Slashdot Mirror


An IMDb for Books

darkgray writes "After years of reading books and never really knowing which books were, perhaps, the best out there, and in the meantime getting more and more impressed by sites like the Internet Movie Database, I decided to start a project of my own. I named it the Internet Book List, and now it needs people to vote on books they've read, and even more it needs dedicated people to submit books and author information. Help out Humanity: Add a Book!"

87 of 388 comments (clear)

  1. What About Amazon? by n3rd · · Score: 3, Informative

    There's always Amazon.com. They have reader reviews as well as a rating system for each book. I personally use it due to the large amount of traffic they have so I can see a wide range of opinions on a product.

    They may not have everything, but they're pretty close.

    1. Re:What About Amazon? by SirSlud · · Score: 5, Insightful

      > They may not have everything, but they're pretty close.

      Erm, and you know this how?

      If Amazon decides not to carry the book, *poof* it ceases to exist if we rely on it as a means of archiving records of books.

      Also, if we rely on Amazon purely as a reference, I don't like the idea of the huge advantage they get on their competitors. Even if another site sells the book for cheaper, the convenience (pardon me, the conflict of interest) of mixing reference lists with sales catalogs seems a little too market-muddling for me.

      --
      "Old man yells at systemd"
    2. Re:What About Amazon? by sethaw · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The problem with amazon is that their main purpose is to sell the product. This is a conflict of interest since they are always pushing some product to you, and in the process influencing people's opinions.

      After using it for movies and also using IMDB.com I have always preferred IMDB.com because it has a much broader user base and offers better information. I feel like a good book site could do the same if it is able to gain enough information to get started.

    3. Re:What About Amazon? by kaisyain · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Amazon edits the reviews in ways that some might object to.

      Amazon limits reviews to 1000 words. 1000 words isn't really that much for some reviews.

      Amazon lets people review books that they clearly haven't read (because they aren't even available yet).

      And maybe you aren't entirely comfortable with the fact that when you submit a review to Amazon "you grant Amazon.com and its affiliates a nonexclusive, royalty-free, perpetual, irrevocable, and fully sublicensable right to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, and display such content throughout the world in any media."

    4. Re:What About Amazon? by Regulus · · Score: 2, Funny

      What you should do is write a spyder-bot that crawls through Amazon.com's site, and collect a huge amount of book information. If you can do it surreptitiously enough, you might not get sued :-D

      --
      I want to live forever, or die trying.
    5. Re:What About Amazon? by joshsisk · · Score: 5, Informative

      If Amazon decides not to carry the book, *poof* it ceases to exist if we rely on it as a means of archiving records of books.

      Well, no. There are lots of books on there that they don't carry. In fact, there are lots of books on there that they have NEVER carried.

      The do this because they will send a request to a rare book dealer for you and then take a commission from the sale if the dealer can find it for you.

      That said, I think a non-commercial DB is better...

    6. Re:What About Amazon? by neuroticia · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Worse are the ill-informed and stupid reviews.. I've seen reviews that say stuff like "Ha-ha! I tricked you! I gave this book one star, but it's the best book I've ever read!" which brings a book's general rating down for no good reason at all... Or the book reviews that say "This book is not for beginners! This is a horrible book!", when the title is "Advanced Technology X", or "This book is not for professional/Advanced Users! It sucks!" for "Technology X for Beginners".

      People are morons.

      But this does not invalidate the review process. Readers of reviews-of-products-they're-searching-for (as opposed to "highest reviews" lists) can still glean SOME idea of what the book/movie is like by reading the reviews. They'll obviously gravitate towards the reviews that sound similar to their take on things--like if they're beginners they'll pay more attention to the reviews by beginners. If they like a certain book and someone mentions that book negatively in a review, they can usually say "Ok, this person's opinion is different from mine".

      No process is perfect. I mean, we've all seen obvious trolls modded up to +5's. (Think the sexy-gal-boy-troll) and intelligent posts at -1.

      But it's still fun, and we still get stuff from it.

      By the way, calling people "stupid" when their opinions differ from yours doesn't demonstrate above-average intelligence. ;) I happen to like Hitchhikers, although I agree with your opinion on the lord-of-the-rings books. (yucky) but don't bash the opinion of either lovers or haters of those books. The fact is, they're popular books, and a LOT of people like them--which means they have a good chance of being liked. Which means the reviews are accurate, which invalidates your argument.

      -Sara

    7. Re:What About Amazon? by n3rd · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Erm, and you know this how?

      Personal experience. It's rare I don't find a book I'm looking for.

      If Amazon decides not to carry the book, *poof* it ceases to exist if we rely on it as a means of archiving records of books.

      An excellent point.

      Also, if we rely on Amazon purely as a reference, I don't like the idea of the huge advantage they get on their competitors. Even if another site sells the book for cheaper, the convenience (pardon me, the conflict of interest) of mixing reference lists with sales catalogs seems a little too market-muddling for me.

      Conflict of interest how? You see this daily in many places. Video game reviews have links to purchase the game they're selling, same with books, computer hardare and almost everything else. And of course, if your purchase the product using that link the reviewer generally gets a percentage of the sale. The same goes for the grocery store. Why not get some toilet paper while you're there instead of driviing to Target and saving $.50?

      Like it or not, convience is king.

      Also keep in mind nobody is forced to purchase the book there, and that's exactly what I do. Use Amazon for the review and then shop around if I decide to purchase it.

      Keep in mind what this person wants to do is not create a reference list but a centralized web site for reviews. If you want a reference list I would suggest The Library of Congress.

    8. Re:What About Amazon? by Nept · · Score: 4, Informative

      Amazon doesn't even come close to having everything. If you want everything go to the Advanced Book Exchange online. Thousands of independent booksellers all over the world. That's everything my friend.

      --
      "Teachers leave us kids alone ..." - Roger Waters, Pink Floyd
    9. Re:What About Amazon? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful


      Actually good fiction teaches concepts that are very educational, many of which can't be gleaned from fact-only books. Loyalty, honor, imagination, sacrifice, tolerance, cooperation, totally hetero male affection and bonding, etc. etc. are all taught extensively in JRR's books. These aren't fictional concepts. Good fiction also provides a window into different experiences, say falling in love with someone society prohibits you from being with. Shakespeare don't ya know? Also good speculative fiction can provide a viewpoint and examination of our current day world. What might things be like if...? What might a world based on this or that economic system be like? What might an alien think of the fact that we all wear clothes and get embarrassed when no other life from does this? What does that say about us?

      I'm sorry to say it really does sound like good fiction is over your head.

    10. Re:What About Amazon? by b!arg · · Score: 5, Informative

      You do realize that IMDB.com is run by Amazon, don't you?

      --

      Everybody dies frustrated and sad and that is beautiful
    11. Re:What About Amazon? by sethaw · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You do realize that IMDB.com is run by Amazon, don't you?

      You may have just ruined imdb.com for me. I hope your happy with yourself now :)

      It is another conflict of interest but the extent of which I don't know. How much information is traded between the two entities? Do they use the same database for ratings? Do they use the same sources for reviews? Are they just separate groups within the same organization? I don't know, but I'll still stand by my original opinion that imdb.com is better for getting information on movies.

    12. Re:What About Amazon? by b!arg · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm not sure of how inter-connected the two sites are. But my gf applied for a job at IMDB and it's at Amazon HQ here in Seattle. She apparently knew all along...I had no idea until then. If you want to buy a movie you are looking at IMDB you'll notice it conveniently links to Amazon's site. And you'll also notice that when you are on Amazon you can get quotes for a movie you are looking to buy from IMDB. I don't know how linked the reviews are. I just quickly chose The Shawshank Redemption for a check and on IMDB it has over 1000 reviews whereas on Amazon it had something closer to 600. Maybe I should have chosen a less popular movie, but it looks like it's not just one db for all reviews, which actually strikes me as being weird.

      IMDB now has a fee-based service, so it looks as if it's trying to be it's own money-making entity as opposed to just a tool for directing people to Amazon. But I'm also sure it does produce quite a bit of synergy for the company(apologies for the buzz-word). IMDB for me is a WONDERFUL tool. It's amazing the breadth and depth of it's information. And it does not bother me that it has anything to do with Amazon. Probably mostly because I don't have any problems with Amazon.

      --

      Everybody dies frustrated and sad and that is beautiful
    13. Re:What About Amazon? by HBergeron · · Score: 5, Informative

      IMDB was originally started by some english blokes as a free universal database project much like the original cddb and the like. You can see its' origins in some of the odd bits of information - they'll often have finnish or irish box office figures for an obscure movie but not U.S.. In my opinion those boys did one hell of a job setting it up. A few years back they sold out to Amazon for a (rumoured) $100M, not a bad chunk of change. Amazon has linked dvd sales to the site be seems to otherwise have left it to it's own devices. The greater clunkiness of the site these days owes more to the business folks who are running the site for amazon who seem to be trying to turn it into another Daily Variety.

      --
      THE YEAR WAS 2081, and everybody was finally equal...
    14. Re:What About Amazon? by PinkStainlessTail · · Score: 3, Insightful
      If you want everything go to the Advanced Book Exchange online.

      Or go to Bookfinder.com, a meta-search whose list of booksellers includes ABE.

      --
      "Slashdot is about legos and staplers." -Cmdr. Taco
  2. Obvious question by mosch · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So ummm... how do we go about inputting books ourself? I mean, there are some decent books in the system that need rating and reviews, but none that I've read recently enough to write a decent review.

  3. Copyrights by Vollernurd · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Have you already considered the legal ramifications for what you're doing?

    It's a sterling idea, it's just that some publishers might get aggrieved when they see information on their publications being held by a third party.

    --
    Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules.
    1. Re:Copyrights by LoudMusic · · Score: 2, Funny

      Have you already considered the legal ramifications for what you're doing?

      It's a sterling idea, it's just that some publishers might get aggrieved when they see information on their publications being held by a third party.
      --
      --
      Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules.


      While I agree with you on these points, I have only one reply ..

      "Fuck`it dude, lets go bowling."

      --
      No sig for you. YOU GET NO SIG!
    2. Re:Copyrights by imadork · · Score: 4, Insightful
      It's a sterling idea, it's just that some publishers might get aggrieved when they see information on their publications being held by a third party.

      How could they possibly have a legal right to complain? How is someone infringing on copyrights by simply acknowledging the existence of a published work? If it's published, it's implied that it was offered for Public Consumption, and referencing the author and title of a particular book should be considered a non-copyrightable fact.

      Besides, there are already publically-accessable book lists in many places, on and off line. Amazon has already been cited, but how about your local library? Or the Library of Congress? Do libraries need to get permission to put books in their card catalog?

      I'm curious if he recognized how much bandwidth can be eaten up by a project like this. Or if he's looked to see is Amazon has a patent on this. It seems right up their alley...

    3. Re:Copyrights by ichimunki · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Who the hell modded this up to five? It's ridiculous. Things like titles, tables of contents, book reviews, book ratings, ISBNs, page counts, date of publication, etc etc are either Fair Use (i.e. criticism) or uncopyrightable facts.

      Personally I see no point in such a database project unless it builds on public information like that produced by the Library of Congress.

      --
      I do not have a signature
  4. Re:Totally Sweet! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    You mean a Site like this:
    http://www.eigenspace.net/reality/
    Which has been around for quite some time....

  5. Free is better by Jonner · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Amazon and other retailer sites are good, but a free, non-comercial one is better. Amazon won't bother having entries for books they don't sell, which excludes many old and obscure ones.

  6. How far back are we talking? by Schnapple · · Score: 5, Insightful
    The imdb has an easier task in this respect - movies have only been around maybe a century or so. But books have been printed for thousands of years. So, how far back are we talking? I presume you can submit a book as old as you want, but how far back is the goal?

    Fiction, Nonfiction, both?

    What about textbooks? Do we want those too?

    How about programming books? Manuals? At what stage of public availability do we want to consider? If it's on a shelf at Barnes & Noble that's one thing, but are we talking Congressional Review here?

    Suggest some boundaries!

    1. Re:How far back are we talking? by andi75 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      > But books have been printed for thousands of years.

      Written, perhaps. But most are lost, because they were only available as hand-made copies, limiting distribution severly. Wide distribution of books was only made possible by Gutenberg's press, first used in 1452, to print a couple of bible extracts in larger (> 100) numbers.

      - Andreas

    2. Re:How far back are we talking? by fruey · · Score: 2, Informative
      But books have been printed for thousands of years.

      Written, yes. Printed, no. Gutenburg invented the printing press about 550 years ago. Before that it was all handwriting. Unless you count evidence from China using clay printing processes 450 years before.

      --
      Conversion Rate Optimisation French / English consultant
    3. Re:How far back are we talking? by oyving · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The easies boundry would be anything with an ISBN. There you quickly have a unique ID for each book as well.

      At least it's a start.

    4. Re:How far back are we talking? by buttahead · · Score: 2

      here you go:

      Book type, category

      Coloring, Coloring
      Pamphlets, not-really-books
      instruction manuals, instruction-manuals or not-really-books
      comic books, comics
      music books, music or music-scores or howto-music

    5. Re:How far back are we talking? by soupdevil · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Speaking of Gutenberg, this project could gain a substantial database if Project Gutenberg's books could be added.

      And Project Gutenberg probably wouldn't mind having an index of all books, both public domain and copyrighted, to refer people to.

      Sounds like a mutually-beneficial relationship to me.

      (www.gutenberg.net)

    6. Re:How far back are we talking? by Cruciform · · Score: 3, Funny

      I'm still looking for the "Bugger all this for a lark" version of the bible mentioned here. :)

  7. Internet Literature Database by frizz · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Maybe an extension to this could include magazines, journals, and other literature. Including full-text for things that are public domain would be another nice feature.

    1. Re:Internet Literature Database by demonbug · · Score: 2, Insightful

      One problem with including things like magazines and journals would be that they periodically change format, and they continuously change in the quality of content. A book, on the other hand, is pretty static once it has been published so reviews of it made today will pretty much be accurate for the rest of that books existence. The same cannot be said for magazines; what happens after five or ten years when all different people are writing and editing a magazine? DO you wipe out all the old review, as they are not really relevant any longer? It seems to me that this kind of thing works better for relatively static works like books, movies, albums, etc. I suppose you could rate each issue of a magazine, but that would get really ridiculous really fast.

  8. Suggestions by coldcity · · Score: 3, Insightful

    1. Amazon "buy this book" buttons. They could get some decent Amazon affiliate revenue I'd think... easily done & free to set up 2. "This user also enjoyed" cross-referencing! I've found some great stuff with that feature of Amazon. Oh. Now I think about it, this site is basically Amazon, except without the database or a way to actually buy books. Hmmm.. not really that great now, is it?

    --
    coldcity
    code, life, art
  9. Obvious answer by mesach · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Personally I would assume that if you signed up there would be a section to submit...

    but thats just me...

    --
    moo.
  10. There is already a good one. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    http://www.alexlit.com It's a little SF heavy, but it has a great rating systems and has been operating for a number of years. Check it out before you start a whole new project.

  11. A Great Idea by Shadow+Wrought · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Although folks are talking about this being a redundant service which Amazon already provides, I think this will provide a better database of books.

    I would much rather research a book or series without being unindated with adds and guesses as to what I want, and sweaters randomly dropping down out of a Target tab.

    I look forward to submitting.

    --
    If brevity is the soul of wit, then how does one explain Twitter?
    1. Re:A Great Idea by targo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I would much rather research a book or series without being unindated with adds and guesses as to what I want, and sweaters randomly dropping down out of a Target tab

      In order for this site to be taken seriously and comparable to Amazon, it needs millions of titles, much more features, and the ability to survive slashdot effect. This presumes a rather powerful database, quite a bit of storage and bandwidth. The current amateurish system would never survive this, it needs some serious full time staff to keep it running.
      And there is no way this would be free unless the original poster is a philantropic millionaire.

    2. Re:A Great Idea by Deagol · · Score: 5, Interesting
      Even if it fails, the spirit of the attempt is worth the time, so long as the content remains Free.

      I remember when the IMDB was a collection of huge text files passed around on USENET. Next, it was converted into DOS-based database application. The app and a few hundred megabytes were passed around the 'net. Once the WWW thing caught on, it went to the web. I don't know if there was ever a time it was on the web but not the pimped commercial version it currently is.

      Since it was a community effort, I felt it worthwhile to add my own contributions. I haven't felt compelled to contribute (can you?) to the current commercial incarnation, as it's not Free anymore.

      My biggest fear is that such a project will sell out like CDDB and IMDB did, riding on the backs of those who selflessly contributed content.

    3. Re:A Great Idea by Shadow+Wrought · · Score: 2, Funny
      That's pretty cool, although I do admit to chuckling at the thought of "rating" a clay tablet from Sumeria (and yes I know that's not how it works but my mind sometimes makes leaps without necessary asking my consent;-)

      The average review for this tablet is 8.7 out of 10...

      --
      If brevity is the soul of wit, then how does one explain Twitter?
    4. Re:A Great Idea by mlinksva · · Score: 2, Informative

      The Open Directory License, used by dmoz isn't a copyleft but was authored roughly for "DB data". At Bitzi we use the similar OpenBits License. One could also choose a Creative Commons license. Or maybe the GNU Free Documentation License. Also see the FSF's licenses page. I wouldn't get enthusiastic about any community contributed data project until license issues are clarified.

  12. Database Append Question by GeckoFood · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Your site looks like it is off to a good start. Considering that there are thousands upon thousands of titles, how do you add a title that is not in the database? Do you have an automated process, or are you stuck adding titles and authors by hand? If you are doing this via hand and you get, say, 100 submissions per month for a new title, you will be a busy bee (and very well might burn out before you really get going). If there is an automated process, how do you access it?

    --
    Be excellent to each other. And... PARTY ON, DUDES!
  13. I stand Corrected by mesach · · Score: 2

    I signed up, went in, looked, and found no place to add a book.

    --
    moo.
  14. How I'd like to see this work by jwjcmw · · Score: 3, Interesting

    One of my favorite wastes of time is following threads on Allmusic. I love the way they have a description of a band, and also have information on contemporaries, styles, members etc. that are dynamically hotlinked to other items in the db. If you could do the same kind of thing with the author information, it would be really great.

  15. Re:It is not called... by SN74S181 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Every time I visit the Amazon website (to read reviews, I would never purchase a book from them) I worry about all that information people are submitting to one of the great sinking ships of the Internet. If and when Amazon.com goes belly up, or becomes even more just another buy.com site spamming our eyeballs with whatever consumer crap is bringing in sales, what is going to happen to all the reviews and content people are voluntarily contributing? I'd surely rather it were going to a non-profit site ('profit' is not bad, it's just that part of the profit-loss system necessitates that companies and their websites die on occasion).

    Anyhow...

  16. Oh boy by Sgs-Cruz · · Score: 2, Informative

    Get ready for a world of hurt ... first the Slashdotting, and then, if this becomes popular, a wave of traffic to your site that won't stop... just look at IMBDB or RottenTomatoes: sites that started small and today have huge server farms...

    --

    Karma: pi (Mostly due to circular reasoning in posts).

  17. Let's hope it's not the IMDb for books... by stienman · · Score: 4, Insightful

    As nice as the IMDb is, there is one major difference between what you are doing and the IMDb:

    The sheer volume of material.

    There are far more books now than movies, and you had better start considering how you are going to apply categories and searching to it. The sheer volume also means that most of the good information is only going to reside in 'popular' books, while the rest, if it is ever added, is going to be dilute and useless.

    I wish you luck in your endeaver, I'm certian others will aid you in its progress. I can't see it becoming very popular unless you somehow leverage existing (possibly for-pay) data sources, such as Amazon, and that path requires you to take your site to a proprietary level (as CDDB and IMDb did), which will upset those who freely added material in the 'early' days.

    -Adam

  18. free database? by agilliland · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I think what would set this apart is the fact that the data is freely available to anyone that wants it. Sure, IMDB is a great database, but the data is not free for people, and neither is Amazon's data of course.

    I am a strong supporter of FREE data the way that freedb.org gives away their database. I think that is the featrue that will make this database worthwhile. Otherwise I agree that Amazon seems to be doing a pretty good job.

  19. Something I've been looking for... by Masem · · Score: 3, Interesting
    ...at least in terms of a quick way to get pertinent data on a book (title, author, publication date, etc) via it's ISBN, ideally in an XML-type format. Sure, I know you can scrap that info from Amazon, but a simple database would be nice. I know there exists a similar XML-based database for DVD releases, and the various CD music databases already exist, but otherwise, the only place I could find a ISNB lookup outside of Amazon was one that simply returned a title for the ISBN.

    I'd also like to see something on the order for computer and video game software. Again, everything tied to the ISBN with some necessary database details to file in.

    --
    "Pinky, you've left the lens cap of your mind on again." - P&TB
    "I can see my house from here!" - ST:
  20. this isn't free yet, AFAIK by edgarde · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I submitted (via email) a missing book and author, but really the site could use a form for this. Populating this database by reader submission seems pretty wrong overall -- it'll always be highly incomplete and fulla errors. I imagine it would be easy enough to get permission from publishers to parse in electronic copies of their catalogues.

    So what rights do I have with this data? I was kinda burned when FireFly sold all my record reviews (along with those by hundreds of other users). CDDB being sold to (and locked up by) Escient is a better example of this phenomenon. (For those who arrived late, freedb is an open source fork of CDDB, which is now called GraceNote).

    No more submissions from me until someone tells me what happens to my work. I don't mind someone like Jon Katz quoting my /. posts, but I'm not willing to have my work turned into proprietary data.

    Good project tho; I'm surprised it took this long to happen.

    1. Re:this isn't free yet, AFAIK by darkgray · · Score: 3, Interesting
      I have no intentions of selling out. I was simply naïve enough to think just about everyone would love a website where they could look up books without having pricetags pushed up their nostrils every three seconds.

      Regarding copyrights, I haven't even thought about it. I didn't realize people would be so annoyed for putting their time into a project like this. I do, however, intend to read up on the GNU licenes and whatnot and make sure I end up not even being able to sell other people's work for my own profit.

      It might be nice with some money to upgrade the server, though. :p

  21. BookCrossing by ciurana · · Score: 5, Informative

    For what is worth, there is a similar effort out there called Book Crossing. Essentially, you put books in circulation by leaving them in cafés or other public places, for people to find and comment on. I put a couple of books (my most recent one today!) out. Anyway, this creates a virtual roaming library that now has global reach.

    Check out their web site; Book Crossing has some neat ideas that could be applied to this project.

    Cheers!

    E
    --
    http://eugeneciurana.com | http://ciurana.eu
  22. Business Plan??? by cosmosis · · Score: 3, Funny

    I think this Book List is a fabulous idea and I support it 100%. My only concern is something of this magnitude will require a business plan of some sort. Already the server appears to be having problems handing the slashdotting effect. If this project hopes to achieve its true potential its going to need a lot of bandwith and storage capacity, in addition to a lot of open-sourced people power and coordination. At the very least I would expect it would require some people to manage it full-time, who will need monetary compensation for doing so.

    Do you have a business plan that will anticipate and manage this growth. I hope so.

    Best of luck and success to you.

    Planet P Blog

  23. Re:I think ... by gorilla · · Score: 4, Insightful
    It's no more difficult than for movies.

    "Call me Ishmael" - Herman Melville, Moby Dick
    "It is a truth universally acknowledged, that a single man in possession of a good fortune must be in want of a wife." - Jane Austin, Pride & Prejudice.
    "There was only one catch and that was Catch-22" - Joseph Heller, Catch-22.
    "It was the best of times, it was the worst of times" - Charles Dickens, A Tale of two Cities.
    ""When I use a word," Humpty Dumpty said, in a rather scornful tone, "it means just what I choose it to mean--neither more nor less." - Lewis Carroll, Alice's Adventures in Wonderland.

    5 perfectly good memorable lines, without lots of context.

  24. Good idea but not quite IMDB by GothChip · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is a good idea. I have often thought that IMDB is the best site on the internet since it was ran from Cardiff Uni (Despite the US-centric reporting and rampant commercialism on the frontpage).

    The main think the IMDB has over a similar book site is the interconnectedness of movies. With actors often appearing in more than one movie, the IMDB is just as much a database for actors, crew, writers, producers and composers as it is for movies.

    With books all you can really index are the titles and the authors - and crossovers are rare.
    You could still list the characters appearing in a book but due to the majority being one of appearances it's usefulness is definately restricted.

    No playing six degrees with books. and no thinking "I really like that character. What else have they been in?"

    All in all it's a nice idea but I can't see it reaching the same level of usefullness of IMDB.

  25. Free labor again? by sohp · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Wow, so we can have another site, like imdb and cddb, where thousands of volunteers can create a huge and valuable database, which is then claimed as sole property by a single company which then proceeds to make money for itself by charging for use? No thanks. May I suggest the Library of Congress card catalog instead?

    1. Re:Free labor again? by schon · · Score: 2, Informative

      The one thing I liked about IMDB was that in its early days you could download all of the data it contained.

      You still can, by going to ftp://ftp.imdb.com/pub/interfaces

      Last update was March 1, 2003.

  26. Trivia and Goofs by dmorin · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Are you planning to add my two favorite sections, Trivia and Goofs? I tell ya, I could spend many hours (often have) just randomly clicking through the trivia and goofs for movies I wouldn't otherwise care about. I mean, how could I go through life not knowing that the lesbian scene in American Pie 2 was shot across the street from Ferris Bueller's house?

    We could even make stuff up, like, "Reportedly Douglas Adams was enjoying a tuna sandwich with pickles when the idea for 'So Long and thanks for all the Fish' struck him."

    Major time waster and brain filler : Turn on the tv. Find movie. Look movie up. Read Trivia, Goofs, Memorable Quotes, Alternate Versions, and Movie Connections in that order. On Movie Connections, click another movie that looks interesting. Repeat. My wife wonders why I'm always saying I'm going to go pick up my office but it takes days.

  27. Re:Um...I thought this was called..... by TiMike · · Score: 2, Informative

    or this.

  28. Link to Gutenberg Project would be sweet by The+Scooter+King · · Score: 2, Interesting

    In the case of public domain books, having a link to the appropriate files on Project Gutenberg would be nice

    --
    Everything's been downhill since the TRS-80
  29. need access to old book reviews by rjnagle · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I wrote an essay about what such a book database would look like.
    Books, Ontologies and Shared Dictionaries

    Interestingly, many of the book reviews from the major sites (nytimes, ny review of books) charge for access to archived articles. When writing my longish longish essay on Gao Xingjian's novel Soul Mountain , I had to go through hoops to figure out how to reach cached copies of these articles. Although dozens (if not hundreds) of people had reviewed this same book, only a handful were publicly accessible.

    Unfortunately, this sort of project would be successful if the major book publications agree to open their content. i would argue that access to old movie reviews (like Roger Ebert, etc) on imdb hasn't hurt the respective publications. Perhaps if the project gains enough momentum, the major publications will see value in providing their content for free.

    I hope this project succeeds (and more importantly finds funding), but I have to wonder what is so wrong with depending on newsgroups (easily accessible from google groups) to find reviews. It's free, easy and threaded, so conceivably people could reply to a thread on a specific book.

    Robert Nagle

    --
    Robert Nagle, Idiotprogrammer, Houston
  30. Here is how by +Majere+ · · Score: 4, Informative

    Under the help section:

    5. How do I help out with the project?
    We'd love to get more people to help out with adding books and authors, so mail us at submission@iblist.com asking to become an administrator. We will contact you as soon as we can.

    1. Re:Here is how by mandrake*rpgdx · · Score: 5, Insightful

      they really should have it user-submitted via a form and have it all automated. Or else this puppy's going to die purty darn fast.

  31. Missing the point guys... by Quixadhal · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Everyone who's chiming in with "What about Amazon" is missing the point of having an independant database whose purpose is to collect and distribute information.

    Amazon is only interested in marketing books so people will buy them. They aren't going to carry information about things they can't sell.

    The Library of Congress will carry information about the book, but no commentary or reviews... and even they won't store data on books that may be centuries old, or only available outside the United States.

    As far as legal concerns... remember that little principle called "Fair Use" that all the big companies want to take away from us? Printing a self-compiled catalog of book titles, even with small excerpts, should be covered under fair use. Reviews of said titles should be 1st amendment. Of course, IANAL.

    This is a great idea!

  32. all books should eventually be online by falsification · · Score: 2, Interesting
    This is a good idea. There needs to be some kind of comprehensive source to get author, title, publisher, year published, etc, for all books published and extant. You probably only need to add another 100 million books or so plus other materials like pamphlets and periodicals. (PCIIW).

    How are you going to pay for this? Maybe the UN will chip in? I assume you'll be including books written in all languages and writing systems.

    This will be an important step toward the long-term goal of the Internet: putting all of human memory online.

    One difficulty you'll eventually see will be people trying to censor all mention of certain books. It will be very difficult to verify that the data is not altered or deleted except for authorized and proper purposes.

  33. /. Corrputing Book Database already? by LowneWulf · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The book database looks like it's pretty heavily geek-weighted right now. Not saying they aren't some of the best titles, but the top fives seem all to be your standard geek picks for books snd suthors.

  34. The Assayer already online book information source by Brad+Lucier · · Score: 3, Informative

    Check out "The Assayer" for online book information.

  35. lots of work by Hubert_Shrump · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Before I go itemizing all my rare/out-of-print/hard to find books, I'd like to know what's going to happen to the data.

    Is this going to turn around and go commercial, or (as we're led to believe) be project Gutenburg-ish?

    If it's going to be open, can we get the DB on DVD, I'd certainly pay for a million-plus library of books that other people cared enough to index.

    Etc.

    --
    Keep your packets off my GNU/Girlfriend!
  36. LOC Blog by blair1q · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Why don't we just lobby for the Library of Congress to put its catalog online with voting and posting?

  37. Where are the rules? by ignoramus · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I like the idea but I really need a few clarifications before I'll devote time/energy to this and couldn't find anything relevant on the site.

    - Is the db really free? Where will it be available for download, how often will the downloadable version be refreshed, can I mirror the database?

    - Who is paying for this, how and why? Maybe a "buy this from amazon" link could be provided for each book, with revenues going towards the project itself. Don't know if this would be sufficient, though.

    I'm sure there are a number of people who would like to get involved but it's crazy to assume anyone will get devoted to a project when they don't even know what will become of their contribution. The "license" of this db needs to be clarified.

  38. Library of congress? by k98sven · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Why not get a copy of the library of congress records?
    They've got quite a lot of books in there and they're public, so you should be able to get them at the cost of reproduction.
    (although, given the sheer size, that might mean some money)

    Seems to me to be a good 'skeleton' for a database like this.

    1. Re:Library of congress? by esme · · Score: 2, Informative
  39. Re:Um...I thought this was called..... by 1_brown_mouse · · Score: 2, Funny

    try http://catalog.loc.gov

  40. What is the point? by Greedo · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If you just want to get reviews of books you might find interesting, check out other online sites like Amazon. Or (gasp) join a book club. Talk to friends. Read reviews in the newspaper.

    And if you want to create an uber-list of all the books in existance, I'm afraid the Library of Congress has probably beaten you to it.

    What makes the IMDB useful (for me, at least) is not their reviews, but the way I can see who was in a particular movie, and what other movies they may have been in. Or to look up who played the part of that really cool character in such-and-such a film.

    There are no comparable "searches" you could do on a IBList-type site. The LoC (among many other places) could give you the list of all the books by a particular author. And if you are looking for "If you loved Dickens, then you'll also like ..." type suggestions, that's where your book club/reviews/knowledgeable bookstore staff will help.

    Oh, and by "knowledgeable", I suggest you ignore your big-box Chapters, B&N or whatever, and visit your local, independent bookseller (if they haven't been driven out of business yet). In my experience, their knowledge and service far outweighs any minor price discount from Big Book City. Often, the independent is cheaper too, especially on new hardcovers.

    --
    Tuus crepidae innexilis sunt.
  41. Not just Reviews - Information and Trivia by WallyHartshorn · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The nice thing about the IMDB is that it carries more than just reviews of the movies. It also has detailed information and trivia about each movie - the stars, the producer, the director, bloopers and goofs, plot holes, trivia, etc.

    If the IBList does the same thing, they'll be filling a niche that Amazon's book reviews don't fill.

  42. Re:Asking slashdotters... by Stonehand · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You might find more variety among the Slashdot audience than you'd think. Not all of us constantly wallow in technical manuals from O'Reilly or _Star Wars_ / _Star Trek_ fiction.

    Hell, my most recent readings include a history of the Qin dynasty as written by a historian of the Han; a short novel about a family of Tsarist aristocrats set in Kiev shortly after the Bolshevik revolution in Moscow; the second half of the "Hyperion" series; and a "novel of ideas" (nihilism, socialism, atheism, et al) of intrigue and conspiracy set in various places in Russia in the late 1800s. Not caring too much as to the age of a text frees one to pick and choose.

    --
    Only the dead have seen the end of war.
  43. from a library student's POV... by reve · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Hi. I'm employed by a library and am working on a masters in library science, but IANAL(ibrarian).

    That said, I spend a lot of time around databases of books. And I'd like to respond to a couple criticisms that have been raised in previous threads as well as make some suggestions.

    It is true that are reference resources for books -- Books in Print with reviews, for example. And to an extent, BIP has been replaced by Amazon -- Because BIP costs money, whereas Amazon is fast and free. Librarians in general arn't happy about an entity with a stake in selling books controlling the reviews. They'd like to see a good, free resource develop.

    But then we're vexed with the question of data format. We're developing free resources which we want to be interoperable, right? There is an internationally-accepted standard (data format) for electronic storage of bibliographic records -- it's called MARC. (http://www.loc.gov/marc/) Any new system storing records of books really should use MARC -- or at least be able to export to MARC, like allmusic/allmovie.com do.

    Again, on the standards front -- what about subject tracings? Yeah, in the current database there's a place for genere, but books often cross those lines -- especially when you're dealing with nonfiction books. Library of Congress puts out a massive list of approved subject headings called (approperately) the library of congreess subject headings (LCSH). Wouldn't using those be wise? Plus you could get the records from the LoC already classified, saving a lot of work and arguments as to how to classify "the diamond age."

    But downloading all those records manually would suck. Luckily, there's also a standard protocol for moving bibliographic records from one place to another -- z39.50. The advantage of z39.50 here would be that the maintainer of the site could suck zillions of bibiographic records from libraries, the LOC, whoever -- as well as share their records with libraries, schools, etc. They (for the most part) wouldn't have reviews, but they would have accurate summaries and bibiographic (size, publisher, isbn, pages, etc) information. To me, that seems like it would be a good way to start getting records for the userbase to augment. Plus, there's a z39.50 perl module available for your fun and entertainment. (http://perl.z3950.org/)

    I think a database like this is ABSOLUTELY needed, and hope the creators will take these standards into account as their resource develops.

    --
    -- r . m o s q u i t o --
  44. Re-inventing the wheel by Cire · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The basic problem is that there was no online database for movies before imdb.

    But these people are re-inventing the wheel. There are tons of people who have much more experience with this stuff, who've spent years getting masters degrees in library science. These people have spent a lot more time trying to figure out out to categorize books already.

    Plus, there are already numberous search tools available, like the loc and Amazon.

    Cire
  45. What's needed is a sorting system by osgeek · · Score: 2, Insightful

    (I wish I could see what the site has, but it's /.'d)

    When it comes to books, I tend to want to read the ones that are recommended by other people who share my tastes.

    No system like this will ever be complete(useful?) without a way to filter out the opinions of people with whom I'll probably never agree.

    A big problem with IMDB is that you have so many widely varying opinions, that it's a pretty useless way to find movies that I might enjoy. It's only really good for seeing who starred in what, really.

  46. Isn't discussing books a violation? by wytcld · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Isn't discussing books online a violation of Amazon's recent patent. Granted, that only applies in contexts where the books are also offered for sale. But if you offer them for sale at anywhere other than Amazon, they can come after you, as long as that silly patent holds up. Meanwhile, I'd suggest that sites which do both discuss and link books consider bn.com - as complete a catalog as Amazon, no bad patents. Let's keep Bezos busy making more enemies.

    --
    "with their freedom lost all virtue lose" - Milton
  47. All Consuming by evand · · Score: 3, Informative

    While the Internet Book List looks like it might eventually become a worthwhile alternative data source to Amazon.com, I've been using All Consuming for a little while and find it to be an exceedingly useful resource for book information.

    While it does use Amazon data (the merits of which are discussed in other replies to this article), All Consuming provides a clean interface and metainformation to the base data, as well as nifty features like weblog scanning (to find mentions of books), the ability to track a book collection, and a "friends" network that keeps one up-to-date with other members' various literary excursions.

    As I put it on my weblog: "If you read, join All Consuming."

  48. Readerware by bmeehan · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Readerware uses Amazon.com, Library of Congress, and several other sources to dish up info about the books, as well as a picture of the cover. It's surprised me on some of the books it can find - even a narrow circulation book published by the company I work for...

    http://www.readerware.com/

  49. Use Bookfinder.com, not ABE. by Nova+Express · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ABE used to be the online bookselling venue of choice, but that's before the new idiot management decided to impose a new commission fee structure on top of what their dealers were already paying, and kicking off those dealers who refused to sign the new agreement.

    Information on ABE's new policies can be found here.

    roght now, the best service to look for books online is bookfinder.com, which searches not only ABE (and Amazon & B&N if you want it to), but also more than a dozen other independent book-listing sites, including TomFolio.com, the site I currently list my science fiction books on (in addition to my own site.

    --
    Lawrence Person (lawrencepersonh@gmailh.com (remove all "h"s to mail)

    http://www.lawrenceperson.com/

  50. Science Fiction Already Has Two Sites Like This by Nova+Express · · Score: 4, Informative

    Science Fiction already has two sites (though not with rankings) with tens of thousands of book and story titles already listed. They are:

    The Locus Index; and

    The Internet Speculative Fiction Database.

    The Locus database covers SF/F/H/etc. from 1984 on fairly comprehensively, while the ISFDB covers a wider timeframe, but isn't (yet) nearly as comprehensive. ISFDB was also suffering under some badwidth caps earlier in the year, but expects their problems to be solved (via hosting through the Texas A&M library system) very shortly. Both are well worth bookmarking and using.

    --
    Lawrence Person (lawrencepersonh@gmailh.com (remove all "h"s to mail)

    http://www.lawrenceperson.com/

  51. accuracy of the database by bcrowell · · Score: 2, Informative
    Populating this database by reader submission seems pretty wrong overall -- it'll always be highly incomplete and fulla errors.
    I was a little worried about this on my own user-submitted book review site, The Assayer. However, it's turned out not to be a problem. The site is very open. Any registered user (i.e., someone who's supplied a valid e-mail address) can enter new books, edit the information about a book, report that the link to a free book has been broken, etc. It hasn't been a problem at all -- users are generally pretty responsible about this kind of thing. I do look at the log file every day or so and make sure that nobody has been doing anything really goofy. Also, I back up the database pretty frequently, so if someone truly malicious came along and munged it, I would just have to restore off of backup. Hasn't happened, though.

    Sure, users make mistakes like entering a title as "The War of the Worlds" rather than "War of The Worlds, The." Not a big deal. I just see it in the log and fix it.

    A somewhat bigger problem is conflicts of interest. I've had several cases where the author tried to submit a review of his own book. The cure is caveat lector: don't trust a review by someone who hasn't given any personal information (real name and bio). Also, a person who has submitted a lot of well-written reviews is more trustworthy than someone who's only written one. I've heard stories about abuse on Amazon.com, too (e.g., grad students submitting glowing reviews of their thesis adviser's book).

  52. Amazon doesn't get the job done by Army+Eye · · Score: 2, Interesting

    For-profit or not, IMDb is MUCH more useful as an informational site than Amazon is. Despite IMDb's tie-in with Amazon, it still is presented in a info first, sell second fashion, in my opinion.

    IMDb lists tons of titles which you have absolutely no chance of buying from them.

    IMDb has the extremely useful 'home pages' for any actor, director, etc. which you can see their entire body of work and even sort the info in a bunch of different ways. Where is a comparable feature for authors on Amazon?

    IMDb does not try to sell me clothing, kitchenware, and other such nonsense on a movie review page. Amazon on the other hand..

    A movie's 'home page' is not ridiculously long and bloated like a book's home page on Amazon.

    You can do some pretty tremendous things with IMDb's advanced search that I have yet to see in Amason. Character name search for example?

    IMDb has a much more pleasant interface. Almost everything on the site is a link to gobs more information.

    Amazon is a great online store, but in terms of being a raw informational web database, I feel it leaves a lot to be desired. I think an 'IMDb for books' is something good to strive for. It DOES fill a need.

  53. Current Top 2 Books. Big Surprise. by LetterJ · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Hitchiker's Guide to the Galaxy
    Ender's Gam

    Followed by a pretty large list of SF and fantasy that makes me say...

    Please, all of you readers who have discovered those shelves in the library and bookstores that don't have books with swords or spaceships on the covers, please, rate some of those books.

    In all seriousness, I enjoy Hitchiker's Guide as much as the next geek, but as a holder of a degree in English I hope to see a balanced list of books rise to the top.

  54. Re:Stay away from this site by benna · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Yes that list was a problem but I saw your email and you were not exactly polite about being removed. This has all been fixed an now there are forums instead. This is a brand new site and you should cut them some slack!

    --
    "It is not how things are in the world that is mystical, but that it exists." -Ludwig Wittgenstein
  55. Re:Stay away from this site by kevin42 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Aww, come on. He didn't intend for the mailing list to be postable from anyone except for himself, and he shutdown the list pretty quickly. Yeah, I got a bunch of messages too, but it wasn't spam, it was people asking questions about how to do stuff, etc.

    Then after less than one day he shut down the list and setup forums. Give him a break.