the state of Mississippi, or a change in the tax law of any local city that your clients may be located within. Now that you've got a group (or realistically, a person) doing this, they then have to pass on all changes that need to be made to a programmer - yes, you have to keep a programmer on staff at all times just to continually update the system with the law, and then if you really have any common sense, you have to then send through quality control. Open source just cannot accomplish this for you, and anyone who would do this continually open source is either a fool with no money or someone paid by a government. I have yet to encounter either.

    When you run the numbers its actually just more cost effective to outsource the solution. We spend ~$10k US annually to have a complete system provided for us that updates as often as a few times a week, a whole lot more cost effective than maintaining the staff necessary to do this otherwise.

  77. Oddly enough... by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 2

    I work for a large software company and we had a similar discussion about removal of functionality. Given the discussion we had, I think that you might very well have grounds for a class action suit, regardless of the EULAs you agreed to. I'd look INTU IT (ha ha), if I were you.

    --
    That is all.
  78. Re:Quicken backdoors by Mendax+Veritas · · Score: 2

    Starting with Quicken 97, and continuing at least through Quicken 99 (don't know about anything newer than that), Quicken included software by Inverse Network Technology (later purchased by Visual Networks, NASDAQ:VNWK) for QOS reportage on dial-up and website connections. This product was originally called AccessWizard, then AccessRamp, and is still being marketed by Visual Networks today as Visual IP InSight. This is what the Intuit guy was talking about.

  79. Two items. by Call+Me+Black+Cloud · · Score: 3, Insightful

    1. Have you contacted Intuit about this? What was their response? Certainly you're not the only one who has noticed this change...what's the buzz in the QB community?

    2. Change. Use Peachtree (I've had it for years, works great) Like Linux? Use VMware.

  80. Snail mail... by samdu · · Score: 2

    You could always use snail mail to send out your invoices. Incidentally, I use QB 2002 to run my business and have not seen a message such as you described. The only time anything remotely similar has come up is when accidentally clicking on premium features (like do a credit check or bank online).

  81. Re:There isn't a "real" OSS solution for accountin by hackus · · Score: 2

    I am not so sure.

    There is a revolution going on. Mostof it has to do with aspects of OSS. But not in exactly the same way. OSS (Open Source Software) in context of a company and a busines process, internal to that companies operations and business goals.

    With the kinds of things Java can do, in the development process, alot of companies are outsourcing the development of key systems, paying more for them upfront for development, but even though the pricetag is much higher in the long run it is cheaper:

    1) The company, in your case, builds its own accounting system.

    YOU own the accounting system.

    2) IDE tools such as Idea's Intellij, provide means to build Java code at a very fast pace. Java in and of itself, isn't what makes things go fast, it is the tools and the technology (OOD) that allows the software to be built rather quickly.

    Couple this with computers that keep getting enourmously more powerful year after year, companies are putting together even more toolsets for programmers to boost thier individuals capabilities and manage the "Holy Grail" of Software Engineering at the moment. ReUse and Patterns...undoubtedly, the next generation IDE's will be able to address those issues even more and put computer hardware advances in speed to even better use.

    3) YOU control when the software needs more features.

    That is, you upgrade and put the money into the software when someone in accounting says: "What if we combined payroll with the taxes section, perhaps we could build a credit system with a bank and Eletronically forward the funds ourselves...instead of having XXXX Payroll outsource company do it?

    4) YOU control when the expenditures should be put into your budget for next year, for more features.

    How much capability is also an important question when you want to figure out how much

    5) YOU own something your competitors can't buy, because this software investment is part of your business process. For example, anyone can go buy Quicken, and try and get it to fit your business.

    Your competitors WILL in fact do that, but YOU have something that fits your business EXACTLY and can change as your busiones changes as fast as your business ROI that YOU determine is acceptable.

    I think this is becomming more common than most people think. I know, because my company is an expert at analyzing huge software systems, such as SAP, PeopleSoft and other Enterprise Resource Planning packages, and determinng, what would be better?

    Spending $80 dollars an hour for 4 programmers and one project manager, or spending 20 MILLION on a software package and consultants to customize it at $180-$250 an hour?

    In a great many cases, it isn't worth spending that much money on these large ERP systems, when technology, specifically Java development environments can produce a custom package for your company at half the cost of rolling your own. (i.e. 20 Million for SAP or 10 Million for your own package....)

    I think this is the biggest threat to Shrink wrap software. Programming environments are becomming so powerful, because ever more powerful machine hardware is providing the programmer with productivity gains and toolsets (IDE's source debuggers Refactoring tools, access to code library systems such as cvs) that allow him to do the work of 5 programmers.

    Compare that even 5 years ago when such things were not inetgrated as they are today.

    -Hack

    --
    Got Geometrodynamics? Awe, too hard to figure out? Too bad.
  82. Re:Packet mangling! by FauxPasIII · · Score: 2


    firewall# iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -p tcp --dport 25 -d ${INTUIT_SMTP_SERV} -j DNAT ${FRIENDLY_SMTP_SERV}

    --
    25% Funny, 25% Insightful, 25% Informative, 25% Troll
  83. Re:Packet mangling! by FauxPasIII · · Score: 4, Informative

    Dammit. Make that:

    firewall# iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -p tcp --dport 25 -d ${INTUIT_SMTP_SERV} -j DNAT --to ${FRIENDLY_SMTP_SERV}

    --
    25% Funny, 25% Insightful, 25% Informative, 25% Troll
  84. Class action suit? by Oestergaard · · Score: 2

    What the fsck is wrong with people?

    So this guy uses a piece of software for free. Good for him. Some day the publisher decides that they want to require payment for the service in the future - and they make him aware of this fact in advance.

    And the first thing that pops up in this guys head is a lawsuit ?!!?

    How about Intuit suing him for stupidity?

    I mean, it's not like they ever promised him that they would make their services available to him for free, in all eternity...

    Especially I find it amusing, that he wants a free software alternative - and would be willing to accept one that had basically so poor functionality that he could sue Intuit because of the conversion costs (from migrating from their free-as-in-beer services to some under-developed free-as-in-speech tool).

    Like, "an alternative that is so crippled that I can't do business is ok, because I'll just move my business to lawsuits instead of doing productive work then".

    And people wonder why the economy is going to hell... Sheesh...

  85. More Intuit BS by joabj · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If my experience is any indication, the company has been pulling such sleazy "forced upgrade" tactics for awhile. A few years back I bought Quicken 97 to balance my checking account. It worked fine up until earlier this year, when I wiped the hard drive and reinstalled the OS and had tor install the Quicken as well.

    For the installation, I had to (re)register the product electronically. Trouble is, Intuit had long since cut off its end of the registration process for the '97, and , as a way of user support in the FAQ, mentioned only that users should upgrade (i.e. buy the new version).


    Bloody hell. I spent $80 for the damn software, I have no use for the additional bells and whistles and it really pisses me off I can longer use this software that I purchased! I went back to using plain spreadsheets and I can gaurantee that under no circumstances will I ever purchase some product by this company. Greedy fucks.

  86. Relational Database by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 2
    Skip spreadsheets. Whip up some tables in your relational database of choice (MySQL, SQLite, Postgres, et al) and slap a web interface on the front using your serverside scripting language of choice (TCL,PHP,PERL, et all).

    I am actually in the process of writing a self-contained webserver based on the TclHttpd using the SQLite embedded database. The plan is to run the server on the individuals computer, and have them open a browser connection to localhost.

    The TCL Web server can also load specialized modules for printing forms, and also access the local file system to syncronize data, poke through the registry etc. Charts and graphics could be handled by rendering GIF files.

    The really nice part about this setup is that a small office can all access the books. With a forms-based accounting system, you SO will be up and running in no time flat.

    Anyone in?

    --
    "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
    --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
  87. Spyware too by Coppit · · Score: 2

    What I haven't seen people mention is that Quickbooks is a spyware piece of crap. Install a software firewall that blocks outbound access and you'll see what I mean. It's harder to stop it from calling home using deeply buried options than it is to stop Real Player. (And that's saying something!)

  88. Re:Invalid argument by MikeFM · · Score: 2

    Most of the weenies wanting world domination aren't the ones actually doing the coding. It's mostly some weird geek groupie cult. Paying a real programmer to write software is just as valid a way of donating money as throwing out nickles if you have the number of nickles to afford to custom write software. If you're not giving away non-unique software you've funded then your missing out on the chance to greatly reduce your costs and to get your software tested a lot better than one or two guys in house could do.

    I won't deny there is a lot of poorly written opensource software but I'd argue that it's certainly not a higher percentage than that of closed source software. If you get a chance look at the source to any commercial program you want. It's almost all crap.

    Most of those "real" Unix's I've seen have been either pretty expensive or pretty sucky and if something goes to hell with them or the company that makes them dies you'll be stuck with no way to fix problems or add new features as you don't have the source code.

    --
    At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
  89. Linux Accounting Choices by SEWilco · · Score: 2

    Commercial and Free:
    L4SB July 2002 table

  90. Re:Registry by tomhudson · · Score: 2
    Quickbooks does put keys in the registry.

    Here's how to find/crack them for any app: works well to get rid of the nag screen asking you to register before your 25 uses are up...

    1. Copy your two registry files to a linux partition
    2. Install the application
    3. Copy the new registry files to a linux partition
    4. Do a diff on the two sets of registry files
    5. Run the app once, copy the new registry files to a linux partition
    6. Write a small Windows app that sets the keys to the value they were after one run, then launches the real app.
    You'll never have to register, which is great if you don't want to give them access to your box.

    I did this for a friend of mine, copied the whole Windows partition (dd if=/dev/hda1 of=/xfer/part1_image_xyz) to linux just to make sure there were no other files hanging around.

    Should work for games, etc, as well

    Now, before I get flamed for this, he owned a legit copy (original CD, manuals, etc.) but didn't like the idea of sharing his stuff w. Intuit.

    In hindsight, looks like he was right

  91. Man in line at the supermarket. . . by kfg · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "Ok, let me just run home and fire up the computer to print this check and I'll be right back."

    An outfit so small and so poor that it *needs* to run free Visicalc on an old 8088 doesn't print checks, it writes them just like most of the world does. It doesn't have very many to write either. Maybe a half dozen a month if it's unlucky.

    In my last retail business (3000 square foot store) I wrote three checks a month. That's all. At that "volume" hand writing them is quicker, easier and cheaper.

    Honestly, you realize hundreds of billions of dollars have been transacted perfectly well with no more "technology" then pen and ink don't you? I have a physical handicap that makes writing a difficulty and it's *still* easier to hand write small volumes of checks than print them.

    When an person/outfit gets big enough that the printing volume gets large enough that there is *benifit* to printing checks and forms then they use their office suite to print them, as I already suggested. Document processors are just that, not just overbloated $400 post-it note writers. If it comes to that I first started printing checks and forms on an 8088 running Microsoft Works 1.0.

    It seems easy to forget that just because new ways of doing things come up that the old ways still work just fine, and in certain situations, for certain people, are even *better* than the new ways.

    The right tool for the right job, and the size of the job helps determine the right tool.

    Honestly, relying on a program like Quickbooks to write a half dozen checks a month, one W2 * a year* and keep a daily transaction ledger is just plain doofey.

    To equate a spreadsheet with programing and IT as some above have done is even doofier. Spreadsheets are an office app, just like a WP. Spreadsheets have been traditionally hated by the IT deparment because they were the app that took computing *OUT* of the IP department and put it on a PC on every businessman's own desk.

    Accounting apps are there to save time and money. If they do neither they are less than worthless. They are NOT supposed to replace understanding of what's going on with your money. If you *can't* balance a checkbook because * you don't understand* the process perhaps business is not the best place for you.

    If you *do* understand the process whipping up a checkbook balancer in a spreadsheet is barely the work of minutes. A simple, single entry, bookkeeping system is hardly the work of more minutes, even if you've never used a spreadsheet before. Double entry will take a bit longer, but then I've refered the reader to a work that lays it all out for them. All they have to do is type it in.

    An office suite, ( which, again, isn't IT, it's a collection of apps for *office workers*) does everything Quickbooks does, and more (without phoning home). That's why MS was late to the "Financial management package" party. It never occured to them that anyone would want such a thing because * they had already provided one,* complete with instructions on how to use it as such.

    It's called MS Office.

    KOffice works just as well. Open Office works even better.

    What the hell do you think is really going on behind the scenes in Quickbooks, behind all the pretty graphics and doofey interface? It's just a *crippled* office suite.

    Cripple your own.

    KFG

  92. You could do that, of course by kfg · · Score: 2

    But that would rely on programing. The spreadsheet solution requires no programing knowledge ( despite what some of the trollier replys to my post have implied. A spreadsheet is a businessman's app, not a programing enviroment. If you can't figure out what a spreadsheet is and how to work one within a few minutes you have no business in business).

    Under certain circumstances, for certain people, your solution is superiour.

    With this caveat I suppose. *I* would never do it quite that way. In any business of mine no accounting data ever goes on the net. Ever. The accounting dept. is stand alone. The idea that in my small office all can access the books gives me the willies. *I* can access the books. My *bookeeper* ( should I even have one at the time) can access the books. That's it. A few times a year an accountant will be given temporary access.

    It can be inconvienient at times, but nowhere near so inconvienient as having the SEC digging through your computers caches and coming up with all sorts of juicey little tidbits. God forbid that any internal finacial data should ever be transmited across the Internet. Then they don't even have to dig around in *your* caches.

    In the old days of paper and pencil the bookeeper was the first employee to get their own office. The office contained a safe. Not for the money. for the *books.*

    Grandma knew something about sucking eggs that the "chillen's" haven't figured out yet.

    KFG

  93. You are overrating them by kfg · · Score: 2

    In the sense you mean they only deal with high level tax issues, and as has already been noted elsewhere the IRS itself will provide you with all the relevant computer data and programing you need.

    What's more, the laws change every time a legislative body goes into session.

    Quickbooks is no replacement for a good accountant and lawyer.

    It is the businessman's responsibility to know and understand all laws applicable to his business. Relying on software to *understand* it for you is folly that can only lead to eventual disaster. That people do so I actually find shocking. Don't end up being like the girl refered to in a post a couple of days ago who insisted her physics paper claiming that electrons go 6 times the speed of light was correct because it was the answer her computer gave her. The IRS won't buy that line any more than the physics professor did.

    You are right. The laws can be so arcane that *noone* understands them, not even the people who wrote them.

    That includes the people who wrote Quickbooks. Garbage in, Garbage out.

    Do your own homework. Know your own business. It's cheaper - and safer. It takes more time. If you went into business to have more time - boy did you make a mistake! As I like to say to people, the greatest thing about being in business for yourself is that you get to chose your working hours - all 100 a week of them.

    As well as handling your own finacial and legal matters at a low level other matters you should be prepared to take care of personally as the new CEO of your own startup firm include:

    Cleaning and unclogging toilets, shoveling walks, taking out garbage, chasing racoons out of the vents and wall spaces ( Yes, I've actually had to do this), washing floors, cleaning carpets, being the LAST person in the business with a nice desk and the last person in the firm to *make any money.*

    If you aren't fully prepared to be personally responsible for all of the above, even if you have millions in start up capital from somewhere, get an hourly job. You'll be happier.

    KFG

  94. Re:Sure... by DaytonCIM · · Score: 2

    I was busy earning some of that money that gets put in my spreadsheet. When you are out of high school and mom cuts off your allowance, you'll understand about "work".

    Straight up, you're an idiot. You're an idiot for having a Cartman UID and accusing someone of being a racist for making a South Park joke. If you're that sensitive, maybe you should stick to the Powerpuff Girls.

    You're an idiot for making the assumption that GMHowell is in high school and he doesn't know "work." Try thinking (and maybe reading) before you type a response, you f$#%ing moron.

    And thank you for the "tip" on spreadsheets. Wow. Can you get me a good deal on Quattro Pro? Do you think AOL is a good ISP for a small business? 'Cause that would just be "da bomb."

    Man, you know all the c00l, l33t, h@x@rs lingo! You're my new h@x@r h3r0!

    At $1,200 per diem fee and a booked calander, it's a fun way to be a geek. Using things I learn on slashdot is good money making FUN.

    By the way, the correct spelling is: c-a-l-e-n-d-a-r and Slashdot is capitalized. Thanks for playing...

  95. Re:Sure... by Xerithane · · Score: 2

    Fact is, SOMETHING in your life is so bad, it would, as you said, make me wake up at night screaming.
    No, it would probably make you kill your own damn self. You don't have the strength to persevere through what he deals with. Your little life has desperation caused from unemployement? I hope your mother/father/sister/daughter/son dies so you can understand anguish.

    If you had on iota of a clue, you'd realize when you are wrong and gracefully back away. It must suck to realize you have no ground to stand on, yet flap your arms to try from falling.

    Here's a little piece of advice: Learn and grow old, admit defeat and idiocy in the same apology, and avoid such situations in the past.

    I have more respect for gmhowells shit than your brains.

    --
    Dacels Jewelers can't be trusted.
  96. Re:Sure... by Eric_Cartman_South_P · · Score: 2
    Yes, that situation is quite unfortunate. Trully sorry to hear it, and sorry if my little flames "hit home" so to speak. Didn't mean them too.

    However, SURELY you must understand that a little flame war, over a topic of misunderstanding (I missed that SP episode) held on a message board, at 2:00am, is *nothing* personal. Just plain fun, albeit at the cost of Karma, which thankfully keeps most flames (such as ours) tucked away.

    :)

  97. Moron alert. by fmaxwell · · Score: 2

    I didn't take it too literally, fscktard. Learn how to communicate.

    I communicate perfectly clearly (and am a published author). That you are too stupid to be able to extrapolate from an example is not my fault.

    But since you insist on making an ass of yourself (and because you pissed me off), I'll lend a hand. You wrote:

    "Absolutely wrong. AOL users are people who don't want to buy/install/manage spam filtering software."

    That's utter bullshit and here's proof:

    From http://www.emailspamblocker.com/: "Email Spam Blocker for America Online AOL(TM) 7.0 - 8.0"

    Go to http://www.antispam-software.net/products.htm and you will see SPAM INSPECTOR for America Online 7.0

    From the Mailwasher homepage: "AOL support coming later."

    Happy now, asshole?

    If you really are as stupid as you seem, I can see why you post anonymously.

  98. Re:if you mess with one of us... by Eric_Cartman_South_P · · Score: 2
    Hehehe. "..all of us." "...what you're getting into."

    Thanks for the laugh.

  99. Re:if you mess with one of us... by Xaoswolf · · Score: 2
    Yes, we are much like the Musketeers, and if you saw the movie, The Musketeer, then I can see why you are laughing.

    Perhaps we should be more like the Boy Scouts or something...

  100. Zing by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 2
    Score that one +1 for insightful, and my original post -1 for dumbassed.

    I think there is a reason the wife doesn't let me balance the checkbook.

    I tend to forget that can does not imply ought.

    --
    "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
    --Dr.W.Edwards Deming