Slashdot Mirror


Lindows Media Computer: Power to Strike Microsoft?

Augustus writes "LinuxHardware.org has just published the first review of the Lindows Media Computer from iDOTpc.com. The review covers the hardware behind the machine but also goes through all of the machine's claimed functionality: "After looking over all the media hype, I went searching for one of these little machines. Could the Lindows Media Computer really pull off meeting the new Windows machine in a pitched battle? It did boast "Instant on" DVD, CD, MP3, and VCD playback as one of the prime features. And, it was only a fraction of the price for a Windows Media Center system. At the time, only one vendor had them available, iDOTpc.com. After some communication, the folks at iDOTpc.com were kind enough to loan me one of the units to take for a spin." You can find the full review over at LinuxHardware.org."

227 comments

  1. DVD? by chrisseaton · · Score: 1, Interesting

    How did it do DVD? Did it have a propeitary software or hardware decoder?

    1. Re:DVD? by halfnerd · · Score: 1

      At least the article stated is doesn't include a hardware DVD-decoder, so I would guess they use software.

    2. Re:DVD? by Brendan+Byrd · · Score: 1

      Well, if you read the article, you can find out :)

    3. Re:DVD? by WPIDalamar · · Score: 1

      Too bad it's so horribly slashdotted, we can't read it.

    4. Re:DVD? by Pharmboy · · Score: 1

      RTFA

      iDOTpc.com was well aware of the problem and told me it was because the system lacked a hardware DVD decoder. The new "M series" would be coming out soon that did include the decoder and took care of the poor playback.

      And as usual, someone modded up the question, thus rewarding someone who was too fucking lazy to actually read the article.

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    5. Re:DVD? by chrisseaton · · Score: 1

      It was /.ed

    6. Re:DVD? by stratjakt · · Score: 1

      It's proprietary and embedded in an onboard bootprom.

      If you scour through mini-itx.com you'll find mentions of it, it was announced there months ago.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    7. Re:DVD? by Pharmboy · · Score: 1

      It was /.ed

      then wait the 5 minutes and you can read the article. The fact that the site is /.ed does not excuse not reading the article first, if the article was JUST PUBLISHED here. Jeez, wait a minute or two, then read the article.

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    8. Re:DVD? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OK, I waited 30 minutes. Still /.ed. Methinks your post should have said wait 5 DAYS... ;)

    9. Re:DVD? by Brendan+Byrd · · Score: 1

      No prob. I posted a copy.

    10. Re:DVD? by missing000 · · Score: 3, Informative

      How did it do DVD? Did it have a propeitary software or hardware decoder?

      Here's a list of the multi media players it seems they are using.

      Not exactly a a good answer to his question. Basicly, the answer is that it only decodes DVD's at boot time. Not while running GNU/Linux.

      From the review:

      The etDVD software is a boot time embedded software set that does all the magic of audio and video playback at boot time.

  2. oksala rocks by wilbrod · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    slashdot too

  3. Gah! by CoolVibe · · Score: 5, Funny

    iDotpc... I could've sworn I read idiot-pc there... I need more coffee...

    1. Re:Gah! by blahlemon · · Score: 1

      That'll learn you for not clicking on links!

      --
      It take more faith to believe in evolution than it takes to believe in God
    2. Re:Gah! by wheany · · Score: 1

      It has an I in it, like a Mac. And it has a dot in it, like anything on the net.

      I gots to get me one of these!

    3. Re:Gah! by drewness · · Score: 1

      I bought a PC from them a few years ago. Believe me, idiot-pc is an apt reading. You get what you pay for on a $400 computer from them. It crashed constantly with any OS and was dead in under a year.

    4. Re:Gah! by Troll_Kamikaze · · Score: 1

      I could've sworn I read idiot-pc there...

      This is Slashdot's new adaptive personalization code at work. Pretty cool to have the text tailored so closely to the reader, huh?

  4. I'm more interested in finding out by RLiegh · · Score: 1, Funny

    What spiffy DRM features it brought over to Linux.
    Take THAT you old microsoft monopoly!!!

  5. instant on? by Lxy · · Score: 5, Funny

    It did boast "Instant on" DVD, CD, MP3, and VCD playback as one of the prime features

    I have one of those, it's called a DVD player. RCA made them awhile ago.

    --

    There is no reasonable defense against an idiot with an agenda
    :wq
    1. Re:instant on? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, does it run Linux? Or did you have to buy another box to get that functionality?

    2. Re:instant on? by Slack0ff · · Score: 1

      I have many instant on products. Not a one of them runs Lindows... Since the site was slashdotted in a new record time I was wondering what the possiblilites of changing the OS was? Could I run Redhat with a DVD Software and X11 amp? Or is this a proprietary thing. I have been eying the $200 Modle with a 1.1Ghz Duron at Walmart.com now for a while and I think it would make a cheap Webserver and Im pretty sure I could get redhat/slackware running. My only doubt is the onboard video but im sure I can fund a driver that works. Anyone tried this?

      --
      Everyday You see me is the worst day of my life -Office Space
    3. Re:instant on? by Lxy · · Score: 1

      I have a Sampo for that :-)

      --

      There is no reasonable defense against an idiot with an agenda
      :wq
    4. Re:instant on? by Master+Bait · · Score: 1

      Why do you need onboard video to run a webserver? At any rate, you can get at least 2d Xwindows any of the all-in-one chipsets that run AMD products.

      --
      "Only in their dreams can men truly be free 'twas always thus, and always thus will be."
      --Tom Schulman
    5. Re:instant on? by Slack0ff · · Score: 1

      My webserver might pull double duty as an MP3/Og player with visualzations at parties.

      --
      Everyday You see me is the worst day of my life -Office Space
    6. Re:instant on? by Pharmboy · · Score: 1

      I was wondering what the possiblilites of changing the OS was?

      Considering it was just a glorified cheap computer with a different bios (VIA 933, 128ram, 20gbhd, trident svga), i would imagine you could. You would be better off buying the Walmart PC, however, which is more expandable, and has similar specs (sans special boot bios) for about half the price, $200. It even comes with a crappy mouse and keyboard, which this system did not.

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    7. Re:instant on? by Slack0ff · · Score: 1

      So the walmart one is defenantly what's I got with. My question is what kind of issues would I run into upgrading a 1.1ghz duron. Because I obviously would not like Lindows from what I have read the interface is decent but im a gnome guy myself (with props to KDE and Enlightenment)

      --
      Everyday You see me is the worst day of my life -Office Space
    8. Re:instant on? by Pharmboy · · Score: 1

      personally, i wouldnt mess with any of it. if you just want a box to run linux and play dvd's and such, just take any decent box, download an iso, and go. the walmart pc isnt duron, its VIA.

      Not sure what you are trying to do, but buying this box (or even the walmart box) probably would do it, just not very well.

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    9. Re:instant on? by nelsonal · · Score: 1

      Designing the whole socket 370 to Socket A adapter might be a bit of a turnoff, or perhaps a challenge. You make the call:). You could probably get a nice Celeron, or possibly even one of the .13 micron Pentium 3s, I don't know if the chipset supports those though.

      --
      Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
    10. Re:instant on? by Slack0ff · · Score: 1

      The Walmart im refering to is a Duron. It can be found here


      http://www.walmart.com/catalog/product.gsp?produ ct_id=2138699&cat=3951&type=19&dept=3944&path=0%3A 3944%3A3951

      --
      Everyday You see me is the worst day of my life -Office Space
    11. Re:instant on? by Pharmboy · · Score: 1

      ah ok. You should not have problems changing the OS over. Remember, Lindows IS linux, with a cheezy desktop. I tried to find tech specs on the box to see, but no good. My best bet is that the box doesn't use anything remotely state of the art, and any recent distro would do fine, like the new Redhat or Mandrake distros.

      Another option is to just keep Lindows, but choose another desktop. Since all the desktops run on X window system anyway, shouldn't be that big a deal. (outside the normal dependency nightmares) I assume you are buying to learn anyway, sounds like a good project, cheap :)

      I have installed an older version of Lindows on another box, version 2.0 i think, its not bad. Kinda of 'linux for dummies'. Didn't make that big of an impression on me one way or another.

      I DO recommend you put up some more RAM if you are going to try to do alot, or use Open Office. If you want to do anything approaching games, the video will be sorely lacking and the ad doesnt say it has an open agp slot. 128MB is adequate (remember, 8mb is shared for video), but you can get a 128mb pc133 stick for less than $20 at buy.com

      If I am reading you right and you want to check out linux or just have a basic linux workstation, this box would be fine. I have run current distros on much less hardware (dual pentium 200s for instance) and been happy with the way X window ran. You may find that Lindows is pretty good for learning. (the ubernerds would disagree, but so what).

      If you are REALLY new to linux, buying it and leaving it as is for a few months would be my recommendation, then move on to more demanding distros. As to using it as a webserver: this box is way more than enough to run Apache.

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    12. Re:instant on? by ScoLgo · · Score: 1
      There was a discussion about these Wal-Mart boxen recently on a linux mailing list I subscribe to.

      The pros...
      • Great price
      • Roomy case interior
      • Linux compatible hardware so you know it will work with other distros if you want to change

      The cons...
      • Questionable power supply
      • A bit under-powered but you gets what ya pays for :-)
      • LindowsOS (no-one who had bought one of these kept Lindows on it - they all had wiped it and replaced it with another distro)

      Of course, YMMV...
      --
      "Michael, I did nothing. I did absolutely nothing - and it was everything that I thought it could be."
    13. Re:instant on? by armyofone · · Score: 0, Offtopic
      You forgot one of the 'cons'...
      • LindowsOS comes pre-installed to run as root.

      Bad, bad idea that's easily fixed with adduser but still... not everyone who buys a cheap computer is aware of these kinds of security issues.
      --
      "A revolution without dancing is... a revolution not worth having"
    14. Re:instant on? by ScoLgo · · Score: 1

      Absolutely correct - thanks for correcting my oversight.

      --
      "Michael, I did nothing. I did absolutely nothing - and it was everything that I thought it could be."
    15. Re:instant on? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Before 3.0, full user support was added. LindowsOS can run as a user or as root. Most of the QA department was unfamiliar with Linux at the time, so there were some quirks in the user stuff, but most of the stuff worked as a user, including Click-N-Run. When you first boot up the computer as root, a menu is displayed that asks if you want to change resolutions or add users or whatever.

    16. Re:instant on? by abe+ferlman · · Score: 1

      The problem was, even though RCA copied the "feature" of running everything as root by default, you couldn't even get to a console, let alone get X running. All in all, I was displeased with the computing experience on my RCA DVD player.

      At least I didn't have to pay the windows tax on it though!

      --
      microsoftword.mp3 - it doesn't care that they're not words...
    17. Re:instant on? by Slack0ff · · Score: 1

      Im not "really new" i wouldnt say. I hopped on the Redhat Band wagon as they released version 5... Im sure that since lindows is linux even the graphs shouldnt be a problem... thanks for your input.

      --
      Everyday You see me is the worst day of my life -Office Space
  6. slashdotted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In a word, no, it doesn't. Too bad.

  7. already slashdotted! by gabec · · Score: 0

    i clicked the link to linuxhardware.org when there were still zero comments on the story and it was already dead! Crazy!

    1. Re:already slashdotted! by (startx) · · Score: 1

      yes, and with a subscription, you too can get in on this pre-slashdot slashdotting!

    2. Re:already slashdotted! by gentgeen · · Score: 1

      Slashdotted before it could be slashdotted??? "verrrry innterressting" -said with german lisp

    3. Re:already slashdotted! by cryptozoologist · · Score: 1

      why would folks want to read the actual article before commenting on it?

    4. Re:already slashdotted! by TobiasSodergren · · Score: 1

      I think I sense a business strategy here.. If enough dupes are published, the slashdot effect is prolonged, thus the guys not paying the subscription fees will never be able to read the article. Damn, I'm good! Or paranoid..

    5. Re:already slashdotted! by carlos_benj · · Score: 1

      A 'german lisp?'

      That'd make it, "Verrry innterethhting...."

      --

      --

      As a matter of fact, I am a lawyer. But I play an actor on TV.

    6. Re:already slashdotted! by gentgeen · · Score: 1

      from the show 'Laugh-In'. maybe you are too young to know/remember. Although, I am to young to have seen the original, I did watch the reruns religiously (sp?)

    7. Re:already slashdotted! by carlos_benj · · Score: 1

      I saw the originals as a kid. Artie Johnson was the actor that did the German soldier with the one-liner.

      --

      --

      As a matter of fact, I am a lawyer. But I play an actor on TV.

    8. Re:already slashdotted! by gentgeen · · Score: 1

      I stand corrected. Wasn't that one of the best shows ever! I don't think anything has come along to rival it. It was so unique. Although I think the 'times' had a lot to do with it.


      I really don't think something like that could be produced today

  8. that damned "l" sound! by incrustwetrust · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    i would like to inform the OSS community that all of these "l" names must stop!

    my nephew, who has aspergers... has great trouble pronouncing l's, but no trouble pronouncing any other letter. why "lindows" when it could be.. mindows! or dindows! maybe even findows? this is a great injustice towards all people who have trouble pronouncing that inherently evil letter! down with the l sound in the OSS community!

    i used "l" 18 times. hmm.

    1. Re:that damned "l" sound! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, the other alternative was "Winux".

    2. Re:that damned "l" sound! by incrustwetrust · · Score: 1

      that's about how my nephew really sounds, except without the fake chinese accent i imagined in my head, and he wouldn't do the "solly"

      i should try to get him to say "lindows" though! as normally he replaces the l sound with w ;)

    3. Re:that damned "l" sound! by GTRacer · · Score: 1
      Actually, 20 times pre-sig, 6 in the sig itself.

      GTRacer
      - 3/2 for me!

      --
      Defending IP by destroying access to it? That makes sense, RIAA/MPAA. Go to the corner until you can play nice!
    4. Re:that damned "l" sound! by usotsuki · · Score: 1

      Mu, hen da na. I also have trouble pronouncing "L" and I too have Asperger's.

      Must be something in the water.

      But when I say "Lindows" it sounds a lot more like "Windows" than it should...:\

      -uso.

      --
      Dreams, dreams, don't doubt dreams, dreaming children's dreaming dreams. Sailor Moon SS
  9. slashdotted already? by killthiskid · · Score: 1

    Damn, record slash dot, 5 posts on the page, and it is gone!

    Mirrors? Copy of the article? Anyone? Anyone? Bueller?

    1. Re:slashdotted already? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cameron, dear friend, you thought we wouldn't have any fun. Shame on you.

    2. Re:slashdotted already? by slyxter · · Score: 2, Informative

      I can sum it up for you in two words: NOT GOOD. It doesn't play DVDs properly, and they need to add new hardware to it to fix that problem. So much for a media PC.

    3. Re:slashdotted already? by Pharmboy · · Score: 5, Funny

      Here is the Reader's Digest Condensed Version(R)

      Tried the box for days. Sucked bad at DVDs because this version uses software decoder. Couldn't read tags on MP3s or list the directories correctly. Lindows couldn't make up their mind if they supported software that was on their own site. Only available at one place. Guys at that place were nice and knowlegable. System was marginal at best. Wouldn't recommend it to a friend. Not a viable contender to Windows Media Center because it simply lacks power. Costs under $400 sans monitor, kb, mouse. Nice try, but don't buy. The End.

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    4. Re:slashdotted already? by SubtleNuance · · Score: 1

      ha! I clicked your goatse link - but the image was notfound - snuck it past me only to be foiled by anandtech's admins i bet... terrific! good work - but my eyes arent burning grub@grub.net

    5. Re:slashdotted already? by Moloch666 · · Score: 1

      Haha, you get an informative for supplying a goatse link. Absolutely wonderful!

      --
      Understanding is a three-edged sword. -- Kosh Naranek
    6. Re:slashdotted already? by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1

      You fail it. Don't you know you need to pad the link with spaces, so it doesn't show up in the status bar?

    7. Re:slashdotted already? by gilesjuk · · Score: 1

      Is the "Lindows" tag irrelavent? it's just a board using DVD/media playback in the BIOS looking at the specs.

    8. Re:slashdotted already? by angle_slam · · Score: 1
      Sucked bad at DVDs because this version uses software decoder.

      The fact that it uses a software decoder shouldn't make a big difference. Among the HTPC world, software decoders are generally preferred, for some reason. I have no problems playing DVDs using PowerDVD and a software decoder on a 1GHz Athlon.

    9. Re:slashdotted already? by Pharmboy · · Score: 1

      The fact that it uses a software decoder shouldn't make a big difference. Among the HTPC world, software decoders are generally preferred, for some reason. I have no problems playing DVDs using PowerDVD and a software decoder on a 1GHz Athlon.

      Once again, RTFA. Its not a Duron, its a 933 VIA CPU with built in shared ram Trident video (using pc133 ram) thus can not be compared to your setup.

      Quoting:

      The folks at iDOTpc.com were on the ball though, and answered all my questions in just a single 5 minute call to their location. I found it funny that they knew all along that the system had performance issues and yet the parent company denied it....

      iDOTpc.com was well aware of the problem and told me it was because the system lacked a hardware DVD decoder. The new ?M series? would be coming out soon that did include the decoder and took care of the poor playback....


      The article clearly presents the problems and solutions if you bother to read it. I think 2 different people have posted the article here already.

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
  10. hrm by jesperht · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Sounds interesting...hopefully it will stand a better chance than that old lindows laptop they tried selling...

  11. DVD Playback ... ? by frodo+from+middle+ea · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Please isn't that illegal ?
    I dont care if DMCA or DCMA or whatever is unethical or not, it it a law , which makes watching DVDs on linux illegal (the encrypted ones only).
    And 99$ for one year of subscription, man at that price m$ looks like a cheap option. Don't tell me with 99$ you get a lot more than a bare bone OS.Coz a typical lindows user wont need MySQl, PGSQL, Apache, etc etc.
    Is it just me, who feels that this whole concept of dumbed-down linux, rediculous ? The average joe doesn't care about GNU, GPL, free sheech/beer (well he does care about the beer :-). ) . So why would he bother to switch ?>
    And geeks have better things to do , like build their distro from scratch than be bothered by such dumb distors

    --
    for the last time people, I am "frodo from middle eaRTH", not "middle eaST".
    1. Re:DVD Playback ... ? by niko9 · · Score: 1

      Not if the DVD player is in the BIOS ROM. The FIC itx motherbords have this. This was mentioned a while back, including an article about Phoenix technologies embeding web browers in their BIOS's. ABIT has has a simple CD player in their BIOS for quite some time. No need to boot into the OS for playing CD's and MP3 CDR's.

      Nothing new to see here.....move along

    2. Re:DVD Playback ... ? by molarmass192 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      They use a DVD decoder embedded into the BIOS, the MPAA gets their cut for the decoder. It's not watching DVDs on Linux that's illegal, it's using an unlicensed DVD *decoder* that's illegal.

      As for Lindows, I fully agree. I like what Lindows is trying to do for Linux but I wouldn't pay $99 a year to be able to download otherwise free software. There may be a few exceptions (StarOffice) that are non-free and available with their service but in general you're right. I think a "pay-as-you-go to download certified software" option might have wider acceptance than a subscription but if MS moves towards a subscription model for the home (and based on what they're doing for businesses this is a possibility) then it's no longer such a bad idea. Personally, I buy a distro DVD twice a year for $50, stage it on my webserver, and use it to update a dozen boxes I watch over. So my way runs $8/year/PC which is right where I want it.

      As for the "average Joe", I like to use my dad as a point of reference. He is from the "pen and paper" crowd. I installed Linux on his PC and he doesn't even know that the OS has been replaced. What he DOES know is he wants a word processor, a spreadsheet program, email, and a browser. Well, he has those and he's perfectly happy. Would he have switched on his own? I can safely say never, because he just wants to get work done ... period. If what is already on the PC is sufficient to accomplish what he wants to do, then that's what he'll use.

      Lindows is smart in this respect because they understand this "joe user" inertia. If somebody walks into BestBuy and walks out with a Lindows PC, in 99% of the cases it will be left with exactly what came preinstalled pretty much until the PC needs to be replaced. I don't think they seriously expect "savvy" Linux users to start switching to Lindows in droves. Personally, I think they're helping bring additional OEM support for Linux and that's a good thing. However, I doubt they'll sell many boxed copies of their distro because savvy folks would rather use RedHat/Mandrake/SuSE/etc and "joe users" wouldn't know how to begin comtemplating an OS switch.

      --

      Good people do not need laws to tell them to act responsibly, while bad people will find a way around the laws-Plato
  12. Bold link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    It'd be nice if everyone started the practice of bolding the link in the submission that's the subject of the post.

  13. I'm seeing a theme here... by Lendrick · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Bored with my musical endeavors, I thought it was time to watch some movies. I put in an older DVD movie, Spaceballs. It was all down hill from there. Anyone familiar with the movie will remember the opening sequence where the large spacecraft moves across the screen. The video playback was quite stuttered, though the audio did not seem to suffer. As the movie went on, the stutter wasn't as obvious but was still there. ...

    First they release an AOL Computer that can't access AOL, and now they're making a Media Computer that can't play media.

    Just because they're pissing off Microsoft doesn't make them a good company.

    1. Re:I'm seeing a theme here... by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 1

      Lindows is starting to remind me of LinuxOne.

      Granted, that's a bit unfair - at least Lindows has produced something. And it has some value added features (to what degree one assigns that value is something of another subject). But I'm beginning to click on the Lindows articles expecting to read about something else they've screwed up. And so, like LinuxOne, Lindows is beginning to seem more like a

    2. Re:I'm seeing a theme here... by Trogre · · Score: 1

      I would highly suspect the reason for the jerkiness is that DMA on the dvd drive is turned off.

      Ogle 0.8.5 is a truly brilliant DVD player (0.9.1 is better, but we'll take what we can get), and plays smooth as glass on most >500MHz systems with UDMA dvd drives.

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    3. Re:I'm seeing a theme here... by i_am_nitrogen · · Score: 1

      Of course, you'll have better results with SPDIF output, as with software decoded audio the software has to deal with imperfect sound card DAC's, whereas a separate decoder or integrated decoder/receiver will have a DAC referenced to a zero error timing source, so that the sound plays exactly at the rate it would in the studio.

    4. Re:I'm seeing a theme here... by beerman2k · · Score: 1

      Not only that but also I really doubt they're pissing off Microsoft at all. Every crappy low end device that doesn't work and has Lindows or Linux in its name is basically saying Linux isn't ready for the big time yet. It only helps M$.

    5. Re:I'm seeing a theme here... by Cyno · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but I bet if I played with that Lindows installation I could have got it to work. Linux and I'm sure Lindows are filled with bugs. It is inevitable that these bugs will one day be worked out. And by then Microsoft had better be working a new business model or they might find their revenue streams drying up. Though I seriously doubt Lindows is much if any competition to Microsoft, I bet Sun, HP, SGI and IBM will give old M$ a run for their money.

    6. Re:I'm seeing a theme here... by richard.kilgore · · Score: 1

      You forgot about the first version of Lindows,
      which was a Windows apps computer that wouldn't
      run Windows apps.

      - richard

  14. Ugh, Lindows by ransom2003 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Lindows would be great if it WASN'T AS BAD AS WINDOWS! If only they would open up the source on that killer version of WINE they have to other distro's.

    1. Re:Ugh, Lindows by ihnm · · Score: 1

      "Lindows.com gives back 100% of our WINE programming back to the public WINE tree." This is a direct quote from lindows.com. I am not a WINE developer, nor do I maintain the public WINE tree, so I can't verify the statement. However, I have no reason to believe Lindows would lie.

  15. Text by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Not too far back, battle waged. A battle between the big man and the little man. Massive Microsoft against little Lindows. After a lengthy court battle, the little man finally prevailed. Microsoft was not able to stop them from using the Windows-like name. That was in Spring of last year. This year, Lindows decided to give Microsoft another swift kick in the pants.

    Perhaps still a little haughty over their win, Lindows decided to take on another of Microsoft's products. In late 2002, Microsoft put into market the Media Center Edition of its popular Windows XP operating system, complete with system requirements dictated to OEM system builders. On January 28, 2003, Lindows released its own Lindows Media Computer as a direct competitor.

    After looking over all the media hype, I went searching for one of these little machines. Could the Lindows Media Computer really pull off meeting the new Windows machine in a pitched battle? It did boast ?Instant on? DVD, CD, MP3, and VCD playback as one of the prime features. And, it was only a fraction of the price for a Windows Media Center system. At the time, only one vendor had them available, iDOTpc.com. After some communication, the folks at iDOTpc.com were kind enough to loan me one of the units to take for a spin.

    This is it, right out of the box. One word came to my mind after seeing it next to my PogoLinux machine - tiny. I hoped there was some serious power packed in that little box or someone was going to be unhappy. With that in mind, on to the system specifications.

    ? VIA C3 E-Series 933MHz Processor
    ? VIA PLE133 + VT8235 Chipset Motherboard
    ? 128MB RAM PC133 and up to 1GB of PC100/PC133 SDRAM capacity
    ? 20GB ATA 100 5400RPM hard drive attached to one of 2 Dual-channel enhanced IDE Ports supporting UDMA 66/100/133
    ? 16X DVD Drive in the single full height 5.25" drive bay
    ? 4 USB 1.1 Ports (two in front, two in back), 1 Serial Port, 1 Parallel Port , and 1 PCI Slot
    ? Integrated Trident 2X AGP with 2D/3D Graphics Acceleration
    ? Integrated VIA AC97 Audio, 3 Audio Jacks: Line-in, Line-out, and Mic-in
    ? Onboard VIA 10/100 Base-T Fast Ethernet Controller
    ? Mini-ITX Tower Case with 150W Power Supply
    ? Dimension: 10.24"(D) x 5.31"(W) x 11.75"(H)
    ? LindowsOS 3.0 MP3.com Edition with dedicated tech support
    ? One Year Parts and Labor Warranty

    Some of you who are avid readers may recognize this box. It is none other than the FIC Falcon CR51 small form factor PC that was announced last October. However, it has been updated with the ?etDVD? software from Elegent Technologies. The etDVD software is a boot time embedded software set that does all the magic of audio and video playback at boot time.

    Brains! I need Brains!

    Of course, I couldn't resist cracking the case. While there were some instructions included, I thought it would be more interesting to see how intuitive it would be to go without. Three thumb screws on the back side released the side panel which slid away. Inside, there isn't a whole lot to see. Yes. On the left you can just get a glimpse of the hard drive which is mounted to the floor of the chassis. Dead center is the DVD drive, and to the upper right is the teeny tiny power supply. Again, not too interesting. But, I discovered that one of the thumb screws actually held onto the DVD drive sled. After popping off the front face plate, I found the mate to the thumb screw. Removing this, I was able to get the DVD drive out of the way and have a better look at the rest of the insides.

    As expected, I wasn't a good photographer. But let me assure you, everything was clean and small. You can make out the twin SDRAM sockets there at the top, the CPU and fan assembly just below that. Under the green heatsink resides the chipset, and over there on the right you can see the single PCI slot. Not a whole lot of room in there for anything else.

    Fire It up!

    Once I had it back together, I connected it to my spare monitor, keyboard, and mouse. (At $3

    1. Re:Text by Decimal · · Score: 1

      Heh. If Lindows were to find a way to drop the price by $100, move the other USB ports to the front, seal up the box and ship it with a controller, they'd have their own console. Microsoft did it, why can't Lindows?

      Better yet, make an XBOX clone. :)

      --

      Remember "Bring 'em on"? *sigh
    2. Re:Text by ilctoh · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Sounds like they're trading necessary power for low cost. For example, does 128MB of SDRAM sound like enough for a multi-media computer? A 20GB 5400 RPM hard drive won't win any awards, especially if folks are seriously into MP3 storage. A CD Burner wouldn't hurt. At least a motherboard with a 4x AGP slot and USB2 support. IMHO, this computer would better be suited for a web browsing/email/word processing computer, not a "Media Computer".

      --
      How many slashes would a slashdot dot, if a slashdot could dot slashes?
  16. Curious about the time shifting by t0qer · · Score: 2, Interesting

    And going off just what I saw in the slash post, there's no mention of it. Since I can't read the article (slashdotted) I can only go on what is availiable to me.

    So since time shifting wasn't mentioned about windows media center or linux, I can only assume since the author is trying to compare lindows to media center that it must have time shifting capabilities.

    So how is the time shifting on linux? Could someone from linuxhardware.com please either provide another mirror to the article, or just answer my reply? I'm just really curious to know if it's working well in lindows.

    Yours Truly
    Toq

    1. Re:Curious about the time shifting by scooby-doo · · Score: 1

      There is no time shifting. It doesn't allow either input or output to a TV. Its just a stripped down PC that plays(poorly) DVDs, VCD, CDs and MP3s. The auther of the review was very impressed with the system.

    2. Re:Curious about the time shifting by Avatar_LHo · · Score: 1

      I am the author. No time shifting. :(

  17. Microsoft-killer? AHAHAHAHAHAHA yeah maybe by krog · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Come on. Has anyone here ever *used* Lindows?

    God. Pitiful... just fucking awful. It's like the worst features of Windows meet the worst features of Linux, and a retard put it all together so other retards could half-use it but no one could fully use it. How anyone could consider it even a serious contender on the desktop, let alone a "MS striker", is beyond the comprehension of an intelligent human.

    Lindows will die and Bill Gates won't even giggle. That's how little of a threat they are.

  18. iDOT Comp- first PC Company built for the Web by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Their website claims:
    first PC Company built for the Web

    Still waiting for the first PC Company built to withstand a good /.'ing

  19. So's y'all can RTFA (blatant karma) by Keighvin · · Score: 0, Redundant
    I cleaned up the HTML but not the formatting - don't blame me for that one. On with the article:
    ---------

    Not too far back, battle waged. A battle between the big man and the little man. Massive Microsoft against little Lindows. After a lengthy court battle, the little man finally prevailed. Microsoft was not able to stop them from using the Windows-like name. That was in Spring of last year. This year, Lindows decided to give Microsoft another swift kick in the pants.

    Perhaps still a little haughty over their win, Lindows decided to take on another of Microsoft's products. In late 2002, Microsoft put into market the Media Center Edition of its popular Windows XP operating system, complete with system requirements dictated to OEM system builders. On January 28, 2003, Lindows released its own Lindows Media Computer as a direct competitor.

    After looking over all the media hype, I went searching for one of these little machines. Could the Lindows Media Computer really pull off meeting the new Windows machine in a pitched battle? It did boast Instant on DVD, CD, MP3, and VCD playback as one of the prime features. And, it was only a fraction of the price for a Windows Media Center system. At the time, only one vendor had them available, iDOTpc.com. After some communication, the folks at iDOTpc.com were kind enough to loan me one of the units to take for a spin.

    This is it, right out of the box. One word came to my mind after seeing it next to my PogoLinux machine - tiny. I hoped there was some serious power packed in that little box or someone was going to be unhappy. With that in mind, on to the system specifications.

    VIA C3 E-Series 933MHz Processor

    VIA PLE133 + VT8235 Chipset Motherboard

    128MB RAM PC133 and up to 1GB of PC100/PC133 SDRAM capacity

    20GB ATA 100 5400RPM hard drive attached to one of 2 Dual-channel enhanced IDE Ports supporting UDMA 66/100/133

    16X DVD Drive in the single full height 5.25" drive bay

    4 USB 1.1 Ports (two in front, two in back), 1 Serial Port, 1 Parallel Port , and 1 PCI Slot

    Integrated Trident 2X AGP with 2D/3D Graphics Acceleration

    Integrated VIA AC97 Audio, 3 Audio Jacks: Line-in, Line-out, and Mic-in

    Onboard VIA 10/100 Base-T Fast Ethernet Controller

    Mini-ITX Tower Case with 150W Power Supply

    Dimension: 10.24"(D) x 5.31"(W) x 11.75"(H)

    LindowsOS 3.0 MP3.com Edition with dedicated tech support

    One Year Parts and Labor Warranty

    FRONT

    BACK

    Some of you who are avid readers may recognize this box. It is none other than the FIC Falcon CR51 small form factor PC that was announced last October. However, it has been updated with the etDVD software from Elegent Technologies. The etDVD software is a boot time embedded software set that does all the magic of audio and video playback at boot time.

    Brains! I need Brains!

    Of course, I couldn't resist cracking the case. While there were some instructions included, I thought it would be more interesting to see how intuitive it would be to go without. Three thumb screws on the back side released the side panel which slid away. Inside, there isn't a whole lot to see. Yes. On the left you can just get a glimpse of the hard drive which is mounted to the floor of the chassis. Dead center is the DVD drive, and to the upper right is the teeny tiny power supply. Again, not too interesting. But, I discovered that one of the thumb screws actually held onto the DVD drive sled. After popping off the front face plate, I found the mate to the thumb screw. Removing this, I was able to get the DVD drive out of the way and have a better look at the rest of the insides.

    As expected, I wasn't a good photographer. But let me assure you, everythin

    --
    Any spoon would be too big.
  20. media computers are a niche by asv108 · · Score: 3, Informative
    While media computers are interesting, I don't see them becoming a mainstream phenomenon anytime soon. Joe Sixpack does not want to deal with the hassle of sticking a computer next to his TV. Media Computing seems to the newest thing to hype this year, last year it was tablets, this year its media computers. The PC manufactures and hardware companies are dying to find new segments since nobody needs to upgrade to a 3GHZ PC.

    Lindows so far has been all hype and no delivery. I wouldn't touch anything backed by Robertson, and I love how Lindows is on its 3rd version in less than a year.

    1. Re:media computers are a niche by Osty · · Score: 1

      While media computers are interesting, I don't see them becoming a mainstream phenomenon anytime soon. Joe Sixpack does not want to deal with the hassle of sticking a computer next to his TV.

      That's the point of a real media computer. You're right that Joe Sixpack doesn't want to deal with the hassles of sticking a computer next to his TV, so companies are working on making it foolproof. Witness the Tivo. That's basically a computer, though specialized somewhat, and Joe Sixpack has no problems with it because it's idiot-proof. Plug it in, turn it on, go through some standard setup (no worse than setting the clock on your VCR), and you're done. Microsoft's Media Center PCs still need some work, but they're pretty close too -- plug it in, turn it on, and you're more or less good to go. You can still get to a desktop, though, which isn't a good idea for Joe Sixpack. The Media Center interface is good, though, so as long as the users stay within that, the experience should be painless.


      From reading the reposts of the article (thanks, Slashdot, for killing the article), it sounds like Lindows' media computer isn't anywhere near that level. In fact, I've seen hobbyist HTPCs that were more integrated and seamless than the Lindows offering seems to be (Lindows doesn't seem to have the media computer anywhere on their site, as far as I could find).

  21. Comparison with MCE? by OnyxRaven · · Score: 1

    Hey, it sounds like they've at least kept up with Media Center Edition though. That is a piece of crap for a program. The interface is slow, the mp3 player is aparently not compatible with WMP9 (which conveniently comes in a patch of course) so new media cant be loaded into the MCE library, and the remote handler doesnt detect anything but the very commercial remotes (I've got an Ira and it has no idea what to do with it). Bleh. I went back to just programming functions into Girder and using winamp.

    --
    --onyx--
  22. What about an XBOX? by gpinzone · · Score: 1

    This thing sounds like crap. All they keep doing is harping on the port blockers for the kiddies. The Xbox media player does all this and more.

    Oh, and someone HAS figured out how to run Linux on an UNMODDED XBOX! I submitted the story yesterday, but...

    1. Re:What about an XBOX? by Pharmboy · · Score: 1

      Oh, and someone HAS figured out how to run Linux on an UNMODDED XBOX! [xboxhacker.net] I submitted the story yesterday, but...


      Just be patient. I am sure that if you will just wait 2 weeks, it will get posted 3 days in a row by different editors that will claim they have a scoop on it.

      Whats the purpose of having Karma if you can't burn it once in a while ;)

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    2. Re:What about an XBOX? by beerits · · Score: 1

      ...somebody beat you to it.

  23. I don't trust Lindows by DeadSea · · Score: 5, Insightful
    They picked a name that is obviously supposed to resemble Windows. While they may legally be able to do this, it seems pretty slimeball to me. Especially since announcements like this make it clear that they are trying to compete head to head with Windows.

    When I was working for a .com that was trying to choose a name, the marketing folks made some very strong points for why you don't have to choose something that people are familiar with. Given that we were promoting widgets, they recommended we not name ourselves widgets.com, ourwidgets.com, or ewidgets.com. Their argument was that if you have a good product you can create your own name. Does Yahoo! need the word "directory" in their name? Does Ebay need the word "Auctions" in its name? Using something wacky wasn't going to hurt you, and it would allow you to later branch out into other markets.

    Software developers really need to look at this lesson. Repeat after me, "The name of your program doesn't have to start with 'Win', 'g', 'k', 'Java', or 'X'".

    Somebody replied to a similar rant of mine here on slashdot. They said that if you wrote a program that browsed Ebay auctions, you should be allowed to put ebay in the name. Maybe you should be allowed to, but that might prevent you from also supporting Yahoo or some other auction site in the future. Its not a good idea.

    In the case of Lindows, the fact that they are using the name of their competitor cheapens them. I have to wonder why they don't think they can't create their own hype. Is their product not good enough?

    1. Re:I don't trust Lindows by oogoody · · Score: 1

      It was far slimier for microsoft to trademark windows in the first place.

    2. Re:I don't trust Lindows by Captain+Beefheart · · Score: 1
      "Their argument was that if you have a good product you can create your own name."

      In an ideal world, IMHO. Good product does not equal success. Good product with Shotgun Method advertising usually leads to success--assuming you aren't ripping off someone else's IP. Yahoo does well despite its name because no search engine-based Web property has an intuitive name, that I know of. Google? Hotbot? Inktomi? Alta Vista? They aren't competing for vocabulary mindshare.

      PC Magazine circulates about 6 million issues a year. PC World, arguably an equally good magazine, barely hovers over 1 million. Why? I think it goes back to vocabulary mindshare. One name speaks more directly to a need than the other.

      I'm sure there are exceptions, but don't forget to take advertising into account. What the hell does "Microsoft" or "Apple" mean? Nothing, by themselves, but one advertises voraciously (and secures its territory with FUD) while the other goes for pop culture value and an indefinable sheen of style and quality.

      Lindows is just riding on MS's coattails, and frankly, I have no sympathy for the latter, and I don't think I'm alone.

      Perhaps it should say something that this company has to ape Windows so much in order to gain any foothold. If they had wormed their way into Walmart thanks to their similar name, I think they'd already be dead and buried. Heard anything about Lycoris lately? Perhaps someone in the /. crowd has an update, but Joe Sixpack only knows about Lindows when it comes to cheap, mainstream alternatives to Windows.

    3. Re:I don't trust Lindows by silverhalide · · Score: 1

      Curious, is your .com company still in business? :-)

    4. Re:I don't trust Lindows by ninkendo84 · · Score: 1
      Software developers really need to look at this lesson. Repeat after me, "The name of your program doesn't have to start with 'Win', 'g', 'k', 'Java', or 'X'".

      Hey, there's no reason to come down on the developers who name their program after what it's used for. Gkrellm, Kdevelop, Gnibbles, Ktron, etc. all use the g or k or whatever to mean that it's built for Gnome, KDE, or just plain X. Especially when they're like the small programs I just mentioned that don't do much but one function anyway.

      What should wiped off the face of linux is the stupid recurring-acronym system (WINE, LAME, etc.) Yeah, your program is GNU, but it doesn't need to be all "cleverly" named like that, a G is enough.

      Lindows is not a stupid name. It tries to form a link between Linux and Windows, even though it's not very successful. It's just a coincidence that the first syllable in Linux and the first syllable in Windows rhyme. (But then again, Winux would have been a better choice) It's not the name that's the problem, it's the crummy OS.

      --

      $ make love
      make: don't know how to make love. Stop
  24. Wake me when it does HDTV by YetAnotherName · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Call me spoiled. I watch Alias, The Practice, and even Fraser in HDTV every week. HDNet's sports are outstanding. And the recent Olympic games awe-inspiring. Guests to my home are blown away when I fire up PBS's continually-playing demo loop.

    Despite the many many nay-sayers, HDTV is here, now.

    Yet I keep seeing product announcements (Lindows Media, Mystro, Dish's 721 etc.) boasting competition to the Tivo, yet not a one is capable of handling HTDV. Tivo can't yet either.

    I'm having to build my own digital recorder on an PC running (shudder) Windows XP with a MyHD card. The data rate of HDTV is high, but not unmanageable. MyHD records and displays a live program using less than 10% of the processor (1.8GHz P4, I'll grant).

    I'm frankly tired of viewing programs with non-square pixels, incomplete color gamuts, and a mere 480 lines of (interlaced) resolution. Wake me when one of these companies does HDTV.

    1. Re:Wake me when it does HDTV by jparker · · Score: 1

      Umm, wake up (soon)
      http://customersupport.tivo.com/tivoknowba se/root/ public/tv451619.htm

    2. Re:Wake me when it does HDTV by NetJunkie · · Score: 1

      The MSRP on the HD TiVo is expected to be $1700. That's crazy. They can keep it...and that's from a TiVo and HD nut. Though, I don't use DSS so they don't have a product for me yet.

    3. Re:Wake me when it does HDTV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cry me a river that you can't yet time shift in HD. Boo-hoo-hoo. Wake me when people like you stop complaining that my high-end-cutting-edge-expensive-toy can't work with my other high-end-cutting-edge-expensive-toy. I would be happy to just *HAVE* HD.

      So you have to build your own because you are so far out on the cutting edge. Maybe you would learn something, whiner!

    4. Re:Wake me when it does HDTV by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      Despite the many many nay-sayers, HDTV is here, now.

      There are so many nay-sayers because you have either a different definition of 'here', or a different definition of 'now' than manufacturers that want to make money and the majority of consumers that put price before quality (probably because they have a puny paycheck compared to you). When you can get a 20" or larger HDTV with HD tuner for $170, HDTV will be here. Until then it's a high end toy for technology junkies, no matter how good it looks.

    5. Re:Wake me when it does HDTV by beanball75 · · Score: 1

      If you read the review, you're giving this crappy computer more credit than it deserves. You can't even hook it up to your television in any way.

    6. Re:Wake me when it does HDTV by i_am_nitrogen · · Score: 1

      How does one tune into HDNet or the PBS loop with the MyHD? I have this card, I'm working on a Linux driver (it only displays color bars so far... no video capture yet), but I can't figure out how to tune to different subchannels/PIDs of a transport stream or whatever the correct term is (I need to learn more about transport streams obviously).

    7. Re:Wake me when it does HDTV by cybrthng · · Score: 1

      Yeah.. HDTV is here and now and my xbox does a better job of HDTV support and media playback then this "pc" ever will :)

      No stuttering DVD, instant on, WMA support, SPDIF/Digital audio out.. all for 199 brand new or 100 bucks ebay :)

      THPS 4 @ 720 is simply amazing on a 96" screen!

  25. I remember this announced on mini-itx.com by stratjakt · · Score: 4, Informative

    A few months back when I was looking into building media-centric PC's for the kids. The DVD software, afaik, is proprietary (licenced CSS codes), and embedded within the bootprom.

    All in all, it looked like a completely gutless solution, incapable of doing nearly everything I wanted it to do.

    It's hardly something to compete with the tivo-like feature set and processing power that the P4/windows based media PC's from big vendors provides.

    It's more like a really really expensive, but really really crappy, DVD player. That runs linux.

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
  26. Cool, but... by kingkade · · Score: 1

    ...can i get native version of AOE2 or Civilization 3 or Unreal or ...? No? Rats...looks like lilo will be in sittin for a while still on my mbr...

  27. Sweet! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny
    Linux has found a +3/+3 Media Center of Monopoly Smiting!


    Now, we only need to find a +2 Shield of Flame Resitence vs. Trolls and we'll save the princess!


    (Jet lag is a horrible thing)

    1. Re:Sweet! by WebMasterJoe · · Score: 1
      Now, we only need to find a +2 Shield of Flame Resitence vs. Trolls and we'll save the princess!
      Congratulations.... but the princess is in another castle!
      --
      I really hate signatures, but go to my website.
    2. Re:Sweet! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If we give the trolls flame resistance, won't that make them worse? :)

  28. Why did I read it as.... by Howard+Beale · · Score: 4, Funny

    idiotpc.com??? Not a good name, but I know a few people that qualify buying a PC from them.

  29. Power to Strike Microsoft? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Slashdot: "Power to Strike Microsoft?"

    LinuxHardware.org: "Ask again later."

  30. Re:Microsoft-killer? AHAHAHAHAHAHA yeah maybe by chrisseaton · · Score: 1

    I want Roberts (Robertson?) to stand up and explain what happened to the Wine intergration he promised. It just seems to have disappeared without trace. I don't think Wine is even installed by default now.

  31. iDOTpc? by CNERD · · Score: 2, Funny

    Sounds like some deformed offspring of the marketing departments of Apple and Microsoft.

    Are they going to have a server version called iDOTnet?

    1. Re:iDOTpc? by NeuroManson · · Score: 1

      It looks like one too, if you didn't check the article.

      --
      Just because you can mod me down, doesn't mean you're right. Shoes for industry!
  32. Re:Microsoft-killer? AHAHAHAHAHAHA yeah maybe by mrscott · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I probably shouldn't admit this in a forum of people who obviously despise Lindows, but I have tried it and I did like it. I think I have a pretty good handle on OSs having used NetWare, Windows, UNIX, Linux, VMS, etc and I found Lindows very easy to install, very easy to navigate and -- more importantly -- very easy to get working on my Windows network.

    Lindows isn't necessarily here for the hard core Linux user. It's for the masses. For similar reasons that hard core Linux/Unix folks hate Windows, they will hate Lindows.

    I commend them for trying. Before version 3, I didn't think it would go anywhere, but after actually using it for a while, my opinion has changed.

  33. No Slimier than Apple Autoglass trademarking Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    in the field of AutoGlass installation and repairs.

    Or any of tens of thousands of other companies that trademark common words. It's perfectly legal, ethical, and not slimey.

  34. Media Computer? by jetkust · · Score: 1

    Is it just me, or wouldn't you expect a media computer to be a computer that you can hook up your television and view its content (video files, sound files, pictures) on your television using a remote control? Why all this talk about DVD playing? What is so special about a computer playing a DVD?

  35. Re:Microsoft-killer? AHAHAHAHAHAHA yeah maybe by KillerHamster · · Score: 1

    I used Lindows just this past Saturday. I installed it on my computer where it lived for roughly 30 minutes while I rushed in a panic to download and burn Slackware 9.0. Lindows is now gone forever, and I'm in Slack Heaven.

  36. I don't trust Microsoft by DeadSea · · Score: 1

    In the case of Microsoft, the product names are probably the least slimy aspect. While Microsoft could have done better than to choose common descriptive terms for its products, their competitors shouldn't be afraid to do something bold and different.

  37. Re:Microsoft-killer? AHAHAHAHAHAHA yeah maybe by Shadow+Wrought · · Score: 2, Funny
    It's like the worst features of Windows meet the worst features of Linux, and a retard put it all together so other retards could half-use it but no one could fully use it.

    Maybe its just the "dows" suffix that makes products blow monkey chunks. Its pronounced just like "Doh!", only its pluralized to indicate a whole mess of 'em.

    It may not be likely, but it sure would explain a couple few things...

    --
    If brevity is the soul of wit, then how does one explain Twitter?
  38. Quite possible by ramzak2k · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If Lindows Media computer is able to create an interface where the user finds absolutely
    nothing lacking in comparison to Windows media Computer & is cheaper - why not ?

    The only reason linux is losing out on the desktop is because of the inability to execute applications (without struggling with wine).
    With all-in-a-box system like a media computer that wouldnt require specific applications to perform tasks there is a good chance that windows will lose out.

    --

    Siggy Say, Siggy Do
    1. Re:Quite possible by geomon · · Score: 3, Insightful

      With all-in-a-box system like a media computer that wouldnt require specific applications to perform tasks there is a good chance that windows will lose out.

      True, but it has to work first.

      The article was quite clear on the inability of this particular product to perform as advertised. The author was also more than a little disappointed at the customer service from Lindow's.

      --
      "Rocky Rococo, at your cervix!"
    2. Re:Quite possible by fname · · Score: 1

      Absolutely true. Of course, this product is an absolute train-wreck; the sellers must know that they have a dog on their hands, but they are trying to sell it anyways. It sounds completely useless to a non-techie, and completely senseless to a linux user.

      If someone doesn't knock Lindows out of the consumer-linux-desktop-of-choice perch that they currently enjoy in the media, they just might set back Linux 5 years.

      The whole premise of Lindows seems to be overselling the product. Does anyone regularly use Lindows, or know of someone else that does? I bet the computers Walmart sells end up running Red Hat/ Debian/ ..., with a pirate version of XP, or being useful paperweights.

    3. Re:Quite possible by zcat_NZ · · Score: 1

      I would bet most end up with a pirate copy of XP.

      They've tried the 'most user friendly' version of Linux and it was terrible, so the other distro's must surely be worse.. and obviously they'll never recommend Linux to their friends either.

      Not that I actually care but if you really wanted to kill Linux from ever becoming a popular desktop OS, what Lindows is doing might well be the most successful way of going about it.

      --
      455fe10422ca29c4933f95052b792ab2
    4. Re:Quite possible by the_consumer · · Score: 1

      Actually, for applications like a "media PC", I'd rather see BeOS (well, we have to wait for OpenBEos now) on them.

      --
      "If you're thinking what I'm thinking, you're right." -
  39. Open source in another 'me too' product shock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Really, you guys are getting way too excited about completely the wrong things.

    if the best open source can do is commoditise someone else's innovation, then that's fine, but please don't pretend open source is some kind of great creative movement.

    In my trade, we rightly look down on derivative products. And if open source is to match its ambitions, it needs to as well.

  40. And don't forget... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    It's FREAKIN' HUGE!

    Dimension: 10.24"(D) x 5.31"(W) x 11.75"(H)

  41. Usage... by rf0 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    As far as I understand from the review. It doesn't do what its meant to do (DVD etc) very well and it can't display on a TV. No pardon me if I wrong but I would want something like this to show stuff on my TV. So basically I can spend £250 on this or £99 on a DVD player than can do the same thing? I know where I'm putting my money

    Rus

    1. Re:Usage... by stratjakt · · Score: 1

      It has TV out, at least is should, all the other VIA Eden boards do. But its an absolutely gutless processor when it comes to doing DVD. I'd imagine trying to watch a hi-quality DivX on it would be a complete excercise in futility.

      You could also spend $200 US bucks on an Xbox and do everything this does and more (they plan to release a generic media playback kit for it)

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    2. Re:Usage... by default+luser · · Score: 1

      Agreed. I don't understand why people get so giddy over VIA's line of minature boards with crappy processors.

      The C3 is a WinChip.

      That means it has:

      - No Branch Prediction
      - No OOOE
      - 1/2 speed FPU

      It's no wonder these chips use 10w, they're so simple. A Pentium III 500 could run circles around them.

      Just imagine how powerful and cool your system would be if you took an 800MHz Tualatin P3 designed for Blade servers, and dropped the bus speed from 133 down to 100. There you go, a powerful Pentium III 600 with 10w power usage.

      In other words, there is nothing amazing about what VIA is doing. You could do the same ( with better results ) using an Intel processor, provided you want to go through the trouble of procuring the parts.

      --

      Man is the animal that laughs.
      And occasionally whores for Karma.

  42. Re:Microsoft-killer? AHAHAHAHAHAHA yeah maybe by mrscott · · Score: 1

    If you look at the Lindows web site, you'll notice that their focus has changed from running Windows apps to integrating well with current environments by easily open Windows files, etc. Basically, rather than embracing Windows, they're working to get people to migrate and use native tools instead. I think that they realized just how hard the effort would be. That's not a reason to close the doors and call it quits. They're just working under a new strategy now.

    Can LindowsOS run software written for Microsoft® Windows? and How can I best "migrate" from using Microsoft® Windows to using LindowsOS?

  43. Everyone knows "I" is the perfect name prefix.n/t by Beebos · · Score: 1

    n/t

  44. Article for the Slashdotted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Perhaps still a little haughty over their win, Lindows decided to take on another of Microsoft's products. In late 2002, Microsoft put into market the Media Center Edition of its popular Windows XP operating system, complete with system requirements dictated to OEM system builders. On January 28, 2003, Lindows released its own Lindows Media Computer as a direct competitor.

    After looking over all the media hype, I went searching for one of these little machines. Could the Lindows Media Computer really pull off meeting the new Windows machine in a pitched battle? It did boast Instant on DVD, CD, MP3, and VCD playback as one of the prime features. And, it was only a fraction of the price for a Windows Media Center system. At the time, only one vendor had them available, iDOTpc.com. After some communication, the folks at iDOTpc.com were kind enough to loan me one of the units to take for a spin.

    This is it, right out of the box. One word came to my mind after seeing it next to my PogoLinux machine - tiny. I hoped there was some serious power packed in that little box or someone was going to be unhappy. With that in mind, on to the system specifications.

    VIA C3 E-Series 933MHz Processor

    VIA PLE133 + VT8235 Chipset Motherboard

    128MB RAM PC133 and up to 1GB of PC100/PC133 SDRAM capacity

    20GB ATA 100 5400RPM hard drive attached to one of 2 Dual-channel enhanced IDE Ports supporting UDMA 66/100/133

    16X DVD Drive in the single full height 5.25" drive bay

    4 USB 1.1 Ports (two in front, two in back), 1 Serial Port, 1 Parallel Port , and 1 PCI Slot

    Integrated Trident 2X AGP with 2D/3D Graphics Acceleration

    Integrated VIA AC97 Audio, 3 Audio Jacks: Line-in, Line-out, and Mic-in

    Onboard VIA 10/100 Base-T Fast Ethernet Controller

    Mini-ITX Tower Case with 150W Power Supply

    Dimension: 10.24"(D) x 5.31"(W) x 11.75"(H)

    LindowsOS 3.0 MP3.com Edition with dedicated tech support

    One Year Parts and Labor Warranty

    FRONT

    BACK

    Some of you who are avid readers may recognize this box. It is none other than the FIC Falcon CR51 small form factor PC that was announced last October. However, it has been updated with the etDVD software from Elegent Technologies. The etDVD software is a boot time embedded software set that does all the magic of audio and video playback at boot time.

    Brains! I need Brains!

    Of course, I couldn't resist cracking the case. While there were some instructions included, I thought it would be more interesting to see how intuitive it would be to go without. Three thumb screws on the back side released the side panel which slid away. Inside, there isn't a whole lot to see. Yes. On the left you can just get a glimpse of the hard drive which is mounted to the floor of the chassis. Dead center is the DVD drive, and to the upper right is the teeny tiny power supply. Again, not too interesting. But, I discovered that one of the thumb screws actually held onto the DVD drive sled. After popping off the front face plate, I found the mate to the thumb screw. Removing this, I was able to get the DVD drive out of the way and have a better look at the rest of the insides.

    As expected, I wasn't a good photographer. But let me assure you, everything was clean and small. You can make out the twin SDRAM sockets there at the top, the CPU and fan assembly just below that. Under the green heatsink resides the chipset, and over there on the right you can see the single PCI slot. Not a whole lot of room in there for anything else.

    Fire It up!

    Once I had it back together, I connected it to my spare monitor, keyboard,

  45. Re:Power to strike Microsoft? by wheany · · Score: 1

    Okay, so no-one likes to be called an uncivilized pleb[e]ian, but other than that, he is right.

    There is no way in hell this is going to affect Microsoft.

  46. Re:Power to Strike Microsoft? by Avatar_LHo · · Score: 1

    LOL. Sorry. I shall beat the hardware master for not upgrading before posting. :)

  47. Its my favorite vegitable too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "who has aspergers"

    They're not bad, but I prefer sweet peas. Yams can be quite good if they're cooked correctly.

    But for a kid, he has good taste in vegitables.

  48. Two Word summary for those who don't RTFA... by zozzi · · Score: 2, Informative
    it sucks.

    --
    ---
  49. Build your Own... by mdw162 · · Score: 1

    You could build your own

  50. Flawed approach by The+Bungi · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Lindows seems to think that somehow the fact that the OS that they use is free automatically gives them the higher ground when going head to head with Microsoft on any given field. Saving yourself $40 (or whatever the bulk OEM cost for an XP license is) is hardly the proverbial silver bullet.

    And who buys these "media PCs" anyway? Does anyone have any info on the size of this market?

    1. Re:Flawed approach by Pharmboy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Lindows seems to think that somehow the fact that the OS that they use is free automatically gives them the higher ground when going head to head with Microsoft on any given field. Saving yourself $40 (or whatever the bulk OEM cost for an XP license is) is hardly the proverbial silver bullet.

      MS Media Center OS is not the same as XP. Similar base, but not the same. I couldn't even find prices for the OS, since you have to buy a box with it preinstalled. Bestbuy.com isnt taking orders anymore, gateway starts at $1700, compusa at 1400, bestbuy was 1700.....these are medium priced, not cheap.

      As to the size of the market: I am betting it IS the next market. The current versions are just glorified computers, but the general idea of the product is what will replace your home stereo,dvd player, etc. A single box. Even my mom would like this, to surf on the tv (once tvs are all high definition) instead of the Dell I bought her.

      Its still a young market, but it is the direction it is going. One box to act as internet router, surfer, music getter and player, dvd player, porno downloader, etc.....

      All you need is a wireless keyboard and mouse, (and maybe wireless video for a seperate monitor to use in other rooms), and yea, I could see every home needing one of these instead of the current methods of a buttload of seperate parts. that may or maynot work well together. Then we could have it all in one convenient box that doesn't work very well :)

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
  51. Re:Microsoft-killer? AHAHAHAHAHAHA yeah maybe by Alan+Hicks · · Score: 1
    I used Lindows just this past Saturday. I installed it on my computer where it lived for roughly 30 minutes while I rushed in a panic to download and burn Slackware 9.0. Lindows is now gone forever, and I'm in Slack Heaven.

    Welcome back tot he fold, brother.

    --
    Slackware, what else when it must be secure, stable, and easy?
  52. Update on Iraqi war: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Today the coalition killed more Iraqis than each other.

    Just kidding, april fools!

  53. They used the wrong VIA chipset imho by Judg3 · · Score: 1

    The 933 they are listing isnt anywhere up to the task of DVD playback.
    They should of gone with the 933mhz M9000 or the 1Ghz M10000.

    Not only do they use faster PC2100 ram, they also have USB2.0.

    They really should of either A. Waited a month or two before releasing this or B. Used something other then the Mini-ITX formfactor.

    Tom's has an article comparing these diffrent boards right here.

    --
    Looking for hardware (Currently need: Large Etch-a-Sketch) Have one? See my journal!
  54. Lindows Makes Crap Again.... by greymond · · Score: 1

    So this crappy company who has nothing better to do than try and make mediocre products that use similar Microsoft names to boost their media HYPE makes another piece of crap.

    From the article:
    "...over time I found it lacking in several areas that were crucial...The poor VIA C3 933MHz CPU isn't even in the same league as those found in the Windows machine...the sound quality was ok but certainly wasn't something to brag about...DVD playback is spotty, VCD is as well. The 3D side of the machine falls woefully short with the Trident offering...I come to the conclusion that it was not a good one."

    So what next? Oh I got it Lindows will make a P2P file sharing program called Lindows Lapster and in a few minutes every news site will have an article posted about how "daring and inovative and whatever they are tryign to be" when all they are doing is building hype around crapy products - kind of like infomercials.

  55. Re:iDOT Comp- first PC Company built for the Web by louzerr · · Score: 1

    I've never heard of a company 'built for the web'. Do they only exist in the ether?

    Or maybe I'm reading it wrong. Did the W3C specifically ask them to start their company?

    You know, I am the only web developer in a group of client-server developers. Maybe I was 'built for the web'.

    --
    "The large print giveth, and the small print taketh away" -- "Step Right Up", Tom Waits
  56. DVD playback stutters by lgftsa · · Score: 1

    From the picture, this MB looks like VIA EPIA board, which has no MPEG decoder, unlike the EPIA-M. That might be the "next version" plans that they mention.

    In any event, both use shared memory. There's no dedicated graphics RAM onboard and that slows down games/video playback, etc horribly.

    The next version probably *will* play back DVD(MPEG-2) smoothly, but forget anything near full screen resolution playback with any other codec. That'll have to be done in software, and it just won't work.

    FYI, I have an old Dell GX1(tiny case, PIII/450) as a dedicated PVR/DVD machine. It can play back full screen PAL video at 80% CPU load(mplayer -vo dga), and that's only because it has a 4Mb Rage Pro embedded video system. If it used shared memory, it wouldn't even come close.

    lh@iamnota.org

  57. There is sound in the OSS community? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where did they get the damn drivers?

  58. name 'windows' is generic by rogersc · · Score: 1

    The name Lindows sounds like Linux-windows, but so what? When I hear that, I figure that it is running X-windows, not Microsoft windows. The term 'windows' has been used in a generic sense before Microsoft started using the term.

  59. Should OF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Eesh.

  60. lest we forget idotpc.net.com.dot by SubtleNuance · · Score: 1

    Ive got ONE WORD: superhypgermegaglobalmedia

  61. DMA ?? by rlillard · · Score: 1

    The reviewer didn't check to see if the DVD player had DMA enabled. The processor has enough gas to run a DVD, I do
    it all the time with my Linux system and my 1GHz processor
    needs about 5% to handle everything. The 128MB is a bit
    slight though. After adding the second128MB stick all should
    have performed well enough.

    1. Re:DMA ?? by Avatar_LHo · · Score: 1

      DMA was enabled. I checked the BIOS for any possible tweaks I could make that would explain the behavior.

    2. Re:DMA ?? by galaxy300 · · Score: 1

      Even more relavent -- the machine is supposed to play DVD out of the box. What kind of media player can't play the formats it advertises it can? A pretty lame one, if you ask me.

  62. Seriously, why DVD on the Computer? by Petersko · · Score: 1

    I really want to know why some people are fixated on watching DVD's on their home computer. 29" TV's can be had for less than the price of a decent new video card, and basic DVD players are dirt cheap.

    I don't understand it. Why sit in front of your computer for 2 hours when you can stretch out on the couch?

    Oooo - movies in 1024x768 - crystal clear! Of course you have to be within 3 feet of the screen to really enjoy it...

    1. Re:Seriously, why DVD on the Computer? by thedbp · · Score: 1

      some of us drive large TVs with our computers. Still others live in dorms and need a computer but don't have room for a TV. still others don't watch TV but enjoy movies. different strokes for different folks.

    2. Re:Seriously, why DVD on the Computer? by Petersko · · Score: 1

      Okay, I'll grant you dorms. Good point.

    3. Re:Seriously, why DVD on the Computer? by angle_slam · · Score: 1
      There is no requirement to watch your PC output on a monitor. Among HTPC experts at avsforum, there are a lot of people who assert that DVD output from the computer is better than from any standalone DVD player, even those costing thousands of dollars. One of the reasons is the easy availability of line doublers and the use of custom resolutions.

      I agree that watching DVDs on your 17" moinitor sucks, but you can also hook up an LCD projector to your computer (most have VGA and/or DVI inputs), and look at a 100+" picture.

    4. Re:Seriously, why DVD on the Computer? by amber_lux · · Score: 1

      I don't understand it. Why sit in front of your computer for 2 hours when you can stretch out on the couch?

      I live in a tiny apartment --- 300 square feet, which includes the kitchen and bathroom. Couple that with 1K mass market paperbacks, 2K trade paperbacks 1K hardcovers and you might see a problem with space. Then there are 15 computers. I use KVM switches to reduce the number of monitors I need.

      Where would I put a TV, since I don't have enough space for more than three monitors?

      Another computer box takes up much less space, comparatively speaking. Hooking it up to the a network and KVM switch is trivial. Finding space for a TV monitor, etc is non trivial.

      BTW, I am perfectly comfortable lying in bed, reading email, surfing the net, or whatever.

      Wind under Thy Wings

      Amber

      --

      Suppose you did.
      Suppose you did not.

    5. Re:Seriously, why DVD on the Computer? by William+Tanksley · · Score: 1

      I don't want to watch a DVD on my current computer. BUT... As soon as I can get a computer that _also_ can do what my DVD player can (including displaying its output on my TV), I'm switching. Why? Because the computer that could do that could also serve as an audio center, PVR (like TiVo), and a number of other things.

      -Billy

    6. Re:Seriously, why DVD on the Computer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Next time you have access to a projector (XGA or higher resolution, LCD, DLP, or CRT only need apply), do a comparison:

      Dirt cheap dvd player in S-Video port
      vs
      HTPC through VGA or better yet DVI port (sadly I'm stuck with analog with my projector).

      Most projectors have pretty poor deinterlacers when compared to the potential of a good HTPC with good software, like Ogle.

      And don't complain that, "Wah, I have to use an Athlon XP1800+ with half a gig of RAM and a Radeon 8500" because a complete HTPC with all that hardware can be had for as little as $600. Compare that to the price it takes to get scaling hardware to make the output from a progressive scan DVD player match the resolution of the projector.

    7. Re:Seriously, why DVD on the Computer? by galaxy300 · · Score: 1

      Living in New York City, I can validate your comment. Many people I know don't have space for a TV considering all the PC equipment they have around the house. Another box that hooks up to a monitor is ideal. However, most of them just play DVD's on their PC's, so this particular product is probably irrelavant to them...

  63. My G4-based Compuinfotainment Center by thedbp · · Score: 1

    Built from parts:

    G4 450
    Desktop-style G3 case painted black w/ silver trim
    768 MB RAM
    120 + 80 GB drives
    32 MB Radeon Dual-Head Graphics (drives a 27" TV and a 14" VGA 800x600 mirrored or separate display at the 'control center' of the couch)
    DVD-RW
    External CD-RW
    Mac OS X (incl. all the goodness of a full install of X)
    EyeTV
    VLC (for VideoCDs, DivX, etc)
    Remote Control via Keyspan
    Wacom Tablet

    Best freakin' PVR etc in the world. Has 2 stereo audio inputs, 2 S-video out, 2 Composite Video out, 1 VGA, 1 DVI, one Mac DB-15, 2 USB, 3 FireWire, 2x DVD-RW, 1 10BaseT Enet, 1 10/100BaseT Enet, SCSI, 2 serial, ADB, and a partridge in a pear tree.

    I can burn a VCD while encoding a DVD to DivX while recording live TV to MPEG-1 while acting as a media server to my LAN while ... you get the idea. Built on the old and the new and it works flawlessly.

  64. Via EPIA M series and MPEG ... by rasjani · · Score: 1

    Indeed the M series of via epia mobos have DVD (eg, mpeg) hardware decoder but it is not supported in Linux.

    Ofcourse, as etDVD is not actually "linux", they *might* have changes to get it work but alas, in lindows its just not yet possible..

    --
    yush
  65. Simpson's Quote by istartedi · · Score: 1

    "I know a genuine Panaphonics when I see one. And there's Magnetbox, and Sorny."

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
  66. Can someone explain what's wrong with /. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why can't I reply to specific comments? The only way I could post anything was to start a new thread. Is there a new "feature" that keeps anonymous cowards from posting normally? Is there a time limit on a story/comment after which anonymous can post/reply? Is there a bug/something wrong with my browser or slash?

    Slashdot is just getting ridiculous with this anti-ac crap. For a site that makes so much noise about "free speech", it's sure going out of its way to make it harder to talk. Just get rid of ac's and get it over with.

    -j

  67. The whole idea of a media computer is bad by mnmn · · Score: 0


    Microsoft is known for going after bad ideas. Take the Windows .NET, now Windows 2003. More useless than the tablet I think is the Media PC. PCs already have all the media they need, why specifically a media PC?

    OK so theyre going after a household gadget, maybe something like TiVO. It better have all the major buttons on it; play rewind etc, as well as on its remote. The rest of the system should be made bullet-proof, i.e. the OS shouldnt need input at awkward moments like a bad cd or apps crashing, shouldnt need a keyboard at all.

    But if theyre going after a PC-cum-household appliance, its a wild goose chase. Everyone would rather do media on their PCs. Many PCs have things like the ATI all-in-wonder and sound blaster extigy and still dont call themselves media. They tried cheap, well everyones rushing for the ECS motherboards.. 1.4GHz AMD for $90. Beat that.

    --
    "Give orange me give eat orange me eat orange give me eat orange give me you." -Nim Chimpsky
  68. You and Avatar missed something by Erris · · Score: 1
    Avatar says:

    Actually, given the lack of upgrade options, I would be hard pressed to recommend this system to anyone. It does look good, fits into small spaces, and doesn't take up a whole lot of space. But I don't know anyone who has these items on the absolute top of their priority list.

    He does not know my wife, her mom, my mom and what must be greater than 50% of the US market. They want small, out of the way stuff like this like you would not belive. They are buying those dinky Bose bookcase systems. They don't care if the sound is not as good as a real stereo because they mostly listen to crap on the radio anyway.

    It's shocking how clueless they are. Last weekend, I brought my old P90 laptop home to play some music for my mom. "You mean your computer can be your stereo?", she asked me. Wow, I was taken back by that one. We plugged it into her little Bose, which my wife loves, and played my wife's Beatles tunes all night long. My mom was particularly impressed by the fact that my wife's entire Beatles collection fit on half a CDROM. They loved it.

    I'd never much bothered with music on my computers before. I fooled around with dinky software on a windoze box two years ago and never bothered with it again until a few weeks ago. Here's what worked:

    • abcde. Ablsolutely the easiest thing ever for ripping CDs. OGG tools work just fine. Installing this on Debian with a working sound card is as easy as looking it up in dselect.
    • Sounblaster sound cards and MediaGX. One fancier sound card I had did not work right and played back oggs too fast. I have yet to look through my collection of PCI sound cards, but some of them might work too.

    This Lindows box needs to have some better software for organizing music, but I'm sure that people like my mom and my wife would love to have one if it were easy enough to use. No, the M$ box is not easy enough to use either. Easy is stand alone operation, perhaps with TV remote control use.

    --
    DMCA, Hollings, Palladium. What might have sounded like paranoia is now common sense.
    1. Re:You and Avatar missed something by Avatar_LHo · · Score: 1

      You're right, I don't know them. But, I know they can get a better computer for less money. I also know that frequently these types will see someone else doing something on a computer that thing is really neat and want to give it a whirl themselves. The system I reviewed just isn't cut out for that. They will quickly run into not being able to do many things because they hardware is pretty much stuck.

  69. Drivers for hardware DVD decoder by EisPick · · Score: 1

    The article attributes poor DVD playback to the lack of hardware decoding, but adds that the vendor promised:

    The new "M series" would be coming out soon that did include the decoder and took care of the poor playback.

    "M Series" refers to the naming convention of the motherboards. The tested model is a VIA EPIA. The "M Series" are the lastest EPIA motherboards, which add several improvements, including DDR RAM and hardware MPEG-2 decoding.

    I've been looking at an EPIA M6000, which, with it's low-power VIA Eden processor, requires no CPU cooling fan. I figured it would be an idea mobo to build a fanless home PC around.

    It turns out that the hardware MPEG-2 decoder in the onboard graphics adapter does allow it to play DVDs smoothly at 30 fps. It also makes an excellent platform for an MP3 jukebox. However VIA has not provided Linux drivers for the MPEG-2 decoder.

    With a little more driver support from VIA, the EPIA-M series of motherboards could have a lot of virtues -- especially in silent and low-power computing applications.

    Tom's Hardware has an informative review of three VIA EPIA mobos -- including one of the "M Series" models.

    These forums are an excellent starting point to find out more:

    VIA Arena Linux Area
    LinITX.com Forum

  70. Re:Text Specs by MrNemesis · · Score: 1

    I don't know whether it's due to my incompetence, but in my experience the VIA boards will only do well at DVD playback when they've got a hardware MPEG2 decoder onboard, which AFAIK this board doesn't (you need the M series with the Castle Rock intergrated graphics for that, not the trident).

    I couldn't RTFA or get to the VIA site (/.'ed), so I couldn't check this out properly, but to me it sounds like they picked the wrong board. Cheap it may be, but flawless DVD playback it ain't. Even the Toms Hardware article on these boards said they weren't brilliant for this sort of thing.

    I'll stick to my 1GHz P3 MythTV box for the time being.

    --
    Moderation Total: -1 Troll, +3 Goat
  71. How is this a media center? by prozac79 · · Score: 1
    I have a five-year old computer collecting dust in my room right now. It plays DVD's, mp3's, and CD's all at decent quality (a little stuttering, but it is an old DVD player). It is pretty much instant access in that I stick in a disk and the appropriate media player comes up. And, it has a video and two-channel audio ouput so I can hook it up to my television and speaker system.

    Now lets look at the media-center Lindows machine. Horrible DVD playback, only a single-channel audio output, and no video output. To me, this is nothing but a low-end desktop computer. Even the reviewer had to hook up a monitor, keyboard, and mouse to get it to work since it doesn't have a TV-out or a remote control interface. It doesn't have any recording features at all (no CD-R drive or TiVo-like functionality). So how is this a media-PC compared to my "non-media" PC?

    Please don't tell me that "media center" will become another buzz-word to describe any computer that has a DVD player attached to it. If it is, then most of us have had media centers for quite a while.

    --
    "Oh dear, she's stuck in an infinite loop and he's an idiot" -Prof. Farnsworth (Futurama)
    1. Re:How is this a media center? by Avatar_LHo · · Score: 1

      That was pretty much my point in the review. I couldn't find anything that I could use to call it a "Media Computer". It lacked power, good sound capabilities, smooth DVD/VCD/DivX/CD/MP3 playback, PVR, and video import/export. Yeah, the case it tiny and it is a quiet machine, but that was about it.

  72. Uninformed moderators... this post is WRONG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The DVDs are decoded by a special embedded player before the OS boots. The two cannot happen at the same time.

    1. Re:Uninformed moderators... this post is WRONG by Pharmboy · · Score: 1

      RTFA

      I get tired of saying this. It clearly states that the DVD player does decode in software, not hardware. the next generation will have hardware decoding.

      I can see why you post as AC, since you didnt read the fucking article and thus have no clue.

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    2. Re:Uninformed moderators... this post is WRONG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I get tired of saying this.

      You're not the only one getting tired of you saying it.

  73. I have a computer alot like this. by Gyorg_Lavode · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I actually have a computer alot like this. I have a via 733 w/ 512pc133 ram in the original shuttle case. (I have 200gb of hdd space so slightly more than thiers.) The one thing I have that they don't is the hardware decoder card. Honestly, you need one if your going to be decoding dvd's. A via isn't going to handle dvd decoding by it's self. That's just silly.

    Comparing these to a windows media computer isn't even fair. They are 2 different beasts. A windows media computer is built around high end hardware capable of doing PVR duties. This little box is a dvd player w/ a hard drive, (as is mine). It was silly of them to sell this without a hardware decoder.

    But with a hardware decoder it should do fine. (I run mine under windows because I haven't been able to get the drivers for the hardware video decoder working under linux. Also, I want a dvd player that works with my remote control and that I can pop the dvd in and have the menu come up, not something I have to work at the keyboard for. I know these features are available, but I haven't seen a simple package that combines these 3 things without me having to hack things up.) I get almost no cpu utilization under windows. When I do get jumps in the video/audio, it's caused by the isa bus (and I have bus mastering, it just sucks), not by the hardware. The box works well for what I wanted when I bought it: A dvd player that is small and trendy looking, but is updatable with standard pc parts and can take a LOT of storage for my music, (I have ALOT of music. I have ripped my hundred's of CD's to the computer to make them all portable at once).

    But a media center? That it is not. The system reviewed should be compared to a set-top box that has a dvd player and can access mp3's, ogg's, and such. I'm thinking about building a new box to work as a media center, but I'll use a bigger case, MUCH stronger hardware so I can use PVR capabilities, and probably a package like the PVR ones that have been discussed here before. Either that or a windows media center computer.

    --
    I do security
    1. Re:I have a computer alot like this. by galaxy300 · · Score: 1

      Not to dis your machine, but the fact that it has a hardware decoder is the exact reason that this machine is *lindows* and not windows. Lindows doesn't have drivers for hardware decoders which is why the used the software decoder built into the ROM of the Via device. I'm sure if they could get MPAA approved drivers for a real decoder and charge $50 more, they would.

    2. Re:I have a computer alot like this. by Gyorg_Lavode · · Score: 1

      There ARE hardware drivers for the hollywood+ for linux. The hollywood+ decodes the mp3 encoding, not the protection encoding. Lindows COULD have hardware decoding, (as evidenced by the article saying the manufacturer would put a hardware decoder in the next iteration of the box), if they wanted.

      --
      I do security
    3. Re:I have a computer alot like this. by hughk · · Score: 1

      Decoding doesn't really seem to be a problem on my slower systems (400MHz and 500MHz). The thing that really helps performance is when the video hardware and the driver supports scaling, for example, using the ATI chips with the GATOS drivers.

      --
      See my journal, I write things there
  74. not a difficult thing by ironfroggy · · Score: 1

    i cant think of a linux distro that doesnt play more media files than windows out-of-the-box. mplayer beats out WMP on that like theres no tomorrow.

  75. If only there was a UNIX-based Media PC! by Nova+Express · · Score: 1

    If only there was some company that offered a UNIX based operating system running on powerful and elegant hardware that offered powerful built-in audio and video with every system sold, and also offered a drive that can read and write DVDs as well as CD-R/W. Alas, if only this glorious, mythical, magic computer company existed in real life...

    --
    Lawrence Person (lawrencepersonh@gmailh.com (remove all "h"s to mail)

    http://www.lawrenceperson.com/

  76. 720p progressive scan by Delirium+Tremens · · Score: 2, Interesting
    The important questions when it comes to modern DVD playback are:
    Can this box upscale DVD resolution to 720p? And if so, through what kind of output? DVI? Components?
    1. Re:720p progressive scan by Avatar_LHo · · Score: 1

      No it can't. It simply doesn't have the hardware/software to do it. Outputs? VGA. That's it.

    2. Re:720p progressive scan by Delirium+Tremens · · Score: 1

      Too bad. It missed a huge market and could have been marketed as a 'Home-Theatre PC' instead of a 'toy'.
      I guess the cheap ones amongst us will have to wait a little longer to get an affordable HiDef media center... sigh...

    3. Re:720p progressive scan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you can find a PCI slot on it you can install the RealMagic XCard (with Remote!) for $100.

      Of course, I think it only has drivers for Windows, at the moment. I own one and it is a hardware decoder solution for just that.

      I have an Athlon XP 1900+, a Radeon 8500 LE 128 MB, a Soundblaster Live! 5.1 (which this card plugs into digitally to the SB Live, sweet!) and this card... I can work and watch DVDs on a high quality hardware decoder with true 5.1 channnel Dolby Digital pumping out and it chews less than 3% of my CPU! I've actually rendered 3D video while I was watching a DVD before and it was no problem for my computer :)

      http://www.sigmadesigns.com/products/xcard.htm

    4. Re:720p progressive scan by YetAnotherName · · Score: 1

      They'd lose any CSS licensing if they output 720p. It's against the law (well, the DVD-CCA's laws, at least): output resolution of CSS encoded material is limited to 720x480i.

    5. Re:720p progressive scan by Delirium+Tremens · · Score: 1

      Good point. I hear that some DVD players will soon be able to output 720p via DVI to HDCP-compatible displays. So the upscaled signal will still be encrypted.
      I am very interested in that since my HiDef display is HDCP-compatible. I am probably going to buy one of those DVD players but I would much prefer to have the same functionality inside a Home Theatre PC. Hence my questions.
      Thanks for the details about DVD-CCA and all.

  77. PIP by nagora · · Score: 1
    Porn In Private

    TWW

    --
    "Encyclopedia" is to "Wikipedia" what "Library" is to "Some people at a bus stop"
  78. Re:They used the WRONG software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Xbox can play DVD smoothly. It only has 733 PIII CPU and 64MB of DDR SDRAM shared with video. The kernel only use PIO to talk to DVD and hard drive.

    What this tell me is the Lindows routine is poorly coded and not taking full advantage of the video chipset.

  79. HTPC hobbyist seeks bragging rights by i_am_nitrogen · · Score: 1

    My HTPC runs on Linux, uses Ogle for DVD playback, xine for music playback (with JESS for visualization), tvtime for analog video (I wrote an effect for the sound blaster live OSS drivers that delays the sound to compensate for the video delay introduced by tvtime), has an OpenGL user interface I wrote, controls my projector via RS-232, and is all navigatable with the remote control that came with my HDTV tuner card. I'm still writing the driver for the HDTV card, but the remote works great with lirc. From bootup to shutdown, the only thing that looks like difficult is the text that scrolls along the bottom of the screen. To get rid of that I just have to set the text palette to black, since I'm using 8bpp vesafb.

    Everyone who sees my "Remote controlled wall" thinks it's pretty cool.

  80. HTPC hobbyist seeks bragging rights (addendum) by i_am_nitrogen · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately I can't sell or give away my open source software to home theater distributors, because of the stupid DVD-CCA and all those other greedy pigs.

  81. Mirror by David_Bloom · · Score: 1

    Here's a mirror

    --

    Karma: Excellent (fuck, even in the future moderation doesn't work!)
  82. High-end home theater (i.e. projector) by i_am_nitrogen · · Score: 1

    I'd say anyone with a projector has an 80% chance of also owning an HTPC these days. It's the only way to get smooth scaled video without paying a few thousand dollars for a Faroudja or similar video scaler/line doubler/quadrupler/deinterlacer/3:2 pulldown remover. Tvtime in Linux works well enough for video source (it chokes hard on film though -- if any tvtime guys are reading, it needs 3:2 pulldown removal! Maybe I'll help out with development when I get some time, just get 3:2 pulldown removal!). Dscaler in Windows supports everything from a $15 bt878 capture card to a several hundred dollar SDI interface available from Cellar Cinemas, and if you set up the capture card's video proc amp right, it'll look great with all of them. In Linux, Ogle is excellent for film-source NTSC dvd's (mplayer has serious sync and stutter issues with any mpeg-2 material I've tried in it), mplayer and xine are great for DivX and DV video (gotta watch those home videos from my digital camera you know), xmms is great for CD audio with the LIRC plugin, ...

    Basically, in the high end, an HTPC offers a lot of integration, and simplifies the user interface. Instead of having to switch the audio/video inputs on my receiver, video switcher, etc, I can just press a button or two on my remote, and switch modes on the HTPC.

    The Lindows Media Center computer is indeed a mistake. It's useless for the high end. It's a good first stab though.

  83. If you mean a beige box, no... by Kjella · · Score: 1

    They don't. But replacing my VCR, CD player, PC as mp3 player et al with a single smart multifunctional box? I think Joe Sixpack could very well go for it if it came with a simple, user-friendly interface in a nice black/silver box the size of my VCR (not PVR - yet). The problem is the user interface - whatever links you have for freshmeat is *not* what I had in mind. You're right he doesn't want a computer - but nothing beats the flexibility of having a computer *behind* the scenes. Oh and about that "not computer" part, that also involves being as quiet as humanly possible. Passive heatsinks, slow CD/DVD drive (preferably selectable, so you can rip fast but listen "normal" if you want), ultra-quiet hard drive (Barracuda V made to spin at 5400RPM in noise protecting box?) and whatever else to make it feel like an appliance, not a computer.

    Kjella

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  84. If the article didnt poo poo it enough heres more by Loosewire · · Score: 1

    Ok so you have a box thats being sold knowingly underperforming, well done mr roberts you will really get the people on side with that one.
    What needs to happen also is thease things to be always on like tivo's and have similar functionality, Why have this instant on dvd thing when you can have the machine standby-ed or always on . that way it can do tivo stuff (with something like mythtv) Thus you can have a dvd player show recorder web browser kung foo fighting box :-)

    --
    Slashdot - The one stop shop for procrastination
  85. ...it doesn't have Video-In by sprayNwipe · · Score: 1

    I thought the whole point of a "Media PC" was that it acted like a PVR and recorded video content. If I want to play DVD's/MP3's/VCD's, I'll just buy a $150 DVD player!

  86. OOOOH Boy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That little box gets my blood pumping! One channel sound, and not a single feature works as advertised! I can't wait to buy into this Lindows craze!

  87. defaults to root by gui_tarzan2000 · · Score: 1
    Yes, *but* at the end of the install it asks if you want to add users now.That way you can control who does what. V2.x didn't offer that but v3.x does.

    What's the deal with the hatred from some about KDE as the front end? It looks much nicer than any other version of KDE or Gnome that I've seen. And things are much easier to find.

    --
    Have you hugged your penguin today?
  88. You forgot the price tag..... by hughk · · Score: 1
    What do Apple have in the price range that can do this?

    Apple do some great media stuff, but they are not exactly on a budget.

    --
    See my journal, I write things there
  89. Subscriptions by luzrek · · Score: 1

    I like the idea of a subscription based service for maintaining software because it supports the companies which develop the software. However, Microsoft's version, where the computer will cease to function and the files contained therein become inaccessable is not acceptable to me. One of the experiences I have had working at a Laboratory where some mission critical equiptment runs on propriatary software with expiring licenses is that the corporations are basically able to extort money from you. When they say, double the cost, you arn't able to switch to a competitor. An arangement where a subscription gaurantees that you have access to the most recent software but does not require you to pay to continue to use your existing software (like the lindows one) is definitely the way to go (at least as an consumer).

    --

    Galium Arsenide is the material of the future, and always will be.

  90. Nice idea, but not there yet by L0J46K · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I think we all want someone to beat Microsoft at their own game. My only hope is that more companies start porting their apps towards UNIX based environments. Linux is great at work, but at home I am locked into a microsoft PC because of gaming / multimedia. At least Lindows is making progress on bridgeing the gap. 2 thumbs up for effort to those guys.

  91. Re:Text Specs by vrmlknight · · Score: 1

    what about if it used DMA from the boot program. from what i have read and a few guesses it sounds like dms isnt turned on for the drive when its being used from the bios

    --
    This must be Thursday, I never could get the hang of Thursdays.
  92. boot player by mcaycedo · · Score: 1

    One of the thing that seems most interesant to me is the Loader, wich with only an Eprom chip is able to handle cd, mp3, vcd and dvd.

    Somebody know about some similar, able to perform only supported with software, without the need of the Eprom?

    1. Re:boot player by Avatar_LHo · · Score: 1

      How about putting in an oversized EEPROM and splitting it between the system BIOS and and everything else.

  93. Obligatory jab at Apple's ridiculous prices... by Cid+Highwind · · Score: 1

    Who cares? Apple prices it's hardware like every machine is hand-chiseled by a Tibetan monk from a solid block of pure, polished, weapons-grade unobtanium!

    --
    0 1 - just my two bits
    1. Re:Obligatory jab at Apple's ridiculous prices... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's certainly true for the high-end desktops that only True Believers would buy, but their laptop pricing isn't too bad. I just bought a 12" 800MHz iBook to replace my old 500MHz that is now dead because I'm an idiot (don't ask), and just for fun I looked into x86 notebooks to see what was out there. For what you get hardware-wise the iBook is not a bad deal.

  94. Stike Microsoft... no wait .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    a ping maybe more accurate, no wait .. hrm an inch.. no wait, hrm no. Have you seen the specs of this machine? Lindows OS= Cheap Crap, lindows makes cheap crap. it's not hard to put together this sort of Shite with the sort of cheap crap materials that they use here at lindows.

    Lindows really isn't rocket science.

  95. Re:Text Specs by MrNemesis · · Score: 1

    The main point about the original media box was that the BIOS itself was capable of decoding DVD's, so the CPU wasn't stressed with the overhead of an OS, and even then it could just about keep up with a DVD.

    I dunno if this BIOS had DMA enabled in it or not though, though I'm not sure if it would help much. Fact is, this board NEEDS an MPEG2 decoder.

    I could never get the hang of Thursdays either.

    --
    Moderation Total: -1 Troll, +3 Goat
  96. Power to Strike Microsoft? by sheldon · · Score: 1

    The answer is: No.

    Next question?

  97. Interested in where the code for this came by brent_linux · · Score: 1

    I know there is at least one Lindows person on the MythTV list, and that he is constantly trying myth on all kinds of hardware. So I wonder how much of the media code that is used in this is taken from something like myth. It seems that they had this out rather quickly after MS got theirs in the market. If some of the code is from MythTV shouldn't they have to release the code that is developed from it?

    1. Re:Interested in where the code for this came by Avatar_LHo · · Score: 1

      Probably none of the code. The feeling I got from the machine is that they took the little FIC machine, tacked on the etDVD from Elegent, dropped in a copy of their OS, slapped a big "Media Computer" sticker on the side, called it a day, and went out for a few drinks.

  98. Re:If the article didnt poo poo it enough heres mo by Avatar_LHo · · Score: 1

    PVR functionality would have greatly improved it's score with me. Provided it worked that is.

  99. Money back? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In my country, we have laws that state that if a product doesn't do what it was advertised to do, then we can return it for a refund. Either the USA doesn't have this kind of law (unlikely), or people who bought them lack the inteligence to RMA these novelty-sized doorstops asap. Oh wait, if they bought Lindows in the first place....

  100. re:Instant on? - Lindows needs vi-agra to play DVD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It did boast "Instant on" DVD, CD, MP3, and VCD playback as one of the prime features

    That's if you bought the optional Viagra add-on pack for it. If you didn't, it's not too late, you can expect a hundred emails each day .......

  101. For those who think that closed Lindows sucks. by Skraggy · · Score: 1

    http://www.linitx.com

    Roll your own Mini box. Choose your own Distro. Install your own choice of DVD player.

    I like the Idea of a Newb proof linux, and a Newb HTPC, but why is Joe Consumer getting sold short, because he isn't Joe Geek.

    Doesn't happen in most home stuff.
    Go into a HiFi or Audio Video shop, and they will try to sell you up to the best, even though the budget stuff is available.
    In most computer shops they try to sell you the garbage at only marginally lower prices than the good stuff.
    Or maybe that is just the UK

    --
    A Skoda is for life, not for casual humour.
  102. way to go by horovitz · · Score: 1

    this doesn't look like an alternative to me

  103. An excellent result based on what's inside by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hmm... the author doesn't seem to have any idea about how those Mhz might work. The C3 900+Mhz CPU does compare with a 233 PIII. It's the same thing as Intel vs. AMD. And for guys like that AMD markets the system with a Intel-compatible number. So the reviewed box isn't half the power of the regular PC. It's a lot slower. No wonder it has problems with the DVD output.

    About the box: with a good ventilation (bigger box) the C3 has a wonderful feature over the recent CPUs - it's cold enough it can go on with passive cooling. Something Intel and AMD don't take into consideration. And the market seems too obsessed with more and more Mhz although most of that power goes unused.