Slashback: Wireless, Radio, Ralsky

Slashback with more on GNU Radio; BeUnited's ongoing bid for Gobe Productive's source code; AOL, IM and the USPTO; the consequences one observer faced for watching spammer Alan Ralsky and more. Read on for the details.

Don't Post While Sleepy: Hi, Chrisd here apologizing about that false post on Sony/Nintendo Playstation Trademark Settlement. Oops. Doh. No excuse. Mea Culpa. I'll be more careful next time.

Is "Rubber stamping everything" a patentable business practice? Brian Dear writes "With all the news these days about the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office issuing a patent to AOL/ICQ/Mirabilis for Instant Messaging, I thought the Slashdot community would be interested in reading about TERM-talk on PLATO, which was announced on the PLATO network on this day in 1973. Here is the URL with a screen shot of the actual announcement."

Turing, Marconi and Rosen: pick any two. squiggleslash writes "Salon is running an informative and sympathetic story about GNU radio. The article discusses how the project could end up pre-empting the Hollywood producers and other content cartel's attempts to destroy modifiable consumer hardware by creating a blatently legitimate space where programmable hardware is a requirement, as well as opening up radio to groups outside of the current cabals. Good stuff."

We've mentioned quite a bit about GNU Radio before (see also Eric Blossom's interview questions and answers; this article delves into the fight that the GNU Radio folks are gearing up for over broadcast flags.

Suiteness and light. To follow up on our mention of the effort to buy from Gobe (and release as Free software) the sourcecode of Gobe Productive, Simon Gauvin of beunited.org writes "beunited.org has been pledged over $10,000.00 by the public and corporate community for the release of Gobe Productive for BeOS. Linux users have also pledged, and we encourage more members of the Linux community to participate for the release of the Linux version. Call all your friends and send them over to beunited.org to help raise awareness!"

Here's the relevant discussion thread if you'd like to learn more about this effort; I wish the site had a bar chart of some sort showing how much money was currently raised, and an obvious PayPal link or similar. Note that for now, beunited's first goal is to open the source for the BeOS version of Productive.

Ralsky, Ralsky, Ralsky ... IsoRashi writes "Over at the Register they have this short article about a guy who took some photos of spammer Alan Ralsky's home. After taking the photographs, the man was chased by someone in a black jaguar and he began receiving threatening phone calls the next day. Here is a direct link to the site the photographer set up."

Read your TOS carefully before you start downloading ... Sergeant Beavis writes "Nate Carlson was kind enough to create a HOWTO for connecting your Linux box to Sprint's Vision network via a Sanyo SCP-4900 phone. However Sanyo's store shows the cable to be out of stock. Now comes FutureDial to the rescue with both the USB cable and SnapDialer software for connecting to the Vision network with Windows instead of Linux. Oh, the cable only cost $19.99 at your local Radio Shack. Enjoy!"

And let this be a lesson (of sorts) to you! gh0ul writes "Looks like Uzi Nissan (for those of you who don't recall owns nissan.com) has lost his fight with Nissan Motors to keep his nissan.com (last name by birthright/company) domain. The site now reads "In compliance with a ruling issued by the United States District Court in Los Angeles on November 14, 2002, in the lawsuit of Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. v. Nissan Computer Corporation, this web site has been converted to non-commercial use." Are we ever going to have any protection against these kind of things?"

The Eye was never there. You never saw it. It was not creepy. Finally, Rob writes "The creepy all-seeing eye logo from John Poindexter and the Total Information Awareness project is suddenly missing from the TIA web site. Old site ; Current site Perhaps TIA is seeking suggestions for a new logo?"

Comments

The VMS PHONE utility is just like TERM-talk too

[sys$manager]

I assume that PHONE on VMS has been around a lot longer than any of the current IM systems, but not as long as TERM-talk. It has basically the same functionality as described on the TERM-talk site.

Nissan

[intermodal]

That's ridiculous. Nissan is his last name, and his company's name. There needs to be some sort of public outcry one of these days.

Re:Nissan

[Anonymous Coward]

There is, it's here. And that's it. Sorry.

Re:Nissan

[thebigmacd]

I hate to argue on principle, but I forgot about this whole thing and when I went looking for the official Nissan 350Z page three days ago, I typed in nissan.com. Upon which I remembered and tried nissan-motors.com, which also does not belong to Nissan Motors. Finally, I found nissanmotors.com. I know, I could have used Google, but my habit is typing in URLS if they are familiar. Case in point...it does sort of hijack Nissan's name.

Re:Nissan

[BJH]

So, you're saying that just the fact that one company is larger than another immediately gives the larger one first rights to the best domain names.

Hmmm...

Re:Nissan

[Linuxthess]

Yes, your absolutely right. They're hijacking his URL as well as his last name for their company.

---------

Re:Nissan

[warpath]

There needs to be some sort of public outcry one of these days.

Well, we all whined about it a lot the last time it was posted on Slashdot.

Does that count?

Re:Nissan

[Anonymous Coward]

So, when I go looking for the noodle company and I get Nissan the car company at nissan.com, I can say Nissan the car company hijacked the noodle company?

You ever hear of viewpoint? Fairness? Equitable treatment? .com's is not trademark infringement unless the guy was selling cars. End of story. If you're too lazy to do a lookup or simple web search, that's your problem. How dare you pretend to make it everyone's.

Re:Nissan

[Anonymous Coward]

You know about it, right? So don't support Nissan if this matters to you.

Write to your congressmen about this.

When you go looking for cars, don't buy Nissans. Don't work for or put out work to company's who have Nissan the car company as a client.

May not hit them financially, but people ask for reasons when they want what you do or produce and you turn them away. Maybe then they'll know and start waking up to this sort of litigation and abuse.

Unless the guy was selling cars, this shouldn't have even made it to court. More people know about this sort of stuff--awhile back on Headline knews, they covered a family restaurant that was sued and lost--was in business for like 40 years and was told to undergo a name change from a 15 yo trademark holder, if I recall. The trademark holder really didn't want to sue supposedly but due to the law, if they don't, then it's known dilution and they may forfeit their mark.

Trademark laws are a good idea. But our/US trademark law has a problem with it--a) there should have been a grandfather clause and b) granted exceptions should not be considered dilution.

Re:Nissan

[Pentagram]

If both are using it for commercial purposes, then the entity that has more to gain from it is more entitled to it

I assume you're not serious. Surely whoever registers it first is entitled to it?

Government: "Clearly Nissan (motors) will make more cash from that domain, so hand it over!"

Seems a bit totalitarian, to say the least. What happens if Mr. Nissan builds up a company that is bigger than Nissan? Does the domain switch back and forth?

Re:Nissan

[Anonymous Coward]

Trollin' trollin' trollin',
Trollin' trollin' trollin',
Trollin' trollin' trollin',
HOTGRITS!

Re:Nissan

[Ytrew Q. Uiop]

Well, basically, yeah. Given that only one entity can have the name, the question arises of who is more entitled to it.

The usual rule is the person who is currently renting something is entitled to use it. ;-)

Domain name lookups are esentially listings rented by ICANN; Uzi Nissan paid money for his listing, and then Nissan Motors decided to sue to take it away. The court was wrong.

If both are using it for commercial purposes, then the entity that has more to gain from it is more entitled to it.

I disagree. It's expropriation of property rights that you're talking about, for corporate, not public, gain. That's a textbook definition of corruption -- taking from the poor to give to the rich.

Imagine if this happened in the real world! People would howl bloody murder if their address was taken away! Companies already name streets after themselves: there's 1 Microsoft Way in Redmond, 1 Blue Jay Way at the Sky Dome ... if this became a trend, should I get evicted from my house at 1 Victoria Street because "Victoria's Secret" has customers who are too lazy to read a map?

Your answer would seem to be "yes" -- after all, they have "more to gain" from owning that particular address than I do.

So big companies do, indeed, have first rights to the best domain names.

How do you know the big companies have more to gain than small companies? Can you prove that a smaller company, (say, Microsoft in the early days), won't eventually out-compete a large company (say, IBM?)

I notice also that non-profit organizations don't seem to fit into your worldview. Should they be denied web pages, because you only value profit in your metric? Should freedom of speech exist only if you have enough money to merit it?

Do you really think that the rich should have more rights because they're rich?
--
AC

Re:Nissan

[MegaHamsterX]

Domains are useless for everyone but superhuge megabranded international companies. I would say the thing we need more than a fix on the lawyers is a fix on the system, perhaps a decentralized DNS system with aliases assigned to PGP keys or something, dunno just a thought.

Re:Nissan

[Christopher Cashell]

If you're serious then I apologise in advance, because that has to be one of the biggest loads of BS I've ever seen.

I was going to write up a reply pointing out how utterly wrong your statement is, but I don't even know where to begin. One person owns something, but since someone else has more to gain from having that something, they should be entitled to it?

Attempting to find the logic in that would be enough to make someone's head explode.

Re:Nissan

[nursedave]

Ludicrous. This is simply the 'might makes right' argument. And it didn't work at Nurenburg... Oh, wait, that was something different... My bad.... Really, this can't be a fair method of determing ownership. This is not a cybersquatter situation at all. I've registered my name, not a common name at all but I was suprised to see how many people share my name after Googling for it. If one of these *other* idiots creates a company using our common name, what is the level of financial success/risk necessary for him to win a fight for that domain name? If he loses the first round, but business is good and he becomes even *more* financially successful, can he try again and win? >Well, basically, yeah. Given that only one entity can have the name, the question arises of who is more entitled to it. If both are using it for commercial purposes, then the entity that has more to gain from it is more entitled to it. So big companies do, indeed, have first rights to the best domain names.

Re:Nissan

[Anonymous Coward]

it does sort of hijack Nissan's name

Exactly. But the thing is that Nissan Motors' use of the domain hijacks Uzi Nissan's use just as much as Uzi's use hijacks Motor's use. Both are equaly legitamate businesses, and Uzi Nissan got it first.

Re:Nissan

[1u3hr]

I hate to argue on principle, but I forgot about this whole thing and when I went looking for the official Nissan 350Z page three days ago, I typed in nissan.com. Upon which I remembered and tried nissan- motors.com, which also does not belong to Nissan Motors. Finally, I found nissanmotors.com. I know, I could have used Google, but my habit is typing in URLS if they are familiar.

Your principle being that domain names should be given to the party having the greatest public name recognition?

Case in point...it does sort of hijack Nissan's name.

Yes, it hijacks Mr Nissan's name.

Re:Nissan

[Anonymous Coward]

Except the noodle company is Nissin.

Re:Nissan

[wrfink]

Maybe if someone "Hacked" his web site and posted anti-nissan messages.... Would it be his fault :-)

Re:Nissan

[Anonymous Coward]

Well, people seem to believe in socialism...

Re:Nissan

[Anonymous Coward]

"might makes right" works just fine for the USA, after all, we have exactly the kind of weapons, that we say Iraq is not allowed to have, and we have many more than they could ever aspire to own. It would have worked fine for the Nazis too, as long as they had won. Nissan is simply extending that principle to websites. You can't blame them for following the example set.

Re:Nissan

[nursedave]

Nice off-topic troll, shit for brains. Yes, the US has nuclear weapons. We've used them in one war to end it and save the lives of 10's to 100's of thousands of Allied *and* Japanese people. Not since. I don't like nukes, but I feel safer with their existance in the hands of democratically elected governments who are answerable to others, instead of insane murderers like Hussein. Trying to compare the two is impossible. >"might makes right" works just fine for the USA, after all, we have exactly the kind of weapons, that we say Iraq is not allowed to have, and we have many more than they could ever aspire to own. It would have worked fine for the Nazis too, as long as they had won. Nissan is simply extending that principle to websites. You can't blame them for following the example set.

Re:Nissan

[Christopher Cashell]

Even socialism wouldn't go this far.

Socialism would permit the taking of (using the current example) the domain for use by the Government for the betterment of *everyone*, but it wouldn't condone the taking of property from one person and giving it to another simply because the latter person "had more to benefit".

Re:Nissan

[loners]

He started running car ads on his site.

That is when nissan motors sued that he was using the domain to capitalize on their name.

Not everyone is being unfairly punished by big corporations. If he had not run car ads, this would have never gone to court and he would still have the domain name.

He got greedy and it cost him.

Re:Nissan

[Anonymous Coward]

No, not the benefit of everyone. There is no way to benefit everyone. Socialism is just about making sure we all have the same scars.

Re:Nissan

[Christopher Cashell]

The goal is to benefit everyone.

Either way, the problem is that I'm talking theory, and you're (cynically) talking about your perception of reality.

TIA logo

[Bodhidharma]

The creepy all-seeing eye logo from John Poindexter and the Total Information Awareness project is suddenly missing from the TIA web site.

How about a pentagram with a goat's head?

Re:TIA logo

[Rick the Red]

Missing? I just went there and the pages look the same. Slashdot posters on crack?

Chrisd: Don't Post While Sleepy

[paulcammish]

Don't you mean "Sleeping"?

Re:Chrisd: Don't Post While Sleepy

[Anonymous Coward]

What's wrong with "sleepy?"

Here's the first dictionary.com entry:

Sleepy:
1:
a) Ready for or needing sleep.

The word has other meanings, but needing sleep seems to be the most prominent.

Are you not a native anglophone?

--AC

How about that other cheek thing?

[Anonymous Coward]

"Over at the Register they have this short article about a guy who took some photos of spammer Alan Ralsky's home. After taking the photographs, the man was chased by someone in a black jaguar and he began receiving threatening phone calls the next day. Here is a direct link to the site the photographer set up."

Okay, I might be stupid, but just because this Ralsky didn't respect us, does that give us the right not to respect him? Afterall, what would the world look like if everybody kept hitting back? I bet there would be world wars, conflicts rising here and there, a western world fighting a middle-east one, and so forth. It would be all terrible! Oh? It already is? For God's sake, stop hitting back and turn the other cheek. How else will we be able to stop this (imo) unfair treatments?

Re:How about that other cheek thing?

[div_2n]

I am not advocating any sort of action one way or another. However, I feel compelled to point out the major flaw in that philosophy.

Just because you change your attitude and turn the other cheek does not guarantee that the other person will change theirs too. Quite likely they will just go ahead and hit the other cheek.

For historical reference, read about Hitler and WW2.

Re:How about that other cheek thing?

[jafiwam]

So, you feel that taking photos from a public street is some sort or threat or harm against Ralsky?

So taking photos from a public street shows a lack of respect?

I have two things to say to your ridiculously ignorant point of view;

- those who want my respect shall earn it

- act as you would have others act upon you

(as one would reasonably expect others in one's own society to share the same values, you can expect others around you to act in manner similar to you)

Ralsky has already acted like a total asshole, he won't stop because of some pseudo-christian claptrap that depends on others having morals and a conscience to control their actions. The "turn the other cheek" stuff won't work on someone that won't eventually realize what they are doing wrong. It only works on people that wake up and "see" what they are doing is wrong.

Ralsky may change his ways, he may not. If he changes, it sure as hell won't be because someone was NICE to him. If he does not, people may take out their frustrations on him. He'll have to deal with that as part of the price of that big old (nasty looking) yuppie palace he bought himself.

Re:How about that other cheek thing?

[ctimes2]

For God's sake, stop hitting back and turn the other cheek. How else will we be able to stop this (imo) unfair treatments?

Hit back HARDER! At some point you both laugh at the pain you caused each other and agree to stop it, or one of you has to hide the body. Which is plenty hard and makes you sweat a lot, plus it's a hassle, so you tend to not get in any more fights. God, the death of common sense around here is annoying... *SMACK*

And yes, you might be stupid. The guy took some pictures of Ralsky's house - I would hardly call that 'hitting back' or disrespectful. Someone threatening this guy... that's hitting back. Or just hitting if you consider that the first 'hit' was taking a picture.

Furthermore, this isn't one of those turn the other cheek situations - the guy who took the pictures is getting anonymous threatening phone calls. He damned well better protect himself, turning the cheek could get him killed.

Re:How about that other cheek thing?

[Twirlip of the Mists]

For historical reference, read about Hitler and WW2.

Does this mean the argument is over now? ;-)

Re:How about that other cheek thing?

[Salubri]

For God's sake, stop hitting back and turn the other cheek.

Actually it's interesting to note this reference in the bible, as people seem to forget the context of the time this quote was made.

During this time much of the "known world" was conquered by the Roman Empire, and the areas around Jerusalem were no exception. During those times of the empire, slavery was legal. However, the legal way to punish a slave was to slap the slave across the cheek with the back of the right hand (after all, the left was only fit to wipe one's ass with.) If they struck in any other way, it was recognizing that the person being struck was your equal.

By "turning the other cheek", you were forcing the person to strike you in a way that made him recognize you as his equal. You weren't being merciful or good, you were FLAT OUT TAUNTING the person striking you. No pun intended, but it was a backhanded way at spreading the message that no man is better than another.

Re:How about that other cheek thing?

[Mr. Slippery]

Hit back HARDER!

"An eye for an eye only leaves the whole world blind." - Gandhi

I'm all for self-defense. (Not only am I for it, I teach it.) Retribution, however, is counterproductive.

Re:How about that other cheek thing?

[Anonymous Coward]

You know the "Eye for an eye" approach to justice is actually all about stopping retribution. The idea is that an eye for an eye limits the damage done, otherwise people would be doing the escalation thing of a life for an eye.

Re:How about that other cheek thing?

[JordoCrouse]

act as you would have others act upon you

So Raslky spied on you? He has posted your home address on public websites, and joked openly about doing bodily harm to you?

Hell, lets do it one better - have you ever even recieved a spam from this guy? Or are you just pissed because there is somebody out there doing something that you don't approve of?

He'll have to deal with that as part of the price of that big old (nasty looking) yuppie palace he bought himself.

Oh, yeah - what does he have to deal with? What is your so called price of his chosen profession? Phone calls? Junk mail? Pizzas? Pictures of his house?

How about destroying his property? How about killing all his plants? How about killing his cat? What is your just price?

And where does your justice end? I've got a friend that makes parts for control mechanisms that get placed into missiles (among other things). At some point in time, I am sure that one of those missiles has killed an innocent child somewhere Should he be stalked? Pictures taken of his house and car?

And everywhere in the world there are people that hate things: abortions, fur, and Gomer Pyle. Should they use whatever action they feel is justified to make people "wake up and see" that they are doing something percieved as wrong? What if somebody hates nerds or computer programmers or fans of Star Trek? Then what?

Call it christian claptrap if you want, but I personally think there is something to this whole "respect each other" idea. Its a pretty novel concept, if you ask me. Maybe you should try it some time, you might like it.

Re:How about that other cheek thing?

[Anonymous Coward]

You're a fucking moron. There's a big difference between an indirect action with unintended consequences (building a missile to take out evil regimes which inadvertently takes out an innocent child, or building a car designed for purposes of transportation which inadvertently kills a family of 6 when a drunk driver plows into them), and a DIRECT action with intended consequences!

And yes, I would have no problems with somebody raping his wife, killing his cat, or molesting his kids. At the VERY least there should be willful destruction to this guy's property. ANYTHING goes until he changes his behavior, loses his million dollar house paid for by stolen resources. And if you don't like it perhaps I'll give a little extra treatment to YOU too.

Re:How about that other cheek thing?

[Kohath]

this is really interesting. is it true?

Re:How about that other cheek thing?

[Bendebecker]

I believe it was John Brown who said, "If someone strikes you, turn the other cheek; but if they strike you again, strike back."

Re:How about that other cheek thing?

[Anonymous Coward]

"An eye for an eye only leaves the whole world blind." - Gandhi

WRONG!

"An Eye for an Eye" only leaves the Victims (who would be blind in any case) and the perpetrators blind. The rest of us can see quite well.

Re:How about that other cheek thing?

[Mr Guy]

What the other guy said about escalation. You really have three options:

1) Toleration.

2) Retribution.

3) Escalation.

Some things are intolerable, not everything can simply be done back to the attacker. If you are going to escalate you damn well better hit them hard enough they can't hit you back.

Re:How about that other cheek thing?

[t]

As has been said before, an eye for an eye leaves the world blind. That is why you must kill your enemy, that is the logic of war.

And as the other posted mentioned already in a Nazi context, you cannot turn the other cheek when the other persons motto is "die infidel".

Mea Culpa

[unicorn]

Dear god. Does this mean that the editors are actually going to edit? Next thing you know they'll start reading posts to make sure they aren't dupes.

Re:Mea Culpa

[Anonymous Coward]

Dear god. Does this mean that the editors are actually going to edit?

Anybody who has fortune installed, knows that editors don't edit. Here:

"An editor is one who separates the wheat from the chaff and prints the chaff."
-- Adlai Stevenson

Re:Mea Culpa

[Random Data]

Dear god. Does this mean that the editors are actually going to edit? Next thing you know they'll start reading posts to make sure they aren't dupes.

Dear god. Does this mean that the editors are actually going to edit? Next thing you know they'll start reading posts to make sure they aren't dupes.

Re:Mea Culpa

[Bob McCown]

Dear god. Does this mean that the editors are actually going to edit? Next thing you know they'll start reading posts to make sure they aren't dupes.

Dear god. Does this mean that the editors are actually going to edit? Next thing you know they'll start reading posts to make sure they aren't dupes.

Dear god. Does this mean that the editors are actually going to edit? Next thing you know they'll start reading posts to make sure they aren't dupes.

Re:Mea Culpa

[Anonymous Coward]

Deer ghod. Doz this meen than the editers is aktually gonna ed-it? nexthing ya no theyll astart reding postz ta mak sur they aint duplicates.

Damn

[unterderbrucke]

I want to post, but there is so much to post about it!
So, I'm just posting to recommend ending quickies, because they're too hard to post to.

One More Time For Those Go-Getters

[Anonymous Coward]

Please remember only to use this address if you have an existing business relationship with Mr. Ralsky.

Alan M Ralsky
6747 Minnow Pond Dr
West Bloowfield Township, MI 48322-2663

Threatening phone calls?

[hng_rval]

Operator: Hello, Mr Johnson?
Jon: Mr Jameson actually.
Operator: Did you take pictures of my house?
Jon: Yes, so what??
Operator: Perhaps you'd be interested in our new line of digital cameras?
Jon: What? No, god no...

(Here comes the threatening part..)
Operator: But my camera now bitch or you'll get a call like this every hour for the new 15 years.

Jon: Noooooooooooooooooooo (dies in horrible spam anguish)

Re:Threatening phone calls?

[Anonymous Coward]

Jokes are funnier if there aren't multiple typos in the punchline.

Relevant Weblog

[cosmosis]

I know, I know. Shameless plug. But my weblog covers many issues of interest to slashdot readers that are mentioned in this thread, with a somewhat anarchistic-democratic bent. I cover wi-fi, gnu radio, p2p everything, decentralization, space migration, etc. If you're interested, check it out:

Planet P Blog - Personal Liberty with Technology.

Re:Relevant Weblog

[Kafka_Canada]

I know, I know. Shameles plug. My site covers none of these pressing issues, but it's a helluva lot more fun :-)

Check it out:

Re:Relevant Weblog

[Anonymous Coward]

Who the hell cares. Who the hell are you? Your opinion matters why? There are a million opinions here and your's is worth exactly 1/1,000,000th of the whole.

Setting up an entire site to espouse them is pittiful to say the least.

Anti-spam nuts

[Anonymous Coward]

These anti-spam nuts are beginning to act a lot like the anti-abortion nuts. Posting personal information about spammers online, making threats against them. Very similar to the so-called "wanted posters" that anti-abortionists post on their sites.

So this guy goes and plays with fire and he gets burnt. Not too wise.

Re:Anti-spam nuts

[Anonymous Coward]

Fuck them, and fuck Ralsky. This is just the Beginning.

That asshole will not rest till he loses every fucking dime of his fortune. What he took away (Millions of hours, even days lost in productivity filtering out his shit) can never be recovered.

So it's only fair to fuck him in the ass somewhere in the alley.

Re:Anti-spam nuts

[Anonymous Coward]

A) It's not personal information - names and addresses, as well as real-estate transactions, are matters of public record.

B) Who made threats? The only threats I've seen so far were the barely coherent ones from (presumably) the guy in the black Jag.

Re:Anti-spam nuts

[pla]

These anti-spam nuts are beginning to act a lot like the anti-abortion nuts. Posting personal information about spammers online, making threats against them. Very similar to the so-called "wanted posters" that anti-abortionists post on their sites.

Taking pictures of someone's house, from the street, does not break the law (though you could argue it borders on stalking). Accessing public records to find things like addresses and phone numbers does not break the law. By Ralsky's own public statements, signing people up against their will for "exciting commercial opportunities" does not break the law.

Making threatening phone calls to a random person *does* break the law. Parking outside their house with the deliberate intent of scaring the hell out of them *does* break the law. Sending spam to people after they have opted out *does* break the law (in many states).

See the pattern? As much as I usually don't believe in such extremes, this really does look look like a case of "good guys vs bad guy".

Re:Anti-spam nuts

[yog]

"... These anti-spam nuts are beginning to act a lot like the anti-abortion nuts..."

There's no law against photographing someone's house. Leaving psychopathic-sounding threatening phone calls is a different matter.

Re:Anti-spam nuts

[Anonymous Coward]

You need to establish a pattern over time for stalking. Making random phone calls repeatedly breaks the law.

Or he needs to move to a gated community.

If you have the address, you just need to sign him up for all those contests to "win a free car" or "win a free vacation", and let him swim in the spam that originates from them... *:)

Re:Anti-spam nuts

[_Sprocket_]

These anti-spam nuts are beginning to act a lot like the anti-abortion nuts. Posting personal information about spammers online, making threats against them. Very similar to the so-called "wanted posters" that anti-abortionists post on their sites.

This would make a much better comparison if clinic workers were grabbing thousands of random people off the streets and performing operations on them. It would be a better point if anti-spam sites listed the home addresses of spammers with violent speach, blood-dripping graphics, and X-ed off the portraits of those who had been murdered.

It does make one good point - physical threats against spammers do no good. But then, the focus of this story thread has not been threatening the spammer in question. It has been uncovering his operation. And repaying the "service" this individual has performed for so many others.

So this guy goes and plays with fire and he gets burnt. Not too wise.

Perhapse it wasn't wise. But it does underscore that those behind these large scale spamming operations play rather fast and loose with morality and legal action. Those who decide to oppose spammers should keep this in mind and be prepared for this kind of behavior.

Re:Anti-spam nuts

[1u3hr]

These anti-spam nuts are beginning to act a lot like the anti-abortion nuts. Posting personal information about spammers online, making threats against them.

Obviously this could go too far. But part of the anger people feel against spammers is because of the feeling that your personal space and privacy is violated by spammers dumping stupid and offensive messages in your personal email. It seems appropriate to fight back by giving the spammers a taste of having their privacy and communications violated. (Of course this isn't at all an argument that would fly in court.)

The eye Remains...

[modulus]

What's that last item all about? The logo looks identical in both the old and new links, as far as I can tell...

Don't post while sleepy?

Re:The eye Remains...

[dmiracle]

The eye is gone as well as the 'scientia est potentia' (knowledge is power) moto. The new logo should be a little more straight forward. Here are some of my suggestions:

The globe under a microscope (variation on a theme).
The 4th ammendment getting pissed on by Calvin.

Re:The eye Remains...

[ManoMarks]

You know, I looked a couple of times, and I didn't see it on the link marked "Current". Are you sure you refreshed?

Re:The eye Remains...

[Techi]

Try doing a ctrl+refresh

LOR:TTT and AOD

[Veramocor]

As long as this is a slashback, lets go back to LOR:TTT.

Did the Castle siege at Helms deep remind you of the castle siege in Army of Darkness?

Undefeatible hero:
Ash/Aragon

The arrow scene.

A king who needs to be encouraged to fight.

Defending a castle against insurmountable armies:
Undead/Orcs.

Csstle being breached, and last minute help saving you.
Henry the Red/ rest of Rohan's army

Aragon really needs to say in the next movie: Come get some.

Re:LOR:TTT and AOD

[CrackHappy]

Yeah, I can't wait to see Aragorn jump in his classic car and reap holy hell among the Orcs with that giant windmill/fan blade thing a ma jig. Too bad they didn't include that part in the trailer.

He also seemed to be missing his metal hand/gauntlet.

"This is my BOOMSTICK!"

Anyone remember the AOD TC for Q2?

Is it me or is Slashdot often broken these days?

[Anonymous Coward]

Is there a forum for this stuff? Ever since the vaunted great release of "Slash2" (or whatever it's called), it seems like the rate of failure has dramatically increased. I know this comment will probably be listed at -1, but since I can't login (cookies are hard!) that's what I get.

Prior usage of IM

[Goldberg's Pants]

While I wasn't aware of the example listed here, surely if the patent is suitably broad, the people who created the *nix "talk" program got there WAY before ICQ.

Still, at least it's the company that bought IM to the mainstream going for it. I guess. Not that that is much consolation.

The Logo - Copyrightable?

[Dr.Dubious DDQ]

As I understand it, material produced by the federal government is NOT copyrightable. Was the logo produced by the federal government, and therefore available to be passed around by the public?...

Re:The Logo - Copyrightable?

[Anonymous Coward]

Material produced by the federal government is not copyrightable, but material produced for the federal government is copyrightable, and that copyright is transferrable to the government. So if they outsourced the website to a design firm (using Frontpage? sad), it could be copyrighted.

Doesn't mean I haven't put the image back together for my own copy.

I also know of no government logos that are trademarked, but then I haven't done any research on the matter.

Mod parent down

[s20451]

Damn spoilers. Some people haven't seen it yet.

Re:Mod parent down

[Rick the Red]

What, are you too lazy to read the book? Talk about a spoiler!

Hey, did you know Gandalf was right about not killing Gollum? Did you know Frodo isn't so strong-willed in the end? Oops, I may have leaked a spoiler for the next movie!

Ralsky's thugs are amatuers.

[ChangeOnInstall]

Some facts regarding the harassing phone calls:

It's fairly easy to turn a license plate number into a name. I figured out how to do it last week trying to reregister my truck. While making the appointment with the DMV, they asked for my plate number, which I gave, and they said my name back to me. I had provided no information other than the plate number. While I'm not absolutely certain, I believe there are a fair number of other ways through which to obtain this someone's name from their plate, e.g. if you have friends in the police or DMV.

The rest of the information used can easily be obtained from semi-public records using services such as Lexis-Nexis. This includes info such as your driver's license number, address, previous addresses, telephone, vehicle registrations, creditors, etc. If you have a state and a name, you can obtain a tremendous amount of info about a person fairly easily. Lawyers and private investigators have accounts with these services.

Overall, Ralsky's tactic is not very impressive. This man really needs to hire some higher quality goons.

Re:Ralsky's thugs are amatuers.

[gad_zuki!]

>I believe there are a fair number of other ways through which to obtain this someone's name from their plate, e.g. if you have friends in the police or DMV.

Hell, just goto the local Jiffy Lube. Name, address, phone, license, etc all get put into the computer and get this, they're using wifi. From now on I'm John Smithe, 666 Mockingbird Lane.

Re:Ralsky's thugs are amatuers.

[KjetilK]

It's fairly easy to turn a license plate number into a name.

Guess that may be the case. But then, this guy might have the number of the Jag in one of his images, if he hasn't posted full-res images.

Re:Basketball Niggas R Pretty Quick

[ManoMarks]

You disgust me. With this tripe, you should be posting on Yahoo! Message boards.

Poindexter gets TIA'ed

[asscroft]

Slashdot rejected this earlier this week, but since this is a slashback on TIA, I offer you this hilarious story submission.

Taste of their own medicine - Poindexter gets TIA'ed.

asscroft writes "[H] has this scoop - The head of the government's Total Information Awareness project, which aims to root out potential terrorists by aggregating credit-card, travel, medical, school and other records of everyone in the United States, has himself become a target of personal data profiling. Wired has the article. The whole idea was started by Matt Smith, a columnist for SF Weekly. And the folks over at cryptome have continued on in fine fashion. Reminds me of the spammer getting spammed. If you have any dealings with mr. Poindexter yourself, you may want to "randomly" select him for security checks, whether you work in the airport, mcdonalds, ace hardware, etc. Let's remind this bozo why we have a 4th ammendment. and remember to support the EFF's efforts against TIA."

damn overcompensation!!!

[SHEENmaster]

I am sick of hearing that "the law still affects the internet" and all that shit!

The fact of that matter is that the internet(more specifically the web) is treated harsher by the law, and not just to "send a message!!!"

If it was a billboard, a newspaper, or a shop, the man would have been able to keep it! But no, because it was on the net; he lost it.

Large Eye

[interiot]

I did a decent photoshop recreation of the eye recently, except blown up to 960x960. It's currently set as my background at work so I can discuss it when people ask what it is.

Re:Large Eye

[Anonymous Coward]

Thats great.

Except the picture doesn't load.

Re:Large Eye

[interiot]

It's geocities, they'll only let me have so much bandwidth. It's up now.

Re:Large Eye

[Anonymous Coward]

A compliant browser shouldn't render a text/plain file as an image, even if it is put on a page using an tag. The image's filename is iao_logo.jpg.txt which causes the server to serve it as text/plain, which may cause it to fail to render in some browsers; the browser must not second guess the type provided by the server. (This masquarading of type is also a trick used by e-mail viruses, such as in sexy.jpg.exe, helped by Windows' suppression of extensions in filenames.)

What is this fascination with .com domains?

[deek]

As far as I'm concerned, anything that ends with .com _should_ indicate that the domain is a company! I feel that it's just plain wrong for personal websites to be setup in the .com TLD.

Having said that, though, Uzi Nissan does have a business in that name. He is most definitely entitled to keep the domain name. I really wish there was a transcript of the conclusion that the Judge came to. I'd really like to know the reason why Nissan Motors won the case.

DeeK

Re:What is this fascination with .com domains?

[SweetAndSourJesus]

Nissan motors has a lot of money.

Uzi Nissan does not.

It was simply a matter of the judge finding a diplomatic way to say this.

Re:What is this fascination with .com domains?

[Linuxthess]

Why the hell should a TLD whose sole-purpose is for COMmercial applications have to be converted to non-commercial use?

My guess is that the judge decided that until its settled (which will never be) he can't "exploit" his name.

Judges like that suck.

---------

Re:What is this fascination with .com domains?

[rmohr02]

I don't really know how it works out legally, but if Nissan Motors had the Nissan trademark before Uzi started using Nissan in his business name, then it might be possible for Nissan Motors to win.

Re:What is this fascination with .com domains?

[Anonymous Coward]

I don't get why you morons say STFU in a forum like this.

It's not as if I can retroactively be quiet, you know.

Thanks for the hostility, though.

Re:What is this fascination with .com domains?

[Anonymous Coward]

From what I remember, the Nissan motor company didn't exist (it was Datsun) at the time Uzi registered his domain name.

Re:What is this fascination with .com domains?

[numark]

Under the domain name dispute rules ICANN adopted, it doesn't matter if you register a domain name that includes a trademark. What does matter if one of the following is true:

1. You bought the domain name specifically for the purpose of selling it to the trademark owner.

2. You have a past history of registering domains with trademarks specifically for the purpose of using them improperly.

3. You registered the domain specifically to disrupt the business of another company.

4. You intentionally registered the domain for the purpose of attracting people away from a legitimate company (note the inclusion of the word intentional).

Those are the rules under ICANN. Unfortunately, judges rarely follow these rules, instead using ancient laws concerning trademarks to turn over domain names to companies who sue specifically because they know ICANN won't give them the domain name. It's a pity, really.

Re:What is this fascination with .com domains?

[1u3hr]

As far as I'm concerned, anything that ends with .com _should_ indicate that the domain is a company! I feel that it's just plain wrong for personal websites to be setup in the .com TLD.

Unfortuantely, there isn't yet a "personal website" TLD. ORG and NET are just as inappropriate. And a person may well have commercial sections on his personal page, or it may evolve into that and it would be inconvenient to have to change the URL.

Re:What is this fascination with .com domains?

[Zigg]

Well, in my case, I used to have a company that I associated with the domain name. I packed it in but think it would be rather silly to have to change my e-mail address and personal website address when so many people already use the one I have.

I realize you did not call for regulation here, but I feel compelled to say that this is precisely why such things that sound like they make sense should not be made into inviolable rules.

DEAD HORSE BEATS YOU

[Anonymous Coward]

In Japan, teen-agers dance on DDR machines, but in Soviet-puppet East Germany, DDR dances on YOU!

The reason the eye was removed...

[WillRobinson]

Either we poked a stick in it. Or they realized, it could only see half the world.

Re:Do some investigating...

[Anonymous Coward]

Anti-spammers are more cowardly then the spammers. Antis just want to send their nasty-grams in the secrecy of their shacks. Stand up to an anti and they tuck tail and run for home.

YAAD

[Anonymous Coward]

slashdot covered this repeatedly

It seems like the Nissan case turned out OK

[Fizgig]

According to this article, Uzi Nissan was told to stop using his site to show car ads. That is a case of trademark dilution. If the guy's just selling computers, then I'm all for him keeping the domain. If he's trying to branch out into the auto business, then he's clearly abusing Nissan-the-car-company's trademark. So he gets to keep the domain, but not show car ads. Sounds like everything's good, right?

Re:It seems like the Nissan case turned out OK

[drinkypoo]

So what if you were from some family named Ford and you could trace that name back to the days when Jesus had not yet been perforated? Could you not have a car dealer called ford motors just because there already was one? Now if he were MAKING cars and selling them under the name "nissan" I would agree with you.

Re:It seems like the Nissan case turned out OK

[Anonymous Coward]

No you couldn't - Now if you had a car dealer named Ford Motors since christ was a carpenter, by all means keep the name Ford Motors - otherwise you are little more then a leech sucking on Ford's pecker.

Re:It seems like the Nissan case turned out OK

[Galvatron]

Could you not have a car dealer called ford motors just because there already was one?

That is correct. Being born with a name does not automatically entitle you to a trademark. If you wanted to make, say, a company that manufactured lawnmower motors, and call it "Ford Motors," you might be able to do that, it would be up to a judge to decide if that's confusingly similar or not.

Re:It seems like the Nissan case turned out OK

[theLOUDroom]

If he's trying to branch out into the auto business, then he's clearly abusing Nissan-the-car-company's trademark.

Screw that. So what if he's showing car ads, has last name is nissan. He should be able to have a website at nissan.com. He could even start a car company and build cars. He just couldn't call his company nissan motors. He should be able to call it widget motors and have all the info about it on his site. Trademark dillution would be saying something was a nissan (car) when it wasn't. All this is, is using his last name to point to a website.
I have a very common last name, like smith. Does that mean if I had smith.com I could never post any info and anything that a company whose name includes smith is involved in? That's retarded. What names likes smith, jones, etc, that would basically mean you can't post anything, because there are going to be thousands or companies with that name.

Re:It seems like the Nissan case turned out OK

[Mr Guy]

have a very common last name, like smith. Does that mean if I had smith.com I could never post any info and anything that a company whose name includes smith is involved in

No, it means that if you have a name such as smith, you can register mrssmith.com. If you use mrssmith to advertise your pie company, you may have problems. Even if you only sell pumpkin pies.

Re:It seems like the Nissan case turned out OK

[poot_rootbeer]

So what if you were from some family named Ford and you could trace that name back to the days when Jesus had not yet been perforated? Could you not have a car dealer called ford motors just because there already was one?

No. You couldn't.

And for the same reason, Mr. Nissan may not run a self-named business that promotes automobile sales.

Pretty simple isn't it?

What an UGLY ASS McMansion.

[Anonymous Coward]

Ralsky deserves everything he gets, just for his utter lack of taste in a home. Jay-zus.

Re:Your disguting bigotry

[ManoMarks]

Oh, how original. Nazi bastard.

Evil spammers.

[pla]

How really strange. I found one particular part of the call transcripts rather interesting...

"You don't know who the hell you were fucking with yesterday, man, you got the wrong guy, you don't even have the guy that you think you have"

Anyone else see a strong possibility of Ralsky having a deep dark secret that someone believed poor Rich had accidentally caught on film? Like meeting with someone to put a hit on Ralsky's detractors, or using the supposedly lucrative spam biz to launder mob money, or the like?

Yeah, slam me for baseless speculation, but the guy doesn't exactly have the cleanest legal record, and that quote just strikes me as so *REALLY* bizarre. Don't have the right guy? What does *that* mean?

Re:Evil spammers.

[rodgerd]

The Mob was my first thought, too. I'm a sucker for conspiracy theory 8).

Re:Evil spammers.

[Anonymous Coward]

"You don't know who the hell you were fucking with yesterday, man, you got the wrong guy, you don't even have the guy that you think you have"

The guy in the Jag was probably doing Ralsky's lady.

Refresh button ...

[Anonymous Coward]

... in your browser makes it re-read the page, and then the logo disappears.

Re:Is it me or is Slashdot often broken these days

[ManoMarks]

It's just you and your machine(s). Anyone and their associated IP addresse(s) involved in the questioning of Slashdot and it's founders are being forward to the TIA program for use in testing their surviellance. This is a form letter. You should be receiving it one hundred times from one hundred different e-mail addresses. Thank you for your time. Click this link to be removed: http://www. Im just pretending to be a removal link.com/removal

Re:Is it me or is Slashdot often broken these days

[JahToasted]

I don't know if its true or not, but I heard that the whole thing about clicking on a link and getting logged out was due to bandwidth (slashdot getting slashdotted). The pages load up logged out since they are static pages, which are used to keep the database from getting hammered and crashing the servers.

Doh

[warpath]

I mis-read the title as "Wireless Radio" and thought "Uh, so?"

Heh. Oops.

Re:Doh

[Anonymous Coward]

Well, thanks for letting us know about that fascinating little internal monolog you had.

Re:Doh

[warpath]

You're welcome! :)

Simpsons goons?

[helix400]

This man really needs to hire some higher quality goons.

Homer: [answering the door] Who is it?
Voice: Goons.
Homer: Who?
Voice: Hired goons.
Homer: Hired goons? [opens the door]
Goons: [take Homer roughly away]

(Aaah yes...The Simpsons Archive. Best site ever!)

Re:Simpsons goons?

[Anonymous Coward]

Greetings, friends. Do you wish to look as happy as me? Well, you've
got the power inside you right now. So, use it, and send one dollar to
Happy Dude, 742 Evergreen Terrace, Springfield. Don't delay, eternal
happiness is just a dollar away.

Re:Simpsons goons?

[Anonymous Coward]

Hello, this is Homer Simpson, a.k.a. Happy Dude. The court has ordered
me to call every person in town to apologize for my telemarketing scam.
I'm sorry. If you can find it in your heart to forgive me, send one
dollar to Sorry Dude, 742 Evergreen Terrace, Springfield. You have the
power.

Ralsky's house: teleco dmarc point

[Rev.LoveJoy]

Did anyone notice that the teleco dmarc piont is just offset from the end of Ralsky's driveway?

Check out some of the last photos (just before the one w/ the Jag). It is near the street with no pole to protect it, should someone ram it with their car.

Cheers,
-- RLJ

Taking pics of the house? Dumba ass -And Nintendo

[puto]

I do not condone spam and I hate it. I think it is one of the worst things ever invented. Eats up time and bandwidth.

We joked the guy good too. Loads of crap delivered to his house. Threatening phone calls. And god knows what else. Fine, he is getting his medicine in spades.

However, if I come home and strange cars are parked in front of my house and people are taking photos. I am gonna be suspicious. Could be crooks, murderers, you name it. So while I might be the ultimate asshole in the unviverse, I am gonna do something. And If I am not an asshole but a regular joe, I am gonna so something.

Take pics of my house(I am a nice guy) while i am pulling up. I am gonna chase you down, get your plate, call a buddy in the dmv. And call you and ask you why the fuck you taking pics of my crib. I will even call the police.

He might be invading our mailboxes but he aint standing on our lawns with an instamatic. That is taking it a step way to far.

He spammed, we junk mailed em. Pretty much quid pro quo. He got the message. But what kinda loser decides to drive by the house and then take pics and then gets pissy when the guy tracks him down? And then whines about it on the net when the guy catches him. Both are assholes in my book.

As for the nintendo thing well penny-arcade had it sorted out a day before the slash dot post.

http://www.penny-arcade.com/view.php3?date=2002- 12 -16

Puto

Re:The VMS PHONE utility is just like TERM-talk to

[bakes]

There is also of course the Unix 'write', and later 'talk'.

write of course didn't have the char-by-char display that TERM-talk and PHONE had, but neither do today's IM systems.

Buddy list? who, or even who | grep friendsloginname if there were lots of people online.

That's a feature of your browser..

[CausticWindow]

called caching.

Rubber stamping everything?

[mentin]

Can we sue USPTO for registering patents that don't meet patentibility requirements?

Re:Rubber stamping everything?

[numark]

As my civics teacher used to say, you can sue for anything, but that doesn't mean you'll win. In this case, that's unfortunately true.

Re:Rubber stamping everything?

[Oloryn]

What I'd really like to see is a provision that every time a patent is invalidated in court, the USPTO gets to foot the legal bill for the case. The only way I can see for the USPTO to develop some sanity is for the results of rubber-stamping patent applications to have a negative effect on them. Making them foot the legal bill for the eventual suit required just might do it.

Mea culpa...

[smagruder]

Chrisd's mea culpa... Ol' Dumb Lott's mea culpa... Chrisd's mea culpa... Shithead Lott's mea culpa...

Somehow, I see a wide ethical spectrum between the two. :)

Re:Mea culpa...

[Anonymous Coward]

What the fuck are you going on about?

+5 funny

[DickScratcher]

Well, I thought this was funny, but then, you are Americans and I have imbibed far too much for a Thursday night.

Why Slashback?

[lucifuge31337]

With all the article dupes on /. to begin with, do we really need to re-cap AGAIN?

Perhaps a Palatir?

[Anonymous Coward]

Didn't it look like the Eye of Sauron from the dollar bill? Perhaps they will come up with a new logo that looks like a Palantir. If A guy named Saruman gets a post in the organization look out.

Re: Perhaps a Palatir?

[Anonymous Coward]

Umm, that's the Eye of Horus signifying the triad of Abydos, and it's about 4000 years old. Has fuck-all to do with J.R.R. Dickface.

http://www.darpa.mil/iao/images/programsline.gif

[CausticWindow]

The eye is still watching

Re:Taking pics of the house? Dumba ass -And Ninten

[DAldredge]

It's a public street. If he does not want pictures of his home taken from a public street he should plant a lot of huge shrubs.

Re:The VMS PHONE utility is just like TERM-talk to

[CormacJ]

It's been around since before PC's were invented.

Look carefully

[dmaxwell]

C1everNickName versus CleverNickName.

This is an imposter.

Maybe Wil needs to end his posts with:

"The real CleverNickName has a uid of 129189."

Re:Look carefully

[Joe Tie.]

Wow, as annoying as that is I have to admit it is pretty clever.

Re:Look carefully

[chrysrobyn]

Maybe Wil needs to end his posts with:

"The real CleverNickName has a uid of 129189."

Yeah, and then C1everNickName is going to have a .sig that says "The real C1everNickName has a uid of 635600"

Perhaps we should just send a polite e-mail to Scumdamn (82357).

Re:Look carefully

[Reziac]

I just noticed that C1everNickName guy myself. -- When I arrived on slashdot, imposters were quite the hobby. That's why my sig reads the way it does.

As to the freaks thing... one of mine, I know I must have collected from an honest but less than flattering commentary on Mac users (which apparently respond to any criticism like a pack of rabid wolves) -- the guy is a Mac user and (per his website) a particularly clueless AOLer to boot, but the rest -- no idea; one has never even made a real post.

OTOH, I don't know where the heck I got some of my growing list of fans either!!

Re:Look carefully

[scumdamn]

I've added Wil to the list. Was it you who sent me the polite email?
If so, thank you. Wil definitely deserves to be on the list.

Rawlsky

[bleckywelcky]

Probably a million people will sound the same on the phone, but if you listen to the phone call threats and Rawlsky's interview on NPR, they sound very similar. Although, I would think that Rawlsky wouldn't risk making threats at some guy just taking pictures, considering he gets death threats, etc. I find it funny too when NPR asks Rawlsky about blind relays and he responds with "no comment". If he wasn't using them he would condemn them as pollution and a problem in the email world, right? Because anyone can see the problem with leaving a blind relay completely open. Yet, he says "no comment" - pretty obvious he uses them (unless he has no idea what they are, which I find hard to believe). I don't feel sorry for this guy receiving death threats or being harassed every day. He does it to millions of people every day, and I doubt that when you want to be removed that he takes you off his list - what's his incentive? As far as I can tell, there are no "Do Not Email List" laws in the US, although some laws restricting the sending of some types of spam. The only miniscule incentive that exists is that it would give him some legitimacy as a marketer rather than some ass just sending bulk email - although, I think he has proably lost any chances at legitimacy already. I don't wish this guy any physical harm, but by all means, harass him to the end of time. (PS - You think he could afford a little more property rather than shoving his million dollar house right between two other houses with a couple feet on each side, sheesh!)

Pixelboard

[smartin]

I wrote an instant messenging app called pixelboard in 1993. How can i contribute to the prior art process?

Mods On Crack (was Re:Nissan)

[Anonymous Coward]

Funny? Perhaps. More sad than funny, as it's pretty much the truth.

BeOS lives

[Anonymous Coward]

I recently discovered that there are quite a few efforts to keep BeOS alive. It's sorta of like linux now--there are several distros. Some commerical, some freeware.

Zeta -- http://www.yellowtab.com/
BeOS Max Edition -- http://www.bebits.com/app/3148
Blue Eyed OS
and more.

Glorified Ford

[Sivar]

After taking the photographs, the man was chased by someone in a black jaguar and he began receiving threatening phone calls the next day.

I knew it! Spammers drive Jaguars!
All style and no substance...
They probably mispronounce the name, too.

Ralsky's Message

[Anonymous Coward]

After listing to the MP3, it sounds like the same guy. It also sounds like the guy maybe a bit older, not sure. Definately not a young ster. I think it probably was Ralsky because he seemed very upset about it.

Gone but not forgotten

[Matthew Weigel]

Heh. Take a look.

770-657-1021

[Calcbert]

The phone number mentioned in "The House That Spam Built," 770-657-1021, is from an AT&T Prepaid Phone Card. Mine was purchased at Sam's Club. I have also seen 612-605-9550 come through from the same card.

Re:770-657-1021

[Anonymous Coward]

Mine too. The Denver and Atlanta numbers are what usually pop up from mine. I believe other AT&T cards use the same system.

Re:The VMS PHONE utility is just like TERM-talk to

[rawg]

I don't really know if this is relevent, but what about IRC? Hasn't IRC been around for a long time?

this guy should lose his domain since you're lazy?

[autopr0n]

Come on, it would take two seconds to use google. Nissan's domain is nissan-usa.com, They have it all their advertizements.

This guy has had that domain while Nissan was still called 'datsun'.

Re:Taking pics of the house? Dumba ass -And Ninten

[bleckywelcky]

Did you even read the article, listen to Rawlsky on the NPR interview, or read that guy's accounts of what happened? He's not being a whiny bastard, he just wanted to report what happened because it was rather odd. He reported it to the police because someone made threats on his life, if you think that's being a wuss then you have problems. I hope you get taken out whenever someone makes a threat on your life because you thought it would be wussy to report it to the police. And in case you didn't realize, Rawlsky is not stopping his spamming - ie he did NOT "He got the message." - he has no fvcking clue what the message even is. When someone is messing with so many people's lives this way (ie not everyone just uses their email to send out the latest pr0n pics to their buds *cough* - some actually use it to conduct real business and make business deals, like me) then there are no limits short of physically harming the guy. It seems like you have no idea what it's like losing contracts or sales because some emails were discarded with the hundreds of spams received every week. Filtering software only goes so far, in the end you have to wade through this shit by hand.

Instant Messaging prior art

[g4dget]

Plato might not constitute prior art from a legal point of view because it probably involved multiple users logged into a single mainframe. AOL's patent applies to networks of computers. Personally, I find such distinctions unwarranted, but that's how patent lawyers think.

However, there is plenty of other prior art. Many IRC clients have had buddy lists, alerts, ignores, private chats, and other features for a long time. And the MIT Zephyr messaging platform is almost completely equivalent to modern IM systems in capabilities and functionality.

Re:this guy should lose his domain since you're la

[BJH]

I definitely don't agree with Nissan Motors' actions, but in the interests of accuracy, Datsun was the name used by a company (Kaishinsha Motors) which then was transferred to another company (Japan Motors) which changed its name to Nissan in 1934. Datsun was thereafter used as a brand name for Nissan-made cars.

So much for geeks

[dan_the_heretic]

Not a word about GNU Radio busting DRM into little pieces. Whats the matter? The subject not trivial enough?

Slashdot: Renting the pretension instead of buying into the dream.

Re:So much for geeks

[Anonymous Coward]

The hardware is $1300, so the lifeless geeks are holding back. Hardware is still $1300,

Re:Taking pics of the house? Dumba ass -And Ninten

[LunarOne]

He spammed, we junk mailed em. Pretty much quid pro quo. He got the message. But what kinda loser decides to drive by the house and then take pics and then gets pissy when the guy tracks him down?

He's an infamous celebrity. People want pictures. He can deal with it. At least he doesn't live in Hollywood where there aren't tour buses full of people driving by and taking pictures. Yet.

Re:this guy should lose his domain since you're la

[Anonymous Coward]

In Soviet Russia

we stand in line all night to look at cars

and only get cheese

Re:Sorry - Error

[Anonymous Coward]

Just found this at: http://www.ncchelp.org/FAQ/faq.htm

Nissan Motors' (NMC) 1959 Trademark was not utilized in the United States until the mid 80's. They operated under the name "Datsun" and started changing the name In the mid 80's to "Nissan". Mr. Uzi Nissan was born with "Nissan" as his last name, and utilized it in businesses in the US from 1980 to present. See www.ncchelp.org/The_Story/the_story.htm

What's Rule 1, Rule 3?

[drf5n]

In the Ralsky article, he said the threatening calls he received were right in line with Rule 1 and Rule 3.

What are they?

Re:What's Rule 1, Rule 3?

[LMCBoy]

One of them must be: "do unto others as you would have them do unto you".

Re:What's Rule 1, Rule 3?

[Oloryn]

In the Ralsky article, he said the threatening calls he received were right in line with Rule 1 and Rule 3.

What are they?

1. Spammers lie
2. If a spammer seems to be telling the truth, see Rule #1.
3. Spammers are stupid

Also, see http://drebbelstraat20.dyndns.org/~mvdwege/misc/sp amrules.html

Consequences

[Steve B]

the consequences one observer faced for watching spammer Alan Ralsky

He was turned to stone?

you slashdotted my cablemodem

[trelaneopn]

just for kicks, 2mbit.com is hosted on my cablemodem. (the link which shows the mirrors hosting the pictures of ralsky's house). I'd like to thank the committee and everyone who made the slashdotting of my cablemodem possible. I hope they don't can my account, but if they do it's been nice knowing you.

Patents

[Anonymous Coward]

People of the tech community need to understand the patent process before making rash comments on how something could receive a patent. A patent professional is only given so many hours to research an applicant's claims on new subject matter. Lacking greater resources (time being the biggest) a best effort is given. With all the information on the Internet, much of it is useless. There are usually never any sort of date stamps. Or the date stamps certify that the material has been recently updated, usless for prior art.

Re:Taking pics of the house? Dumba ass -And Ninten

[JordoCrouse]

He's an infamous celebrity. People want pictures. He can deal with it. At least he doesn't live in Hollywood where there aren't tour buses full of people driving by and taking pictures. Yet.

Not many celebrities are openly threatened with deadly force on a regular basis. You don't often hear "Harrison Ford, that piece of shit". But take a look at the messages in this article and at other spam related articles throughout the ages on /. There are people out there, who, for whatever reason, really, really hate this guy.

So we moved from junk mail, to satellite pictures, to pictures taken in front of this guy's house. How long until somebody destroys his property, or kills his cat? How long until somebody drops off something that explodes?

This guy is a celebrity like Saddam Hussein is a celebrity. Hell, people like OJ more than this guy.

Lets quit with the jokes and the funny ha-has and give this guy a break before somebody gets hurt, mmkay folks?

Re:The VMS PHONE utility is just like TERM-talk to

[SEWilco]

Hasn't IRC been around for a long time?

No. Not anywhere near twenty years.

Re:The VMS PHONE utility is just like TERM-talk to

[Anonymous Coward]

IM is actually two independant services coupled together--messaging and notification. AOL's patent is specific to a system that couples these two services together. talk, this TERM-talk thing, IRC, zephyr all all allow for messaging, but none of them allow for presence notification.

"But what about finger, who, IRC's ISON?!!" That's not notification. That's asking the server if someone's available which is DISTINCTLY different than having the server tell you when someone's available.

I'm pretty well knowledgable about Instant Messaging, and I've yet to be shown something that can actually consider prior art.

As for the "rubber stamping everything" comment, do all patents take six years to be processed (the application was made January 97). I hate software patents as much as the next guy, but I really think the USPTO actually did some research on this one, and that AOL deserves the patent.

why the logo is scary

[Sarin]

The logo is indeed frightning, why is the eye watching at Europe for instance instead of the USA?

One more thing the eye in the background and the pyramid is the Illuminati logo.

For those who have never heard of The Illuminati, or are brand new to the study, and who might ask, "In a nutshell, what the heck is the Illuminati?" I'll give you here the basic assertion in a very brief capsule:

A man named Adam Weishaupt founded a secret society in Bavaria in 1776, that had as it's goal, to rule the world. The methods they would use would be assassinations, bribery, blackmail, revolutions, and espionage. Their model of organization was similar to the Jesuit Order and the steps and degrees of Freemasonry. They intended to control and manipulate banks and bankers, money-lending powers, the world's financiers. They intended to cause economic collapses, wars, bloody uprisings and revolutions around the world, with each upheaval calculated to re-structure the status quo leaving the Illuminati in greater positions of influence, and poised for their next step. The main enemies or "targets" of The Illuminati in the 1700s were the kings and queens, the monarchies of Europe, and, the Church. The two most-remembered Illuminati-caused revolutions in history, were, the French Revolution and Reign of Terror (1788-1799), and the Russian Revolution of 1917 that first made Communism a world power. The Illuminati and it's diabolical conspiracy was very real. These things actually happened and are a matter of world history. The Illuminati Conspiracy got exposed. The authorities made raids and seized Illuminati documents. In its day this was all public headline news, not some obscure, rare, or arcane knowledge. There you have the basic gist of it. That is the starting point. That is what people usually mean by "The Illuminati."

I guess they don't want to be associated with them or perhaps they want to hide this fact if you're more conspiracy-theory minded

Re:why the logo is scary

[Bendebecker]

The french revolutions major causes were the rising power of the middle class (which economically opposed the power of the old aristocracy), national debts caused by wars after wars (many instigated by Louis 14th in order to demostrate his power), the tax system which had fallen into complete disarray and desperately needed reform, and a slew of terrible kings(but pretty good regents). Beneath these there are at least a dozen more minor causes. If the Illuminati had any influence on this event at all, it was insignificant.
As for why the Illuminati are now obscured, I would assume because the so called "Illuminati conspiracy" has been written off as mostly baseless. There were other so-called conspiracies at the time as well: the communist conspiracy, the anrachist conspiracy, and the democratic conspiracy. Throughout the 1800's there were dozen of revolutions and wars all over Europe(mostly in france) and everyone was paranoid. The upper nobility feared democracy and had claimes of democratic conspiracies, the middle class factory owners feared the communists and hence clamed they had a conspiracy. Dozens if not hundreds of 'conspiracies' were exposed. Saying the Illumanti conspiracy started those events and that there was a big bad conspiracy going on in the 1800's is like saying that a secret government agency in contact with Alien lifeforms were really running the world in the 1900's. If you believe that:
1)you're out of touch with reality
2)you're scapegoating your own problems by claiming they arent really your fault, there such and such's fault

As for the eye, it's easier to borrow an existing symbol than to come up with one of your own. Some desginer probably said 'hey, everyone knows the eye, its on the back of $1's so ppl are familiar with it as a symbol, lets use in this context. As for the eye looking at Europe it is probably looking in the general direction of the middle-east and not so much at Europe. What they were probably trying to do was to blend a nationally recognized symbol (that since its on $1's holds a realtion to the feds) with the old Pinkerton detective agency logo(which was an all-seeing eye). The person who designed probably never even knew what the $1 bill symbol was, he/she probably jsut saw it - thought it was cool - and decided to use it.

Re:why the logo is scary

[bwcbwc]

Speaking of the Illuminati, I'm not sure if it's still in print, but Robert Anton Wilson's Illuminatus Trilogy is looking awfully prescient right now. It's a lovely conspiracy theory (probably fictional) showing how the Illuminati control both sides of the two-party system, business and labor, Judeo/Christian/Islam and Satanism, and basically co-opt or kill anybody who gains power outside their control.

Re:why the logo is scary

[Anonymous Coward]

You have it confused with the Illuminazis, who had their unsuccessful brauhaus putsch in Munich in 1973. Unknown if a second edition of Mein Kampf is in progress.

Re:why the logo is scary

[Dr.Dubious DDQ]

The logo is indeed frightning, why is the eye watching at Europe for instance instead of the USA?

I think the logo is VERY telling. The globe is turned so that the Middle East region faces the viewer...while the All Seeing Eye is focussed on the Eastern US and Western Europe, i.e. the alleged "Free World".

It's as though they were blatantly saying "while you, the viewer, have your attention on the Middle East, we'll have our attention on YOU..."

(No, this is NOT a lead-in to one of those stupid "in soviet russia" jokes, I'm serious...)

Anyone notice Ralsky changed his tune?

[Anonymous Coward]

In the linked article, it says he claims to toss paper spam in the wastebasket "it doesn't bother me"
Last week he was talking about police action against those who'd signed him up for mailing lists.

Guess he learned that was futile and just bad press in general.

Total Information Awareness == Paranoia

[CritterNYC]

Are you bored with your life of reasonable, rational thought? Do you long for the simplicity and excitement of paranoia?

Did the ICQ people use PLATO's TERM-talk?

[platopeople]

What I am curious about is whether or not any of the four ICQ/Mirabilis gentlemen, or the investor father of one of them (Vardi), had any exposure to the PLATO system -- specifically, exposure to TERM-talk -- prior to developing ICQ.

I wonder this because Control Data Israel had a PLATO system installed in Israel in the 1980s and it was used extensively by the Israeli Defence Force, and it is known that at least some of ICQ's founders served in the IDF before the founded ICQ.

I've contacted the ICQ folks but none of responded to me.

- Brian (brian@platopeople.com)

Re:Taking pics of the house? Dumba ass -And Ninten

[Anonymous Coward]

I would have no issues, none whatsoever, to any acts of property destruction of violence towards Rawlsky and his family. Rawlsky deserves to meet up with a couple of religious types in Pakistan, bounded and gagged, and have his throat slit from ear to ear and his head detached and buried along with his headless torso in a shallow grave.
I'd buy the video of THAT for $19.95!

Re:Taking pics of the house? Dumba ass -And Ninten

[Alsee]

It sounds like all this guy did was take some pictures. If someone threatened his life over it then the person who made the threat needs to be put in prison.

Lets quit with the jokes and the funny ha-has and give this guy a break before somebody gets hurt, mmkay folks?

The spammer is free to make jokes and hassle people all he wants, so long as he doesn't break the law. And we are free to make jokes and hassle him all we want, so long as we don't break the law.

If someone gets hurt then the person who did it should go to jail. So I don't see your point unless you think that making jokes and saying I don't like spammers somehow makes me responsible if someone else sends a bomb.

-

$740,000 for THAT?

[Dr. Mu]

The sad thing about Mr. Ralsky's house is its proximity to his neighbors. In these parts, when someone pays three-quarter mil, they get some acreage to spread out in. Hell, he's crammed cheek-to-jowl with his neighbors like poor people! And where are the trees? Tsk. Such taste.

Re:$740,000 for THAT?

[Anonymous Coward]

You can take the trash out of the trailer-park, but you can't take the trailer-park out of the trash.

Re:$740,000 for THAT?

[poot_rootbeer]

Have you been through Beverly Hills lately? The McMansions are ALL like that these days -- crammed up side to side like townhouses, with their BMWs parked out in the street because there's no room in the garage.

Re:$740,000 for THAT?

[Anonymous Coward]

I hate that this type of neighborhood is becoming the status quo.

Not that anyone honestly expected this guy to have taste.

Re:$740,000 for THAT?

[elfkicker]

Haven't you ever seen a McMansion before?

espouse!

[Anonymous Coward]

I like the word 'espouse', too.

It's just fun.

Troll vs. Ralsky

[Anonymous Coward]

You're a fucking moron.
And yes, I would have no problems with somebody raping his wife, killing his cat, or molesting his kids.

Hmm... you seem to be a troll. Let's compare:

Alan Ralsky's emails:
Scoring: -1, Off Topic -1, Flame Bait -1, Troll -1, BloodyAnnoying
Moderation totals: -4, Not Worth Reading

This post:
(1) Insult's parent post. Score:-1 (Flame Bait)
(2) Advocates cat-killing:Score: -1(Flamebait), -1(Troll), +1(Insightful) (cat owners may disagree)
(3) Advocates rape: Score: -1(Flamebait) -1 (Troll), -1 (Evil), -1 (Sick), -1 (Twisted), -1 (Perverse), -1(Wrong)
(4) Advocates child molesting: Score:-1(Flame Bait), -1 (Troll), -1 (Evil), -500000 (SickBastard)?

Moderation Total: system overloaded. Score too negative. Score aborted.

Net result: Ralsky -4, Troll -5 million or so.

Troll loses.
--
AC

Re:Troll vs. Ralsky

[Anonymous Coward]

No, troll doesn't "lose". It's not a contest, fuckwad. Fact is, when you attempt to correct someone's inappropriate actions and they refuse to modify their behavior, you need to escalate. For a real-world example of this, watch the Iraq undergo a regime change in March of next year.
I hereby declare a fatwa against Mr. Rawlsky. If he does not stop his evildoing ways immediately, I hereby authorize all peace loving anti-spammers everywhere to perform a regime change on him.

P.S. I am not advocating violence against Mr. Rawlsky. You may interpret "regime change" in any fashion you see fit. I simply mean, "attitude adjustment". :-)

FUD

[Anonymous Coward]

maybe

what would you do if you were ralsky? (spits)

probably try disinformation, if possible - i would research the target and have someone call from a prepaid card to make threats - IF I WAS 15 AND LACKED IMAGINATION!!!

what a pussy - now that we have his address, what i really want to know is what is his provider and likely net block?

Re:Taking pics of the house? Dumba ass -And Ninten

[ChaosDiscord]

However, if I come home and strange cars are parked in front of my house and people are taking photos. I am gonna be suspicious. Could be crooks, murderers, you name it.

Take pics of my house(I am a nice guy) while i am pulling up. I am gonna chase you down, get your plate, call a buddy in the dmv. And call you and ask you why the fuck you taking pics of my crib. I will even call the police.

As a general rule, if I'm concerned that someone is considering commiting a crime against me, I'll just tell the police and provide them with whatever information I can. Calling up my possible assailant seems a bit strange. "Hi, this is Bob the Mangler." "Hi Bob, I happened to notice you scoping out my place. I was just wondering, were you planning on killing me?"

Like it or not, people are pretty much free to stop on the street near your home and take pictures. It's totally different if they're trespassing on your property, but while creepy, it's legal. (And there are potentially good reasons for society to allow this. A private detective investigating a cheating spouse might want photos of the spouses car in their lover's driveway. A nieghborhood association might want evidence of someone violating local planning codes. Someone selling their house across the street might want photos of the view to show prospective buyers. A newspaper reporter writing a piece might want to show the home as a good example of the extravagence that a slimy spammer or politician enjoys.)

Re:The VMS PHONE utility is just like TERM-talk to

[Brainchild]

IM is actually two independant services coupled together--messaging and notification. AOL's patent is specific to a system that couples these two services together. talk, this TERM-talk thing, IRC, zephyr all all allow for messaging, but none of them allow for presence notification.

So you mean that when, my ~/.ircrc file contains:

notify OoklaTheMok

and the IRC server notifies me when OoklaTheMok signs onto the server, that the server is lying, and OoklaTheMok really hasn't signed on?

And you mean that when gaim signs me onto the AIM server, it doesn't say anything to the server about ThundarrTheBarbarian being in my Buddy List, but the AIM server somehow magically knows to notify me when ThundarrTheBarbarian signs onto AIM?

Wow. So i guess ircII's notification facility that i was using back in 1995 wasn't really notification at all. You must know a lot more than i do about instant messaging....

Elcomsoft

[Anonymous Coward]

How come the fact that Elcomsoft was found not guilty was never posted on slashdot?

Ralsky envokes the wrath of geeks

[xchino]

Doesn't he realize what slashdot can do to him? Was the two tons of junk mail a day not indication enough? I wish he had the license plate number, I could trace it to a name, and more importantly I WOULD trace it and post it. Perhaps someone should post his home phone # so AC's can make vague threats to him.

Re:The VMS PHONE utility is just like TERM-talk to

[Anonymous Coward]

umm... I'm pretty sure many bored unix users wrote code that did the fingering for them and ran periodically, probably as a self-submitting cron job (1987-91)...

Re:What's Rule 1, Rule 3? thanks

[Anonymous Coward]

Thanks.

Re:Hmmmm...

[Anonymous Coward]

Big man, pig man, ha ha, charade you are
You well heeled big wheel, ha ha, charade you are
And when your hand is on your heart
You're nearly a good laugh
Almost a joker
With your head down in the pig bin
Saying "keep on digging"
Pig stain on your fat chin
What do you hope to find?
When you're down in the pig mine
You're nearly a laugh
You're nearly a laugh
But you're really a cry.

Here is the new Logo

[goombah99]

actually they already have a new logo. its just not on the front page yet. see http://www.darpa.mil/iao/TIASystems.htm.

also if you check out the program power point slides you will see they have scrubbed the blatantly skin crawling ones. It used to show that they were going to collect data about your dogs veternary records, your mortgage payments, magazine subscriptions and known associates. Now this is gone. Also they have heftier looking compartmentalization of the records keeping shown, suggesting they are thinking of protecting you. (ha!).

finally poindexter's resume has been cleaned up.

TIA Creepy Logo

[Gareman]

Was replaced a few minutes ago by a more friendly red pyramid logo: http://www.darpa.mil/iao/images/TIALogo_black_tran sparentSm.gif

After hearing Prof. David Cole from Georgetown Law talk about the TIA program yesterday on NPR (available at npr.org, search for TIA), I'm beginning to wonder if the whole thing is a lightning rod, or litmus test for the publics tolerance of civil liberty erosion.

Think about it: Let's put a guy convicted of lying to congress and overstepping his authority in charge of a military program to gather information about every US citizen. We'll announce it publicly and we'll set up a web site with a creepy (best description for it) logo with the "all seeing eye" that will immediately attract the attention of conspiracy theorists. While the public screams about the mind bogglingly sinister program, the REAL stuff will be going on, which is way more subtle than a $250 million boondoggle sci-fi technology program. The whole scam might be a project from that new government office of misinformation (that still appears to exist, despite the public outcry).

Man, I'm spending too much time on this stuff. Back to the EFF web site.

--g

Perhaps one of Ralsky's customers?

[alizard]

I don't think Ralsky's denials about kiddy porn are believed here. Particularly since IIRC, references to complaints about kiddy porn spam on the abuse newsgroups apparently originating from Ralsky's House of Spam were referenced during the discussion.

People making serious money off a seriously illegal product get very touchy about their activities being inquired into. Perhaps there are other things than kiddy porn illegal in the USA that Ralsky is helping sell.

Remember, the business associates of a spammer aren't going to be nice people. At minimum, the guy in the Jaguar had reason to fear discovery of his association with Ralsky.

Hopefully, the person discovering this has gotten the image to some people with serious expertise in image enhancement, forensic or intelligence in the hopes of getting the Jaguar's license number.

Re:Perhaps one of Ralsky's customers?

[Anonymous Coward]

Hopefully, the person discovering this has gotten the image to some people with serious expertise in image enhancement, forensic or intelligence in the hopes of getting the Jaguar's license number.

Have you seen the picture (mirror)? This ain't television. You can't just remove the wing mirror from the image to reveal what the camera would have seen had the wing mirror not been there!

And I doubt that from the four other shots of the car in the driveway that there's enough information to recover the plate number.

Re:Perhaps one of Ralsky's customers?

[Eggplant62]

Hopefully, the person discovering this has gotten the image to some people with serious expertise in image enhancement, forensic or intelligence in the hopes of getting the Jaguar's license number.

I did send the negative of the rear-end of the Jag off to a photographic professional to attempt to resolve the license plate. Here's a scan of what he was able to accomplish.

According to the gentleman who performed the hi-res scan of the negative, the details are muzzled up by camera movement, slow shutter speed and lack of quality of the film. Remember, this was a cheapo disposable Kodak camera, available at any CVS pharmacy around the US. Rich

invokes or evokes?

[Anonymous Coward]

They're mistakes Otto, I looked them up.

Re:Taking pics of the house? Dumba ass -And Ninten

[evilviper]

If someone is on your lawn, taking pictures... Chase them away, call the cops... Great! Now, tracking them down, going to their home, that is stepping well over the line.

Besides that... Of course you would do that if someone was strangely interested in you. But when you are a well-known public person, you have to expect it will happen. You think politicians or major CEOs track down every reporter that took a picture of their house?

Any way you look at it, privately tracking them to their home, and threatening them, is crossing way over the line.

No worries.

[AndroidCat]

I've almost got a voice command interface for Zork working. Changing it from MS Agent to SAPI for the telephone shouldn't be a biggy.

Hi, I'd like to sell you a camera...
You are in an open field west of a big white house with a boarded front door.
There is a small mailbox here.

Although the word recognition sucks for a program like Eliza, the results could still be gratifying. "Would it make you happy if you could sell me a digital kangaroo?"

Re:No worries.

[sparty]

I've almost got a voice command interface for Zork working. Changing it from MS Agent to SAPI for the telephone shouldn't be a biggy. Hi, I'd like to sell you a camera... You are in an open field west of a big white house with a boarded front door. There is a small mailbox here. Although the word recognition sucks for a program like Eliza, the results could still be gratifying. "Would it make you happy if you could sell me a digital kangaroo?"

So what if your AI system actually does order something, like phone service, where they just "confirm" your info and don't actually request it? Is the agent acting as an authorized agent for you and therefore you've bought something? (I'm actually really curious as to what the IANALs or even IAALs if any care to comment...it seems like a piece of technology accidentally ordering something, such as a buggy version of IE accidentally buying an extra copy of Office from bestbuy.com, would be a non-contract/non-purchase if you pursued a reversal, but that technology you set up specifically to deal with people selling stuff might be a different case, if you set it up knowing that it might say something to the effect of "Yes, would I like to buy that?" that could be reasonably interpreted as an agreement).

Re:The VMS PHONE utility is just like TERM-talk to

[PapaZit]

With zephyr, you create a ~/.anyone file with a list of friends in it. Typing "znol" will give you a list of people on that list who are logged in to Zephyr. Any time someone on that list logs in or logs off, you get a zephyrgram telling you about it.

How's that different from an ICQ friends list again?

Website idea

[magick_]

Maybe Uzi Nissan can post his bio, mentioning he owns Nissan Computer Corp, and post a link to the new site. Add some pictures of family and friends, and you got a simple personal website.

That shouldn't violate the ruling, or does it?

Re:The VMS PHONE utility is just like TERM-talk to

[Zigg]

You're missing one very important point, which you'd have if you've ever actually checked the IRC protocol. To implement notification in IRC, your client actually sends ISONs to the server at a certain interval; NOTIFY never actually goes to the server itself -- just manages a client-side list. Contrast this with a server that manages the list and sends you the notifications.

Is that spitting hairs? I think so. I think that frankly, it's bullshit. Welcome to the USPTO.

Re:Ralsky's thugs are amateurs.

[Lieutenant_Dan]

The author states in the article that he cannot get it from the picture that he took of the Jag.

Re:Taking pics of the house?

[jvl001]

In the US, there are no laws against someone standing on public property and taking a picture. It's hypocritical to suggest that committing fraud (pretending to be someone else to sign them up for junk mail) is somehow legally and morally superior to standing in a street taking pictures.

Was this "covert" mission poorly planned and executed? Yes. Was it a bad idea? Yes. Illegal? No.

Calling someone up and threatening them ... now that's illegal. If you listen to the recordings, they are as amateur and ill advised as this poor fellow's attempts at spying.

Note to future 007's: Shut off the flash.

Re:Ralsky's thugs are amateurs.

[KjetilK]

Oh, I thought I RTFA. Oh, I guess not... :-)

You mean this, right?...

[gosand]

I'll bet it was more like this: (give it some Monty Python voices when you read it...)

Operator: Perhaps you'd be interested in our new line of digital cameras?

Jon: What? No, god no...

(Here comes the threatening part..)
Operator: But my camera now bitch or you'll get a call like this every hour for the new 15 years.

Jon: What? What do you mean "but your camera"?

Operator: Huh?

Jon: You said "but my camera".

Operator: No I didn't. Oh, right. Sorry. I meant "buy".

Jon: And you'll call me for the "new" what?

Operator: Sorry?

Jon: You said you would call me for the "new 15 years". What does that mean?

Operator: I did?

Jon: Yes, you did. Are you mad?

Operator: No, sorry, my fault again. I meant to say the "next" 15 years.

Jon: Do you really think digital cameras will be selling in 15 years?

Operator: Well, I don't know. I suppose so.

Jon: And would you really call me every 15 minutes?

Operator: Would that be an inconvenience?

Jon: Yes, quite.

Operator: So sorry. I won't call then.

Jon: Thanks, I appreciate that.

Operator: So, are you happy with your penis size?

Jon: Pardon?

I checked out this "Nissan" guy.

[rdmiller3]

He never filed for any kind of trademark to protect the name for his product type, but that's not all...

He used to run an auto parts store before he got into computers. "Nissan Auto Parts". Handy, huh? Having the name "Nissan" and selling parts for import cars? His original complaints claimed that he was using the name before the Japanese corporation, but that was a lie.

Despite my dislike for multinational corporations in general, I think that the Nissan corporation has a legitimate case against this guy. He has a provable history of riding on the coattails of their name.

It does raise the issue though, that there's a descrepancy between Trademark law and the Domain Naming System. I think that if a company wants to claim "ownership" of a trademark, then they should reflect the Trademark's artificial namespace in their DNS name. Nissan Motors should get "nissan-automotive.com" or something like that and Mr. Nissan should get "nissan-computers.com". Then maybe Nissan Motors could make a case against Mr. Nissan based on the likelihood of which "Nissan" people all over the world would be looking for if they just typed in "nissan.com".

Guess who'd win?

-Rick

Nissan didn't lose domain

[ccorneli]

I can't find anything that says he had to give up the domain name. He probably killed the site because his computer company went under. The court case is from back in 2000 and it said he couldn't mislead by advertising cars on his site. (google search if you want the details) But he could keep the domain. IANAL but trademark law allows companies with the same name in different businesses to exist so as long as he uses it for his computer business he has the right to keep it. If he uses it for cars (as he indirectly was), then I'm gusssing Nissan Motors was incorporated first. I don't know anything about his business, but it's not far-fetched to think his 'computer' company was built to get revenue from internet car advertising. (does the wayback machine have his site from pre-2000?)
If it's going away, then he probably sold it to cash out on the 'business'.

Re:Taking pics of the house? Dumba ass -And Ninten

[poot_rootbeer]

Settle down there, kid.

If there's someone suspicious lurking in front of your home, you call the police. Period. Anything else amounts to vigilante justice, and makes you a criminal.

Re:Taking pics of the house? Dumba ass -And Ninten

[pjmorse]

He spammed, we junk mailed em. Pretty much quid pro quo. He got the message.

Really?

Judging from my mail logs, Mr. Ralsky lost that particular postcard among all the other mail.

Be serious...

[Anonymous Coward]

http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=48400&cid=4926 960 -- there he fucking is. Seriously, THAT IS HIM!!!

You wouldn't know accurate reporting if it whupped you upside the nut sack with a bash mag!

Re:Nissan - more deserving

[JGski]

So the argument is Nissan Motors deserves the domain due to utilitarian arguments. Well then, please analyze the situation properly.

In reality, the smaller company is likely to have more to gain: small companies that grow do so at a larger % increase rate than large companies. If I'm a start-up and go from nothing to $1000 income in a fiscal year, it's infinite growth. The next fiscal year I make $100,000; that's 10,000% growth rate. The next fiscal year $1,000,000; that's 1000% growth rate.

Such growth is not unreasonable for a successful and growing small company. As you get bigger, it's harder to grow. This is the rationale behind merger and acquisition - it is often the only way to keep the books moving up-and-to-the-right.

Go to Nissan Motors' SEC finanicals and you'll see that they haven't had growth approaching small company rates since the 1960s. Guess Nissan Motors is less deserving on utilitarian grounds too; in addition to the basis of virtue, fairness and just about every other ethical standard.

This whole episode is nothing more that unbridled, unrestrained and unethical exercise of power by Nissan Motors. May the Nissan marketers and lawyers enjoy their roast in hell or their agony of bad karma in this life or the next (depending on one's theistic views) - there is absolutely no doubt of either outcome for them.

It goes without saying: boycott Nissan products and propagate the anti-Nissan meme with every person you know that may be considering their products. Use the power of scale-free networks to destroy the Beast.

Possible...

[pla]

I just played a bit with the second two photos you linked to. Believe it or not, although the jpegs lack sufficient detail, I would feel willing to bet that, given a high-res scan (4k) of those two negatives, I could get a license plate. For example, even with the images posted, I can make out some sort of "special" sticker on the right side of the license plate, possible one of those FOP stickers.

Unless, of course, Rich already heavily cropped and enlarged the pictures he posted on the web. Then I doubt I could do much more. ;-)

Re:The VMS PHONE utility is just like TERM-talk to

[Brainchild]

Is that spitting hairs? I think so. I think that frankly, it's bullshit. Welcome to the USPTO.

If you're splitting hairs, it's not novel or innovative. IRC is non-patent prior art, it's extremely similar to AIM, and the move from automated client-based polling to server-based "push" notification is a rather obvious one to an expert in the field. ("The client polling requests are overloading the server. How can i reduce the load on the server? Oh---i'll just move the notification functionality from the client to the server. Bingo!")

Last Post!

[alpg]

Suppose for a moment that the automobile industry had developed at the same
rate as computers and over the same period: how much cheaper and more
efficient would the current models be? If you have not already heard the
analogy, the answer is shattering. Today you would be able to buy a
Rolls-Royce for $2.75, it would do three million miles to the gallon, and
it would deliver enough power to drive the Queen Elizabeth II. And if you
were interested in miniaturization, you could place half a dozen of them on
a pinhead.
-- Christopher Evans

- this post brought to you by the Automated Last Post Generator...