Slashdot Mirror


New Dual System PC

An anonymous reader writes "ExtremeMhz.com has released an article on how they designed and built a PC containing dual systems. One system is a supercooled Intel and the other is a water chilled AMD. This PC features Dual SCSI storage subsytems also. Looks like some crazy stuff." Now if only they could put a mac and a PC in one case ;)

102 of 163 comments (clear)

  1. Mac in a dual case. by SN74S181 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Well, there have been PC cards for Macintosh machines for a long, long time, so I guess you can cram an expensive 'PC' (we'll call it 'an IBM' for the old time Mac Zealots) in a Mac case.

    It's possible because the PC is an open architecture.

    I can imagine the screaming and sputtering and legal injunctions that would stream out of Steve Job's office, though, if someone tried to implement and market a PowerMac on a PCI card that could be plugged into a PC. It's closed hardware, you see.

    1. Re:Mac in a dual case. by mithras+the+prophet · · Score: 5, Interesting

      You can buy this PowerPC on a card.

      Combine it with Mac-On-Linux, and you can run OS X Jaguar on your PC.

      Or so I imagine - I certainly haven't tried it.

      --
      four nine eighteen twenty-7 thirty-nine forty-7 fiftyeight sixty-nine seventy-9 eighty-8 one-hundred-and-nine one-twenty
    2. Re:Mac in a dual case. by themo0c0w · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Terrasoft makes PowerPC Linux machines, called briQ's with a 5.25" form factor. Come with a 500Mhz G4 or G3, laptop (2.5") HDD, etc.--and only manage to chew up 40W. They also managed to cram in a PCI slot somewhere...

      Theoretically, you could cram a full-tower case full of these babies, thus having your Mac 'n AMD or whatever.

      Wonder if that comes close to SGI's computing power per unit volume record...

      --
      ph34r teh p0w3r 0f th3 c0w
    3. Re:Mac in a dual case. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting


      actually that MOL seems to be a waste of time
      from the FAQ

      Before continuing, you should also be aware of some requrements for running MOL:

      - A supported PowerPC(TM) CPU (604[e], G3 or G4)
      - Linux/ppc
      - A 2.2 or 2.4 kernel
      - MacOS 8.6* or later (9.2.1 is known to work)

      MOL can run MacOS 7.5.2 and later in "oldworld" mode. However, this requires an image of a supported boot ROM.

      MOL can run on non-Apple hardware. APUS hardware (Amiga PowerUp System) is currently unsupported, but work is in progress.



      so you need to have a Mac then run Linux which in turn then runs OSX

      this seems to be as useful as having a Windows emulator on Windows or an Amiga emulator that only runs on an Amiga

    4. Re:Mac in a dual case. by MyHair · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You can buy this PowerPC on a card.

      I can't find the price. Anyone know the price on that and if it would be useful to run OSX on a PC? Or perhaps a Linux host running separate from the PC?

    5. Re:Mac in a dual case. by notinuse · · Score: 3, Informative

      Commodore did this in the '80s, with the Amiga 2000 and the Bridgeboard. The various models of Bridgeboards had x86 processors and their own RAM. They could share the floppy drive, and could display simple graphics on the Amiga screen, in a window. Or you could install a separate video card and use a switch. My A2000 was setup to run MacOS, Windows and AmigaOS simulataneously, all in one box, many years ago. As has been already stated, Apple had PC cards available for Mac for some models also. Again, many years ago.

    6. Re:Mac in a dual case. by tevman · · Score: 1

      haha, where have i heard this argument before... oh yeah... :)

      --
      sig is broken try again tomorrow
    7. Re:Mac in a dual case. by pmz · · Score: 1

      You can buy this PowerPC on a card [agelectronics.co.uk].

      Do you know if there is such a card available for Sun workstations (the one in the link is Windows/Linux only)? The SunPCi x86 coprocessor is extremely useful and well-integrated into Solaris, but it would be really neat to have a PowerPC coprocessor as well. Imagine Solaris on SPARC, Windows/Linux on x86, and Mac OS X on PowerPC all in one enclosure!

    8. Re:Mac in a dual case. by gregmac · · Score: 1

      Sun makes (or someone makes them for Sun, not totally sure) x86-based cards that plug into their SunFire servers, and workstations. I saw a demo once of one of their thin clients opening up its own PC sessions using one of the actual x86 cards in the server (the card is dedicated to the client, so no "virtual" stuff). You could also access the SunFire server from a Sparc workstation, and have a PC card in the sparc that let you do the same thing. Was pretty neat.

      --
      Speak before you think
  2. Siamese did this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    If I'm not mistaken, there was a range of computers built by (or called) Siamese. They had amiga, atari, mac and PC, and any combination of many others all in the one system, all used through the one monitor and keyboard. I'm not sure about sharing drives however

    1. Re:Siamese did this by KingDaveRa · · Score: 1

      I don't think it shared drives. The main idea was to use retargetable graphics on the Amiga side to come up on the PC screen. It all worked really well supposedly.

    2. Re:Siamese did this by Ponty · · Score: 1

      Close. It was a wacky Amiga-people idea (that failed like the rest) to put an Amiga on a coprocessor card for PCs and sell it to people who didn't know better. It happened around 1997, and IIRC, it was never released.

    3. Re:Siamese did this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      There was bridgeboard for the Amiga A500 and A2000 (circa 1989/90) that was essentially a 286/386 on a card. It shared the Amiga's memory and drives and you could pull up a PC DOS session in a window within the Amiga's OS. It's the most integrated dual-hardware system I've ever come across. Heck, you could even copy and paste text from one to the other - later versions even let you transfer files between the two machines.

    4. Re:Siamese did this by Splab · · Score: 1

      we had one of those... never worked that good though...

    5. Re:Siamese did this by Thing+1 · · Score: 1
      Back in 1983 my parents bought me an IBM PC but the high school had Apple ][s. So we got a QuadLink board so I could bring work (and games) home. Worked like a charm but a bit tough to install -- it was an octopus, with wires running everywhere.

      I still have it but I have no idea whether it would actually work in modern PCs.

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
  3. cool by Captain+Galactic · · Score: 4, Informative

    I always dreamed of this...Play a game on one system, when boss/parent/spouse walks in,push a button & pretend you are working...

    1. Re:cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yeah, like some sort of... Windowing... system... Using "windows", we could quickly and easily switch between two (OR MORE??) different programs all together! Maybe by pressing special key combonations, too! (That way we wouldn't have to modify our keyboards, too.) Like, ALT-TAB on Windows... maybe COMMAND-TAB on Mac. That sure would fool them! Now if only we could get some techy-type person to make and mass market this! (Or are we just dreaming here??)

    2. Re:cool by Marc2k · · Score: 1

      Man...you know what...there was a gaming "system" that came out in the early 90's that could do this.

      I think it was called...Leisure Suit Larry 1.

      --
      --- What
    3. Re:cool by MyHair · · Score: 3, Funny

      ...when boss/parent/spouse walks in,push a button & pretend you are working...

      Damn, you work with your parents and your spouse? Sounds like a mess to me. I'd look for another job!

      My boss is in another state 900 miles away. So are my parents and my ex spousal candidates. I highly recommend this arrangement, although it's hard to get all of them to move so I had to, but other than that it's been great.

    4. Re:cool by joedavis123 · · Score: 1

      After seeing the first picture on their webpage, it made me start dreaming of some sort of contraption where you can have your bong work out of your computer !!! That would rule!

    5. Re:cool by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
      ...when boss/parent/spouse walks in,push a button & pretend you are working...
      Damn, you work with your parents and your spouse?

      I think you misread that. The / in this case is not an or operator, it's an and. Clearly this person is from some combination of down south, and back east.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  4. Cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Now if they can only cram a built in space heater in it to make it perfect. Wait a minute....

  5. One question by prichardson · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I understand this has some coolness factor, but does it have any purpose at all? One might as well just grab two cases and duct tape them together. The only time sharing a case would be cool is if they could share other components as well (monitor/keyboard don't count).

    When I first heard about the PC and mac combo I thought someone might have found a way for two computers to share components and was wildly disapointed. I'll start getting interested in this stuff when the computers can share a hard drive or a video card. Otherwise it's merely a case mod.

    --
    Help I'm a rock.
    1. Re:One question by GMontag · · Score: 2, Funny

      Exactly my thought, like drop off one of each at a Delaware welding shop and pick it up after lunch.

    2. Re:One question by swtaarrs · · Score: 1

      If people never did things simply because they were cool, life would be much more boring. Part of the fun of doing things new and different ways is just the experience of it, regardless of whether it serves a useful purpose or not. I've had at least 5 different operating systems (a few linux distros, beos, windows.net) installed on my second hard drive in the past couple months. Did they all serve a useful purpose? No, but I like the experience of trying something different, just like the people at extrememhz.

    3. Re:One question by anon*127.0.0.1 · · Score: 1

      Since when did "purpose" or "usefulness" have anything to do with a geek project? You want a purpose? I'll give you one!

      Okay... here's the scenario. You need a new computer, but your wife/girlfriend/SO says "There's only money in the budget for ONE new computer. We'll just have to share!"

      So you just buy this monstrosity, keep her from seeing the price tag, and the two of you can compute away at the same time. It's kind of like a bicycle built for two, only without the doing things together part.

      --
      I am NOT a man!
      I am a free number!
    4. Re:One question by sketerpot · · Score: 1
      Wouldn't it be possible to have a single computer with two sets of monitors/keyboards? It would be like a dumb X client except that it only takes one computer.

      I seem to remember Sun or SGI doing something like this with one of their workstations. Could it be done with PCs?

    5. Re:One question by The+Wooden+Badger · · Score: 1

      I've thought about putting my main computer in the same box as a server. Throw in a network switch and you have a great rig to take to LAN partys. Or use it as a space saving setup. Me, I'd do it for the coolness.

      --
      Heroscape, it's like legos combined with anachronistic wargames.
  6. They have done PC and Mac together by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    TechTV's Screensavers did it. They put a G4 in one of those Antec Cases and then they put a 5 1/4" pc in one of the drive bays.

    It was pretty complicated and look largely useless but heh... they did it!

    Look back on their site around Oct-Dec to find it.

    1. Re:They have done PC and Mac together by proj_2501 · · Score: 1

      Long before this was the NuTek Duet, which attempted to run Mac software and hardware on some weird reverse-engineered Motif-based system. It had a 486/66 in the same case and you could change between the two with a large front panel switch.

    2. Re:They have done PC and Mac together by langed · · Score: 1

      The Monster Machine: G4/PC Hybrid on TechTV? you must be talking about this... :)

  7. Let me get this straight... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's 2 separate PCs, in one case, with a unified PSU and cooling system...

    Next!!!

    Seriously, this is a bit boring really, isn't it... wake me up when a MoBo manufacturer develops a dual-machine (not dual CPU!) board with a unified disk subsystem, now that I would buy...

  8. PC/MAC Machine by rminear · · Score: 5, Informative

    TechTV/The Screen Savers did this about a month or two ago. They built a clone mac machine, and then added the PC Parts and processor to it. http://www.techtv.com/screensavers/supergeek/story /0,24330,3413988,00.html

  9. mac and pc in one case by ZeissIcon · · Score: 4, Informative

    Actually, back in the day, they did. Orange computing used to make a PCI card with an entire pentium 100 computer on it that would share the hard drive on your 604 mac, you could access it through a window on your mac desktop. I think they discontinued them because they were useless; 500 mhz processors were showing up in the marketplace and the Orange card was more expensive than a complete PC.

    1. Re:mac and pc in one case by artemis67 · · Score: 2, Informative

      The company was Orange Micro , and they've long since gotten out of the business.

      Their cards were always priced similarly to a complete PC system at the same Mhz; what you were paying for was a) the convenience of running two systems out of one box, and b) the interoperability of the two environments. Their competition was Insignia's SoftWindows emulator, which was as zippy as a tortoise in a vat of cold molasaass, so Orange Micro offered a significantly better solution.

      I think what killed their business model was that Macs got fast enough to run PC emulation software at acceptable speeds (about the time the G3's first came out). No, you still couldn't do 3D modeling with it, but when you double-clicked on the My Computer icon on the desktop, the window would open and render in seconds rather than minutes. That also meant that Office-type applications now ran at acceptible speeds, despite the fundamental x86/PPC incompatibility of having to convert big endian/small endian numbers for every byte that passed through the CPU. Orange Micro just couldn't compete because their PC cards started at just over $1000, whereas VirtualPC cost (back then) about $250.

  10. Re:Steps by Luke-Jr · · Score: 1

    Already done most of that... can't seem to find that acqua-l3m though :/

    --
    Luke-Jr
  11. Already been done... by Richard_at_work · · Score: 4, Informative

    Way back in the mists of time, i remember two occurances of pretty much the same thing. One was a sega mega drive in the same case as a desktop PC, literally it had a place where you could plug in a cart underneath the CD bay. Also the Amiga was released with the same thing, you had a Amiga 1200 mobo and a Intel mobo in the same case, both sitting on the same scsi chain using the same drives at the same time. It was kinda expensive at the time, but useful for the people who needed both. Screen switching was done via a built in kvm or something. Thinking about it now, i think it was a extension to the Siamese which used a serial leed between two seperate cases.

    1. Re:Already been done... by madhippy · · Score: 1

      One was a sega mega drive in the same case as a desktop

      that would have been the amstrad mega pc ... linkage:

      here and here

    2. Re:Already been done... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
      There are actually a number of different PC hardware solutions to running PC software on the amiga. The most popular was a 286 which commodore sold, and sometimes bundled with the Amiga 2000. There is a text console for it which shows up on its own "screen" (you know, the GUI-mode screens which can be pulled up/down and flopped between; Workbench is on one of them.

      There have been PC boards for tons of computers. There was an SBUS 486 card for old suns, there have been a number of PC-on-a-card devices for macs, both nubus and PCI (and maybe some other ones too for a performa or two) and of course, you can get a PC-in-a-PC.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  12. I don't get it by sql*kitten · · Score: 3, Informative

    ExtremeMhz.com has released an article on how they designed and built a PC containing dual systems. One system is a supercooled Intel and the other is a water chilled AMD.

    For years, you've been able to mix a PC and a SPARC in one case, and you can mix AS/400 and PC too. There are many advantages to this kind of configuration. But why would you want to mix a PC and a PC?

    1. Re:I don't get it by 3waygeek · · Score: 3, Informative

      FWIW, SPARC cards date back to the early 90s; Definicon had an ISA bus SPARC coprocessor in 1991 or so. It ran SunOS 4, a forerunner of Solaris.

      Definicon had other coprocessors, too, including 68K, AMD 29K, and National 32K families. When I worked there (90-92), I developed firmware and about half of a SVR4 kernel for an i860 coprocessor; unfortunately the project was cancelled (lack of funds).

    2. Re:I don't get it by burns210 · · Score: 1
      "But why would you want to mix a PC and a PC?"

      I know this is slashdot, but i will remind you anyways. why: so you can make a beowolf cluster of them!

    3. Re:I don't get it by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Informative
      SunOS 4, a forerunner of Solaris

      Solaris == SunOS + OpenWindows.

      Solaris 1.x is based on SunOS4 which in turn is based on 4.3BSD.

      Solaris 2.x is based on SunOS4, which is based on (or at least is a workalike for) SVR4. The SunOS4/BSD codebase was (ostensibly) used to create the /usr/ucb binaries included with it, which are BSD-style commands (SVR4 commands being the default.)

      SunOS4 is not a forerunner of Solaris, SunOS4 is the prior major revision of SunOS, a component of Solaris. SunOS4 is SunOS5's predecessor, though.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  13. Mac and PC in one case? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    1995: LC 630 DOS. 68040 and 486/66 in one case, swap operating systems almost instantly with a key combination. It even exchanged the clipboard contents.

    1997: PowerMac 7300/180. Similar arrangement, Pentium 100 or 166

    Sheesh, I thought this was "news for nerds", not the "noise of newbies"

    1. Re:Mac and PC in one case? by raque · · Score: 1

      I have one of these cards, the P100. I have no Idea what I'll do with it, but its there all the same.

    2. Re:Mac and PC in one case? by longbottle · · Score: 1

      Drop me an email, I collect obscure stuff like that.

      --
      I don't suffer from insanity. I enjoy every minute of it!
    3. Re:Mac and PC in one case? by raque · · Score: 1

      Love to, but your email gets bounced back to me, let me know where to send it and I will

  14. Wow! A Mac and a PC in the same case, Taco? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    You mean like I had in 1990 with my Amiga 3000 running a Bridgeboard card with a 386 CPU and at the same time running the Emplant on the Amiga side to run Mac software?
    Fuck, you're a real visionary Taco!

  15. No way by arvindn · · Score: 4, Funny
    Now if only they could put a mac and a PC in one case.

    Yeah right. I'll put a Mac and a PC in one case for you the moment you make oil and water mix. Oh wait. They already did that. Nevermind.

  16. How about Amstrad's Mega PC by shippo · · Score: 1

    Back in 1992, British PC manufacturer Amstrad built a machine that combined a 386/SX PC with a Sega Megadrive.

    It was a complete flop, though.

  17. sweet! by sporty · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's a computer and fridge, with water and ice dispenser! Now if only it had a crisper :)

    --

    -
    ping -f 255.255.255.255 # if only

    1. Re:sweet! by Marc2k · · Score: 1

      It may not have a crisper, but if you could turn off the cooling on both systems on demand, you'd have one HELL of a toaster oven.

      --
      --- What
    2. Re:sweet! by sporty · · Score: 1

      You can't do that though. You know how many people would put toast into the toaster than bread?

      You'd have quite a problem with tech support :)

      --

      -
      ping -f 255.255.255.255 # if only

  18. A PC and Mac in one case? by i_need_no_nick · · Score: 1
    Isn't this getting a bit weird for slashdot?

    I mean, I'm sure it's alright in some circles to talk about police constables with anoraks being shoved into cases, but I always thought those sort of situations were more the preserve of some of the world's seedier clubs...

    Ah well, to each his own.

  19. What an innovative concept... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    ...though I think I've seen it somewhere else...

  20. Done... many times before. by jedrek · · Score: 1

    There's quite a lively online gaming scene in Poland, but the internet infrastructure is - for the most part - monopoly run by the state telco. One of the telco's largest competitor's (Internet Partners) has been building their own network, and have set it up very well with lots of crossovers to the telco's network.

    Anyway, one active scene member managed to hook up 'the scene' (in general) with a place for 2 machines in one of IP's server rooms. The only problem was, how to meet the demand of all of the scene members. Different games, different servers, different loads. The solution was to put together 4 dual processor motherboards into two cases. This let them set up something like 30 different servers for 3-4 different games.

    I'll try to find the link to the article (with photos)... I know I had it arround here somewhere.

  21. Re:Page colours by mattrix2k · · Score: 1

    Err I'm getting black on light grey on Moz1.3b/Win98.. what kinda browser are you using?

  22. Wow! That was really pointless and boring by crovira · · Score: 1

    Dudes, it must suck to be you...

    That brought zero to the state of the art. Talk about being stuck on/in a case.

    How about improving component accessibility next time. Your case looked like it was filled with flatulent intestines.

    --
    MSBPodcast.com The opinions expressed here are my own. If you don't like 'em... Think up your own stuff.
  23. my god... by Da_Monk · · Score: 4, Funny

    Now if only they could put a mac and a PC in one case

    can you imagine the consequences?
    Dogs and cats living together...MASS HYSTERIA!

    1. Re:my god... by anlprb · · Score: 1

      Dogs living together...
      hmm www.terrasoftsolutions.com/products/briQ/

      Ohh well, nothing to see here.

      --

      One Token Ring to Rule them All, One Search Engine to Find Them, One WAN to bring them in, and TCP/IP Bind them...
  24. Sharing? what a waste. by pyrote · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Asus and many others already do this, it's called dual CPU motherboards. if you want 2 environments, VMware is out and MSoft is planning a similar software built in.

    I thought about this myself, not impressed with it's technical feat, I choose to just run a 2ghz machine and a dual monitor system.

    Usefull if you can't afford/aquire another case, but I can't see how this changes the world any more than putting a computer in a 1920's taster case (which I'm trying to do now anyway). I hope I don't wind up on slashdot frontpage.

    --
    THE WORLD IS GOING TO END!!!! eventually.
    1. Re:Sharing? what a waste. by cptgrudge · · Score: 1
      Microsoft just aquired the VM IP from Connectix. Press release is here. They are a direct competitor to VMware. Here's my question. Now that Microsoft owns the software, will the software run non-Microsoft Operating Systems? It did before, will it now?

      This whole "two computers in one case! yay!" thing is tired. Move along, nothing to see here.

      --
      Qualitas edurus commercium, nullus penitus net rimor, nullus deus beneficium
    2. Re:Sharing? what a waste. by pyrote · · Score: 1

      prolly not... my guess is that it wil be implimented into a "clean room" copy of the OS running to offer terminal services that can do more.

      My guess is that they are itchin to get DirectX implimented on a terminal service. then they can set the X box up as a terminal for a hub computer.

      Personally I like terminal service style computing, but not at the expense of flexibility like running Linux on a winpc.

      --
      THE WORLD IS GOING TO END!!!! eventually.
  25. Re:Page colours by baryon351 · · Score: 1

    Uhhh it comes up as light grey on black for me. I suggest you change your browsers.

  26. MacCharlie by Shayde · · Score: 5, Informative

    The first real incarnation of this was a weird little thing called a MacCharlie. It took what was then the only form factor of the Mac (what I believe folks today call a 128KE) and added a pair of 5 1/4" floppy drives, a system board, and the keyboard extension needed for the F1-F10 keys and the numeric keypad.

    Here's a decent webpage about it. It was manufactured by Dayna, and actually was sort of cute.

    I believe it was limited to 80x24 text applications (since in that day, the Monochrome Graphics Adapter was actually an expansion, and if you were -really- inventive, you could get (gasp) a CGA card! Woo! :)

    --
    Event Management Solutions : http://www.stonekeep.com/
    1. Re:MacCharlie by TrackDaddy · · Score: 1
      Yup, that was the first one, and then there were the cards. Once apple added a card bus (NuBus, then later PCI) there were several PC-on-card products that shared the disk, video hardware, etc. Apple even sold one of their own, a 486 board that worked in the 6100/7100/8100 series systems. This allowed you to switch systems w/ a key combo and shared the contents of the clipboard as well. It worked pretty good, but was a little pricey.

      Now for the real fun. Apple still has machines in R&D running hardware that supports both their OS and Windows in a similar multi-board type system. This allows Windows to run on Apple HW w/o SW emulation. There is a some abstraction layer code that lets the windowing system interoperate like rootless X11 in Jaguar. Of course, the question is, does the market want this, and in the end would it help Apple. Until someone decides that those questions have been answered appropriatly, don't expect to see these systems emerge from R&D.

      So in short... move along, nothing to see here ;-)

      --
      Run! There's a lobster loose!
  27. Share the Disk subsystem by Brymouse · · Score: 1

    If they could get both computes to share the same SCSI buss I would be impressed.

    I rember back in 1991 or so I had a friend that did this. He even wrote a program so the computers could pass network data over it.

    It never worked that well IIRC, but was a interesting proof of concept.

  28. But ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
    When will they put two FPGA C64 emulators into one box?

    Now that would be swank.

  29. Read the article by HoldmyCauls · · Score: 1

    The two *are* sharing a disk.

    --
    Emacs: for people who just never know when to :q!
  30. Why is it so big? by panurge · · Score: 4, Interesting
    A rough calculation suggests that a flow of no more than 1.5 litres/min should be needed.(Water is an extremely effective heat removal fluid). This is very small indeed. So why is the equipment so big? The wall of the tubing is given as being 3mm thick. I would have thought that 5mm bore 1.5mm wall tubing would be more than adequate, with the result of much lower stresses on the heatsink, and much easier pipoe routing. The convector ("radiator") only needs to be large because the temperature differential between air and liquid is tiny and the design is extremely inefficient.

    As for conformal coating, if you want to try this heed this well meant advice: use the brush on stuff. It is much less likely to get into connectors from BELOW (masking doesn't cover the holes on the board side of the connectors) and it is easier to apply around devices that have heat sinks or just need some air exposure.

    I may be wrong but I am going to hazard a guess that a lot of this water cooling stuff is far bigger than necessary in order to look impressive - but that does not improve the performance, neither is a thick walled tube less likely to leak than a properly sized thin walled tube. Computers do not have high levels of vibration and cables and pipes crossing one another or rubbing on metal like they do in the more badly designed cars.

    --
    Panurge has posted for the last time. Thanks for the positive moderations.
  31. Re:Page colours by littleghoti · · Score: 1

    I get the nasty colours too- I am running safari, so it is only a beta.

  32. Extreme Leak Protection by AlterEd · · Score: 2, Insightful
    The first step in setting up the cooling circuit involves preparation. In order to ensure that the electronics are protected in the event of a leak occurring in the future, all PC boards (for both systems) were protected by applying several layers of spray on acrylic lacquer conformal coating.
    OK, sounds like a great idea. Where does one purchase spray on acrylic lacquer conformal coating?
    Note: Special care must be taken to protect the areas of the board that should no be sprayed, e.g. memory slots, ATX connectors, PCI slots etc.
    But wait. If you don't cover the RAM slots, what's the point of covering anything? OK, maybe if you've got a little leak and it just dribbles on the board a bit you'll get lucky and you won't lose any blue smoke. I just don't see the point, it seems a bit like wearing a radiation suit all the time to protect against The Bomb, but not wearing the hat.
    --

    Ed Chauvin IV
    1. Re:Extreme Leak Protection by simetra · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Perhaps they ought to put all the stuff in (i.e., RAM, cards, cables, then dip the thing in that protector stuff.

      --

      "Would it kill you to put down the toilet seat?" -- Maya Angelou
  33. OrangePC's for Mac, etc. by mgbastard · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Well, there have been PC cards for Macintosh machines for a long, long time, so I guess you can cram an expensive 'PC' (we'll call it 'an IBM' for the old time Mac Zealots) in a Mac case.

    Unfortuntely, these cards are no longer offered - perhaps the power requirements got too obscene for the PCI bus to provide power. I bet nobody thought of hooking up a drive connector to a PCI card back then (as with a Radeon 9700)

    I would definetly be in the market for this, as its one less @#$#$#@ box under my desk. I don't need more than a ~1Ghz Pentium III pc (or two). A dual Centrino on a PCI card would be a bonus. Yes I would like to bring it up as a window under os X or X (or optionally full screen cheap but decent 2d-accelerated video out the back of the card)

    Anybody going to make that card for me? I believe the highest performance model ever offered by any of the manufacturers was the OrangePC (OrangePC 660 - AMD K6-2/400 @100 MHz bus, L2 cache) That's too pokey for today, plus there's no driver support for doing things between modern versions of the OS, or support for newer macs than a B&W G3.

    The VirtualPC route has never interested me too much - every time I've demoed it, its never been quite fast enough for the tasks I wanted it for - like compiling for win32 or a developer install of sql server, etc.

    --
    Anyone seen my low uid? last seen 10 years ago while panning the #@$# out of Taco's 'web based discussion system'
    1. Re:OrangePC's for Mac, etc. by wadetemp · · Score: 1

      I would definetly be in the market for this, as its one less @#$#$#@ box under my desk. I don't need more than a ~1Ghz Pentium III pc (or two). A dual Centrino on a PCI card would be a bonus. Yes I would like to bring it up as a window under os X or X (or optionally full screen cheap but decent 2d-accelerated video out the back of the card)

      Why don't you just put the boxes in a closet somewhere, get it on your home network, and use some kind of network-based video? (VNC, Terminal Services, X Windows, etc.)

  34. Re:If you have a Mac by phasm42 · · Score: 1

    No, no, you got that backwards :-]
    </fuelforfire>

    --
    "No one likes working in a hamster wheel, and your shop smells of cedar shavings from here." - TaleSpinner
  35. Re:Wow! A Mac and a PC in the same case, Taco? by 91degrees · · Score: 1

    Not quite like that. Your Amiga setup was actually probably better in many ways. Most of the Amiga's hardware was used by the 386 - at least the hard drive and the monitor were. The same goes for the Emulated Mac. Best of all though, you could run apps for all three systems at the same time on the same screen!

  36. Why the hell would anyone do this? by venomkid · · Score: 1

    There's only a few (good) reasons to do something like this: push price down per performance/application, push performance up per price/application, or push new technological applications per price/performance. This thing doesn't do any of those.

    Outside of the usual overclocker zeal, I really don't get it.

    --
    vk.
  37. What's so great about this? by xA40D · · Score: 4, Funny

    Just two systems? I've got 6 systems in one box. A 386sx, 386dx, 486sx2, 486dx4, CYRIX 686,and a Pentium. It's got a big label on the front too:

    Obsolete Hardware

    Hmm, I wonder if I could get on the front page if I posted some photos on the web?

    --
    Do you mind, your karma has just run over my dogma.
    1. Re:What's so great about this? by MyHair · · Score: 3, Funny

      Hmm, I wonder if I could get on the front page if I posted some photos on the web?

      First you'd have to add neon lighting or make them into a Beowulf cluster.

    2. Re:What's so great about this? by hulksmash · · Score: 1

      You should take some pictures right next to your Delorian and some Betamax tapes and Reel to Reel player... jk

  38. pc and lunix by voot · · Score: 1

    now there would be a good combo, forget the mac

  39. One answer. by Pharmboy · · Score: 1

    A computer without two systems is like a duck without a wooden handle.

    --
    Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
  40. Pardon me if I'm not impressed by TWX_the_Linux_Zealot · · Score: 4, Interesting

    As huge as that case is, I don't see how it would be difficult to put two complete PCs inside. If it were the size of a standard full-tower (aka, not a doublewide, like it appears to be), or were something engineered along the lines of the Mini-ITX form-factor, I would then be impressed. With how they have it, I'm not.

    My old DEC Alphaserver 1000a is smaller than that, and if I took out the raid array section and replaced the power supplies with standard size supplies, I could easily fit two motherboards into the case. I can't see why I'd want to.

    If someone is really interested in having an enclosure with multiple PCs in it, I'd recommend getting one of those equipment units that musicians have for sound equipment (one of the deeper ones), and going with 19" rackmount stuff. It's more durable, more standardized, and at this point. the cases can be found from anywhere between $60 and $100, depending on how fancy you get. If you want more than that, get a standard 19" telco cabinet, and put all of your systems, network equipment, etc, in there. It's not difficult.

    --

    IBM had PL/1, with syntax worse than JOSS,
    And everywhere the language went, it was a total loss...
    1. Re:Pardon me if I'm not impressed by jonr · · Score: 1

      Ditto. This is one ugly hack, if you ask me. That is definetly the Frankenstein Computer. Why not put the thing on top (what is that? compressor? the lousy article doesn't say) inside this monster case? I totally fail to see the 'coolness' of projects like these, it's like the glue-on spoliers.
      J.

    2. Re:Pardon me if I'm not impressed by TWX_the_Linux_Zealot · · Score: 1

      It is definitely one thing to have big computers, after all, my workstation is an ATX-full tower, and I have three 17" displays hooked up triplehead xinerama, but I'm actively looking for the right rackmount case to replace the tower with. I'd rather have big UI than big case. As much as I have mixed feelings about Apple Computer, their plans of having small, inconspicuous computers that look cool are a definite advantage.

      --

      IBM had PL/1, with syntax worse than JOSS,
      And everywhere the language went, it was a total loss...
  41. That's silly... by FireballFreddy · · Score: 1

    My left mouse button sends ctrl-alt-del. I double-click a lot.

    -FF

    --
    SQUEAK, the Death of Rats explained.
  42. Rack mount by briancnorton · · Score: 4, Funny

    This is truly an amazing feat of boredom, but isnt this why they invented rackmounts?

    --

    People who think they know everything really piss off those of us that actually do.

  43. PC + Sega was done and flopped by Beetjebrak · · Score: 1

    I remember a Sega Megadrive and a 386DX(?) were once merged into a single PC-like box in the early '90s. The Megadrive was great for gaming, but sadly the two systems were completely separated. You couldn't program the gfx chips of the Megadrive through the 386. And Sonic the Hedgehog looked much better on a big TV screen anyway ;-)

    --
    Learn from the mistakes of others. There isn't enough time to make them all yourself.
  44. microsoft and apple by frankmu · · Score: 2, Interesting

    they used to cohabitate way before the mac/pc combo.. the old apple ][ had a cp/m card made by microsoft in the early 80's.

    --
    Supreme executive power derives from a mandate from the masses, not from some farcical aquatic ceremony.
  45. PC and MAC in one by Milliardo · · Score: 4, Informative

    Tech TV's show The Screen Savers put a MAC and PC in the same box. It wasn't as cool as I thought it would be, but it worked.

  46. Only 2? by eht · · Score: 1

    RenderCube does 4, they also build in a KVM and a 100Mbps Ethernet switch, it looks quite nice too

  47. mac/pc combo, sorta by Krizzzopolis · · Score: 1

    http://www.techtv.com/screensavers/supergeek/story /0,24330,3413988,00.html i think that 301 little pc belongs on my dash, rather than in a custom mac case

  48. G4/PC Hybrid by hulksmash · · Score: 1

    As to your comment about wishing they could put a Mac and PC in the same case, well its been done by mastermind Kevin Rose of the Screensavers! He even used a Samsung SyncMaster 171MP picture-in-picture monitor and a KVM switch that allows you to see and control both on the same screen! Also check out Yoshi's Boxx, with every game sytem you can think of crammed together:

  49. an idea by tevman · · Score: 1

    so, wouldnt the best idea be to implement some sort of hardware standard where the motherboard is just a connceting device where you can just plug in these other boards that contain whole computer systems, it would be good... (imagines what it would be like) mmmmmm... tasty, just imagine, any kind of processor you could put in your computer... it would be universal... i dont really have teh money or skills to prusue that right now, but if anyone has some vc they want to give me, i would try to make it happen... :P

    --
    sig is broken try again tomorrow
  50. OpenMOSIX by commanderfoxtrot · · Score: 1

    First things first. These people have done nothing clever; they've just shoved two independent computers in one big box. Big deal. My hamster could have thought of something more useful... like running round his wheel.

    Now, what IS clever is to put two simple motherboards together in a normal ATX case. It can be done. Just a processor, LAN and some RAM... and run OpenMOSIX / MOSIX software. Clustering on the cheap. So it's not dual-proc, but it's much cheaper, and you also get loads of PCI slots, IDE headers, serial ports - the works.

    Presumably one can do something clever with Xinerama and the two VGA-outs. Any X-perts here?

    Ebuyer in the UK (now the US also) sell a fully-featured motherboard for 35ukp. Just add some RAM, a CPU and some power and stick it into your case. Double the power of your PC for 150ukp.

    --
    http://blog.grcm.net/
  51. think Panda Project by emptybody · · Score: 1

    though they seem to have disappeared, they built a modular architecture. want x86? slap in an x86 processor daughter board. Want a sparc? slap in a sparc daughter card.
    too bad apple didn't want to play. they were all ready to go with MAC daughter cards too.

    sadly they now appear to be no more.
    >x_x

    --
    comment directly in my journal
  52. My dream case.... by jazman · · Score: 1

    Brilliant stuff. Now where can I get my dream case from - one with all the drives and IO and switches on the SAME SIDE so I don't have to keep turning the damn thing 180 every time I want to fiddle with something?

  53. Everything old is new again by macrophage · · Score: 1

    And I thought the original Franken-system was the old DEC Robin. I gotta admit, this one is a LOT faster.

  54. There's heaps of this stuff by Groganz · · Score: 1
    PC cards, biscuit PCs etc.

    Not to mention the VIA mini-itx boards, Shuttle spacewalker flex-atx boards, PCs that fit in a 5 1/4" bay. If I win lotto I'll make a cluster out of a backplane and a bunch of PC cards :)

  55. Already a Movie-of-the-Week by sharkey · · Score: 1

    Check it out here.

    --

    --
    "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  56. Other dual-systems by Gax · · Score: 1

    Eyetech have sold combined x86/Amiga systems to the Amiga market for years and Siamese Systems announced, though never sold, the 3-Pack and 8-pack Amiga/Alpha-based systems.