Slashdot Mirror


Blank Media Prices Could Soar In Canada

kidlinux writes "The Canadian Coalition for Fair Digital Access (CCFDA) composed of businesses like HP, Apple, Best Buy, and Costco may consider pulling recordable media products like mp3 players, digital cameras, and associated media if a recording industry backed media levy is ratified. From the article "if the proposed levy is approved MP3 players such as Creative Labs's Nomad, RCA's Lyra, and Apple's Ipod will increase $112 or more on average". Blank CDs will go up from $50 (on which we already pay $21 in levies) to $88 dollars per pack of 100. The media levies have been getting worse and worse here. Personally, I think sales of above mentioned items will speak for themselves, however, the CCFDA's website has contacts for the Government of Canada's representatives - contact them with your objections!"

85 comments

  1. Mail order. by GMontag451 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Just buy them mail order. $50 per 100 is already incredibly expensive. You can get 400 for $60 at places in the US.

    1. Re:Mail order. by roseblood · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Well, I can see this as a nice opportunity for profit. Let the smuggling begin!

      --
      There are lies, damned lies, and statistics.
    2. Re:Mail order. by merdark · · Score: 1

      Unfortunatly, there is some law that specifies all US companies must use UPS when delivering to Canada. Of course, UPS is not going to waste such an opportunaty, so in addition to 15% taxes we must pay on imported items, we must also pay a *UPS tax* which can sometimes be as high at 100% of the value of the item being shipped!

      My family has bought things online in the US for say $50 and in the end payed > $100 for it thanks to these taxes/corporate levies.

      It's so bad in fact, that some of my freinds who are into DJing buy their vynl from europe because it's actually *cheaper* to have items shipped overseas rather than pay the UPS tax.

      So unfortunatly we cannot just buy stuff in the US. :( Unless we drive there I suppose, but there are numerous problems with that.

    3. Re:Mail order. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      $50 per 100 is already incredibly expensive.

      You forget those are Canadian dollars. That's like 56 cents US :)

    4. Re:Mail order. by quintessent · · Score: 2

      Hmmm. Looks like a good opportunity here. You pay someone to bring the stuff over the border and mail it to you. The CD runners are on the loose!

    5. Re:Mail order. by tHiNk411 · · Score: 1

      I just bought a whole bunch of 50 packs from frys electronics for $4 each, we could make alot of money shippin them over. Is there any laws on purchasing from ebay and shipping blank media to canada? smuggling blank media sounds good.

    6. Re:Mail order. by Kwikymart · · Score: 2

      Nope, it's legal to bring recordable media into Canada to avoid the levy as long as you don't resell it. It is illegal to not declare the items you bring through the border, though.

      --

      Buying a Dell computer is equivalent to dropping the soap in a prison shower.
    7. Re:Mail order. by BitterOak · · Score: 2
      Unfortunatly, there is some law that specifies all US companies must use UPS when delivering to Canada.

      This is completely false. I live in Canada and have had things shipped here by several different methods, UPS being only one of them.

      we must also pay a *UPS tax*

      Again, that's bullshit. In some cases you may need to pay a broker's fee to get it through customs, but it doesn't usually apply to individuals (as opposed to corporations), although if you have to pay it once you'll have to pay it each future time you receive a shipment via UPS.

      Try checking your facts before posting such nonsense.

      --
      If I can be modded down for being a troll, can I be modded up for being an orc, or a balrog?
    8. Re:Mail order. by merdark · · Score: 1
      This is completely false. I live in Canada and have had things shipped here by several different methods, UPS being only one of them.

      How recently? I've had many things shipped via other means as well. But starting maybe end of last year or beginning of this year suddenly all companies are telling me they must ship via UPS since there was some problem with using the regular post. So now the regular post apparently won't carry packages from companies in the US. For some reason all the companies said it also *had* to be UPS, no FedEx. Don't remember the reason, but supposedly they had no choice. And this is more than one company doing this.

      Again, that's bullshit. In some cases you may need to pay a broker's fee to get it through customs, but it doesn't usually apply to individuals (as opposed to corporations), although if you have to pay it once you'll have to pay it each future time you receive a shipment via UPS.

      The extra charges *may* be a brokers fee, but UPS certainly wasn't up to explaining it. It wasn't customs, customs were a separate charge. And this charge is nothing a corporation can pay. I did look into this. The companies I was dealing with all said that they paid UPS for all the charges they could. UPS told me that this extra charge was levied by UPS, and there was no way for any company to pay it. It's always the individual. Not to mention it's around $50-70 US and I've had to pay it for items that were valued at around $50. Just silly. Again, this is a recent change. I've ordered things in years past and never had such problems. And if you said this fee isn't usually applied it individuals, it's funny that at least two people I know (the only two to order anything recently) got nailed on this fee. It's just not worth ordering things from the US with rates like that.

    9. Re:Mail order. by notworthy · · Score: 1

      Amazingly I've ordered things over the summer from various online retailers and not one order was shipped via UPS (one was sent FedEx)

    10. Re:Mail order. by squeegee_boy · · Score: 1

      Ditto here. Fedex last week, Canada Post parcels(from USPS) several times over the last year.

      Merdark, I don't know where you're getting your info, do you live in Quebec or something (sometimes strange regs there)? I'm in Vancouver. No such regs here.

    11. Re:Mail order. by merdark · · Score: 1

      Really? I live in Ontario. Maybe this is an Ontario thing? Maybe the companies I've been dealing with are ripping me off somehow?

      I honestly don't know. It's good to know that this isn't the case across Canada though. Next time I need to order something I'll try and find out more. But I know for a fact that two companies both said they can't ship to me via Canada Post and for some reason (I don't remember anymore) they couldn't use FedEx, only UPS. Weird.

      At any rate, I clearly stand corrected. ;)

    12. Re:Mail order. by merdark · · Score: 1

      Ah, I've double check edmy sources. Apparently it is the companies I'm dealing with that refuse to ship with Canada Post. And UPS and FedEX both charge brokerage fees that is often close the price of the item. My mistake. Sorry. Should check facts before let lips flap.

  2. In that case... by digerata · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I live in the US and since our prices aren't going up...

    Send me a check in the mail for whatever you want plus 5% commission and shipping charges and I'll send you back your buy.

    --

    1;
    1. Re:In that case... by eht · · Score: 1

      in cananda it's called a cheque

    2. Re:In that case... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      10% commission if you specifically decide to order.

  3. Incomplete link. by Dr+Caleb · · Score: 5, Informative
    It should be: http://canada.gc.ca/

    The actual place to find MP's emails is here. Imagine that, an editor not checking the links.

    --
    "History doesn't repeat itself, but it does rhyme." Mark Twain
  4. exchange rate by syrinx · · Score: 5, Funny

    So MP3 players go up $112 Canadian... that's, what, $5 US?

    --
    Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur.
    1. Re:exchange rate by crow · · Score: 4, Informative

      Actually, $112.00CND is $71.7810US. Still significant.

    2. Re:exchange rate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which is $150 New Zealand.

  5. It's only a matter of time... by HotNeedleOfInquiry · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Before they levy a media charge for pencil and paper.

    --
    "Eve of Destruction", it's not just for old hippies anymore...
    1. Re:It's only a matter of time... by SolarInfinity · · Score: 2, Funny

      Or for Sharpees, because they might be used to defeat copy protection.

  6. I may start ordering CDs from Canada... by lightspawn · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Since they're music-industry prepaid, I can record any (RIAA) music I like legally on them, right?

    1. Re:I may start ordering CDs from Canada... by thermo99 · · Score: 1

      No. The high costs are to help regain lost profits from people that burn stolen music to cdr. Thats the only people that use cdrs right?

    2. Re:I may start ordering CDs from Canada... by fonebone · · Score: 2

      that's actually right, and that's indeed the point. if i'm not mistaken, in canada you're legally allowed to make copies for your own purposes or to lend to a friend, and they make up for it with these costs added to blank media.

      --
      when the rain comes, they run and hide their heads. they might as well be dead.
    3. Re:I may start ordering CDs from Canada... by metacosm · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What about people who use this Media/Hardware for other purposes -- why should they have to suffer!

      It is scary the massive amount of power the media industry must wield in Canada.

      Beyond that, it won't work. Honestly, in the age of globalization and the internet, it seems all this would do is drive people to order media online only and in bulk (to reduce shipping costs and dodge the tax).

    4. Re:I may start ordering CDs from Canada... by Craevenwulfe · · Score: 1

      Not quite. You're legally allowed to copy it, why therefore are they allowed to charge you for doing so? It's not a nice option they are selling to you. IT'S THE LAW.

    5. Re:I may start ordering CDs from Canada... by Sentry21 · · Score: 2

      Not quite. You can record any songs owned by the Canadian equivalent of the RIAA (forget their acroname now, but they have one...). This means, to me, that I can copy anything, but there's likely to be trash that you can't copy that I could, and trash that you could copy that I can't.

      --Dan

    6. Re:I may start ordering CDs from Canada... by quintessent · · Score: 2

      Yes. Canadian law lets you copy CDs.

      By the way, people in the U.S. pay a levy on all recordable CDs as well, only smaller. Kind of ridiculous when I'm buying CDs for my photos or something.

  7. 50$ for 100 blank CDs? I don't think so. by Sandman1971 · · Score: 2

    I live in Canada. Unless you buy your blanks at chain stores like Future Shop, you won't pay 50$ for 100 blank CDs. I just bought a bundle of 100 for 18$ (all Canadian prices).

    --
    It's better to burn out than to fade away
    1. Re:50$ for 100 blank CDs? I don't think so. by shfted! · · Score: 1

      Where did you buy them? The best i have found, in Prince George, BC, is $50 for 100.

      --
      He who laughs last is stuck in a time dilation bubble.
    2. Re:50$ for 100 blank CDs? I don't think so. by Screaming+Lunatic · · Score: 3, Informative

      You live in Prince George? Ouch, that's gotta hurt. You can get 100 CDs $39 from here. These are 80min,48x CDs. Probably get the 72min cheaper elsewhere.

    3. Re:50$ for 100 blank CDs? I don't think so. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Ignore that other dude. I moved up to Prince George a while ago and far prefer it to Vancouver, although I think the Okanagan may well beat both.

      Anyway, you totally want to get your CD-Rs online. Sometimes you can get 'em off of ebay for a ridiculously low price (say, $10 including shipping for 100).. On the other hand, you can also buy from NCIX (in BC, though, which means PST - so is A-Power, for that matter).

      Link to a list of spindles here.

    4. Re:50$ for 100 blank CDs? I don't think so. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Eh... I wasn't looking closely enough. Those NCIX ones are only 50-packs. A-Power's a way better deal.

    5. Re:50$ for 100 blank CDs? I don't think so. by roll_w.it · · Score: 2, Informative
    6. Re:50$ for 100 blank CDs? I don't think so. by PFAK · · Score: 1

      It's hard to get recordable media at A-Power, usually you have to phone ahead, and half of the time they don't have it..

      Just like they don't have half of their other stock in at the time, with me living in Coquitlam, and going out there. After saying they have it (about a 30 minute drive), it's a tad annoying.

      But, it's still better then going to Metro Town and buying them there..

      --

      Free means no restrictions, ironic the FSF's GPL forces restrictions, isn't it? What's your definition of free?
    7. Re:50$ for 100 blank CDs? I don't think so. by Screaming+Lunatic · · Score: 2
      I forget the name of the place at MetroTown. But they sell CDs cheap as hell there. But, I have to agree with you on the A-Power deal.

      Any idea how much they are at Costco?

    8. Re:50$ for 100 blank CDs? I don't think so. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      CostCo, IMO, is crap for computing stuff. I once saw a 10-pack of CD-Rs labeled "Audio-only" (as far as I know, until you actually write the ToC, it isn't audio/data/whatever-only), with a price of $14. I haven't came back since. Even though CostCo is within a 5 minute walk from my house.

      18 DOLLARS? WHERE IN THE BLOODY FUCK DID THAT GUY FIND 100 CD-Rs FOR $18? I've been paying 10 bucks for 10-packs!

  8. I hope it does pass! by Dimwit · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The whole point of this "tax" is to cover the supposed cost of piracy. With money like that, they have no right to say you can't pirate - "Of course I can pirate, the cost to the recording industry was covered when I bought the blanks!"

    --
    ...but it's being eaten...by some...Linux or something...
    1. Re:I hope it does pass! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course you can still pirate, but be warned: pirating music? That's a paddling!

    2. Re:I hope it does pass! by Screaming+Lunatic · · Score: 5, Insightful
      That is not the whole point. RTFL (Read the fucking legislation) It's called the "Private Copying Tariff".

      A "private copy" is a copy of a track, or a substantial part of a track, of recorded music that is made by an individual for his or her own personal use. A compilation of favorite tracks is a good example of how people typically use private copies. In contrast, a copy made for someone else or for any purpose other than the copier's own use is not a private copy.

      So I'm paying a levy because my Matt Good CD is in my CD player at home, but I have a copy sitting in my car, so I won't lose it, scratch it, etc.

      And 75% of that levy is marked for "record publishers" which may be national corporations. 25% is marked for artists and local record companies. So Matt Good or Battle Axe Records won't be seeing squat compared to what Sony would get.

    3. Re:I hope it does pass! by DoctorRad · · Score: 1

      Hang on a minute... Do we honestly believe that the music industry doesn't take into account the lost revenue from piracy in its pricing structure, at least to some degree?

      Surely an industry of this size would build compensation for 'shrinkage' (i.e. theft) into its prices just as supermarkets do? And what of software companies for that matter?

      Dr. Matt.

    4. Re:I hope it does pass! by Sentry21 · · Score: 2

      The thing you should note is that, according to the current legislation, you can make a (legal) 'private copy' of someone else's music (i.e. a friend's Sneaker Pimps CD) for your own use. The distinction is that they cannot legally make one for your use, you have to make it yourself. Thus, you can borrow and burn all you want, but do it from the originals.

      Your point, therefore, is moot, however I do not entirely disagree with you. CD-Rs today are classified as 'Audio' or 'Data', and both are tariffed, albeit not as much. I suggest that data CDs be not tariffed at all, and then people who wish to borrow 'n' burn can do so by buying Audio CD-R discs, knowing that artists are being compensated to some extent (moreso than if there was no tariff).

      Just a thought.

      --Dan

    5. Re:I hope it does pass! by quintessent · · Score: 2

      The same goes for the CD-R "tax" in the United States, by the way.

  9. Re:Screw "soviet canuckistan" by BlackCobra43 · · Score: 1

    I could say the same thing of Americans,with 9/11....cept it would be deathbeds..

    --
    I never spellcheck and I freely admit it. Save your karma for more worthwhile "lol erorrs" replies
  10. lawsuit against RIAA by www.sorehands.com · · Score: 2

    Why are there not lawsuit against the RIAA and other "publishers" who are collecting money from these fees and making copy protected media.

    If they are getting money, they should either get the fees or copy protection. Not both!

    1. Re:lawsuit against RIAA by quintessent · · Score: 2

      Better yet--neither.

      When I back up a CD for personal use, it's none of their business. They are not losing a legitimate cent.

  11. Email your MPs by Screaming+Lunatic · · Score: 5, Informative
    Here's the email is sent to my MP, the Industry, Heritage, and Finance Ministers. I encourage other Canadian /.ers to do the same.

    Dear Sirs and Madam,

    I am very concerned about the Private Copying Tariff that I am forced to pay every time that I purchase recordable media. I am enraged that the Canadian Private Copying Collective (CPCC) and the Copyright Board are proposing to increase the tariff.

    First and foremost, the CPCC is responsible for collection, distribution and enforcement of this tariff. However, the CPCC is not an arm of the government and therefore is not accountable to voters and taxpayers.

    Secondly, they have collected $28 million over the last few years. However, they have not distributed any of the collected monies. Furthermore, 75% of the collected levy is earmarked for publishers. These publishers do not have to be Canadian business and most likely will be large American record labels. Local artists and record companies are forced to fight over the smaller piece of the pie. This should be a great concern for the Honourable Heritage Minister.

    The levy applies to all recordable media despite what said media may be used for. Whenever I archive pictures of my family, record labels benefit. Whenever I backup data, record labels benefit. This should be a great concern for the Honourable Minister of Industry. The bottom line of businesses that rely on recordable media is affected.

    What is most disturbing is that I am considered a thief the moment I purchase recordable media. I am given no opportunity to present my case.

    Currently, I am able to purchase a CD-R for about $0.39 retail. Of that $0.39, $0.21 of the cost is the levy. The new proposed levy is $0.59. That is absolutely ridiculous. About 75% of the cost of the CD will be the levy.

    I urge all Members of Parliament to consider the effects this levy will have on Canadians and Canadian business. This levy benefits large record labels and is detrimental to average Canadians and independent artists in particular.

    Sincerely,

    1. Re:Email your MPs by Blue_Fox · · Score: 2, Informative

      Sending to your MP is good. Forget the ministers listed on the web site, since the Liberals around Cretien aren't about to start listening now. Just look at the $2M gun registry that will end up costing taxpayers 500 times that amount.

      Back benchers are being heard now, so there is a good chance things can be changed if enough people take issue with the levy.

      Snow season is here, and if we're lucky as a nation, perhaps Mr. Cretien will decide to take a walk in it.

      (For our American friends, Trudeau, a former Prime Minister, took what has become a famous "walk in the snow" during which he decided to retire.)

    2. Re:Email your MPs by Screaming+Lunatic · · Score: 2

      I actually emailed it to my MP, Svend Robinson, as well. Let's see if he replies back. If he does, he definitely will raise a stink about it. He's just the type of guy that would take offense to stuff like this.

    3. Re:Email your MPs by CokeBear · · Score: 2

      Svend Robinson is like Canada's version of Paul Wellstone. (and thats in a country where most politicians are already to the left of Mr Wellstone). Oh yeah, and Mr Robinson is also openly gay (not that there's anything wrong with that). Consider yourself lucky that you are represented one of the most "progressive" politicians in North America. He might actually get something done here.

      --
      Reality has a liberal bias
    4. Re:Email your MPs by quintessent · · Score: 2

      Even more fun: e-mail your MPs your MP3s.

    5. Re:Email your MPs by pumpkinescobarsof2 · · Score: 1

      thx much, sent it to my reps too. it's exactly what i wanted to send, with all the figures and such. very well written btw.

  12. Time for Canada to ditch Copyright by Henry+V+.009 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I hope that Canada carries this policy to its logical conclusion:

    Canada should ditch copyright completely. Artists could be paid a government stipend based entirely on popularity (wonderful deal for artists, let me tell you). The government can levy an 'Entertainment' tax in whatever manner it chooses.

    1. Re:Time for Canada to ditch Copyright by Mr.+Troll · · Score: 1

      Hooray for socialism!!!

      How about the government giving out medicine based on how important my work is to society.

      OHH, how about we all just work for the state and they give us whatever we need, nothing more, nothing less. And being a troll looking fellow, how about our awesome "Big Brother" assign a female to me for mating purposes!!!!

      WOOOOOT

      --
      Kiss my shiny metal ass
    2. Re:Time for Canada to ditch Copyright by Henry+V+.009 · · Score: 2

      Not quite right, because: IN SOVIET RUSSIA the females assign "Big Brother" to YOU!

  13. Re:Screw "soviet canuckistan" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    HARK! I Hear an annoying coward whining!
    Sounds like another opinionated american prick who likes picking on the little guy.

    American forign policy... hmmm... makes you think, doesn't it?

  14. Re:In that case...Offtopic but... by the_other_one · · Score: 3, Funny

    A few years ago at a prior employer I had written a specification for an enhancement to a large financial application. It had much to do with cheque printing.

    Just prior to printing multiple copies of this document for a meeting that was about to start while the printouts were still warm. I did a spell cheque on a machine that obviously had MS Word configured differently from mine

    As the various copies are just about finished being passed around to the upper brass of my company and the client 's top brass; One of them asks "What are Tax Remittance Cheeses?"

    At this point I was rather worried about my next payroll cheese

    --
    134340: I am not a number. I am a free planet!
  15. Re:In that case...Offtopic but... by CyberDong · · Score: 1
    I've seen that. It happens when you spell it "cheqe". The same thing happened on a company-wide memo I saw. Quite funny. The memo read something like:

    "If the customer so desires, you shall cut them a cheese..."

  16. Re:Email your MPs - minor mods by LUN!X · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Just made a couple minor mods to parent post.. basically the same thing. Props to Screaming Lunatic of course :D
    Dear Sirs and Madam,

    I am overwhelmingly displeased with the Private Copying Tariff that I am forced to pay every time that I purchase recordable CD media. I am enraged that the Canadian Private Copying Collective (CPCC) and the Copyright Board are proposing to increase this tariff.

    First and foremost, the CPCC is responsible for collection, distribution and enforcement of this tariff. However, the CPCC is not an arm of the government and therefore is not accountable to voters and taxpayers.

    Secondly, they have collected $28 million over the last few years. However, they have not distributed any of the collected monies to the people supposedly deserving of those monies. Furthermore, 75% of the collected levy is earmarked for publishers. These publishers are not necessarily Canadian businesses and indeed, most are large American record labels. Local artists and record companies are forced to fight over the smaller piece of the ill-gotten pie. This should be a great concern for the Honourable Heritage Minister.

    The levy applies to all recordable media, despite my intentions for that media. As an example, whenever I archive pictures of my family, record labels benefit. Whenever I back up my personal data, record labels benefit. This should also be of great concern to the Honourable Minister of Industry, since the bottom line of businesses that rely on consumers purchasing recordable media is ultimately adversely affected by this unfair tariff imposed at the behest of record labels.

    What is most disturbing is that I am treated as a thief every time that I purchase recordable media. I am given no opportunity to present my case, nor am I accorded the dignity and respect that I deserve as a law-abiding Canadian citizen. I find it particularly galling that the American recording industry is primarily responsible for this insult.

    Currently, I am able to purchase a CD-R for about $0.39 retail. Of that $0.39, $0.21 of the cost is the levy. The new proposed levy is $0.59. That is absolutely ridiculous. About 75% of the cost of the CD will be the levy.

    I urge all Members of Parliament to consider the effects this levy will have on Canadians and Canadian business. This levy benefits large record labels and is detrimental to all Canadians.

    Sincerely,
    your name here
  17. Re:Screw "soviet canuckistan" by PFAK · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Oh yeah, and the US softwood lumber tarriffs just rock.

    We've lost over 30,000 jobs in BC because of this, and you say we're whiney, look at the bush administration. At least our Prime Minister can spell, and knows the names of other country leaders.

    Oh, and Bush IS a moron.

    Maybe you should actually pay attention to what happens outside your country, the United States aren't exactly the world ya know?

    --

    Free means no restrictions, ironic the FSF's GPL forces restrictions, isn't it? What's your definition of free?
  18. Fair is Fair by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Perhaps the Canadian government is simply evening out the system. Here's how I see it. The media companies know that the dramatic surge in blank CD sales has to do with people making copies. That surge is obvious due to the number of spindles I see on store shelves that were not there three years ago.

    So these media companies go complain to the government that they are losing revenue and that they expect the government to do something about it. The government considers the situation and decides to play Robin Hood.

    We tax the blank media sales for about as much money as the difference between blank media and say a standard audio disc. That money goes proportionately to the media companies.

    People get what they want.. the ability to make their own media discs and the media companies get compensated.

    Fair is fair, eh?

  19. a letter I sent back in March ... by LUN!X · · Score: 1, Informative
    BSD license applies :) comments welcome too
    Dear Sirs and Madam,

    I am objecting to the CPCC proposal for further taxation on computer back-up media and other recordable Compact Discs, as I believe that the proposed levy will further impose unfair penalties upon the honest people that use Compact Discs. I hope and pray that you people, who are in the position to do great harm by ratifying the CPCC proposal, will also object to it.

    It is evident that monies collected via the proposed tariff will be paid to representatives of the music industry, even though I personally use the Compact Disc media itself solely in a legal fashion, as I am entitled by copyright law.

    I find it distressing that this proposal advocates another tax in excess of those already levied, merely to support continued legal use of the Compact Disc media that I use. I contend that if I am to give money to the record industry, then it is only right that I should receive fair value in exchange - and more importantly, that any such transaction should be willful and deliberate, not in the form of extortion that the proposal recommends.

    I thank you for your time and consideration; please summarily reject the CPCC proposal so that my rights, and those of my fellow Canadians, may not be unjustly abrogated.

    Sincerely,

    insert full name and address here
    1. Re:a letter I sent back in March ... by LUN!X · · Score: 1, Troll
      forgot to list the MP addresses! this took me forever to harvest so you all better use em. ahem.

      send main copy to:

      pm@pm.gc.ca

      then cc: or bcc: to
      Abbott.J@parl.gc.ca;Ablonczy.D@parl.gc.ca;Adams. P@parl.gc.ca;Alcock.R@parl.gc.ca;Allard.C@parl.gc. ca;Anders.R@parl.gc.ca;Anderson.Da@parl.gc.ca;Ande rson.D@parl.gc.ca;Assad.M@parl.gc.ca;Assadourian.S @parl.gc.ca;Asselin.G@parl.gc.ca;Augustine.J@parl. gc.ca;Bachand.C@parl.gc.ca;Bachand.A@parl.gc.ca;Ba gnell.L@parl.gc.ca;Bailey.R@parl.gc.ca;Bakopanos.E @parl.gc.ca;Barnes.R@parl.gc.ca;Barnes.S@parl.gc.c a;Beaumier.C@parl.gc.ca;Belair.R@parl.gc.ca;Belang er.M@parl.gc.ca;Bellemare.E@parl.gc.ca;Bennett.C@p arl.gc.ca;Bergeron.S@parl.gc.ca;Bertrand.R@parl.gc .ca;Bevilacqua.M@parl.gc.ca;Bigras.B@parl.gc.ca;Bi net.G@parl.gc.ca; Blaikie.B@parl.gc.ca;Blondin-Andrew.E@parl.gc.ca;B ryden.J@parl.gc.ca;Brown.B@parl.gc.ca;Brison.S@par l.gc.ca;Brien.P@parl.gc.ca;Breitkreuz.G@parl.gc.ca ;Bradshaw.C@parl.gc.ca;Bourgeois.D@parl.gc.ca;Boud ria.D@parl.gc.ca;Borotsik.R@parl.gc.ca;Bonwick.P@p arl.gc.ca;Bonin.R@parl.gc.ca;Catterall.M@parl.gc.c a;Castonguay.J@parl.gc.ca;Casson.R@parl.gc.ca;Case y.B@parl.gc.ca;Carroll.A@parl.gc.caCarignan.J@parl .gc.ca;Cardin.S@parl.gc.ca;Caplan.E@parl.gc.ca;Can nis.J@parl.gc.ca;Calder.M@parl.gc.ca;Cadman.C@parl .gc.ca;Caccia.C@parl.gc.ca;Byrne.G@parl.gc.ca;Burt on.A@parl.gc.ca;Bulte.S@parl.gc.ca;Cuzner.R@parl.g c.ca;Cummins.J@parl.gc.ca;Cullen.R@parl.gc.ca;Cret e.P@parl.gc.ca;Cotler.I@parl.gc.ca;Copps.S@parl.gc .ca;Comuzzi.J@parl.gc.ca;Comartin.J@parl.gc.ca;Col lenette.D@parl.gc.ca;Coderre.D@parl.gc.ca;Clark.J@ parl.gc.ca;Chatters.D@parl.gc.ca;Charbonneau.Y@par l.gc.ca;Chamberlain.B@parl.gc.ca;Cauchon.M@parl.gc .ca;Finlay.J@parl.gc.ca;Farrah.G@parl.gc.ca;Eyking .M@parl.gc.ca;EppK@parl.gc.ca;Eggleton.A@parl.gc.c a;Efford.J@parl.gc.ca;Easter.W@parl.gc.ca;Duplain. C@parl.gc.ca;Duncan.J@parl.gc.ca;Duceppe.G@parl.gc .ca;Dube.A@parl.gc.ca;Drouin.C@parl.gc.ca;Dromisky .S@parl.gc.ca;Doyle.N@parl.gc.ca;Discepola.N@parl. gc.ca;Dion.S@parl.gc.ca;Dhaliwal.H@parl.gc.ca;DeVi llers.P@parl.gc.ca;Desrochers.O@parl.gc.ca;Desjarl ais.B@parl.gc.ca;Day.S@parl.gc.ca;Davies.L@parl.gc .ca;Dalphond-Guiral.M@parl.gc.ca;Grey.D@parl.gc.ca ;Grewal.G@parl.gc.ca;Graham.B@parl.gc.ca;Gouk.J@pa rl.gc.ca;Goodale.R@parl.gc.ca;Goldring.P@parl.gc.c a;Godin.Y@parl.gc.ca;Godfrey.J@parl.gc.ca;Girard-B ujold.J@parl.gc.ca;Gauthier.M@parl.gc.ca;Gallaway. R@parl.gc.ca;Gallant.C@parl.gc.ca;Gagnon.C@parl.gc .ca;Gagnon.M@parl.gc.ca;Fry.H@parl.gc.ca;Frulla.L@ parl.gc.ca;Fournier.G@parl.gc.ca;Forseth.P@parl.gc .ca;Fontana.J@parl.gc.ca;Folco.R@parl.gc.ca;Fitzpa trick.B@parl.gc.ca;Hill.J@parl.gc.ca;Hill.G@parl.g c.ca;Herron.J@parl.gc.ca;Hearn.L@parl.gc.ca;Harvey .A@parl.gc.ca;Harvard.J@parl.gc.ca;Harris.R@parl.g c.ca;Harper.S@parl.gc.ca;Harb.M@parl.gc.ca;Hanger. A@parl.gc.ca;Guimond.M@parl.gc.ca;Guay.M@parl.gc.c a;Guarnieri.A@parl.gc.ca;Grose.I@parl.gc.ca;KraftS loan.K@parl.gc.ca;Knutson.G@parl.gc.ca;Kilgour.D@p arl.gc.ca;Kilger.B@parl.gc.ca;Keyes.S@parl.gc.ca;K enney.J@parl.gc.ca;Keddy.G@parl.gc.ca;Karygiannis. J@parl.gc.ca;Karetak-Lindell.N@parl.gc.ca;Jordan.J @parl.gc.ca;Johnston.D@parl.gc.ca;Jennings.M@parl. gc.ca;Jaffer.R@parl.gc.ca;Jackson.O@parl.gc.ca;Ian no.T@parl.gc.ca;Hubbard.C@parl.gc.ca;Hinton.B@parl .gc.ca;Hilstrom.H@parl.gc.ca;Maloney.J@parl.gc.ca; Malhi.G@parl.gc.ca;Mahoney.S@parl.gc.ca;Macklin.P@ parl.gc.ca;Mackay.P@parl.gc.ca;MacAulay.L@parl.gc. ca;Lunney.J@parl.gc.ca;Lunn.G@parl.gc.ca;Loubier.Y @parl.gc.ca;Longfield.J@parl.gc.ca;Lincoln.C@parl. gc.ca;Lill.W@parl.gc.ca;Leung.S@parl.gc.ca;Lee.D@p arl.gc.ca;Leblanc.D@parl.gc.ca;Lebel.G@parl.gc.ca; Lastewka.W@parl.gc.ca;Lanctot.R@parl.gc.ca;Lalonde .F@parl.gc.ca;Laliberte.R@parl.gc.ca;Laframboise.M @parl.gc.ca;McKay.J@parl.gc.ca;McGuire.J@parl.gc.c a;McDonough.A@parl.gc.ca;McCormick.L@parl.gc.ca;Mc Callum.J@parl.gc.ca;Mayfield.P@parl.gc.ca;Matthews .B@parl.gc.ca;Masse.B@parl.gc.ca;Martin.Pd@parl.gc .ca;Martin.K@parl.gc.ca;Martin.P@parl.gc.ca;Marlea u.D@parl.gc.ca;Mark.I@parl.gc.ca;Marcil.S@parl.gc. ca;Marceau.R@parl.gc.ca;Manley.J@parl.gc.ca;Pagtak han.R@parl.gc.ca;Pacetti.M@parl.gc.ca;Owen.S@parl. gc.ca;Obhrai.D@parl.gc.ca;OReilly.J@parl.gc.ca;OBr ien.L@parl.gc.ca;OBrien.P@parl.gc.ca;Normand.G@par l.gc.ca;Nault.R@parl.gc.ca;Neville.A@parl.gc.ca;My ers.L@parl.gc.ca;Murphy.S@parl.gc.ca;Moore.J@parl. gc.ca;Mitchell.A@parl.gc.ca;Minna.M@parl.gc.ca;Mil ls.D@parl.gc.ca;Mills.B@parl.gc.ca;Milliken.P@parl .gc.ca;Merrifield.R@parl.gc.ca;Meredith.V@parl.gc. ca;Menard.R@parl.gc.ca;McTeague.D@parl.gc.ca;McNal ly.G@parl.gc.ca;McLellan.A@parl.gc.ca;Pratt.D@parl .gc.ca;Plamondon.L@parl.gc.ca;Pillitteri.G@parl.gc .ca;Pickard.J@parl.gc.ca;Picard.P@parl.gc.ca;Phinn ey.B@parl.gc.ca;Pettigrew.P@parl.gc.ca;Peterson.J@ parl.gc.ca;Peschisolido.J@parl.gc.ca;Perron.G-A@pa rl.gc.ca;Peric.J@parl.gc.ca;Penson.C@parl.gc.ca;Pa try.B@parl.gc.ca;Parrish.C@parl.gc.ca;Paradis.D@pa rl.gc.ca;Paquette.P@parl.gc.ca;Pankiw.J@parl.gc.ca ;Pallister.B@parl.gc.ca;Reynolds.J@parl.gc.ca;Reid .S@parl.gc.ca;Regan.G@parl.gc.ca;Reed.J@parl.gc.ca ;Redman.K@parl.gc.ca;Rajotte.J@parl.gc.ca;Provenza no.C@parl.gc.ca;Proulx.M@parl.gc.ca;Proctor.D@parl .gc.ca;Price.D@parl.gc.ca;Skelton.C@parl.gc.ca;Sim ard.R@parl.gc.ca;Shepherd.A@parl.gc.ca;Sgro.J@parl .gc.ca;Serre.B@parl.gc.ca;Scott.A@parl.gc.ca;Schmi dt.W@parl.gc.ca;Scherrer.H@parl.gc.ca;Savoy.A@parl .gc.ca;Sauvageau.B@parl.gc.ca;Saada.J@parl.gc.ca;R oy.J@parl.gc.ca;Rock.A@parl.gc.ca;Rocheleau.Y@parl .gc.ca;Robinson.S@parl.gc.ca;Robillard.L@parl.gc.c a;Ritz.G@parl.gc.ca;Thibeault.Y@parl.gc.ca;Thibaul t.R@parl.gc.ca;Telegdi.A@parl.gc.ca;Szabo.P@parl.g c.ca;Strahl.C@parl.gc.ca;Stoffer.P@parl.gc.ca;Stin son.D@parl.gc.ca;Stewart.J@parl.gc.ca;Steckle.P@pa rl.gc.ca;St.Denis.B@parl.gc.ca;St-Julien.G@parl.gc .ca;St-Jacques.D@parl.gc.ca;St-Hilaire.C@parl.gc.c a;Spencer.L@parl.gc.ca;Speller.B@parl.gc.ca;Sorens on.K@parl.gc.ca;Solberg.M@parl.gc.ca;Whelan.S@parl .gc.ca;Wayne.E@parl.gc.ca;Wasylycia-Leis.J@parl.gc .ca;Wappel.T@parl.gc.ca;Volpe.J@parl.gc.ca;Venne.P @parl.gc.ca;Vellacott.M@parl.gc.ca;Vanclief.L@parl .gc.ca;Valeri.T@parl.gc.ca;Ur.R-M@parl.gc.ca;Tremb lay.S@parl.gc.ca;Torsney.P@parl.gc.ca;Tonks.A@parl .gc.ca;Toews.V@parl.gc.ca;Tirabassi.T@parl.gc.ca;T hompson.G@parl.gc.ca;Thompson.M@parl.gc.ca;Yelich. L@parl.gc.ca;Wood.B@parl.gc.ca;Williams.J@parl.gc. ca;Wilfert.B@parl.gc.ca;White.T@parl.gc.ca;white.R @parl.gc.ca
  20. Re:In that case...Offtopic but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, you did a spell check that turned the word cheque to check.

  21. Buy from a US site? by fdiaz5583 · · Score: 1

    Couldn't you buy a pack of CD's from a US retailer? Are the fees levied for anything that crosses the border despite it coming from America?

    1. Re:Buy from a US site? by quintessent · · Score: 2

      Man in dark coat on the street: "Hey, buddy. Wanna buy a hard drive?"

    2. Re:Buy from a US site? by klparrot · · Score: 1

      You would have to (theoretically) pay duty, which includes provincial and federal taxes. I'm not sure if you'd pay the levy though. Can anyone say for sure?

  22. "Guilty!" Even if proven innocent. by CyberDong · · Score: 1
    From the document:
    The levy is payable on all media that qualify, without regard to end use. No purpose is served by asking that the tariff include a mechanism that would allow those who can prove that they use qualifying media for purposes other than reproducing musical works to be exempted from payment or to receive a refund.
    How long will it be before I'm convicted of murder for buying bullets...?
  23. but wait, there could be more... by Muggins+the+Mad · · Score: 1


    Ok, so if this goes ahead, what's to stop the big *software* companies getting their own levy added to this?

    Then the photographers.

    Heck, CDs can be used to record music or software that *I* produce, why can't I get some of that pie too?

    - Muggins the Mad

  24. Copies of what by nuggz · · Score: 2

    Most of the CD's I burn (about 40 in the last month)

    were, linux CD's (debian/mandrake/gentoo)

    Audio (from mp3.com, there is nice stuff in Electronic/Ambient)

    CD's of digital photos.

    I shouldn't have to pay Britney Spears for my family photos.

  25. 75% for publishers, 25% for artists by dpilot · · Score: 2

    And why do I have this ugly feeling that publishers get a 95% cut out of the artists' 25%, too.

    Maybe I'm all wet on this, but it's perception, and I'll bet it's not limited to me. In the computing and software industry, we unfortunately know how perception is sometimes more importatnt that reality, though we also lament it.

    --
    The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
  26. Cross the Border by Cyno01 · · Score: 2

    Just as we went up north during prohibition to get our fix we're gonna have canadians coming down here to buy blank CD-Rs. $50 per 100?!?! I got 200 for $3-US (after rebates of course) at office max.

    --
    "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
    1. Re:Cross the Border by Dr+Caleb · · Score: 4, Informative
      Not just for CD's. The legislation applies to all recordable digital media. DVD+RW's, Hard discs, magnetic tape etc. That's why iPod's will cost more.

      So we get to pay the CPCC/RIAA just to be able to boot an O/S or back it up. Aren't we lucky!?!

      --
      "History doesn't repeat itself, but it does rhyme." Mark Twain
  27. Re:Screw "soviet canuckistan" by peterdguru · · Score: 1

    I'm the legalization of Marijuana in BC will more than make up for forest industry job losses. Especially when you add up the tariff free illegal exports to the USA.

  28. Re:a letter I'm sending now...cc'd to all members by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Dear Members of Parliament,

    I would like to take this opportunity to convey my objects to proposed changes to the Private Copying Tariff that I am forced to pay every time that I purchase recordable CD media. I am enraged that the Canadian Private Copying Collective (CPCC) and the Copyright Board are considering raising the tariff from it's current rate, of which approximately 51% of the retail cost is tariff, to an outrageous 75% of the retail cost.

    This will result in direct cost increases to the Canadian consumers from approximately $39 per 100 CD-R to over $60!

    The existing tarrif wrongly assumes my CD-R purchases are used for the purposes of music recording, instead of data backup and archival purposes, resulting in benefit to an industry which I personally do not support or purchase from anymore in protest for their extreme position with regards to media shifting and artist compensation.

    The proposed increased tariff adds insult to injury and will result in my immediate boycott of the CRIA as well as active and energetic opposition to re election of ministers who would support such blatent extortion.

    I suggest all members consider the past history of the RIAA in the US as they have been convicted of "price fixing" in maintaining artificially high consumer prices for music over the last decade. Their Canadian equivalent (CRIA) should be investigated for similar activities.

    I thank you for your time and consideration; please summarily reject the CPCC proposal so that my rights, and those of my fellow Canadians, may not be unjustly abrogated.

    Sincerely,

    insert full name and address here

  29. Gov't pays out too by phorm · · Score: 2

    My question is, doesn't the government realize that they're shooting themselves in the foot too?
    How many government agencies purchase recordable CD's. As DVD and CD-R's become more popular (as backup, etc), how will this increase?

    How many government organizations are allowed to pirate? I work in schools, and every year one of the schools in the district gets audited/checked by the software police. Anybody I find with Kazaa gets a quick introduction to "add/remove programs" (and then ad-aware). We do use a fair amount of CD-R's, for either backing up data or ghost images, etc etc. As software is bought on a license basis, there can also be copies of the originals (that don't work without a valid key anyways), so that the masters can be kept safe.

    So what happens when all the government-run sectors have to pay 4x the amount of recordable media? I think they might notice some problems there.

    Jean: Mike, the server crashed again so we'll need to restore the backups.
    Mike: Ummm, sorry Jean, ever since the tariffs went up we haven't been able to afford backup discs. We tried going back to tape but then they taxed that too. We still have our backup discs from 1999 though, will those work?

  30. Have I got a deal for you Canadians! by teamhasnoi · · Score: 2
    When your guy decriminalizes dope, you can trade it with Americans for CD-Rs!

    Everybody Happy! What a Coun-try!

  31. costco prices by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    a friend said he was a member and he could get 50 for 32 dollars. i don't think they are a good deal myself.

    here in surrey bc, pc alley sells 50 80min 48x for 25 bucks. they'll sell them 20 bucks if buy alot though.

    futureshop was NEVER a good place to buy cds. staples, toys r us, and bigger computer stores are usually crap as they want profit. small stores can usually get them in big cities. if anyone needs blanks here in bc, i can mail em. :)
    75757417 my icq #

    blue tiger

  32. They'll have to pay the tax anyway. by User+956 · · Score: 2

    Send me a check in the mail for whatever you want plus 5% commission and shipping charges and I'll send you back your buy.

    You are aware, of course, that packages are opened and searched at the border, and your Canadian friends would probably end up paying the tax anyway.

    --
    The theory of relativity doesn't work right in Arkansas.
  33. Big deal. by Wakko+Warner · · Score: 2

    All these levies mean music piracy is, therefore, perfectly legal in Canada.

    So quit whining.

    - A.P.

    --
    "Remember when the U.S. had a drug problem, and then we declared a War On Drugs, and now you can't buy drugs anymore?"
  34. My MP cares! by CyberDong · · Score: 1
    I fired off my letter, and today I received a reply from Joe, my MP.
    Thank you for your letter concerning the proposed increased levy on recordable media. As you may be aware my colleague Loyola Hearn has written to the Secretary General of the Copyright Board, Claude Majeau, when this issue first arose requesting that this levy be immediately reassessed and removed from all blank audio recording media in Canada as quickly as possible. It remains my strong opinion and that of the PC Party of Canada, that this levy is yet another punitive form of taxation, which Canadians should not be expected to pay. I have taken the liberty of forwarding a copy of your letter to Mr. Hearn for his information. I trust that this is satisfactory.

    Thank you again for writing and for sharing your views with me.

    Sincerely,

    Joe Clark

    I'd vote for Joe again...