Slashdot Mirror


Eleventy What?

TheFr00n asks: "I recently managed to teach my ten year old son the hexadecimal number system, but he shot me back a question that has me stumped. How does one pronounce hex, after the first iteration? In decimal, we have nice words like 'fifty' and 'sixteen'. Is there an official way of pronouncing a hexadecimal number like CF9? 'See hundred and effty-nine'? (which is totally wrong anyway because a hundred is 64 in hexidecimal) Any thoughts?"

157 comments

  1. Maybe by David_Bloom · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Won't just "Cee Eff Nine" work?

    --

    Karma: Excellent (fuck, even in the future moderation doesn't work!)
    1. Re:Maybe by Speedy8 · · Score: 1

      ya but that doesn't have a nice flow to it.

    2. Re:Maybe by David_Bloom · · Score: 1

      Going along with this, for numbers in the "Hexithousands" (i made that up), use "scientific hexitation" (e.g. cee eff nine times eff to the sixty-fourth power)

      --

      Karma: Excellent (fuck, even in the future moderation doesn't work!)
    3. Re:Maybe by David_Bloom · · Score: 1

      * correction: actually, that would be to the hexihundreds...whatever

      --

      Karma: Excellent (fuck, even in the future moderation doesn't work!)
    4. Re:Maybe by leviramsey · · Score: 1

      I think "zero-echs-cee-eff-niner" has a good flow... I'd like to see Eminem work that into his next batch of rhymes.

    5. Re:Maybe by MarvinMouse · · Score: 1

      If English doesn't float your boat, how about German

      tsay-eff-noin?

      Or french

      say-eu-neuf? (where eu is like Eu in Europe.)

      Or a variety of other languages? I am pretty sure we could find one you like. ^_^

      --
      ~ kjrose
    6. Re:Maybe by GreyWolf3000 · · Score: 1

      Not sixty-fourth power, to the power of six four.

      --
      Slashdot: Where people pretend to be twice as smart as they really are by behaving like children.
    7. Re:Maybe by ibennetch · · Score: 1
      Won't just "Cee Eff Nine" work?
      That depends...do you say "one zero zero" or "one hundred" when speaking of the decimal number 100?
    8. Re:Maybe by KDan · · Score: 2, Informative

      That's the official pronunciation for hex though.

      For anything other than decimal you're not meant to use "ten", "hundred", "twenty", etc. Eg:

      Binary: 1011 - One-Oh-One-One
      Octal: 7326 - Seven-Three-Two-Six
      Decimal: 4729 - Four thousand seven hundred and twenty nine
      Hexadecimal: 28ad - Two-Eight-A-D

      Simple, huh?

      Daniel

      --
      Carpe Diem
    9. Re:Maybe by unitron · · Score: 2, Insightful
      "Binary: 1011 - One-Oh-One-One"

      Please be precise enough to use "zero" when pronouncing "0".

      "Decimal: 4729 - Four thousand seven hundred and twenty nine"

      There is no "and" in "4729".

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    10. Re:Maybe by unitron · · Score: 1

      But is that to the power of six four decimal or six four hex?

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    11. Re:Maybe by pyite · · Score: 1

      Says who? For all I care, put an "and" wherever you want.

      --

      "Nature doesn't care how smart you are. You can still be wrong." - Richard Feynman

    12. Re:Maybe by suraklin · · Score: 1

      there is in german

    13. Re:Maybe by ffsnjb · · Score: 1

      "And" is used to denote the decimal point, as in "four hundred thirty six and two tenths" = 436.2, or so says every first grade mathematics textbook I've ever seen.

      --
      "Why do you consent to live in ignorance and fear?" - Bad Religion
    14. Re:Maybe by RV.eq.VFG · · Score: 1

      There is in British english too. (The way wot I speak it).

    15. Re:Maybe by restauff · · Score: 1

      There is in german, though the "and" is in a different place. Pronounced in german word order, 4729 is four thousand seven hundred nine and twenty.

    16. Re:Maybe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not only that, but its also proper english grammer. Along the same lines, all of my csc professors have been pronouncing hex using their individual character names (i.e. 7f5 is read as seven-eff-five)

      Just pointing out what I have been tought so theres my 2 cents

    17. Re:Maybe by KewlPC · · Score: 1

      Except that it is correct.

      Although I'm sure he didn't mean it this way, the "and" denotes addition. It used to be a common way of expressing numbers, but is now taught as being "incorrect." For an example, the Gettysburg Address: "Four score and seven years ago" = 80 + 7 = 87, or "Indeed, I am not yet one and twenty." = "Yeah, I'm not one plus twenty yet" = "Yeah, I'm not twenty-one yet."

      Four-thousand-seven-hundred and twenty-nine means 4700 + 29, which is the equivalent of 4729.

      The "you only use 'and' in place of the decimal" rule is only partly correct (although universally taught as being 100% correct by people with no knowledge of history or the English language), in that putting "and" in place of the decimal follows the rule that "and" actually means addition: four and seven-tenths = 4 + 0.7 = 4.7

    18. Re:Maybe by unitron · · Score: 1
      The 'and' is best saved for speech of a poetic nature ('fourscore and seven', 'four and twenty blackbirds') or colloquial use.

      The sloppier one's speech, in circumstances where clarity and precision should be the norm, such as newscasters, public utterances of politicians, teachers in the classroom, et cetera, the sloppier I suspect to be their thinking.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  2. What's wrong with... by rasteri · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Just saying the phonetic equivalents of the letters, and the numbers as usual?, as in "see-eff-nine"

  3. No worries here by itwerx · · Score: 2, Funny

    DEADBEEF always works for me but there are some who would consider it BADC0DE... :)

    1. Re:No worries here by fidget42 · · Score: 1

      I prefer 2BAD (or 2BADDEAD for you 32-bit people).

      --
      The dogcow says "Moof!"
    2. Re:No worries here by bsmoor01 · · Score: 2, Funny

      How can you forget FECEFACE?!?!

    3. Re:No worries here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      B00B1E5

    4. Re:No worries here by buysse · · Score: 1

      To hell with that! 0xDECAFBAD is my choice.

      --
      -30-
  4. Node on E2? by *xpenguin* · · Score: 1

    There was a node on E2 about this, but I couldn't find it after searching for a few minutes. Anyone remember the title?

    1. Re:Node on E2? by Gudlyf · · Score: 1
      Maybe this?

      It's the closest I could find...

      --
      Trolls lurk everywhere. Mod them down.
  5. I'll be so damn happy by sydlexic · · Score: 1

    when this day is over.

    /me waits, watches the clock and clicks reload

    1. Re:I'll be so damn happy by quakeslut · · Score: 1

      yeah me too dude. you're not alone.

    2. Re:I'll be so damn happy by addaon · · Score: 2, Funny

      Actually, he is. So very, very alone.

      --

      I've had this sig for three days.
  6. Perhaps, by Sevn · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If there was an actual need to speak these numbers,
    we'd have some slick as chit way to pronounce them.
    Necessity is the MUTHA of invention. Most people go
    around talking in base ten. Most people have no
    need at all for anything but base ten. Go figure
    it's what we have words for.

    --
    For every annoying gentoo user, are three even more annoying anti-gentoo crybabies. Take Yosh from #Gimp for example.
    1. Re:Perhaps, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      ... Most people go around talking in base ten. ...
      Do that round here and the men in white coats come to take you away.
  7. Color by David_Bloom · · Score: 4, Funny

    Well, if it represented a color (#c0f090), I'd call it light green.

    --

    Karma: Excellent (fuck, even in the future moderation doesn't work!)
  8. 0x29a by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    slashdot is evil

  9. Heh by itwerx · · Score: 3, Funny

    "CF"
    "CF9"
    "CF9 with Jack and Jill"
    "Now F is tired"
    "CF sleep..."

    "69" comments are automatically modded redundant and posters will be assumed to have the mental age of an eggplant.

    1. Re:Heh by aeakett · · Score: 2, Funny

      That is way funny to us ColdFusion programmers!

    2. Re:Heh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      damn bastages modded you up. villians!

  10. In all non-decimal systems.. by denubis · · Score: 4, Informative

    This is, unfortunatly, a point that has been drilled into me by my Discrete Math profs.

    All non decimal systems pronounce the digits individally.

    E.g. 10 in base 2 is not "ten" but "one zero"
    And 734 in octal is "seven, three, four. Not seven thirty four, or variations on that theme.

    Hope this helps.

    1. Re:In all non-decimal systems.. by clem.dickey · · Score: 1

      Yeah. And I had a teachers who insisted that "pretty" be pronounced to rhyme with "petty" (not "pity"), "err" rhymes with "slur" (not "air"), "nucleolus" is stressed like "alveolus" and "gigahertz" starts with a soft g. All correct I suppose, but rarely heard nowadays.

      I say "thirty-two hex" and even "thirty-two hundred hex" and "charlie thousand hex" on occasion. And my world hasn't collapseD43mjodu4trfk#*(%^&#)$)*(

    2. Re:In all non-decimal systems.. by jafuser · · Score: 1

      I know someone who, even after being corrected, still can't break the habit of using the "singular" form, "one gigahert" for 1Ghz.

      --
      Please consider making an automatic monthly recurring donation to the EFF
    3. Re:In all non-decimal systems.. by dotpl · · Score: 1

      10 in base 2 is not "one zero", it's "zero one"

      that's what my assembly teacher keeps repeating anyway, "you always read binary from right to left"

    4. Re:In all non-decimal systems.. by hixmobile · · Score: 1

      Also, where the digits are easily confused, better to use phonetics. So the answer to your query is "Charlie Foxtrot niner".

    5. Re:In all non-decimal systems.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you really want to melt his mind teach him aritmetic to a negative base ...2^-2,2^-1,2^0
      4 is 100 etc

    6. Re:In all non-decimal systems.. by robslimo · · Score: 1

      Gak!

      Your assembly teacher is being pedantic on a non-issue. OTOH, it is akin to the big endian/little endian holy wars of past which were never won... the combatants simply tired of the fight.

      If it is written out as 11001010001, then natives to non-asian/eastern languages will naturally tend to read it from left to right, starting with "one, one..." As long as the right people know which bit is most significant, it's OK.

      Your instructor is distracting you with a rule which is linguistically invalid and therefore technically false. Tell them I said so. I have 14 years experience programming in asm, how about your teacher?

    7. Re:In all non-decimal systems.. by unitron · · Score: 1

      GigaHertz, like giga-everything else, really does start with a "j" sound because it comes from the same root word as "gigantic". Back when microwave communications technicians were working those frequencies and computer people relied on ferrite beads strung on wires for memory there wasn't the present misunderstanding about this.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    8. Re:In all non-decimal systems.. by unitron · · Score: 1

      Has anyone ever pointed out to that person that the term used for cycles per second (as opposed to cycles per some other length of time) is the proper name Hertz, so that 1 cycle per second is 1 Hertz, and if you need a different term for singular and plural it would actually be Hertz and Hertzes? (If you're going to be wrong you might as well be accurate about it :-)

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    9. Re:In all non-decimal systems.. by Mr+Z · · Score: 1

      You don't read it aloud from right to left. You interpret the number and perform most arithmetic from right to left, just like in decimal. Never, in my 15 years of assembly programming experience have I ever encountered someone (including the astoundingly little-endian designers I work with) that reads binary aloud from right-to-left.

      --Joe
    10. Re:In all non-decimal systems.. by Captoo · · Score: 1
      That's how I learned it, too. Until now that is.

      I have a digitial design teacher who wants us to read non-decimal numbers from right to left and decimal numbers from left to right. How's that for throwing a wrench in the works?

    11. Re:In all non-decimal systems.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I always precede diff non-dec numsyses w/ a prefix like 'oh-ecks' (0x) so people know. Most of my friends do this as well.

    12. Re:In all non-decimal systems.. by Doug+Merritt · · Score: 1
      GigaHertz, like giga-everything else, really does start with a "j" sound because it comes from the same root word as "gigantic

      Nope. E.g. www.m-w.com says either pronunciation is ok:

      Main Entry: giga-
      Pronunciation: 'ji-g&, 'gi-
      Function: combining form
      Etymology: International Scientific Vocabulary, from Greek gigas giant : billion ; gigahertz; gigawatt
      My previous understanding was that the J pronunciation was primarily British where American was primarily G, but I certainly hear J from time to time in the U.S.

      Back when microwave communications technicians were working those frequencies

      Huh? They never stopped. And more recently cpu clock speeds hit gigahertz.

      and computer people relied on ferrite beads strung on wires for memory there wasn't the present misunderstanding about this

      What on earth does core memory have to do with all this? (That's a rhetorical question; the answer is "nothing at all")

      --
      Professional Wild-Eyed Visionary
    13. Re:In all non-decimal systems.. by Cainam · · Score: 1

      It won't be any fun typing in a number someone reads to you that way. You'll have to either buffer the whole thin in your head and then type it, or type each number followed by the left arrow key. What a stupid thing to do.

    14. Re:In all non-decimal systems.. by schon · · Score: 1

      I had a physics teacher who reamed some guy out for not pronouncing "kilometer" as "kilo-meter".. he had this huge tirade about the joining of two words, and how you should always keep the pronounciation of each one..

      So I asked him what you use to measure temperature or speed? Obvously a "thermo-meter" or "speedo-meter"..

      He didn't like that.

    15. Re:In all non-decimal systems.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      please have more sympathy for your autistic proffessors please. That genius don't come free, you know!

    16. Re:In all non-decimal systems.. by pyrrho · · Score: 1

      this kind of crap is why people graduate thinking they know "the one right way" when in reality they have been indocrinated in a field where things are really wide open, undiscovered, and far from finalized.

      in the real world, you need to arrange some common definitions with your colleagues and use them for consistency. When you change jobs, repeat the process. All terminology in software engineering, so far, is pretty local.

      A fun one to follow is "polymorphism". People are certain what it means. But it means and has been used to mean, a variety of semi-related things. Fact is, you cannot rely on a common jargon in software engineering the way you supposedly can in other engineering disciplines. imnsho

      --

      -pyrrho

    17. Re:In all non-decimal systems.. by b!arg · · Score: 1

      Let's just think back a bit...1.21 gigawatts...

      --

      Everybody dies frustrated and sad and that is beautiful
    18. Re:In all non-decimal systems.. by KewlPC · · Score: 1

      Tell your assembly teacher that while most operations on binary numbers are performed from right-to-left, you speak it left-to-right, because that is proper English.

      If he still insists on being an (incorrect) pedant, ask him why he doesn't speak the decimal number 456 as "six-fifty-four-hundred", and tell him that while operations on decimal numbers are performed right-to-left, just like with binary numbers, the number itself is read left-to-right (again, just like with binary numbers).

    19. Re:In all non-decimal systems.. by unitron · · Score: 1
      My point was that before consumer-level computer processor speeds, memory sizes, and hard drive sizes got into the range of needing the 'giga' prefix, in other words, before the general public got involved, people using the prefix knew the proper pronunciation. As for the dictionary citation, if enough people misuse or mispronounce a word often enough long enough, then eventually the incorrect definition or pronunciation becomes accepted as "correct". Apparently that process is underway with regard to 'giga'. People who know it's pronounced with a 'j' sound pronounce it with a hard 'g' sound when dealing with the general public just to avoid the hassle of having to explain the etymology 500 times per day.

      Or perhaps you feel I'm making a 'guy-gantic' mistake :-)

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  11. (something important seems to be missing) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I recently managed to teach my ten year old son the hexadecimal number system

    Oh, he'll never get picked on.

    Why don't you kick around a fucking soccer ball or something.

  12. Err, it's just the same as any other number system by Bitsy+Boffin · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Err, are not the names we give numbers independant of any notational system? i.e

    The number we have given the name two and is written as "2" in decimal, in binary is written 10, but it's still called two, just the notation changed. In hexadecimal, the number we call sixteen is written 10, but it's still called sixteen.

    Of course if you want say a number in a specific notation you'll need to not only spell it out but also state the system so as to avoid ambiguity ("the number `one-zero' in binary notation") as using the number's name implies the use of the decimal notation.

    If you ask somebody to write down some numbers, and you read them out as "one, two, three, four", the subject should be perfectly able to use the binary notational system to write them down as "01, 10, 11, 100", they've recorded the numbers you spake correctly.

    --
    NZ Electronics Enthusiasts: Check out my Trade Me Listings
  13. effty-nine by Radical+Rad · · Score: 1

    I like it. Now I can write a satirical political novel about civil liberties lost through digital surveilance and call it '19A4'.

    1. Re:effty-nine by lexarius · · Score: 1

      2B||!2B==True
      For any value of 2B. FYI.

    2. Re:effty-nine by Radical+Rad · · Score: 1

      Great, I'll tell Hamlet. :-)

    3. Re:effty-nine by Hellkitten · · Score: 1

      At least you should try to get it rigth: the name should be: 0x7C0

      0x19A4 is about four and a half thousand years into the future

      --
      - We are the slashdot. Resistance is futile. Prepare to be moderated -
    4. Re:effty-nine by mink · · Score: 1

      So it would be a work of science fiction instead of a history book?

      --
      Well I've wrestled with reality for thirty five years doctor, and I'm happy to say I finally won out over it.
    5. Re:effty-nine by Radical+Rad · · Score: 1

      Technically you are corretc but then the significance of the title would be lost on most of the population.

    6. Re:effty-nine by Hellkitten · · Score: 1

      the significance of the title would be lost on most of the population

      The same part of the population that would "get" 19A4?

      I don't think most of the population would understand the significance unless it is explained to them, and then it should be done properly anyway.

      --
      - We are the slashdot. Resistance is futile. Prepare to be moderated -
  14. As a programmer 20 some years ago... by DaoudaW · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Finally something I know something about. "One, two, three, four, five, six, seven, eight, nine, able, baker, Charlie, dog, easy, fox, one-zero. One-one, one-two, one-three, one-four, one-five, one-six, one-seven, one-eight, one-nine, one-able, one-baker, one-Charlie, one-dog, one-easy, one-fox, two-zero. Two-one, two-two, two-three..." Three digit numbers likewise: "One-zero-nine, one-zero-able, one-zero-baker,..., nine-fox-fox, able-zero-zero."

    1. Re:As a programmer 20 some years ago... by Bitsy+Boffin · · Score: 1

      Maybe correct 20 years ago, but you're a bit off on your phonetic alphabet no..

      Alpha, Bravo, Charlie, Delta, Echo, Foxtrot

      (the rest .. Golf, Hotel, India, Juliet, Kilo, Lima, Mike, November, Oscar, Papa, Quebec, Romeo, Sierra, Tango, Uniform, Victor, Whiskey, X-ray, Yankee, Zulu).

      --
      NZ Electronics Enthusiasts: Check out my Trade Me Listings
    2. Re:As a programmer 20 some years ago... by HeghmoH · · Score: 1

      Even today, there's more than one phonetic alphabet in use.

      --
      Mod down posts with a "Free Mac Mini/iPod" sig, they're spam!
    3. Re:As a programmer 20 some years ago... by DaoudaW · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I've done that one when operating an aviation radio, but for hexadecimal I've only ever heard "able, baker, charlie, dog, easy, fox".

    4. Re:As a programmer 20 some years ago... by paploo · · Score: 1

      Your usin' the old Army alphabet from WWII. Try the international radio alphabet used by NATO and civil aviation (among other things):
      one, two, three, four, five, six, seven, eigth, niner, alpha, bravo, charlie, delta, echo, foxtrot. :)

      -Jeff

    5. Re:As a programmer 20 some years ago... by paploo · · Score: 1

      (Oops, mark me down as -1 Redundant! Someone already wrote about that alphabet! :) (Do I get any brownie points for adding a few extra details about it?... I didn't think so.))

      -Jeff

    6. Re:As a programmer 20 some years ago... by Tower · · Score: 1

      Ah, but the computer industry doesn't rely on the aviation conventions... there is a lot of inertia in the naming (especially at places such as IBM)...

      Abel, Baker, Charlie, Dog, Easy, Fox... the only way to digitize.

      --
      "It's tough to be bilingual when you get hit in the head."
    7. Re:As a programmer 20 some years ago... by CharlieG · · Score: 1

      The "able Baker" phonetic alphabet was the OLD US and British Phonetic alpahabet (circa 1942). Post WWII it was changed, as some non native english speakers had serious problems with hearing/saying some of the words "Queen" vs "Quebec" is one of them

      Currently, in the US, there are 2 main forms of the Phonetic alphabet being used "Police" and International/Military. The Police version has some regional variations, but as almost all theri comms are intra department it does not matter (btw the 10 codes vary somewhat too)

      Police Military
      A Adam Alpha
      B Boy Bravo
      C Charles Charlie
      D David Delta
      E Edward Echo
      F Frank Foxtrot
      G George Golf
      H Henry Hotel
      I Ida India
      J John Juliet
      K King Kilo
      L Lincoln Lima
      M Mary Mike
      N Nora November
      O Ocean Oscar
      P Paul Papa
      Q Queen Quebec
      R Robert Romeo
      S Sam Sierra
      T Tom Tango
      U Union Uniform
      V Victor Victor
      W William Whiskey
      X Xray Xray
      Y Young Yankee
      Z Zebra Zulu

      --
      -- 73 de KG2V For the Children - RKBA! "You are what you do when it counts" - the Masso
    8. Re:As a programmer 20 some years ago... by TimeZone · · Score: 1
      You must work for IBM. It's the only place I've heard the able-baker-charlie notation. confused the heck out of me at first (being used to the NATO standard alpha-bravo-charlie). There are in fact many phonetic alphabets, and (as others have indicated), they have changed over time, and many are regional. For a good list, look here: http://www.columbia.edu/~fuat/cuarc/phonetic.html

      TimeZone

    9. Re:As a programmer 20 some years ago... by DaoudaW · · Score: 1

      Nope, but I did work in an IBM shop for a few years. Must have been where I picked it up. Interesting that the Columbia University link actually mentions hex digits with the "Able, Baker, Charlie,..." alphabet.

  15. Maybe the media will show some interest by mbstone · · Score: 2, Funny

    Andy Rooney, for example, expounds on topics just as mundane and trivial as this one, every Sunday on 3C Minutes.

  16. CF9 by crmartin · · Score: 1

    "Charlie Foxtrot nine" of course.

    1. Re:CF9 by ConeFish · · Score: 1

      More correctly: Charlie Foxtrot Niner

      --
      The dumber people think you are, the more surprised they are when you kill them.
    2. Re:CF9 by dlcantrell · · Score: 1

      That's affirmative, err.. WTF over.

  17. I've thought about this by Rysc · · Score: 2, Funny

    and you're right, there is no current answer.

    What needs to be done is to invent words that mean each of these symbols. When you say A in hex it is not the alphabet A, it's a totally different concept and needs a different word to express it.

    The best way would be to invent and standardize a set of words for speaking numbers/about numbers in base 16. Because, really, 10 would be pronounced "sixteen" which makes no sense. Base16(16) should be pronounced "16" and mean base10(22).

    It's a culture/language thing, you see. In order to have it make sane sense you need to think of numbers in base 16, not 10.

    I have, of course, come up with my own words for each of these A-F numbers, with simple rules for how to pronounce combinations like 1CF anf D7B and so on. I'd post them, but I've mislaid the paper I wrote them on. And I think that illustrates my point: In order to remember/use these things properly, we'd have to think in another base. And that's just too impractical to be likely to happen.

    --
    I want my Cowboyneal
    1. Re:I've thought about this by nickos · · Score: 1

      (I don't know why that got modded funny, but nevermind.)

      "When you say A in hex it is not the alphabet A", this is a perfectly good point, but you don't go far enough. To do this properly, we really need new symbols for the hex numbers A to F too.

      But then, we probably have too many characters for all sorts of things as it is, and hex is not in common enough usage for much effort to be invested in this.

    2. Re:I've thought about this by kfx · · Score: 1

      I've thought about this too, and that's the same conclusion that I came to (invent new symbols/names for hex A-F).

      The only problem it would take some doing to memorize these new symbols, and it would make it more difficult for new programmers, etc. to learn how to use hex...

    3. Re:I've thought about this by Tukla · · Score: 1

      I read a book called The Coming of the Quantum Cats years ago. The author decided that one party in the book used straight binary mathematics, and he came up with words to replace base-10 words. Not that this would help with hex, but it was mildly amusing reading (since one character -- an accountant -- had to learn the new language).

  18. What's nice about the 1st 6 from aviation notation by Ayanami+Rei · · Score: 2

    is that each one is 2 syllables. Hence, it's easy to partition them off in a noisy environment without wondering if you're hearing 1 or 2 digits.

    --
    THIS THING CAN TURN ON A DIME, MACROSSZERO STYLE ALSO FUCK BETA, ~NYORON
  19. dek el zen tris cat kink by PurpleBob · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Well, I don't know how to solve the problem of "hundred". But the digits can have names (and not just the letter names, which have the problem that they're hard to tell apart and A sounds like 8).

    On Everything2, there's the node Names for digits higher than 9. The names for the digits - I have no idea who created them - are "dek" for A, "el" for B, "zen" for C, "tris" for D, "cat" for E, and "kink" for F.

    --
    Win dain a lotica, en vai tu ri silota
    1. Re:dek el zen tris cat kink by cybermace5 · · Score: 1

      Just don't go to Canada and pronouce 'FA'. You'll get slapped.

      --
      ...
    2. Re:dek el zen tris cat kink by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dek and El are from the Schoolhouse Rock song little twelvetoes, in which 10 base 12 is pronounced 'doh'.

  20. Donald Knuth Has The Answer by Sunlighter · · Score: 5, Interesting

    In section 4.1 of The Art of Computer Programming, Donald Knuth describes:

    ...a prominent Swedish-American civil engineer named John W. Nystrom [who] decided to... [devise] a complete system of numeration, weights, and measures based on radix-16 arithmetic. He wrote, "I am not afraid, or do not hesitate, to advocate a binary system of arithmetic and metrology. I know I have nature on my side; if I do not succeed to impress upon you its utility and great importance to mankind, it will reflect that much less credit on our generation, upon our scientific men and philosophers." Nystrom devised special means for pronouncing hexadecimal numbers; for example, [0xC0160] was to be read "vybong, bysanton." His entire system was called the Tonal System, and it is described in J. Franklin Inst. 46 (1863), 263-275, 337,348, 402-407.

    Maybe you should get that issue of that journal and give it a try.

    --
    Sunlit World Scheme. Weird and different.
    1. Re:Donald Knuth Has The Answer by nickos · · Score: 3, Interesting
      quoted from http://www.monmouth.com/~colonel/tonal.html

      From Recreations in Mathematics, by H. E. Licks (Van Nostrand, 1917):
      John W. Nystrom of Philadelphia devised about fifty years ago the tonal system&quot of numeration in which 16 is the base instead of 10 as in the decimal system. The numerals 1, 2, 3, 4, etc., were called An, De, Ti, Go, etc., and new characters were devised for 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15. This system embraced also a new division of the year into 16 months, these having the names Anuary, Debrian, Timander, Gostus, Suvenary, Bylian, Ratamber, Mesidius, Nictorary, Kolumbian, Husander, Victorius, Lamboary, Polian, Fylander, Tonborious, the first two letters of each month being the names of the sixteen numerals.
      This is slightly inaccurate. The figure 9 was used for 10, on the principle of making the digits for 8 or greater look like those of their 16's complements written upside down; and a new figure was devised for 9. The name of 12 was Vy, not Vi; and I believe that the meth, nith, vyth, and tonth months were named Mesudius, Nictoary, Vyctorius, and Tonborius.

      The year began at the winter solstice, that being the Anth of Anuary. Every month had tonra days except for Debrian, Gostus, and Lamboary, which had only tonby, but Debrian had an extra day in leap years.

      The powers of ton were: ton, san, mill, bong. These could be used as prefixes to indicate multiplication or as suffixes to indicate division. For instance, the day was divided into ton (sixteen) tims, a tim into ton timtons, and a timton into ton timsans.

  21. Right they are by GCP · · Score: 1

    Twenty is a number. 20 decimal represents that number. 20 hex does not. It represents a different number.

    But the 2 and the 0 in 20H are still a two and a zero, so saying "two-zero hex" (where "hex" is optional if understood) is quite correct, while "twenty" is not.

    --
    "Those who have never entered upon scientific pursuits know not a tithe of the poetry by which they are surrounded."
  22. I don't know the answer, but don't use "and"! by Trillan · · Score: 1

    159 is formally "one hundred fifty nine," not "one hundred and fifty nine."

    "And" is for decimal places, as in 159.7 = one hundred fifty nine and seven tenths.

    1. Re:I don't know the answer, but don't use "and"! by ZigMonty · · Score: 1

      159 is formally "one hundred fifty nine," not "one hundred and fifty nine."

      "And" is for decimal places, as in 159.7 = one hundred fifty nine and seven tenths.

      Says who? Where I come from, we put the "and" in. Do you have a World Government decree supporting your claim?

    2. Re:I don't know the answer, but don't use "and"! by jo_ham · · Score: 2, Informative

      In the UK adding the "and" is correct, as is pronouncing the numbers after a decimal point individually.

      159.34 is "one hundred and fifty nine point three four".

      You'll only hear Americans and children who are just learning about decimals say "point thirty four" in the UK.

    3. Re:I don't know the answer, but don't use "and"! by gillisgirl · · Score: 1

      Where I come from, people say they work at "Fords" and shop at "K-marts". Doesn't make it right, and just makes them sound stupid. I was taught that "and" represents the decimal while studying for my math degree. It's not the "World Goverment," but I'll trust a bunch doctors of mathematics in this case.

    4. Re:I don't know the answer, but don't use "and"! by John+Harrison · · Score: 1

      The most annoying error in my opinion, is people who claim to shop at Nordstroms rather than at Nordstrom.

    5. Re:I don't know the answer, but don't use "and"! by pthisis · · Score: 1

      159 is formally "one hundred fifty nine," not "one hundred and fifty nine."

      "And" is for decimal places, as in 159.7 = one hundred fifty nine and seven tenths.


      You can easily pick up any of the formal writing guides (e.g The Columbia Guide to Standard American English, or the Associated Press style guide) and see that "and" is correct usage when pronouncing 159 as "one hundred and fify-nine". Any native American English speaker will agree.

      The same is true in Britain for native speakers.

      Some American math professors teach a jargon where "and" represents the decimal point, but that is _not_ acceptable formal English and should only be used in contexts where that jargon is likely to be understood by all listeners (e.g. mathematical journals). Even better, avoid it completely and use an unambiguous pronunciation such as "one hundred point five nine", which is what British math professors teach.

      Sumner

      --
      rage, rage against the dying of the light
    6. Re:I don't know the answer, but don't use "and"! by pthisis · · Score: 1

      I was taught that "and" represents the decimal while studying for my math degree. It's not the "World Goverment," but I'll trust a bunch doctors of mathematics in this case.

      That's like trusting a bunch of doctors of literature's opinions on a question about infinite-dimensional Hilbert spaces.

      You can pick up any American english style guide (e.g. the Columbia University style guide, the Associated Press guide) and see that "one hundred and one" is acceptable usage meaning "101" in formal written American English.

      Using "and" to indicate the decimal point is jargon used by some American mathematics instructors but is not correct in formal written American english. I'd stay away from it entirely even in mathematics because the alternate British form is completely unambiguous--say "one hundred point one" to indicate "100.1". Non-mathematicians and both British and American mathematicians will understand it.

      Sumner

      --
      rage, rage against the dying of the light
    7. Re:I don't know the answer, but don't use "and"! by gillisgirl · · Score: 1

      From the Chicago Manual of Style web page Q&A (http://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org/cmosfaq.html)

      "Q. In the admittedly rare circumstances when you want to write out the name of a large number, are there any agreed-upon guidelines for the usage of the word "and"? Is it "six hundred seventy-two" or "six hundred and seventy-two"? I was taught the former in grade school; a colleague was taught the latter, equally adamantly. I should note that said colleague is Canadian; is this perhaps a question of American versus British usage? All consulted manuals are, inexplicably, silent on the matter.

      A. Paragraph 8.9 in the fourteenth edition of The Chicago Manual of Style implies the correct rule. Numbers, even large ones, should be spelled out if they must begin a sentence. So,

      One hundred ten men and 103 women will receive advanced degrees this quarter. (emphasis mine)

      For many people it is more idiomatic to say "one hundred and ten"; a glance at the most recent draft of the manuscript of the fifteenth edition shows that we are prepared to allow "and" in written contexts as well. Perhaps caution is advisable, however. Look at the following two expressions:

      six hundred seventy-two

      six hundred and seventy two

      In some contexts, the latter expression could possibly be construed as two numbers: 600, on the one hand, and 72, on the other. But in the majority of contexts there would be no reason to worry:
      Six hundred and seventy-two people gathered to celebrate her birthday."


      Clearly, at least one style guide prefers that "and" not be used, but admits the "idiomatic" use of it can be allowed.

    8. Re:I don't know the answer, but don't use "and"! by buysse · · Score: 1

      I reserve my personal hatred for people who say "Barnes and Nobles." I only make one exception -- people from Chicago can't help themselves. Wrigley's Field, indeed.

      --
      -30-
    9. Re:I don't know the answer, but don't use "and"! by guanxi · · Score: 1

      Actually, that's wrong. Proper English (both British and American) is that "and" is used to denote something added to the whole number. You don't separate a description of an integer with "and". So, 183,269 is "one hundred eighty three thousand, two hundred sixty nine", not "one hundred and eighty three thousand two hundred and sixty nine". It also means that $194.31 is "one hundred ninety four dollars AND thirty one cents".

    10. Re:I don't know the answer, but don't use "and"! by pthisis · · Score: 1

      Right, now check out Columbia.

      The point is that using "and" to represent the decimal point is a Bad Idea since it's a jargon limited to a small set of American mathematics professionals. Even Chicago allows it to mean something other than the decimal, and Columbia and other manuals allow that in formal writing--so clearly it's an ambiguous usage. I'd stick with:

      162: one hundred sixty-two
      100.62: one hundred point six two

      Both are unambiguous and will communicate the idea clearly to listeners of all backgrounds--which is, after all, the point of language.

      Sumner

      --
      rage, rage against the dying of the light
    11. Re:I don't know the answer, but don't use "and"! by KewlPC · · Score: 1

      Correct. However, I will point out that nobody says, "three-hundred and one" and means "300.1". The actual math jargon is "three-hundred and one tenth" (which, according to the rule I'll describe below, is correct, but not for the reason that most math teachers think), but this is thankfully falling out of favor in preference to the less ambiguous, and easier to say, "whatever point whatever" style ("three-hundred point one" in this case).

      The word "and" means "in addition to", so "Jim and myself..." means "Jim, in addition to myself..."; "five-hundred and one" would mean "five-hundred in addition to one", or "500 + 1", which is the equivalent of "501".

      You can see this in just about every formal writing that is more than about 100 years old. Take the Gettysburg Address, for example: "Four score and seven years ago...". This means 80 in addition to 7 (80 + 7), or 87.

      The problem with most American math teachers is that they're pedants with no knowledge outside of mathematics. They teach "sixty-two and seventy-nine hundredths" as correct English (and it is, FWIW), yet teach "nine-hundred and fifty-three" as being incorrect (which it isn't) because that's the rules of their jargon. This would be like CompSci professors teaching their students that a kilometer is 1024 meters.

  23. I have the solution! by Michael.Forman · · Score: 3, Insightful


    I was really inspired by this question. It's a wonderful mix of mathematics and linguistics. Because a quick post to Slashdot couldn't cover it in enough detail, I wrote up some thoughts I had on the subject, which you can find here. Also included is information on how Americans and Europeans differ in their transliteration of base-ten numbers.

    Here's an excerpt:

    How does one transliterate numbers of arbitrary bases? For example the number "562" is transliterated as "five hundred and sixty two" but how would one transliterate the hex number "0xDEADBEEF"? The text below attempts to answer that question using two methods. The first is a rigorous and technically accurate method but is difficult to use. The second is technically less rigorous but is simple to use ...

    Michael.

    --
    Linux : Mac :: VW : Mercedes
    1. Re:I have the solution! by octalgirl · · Score: 1

      Man, do I feel stupid after looking at that!

    2. Re:I have the solution! by toast0 · · Score: 1

      "For example the number '562' is transliterated as 'five hundred and sixty two' ..."

      Actually the number "500.62" is transliterated as "five hundred and sixty two"... the number "562" is transliterated as "five hundred sixty two" Don't they teach this is elementry school anymore?

    3. Re:I have the solution! by toast0 · · Score: 1

      wow, don't i look like an idiot...

      make that last stinging statement "Don't they teach this in elementary school anymore?"

    4. Re:I have the solution! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well actually 500.62 is properly pronounced "five hundred and sixty two hundredths." Don't they teach THAT in elementary school anymore?

    5. Re:I have the solution! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe, but I dropped out of elementary school early to play for the NBA.

    6. Re:I have the solution! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      interesting proposal. I found the background on american and european the most useful. when are you going to add the information for japanese? maybe in time for a slashback? :^)

    7. Re:I have the solution! by pthisis · · Score: 1

      Actually the number "500.62" is transliterated as "five hundred and sixty two"... the number "562" is transliterated as "five hundred sixty two"

      Not in formal written American English (according to any of the major style guides--e.g. Associated Press, Columbia, etc) nor in British English at all.

      That usage is a jargon used by some American mathematicians but shouldn't be used if you're addressing a general audience (and is incorrect in formal standard American English, where "five hundred and sixty-two" means 562). The usage "five hundred point six two" is unambiguous for "500.62".

      Sumner

      --
      rage, rage against the dying of the light
  24. Re:Err, it's just the same as any other number sys by TheFr00n · · Score: 1

    I do get what you're saying, but consider that the spoken form assumes base ten - hence its terminology and interations of ten.

    This all comes of not having enough digits to begin with. If we could just have evolved with eight fingers on each hand ...

    --
    "By Grabthar's Hammer, what a savings."
  25. Re: Thanx! by WilDoane · · Score: 1

    This seems so obvious now that you say it, but I've never pronounced them using the phonetic codes. And, yes, I do get into a lot of confusing situations because of misunderstandings! And non-tech types always look at me funny when I say "SEE-THOUSAND" for C000.

  26. you're a troll by TheFr00n · · Score: 1

    FYI he prefers cricket.

    You sound as if someone you used to make do your homework is now your boss. Quit whining.

    --
    "By Grabthar's Hammer, what a savings."
  27. Hey, pity the poor Romans by crosbie · · Score: 1

    MCMLXXXVIII

    How do you say that in a hurry eh?

    And don't get me started on the US/UK difference in missing out 'and' e.g. 101 Dalmations:

    One Hundred AND One Dalmations
    vs
    One Hundred, One Dalmations.

    And how about Two gross, three dozen and four?

    "Thirteen Twenty", could be a year or a time.

    Four score and Ten
    vs
    Quatre Vingt Dix

  28. Yes by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 3, Funny

    Is there an official way of pronouncing a hexadecimal number like CF9?

    "Three thousand five hundred seventy seven."

    1. Re:Yes by oPless · · Score: 1
      or Cee Eff Nine
      or Charlie Foxtrot Nine

      BTW for you Americans out there, the rest of the world uses the NATO/Seaspeak Alphabet.
      • Alpha (also spelled Alfa)
      • Bravo,
      • Charlie,
      • Delta,
      • Echo,
      • Foxtrot,
      • Golf,
      • Hotel,
      • India,
      • Juliet,
      • Kilo,
      • Lima,
      • Mike,
      • November,
      • Oscar,
      • Papa,
      • Quebec,
      • Romeo,
      • Sierra,
      • Tango,
      • Uniform,
      • Victor,
      • Whiskey,
      • X-ray,
      • Yankee,
      • Zulu,

      It took me a while to wonder WTF yank films insist on saying "Baker" instead of "Bravo"
      I suppose it's because you can't spell COLOUR,
      FLAVOUR or any number of other words correctly.

      STOP BASTARDISING THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE DAMNIT!
      :-)
    2. Re:Yes by Milican · · Score: 1

      Its flava ya limey! Just kidding :)

      JOhn

    3. Re:Yes by pyrrho · · Score: 1

      ooooh, good answer.

      --

      -pyrrho

    4. Re:Yes by oPless · · Score: 1

      Argh!


      Stop

      This

      Madness

      Now!

      !!!!11

    5. Re:Yes by TummyX · · Score: 1

      Or more accurately:

      "Three thousand thread hundred twenty one."

    6. Re:Yes by TummyX · · Score: 1

      I meant three not thread.

      Been coding far too much.

    7. Re:Yes by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

      Oops. C is 12, not 13 :).

  29. Implied base 10 in oral speech by cgenman · · Score: 1

    There have been many, many comments along these lines here at slashdot (why would I expect more?), and it is just wrong.

    Twenty-three obviously represents a two in the second order digit and a three in the first order digit. In addition, our language has an implied base 10 marker, though not an inherent one. We did not name 2^6 number of sticks as "si-cs-ti-for", like we did a "pair" of sticks, we constructed that number out of a shared understanding of a base 10 numerical system.

    If you ask someone to write down "one, two, three, and four" and they do so as "1,10,11,100," that would be a conversion between bases. The proper way to read that back would either be "one binary, one zero binary, one one binary, one zero zero binary" or "binary one, ten, eleven, one hundred," depending upon whether the person you are speaking to ties colloquial number abbreviations to base 10 or not.

    If someone asked you to read the hexadecimal "23" (or in computer terms 0x23), the proper way is to say "twenty-three." If you had just said "thirty-five," the base-10 equivalent, you would not have communicated the number effectively: you would need to say "thirty-five base ten," at which point your friend would probably say he needed the hexidecimal, thank you.

    Any numbers you see or speak have an explicit or an implied base, whether you can see it or not.

    1. Re:Implied base 10 in oral speech by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      There's slightly more to it than that though, because the arabic numerals are named by base 10.

      The name of the numeral '2' is 'two'. The value of the numeral '2' is 2 in base ten, and any bases with a radix larger than 2.

      So, if I write, "what's 3 in binary?" you know that I mean I want 11 as the answer because you assume the 3 in the question is in a base higher than 2, so the numeral also has some implied value, and use beyond that of a symbol.

      Gee, this is challenging to describe in English... :)

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    2. Re:Implied base 10 in oral speech by Mr+Z · · Score: 1
      Gee, this is challenging to describe in English... :)

      Hence this joke, which is only funny when read: There are 10 types of people in the world--those who understand binary, and those who don't.

      Back to the topic... I personally use the same nomenclature for decimal and hex, suffixing my statement with the base when it's ambiguous. I'll say things like "twenty-three hex", "cee thousand hex". I rarely speak binary numbers, though. When I do, they're typically short enough that I'll just read the digits.

      --Joe
  30. Re: Thanx! by Tower · · Score: 1

    And the always helpful "Charlie-gazillion" (usually C0000000h), although "Charlie-eight-gazillion" (C8000000h) seems acceptable, as long as everyone knows you are dealing with a single word (2-byte word fans need not apply).

    --
    "It's tough to be bilingual when you get hit in the head."
  31. Obligatory Saturday Night Live Reference by MacGod · · Score: 1

    Keanu Reeves on Celebrity Jeopardy:

    Trebek: "And You wagered eleventy billion dollars. That's not even a real number"

    Reeves "...yet."

    Trebek "Simply stunning."

    Of course, I guess that's better than French Stewart's $Texas wager.

    --
    "Reality is merely an illusion, albeit a very persistent one " -Albert Einstein
  32. Here's a scheme by crosbie · · Score: 1

    For hex, we just need new terms for the powers, e.g.

    0 zero 10 hex 20 biex 10 hex
    1 one 11 hexune 21 biex one 20 biex
    2 two 12 hexadual 22 biex two 30 triex
    3 three 13 hexter 23 biex three 40 quadex
    4 four 14 hexaquad 24 biex four 50 quinex
    5 five 15 hexequine 25 biex five 60 sessex
    6 six 16 hexess 26 biex six 70 heptex
    7 seven 17 hexept 27 biex seven 80 octex
    8 eight 18 hexoct 28 biex eight 90 nonex
    9 nine 19 hexanone 29 biex nine a0 alphex
    a alp 1a alphexen 2a biex alp b0 bethex
    b bet 1b bethexen 2b biex bet c0 caphex
    c cap 1c caphexen 2c biex cap d0 dellex
    d dell 1d dellexen 2d biex dell e0 eechex
    e eek 1e eechexen 2e biex eek f0 fokex
    f foke 1f foxen 2f biex foke

    100 one hexted
    1000 hex hexted
    1,0000 one hexend
    10,0000 hex hexend
    100,000 one hexted hexend
    1000,0000 hex hexted hexend
    1,0000,0000 one hexillion

    2^64 one biexillion
    2^96 one triexillion
    2^128 one quadexillion

    Pronunciation guide
    hexune as in "hex yoon"
    hexanone rhymes with zone
    alphexen as in alfexen
    caphexen as in cafexen
    foxen rhymes with hoax
    biex as in "buy X"
    triex as in "try X"
    quinex as in "Quin X"
    nonex as in "Zone X"
    fokex as in "Broke X"

    Examples

    101 one hexted and one
    111 one hexted and hexune
    1CE = one hexted and caphex eek
    CF9 = cap hexted and fokex nine
    DEADBEEF = Dellex eek hexted and alphex dell hexend, bethex eek hexted and eechex foke

    Compare with a decimal approximation of 83286339, i.e.
    "Eighty three hundred and twenty eight 'tenthou', sixty three hundred and thirty nine"
    as opposed to
    "Eighty three million, two hundred and eighty six thousand, three hundred and thirty nine"

    In hex. 83326339 would be
    "Octex three hexted and triex two hexend, sessex three hexted and triex nine"

    1. Re:Here's a scheme by menasius · · Score: 1

      "DEADBEEF = Dellex eek hexted and alphex dell hexend, bethex eek hexted and eechex foke"

      In the news today, 12 computer scientists die from choking to death. Apparently, their colleagues stood by and watched thinking they must surely be trying to pronounce a hexidecimal number.

      -bort

  33. Soccer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why don't you kick around a fucking soccer ball or something.

    Then he'll get a severe ass kicking every single day! Soccer is a girls' sport.

    1. Re:Soccer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yay for generalizations. Windows is also for braindead drones, Linux is for pasty, pimply geeks (OK that one is true), BSD is dead, and you will never get laid (OK that one too).

  34. Can of cun.. by rf0 · · Score: 1

    Does efty-1-ninety remind anyone else of the shop keep out of League of Gentlemen?

    This is local site for local people

    Rus

  35. Hmm by jtheory · · Score: 1

    That's certainly interesting, and if I were writing a SF novel about a future in which the world had converted to hex, I might use it. Except by that time we'd probably have a more efficient means of communicating numbers to each other than speech....

    I wouldn't teach a kid that this was how to pronounce hex, anyway (see orig question); after all, conversation is about shared meaning, and if he's the only one in the room who knows what he's saying, he's not communicating. That's even worse than raising your kid speaking Klingon (where at least there are a *few* people out there who'll be able to figure out what he's saying).

    If you *really* need to be able to pronounce hex (instead of just typing or writing it!) just say "hex", pronounce each numeral, and use alpha bravo charlie delta echo foxtrot ("niner" instead of nine, if you want).

    Very simple, uses standards everyone understands (or can figure out in 5 seconds), is clear to the ear and easily transcribed (unlike saying "four hundred seventeen, in hex" and forcing the person to convert). Plus this works with ANY base!

    --
    Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler. -Albert Einstein

    --
    There are only 10 types of people: those who understand decimal, those who don't, and, uh, 8 other types I forget.
  36. sheesh by eglamkowski · · Score: 1

    What's wrong with just prouncing it "cee-eff-nine"?

    --
    Government IS the problem.
  37. I need spam!!! by me_is_farked · · Score: 1

    my professor is giving $50 to the person who can collect the most spam in 3 weeks so please forward me your inbox, sign me up for midget pr0n, post my email anywhere! My email is me_is_farked@yahoo.com the more the merrier!!!

    1. Re:I need spam!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good for you.

  38. One of my favorite songs: by chrysrobyn · · Score: 1

    One hundred buckets of bits on the bus,

    one hundred buckets of bits.

    Take one down,

    Short it to ground

    FF buckets of bits on the bus.

    ...

  39. Re:How about the places we call NEE! by ii-v-i-head · · Score: 1

    i have a simple idea. since you want to make a representation of the "number" through speech, then use pitch to represent the "place" of the number: something like C-3! F-2! 1-1! in the manner of Knights which say NEE! see: monty python

  40. Re:Err, it's just the same as any other number sys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Eight ? Man I want 16 on each, base 32 the only way to go baby.

  41. WOW by drxenos · · Score: 1

    The slashdot group will argue about ANYTHING! You guys are as bad as my daughter. She'd argue over the validity of 2 + 2 = 4.

    --


    Anonymous Cowards suck.
  42. Re:What's nice about the 1st 6 from aviation notat by Leigh13 · · Score: 1

    How is "dog" two syllables? Or "fox?"

    Just wondering....

    --

    What I should have said was nothing.
  43. It's easy by $beirdo · · Score: 1

    10 is pronounced "sixteen".
    11 is pronounced "seventeen".
    12 is pronounced "eighteen".
    13 is pronounced "nineteen".
    14 is pronounced "twenty".
    1E is pronounced "thirty".
    3E8 is pronounced "one thousand",

    Whether a number is written in decimal or hexidecimal or binary, its verbal representation is the same. A number is a number.

  44. in decimal, "and" = a decimal by sirshannon · · Score: 1

    it isn't "Four thousand seven hundred and twenty nine", it is "Four thousand seven hundred twenty nine".

    4729.5 - Four thousand seven hundred twenty nine and five tenths

  45. And beyond fifth grade they use "point" by yerricde · · Score: 1

    "four hundred thirty six and two tenths" = 436.2, or so says every first grade mathematics textbook I've ever seen.

    Of course, in practice, it's read "four hundred thirty-six point two" in the USA. Evidence: FM radio stations that say "ninety-five point one" rather than *"ninety-five and one tenth". In fact, saying "point" reinforces the difference between the inexact numeral 95.1 and the exact numeral 95+1/10.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
    1. Re:And beyond fifth grade they use "point" by ffsnjb · · Score: 1

      Of course, using "point" when referring to money would sound pretty retarded. If I ever see that on a check, I'll die laughing with a finger pointing and a hand on the gut.

      --
      "Why do you consent to live in ignorance and fear?" - Bad Religion
  46. Kid will be wrong anyway by SirLanse · · Score: 0

    He taught his kid Hexidecimal. He said 100 = 64 well that is OCTAL! in Hex 100 = 256.

  47. Re:What's nice about the 1st 6 from aviation notat by Some+Woman · · Score: 1

    Perhaps he is speaking of Alpha, Bravo, Charlie, Delta, Echo, Foxtrot, etc...

    --
    My dingo ate your honor student.
  48. Hey, you forgot! by zonix · · Score: 1

    "... two-four".

    Geez!

    z
    --
    What would an EWOULDBLOCK block, if an EWOULDBLOCK could block would? -- me
  49. Re:What's nice about the 1st 6 from aviation notat by Leigh13 · · Score: 1

    Ah ha... no one mentioned that in the parent. Thanks for the heads up!

    --

    What I should have said was nothing.
  50. On checks by yerricde · · Score: 1

    Of course, using "point" when referring to money would sound pretty retarded.

    Ah, the exception that proves the rule; however, there is a rule for exceptions to the rule. A check is a legal document, and legal documents tend not to use colloquialisms such as "point". But notice also that the fraction following the "and" in the amount field is written in figures ("and 53/100 XXXXXXXX"), not in words ("and fifty-three hundredths XXXXXXXX").

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
  51. hex - hexia - hexenium by yuri+benjamin · · Score: 1

    I propose using the suffix hex for multiples of 16^1,
    hexia for multiples of 16^2 and
    hexium for multiples of 16^3.

    Therefore I would pronounce CF9 as "Twelve-hexia, Effex, Nine"
    B3D1 would be "Elevenexium, threehexia, deehex, one"

    Note: A, B and C can be pronounced ten, eleven, twelve.
    D, E and F I would pronounce dee, ee and eff.

    --
    You make the mistake of thinking you can educate the fundamental stupidity out of people. You can't.
  52. Re:What's nice about the 1st 6 from aviation notat by dosowski · · Score: 1

    Hmm... Heads up indeed. Or perhaps eyes up. He did mention "aviation notation" in the subject line. But that's why I don't like it when people make the subject line the beginning of the first sentence of their post, then continuing it in the actual body. It makes it a bit confusing because it's so easy to skip past the subject line and get to the meat of the post. The subject line should be a reference to the body, but the body should be able to stand on its own.

  53. Re:What's nice about the 1st 6 from aviation notat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    SARCASM, dude

  54. corrections by Ayanami+Rei · · Score: 1

    Perhaps he is speaking of Alpha ...

    Exactly. But it's she. Thanks!

    --
    THIS THING CAN TURN ON A DIME, MACROSSZERO STYLE ALSO FUCK BETA, ~NYORON
  55. Re:What's nice about the 1st 6 from aviation notat by dosowski · · Score: 1

    Uh, sorry I don't see anything sarcastic there. Seriously. Don't you think that could have been an entirely straighforward conversation with no sarcasm. But this is Slashdot, we couldn't have that.

  56. How About? by 4of12 · · Score: 1

    Three thousand, three hundred and twenty-one?

    Tell your son that rules for formal pronunciation require on-the-fly conversion to decimal.

    Informally, he can say either "zero eks cee eff nine", or "cee eff nine base sixteen".

    If he's smart, he'll figure out it's less work to settle for the serialization scheme of pronunciation.

    Shoot, for very large or very many decimal numbers that you have to read over the phone the serialization protocol is typically what is used.

    You don't hear many folks talk about their checking account balances of "four hundred eighty-seven undecillion, nine hundred seventeen decillion, ...."

    --
    "Provided by the management for your protection."