Slashdot Mirror


Projecting Sound 'Inside Your Head'

Gregus writes "Projecting 'hypersonic sound' has appeared here before, but NY Times Magazine (FRRYYY) has an in-depth article with its lauded inventor and its applications. John Anderton, you could use a Guinness right now." Plus this story includes screwing with Mall Walkers!

291 comments

  1. Relief by Ken@WearableTech · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's good to know that I'm not crazy and someone has been telling me to start those fires...

    1. Re:Relief by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes...Sorry about that but I needed a test subject... ;)

      I think that the goverment should introduce legislation to control this type of sound. It could be used to control/influence people!

    2. Re:Relief by Ken@WearableTech · · Score: 1

      You could really mess with some people.

    3. Re:Relief by mwolff · · Score: 1

      Imagine this being used as a weapon in war. Instead of the current psychological torture, where the music is just played really loudly, it would be played really loudly in your head!

    4. Re:Relief by TobiasSodergren · · Score: 5, Funny

      Oh, finally an explanation for why J Lo is selling records. The military must be buying it.

    5. Re:Relief by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow I heard that!!

  2. I saw this on CNN a while back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It seems like many people in the industry thought this guy was a crack-pot, and didn't believe some of his theories. However, he seems to have been able to prove himself and turn many skeptics into believers. This really does have some neat, and disturbing applications.

    1. Re:I saw this on CNN a while back by Blaine+Hilton · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It seems like all great inventers have started as being considered a "crack pot" Now I wonder how this will be used. It seems like something that is too powerful to exist. Kinda like the cartoons where they use a device to control every one in the world. If this is connected to a set of satalites and beamed down very loud music or just a shrill note, somebody could become very powerful, very fast.

    2. Re:I saw this on CNN a while back by Twirlip+of+the+Mists · · Score: 4, Funny

      It seems like all great inventers have started as being considered a "crack pot"

      The thing is, crackpots are also considered crackpots. The trick is in telling the difference.

      Myself, I play the odds. The crackpots outnumber the geniuses by such an astounding margin, I just assume that anybody who sounds like a crackpot, is.

      If this is connected to a set of satalites and beamed down very loud music or just a shrill note, somebody could become very powerful, very fast.

      Now, see what I'm talking about? This is exactly the kind of thing that makes you sound like a crackpot.

      --

      I write in my journal
    3. Re:I saw this on CNN a while back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except that this technology only works in air. It's based on ultrasound.

    4. Re:I saw this on CNN a while back by Rob+Hoogers · · Score: 1

      Well, the first one to come up with earrings using the same technique to create a 'cone of silence' around you will be very rich indeed...

    5. Re:I saw this on CNN a while back by jpmorgan · · Score: 1

      The point of satellites is they're in space. The point of space is it's notably devoid of air. Kind of makes hooking this kind of thing up to a satellite kind of useless.

    6. Re:I saw this on CNN a while back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thats impossible. Sound does not travel in space. In order to get that to work, you would need a satellite orbiting within the earth's atmosphere.

      A blimp would be much more effective. Imagine your advertising audience at sporting events.

    7. Re:I saw this on CNN a while back by Fruny · · Score: 1

      If this is connected to a set of satalites and beamed down very loud music or just a shrill note, somebody could become very powerful, very fast.

      No air, no sound.

    8. Re:I saw this on CNN a while back by Blaine+Hilton · · Score: 1

      What if they modulated it to go through space as a laser beam or something? I don't know what they would do, but if they can send sound like this I'm sure they can come up with other ways to "break the laws of physics". Remember when people thought the earth was flat?

    9. Re:I saw this on CNN a while back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Prick.

    10. Re:I saw this on CNN a while back by thynk · · Score: 1

      I won't pretend to understand the science of this, but as I do understand it from the article, it doesn't vibrate the air waves, rather directly vibrates the bones in your ear.

      --

      Good judgment comes from experience, and a lot of that comes from bad judgment.
    11. Re:I saw this on CNN a while back by fatcat1111 · · Score: 1

      I believe it was Carl Sagan who said,"They laughed at Columbus, they laughed at Fulton, they laughed at the Wright Brothers. But they also laughed at Bozo the Clown"

      --
      How Politicians Lie: http://www.factcheck.org/
    12. Re:I saw this on CNN a while back by peter · · Score: 1

      > What if they modulated it to go through space as a laser beam or something?

      You know in Star Trek, when they remodulate their stuff whenever they want to do something? They're just making that up. Unless you can think of a way to convert a laser beam into sound, other than setting up a receiver, amp, and speaker (HSS or otherwise), you're not going to get anywhere with this. If you need to put something somewhere to receive the satellite signal, it might as well be a normal satellite phone.

      --
      #define X(x,y) x##y
      Peter Cordes ; e-mail: X(peter@cordes , .ca)
  3. Oh joy! by GMontag · · Score: 5, Funny

    Yea, great, mucic for the voices i my head to sing along with. Quite badly I might add.

  4. wow by Miguel+de+Icaza · · Score: 4, Funny

    its not a dupe, its an echo ;)

    --
    Before adopting WHATWG, read the moonlight.NET EULA [http://www.microsoft.com/interop/msnovellcollab/moonlight.mspx]
    1. Re:wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ah yes, inside the empty heads of ./ readers everywhere...

  5. Tasteless by Linux-based-robots · · Score: 4, Funny
    Plus this story includes screwing with Mall Walkers!

    Ok this is a new low for the NY Times, using pr0n to attract readers. I mean, how horny do you think we are?

    1. Re:Tasteless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...especially considering many mall walkers are senior citizens.

      ick

    2. Re:Tasteless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      "how horny do you think we are?"

      We're really, really horny!

  6. This is scary.. by phelddagrif · · Score: 5, Interesting

    With this technology, they can directly beam marketing into your head, and it's not like you can ignore it like you can print/t.v/radio ad's by switching the channels, or averting your eyes. Now they have the ability to force you to listen to it, whether you want to or not.

    1. Re:This is scary.. by Linux-based-robots · · Score: 5, Funny

      You fool! Don't spill the beans! I have enough problems with popup ads already!

    2. Re:This is scary.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As far as I know, somebody who has been deafened by 140 dB sounds can't hear this marketing. Time to walk to your nearest airport.

    3. Re:This is scary.. by MattCohn.com · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Not only that, but if you read deeper, the Navy is using this as a weapon.

      In reality, HIDA is both warning and weapon. If used from a battleship, it can ward off stray crafts at 500 yards with a pinpointed verbal warning. Should the offending vessel continue to within 200 yards, the stern warnings are replaced by 120-decibel sounds that are as physically disabling as shrapnel. Certain noises, projected at the right pitch, can incapacitate even a stone-deaf terrorist; the bones in your head are brutalized by a tone's full effect whether you're clutching the sides of your skull in agony or not.

    4. Re:This is scary.. by trite · · Score: 1

      All you have to do is take a step in either direction to avoid the sound.

    5. Re:This is scary.. by blakestah · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Ear plugs will block it.

      So will headphones with a hard external shell.

      If someone puts sound someplace in public, there is really no way to avoid it now. The difference is, with HSS, you can have fine spatial control over the exact position of the sound. If anything, there should be a lot more quiet in public, and perhaps more sound in very specific locations.

      I kinda like the idea that you could, in principle, use a hard surface to totally reflect the sound without loss and direct it at someone else.

      A mirror, if you will.

      Or, you could use a waveguide to do it.

    6. Re:This is scary.. by gordyf · · Score: 3, Informative

      I don't think earplugs would block it. It sounds like the sound is transmitted using hypersonic frequencies, and only becomes audible once it hits something, like.. your head. From there, bone transmission takes over, and plugging your ears won't do a thing.

    7. Re:This is scary.. by bahwi · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Leela: "Didn't you have ads in the 20th century?"

      Fry: "Well sure, but not in our dreams! Only on tv and radio...and in magazines...and movies. And at ball games, on buses, and milk cartons, and t-shirts, and bananas, and written on the sky. But not in dreams! No sirree."

    8. Re:This is scary.. by RadioTV · · Score: 1

      This sounds like a good use for the brown noise.

      --
      I have great faith in fools - self confidence my friends call it. - Edgar Allan Poe
    9. Re:This is scary.. by Zaak · · Score: 5, Funny

      I don't think earplugs would block it. It sounds like the sound is transmitted using hypersonic frequencies, and only becomes audible once it hits something, like.. your head. From there, bone transmission takes over, and plugging your ears won't do a thing.

      *Hello, friend.*

      Who's that?

      *I'd like to make you an offer you can't ignore.*

      Where are you? I can't see you.

      *Now, for a limited time only, you can buy our exclusive AD BLOCKER equipment for just $49.95*

      Aahhh! I'm going insane!

      *Remember, AD BLOCKER contains Tuning INterference Frequency Overriding Impedence Level Helmet Addition Technology for improved AD BLOCKING!*

      Help me!

      TTFN

    10. Re:This is scary.. by dswensen · · Score: 1

      And instantly piss off your customers to such a degree that a tidal wave of complaint letters would probably flood right into the offices of said company.

      Yes, they can beam advertising right into your head, but people aren't going to like that, and it sure isn't going to make people want to buy their product. If any company is silly enough to try that tactic, I'm willing to bet they will learn very quickly how counterproductive it is.

    11. Re:This is scary.. by MisterFancypants · · Score: 1

      Maybe those tinfoil hat people are on to something after all.

    12. Re:This is scary.. by eric434 · · Score: 1

      Check out the Etymotic ER-4P. 23dB of full-band (not just bass, like those crappy Bose noise-cancelling ones) isolation, and if that fails you can play the music loud enough to drown out anything short of a missile impacting your head.

      --
      This .sig temporary until a better .sig can be constructed.
    13. Re:This is scary.. by blakestah · · Score: 1

      Let me open a large can of speculation.

      First, bone conduction to the cochlea will only work for low frequencies. It is unlikely to be useful here.

      Second, here is my take on how this works. I haven't actually read any of the technical lit, but I know a little about acoustics. And, since this is /., there is no real need to know what you are talking about :)

      A laser creates light inside a resonating chamber, and then releases it.

      To make the sonic analogy, create ultrasound inside a resonating chamber, and then release it. The problem is making it audible. But really high frequecies of sound have good qualities in this application, like minimal spreading.

      To make it audible, you amplitude modulate the ultrasound wave in the audible range. So, if you are using a 5 MHz signal, just amplitude modulate it with a speech envelope (300-3k Hz range). That way, you can transport sound across a longer distance (minimal spreading), and still have it be audible. Use of ampltude modulation allows you to use a single resonating chamber (FM modulation may work better, but the resonating chamber needs to change in size! )

      Now, it is still sound. Sound will reflect off hard surfaces. High frequency sound will not conduct through the bone. So, hard plastic headphones would attenuate the sound pretty well. The way it creates sound in the ear is that the cochlea will respond to the ultrasound "envelope", so that the modulation gets converted to sound.

      The downside is that the high frequency sound doesn't bend well. If you turn your head a little, you probably get 20 dB attenuation (10 fold loss in amplitude, 3 fold loss in loudness).

      Using an ultrasound source with slightly lower coherence (wavelets of ultrasound, if you will), you can branch the source to two emitters and create a zone of interference in which sound will be audible. Low coherence laser interferometry is already a technique with substantial use in biological imaging applications.

      In any case, rest assured, ultrasound absolutely doesn't transmit through bone (it mostly reflects as bone has a high acoustic impedance), and there is still no way anyone can "beam" sound into your head.

    14. Re:This is scary.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The system works very much like a laser, meaning it's focused. If you walk out of the focused area, you no longer hear the directed sound.

      More than likely, in the case of the Pepsi machines asking you if you want a drink, most people will walk on by only hearing the beginning, and lose the ad before it's allowed to finish.

      This is no different than flipping the television when commercials come on; you hear the beginning, realize that it's a commercial, and flip the channel (usually to another commercial).

    15. Re:This is scary.. by graxrmelg · · Score: 1

      If any company is silly enough to try that tactic, I'm willing to bet they will learn very quickly how counterproductive it is.

      Sure, just like all companies have learned not to use telemarketing, spam, ads before movies, popups, and all the other annoying methods that fill our every waking moment with advertising.

    16. Re:This is scary.. by Rob+Hoogers · · Score: 1

      Nope. The HIDA works even when you are blocking your ears. It will cause the bones in your head to vibrate. It would have to be an active countermeasure...

    17. Re:This is scary.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      * Phbbbbt. *

      Tinfoil Hat.

    18. Re:This is scary.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's "Soviet" Russia, you knob-gobbler.

    19. Re:This is scary.. by Muerto · · Score: 1

      Pretty soon i'll have to put the foil back on my head.

    20. Re:This is scary.. by blakestah · · Score: 1

      There are two ways to make your cochlea vibrate.

      The first is sound coming in the ear canal, which can be blocked by blocking sound waves.

      The second is bone conduction (one reason your voice sounds really different than when you listen to it on tape). Ultrasound doesn't transmit through bone.

      It is still sound, it still reflects off hard surfaces. No one can beam sound into your head.

      Provided, of course, you wear a tin foil hat ;)

  7. Subliminal messaging taken to new heights? by razormage · · Score: 5, Insightful

    While research has proven that subliminal messages are, from a marketing standpoint, mostly ineffective, one has to wonder about the advertising possibilities of this type of technology.
    Sure, there are the obvious "private advertising" applications mentioned in the article, but this kind of thing can be very interesting - and very frightening.
    Picture - you're driving along a road during rush hour. Suddenly, your skull registers the squeal of tires and a massive crash. Or, walking down a sidewalk, a quiet voice inside your head whispers that you're all going to die.
    Like any new technology, this one sounds fun, but is going to require some degree of regulations and control to avoid abuse.

    1. Re:Subliminal messaging taken to new heights? by Dyolf+Knip · · Score: 3, Insightful
      you're driving along a road during rush hour. Suddenly, your skull registers the squeal of tires and a massive crash.

      Utterly soundproof cars become all the rage; convertibles become well and truly dead.

      Hmmm, I wonder if this widget could be combined with anti-noise generators? On the face of it, it seems like a uniform anti-noise sphere would work much better than a point source speaker.

      --
      Dyolf Knip
    2. Re:Subliminal messaging taken to new heights? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are already noise canceling headphones that will kind of do that. I suppose you could analyze the sound that is coming near the device, then create frequencies of sound that are 1/2 a wavelength off from the original sound, canceling the original out by the law of superposition.

    3. Re:Subliminal messaging taken to new heights? by error0x100 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      A soundproof car? No thanks. I'd kinda like to hear the sound of real screeching tires if there is an impending accident, or the horn of a runaway truck coming up behind me, or the sirens of an ambulance etc.

    4. Re:Subliminal messaging taken to new heights? by Dyolf+Knip · · Score: 1

      Good point. Ok, how about a car that is permeable to sounds in the normal range but not to hypersonic frequencies. Heck, a simple external microphone pickup that relays stuff to the inside would do it.

      --
      Dyolf Knip
    5. Re:Subliminal messaging taken to new heights? by Saeger · · Score: 1
      Hmm. I think I'm going to pitch a show called "Totally Hidden Voices" and hope Howard Stern doesn't sue me for stealing "his idea". :)

      Imagine the pranks you could pull with a hidden directional speaker and camera:

      • You tape a friend's voice saying nasty things, and replay it to the person he's talking to when his back his turned.
      • Direct the screech of tires at J-walkers illegally crossing the street (as you suggested).
      • Make it seem like people really *are* talking behind someone's self-conscious back. "What a doofus" "Did you see the car he drives?" "Why is he going out with that bitch?" "I bet he's a drunk" "He smells like a wet rag"
      • At a Star Wars convention, have endless fun with "Feel the force, Luke"
      • Gunfire in a bank.
      • The popsicle jingle from the icecream truck that never shows up. Everybody laugh at the disapointed kid waiting on the curb!
      • "Stick 'em up!"
      • Obligitory Real Genius prank.
      • ... my imagination's tired already.
      The possibilities are endless! I'll take the good with the bad, even if I have to stick an icepick through my eardrums to silence the ads & gov't propaganda. :)

      --

      --
      Power to the Peaceful
  8. Scary applications by sib888 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This has the potential to be the worst invention ever. How would you feel about being forced to listen to advertisements while riding the subway? You can't turn it off. 20 minutes of commercials, or event (shudder) popular music.

    --
    I'm sib888, and I approved this comment.
    1. Re:Scary applications by Dyolf+Knip · · Score: 4, Funny

      Well, if everyone there is being subjected to that kind of nonsense, including cops, how long would it take for them to find the transmitters and tear them apart?

      --
      Dyolf Knip
    2. Re:Scary applications by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Well, if everyone there is being subjected to that kind of nonsense, including cops, how long would it take for them to find the transmitters and tear them apart?

      It depends on how slowly you phase it in. The real question you need to ask is 'how long will it take people to get used to it and tune it out'? How much invasiveness are you already putting up with? Why?

      --
      Post AC. Slashdot isn't worth reading except at -1 anyway.

    3. Re:Scary applications by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You think that's scary? Wait til they come out with the cranium-embedded transmitter using this technology. All of the sudden all your thoughts being converted into "audio" and broadcast to The Man.

      Did I just say that out loud?

    4. Re:Scary applications by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This has the potential to be the worst invention ever. How would you feel about being forced to listen to advertisements while riding the subway? You can't turn it off. 20 minutes of commercials, or event (shudder) popular music.


      not a problem, I simply locate the source and beat it to pieces with a baseball bat. Oh and if a person is holding that assult device, he get's to taste the bat too..

      The only solution to this kind of terrorism is excessive physical violence.

    5. Re:Scary applications by Jeremi · · Score: 1

      Christ, I already feel that way every time I go to a movie theater.

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    6. Re:Scary applications by Adeptus_Luminati · · Score: 2, Funny

      I have a suspicion that the sale of sledge hammers and hand guns will rise shortly after this product debuts. Time to buy hardware store stocks.

      --
      No trees were killed in the making of this post; however, many trillions of electrons were horribly inconvenienced.
    7. Re:Scary applications by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      During WW2 some German scientist were working on different sonic weapons. I have read an interesting article about "Feraliminal Lycanthropizer" http://www.physicsroom.org.nz/log/archive/8feralim .htm. For the most part it seems like hokie psudo-science. I am surprised no one has mentioned the "brown noise" from South Park.

  9. Huh? by Dyolf+Knip · · Score: 1
    One truly harrowing noise is that of a baby crying, played backward, and combined with another tone

    Does anyone happen to have heard this one? What's so freaky about it?

    --
    Dyolf Knip
    1. Re:Huh? by ComputarMastar · · Score: 4, Funny
      One truly harrowing noise is that of a baby crying, played backward, and combined with another tone
      Does anyone happen to have heard this one? What's so freaky about it?
      They don't mention that the other "tone" is a Britney Spears song.
    2. Re:Huh? by Dunkalis · · Score: 4, Informative

      RTFA...The sound is meant to be used as a weapon, and the writer got to see how it worked. The writer was nauseated and in pain at one percent of what it would be on the battlefield.

      This is some scary stuff. I can't begin to imagine how horrible this could make life.

      --
      Slashdot is a waste of time. I enjoy wasting time.
    3. Re:Huh? by thynk · · Score: 1

      One truly harrowing noise is that of a baby crying, played backward, and combined with another tone

      Does anyone happen to have heard this one?


      Well that one time when my child was possessed...

      --

      Good judgment comes from experience, and a lot of that comes from bad judgment.
  10. Projected advertising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Imagine, [Norris] says, walking by a soda machine (say, one of the five million in Japan that will soon employ HSS), triggering a proximity detector, then hearing what you alone hear -- the plink of ice cubes and the invocation, ''Wouldn't a Coke taste great right about now?''


    Hello, "Minority Report".
    1. Re:Projected advertising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Forgot to paste in the even more appropriate,


      Or hearing different and extremely targeted messages in every single aisle of a grocery store -- for instance, near the fresh produce, ''Hey, it's the heart of kiwi season!''
  11. Isn't that... by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 1

    ... what Field of Dreams was about?

  12. Watch out guys.. by wikkiewikkie · · Score: 4, Funny

    "transmitting" sound to other people? Sounds like a copyright circumvention device to me.

  13. Dupe? by Lord+Bitman · · Score: 1

    Is this a dupe, or is this a different technology? The previous story, if I recall, had multiple speakers to focus on a single point. This one seems to have only one. Anyone else remember?

    --
    -- 'The' Lord and Master Bitman On High, Master Of All
    1. Re:Dupe? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The array of loudspeakers to focus sound has been researched for awhile. Over a year ago, there was a story on slashdot about using ultrasonic waves and the nonlinearity of air to create a focused beam of sound that got around the array of speakers problem. The latter seems similar to this technology.

      I don't know why people are being alarmist about this story. It's a focused beam of sound. So what? And the military applications of sound have also been thought up awhile ago.

    2. Re:Dupe? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I remember what a sack of shit you are. And when I get some more mod points, I'll bring you down again.

    3. Re:Dupe? by Lord+Bitman · · Score: 1

      Fortunatly there is a meta-moderation system in place. Yay!

      --
      -- 'The' Lord and Master Bitman On High, Master Of All
  14. Just wait... by }InFuZeD{ · · Score: 5, Funny

    Till some artist thinks its funny and puts a recording of fingernails on a chalkboard on their CD... and projects that sound inside your head.

  15. what about the bass? :D by obli · · Score: 2, Funny

    will it make floor-shaking bass sounds when I listen to music in my head too?

  16. For those of us who don't like giving our details by WegianWarrior · · Score: 0, Troll

    ...can someone find a mirror? I've tried, but...

    --
    Everything in the world is controlled by a small, evil group to which, unfortunately, no one you know belongs.
  17. tinfoil hats by drayzel · · Score: 5, Funny

    For those that looked at me funny while I was wearing my tin foil hats: Apolgies will be accepted in verbal and written form from 6AM to 11:30PM.

    Your apologies will be accompanied the cursory "I told you so"

    ~Z

    1. Re:tinfoil hats by Brad+Mace · · Score: 2, Funny

      This sounds like a good time to start selling stocking caps with a wire-mesh lining. And I know just how to advertise them. It'll be more effective than getting a call at 6am offering to sell you a telezapper.

    2. Re:tinfoil hats by WTF+Wazzat · · Score: 1

      I told you so is right. I am torn between the desire to get one of these and the desire to strangle the inventor. There is absolutely no possibility this thing will be used responsibly. Marketers are unscrupulous and unmerciful, and this will be a powerful weapon in their hands. It will degrade the quality of all our lives.

  18. Article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    March 23, 2003
    The Sound of Things to Come
    By MARSHALL SELLA

    No one ever notices what's going on at a Radio Shack. Outside a lonely branch of the electronics store, on a government-issue San Diego day in a strip mall where no one is noticing much of anything, a bluff man with thinning, ginger hair and preternaturally white teeth is standing on the pavement, slowly waving a square metal plate toward people strolling in the distance. ''Watch that lady over there,'' he says, unable to conceal his boyish pride for the gadget in his giant hand. ''This is really cool.''

    Woody Norris aims the silvery plate at his quarry. A burly brunette 200 feet away stops dead in her tracks and peers around, befuddled. She has walked straight into the noise of a Brazilian rain forest -- then out again. Even in her shopping reverie, here among the haircutters and storefront tax-preparers and dubious Middle Eastern bistros, her senses inform her that she has just stepped through a discrete column of sound, a sharply demarcated beam of unexpected sound. ''Look at that,'' Norris mutters, chuckling as the lady turns around. ''She doesn't know what hit her.''

    Norris is demonstrating something called HyperSonic Sound (HSS). The aluminum plate is connected to a CD player and an odd amplifier -- actually, a very odd and very new amplifier -- that directs sound much as a laser beam directs light. Over the past few years, mainly in secret, he has shown the device to more than 300 major companies, and it has slackened a lot of jaws. In December, the editors of Popular Science magazine bestowed upon HSS its grand prize for new inventions of 2002, choosing it over the ferociously hyped Segway scooter. It is no exaggeration to say that HSS represents the first revolution in acoustics since the loudspeaker was invented 78 years ago -- and perhaps only the second since pilgrims used ''whispering tubes'' to convey their dour messages.

    As Norris continues to baffle shoppers by sniping at them with the noises he has on this CD (ice cubes clanking into a glass, a Handel concerto, the plash of a waterfall), some are spooked, and some are drawn in. Two teenage girls drift over from 100 feet away and ask, in bizarre Diane Arbus-type unison, ''What is that?''

    Norris responds with his affable mantra -- ''In'nat cool?'' -- before going into a bit of simplified detail: how the sound waves are actually made audible not at the surface of the metal plate but at the listener's ears. He doesn't bother to torment the girls with the scientific gymnastics of how data are being converted to ultrasound then back again to human-accessible frequencies along a confined column of air. ''See, the way your brain perceives it, the sound is being created right here,'' Norris explains to the Arbus girls, lifting a palm to the side of his head. ''That's why it's so clear. Feels like it's inside your skull, doesn't it?''

    In the years Norris has demonstrated HSS, he says, that's been the universal reaction: the sound is inside my head. So that's the way he has started to describe it.

    Just to check the distances, I pace out a hundred yards and see if the thing is really working. (I've tried this other times -- in a posh hotel in Manhattan, in another parking lot in San Diego -- but HSS is so often suspected of being a parlor trick that it always seems to bear checking.) Norris pelts me with the Handel and, to illustrate the directionality of the beam, subtly turns the plate side to side. And the sound is inside my head, roving between my ears in accord with each of Norris's turns.

    The applications of directional sound go quite a bit beyond messing with people at strip malls, important as this work may be. Norris is enthusiastic about all of the possibilities he can propose and the ones he can't. Imagine, he says, walking by a soda machine (say, one of the five million in Japan that will soon employ HSS), triggering a proximity detector, then hearing what you alone hear -- the plink of ice cubes and the invocation, ''Wouldn'

    1. Re:Article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about the part in the article where the inventor says he is working on an invention using the word "matter".. didn't anyone catch that..?

      Shouldn't this be more interesting?

      hello..?

  19. This will likely become... by iiioxx · · Score: 4, Interesting

    the most abused technology in history. I have visions of teenage drive-by "screamers" hitting pedestrians with targeted high-decibel music as a prank.

    What about sonic weapons? Is there any reason why a rigged emitter couldn't be built that would emit a signal loud enough to rupture the eardrums of a specific target? Or at the very least, cause excruciating pain?

    I think the inevitable barrage of targeted advertising will be the least of our worries with this new technology.

    1. Re:This will likely become... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would project the "Better Get Maaco" commercial into their heads, causing them to stop short at the "beep beep" and getting their precious vintage cars rear-ended. Ha ha! Take that, larry.

    2. Re:This will likely become... by MattCohn.com · · Score: 4, Informative

      Read deeper into the article my friend...

      For the moment, though, HSS is unfinished business. As night must follow day, there are Defense Department applications. Norris and A.T.C. have been busy honing something called High Intensity Directed Acoustics (HIDA, in house jargon). It is directional sound -- an offshoot of HSS -- but one that never, ever transmits Handel or waterfall sounds. Although the technology thus far has been routinely referred to as a ''nonlethal weapon,'' the Pentagon now prefers to stress the friendlier-sounding ''hailing intruders'' function.

      In reality, HIDA is both warning and weapon. If used from a battleship, it can ward off stray crafts at 500 yards with a pinpointed verbal warning. Should the offending vessel continue to within 200 yards, the stern warnings are replaced by 120-decibel sounds that are as physically disabling as shrapnel. Certain noises, projected at the right pitch, can incapacitate even a stone-deaf terrorist; the bones in your head are brutalized by a tone's full effect whether you're clutching the sides of your skull in agony or not.

      And then later, he asks to have a demo...

      Norris prods his assistant to locate the baby noise on a laptop, then aims the device at me. At first, the noise is dreadful -- just primally wrong -- but not unbearable. I repeatedly tell Norris to crank it up (trying to approximate battle-strength volume, without the nausea), until the noise isn't so much a noise as an assault on my nervous system. I nearly fall down and, for some reason, my eyes hurt. When I bravely ask how high they'd turned the dial, Norris laughs uproariously. ''That was nothing!'' he bellows. ''That was about 1 percent of what an enemy would get. One percent!'' Two hours later, I can still feel the ache in the back of my head.

    3. Re:This will likely become... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about sonic weapons? Is there any reason why a rigged emitter couldn't be built that would emit a signal loud enough to rupture the eardrums of a specific target? Or at the very least, cause excruciating pain?


      Why waste my time doing that? I can build a pain field generator with Off the shelf parts right now. Hell if you want me to I can make many people start uncontrollable puking with so low frequency sound.

      this "plate" could do the hypersonic painfield attack, but it probably has a huge problem with high power generation. while I can easily get my hands on 10,000 watt audio amplifiers.

    4. Re:This will likely become... by iiioxx · · Score: 1

      I read the part about the Defense Department, and yes, militarization of the technology is inevitable. But, I was referring more to the possibility of a high school kid taking a "harmless" commercial model, and re-engineering it with a few parts from Radio Shack in order to up the output to dangerous levels.

      Just vandalize a talking Coke machine to get the emitter, add an amp and a battery pack, and with a basic knowlege of electronics, you've got yourself a crude "sound gun".

      Of course, one could argue that with some basic knowledge of firearms, you could also make a homemade projectile weapon. But unlike a crude, homemade firearm, the HSS weapon is discreet and silent (to all but the victim). Not to mention that while there is a restriction on who can purchase ammunition (18 or older in most states), there is no such restriction on electronic components.

    5. Re:This will likely become... by QuoteMstr · · Score: 1

      I would have to say explosives are the most abused technology is all of history.

    6. Re:This will likely become... by uptownguy · · Score: 1

      I would have to say explosives are the most abused technology is all of history

      Sorry! If I had any points, I'd mod you up. But instead I'll correct your typo...

      I would have to say that explosives are the most abused technology in all of history.

      ...and use it as my new sig. Imitation is the most sincere form of flattery...Wonder if anyone else will do the same?

      --


      I would have to say that explosives are the most abused technology in all of history.
    7. Re:This will likely become... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to mention that while there is a restriction on who can purchase ammunition (18 or older in most states)

      Hang on... in some state you have to be 21+ to drink?? But some let you buy ammunition (and presumably guns) when your 18???

    8. Re:This will likely become... by Saeger · · Score: 2, Insightful
      ''nonlethal weapon,'' the Pentagon now prefers to stress the friendlier-sounding ''hailing intruders'' function.

      I fucking hate nicey-nice euphemisms! But just as "Carnivore" is still called Carnivore, rather than their new unemotional term, I expect people will still keep the "nonlethal weapon" meme despite what the pentagon would like.

      Long live George Carlin.

      --

      --
      Power to the Peaceful
    9. Re:This will likely become... by iiioxx · · Score: 1

      Hang on... in some state you have to be 21+ to drink?? But some let you buy ammunition (and presumably guns) when your 18???

      As far as I know, the drinking age is a federal law and applies in all 50 states (somebody correct me if I'm wrong). Likewise, it is a federal law that states that you must be at least 18 years old to buy a longgun (rifle or shotgun) and 21 years old to buy a handgun. There is a similar federal restriction on the purchase of ammunition (18 for longgun ammo, 21 for handgun ammo). The funny part is, there are a lot of calibers that are used in both longguns and handguns. So if an 18 year old goes to buy 9mm Para (for example), the clerk has to ask if it is for a handgun or longgun. If the kid says longgun, he can buy. If he says handgun, he can't. How do you think most people answer?

      From what I have heard, there are a few states which have tightened the restrictions, stating that any ammunition that CAN be used in a handgun must be sold as handgun ammo, whether or not it WILL be used in a handgun. Most don't though, which is why I said that most states require you to be at least 18.

      But in my mind you should flip the question around:

      "Hang on... you mean that when you are 18 you are legally considered an adult, can join the Army and be sent off to die defending your country, but you're not responsible enough to buy a beer or a handgun???"

    10. Re:This will likely become... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jesus. Get off the d00dz jock.

  20. while the technology is cool by McDrewbie · · Score: 3, Interesting

    While the technology is cool and perhaps one day will be refined for home music consumption, its ability to be used as a non-lethal incapacitating weapon is scary. What could a corrupt government do with these devices. Would public protests against the government eliminated by these devices? (under the normal guise of controlling the crowd and responding to protesters crossing police barriers.)

    1. Re:while the technology is cool by djcapelis · · Score: 1

      Whose to say a nice little unibomber or determined citizen can't just make one of these devices to beam it right back? The only reason we haven't had nukes blowing up all over the place is because of the rarity of radioactive materials. Not because they are hard to make, we've all heard stories to affirm that they most assurdly could be made by joe schmoe in his backyard. From what I understand, this technology is simple to make and requires no special materials. This is the fact that disturbs me most, it will be extremely hard to stop anyone from making one of these, and the effects appear to be quite interesting. Though, then again, perhaps this will just be as common as a gun... if someone uses it wrong, they'll be taken down with the same weapon.

      --
      I touch computers in naughty places
    2. Re:while the technology is cool by gravelpup · · Score: 1
      its ability to be used as a non-lethal incapacitating weapon is scary...

      I'll take a non-lethal weapon over a lethal one any day. This sounds a lot more humane than even pepper spray, tear gas, rubber bullets, nightsticks, etc... barring long-term negative effects, anyway.

      --

      Things are more like they are now than they ever were before.

    3. Re:while the technology is cool by peter · · Score: 1

      > Would public protests against the government eliminated by these devices?

      If it's a lot worse than tear gas, using it will create sympathy for protesters who are attacked with it. If it isn't, then people will add earplugs to their G8 welcoming committee survival kits, along with wet cloths to protect against gas, and thick clothing to pretect against police brutality. (if earplugs or headphone-style ear protectors work against this.)

      I just hope this doesn't cause long-term hearing damage, but if it does, maybe people could sue the police for brutality or something.

      --
      #define X(x,y) x##y
      Peter Cordes ; e-mail: X(peter@cordes , .ca)
  21. Sounds...annoying by canajin56 · · Score: 5, Insightful
    "Imagine, he says, walking by a soda machine (say, one of the five million in Japan that will soon employ HSS), triggering a proximity detector, then hearing what you alone hear -- the plink of ice cubes and the invocation, ''Wouldn't a Coke taste great right about now?'' Or riding in the family car, as the kids blast Eminem in the back seat while you and the wife play Tony Bennett up front. Or living in a city where ambulance sirens don't wake the entire neighborhood at 4 a.m. Or hearing different and extremely targeted messages in every single aisle of a grocery store -- for instance, near the fresh produce, ''Hey, it's the heart of kiwi season!''"

    The bit about different people in the car only hearing their own music is cool. The annoying pop machines and, even worse, PRODUCE ISLES, are just awful. I mean, I can look away from an obnoxious billboard etc, but there is no way to stop this! Not even plugging your ears, since it is IN your head!

    Also, using it for emergency sirens? One of the biggest problems with CURRENT emergency sirens is that it is VERY difficult for the human ear to tell which direction it is coming from, because of the specific frequencies used. If it projects the sound INTO your head, there will be no way in HELL to know where it is coming from.

    Another problem with using it for sirens is that it is important to hear the siren well before the emergency vehicle reaches you. This system appears to be LOS, so how well will that work? It would only work if the ultrasonic sounds can penetrate through surrounding houses and so on, which would be FAR worse than current sirens, as the walls of your house wouldn't dampen it! And if it CAN'T penetrate through your walls, then I don't see how CARS wouldn't block it, too; It is VERY important that people inside of cars be able to hear the siren!

    --
    ASCII stupid question, get a stupid ANSI
    1. Re:Sounds...annoying by fuctape · · Score: 1
      Didn't read the article, eh? You *can* affect directionality with it:

      "...and, to illustrate the directionality of the beam, subtly turns the plate side to side. And the sound is inside my head, roving between my ears in accord with each of Norris's turns."

      C'mon, it was in the 7th paragraph.

    2. Re:Sounds...annoying by canajin56 · · Score: 1

      Yes, I read that part, thank you. But that isn't the same direcionality as would be required for an emergency siren. First, according to the author, it still sounds like it is in his head, just moving around.

      To use it as a siren, it would have to sound like it was coming from somewhere else. Also, if it was omnidirectional, the method described in the article wouldn't work. If it wasn't omnidirectional, it would mean that the ambulance would have to aim it at specific people. Doesn't sound useful.

      --
      ASCII stupid question, get a stupid ANSI
    3. Re:Sounds...annoying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can just see John Malkovich complaining to the manager now, "It's my head. *slaps his head repeadedly* It's my HEAD! I will see you in court!"

      But seriously, I can see a HUGE backlash against anyone who uses this. Not to mention pop machine vandalism will reach an all time high.

      But wait until the public starts using this for say, protests, aiming say, anti-war messages at public officials while they are trying to give a speech.

      Of course if this guy would also invent a bowel disruptor, then things would be even better when it comes to making politicians pay for their lack of interest in what the people want.

    4. Re:Sounds...annoying by error0x100 · · Score: 1

      Sure, but how do you suppose this is going to be achieved for dozens of motorists and pedestrians simultaneously, in rush hour, by an ambulance siren?

    5. Re:Sounds...annoying by uptownguy · · Score: 1

      But wait until the public starts using this for say, protests, aiming say, anti-war messages at public officials while they are trying to give a speech.

      Or your local police force for dispersing, say, an anti-war protest that just won't disperse on its own.

      --


      I would have to say that explosives are the most abused technology in all of history.
    6. Re:Sounds...annoying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was thinking it would work well when the emergency vehicle come up behind someone on the freeway, only to find they have the stero up and are totally oblivious to the need to move out of the way...just 'beam' the siren right at them.

      It would also be very useful for the Police, they can talk to people from inside the car, warning them their taillight is out, or telling them exactly what will happen if they don't pull over immediatly.

      Think about burning buildings with people at the windows, the fire brigade can tell them to stay put, or move to the roof, or detail escape paths for them.

      I'm also thinking close range secure communication for military units, a spotter up high could 'silently' talk to people on the ground, no radio, no interception.

      I could go on for ages.

  22. Re:For those of us who don't like giving our detai by nfg05 · · Score: 1

    didnt make me log in... maybe i'm just lucky

  23. Nasty side effect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It turns out, if they direct high levels of bass into your head, it will explode. The military however is very please by this discovery.

  24. Re:For those of us who don't like giving our detai by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just use these:

    username: annoying
    password: annoying

    works on a lot of website. :-D

  25. vending machines whispering to you... by Rxke · · Score: 1

    By this i swear i'll bash the first vending machine that tries to lay that kind of trick upon me... God how i hate commercials. this just is not right. im already crazy enough by myself thank you

    1. Re:vending machines whispering to you... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why? Hack and reprogram the soda machine to knock out anybody that tries to repair it with a high decibel sound that can't be defended against. After the repair bill, and hospital bills from that one, the offending companies may begin to get your point. Lather, rinse, repeat.

  26. I will stop, and search for the device, smash it!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I want everyone to be very aware of the fact that there will be people out there that will be VERY VERY disturbed by this technology.

    This must be one of the worst and frightening inventions I can think of (right next to vx gas).

    If this sort of thing happened to me, I would gladly stop in my tracks, figure out where this is emanating from, and quickly smash it to pieces.

    No freakin way is someone going to beam crap into my head. The possibilities for abuse is ASTRONOMICAL. God, the North Korean government would love something like this.

    -Anonymous Coward

  27. Oh boy ... by DaemonGem · · Score: 1

    Can we slashdot soundwaves now?
    -Dae

    --
    "Alle reden vom wetter. Wir nicht." - SDS Sozialistischer Deutscher Studentenbund.
    j00 4r3 3n73r1ng l337 w0r1d.
  28. Reminds Me Of That One Futurama... by Cyno01 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Fry: So you're telling me they broadcast commercials into people's dreams?

    Leela: Of course.

    Fry: But, how is that possible?

    Farnsworth: It's very simple. The ad gets into your brain just like this liquid gets into this egg. [He holds up an egg and injects it with liquid. The egg explodes.] Although in reality it's not liquid, but gamma radiation.

    Fry: That's awful. It's like brainwashing.

    Leela: Didn't you have ads in the 20th century?

    Fry: Well sure, but not in our dreams. Only on TV and radio. And in magazines. And movies. And at ball games and on buses and milk cartons and t-shirts and written on the sky. But not in dreams. No siree!

    --
    "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
    1. Re:Reminds Me Of That One Futurama... by Professor+Farnsworth · · Score: 2, Funny
      As I recall...

      Amy: We all have ads in our dreams, Fry. But you don't see us rushing out to buy brand name merchandise at low, low prices. . .

      *pause*

      Then we all went shopping.

  29. conversely by rigelstar · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The real winner will be the engineer that develops a practical system to counter-act such a device. A small device such as a watch that can detect the signal and then send a destructive wave to cancel the signal would be good.

    1. Re:conversely by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think perhaps far more interesting would be a sound "mirror" that could reflect the sound away from you, and even concentrate the reflection. And should the high-energies involved happen to destroy the transmitter when it is targeted by the mirror...

      What a pity that would be.

  30. its like in deer hunter... by RyLaN · · Score: 2, Funny

    or whatever that game was where you shot at the people using calls such as 'im naked, and i have a pizza..' imagine the hunters expressions after 6 hours in a tent.. :-)

    --
    At least the war on the environment is going well
  31. I'm sceptical about some of the uses mentioned... by MyNameIsFred · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I think there are certainly some uses for this technology. One of the best examples was a museum. When you stand in front of a painting, you and you alone hear a description of it. For others, I'm sceptical. For example, most of the soda machines I see are tucked away. Generally, if I'm close enough to see the machine, its because I want to buy a soda. It seems a little senseless to advertise to someone who is in the process of buying it. Other examples he mentions, such as kids in the back seat of a car are easily handled with current technology -- headphones. I don't see any added benefit.

  32. Dangerous by terradyn · · Score: 2, Insightful

    They explain the concept on how to disable the enemy with this technology. Take the reverse baby crying sound and crank up the output signal for the speaker. What's to stop someone from buying the speakers in the future and doing the exact same thing to civilians/police? I'd hate to see this type of technology in the hands of terrorists. Imagine sonic bombs taking out city blocks (given that the inventor says 1% output could nauseate the author for hours, what do you think 100% output would do)?

    1. Re:Dangerous by mbstone · · Score: 1

      What's to stop someone from buying the speakers in the future and doing the exact same thing to police?

      Freeee Dooonutts.... Baack at the Staaation....

  33. For those who don't care to register at NYT.. by rI'HaD+martaq · · Score: 0, Redundant
    Article is several pages long, bear with me here.

    No one ever notices what's going on at a Radio Shack. Outside a lonely branch of the electronics store, on a government-issue San Diego day in a strip mall where no one is noticing much of anything, a bluff man with thinning, ginger hair and preternaturally white teeth is standing on the pavement, slowly waving a square metal plate toward people strolling in the distance. ''Watch that lady over there,'' he says, unable to conceal his boyish pride for the gadget in his giant hand. ''This is really cool.''

    Woody Norris aims the silvery plate at his quarry. A burly brunette 200 feet away stops dead in her tracks and peers around, befuddled. She has walked straight into the noise of a Brazilian rain forest -- then out again. Even in her shopping reverie, here among the haircutters and storefront tax-preparers and dubious Middle Eastern bistros, her senses inform her that she has just stepped through a discrete column of sound, a sharply demarcated beam of unexpected sound. ''Look at that,'' Norris mutters, chuckling as the lady turns around. ''She doesn't know what hit her.''

    Norris is demonstrating something called HyperSonic Sound (HSS). The aluminum plate is connected to a CD player and an odd amplifier -- actually, a very odd and very new amplifier -- that directs sound much as a laser beam directs light. Over the past few years, mainly in secret, he has shown the device to more than 300 major companies, and it has slackened a lot of jaws. In December, the editors of Popular Science magazine bestowed upon HSS its grand prize for new inventions of 2002, choosing it over the ferociously hyped Segway scooter. It is no exaggeration to say that HSS represents the first revolution in acoustics since the loudspeaker was invented 78 years ago -- and perhaps only the second since pilgrims used ''whispering tubes'' to convey their dour messages.

    As Norris continues to baffle shoppers by sniping at them with the noises he has on this CD (ice cubes clanking into a glass, a Handel concerto, the plash of a waterfall), some are spooked, and some are drawn in. Two teenage girls drift over from 100 feet away and ask, in bizarre Diane Arbus-type unison, ''What is that?''

    Norris responds with his affable mantra -- ''In'nat cool?'' -- before going into a bit of simplified detail: how the sound waves are actually made audible not at the surface of the metal plate but at the listener's ears. He doesn't bother to torment the girls with the scientific gymnastics of how data are being converted to ultrasound then back again to human-accessible frequencies along a confined column of air. ''See, the way your brain perceives it, the sound is being created right here,'' Norris explains to the Arbus girls, lifting a palm to the side of his head. ''That's why it's so clear. Feels like it's inside your skull, doesn't it?''

    In the years Norris has demonstrated HSS, he says, that's been the universal reaction: the sound is inside my head. So that's the way he has started to describe it.

    Just to check the distances, I pace out a hundred yards and see if the thing is really working. (I've tried this other times -- in a posh hotel in Manhattan, in another parking lot in San Diego -- but HSS is so often suspected of being a parlor trick that it always seems to bear checking.) Norris pelts me with the Handel and, to illustrate the directionality of the beam, subtly turns the plate side to side. And the sound is inside my head, roving between my ears in accord with each of Norris's turns.

    The applications of directional sound go quite a bit beyond messing with people at strip malls, important as this work may be. Norris is enthusiastic about all of the possibilities he can propose and the ones he can't. Imagine, he says, walking by a soda machine (say, one of the five million in Japan that will soon employ HSS), triggering a proximity detector, then hearing what you alone hear -- the plink of ice cubes and the invocation, ''Wouldn't a Coke taste great

    --
    Qapla'!
  34. As advertisement becomes more and more abusive... by savgreen · · Score: 1

    Maybe the mental environment, as technology is getting more and more advanced, is becoming something we have to actually take an active role in. Maybe this will be the straw that breaks the camel's back, so to speak, and instead of just crazy black-masked anarchists smashing starbucks windows, we'll have soccer moms and white-collar workers taking baseball bats to asshole ad-machines. Imagine how YOU would feel, if some coke machine rained messages directly into your head every time a car or anything tripped the motion-sensor across the street. oh, to dream... ben

  35. Seriously cool by SexyAlexie · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'm deaf myself, and I wonder if this thing could work a lot better than ordinary hearing aids.. would be seriously cool, and be much cheaper.

    --
    I'm too sexy for you.
    1. Re:Seriously cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There seems to be some confusion over what this thing does; the sound is not literally produced inside the listener's head, bypassing the ears, it only feels like that. The high powered weapons-grade version works on deaf people the same way it works on everyone else, by scrambling their equilibrium and jiggling their innards. Probably not too helpful as a hearing aid.

      " 'See, the way your brain perceives it, the sound is being created right here,' Norris explains to the Arbus girls, lifting a palm to the side of his head. 'That's why it's so clear. Feels like it's inside your skull, doesn't it?'

      In the years Norris has demonstrated HSS, he says, that's been the universal reaction: the sound is inside my head. So that's the way he has started to describe it. "

  36. One question... by renehollan · · Score: 1
    How do I get a job working for this guy?

    ...grin...

    --
    You could've hired me.
  37. Man, this is gonna help! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    No problem getting chicks now. Just play "Look at that stud, isn't he sexy. You KNOW you want to sleep with him, badly. Don't wait. Take him now!"

    1. Re:Man, this is gonna help! by SexyAlexie · · Score: 0

      Take me now!

      --
      I'm too sexy for you.
  38. Re:Grado SR 80 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Wow, that's your definition of 'good' headphones? Any pair of crap 1$ headphones will do that. REAL headphones will project a soundstage, and unless you have a hollow head with people in it, a soundstage should be *outside* your head.
    Try some real headphones, like Sennheiser or Staxx.
    Grado, I mean please. The Bang and Olufsen of headphones...

  39. Re:oh well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    while [ $YOU == "fucker" ] ; do

    mv /bin/laden /dev/null

    done



    I officially declare this the unfunniest attempt to make a UNIX joke I've ever read.
    Congrats, Jacques.

  40. Re:Grado SR 80 by iggymanz · · Score: 2, Interesting

    actually, a really old primitive set of monophonic headphones will make the sound appear to be in the exact center of your head

  41. Its nothing great, headphones do this already, by HanzoSan · · Score: 1


    The only thing great about this is the fact that this has a better range, but headphones and speakers already have the ability to place sounds in certain places.

    My headphones the Grado SR80s can place the sound anywhere all the way around my head, including the inside my head sound.

    State of the art speakers can already place sound in different areas, look I dont care if they put ads on these new speakers, I'll have my headphones on and they will be blocked out.

    --
    If you use Linux, please help development of Autopac
    1. Re:Its nothing great, headphones do this already, by boulat · · Score: 0

      You actually didnt understand the concept - the waves will vibrate your head, your bones and inner ear and it doesnt matter what you have - your whole body will feel tiny-bity vibrations that your ear will amplify thousand times and you'll get the message no matter what

    2. Re:Its nothing great, headphones do this already, by Elminst · · Score: 1
      I'll have my headphones on and they will be blocked out.

      That's where you are completely wrong. There is no sound coming from the outside to be blocked.
      The sounds do not occur until the waves hit the bones inside your head. Your headphones can't block them.
      Go back and read the whole article, it explains this.
      --
      No unauthorized use. Trespassers will be shot. Survivors will be shot again.
    3. Re:Its nothing great, headphones do this already, by Wolfrider · · Score: 1

      --Finally, perhaps a use for the "tinfoil hat"?

      --Seriously, I'd much rather this type of sound application had an opt-in strategy. Intrusive ads can lead to a real invasion of privacy... This could be the New SPAM for advertisers.

      --
      .
      == WolfriderV6 == I'm willing to admit that *I just might* be wrong... Are you??
    4. Re:Its nothing great, headphones do this already, by boulat · · Score: 0

      Gee i love slashdot Karma - its made up by idiots.

      First this guy posts 2 hours AFTER me saying what i said, without any technical details, and gets a 1

      and i get a 0

      whoever rates these things - get a life

  42. Elanor White is RIGHT! by DivideByZero · · Score: 1

    Chalk another one up for Elanor White and the schiz^D^D^D^D^D Veterans of the thousand psychic wars.

    Oh, Elanor, I KNEW you were right, but now I have proof! I'd better start some of your DIY projects NOW! (search on "Diary #134" for her plans to make a cap to simulate EW weapons from common household items!)

    Like Elanor says: "Skeptics: You must explain ALL occurrences taken together as a complete SET, or you have explained NONE of them." Go, Girl!

    (/chuckle)

  43. *Waves hands* by baywulf · · Score: 4, Funny

    "These are not the droids you were looking for."

  44. Re:Grado SR 80 by Bunji+X · · Score: 1

    Yes, innovation is baaaaaad.....

    Please explain how you would go about projecting sound at a person 100 yards away with your cheap headphones.

    --
    ---
    The combined human population is enough to feed every living tiger for app. 28000 years.
  45. I don't know about you.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But I expect them to really keep their 'projectors' and speakers really protected... Because I can tell you that i'll break or block them...

  46. In the airport by shatfield · · Score: 1

    I was recently travelling, and had a layover in Pittsburgh, PA. Waiting 2 hours for a plane to take off is the Pitts (pardon the pun ;-)), but what made it infinitely worse is that I was sitting next to the end of a conveyor belt. The airport had 3 alternating audio messages, stating that "You are nearing the end, please watch your step". These repeated constantly over and over again for 2 hours!

    Luckily I had headphones (at least until my laptop ran out of battery.. ugh!).

    --
    "To make a mistake is only human; to persist in a mistake is idiotic." Cicero
    1. Re:In the airport by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I'd go get your laptop fixed. Whenever the battery in mine runs out, I still have my headphones. Something is seriouslly wrong with yours.

  47. They can do that already with loudspeakers by MyNameIsFred · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This technology doesn't suddenly make it possible for them to force you to listen to things on a subway. They could do that already with loudspeakers. The fact that they don't, and that so many mass transit systems ban radio et al unless you use headphones, suggests that this invention won't change this.

    1. Re:They can do that already with loudspeakers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This technology doesn't suddenly make it possible for them to force you to listen to things on a subway.

      Except that it sort of does. The sound is passed to your ear by bone conduction, so plugging your ears doesn't work. Unless you have a shield to deflect the sound, you are going to hear it.

      However I don't see the practice of forcing ads on people like that being condoned by ANY government. My bet is that it gets banned like any loud sounds: as a public disturbance.

    2. Re:They can do that already with loudspeakers by yy1 · · Score: 1

      It would be nice if they used this tech so you could ACTUALLY HEAR the announcements. Sometimes they are important like "This train is going express after the next stop" which usually sounds like something from a Peanuts tv show, thus making you miss your local only stop and having to backtrack...

      This tech is pretty cool, but i think it will end up being used much like laser technology is used, some genuinely useful things (say laser pointer) that can also be used in "bad" ways (at the movie theater for instance) or clamped to a gun and used as a sight... Or to shoot down spaceships.. Ultrasonic sound is finding many parrellel uses in medicine, military and the commercial sectors. I think this guy is just opening up the uses of ultrasound that previously hadn't been considered, or funded well enough to make feasible, seems like this guy and his buddies are their own VC seedcorp. Very "american inventor" even a indirect comparison to Thomas Edison (among other "great american inventors")

      --
      Because, sometimes they just have to touch the stove.
      -YY1
  48. Re:oh well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Uh. D00d, you just overwrote /dev/null. Now your system won't boot.

    Asshat.

  49. Advertising use is abuse? by bobsledbob · · Score: 2, Insightful


    I've read a couple of posts that suggest the reader would likely hunt out and smash the offending advertising emitter using this technology. I'd suggest that you'd even have the legal right to do so!

    This technology creates the offending sound 'in your head'. Litteraly, the sound is created by the resonating waves heading your eardrum or bones in your ear. This is as close to abuse as you can get, imho. You can't turn away or tune it out.

    It's one thing for an ad to sit there waiting to be looked at, or a background noise which are human brains are accustomed to tuning out. It's yet an entirely different thing to have sound resonating in your head which you cannot stop nor have really much sense of the emminating source.

    Just think of the problems caused by billboards on the freeway... 'Um, excuse me, while your driving by at 60 mph, would you consider a nice refreshing .'

    --
    Beware of geeks bearing formulas.
  50. inventors with(out) social conscience by Kolenkow · · Score: 1

    This must be a good example of the old "wow, I came up with a strange idea that worked, so I guess I have to build the device now"-law. It's silly. Why aren't there an organization called "inventors with social conscience" or something like that.

    --
    Hofstadter's Law: It always takes longer than you expect, even if you take into account Hofstadter's Law
  51. domestic disturbances by chillax137 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Back in high school I used to drive around with friends shining a 2 million candlepower spotlight into bedrooms of people we didn't like, or ringing the doorbell and waiting until they answered the door to blind them. I imagine that I wouldn't have been nearly as bored with a sound "spotlight" to bother people.

    --
    chillax137
  52. Re:oh well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "That's right, Bob, a very impressive rally from the Sand Monkeys. Looks like we might have a ballgame here after all. At the hand of the first quarter, the score is Cowboys 50000, Ragheads 12. Stay tuned for more action, we'll be right back."

  53. So... torture noise. by meringuoid · · Score: 1
    We've already got the reversed tape of a crying baby. Now, how about...

    Nail on blackboard
    White noise
    Perfect sine tone, but damn loud
    'You Suck' over and over again
    N-Sync

    --
    Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    1. Re:So... torture noise. by TheLink · · Score: 1

      How about the appropriate resonant frequency of the stuff you're firing your sonic disruptor at.

      Or any of those low Hz stuff that make people really sick. (not sure if the thing can do low Hz).

      Or how about I use a time domain/UWB radar to figure out when your heart beats, and thump your heart with the appropriate sound at the appropriate time.

      As for voices in head thing - lots of uses for that. I believe some military ppl have already done stuff with voices in head using microwaves to generate sound from the target's skull bones.

      I'm not surprised with this thing, they already had phased array radars, so was wondering when someone would do something like that for sound. The hypersonic method is an innovation of course.

      --
  54. That Evil 'Ol Flyneye by flyneye · · Score: 1

    LOL,ya..uh huh wait'll i get my hands on one of those sound projectors.
    not only will you hear what i want you to hear but you can bet it will contain the fruits of my own research into low freq.sound and brainwave entrainment in the alpha range.
    hope i dont have to steal a coke machine to get one,but imagine if you will:
    " now watch this"flyneye said with a boyish grin on his face as he aimed ths silver plate at the blonde on the sidewalk.the blonde had just walked into a column of erotic sound and subliminal suggestion coupled with brainwave entrainment.slowly her hands crept into the wasteband of her jogging suit while the other cupped her ample breast."she never knew what hit her" said flyneye " now just watch as i go strike up a conversation with her"......
    it'll be cool kinda like x-ray specs but with interactive results.im getting my tickets for the miss america show now LOL..........

    --
    *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
  55. NetZero Subway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hmmm... As far as it being used on subways I think that could actually be kind of a good idea. There could be two types of subways: one that's you pay for (like you already do) and you don't have to listen to any advertisements and one which is free in which you have to listen to these advertisements. For people that are broke or just really cheap the latter would be a good choice to have.

  56. Re: by boulat · · Score: 0

    Its fascinating how this guy comes up with such easy and common sense concepts without in-depth calculus analysis or any of those engineering proves one might go through before constructing a prototype. He is one of those guys like Einstein who just works by his instincts and achieves the results. Who would have thought of a club where you dont have a 30 kW sound system and you dont hear the beats thump the walls?> Or even better - now you dont need to build nightclubs in residential or abondoned places.

  57. Re:Grado SR 80 by Bunji+X · · Score: 1

    Ah, and that would not be annoying for the non-intended audience, in what way?

    Read the article and get a clue what the system is about.

    --
    ---
    The combined human population is enough to feed every living tiger for app. 28000 years.
  58. Re:oh well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm sure he'd reply, but his system is probably down for the moment.

  59. Applications by Animats · · Score: 2, Interesting
    This thing has lots of uses. Kiosk systems. Trade shows. Phone booths. But the killer app may be audio (and video) conferencing.

    The other direction, the steerable microphone with strong off-axis noise rejection, has been around for years. I have one, and it's not a big parabolic reflector; it's four small microphones and a DSP. Combine that with the ultrasonic speaker and you have a hands-free phone that's useful in office environments. You could probably mount the microphones on the speaker, because the outgoing signal is ultrasonic until the impedance of the air downconverts it. So the outgoing audio can be filtered out from the microphones.

  60. DRM? by nurb432 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Now the RIAA can restrict 'collaterial hearing' from your car stereo..

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  61. Re:For those of us who don't like giving our detai by slasher+guy · · Score: 1

    neither did I.

  62. Got one at Work by mistermund · · Score: 5, Interesting

    We have one of their units at work, and have been using it since the fall. It really does work - you're able to point sound at someone 20 feet away, yet the person standing next to them hears nothing. Also, any sound reflecting surface (concrete walls) that the beam is aimed at effectively becomes the sound surface itself. The only downsides to the unit is that bass is nonexistent - high frequencies only. Also, volume is fairly limited, but it works well enough. I believe we paid about $800 for the device, so it's not that terribly expensive.

    It's really fun to aim it out the window of our building at passing people below. (God speaking to them, etc)

    1. Re:Got one at Work by dpete4552 · · Score: 1

      Where do you go about purchasing one of these bad boys?

      --
      http://www.archive.org/details/ThePowerOfNightmares
    2. Re:Got one at Work by the-build-chicken · · Score: 1

      Like other poster...how about letting us know how you go about acquiring them (do you contact the company directly, or does it have channel partners)? Thanks in advance :)

    3. Re:Got one at Work by mistermund · · Score: 1

      We contacted the company directly. My boss flew out to California to meet with them and get a demo. Sorry I don't have the details.

      We'll be mounting one on a computer controlled servo gimbal this week for automatic pointing of sounds as part of a training simulation.

  63. In other news.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ProTools has been declared a terrorist weapon. Thousands of bubblegum pop musicians are being rounded up and shipped to camp x-ray...

  64. Come On--Nobody by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is Jesus, Kent.

    1. Re:Come On--Nobody by DirkDaring · · Score: 1

      ...and stop playing with yourself!

  65. Re:Grado SR 80 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You believe that? You've been lied to. Go listen to some Totem Acoustics System 1s, and tell me again how your Grado POS headphones can compare?

  66. Combined with face recognition by imnoteddy · · Score: 1
    Imagine, he says, walking by a soda machine (say, one of the five million in Japan that will soon employ HSS),
    triggering a proximity detector, then hearing what you alone hear -- the plink of ice cubes and the invocation,
    ''Wouldn't a Coke taste great right about now?''.

    If you recognize the face of a person within the "target" area you could target a personal message.

    From a Coke machine to a known customer: "Hi Bob, It's Tuesday! You always buy a Coke on Tuesday!"

    From a hacked Coke machine at a sleazy motel: "Hi Bob! It's a Tuesday! You always bring your secretary here on Tuesday!"

    --
    No electrons were harmed creating this post, though some may have been subjected to electrical and/or magnetic fields.
    1. Re:Combined with face recognition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you ever see "Minority Report" ???

  67. Sounds stupid by twitter · · Score: 1
    It's possible for coke machines to carefully stay things to people who walk by. You use normal spearkers and the inverse square law to talk to one or two people at a time. That's anoying enough so that people don't use it.

    This gadget would be worse as a barker. It will transmit that sound hundreds of feet down hallways anoying all the people there. Can you imagine dozens of these things all trying to get you to buy shit?

    Currently we think of people who destroy public equipment and hear voices as crazy. We won't if anyone is dumb enough to use one of these things.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    1. Re:Sounds stupid by RadioTV · · Score: 1

      I'm afraid that any Coke machine that I come across using one of these will meet with a wee bit of the ultra-violence.

      --
      I have great faith in fools - self confidence my friends call it. - Edgar Allan Poe
    2. Re:Sounds stupid by twitter · · Score: 1
      I'm afraid that any Coke machine that I come across using one of these will meet with a wee bit of the ultra-violence.

      Easier to pull it's plug. Other rotten tricks I've seen are a coke poured into the place the cokes fall out and buble gum stuck into the coin slot. Ultra violence would be more satifying. Hunter S Thompson reports that a man who passed out on his horn in Samoa was catrated by outraged bystanders. Ultrasonic won't last long as a means of advertising.

      --

      Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

  68. Stop The Noise! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    It isn't enough that we have the raging cattle noise of endless traffic, engines roaring, tires squealing, horns honking, drivers' groaning, the people who can't seem to sit still and have to babble all the time, especially into their cellphones, the buzz of planes overhead, and all the other noises that drown out the relaxing sounds of nature and valuable silence, visual noise bombardments in the form of billboards, TV advertisements, and other such idiocy, but now we're going a step further and attacking our minds seemingly directly with yet more noise?

    The Amish and Catholic monastic life suddenly seems a lot more attractive.

    I opt out of the noise pollution.

  69. You can license HSS technology here by GuNgA-DiN · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Check this site out:

    http://www.atcsd.com/tl_hss.html

    (Includes data sheet, white paper, FAQ, etc...)

  70. Subliminal Possibilities by Demeizer · · Score: 1

    Well one things for sure if this kinda technology falls in the wrong hands there will be catastrophic effects. Imagine using pyschology with this kindof technology, something like a silent assassin that delivers only subliminal messages to his victim (someone in power most likely). What would he be able to do? Of course that depends on the person. I guess it could be used in alot of positive ways example enjoyment. But imagine all the other possibilities. Like thought focusing, the ability to actually see clearly pictures in your head with the use of directed frequency. Sorry i'm just babbling. L8rz.

  71. Someone please post the baby sound... by eMartin · · Score: 1

    I'm sure someone here has a recording of a baby crying and the ability to reverse it and put it into an MP3.

    I've gotta know what this sounds like.

  72. Re:Grado SR 80 by Sirwar · · Score: 4, Informative

    Headphones are like any speaker, they are designed for a different sound. The BEST home theater setup wont be the BEST for music, and vice versa. Sennheiser, while good, are only good for their kind of music. Music with delicate highs and a full frequency range. Mostly classical and the like. Awesome soundstage. Flat frequency response. However I wouldn't own a pair of Senns because I don't listen to that kind of music. Not only that, but they need a LOT of power. Normal headphone jack? no good. You need a dedicated $200+ headphone amp(the DSP Sennheiser sells is NOT an amp, btw) Grado cans on the other hand sound much faster and alive, great for rock, or any kind of faster music. They also have a better sounding bass. Listen to Rush with the Sennheiser HD-600(most expensive non-electrostatics they make) and then listen with the Grado SR-60(cheapest open-air Grado makes). TOTALLY different sound, and despite the lack of bass in the Grado low-end models, I bet a donut you'll like the SR-60 better. The SR-225 is probably the best value, and some say best sound of the SR line, but I went for the 325's. the RS line uses wood so a smoother sweeter sound, I can't wait to get some myself. Downfall to Grado: soundstage. Almost none. Its a very in-head sound. With Senns you'll sometimes wonder if you left some speakers on by accident. High-end Grados still sound perfect and smooth, but you know their headphones. Even so, Senns sound so dead on the wrong music, a pair of $50 sonys would be just as good. Do electrostatics like Stax sound better than normal dynamics? well, I've never tried any myself, but most people who spend like 10k on headphone setups still don't buy Stax. Best soundstage headphones going around right now? People say the AKG K1000, but they sorta cheat, the drivers are held away from your ear. Funny looking things. btw, did you know you can make your own electrostatic headphones at home? I believe you use clear plastic wrap to produce the sound.... 30 Helens agree, Grado is Great.

  73. How ? by Bugmaster · · Score: 1
    I am curious as to how this technology works. The article mentions that it can project a beam of sound, or a sphere of sound, over 450 feet, with no loss in volume -- and it can do this virtually without moving parts. This sounds a bit too good to be true.

    So, can someone explain, in high-school-physics terms, how this might be possible ?

    --
    >|<*:=
    1. Re:How ? by nicsterrr · · Score: 1

      Basically, sound waves are non-linear. It's just that at the levels that we listen to them, the pressure fluctuations are small compared to atmospheric pressure that the non-linearities are very small; so small that acoustical engineers don't bother calculating them unless they are working with something like rockets or something else really really loud.

      This system uses a very loud ultrasonic wave to generate non-linearities in the air. In order to do this, the ultrasonic wave has to be much louder than say the sound that a normal loudspeaker would produce. We don't hear the ultrasonic wave because it's over twice the frequency of our hearing limit. What we hear with this device is actually the byproduct of the sound production, which is something we would not normally hear with a normal audio frequency transducer because the non-linearities are normally too small.

      In conclusion, this device hammers out really loud ultrasonic waves at you in order to generate really quiet audiable byproducts. Presumably, it's only able to generate enough SPL due to the beamwidth of the ultrasonic wave being so narrow.

    2. Re:How ? by bezuwork's+friend · · Score: 1

      You can see his patents relating to ultrasonic speakers here

  74. Can't Wait For Grandmom To Have Another Aneurism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Noise always requires physical movement. Oscillating movement has destructive potential.
    Whoever owns one of these gadgets that is closest to my grandmom when her next aneurism hits will be sued for millions. Oh, the pain and suffering she will have endured! It will have practically destroyed my life! I'm gonna be rich, rich I tell yas! I'll be taking bids starting at 75% of winnings from interested attorneys beginning next week.

  75. Nevermind, I found one. by eMartin · · Score: 2, Informative

    I found a baby crying WAV at http://ladywing.crosswinds.net/wavs.html.

    Without editing it, you can play it backwards in the Quicktime Player by pressing ctrl-[left arrow], and ctrl-L will loop it.

    Anyway, it actually sounds pretty much the same played both ways.

  76. oops by Sirwar · · Score: 1

    Guess I should learn to use the html paragraph tag in /. forums. doh'ith!

    1. Re:oops by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not only can't you use HTML, you spew forth the worst kind of touchy-feely pseudo-science dreck that is so prevalent in the 'high end' audio world. Faster headphones with sweeter sound, eh?
      How about some 200$/inch speaker cable while you're at it?
      An audiphool and his money are soon parted.

  77. Re:wow - indeed! by riqnevala · · Score: 1

    In fact, there may or may not be any echoes at all! You know that whistling sound from amplified noise feedback? Well if there is no sound, there is no feedback, and there is no whistling!

    Please, spanish audience to the left, and english audience to the right..

    --
    love slashdot. populate it. use it. abuse it. hate it. kill it. miss it. stop following links, they only kill servers.
  78. The voice of God... by mackman · · Score: 2, Funny

    Bart: Rod! Todd! This is God!
    Rod: How did you get in my head?
    Bart: Whaddya mean, how did I get in your head? I created the universe! Stupid kid.
    Todd: Forgive my brother. We believe you.
    Bart: Talk is cheap. Perhaps I'll test a guy's faith. Walk through the wall! I will remove it for you.
    Rod: [thud]
    Bart: Ha ha ha.
    Todd: What do you want from us?
    Bart: I got a job for you. Bring forth all the cookies from your kitchen and leave them on the Simpsons' porch.
    Rod: But those cookies belong to our parents.
    Bart: Ugh! Look, do you want a happy God or a vengeful God?
    Todd: Happy God.
    Bart: Then quit flapping your lip and make with the cookies!
    Todd+Rod: Yes, sir!

  79. Stop eating, drink Guinness by Hal-9001 · · Score: 1
    John Anderton, you could use a Guinness right now.
    I can always use a Guinness. Guinness: the beer that drinks like a meal. ;-)
    --
    "It take 9 months to bear a child, no matter how many women you assign to the job."
  80. US Military Using Real Genius as Inspiration? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Kent, this is Jesus. You've been a naughty, naughty boy."

    Between this and that plane with the huge laser mounted in it, doesn't it seem like the US military is milking the 80's movie Real Genius for ideas?

  81. crush crush crush! by dswensen · · Score: 1

    Reading the article, this inventor sounds like the "I'm crushing your head" guy from Kids in the Hall.

    Look at you! I'm beaming sounds into your head! Hah hah hah!

    1. Re:crush crush crush! by chazmote · · Score: 1

      Yeah, except he doesn't have the courage to at least face his victims - a little different than being obnoxious to somebody's face.

  82. Can anyone say "assault". How about "terrorism" by chazmote · · Score: 1

    How would this be different than, oh say, someone lacing something in the pulbic domain with LSD (it probably won't kill anybody outright, it's undetectable, disorients users.) Seems like good old Orwelian terrorism. (Terrorism (from Webters): Systematic use of terror (cause of extreme anxiety) especially as a means of coercion.) If there are any lawyers reading this - do us a favor and find the people this twerp has harrased and get a class action going. Ditto the post on finding countermeasures, and fast.

    1. Re:Can anyone say "assault". How about "terrorism" by Katravax · · Score: 1

      It's too bad your post isn't being modded up. You make a good point. You apparently have the same fears about it that I do. You can now be forced to listen to something. You can be harrassed, driven crazy, made scared, made sick, even injured, have no defense against it, and it might not even be possible to tell who is doing it. You can guarantee the cops will use this against protestors, even the peaceful ones (witness the forced pepper solution videos against peaceful demonstrators where the cops held their eyes open and dabbed it in with Q-Tips, fairly easy to find with Google). I'm seeing uses like the sick-stick in Minority Report, but now it can be done to a whole crowd. The beneficial uses -- all apparently convenience -- can never match the dangers this technology presents.

    2. Re:Can anyone say "assault". How about "terrorism" by lommer · · Score: 1

      Please don't use the word Orwellian unless you have at least read 1984, and preferably the other classics like Animal Farm, et al. The context you use it in makes it only an inapplicable buzzword that onlyu demonstrates your ignorance of its meaning.

    3. Re:Can anyone say "assault". How about "terrorism" by lommer · · Score: 1

      damn, forgot the preview button again...

  83. Well said by chazmote · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Unbelievable that "personal countermeasures" are going to be required just to walk down the street!

    1. Re:Well said by MikeFM · · Score: 1

      Where did you grow up? I've been using personal countermeasures since the 2nd grade. Ranging from a bad attitude to toys that can zap annoying jocks to radio jammers to stop those damned freaks driving down the street with their radios blasting.

      If someone misuses one of these in-your-head speakers on me I'll fry the damn things electronics. Oopsie.. did I do that? :)

      Other than such annoying uses this actualy sounds like cool technology. I had one of those all-in-one earphone/microphone things at one time and it was awesome. I'd love to find one like it again for Net phone use.

      --
      At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
  84. Thanks for demonstrating need to fight this by chazmote · · Score: 1

    "It's really fun to aim it out the window of our building at people passing below..." Laugh it up next time you get poisoned. See my post on assault. ferra....

  85. Seriously cool, if not abused by chazmote · · Score: 1

    Agreed it could be put to some great uses. But as the creator and others (posting here) have proven, it's far more likely to be used as a weapon than as an aid. I'll be learning everything I can about it to come up with a counter.

  86. Re:Dumbshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bullshit. If one of the pilots were a relative of yours, you'd be grieved by the loss, but proud of the sacrifice.

    Unless you're a whiny, selfish prick, of course.

  87. Re:Grado SR 80 by tang · · Score: 1

    I have the Grado sr125s, great cans, for the price. I audioditioned the Sennheiser...680? I think, or 580? I cant remember, but wasnt impressed for the price/performance ratio. Lots of people find the grados uncomfortable, but I wear them 7-8 hours a day at work, no discomfort. Grados reminded me much more of my home Klipsch rig (Heritage Klipsch) in their forwardness, I wouldn't trade them for all the Sennheisers in the world.

  88. Re:Dumbshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I guess you would be proud to sacrifice your loved ones to the incompetence of army personnel. Yeah, right.

    But then again, you probably do nothing except jacking off to patriotic websites all day, so you don't really know what pride and sacrifice is.

  89. Re:Dumbshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would be proud to sacrifice my loved ones in a valiant crusade against evil. Yes.

    And you're right about the jacking off, but the websites aren't patriotic. Unless pussy is patriotic. Which I guess it is. ("Pussies for peace!") So I guess you were right after all. I do nothing all day except jacking off to patriotic websites.

  90. Noise always requires physical movement by chazmote · · Score: 1

    Just like hitting somone over the head with a bat does. Hopefully the law will step in and liability of owenrship/production of such devices will curtail abuse. But that won't keep it out of the hands of the cops/shock troops...

  91. Watch the suicide rate... by Azureflare · · Score: 1
    go up 1000+%. Imagine all those annoying commercial jingles...constantly going in your head....AHHH MAKE IT STOPPP NOOOOOOOO

    BTW what are the military applications of this? What's to stop them from making someone's head explode? I think the unstoppable noise would probably be the most annoying. How do you put brainplugs in?

  92. Excellent point by chazmote · · Score: 1

    Any technology can be put to destructive use (passanger airplanes). However, What this author (and seemingly others, who have posted here) has already done should be grounds for criminal prosecution. One thing to have a sign at the front of the museum saying "Understand that if you stand within 5 ft. of an exhibit you will be recieving ultrasonic waves which will vibrate your body to create an audible description of the work..." Quite another to harass passers-by with random noise without explanation. I hope the creator gets his mansion taken away.

  93. HOWTOs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anybody have some links to a DIY plans on this? ;)

  94. Re:Dumbshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We can only hope the "valiant crusade against evil" thing is a joke. Really, I can't believe you're actually buying it. I for my part have not heard that much bullshit talk on TV since I saw a Hitler documentary (it had lots of speeches, too).

    Just saw some "progress report" on the war in the news. They mostly tried to ignore the questions about friendly fire and stressed that at least Saddam didn't use any of his imaginary weapons of mass destruction yet. Is the public really that dumb/ignorant?

  95. Been done by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think a fellow at MIT has been doing exactly this for at least five years. Here is his company's home-page: http://www.holosonics.com

    Is this patent infringement are these actually different?

  96. Re:Dumbshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A joke? No. Which part do you not buy? The part about evil? That's okay. I'm glad you can't recognize evil. That means you've never seen it.

    No, the public isn't dumb. We understand that this is a war. Why are we not talking about friendly fire? Because we only have heard of one instance of it, and we're not 100% sure yet that that's actually what happened.

    And the fact that you think Saddam's weapons are imaginary just shows that you're a fucking idiot. There are "imaginary" weapons lying in the Kuwaiti desert in smoking pieces after being shot down by Patriot missiles!

  97. Again, thanks for providing resolve. by chazmote · · Score: 1

    Too bad you didn't do time.

  98. Re:Dumbshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, right. I'm sure you have seen things so "evil" in your life that you just have to believe it. Like for example the guy that always stole your lunch money in school.

    Concerning friendly fire: Did you hear about the guy who threw a grenade into an American command tent in Kuwait? He was supposeldy American! Great army you have there.

    And a scud missile with a conventional warhead is hardly a dangerous "weapon of mass destruction". If it was classified as such, why does the military tell that they STILL HAVE NOT FOUND any hard evidence that these weapons actually exist? And how many were scuds shot down? FOUR! OH MY GOD FOUR MISSILES! THE UNIVERSE IS GONNA DIE!

  99. Applications? by mivok · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I had a similar idea a while back, just with a little more sinister application. It involved using two ultrasound sources with frequencies differering by something like 7Hz (cant remember exactly, but it was supposedly the resonant frequency of the gut), aim it at someone and make them feel distinctly queasy. Thankfully for all my classmates, I never actually got to try it out (I'm not sure if the guy in the article used the same method, and whether my idea would have worked), but if he were to transmit the sound at the natural frequencies of certain objects to that specific object, some pretty spooky effects could be generated, and nobody would hear.
    (Time to go set up a haunted house I think.. smashing wine glasses, voices in peoples heads, strange feeling in the stomach - 'must be a ghost passing through me'). I'd make a fortune!

  100. Re:What your Country dont want you to see!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's always amazing how many retards claim to be speaking on behalf of the "American people". Keep going you moron! If the army hadn't rejected you because you were too fat and ugly, you would maybe know by now how much "fun" a war actually is.

    Let's roll!

  101. 7.1 anyone? by Powercntrl · · Score: 1

    Just when you thought it was safe to buy that amplifier bundled with 6 speakers and a subwoofer, the next thing you know - you need a new amplifier cause they'll be a speaker added for beaming stuff right into your noggin.

    This is getting insane. Anyone know some companies that produce sound-cancelling hardware I can invest in? I have a feeling about something...

    --

    ---
    DRM is like antifreeze, to the MPAA/RIAA it's sweet, to the consumers it's poison.
  102. KENT! THIS IS GOD, KENT! by doubleyou · · Score: 1

    I immediately thought of Real Genius when I read this. But none of you young'uns would remember that movie anyway...

  103. Re:Dumbshit by bitchazz · · Score: 1

    My understanding is that they were not the illegal SCUDs, but a medium range weapon that would most likely be considered a defensive weapon. Sorry to butt into your pissing match of a thread.

  104. Think of the military applications... by An+Onerous+Coward · · Score: 1

    "But you have recruiting ads on TV. Why do you need subliminal messages?"
    "It's a three-pronged attack. Subliminal, liminal, and superliminal."
    "Superliminal?"
    "I'll show you. Hey you! Join the navy!"
    "Uh, yeah, alright."
    "I'm in."

    The Simpsons is the sum of all wisdom.

    --

    You want the truthiness? You can't handle the truthiness!

  105. Re:Dumbshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're wrong. The UN said that missiles with a range of more than 90 miles are illegal for Iraq. These babys flew more than 110 miles. They're either Scuds or al Samouds or al Fatahs or al Husseins, all of which are illegal. Saddam Hussein is a fucking liar, and every reasonably intelligent person in the world knows it. Except for the idiots who refuse to believe the facts right in front of them, of course. There's a word for those kinds of people. They're called "crazy," and should be either ignored or, if they make a nuisance of themselves, shot on sight.

  106. Re:What your Country dont want you to see!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's it? That's all you've got? Boy, you're dumb.

  107. Inside Joke by Jafafa+Hots · · Score: 1

    Does this story leave anyone else with a craving for a Mokie Coke?

    --
    This space available.
  108. Re:Grado SR 80 by eric434 · · Score: 1

    It's called a reaaaally powerful headphone amplifier...

    DO a search on www.headwize.com, a guy named Apheared once built one that let his Grado SR80s be heard through a steel door in the middle of New York City.

    It's a portable amp that ran (runs?) off 16AA batteries... (ok, maybe not so portable!)

    --
    This .sig temporary until a better .sig can be constructed.
  109. Re:What your Country dont want you to see!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's it? That's all you've got to answer? Boy, you're dumb.

  110. Imagine a Knicks game... by jayrtfm · · Score: 1

    .... if Spike Lee had one of these.

  111. Even better if... by Sunlighter · · Score: 1

    ...it sends a "destructive wave" to destroy the transmitting device!

    --
    Sunlit World Scheme. Weird and different.
    1. Re:Even better if... by eggcozy · · Score: 1

      > Even better if it sends a "destructive wave" to destroy the transmitting device!

      Even better if it sends a "destructive wave" to destroy the person holding the transmitting device!

  112. Re:What your Country dont want you to see!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    News just in: "US Army fails to invade Germany because they were unable to find Berlin on a map!"

  113. Re:What your Country dont want you to see!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Ah, yes. The old "Americans are dumb!" argument. Which is oh so effective against the "Europeans are fascist, elitist scum sold nuclear reactors to third-world dictatorships!" argument.
    "Mr. Secretary, is it true that only 15% of Americans can find Berlin on a map?"

    "Yes, but fortunately every single one of them is a United States Marine."
  114. Re:What your Country dont want you to see!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What else could I have said? I was accused of being "fat and ugly." What do you expect me to do? Say "nuh-uh?"

  115. Re:What your Country dont want you to see!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Marines? Aren't this the guys that are trained not to use their brains anyway? I doubt they are able to differentiate a map from, say, a Whopper with cheese.

    I've seen quite a few documentaries about the marines which also included interviews with some of them and have to say the old "Americans are dumb!" argument fits perfectly here.

  116. I'd just be happy if.... by ralfg33k · · Score: 1

    I could tell the dipshit doing 45 mph in the fast lane to GET THE *&%$ OUT OF MY WAY!!!!

  117. Re:What your Country dont want you to see!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Damn it, you ARE fat and ugly. I expected you to lose some fucking weight and get an education so you'd be able to do something else besides shoveling in potato chips and "being patriotic" while watching the war on TV!

  118. This one goes to eleven! by JRHelgeson · · Score: 1

    Spinal tap could use this technology when they're on tour!

    It's very special, because, as you can see--the numbers all go to 11. Right across the board. Eleven, 11...
    And most amps go up to 10?
    Exactly.
    Does that mean it's louder?
    Is it any louder? Well, it's one louder, isn't it?
    It's not 10.
    You see, most blokes are going to be playing at 10--you're on 10 on your guitar, where can you go from there? Where?
    I don't know.
    Nowhere!
    Exactly!
    What we do, if we need that extra push over the cliff, you know what we do? You put it up to 11.
    Eleven.
    Exactly. One louder.
    Why don't you just make 10 louder, and make 10 be the top number, and make that a little louder?
    {confused} This one goes to eleven.

    Spinal Tap Rules!

    --
    Good security is based upon reality and common sense. Common sense is a function of having common knowledge.
  119. Oh No!! by rat7307 · · Score: 1

    I've got the feeling that they'll use those Mentos ads as both advertising AND as a battlefield weapon....

    --
    Burma?
  120. Re:Dumbshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Except that the guy who threw the nades into the tent was actually AN AMERICAN SOLDIER.

  121. I want one of these in my car by Lord+Sauron · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So I can send messages like:

    - Hey dude, your tire's flat
    - Go home, or learn where the accelerator pedal is
    - You moron, speed up
    - Do you know how I can get to Chestnut St. ?
    - Yo mamma's fat

    and direct it to a car.

    1. Re:I want one of these in my car by mrdogi · · Score: 1

      That's an extremely cruel thing to be doing to cars! I mean, jeesh, the next thing you know we'll be enslaving the poor things, and making them do our bidding: driving us places, being forced to stay outside in the weather... oh, wait. nevermind.

  122. Re:What your Country dont want you to see!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm more of a cookie man. Potato chips aren't my thing.

  123. Re:What your Country dont want you to see!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ever thought of dipping them?
    No, not the cookies.

  124. Political Uses- Angry Voices in The Head by Alien54 · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Yea, great, mucic for the voices i my head to sing along with. Quite badly I might add.

    The NYTimes article describes the protoype used as being very portable.

    flash forward.

    Can you imagine a protester using this to tell a politician what they think about the politician? or dozens of protesters.

    Or aimed at Bill Gates at Comdex. or any other celebrity.

    more subtly done, just a quiet voice wispering in the ear "you're evil" or something. Even with glass in between, the glass should resonate nicely.[?]

    This will turn being a celeb into a living hell.

    I can envision the havok teenage boys with these things could do.

    --
    "It is a greater offense to steal men's labor, than their clothes"
    1. Re:Political Uses- Angry Voices in The Head by GMontag · · Score: 1

      Can you imagine a protester using this to tell a politician what they think about the politician? or dozens of protesters.

      Obviously, this is being used by the WWP and MIM already to recruit "useful idiots".

      How else would one explain the 'Kill Kurds, Not Mumar' and 'No Blood for Liberty' crowd? Oh yea, don't forget 'No Blood for Oil' non-arguement (easily avoided by adopting the french/German/Russian head turning position on trade/sanctions) and the casting of Nush as Hitler while Saddam is Stalin refined.

    2. Re:Political Uses- Angry Voices in The Head by TheLink · · Score: 1

      Or imagine some military guy using it on a dumb president in the middle of the night. "Hi Mr President, this is God speaking, Mr X is evil".

      --
  125. How does it work? by lommer · · Score: 1

    The article is pretty thin on the details - does anyone here know or have some idea how this technology works? The article makes some vague references to ultrasound, does it maybe utilize interferance patterns or something?

    1. Re:How does it work? by thynk · · Score: 1

      http://www.atcsd.com/tl_hss.html has some more detail on how it works.

      --

      Good judgment comes from experience, and a lot of that comes from bad judgment.
  126. Well that's just great by Tsunamio · · Score: 1

    Ignoring the whole advertising thing-not because it's not a ghastly prospect, just because everyone else seems to have touched on it already-I think the government having this is just as bad. Consider, folks protesting something just plain wrong-not war maybe, but, I dunno, baby eating. And these are popular protests that the government is ignoring, so they escalate to civil disobedience, ala civil rights protests. Do we really want the government to be able to cripple things like that?
    On the other hand, I suppose it's entirely likely that the Supreme Court might ban these on an invasion of privacy basis. We can but hope.

  127. Re:What your Country dont want you to see!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Okay. We're dumb. We're also kicking the ass of every sand-monkey we can find. And don't think we won't turn left at Baghdad and take care of a few other problems that have been pissing us off of late.

  128. I've heard this system in person by rasper99 · · Score: 2, Informative
    Having this system demonstrated was something you can't really describe. It was a similar sound to mono headphones but had a way different feeling. Without anything on your head or in your ears the sound was coming from inside my head. Truly a strange feeling.

    There are many saying how it's an invasion of personal space, etc. Talking to the people who presented it they pointed out how a loudspeaker blares out over a large area. This system would be projected only in the area near a vending machine, store front window display, TV screen in a store, etc.

    In a store with a lot of TV screens hawking different products each one would have it's "sound zone" which you could easily leave.

  129. Re:Cone of Silence by Wolfrider · · Score: 1

    --Chief, is that you??? == Agent 86

    Check out:
    http://us.imdb.com/Title?0081249

    --
    .
    == WolfriderV6 == I'm willing to admit that *I just might* be wrong... Are you??
  130. Repeat post? Whatever... by TheRealStyro · · Score: 1

    I remember reading about this some time ago. Hmm, possibly within the past year.

    At any rate, an interesting device. But looks like it has far too many non-beneficial uses - narrow cast marketing (hell, we have too many adverts already), protest/crowd control (where did that constitution go off to?), weapons (like we need more), 'suggestive control' (ok, more adverts), etc. While the beneficial uses are too few - rescue vehicle siren (can the sound go through metal & glass and distract someone from an +800 watt car audio system?), 'private' audio without disturbing others (yes, but it is mono or stereo at best, and anyway it has lousy bass; what are going to do - watch lifetime/oxygen channels all the time?).

    Interesting, but has dubious societal benefits.

    --
  131. The first time this happens to me by teamhasnoi · · Score: 3, Interesting
    there will be one less HSS in the world, and one less operator.

    I'm sure that this 'sounds' like great tech to advertisers. It's too bad I will be forced to direct it at you at your home, work, and anywhere you go. I won't be gentle.

    I have a right to silence in 'my head' and will defend that right like a crazy motherfucker hearing voices.

    Got it, Madison Ave?

    1. Re:The first time this happens to me by peter · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Think about it. If advertizers thought it was a good idea to broadcast adds from pop machines, they could do it with normal loudspeakers. They're smart enough to know how much that would piss people off, and lead to the machine getting unplugged, so they don't do it. There are laws against noise pollution, and so on. It might catch on in stores like the article suggested, though, and I don't like that prospect. I already detest shopping, and HSS would certainly make me dislike it even more. It would be a lot harder to smash the emitter in a store than in a soda machine.

      You're right (in your reply to your own message) about the scary prospects of this in the hands of unscrupulous individuals in positions of power, such as the CIA.

      --
      #define X(x,y) x##y
      Peter Cordes ; e-mail: X(peter@cordes , .ca)
  132. Oh this is GREAT!!! by GReaToaK_2000 · · Score: 1

    So now they (people with this device) can violate you person any time... Combined with audio technology you could truly injure people.

    Dear old Grandma is dead, but if someone has a sound byte from her they can pretend to be Grandma talking to you...

    ALSO, we have week minded people in this country that think they hear things in records and kill themselves and others...

    So HOW, JUST HOW is this a good technology?

    Greatoak
    -"Kill the band, Kill your family, then kill yourself. Make sure you get your whole head in front of the shotgun. Thank you for calling..."

  133. Re:Dumbshit by kaoshin · · Score: 1

    And a muslim.

  134. tin foil hats!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Time to bust out those tin foil hats boyz!!1

  135. Who will believe you when you are crazy? by teamhasnoi · · Score: 1
    As I was thinking more about this, the thought that disturbed me is that there is (as of now) no way to tell if you have been targeted by this device.

    It leaves no marks, or physical evidence of its use.

    This part made me ill:

    At first, the noise is dreadful -- just primally wrong -- but not unbearable. I repeatedly tell Norris to crank it up (trying to approximate battle-strength volume, without the nausea), until the noise isn't so much a noise as an assault on my nervous system. I nearly fall down and, for some reason, my eyes hurt. When I bravely ask how high they'd turned the dial, Norris laughs uproariously. ''That was nothing!'' he bellows. ''That was about 1 percent of what an enemy would get. One percent!'' Two hours later, I can still feel the ache in the back of my head.

    There is no way to tell that the author has undergone this 'minor' attack. I'm afraid I see uses for this device like torture, interregation, and harrasment. I'm guessing that distraction at the right time (such as driving, or crossing the street) can make quick work of a political 'radical' or 'troublemaker'. 'Hearing voices' could brainwash a victim, or cause that person to commit suicide, murder or other acts, just to get the voices to stop (negative reinforcement).

    Imagine yourself sitting at home alone when this device is used against you. A whispery voice calls you by name, startling you. You look around, your heart racing. You KNOW you are alone, but you know you heard something. Or did you? Convinced you were 'imagining things' you go back to reading your book or surfing the net.

    "We are watching you." The voice whispers again. You jump up, terrified. Grabbing your red Swingline stapler, you shakily call out, "Whoever is doing this better fucking stop!"

    Your voice seems to echo back at you as you glance around. The voice sounded like it was right behind you! You start looking around the room. Was that door open like that when you came in here? You're not sure.

    Suddenly manical laughter mixed with inhuman groans and screams erupts as if all around you. Your scream and the scream in your head twist around each other as the room spins. The laughter is louder and the screaming changes to pain. You grab your head and it seems as if it is going to come off your shoulders. You drop to the floor and vomit from the pain. You black out.

    Excuse my "Choose your own Adventure" writing style, but I really wanted to point out that people are easily manipulated when confronted with the unknown.

    The military and police forces WILL use this, and certainly MISUSE this technology.

    This device has far more potential for evil than good. *Especially* since the 'good' uses are primarily advertising.

    This is the scariest thing I have read on slashdot.

  136. omfg by moro_666 · · Score: 0

    i don't give a damn about this sound device
    but i WANT THAT CHOPPER !!!!!
    the only question now is how to raise 50k $ ????

    anyone else interested for the chopper ?

    --

    I'd tell you the chances of this story being a dupe, but you wouldn't like it.
  137. Re:Cone of Silence by Rob+Hoogers · · Score: 1

    Drat! You miss nothing!

    "Well, 99, we are what we are. I'm a secret agent, trained to be cold vicious and savage. . . . Not enough to be a businessman."

    Check out: http://www.cinerhama.com/getsmart/innovations.html

  138. Re:Grado SR 80 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    so now make that same device target only one person. while they are walking by. from 400 feet away.

  139. Crazy implications by dirtsurfer · · Score: 1

    Wow.. so pretty soon you'll be able to hook up an amplifier to a soda machine and shatter the skulls of anyone who wanders by. This is going to be an interesting future o_O

  140. Reminds me of Minority Report by mpweasel · · Score: 1

    Remember the personalized advertising? One machine scans your eyeball to identify you, another projects personalized 3-d ads to your eyes and ears to entice you to buy their latest product...

  141. Re:KENT! THIS IS GOD, KENT! by jjhall · · Score: 1

    I know what you mean! I thought that movie was pretty cool a few years back when I saw it. I would love to have some of the tech they use in that movie, that is for sure!

    Jeremy

  142. Re:Grado SR 80 by insanecarbonbasedlif · · Score: 1

    TOTALLY different sound, and despite the lack of bass in the Grado low-end models, I bet a donut you'll like the SR-60 better.

    OK, I'll take you up on that...

    Ok, I like the Sennheiser HD-600 better (It makes working man sound AweSOME...)...
    So, ah, make mine a maple bar.
    Do you deliver?

    --
    Just because I doubt myself does not mean I find your position compelling.
  143. Re:KENT! THIS IS GOD, KENT! by Rob+Hoogers · · Score: 1

    Remembered it when I read the line. Great jokes. Starts off with Val Kilmer being asked if he is such and such. 'I hope so' he retorts, 'I'm wearing his underwear'. One of the few movies with ultracool nerds I can think of...

  144. Hearing for the deaf? by tomzyk · · Score: 1

    Just a thought on a possible application of this technology:
    I don't know what state laws are about your hearing capabilities in order to get a driving license (it could be dangerous to have someone driving the roads without being able to hear a siren... but then again, we have teenagers blasting car stereos all of the time anyways.) but something like this might be useful. Put a microphone on the outside of the car that picks up random noise from outside and, if it hears anything like a police/firetruck siren [you don't want it to pick up EVERYthing or you'd go crazy], it could "tell" the driver about it.

    Or maybe having some kind of apparatus/booth so deaf people can practice their speaking. A recording can say a word and they can try to repeat it. Talking into a microphone with a delay on the playback could allow them to learn to adjust their pitch/tone/accentuation/etc....

    Just a thought. (and no, I don't know anything about being deaf or even know anyone that is deaf. This is just me thinking out loud.)

    --
    Karma: NaN
  145. World Domination by Sudheer_E · · Score: 1

    YAH! My plans of world domination using subliminal messages is now going to come true. Now all I have to do is find either (a) a really good advertising agent or (b) A crackhead 60's singer.