Slashdot Mirror


Nebula Award Winners, Hugo Nominees Announced

CBNobi writes "The 2002 Nebula Award winners have been announced this weekend. The winner for best novel was American Gods by Neil Gaiman (reviewed here at Slashdot), and the winner for best script was LotR:The Fellowship of the Ring. The nominees for the 2003 Hugo Awards have also been announced; Episodes of Enterprise, Firefly, and Buffy are all nominated for best short form dramatic presentation, and LotR and Spirited Away are among the nominees for best long form presentation."

122 comments

  1. Hugo 2003 - Short Form Dramatic by ZPO · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Hmmm,

    Firefly - Cancelled (and it was just getting fun)

    Enterprise - Might be cancelled soon

    Buffy - Wrapping up the series? (don't watch it, but recall the wife mentioning it.)

    Should it be seen as a sign of the times that the nominees are all either going or gone? Makes you wonder about the intelligence of the masses. Oh wait, we already know about the intelligence of the masses.

    1. Re:Hugo 2003 - Short Form Dramatic by Jerf · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm using this category as a yardstick for how much to care about the Hugos in the future. I'm not demanding that Firefly win, as I don't watch Buffy and can't fairly compare the two. But Enterprise should lose.

      A Night in Sickbay and Carbon Creek are absolutely atrocious and pretty bad, respectively. Neither is a shining example of drama.

      Do read the links, and note that while there is some continuity criticism that you might be willing to ignore for the sake of a Hugo (though even that should count against them; why is it only Star Trek, of all the shows on TV, gets to ignore and even actively contradict continuity whenever it feels like it? it's in a league all its own), the criticism is mostly about the piss-poor dramatic structure of the episodes. (Admittedly Carbon Creek is the best the show had to offer, which isn't saying much; poke around some of the other critiques on that site and you'll see what I mean. He sold me pretty thoroughly on his opinions, and the only reason I'd watch Enterprise now is to see him deconstruct it.)

    2. Re:Hugo 2003 - Short Form Dramatic by lowmagnet · · Score: 1

      Please read the rest of the website for examples of how much not better the guy who runs it is than B&B.

      --
      Heute die Welt, morgen das Sonnensystem!
    3. Re:Hugo 2003 - Short Form Dramatic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Enterprise & Buffy making it to the final 5 makes you wonder about the intelligence of the few. Buffy has lost it this year, and Enterprise never had it.

      Where's Farscape? I know I nominated it.

    4. Re:Hugo 2003 - Short Form Dramatic by defaulthtm · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Buffy is wrapping up but as a series probably has reached the end of its natural life. If you look at the season villains they have got larger and larger (by season 1: The Master - Uber Vamp; 2: Spike, Angel, Dru - Multiple uber vamps; 3: The Mayor - My personal fav big bad; 4: Adam - Frankenstein's demon; 5: Glory - a god; 6: Willow gone evil; 7: The first evil) to the point that it will be very difficult to top the current big bad. A spin off appears to be in the works. that may have SMG guest appearances.

      Angel hasn't been renewed yet either. That is fairly disappointing.

      Enterprise has been terrible since the get go. The suggestion that they weren't going to use technology to solve problems was a blatant lie and basic Star Trek races (Vulcans for example) ended up being written so badly it was astonishing.

      --
      K
    5. Re:Hugo 2003 - Short Form Dramatic by Jerf · · Score: 1

      Ah, good ole' ad hominem.

      I don't care if he's Hitler, his criticisms seem valid to me. I didn't browse around much more of the site, proto-sci-fi Universes don't interest me, they're a dime a dozen. I've got one myself. Until they make it to a final product I've got better things to do.

  2. The problem with network TV shows. by MtViewGuy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Unfortunately, it also says way too much about how short-sighted TV executives are nowadays.

    TV executives frequently do not like hour-long dramas due to the high cost of production per hour; they still (unfortunately for us TV viewers :( ) like reality shows because reality shows have relatively low cost of production per hour. Even with its exotic locales, the best-known reality show (Survivor) is still a bargain compared to shows like the now-cancelled Firefly, the soon-to-end Buffy: The Vampire Slayer, and the potentially-cancelled Enterprise.

    The days of a network letting a show find its audience are long over. You'll never see anything like how NBC allowed Hill Street Blues to eventually become a big hit again.

    1. Re:The problem with network TV shows. by iabervon · · Score: 2, Interesting

      They're also particularly down on shows that require a lot of special effects and sets every episode. Law & Order, for instance, is probably a lot cheaper, because it only needs an occasional stunt. The real problem is that they keep coming up with new shows to fill the timeslots and viewer segments vacated by shows they cancelled, meaning that sci-fi TV is full of shows you haven't gotten into yet and shows that are being cancelled. If the shows are trying not to be short or interchangable, it's not going to be good storytelling.

      On the other hand, if they made a sci-fi reality show, I'd watch that. Perhaps a show like Firefly, except that they killed off a character each week, with the plot point that something really great was going to happen to any crew member who survived the season. Alternatively, "Survivor: B5" would be really amusing; you follow a set of random residents who have to avoid getting themselves killed by the disasters that are always happening on the station, and also have to avoid getting voted out an airlock, shipped back to their home planet, etc.; it would be based on interpersonal skills and dexterity, but with more exciting things they have to do.

    2. Re:The problem with network TV shows. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unfortunatly this wasn't enough to stop NBC from bringing back Hunter after a 10 year hiatus.

  3. Kiln Boring by N8F8 · · Score: 0, Troll

    I finished Kiln People last week after a slow two weeks of slugging through it. Flat-out one of the most boring books I've ever read. Interresting ideas, but one boring book.

    --
    "God fights on the side with the best artillery." - Napoleon, Marshal of France - speaking truth to power
  4. Re:I'm glad Ian McLeod didn't read anything by Colm+Buckley · · Score: 3, Interesting

    That's an amusing troll; it's a little too reactionary to be convincing, however.

    For what it's worth, China Miéville, who was nominated, is considerably further to the "left" than Ian McLeod; in fact Mr Miéville has stood for Parliament on behalf of a political party you would no doubt dub "sophomoric Marxist".

    Not everyone subscribes to the last-man-standing-wins model of American capitalism.

  5. Umm where's Alias? Whatever. by Kibo · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I guess the Joss Whedon, Rick Berman & Brannon Braga mutual admiration society didn't leave any room for something watchable.

    --
    --Jimmy has fancy plans; and pants to match.
  6. Gah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That there are two substandard Enterprise episodes on the Hugo nomination list is proof enough that the folks making the nominations are totally insane. I mean, come on "A Night in Sickbay" is widely considered one of the worst Star Trek episodes ever committed to film.

  7. Re:Newflash by andy666 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    no it's really just the opposite. people treat "art" as this holy thing that isn't supposed to be something enjoyable.

  8. Re:I'm glad Ian McLeod didn't read anything by prbt · · Score: 1

    I hope this is a troll.

    "Americans bad. Capitalism bad. Socialism good. Drugs good. High technology cool, but the best technology (computers and aerospace) is American. Don't ask us to reconcile that." - you seriously can't think of what sort of people might subscribe to these views?

    "I'm glad to see the Nebula voters have voted for right-thinking, American-proud authors like Gaimain, and avoided socialist anti-American clap-trap like McLeod[.]" Sorry, have I missed something, do the Klan and NRA write sci-fi now?

  9. Re:I'm glad Ian McLeod didn't read anything by j-b0y · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Ian McLeod is Scottish, for a start. I know it seems like a subtle difference, but at least try and get it right.

    Ian Mcleod is a socialist and has written some pretty intersting stuff about how the future might work if you do not accept the inevitability of near-future societies that are nation-state economies driven by Capitalism. He nails the US, because of its arch-Capitalist nature, and ironically tags the UN as behoven to the US.

    I guess he got pretty fed up with seeing the future solely portrayed as a Captialist utopia, something which he disagrees with. It's nothing personal, just another point of view.

    --
    Please remain calm, there is no reason to pani... wait, where are you all going?
  10. American Gods by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Oh man, this was an awesome book. It actually got passed around in my group of friends... one guy who doesn't read a whole lot really loved it. It's weird, that'd never happened before. It really is a great book.

    1. Re:American Gods by asdfx · · Score: 1

      I have to disagree. I found the book to be just 'ok'. It had some interesting ideas, but the main character was completely unintriguing (although, some of the other characters were more interesting). His name was 'Shadow', for Darwin's sake. The battle at the end was short and left much to be desired. I gave it to a friend to read as he found the topic interesting the way I had. He was also less than impressed. Doom's Day Book was awesome Sci-Fi and it won the Hugo and Nebula awards. I wouldn't put Gods in the same class as Doom's Day, not really close.

    2. Re:American Gods by Evil+Pete · · Score: 1

      'awesome' ? Um don't think so. You know, when it was released and everyone was talking about it I got really enthused and went to various bookstores looking for it here (in au). Nope. No luck. Never heard of him. No sign of him on the bookshelves at all in the SF section. Finally, found a copy at a discount table in a supermarket at 1/3 normal price. Read it and ... it was ok, well written ... but as SF ? Eh. Not impressed, well not as SF novel of the year thats for sure! In fact it reminded me of R.L. Lafferty and a book of his called 'Fourth Mansions' from about 30 years ago .. very similar but Mansions was funny instead.

      Right now I have started on the 'Culture' novels of Iain Banks, "Consider Phlebas" ... and that is good heady SF ... yep awesome. But American Gods was disappointing.

      --
      Bitter and proud of it.
  11. Re:Newflash by Michael+Dorfman · · Score: 3, Interesting

    OK, maybe it's me, but I didn't find "American Gods" particularly enjoyable. In fact, I found it to be pretty lame. If that was the best Science Fiction novel of the year, I guess I have a better understanding of why I tend not to read much SF.

  12. Re:Newflash by bsartist · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I think it was actually a fairly slow year for SF. Kim Stanley Robinson's "The Years of Rice and Salt" got good reviews, but for me it dragged - I couldn't even finish it. Maybe I'll try again. David Brin's "Kiln People" was better, but it wasn't his best.

    To be honest, I think it's been a slow decade for SF. Many of the Great Ones of the genre - from Asimov to Zelazny - are gone, and the younger generation seems to still be searching for its voice.

    --
    Lost: Sig, white with black letters. No collar. Reward if found!
  13. Long form presentation by bsartist · · Score: 3, Funny

    At 3+ hours, The Fellowship of the Ring gives new meaning to the term "long form presentation." ;-)

    --
    Lost: Sig, white with black letters. No collar. Reward if found!
  14. Re:I'm glad Ian McLeod didn't read anything by bsartist · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm glad to see the Nebula voters have voted for right-thinking, American-proud authors like Gaimain

    LOL! Neil Gaiman is British.

    --
    Lost: Sig, white with black letters. No collar. Reward if found!
  15. Re:Newflash by RickHunter · · Score: 3, Interesting

    And IMHO, its found it in Wil McCarthy. If you haven't read The Collapsium, do so now. Reasonably hard science fiction by someone who can actually write? Sign me up!

    Seriously, there's a lot of good new science fiction and space opera authors popping up recently. Some good fantasy authors too. Most are still finding their way and struggling to stand out amidst the tide of mindless Tolkien clones and talentless hacks, but they are there. And then there's older space opera/sci-fi authors, like Bujold, that're still doing good work. I think the '90s was the slow decade, and what we're seeing now is a resurgance.

    As for TV, give up on the American networks already. They haven't produced anything worthwhile since Next Generation and Babylon-5, and they're not going to anytime soon. Not while they treat the viewer as an inconvenient obstacle between them and their money and use legislation instead of innovation to protect their revenue. Turn to Japan for your sci-fi TV fix, and watch shows like Crest of the Stars (and Banner of the Stars, and the other soon-to-follow sequel series), Legend of the Galactic Heroes, Gundam, Macross, and the new Ghost in the Shell TV series.

    (Anime sci-fi shows named off the top of my head. There's a couple dozen other great ones you can find if you look.)

  16. Re:I'm glad Ian McLeod didn't read anything by etigidy · · Score: 2, Informative

    Actually, Ken McLeod wrote Cosmonaut Keep. I haven't read it, but I imagine it can't be too different in political views from his other books like Stone Canal and The Cassini Division, both of which I didn't enjoy. Ian McLeod wrote other stuff, which I've never read.

  17. Vote for firefly! by Snaller · · Score: 1

    How do you vote anyway? :)

    --
    If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
    1. Re:Vote for firefly! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      The Nebula Awards are selected by the writers themselves.

      The Hugo Awards are awarded by members of that year's World Science Fiction Convention, which this year is Torcon 3 in Toronto.

      If you just want to vote without attending the convention, you can buy a supporting membership. It's rather pricey ($40 US), but you get some other perqs. The attending membership is $185 US.

      I went to the Chicago Worldcon a few years back. It was a blast! Expensive, but fun.

  18. Re:Newflash by shadowbearer · · Score: 1

    Pretty slow, but there were some highlights, like David Weber/Baen coming out with War of Honor (the first book to _ever_ include a CD in the back which contains the entire series and lots more books).

    There should be an award for "Best Publishing Innovation of the Year." :-)

    SB

    --
    It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
  19. ANISB hilarity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Come on. How could an episode revolving entirely around the erotic dreams of the Captain about his super-hot Vulcan first officer NOT win a Hugo?

  20. Charles Stross by smugfunt · · Score: 3, Informative
    Nominations for the Best Novelette Category
    (377 people submitted nominations for 149 novelettes)

    "Halo" by Charles Stross (Asimov's 6/02)


    Go Charlie!
    Apart from writing great science fiction Charlie writes the Linux column in the UK's Computer Shopper magazine.
  21. is it me... by sigep_ohio · · Score: 1

    or do these sci-fi and fantasy awards seem like people in these sectors of entertainment simply jerking each other off, because the long standing awards groups don't give them the recognition they feel they deserve.

    Don't get me wrong, i love sci-fi and fantasy. But some of the shows up for awards in the hugos, don't deserve any type of nomination or recognition. As for the nebula awards, I don't get to read much(I am too lazy, and I grew up in america so I don't know how to read), but shouldn't critical and/or monetary success be enough. I mean if people buy your book or a critic whose opinion you value says it is good, do you really need an official award or nomination saying it is a good piece of writing?

    --
    Beer Die is the game of champions Learning To walk my own path.
    1. Re:is it me... by imsabbel · · Score: 1

      Do you really need official awards saying that an actor or movie is good?.
      Hey, with a book it makes more sense. you need a lot more time to read a book than to watch a movie. If a movie sucks, you lost 2 hours. if you try to finish a novel for 3 weeks only to find out it doest get better, well then you lost a lot more time....

      So you want some kind of review/award system to see the gems of the genere, but if "conventional" media either ignores or geekifies all the stuff, you need special awards.
      HEy, it only the nebular and the hugo.
      If you really wanna see people jerking off each other, watch the next emmy award.

      --
      HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
    2. Re:is it me... by sigep_ohio · · Score: 1

      In a way, I was saying the the whole awards process is flawed(not that I have a better solution though). Merely, that unless we award everyone, there is always someone who complains. but who wants that kind of a situation, it would be like first grade art class. I think we are grown up enough to accept the fact that some peoples art is better than others.

      As for genre descrimination, I think that would be taken care of somewhat if awards were done in a similar fashion to dog shows. each genre as its awards(with only people familiar with or working in the genre voting), then the winners from each genre could be stacked up against each other(everyone would vote here) for a 'Best In Show' style finish. it might take longer, and it certainly isn't perfect but it is a start.

      As for books, like I said I don't read much. I do understand that books are a heavy time investment and that you don't want to read a crap novel as much as you watch crap movies(and man there are a lot). But isn't that what book clubs and critics(those you trust) are for? Like I said before, no system is perfect though.

      The emmys are one big jerk-off session. The oscars are getting there. Who ever heard of giving someone an award because they got shafted the last time, because the previous winner was shafted the time before that? I mean wtf? Atleast the Hugo and nebular seem to award who deserves it this year, not someone who should have one it for previous work. Those awards are called Lifetime Achievement awards, and they are much nicer(IMO) than a single performance award.

      --
      Beer Die is the game of champions Learning To walk my own path.
  22. American Gods - Highly Overrated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    IMO, the only reason that American Gods has any popularity is because of Slashdot. (I myself read it because of the glowing review it got here.) But I think it has to be the most overrated book I have ever had the displeasure to read. I found it mind-numbingly boring for vast sections of the book and whenever the story did manage to veer into interesting territory, Gaiman skillfully managed to yank it back into mind-numbing territory in quick order.

    Glad to see it didn't make the Hugo Award list.

    1. Re:American Gods - Highly Overrated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IMO, the only reason that American Gods has any popularity is because of Slashdot. (I myself read it because of the glowing review it got here.) But I think it has to be the most overrated book I have ever had the displeasure to read. I found it mind-numbingly boring for vast sections of the book and whenever the story did manage to veer into interesting territory, Gaiman skillfully managed to yank it back into mind-numbing territory in quick order.

      I couldn't agree more. How Gaiman managed to take a great story idea and make it a chore to read is beyond me. Did no other novels come out last year that were more worthy of the Hugo than this? I fear for the state of the genre.

    2. Re:American Gods - Highly Overrated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative
      But the reason that American Gods didn't make the Hugo Award nominees list this year is because it won the Hugo Award last year. It also won the Bram Stoker award from the Horror Writers Association.

      I thought it was a brilliant book that demanded a lot and gave a lot back. Also Ghodammned funny.

    3. Re:American Gods - Highly Overrated by dancomfort · · Score: 1

      Please moderate parent up. Thanks!

    4. Re:American Gods - Highly Overrated by zhevek · · Score: 1

      I really love The Sandman comics, but Gaiman has disappointed me with both books I've read by him: American Gods and Neverwhere. Both were above average reads, but nothing spectacular. His best book is Good Omens, but he co-authored that with Terry Pratchett. However, it is one of the funniest books I have ever read (right up there with the Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy books).

  23. Farscape and Others Forgotten by derrickh · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Enterprise gets 2 nominations and Whedon gets 3?
    How about dumping the Trek spinoffs and put a couple of episodes of Farscape in. I'll put 'Prayer' up agaist 'Night in SickBay' any day of the week. And 'Carbon Creek' pales up against 'Kansas'.

    Also, this shows you how important mindshare is. By many peoples account, Firefly was a show with potential, but it wasn't really good yet. But Whedon's name on it made people believe that it has to be great and deserves an award.

    Solaris was easily the most 'sci-fi' movie of the year but Spiderman gets a nod instead?

    D

    1. Re:Farscape and Others Forgotten by Khomar · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Actually, Firefly was already quite good in its first season. The acting and writing was very good, and the crew really had excellent chemistry. It is true that the show did not really have a strong plot (it was just starting to get into the main story), but the characters were already well defined and joy to watch. There was a good amount of mystery that definitely added to the enjoyment. Unfortunately, we will never get to see where they were going.

      I have over the years watched less and less television due to the poor quality of the nearly every show until Firefly came along. I did not watch it because of Whedon. I had very little experience with any of his shows, and being somewhat anit-vampires, his name was actually more of a detriment in my mind (misguided or not). I watched the show because I was hoping to find a good sci-fi show that I could really get into, and I did. In my mind, the quality of the show had little to do with names but rather the care put into the dialog, the attention to detail (no sound in space), and the incredible acting and chemistry (especially for a first season). Its really too bad that Firefly is gone for good.

      --

      I believe in de-evolution. God made the world perfect, man fell, and its been going downhill ever since!

    2. Re:Farscape and Others Forgotten by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I nominated 4 eps of Farscape, and left my 5th slot blank.

    3. Re:Farscape and Others Forgotten by RedWizzard · · Score: 1
      In my mind, the quality of the show had little to do with names but rather the care put into the dialog, the attention to detail (no sound in space)
      That's Whedon in a nutshell: fantastic dialog and attention to detail.
    4. Re:Farscape and Others Forgotten by Mark+Atwood · · Score: 1

      If that's how you feel, why didn't you nominate them. Nominations and votes are not done by some secret cabal. Nominations are from all of the members/attendees of last year's and this year's WorldCon (2002 ConJose in San Jose, and 2003 TorCon in Toronto), and the vote is by members/attendees of this year's WorldCon.

      If you don't join and vote, you have zero right to bitch about it.

      You don't even have to buy a full membership and fly to those cities, you can just buy a simple voting membership.

  24. reality television by Ender+Ryan · · Score: 1
    As far as I can tell, people are getting sick and tired of "reality television". While reality shows may still be gaining viewers(I dunno, do you?), many, many people I know are sick to death of them and are turning away from television moreso than before.

    I think this just goes to demonstrate your point even further, that networks are only thinking short-term these days.

    Is there not a single competent businessman among the bunch? A competent businessman would think long-term instead of going after short-term gain.

    What are the networks going to have left when the reality tv ratings drop off? Nothing.

    --
    Sticking feathers up your butt does not make you a chicken - Tyler Durden
    1. Re:reality television by HiThere · · Score: 1

      They'll pass laws making it illegal to compete against them. After all, if people aren't watching them, there *must* be illegal competition causing it.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    2. Re:reality television by RickHunter · · Score: 1

      The thing is, "competent businessmen" these days are defined as those that only think about the short term. After all, that's what gets them the big bonuses, and when things start going all wahoonie-shaped, all the decision-makers can bail out with their golden parachutes and leave everyone else to die. Sacrificing short-term profits, even a little, for long-term stability and growth and an even bigger payoff ten years down the road is seen as stupid, unprofitable, irresponsible, and professional suicide.

      And what do we have to show for it? A domestic economy that's in shambles, that's what.

    3. Re:reality television by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What are the networks going to have left when the reality tv ratings drop off? Nothing.

      Ah, yes. Doom and gloom. It's a shame the production companies all went out of business and bulldozered those soundstages...

      Oh, wait. They didn't. Hmm. Maybe... just maybe... if and when the pendulum swings back from reality television shot on location on video to filmed dramas shot on soundstages... just MAYBE they'll be ready.

      Idiot. Fucking idiot.

  25. Re:Newflash by Tycho · · Score: 2, Informative

    One relatively new author that I like is Alastair Reynolds. He is a scientist who works for the ESA currently and he is a reasonably good writer too. However, he is British and his books are generally released about a year earlier in the UK than in the US. His first two books "Revalation Space" and "Chasm City" are reasonably easy to find in the US. His third book "Redemption Ark" should be out in June in the US.

    --
    Impersonating Tycho from Penny Arcade since before there was a PA.
  26. Re:Umm where's Alias? Whatever. by Jerf · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'd have a hard time calling Alias sci-fi. The only sci-fi aspects (rather then fairly realistic and current science) are the Rambaldi storylines, and given what we've seen so far, I'm more inclined to call that fantasy then sci-fi.

    It's a hard call because that storyline is so small and not-well exposited (to keep it mysterious) that you can't get a "feel" for it. I call it fantasy because right now the artifacts are basically working like magic, returning life to long-dead things and so on.

    I admit that my current #1 theory to explain Rambaldi is that he is indeed a space alien who couldn't or wouldn't go home, but that's my theory, not official show theory. ;-)

  27. Re:Newflash (more anime) by OoSync · · Score: 1

    Last night I just discovered fansubbed versions of _Last Exile_. Awesome visual style harkening to the WWI era of aircraft mixed with Star Wars pod racing. Just plain *Frikin' A*. Get it from Anime-Kraze as a Bit Torrent download.

    --

    I always get the shakes before a drop.
  28. bah! by Ender+Ryan · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I put down Cosmonaut Keep. It was just ridiculously silly and blatantly attacking America. I myself strongly criticize America, my home, because it is deserving of a lot of criticism with freedoms being abridged recklessly by some. But that book was ridiculous, and McLeod's socialist ideas were... juvenile.

    --
    Sticking feathers up your butt does not make you a chicken - Tyler Durden
    1. Re:bah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anybody who whines about the "freedoms being abridged recklessly" and doesn't throw in an entire paragraph-- or at least a mention in passing-- about responsibility instantly gets branded an idiot in my book.

  29. I feel really old :-( by esconsult1 · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I grew up reading Niven, Blish, Asimov, Silverberg Vance and others. Its kinda hard for me to start reading some of the new masters, not because I wouldn't like them, but maybe because I'm too lazy to explore new books (yeah, I know that's bad).

    But my dilemma is this, I've read all Sci-Fi/Fantasy from Asimov, Niven, Vance, but have not yet finished all the works of the old masters.

    Can any younger (or at least more flexible) Slashdot reader suggest a few authors that they've read and liked? I don't want to get into serials right now, perhaps something that is sort of standalone would be better as an introduction to a new author, I think.

    1. Re:I feel really old :-( by Tar-Palantir · · Score: 1

      Have you read any Orson Scott Card? He writes in various genres, but he has some excellent science fiction (particularly Ender's Game and Pastwatch)

    2. Re:I feel really old :-( by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I sympathize - I used to read tons of SF, but over the past decade or so haven't kept up. I want to get back into it, and my plan of action is simple - you might want to consider a similar approach. First, get the list of Hugo and Nebula and World Fantasy Award winners for the past 10 years. Read everything that's on both lists, then start in on stuff that makes one list. Then start following up on other works by authors who appeal to you. And start looking in on nominees for the awards who didn't win. Oh, and winners of the John W. Campbell award for best new writer.

      And once you're done with the awards, check out the "Year's Best" compilations.

    3. Re:I feel really old :-( by SquadBoy · · Score: 2, Informative

      The "and others" leaves a lot of room but I'll try.

      David Drake - Great Military SF.

      Jerry Pournelle - But I'm sure he is one of the "others".

      John Ringro - I just started on some of his stuff and he is *good*.

      Neal Stephenson - Great just plain great.

      David Brin, Greg Bear,

      --

      Cypherpunks: Civil Liberty Through Complex Mathematics. Those who live by the sword die by the arrow.
    4. Re:I feel really old :-( by HiThere · · Score: 1

      Charles Stross. (Figure out what he's saying. Take him seriously.)
      Robert Forward. (Classic hard SF with new technology.)

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    5. Re:I feel really old :-( by idfrsr · · Score: 1

      Neal Stephenson - great what I have read so far.

      Orson Scott Card - some of the more interesting books I have read (pastwatch, ender's game, homecoming series)

      Iain (M.) Banks - Banks is in my opinion one of the most underated writers of the day. With (sci-fi) or without (reg. fiction) the 'M.' his books are very good. Particulaly Excession, Player of Games, and The Crow Road, and The Wasp Factory.

      --
      "The large print giveth, and the small print taketh away" -Tom Waits
    6. Re:I feel really old :-( by gmuslera · · Score: 2, Informative
      I'm also an old-school sci-fi reader, but there are a lot of relatively new authors that have very good books.

      I'm not sure what you call old scifi. I put in that category authors not because I think their stories looks like watching 2001, but because I grew knowing them so I don't remember when I first read something from them. In that category I put maybe modern writers like Greg Bear, Samuel Delany, Daniel Keyes, John Brunner or Alfred Bester, and all of them have good books.

      For a list of what I have in my bookshelf from not "old" writers and I think that are pretty good, I should say:

      • Orson Scott Card: is a good one, and I must add to his good books Treason. I don't think that the rest of the Ender serie is as good as the first book, but anyway is a good reading.
      • Iain Banks: I read from him part of the Culture series, and is very good.
      • Julian May: The saga in the pliocene is pretty good.
      • Dan Simmons: I'm not read a log from him, but Hyperion is between my preferred books books.
      • John Varley: you must read "the persistence of vision" or whatever is called in english :-)
      • Terry Pratchett: Is not exactly sci-fi, not exactly fantasy, not exactly humor, but is a good mix of all of this.
      • Gregory Benford: have a good serie on the galactic centre, not sure about other books from he.
    7. Re:I feel really old :-( by asylum · · Score: 1

      Although I'm only in my 20s, I read all of the sci-fi classics in high school, and then sort-of dropped the genre until recently. Some authors with which I have recently connected:

      Neil Gaman - More fantasy than sci-fi, but intelligent and very entertaining. Start with "Stardust". It's a quick read, and even my wife enjoyed it

      Bruce Sterling - He's not exactly new, but definitely more recent than Asimov and Niven. "Schismatrix" is a impressive and original piece of sci-fi.

      Neil Stephenson - Stephenson has become my favorite contemporary author. His books are massive, but are so entertaining that I literally can't put them down. All of his novels are incredible, but I would recommend you start with "Snow Crash"

    8. Re:I feel really old :-( by Michael+Crutcher · · Score: 1
      The whole Ender's game series is awesome. Its perfect for introducing people to science fiction. The ideas that the books present get progressively deeper so that even non sci-fi fans can find themeselves enjoying some pretty geeky stuff.

      Speaker for the dead (the second in the Enders series) is my favorite. It starts slow, methodically laying out the backstory, but crescendos into a very satisfying ending. I think Card's discussion of a network that could be considered an intelligent "alien" lifeform is great. Makes you wonder if the internet will at some time in the future become "self aware"

      CleverSig mySig = null;

    9. Re:I feel really old :-( by Scarblac · · Score: 4, Informative

      To my amazement, no-one has mentioned Vernor Vinge yet. His last two novels, _A Fire Upon The Deep_ and _A Deepness In The Sky_ are absolutely superb. They both won both Hugo and Nebula, iirc.

      Another author I like is Greg Egan. Try _Diaspora_ and/or _Permutation City_. His ideas are way out there, but always very interesting.

      --
      I believe posters are recognized by their sig. So I made one.
    10. Re:I feel really old :-( by IvyMike · · Score: 2, Informative

      First, you should check out the Internet Top 100 SF/Fantasy List, which does contain many of the classics you've read, but also has a lot of newer authors you haven't read. It also usually has a number of classics from authors such as Lem and Strugatsky that you may not know.

      I agree with most of the suggestions given in this thread so far. I'd also suggest looking into: "Diaspora", Greg Egan; "A Fire Upon The Deep", Vernor Vinge; The Book of the New Sun series by Gene Wolfe.

    11. Re:I feel really old :-( by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, VV kicks ass. Also try The Peace War and Marooned in Realtime, which I haven't read but am desperately searching for.

      Btw, FUtD and DitS only won the Hugo both years, not the Nebulas.

    12. Re:I feel really old :-( by RickHunter · · Score: 1

      Give Wil McCarthy's The Collapsium a try. It reads very much like Niven and Asimov at their best. You might also like some of David Weber's stand-alone books (Path of the Fury, The Apocalypse Troll). Greg Bear might interest you, though one must be careful - some of his books are great, while others are absolutely terrible. I found Moving Mars to be one of the best, having both interesting ideas and good writing. You might also like Timothy Zahn's Manta's Gift or Angelmass - again, they have a similar feel to Asimov and Niven.

    13. Re:I feel really old :-( by maxpublic · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately most of the 'new masters' can't hold a candle to the old ones. I keep hunting for folks who can do the job, but they're few and far between with miles of dreck to trudge through from one distant shining light to another.

      Remember, this is the age where excruciatingly bad D&D novels are popular and are considered to be 'fantasy' instead of 'product placement ads'. With a few exceptions (George R. R. Martin comes to mind) the 'oldies but goodies' are pretty much still the best the market has to offer.

      Max

      --
      My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
    14. Re:I feel really old :-( by defaulthtm · · Score: 1

      I am also an old school sf reader and there are only a few writers that I look forward to publications from at this point.

      1. Orson Scott Card - I have to plan on not sleeping when I purchase one of his books, I just read them until they are done to the exclusion of all else.

      2. Neil Gaiman - American Gods is well worth the time.

      3. Tim Powers - nearly always a new story

      4. Tonya Huff - mental junk-food but the good kind :-)

      5. Laurell K. Hamilton - Ann Rice with what is usually a different story every book instead of publishing the same story with different names.

      Really I have found that in large part that the stories that are actually new have been few and far between. I wish Harlen Ellison was still being creative and someone could fill the shoes of Phil Dick but have found myself falling back on classic mystery (Rex Stout) and humor (Wodehouse) but those tend to be somewhat repetitive as well. At least the characters are well written.

      --
      K
    15. Re:I feel really old :-( by Tiny+Elvis · · Score: 1

      Another vote for Vernor Vinge here. Across Realtime is a great book, one of my all time favorites.

    16. Re:I feel really old :-( by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Robert Sawyer is doing a lot of interesting writing these days. I enjoyed his dinosaur-world series ("Far-Seer", "Foreigner", and "Fossil-Hunter") quite a bit--and each can stand on its own--but would also strongly recommend "End of an Era".

      I'd also check out the sf anthologies that Orson Scott Card edited: "Future on Fire" and "Future on Ice". I like anthologies as a way of finding new authors without having to get through an entire book.

    17. Re:I feel really old :-( by Xtifr · · Score: 1

      Its kinda hard for me to start reading some of the new masters, not because I wouldn't like them, but maybe because I'm too lazy to explore new books (yeah, I know that's bad).

      I've said it before, and I'll say it again. One of the best ways to discover new, good authors is to check out awards lists and award nominees. I've been reading SF since the late sixties, and most of my favorite new authors I've discovered in the last quarter century or so have come off of award nominee lists. Of course, I probably miss a few good ones this way, but I have discovered so many good authors that I really don't feel deprived.

      A good place to start might be Locus Mag's Online list of SF Awards. If you can't find some interesting stuff to check out from browsing that, you're beyond lazy. :)

      Just as a ferexample: if a book wins both the Hugo (award from fans) and the Nebula (award from writers), chances are pretty high that it's a pretty durn good book. Have you read everything on this list? (The only one on that list that didn't impress me is "Dreamsnake".)

    18. Re:I feel really old :-( by Katharine · · Score: 1

      A few more suggestions, in addition to the excellent ones already put forth:

      David Weber, the "Honor Harrington" series. Excellent military s-f, do not miss it.

      Sherri Tepper ("Gate to Women's Country" is quite apropos right now, and I really liked "Fresco." But these may be too feminist for some)

      C.S. Friedman--brilliant! Especially "This Alien Shore."

      Elizabeth Moon, "Deed of Paksenarrion" is very good, but long (and you can hear the dice rolling in the background from time to time in book one), and the s-f stories about Herris Serrano of the space navy are excellent (the trilogy that starts with "Hunting Party is a fine choice for young women in particular, kind of like the McCaffrey "Pern" books but should be entertaining for everyone). For those who are leery of reading books with a military theme written by a woman, please note that Ms. Moon is a former Marine.

      Lois McMaster Bujold. Great fun, even my 70 year old retired scientist father enjoys her books. Reminds me a little of Heinlein before he got really weird. "Cordelia's Honor" is a good place to start.

      John Barnes, his characters also remind me of Heinlein.

    19. Re:I feel really old :-( by Katharine · · Score: 1

      I almost forgot: "To Say Nothing of the Dog" by Connie Willis. Great fun!

    20. Re:I feel really old :-( by hammy · · Score: 1

      I agree Neal Stephenson's books are good but I just wish he'd learn how to end a story. The endings to Snow Crash, Cryptonomicon were terrible. The ending to Diamond Age was slightly better but still not terribly satisfying. It's so frustrating to come to the end of a book that I've enjoyed only to be cheated by the way he wraps the story up.

    21. Re:I feel really old :-( by Perky_Goth · · Score: 1

      I agree with Dan Simmons, Hyperion is up there as a great novel indeed. It's a series, but you might read them separatly as well. Great epic stuff.

    22. Re:I feel really old :-( by m1066ad · · Score: 1

      Noone mentioned Spider Robinson [very talented, he can make ya cry and laugh out loud, in the same short story - and he tells terrible puns ;-) Start with Callahan's Crosstime Saloon...], Harry Harrison [The Deathworld Trilogy, Soylent Green, The Stainless Steel Rat, ect.]. Frederick Pohl, C.M. Kornbluth, J.G. Ballard, Arthur C. Clarke[!!?], Alan Dean Foster, L. Sprague De Camp, Alfred Bester, A.E. Van Vogt...I could go on, for pages.

    23. Re:I feel really old :-( by SquadBoy · · Score: 1

      This is basically a universal opnion. Yes he should end a book but the trip is IMO worth it.

      --

      Cypherpunks: Civil Liberty Through Complex Mathematics. Those who live by the sword die by the arrow.
    24. Re:I feel really old :-( by skurmus · · Score: 1

      I agree with a previous poster about looking at previous Hugo and Nebula winners. I started reading SF after the age of 25 and the prize lists were invaluable.

      Despite its many problems, I also like Amazon for this stuff. I bought most of my classic SF from them and the "recommendations" they offered introduced me to a lot of the writers suggested by others here. I also like to look at the lists at Amazon especially ones that include my favorite books and try to read the other stuff in the lists.

      In addition to previous recommendations, I would suggest:

      Connie Willis: For elegant writing and excellent sense of humor (albeit with too much time travel stuff)

      Lois McMaster Bujold: The vorkosigan stuff for excellent space opera.

    25. Re:I feel really old :-( by mink · · Score: 1

      Michael Swanwick Authorised Page here has some good stuff, from dark fantasy to post apocalyptic eastern US, space beaurocrats to asteroid mining colonies.
      I also like his short stories.
      However I am biased as I have known him since I was a little kid hiding under my partents tables at various sci-fi con dealer rooms.

      --
      Well I've wrestled with reality for thirty five years doctor, and I'm happy to say I finally won out over it.
    26. Re:I feel really old :-( by mink · · Score: 1

      You left out Harrison's "Bill the Galactic Hero" stuff that is a great parody of so much.

      Then again no one has mentioned Kilgore Trout in any of all this name dropping.

      --
      Well I've wrestled with reality for thirty five years doctor, and I'm happy to say I finally won out over it.
  30. I should clarify by Ender+Ryan · · Score: 1
    I am not supporting the troll to which you replied, just giving you my opinion of Cosmonaut Keep.

    --
    Sticking feathers up your butt does not make you a chicken - Tyler Durden
  31. Re:Newflash (more anime) by RickHunter · · Score: 1

    Been watching that, but I didn't mention it here. Its more steampunk or fantasy than science fiction so far. There are others that are borderline sci-fi, but they tend to be more "X in space". (Stellvia, for example, feels a lot like Azumanga in space.)

  32. Umm. by lowmagnet · · Score: 1

    Alias isn't sci-fi/fantasy?

    --
    Heute die Welt, morgen das Sonnensystem!
  33. Buffy is like Jar-Jar... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...so damn stupid you can't understand why would anyone watch it.

    1. Re:Buffy is like Jar-Jar... by Okonomiyaki · · Score: 1

      You're absolutely right. Buffy the Vampire Slayer was a terrible movie.

  34. hugo nomination by kissmachine · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ha! hey there -- so my husband and pals read slashdot regularly and one of his buddies messaged me in SILC to tell me about this post. all you people who hasn't read SF since the old greats should read my book (it's a finalist for best related book). it's called better to have loved: the life of judith merril. she was my grandmother, known as the little mother of science fiction. more info

  35. FYI: SF's Trade Paper by Embedded+Geek · · Score: 4, Informative
    To follow the Nebula race or pretty much anything about the SF or Fantasy trade, you just can't beat LocusMag, the online version of Locus. Some reviews (the print version is known for the most exhaustive reviews of SF - anything printed anywhere gets at least a mention), but the big emphasis is on fandom, awards (not just the Hugos & Nebulas), opening and closing of new markets, and ongoing trends (check out this piece on how SARS, war, and economic changes are turning our world into one that SF readers will find familiar).

    It also has a disturbingly complete necrology of recently deceased members of the SF community. It seems like every other headline is "So & so dies," but that's to be expected with all the graying pulp era artists, writers, and fans.

    --

    "Prepare for the worst - hope for the best."

  36. New (sorta) Zelazny! by edremy · · Score: 1
    Lord Demon. Just picked up the paperback this weekend- not sure if it's been out before. It's another duo with Jane Lindskold.

    Pretty clearly a Zelanzy plot with Lindskold doing all of the writing, but it wasn't bad overall. (It helps that I like Chinese mythos stuff, even if this wasn't very Chinese.)

    Let me also second Aliaster Renyolds as someone picking up the slack: Revelation Space and Chasm City aren't bad at all.

    --
    "Seven Deadly Sins? I thought it was a to-do list!"
  37. My take on Stephenson's work by JimmytheGeek · · Score: 2, Informative

    One caveat with Stephenson - "Big U" is an interesting attempt to satarize a behemoth of a university, probably his first book. He hadn't developed his amazing chops yet. I worship the man, but I think he'd agree this is not worth the time.

    Zodiac was pretty good. Strong narrative, some good characters. You can see the emergence of some geek-friendly themes. It lacks the absolute truckloads of storytelling talent he lavishes on subsequent books, but for many writers this would be their best book ever.

    Snow Crash was AMAZING. Has the aforementioned truckloads. Very funny, surprising consistency all the way through. Nothing sacrificed for a laugh, but many of them fit. And a fine backdrop of whimsical neurolinguistic mysticism driving it. Great characters. Absolutely great. Each is hip - or wants to be - in a different way. It's male dominated, but there is a very strong female character that feels real, like the author has actually met a female in person. Even minor characters are fully fleshed out in a few deft strokes.

    Diamond Age - AMAZING Very good at pulling heartstrings, fascinating look at nanotach. More of a "realistic" feel than Snow Crash. (Neither good nor bad in itself, but some readers might find S.C. too enjoyable/easy)

    Cryptonomicon - awesome. Staggering. (Especially if you have to carry it a long way) This is a more complex narrative, with two sets of characters in two time periods. Amazingly, they fit together and not just at a tangent point. It is rich with historical insight, and it has tons of stuff for those who get a hard-on for computer security.

    On a side note - I may have spotted him at Norwescon this weekend. Not really sure. I happened to be raving about him at the time and may have invoked him.

  38. lotr or spirited away... by Peterus7 · · Score: 1
    How do you chose with such good movies? They're both good. I think if it were possible they should both win prizes, because both were excellent pieces of work.

    And Nemesis isn't up for one. How strange. (ha.)

    1. Re:lotr or spirited away... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "...And Nemesis isn't up for one. How strange. (ha.)"

      Couldn't help but overhear you there. The "N" in Nemesis is silent.

  39. Re:I'm glad Ian McLeod didn't read anything by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not everyone subscribes to the last-man-standing-wins model of American capitalism.

    True. Those who reject it are known as "idiots."

    There are smarter people in the world than you. Once you realize this fact, I mean REALLY internalize it, life will start making a whole lot more sense to you.

  40. Re:I GOT THE SLASHDOT AWARD RIGHT HERE: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ahhh... welcome back old friend. We've missed you.

  41. Mod parent up by Snaller · · Score: 1

    Hey, this is interesting. Give the guy a cigar :)

    --
    If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
  42. Greg Bear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    RickHunter is right on Bear. Be Careful.

    Moving Mars is great. Eon and Forge of God were great, but feel dated now. Damn cold war ending. Forge of God is still worth reading, its one of my all time favorites. Avoid Anvil of Stars at all costs. Dinosaur Summer was weak too. Blood Music is a cool concept but the story never quite gelled.
    Same for Darwin's Radio. Im missing a few that I have read plus there are many more. It doesnt sound like a very positive review, but honestly, I really like reading him stuff.

    1. Re:Greg Bear by RickHunter · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'd disagree about Eon, though that's most likely me getting fed up with cold-war-era sci-fi at about the time I read it. Some interesting ideas, but I think the writing quality was poor. I agree about avoiding Anvil of Stars - avoid, avoid, avoid! Slant is also pretty bad, it reads like an attempt to jump onto the nanotech/biotech bandwagon of the time. Songs of Earth and Power was amazing, but its really fantasy, not sci-fi. Still, its a great story, with some very interesting ideas.

      Bear's amazing when he allows himself to be himself. (Songs, Moving Mars) When he tries to jump on a trend (Anvil, Slant), he sucks.

  43. Cancel Enterprise -- STOP THE HORROR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As has already been mentioned, the two Enterprise episodes up for consideration are perhaps the worst ever. Hell, I'd pick Quark's mother rubbing Grand Nagus Zek's ears (from one of the most-hated DS9 episodes) over Archer and his dog in a "decontamination gel" scene. The writing on the series usually seems to be a rehash of technobabble-heavy TNG episodes, not to mention the fact that all episodes are either written by or come from ideas by Rick Berman and Brannon Braga. The running Temporal Cold War plotline is kept so ambiguous that I doubt the producers even know where they're going with it (altho they have sadly missed many opportunities to make some funny Quantum Leap jokes). I have found the acting, even in widely acclaimed episodes such as "Future Tense," to still be somewhat wooden and stilted. A lot of the characters seem to be shoved to the background (see Trip and Mayweather... or are they the same character? Geez, I don't know, it's not like I've seen an episode that really makes it clear). About the only good thing I can find in the show is the all-CGI special effects, and those would be much better employed if they were, say, used to go back and redo one of the Dominion War ship battles from DS9 (which are spectacular already). Hopefully they won't let this one drag on interminably for seven years only to come to a convoluted ending...

  44. stupid AC by Ender+Ryan · · Score: 1
    if and when the pendulum swings back from reality television shot on location on video to filmed dramas shot on soundstages... just MAYBE they'll be ready.

    Idiot, fucking idiot, you completely missed the fucking point! Dramas take YEARS to get large followings. If they were competent, they'd be supporting shows that had a chance of being really good, instead they go and cancel everything that isn't an instant cash infusion.

    When the reality shit bombs, they will have nothing keeping them stable for years.

    Silly AC, get a clue before you go flaimbaiting.

    --
    Sticking feathers up your butt does not make you a chicken - Tyler Durden
    1. Re:stupid AC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dramas take YEARS to get large followings.

      Demonstrably false. Consider the ratings of the two most popular dramas on television right now, "ER" and "The West Wing." Those shows debuted in the top ten, and have been there ever since.

      When the reality shit bombs, they will have nothing keeping them stable for years.

      Except everything they've been showing all along.

      Silly AC, get a clue before you go flaimbaiting.

      How's this for flamebait: fuck you, you ignorant son of a whore.

  45. Re:Umm where's Alias? Whatever. by Kibo · · Score: 1

    They are technology so advanced that it appeares to be magic, and that's not scifi? Seems like they do a hell of a job selling it.

    --
    --Jimmy has fancy plans; and pants to match.
  46. Contratulations Richard! by Mike+McCune · · Score: 1

    I would like to congratulate fellow Twilight Tales member Richard Chwedyk for winning the Nebula for Bronte's Egg and for allowing Twilight Tales to post it on the Web site.

    <blatant plug>
    If any Sci-Fi or Horror fans visit Chicago, come to Twilight Tales on Monday night for Chicago's longest running (10 years) genre specific reading group.
    </blantant plug>

    --

    In a world that is Free and Open, who needs Windows and Gates?

  47. Re:I'm glad Ian McLeod didn't read anything by spun · · Score: 1

    That's rich. Look up the etymolgy of the word "idiot." It derives from the Greek word, "idiotes" meaning a private person, someone who does not particiape in public life. To the ancient Greeks, a private person who thought only of themselves was stupid, and so the word eventually took on it's current meaning.

    So in the original sense of the word, those who subscribe to the last-man-standing-wins model of American capitalism are "idiotes," or private people unconcerned with civic responsibility.

    --
    - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
  48. Ursula K. Le Guin wins Grand Master Status by spun · · Score: 1

    She's one of my favorites, and I have considered her a Grand Master ever since I read "The Disposessed," one of the best SF stories about anarchist society that I have ever read.

    --
    - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
  49. Re:I'm glad Ian McLeod didn't read anything by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    True. But he lives in Minnesota now. . .

  50. Michael Swanwick by sbszine · · Score: 1

    Looks like Michael Swanwick got a lot of nominations this year. I hope he picks up a Hugo or two, he's a great underrated writer.

    Check out Stations of the Tide if you haven't read any of his stuff yet. Great book, very much in the vein of The Void Captian's Tale by Norman Spinrad.

    --

    Vino, gyno, and techno -Bruce Sterling

  51. Re:I'm glad Ian McLeod didn't read anything by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ohhhhh... kay. I guess if we all spoke ancient Greek, you might have some kind of point here. "Four thousand years ago, X meant Y! Isn't that insightful? X really means Y!"

    I don't think I have a word for a person who either doesn't understand or deliberately tries to ignore what "idiot" means. "Idiot," it seems, isn't strong enough.

  52. American Gods question by schnitzi · · Score: 1

    Judging from the review of American Gods, I have to ask... Is there any science in it?

    --



    I object to that article, and to the next reply.
  53. no Starhunter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Starhunter (with Michael Pare) is excellent sci-fi. Why didn't it get any nominations?

  54. Color Me Unsuprised by fm6 · · Score: 1
    Congratulations, you're now Exhibit A for getting rid of the "troll" mod. I saw your post while metamoderating. Whoever modded you down was probably a Brin fan and didn't like to see Mister Uplift dissed. Quite unfair. It seems obvious to me that you're expressing an honest opinion.

    I don't have an opinion on Kiln People because I haven't read it and probably never will. But your review sums up my reaction to the last couple of Brin books I've read. Like many "hard" SF writers, Brin has two nasty flaws: he dreams up INTERESTING IDEAs faster than he can make up actual stories to go with them; and he hates to discard an INTERESTING IDEA once he's put any work into it, no matter how absurd and illogical and just plain stupid the INTERESTING IDEA actually is.

    He's not alone in having this problem, of course. Even some of my favorites (Neal Stephenson comes to mind) do it. But Brin's always been worse than anybody, and its finally overwhelmed the positive aspects of his work. So I guess I'll never find out how the Uplift Wars turn out. Oh Well!

  55. Yah shunt've messed with Clan McLeod, boyo by leftie · · Score: 1

    *shickt* *sssssthwack* *thunk *thunkthunk* *ZOT-rumble-rumble*

  56. Ted Chiang declined Hugo nomination? by StoneLion · · Score: 1

    According to the article and to Torcon 3's Web site, "Ted Chiang respectfully declined his nomination for the Best Novelette category." Anybody know which novelette, and why?

    1. Re:Ted Chiang declined Hugo nomination? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The story was "Liking What You See: A Documentary."

  57. Re:I'm glad Ian McLeod didn't read anything by spun · · Score: 1
    Yeah, righ, whatever. I explicitly state that idiot has taken on the current meaning of 'stupid person.' I guess you are just irony-impaired. Or stupid.

    Yes, my hauling out the ancient Greek definition of the word "idiot" in this case is a variation of the old "I'm rubber, you're glue" argument, but it fits the situation. You were being infantile, I was infantile right back, but it sounded smart, unlike you're original insult, which sounded, well, idiotic.

    --
    - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton