Slashdot Mirror


TRON + Linux = "T-Linux"

An anonymous reader writes "The T-Engine Forum and MontaVista Software announced today that they are collaborating to combine the long-dominant Japanese embedded operating system, TRON ("The Real-time Operating system Nucleus"), with embedded Linux, in the hopes of creating a standardized software architecture for embedded devices that takes advantage of open source software and the benefits of Linux."

76 of 143 comments (clear)

  1. Kernel Panic: Light Bike On Fire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny
  2. Light Cycles. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Aslong as we can use those light cycles I will be glad to use it.

  3. I can feel by dknight · · Score: 1

    the MCP jokes coming already.

    1. Re:I can feel by mcpkaaos · · Score: 2, Funny

      easy killer.

      --
      mcp:kaaos

      --
      It goes from God, to Jerry, to me.
  4. question by lingqi · · Score: 4, Insightful
    takes advantage of open source software and the benefits of Linux.

    not trolling, but a genuine question: advantage of open source I can understand - what benefit does linux bring to the embedded world, if they already have the core OS?

    --

    My life in the land of the rising sun.

    1. Re:question by Evil+Adrian · · Score: 4, Funny

      A cute penguin logo!

      --
      evil adrian
    2. Re:question by ergo98 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Marketing. I'm surprized they don't talk about how they're also Bluetooth+XML enabling it.

    3. Re:question by frankthechicken · · Score: 2, Funny

      Embedded fanaticism?

      A fanatical penguin?

      An embedded penguin fantacism?

      Short answer I don't know apart from what has been said below, branding and marketing. It gives them a solid base to draw support from, by using a well known and trusted name.

    4. Re:question by cybermace5 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Plenty.

      Embedded devices are becoming increasingly powerful, and are expected to do more. Have you ever looked into the capabilities of new high-end stereo receivers? It's almost exponential from year to year.

      A lot of functions normally requiring a full computer are being moved into embedded devices. It makes it a lot easier to port in an application, if it uses an OS you're already familiar with.

      Linux adds another layer of compatibility over the base OS. For optimal speed, yes, you'd want to tweak every line for the target hardware. But the hardware cycle is so fast, that sometimes it's nice to let someone else specialize in the performance tweaks. Lets you concentrate on functionality.

      There's already a million ways that this is being done, but an open and high-quality (yet to be seen) alternative is always welcome.

      --
      ...
    5. Re:question by The+Clockwork+Troll · · Score: 1
      Embedded devices are becoming increasingly powerful, and are expected to do more. Have you ever looked into the capabilities of new high-end stereo receivers? It's almost exponential from year to year.
      Indeed, which makes it all the more ironic that the highest-end receivers are judged primarily on how cleanly they can get amplify a simple stereo audio signal (which typically means bypassing all that electronic wizardry).
      --

      There are no karma whores, only moderation johns
    6. Re:question by t0ny · · Score: 1

      Its all about the Ben Franklins: money! They dont have to pay a license fee for Linux, thus more profit.

      --

      Manipulate the moderator system! Mod someone as "overrated" today.

    7. Re:question by zbik · · Score: 5, Informative

      TRON is more of an OS specificication than an OS; many vendors implement the TRON API in their RTOS, and many applications (in Japan) are developed for it. This project could be cool because it would enable companies to adopt Linux while maintaining compatibility with their legacy embedded apps -- provided this does not become a proprietary MontaVista technology. The benefit of Linux is the massive amount of hardware it will run on, and the all the development tools & libraries available.


      Redhat's eCos already supports uITRON (Micro Industrial TRON, the most popular flavor) through a compatibility layer.

    8. Re:question by lingqi · · Score: 1

      Yeah but that doesn't change the fact that they already have the core OS. Moving that to OSS, fine; but what does linux has to do with it? I am not arguing against the need for an OS for the progressively complex embedded systems, but the relationship (advantages, no less) thereof (especially in this case) with linux?

      --

      My life in the land of the rising sun.

    9. Re:question by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      "not trolling, but a genuine question: advantage of open source I can understand - what benefit does linux bring to the embedded world, if they already have the core OS?"

      Free advertising on Slashdot.

    10. Re:question by NanoGator · · Score: 2, Funny

      "Free advertising on Slashdot."/i.

      Ha! Somebody should print the source code and write an article about how they installed Linux on a ream of paper...

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    11. Re:question by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 1

      "Ha! Somebody should print the source code and write an article about how they installed Linux on a ream of paper..."

      hehehe

      Of course, we'd get hundreds of stale 'page fault' jokes to the tune of "if it were the Windows source code..."

    12. Re:question by torpor · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Oh man, the sky is the limit ... development in the OSS realm is *easier*, because you can compare notes with other professionals who have - quite often - explored territories you've only begun to chart.

      Focus shifts, then, on feature and performance, and the ol' not-sure-if-I-am-doing-this-right-because-I-don't- fully-understand-the-only-docs-I-can-find janx spirit becomes less and less evident ... of course, there is plenty of that janx in linux land, but I believe you're referring to OSS specifically from an 'edge' developers perspective here, not user. Guys on the edge deal with janx.

      As someone who has followed the TRON project since its earliest inception, this is really great news to me. TRON was - in the early 80's a conceptual framework for a computing on a massive scale.

      Essentially, all devices in the TRON class - no matter their hardware design - would be able to communicate freely with each other, exchange information, and share load.

      So, your fridges processor (or storage space) could be used as overflow if your microwave oven decides it needs just a little extra power to do what you're telling it to ... all the way up to your personal communications system (conceptually, at the time, just-another-appliance).

      I, personally, have been waiting for years to see what comes of TRON and the OSS movement - having had one foot firmly planted in both boats - and so for this sort of event to occur is very motivational indeed...

      --
      ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
    13. Re:question by nevets · · Score: 1

      Development. It is much easier to develop on an embedded device if it is running the same OS as your desktop. On the desktop, you only need to simulate the device drivers, but the software can be tested natively.

      Also having a single OS that is supported quite well has its advantages too. Linux does offer a reusability and a standard api, where as other embedded OSs need to be almost completely designed for a different device (vxWorks).

      --
      Steven Rostedt
      -- Nevermind
    14. Re:question by Wolfrider · · Score: 1

      How about a Beowulf Cluster of embedded fanatical penguins carrying rocket launchers and posters of Natalie Portman covered in hot grits??

      --
      .
      == WolfriderV6 == I'm willing to admit that *I just might* be wrong... Are you??
  5. DARN!! by Xandar01 · · Score: 4, Funny

    I was really hoping this had something to do with lightcycles and recognizers.

    --
    Life moves pretty fast; if you don't stop and look around once in a while, you could miss it. -FB
    1. Re:DARN!! by paulcammish · · Score: 1
      I was really hoping this had something to do with lightcycles and recognizers.

      To quote the Bit:

      YeS... YeS... YeS, YeS, YeS, YeS, YeS, YeS, YeS, YeS, YeS... Noooo!

  6. MCP! by Traicovn · · Score: 5, Funny

    Personally, I think that if we have a 'tron' linux that somewhere they better make something named 'MCP'. Maybe root should be replaced with the loggin MCP.... heheheh...

    --

    [Something witty and intelligent should have appeared here.]
    {Traicovn}
    1. Re:MCP! by Xpilot · · Score: 1

      Personally, I think that if we have a 'tron' linux that somewhere they better make something named 'MCP'

      Microsoft Control Program?

      --
      "Backups are for wimps. Real men upload their data to an FTP site and have everyone else mirror it." -- Linus Torvalds
    2. Re:MCP! by sharkey · · Score: 1
      Microsoft Control Program?

      MCP: Microsoft Crashing Program

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    3. Re:MCP! by doctor_oktagon · · Score: 1

      Unisys mainframes created long before Tron, but still in use today powering banks and airline booking systems have an MCP component of the basic OS (not sure if it was OS/1100 or the A-Series from the Sperry machines).

      They are batch-controlled systems and you submit jobs to the MCP for processing.

      I *loved* it when I saw it!

    4. Re:MCP! by uberdave · · Score: 1

      Master Control Program, actually. "I want him in the games until he dies playing."

  7. bad slashdot math by larry+bagina · · Score: 1, Funny

    I'm pretty sure Tron + Linux = "Li'l nuts"

    --
    Do you even lift?

    These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

  8. acronyms by shird · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Seriously, what is it with people completely bending the rules of acronyms just to make something sound cute/cool. "The Real-time Operating system Nucleus" should be called "TROSN"

    --
    I.O.U One Sig.
    1. Re:acronyms by Evil+Adrian · · Score: 3, Funny

      Totally. Rock on, lexical lad! ;-)

      --
      evil adrian
    2. Re:acronyms by Xandar01 · · Score: 1

      I agree. They were trying real hard to come up with something that would fit. Maybe they should have tried:

      The Really Obscure Nucleus
      Tiny Real-time Operational Neural-net
      Techno Real Op Net
      This Retarded Opportunistic Name

      --
      Life moves pretty fast; if you don't stop and look around once in a while, you could miss it. -FB
    3. Re:acronyms by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      That's GNU/TURD asshole!

      hee hee, neutered asshole.

    4. Re:acronyms by silvaran · · Score: 4, Funny

      "The Real-time Operating system Nucleus" should be called "TROSN"

      Bless you.

    5. Re:acronyms by VinniTheGeek · · Score: 1

      Just call it Trogdor and get it over with LET THE BURNINATION COMMENCE! http://www.homestarrunner.com

  9. TRON Linux Announced by joenobody · · Score: 3, Funny

    Japan - TRON Linux was announced and promptly sued into a smoking crater in the ground by Disney today. Disney representatives stated they were merely protecting their valuable intellectual property and that Linux is only used by thieves, anyways. MSFT rose 4 points.

    --

  10. In other news by worst_name_ever · · Score: 2, Funny

    Linux kernel renamed "Master Control Program".

    --

    In Soviet Rush, today's Tom Sawyer gets high on you.
    1. Re:In other news by fiftyfly · · Score: 1
      In other news... Linux kernel renamed "Master Control Program".

      pffft - that's GNUMCP to you, punk ;)

      --
      "Sanity is not statistical", George Orwell, "1984"
  11. Zippy Blue Lights by Myriad · · Score: 1, Redundant
    TRON + Linux = "T-Linux"

    Damnit, when I saw the headline I was thinking I'd finally get some cool 3D interface with zippy blue lights and neat sound FX!

    I'm soooo disappointed. Now I don't even get a angry-spooky-face-in-a-spinning-thing when the kernel panics.

    Blockwars: a realtime, multiplayer game similar to Tetris.

    --
    "They do not preach that their god will rouse them, a little before the Nuts work loose." Kipling, 'The Sons of Martha'
    1. Re:Zippy Blue Lights by Mr.+Bad+Example · · Score: 1

      Damnit, when I saw the headline I was thinking I'd finally get some cool 3D interface with zippy blue lights and neat sound FX!

      Look on the bright side. This way you don't get sentenced to the Game Grid and discorporated by a laser when the kernel panics.

  12. Obligatory TRON quote: by euxneks · · Score: 1

    Do you realize how many outside systems I've gone into? How many programs I've appropriated?

    Just thought that was appropriate =)

    --
    in girum imus nocte et consumimur igni
  13. patent... by g4dget · · Score: 2
    One interesting hurdle along the path is likely to be finding a way to build a dual-kernel system that can add T-Kernel's real-time capabilities to Linux's rich set of sophisticated OS features without violating the RTLinux patent.

    I don't see that as necessary. The validity of the patent seems very much in question to many people. I can't think of anybody better to test the validity of the patent than a large association of Japanese real-time companies.

    1. Re:patent... by phrantic · · Score: 1

      From what i can see (although the link to the link on the license in the aritcle is broken), it would appear that irrespective of whether the patent is valid or not, as long as you stick to the GPL you do not incur a license fee.

      I am not sure what license approach monta-vista use but i guess it is some flavour of the GPL.

      Getting back to the question of the validity of the patent itself, I have written individual tasks from real time RISC based applications (but I'm better now). What I would like to know is when does a "task" become complicated enough to be classed as a complete OS? Or what does a collection of code need to have to be classed as an (in)complete OS? I was charged with writing the communication task that talked to external devices, and spat the information to the "display" task. If you lump the comm and display task together is that an OS? Having not read the entire patent, I am not sure if there is a definition of what an OS is.

      --
      --My sig is bigger than your sig--
  14. Correction by The+OPTiCIAN · · Score: 1

    > TRON + Linux = "T-Linux"

    Surely it should be T-GNU/Linux.

    > creating a standardized software architecture
    > for embedded devices that takes (sic) advantage
    > of open source software and the benefits of
    > Linux (sic)

    Imagine a baerwolf cluster of those!

    --


    Believe with me, my saplings.
    1. Re:Correction by watzinaneihm · · Score: 1

      Or GNU/T/Linux.
      Certainly sounds better

      --
      .ACMD setaloiv siht gnidaeR
    2. Re:Correction by Surak · · Score: 1

      No, no, no ... that's T-GNU/TRON/GNU/Linux

      -- rms

  15. standardized software architecture??? by amalcon · · Score: 1

    "in the hopes of creating a standardized software architecture for embedded devices that takes advantage of open source software and the benefits of Linux."
    Um...I'm failing to see something here. What could possibly come out of this that's more standard than *nix? It seems that they are just trying to piggyback their core in on top of a current "standard..."

    And, just to beat the horse even further to death, !

    --
    -Amalcon
  16. Trademark infringement w/ Mentor's Nucleus RTOS? by mkettler · · Score: 3, Interesting
    As much as I despise frivolous trademark infringement suits, this one seems to be strongly in favor the side of the trademark holder, were it to become an issue.

    Mentor, the makers of the real time operating system "Nucleus" (tm), would appear to have reasonable grounds for confusion with a product in the same market place "The Real Time Operating system Nucleus Linux" aka TRON-Linux.

    http://www.mentor.com/nucleus/

    Sure you can argue Nucleus is a general term, but I doubt that argument holds much weight when both names are used in the same market. Heck, these two are even in the same tiny corner of the computer word (realtime operating systems).

    Of course, IANAL, much less a trademark specialist. Anyone more educated on the topic care to comment?

    --
    -Matt
  17. I'll SUE! by de_boer_man · · Score: 4, Funny

    In related news a flurry of lawsuits were recently filed:

    The first was filed by Disney, because they OWN TRON.

    The second was filed by SCO, because they OWN Unix, and this whole TRON thing might somehow cut into their profits.

    The third was also filed by SCO. It was a billion dollar lawsuit against Disney. SCO also threatened to pull Disney's TRON license, which could prevent Disney from using bits, light cycles, or recognizers, or strange old men rotating in I/O towers at any future time.

    --
    .sig wanted. Inquire within.
  18. I'll be laughing when... by Tuxinatorium · · Score: 1

    ...Disney sues them for violating their "Tron" trademark. Come to think of it, one of these days I should get around to trademarking every possible 3- letter acronym that isn't already taken. I could extort gazillions of $$$ out of honest companies with that kind of IP-squatting.

  19. answer by djupedal · · Score: 2, Informative

    Silly question, perhaps...the news last month from Japan explained that the manufs. there are simply looking to be MS free. And since they've recognized that their own efforts have failed, while Linux is growing, they've bitten the bullet and moved on.

    Of course there are other reasons, but how much more of a reason should they need.

  20. Makes sense to me by mao+che+minh · · Score: 2, Interesting
    It makes perfect sense. How can you have a truly standard hardware architecture that software developers and hardware engineers can work with openly, if it isn't all open source from the ground up (so to speak)? If you are going to push for such a model, why not choose the most established (and the most popular and the most coporate backed) open source operating system? This insures maximum future interoperability.

    Besides, it's just a start. Once you have such a moidel in place, other open source OSs would be just as welcome. You just have to start as simply as possible. Right?

  21. Re:Unlikely by ewhac · · Score: 2, Informative

    I was reading about TRON in Byte Magazine in the mid-1980's. This almost certainly pre-dates anything Mentor has done, much less registered.

    Schwab

  22. Ahem! by marhar · · Score: 1

    Don't you mean GNU/T-Linux... and on RMS's birthday, for shame!

  23. TRON Code by LimeColoredSloth · · Score: 1

    What's cool about TRON is the TRON code character encoding format, which supports all Unicode characters and more. By switching between different character set planes (like ISO 2022 does), they do away with pesky Unicode surrogate pairs, which not even Windows 2000 supports.

  24. Re:Trademark infringement w/ Mentor's Nucleus RTOS by dvdeug · · Score: 1

    Mentor, the makers of the real time operating system "Nucleus" (tm), would appear to have reasonable grounds for confusion with a product in the same market place "The Real Time Operating system Nucleus Linux" aka TRON-Linux.

    TRON is a system that dates back at least to the early 80s. Nucleus - their website is obviously targeted for marketing droids - probably postdates it, making a trademark infringement suit pointless and possibly dangerous.

    Also, Nucleus has little grounds for a trademark infringement suit with TRON - the N could be changed, as the system is always called TRON.

  25. Re:Trademark infringement w/ Mentor's Nucleus RTOS by dvdeug · · Score: 1

    The TRON project was started in 1984*, meaning they've been using the name for 15 years. If Nucleus wanted to press a claim, they would lose and possibly be countersued for trademark infringement, or just have the trademark lost as a generic term.

    *
    http://tronweb.super-nova.co.jp/projecthistory.h tm l

  26. Re:What a stretch by Narchie+Troll · · Score: 1

    Yes, the Japanese are known for their fanatical devotion to watching non-animated American Disney movies in English.
    I bet EVERY geek over in Japan knows about the movie Tron, considering that all geeks are culturally exactly the same everywhere.

  27. Wow, this reminds me of an old bet I won... by L0stb0Y · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This reminds me of the time I won $5 from a guy because he didn't believe me that "TRON" was short for "TRace ON"- (and the TROFF , well duh)~

    Was the same guy who didn't understand why I kept calling ! "bang" >:)

    --
    "We are the music makers, and we are the dreamers of dreams."
  28. Personally I think the patent is bogus by msobkow · · Score: 2, Interesting

    All that I see RTLinux doing is acting as a microkernel that can switch between OS personalities. It just so happens that they lost their way and created a whole real-time OS instead of setting it up as a personality over the microkernel.

    The other way of looking at the RTLinux patent is that they've patented the idea of running a VM hosted OS under a real-time system. Again, that just doesn't make sense as an enforceable patent or you could start patenting any specific combination of host and guest systems.

    Maybe there is something buried in the patent that I didn't understand, but to me it just seems like patenting a specific case of the obvious. Then again, I thought (and still think) that patents like Amazon's one-click were asinine and unenforceable, yet no one's managed to knock the stupid thing down yet.

    --
    I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
  29. Re:Trademark infringement w/ Mentor's Nucleus RTOS by mkettler · · Score: 1

    Fair enough, I obviously didn't do my homework on the TRON half of TRON-Linux, and assumed it was a newer project.

    Thanks to all who provided answers and insight.

    --
    -Matt
  30. Not a chance by msobkow · · Score: 2, Informative

    "Nucleus" has been around for a rather long time, usually used to indicate the center or core of something (analagous to the nucleus of a cell.)

    Even more damning for any attempt by Mentor to enforce any copyright claims is the fact that terms like "nucleus" and "core" have been used in operating systems textbooks and papers since the seventies.

    TRON also only uses the word as part of an acronym, not as part of a trademark.

    The biggest issue would be (as others have pointed out) that TRON existed long before Mentor's Nucleus RTOS.

    --
    I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
  31. CPU's? by rf0 · · Score: 1

    Looking over the article is says that TRON supports SH, MR, ARM, and MIPS. These I can understand and am happy with the idea. Now I'm not trolling but would there be any benefit or using linux's x86 code and running embedded systems on Intel/AMD or are they to big/hot/complicated/etc to be of any use in embedded systems?

    Rus

    1. Re:CPU's? by bobthemonkey13 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Um... According to the Linux Kernel Archives:
      Linux was first developed for 32-bit x86-based PCs (386 or higher). These days it also runs on (at least) the Compaq Alpha AXP, Sun SPARC and UltraSPARC, Motorola 68000, PowerPC, PowerPC64, ARM, Hitachi SuperH, IBM S/390, MIPS, HP PA-RISC, Intel IA-64, DEC VAX, AMD x86-64 and CRIS architectures.
      So, I'm guessing that they would use that existing kernel code on existing hardware rather than switching to x86. Desktop-oriented x86 chips by Intel and AMD are way too power-hungry and hot to be of any use in most embedded systems -- about the smallest thing you'd find one in would be a game console. Other x86-compatibles such as VIA's Eden might be a bit more practical, but still out of the range of what T-Linux seems to be targeted at. Really, the x86 architecture was never intended for this kind of use (and is horribly broken in general, and probably should be done away with altogether, but that's another rant).
  32. Oh My! by Icephreak1 · · Score: 1

    Blasphemy! How dare you take the good TRON's name in vain!

    - IP

  33. neato by ohzero · · Score: 1

    Maybe we can all wear neon clothes and roll around on geometric objects while we kernel tune.

    --
    -- http://www.criticalassets.com
  34. T-Linux? by anno1602 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Noooo! Deutsche Telekom, take your hands off Linux!

    For those who don't know them, about every product as a T prefixed: T-Mobile, T-Net, T-Systems, T-Online... and now T-LInux)

  35. Re:Let me get this straight... by patrixmyth · · Score: 1

    No, No, not even close...
    Mullah Noah, and that whole Great Flood thing...
    Come on... even assuming a world population of only, say 10,000 that would mean an extinction on the scale of 99.99% at least, and that's just the humans, nevermind the animals.

    (I always wondered though, did they have to load up 2 dolphins, as well, or was it just the land animals that had to pay for man's evil?)

    --
    "Don't you know you're going to shock the monkey?"- Peter Gabriel
  36. Re:Let me get this straight... by Icephreak1 · · Score: 1

    Ain't my war. I'm Canadian. Blame me.

  37. So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    ..If you read and believe in the Bible, that's quite wrong.

    Cain was not a terrorist. His goal was not terror, nor was it to overthrow a government, or liberate any supposedly oppressed people, yadda yadda. (Note: AFAICT, there was no government at that time.)

    Cain was a murderer, plain and simple. His goal was to off Abel. Which he did with great gusto.

    If you want a real Biblical terrorist, look at the rest of the Old Testament. God's probably the top-rated terrorist - the Great Flood and the Angel of Death and plagues in Egypt spring immediately to mind.

    I'm unsure as to whether the Israelites can be considered terrorists. Sure, they slaughtered men and took the heathen women that were foolishly living in 'their' 'holy land', but then, their actions are more reminiscent of military conquest.

    A brutal, bloody conquest, but a conquest none-the-less.

    And now for something completely different: If you pray to God, you're supporting terrorism!

  38. I'd rather they worked on BTRON by kahei · · Score: 1

    ...seeing as it's already the standard TRON for the desktop and actually has unique TRON-style features (i.e. the universal character set).

    Bolting TRON and Linux together does not seem to offer any particular advantages to the world as a whole, although it might be an advantage to TRON.

    Use BTRON today! Documentation probably Japanese only but still in many ways easier to read than GNU Info.

    --
    Whence? Hence. Whither? Thither.
  39. Re:Sounds great by Lazarus2k2001 · · Score: 1

    He is talking about QNX, a real time operating system from europe.

    --
    "Holy instant noodle"
  40. They also announced a new ad slogan: by sammy+baby · · Score: 2, Funny

    "TRON - fighting for the users."

  41. Ooohh by Jack+Comics · · Score: 1

    I always wanted Bruce Boxleitner inside my machine ... but then with a certain Bruce Boxleitner character's penchant for nuclear weapons, does my machine become a weapon of mass destruction?

    --
    "We are all in the gutter, but some of us are looking at the stars." - Oscar Wilde
  42. Virus Proof? by Fig,+formerly+A.C. · · Score: 1
    The T-Linux is only susceptible to the mutagenic T-Virus, product of the Umbrella corporation's CS division buried deep under Racoon City.

    Lame, I know, but it's a slow day at work.

    --
    Murphy was an optimist.
  43. Test post by dbarclay10 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Test post, please ignore.

    --

    Barclay family motto:
    Aut agere aut mori.
    (Either action or death.)
  44. Re:Let me get this straight... by Lispy · · Score: 1

    This is soooooo lame. Forgive me, but I have about 70 years on this planet. I didn't START this war, i didn't attack any NCY-buildings and I def don't intend to. My personal believe is that the slashdot crowd (and Opensource folk in general) are open minded and world-aware people with a FOCUS on Computers and Electronics. So why don't you just let us do what we live for and continue with whatever meaningful you have been doing. I BET every Slashdotter has an opinion about the current situation but they don't discuss it on Slashdot since it's just not the right place. FYI I'm german and I get flamed pretty often, lately, so I come here to relax...

    take care and get well soon,
    Lispy

  45. Re:Coalition of the Willing by Zider · · Score: 1

    And what exactly does this has to do with embedded systems?