Slashdot Mirror


The t68i Replacement is Here

interdigitate writes "The new T610 was been unveiled today by Sony Ericsson. This is the t68i replacement and its supposed to improve on it in every aspect. It has a 16bit color screen, Polyphonic ringtones, a built in digital camera, GPRS, Bluetooth (ofcourse), and most importantly it has Synchronization which should mean it will work with apple's iSync! " So... pretty. Must... resist.

23 of 430 comments (clear)

  1. Unfortunately... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    The telephone aspect of the phone had to be removed to save space.

    1. Re:Unfortunately... by bezza · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Polyphonic ringtones is sort of like MIDI for phones.

      There are phones that do the .wav thing and I cannot wait to get my hands on one of those. I think it would be hilarious to record myself saying "bring, bring" and have that play when the phone rings.

      --
      WARNING: This sig does not contain a joke
  2. Read the specs by rf0 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Looking at the Specs half way down there is apparently DRM (Digital Rights Management). Does this mean that I can't have WAV's as ringtones now? :P

    Rus

    1. Re:Read the specs by Sheetrock · · Score: 5, Insightful
      By DRM, I think they're referring to the protection on a user profile of files (not that you'd store many on here), messaging ID, and e-mail account. It probably implements enough of their DRM API to sync with things like Palladium when it comes out later to sufficiently protect a computer sync of the phone's databases over infrared (assuming that's an addon to this model) as well.

      It's a good thing in this context.

      --

      Try not. Do or do not, there is no try.
      -- Dr. Spock, stardate 2822-3.




    2. Re:Read the specs by stratjakt · · Score: 5, Insightful

      DRM isnt an evil term. You've read too much slashdot.

      When you use a password on an secure connection to your banks website to transfer funds, that's a form of DRM.

      Putting a BIOS password on your own machine so noone but you can boot it up, is DRM.

      You have digital stuff, you have rights to it, you want a way to manage access to it, that's DRM - Digital Rights Management.

      The problem isnt the fact that stuff can be secured, the problem is the question of ownership. The RIAA/MPAA members think they own the songs on the CD you bought. MSFT thinks it owns all the IP on your desktop, etc.

      It's not the technology at fault, it's the IP system and the many vague definitions of 'ownership'.

      Saying DRM is evil or wrong is like saying "ping" is a hacking tool.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    3. Re:Read the specs by stratjakt · · Score: 4, Insightful

      >> you'll only be able to play that mp3 for 48 hours until it self-destructs.

      That's just one application, and a bad one IMO. You could use the same technology to make sure that noone else can listen to the memos you dictate to a device.

      It's the use of a technology that's right or wrong, not the technology itself. Like console modchips. Use them to play japanese games in america, good. Use them to pirate games, bad.

      It's the completely one-sided view of technology that has us wind up with stupid laws like the DMCA.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
  3. But... by Kshu · · Score: 5, Interesting

    How about a model that lets you chat via IRC? That one I'll buy for sure.

  4. Silent is good by cindik · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm very happy to see more wireless communications which don't require people to be chattering all the time. If they're too bored to watch the movie, participate in church, watch the play, etc., now they can busy themselves silently.

    OTOH, is this going to be banned from theaters and other venues where cameras are prohibited? At what point do we end up with unenforceable "no camera" rules?

    1. Re:Silent is good by Hal-9001 · · Score: 4, Informative
      At what point do we end up with unenforceable "no camera" rules?
      Forget about unenforcable--most "no camera" rules are rubbish. I can understand "no flash photography" because the flash damages ancient artwork or distracts performers, but passive recording of an image causes no real harm. The only damage that could result from passive photography is the dilution of intellectual property, but that is an abstract, socially-constructed danger--there is no real damage to property or safety.
      --
      "It take 9 months to bear a child, no matter how many women you assign to the job."
  5. please please please by rhs98 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I have a t68, and hope to god they have fixed the awful speed of the predictive text messaging. It is truly slow, and not much difference if any from the t68i.

    Here's hoping

    1. Re:please please please by Darren+Winsper · · Score: 4, Informative

      I found there was a considerable difference in the T68i version. The T68 was intollerable, but the T68i is just fine for me.

  6. Wow! 2Mb! by Joel+Rowbottom · · Score: 5, Funny

    Wow! Up to 2mb of memory available! I almost wet myself, I could store almost two floppy disks on there!

    (oh, wait...)

    --
    Smegma.
  7. this is why S-E is so far in front of Nokia by hype7 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The thing I love about Sony-Ericsson, and the reason why I will continue to buy their phones over Nokia's which I otherwise prefer to use, boils down to this:

    Bluetooth.

    S-E are putting it in a lot of their phones; Nokia are putting it in very few. You haven't seen how cool Bluetooth is until you run iSync with a mac, or get Romeo controlling your mac from the other side of the room through your phone.

    It's very cool :)

    -- james

    1. Re:this is why S-E is so far in front of Nokia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      Well I have been using My T68 for controling my Powerpoint and Kaynote presentations for two weeks. The new 12" Powerbook G4 and a T68 is a wounderful combination. No cables needed I i dont have to spend almost $100 on a remote! And when i get back to my office my desktop computer automatically logs me back on our intranet (and of again when I leave).

      It is really amazing! Jonas Sallings Sony-Ericsson Clicker and S-E phones really rule! Now I just have to decide if to buy a P800 or a T610 not an easy choise :)

  8. Hoped they improved... by usmcpanzer · · Score: 5, Informative

    the antenna strength. I shutter when someone walks into my store to buy the t68i. It looks cool, everyone wants a color screen phone, but about two thirds of them are returned. Horrible reception compared to the Nokia gsm phones.

    **This is with AT&T's new GSM network.

  9. Re:Open Source & synchronization by phil-trick · · Score: 4, Informative

    Well, look no further than:

    Multisync @ Sourceforge

    Works great with my T68 and evolution.

    Phil

  10. I used to think Bluetooth was useless by jht · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Then I got a T68i last fall. Now I have a Bluetooth adapter for my Mac, a Jabra Bluetooth headset, and a Palm Tungsten T. Amazingly, it all Just Works together. I can sync the Mac to both the Palm and the T68i, use Bluetooth to copy themes and ringtones to the phone, leave the phone buried in my pocket and use the Palm to dial it (I keep more of the database in my Palm than I do in the phone - I only keep the 50 or so most likely numbers in the phone), and just use the Jabra to talk.

    Once set up, Bluetooth is actually pretty neat stuff. Personally, it's now a feature I will look for going forward in phones, computers, and accessories.

    This new T610 phone looks interesting, but I'm not sold on cameras in my phones. I'd rather save the size and go small.

    --
    -- Josh Turiel
    "2. Do not eat iPod Shuffle."
  11. Re:Verizon by Smitty825 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Verizon (and Sprint) uses a different network standard (called CDMA) than AT&T (and Cingular/T-Mobile) do (GSM). To avoid a vi/emacs level flame war, let's not discuss which one is better :-)

    There is a model very similiar that is coming out for Sprint (and other CDMA providers). It looks the same, but it doesn't include the built in Camera. It does have bluetooth, though. It is called the T608.

    Verizon has quasi-announced that they aren't going to be supporting any new bluetooth phones, until they can charge for the data transfered between the phone and the external device (according to a Verizon Insider on HowardForums.) They get there own version of this phone called the T606, which supports BREW, but does not have the built in camera or bluetooth support.

    If you go to Phone Scoop, they have pretty informative pieces on each of these phones...plus a giant preview of all of Sony Ericssons new phones!

    --

    Doh!
  12. The BEST thing about Bluetooth is the Mac!! by adzoox · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Have you seen Romeo and Sony Clicker?

    They let you control iTunes, Keynote, PowerPoint, DVD Player

    Sony Clicker has a proximity sensor, applescripts lauch like check mail and iTunes play when you walk in the room

    Romeo lets you use the joystick on the phone like a mouse

    One is availible from www.versiontracker.com the other from www.macupdate.com

    --
    Yell & scream & rant & rave... it's no use... you need a shaaaave ~ Bugs Bunny
  13. You might also want to consider... by SunnyElLoco · · Score: 5, Informative

    the new Nokia 3650 (came on sale here two days ago). I just bought one and I must say it's the nicest phone I've used. It comes with all features of the T610 (minus DRM) and then some. The most important features in my opinion of the 3650 that T610 lacks are: more memory (3.4MB internal memory + memory card, mine came with 16MB card, vs. 2MB of T610), bigger screen (176x208 vs. T610's 128x160) and video capture. Also the 3650 looks nicer than the T610 IMHO. On the other hand T610 is smaller and lighter at least on paper, although I have to say that the 3650 is by no means "heavy".

    Other than that there are many similarities between the phones. Both are tri-band, run the Symbian OS, both have a camera, bluetooth, infrared, Java, e-mail etc.etc.

    Of course these are just my opinions, but you should at least check out the 3650 if you're considering the T610.

  14. Re:HOW??? by zuhl · · Score: 4, Informative

    Here is some shareware to control PowerPoint and Keynote from your S-E.

    http://homepage.mac.com/jonassalling/Shareware/

    Pretty slick stuff. You can also control iTunes with it as well. And it has a "proximity sensor" so when you and your phone are out of range, iTunes will pause. When the phone comes back in range, iTunes starts playing again. It's all mac-based right now. Bunch of AppleScripting going on in the background as well, I believe.

  15. t68i sucks by flats · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I have a t68i, and I can't wait until my contract is up in a month or two so I can renew and get a Nokia phone. (So I don't have to pay full price for the phone)

    I bought the t68i based on features before actually testing the phone.

    1) It was slow until I got a refurbished model which is faster.
    2) The microphone is WAYYY too sensative, nothing but background noise! My girlfriend hates it when I'm in a car or airport.
    3) Bluetooth-schmootooth, there's nothing THAT cool about it yet...sure there's a few tricks, and maybe sync-ing address books is all right...but there's not enough practicality in it yet.
    3) The antenna is horrible, you put a finger on it and the strength goes down a notch or two. And that's not just because it's GSM...I've used my phone in 10 different cities by now...some have better signal than others, but the antenna is putrid.
    4) Not a rugid phone. Anytime it has ever been dropped, I'm worried I'm out of luck!
    5) Anytime I go out of range, it takes more than 5 minutes to re-establish -- it's faster to turn the phone off and turn it back on -- what kind of crap is that?

    I can't wait to get a nokia phone again, I've been searching eBay -- but I want to test the phone first.

    It might be feature-rich, bluetooth, and a good battery -- but as a phone IT SUCKS!

  16. Re:Polyphonic ringtones by DrewCapu · · Score: 4, Funny

    Personally, I've preferred that good ol' piano tune that Yosemite Sam had Bugs Bunny play: e d c d c c e g f a C# C# a a. (... no silly, rabbit! like this!)

    When (clueless) people ask if it's a wrong note in there I just tell them, "No! I just don't want my phone to explode :P"