Slashdot Mirror


The t68i Replacement is Here

interdigitate writes "The new T610 was been unveiled today by Sony Ericsson. This is the t68i replacement and its supposed to improve on it in every aspect. It has a 16bit color screen, Polyphonic ringtones, a built in digital camera, GPRS, Bluetooth (ofcourse), and most importantly it has Synchronization which should mean it will work with apple's iSync! " So... pretty. Must... resist.

74 of 430 comments (clear)

  1. Unfortunately... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    The telephone aspect of the phone had to be removed to save space.

    1. Re:Unfortunately... by McWilde · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yeah, I was wondering how polyphonic ringtones, a built-in camera and 16 bit color display are "supposed to improve" a telephone. For me if it goes [BEEP] it's probably someone trying to reach me, I can read their name or number in black and white just fine. If I have nothing better to do I'll pick up and talk to them.

      --
      Maybe
    2. Re:Unfortunately... by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "The telephone aspect of the phone had to be removed to save space."

      As amusing as that comment is, I've found my T68i to do the PDA job that I could never get in the habit of using my PocketPC for. Now it acts as my alarm clock, phone number/email book, appointment book, and I even fiddle on the internet with it once in a while.

      There are two key things about it I wish my PocketPC was: The size/durability to fit in my pocket. The wireless internet connection at a reasonable rate.

      I do use it as phone once in a while, but that's eclipsed by it's PDA capabilities.

    3. Re:Unfortunately... by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "Yeah, I was wondering how polyphonic ringtones, a built-in camera and 16 bit color display are "supposed to improve" a telephone."

      Have you ever had your cell phone go off and have like 5 people check their phones?

      If you're curious how it makes it a better phone, I can explain the ringtones aspect of it. With the T68 you can group people into different categories and give them different ring tones. So if my gf calls, I can make it ring with a song, but if my job calls I have it ring silently. The neat thing about that approach is that I can make the 'NO-ID' calls silent.

      The next step would be to use .WAV files or something like that (I hope that's what polyphonic implies...) so you could have better control over the ring. Not sure what the mass market appeal is for something like that, but I already have my email notifications set up with unique sounds for the people I actually want to hear from.

      I think that in general, the sound aspect of interfaces is not given as much attention as it should.

    4. Re:Unfortunately... by bezza · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Polyphonic ringtones is sort of like MIDI for phones.

      There are phones that do the .wav thing and I cannot wait to get my hands on one of those. I think it would be hilarious to record myself saying "bring, bring" and have that play when the phone rings.

      --
      WARNING: This sig does not contain a joke
  2. Read the specs by rf0 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Looking at the Specs half way down there is apparently DRM (Digital Rights Management). Does this mean that I can't have WAV's as ringtones now? :P

    Rus

    1. Re:Read the specs by Sheetrock · · Score: 5, Insightful
      By DRM, I think they're referring to the protection on a user profile of files (not that you'd store many on here), messaging ID, and e-mail account. It probably implements enough of their DRM API to sync with things like Palladium when it comes out later to sufficiently protect a computer sync of the phone's databases over infrared (assuming that's an addon to this model) as well.

      It's a good thing in this context.

      --

      Try not. Do or do not, there is no try.
      -- Dr. Spock, stardate 2822-3.




    2. Re:Read the specs by b96miata · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Or you could get any phone from sprint that supports pcs vision. Qualcomm makes a free tool to convert wav's into ringers you can download right to your phone (they're bigger than midi ringers of course) Anyone who's into cool new phones and wants a service that won't charge you an arm and several legs for data use should check out the above. I don't wanna count the hundreds of dollars I'd owe if I'd used the same amount of data on at&t's network that I have on my $10 unlimited data plan.

    3. Re:Read the specs by stratjakt · · Score: 5, Insightful

      DRM isnt an evil term. You've read too much slashdot.

      When you use a password on an secure connection to your banks website to transfer funds, that's a form of DRM.

      Putting a BIOS password on your own machine so noone but you can boot it up, is DRM.

      You have digital stuff, you have rights to it, you want a way to manage access to it, that's DRM - Digital Rights Management.

      The problem isnt the fact that stuff can be secured, the problem is the question of ownership. The RIAA/MPAA members think they own the songs on the CD you bought. MSFT thinks it owns all the IP on your desktop, etc.

      It's not the technology at fault, it's the IP system and the many vague definitions of 'ownership'.

      Saying DRM is evil or wrong is like saying "ping" is a hacking tool.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    4. Re:Read the specs by Gannoc · · Score: 3, Insightful
      DRM isnt an evil term. You've read too much slashdot.


      Incorrect.


      Digital Rights Management was defined as a way to people to maintain their "Rights" (as in copyrights) digitally.

      Maybe Sony is expanding the term to include general security so down the road people think "Oh, DRM! Great, now I can use online banking! Its just like SSL!", and will ignore the fact it means you'll only be able to play that mp3 for 48 hours until it self-destructs.

    5. Re:Read the specs by stratjakt · · Score: 4, Insightful

      >> you'll only be able to play that mp3 for 48 hours until it self-destructs.

      That's just one application, and a bad one IMO. You could use the same technology to make sure that noone else can listen to the memos you dictate to a device.

      It's the use of a technology that's right or wrong, not the technology itself. Like console modchips. Use them to play japanese games in america, good. Use them to pirate games, bad.

      It's the completely one-sided view of technology that has us wind up with stupid laws like the DMCA.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    6. Re:Read the specs by cmoney · · Score: 3, Interesting

      There's DRM already in place on their current phones. It simply stops you from forwarding on content that you paid for.

      For example, if I buy a $.99 ringtone from say T-Mobile and download it to my current T300 (or T68 or 7210 or 3650, etc), it stops me from then putting that ringtone into an MMS and forwarding it to my girlfriend.

      However, if I download a free ringtone that I wrote myself, I can forward it on as much as I like.

      Same goes for background images and I'm guessing games as well.

      This isn't as bad a Verizon's Get $hit Now though!

  3. But... by Kshu · · Score: 5, Interesting

    How about a model that lets you chat via IRC? That one I'll buy for sure.

    1. Re:But... by emir · · Score: 2, Insightful

      well just buy any java enabled phone out on market and download irc client.... it might be wise to buy java phone with gprs as without gprs your phone bill will probably ruin you.....

      --
      -- http://electronicintifada.net --
    2. Re:But... by horza · · Score: 3, Interesting

      With the size of the screen, and the speed of typing on a numeric keypad, it doesn't sound useful for IRC except in the deadest of channels. Even with a normal monitor the text flies off the screen in around a second when the conversation gets heated. If you are really such a masochist, I guess you can load in a Java applet that tunnels over port 80 to a gateway you are running at home.

      Phillip.

    3. Re:But... by brakk · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I have a sanyo 4900 through sprint pcs and i can get an irc client for it, just never really saw the point because it takes so long to type something. the cool thing is that i can plug it up to a laptop by way of USB and just surf/irc that way.

    4. Re:But... by cmoney · · Score: 2, Informative

      Watch out, not every Java enabled phone works properly. I'm told the Nokia 7210 has J2ME support, but doesn't support network sockets from Java apps, only forwarding on to URLs.

  4. Silent is good by cindik · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm very happy to see more wireless communications which don't require people to be chattering all the time. If they're too bored to watch the movie, participate in church, watch the play, etc., now they can busy themselves silently.

    OTOH, is this going to be banned from theaters and other venues where cameras are prohibited? At what point do we end up with unenforceable "no camera" rules?

    1. Re:Silent is good by Hal-9001 · · Score: 4, Informative
      At what point do we end up with unenforceable "no camera" rules?
      Forget about unenforcable--most "no camera" rules are rubbish. I can understand "no flash photography" because the flash damages ancient artwork or distracts performers, but passive recording of an image causes no real harm. The only damage that could result from passive photography is the dilution of intellectual property, but that is an abstract, socially-constructed danger--there is no real damage to property or safety.
      --
      "It take 9 months to bear a child, no matter how many women you assign to the job."
    2. Re:Silent is good by GigsVT · · Score: 2, Informative

      Except around military places, in which case the "no camera" rule is taken very seriously.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    3. Re:Silent is good by deanj · · Score: 2, Informative

      The "no camera" rules most people refer to when they're talking about cell phones is "no cameras" in locker rooms, dressing rooms, etc. It's about privacy, not intellectual property.

  5. please please please by rhs98 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I have a t68, and hope to god they have fixed the awful speed of the predictive text messaging. It is truly slow, and not much difference if any from the t68i.

    Here's hoping

    1. Re:please please please by Darren+Winsper · · Score: 4, Informative

      I found there was a considerable difference in the T68i version. The T68 was intollerable, but the T68i is just fine for me.

    2. Re:please please please by duffer_01 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I also have a t68i which I love, but I hope that the RF reception is better in this new device. I know GSM (in N.A) is still new, but other GSM phones do not see, to have the same RF reception problems as this one.

  6. Finally! by Mindjiver · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Finally a decent phone from Sony-Ericsson. Hopefully this will help to stop Ericsson from bleeding to death.

    Too bad I can't afford this. But maybe it's just as good as I would just destroy it after too much beer.. =)

    --
    I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty or give me death!
  7. Verizon by walt15 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    But what I want to know is why I can't use it with my verizon service. Everyone I talk to says none of the ericson(sp) phones are not compatible with the network here in MI.

    --
    This is my post. Deal with it.
    1. Re:Verizon by Smitty825 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Verizon (and Sprint) uses a different network standard (called CDMA) than AT&T (and Cingular/T-Mobile) do (GSM). To avoid a vi/emacs level flame war, let's not discuss which one is better :-)

      There is a model very similiar that is coming out for Sprint (and other CDMA providers). It looks the same, but it doesn't include the built in Camera. It does have bluetooth, though. It is called the T608.

      Verizon has quasi-announced that they aren't going to be supporting any new bluetooth phones, until they can charge for the data transfered between the phone and the external device (according to a Verizon Insider on HowardForums.) They get there own version of this phone called the T606, which supports BREW, but does not have the built in camera or bluetooth support.

      If you go to Phone Scoop, they have pretty informative pieces on each of these phones...plus a giant preview of all of Sony Ericssons new phones!

      --

      Doh!
    2. Re:Verizon by RobertKozak · · Score: 2, Funny

      I am in LA. SO coverage is fairly good for many of the providers. There is only two major features I want in my next phone: Camera and Bluetooth. In that order. I meet a lot of girls and I can't remember 3 days later these girls I have on my phone. I need to take a picture ;-) Bluetooth would be cool because of the handsfree and wirefree headsets.

      --
      Bet this .sig looks familiar.
  8. Wow! 2Mb! by Joel+Rowbottom · · Score: 5, Funny

    Wow! Up to 2mb of memory available! I almost wet myself, I could store almost two floppy disks on there!

    (oh, wait...)

    --
    Smegma.
  9. Polyphonic ringtones by BWJones · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Please!!!! No more ringtones. How many more versions of electronic renditions of Beethovens 9th do we have to listen to ?

    --
    Visit Jonesblog and say hello.
    1. Re:Polyphonic ringtones by DrewCapu · · Score: 4, Funny

      Personally, I've preferred that good ol' piano tune that Yosemite Sam had Bugs Bunny play: e d c d c c e g f a C# C# a a. (... no silly, rabbit! like this!)

      When (clueless) people ask if it's a wrong note in there I just tell them, "No! I just don't want my phone to explode :P"

  10. this is why S-E is so far in front of Nokia by hype7 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The thing I love about Sony-Ericsson, and the reason why I will continue to buy their phones over Nokia's which I otherwise prefer to use, boils down to this:

    Bluetooth.

    S-E are putting it in a lot of their phones; Nokia are putting it in very few. You haven't seen how cool Bluetooth is until you run iSync with a mac, or get Romeo controlling your mac from the other side of the room through your phone.

    It's very cool :)

    -- james

    1. Re:this is why S-E is so far in front of Nokia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      Well I have been using My T68 for controling my Powerpoint and Kaynote presentations for two weeks. The new 12" Powerbook G4 and a T68 is a wounderful combination. No cables needed I i dont have to spend almost $100 on a remote! And when i get back to my office my desktop computer automatically logs me back on our intranet (and of again when I leave).

      It is really amazing! Jonas Sallings Sony-Ericsson Clicker and S-E phones really rule! Now I just have to decide if to buy a P800 or a T610 not an easy choise :)

  11. A most disappointing "feature" by no_such_user · · Score: 3, Interesting
    From the specifications:

    Features
    o DRM (Digital Rights Management)

    Again, when did DRM become a *feature* for end users? And exactly what are they using DRM for here... ringtones?
    1. Re:A most disappointing "feature" by Mr_Silver · · Score: 3, Informative
      And exactly what are they using DRM for here... ringtones?

      Forward-locking. In other words, if you download an application, ringtone, logo, icon or something else you can't forward it onto your friend. You can't physically get it off the phone (via IR, Bluetooth or PC Link).

      DRM in games (as in timeout expiration) is nothing new and doesn't require a DRM enabled platform for it. You simply get the server to pass an identifer in the JAD file which details the download time. The JAR file can use this to work out when an application will expire.

      This works for any Java enabled phone.

      --
      Avantslash - View Slashdot cleanly on your mobile phone.
  12. Lots of memory! by steelerguy · · Score: 2, Informative

    Wow, according to their web site it has plenty of memory also to store photos and other garbage. A whopping 2 MB! That tremendous number is 7% the size of my hard drive back in 1992. Why do they even bother wasting space with a camera? My 3 year old digital camera could barely fit one picture on there.

    OK, enough complaining, the phone actually looks cool. Just don't get the camera in the phone thing.

  13. Open Source & synchronization by MnO-Raphael · · Score: 3, Interesting

    the T610 is fully compatible with any computer. Your phone books and calendars will stay synchronized and updated

    Sounds promising, but is this also true for the various open-source calendar software? I've tentatively been looking for non-Windows synchronization software for my t39m without any luck.

    1. Re:Open Source & synchronization by phil-trick · · Score: 4, Informative

      Well, look no further than:

      Multisync @ Sourceforge

      Works great with my T68 and evolution.

      Phil

  14. T68 does work with iSync... by Serff · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I have a T68m and it works great with iSync...So I don't know what you mean by that. Phone looks pretty sweet. But will we see it in the US before 3G phones come out???

  15. Interesting ... by Draoi · · Score: 2, Interesting
    From the specifications;

    DRM (Digital Rights Management)

    It's got this 'Music DJ' function, but just how capable is it if it's got DRM. Is it crippled beyond belief? And with e-mail and Java built-in, how long before we see the first T610 virus?

    --
    Alison

    "It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education." - Albert Einstein

  16. You got to love it by cca93014 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Say what you like, but the SonyEricsson corporate branding is really fucking good.

    No doubt they spent more on that logo than most people earn while they are taking a shit at work.

    1. Re:You got to love it by jgerman · · Score: 2, Funny

      No doubt they spent more on that logo than most people earn while they are taking a shit at work


      WTF? I would hope so. Considering if I only spend a minute or two taking a dump at work, I probably couldn't afford a Big Mac, much less an advertising budget. Are you sure that you said what you meant?

      --
      I'm the big fish in the big pond bitch.
  17. Hoped they improved... by usmcpanzer · · Score: 5, Informative

    the antenna strength. I shutter when someone walks into my store to buy the t68i. It looks cool, everyone wants a color screen phone, but about two thirds of them are returned. Horrible reception compared to the Nokia gsm phones.

    **This is with AT&T's new GSM network.

    1. Re:Hoped they improved... by Cato · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I've never had a problem with T68 reception in the UK or Europe, or even India. I did find reception in Florida (Tampa area) and Texas (North Dallas) was very flaky, but I assumed that was just the state of US GSM networks (mainly Voicestream/T-Mobile and AT&T Wireless).

  18. Hrmmm.. by dasmegabyte · · Score: 2, Funny

    So, GSM phone. That means it only works with "T-Mobile" in the states, right? The company with decent calling plans, but the shittiest service, worst calling areas, no roaming (that's what "no roaming fees!" means...you can't roam at all with an all-digital phone!) worst building penetration and no plans to improve any of these? The one that paid several million dollars for their spokesman, and it was Jamie Lee Curtis? No thanks, man. I'll stick with my POS $30 Kyocera and Verizon, where I spend a lot extra to get the basic level of service I should get with everybody -- service that works indoors, service that works in the mountains as well as in the city, service that works in Canada and Mexico and the peace of mind to say "no, go ahead and call me, my phone will be on, I get service everywhere?"

    --
    Hey freaks: now you're ju
    1. Re:Hrmmm.. by SLot · · Score: 2, Funny

      The one that paid several million dollars for their spokesman, and it was Jamie Lee Curtis?

      Michael Douglas will no doubt be upset to find that he actually married Jamie Lee Curtis instead of Catherine Zeta-Jones. I'm sure Christopher Guest will be a little surprised too. :)

    2. Re:Hrmmm.. by krokodil · · Score: 2, Informative
      That means it only works with "T-Mobile"

      Well, here in San Francisco it works also with Cingular and AT&T. Plus it is 3-band and will work pretty much anywhere in the world.

    3. Re:Hrmmm.. by BrookHarty · · Score: 2, Informative

      GSM - ATTWS, Cingular, Tmobile. CDMA - Alltel, Sprint, Verizon. (Nextel is in there somewhere, dunno)

      Lots of national GSM providers, some small local providers, and too many international providers.

      I have both tmda and gsm phones, the only thing that has been holding me back from upgrading full to gsm, is I have too many extra hardware. Multiple car chargers, batteries, speakerphone, ear phone accessories. But those polyphonic ring tones and 16 bit color displays are really tempting to upgrade. Played around with uploading midi files to a polyphonic phone, freaking sweet.

  19. I used to think Bluetooth was useless by jht · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Then I got a T68i last fall. Now I have a Bluetooth adapter for my Mac, a Jabra Bluetooth headset, and a Palm Tungsten T. Amazingly, it all Just Works together. I can sync the Mac to both the Palm and the T68i, use Bluetooth to copy themes and ringtones to the phone, leave the phone buried in my pocket and use the Palm to dial it (I keep more of the database in my Palm than I do in the phone - I only keep the 50 or so most likely numbers in the phone), and just use the Jabra to talk.

    Once set up, Bluetooth is actually pretty neat stuff. Personally, it's now a feature I will look for going forward in phones, computers, and accessories.

    This new T610 phone looks interesting, but I'm not sold on cameras in my phones. I'd rather save the size and go small.

    --
    -- Josh Turiel
    "2. Do not eat iPod Shuffle."
    1. Re:I used to think Bluetooth was useless by jht · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah, it's about the same size, but it might be even smaller without the camera hardware. If the T68i were just a smidge smaller, I could easily toss it in the pocket of just about anything. As it stands, it won't fit in enough stuff that I usually use the belt case or a jacket pocket. It'd be handy if it could fit in a jeans pocket easily.

      I'm also not sold on the utility of still cameras in phones for the average user. I do see commercial applications for it (realtors, for instance, or insurance appraisers), but I don't think still photos are a killer app for mobile phones - especially at the quality they can shoot. The thing I like about Bluetooth is that it lets you combine products that do individual tasks well, rather than try and cram everything into one device. As a PDA, for instance, my T68i is fine for reviewing stuff that's been synced to it. But browsing information is a pain when there's a lot of it, it has limited storage, and data entry is awful. But my Palm does that stuff all really well. Since my Palm and T68i can essentially operate as a linked device via Bluetooth, I can deal with the strengths of each separately. I prefer that approach.

      What might be a nice feature once 3G is more widespread is lo-res video in phones. If it's simple to use, it could be pretty popular. All I think you'd need to be "good enough" is 5-10 fps, I'd think. At lo-res (like 120x120), that's not a ton of bandwidth.

      --
      -- Josh Turiel
      "2. Do not eat iPod Shuffle."
  20. Re:Swell.... by binaryDigit · · Score: 3, Funny

    and man does that new phone work fine! I just called your wife and phone sex is better than ever was :)

    Well luckily for you they increased the size of the microphone hole another .5mm to allow for your increased sexual satisfaction.

  21. it has J2ME (Re:But...) by alch · · Score: 2, Informative

    Hey - it has J2ME !! You can write it yourself !!

    J2ME gives you control over some SMS aspects, the GPRS data channels. If you want an example - head over to http://www.wireless-village.org to how they implement some of this over the SMS channel.

  22. Well I /was/ excited... by FyRE666 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I've been keeping an eye on the Ericsson developers site for a while now, being a j2me developer and to be honest I'm a bit disappointed with this new phone. I'm sure it's great technically, but Ericsson are doing the bare minimum to support java developers. Their "emulator" for the P800 was simply a skin for the reference emulators in Sun's Wireless Toolkit, and since their documentation is little more than sales pitch (that I've found at least) it appears they have no extended APIs to take advantage of sound or other phone specific features.

    So what this means is that people buying this, hoping to be able to download whizz-bang games are going to be a bit disappointed. There's no way of knowing whether it even supports image transparency for christ's sake. If you're interested in Java apps, then Nokia or Siemens are the way to go as both have pretty good APIs and very good documentation (Sprint java phones apparently have their own classes for sound too).

    1. Re:Well I /was/ excited... by FyRE666 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Hello, you are jumping down on them for following a spec?

      Not at all - it's great to follow the spec, but the fact is that MIDP1.0 on its own is unsuitable for games use (no transparency, no sound etc) and so savvy vendors have ADDED classes which can be used if required. This is not a bad thing - games are usually designed for a subset of phones anyway, due to differences with memory, processor speed and display type and size. It's impossible to design anything other than a simple game that will work and look good on ANY j2me phone, unless you just design for the worst case which is insulting to the people who have splashed out on a nice big colour screen.

      Siemens were the only manufacturer who departed from the standard by altering the way certain methods worked in the Image class, but they've fixed this and their game API is very very close to the spec for MIDP2.0, which can only be a good thing.

      Phones and games have a much shorter lifespan than websites - so it makes sense to design to a phone than design for technology over a year old when virtually all the meatspace implementations offer more.

  23. It still looks ugly by VEGx · · Score: 3, Funny

    It still doesn't look anything as nice as Nokia. It has Bluetooth, aye, but is it a requirement to look bloody ugly to have a bluetooth? :/

  24. Looks like fun, but, by irving47 · · Score: 2, Interesting
    There's not much point in upgrading from a t68i unless you've just gotta have the camera and polyphonic ringtones.


    Someone mentioned unenforceable camera rules in theaters and the like. Add to that military personnel that will be unable to take this phone to work. I'd imagine intelligence agencies as well.

    --
    I had a sucky sig.
  25. No screen protection? by MBraynard · · Score: 3, Insightful

    That's a really pretty screen and I fear it getting scratched up against my pen or pocket knife. Why wouldn't it have a flip over protector?

  26. P800 by elmo13 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This phone looks ok, but has anyone seen the P800?

    The P800 is verily cool - I would get one if I wasnt a poor student (you can send me money if you want, cheers ;-). It can do just about everything the T610 can do + lots more. I think the only bad thing about it is the Sony memorystick instead of SD or something.

    3G phones seem to almost be here (UK). I wonder what they'll be like. Anyone know S-E's pland for 3G? What I want is a phone that I use as a PC when I'm at home, not just on the move (with a contact lense screen of course).

  27. Re:Why? by normaldude · · Score: 2, Informative

    RE:"I don't understand. Why would anyone want a thing that wasn't the P800?"

    Size. The P800 is a very wide brick. And since I carry my phone in my front left pocket along with my wallet, every cubic mm is important.

    Ericsson T68/T68i: 100mm x 48mm x 20mm
    Ericsson T610: 102mm x 44mm x 19mm
    Ericsson P800: 117mm x 59mm x 27mm

  28. It's only just the beginning: by banana+fiend · · Score: 2, Funny

    3 billion human lives ended on August 29th, 1997. The survivors of the nuclear fire called the war Judgment Day. They lived only to face a new nightmare: the war against the machines.

    the T800 is next

    --
    Johns: Well, how does it look now? Riddick: Looks clear.
  29. The BEST thing about Bluetooth is the Mac!! by adzoox · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Have you seen Romeo and Sony Clicker?

    They let you control iTunes, Keynote, PowerPoint, DVD Player

    Sony Clicker has a proximity sensor, applescripts lauch like check mail and iTunes play when you walk in the room

    Romeo lets you use the joystick on the phone like a mouse

    One is availible from www.versiontracker.com the other from www.macupdate.com

    --
    Yell & scream & rant & rave... it's no use... you need a shaaaave ~ Bugs Bunny
  30. Re:I've been waiting for this.. by robb0995 · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Except for the built-in camera, the T68i already offers all of these features you've been waiting for!

    I have the T68i with the bluetooth headset and the "Communicam" and it's an OK phone. It's not all that special. I also don't see what makes this newer version all that special or "a new generation." It seems like a marginal set of tweaks and the permanent installation of the camera.

    Not that I'm looking for MORE features. My T68i crashes about once a month, which is totally unacceptable for a phone! It is already feature-bloated. Please, be a phone first and best!!

  31. You might also want to consider... by SunnyElLoco · · Score: 5, Informative

    the new Nokia 3650 (came on sale here two days ago). I just bought one and I must say it's the nicest phone I've used. It comes with all features of the T610 (minus DRM) and then some. The most important features in my opinion of the 3650 that T610 lacks are: more memory (3.4MB internal memory + memory card, mine came with 16MB card, vs. 2MB of T610), bigger screen (176x208 vs. T610's 128x160) and video capture. Also the 3650 looks nicer than the T610 IMHO. On the other hand T610 is smaller and lighter at least on paper, although I have to say that the 3650 is by no means "heavy".

    Other than that there are many similarities between the phones. Both are tri-band, run the Symbian OS, both have a camera, bluetooth, infrared, Java, e-mail etc.etc.

    Of course these are just my opinions, but you should at least check out the 3650 if you're considering the T610.

  32. Support SSH? by sleeeper · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I know that using SSH on a keypad phone would be very difficult, but I want a small phone that I could use to hook into my servers in a pinch, (i.e., one every two years, maybe never).

    With java support, is there a a java ssh client that would work on this phone (or any other small java phone)?

    There is scant online documentation about using ssh on a java phone.

  33. Re:not what I'm looking for by Goth+Biker+Babe · · Score: 2, Informative

    " These combined devices are too big and the battery life typically sucks. I think that you make too many compromises by throwing everything into the same device. I think that it is better to split them up.

    The phone should be as small as possible with awesome battery life. Simple email, contact list, and calendar access is a must. I always carry the phone."

    You've obviously never seen a T68i. It's about as small as it can be whilst allowing me to actually press the buttons. It will run almost a fornight on standby (ie on but not transmitting phone calls) and even using the clip on MP3 player I generally only have to charge it once a working week.

    It has bluetooth and IrDA, uses GSM and GPRS standards and works fine with my PDA both as a modem for internet usage and synching it's phone book and calendar via OBEX.

    Erm, exactly what you're on about!

  34. What, exactly, is the point? by Dixie_Flatline · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Now, I really don't mean this as a troll. I looked at the phone, and I tried to think of what I could do with it and what it provided me over anything else, and I couldn't really think of anything.

    Yes, bluetooth is cool. I can get behind that.

    But a standalone PDA is going to be better than the built-in PDA, if for no other reason than it has more memory.

    A standalone digital camera will be better because it'll have more memory and a better lens.

    A standalone phone will be no worse, and from the looks of it, it'll be easier to talk on and handle because it's smaller.

    Half decent versions of all these things would probably even cost less. They didn't have a price on that page that I could see, but the T68i was pretty pricy. Is it all just a space/convenience thing? Are people that anxious to free up some space that they'll use a somewhat inferior all-around package instead of 3 high quality individual pieces? Do geeks really not want to carry a bag around?

    Now, being a programmer, I've never really had a use for a PDA (no meetings or things to remember...I never used the PDAs that I had), I'm only starting to want a cell phone (and even then, it's mostly because I bicycle on my own a lot) and I've been doing okay with SLR film cameras (though a digital would be awfully nice with a couple good lenses...) Maybe I'm missing everything about this phone except the 'cool' factor of owning a high-tech cutting edge phone.

  35. w00t! 3|337 |-|40r speak has ruined me by revery · · Score: 2, Funny

    This is the t68i replacement and its supposed to improve on it in every aspect. It has a 16bit color screen

    Am I the only one who tried figuring out what the heck t68i and 16bit were in script-kiddish before my brain took back over...

    --

    Some days it's not even worth uploading my consciousness

  36. Re:HOW??? by zuhl · · Score: 4, Informative

    Here is some shareware to control PowerPoint and Keynote from your S-E.

    http://homepage.mac.com/jonassalling/Shareware/

    Pretty slick stuff. You can also control iTunes with it as well. And it has a "proximity sensor" so when you and your phone are out of range, iTunes will pause. When the phone comes back in range, iTunes starts playing again. It's all mac-based right now. Bunch of AppleScripting going on in the background as well, I believe.

  37. Re:Is DRM all bad? by Wntrmute · · Score: 2, Insightful
    If there is no DRM what incentive is there for a content provider to create content?

    Yeah, 'cause as we all know, before DRM was invented in the last few years, no content existed. All those movies, music, works of art, books, and software created before the existence of DRM are just a big collective hallucination. After all, we all know people would never create anything without absolute total control until the end of time, right? This website is a perfect example. Would slashdot even exist if DRM wasn't stopping us from cut-and-pasting the slashdot headlines, blantantly stealing Malda's content? Would Linus Torvalds have ever created Linux without DRM to protect it? I think not.

  38. Heh! You just want one...admit it! by jtrascap · · Score: 2, Funny

    I don't...only because I just got a P800 on Friday, but it does look to be a SCHWEET leetle tang!

    Seriously, the cam IS very helpful - I snap the photos of people when I grab their phone numbers, so when a call comes in I can see who it is. Mounted in my car, it's great - I can instantly associate the photo without having to actually read anything, which makes driving alot safer.

    The polyphonic ring tones can be as annoying as anything else out there, but it can also be a hell of alot less harsh on the ears. Boss calls, theme from "Empire Strikes Back" softly plays. 'Nuff said.

    I love my Sony - I immediately replaced my Siemens SL45i and Palm Vx at once and never looked back. The new Sony line is kickass...

  39. t68i sucks by flats · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I have a t68i, and I can't wait until my contract is up in a month or two so I can renew and get a Nokia phone. (So I don't have to pay full price for the phone)

    I bought the t68i based on features before actually testing the phone.

    1) It was slow until I got a refurbished model which is faster.
    2) The microphone is WAYYY too sensative, nothing but background noise! My girlfriend hates it when I'm in a car or airport.
    3) Bluetooth-schmootooth, there's nothing THAT cool about it yet...sure there's a few tricks, and maybe sync-ing address books is all right...but there's not enough practicality in it yet.
    3) The antenna is horrible, you put a finger on it and the strength goes down a notch or two. And that's not just because it's GSM...I've used my phone in 10 different cities by now...some have better signal than others, but the antenna is putrid.
    4) Not a rugid phone. Anytime it has ever been dropped, I'm worried I'm out of luck!
    5) Anytime I go out of range, it takes more than 5 minutes to re-establish -- it's faster to turn the phone off and turn it back on -- what kind of crap is that?

    I can't wait to get a nokia phone again, I've been searching eBay -- but I want to test the phone first.

    It might be feature-rich, bluetooth, and a good battery -- but as a phone IT SUCKS!

    1. Re:t68i sucks by Slotted+Aloha · · Score: 2, Informative

      I can only double that. The t68i is the 4th GSM phone I am using and it's the first and last Sony Ericsson.

      Speed quality is ridiculous. My previous phone, a Siemens SL45 (which I replaced because I've dropped it once too many times) had crystal clear reception in place where the speech quality on the t68i is just barely tolerable. I am not sure that the lack of speech quality is related to a bad overall reception though; the phone usually picks up signals just fine.

      The user interface just sucks. Simple things such as selecting an entry in the phonebook and placing calls requires "CLICK", "CLICK", "CLICK", "CLICK", "CLICK", "CLICK" .....

  40. hmmm.... by Tumbleweed · · Score: 2, Informative

    Okay, it doesn't look anywhere near as pretty as the T68i, but that's hardly a big deal. The thing is, like the T68i, it has an internal antenna, which means it's reception is going to suck as bad as the T68i's did. You can tack on all the features in the world, but when you keep dropping connection in iffy areas, I'm just not impressed.

  41. SE's Direction by onthefenceman · · Score: 2, Informative

    I really hope that SE has improved the antenna on this model. The t68i has mediocre reception, especially for initiating a call or sending an SMS. This has proved true both on T-Mobile and on foreign networks I have tried. I appreciate a lot of the features on the latest SE phones, but why does it seem that every phone that comes out now builds in a digital camera? They have no optical zoom, poor resolution, and occupy lots of silicon real estate. I'd say SE needs to tilt their R&D budget a few more degrees toward usability over bells and whistles.

    --
    Have you seen my stapler?