Slashdot Mirror


Apple Hawks Madonna iPods

danamania writes "Apple's latest promotion is a gimmick with Madonna, Tony Hawk or Beck's signature, or a No Doubt logo, on an iPod. It seems Apple's really pushing the iPod as a too-cool fashion accessory as much as a too-cooler MP3 player... is Maddie's signature worth an extra USD49 over the standard iPod?" Instead of $50 for the engraved signature, you can spend $20 to print "Madonna's Signature" in beautiful Helvetica.

150 of 349 comments (clear)

  1. Increased value? by Nogami_Saeko · · Score: 5, Funny

    Could it not argue that having Madonna's signature on your iPod would decrease the value?

    --
    "Nothing strengthens authority so much as silence." - Charles de Gaulle
    1. Re:Increased value? by tangledweb · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I would not mind an iPod, but this is a stupid idea. Most of the people stupid enough to want a pointless celebrity endorsement on their purchases are too young for an iPod.

      Star Wars lunch boxes sell well to the to young to know any better, but I don't think many in this demographic have the spending power for consumer electonics.

      The only positive side I see is that surely some or all of the people they pick will turn out really unpopular. There has to be an iPod equivalent of the Jar Jar Binks lunch box.

      I picture the price list this way:
      Madonna iPod $349
      Regular iPod $299
      Mariah Carey iPod $149 (with bonus laser/bubblejet printable sticker slightly larger than signature)

  2. Coming soon .... by binaryDigit · · Score: 5, Funny

    The Cowboy Neal autographed iPod (really just a big X marked in crayon).

  3. At first, the engraved iPOD seemed superfluous.... by User+956 · · Score: 5, Funny

    But then I realized, of course, that we're living in a Material World.

    Does this mean Steve Jobs is a Material Girl?

    --
    The theory of relativity doesn't work right in Arkansas.
  4. I'm waiting for the Hulk Hogan model by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    RED AND YELLOW, brutha! Whatcha gonna do when Hulkamania runs wild on you! Say your prayers, eat your vitamins, and use your Mac.

    1. Re:I'm waiting for the Hulk Hogan model by OO7david · · Score: 2
      RED AND YELLOW, brutha! Whatcha gonna do when Hulkamania runs wild on you! Say your prayers, eat your vitamins, and use your Mac.
      ...and don't forget to dial 10-10-220! There's no committment and I don't have to kill Alf!
    2. Re:I'm waiting for the Hulk Hogan model by jgkastra · · Score: 2, Funny

      And remember: Drink your drugs, don't do school, stay in milk....

      I need work!

  5. How Much... by GeneralEmergency · · Score: 3, Funny


    ...for one molested by Madonna's dog?

    No. Seriously.

    --
    "A microprocessor... is a terrible thing to waste." --
    GeneralEmergency
    1. Re:How Much... by sharkey · · Score: 4, Funny

      Madonna's dog

      Sean Penn or Guy Ritchie?

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  6. why? by neo8750 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    why would anyone do this? if they are a die hard fan they will mostlikely try for the real thing not just cheap engraved fake. I don't see why a person would waste 50 dollars more on this.

    1. Re:why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's actually an extra $30, as the engraving itself costs $20. In fact, the engraving used to cost $50 only a few months ago.

    2. Re:why? by MQBS · · Score: 5, Funny

      Err, the real thing? Since when does Madonna carry around a laser-engraver with her? Maybe Beck has one. I wouldn't put it past him.

      --
      The dream reveals the reality which conception lags behind. That is the horror of life- the terror of art. -Franz Kafka
    3. Re:why? by mshiltonj · · Score: 2

      why would anyone do this?

      Why do they sell "Eddie Bauer" Ford Explorers?

      *shrug* I have no idea why, but they seem popular.

    4. Re:why? by Zebbers · · Score: 2

      or better yet those harley trucks ;)

    5. Re:Why? by pi+radians · · Score: 2

      please remind me which one of them is the 'indy group'.

      I was wondering the same thing myself....

      --

      sin(6cos(r)+5A)
    6. Re:Why? by c13v3rm0nk3y · · Score: 2

      The easy answer is that, more than any other device, an iPod is marketed as a "lifestyle device".

      The fact is people identify heavily with their grown-up toys, and the iPod market even more so, it appears.

      My guess is that some money was thrown at researching this idea. I'm also guessing this kind of "indy" endorsement fits right in where Apple wants to position the iPod.

      Heck, the way they market the iPod is almost right out of a book entitles "The Conquest of Cool" by Thomas Frank (of The Baffler fame).

      --
      -- clvrmnky
  7. Devo by jgalun · · Score: 5, Funny

    I am holding out for the limited edition Devo iPod.

    Whip it! Whip it good!

  8. Including Music by Fubar · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I wouldn't be surprised to see Apple start shipping iPods with 'special tracks' from artists.

    I bet the RIAA wold love that.

    1. Re:Including Music by Refrag · · Score: 2

      Macs ship with an iTunes Sampler of music from popular artists. I think that Barenaked Ladies is one of the groups. I don't remember the rest.

      --
      I have a website. It's about Macs.
  9. Wow. by mkg · · Score: 2, Insightful

    All I can say is....ewwww! I love my iPod and all, but this is a little too cute for my tastes. I'm sure they'll sell. People are so awestruck by celebrity that they will purchase just about anything to identify themselves in some manner or another.

    1. Re:Wow. by nomadic · · Score: 2

      I don't think so. The cretins might watch Entertainment Tonight and read the National Inquirer, but when was the last time you saw someone wearing a Madonna t-shirt?

  10. But by unterderbrucke · · Score: 2, Troll

    "too-cool fashion accessory as much as a too-cooler MP3 player"

    Two years from now, will it still be cool?
    Two years from now, my Nomad Jukebox 5gb (c. 1956) will still nice-looking due to it's timeless design.
    But, soon enough the "clean" look will be "out", and iPod sales will drop. Mark my words.

    1. Re:But by ipjohnson · · Score: 5, Funny

      I don't think the clean look ever really goes out it just becomes less of a fad. Besides I'm sure apple will come out with a "hippie" version soon that comes in a multi colored cases and a roach clip on the back ;-)

    2. Re:But by nfotxn · · Score: 3, Insightful

      No, your Nomad will look just as pleebian as ever and Apple will sell new iPods with more features and new avant guarde styling.

      And people will buy them. That's the powerful combination of technology and fashion which Apple's more recent success is almost entirely due to.

      --

      _nfotxn

    3. Re:But by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 2

      Hope your joking. A clean design is minimalistic. Minimalistic designs are more likely to last because there is less to out of fasion (duh).
      The clean look will never be "out", because it is part of a funamental design principal.
      The Nomad Jukebox on the other hand, hardly looks like a timeless design.

    4. Re:But by c13v3rm0nk3y · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Two years from now, my Nomad Jukebox 5gb (c. 1956) will still nice-looking due to it's timeless design.

      Industrial design is a funny thing. I'm not sure I agree that the "brushed-metal-look-plastic and primary colour bezel" look is any more valid (in the long run) than any other choice out there. It may depend on how one defines "timeless", but I'm not sure the current Creative or Panasonic designs are necessarily timeless. Of course, only time will tell.

      Both are relatively recent takes on a look that has been around for some time. My first personal cassette player was a tiny Toshiba that was rounded-rectangular, brushed silver with black trim. Very iPod like for the time. That was close to 20 years ago.

      Not to mention the creative also offers the NOMAD Jukebox Zen, which is aimed directly at the value-oriented would-be iPod buyer.

      Creative is doing what most companies do: creating brand-recognition through design and style, while offering enough of a departure (read: copying other successful styles) to pick up the margin customers.

      --
      -- clvrmnky
  11. Madonna iPod by binaryDigit · · Score: 3, Funny

    Beware the Madonna iPod, every time you turn around it will shed its outer cover. Plus instead of a blank pause, it will insist on playing "Material Girl" and/or "Like A Virgin" between all your tracks.

  12. Rumor has it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Apple will engrave Anonymous Coward for only $19.95!

  13. I was hopping it came with the music she pirated! by F34nor · · Score: 2, Funny

    I was hopping it came with the music she pirated!

    If it did there'd be some Whilliam Orbit in there it bet!

  14. I don't understand this by sweetooth · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why would anyone want an iPod with a printed signature or logo. I understand branding etc, but with signatures most people don't care unless it is real. Also, for the price you could get it engraved with your own custom item makeing the iPod unique. That seems much more practical to me. Then at a later date when you happen to be at a coffee shop in London and Madonna forgets her purse again you can get her to autograph her iPod when she asks to borrow two pounds for that cake she is buying for her kid.
    http://english.planetarabia.com/content/arti cle.cf m/103366/115819

    1. Re:I don't understand this by sweetooth · · Score: 2

      I should have been more clear. I understand why Apple and even the artists would do this. I don't understand why anyone would buy it.

    2. Re:I don't understand this by AndroidCat · · Score: 2
      my guess is that Apple got these artists to submit their John Hancocks for a very low or zero dollars

      Mod the parent up as funny!

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    3. Re:I don't understand this by sweetooth · · Score: 2

      I don't know why anyone would want that either :)
      Hell, at least show up to Linux World and get him to sign your laptop or something, then it's real.

    4. Re:I don't understand this by The+Good+Reverend · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Why does anybody buy Nikes when there are higher quality shoes out there? Why do you buy the "name brand" vegetables in a can when the store brand taste the same? Why do the masses want Clariton when the generic does the same thing?

      People like branded things - people like to think their "version" of an item is somehow better. The fact that Woz signed my IIgs doens't mean it ran any faster, but it was still cool to have. It's just a function of society to want something we view as "unique".

    5. Re:I don't understand this by sweetooth · · Score: 2

      Ok, that's fine, but this isn't even a signature. It's printed on the side of the damn case. This is just like the people that buy Eddie Bauer(sp?) edition Ford Explorers. It has a decal with the guy's name, some extra leather, fake wood paneling and costs several thousand dollars more.

      Now if the guy walked up to your car and signed it in gold pen that might be kinda cool, but I don't understand buying a reprint of someones signature. I thought the whole point of getting a signature/autograph was because you got the persons actual signature. Hence you took the time and effort to go somewhere that the person was and actually asked for a signature.

    6. Re:I don't understand this by The+Good+Reverend · · Score: 2

      None of the items I listed have "authentic" signatures either - my point was that people like something with makes their product stand out from others. I like getting signatures of famous people to remember I met them, not as a "collect and trade" kinda deal. I don't think the authenticity of the signature is the issue here.

  15. RIAA and such by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Correct me if I'm wrong but aren't some of Madonna's newest CD's made with one of the new copy protection schemes? Doesn't it seem strange for her to be supporting the ipod while her music can't be played on it?

    1. Re:RIAA and such by GutBomb · · Score: 2

      the copy protection keeps the cds from being ripped. that's how it works. it keeps computers from being able to read the disc, so it can not be copied or ripped.

    2. Re:RIAA and such by wdr1 · · Score: 2

      Damn. I saw the subject line & thought you were going to link us to an RIAA version of the iPod!

      -Bill

      --
      SlashSig Karma: Excellent (mostly affected by moderatio
  16. My Opinion by OverlordQ · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Personally, I dont really see what's wrong with this. It's just like having a signed by . Hardcore fans pay good money for 'autographed' items.

    --
    Your hair look like poop, Bob! - Wanker.
    1. Re:My Opinion by elmegil · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If there were no difference between an actual signature and a silkscreened signature, you might have a point.

      --
      7 November 2006: The day Americans realized corruption and incompetence weren't addressing 11 September 2001
  17. Other iPods... by UnixRevolution · · Score: 5, Funny

    The Iron Maiden iPod... The Metallica iPod (just the irony makes it worth $50 more), the Devo iPod, and of course...

    The artist formerly known as the artist formerly known as Prince iPod.

    --
    You like your new Mac more than you like me, don't you, Dave? Dave? I asked...She said Yes.
    1. Re:Other iPods... by Dr+Caleb · · Score: 5, Funny
      .. The Metallica iPod

      As an added bonus, the Metallica iPod play mostly static interspersed with Lars Ulrich screaming "YOU FUCKING MUSIC PIRATES".

      --
      "History doesn't repeat itself, but it does rhyme." Mark Twain
  18. Should have music pre-loaded by johnkeyes · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This would make more sense if the iPod came preloaded with a bunch of music from the artist whose name is engraved.

    1. Re:Should have music pre-loaded by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 2
      "Tony Hawk is a musican?"

      No, but he's an apple cover-boy. There's a switch ad featuring him.

  19. Anyone notice this? by Xerithane · · Score: 5, Funny
    From the iPod site:

    Display your favorite contacts and appointments.


    Anybody else find that a bit strange, I'd prefer it to show all of my contacts and appointments.
    --
    Dacels Jewelers can't be trusted.
    1. Re:Anyone notice this? by gl4ss · · Score: 2

      well, remembering sucky things is bad.

      it protects you!

      you know, like a newspaper with only happy news.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    2. Re:Anyone notice this? by Refrag · · Score: 2

      If all of your contacts and appointments are your favorite it'll show those too. Apple is just illustrating that you can specify that it only synchronize a cross-section of your information.

      --
      I have a website. It's about Macs.
  20. If a tree... by galego · · Score: 5, Funny

    fell on Madonna in the forest and someone recorded the audio, could I get that preloaded on my iPod instead?

    --

    Que Deus te de em dobro o que me desejas

    [May God give you double that which you wish for me]

    1. Re:If a tree... by MonTemplar · · Score: 5, Funny

      It happened already. What, you mean you haven't heard Die Another Day yet? :)

      MT.

      --
      -MT.
  21. sounds like a gimmick but it is interesting.... by smd4985 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    because i'm sure all these artists understand that the iPod is often used to store illegally obtained music files. can this be construed as tacit approval? what would hilary rosen say?

    or perhaps musicians realize that like the VCR the iPod MAY encourage piracy but it has plenty of non-infringing uses. just like gnutella....

    --
    smd4985
  22. Mac Plus w/ Jobs' name by yroJJory · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I've got a slew of Mac Plusses with Steve Jobs' signature engraved inside and it didn't cost me $50 on top of the original $4000.

    --
    Jory
    1. Re:Mac Plus w/ Jobs' name by Daleks · · Score: 2

      Inside the case of my old 8500 are a bunch of signatures by, whom I assume, the designers and engineers. Inside the case of my Quicksilver tower are... no signatures.

  23. Re:OK by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Because Marketing, two chimps and a wolverine, at Apple went to "focus groups" (the three idiots that thought Performa was a strong name) and they said, "I will buy something with Madonna's scrawl on it."

    And thus there was crap on the shiny back of an iPod to be covered in the thumb prints of day to day use.

    (I have a 20GB iPod - Back gets all printy fast)

  24. Just great... by Yoje · · Score: 3, Funny

    First the RIAA will sue me for attempting to put MP3s on my iPod; then Madonna, No Doubt, and Beck will sue me for attempting to steal their iPods. "Why yes officer, that is my iPod, see, that's my signature right there."

  25. Re:OK by jericho4.0 · · Score: 2

    You might be correct, but just watch Apple sell a million of these.

    --
    "A language that doesn't affect the way you think about programming, is not worth knowing" - Alan Perlis
  26. Ok, so how long... by Quixadhal · · Score: 4, Funny

    before we can get our favourite pr0n image engraved on it? No, I'm not nescessarily suggesting that Madonna be involved...

  27. Nerd iPods by binaryDigit · · Score: 4, Funny

    /.Pod - slashdots any computer that you hook up to it. Keeps on wanting to be "beowoulf clustered" with iPods of the opposite gender (but of course is lucky to even get them to acknowledge it).

    K&RPod - Trse UsrIntFace, very flexible though

    GPLPod - If you sing along, you must record your singing and distribute the original song along with your singing.

    M$Pod/SonyPod/RIAAPod - You hate it because you have to.

    CaseModPod - iPod with glear plastic case, neon kit, chipped cpu w/water cooling

    1. Re:Nerd iPods by meringuoid · · Score: 2
      CaseModPod - iPod with glear plastic case, neon kit, chipped cpu w/water cooling

      OK, so you're trolling and all, but I actually think you might have a market niche here... I certainly want one of those!

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    2. Re:Nerd iPods by MonTemplar · · Score: 2

      AdaPod - will only play marching band music, barfs on anything else.

      --
      -MT.
  28. Re:Hawking? by l1gunman · · Score: 4, Informative

    Nope... guess again. The use of "hocking" as you suggest refers to leaving something with a pawn broker in exchange for a "loan". Derived from one of its meanings as "last resort". Hawking means, among other things, peddling, usually accompanied by a loud noise or shouting. Sheesh, don't any of you guys read anything besides slashdot! ;-)

  29. Bah! I knew it all along! by AndroidCat · · Score: 2, Funny

    She's always been one of those Pod People!

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  30. Think Different, Godammit! by MonTemplar · · Score: 4, Funny
    I'd have one of the following :

    Kevin Mitnick edition iPod (plays music, DOSes your iMac).

    Hillary Rosen edition iPod (plays nothing, shops you to the Feds for file-sharing)

    Nick Cave edition iPod (plays music, but you hear only silence)

    Satan edition iPod (plays music in reverse, you hear voices telling you to 'do it! do it!')

    MT.

    --
    -MT.
    1. Re:Think Different, Godammit! by AndroidCat · · Score: 2

      RIAA edition iPod (you buy it, but it sues you anyway)

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    2. Re:Think Different, Godammit! by flimflam · · Score: 2

      Nick Cave edition iPod (plays music, but you hear only silence)

      I think you meant John Cage.

      By the way, here's his signature, for free no less.

      --
      -- It only takes 20 minutes for a liberal to become a conservative thanks to our new outpatient surgical procedure!
    3. Re:Think Different, Godammit! by Some+Dumbass... · · Score: 2

      I'd have one of the following:

      I want the rarest iPod in the world: the one signed by Bill Gates.

      I hear he was drunk at the time.

    4. Re:Think Different, Godammit! by MonTemplar · · Score: 3, Funny

      I want the rarest iPod in the world: the one signed by Bill Gates.

      I hear he was drunk at the time.


      So was Steve Ballmer, that's why your music gets interspersed with whooping, hollering, and chants of "Developer! Developer! Developer!" :)

      MT.

      --
      -MT.
  31. No surprise by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 2

    Eddie Bauer
    Kathy Ireland
    Martha Stweart
    Tommy whatshisname
    Ad infinitum

    Celebrity connection sells. Real signature or just a logo.

    1. Re:No surprise by overunderunderdone · · Score: 2

      Well Eddi Bauer is the designer not so much a celebrity

    2. Re:No surprise by c13v3rm0nk3y · · Score: 2

      Who/what is this "Ad infinitum" you speak of? A new Techno/Trance DJ? A rapper? A nu-metal band?

      Damn, why didn't I hear about them in CMJ magazine?

      --
      -- clvrmnky
  32. Who will do this? by teamhasnoi · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Bland trust-fund kids?

    How about ipods in *different colors*?? It worked for the iMac, and is a better choice than the signature of the 'flavor of the month'. Cmon, THINK DIFFERENT, indeed.

    Better yet, a clear, removable face plate that can cover photos or art of your OWN MAKING.

    That sounds more like Apple to me...

    1. Re:Who will do this? by swb · · Score: 2

      How about ipods in *different colors*?? [...]That sounds more like Apple to me...

      It all sounds like Apple to me -- much of their innovation has been centered around what are really superficial visual design changes.

      Some wags may argue that some of the design changes made the machine easier to work on (some aspects of the B&W G3 case design) or easier to use (the new iMac's screen adjustability) or made them more productive because they made them feel better looking at a "good" design.

      I think overall that the design changes were designed more around grabbing people's attention than material improvements in the basic function of the device.

      I think Apple rather lays bare the superficiality of some of their design motivations and cheapens the actual design ground they laid by doing this with the iPod. But I bought a Tivo instead of an iPod with my mad money, so what do I know..

    2. Re:Who will do this? by teamhasnoi · · Score: 2
      And fake signatures of people you don't know is HOT HOT HOT? I got a middle school Trapper Keeper for you then.

      There are lots of colors and designs other than 'Booberry' and 'Flower Power'.

      Color will always sell. 'You can have it in any color you like, as long as it's black' - Henry Ford

      Ask Ford about that now.

      Your fashion guess could be right. I like early 60's clothes, mid 60's cars, late 50's furniture, and present hardware. What it all means - who knows.

  33. None of you understand this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    I'm posting this anonymously to protect my job. Not that they'll fire me or anything, but why risk it?

    For several years, we (Apple) have been working on ways of customizing computers and electronics. It all started back in the Power Mac Cube days, when we were looking into new injection molding processes. That worked okay, but we got a lot of flak from customers who thought the mold lines in the plastic looked like cracks.

    Now we're looking at custom laser engraving, trying to figure out ways to get the cost down to less than a dollar per square inch. The idea is that you will be able to order your laptop with anything at all engraved on the surface: your name, a logo, a picture of your kids, whatever.

    This little promo is just some of the runoff from that work.

    Oh, and incidentally, Apple isn't doing this for the money. I don't want to say anything else too specific, but there's more going on between Apple and these artists than just this. Expect to see more interesting things in the coming months.

    1. Re:None of you understand this by Otter · · Score: 2
      Oh, and incidentally, Apple isn't doing this for the money. I don't want to say anything else too specific, but there's more going on between Apple and these artists than just this. Expect to see more interesting things in the coming months.

      There has to be something more to this -- just selling Madonna or No Doubt-branded cases is schlocky, and Jobs would never agree to schlocky to sell a few more units.

    2. Re:None of you understand this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Actually, it's a hell of a lot more interesting than that. And I'm astounded that nobody's guessed it yet.

      See, the deal is that Apple's management-- Steve more than anybody else, really-- sees the record companies kinda dropping the ball. People are happy with MP3-quality music, and they want to be able to buy it over the Internet. Current systems for doing that just suck. Since Apple controls .Mac, the OS, iTunes, the iPod, and QuickTime 6/AAC, they're the only ones who are in a position to make a real end-to-end, easy-to-use digital music distribution system happen.

      In the future, you'll (assuming we can cut a deal with Apple Records on that nasty trademark matter) be able to plug you iPod into your Mac, browse a library of songs via iTunes, and download them directly to your iPod over broadband or AirPort. Micro-payment (well, semi-micro; on the order of a dollar per song) will be handled through the .Mac "one click" system, which Apple licensed from Amazon and already uses in iPhoto for buying photographic prints on line. The only DRM will be the stuff we've already go built into the iPod that makes it inconvenient, though of course not impossible, to copy music off of it once it's been put on.

      When we go live with this-- which we're hoping to do by the end of next year at the latest-- we're going to need some big names. That's why we've been talking to Madonna, No Doubt, Beck, Dave Matthews Band, Moby, and some others.

      Basically Apple is trying to do an end-run around the record companies and the RIAA. It's not done yet, and it may not work, but the foundation is there and all that's really left is to sort out the legal details.

      If anybody finds out I've posted this, I'm out of a job, and I'll probably end up with my ass in court. Hope this "anonymous coward" thing works as advertised.

    3. Re:None of you understand this by MonTemplar · · Score: 3, Funny

      Ooooh, is there a 'Britney Spears' signed mp3 player "in the coming months"?... :D

      More to the point, will it refuse to play in proximity to a Christina Aguialera or Justin Timberlake edition player? :)

      MT.

      --
      -MT.
    4. Re:None of you understand this by GeneralEmergency · · Score: 2



      Well, now that I do, I still think that this is a stoooooopid product idea specifically designed to troll for morons.

      But I'm sure you're really a nice person in real life.

      --
      "A microprocessor... is a terrible thing to waste." --
      GeneralEmergency
    5. Re:None of you understand this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Loose lips sink ships.

      I'm not going to bother looking up who posted this, but if it comes to my attention I won't ignore it. For the world, please discount this rumor because will lead to false expectations.

      Steve.

    6. Re:None of you understand this by usr122122121 · · Score: 2
      Now we're looking at custom laser engraving, trying to figure out ways to get the cost down to less than a dollar per square inch.
      I'm guessing you're not quite there yet... judging by the $30 additional cost...
      --

      -braxton
    7. Re:None of you understand this by shepd · · Score: 2, Interesting

      >People are happy with MP3-quality music, and they want to be able to buy it over the Internet. Current systems for doing that just suck.

      Not again. Apple is going to re-package emusic? Seriously, in what way does emusic suck? I get the whole album. It's one click. I get all I can download (well, I hear they cut you off at 100 albums a month). I suppose it might be nice for the client to also download the artwork for free, but feh, who cares that much?

      >Micro-payment (well, semi-micro; on the order of a dollar per song) will be handled through the .Mac "one click" system

      Oh, I see. Sorry to say, it's dead before it hits the ground then. I hate micropayment BS, and that easily adds up to more than buying the real CD for me. Emusic has the best idea, IMHO.

      >The only DRM will be the stuff we've already go built into the iPod that makes it inconvenient, though of course not impossible, to copy music off of it once it's been put on.

      So, it's actually _worse_ than emusic, then? :-/

      It feels to me like another "let's take an idea, slap a nicer interface on it, and charge ungodly amounts" Apple standard idea then.

      Just my two cents.

      (For all though that haven't seen it yet, emusic is there. Try it and be amazed. It's totally free, for the first few songs. And, trust me, their 128 kbps is about as good as any 192 kbps I've encoded at home).

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    8. Re:None of you understand this by lunartik · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Funny this should also be posted today:

      Man arrested for leaking Apple documents
      by Jim Dalrymple, jdalrymple@maccentral.com
      December 11, 2002 4:10 pm ET

      Apple on Wednesday filed a civil complaint in the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Santa Clara against a former contract employee for leaking documents. In addition, according to court documents filed last week, the District Attorney in Sacramento, California is also pressing criminal charges and the man has been arrested.

      Jose Lopez -- who was contracted by Apple through the Volt Services Group -- and an unnamed person referred to as Doe 1 are named in the civil complaint filed by Apple this morning. Lopez worked for Apple as a contractor last summer when schematic drawings and other details about Apple's Power Mac G4 were released on the Internet.

      "Apple has filed a civil complaint against Jose Lopez, previously employed by Apple as a contractor, who we believe stole Apple's trade secrets by posting schematic drawings, images and engineering details of an unannounced Apple product on the Internet," an Apple spokesperson said in a statement to MacCentral today. "Innovation is in Apple's DNA, so the protection of trade secrets is crucial to our success. Our policy is to take legal actions where necessary to preserve the confidentiality of our intellectual property."...(more)
      .

    9. Re:None of you understand this by ottffssent · · Score: 2

      > The idea is that you will be able to order your laptop with anything at all engraved on the surface: your name, a logo, a picture of your kids, whatever.

      Now *that* might push me over the edge and get me to buy a Tibook. I know you all think I'm joking, but how wicked-cool would that be? They'd have to get rid of that stupid glowing apple logo thing, but I'd pay $100 if I could get a magic-eye picture of Tux lounging on an iceberg engraved into the lid. Wouldn't you?

    10. Re:None of you understand this by Twirlip+of+the+Mists · · Score: 2

      Dude, if you don't work for emusic, you're going to have to present some kind of credentials or something. This is the biggest-- and lamest-- sales pitch I've seen in a Slashdot comment in a long, long time.

      --

      I write in my journal
    11. Re:None of you understand this by shepd · · Score: 2, Interesting

      >Dude, if you don't work for emusic, you're going to have to present some kind of credentials or something. This is the biggest-- and lamest-- sales pitch I've seen in a Slashdot comment in a long, long time.

      Honestly, I don't work there. It's just one of the few services I buy that I am truly satisfied with. It was everything I expected, and in this day and age, that sorta surprised me (in a good way).

      Like I say, try it out if you don't believe me. :-) I did on the advice of another random poster on metafilter, and it was well worth it (not many big name bands, though).

      If you've got any questions, fire away.

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
  34. Only $20 by mattvd · · Score: 4, Informative

    Actually, it looks like you get $30 off at checkout.

  35. "Innovation" at Apple by Codex+The+Sloth · · Score: 2

    This didn't work for Palm and it won't work for apple because it's a stupid idea. I'm just waiting for the clip on colored face plates -- that managed to eek a few extra years out of the Gameboy franchise that way.

    --
    I am not a number! I am a man! And don't you ... oh wait, I'm #93427. Ha ha! In your face #93428!
  36. IANAT but... Why is this slashdotworthy? by The+Pi-Guy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It was cool when the iPod was the first easily usable MP3 player with a hard drive that fit in a small space. It was cool when they got linux support. It might've been cool if it was engraved with RMS' signature or CowboyNeal's, or even maybe Steve Jobs'. But remind me one more time why I, a geek/nerd/this/that/whatever, care about this? IANATroll, but this has gone a little too far with the 'slashvertisements'.

    Ah well. I can see my karma dropping now. Mods, do your worst...

    --j

  37. Re:Coming soon .... Bill Gates iPods by MonTemplar · · Score: 2

    The foolish and unwary.

    It lets you download music to it, then presents you with an EULA informing you that you do not own the music, but merely have a limited licence to listen to it. Pressing the Play button constituted agreeing to the EULA, pressing any other button gives you a BSOD. :)

    MT.

    --
    -MT.
  38. Unique iPod-only, artist-specific content? by uucee · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This could be cool (rather, worth the money) if Apple and the artists' labels got together and offered unique and compelling content only available for the signature-series iPods. Instead of pushing this as a logo gimmick, maybe selling "a year-long subscription to content only available to these iPods" would make the offer appealing.

  39. iBond or iT2000 edition? by T-Kir · · Score: 2

    Yep, it might reduce the price to nothing... for example would playing "Die Another Day" incite hardware failure? Either by the iPod developing a taste for music (in which case it self destructs) or the listener throws the iPod into a wall? (when users friend has got a waaaay cooler "Q" department issue iPod/iBond with a laser light show or something).

    So in the end it is rather worthless, being in little pieces and all, unless Apple develops a special Terminator edition called the iT2000 (for when the film comes out) that can morph back together?

    --
    Are you local? There's nothing for you here!
  40. Why? by greymond · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I don't want to get flaimed for this - but honestly - this idea of of a Pop-Star, Skater guy, Loner, and Indy group signing an Ipod baffles me.

    I'm all for people who want to get an Ipod - i'm sure it's a cool toy - as well as i'm sure it like all other toys has its +'s and -'s

    But WHY? would you be more incligned to buy a Palm Pilot or a Zaurus if it had any of these signatures on it?

  41. How to make money by Ralph+Wiggam · · Score: 2

    1. Pour plaster or some other softer substance over the signature section of your engraved iPod. Let harden and remove.
    2. Buy all the old Madonna albums from the used section of your local music store.
    3. Put ink on the tip of your plaster mold.
    4. Stamp album covers.
    5. Ebay some autographed Madonna albums.
    (you knew it was coming)
    6. PROFIT!

    -B

    1. Re:How to make money by sconest · · Score: 2

      3. Put ink on the tip of your plaster mold.
      4. Stamp album covers.

      Wouldn't the signature be in reverse ?

      --
      Guvf vf abg n EBG zrffntr
    2. Re:How to make money by Stuart+Gibson · · Score: 2, Funny

      No. Think about it, we'll wait here for you.

      Goblin

      --
      It's all fun and games until a 200' robot dinosaur shows up and trashes Neo-Tokyo... Again
  42. "Maddie"?! by Wee · · Score: 2
    She has one name all her professional life and now she has a nickname too? What's next, we call her "M"? Isn't that just a little ridiculous?

    Ah... I mean more ridiculous than Madonna as a conceptual whole.

    -B

    --

    Ash and Hickory, straight-grained and true, make excellent bludgeons, dandy for the cudgeling of vegetarians.

    1. Re:"Maddie"?! by Frymaster · · Score: 3, Funny
      She has one name all her professional life and now she has a nickname too? ...Isn't that just a little ridiculous?


      and your real name is "Wee"?

    2. Re:"Maddie"?! by sconest · · Score: 2

      What's next, we call her "M"?

      Too late, already taken by a French singer

      --
      Guvf vf abg n EBG zrffntr
    3. Re:"Maddie"?! by Wee · · Score: 2
      and your real name is "Wee"?

      No, but that's what everyone calls me. My dad gave me the nickname a long time ago and it stuck. In my signature (the real, on-paper kind), my first name appears as "Wm". Giving Madonna another, shorter name is like calling me "W". That was my point.

      -B

      --

      Ash and Hickory, straight-grained and true, make excellent bludgeons, dandy for the cudgeling of vegetarians.

    4. Re:"Maddie"?! by Joe+Jordan · · Score: 2

      Actually, her full name is "Madonna Veronica Louise Ciccone". I know this because my g/f is a huuuuuuuuge fan. Car rides with her are NOT what I would call fun.

    5. Re:"Maddie"?! by Wee · · Score: 2
      I thought my wife's Dance Hall Crashers fetish was bad. Oy. I feel for you.

      Be strong, brother.

      -B

      --

      Ash and Hickory, straight-grained and true, make excellent bludgeons, dandy for the cudgeling of vegetarians.

  43. Makes no sense by zecg · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It seems like a really bad move from a marketing strategy viewpoint. I am just not able to see how people who buy portable hardware for playing digital music (even the user-friendly Mac flavor) are the same people who would enjoy having something signed by a pop-star. But let us say that they are - I still don't see why you need to advertise a solid hi-tech product with a cheap gimmick. It is not just simple endorsement.

    --
    .i lu doi ringos.star. xu do puku'aroroi dunli dopecaku leni virnu li'u
  44. Re:OK by archeopterix · · Score: 3, Funny
    You might be correct, but just watch Apple sell a million of these.
    I'd love to watch it, but I'm currently on the lookout for The Grand Flying Pig Squadron coming to my town this month.
  45. Case-mod an i-Pod by BSDevil · · Score: 2

    Has anyone ever done it yet? Take off that silvery cover and replace it with, I dunno, a clear case and a blue mini-cold cathode.

    Why? Why the hell not...

    --
    Cue The Sun...
  46. What about the lawsuit against the contractor? by jbuilder · · Score: 2, Offtopic

    Why is a Madonna/No Doubt/Cowboy Neal - branded iPod Slashdot-worthy, but this article isn't? Apple is filing a lawsuit against a former contactor for theft of trade secrets. It seems that this contractor posted schematics of new apple hardware onto the internet...

    Moderators, punish me if you must, but I think this bears mentioning on /. *way* more than a Madonna iPod does... Especially since I'm more of a KISS fan myself... ;)

    --
    Polymorphism -- It's what you make of it.
  47. No no no! by mao+che+minh · · Score: 4, Funny

    They need an Ellen Fiess edition!

    1. Re:No no no! by chegosaurus · · Score: 2

      I was listening to some techno and it's all, like, "beep beep beep"

  48. Old technology by El · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Wouldn't it a heckova lot cooler to use flexible displays or electronic paper wrapped around the iPod so you could customize the external appearance yourself? Skins for physical devices -- now THAT is cool!

    --

    "Freedom means freedom for everybody" -- Dick Cheney

  49. A better, more profitable idea by mao+che+minh · · Score: 2

    A better, more profitable idea would be to make a cheap-o, 2 GB iPod for $99. Here is the price list: iPod prices. Customer engraving is $19.95.

  50. Apple's long history of 'celebrity computers' by redherring22 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Remember the Apple IIgs, which had Steve Wozniak's "WOZ" signature on the box?

    </apple geek nostalgia>

  51. Re:Who wants an ipod by gamgee5273 · · Score: 2

    Wait. I think the Apple/DoCoMo announcement about Quicktime on cellphones might have some bearing on where the iPod is going. There's nothing about iPod that specifically says "music," is there? Apple can do whatever it wants to with it - including slapping a color screen in like the Archos is using, increasing the disk space, creating QT & iPhoto capability, AND adding an input method (a scroll wheel-based keyboard?) - without really having to change the form factor. I used to trumpet the Archos because it is cheaper but, dammit, FireWire rulez!

  52. Re:What Really Bothers Me by Knobby · · Score: 2

    Apple is trying to sell their product to Joe Sixpack. Joe doesn't know or care what a GB is. He does know, roughly how long a CD or a record takes to listen to.

    The default import settings for iTunes is 160kbps MP3 (non-VBR). At those settings, 1000 songs (or roughly 2.6 days worth of music) consumes roughly 4.6GB which leaves enough space for the OS and your calendar, contacts, etc.

    If you take a look at the Tech Specs page you'll find: At a 160Kbps compression rate (the default setting for encoding MP3s in iTunes), 20GB equals approximately 4,000 songs, or about 400 CDs. At 128Kbps -- the most popular compression rate people use for MP3s -- 20GB is equivalent to approximately 5,200 songs, or about 520 CDs.

  53. Re:At first, the engraved iPOD seemed superfluous. by dirkdidit · · Score: 2

    I think I speak for everyone when I say I'm sorry that you happen to remember Madonna videos from 15 years ago. :-)

  54. Madonnas IPods? by Snaller · · Score: 2

    How many have she got?!

    And what when they are all sold - how is she going to listen to music?

    And where did she get all those mp3s anyway - did she download them from the net? Eh? Eh? Eh?

    --
    If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
  55. Spielbergs IPod! by Snaller · · Score: 2

    They had to drop that, it had been taken!

    --
    If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
    1. Re:Spielbergs IPod! by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 2
      Don't use Style Sheets - it makes web pages unreadable in Microsoft Internet Explorer.

      What's with you sig? Would you prefer designers to embed the style into the HTML via fonts tags and other horrible hacks that's make no sence and can't be overriden? Why no use another browser if it's that much of a problem?

    2. Re:Spielbergs IPod! by Snaller · · Score: 2

      > What's with you sig?

      Well, its a soundbite, your sig can't be very long. Follow: most webmasters (>90%) don't use stylesheets as they were intended, namely as a relative definition. They define all fonts as ABSOLUTE sizes, if you do that the font size can't be adjusted in Microsoft Internet Explorer - ie, if your sight, like mine, isn't 20/20 it can be hard to read a lot of pages. If they had designed them with just a little bit of care, and used relative font sizes instead, they would be scalable and readable. If you tell that to the webmasters they either don't know what you are talking about or tell you to get lost (in varying degrees of politeness)

      >Would you prefer designers to embed the style
      >into the HTML via fonts tags and other horrible
      >hacks that's make no sence

      Actually a lot of people are embedding stylesheet commands into the HTML

      >and can't be overriden?

      The point is that a lot of pages become unredable because their effects can't be overridden (in MSIE)

      >Why no use another browser if it's that much of a problem?

      that much of a problem? That 90% of web pages become hard to read - because most of the web (non linux pages) are designed for MSIE and many of them won't work (and the adage, then don't visit the page hurts me not them)

      --
      If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
    3. Re:Spielbergs IPod! by penguinboy · · Score: 2

      Don't use Style Sheets - it makes web pages unreadable in Microsoft Internet Explorer.

      Are you insane? There are so many things wrong with that statement:

      1. Obsolete: Style sheets and CSS are the current standard. The alternative (font tags and the like) is deprecated (not to mention generally a lot more work to deal with).

      2. False: Internet Explorer does a generally serviceable job of rendering CSS. And while IE might have some quirks, Netscape 4.x is an actual example of a browser that can't deal with style sheets well.

      3. You seem to be forgetting that this is /. - not exactly the best place to go to drum up sympathy for Microsoft products.

    4. Re:Spielbergs IPod! by Snaller · · Score: 2


      >>Don't use Style Sheets - it makes web pages
      >>unreadable in Microsoft Internet Explorer.

      >Are you insane? There are so many things wrong
      >with that statement:

      There is only something wrong with that statement if you are 20 year old "websdesigner" who don't care about the readability of your pages.

      >1. Obsolete: Style sheets and CSS are the
      >current standard.

      Which is used wrongly by about 90% of those who use them.

      >The alternative (font tags and the like) is
      >deprecated (not to mention generally a lot more
      >work to deal with).

      Which is amusing since a lot of sites use inline stylesheet tags.

      >2. False:

      False? False what? Now you are insane - you think i would write about a problem if there wasn't one?

      > Internet Explorer does a generally serviceable
      >job of rendering CSS.

      Except you can't change font size on fonts which has been set to absolute font size in stylesheets. And since most webmasters (>90%) don't use stylesheets as they were intended, namely as a relative definition but define all fonts as ABSOLUTE sizes, you (i) have a problem! You can't adjust the font size in Microsoft Internet Explorer - ie, if your sight, like mine, isn't 20/20 it can be hard to read a lot of pages(fact! Even if you can spot a skaterbabe at 50 miles). If they had designed them with just a little bit of care, and used relative font sizes instead, they would be scalable and readable. If you tell that to the webmasters they either don't know what you are talking about or tell you to get lost (in varying degrees of politeness)

      >3. You seem to be forgetting that this is /. -
      >not exactly the best place to go to drum up
      >sympathy for Microsoft products.

      You mean this is slashdot where people don't care about anyone but themselves? I don't give a shit about sympathy for Microsoft products, I'm just trying to get some sympathy for myself ... no wait, not even that, I'm just trying to get the amateurs to do a proper job when they are making webpages! (Follow the intent of stylesheets, not making a WYSIWYG page!) And if some of the idiots at Microsoft happen to read this so they could change the behavior of their damn browser that's even better ("So use another browser" - except you can't for a lot of websites)

      I got another message along with yours, from a guy who says "You're right! I remember that when i design webpages" - so that's one down, a few millions to go.

      --
      If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
    5. Re:Spielbergs IPod! by penguinboy · · Score: 2

      Which is used wrongly by about 90% of those who use them.

      The fact that people misuse stylesheets does not mean that they are the wrong thing to use. They can be implemented correctly and they are the correct solution to use.

      Except you can't change font size on fonts which has been set to absolute font size in stylesheets. And since most webmasters (>90%) don't use stylesheets as they were intended, namely as a relative definition but define all fonts as ABSOLUTE sizes, you (i) have a problem! You can't adjust the font size in Microsoft Internet Explorer - ie, if your sight, like mine, isn't 20/20 it can be hard to read a lot of pages.

      Now that you mention it specifically, I know what you mean. My sight is far from perfect and I frequently find myself increasing the font size of web pages. However, Internet Explorer only has five size levels: +2, +1, Normal, -1, and -2 - and I find that even the largest setting isn't that much larger than the default, especially when dealing with text that is initially very small. I don't see how a web designer could get around this by using font tags vs. CSS.

      What I do is use Mozilla. It allows an apparently unlimited level of font size adjustment, from microscopic all the way up to massive and it seems to always work, regardless of how the sizes were initially specified. If you don't have any choice but to use Internet Explorer, you have the option to ignore specified font sizes and to specify your own stylesheet.

      While I don't believe in intentionally making an effort to screw users with certain browsers, I think that the standards that exist are usable and some of the browsers out there prove that it is possible to implement the standards effectively. If some browsers don't comply, they are the problem. The solution is to fix the defective browsers, not to revert to using obsolete standards.

      As an aside, do you have some examples of sites that don't work well in IE because of their use of CSS?

    6. Re:Spielbergs IPod! by Snaller · · Score: 2

      Now that you mention it specifically, I know what you mean. My sight is far from perfect and I frequently find myself increasing the font size of web pages. However, Internet Explorer only has five size levels: +2, +1, Normal, -1, and -2 - and I find that even the largest setting isn't that much larger than the default, especially when dealing with text that is initially very small. I don't see how a web designer could get around this by using font tags vs. CSS.

      Well, it would be nice if they added more levels, or no limits at all.

      However there is great difference in the 5, if you don't see much difference it is perhaps because of the font size locking.


      What I do is use Mozilla. It allows an apparently unlimited level of font size adjustment, from microscopic all the way up to massive and it seems to always work, regardless of how the sizes were initially specified.


      Yes i know, this is how i feel it should be done.
      Unfortunately i still need MSIE.
      If you don't have any choice but to use Internet Explorer, you have the option to ignore specified font sizes and to specify your own stylesheet.

      Yes, but as i think i mentioned, there is a bug (or a peculiar feature) in MSIE that causes it to REMEBER the font line spacing, even when you have told it to ignore font sizes. So the letters are big, but the linespacing may still only be 5 points (ie, the letters are on top of each other)
      As for my own stylesheet, not sure how that would help since its one for all sites. If it was one for each site, then perhaps.

      As an aside, do you have some examples of sites that don't work well in IE because of their use of CSS?

      Well of the cuff there is http://www.cnn.com - you can't change the font size since they lock it with stylesheets, or http://www.usatoday.com/
      - http://www.cbs.com/ is an example of where they letters are ontop of each other on some pages, even when you have disabled stylesheets.

      (If you have a version of MSIE where this is not a problem, by all means do tell :)

      --
      If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
    7. Re:Spielbergs IPod! by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 2
      ...They define all fonts as ABSOLUTE sizes, if you do that the font size can't be adjusted in Microsoft Internet Explorer...

      I though that might be the case.

      Actually a lot of people are embedding stylesheet commands into the HTML

      Yes, unfortuntaly, 99% of the time, these people are being idiots.

      Maybe you should have something more like: "Don't deffine font sizes in px. Internet Explorer can't re-size them"?

      BTW, it's only the px unit that doesn't re-size. pt is also an absolute measument, and it's re-sizeable. But it's not meant for monitors, dispite being the norm for on the web for years.

    8. Re:Spielbergs IPod! by Snaller · · Score: 2

      Maybe you should have something more like: "Don't deffine font sizes in px. Internet Explorer can't re-size them"?

      Yeah, perhaps. But this one seems to get a the attention of a lot of people - perhaps it might even change something (eventually :)

      --
      If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
  56. The obvious signature... by Megane · · Score: 2

    ...is a Woz signature, of course.

    --
    #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
  57. Re:Setting: 2008, Anytown, USA..... by smack_attack · · Score: 2

    Ba hahahaha, please mod this up.

  58. Re:At first, the engraved iPOD seemed superfluous. by User+956 · · Score: 2

    I think I speak for everyone when I say I'm sorry that you happen to remember Madonna videos from 15 years ago

    And I'm sorry if you happen to remember her video from last month.

    --
    The theory of relativity doesn't work right in Arkansas.
  59. Not so strange, but different.. by unorthod0x · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've got 4 Apple ][gs', two of which are the "Special Woz Edition" - I don't recall them being more expensive when I purchased them; if memory serves well it was first-come-first-serve.

    That said, this iPod/Madonna/Tony Hawk/etc. does seem to be a departure from the above; would you pay extra for a "Steve Jobs iPod"? Would you have paid extra for the Woz edition of the ][gs? I think back then in my early Apple days (read: Apple as a religion) I might have actually considered it, and would certainly be tempted by a Woz edition iPod (LOL) - but non-Apple celebrities? I dunno, it cheapens the allure of this product enhancement if you ask me..

  60. How about uploading art? by phong3d · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It would be pretty interesting to be able to upload a black-and-white GIF or perhaps some similarly colored vector graphics to have engraved on the back. That sounds like the next obvious step after this pre-made designs and text customization.

    1. Re:How about uploading art? by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 2

      Umm, you did see the previous comment , right?

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  61. Re:I was hopping it came with the music she pirate by The_dev0 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Fuck that, Mirwais has written most of her hits in the last couple of years.

    --
    Never fight naked, unless you're in prison...
  62. iCe Pod by Znonymous+Coward · · Score: 2

    Forget iPod, I want the Vinalla iCe Pod. Preloaded with all my favoriate iCe tunes.

    --

    Karma: The shiznight, mostly because I am the Drizzle.

  63. One iPod to Rule Them All by orpheus2000 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I had a friend who asked Apple if they would take a custom TrueTypeFont to engrave. Namely, a TTF for Quenya, and have it engraved in the language of Mordor:

    Ash iPod durbatulúk, ash iPod gimbatul,
    ash iPod thrakatulûk agh burzum-ishi krimpatul

    Apple said no; a pity. I would have liked to have seen The One iPod

    1. Re:One iPod to Rule Them All by Alex+Thorpe · · Score: 4, Funny

      The Black Tongue of Mordor? Nah, someone might stick it in a fire to see if it glows.

      --
      "Common Sense Ain't" -Unknown
  64. I'd pay extra for Hilary Rosen's signature iPod by Rai · · Score: 3, Funny

    Or a portable DivX player with a picture of Jack Valenti on it.

  65. Apple might just be on to something here.. by CashCarSTAR · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Now I'm no Apple fan, but they may have a good idea here. Forget the scrawls. They are useless and ugly. However, looking at the No Doubt one, that's not a bad idea. They just need more options. I'd love if I could get various band logos of bands I liked scrawled onto an IPod, not just one, but logos of all the bands I like. Apple could have a large database of band logos and let you choose a bunch to throw on it together, make it look sortta raggadly put together.

    1. Re:Apple might just be on to something here.. by Alex+Thorpe · · Score: 2

      THAT would be better; I care nothing for these few celebrities, but if I could get band logos from Blind Guardian, Iced Earth, perhaps Queensryche, that'd be more like it. If I didn't already have an iPod, that is.

      Oh, and I'd need a new iPod case that also has a clear back, so you can see the engravings.

      --
      "Common Sense Ain't" -Unknown
  66. Will it match my purple iMac? by geekee · · Score: 2

    Because if it doesn't match, my friends will think I'm a total dork.

    --
    Vote for Pedro
  67. So how did I do? by wirefarm · · Score: 2

    I predicted pretty much this same scenario in This Post a week or so ago.
    I hope you're for real - I'd really like to see this happen.

    Cheers,
    Jim in Tokyo

    --
    -- My Weblog.
  68. People that don't like... by Refrag · · Score: 2

    People that don't like carrying bricks in their pockets? People that like a good user interface?

    --
    I have a website. It's about Macs.
  69. What if I lost my iPod by Aqua+OS+X · · Score: 3, Funny

    What if I lost my iPod and someone found it and returned it to Tony Hawk?

    --
    "Things are more moderner than before- bigger, and yet smaller- it's computers-- San Dimas High School football RULES!"
  70. iPod as Fashion by r00tyroot · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Recently at a motorcycle show I learned that one BMW's newest bikes, the F650CS, comes with an iPod when you purchase the bike: this page has details ...cute

  71. iPods I'd like to see by Ilan+Volow · · Score: 5, Funny
    • Madonna iPod--changes the style of its interface every year and half just for shock value
    • Tony Hawk iPod--comes with wheels and requires elbow pads and helmet
    • No Doubt iPod--plays nothing but funky ska/reggae and constantly inserts references to your ex's in songs
    • Beck iPod--error messages that say "You're a loser baby, so why don't you kill me."
    • Milli Vanilli iPod--claims to be an iPod, but really is only a 32MB Diamond rio.
    • Britney Spears iPod--the sound quality only is only good if you're under twelve, and has buttons so big you'd swear they weren't real.
    • P Diddy iPid--We all know it's really just the Puff Daddy iPod. Who are they trying to fool?
    • J Lo iPod--useful as a wedding gift for a couple you know will last less than a year.
    • George Michael iPod--has special ports for jacking into public restrooms.
    --
    Ergonomica Auctorita Illico!
  72. Re:Coming soon .... Bill Gates iPods by binaryDigit · · Score: 2

    informing you that you do not own the music, but merely have a limited licence to listen to it

    But isn't this how most music is currently? Not that you have a EULA, but the copyright holder usually only gives you a limited use license to listen to the music, you at no point actually own the music. Not exactly a M$ specific thing, well at least the license part, the BSOD of course is copyrighted by M$ and it's one they protect (and exercise) rigorously ;)

  73. Smart Move by Apple by wdr1 · · Score: 2

    is Maddie's signature worth an extra USD49 over the standard iPod?

    Well, considering one can by a pretty run of mill shirt for $15.00 at Target, or $185 at Neiman Marcus, I would say yes, to many consumers it's worth paying more simply for status.

    I think it's a really smart move on Apple's part & plays perfectly into their geek chic motif.

    -Bill

    --
    SlashSig Karma: Excellent (mostly affected by moderatio
  74. Re:Coming soon .... Bill Gates iPods by MonTemplar · · Score: 2

    But isn't this how most music is currently? Not that you have a EULA, but the copyright holder usually only gives you a limited use license to listen to the music, you at no point actually own the music.

    For items that you can physically hold in your hand (tape,CD,vinyl), the above does not apply, for now. Although the music industry is doing its damnedest to try and rectify that. :(

    My original post was more along the lines of 'All your files are belong to Microsoft', only with better wording. :)

    MT.

    --
    -MT.
  75. Re:Hawking? by Chris+Burke · · Score: 2

    Best post recognizing that one has been inappropriately mod'ed up... ever!

    --

    The enemies of Democracy are
  76. Apple leads by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 2

    Like it or not, Apple leads the consumer electronics industry in terms of design. When they put out the five fruit-flavored iMacs, lots of people said, "so, that's just stupid, can I get beige?" A year or so later, you could get the mini George Forman grill in five fruit flavors.

    If we do get the kids' picture laser-engraved on the powerbook, you can bet in a year everybody will be offering a similar service.

    The brilliant part is, of course, it decimates the used equipment market.

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  77. Waiting in line at the bank, behind Beck by c13v3rm0nk3y · · Score: 2

    What I'd really like to know is if Beck really signs his cheques with this same signature.

    Imagine waiting in line behind Beck at the bank while he endorses all his royalty cheques.

    "Sir, there's quite a line behind you, perhaps you's like to step aside?"

    "Butterfly pecans in my suitcase. Greasy foundlings like a termite, choking on a splinter. Cold brains. A devil's haircut in my mind."

    "Uh...?"

    "Just one more curlicue."

    "Oh."

    --
    -- clvrmnky
  78. Gifts to employees, clients, etc. by AHumbleOpinion · · Score: 2

    Why would anyone want an iPod with a printed signature or logo

    Consider the case where the buyer and the user are not the same person. For instance iPod's engraved with a company logo and presented as gifts to employees, clients, etc.

    1. Re:Gifts to employees, clients, etc. by sweetooth · · Score: 2

      Ok, that's fine, but that's not what this is. These are "celebrity" signatures.