Slashdot Mirror


Slashback: Revolutionism, Media, Oregon

Updates and clarifications in tonight's Slashback include word on the extra-theatrical availability of Revolution OS, consideration of Free software in Oregon. availability of HP's new streaming-audio toy (which does not play Ogg Vorbis), and more. Read on for the details. Bonus material is always, well ... bonus. Khyron writes "Revolution OS, the definitive documentary film on the evolution of Linux and the relationship between the Free Software and Open Source movements, is finally available for purchase on DVD! The 2-disc special edition set now available includes full-length commentary by the director, as well as an additional 70 minutes of interview footage, a still image gallery, biographies, a 113-page documents section, and even the 'Free Software Song' music video. Additionally, in the spirit of its subject matter, the DVDs are unencrypted and region-free. I have contacted the director, J.T.S. Moore, and he is eager to grant permission to LUGs to hold free screenings -- he asks that you contact him first to coordinate and he'll even list your screening on his website."

Sounds and pictures from the same box -- impossible! An anonymous reader writes "The HP Digital Media Receiver ( discussed here before) is available for sale at CompUSA and online. The wired version is $199, and the wireless one is $299.

I've been using it for a little while, and I really like it so far. It took a while for the PC software to start serving, but now its fine. It found all my playlists and digital photos on the first pass, and the network setup worked properly too. I'd like to see higher-resolution photos, but it's a pretty cool way to show the pictures to my less-techie friends.

Also, I installed the PC software on both of my home PCs, and the Receiver automatically finds the music on both! It did have a bunch of duplicates (which made it easy for me to go prune out all my dual mp3s), but it was pretty cool. You can't edit a playlist at the TV set, which is a bit of a bummer, but I use WinAmp on my PC anyway, and that worked fine. I like the interface on the TV a lot (although it's a little dull after a while), and it sorted most of my media properly. Some of my MP3s ended up in weird places, but I guess that's from the ID3 tags?

One other thing - I am pretty sure I read somewhere that the Receiver runs Linux. Did anyone else see this too? The only other thing about it I didn't really like was the lack of a reset button. There is a power button, but it didn't reset the device when I pushed it, so I had to unplug it once.

Anyhow, I'm sure there are going to be a ton more products like this one out there soon, but I definitely prefer this to the Prismiq and the Audiotron. It's a much more intuitive box, although a front-panel LCD would be a really nice add!"

Since the general welfare means you, too. Cooper Stevenson writes "Thanks to all of those who called, wrote, and emailed their Legislators in Oregon, House Bill 2892 will get a hearing as covered by the Oregonian:

'A new bill would make Oregon the first state to take a formal stance against the hefty fees and technological limitations of software produced by large corporations such as Microsoft.'

'A House committee is scheduled to consider a proposal that promotes "open-source" software, which doesn't charge recurring fees and enables customers to alter the software code, making it more compatible with other programs.'

Global neural links sought. Controlio writes "With the first truly televised war underway, for the first time we have media members armed with sat trucks chasing the folks with the automatic weapons around. Several fixed cameras are mounted around Baghdad, and members of the media from all around the world are sending reports from the field using sat uplinks and video phones. So the question is, those of you with access to a Big Dish, have you found any wild feeds yet? I live in Michigan (U.S.), and have only been able to pinpoint local media backhauls (like Fox's news backhaul to their local affiliates), but nothing from abroad. Anyone out there have any sat and channel information for either the Baghdad cams, foreign news agencies, or best of all, the news feeds from the front line?"

This question is a good followup to a recent question posted as an Ask Slashdot seeking unbiased news about the current war.

198 comments

  1. sound and video on a PC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I remember people used to say, when I would demonstrate my C-64 to them, that you would never be able to watch tv-quality video on the computer. Now when I play tv-quality video on my computer, I'm upset about how inferior it is, running in it's tiny little postage stamp frame and or all big and blocky.

    Course, we'll never be able to play HDTV on a computer.

    1. Re:sound and video on a PC by stwrtpj · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Course, we'll never be able to play HDTV on a computer.

      You realize, don't you, by actually saying that something will never happen, you have practically assured that it will happen at some point. Just like when people said man would not fly.

      Of course, this still doesn't explain the lack of flying cars ...

      --
      Karma: Frotzed (mostly due to the Frobozz Magic Karma Company)
    2. Re:sound and video on a PC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      That's the way it is. Just as soon as you say a computer can't do it, someone makes a computer do it. But I'm quite sure that my computer can't run a realistic Uma Thurman simulation, with full tactile responses, just like a holodeck. Not possible.

    3. Re:sound and video on a PC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      So your computer can't simulate an anorexic cadaver with Death's face? And this is bad how?

    4. Re:sound and video on a PC by outZider · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No, it does explain it. Man has said for ages that we *will* have flying cars. Hence, the total void of flying cars.

      --
      - oZ
      // i am here.
    5. Re:sound and video on a PC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You realize, don't you, by actually saying that something will never happen, you have practically assured that it will happen at some point.
      One can only hope, but I'm afraid that'll never happen to me!
    6. Re:sound and video on a PC by Drishmung · · Score: 1

      Um, I thought the comment was supposed to be ironic, surely?

      --
      Protoplasm. Quiet Protoplasm. I like quiet protoplasm.
    7. Re:sound and video on a PC by GammaTau · · Score: 4, Interesting

      You realize, don't you, by actually saying that something will never happen, you have practically assured that it will happen at some point. Just like when people said man would not fly.

      Well, watching HDTV with a computer has already happened. :) See the HDTV snapshots from the GNU Radio project site.

    8. Re:sound and video on a PC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Check out www.realdoll.com
      I used a computer to find that, does that count?

    9. Re:sound and video on a PC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just as soon as you say a computer can't do it, someone makes a computer do it. But I'm quite sure that my computer can't run a realistic Uma Thurman simulation, with full tactile responses, just like a holodeck. Not possible.

      Realistic simulation? Based on the Star Trek reference, I'd say the tactile response system would be money wasted.

    10. Re:sound and video on a PC by IvyMike · · Score: 1

      Way to get the joke.

    11. Re:sound and video on a PC by weston · · Score: 1

      Of course, this still doesn't explain the lack of flying cars ...

      No, no, it actually does, because future pundits everywhere insisted those would happen.

      (OK, there's a potential logical error there, but we might have a <=> b here...)

    12. Re:sound and video on a PC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      No, what you actually mean to say is that no-one will make an Open Source Uma Thurman simulation.
      I'm sure you'll want to fix the behavioral bugs... like not wanting to hang out with a Slashdot geek.

    13. Re:sound and video on a PC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Course, we'll never be able to play HDTV on a computer.

      Maybe *you* won't, but I've been doing it for over a year now. There are plenty of HDTV/ATSC tuner cards for the PC (windows only drivers so far) and since HDTV is fundamentally just a ~2MB/s mpeg-2 datastream, you don't even need special hardware to play it back.

      Most ATI video cards sold over the last 18 months can play back hi-def mpeg2 with minimal effort. Even if you don't have such a card, it only takes about a 2.4GHz P4 or so to do all the decode on the cpu.

    14. Re:sound and video on a PC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Flying cars? That'll never happen!

    15. Re:sound and video on a PC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Moller.com
      Although it won't be a "car" until it gets tail lights and other things for it to be "street legal".

    16. Re:sound and video on a PC by Voltronalpha · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The HDTV Standard is also inferior to your some computer monitor resolutions, Why don't people get that it's all a matter of resolution, NTSC 480 lines, HDTV 1920 x 1080 or more commonly 1280 x 720

      Home televisions are outrageously over priced for their ability.

      --
      There is evidence to prove both Democrats and Republicans are lying cocksuckers. Vote independently.
    17. Re:sound and video on a PC by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 4, Funny

      You realize, don't you, by actually saying that something will never happen, you have practically assured that it will happen at some point. Just like when people said man would not fly.

      You're never gonna get laid with that attitude...

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
    18. Re:sound and video on a PC by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1

      No, what you actually mean to say is that no-one will make an Open Source Uma Thurman simulation. I'm sure you'll want to fix the behavioral bugs... like not wanting to hang out with a Slashdot geek.

      Or trying to sleep with all his friends...

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
    19. Re:sound and video on a PC by legLess · · Score: 1

      My new fighting technique is unstoppable "Get your war on," page 4:

      "Bah! We're living in the 21st Century, and people still wage war to impress invisible superheroes who live in outer space! I thought we'd all be chilling out in solar-powered flying cars by now!"

      --
      This isn't as much "normalization" as it is "don't take so many drugs when you're designing tables."
    20. Re:sound and video on a PC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      It's possible, but it will be more like an internal "Matrix" simulation than an external StarTrek holodeck.

      I just hope you can mod Uma's personality. If not, then it's necrophilia-mode for me!

    21. Re:sound and video on a PC by darqchild · · Score: 1

      I will not lose my virginity!!! *crosses fingers*

      --
      What? Me? Worry?
    22. Re:sound and video on a PC by afidel · · Score: 1

      no they aren't, how much is a 29" computer monitor? A lot more than the $350 I paid for my 29" flat tv with 4 video input sources I can assure you. Sure it's standard definition, but the number of times I wished I had more resolution while watching normal tv programming can be counted on one hand. Now for watching movies I can see having an HDTV or beyond, but for the tripe they show on tv I really don't want to spend any more.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    23. Re:sound and video on a PC by blancolioni · · Score: 1

      You realize, don't you, by actually saying that something will never happen, you have practically assured that it will happen at some point.

      I will never have sex with Hugh Jackman.

    24. Re:sound and video on a PC by K8Fan · · Score: 1

      I've had PC HD cards for several years. Currently, I'm using a Telemann HiPix with the user modified software from a dedicated group of hackers from the AVS Forums. But processor speeds have reached the point where one can playback HD transport streams solely in software using a tool like DVHSTool and the MPEG2 decoder from a software DVD player.

      --
      "How perfectly Goddamn delightful it all is, to be sure" Charles Crumb
    25. Re:sound and video on a PC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can count pretty high on one hand.

    26. Re:sound and video on a PC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      in that case... I will never, ever, ever nail a supermodel

    27. Re:sound and video on a PC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have just assured he will get laid!

    28. Re:sound and video on a PC by sharkey · · Score: 1
      Just as soon as you say a computer can't do it, someone makes a computer do it.

      A computer can't make my toddler sit up and eat her dinner. In addition, it can't tell me the winning numbers for Saturday's Powerball drawing, and make women understandable to men.

      *crossing fingers*

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    29. Re:sound and video on a PC by theghost · · Score: 1

      Of course, this still doesn't explain the lack of flying cars ...

      We'll never see flying cars!

      (There you go - we should be seeing them any day now.)

      --
      The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing.
    30. Re:sound and video on a PC by phraktyl · · Score: 1
      A computer can't make my toddler sit up and eat her dinner.
      I don't know about that. Take one of the boat-anchor computors from 10 years ago, and tie kid up to it. She is now sitting up. I'm sure you'll figure out the eating dinner part.
      In addition, it can't tell me the winning numbers for Saturday's Powerball drawing,
      Very easy. All you have to do is use your computer to look for the numbers on Monday.
      and make women understandable to men.
      Okay. You may be out of luck here...
      --
      Karma: Marginal (mostly due to the border around the website)
    31. Re:sound and video on a PC by Rysc · · Score: 1
      Of course, this still doesn't explain the lack of flying cars ...



      Yes it does. As far as I recall, everyone as always said "We'll have flying cars soon." If only there would be a prevailing belief that it's impossible, then we'd have them by next year.

      --
      I want my Cowboyneal
    32. Re:sound and video on a PC by ePhil_One · · Score: 1
      That's the way it is. Just as soon as you say a computer can't do it, someone makes a computer do it. But I'm quite sure that my computer can't run a realistic Uma Thurman simulation, with full tactile responses, just like a holodeck. Not possible.

      Mine can. Now you'll have to excuse me for about 20 years...

      --
      You are in a maze of twisted little posts, all alike.
    33. Re:sound and video on a PC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Suck my dick faggot.

  2. Wild Feed by Z4rd0Z · · Score: 4, Funny

    Here's a wild feed if anyone's interested.

    --
    You had me at "dicks fuck assholes".
    1. Re:Wild Feed by joe_bruin · · Score: 3, Interesting

      actually, there are few useful wild feeds.
      the embedded news crews are equipped with encryption hardware (software?), so as not to make the information available to the enemy. same is true for field reports from kuwait and qatar.
      this may not be the case with the baghdad cams (where the iraqis may not have approved encryption equipment coming into the country), but those are not very interesting at the moment anyway.

  3. paradox by pangu · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Revolution OS now available on media that the Revolution OS isn't supposed to be able to play...

    1. Re:paradox by Z4rd0Z · · Score: 2, Funny

      Truly a profound observation.

      --
      You had me at "dicks fuck assholes".
    2. Re:paradox by gregfortune · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's not encrypted or region coded so it's perfectly legal to watch. The only contention arises when the DVD has been encrypted forcing us to break the encryption before we can watch the movie... Obviously, reading the entire post can be helpful sometimes...

    3. Re:paradox by MsGeek · · Score: 4, Interesting

      No paradox: the version of Xine that comes with Lycoris Linux and Mandrake 9.1 has the DVD Menu plugin which will allow you full access to the Revolution OS DVD. Since there is no CSS encryption, there is no problem.

      --
      Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power multiplied.
    4. Re:paradox by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Still a paradox that it has to be paid for and can't be DLed for free! (Or can it?)

    5. Re:paradox by homer_ca · · Score: 4, Informative

      Actually the MPEG2 codec is patented, so free DVD player software would be illegal in the US unless you paid your $2.50 to the MPEGLA.

    6. Re:paradox by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Someone please put this up on Kazaa so I can watch it.

      If its good, I'll buy. I promise.

    7. Re:paradox by ncc74656 · · Score: 1
      Revolution OS now available on media that the Revolution OS isn't supposed to be able to play...

      If you had read the linked article, you would've learned that the Revolution OS DVD is region-free and CSS-free.

      Then again, this is Slashdot...what the hell was I thinking, that someone would read an article before posting about it?

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    8. Re:paradox by Mr+Z · · Score: 1

      Which part is patented: The encoding process, the bitstream syntax, or the decoding process?

      As long as the decoding process is not patented, there isn't an issue.

    9. Re:paradox by Mithrandir · · Score: 3, Interesting

      All of it - at least as far as they are going to tell you. Unfortunately, the way the MPEG group works is everyone submits that they have x number of patents to the -LA group. It totals up all the patents, divides the money received and sends the proportional amount to the individual patent holders. It's a core problem with the spec because nobody knows exactly what is patented and which patent applies where, just that there are a lot of them. In fact, it is known that many of the patent claims are bogus (expired, not actually applicable), but there's so many (thousands last I heard) that it's not even worth their while to sort out the mess.

      In the earlier processes, the patents were on the compression technology, not on the encoding or decoding. That's what Fraunhofer were going after all the free players with trying to force them to cough up non-existant money for licensing their patented compression technology. In that case, the patent was on how to compress the audio in a meaningful way and then extract the audio channel back again in hardware. They then managed to extend that claim to software implementations. The only reasone we know they had the patents on that particular piece of technology was that they stood out from the crowd and said "we own this, cough up the money now". Most of the time that doesn't happen - it just goes into an anonymous pool run by MPEG-LA.

      --
      Life is complete only for brief intervals in between toys or projects -- John Dalton
    10. Re:paradox by embarcadero · · Score: 2, Insightful
      dude -- this guy made this movie with his own money and is selling it with no encryption or region encoding because the community is always bitching about how evil the movie industry is with all their countermeasures.

      If you want the DVD, just buy it. Show some support for one of the few people who did exactly what we're always asking for.

    11. Re:paradox by evilviper · · Score: 1

      Well, since the GPL forbids the distribution of software that is covered by patents, it is completly illegial to distribute the software (eg. MPlayer) in the first place, so paying $2.50 doesn't change things much.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    12. Re:paradox by Tuzanor · · Score: 1

      he never said GPLed software. It could be BSD licensed, but still, unless you pay to the MPEGLA, it's still illegal.

    13. Re:paradox by evilviper · · Score: 1

      ...and I never said you couldn't have a BSD-licensed MPEG2 player... What's your point?

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    14. Re:paradox by davidmccabe · · Score: 1

      That's only if it's encrypted with CSS, which it isn't. Playing DVDs isn't illegal, only decrypting them is, but they almost all are encypted.

    15. Re:paradox by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1

      If you want the DVD, just buy it. Show some support for one of the few people who did exactly what we're always asking for.

      Bullshit! If he really did what we're always asking for, he'd have an Xvid encoded version all over the p2p networks already. Pay attention! ;)

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
    16. Re:paradox by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That you smelly, dirty, linux fucks are a bunch of hypocrites who spout off about fighting for "freedom" of software (free as in ankle tracking device to prevent future unfreeness), and when its inconvenient for you- you have no problem disregarding IP laws. So fuck you, grow some real ethics, or stop spouting off. I guess that's what happens when you have a revolution pioneered and evangelized by twelve year old kids. d0vvN w1+H m$#!@$!@#!@#%$#%(U#%)(!

    17. Re:paradox by bfree · · Score: 2, Interesting

      My immediate reaction to the comments here that the DVD is region free and unencrypted (same thing is it not for DVDs) was does the case carry the DVD logo, and are they paying any licensing fees? I've only ever come across one high capacity video disc for sale without a DVD logo (and regret not buying it just for the sake of it even though it was a German metal band) but I would love to see more. Anyway, your right, playing back DVDs is a legal problem for Free Software, not just because of the encryption technology, but also because patents abound and a player has to pay quite a bit in licensing (that $2.50 is on top of a $10k entry fee still I presume, nice to see they seem to have dropped the different rates depending on what audio formats you can output though).

      --

      Never underestimate the dark side of the Source

    18. Re:paradox by pla · · Score: 1

      but there's so many (thousands last I heard) that it's not even worth their while to sort out the mess.

      Well then, it sounds to me like their own carelessness all but assures that free software can safely ignore them.

      In order to sucessfully sue a supposedly infringing group, MPEG-LA would need to figure out EXACTLY which patents the free software violated. Now, they take a big risk right there, since quite possibly, the answer would end up "none".

      After that, they would need to prove that the software in question actually did violate their patent (probably the easiest part of this process when dealing with open source).

      And all that for NOTHING, since a "free" software group has no income to take away, no assets to forfeit, no proprietary code base to confiscate, nothing. At best, the patent holders could get an injunction against the software, which would still have absolutely no effect due to the very nature of open source software (look how successful the banning of DeCSS turned out... Hell, I have a T-shirt with the DeCSS code on it).

      So, trying to thwart open source implementations of a patented nightmare just wastes the patent holder's time and money for no gain whatsoever. Looks like, for a change, the "good" guys win no matter what.

      And for those who would call this "anarchy" and a "knife in the back" of due process and/or the rule of law in general - Go whine to your corporate lawyers. We'll build the new empire either with your help, or on your crushed remains, doesn't matter which. ;-)

    19. Re:paradox by embarcadero · · Score: 1
      No kidding.

      The annoying little kids who think it's cool to steal IP are totally shooting themselves in the foot. One day, someone is going to write a history of the free software movement, and it's going to sound like this:

      "The community of intellectuals and idealists that developed this software was keenly aware of the need for strong intellectual property protection. They understood that the GPL was utterly powerless in a world without protected IP.

      "But ultimately, as they succeeded in growing the community of users, these leaders were blindsided by the influx of a more practical sort of user. These consumers of the free software weren't interested in the freedom-to-modify aspects of the software. They were motivated by the fact that it didn't cost anything.

      "But one thing they did pick up on was the incredible fervor of the founders of the movement that it was a moral imperative that software should be 'Free'. They championed this, and expressed outrage when copy-protection schemes were put in place, even around other forms of intellectual property, like movies.

      "In the end, the behavior was so widespread in the culture that the Free Software leadership lost all credibillity in the legal world. Among legal scholars and the courts, the view of the GPL and Free Software ultimately became one of resigned pragmatic rejection:

      "'A long history of experience has shown that owners of the property cannot reasonably expect these licenses to protect their property from being freely distributed. Our society has rejected the idea that if an author fails to meaningfully protect his property from copying, somehow he can require the government to protect it for him. "

    20. Re:paradox by MsGeek · · Score: 1

      Xine is both free as in beer and free as in speech and available at http://xinehq.de/. And both Lycoris Linux and Mandrake Linux have GPL .ISO sets that can be downloaded for free and home-burnt that include Xine. There is also a port project to bring Xine to Win32.

      --
      Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power multiplied.
  4. About time by mao+che+minh · · Score: 4, Funny
    I had almost given up on ever seeing actually seeing Revolution OS.

    What's this, a free software music video? this is going to be one of dumbest, geekiest things ever created. I can't wait to watch it.

    1. Re:About time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I have had the chance to go see one of the last screening of RevolutionOS. It is definitly worth watching. If you don't have a clear idea on who is who in the opensource/freesoftware arena, this will definitly give you a nice timeline and who's who. As far as the song is concerned, this is a "free software song" (i beleive the MP3 is availble on their website, fsf that is). it is funny, not ROTFL, but funny.

      I'd recommend anyone to get that DVD. It is full of good stuff for anyone interested in where this comes from. It is not oriented towards your local (insert big project name here) hacker, but more oriented towards the young geek, and the businessman that will get involved with OpenSource. It sort of demistify the whole thing, give a very good idea on what freesoftware and opensource are, where they come from and where they are heading...

      anyway, 'nuff said, go watch it for yourself and make a decision about its quality, don't trust me, i'm just a geek that believes all he reads on slashdot... -:>

    2. Re:About time by Stickster · · Score: 1

      That is the one part of the film we could have all done without. It's no secret that a lot of geeks dabble in music in their spare time; the ones depicted here should probably try pottery instead. Nevertheless, they did hang 'em out on the table, so you have to give them credit for that, at least. I do plan on buying the DVD, but I sure hope it has chapter stops so I can skip that god-awful song. Even my wife, who is much more forgiving than I, begged me to turn it off when we saw the movie on IFC. Good film other than that, though.

    3. Re:About time by IamTheRealMike · · Score: 1
      What's this, a free software music video? this is going to be one of dumbest, geekiest things ever created. I can't wait to watch it.

      Oh my god no! Don't do it! The free software song is probably the biggest and best advert for Microsoft around. It's not only an incredibly bad song, but watching people actually sing it is fanatically embarassing and creepy. When RMS sang it at FOSDEM, it made the whole thing feel like some damn cult, as opposed to a bunch of geeks talking about cool stuff (like it was).

      For those who don't know, the tune is some kind of Bulgarian folk dance, with a rhythm that is practically impossible for westerners to keep in their heads, and a tune that sounds like the composer got bored half way through and just stopped adding new notes in the middle of a bar.

      RMS can do great code. He's a lousy musician.

  5. because they're rebels dude by mao+che+minh · · Score: 1

    they're rebels

  6. Digital Media Player by doublesix · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I highly recommend BroadQ's software. It uses a Sony Playstation to play MP3's DivX's etc over a home network. Its a work in progress but it rocks! BroadQ.co

    1. Re:Digital Media Player by schulzdogg · · Score: 1

      This looks perfect, has anybody used it?

    2. Re:Digital Media Player by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes! its a neat hack, and its a wonderful addition to my living room.

      windows only tho.....

    3. Re:Digital Media Player by nyquil · · Score: 1

      it does in fact work in linux, i use it all the time. the playstation boots up and contacts the local server you are running (i'm using the java version under linux), checks for new version of the player/codecs, downloads them to the local server if neccessary, then copies the player executable (java) to the ps2 and loads it. then you browse thru all the files you have shared, and play them. it works really really well.

    4. Re:Digital Media Player by nuxx · · Score: 1

      Yep, I use the BroadQ Qcast Tuner almost daily to play Ogg Vorbis files from my FreeBSD box. It also can serve files from Windows, OS X, and any *nix that has a JRE and X.

    5. Re:Digital Media Player by rpg25 · · Score: 1

      wireless-p?

    6. Re:Digital Media Player by doublesix · · Score: 1

      I havent tried it wireless, but I seem to recall there's a thread on their forum around here

  7. Reporters chasing battles by lingqi · · Score: 0, Interesting

    They are not kidding.

    I saw on Japanese morning news that they got a reporter (or a few, I guess) riding with US troops in humvees through the Iraq desert.

    The interesting part is - it's a woman! (and quite a good looking one) In the show she was complaining how hot and stuffy the desert suit is, and talking about the gas masks. I mean not to stereotype, but she would (from the look) fit to be one of those fragile-looking japanese ladies that will probably become a housewife in a few years.

    I can hardly imagine what would happen if they really hit on some serious fighting. More interestingly, considering that there always seem to be rape-incidents a couple times a year with US troops stationed in S.Korea and Japan, I do wonder if the Iraqies pose more danger to her instead of her travel companions... Well unless she likes it that way; but anyhow... I doubt those troopes have their minds set on fighting - or, would fight more valiently than any other squadron in the force...

    --

    My life in the land of the rising sun.

    1. Re:Reporters chasing battles by Xeleema · · Score: 1

      Ye-OW! No kidding about some of the troops in S.Korea and Japan. I've had friends that were stationed in S.Korea and all over Asia. The best places in Japan are the ones that let you rent a hotel room so you can trash it. Even better are the places that offer a Maid to come by in the middle of it...a bloke can go broke in the land of the Rising Sun.

      --
      "When I am king, you will be first against the wall..."
  8. HP Digital Media Receiver doesn't support ogg... by daVinci1980 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ...Won't stop me from buying it.

    I'm all for Open standards, and I have all of my music encoded as ogg on my machine, but I have to say that I'm disappointed with the sound quality of it.

    You can debate it all you like, but I've found that Ogg produces some sound artifacts that MP3 doesn't, that are more irritating to my big ol' ears.

    --
    I currently have no clever signature witicism to add here.
  9. Revolution OS from HP by ralphart · · Score: 4, Interesting

    HP sent me a FREE copy.

    I got several calls from various marketing/survey types (must have clicked on a box on their website one day expressing interest in Linux) and after asking a few questions said they'd be sending me information. Imagine my surprise when the package contained a DVD of Revolution OS.

    Sorry to say I haven't watched it yet (kids thought it over-the-top geeky and refused access to the DVD player).

    1. Re:Revolution OS from HP by geekoid · · Score: 4, Funny

      you need to get new kids. ;)

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:Revolution OS from HP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      FYI -- I have the hp one too.

      the hp version is shorter and has less material. the new one on thinkgeek has lots of bonus material and the interview with the director and stuff.

    3. Re:Revolution OS from HP by Christopher_G_Lewis · · Score: 1

      Maybe your kids need new parents :-)

    4. Re:Revolution OS from HP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah, the kids are fine.

      Just reformat them and install Debian.

      But whatever you do, don't install FreeBSD. Kids get into enough trouble without a little daemon on their shoulders.

  10. Karma whoring by daserver · · Score: 2, Informative

    mms is a menu system for playback of music and movies. It supports framebuffer/dxr3 and lircd/keyboard.

  11. what player? by SHEENmaster · · Score: 1

    Did anyone bother to write a Linux DVD player for unencrypted videos? What's the point of writing a player if it won't get you arrested and exiled to a Turkish MPAA prison?

    j/k, I assume that the files are just unencrypted mpegs found after mounting the disc?

    --
    You can't judge a book by the way it wears its hair.
    1. Re:what player? by BJH · · Score: 1

      Xine.

    2. Re:what player? by morgue-ann · · Score: 4, Informative

      Ogle and xine will play unencrypted DVDs if you are missing libdvdcss. In fact, xine has libdvdread and libdvdnav (and liba52?) in the main build now, so xine is all you need if you're playing libre discs.

      There aren't many region free and CSS free discs in the US, but The Man Who Fell to Earth (VALIS) is one.

      Revolution OS has been available from Netflix as a single disc since at least Christmas. My parents & sister watched it while visiting & learned more in 86 minutes about the open source movement than I could have told them in three hours.

      My mother had to quit a job teaching Windows apps because they crashed so much she was embarrased. She consults on medical billing stuff running on MUMPS & VAXen (i.e. stable), so she was happy to learn that an alternative to Microsoft has some real momentum.

    3. Re:what player? by afidel · · Score: 1

      actually I would venture that ~50% of DVD's are CSS and region free, as that is what almost all porn is and porn is probably half of the DVD's out there.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
  12. Ogg? by lostchicken · · Score: 2, Funny

    Can it play Ogg Vor... Oh. Never mind.

    --
    -twb
  13. Patents by yerricde · · Score: 2, Informative

    It's not encrypted or region coded so it's perfectly legal to watch.

    Not entirely. As far as I know, AC3 audio and MPEG-2 video are patented in the United States.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
  14. Revolution OS on DVD? by rlowe69 · · Score: 1

    Umm, I was at the Open Source Weekend here in Ottawa, Canada January 25th and 26th and they showed Revolution OS and gave several DVD copies away as prizes. So the DVD version has been out for a while.

    I can only assume that this DVD has more stuff? *shrug*

    --
    ----- rL
    1. Re:Revolution OS on DVD? by Smidge204 · · Score: 1

      "The 2-disc special edition set now available"

      The description above goes on to list what makes it so special...
      =Smidge=

    2. Re:Revolution OS on DVD? by Jester998 · · Score: 1

      Did they really give those away as prizes?

      I was there, but donated $20 to OCLUG and they gave me a copy... it wasn't a prize so much as an incentive to donate $15 or more (anything less than $15 (IIRC) and you didn't get the DVD).

      And I think the version that /. is talking about is the "bonus" 2-DVD set, such as found here.

    3. Re:Revolution OS on DVD? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes this DVD has more stuff, There are an extra 37 seconds that they cut out from the origional release plus the director's commentary audio track!

      Along with the keep you on the edge of your seat reading of over 100 FSF documents.

      We showed it at the local megaplex in it's entirety. Including showing the >100 documents and extra interview footage. We had the audience crying out for joy, Screaming in triumph, to the point the were insighting a mob to thank us for showing this film with the doors locked.

      It's Oscar winning material!

  15. Re:Disturbing by valkraider · · Score: 4, Informative

    They left out that it is for state agencies, not for private companies. The bill is here: House Bill 2892. There have been other slash stories on it as well. And a nice Google Search can get tons of info.

    This is a good bill.

    Oregon also has some Bad Bills like SB742 which would create terrorists of peace protestors, give them life in prison, and require local law enforcement to monitor "questionable" organizations. Hmm. A nice Google search can net you more opinions on SB742. It is disturbing!

  16. WildFeed what WildFeed by PenguinPooper · · Score: 0

    Either I'm looking at the wrong bird at the wrong time or whatever, but all I'm seeing is backhauls (lots) too. I find it quite surprising that nobodys snagged a decent feed considering how many uplinks are going on... back to looking......

    --
    My mother in law is worse than yours...and yes I will trade!
    1. Re:WildFeed what WildFeed by Cpt_Kirks · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I had to give up my dish when I moved last year, but feeds were going away then. It seems a lot of stuff is either encrypted or going to Ku band.

      I saw tons of interesting stuff on my dish in 1991. Iraqis getting blown in half and crispy citters. A lot of footage was coming on the in dish, being censored and then put out on cable.

      Now I have to make due with Fox News :/

  17. I never got my free copy :( by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i think it was hp or ibm.
    anyhow i filled out the survey and answered a phone call they the promised dvd never came.

    either way i can't understand why Revolution OS is not free for downloading.

    1. Re:I never got my free copy :( by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      uh, because the filmmaker spent his own money making it? and he's trying to make some of that back? and it's not from hollywood? don't be a dork.

  18. Re:Disturbing by geekoid · · Score: 2, Informative

    SB742 has died in comittee.

    May it rot in Hell.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  19. HP Digital Media Receiver by ryanr · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Close, but not quite enough... I want a similar box with a DVD (ROM) drive in it, so one can walk up and play physical DVDs in it, too. I was all set to buy a GoVideo D2730, but SonicBlue decided to go bankrupt and sell off the product lines instead of releasing them.

    Yeah, I know, I DO plan to build a HTPC, but I'd like to have a box available in the $200-300 range that the wife and children can use as simply as a DVD player. I can take care of the media server behind the sceens myself. I'm not going to build a $1000 HTPC for each TV in the house...

    Ideally, the box would do 100bT (the HP box says it's 10), and I'd like it to run an OS that I get source for, so I can customize it. Oh, and a pony, I'd like a pony.

    Seriously though, I'd love to have the proverbial Linux set-top box, with maybe a 5 1/4 bay to accept a DVD drive (that could cost extra, I don't care that much.) The important bits are that it be AV-style casing, be in the $200-300 range, and have flawless, standard NTSC output. Doesn't need to be HDTV yet. Just composite and s-video, maybe component would be nice. Needs an IR input for remote as well. I'm actually willing to put up with the endless software upgrade cycle and small glitches that represent an immature or beta software base. I can upgrade/try other progs as needed.

    Anyone know of such a boxen that meets my criteria?

    1. Re:HP Digital Media Receiver by Osty · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I know, I DO plan to build a HTPC, but I'd like to have a box available in the $200-300 range that the wife and children can use as simply as a DVD player. I can take care of the media server behind the sceens myself. I'm not going to build a $1000 HTPC for each TV in the house...

      Ever consider buying ... (wait for it) ... a $200-$300 DVD player?

    2. Re:HP Digital Media Receiver by ryanr · · Score: 1

      Ever consider buying ... (wait for it) ... a $200-$300 DVD player?

      Well...no. First off, I haven't seen much on a $300 DVD player that interests me more than the $80 ones... and second, I'm under the impression that DVD players do a poor job of streaming ripped DVDs and MP3s from the local Ethernet. If you know of a DVD player that does the latter bit, then that's what I'm after...

    3. Re:HP Digital Media Receiver by moosesocks · · Score: 1

      The hardware's been availible for a really long time. Unfortunately, no software has come out to support it.

      What DO these people do with their HTPCs? How the heck do you effectively control windows/linux with a remote (other than moving the mouse around with a joystick)?

      We simply need a tivo-like application to organize all our videos, etc. Even the Digital Media Center edition of windows doesn't come close, handles music horribly, requires hardware mpeg compression, and STILL stresses a P4 (and yet the tivo can work easily with a 50mhz PPC chip). Sure, I know about mythTV and freevo - the two projects certainly look promising, but aren't even close to ideal yet (although linux is certainly winning this race, I'd like to see something from apple).

      Not yet. Not yet.

      --
      -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
    4. Re:HP Digital Media Receiver by Osty · · Score: 0, Troll

      I'm under the impression that DVD players do a poor job of streaming ripped DVDs and MP3s from the local Ethernet. If you know of a DVD player that does the latter bit, then that's what I'm after...

      Here's an idea -- try buying DVDs and CDs. I've never found a DVD player that couldn't play DVDs and CDs.


      However, if you must pirate (blah blah blah backing up my discs because I'm afraid they're going to get damaged blah blah *cough*bullshit*cough*), I'm sure you're smart enough to figure out how to burn those to a DVD or CD for play in your DVD player. Many DVD players now will play mp3 files directly, and a number will even play Divx movies directly as well. Add to that the fact that you'll get better picture quality out of a DVD player than a HTPC (well, without major and time consuming tweaking of your HTPC, anyway), and generally better sound quality (I've never seen a $200-$300 PC with TOSLink output), I don't see any reason why you wouldn't buy a stand-alone DVD player.

    5. Re:HP Digital Media Receiver by ryanr · · Score: 1

      At this point, you're just being a troll, but let's give it one last shot...

      First off, my DVDs are contstantly getting trashed by my small children, and yes that's the main reason for wanting a system that doesn't require physical media. However, if all I wanted to do was copy them, then why do I want the DVD-rom drive in it? The drives in my PCs will rip the movies just fine. It's because I want to play physical media that I own on them, on occasion. If all my video were just downloaded, then I'd be fine with the $200 HP box, wouldn't I?

      I don't care about a TOSLink output, I have nothing that takes that as an input.. a fact that ought to be blatantly obvious if I'm only interested in NTSC, and $80 DVD players make me happy.

      The main point, which you've managed to avoid through a couple of posts now, is that I want a box that can play audio and video from across a network as well as physical disks. If you know of such a box, I'd like to hear about it. Otherwise, your opinion on whether what I'm trying to do is legitimate is of no use to anyone.

    6. Re:HP Digital Media Receiver by ryanr · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The hardware's been availible for a really long time. Unfortunately, no software has come out to support it.

      I'm kinda seeing the opposite, at least for the hardware I'm looking for (as descibed in my original post). Specifically, I'm not seeing a lot of hardware that is in a small VCR-size case, perhaps solid-state, built-in IR receiver, video chipset specifically designed for TV output. I've seen a few set-top box announcements, but I'm not seeing them make it to market. Maybe software is the reason, I don't know.

      On the other hand, I see many Linux video-related software projects for general-purpose x86 PCs, if you don't mind spending the $1000 for decent hardware and having the noisy, large PC by the TV.

      What DO these people do with their HTPCs? How the heck do you effectively control windows/linux with a remote (other than moving the mouse around with a joystick)?

      You don't control the OS in general from a remote. (well, if you want to use your TV as a monitor, you can get wireless mice and keyboards.) For my application, you set the machine to boot with your AV application full-screen, and your remote talks to that. Think running Windows Media Player from a remote. All the functions you'd want to do could be done from a stardard universal remote, except for the naming & categorization tasks. For what I'm after, that's done on the server though, not the set-top boxes.

      We simply need a tivo-like application to organize all our videos, etc. Even the Digital Media Center edition of windows doesn't come close, handles music horribly, requires hardware mpeg compression, and STILL stresses a P4 (and yet the tivo can work easily with a 50mhz PPC chip). Sure, I know about mythTV and freevo - the two projects certainly look promising, but aren't even close to ideal yet (although linux is certainly winning this race, I'd like to see something from apple).

      That's what I'm talking about... In fact, the TIVO is just about exactly what I'm after, right down to running Linux. Problem is that it's not aimed at being a remote DVD player, but rather it's PVR function (duh). Plus the subscription fees and their attempts to keep it as closed as possible are really counter-productive to the kinds of projects I'd like to try. Still, the hardware base is about right, and the price would be about right without the large hard drives.

    7. Re:HP Digital Media Receiver by lukew · · Score: 1

      Risking the imminent geek bashing I have coming my way, I have to suggest an Xbox.

      Of course, it's not entirely legal the mods to get it running. But it makes a beautiful mediabox (streaming accross the network, the client I'm using looks like a hacked up Shoutcast server), DVD player, and of course - Xbox games.

      I must now retreat to my bunker before the anti-MS masses storm the area. See you in 6 months.

    8. Re:HP Digital Media Receiver by Wesley+Felter · · Score: 1

      The ZapStation is probably a bit more than you need, but I find it works pretty well.

    9. Re:HP Digital Media Receiver by ryanr · · Score: 1

      Actually, I was wondering about the game consoles, and was hoping someone had tried that and would reply. :)

      The XBox will actually do all the video output options, including HDTV, no? I remember reading some Viewsonic scan converter review that mentioned a couple of games doing 1080i. I have no moral issues with modding one so I can run my choice of software. I don't even have any use for XBox games, that's what my Windows machine is for. :)

      So what OS are you using when streaming video? The one that comes with it? Tried the XBox linux at all? I'm curious how good the video support is.

      How much for an XBox with a mod & Ethernet (Fast Ethernet?) Do they have IR receivers, or any aftermarket ones?

    10. Re:HP Digital Media Receiver by SailorFrag · · Score: 2, Informative

      How the heck do you effectively control windows/linux with a remote...

      LIRC for Linux. It can control lots of software, including at least one HTPC software project.

      It has a windows port too.

    11. Re:HP Digital Media Receiver by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Microsoft sells the XBox at a loss, doesn't it? Avoid buying legal games and they won't earn a cent off your ownership. :)

    12. Re:HP Digital Media Receiver by scm · · Score: 1

      How much for an XBox with a mod & Ethernet (Fast Ethernet?) Do they have IR receivers, or any aftermarket ones?

      The XBox comes with ethernet (don't know off hand it it's 10 or 100), and you can buy a, IIRC, ~$30 IR remote (which is required to enable DVD playback on a stock XBox).

    13. Re:HP Digital Media Receiver by evilviper · · Score: 1

      Geat a cheap computer with an AGP slot, and an Nvidia "Personal Cinema"...

      That's not exactly an endorsement. I got an ATI All-in-Wonder only to later find out the that TV-out is completely useless with the Linux (gatos) drivers... Yes, I'm quite pissed-off with ATI.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    14. Re:HP Digital Media Receiver by slick_rick · · Score: 1

      Ok, I will bite troll.

      I own over 200 cds. You really expect me to dig through them once and hour and decide what I want to hear next? Or listen to the same 5 or 6 CD in rotation? Or perhaps you expect me to shell out a wad of cash for some monstrosity that will hold all 200? Don't I atleast own right to listen to the music on the CDs I bought? I have a 5 Gig Ogg collection. I only had to dig all my CDs out of the hall closet once to rip them. It was a long painfull process and I have no urge to ever do it again.

      It is about convencience, just like every other new household appliance in the history of man. If you owned all the music you listen to you would understand.

      --
      apt-get install redhat please god - Me (take it easy, I love Debian)
    15. Re:HP Digital Media Receiver by ryanr · · Score: 1

      That doesn't seem to be a particular model of card, rather it's a family of cards with capture hardware? and a software bundle (Windows).... is there an inexpensive model in that family?

      Does/can one of these cards boot the machine on the tv-out port? (I.e. it POSTs on the TV)

    16. Re:HP Digital Media Receiver by moosesocks · · Score: 1

      That's not the point. Desktop enviornments were designed to be controlled with a mouse or trackball, NOT a remote. Using a remote to navigate is extremely awkward.

      --
      -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
    17. Re:HP Digital Media Receiver by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This may sound silly, but get a XBox and add the simple little hack (around $20 or so) and you have a nice box that has all of the hardware needed including 10/100 ethernet, nForce audio, DVD drive, etc.

      Linux runs relatively nicely on it...

      And the best part is that if you never buy any XBox games (which, if you use the Cromwell Linux BIOS, you could not run anyway) then Microsoft will loose money on your sale. (The XBox is still slightly more costly to make than they get from the sale price.)

      The machine is plenty fast enough to do fully DVD playback and you can even get high resolution display addapters for your HDTV.

    18. Re:HP Digital Media Receiver by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1

      I have a 5 Gig Ogg collection.

      Do you have a winmx username? ;) I'd like to have a 5 gig ogg collection. I've only got a 5 gig mp3 collection, and that's less than 200 CDs worth of music, that's for sure...

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
    19. Re:HP Digital Media Receiver by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 0, Troll

      How the heck do you effectively control windows/linux with a remote

      You whip out your dick and point it at the computer. Bill and Linus both will do anything for you at that point.

      Yeah, I'm going to Troll of the Year Award, posting with a karma bonus. ;)

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
    20. Re:HP Digital Media Receiver by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      5 GB is not that much. I have 6.3 GB of Oggs, all ripped from my own media, and that's only 1294 tracks from 108 CDs. They're encoded with -q 4.99, so maybe that's part of it.

      The files may be large, but I didn't want to rip and encode them again any time soon. Re-ripping all of them to get rid of the MP3s was bad enough.

    21. Re:HP Digital Media Receiver by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You want an XBox. Well within the price range, even including a mod chip. It has beautiful RCA, S-Video and component NTSC and HDTV output up to 1080i. The remote and IR receiver are another few bucks.

      It fits all your criteria (except maybe 100mbit) - plays DVDs (region free and without macrovision) right out of the drive, as well as playing all flavors of DivX and pretty much any other format, audio or video, across the LAN or off a DVDR or its internal 8 gig hard drive. Can run Linux, X and all.
      An Xbox, equipped with the IR remote and a big hard drive upgrade, is about the best media box I can think of.

      And if that's not enough, you can make MS take a loss on the hardware. :P

    22. Re:HP Digital Media Receiver by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On the other hand, I see many Linux video-related software projects for general-purpose x86 PCs, if you don't mind spending the $1000 for decent hardware and having the noisy, large PC by the TV.


      this is only for those that are too lazy to find a good case.

      GCT-allwell has a vcr/dvd type computer in a case ready to go for quite cheap.

      if your HTPC looks like a PC then you certianly didnt do much research

    23. Re:HP Digital Media Receiver by SailorFrag · · Score: 1

      Indeed, navigating a normal desktop with a remote doesn't work very well.

      Luckily, there are menu programs that are designed to make sure you don't need to do that. I'd imagine an HTPC as having its own menuing system that is designed to accomodate many types of remotes (some have more buttons than others, after all), with different menus to match.

    24. Re:HP Digital Media Receiver by FrostedWheat · · Score: 1

      have flawless, standard NTSC output

      Make up your mind :)

    25. Re:HP Digital Media Receiver by evilviper · · Score: 1
      and a software bundle (Windows)....

      I would REALLY suggest you stick to Linux. Freevo works great. With Windows, you are going to be severely limited in what you can do.

      is there an inexpensive model in that family?

      I wouldn't know. As I said, I went for an All-In-Wonder, and now regret the purchase... The NVidia cards are the only ones with fully-functional drivers for Linux.

      Does/can one of these cards boot the machine on the tv-out port? (I.e. it POSTs on the TV)

      I have NEVER come across any card with TV-out that DIDN'T show POST.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    26. Re:HP Digital Media Receiver by rpg25 · · Score: 1

      I have small children. Shiny disks just end up with little fingerprints all over them and in the wrong boxes. Anyway, I have too many to keep in easy reach. So I ripped all my CDs. I didn't pirate any. If I had a good DVD-ripper, I'd rip all the kids' videos (those are the ones we watch repeatedly). And ripping them would let me tear off the blankety-blank un-skippable commercials they put on to brainwash my kids.

  20. Lacking Rendevous :( by miradu2000 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    More important than Ogg support IMHO how HP decided not to implement the ZeroConf (apple's rendevous) stanered into this device. For consumers to realyl pick up on this, it needs to be plug and play - the ONLY way that will happen is if you don't have to set up anything.. Rendevous lets that happen. The new Tivo option will preform much better than this do to it's rendevous integration with computers.

    *sigh*... maybe in a firmware rev?

    1. Re:Lacking Rendevous :( by Watts+Martin · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'd really love to have Turtle Beach's Audiotron supporting Rendevous/ZeroConf. Of course, I'd like to be able to control the Audiotron from iTunes.

      I suppose we can all wait until Windows 2003 implements Rendezvous. Then all hardware will support it, and Mac owners will have one more thing they can kvetch about Microsoft stealing, while the anti-Mac crowd will respond with taunts about market share and CPU speed. The natural balance of the universe will thus be restored.

  21. OK then by The+Bungi · · Score: 3, Insightful
    'A new bill would make Oregon the first state to take a formal stance against the hefty fees and technological limitations of software produced by large corporations such as Microsoft.'

    I would like more information about this. States have tons of custom and commercial software packages they use for everything from tracking DUI offenders to registering kids in school districts. And those products more likely than not use things like databases and middleware things that are mostly OS-specific.

    Forget about Windows and Office for a sec and think about the costs related to moving all that to an "open" platform. Especially today, when most states are flat broke and pulling money away from programs like education and welfare.

    Does anyone have any real, specific information as to how Oregon plans to deal with this, outside of the all too familiar "oh, another blow to m$" static I keep hearing?

    It seems to me that these are mostly empty gestures. What they should be doing is introducing alternative operating systems and applications selectively, where it makes sense and they represent the best tool for the job at hand. In this scenario, the "you must use [insert software]" is nothing more than an imposition made by the very people who know absolutely nothing about these things (the legislators) to the detriment of the people who will actually burden this (the MIS staffs at the state agencies). And ultimately, to the detriment of the taxpayers as well.

    It's a bad Dilbert cartoon - at a massive scale.

    1. Re:OK then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The biggest factor in the bill is to help schools. About a year ago, Microsoft threatened to audit all the schools in Portland for compliance. A couple districts are experimenting with Linux and OpenOffice, and this bill would encourage that type of preference. Presently, many district tech-heads mandate Microsoft-only software purchases.

    2. Re:OK then by Otter · · Score: 5, Insightful
      What are you taking about? This bill only requires that open source alternatives be _considered_. It certainly doesn't require that all existing software be thrown out.

      Look, I'm as game as anyone for ridiculing the kiddies who think because they get by with only Linux for their computer use (email, IM web browsing) it should be shoved down the throats of every highway department and armed forces branch, but that has nothing to do with this.

    3. Re:OK then by eadint · · Score: 1

      most gvernment work is done by tn3270
      that wp, and other office stuff can easilly be done.

    4. Re:OK then by dirk · · Score: 1

      Once again I have to ask why we need a law to have OSS considered. Is there something in the law saying only closed source software can be considered? IF it is like most software purchases, they have a set of requirements and they are required to get software that fills those requirements. There is nothing stopping OSS from being considered, so why would it have to be mandated that it be considered? No one would like a law mandating that closed source software be considered, because there is nothing from stopping it. The same holds true for OSS. The difference is the people making the decisions have been choosing closed source (for a variety of reasons) and the OSS people are insistent that OSS is the better choice, so they want to force the issue. As long as there is no law making it an unfair playing field between OSS and closed source software, this law is unnecessary and just plain prejudicial.

      --

      "Information wants to be expensive" - Stewart Brand, the same guy who said "Information wants to be free"
    5. Re:OK then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Arizona has a law on the books against the heinous crime against humanity, sodomy, which it defines as any penetration of a non-vaginal orifice. Meaning anal sex and blow jobs... Is this necessary, current,? no, is it even applicable to our current society? no, is it prejudices? YES! but is it a law, with sentencing attached. Go AZ!

      Laws dont always make sense, but Im sure that at some point in time some male law maker thought to himself..... oh wait scratch that.... female, thought I'd never do that, or that, and now we have yet another outdated law.

    6. Re:OK then by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Once again I have to ask why we need a law to have OSS considered. Is there something in the law saying only closed source software can be considered?

      Before OSS became a serious thing (or rather, before it was mature enough to become a worthy alternative), people only used closed source software because that's all there was. However, even in those days, many people wouldn't consider all of the options when making a purchase. Realistically, many people still don't, on anything. However, there are laws in place in many state governments (although I don't know about Oregon specifically) that require them to do things like put the purchase up to a bid and let contractors and suppliers and so forth bid, and then they pick the lowest price. I don't know if it's the function or specific package that goes up for bid or not. Anyway, the assumption in a bidding system is that the suppliers will be commercial entities. Many good OS solutions are NOT commercial entities, but provide commercial level support and stuff (not services, though). For the states money and need, it is a good thing to consider OSS in the purchasing process.

      That said, it is also quite normal for a PHB to hear someone say "We need software to do this" and then call up Microsoft to start the bidding process. This sort of thing happens frequently because the PHB isn't even aware that there's alternatives to Microsoft. He may likely wind up calling his guy back and saying "It's too much money."

      Now, a bill that requires them to consider OSS solutions would change that. Now the PHB can't call Microsoft and decide it's too much money. Now he needs to find a company (say, uh, RedHat?) who provides competitive services/software that's also OSS and SHOP AROUND.

      The reason there's no law mandating that closed source software be considered is because it's never been needed to ensure that all of the options are considered. It was previously the *only* option. Now there are alternatives. Making this law requires people to look at the alternatives. That's all. And it is a Good Thing.

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
    7. Re:OK then by po8 · · Score: 1

      I talked to Rep. Barnhart (a regular /. reader, BTW!) a bit ago, and it's actually stronger than that. Under the current Oregon rules for competitive bidding of software projects (and I believe this to be true in most states) there is no straightforward mechanism to make it possible to consider open source even if the contracting agency knows they want it. One of the primary purposes of the "must consider" clause is to give contracting agencies that want OSS the ability to reject commercial bids.

      The other, less-talked-about clause in HB2932 is the "must support open standards" clause. Rep. Barnhart believes (and I agree) that this is an even bigger deal: it should mean no vendor lock-in on storage and communication formats.

      This is the kind of thing that makes me proud to be an Oregonian, right up until the schools close for good.

    8. Re:OK then by dirk · · Score: 1

      The PHB syndrome can't be avoided. There will always be people who prefer one type or brand of software over another and will slant things in it's favor. It happens with OSS as well as MS and other closed source. If the person making the decision likes RedHat more than MS, there is a greater chance that RedHat will get picked. No law will change that.

      It seems the root of what you are worried about is that there should be a fair process for determining the purchases, but this bill doesn't really do that. It makes it so MS and OSS will be considered and nothing else. If you wanted a fair system, OSS shouldn't be singled out, all software should be considered by having an open bidding process or something along those lines. This is a bill to push OSS over closed source, when it should be a bill to pus the best software for the job. If Joe's Software Shack has the best program for what is needed, and it's closed source, it should have to be considered along with BoB's Open Source App.

      --

      "Information wants to be expensive" - Stewart Brand, the same guy who said "Information wants to be free"
    9. Re:OK then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Especially today, when most states are flat broke and pulling money away from programs like education and welfare.

      Won't someone pleeeeeease THINK OF THE CHILDREN!!!!!

  22. Revolution OS by Karpe · · Score: 1

    I wonder if the video transfer is anamorphic. It says it is 2.35:1 letterboxed, but some people call any video that is wider than 16:9 letterboxed, because it always has horizontal bars, even if the transfer is anamorphic.

    1. Re:Revolution OS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ?? Surely the presence of the two black bars is why they call it "letterboxed" ?

    2. Re:Revolution OS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Can I just download an ISO of the DVD instead?

      DVDs do not use ISO9660, but rather UDF. So you can't download an ISO of a DVD.

    3. Re:Revolution OS by clarkc3 · · Score: 1
      some people call any video that is wider than 16:9 letterboxed

      2.35:1 is wider definitely letterboxed, and 1.85:1 is not as wide as 16:9 - yet is still definietly considered letterboxed. things like 4:3 (most TV shows, pan & scan movies) are not

  23. Saddam by denisonbigred · · Score: 1

    Do you actually think that Saddam lets the people choose the government? Hell from the looks of our last election, we barely choose ours. Your reasoning is idiotic.

    --

    "There's no way to rule innocent men. The only power any government has is the power to crack down on criminals."
  24. Revolution OS by fobbman · · Score: 1

    Sounds cool. Can I just download an ISO of the DVD instead?

  25. I need sleep by grondu · · Score: 2, Funny

    region-free

    Man, I need sleep. I read that as Rogaine-free.

    --

    I'm the urban spaceman babe, but here comes the twist... I don't exist

  26. Re:Disturbing by MoOsEb0y · · Score: 1

    Have you even read the SB742 link you posted? It's about the DOT making money to do road improvements.

  27. Ladies and Gentlemen by tjohns · · Score: 3, Informative

    Ahem...ladies and gentlemen, may I have your attention please...

    I now present, for your listening enjoyment, The Free Software Song!!!

  28. Thats What they do Sex == Talk by eadint · · Score: 0, Troll

    I would bet that the strategy is to put a sexy woman there so that the horny soldiers will tell her anything for attention. hell maybe she'll even fuck them if they give her really juicy stuff. did you see the hot looking redhead sex-pot they got covering the guy leading the whole thing I'll bet you ten dollars he's fucking her and thats why they put her there

  29. Revolution OS on P2P networks? by iCEBaLM · · Score: 0, Troll

    Someone wanna put this on one of the P2P networks? $15 for a DVD case to ship to CANADA is ludicrous.

    -- iCEBaLM

    1. Re:Revolution OS on P2P networks? by embarcadero · · Score: 1
      You know, that's just rude. The director self-financed this documentary, and has been one of the most flexible and open independent filmmakers EVER in trying to publish incredible material about the linux & open source community without doing the bullshit things that the big media companies do, like regional encoding.

      To stiff him his $15 bucks on such an amazing and expensive-to-produce piece of Linux history is EXACTLY the attitude that the RIAA expects of us.

      If I see this thing on Kazaa, I'll change my opinion about the RIAA's stuff. There's no reason to fight for the moral high ground if the community acts so incredibly selfish and hypocritical, and destroys one of the most obvious supporters of the open-source value system.

    2. Re:Revolution OS on P2P networks? by iCEBaLM · · Score: 1

      The DVD itself isn't $15, that's just the SHIPPING cost. The DVD is $25, of which I would gladly pay, but I will not pay 60% of that cost in shipping fees!

      If he wants to get paid, he should have more than one retailer for it, one that perhaps doesn't charge 60% of the cost of the actual product just to ship it across one land shared border (of which it really only costs about $5 to do).

      -- iCEBaLM

    3. Re:Revolution OS on P2P networks? by embarcadero · · Score: 1

      gotcha, sorry i missed the original point. i don't have any idea how much he's paying the retailer to handle this stuff. usually you have to pay big fees for promotion and placement of products before a retailer will even begin to carry it. maybe if you email him he'll just send it to you directly.

    4. Re:Revolution OS on P2P networks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Idea: Send him $25 and get an affadavit to recieve a single copied DVD from someone else.

  30. What a deal! by Otter · · Score: 3, Funny
    All corporate patrons receive two gratis hours of Free Software licensing and/or GPL consulting from FSF's GPL Compliance Labs (with a reduced rate for further consultation).

    Wow, two free hours of RMS insisting that "it's correctly termed GNU/Linux -- here, read this 85 point manifesto."

    It's a nice chunk of change they've picked up, though. Looking at their rates, that's $10,000 each from IBM and HP, and probably $500 each from the others. I wonder if they really got that much out of them or if they offered a discount to get the ball rolling.

    1. Re:What a deal! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Wow, I post this on the wrong story, repost it on the correct story and get modded up on the wrong story!

      -- Otter

  31. As a former state worker by eadint · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I worked at EDD in sacramento. and i think gnu would be great there. in california 90% of the real work is done by tn3270 this can easily be done in linux. the major needs are. email, word processor, spreadsheet and presentations for the managers. the main road block would be exchange most big corporations love that program and i don't think that there is a real alternative to it. but I'm sure that that could be worked out.
    Star office
    X3279 or something like that
    Mozilla for a web browser.
    although i would set the managers up with Apples. the less they have to thing the better off you are, as a former it person for them i should know.

    1. Re:As a former state worker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      In an article for Linux Journal (February 2003), they discuss exactly that. They talk about replacing exchange with IMAP, OpenLDAP, and Berkely DB (Cyrus IMAP uses this I guess). They actually found that their solution scaled and performed better than an actual exchange server. Very interesting, especially considering that I know jack-squat about exchange...

    2. Re:As a former state worker by afidel · · Score: 2, Informative

      There are two alternatives to exchange (maybe 3), Lotus Notes, and Oracle's email server which is supposed to function as a drop in replacement for Exchange. There is also the old HP UNIX email server that was also a drop in replacement for exchange and which last I had heard was picked up by one of the largest users and was going to be worked on and made commercially available again (this was like 9 months ago, haven't looked into it since). Also if you want to put up with Exchange as the email server you can use Ximian Evolution with the exchange connector. None of these are free software, but all of them will run on free platforms and will allow you greater flexibility.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
  32. Which player? by yerricde · · Score: 1

    blah blah blah backing up my discs because I'm afraid they're going to get damaged blah blah *cough*bullshit*cough*

    Would you frown on "format-shifting VHS tapes because I'm afraid VHS will go the way of the 8-track after my VCR has died" or "format-shifting VHS tapes because they're notorious for wearing out after a couple dozen plays"?

    Many DVD players now will play mp3 files directly, and a number will even play Divx movies directly as well.

    Divx 1 movies (Circuit City time-bomb DVD) don't work anymore because the license servers have been taken down. Which set-top player do you recommend for DivX 4+ movies (AVI with MPEG-4 video and MP3 or AC3 audio)?

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
    1. Re:Which player? by Osty · · Score: 1

      Would you frown on "format-shifting VHS tapes because I'm afraid VHS will go the way of the 8-track after my VCR has died" or "format-shifting VHS tapes because they're notorious for wearing out after a couple dozen plays"?

      I realize there are legitimate reasons for timeshifting. Certainly archiving your old VHS tapes is one, as is archiving old home movies. Fine. Rip them into your PC, and then onto VCD or DVD. However, that doesn't change the fact that many people do pirate movies. It just gives them a convenient excuse they can tell themselves to help manage their guilt.


      Divx 1 movies (Circuit City time-bomb DVD) don't work anymore because the license servers have been taken down. Which set-top player do you recommend for DivX 4+ movies (AVI with MPEG-4 video and MP3 or AC3 audio)?

      People still relate Circuit City's aborted "Divx" with the word "Divx"? Anyway, I obviously meant the MPEG4-based DivX encoding that is popular for movies (pirated and otherwise) these days. As for players that support it, look here. Ignoring the two DVD-playing consoles (PS2 and XBox, where the XBox at least requires hacking before it'll play mpeg4/divx and so doesn't count), there's still 5 other players that support Divx, and at least one of them is in the $200-$300 price range.

  33. The most fascinating elements... by Slur · · Score: 1

    ...of Revolution OS are the bizarre physical mannerisms of RMS and ESR. I enjoyed all their commentary but I had to go home and take a shower to get rid of that creepy feeling.

    --
    -- thinkyhead software and media
  34. In other news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The State of Oregon is doing such a wonderful job that that community of Sherwood, a town with one of the highest gross income per citizen has the lowest school funding. Roughly $250 less per student then the second least funded school district.

    Way to go!

    I have to admit though it is funny looking at the school boards saying things like

    "School Closed March 21 Due to Lack of Funds"

    I think their trying to give us a guild trip :)

  35. I quit a job by SHEENmaster · · Score: 1

    because the Exchange server that my Java applets needed to place orders fucked ittself up so many damn times. (the config files would randomly reset themselves for factory default every week or two)

    A big problem with Micro$oft's crap is that it makes those using it look bad, beyond mere embarrasement. I switched my father over to Linux several months ago, and he has never looked back.

    --
    You can't judge a book by the way it wears its hair.
  36. Wild feeds? by Znonymous+Coward · · Score: 1

    Forget that, where can I find the Girls Gone Wild feeds?

    Drunk grils showing their breasts for 10 cent beads... Now that's a good deal.

    --

    Karma: The shiznight, mostly because I am the Drizzle.

    1. Re:Wild feeds? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, I too want to see girls going "wooo!" and "wooo party!" and of course drunken frat guys going "woooah yeah!"

  37. Re:HP Digital Media Receiver doesn't support ogg.. by evilviper · · Score: 4, Informative

    I find that INCREDIBLY hard to believe. Not only has my experience been very positive (and I've got really good ears, and equipment to match), but the double-blind tests conducted have said the same.

    Are you sure the problem isn't just that you don't like hearing the high-frequencies, or maybe you're just so accustomed to MP3 that you don't like hearing music without the artifacts?

    --
    Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  38. Re:Your sig by jcast · · Score: 1

    It's 34 now.

    --
    There are reasons why democracy does not work nearly as well as capitalism.
    -- David D. Friedman
  39. Re:Disturbing by Kioti · · Score: 1

    The problem starts when people use the title of "Peace Protest" but run more of a "LA Lakers just won the NBA Finals Riot". Blocking freeways, breaking windows, vandalizing personal and private property alike are not actions of people seeking peace. They are actions of criminals who should go to jail for them. And if they hurt someone in the process they should go to jail for a long time. Just like any non "Peace Protestor" would.

    --
    Regards,
    ~Joshua Norton
  40. Re:Disturbing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's what they WANT you to think, you naive, innocent little man...

  41. mini-itx Via eden boards! by mabhatter654 · · Score: 1
    visit sfftech.com or mini-itx.com for lots of options! The via eden boards fit the spec you ask for and are fairly cheap (100-170) and ship complete! Just add ram, box, and drives. There's lots of help out there for projects just like yours--take your pick.

    If you can wait a while and love Linux, there's even some new SFF boards that have the embedded media players that work seperate from the OS.

    have fun!

  42. Extra! Extra! Read all about it! by 200_success · · Score: 1

    Washington Declares War on Oregon

    Moves capital to Redmond for better naval defense
  43. Revolution OS DVD by redcliffe · · Score: 1

    I'd buy it if I didn't have to use credit card. I refuse to ever get a credit card. I wish they'd except bank transfer.....

  44. Re:Extra! Extra! Read all about it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're saying this like it's a bad thing... we've never really trusted those granola-munchers down there in Ory-gun... :-)

    (I'm betting if we just cut off their supplies of Birkenstocks and the flow of Starbucks, we can bring 'em to their knees within days)

  45. Not true... by nuxx · · Score: 1

    I use the BroadQ Qcast Tuner on my PS2 serving files off of a FreeBSD machine almost daily. With the Linux Binary Compatability stuff installed, you just install the JRE through the ports collection and it works. Really well, in fact.

  46. Re:HP Digital Media Receiver doesn't support ogg.. by Mr+Z · · Score: 1

    When did you last try Ogg? I converted all my stuff to Ogg around RC2 time frame, between RC2 and the final 1.0, they fixed some very noticeable quality problems.

    I know a couple of my tracks ran into these problems.

    --Joe
  47. That HP Media Center Box... by blackwizard · · Score: 1
    ... sounds like a stripped down version of the HP de100c, (PDF manual) which, although it is no longer sold, does run linux, and is a neat little hackable box.

    I think the DEC had the potential to be a really great product. Seems like it got lost somewhere in the merger... plus, when it was released a couple of years ago it was priced way out of the market. Damn shame.

  48. Re:HP Digital Media Receiver doesn't support ogg.. by don.g · · Score: 1

    Vorbis produces *different* artifacts. Personally, I much prefer the degradation of Vorbis to the MP3 artifacts that at times make it sound like drums have been filled with water.

    --
    Pretend that something especially witty is here. Thanks.
  49. The icon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is it me or does the icon look like a robed penis?

  50. Self-evident by Ari+Rahikkala · · Score: 2, Funny
    One other thing - I am pretty sure I read somewhere that the Receiver runs Linux. Did anyone else see this too? The only other thing about it I didn't really like was the lack of a reset button. There is a power button, but it didn't reset the device when I pushed it, so I had to unplug it once.

    Why in the world would anyone want to reboot it if it runs Linux ;) ?

    1. Re:Self-evident by spitzak · · Score: 1

      Because the *application* crashed.

  51. Re:Disturbing by ShadowDrake · · Score: 1

    The problem is that many protest actions are open to interpretation. Is a protestor standing in front of the public building picking a spot to maximize the attention his message recieves, or because he wants to block entry? Is the man who struggles with a cop trying to defend himself from a potentially violent officer, or trying to make a first strike? It's often all a matter of perception.

    To further prove the point, I propose the following experiment.

    Record some "protestors". Create two copies of this tape, with their banners and audio edited to suggest the "protestors" espouse both sides of a controversial issue. Show the tapes at random to audiences, and survey them as to the acceptability of the "protestors'" actions.

    One gets you fifty that when people agree with the "protestors'" cause, they will consider their actions much less malicious.

    --
    It's just like a fascist dictatorship, without the punctual rail service!
  52. SICK! by Saeger · · Score: 1
    You are a truly bastard to post that picture.

    Have you thought about how the zebra's friends and family must feel?

    Please support the wildlife by sticking to CNN and away from National Geographic!

    --

    --
    Power to the Peaceful
  53. Re:HP Digital Media Receiver doesn't support ogg.. by afidel · · Score: 1

    I personally have submitted three different test samples where a Lame encoded VBR with -extreme was undistinguishable from the source but where a high bitrate ogg was easily picked out. There are definitly some high frequency issues as well as one bass distortion issue present in ogg. I hope that they are able to work these out (they may be already, I submitted several months ago), but to say that ogg is perfect is simply not true.

    --
    There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
  54. Re:HP Digital Media Receiver doesn't support ogg.. by FrostedWheat · · Score: 1

    maybe you're just so accustomed to MP3 that you don't like hearing music without the artifacts?

    When I first started using Ogg, I kept thinking I was hearing artifacts. But everytime I went back to the original CD I couldn't tell the difference; what I thought was artifacts was actually part of the original uncompressed track.

    I think Ogg is almost *too* good. ;)

  55. Alternative media sources by Big+Nothing · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I find The Guardian to be one of the most unbiased, objective news sources in existance:
    http://www.guardian.co.uk/

    If you want to get another perspective on the news, Al-Jazeera is the thing for you. It's just as biased as CNN, but it provides a different angle on the news:
    http://www.aljazeera.net/

    Not mainstream:
    http://dearraed.blogspot.com/

    --
    SIG: TAKE OFF EVERY 'CAPTAIN'!!
  56. How about ease of use. by eadint · · Score: 1

    About a year ago i was playing around with diferent linux email systems, they seemed to be hard to set up and they didnt really have a unified paradigm. this would make large scale email hard. although. i guess i should look into this again.

  57. So? by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    UK TV stations have at least 3 or 4 ladies "embedded" with troops.

    US left behind in this respect I guess...

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  58. Real Internet Wild Feed by Danta · · Score: 1

    Here's a real one.

  59. Re:Disturbing by valkraider · · Score: 1

    Oops. My fault. That was a bill from the 2001 legislature... It seems as though the current 742 has died in committee, and thus is no longer available in its original format. Some of the more "conspiracy theory" websites are saying that it is not dead - but consider the source. At least for now, it has died. It doesn't mean the Oregon Legislature won't do stupid stuff soon though, they are quite good at it. It was kind of funny and ironci that SB742 was sponsored by a guy named "Mennis". ;)

  60. Re:Extra! Extra! Read all about it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey, pal, Starbucks was originally a Washington thing... You sent 'em here, we didn't ask for them!

  61. there are 600 embedded reporters! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And some non-embedded ones, like the ones in Baghdad.

  62. Testing by TheMidget · · Score: 1

    1234

  63. Re:Disturbing by Kioti · · Score: 1

    I really have no problem with peaceful protesting as a way for people to express their opions. I doubt many people would consider blocking freeway onramps and breaking car windows out a peaceful protest though. Rgardless of the subject matter on the signs.

    --
    Regards,
    ~Joshua Norton