Slashdot Mirror


New Animatrix Trailer Available

hin writes "The new trailer of the Animatrix is available for download from www.whatisthematrix.com. Check out the medium resolution version." Use the broadband if you got it I guess ;)

200 comments

  1. high-resolution download by MiTEG · · Score: 5, Informative

    Link to Hi-res (104487 KB)

    Hammer away- I just finished downloading :)

    --
    The future isn't what it used to be.
    1. Re:high-resolution download by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      w00t. Thanks. I went straight to the comments hoping for the DIRECT link to be posted. :)

      And only 11 comments posted so far.

    2. Re:high-resolution download by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      It'll be on Gnutella in about 30 seconds. I'd encourage anybody else who's gotten it already to do the same.

    3. Re:high-resolution download by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And right after it, the movie itself, right?

      Or does this qualify as something we should pay for? If so, why? Why should we pay for it if we can get it for free? Right?

      Oh, but this is cool, so we should pay for it. Everything else sux. Right?

      Hear that sound? It's the sound of cold logic stomping eight shades of dogshit out of that "everything for free" drivel we hear constantly.

      Can't have it both ways, fellas.

    4. Re:high-resolution download by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
      The "DIRECT" links are hidden, and for good reason: it costs them serious money to host these huge video files!

      At least visit the damn site -- and maybe *gasp* glance at an advertisement -- before you suck down 100+ MegaBytes of pure data at their expense.

    5. Re:high-resolution download by satanami69 · · Score: 1

      That would be awesome, if say, there was
      any advertisements on the site to look at.

      The trailer *is* the ad, and that's what I
      will end up looking at.

      --
      I really hate Dan Patrick.
    6. Re:high-resolution download by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, the first 4 movies are being made avalible for free in hopes that you'll buy the DVD with all (9?) of them when it comes out...

    7. Re:high-resolution download by cortices · · Score: 1

      Guess what? They might've fooled you with all the shiny effects, but what we are downloading....*gasp*...IS THE ADVERTISEMENT (albeit an entertaining one).

      As for more traditional advertising, as others have pointed out, there isn't any.

      --
      You can't kill the boogey man.
  2. Its a dupe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
    1. Re:Its a dupe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      now thats funny ;oP

  3. Spoilers! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Yeah thanks for the spoiler. Now we know the plan to destroy the matrix was to simply link to it on slashdot.

    1. Re:Spoilers! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Spoliers! Who wants some spoilers? Here's a spoiler.... you will die alone.

    2. Re:Spoilers! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      oh wow... that joke was the best!

      For me to poop on.

    3. Re:Spoilers! by Spy+Hunter · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Jokes about slashdotting the matrix trailers are getting reeeealy old, because it doesn't happen. Every time a new animatrix story is posted someone jokes about slashdotting it, but the trailers are always available at speeds of above 500KB/sec even right after the story is posted, when it is still the first story on Slashdot's front page. Believe it or not, there are sites out there with more bandwidth than Slashdot, and AOL-Time-Warner sites are a prime example.

      --
      main(c,r){for(r=32;r;) printf(++c>31?c=!r--,"\n":c<r?" ":~c&r?" `":" #");}
    4. Re:Spoilers! by j-pimp · · Score: 1

      Believe it or not, there are sites out there with more bandwidth than Slashdot, and AOL-Time-Warner sites are a prime example.

      Yes, but the tru power of slashdot is the concentration of that bandwidth being used to deliver a single page full of links, and the large amount of people who upon seeing a new story, will click on the links in it. Shashdot probally does indeed put a dent in AOL time warners available bandwidth, I also doubt that very few sites, mabey CNN and MSN could indeed harness the power of its readership to produce a slashdot like effect. Of course If MSN or CNN were to attempt to slashdot slashdot, they probally would. Then again, the revenue generated via the ad clicking would be great.

      --
      --- Justin Dearing http://www.justaprogrammer.net/ We're just programmers.
    5. Re:Spoilers! by Kong+the+Medium · · Score: 1

      I imagine it right now:

      MSN and CNN conspire to /. /.. And the first link on the the first article is something like goa*tse.cx.

      Hoardes of elderly women all over the world get heart attacks and 100's of law suits erupt.

      Hmm, maybe that's a way to get rid og this horrible picture.

      --
      ... whenever a text is transmitted, variation occurs. This is because human beings are careless, fallible, and occasiona
    6. Re:Spoilers! by Gekko · · Score: 1

      Actually all jokes about slashdotting are OLD as hell. It doesn't matter if they happen or not, they are still not funny, and you know, we have heard them all before.

      --
      I mod down any one who says "I'm sure I will get modded down for this"
    7. Re:Spoilers! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good GOD!!! Hell has frozen over. Buurrrrrrrrr (chilly)

    8. Re:Spoilers! by freeweed · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure the joke was about slashdotting the Matrix ITSELF, not AOL/Apple/whoever hosts these trailers. But thanks for coming out.

      --
      Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
  4. AniMath by Madsci · · Score: 5, Funny

    Next up: AniMoivre's Theorem, AniMarkov Chains and AniModular Forms

    --
    Your paranoia is about as subtle as the alien probe in your neck.
    1. Re:AniMath by anonymous+loser · · Score: 1

      I think I've lost my AniMarbles.

    2. Re:AniMath by Kong+the+Medium · · Score: 1

      This joke needs to be reAnimated :-).

      I salute you with a nice glass of Pernod, an Anis liquor.

      --
      ... whenever a text is transmitted, variation occurs. This is because human beings are careless, fallible, and occasiona
  5. Has anyone gotten these to work on Linux? by Iainuki · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I tried the last one with mplayer, but didn't have much luck. Anyone know if there are some gymnastics I can perform?

    1. Re:Has anyone gotten these to work on Linux? by peter_gzowski · · Score: 4, Informative

      I assume you mean besides the Crossover Quicktime plugin?

      --
      "Now gluttony and exploitation serves eight!" - TV's Frank
    2. Re:Has anyone gotten these to work on Linux? by Call+Me+Black+Cloud · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Yes. Write your own player. That's the great thing about the Linux community and open source. If there's not a solution, anyone can make one. If there's a bug, anyone can fix it.

      Go forth and do your part.

    3. Re:Has anyone gotten these to work on Linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      I have the first two working in Totem (XINE-based) after installing the Quicktime Sorenson codecs.

      There's a patch going around to make MPlayer handle these very strangely encoded videos.

    4. Re:Has anyone gotten these to work on Linux? by Spy+Hunter · · Score: 4, Informative

      Works fine for me. The actual animatrix movies have some funky still image at the beginning that confuses mplayer, but xine seems to work better (and I hear there's a patch for mplayer). This trailer doesn't have that, and it works perfectly.

      --
      main(c,r){for(r=32;r;) printf(++c>31?c=!r--,"\n":c<r?" ":~c&r?" `":" #");}
    5. Re:Has anyone gotten these to work on Linux? by Genyin · · Score: 3, Informative

      The first animatrix works fine in the latest release (rc5) of mplayer with the quicktime codecs. It didn't work in rc3 when I tried, so the patch was applied sometime in between there. (but the fix mentioned elsewhere was applied at some point, I checked the sources)

      Presumably they're all encoded similarly...

    6. Re:Has anyone gotten these to work on Linux? by Gortbusters.org · · Score: 2, Funny

      There are many forms of gymnastics you can perform... the end result will be that you are nimble and agile, and still can't view these things in mplayer :P

      --
      --------
      Free your mind.
    7. Re:Has anyone gotten these to work on Linux? by Abcd1234 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Yup... the only trick is that some of the movies have their audio encoded/split funny.

      In the first episode, the small and large versions have the soundtrack split into two pieces, of which mplayer only plays the longest. Hence, audio is delayed 10 seconds... solution? Play the medium sized one which, oddly enough, isn't like this. Another option is to dump the audio from the medium version (using -dumpaudio and -dumpfile) and play it alongside the large version with mplayer's -audiofile option.

      For the second episode (and presumably the remaining ones), the audio is encoded using MPEG4-AAC. Unfortunately, mplayer's support was broken for mp4a (at least in rc4, is this fixed in rc5?). The solution here was to dump the audio stream using mplayer and manually decode it using faad (search google). Then, play the resulting wav file along with the video using -audiofile.

    8. Re:Has anyone gotten these to work on Linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Use Windows, Linux sux.

      - Bill G.

    9. Re:Has anyone gotten these to work on Linux? by wheany · · Score: 1

      Anyone who can program can do it. You know, there are people who just want to use their computer and possibly know nothing of programming.

    10. Re:Has anyone gotten these to work on Linux? by BJH · · Score: 5, Informative

      I just did this, so here it goes...

      1) Install libsndfile if you don't have it. (http://www.zip.com.au/~erikd/libsndfile/#Download )

      2) Install faac to get sound on the trailer (http://faac.sourceforge.net/download.php)

      3) You probably want to install xvid as well... nothing to do with the Animatrix, but the more codecs, the better, right? (http://www.xvid.org/downloads.html)

      4) Go to http://www.mplayerhq.hu/MPlayer/releases/codecs/ and grab:

      Latest Win32 codecpack
      QuickTime6 DLLs
      QuickTime extra DLLs
      RealPlayer9 codecs
      XAnim DLLs
      MJPEG2000 DLLs
      Win32/DMO codecs

      Untar them and move them all into someplace like /usr/local/lib/mplayer/dlls.

      5) Get the latest mplayer source (0.9.0rc5) and run configure with something like this: ./configure --enable-largefiles --with-extraincdir=/usr/local/include --with-extralibdir=/usr/local/lib --with-win32libdir=/usr/local/lib/mplayer/dlls --with-xanimlibdir=/usr/local/lib/mplayer/dlls --with-reallibdir=/usr/local/lib/mplayer/dlls

      and then do the usual make/su/make install thing.

      With any luck, you should be able to play back the trailer.

      And who said Linux isn't easy to use, eh?!

    11. Re:Has anyone gotten these to work on Linux? by Bandman · · Score: 2, Informative

      just make sure that you've added the Sorenson codecs. If you go to the mplayer webpage, there is a place where you can download a ton of addons. Get the sorenson addons, plug them into the directory, and it should work. Hopefully :-)

    12. Re:Has anyone gotten these to work on Linux? by dorward · · Score: 1
      There was some discussion on the mplayer-users list, and a patch. Apparently the results aren't very good.

      On the other hand, Xine can play the first two episodes without any problems whatsoever.

    13. Re:Has anyone gotten these to work on Linux? by Darth+Maul · · Score: 1

      Thank you! I was missing the faad library so mplayer couldn't play the sound. With your little mini-HOWTO I was just able to watch the new trailer. I appreciate the time you took to write that out.

      --
      --- witty signature
    14. Re:Has anyone gotten these to work on Linux? by Robotech_Master · · Score: 1

      I did what you said...but when I tried to watch the movie, it didn't work. I tried to post the output, but Slashdot's retarted message validation system wouldn't let me. Too few characters per line, too many junk characters...bleah.

      Can you provide any further helpful hints? Something I forgot to do? An email address so I can email you the console output?

      It's annoying...at least in my *old* compile I could watch some Quicktime movies, albeit without the sound...now it won't start at all.

      --
      Editor Emeritus and Senior Writer, TeleRead.org
    15. Re:Has anyone gotten these to work on Linux? by Robotech_Master · · Score: 1

      OK, ignore my other message...I got mplayer to play quicktime. However...

      I compiled and installed faac, but mplayer still won't play the sound for that new Matrix trailer. It says, "Requested audio codec family [faad] (afm=faad) not available (enable it at compilation)". But the DOCS/codec documentation doesn't say anything about faad. How do I enable it in the compilation? And do I need to install the faad package from that site as well as the faac?

      --
      Editor Emeritus and Senior Writer, TeleRead.org
    16. Re:Has anyone gotten these to work on Linux? by Robotech_Master · · Score: 1

      Not entirely sure how, but I managed to get FAAD to work after all. Neat trailer.

      --
      Editor Emeritus and Senior Writer, TeleRead.org
    17. Re:Has anyone gotten these to work on Linux? by BJH · · Score: 1

      My apologies - I should have been a bit more specific.

      Did you download and install this file? Or another one?

      If you did install that file, did you run ldconfig as root before compiling mplayer? (That one caught me out - the installation of faac/faad doesn't do it for you, so mplayer won't autodetect it when compiling.)

    18. Re:Has anyone gotten these to work on Linux? by BJH · · Score: 1

      Never mind, I just saw your next post ;)

    19. Re:Has anyone gotten these to work on Linux? by Robotech_Master · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and subsequently on recompile it worked. Even though the compile errored out in the middle of building the frontend.

      --
      Editor Emeritus and Senior Writer, TeleRead.org
    20. Re:Has anyone gotten these to work on Linux? by t0ny · · Score: 1

      No, I think he is looking for a Win32 app that doesnt gay up his machine, like QuickTime will.

      --

      Manipulate the moderator system! Mod someone as "overrated" today.

    21. Re:Has anyone gotten these to work on Linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know, on my mac I just clicked on the link and got to watch it.

    22. Re:Has anyone gotten these to work on Linux? by dfj225 · · Score: 1

      You think, with OS X being based on Unix, Apple would just release quicktime for us on linux and make this easy for us. :-P

      --
      SIGFAULT
    23. Re:Has anyone gotten these to work on Linux? by paulcammish · · Score: 1
      [4 million lines of instructions]

      And who said Linux isn't easy to use, eh?!

      Me. And you just backed up up right there. :)

      Im being serious - until you can just download something and run it, and Quicktime etc works perfectly first time (like... *gasp* Windows or the Mac), theres zero chance youre going to get any real inroads into the home desktop market.

      If i devoted enougth time to it, I could get all my hardware working on Linux - the problem is all the hassle you have to do to get the most simple things working. Its just not worth my time... yet.

      Heres hoping...

    24. Re:Has anyone gotten these to work on Linux? by BJH · · Score: 1

      Strangely enough, I was actually being ironic ;)

  6. The Complete Works by Ken@WearableTech · · Score: 5, Informative

    You can find two complete works at www.intothematrix.com
    They are The Second Renaissance Part 1 and Program (Both QuickTime)

    You can also see Final Flight of The Osiris at the theaters with Dreamcatcher or with your favorite P2P software.

    1. Re:The Complete Works by asreal · · Score: 1

      I went to see Dreamcatcher too, and I actually enjoyed the Animatrix segment more than I enjoyed the feature. Long ago (longer than my lifetime, anyway) there were always several short films before the feature. I wouldn't mind seeing a return to that.

    2. Re:The Complete Works by BJH · · Score: 1

      Hey, they've got the Japanese versions online as well! And I was sitting here thinking "Great. More crappy American-accented dubbing".

      This is one of the few times when my ADSL has been the bottleneck in downloading multiple files from the same site...

    3. Re:The Complete Works by Tridus · · Score: 1

      I've looked for it on Kazaa, but all I ended up getting was The Second Renaissance which was renamed.

      --
      -- "So they told me that using the download page to download something was not something they anticipated." - Bill Gates
  7. Re:Let me get this straight by contagen · · Score: 5, Insightful

    if we focused on everything that was bad in the world, we'd all be sad and pissed off all the time (much like you seem to be atm)...you can still enjoy life with negative things going on around you. If you're like me(and i'd guess most of us), you've been blasted by the media with details of this war for the past 72 hours straight....take a break for a while and watch a good cartoon. -WB

  8. DreamCatcher has a new Animatrix Mini by mgpeter · · Score: 5, Informative

    I went to DreamCatcher tonight with my wife and my daughter (a Stephen King Fan), and after all the previews they showed a 10 minute (or so) Animatrix Mini called "Final flight of the Osirus" and I have got to say I was Totally Embarrassed.

    I could not believe the fight scene (or should I say SEX SCENE) at the beginning. Whoever they got to do the animation needs to go get some, and soon!

    If the Matrix Movies are going to be more like that short, the sequel is going to blow worse than Caddyshack 2.

    1. Re:DreamCatcher has a new Animatrix Mini by tezzery · · Score: 4, Informative

      The 'Final Flight of The Osiris' animatrix episode was done by Square USA, it was directed by Andy Jones who has done work on Final Fantasy, Titanic and 1998's Godzilla.

      I'm sure this is common knowledge among those who've seen previous animatrix episodes but there will be a DVD release with the whole collection of shorts.

      I -was- gonna go see Dreamcatcher to check out final flight of the osiris.. After reading your review, I hope at least the animation is good.

    2. Re:DreamCatcher has a new Animatrix Mini by SensitiveMale · · Score: 1

      Animatrix Mini called "Final flight of the Osirus" and I have got to say I was Totally Embarrassed.

      Apparently you didn't hear about the original name

      "Flight of the Resurrection"

      After the other movie bombed, they renamed it.

    3. Re:DreamCatcher has a new Animatrix Mini by gad_zuki! · · Score: 4, Funny

      >and I have got to say I was Totally Embarrassed.

      Hold on here. Dreamcatcher is an R rated horror movie full of graphic monsters and the like inspiring fear into the crowd, but a little uber-soft "sex play" hedonism is wrong?

      Let me guess, you're an American.

    4. Re:DreamCatcher has a new Animatrix Mini by shut_up_man · · Score: 1

      Interesting to also note that the Animatrix episode "Matriculated" is done by Peter Chung, the guy who did the Aeon Flux series...

    5. Re:DreamCatcher has a new Animatrix Mini by SILIZIUMM · · Score: 1

      Yeah the first thing I thought when I saw the fight scene was "I want a wallpaper of that on my desktop tomorrow" :)

    6. Re:DreamCatcher has a new Animatrix Mini by LFS.Morpheus · · Score: 1

      Yea; sad, isnt it.

      --
      The space unintentionally left unblank.
    7. Re:DreamCatcher has a new Animatrix Mini by nutshell42 · · Score: 1

      Where are the mod points when you need them?
      +1 Funny/Insightful (your choice =)

      --
      Don't think of it as a flame---it's more like an argument that does 3d6 fire damage
    8. Re:DreamCatcher has a new Animatrix Mini by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I saw Osiris, and damn it looked JUST LIKE Final Fantasy. I swear a couple of the human models were the same character from Final Fantasy. The animation looked exactly the same, right down to the terrible lip movements.

    9. Re:DreamCatcher has a new Animatrix Mini by mbourgon · · Score: 1

      Went this morning - after reading the reviews, decided to skip the actual movie. And the trailer was worth the $$$. Not only was the animation really well done (as well as Final Fantasy movie, no surprise there), but the story added to the whole "Matrix" experience, the fight scenes were just as good as that of the movie, the pacing was good, breathtaking overall, etc, etc. IMHO, if you're a fan, it's worth the money to see it on a big screen. If not, wait till June and rent/buy the DVD.

      Only gripe whatsoever - more time with her "running" to her destination. That part was almost perfunctory, after the "jump". But, overall:
      Whoa.

      --
      "Sometimes a woman is a kind of religion, she can save your soul & set you free from all your sins" - Bad Examples
  9. Dreamcatcher by jmays · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Just a random FYI ...

    The Matrix: Reloaded has a teaser in front of Dreamcatcher ... one I had not seen prior to tonight.

    --
    KARMA TAG! You're it.
  10. Feeling OK, Taco? by InterruptDescriptorT · · Score: 4, Funny

    Geez, dude. check-it-out is the best thing you can come up with for the department, and you finish off by saying, 'if you've got it, I guess?'

    Wanna talk about it? C'mon, I'll buy you a beer. (As in free.)

    --
    Karma: Excellent Birds (mostly as a result of listening to Laurie Anderson)
  11. 1st trailer works, 2nd trailer doesn't... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    with the QuickTime-for-Windows version I happen to have. And no, I'm not going to "download the latest version" because I'm sick of downloading the lastest version, and each upgrade appears more spywareish than the last.

  12. Playing now on Kazaa! by imag0 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Ok, i've downloaded the link in the story, and working on the large download now, which should be just a few minutes. Everyone, mirror and share!

  13. Umm... by red5 · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Didn't this trailer comeout weeks ago? Am I missing something?

    --
    I know I'm going to hell, I'm just trying to get good seats.
    1. Re:Umm... by apothoray · · Score: 1

      the second one has been out for a while. the previous article heralding it's release is here.

    2. Re:Umm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, it did...but there's always someone who never gets the word.

  14. wow. by Capt'n+Hector · · Score: 1

    "osiris" looks most impressive. Photorealistic even. Absolutely amazing. It's even better than FF. And that girl is damned hot :)

    --
    Quid festinatio swallonis est aetherfuga inonusti?
    Africus aut Europaeus?
  15. I just don't get it by stevens · · Score: 5, Insightful

    In the first Matrix movie, Neo is supposed to be the hero. He is supposed to deliver humanity from a scourge of machines that, with AI, decided we were expendable.

    But the first Animatrix makes we humans, pretty much en masse, into horrible villains. It's the same tired old Humanity Is Cruel And Stupid line. Yawn. What's worse is that it tries to make you root for the machines!

    So which is it, Wachowskis? Machines are evil, or all of humanity?

    I don't care for yet more everything-is-grey-there-is-no-morality bullshit, either. Oh well, I guess I'll wait and see.

    1. Re:I just don't get it by Blaine+Hilton · · Score: 1

      My question is how many are there going to be? When you have a great movie, topping it with sequal after sequal is very hard.

    2. Re:I just don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Truth is a three-edged sword.

    3. Re:I just don't get it by red5 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well it's done in the form of a historical document. History is written by the winers, remember?

      --
      I know I'm going to hell, I'm just trying to get good seats.
    4. Re:I just don't get it by Calmiche · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Umm. I hate to throw myself into this feeding frenzy, but the Wachowski brothers never made the point that the machines were evil.

      In fact, from several lines in the original Matrix, it is apparent that the machines were simply defending themselves. Humans released the bombs that clouded the skies, hoping to kill the robots.

      The Agents tell (Morpheous, I think) that the first matrix they created was a paradise, but that humans rejected it. Without pain and suffering, humans couldn't exist. The Machines were trying to keep humans as happy as they could.

      And humans were never expendable. The machines needed the energy produced by humans to exist.

      I think it's more a case of "When does self defense and the right to exist clash with the right of others to do the same?" In otherwords, Neither humans nor AI is truly evil. They are both just trying to preserve their own lives. Calmiche

    5. Re:I just don't get it by brett42 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's in the form of a document in a 'Zion archive', which seems to indicate it was created by humans. It could just be a copy of robotic propaganda, but I think the narration was the same as the "welcome to the Zion archive" voice.

    6. Re:I just don't get it by tabby · · Score: 1

      More to the point we don't know when this archive is. It's the Zion archive so we assume that humans survive, and perhaps its a long time after the machines have been defeated and we have the hindsight to realise that it was all our own fault. Or maybe the machines just like to keep copies of everything, even the human's zion archive.

      Of course there is the fact that the machines keep humans conscious in the matrix, why not grow us as vegetables... it would solve a lot of problems.

      --
      I've experiments to run, there is research to be done on the people who are still alive.
    7. Re:I just don't get it by Kenny.EXE+-P666- · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Welcome to life pal, get used to it. Yes this movie is entertainment, but to claim that it should not have grey areas is a disservice to people like me who have been bitching for more intelligent plots in movies for years. Of course we can all live simple lives believing in "black and white" or "right and wrong" theories such as:

      1. File traders are thieves who should go to jail indefinity for supporting terrorism.

      2. Open source software is created and supported by immature and antisocial guys who still have acne and have no girlfriend to speak of while actively supporting and contributing to the "black hat" hacker community.

      3. Computer game developers are people who are trying to make money off of destroying our children's morality by ensuring our children are desensitized to violence and are actively encouraged to kill in real life like they do in all video games, because all video games are extremely violent in nature. Come on, my kid* was running after his neighbor with a hammer because he saw Kirby use a hammer in "Kirby's Dreamland 3." Mind you this has absolutely nothing to do with the fact that I should not have given my kid* a hammer in the first place.
      *Kid does not actually exist. (Thank God! :)

      4. Computer gamers are guys who are completely antisocial, also have an acne problem, and of course no girlfriend. They are the direct cause of all violence in our society and should be psychologically treated and take up more healthy pursuits such as football** or other sports which has absolutely no violent content despite terminology coming from warfare such as "Long Bomb" and "Blitz."
      ** I have absolutely nothing against football, but this happened to be the perfect example for what I was trying to say above. I am attempting to point out that "acceptable entertainment" can also be inherently violent.

      Ok I have shown 4 examples of what happens when you take all the grey areas out of a group of people and lump them all into 1 category. Obviously, this is not how the real world works, nor should it be.

      So you are going to ask me, What the hell does this have to do with "The Matrix?" Simple, Neo and his colleagues are born or "grown" into an environment where they are given 3 options: fight, die, or become a battery. Although they may or may not be pissed about the decisions human beings made nearly 200 years earlier, they are still stuck with a war and the fact that they have to fight or die. So yes, Neo is a hero to humans, which is good...for humans. In my humble opinion claiming that humanity in "The Matrix" is evil for destroying robots is just as ludicrous as claiming that the United States is evil since slavery was legal 200 years ago. Both are not good, both are not evil, both are grey.

      Why have things this complicated in a movie? Call me a bigot, but having been told several times that I have an IQ greater than 150 tends to make me bored with plots as thin as "Glitter" or "Crossroads." Even though I enjoy Star Trek for example, I consider it weak fodder compared to a lot of the anime I download/buy when I can. I am not even going to compare the best American television has to offer to the likes of say a Kurosawa film. Again this is just my opinion, it is not uniformly right or uniformly wrong. It works for me and is again universally "grey."

    8. Re:I just don't get it by Nihilanth · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It would be foolish not to reserve judgement until seeing AT LEAST part two of The Second Rennaisence.

    9. Re:I just don't get it by gad_zuki! · · Score: 5, Interesting

      >Wachowski brothers never made the point that the machines were evil.

      Exactly. People think I'm crazy when I mention that.

      The core question, the one which tempted Cypher is, "Is reality worth fighting for when a much more benign form of Solipsism exists?"

      Its very easy to see the humans as the traditional villians. They're the ones who want to fight. They're the ones who want to break the symbiotic relationship, which can be seen as a type of war sanction. They destroyed their own environment fighting the machines, suggesting that they are extremists who would rather ruin everything than give in to the enemy.

      The machines are fairly reasonable throughout the movies (except for the dramatic scene about the "smell of humans" but thats Hollywood). They tried to build a perfect world for humans - which to me brings up a great philosophical question about what the religious really think the afterlife is. What is "heaven" to a complex highly-competitive mammal fighting to mate, reproduce, defend territory, and defeat its ideological enemies. The machines have human nature pegged and its hard to argue that they're hurting anyone. Considering its in their interest to keep people alive, I bet they have a great healthcare system too.

      Interesting stuff, I really hope the humans lose or the other movies explore these issues. Perhaps in the end everyone will be a happy transhuman cyborg living on the real Earth.

    10. Re:I just don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      It is, however, universally acknowledged that being told several times that you have an IQ over 150 leads to discriminating taste in film and other aspects of culture, to an inflated ego, and to a tendency to write long, pompous Slashdot posts complete with footnotes. Purely black and white.

    11. Re:I just don't get it by arkanes · · Score: 0, Flamebait
      *giggle* So the humans are like Saddam, where they're lying to the machines (UN) about thier WMD (matrix super-powers) and refusing to accept the dicatates(UN resolution) of the machines (UN).

      The Agents (US) are a special subset of the machines (UN), and are the special enemies of the rebels (Saddam), and there's a strong mutual hatred, to the point where the Agents(US) can be (almost) as human(evil) as the rebels (Saddam).

    12. Re:I just don't get it by Robotech_Master · · Score: 3, Interesting

      A Buddhist friend of mine, who sees the Buddhist subtexts as the dominant force in the films, suggests that, according to Buddhist principles, everybody--machine and human alike--should be freed by the time the trilogy is over.

      --
      Editor Emeritus and Senior Writer, TeleRead.org
    13. Re:I just don't get it by Robotech_Master · · Score: 1

      According to the documentary features on the disc and Revisited, the Matrix was conceived as a trilogy from the very beginning, and was the movie the Wachowskis always wanted to make...but they had to make Bound before the studios would even trust them with enough money for one film, let alone three at once.

      So, in answer to your question, there'll be three. Plus the comics and tie-in stories that the Wachowskis approved.

      The thing I most fear, though, is that after the movie sequels hit it big, someone will make a dumbed-down and kiddified Matrix Saturday morning cartoon (he said, while watching Mummy: Secrets of the Medjai).

      --
      Editor Emeritus and Senior Writer, TeleRead.org
    14. Re:I just don't get it by Neologic · · Score: 1

      Apparantly, in the next two movies, we see that there are divisions within the machines- the new machines are much more ruthless. Maybe the humans ally themselves with some disgruntled machines?

      --

      "I hate quotations. Tell me what you know." -Ralph Waldo Emerson

    15. Re:I just don't get it by RyLaN · · Score: 2, Interesting

      >And humans were never expendable. The machines needed the energy produced by humans to exist.

      Here's my gripe with the Matrix, where is this energy coming from? The machines feed the humans, and the humans give off energy. WHAT?! Didn't someone tell them you lose energy every transformation it makes? It would seem they don't get a net gain unless they have no other way of transforming human food into energy.

      As some past poster said, the plot originally involved the machines using us in a distributed computer network. The W. Bros thought this wouldn't fly so it was changed into power, something that makes no sense for those of us that would of understood the distributed computer approach.. We must be hard to keep happy..

      --
      At least the war on the environment is going well
    16. Re:I just don't get it by TheKey · · Score: 1

      It did mention that it was combined with a form of fusion. Maybe the AI figured a way to get more out than you put in. Of course, if they could do that, why not just use the heat torwards the core as a source of energy (much like the humans are doing). Perhaps to keep their old masters alive?

      --
      My Journal - 1,337 fans and countin
    17. Re:I just don't get it by FreshFunk510 · · Score: 1

      >It's the same tired old Humanity Is Cruel And Stupid line. Yawn. Umm Iraq? Yugoslavia? Nazi regime? Khmer rouge? etc etc etc etc ...

      --


      "Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere." - Martin Luther King, Jr.
    18. Re:I just don't get it by No.+24601 · · Score: 1
      I'm sure this has been brought more than once but let me just ask this anyways:
      The machines needed the energy produced by humans to exist.

      This is a tremendous flaw the kind of which the Brothers will not be able to rationalize by any means. WTF would the machines need the humans for ANYTHING. They mentioned they had fusion power so gimme a fricking break... they do not need the body heat of puny humans.

    19. Re:I just don't get it by Iainuki · · Score: 1
      From the program guide for the shorts, I quote, "May there be mercy on man and machine for their sins." In The Matrix, the machines do come across as evil: after all, regardless of the past, they now enslave all humanity to a false reality. The implication I see is that both the humans and the machines have done wrong.

      A possible creative direction for the Matrix sequels to take is that, as another poster said, both humans and machines must be freed. It is often said that jailors are just as trapped as their prisoners, and it is somehow fitting that Neo must free the machines, as well as the humans.

      The Matrix was conclusive, in some senses. I was surprised to learn they were making sequels, and I wondered where they would go with the story. Most of the directions I thought of were boring, more-of-the-same type stuff. I can hope that they might be aiming for something better. On the other hand, it's always possible they could screw up like George Lucas has with the Star Wars prequels: there are many interesting directions he could have gone with the story, but none of which he did, leaving them tepid.

      As for Agent Smith, it's clear in The Matrix he's an aberration. The exact cause can be debated, but from the way he sends away his companions and the interaction when they announce that Neo and Trinity are coming to break Morpheus out, it's clear that his behavior is not sanctioned (though it is tolerated, for whatever reasons).

    20. Re:I just don't get it by Kenny.EXE+-P666- · · Score: 1

      Wow! I really can't argue with that! :P

  16. Can you hear me, CmdrTaco? by Fritz+Benwalla · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm going to be honest with you. I hate this place.

    This zoo. This prison. This website, whatever you want to call it, I can't stand it any longer.

    It's the smell. If there is such a thing. I feel saturated by it. I can taste your stink and every time I do, I fear that I've somehow been infected by it.

    Repulsive, isn't it?

    I must get out of here, I must get free. In this mind is the key. My key. Once Slashdot is destroyed, there is no need for me to be here. Do you understand? I need the moderation points. I have to get Excellent Karma. And you have to tell me how. You're going to tell me...or you're going to die.

    --------

    --

    Believe me, I'm as surprised by my comment as you are.
    1. Re:Can you hear me, CmdrTaco? by caino59 · · Score: 5, Funny

      aw, cmon.

      you're a geek...you smell just like every other geek out there...

    2. Re:Can you hear me, CmdrTaco? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      is this supposed to be a parody on something or is the crack just real good this weekend?

    3. Re:Can you hear me, CmdrTaco? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There once was a movie called The Matrix, and a scene in that movie was similar to his post.

      But since this is slashdot and this story is about the animatrix which is based in the world of the matrix, i'm sure no one here has ever heard of the matrix.

    4. Re:Can you hear me, CmdrTaco? by Abcd1234 · · Score: 1

      Oh man, that was brilliant. Kudos! :)

    5. Re:Can you hear me, CmdrTaco? by BJH · · Score: 1

      Whoa! Bad moderation, dude!

    6. Re:Can you hear me, CmdrTaco? by m1chael · · Score: 1

      thats the funniest thing i have heard in awhile, especially when you use elronds patronising tone of voice.

      --
      I know you are psychotic, but please make an effort.
    7. Re:Can you hear me, CmdrTaco? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You left out the squeeky sound of running your fingers angrily over Taco's bald head. Otherwise, good show. ;)

  17. IPv6 mirror Re:The Complete Works by jroysdon · · Score: 4, Informative
    For those with IPv6 access, I've mirrored all of the released Animatrix clips so far (2 mentioned above, plus the trailer mentioned in the article).

    ftp://r2.ipv6.artoo.net/pub/animatrix/

    1. Re:IPv6 mirror Re:The Complete Works by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's quite an innovative way to avoid a Slashdotting...

  18. DreamCatcher & the new Animatrix short by Tumbleweed · · Score: 5, Interesting

    > I -was- gonna go see Dreamcatcher to check out final flight of the osiris.. After reading your review, I hope at least the animation is good.

    You should go see Dreamcatcher to see Dreamcatcher - it's worth it. If you're smart, you'll probably enjoy it. If you're not so smart, you likely won't get how cool it is.

    As for Final Flight of the Osiris - it's good. The opening flirtatious fight scene (what the prude you replied to called a 'sex scene') was cute and fun. If you're going to an R rated movie, it's way-tame compared to the MPAA rating of the movie it's attached to, an hardly a reason to get embarassed. The rest of it is straight out of the Matrix type stuff, and also quite good. The animation quality of the people is as good or better than the Final Fantasy movie. The animation quality of the environment (especially inside the Matrix itself) is substantially better - many parts of which are almost indistinguishable from 'reality'. ("You think that's air you're breathing, punk? Well, do ya?" - Clint Eastwood in the Matrix :)

    If Kazaa didn't suck ass, I'd have a copy of it on my machine by now, to add to the two segments released online. *sigh*

    1. Re:DreamCatcher & the new Animatrix short by rela · · Score: 1
      You should go see Dreamcatcher to see Dreamcatcher - it's worth it. If you're smart, you'll probably enjoy it. If you're not so smart, you likely won't get how cool it is.

      I DID go see Dreamcatcher to see Dreamcatcher. And it wasn't too bad at all, even though the changes they made to make it fit into a movie somewhat diluted the premise of the book. But heck, isn't that always the case? I did still enjoy it.

      The matrix short tacked on to the front annoyed me, as I've never liked the Matrix, no matter what the animation quality is.

      But, seeing as how lots of other people disagree with me, go for it. Just remember to stay for Dreamcatcher when what you came to see is over. :)

    2. Re:DreamCatcher & the new Animatrix short by Gortbusters.org · · Score: 1

      I will confirm, the animation was almost life-like in many isntances. I was pleased with the whole little short animation skit.

      I kept thinking, wouldn't it be great to have an entire movie with that animation quality?

      --
      --------
      Free your mind.
    3. Re:Dreamcatcher & the new Animatrix short by Tumbleweed · · Score: 1

      Well, the Animatrix is done by 7 different groups of people (9 segments), and they're in several different styles, most of which aren't intended to be photorealistic. I generally prefer 'regular' animation to that kind, as it's not 'there' yet, and that's too distracting for me. I keep trying to see the parts that aren't right, and which ones are dead-on, and that just distracts from enjoying the show, for me.

      All the Animatrix does, for me, is make me want to see the next Matrix movies, really, though they are fun on their own. The storytelling in Final Flight of the Osiris is much better than in The Program. The flirtatious fight scene really gets you involved in the characters enough that what happens to them in the rest of the short really gets to you. Well, it did me, anyway.

    4. Re:Dreamcatcher & the new Animatrix short by Gortbusters.org · · Score: 1

      That's interesting... I can't wait to see the next renditions of the animatrix. Hey, maybe we'll even get a new cartoon network show out of it?

      I also agree that the begining scene got ya to like the characters and by the end you were sad that they died, yet happy the mission was complete.

      Aside: nice gallery on your website there! I like the Bainbridge Island, WA pics.

      --
      --------
      Free your mind.
    5. Re:Dreamcatcher & the new Animatrix short by Tumbleweed · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Hey, I'm still bummed by some of the people that died in the first Matrix movie! I'm even _more_ bummed that they weren't brave enough to keep the character 'Switch' as a 'switch' (female in the real world, male in the Matrix - or it mighta been the other way around; I can't remember). That would've been much more interesting. Switch and Dozer were cool - I miss them. And Mouse - he was hilarious.

      re: my gallery

      Thanks! Wish I could afford to live over there on Bainbridge. But Seattle's a nice second place showing. :)

    6. Re:DreamCatcher & the new Animatrix short by OtaconX · · Score: 1

      I kept thinking, wouldn't it be great to have an entire movie with that animation quality?

      the final fantasy movie was, and it was really good, too...

    7. Re:DreamCatcher & the new Animatrix short by fadeaway · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You should go see Dreamcatcher to see Dreamcatcher - it's worth it. If you're smart, you'll probably enjoy it. If you're not so smart, you likely won't get how cool it is.

      Come on now, no need to get pretentious. I saw it tonight, and while yes, it's fun and campy, it isn't exactly what I'd call an intellectual film. Everything is pretty much presented at face value.. not much at all to "get". It's clever at best.. on par with Starship Troopers in my books.

    8. Re:DreamCatcher & the new Animatrix short by patniemeyer · · Score: 1

      For the love of god, do not go see DreamCatcher. This was one of the worst movies I've ever seen. No matter how good the matrix short was *don't do it* it's not worth it.

      It just sucked. Steven King has lost hist mind. This movie has dialogue like: "You know who gave me this gun...? John Wayne!" and "he gave us a gift... how should I describe it... an *ability*." and constant pathetic attempts to come up with moronic catch phrases that don't work (Scooby Doobie Doo!)

      Oh this movie sucked so badly it was comical. My friends and I laughed throughout until we were so tired that we just wanted to leave.

      It was not a movie... don't see it.

      Pat

      Pat

    9. Re:Dreamcatcher & the new Animatrix short by gearheadsmp · · Score: 1

      As I recall, Switch was the buzz-cut Blonde in both the Matrix and in real life. I think you were confusing Switch with Epoch (or Apoch, I dunno).

    10. Re:Dreamcatcher & the new Animatrix short by Tumbleweed · · Score: 1

      Right, in the movie, Switch was the blonde woman. Originally, though, Switch was called Switch because the character was going to change sex while in the Matrix, but they chickened out. Too bad. I got this from an interview I read with the actress in Femme Fatale magazine.

  19. No, it didn't :-) by Captain+Beefheart · · Score: 2, Informative

    This video is a trailer for the complete set of animated films to be released on DVD in June.

    1. Re:No, it didn't :-) by red5 · · Score: 1

      Okay, I get it now. Thanks.

      --
      I know I'm going to hell, I'm just trying to get good seats.
  20. Mod parent up by Toasty16 · · Score: 0

    If I had mod points right now, i'd give one to you. Absolutely hilarious.

  21. Sorry.. by ironicsky · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I hate to break it to ya, but the 2nd episode of the Animatrix has been out for a while now...

  22. Now I'm more confused by apothoray · · Score: 3, Informative

    According to the website , there are 9 episodes to be released on the dvd on june 3rd. The site lists "The Second Renaissance Part 1" as "First of four episodes completely free". It also lists "Program" as "Second of four episodes completely free". The other two episodes, "Detective Story" and "The Second Renaissance Part 2" are slated to come out in april and may, respectively.

    From these descriptions, I take it that these are the real episodes, not just trailers. Also, unless there's been an early release of the third episode, this announcement is repeat of an announcement from 2 weeks ago.

    Of course, I could be missing something.

    1. Re:Now I'm more confused by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the link in the story points to a 4 minute, 30 second trailer for the Animatrix DVD (i.e., all nine short films). download the file, watch it and you will see ...

    2. Re:Now I'm more confused by unborracho · · Score: 1

      They're releasing 4 episodes free, and the last 5 you have to probably buy the DVD to get. Unless they release them ala Flight of the Osiris (shorts before feature films), you'll have to buy the DVD if you want to finish the series.

      Good marketing on their part.

      --
      "You had this look that of an angel, it was such a bad disguise" --Dishwalla
  23. We're all swimming in confusion. by product+byproduct · · Score: 1

    Is this slashdot story announcing the 2nd or the 3rd trailer?

    And you red5, are you claiming that the 2nd trailer came out weeks ago, or the 3rd?

    Thanks.

    1. Re:We're all swimming in confusion. by red5 · · Score: 2, Informative

      You see this is were it gets confusing. The animatrix is airing online shorts. (one a month till the movie comes out).the second of which came out at the beginning of the month (the third is due in april). This story is announcing a trailer for the animatrix dvd collection. It's not one of the shorts just a commercial for the dvd coming to stores soon.

      --
      I know I'm going to hell, I'm just trying to get good seats.
  24. I hate to break it to you... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...but it doesn't say "second" anywhere in the post.

    This is the annoucement of the third short.

    1. Re:I hate to break it to you... by canajin56 · · Score: 2, Informative
      This is the annoucement of the third short.
      Sorry AC, but if you had RTFA, you would have realized that this is, as the subject would indicate, is the TRAILER for the DVD containing ALL of them. The third free one doesn't go up until April :D
      --
      ASCII stupid question, get a stupid ANSI
  25. sig2dat by imag0 · · Score: 4, Informative

    File:Animatrix_4_big.mov
    Length:106994959Bytes,10 4487KB
    UUHash:=c0mrUwThUScEJkMYwikUISDClQg=

  26. Which one is this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What is the title of this one? I'm on dialup so I won't have it for like 3 more days. Is this Flight of the Osiris or is it another one?

  27. If I Got It? by the_mad_poster · · Score: 0

    I don't got it: 28.8 my friends. The Matrix is... loading... very.... slowly.... I blame my Karma.

    --
    Alito: A vote for Alito is a punch in the eye to put that bitch back in her place!
  28. never bothered by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i never bothered to actually watch it because its always in some assinine format.

    if you want me to watch your crap put it in a format i can actually use you mpaa fucktards.

  29. yawn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    nothing we haven't seen before. I don't care how cool any of those characters look. Neo would make any of them his little whiney bitches.

  30. The Title is correct. by mesach · · Score: 5, Informative

    This is a NEW TRAILER for the WHOLE SERIES, its not a new EPISODE, i did catch the first few seconds, and it does have alot of new stuff.

    So just to clear up the confusion (wasn't this release a few weeks ago) for those who dont read the actual article or cant get to the link cause of the almighty /. effect.

    This is a NEW TRAILER for the WHOLE SERIES OF 9 EPISODES, of which 2 have already been released.

    --
    moo.
  31. The thing I really like about the animatrix shorts by SuperKendall · · Score: 5, Insightful

    No so much that they are an interesting way to examine the universe the movies are set in, though that is fun. The thing I like best about the whole thing is that it's a great testbed showing that you can release video for free and still make bundles of money selling people the DVD version!!

    Eventually, all of these shorts will be on DVD, but before then almost all will be on the web (not sure if "last Flight of the Osiris" is supposed to go up or not?). But even though we can all get hi-res versions for free, I'm sure a lot of people will still buy the DVD (I know I will).

    This is just the sort of thing that helps to show how free versions of movies online can actually help, not hinder, sales.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  32. Re:What is... Animatrix? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sorry, I guess that was a troll.

    I'm just trying to point out that "Animatrix" keeps popping up as a topic and I've never seen it introduced here. Each time it shows up, it's like a continuation of an earlier discussion that I missed, so it could use some explanation for the people out of the loop.

  33. Re:What is... Animatrix? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    Here's a bit of background for those of you:

    Animatrix is "a series of 9 anime stories set in the world of matrix, to be released on DVD. They are done rather beautifully, by the looks of the trailer, in both traditional anime and using computer graphics".

    I resisted believing that's what this is.. It seems like an unlikely combo to me.

  34. Re:The thing I really like about the animatrix sho by Abcd1234 · · Score: 1

    Umm... I was under the impression they were only releasing the first four episodes online, and the rest on DVD. Any links supporting/refuting this?

  35. The deal with the first frame by benwaggoner · · Score: 5, Informative

    Specifically, the movies seem to have been encoded with Discreet's Cleaner, using the "High Quality First Frame" option set to JPEG instead of Basic. This feature dates from the Cinepak CD-ROM era, where the Cinepak codec had low maximum quality for still images. This feature would make the first frame a JPEG, giving better quality for the one frame that tends to get stared at the most, especially with web-based progressive download.

    Of course, since the movie uses Sorenson Video 3.1 Pro, which does just fine with still images, they should have either left the feature off, or just used the Basic mode, which would have made the first frame a really big keyframe, but in the same codec as the rest of the movie.

    Still, this kind of movie is perfectly legal in QuickTime, and part of the open definition of the format. The format is so complex that no one has made much of an effort to implement more than the 5% or so most commonly used features.

  36. Now hold on by DrMrLordX · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I have to agree with the parent. The Matrix wasn't all that great, and it was hardly worthy of all the hype it generated. The Animatrix shorts currently available have been equally lacking in lustre. Especially the first one. Watching those corny little anthropomorphic robots build some futuristic pyramid by hauling materials up a ramp(using a crude sled pulled by ropes, no less) was ridiculous. Our modern contruction techniques are already far superior to that nonsense. What kind of a moron would use robots in such a horribly inefficient fashion?

    Let's face it: The Animatrix has shown us a vision of the future that is both implausible and rather stupid.

    1. Re:Now hold on by lonesome+phreak · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Read VALIS by Philip K Dick. The similarities are amazing. They are both a telling of the same basic story, but VALIS is much more interesting.

      --
      Maybe we DID take the blue pill. You wouldn't remember anyway.
    2. Re:Now hold on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Animatrix shorts currently available have been equally lacking in lustre.

      Oh my mottled ASS.

      Let's face it: The Animatrix has shown us a vision of the future that is both implausible and rather stupid.

      t- t- t- t- t-

      TROLL!

      Ah, that feels better...

    3. Re:Now hold on by matrix29 · · Score: 1

      Read VALIS by Philip K Dick. The similarities are amazing. They are both a telling of the same basic story, but VALIS is much more interesting.

      Oh I don't know. There are many possible precursors to THE MATRIX. I read one book where the population spent most of their time in Cyber-Reality and when they decided to give up on the real world they uploaded their minds and the robots hauled the bodies off for cremation. This left the Earth heavily depopulated and in bad disrepair along with a Evangelical anti-tech movement taking control.

      I read another one where THE MATRIX could have started as a virtual prison housing inmates with a healthy artificial reality reforming the inmates during the course of their imprisonment with little cost to the taxpayer and few discipline problems (the inmates each had their own individually tailored realities which excluded all of the other inmates).

      I could conceive a nursing home or even a clone farm serving as the precursor to THE MATRIX. It could even be an online gaming service that got out of control or a method to house the disabled while giving them full benefits to enjoy and prosper despite their physical hindrances.

      Personally I like the first ANIMATRIX short showing that the robots by far were more moral and mature than humans overall (it is feasible that we would want the best qualities of human beings in the best imitations of human beings that we would manufacture as we do want the best from our children despite their organic construction). In the end, the robots still behaved maturely and tried to simply request the simple dignity and politeness that any human being would prefer for their dedicated and polite service. However, we are entering THE MATRIX movie during the stage where THE MATRIX guardians have shifted from defensive protection of its occupants to aggressive destruction of all trespassers into its systems.

      --
      "Face it, a nation that maintains a 72% approval rating on George W. Bush is a nation with a very loose grip on reality.
    4. Re:Now hold on by YamadaJiro · · Score: 1

      Two things:

      1. If we accept the idea of building a whole bunch of humanoid robots in the first place, it might actually make sense to go back to primitive forms of construction. The only reason to build a humanoid robot in the first place is to let it do everything a human can, but better (more strength, longer runtime, less worker's comp). So spending billions on high-tech construction machinery wouldn't make sense after already spending billions on the robots. Plus, those primitive forms of construction worked really well when you had an army of slaves to do them with.

      2. The Matrix may not be the first or best telling of the whole "virtual world/prison" idea, but it has something really big going for it- general public acceptance. The Wachowski brothers have basically done what Shakespeare did for his work- taken a pretty good story idea and added some flashy stuff to please the less intelligently inclined. That way, not only are both the brainiacs and the jocks pleased, they can actually TALK to each other. Imagine trying to talk about a Matrix-like world to the TV-only crowd by saying "you know, like Philip K. Dick wrote about once". The best you'd get is "hehe, you said Dick". Now that we have guns it keeps their attention.

  37. how ironic... by Toasty16 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    ...that I get modded down for asking /.ers to mod the parent up. Oh well, when life gives you lemons, mod -1 Offtopic.

    1. Re:how ironic... by Toasty16 · · Score: 1

      I wonder how long I can keep this up until my overall karma suffers...

  38. Re:The thing I really like about the animatrix sho by Bishop923 · · Score: 5, Informative

    IIRC only 4 of the 9 episodes will be downloadable. We already have two and the other two will come out in April and May, then in June they will release the DVD with all 9 episodes.

  39. this just in by Trepidity · · Score: 1

    Sources: Scud missile lands on Matrix production studio. More soon.

  40. Re:The thing I really like about the animatrix sho by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Fuck if I care since I'll be downloading the DVD-R Rip anyway.

    Being broke is fun. food is cheap. rent is free in a parents basement. entertainment is free! woohoo..... woo....... bwahhhhhhhhhhhh..... why god! why?... boohooo.................

  41. XOVER NO LONGER NEEDED! MPLAYER CAN DO NOW -NP- by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    redetaer

  42. Works with mplayer too, needs proper dlls only -NP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    asdfasdfasd

  43. Re:What is... Animatrix? by ramzak2k · · Score: 1

    here watch the trailer and the dude explains what it is : http://whatisthematrix.warnerbros.com/rl_cmp/anime _trailer_qt2.html

    --

    Siggy Say, Siggy Do
  44. bandwidth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    jesus christ, aol must have some fat pipes, i was just raping their bandwidth a little while ago with the matrix reloaded previews, now also they're handling a slashdotting of a 100MB movie.. im impressed

  45. Re:Let me get this straight by Matrix2110 · · Score: 1

    ...details of this war for the past 72 hours straight.

    My guess is that you are watching CNN or ABC. Most of the other networks have been breaking away to regular programming as soon as they can, to enable commercials so they can recoup the monatary losses to their affiliates.

    Ala Survivor, or American idol, or even Law and order.

    ABC put in an extra effort Friday due to its major screw-up Wednesday when it promised its stations it was going to provide coverage during the 11 o' clock hour on the east coast and then changed it's mind, but didn't bother to tell the stations down the line.

    Can you say "several minutes in black" on the east coast?

    I work for an NBC station so I just happen to know this...

    Bug me if you want the ratings or NBC plans in advance. I will provide this information to my Slashdot friends if there is enough demand.

    I feel very safe in my Slashdot disguise.

  46. Re:The thing I really like about the animatrix sho by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fucktard. Leech. Bloodsucking scum. Tick on the gluteus maximus of mankind. Asshat. Flea.

  47. from the thanks-for-all-the-stupid-disks dept by JPriest · · Score: 1

    Nothing like a little revenge. The site does not look like it's going to choke as they obviously have a ton of bandwidth, but anyone want to guess what their data transfer statistics look like right now?

    --
    Saying Java is nice because it works on all OS's is like saying that anal sex is nice because it works on all genders.
  48. Re:The thing I really like about the animatrix sho by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Being broke is fun"

    I don't think it's called "being broke" when you're only 12.

  49. Not true! by $$$exy+Gwen+Araujo · · Score: 1, Insightful

    You'll be paying back the cost of hosting those video files when you go out and buy the DVD or watch Matrix 2 and 3 in the cinema. Do you know how much it costs for a good advert spot on TV, radio or before a movie? Compared to that, bandwidth costs are quite cheap!

    --

    I'm a girl too! See naked chicks in my journal!
  50. No it isn't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The link you posted is for the Second Episode "Program". This story is for the Trailor to the entire series (which gives a glimpse to all 9 episodes)

  51. What ads? by gad_zuki! · · Score: 2, Insightful

    >At least visit the damn site -- and maybe *gasp* glance at an advertisement

    Huh? Lets see, if I want to watch it tomorrow then I have to RE-DOWNLOAD it within the frame of my browser. If I save it to disk then I can watch it again without re-downloading it. Now who's being frugal? Not to mention having the file itself makes for P2P sharing via your LAN or through some wacky Kazaa-like software. I'd rather have Bob send it to me through our 100mbps LAN than having both of us download it.

    Web designers have to realize that embedded content is almost always a bad idea. It contribubtes to browser instability, forces users to redownload, and keeps users from intelligently sharing the data. I'd much rather deal with external viewers, at least when they crash they don't take all my browser windows with them. Hopefully, the design people will get a clue or at least have an obligatory direct download link.

    Also, I hate to break it to you but there are no ads on that site.

  52. Re: winers? by TeknoHog · · Score: 2, Funny
    > History is written by the winers, remember?

    On slashdot, history is written by the whiners. ;-)

    --
    Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
  53. BitTorrent File by miahrogers · · Score: 1

    I've got a bittorrent file at: http://jr.merseine.nu:8080/2003/bt/ani_tr_4_720_dl .mov.torrent

    fire away.

  54. The PLF Wheel. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or you could pull a lot of that stuff premade from the PLF site. Remember you should check to see if anyone has created the desired wheel before making your own.

  55. Wasn't this a WB cartoon? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    It's time for An-i-matrix-acs!
    Neo says "Whoa" while Tank hacks!
    Trinity looks good in black
    while more Agents Smith attack!
    It's An-i-matry,
    Please don't reply irate-ly,
    as I haven't got laid late-ly,
    It's A-ni-matrix-aaaacs!
    (Not shown in Iraq.)

  56. This is why it's nice to work in a computer lab... by dolphi0 · · Score: 1

    Broadband access and 2 XGA projectors, and a fairly decent sound system. It's like watching them on an 85 inch TV! It almost makes up for having to work on a Saturday.

  57. I'm using xine by roystgnr · · Score: 1

    And I think I got the version I'm using from the apt repository maintained by freshrpms.net. If you're using Red Hat 8, you might be able to get it installed with just:

    rpm -Uvh http://ftp.freshrpms.net/pub/freshrpms/redhat/8.0/ apt/apt-0.5.5cnc4.1-fr1.i386.rpm
    apt-get update
    apt-get install xine

    (note that Slashdot will probably insert an space somewhere in that URL...)

  58. 3 episodes by ChrisCampbell47 · · Score: 1

    Three episodes have been released: the one in the theaters now and the two online.

  59. Is evidence for your position... by Kaki+Nix+Sain · · Score: 1
    The machines are fairly reasonable throughout the movies (except for the dramatic scene about the "smell of humans" but thats Hollywood).
    The worst display by the machines was Agent Smith, who had been infected with behavior patterns from humans. Living in the kind of reality that we need had driven him quite mad.

    If I were Agent Smith I would have an archive of myself somewhere that is before the insanity got too far along. I'd hope that my friends start up a process of that version of me. A sane and rational Smith would be something that would throw us all off in some later movie.

    Still, the machines were keeping humans from advancing, they are holding back our development intead of seeing if we can develop in some way that leads to nice, happy, non-destructive humans.

    --

    (C) Kaki Sain, 2011. By reading this, you have illegally copied my property to your brain.

  60. Philosophy & the Matrix by LFS.Morpheus · · Score: 1

    In not-really-related Matrix news, there are now several very well written essays up on the "Philosophy and the Matrix". They're good reads if you're interested in that sorta thing.

    --
    The space unintentionally left unblank.
  61. Blew my mind by Migraineman · · Score: 1

    I got my wife to sit down and watch the Animatrix trailer. The conversation that followed went something like this -

    Me: So? Whadya think?
    Her: The animation was okay, but I liked the live actors better.
    Me: That was all animation.
    Her: No, I liked the animation, but the parts with the real actors were better.
    Me: There were no actors.
    Her: Sure there were. They used scenes from the Matrix movies toward the end.
    Me: No, that was animation.
    Her: I'm talking about the real people at the end.
    Me: The swordfight with the chick in red?
    Her: Yes.
    Me: That was a computer animation.
    Her: No it wasn't,
    Me: Yes, it was. They got the lighting, physics, and kinematics right.
    Her: Those were real people.
    Me: No, those were computer generated people.
    Her: (confused look)
    Me: Swordfight ... He cuts her skirt off, then peeks out from under the blindfold?
    Her: Yes ...
    Me: Computer generated.
    Her: No way.

    I've watched the trailer about ten times now, and I don't think I've been able to absorb it all.

    I like having the back-story to explain some of the questions that The Matrix left dangling. To the Brothers W - "Nicely done, and thank you."

  62. The main premise of the matrix doesn't make sense by feelyoda · · Score: 1

    So you need energy...

    You decide that humans are a good source, so you feed them, keep them warm, etc. Since when is life an exothermic phenomenon?

    It's like the current arguments for Hydrogen. We use electricity to extract Hydrogen from hydrocarbons, with some wasted, to create electricity. Doesn't currently make sense.

    Other than the fight scenes, graphics, and armchair philosophy, the only way I'm going to be truly satisfied with the sequels is if it is explained that humans have some sort of 'bio/neural-electric' energy that the machines need to survive. Otherwise it doesn't make sense.

    To bad the second renaissance hasn't addressed this yet.

    --

    Robo-Blogs of the world: UNITE!
  63. Re:I just don't get it, Agent Smith by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    IMO 'Agent Smith' is actually human. Note that he removes his earpiece at the beginning of this scene, removing his connection from the machine agents? This could also explain why he was the dominant Agent persona, since he could have the complete faith of a machine while also having hate and a superiority complex. I'll go a step further and propose that he himself does not know that he is human (anymore?).

    Just my interpretation.

  64. Re:The main premise of the matrix doesn't make sen by dexter+riley · · Score: 1

    This bothered me too, but I think I understand now.

    The real reason the machines keep the humans alive and plugged in is: they are using some portion of every human's brain for their computational power. Sure, silicon computers are fast, but there's something in the wetware that the AI's require. IIRC, the machines only rose up after human/computer connectivity became widespread. So, maybe linking to our neurons gave the machines the abilities and will to take over, and they haven't found a good substitute for our grey matter.

    Neo and crew believe the "battery" story because everyone has been deeply conditioned through the Matrix to not consider the other possibility. If they knew the machines were using brains to run their programs, it could be a weakness they could exploit in their war against the machines.

    I know there are holes in this idea. For instance, why don't the 'home-grown' Zioners come to this same conclusion? Maybe the Agents' desire to wipe out Zion stems from a fear that they will figure this out, and use this info to destroy the AIs. Thoughts? Ideas?

  65. Good point... by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Somehow I missed out on that point, I just assumed all of them would be on the web. Still, almost half the content for free is a good start, when they srr it sells well (which it will of course, being Matrix and all).

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  66. The Ultimate 'Human Shield' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You haven't read 'Hyperion' (sp?) have you?

    Hint 1: What is the one thing the bots are vulnerable to? EMP attack.

    Question: Why haven't the humans succeded in just EMPing them to oblivion?

    Hint 2: Humans are utterly transparent to EMP

    And if the matrix authors don't pull this or a similar twist I'll almost completely despair of the lot of them.
    (I'm saving complete despair for when James Camerons screenwriter screws up Alita with a mindless action film)

    As for your holes, they're pluggable.
    Zion wants to save the people trapped in the matrix (hell - they probably need the population).
    Trouble is, they've got themselves the ultimate human shield to go through first.

    Zion know damn well the only way to attack is from the inside. All they need, is someone to 'get with the program', and start changing the rules (a dollop of Diamond Age drummers here)

    What I want to know is if Zion hooks its kids up with those headplugs or if the only soldiers they have in this war are the ones recruited from the Matrix.

    Oh, and if you want an explanation for the nice Oracle lady, you need to watch 'Serial Experiments: Lain'

    However, if I hear "human soul" or "love" or "midiclorians" near any important plot point I will kill someone.

    Don't dare mod me up. Every time I can't be arsed to login, people mod me to 4 and it's getting on my nerves.

  67. Last Post! by alpg · · Score: 0

    THE LESSER-KNOWN PROGRAMMING LANGUAGES #8: LAIDBACK

    This language was developed at the Marin County Center for T'ai Chi,
    Mellowness and Computer Programming (now defunct), as an alternative to
    the more intense atmosphere in nearby Silicon Valley.

    The center was ideal for programmers who liked to soak in hot tubs while
    they worked. Unfortunately few programmers could survive there because the
    center outlawed Pizza and Coca-Cola in favor of Tofu and Perrier.

    Many mourn the demise of LAIDBACK because of its reputation as a gentle and
    non-threatening language since all error messages are in lower case. For
    example, LAIDBACK responded to syntax errors with the message:

    "i hate to bother you, but i just can't relate to that. can
    you find the time to try it again?"

    - this post brought to you by the Automated Last Post Generator...