Slashdot Mirror


Mini-Box M-100

Craig Mctavern submits this link to a blurb about the Mini-Box M-100 small form-factor computer. Looks tailor-made for a home audio/visual system.

189 comments

  1. Put that on a robot! by tcd004 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'd love to add one of these m-100's to one of these personal robots and have my own autonomous drink caddy.

    Of course, I'd prefer if the hardware was made by Jesus.

    Tcd004

    1. Re:Put that on a robot! by Hayzeus · · Score: 1
      You'd drastically cut the run time of the Cye Robot, since a full blown micro like the m-100 will generally use a mind boggling amount of current.

      Ok, maybe not mind boggling, but a hell of a lot. Then, of course, you'd have to get the voltages correct.

    2. Re:Put that on a robot! by Hayzeus · · Score: 1

      Whoops -- scratch that part about dealing with the multiple voltages; I just noticed the DC-DC converter blurb.

    3. Re:Put that on a robot! by Zakabog · · Score: 1

      How would that work? The robot is controlled by software on a computer, wirelessly. If you attached the robot to the computer then you'd need a keyboard monitor and mouse to use the software but it'd all be attached to the cye, which is kind of pointless.

    4. Re:Put that on a robot! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I'd prefer if the hardware was made by Jesus."

      I think you mean were made by Jesus." Subjunctive mood to express a wish for a hypothetical situation like that, buddy. Your sentence literally means that you would prefer that something happened in the past.

    5. Re:Put that on a robot! by craigtay · · Score: 1

      I could spend 500 dollars on an 800 Mhz computer or 500 dollars on a new mothboard/ram/cpu that ran at about 2.5 ghz.... You would be trading in a heck of a lot just to impress of a few geeks.

    6. Re:Put that on a robot! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Shouldn't that be (or have been) "Your sentence literally means that you would prefer that something had happened in the past."?

      --unitron, posting as AC

    7. Re:Put that on a robot! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Past perfect is better yes, but you statement does not convey the awkwardness of the original poster, which is what I was pointing out. My statement was equivalent in meaning to the original, and thereby demonstrated why it was incorrect, while yours is not.

    8. Re:Put that on a robot! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *your
      *did not

      Oh the irony....

  2. Bugger by jonathonc · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Looks like the Mini-Box online store is down even before the Slashdot Effect hits.

    1. Re:Bugger by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thats because it was mentioned on Arstechnica this morning as well

  3. Buy the Mini ITX Compact Falsh IDE Adapter! by eviljolly · · Score: 1

    I always wanted a Falsh IDE Adapter!
    http://www.mini-box.com/cfadapter.htm

    1. Re:Buy the Mini ITX Compact Falsh IDE Adapter! by mst76 · · Score: 3, Informative
      I always wanted a Falsh IDE Adapter! http://www.mini-box.com/cfadapter.htm
      They're slightly cheaper here.
    2. Re:Buy the Mini ITX Compact Falsh IDE Adapter! by agrippa_cash · · Score: 1

      Its good to see that they hired a Slashdotter.

    3. Re:Buy the Mini ITX Compact Falsh IDE Adapter! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.mydigitaldiscount.com/catalog/product_i nfo.php?products_id=43
      Fits in a 3.5" bay. I use this on my Freesco router.

  4. power consumption by the+idoru · · Score: 2, Funny

    Mini-box runs at only 12V

    anyone got a spare battery lying around? seriously, though, 12V is some crazy low power consumption. you gotta admit, that's pretty cool.

    1. Re:power consumption by pdiaz · · Score: 1

      operating voltage has nothing to do with power consuption.
      The mini-box power consumption is 10 Watts

      --
      Make It Secret . Free JavaScript implementation of AES for your browser
    2. Re:power consumption by gbjbaanb · · Score: 2, Informative

      go back to high school, do not pass go, do not collect £200 :-)

      Voltage is just the 'speed' the current 'flows' at - power consumption is measured in Watts, or voltage multiplied by amperage (the 'amount' of current)

    3. Re:power consumption by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I always think of voltage as presure, but I can see how your analogy works as well.

    4. Re:power consumption by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I tend to think of voltage as Twinkies. Current is more akin to a Quarter Pounder with Cheese. Using this scenario, wattage works out to be Budweiser (in longneck bottles). Resistance would be the girlfriends.

    5. Re:power consumption by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 5, Funny
      12V is some crazy low power consumption

      That's nothing. My Athlon CPU uses only 1.75 volts of power! I'm taking the ugly heatsink and fan off of that sucker right now because a chip at this low voltage just doesn't need them. From now on, I'm going to run it bare to the world!

      Wait a minute... I've almost got the heatsi3nk lo4ose*A#]]x(++ .=-

    6. Re:power consumption by mfh · · Score: 1

      The computer that you're using now probably runs at 12V also, regulated by that 300W+ power supply that you plug into the wall.

      Duhh??

      --
      The dangers of knowledge trigger emotional distress in human beings.
    7. Re:power consumption by syrah · · Score: 1

      Actually, most PC's convert ~120VAC @ 60Hz to 12VDC plus 5VDC! And actually, ATX motherboards have a whole bunch of wires going into them, with who knows what other voltages.

      I've been running a small ATX MB with a Via 800Mhz CPU fanless (hasn't died yet) with the 12VDC-DC convert board. There is one of those black brick converts that plugs into the wall and outputs 12VDC, which goes into the 12VDC-DC converter board.

      My goal was to build a silent computer that could play mp3s while I fall asleep and wake up. And I had just started to hate all the fan noise of most modern PCs.

      Anyways, tomorrow morning I'm going to get some big 6V batteries. Really big, like 1'x2'x6". I think bulldozers use them to start. Anyway, my cable modem needs 12VDC and 5VDC, the motherboard needs 12VDC and I have a LCD display that needs 14VDC. I'm hoping the modem will accept 6V instead of 5V, and the screen will run on 12V instead of 14V. Then I can run everything off of the batteries. And I'm hoping the batteries will last for 6 hours of screen on time, longer with the screen off. I want to be able to ride out power outages, of which there is only about 1/year where I live.

      So... the idea of running these PCs off of batteries is not unfounded - at least I hope it isn't!

      --syrah

      --
      (This post probably would have been more coherant if I had spent more attention writing it.)
    8. Re:power consumption by unitron · · Score: 2, Informative
      "Voltage is just the 'speed' the current 'flows' at..."

      Wrong, wrong, horribly wrong. An interesting analogy, but fatally flawed. Even if you start from the premise that the "speed" at which current flows varies with variations in voltage, that's still not the definition of voltage.

      Voltage is the expression in units (Volts) of electromotive force (the E in E=IR, Ohm's law). It's how much difference in electrical potential exists between 2 points. If a conductive path is established between those 2 points then the E will cause the flow of current (I, expressed in Amperes).

      How much current flows depends on the voltage difference between those 2 points and the conductance of that path. The conductance is usually expressed as its mathmatical inverse, resistance (R, expressed in Ohms). The higher the resistance, the lower the current.

      How fast that current flows will be somewhere just a little shy of the speed of light and will be pretty much independant of voltage level.

      To get a certain amount of current to flow through a given resistance a certain voltage must be applied across that resistance. The amount of power, measured in Watts, is the voltage times the amperage. 10 Volts will drive 1 Ampere through 10 Ohms for a dissipation of 10 Watts, or 10 Amperes through 1 Ohm for a dissipation of 100 Watts.

      If one is talking about AC (alternating current), then the power equation (P=EI) has to be modified to take into account the continuous change of voltage and amperage over time, as well as another kind of opposition to the flow of current, known as reactance, which changes as the frequency of alternation changes (and whether it increases or decreases in response to an increase or decrease in frequency depends upon the presence or absence in the conductive path of a couple of other electrical characteristics), but for household stuff the DC equation can still give you a rough idea of power consumption, or a way to figure average current by starting with the Watts and doing the math backwards.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    9. Re:power consumption by varkentje · · Score: 1
      How fast that current flows will be somewhere just a little shy of the speed of light and will be pretty much independant of voltage level.

      Depends what you mean. Current flow is expressed in Ampere, which is Coulomb/second. Coulomb is a measure of charge; Current flow then corresponds to the physical movements of electrons in a copper wire. Copper contains some 8.5e22 free electrons per cubic centimeter. Now if you know the diameter of the copper wire you can compute how fast the electrons have to move through the wire to establish the current you had in mind. This can be surprisingly slow! E.g. on the order of centimeters per hour is not unusual! See for an example this page.

      Of course the electric field (or electromotive force as you call it) travels much faster through the wire, that is probably what you meant with "a little shy of the speed of light".

      Paul

    10. Re:power consumption by unitron · · Score: 1
      Electromotive force is roughly (very roughly) analogous to water pressure and the current flow is (again, roughly) analogous to the flow of water (like gallons per minute instead of Coulombs per second). However the force which causes the electrical current to flow is not the same thing as the electromagnetic field generated by that current flow.

      Voltage applied across a conductive path forces electrons into one end of the path and attracts them out of the other end. An individual electron may very well travel from one end to the other at a lot slower rate than lightspeed but the effect of one electron entering the path and pushing away another due to the repulsion of like charges, and that one pushing another one which pushes another one..., that effect, combined with the attraction of an opposite charge at the other end, causes this "ripple" to move from one end of the conductive path to the other at a rate close to lightspeed.

      If you had some magical superconductive wire that would let enough current flow through 186,000 miles of it to light a flashlight bulb off of a flashlight battery, hooking up the battery in series with a switch and a bulb and that long long wire (spread out in as big a circle as possible when you bring the 2 ends close together) and then turning on the switch should cause the bulb to light up in just a little over a second.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  5. 3 words: Car Ogg Player by mhesseltine · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This would be ideal. It has an LCD display, programmable keypad, and does floating point, so Ogg is possible.

    Now all I need is a job and some $$$ :(

    --
    Overrated / Underrated : Moderation :: Anonymous Coward : Posting
    1. Re:3 words: Car Ogg Player by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's a fixed point ogg library.

    2. Re:3 words: Car Ogg Player by insecuritiez · · Score: 5, Informative

      "...and does floating point, so Ogg is possible."

      If you will recall, the XIPH team re-wrote the Ogg decoder so that it can run on systems that can only do integer math. "Several optimizations were made that resulted in the decoder being twice as fast. We've also tuned the code to be tolerant for those who implement Vorbis using integer-only math. This allows hardware and embedded devices to more easily support Ogg Vorbis playback." http://www.linuxjournal.com/article.php?sid=4416.

    3. Re:3 words: Car Ogg Player by Daniel_Staal · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This would be ideal. It has an LCD display, programmable keypad, and does floating point, so Ogg is possible.

      Now all I need is a job and some $$$ :(

      Sounds like you've got one: incorporate, make, build, and sell. And yes, the next step is profit!

      --
      'Sensible' is a curse word.
    4. Re:3 words: Car Ogg Player by TeknoHog · · Score: 4, Informative

      I assume we're talking about Vorbis, the audio codec of the Ogg family. AFAIK, the integer-only codec is separate from the main Vorbis code and called Tremor (I hope the name has nothing to do with sound quality). There are good reasons why these codecs are mainly developed for FP math; for example modern processors are faster with FP as they are optimized for modern software (a kind of reverse chicken and ogg problem :-).

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    5. Re:3 words: Car Ogg Player by pbox · · Score: 1

      Actually make, build, sell, and then if profit, incorporate.

      --
      Code poet, espresso fiend, starter upper.
    6. Re:3 words: Car Ogg Player by Eccles · · Score: 1

      and then if profit, incorporate.

      Ya gotta profit first? Damn, I miss the dot com boom.

      --
      Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
    7. Re:3 words: Car Ogg Player by evilviper · · Score: 1
      Tremor (I hope the name has nothing to do with sound quality).

      I can assure you the quality is just fine.

      modern processors are faster with FP as they are optimized for modern software (a kind of reverse chicken and ogg problem :-).

      You lost me there... You think processors can do float calculations faster than int? I've got some news for you, float is much slower. One look at the numerous hacks added on top of i386 should reveal that. We wouldn't have MMX, 3DNow, and all the others if float was faster.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    8. Re:3 words: Car Ogg Player by evilviper · · Score: 1

      Well, most people are going to want to play MP3s, and that means paying license fees before you can sell your first unit.

      I don't think an Ogg-only player is going to sell well enough.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    9. Re:3 words: Car Ogg Player by Afrosheen · · Score: 1

      Actually he's right, newer processors do float better than integer from what I've seen. Typically though, Intel has been worse at float and better at integer and AMD's have been the exact opposite. Might be my imagination, but I believe ugly hacks like MMX and 3dNow were designed to make up for the shortcomings in older x86 chipsets.

      I challenge you to find 4 apps that require and/or excel with MMX. MMX was just never really utilized. SSE and SSE2, that's a different story.

    10. Re:3 words: Car Ogg Player by evilviper · · Score: 1
      I challenge you to find 4 apps that require and/or excel with MMX. MMX was just never really utilized. SSE and SSE2, that's a different story.

      Well, looking at my processor, I don't even have support for SSE/SSE2, just MMX/MMX2, yet mplayer works quite well, and does quite well on older hardware as well.

      4 then? Xine, MPlayer, Avifile... pretty much any media application.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    11. Re:3 words: Car Ogg Player by Daniel_Staal · · Score: 1

      No, definately incorporate first. Incorporation has two major benifits for this: it make it easier to raise funds (sell stock), and it insulates you from the business failing (the corporation goes bankrupt, you don't). Both of these are useless if you incorporate last.

      --
      'Sensible' is a curse word.
  6. Openbrick anyone ? by theefer · · Score: 4, Interesting

    How is it different from the OpenBrick ? Mh this mini-box seems to run a 800 Mhz x86 processor (OpenBrick has a 300 Mhz Geode processor). I heard the OpenBrick could not play DivX smoothly, maybe this is the solution ?

    Sounds interesting, has anyone gotten one already ?

    --
    theefer
    1. Re:Openbrick anyone ? by luzrek · · Score: 4, Informative

      The Minibox seems to run the EPIA-M motherboards from VIA with either their 600Mhz Eden or faster C3 processors. The EPIA-M motherboards support direct MPEG-2 playback so DVD playback should be no problem. For more info on Mini-Itx stuff check out mini-itx's website.

      --

      Galium Arsenide is the material of the future, and always will be.

    2. Re:Openbrick anyone ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      I have an 800 MHz Mini-ITX computer and it does not have the juice for a consistent smooth DivX/MPEG-4 or MPEG-2 playback. It is very acceptable as a hobby computer, but not yet there for true home A/V. Someday this form factor of a computer will be the solution, but not yet. It is great for audio, though, and basic game playing!

    3. Re:Openbrick anyone ? by xtra · · Score: 2, Interesting

      but only if you are using windows

      hardware acceleration is not (yet) supported under linux

    4. Re:Openbrick anyone ? by Sleepy · · Score: 1

      > I have an 800 MHz Mini-ITX computer and it does not have the juice for a consistent smooth DivX/MPEG-4 or MPEG-2 playback.

      This is certainly true if you use BUILT-IN VIDEO on many of these mini-PC's.

      More CPU will help only a little.. faster video hardware's where it's at. A Shuttle mini-PC with an add-in GeForce2 makes all the difference. Built-in video is usually marginal for movie viewing (especially divx).

    5. Re:Openbrick anyone ? by Ed+Avis · · Score: 1

      Today's graphics cards have quite a lot of processing power and onboard memory. And for a home entertainment system you need to do video playback, maybe recording too, but very little else that is computationally intensive.

      I wonder if you could port Linux to run on the video card and do without a motherboard?

      --
      -- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
    6. Re:Openbrick anyone ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The new M-series of Mini-ITX boards are much faster than your Eden series. With DDR memory and hardware MPG2 decoding, they do pretty good. There was a Tom's Hardware review as a Slashdot story earlier this week.

  7. Good but... by Valiss · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The main lure for me is the size. I mean that thing is tiny! For some special project or around the house type things (i.e. an mp3 player for the front room) it could be useful. BUT, the $495.95 definately would make me thing twice about buying this over another (barebones-esque)system. Would the savings in my electric bill cause this to pay for itself over time?

    --

    -Valiss
    1. Re:Good but... by TopShelf · · Score: 1

      Without a HDD, what sort of storage options could you go with on this thing? Is there room inside for a 3.5"?

      --
      Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
    2. Re:Good but... by Uber+Banker · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes, why pay more for a small computer that ca have some dedicated function when you can get custom hardware to do it smaller for less with less redundancy.

      I think the real use for these (and low power CPU mini-itxs etc) is for a multi-use function, perhaps as a flexible terminal to your main computer in the closet.

    3. Re:Good but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can get it with a 2.5" 40 GB HDD, but it's $150 more.

    4. Re:Good but... by kavau · · Score: 2, Informative
      From the website:

      M-100-A configuration (add $150)
      256Mb PC133 RAM
      128Mb CompactFlash with Embedded Linux
      40Gb 2.5" IBM drive
    5. Re:Good but... by Valiss · · Score: 1

      And extra $150 certianly would dissuade me from buying this.. at least for some home-type project. And I can't imagine why we would need these at work. Still, the size is impressive....

      --

      -Valiss
    6. Re:Good but... by Daath · · Score: 1

      "Would the savings in my electric bill cause this to pay for itself over time?"

      Not unless it'll give you electricity instead of using it ;)

      --
      Any technology distinguishable from magic, is insufficiently advanced.
    7. Re:Good but... by GlassHeart · · Score: 1
      ...an mp3 player for the front room [for] $495.95

      You mean like an iPod? The 20 GB model is exactly that price, smaller, much lighter, and quite a bit more stylish.

      The zero noise version of the M-100 makes an obvious home web server, but the hard disk will take it to $550 or maybe $600. The TV out makes it an interesting set-top box, or video game console. Either application will have difficulty justifying its price tag, though. An MP3 player is an even more unnecessarily expensive idea.

      What might work is if you use it for all those purposes. A quiet and low power MP3 server/player, personal web and print server, PVR, digital camera picture viewer, and game console at about $700 (200 GB hard disk) can be interesting. Unfortunately, it doesn't have an infrared port for a remote control, but that won't cost too much. The key will then be software, especially with reconciling all the real time tasks. Don't want to miss out on a favorite show just because you were slashdotted, no?

    8. Re:Good but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and game console

      How? You still need a monitor, keyboard, and mouse to use the O/S and install games. And possibly a joystick unless all you want to play are keyb/mouse games. Now throw in some speakers so you can hear your games. (Or you could suffer with headphones I suppose.) Now drag an Ethernet cable into the livingroom since it doesn't have integrated wireless. (Or not if you don't want to play online at all.)

      So basically what's the point? By the time you add all that stuff, all you have is a *realy* slow computer.

    9. Re:Good but... by GnarlyNome · · Score: 1

      Great use for it. You are at the local coffee house drinking your doubledecaff latte. and the clown next to you pulls out a new sony vaio .. BUT your m-100 can out geek him every time. Best of all it dosen't run windows

      --
      Diplomacy is the art of saying "Nice doggie" until you can find a rock. Will Rogers
    10. Re:Good but... by Afrosheen · · Score: 1

      You just gave me a great idea. I've been looking for a mame-friendly tiny box to hook up to the TV, and this may just be the thing.

      Better yet, with a tiny backlit, full color lcd display, I could haul around a 1/2 din sized arcade. No hard drive necessary, as I could load all the roms I want onto a compact flash card. I was thinking about getting a GamePark32 for this but I may change my mind now.

      Then again, the GamePark is $300 cheaper. Oh well.

    11. Re:Good but... by GlassHeart · · Score: 1
      So basically what's the point?

      The point is not that it'll make a great game console, or a great web server, or a great PVR. The point is that, for $700 or whatever, you have a usable version of all these features. This can be, with a hefty investment in appropriate software, a jack-of-all-trades box that can justify its cost.

      Want a really good console? Buy the PS2 or the X-Box, which is less than half the price of this.

  8. Car Computer. by Hodr · · Score: 4, Interesting

    A friend of mine has been researching small computers for his car. He wants to run an mp3 jukebox application as well as control a scrollbar in the back window (for when you would like to express yourself to those driving to close behind you).

    This computer would seem to fir the bill perfectly, now we just need to find a nice cheap source for a 8x3 inch or so lcd display for the dash.

    1. Re:Car Computer. by tfriedlich · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Why not just use a Zaurus? Throw a 1GB IBM Microdrive in the CF slot and a wifi card in the SD slot and transfer files from your home system wirelessly to the car when you pull in to the garage. Ok, prbly not the best use of technology, but I am just loving my new Zaurus.

    2. Re:Car Computer. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why not go fuck yourself?

    3. Re:Car Computer. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      'cause I'm just to tired from boning your mom. I shaved her back for you, I doubt that you will even recognize her ;-)

    4. Re:Car Computer. by afidel · · Score: 1

      Do not use microdrives, just get a 1GB CF card, much much lower power consumption, faster transfer, and at this point cheaper most places.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    5. Re:Car Computer. by NormalVisual · · Score: 1

      And only good for between 400K and a million writes before it starts going south. :-)

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
    6. Re:Car Computer. by afidel · · Score: 1

      I really really doubt you are likely to wear out a card storing media (exactly how often do you change out your music? Even every day would put you at 1,000+ years =) Using is for swap on the other hand....

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    7. Re:Car Computer. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      as well as control a scrollbar in the back window (for when you would like to express yourself to those driving to close behind you).

      Your friend might want to read about something called Road Rage before he pisses off the wrong person with his cute little "scrollbar" and ends up dead.

    8. Re:Car Computer. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And only good for between 400K and a million writes before it starts going south. :-)

      Oh... so after 10 lifetimes worth of use, it might end up defective. I'll take my chances. (dumbass)

    9. Re:Car Computer. by GnarlyNome · · Score: 1

      Stop Fighting childern you know that all your parents are brothers

      --
      Diplomacy is the art of saying "Nice doggie" until you can find a rock. Will Rogers
    10. Re:Car Computer. by NormalVisual · · Score: 1

      You don't necessarily need to use it for swap to get a lot of writes on it. If you brain-fart and fail to disable logging on the system, you'll get a fair number of writes each time you start the machine up/shut it down, which could be several times per day. If all you're going to use it for is a jukebox, you could probably get away with it. If you're going to use it for something a little more adventurous, I'd go with a real storage solution.

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
    11. Re:Car Computer. by NormalVisual · · Score: 1

      Ooh, that hurt. Let's just say that I've evaluated CF for a couple of different platforms and found it lacking.

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
    12. Re:Car Computer. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ALL right now ya talking!

    13. Re:Car Computer. by funky+womble · · Score: 1

      Recording file access-times is probably a pretty bad idea, too.

    14. Re:Car Computer. by Fubar411 · · Score: 1

      Last time I checked, microdrive was faster.

  9. Car Stereo? by Bakobull · · Score: 0, Redundant

    This would be great to play MP3's in your car.

    --
    "The ignorant fight to win, the wise win before they fight." -Sun Tzu
    1. Re:Car Stereo? by applef00 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Totally. This would fit nicely into my Camaro's DIN slot. If anyone would like to buy it for me, I'll be happy to pay you back with a harrowing thrill ride, accompanied by any music you'd like.

    2. Re:Car Stereo? by Uber+Banker · · Score: 1

      why is it better than an iPod? A dedicated lower cost dedicated function device. The usefulness of this type of thing must be in its adaptability (or complex function, like a firewall or fancy router etc), rather than a narrow simple dedicated function.

    3. Re:Car Stereo? by Xerithane · · Score: 5, Funny

      Totally. This would fit nicely into my Camaro's DIN slot. If anyone would like to buy it for me, I'll be happy to pay you back with a harrowing thrill ride, accompanied by any music you'd like.

      Hmm.. sounds tempting, but do I need a mullet first?

      --
      Dacels Jewelers can't be trusted.
    4. Re:Car Stereo? by applef00 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Mullet and moustache.

    5. Re:Car Stereo? by cei · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but is it dedicated?

      --
      This sig intentionally left justified.
    6. Re:Car Stereo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The usefulness of this type of thing must be in its adaptability (or complex function, like a firewall or fancy router etc), rather than a narrow simple dedicated function.

      Uhh... he said he wanted an MP3 player for his car. I didn't read anything about a firewall, fancy router, etc...

    7. Re:Car Stereo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget your stabbin' knife.

    8. Re:Car Stereo? by Ender_Stonebender · · Score: 1

      Because unlike the iPod, it stays put in the car's dashboard, doesn't need an adapter to be used in the car, and you can add a TV/FM tuner card without much difficulty. (You would lose the ability to listen to AM stations, but I have a feeling that that wouldn't bother too many people.) Oh, and in some cars, you would be able to hook up a USB CD-ROM drive to use for file transfers and playing CDs - In my car, I'd probably take out the ashtray (I don't smoke, so there's no point to having one, and I think it's the right size - I'd have to go out and measure it to be sure) and replace it with the optical drive.

      --
      Loose things are easy to lose. You're getting your hair cut. They're going there to see their aunt.
  10. Re:Obligatory by gpinzone · · Score: 2, Funny

    Don't forget, "Does it run Linux" and "Can I make a TiVo out of it?" and "Who could possibly want this thing when you can buy a [XBOX, Walmart cheapo computer, PS2 running Linux]?"

  11. Re:Obligatory by atari2600 · · Score: 1

    It does run LINUX kind sir. Please visit the product's website.

  12. Not a web server by Bakobull · · Score: 5, Funny

    The online store must be using one of these as its server.

    I think I smell something melting...

    --
    "The ignorant fight to win, the wise win before they fight." -Sun Tzu
  13. home network storage by Adler · · Score: 2, Interesting

    a box this size, and silence and low power use would be great for home network storage. just what i've been looking for, for sometime now. now if it was just $300 cheaper. seriously, why isnt there a cheap HD in a box that oen can use for home netowrk storage, at these prices for $500 i can get a huge new HD setup and my problems would be solved, but for a small networked HD with like a web interface, i'd sell my soul. anyoen seen somethign liek that? for around $200 ? anybody?

    --

    Everybody denies I am a genius--but nobody ever called me one!

    1. Re:home network storage by Pharmboy · · Score: 1

      i'd sell my soul. anyoen seen somethign liek that? for around $200 ? anybody?

      Walmart has an Athlon 1.1ghz box with Linux on it, hardrive, cd, kb, mouse, for 199.99

      Please reply back with your email address, and I will forward you an address to send your soul.

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    2. Re:home network storage by luzrek · · Score: 4, Informative
      I'm not sure about doing it for less than 200$, but I recently made a silent miniitx system for home to use as an MP3/PVR/Fileserver and it did run about 500$. However, if you wanted just a harddisk/case/processor you could probably build it for about 300$. Here is the breakdown:

      EPIA-M with 600Mhz processor - $150

      Ugly but quiet case - $50

      Harddisk - $80

      128Mhz RAM - $30

      total - 310$. Note that I left out the CDROM/DVDROM drive. This is because the EPIA-M supports boot from network. If you really want one you could spend another 20$ for a generic.

      --

      Galium Arsenide is the material of the future, and always will be.

    3. Re:home network storage by Zakabog · · Score: 1

      You're forgetting the point, this thing is VERY SMALL and uses a 60W PSU. It's not that it has linux, it's that it is tiny and uses little power.

    4. Re:home network storage by Arthur+Dent · · Score: 1
      128Mhz RAM - $30

      Uh, you're still using 128 MHz RAM?

      Get with the times! You can get 333MHz DDR Ram (stock speed of 166MHz) now.

    5. Re:home network storage by L0k11 · · Score: 1
      i know it wouldn't be any good as a file server...

      but if you hooked this thing up to a network you could easily use another computer as a file server to store mp3s and the like and eliminate the need for the mini-itx to have a hard drive

      That would suit the home entertianment job just fine.

      btw i thought of it because my friend uses his xbox to watch divx he has downloaded onto his pc. xboxes are probably cheaper for the job

      --
      "Those who cast the votes decide nothing. Those who count the votes decide everything" -- Josef Stalin
    6. Re:home network storage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just gut a Shuttle SV-25 for the components and recase them. Under $200 nowadays.

  14. No smooth movies... by EdMack · · Score: 5, Informative

    The Mini-ITX boards were reviewed on Tom's Hardware not long ago here

    --
    puts ("Python r0cks\n");
  15. Price by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    For those who can't get to the online store, its priced at $495.

    --clambert

  16. Re:Obligatory by WatertonMan · · Score: 1

    If I recall the last Slashdot discussion of small form computers for A/V systems, they were all powerful enough as MP-3 players but not really up to the task of being a general video player/recorder.

  17. Optical Drive by verloren · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Looks tailor-made for a home audio/visual system.

    Unfortunately it lacks an optical drive, so its use in that context is limited (but only by money of course, buy an external drive!)

    1. Re:Optical Drive by Hangnail+Whipperwill · · Score: 1

      This seems like an interesting product for car/mobile applications, but for home stereo systems I think something like this would be more useful. Basically it just bridges the gap between your fileserver and your stereo.

      Sony and HP are coming out with similar products, but the Prismiq model doesn't have the wireless hardware built-in, so you should be able to easily upgrade to 802.11g in the future.

    2. Re:Optical Drive by AKnightCowboy · · Score: 1

      It's also much slower compared to a PIII or even a Celeron of similar clock speed. People complain they can barely decode and play DVDs on the highest speed Via Eden processors. It seemed nice at first for a HTPC, but Linux support is apparently quite lacking so I went the micro-atx route and went with an Athlon. Should be interesting to keep it quiet and cool. Hopefully those Zalman flower coolers actually work. ;-)

  18. Umm..isn't this just another VIA EPIC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    There's the solar pc (which build these units) and a host of others.

  19. Small form factor roundup on Ars today by Wee · · Score: 4, Informative
    This is probably spill-over from the small form factor roundup on ArsTechnica today. There's a lot more info over there about the M-100 and a few others (including the Netdrive, which was on Slashdot a while back).

    As for me, next week the birthday elf is gonna bring me a Shuttle SN41G2 and a Athlon 2800+ Barton core CPU -- or I'm going to hunt that little shit down and kick his ass. Santa didn't bring me a tiny PC and it nearly cost him his life. He got to walk away with only having lost two reindeer. The elf ain't going to be so lucky. So pony up with the SFF computer or watch your back...

    -B

    --

    Ash and Hickory, straight-grained and true, make excellent bludgeons, dandy for the cudgeling of vegetarians.

    1. Re:Small form factor roundup on Ars today by rtv · · Score: 2, Informative

      If you want to run Linux, think seriously about getting the Intel mobo version. Linux nForce support is not great. Too many things don't work. It's a nice Windows box, if a little loud with the Athlon space-heater inside.

    2. Re:Small form factor roundup on Ars today by Wee · · Score: 1
      I had wondered about both of those things. The noise I might be able to handle. My main workstation has a Turbo-Cool 2X on it which is pretty loud. Very loud, actually. But it's under the desk, which helps a little.

      As far as drivers, I'm primarily thinking of a Windows-only box, since I want my dual-boot machine (the one with the F15-sounding fan in it) back on Linux full-time. Nvidia released fairly new drivers for linux. Do therse have missing features as well? I was thinking of making a little 10GB partition for Linux just for grins, but if I have to wait for the maturity level of chipset drivers to go up I guess I could.

      -B

      --

      Ash and Hickory, straight-grained and true, make excellent bludgeons, dandy for the cudgeling of vegetarians.

    3. Re:Small form factor roundup on Ars today by greg_barton · · Score: 1

      Ditch the 2800+ and get a 2500+. The price just nosedived to about $125 and I'm overclocking mine to 2080Mhz, as fast as the 2800+. :)

    4. Re:Small form factor roundup on Ars today by Wee · · Score: 1
      Damn. I almost bought one last week (kind of a "buy the holster, have to buy the gun now" thing my uncle taught me). I glad I held off. Can you O/C them if they are in a SHuttle? I imagine those thigns have pretty strict heat requirements. Although if it'll cool a 3000+, it'll cool a 3500+ which has been bumped up.

      Since the last CPU I overclocked was a K6/150, how does one go about it these days? Did you just bump up the multiplier? Can you mess with the voltage as well?

      Off to do some googling...

      -B

      --

      Ash and Hickory, straight-grained and true, make excellent bludgeons, dandy for the cudgeling of vegetarians.

    5. Re:Small form factor roundup on Ars today by GnarlyNome · · Score: 1

      Bun- Bun is that you?? Bad Bunny.. torq

      --
      Diplomacy is the art of saying "Nice doggie" until you can find a rock. Will Rogers
    6. Re:Small form factor roundup on Ars today by Afrosheen · · Score: 1

      Props to the low user number. :)

      And honestly, nothing has changed since the good old 300A to 450 days of the Celeron. Bump the multiplier, bump the voltage if necessary. Every good motherboard will provide you with incremental settings for everything. My Soyo Dragon Platinum lets me bump voltage by half-steps and all that jazz.

      If anything, overclocking has gotten better over the years. The only drawback is that Athlons run hot to begin with, so overclocking isn't always an option unless you're positive you've got a wonderful heat sink and plenty of fans. The old Celerons could handle it because they could throttle themselves instead of melting down. I think Athlons still can't do this.

    7. Re:Small form factor roundup on Ars today by greg_barton · · Score: 1

      As long as you can set the FSB multiplier on the motherboard, you can do it. I've set mine to 166Mhz FSB with a 12.5/13x multiplier. (ABIT IT7 motherboard) I've heard of people setting the FSB higher, up to 180, with the right RAM. (I'm only using PC2700, though, so 166 was about the best I could do. Any higher than that was unstable...)

    8. Re:Small form factor roundup on Ars today by Wee · · Score: 1
      Well, the Shuttle has this weird heat pipe deal. It's rated pretty high, but I don't know what the BIOS options are like.

      -B

      --

      Ash and Hickory, straight-grained and true, make excellent bludgeons, dandy for the cudgeling of vegetarians.

  20. X terminals by QuantumRiff · · Score: 1

    If they could drop the price down below $300, maybe by getting rid of the keypad and flash card reader, I would be damn tempted to try to make a couple of X terminals here at the office.

    --

    What are we going to do tonight Brain?
    1. Re:X terminals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can buy mini-ITX for that kind of price. I just purchased a system for ~$400 (case, 256MB, EPIA M9000, slim CD-ROM, sales tax, shipping). It's a little bigger than this one, but not much. For the extra size, I can hold 1 PCI hard and a 3.5" hard drive. It's going to go in my car under the front seat.

    2. Re:X terminals by satterth · · Score: 2, Informative

      Run, don't walk, to your nearest computer store and ask them to get Mni-ITX style motherboards for you. Via makes a few of them. Check out viavpsd.com, its whats in this little box.

      --
      Being called a dork on Slashdot must be like being called the retard in special ed.
    3. Re:X terminals by RatBastard · · Score: 1

      MWave.Com, and a few others, sell the motherboards that go in these babies. The 500 and 800MHz jobs will run you just shy of $100.00, that includes dual IDE buses, built in video (nothing spectacular, but runs Windiows okay), audio, TV-Out, 10/100base T, serial, parallel, USB and CPU. Not a bad deal at all. I've got three different models in my house.

      Oh, and these are Via EPIA motherboards. You can even get external 60 watt power adapters for them that remove the need for a fan and PSU in the system.

      The hardest part is finding the Lego bricks to build the case out of!

      --
      Boobies never hurt anyone. - Sherry Glaser.
    4. Re:X terminals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or buy Shuttles and gut them for parts. Why limit yourself to a Via CPU when for such a low price ya get the whole box?

  21. Re:power consumption/size by luzrek · · Score: 3, Informative
    Power consumption is measured in watts, not volts. I think that you'll find that most computers run with even lower core voltages. The 12 volt input means that you can do the AC to DC power conversion outside of the case saving yourself volume and heat required for said conversion. Another major advantage of the 12volt power input is that it is easy to regulate your Automobile's voltage output to 12 volts and run the computer there, perhaps for an MP3/OGG server.

    The power for the computer is apparently about 10 watts, which is impressive. 6 of those watts are used by the EPIA-M motherboard + Eden 600 Mhz processor. The faster processor uses quite a bit more energy. Interestingly, a desktop harddrive consumes about 17 watts in typical operation. So the 10 Watt figure is likely optimistic and/or when no peripheral devices are being used.

    Just did some checking, the other really small case is from casetronic which is 5.1cmx17.8cmx25.4cm is about 400 mL larger than the 20cmx4.4cmx22cm mini-box case. They both take a 12 volt input. Form factor wise, the casetronic case is actually exactly the same size as most car stereos, guess what market it is aimed at.

    --

    Galium Arsenide is the material of the future, and always will be.

  22. Seems pricey, & how to do it by danlyke · · Score: 4, Informative

    It isn't that much smaller than the iDot mini-ITX machines (I'm just a customer, I've bought a bunch for various embedded applications), which, by the time you stuff in some RAM you had lying around anyway are under $200. If you're going to spend an extra $295 for a display and a few buttons, going super small and super low power with one of the gazillion PC104 vendors seems smarter.

    In my house we have two laptops with 802.11b that are almost always close at hand, so running the whole thing headless and just using one of those laptops with a web browser to control the media center seems like the obvious choice.

    I need to finish up with code for the web server and media play control, but I've got some instructions on building one of these to boot off CompactFlash into stripped down Linux if anyone cares.

  23. Re:Obligatory by Pharmboy · · Score: 4, Funny

    Imagine a beowulf cluster of those!

    I did. It would have about the same power as a single new 3.0ghz box...and take up more room. Oh, and cost more.

    --
    Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
  24. Re:Penis-Bird - FP! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That REALLY doesn't look like much of anything...just some ascii...yeesh. The days of ascii crapflooding are long, long gone, aren't they? :~~(
    --
    Slow Down Cowboy!

    Slashdot requires you to wait 2 minutes between each successful posting of a comment to allow everyone a fair chance at posting a comment.

    It's been 1 minute since you last successfully posted a comment

    Chances are, you're behind a firewall or proxy, or clicked the Back button to accidentally reuse a form. Please try again. If the problem persists, and all other options have been tried, contact the site administrator.

  25. HUGE sale on just the motherboard by binaryDigit · · Score: 3, Funny

    From the site:

    VIA EPIA V, 800MHz Motherboard
    Regular price: $115.00
    Sale price: $112.00

    At savings like that, buy two, or four. Start that beowulf cluster NOW!

    1. Re:HUGE sale on just the motherboard by cei · · Score: 3, Funny

      I can see the ad now...

      BUY 39, GET ONE FREE!!!

      --
      This sig intentionally left justified.
  26. Mini ITX Compact Flash IDE Adapter, even cheaper! by monopole · · Score: 2, Informative

    http://www.acscontrol.com/
    Works fine.

  27. Almost great for lan parties by Zakabog · · Score: 1, Interesting

    If they only made one with a good video card it'd be perfect for lan parties. Not the best computer you can buy, but my and 2 other friends are going to Quakecon in Texas, our main issue is size. The trunk in a '69 chevelle is large but we need a months worth of clothes, 3 computers and 3 monitors. It looks like you can easily fit 3 of these on your lap or in the glove compartment or anywhere besides the trunk while leaving tons of space in the seating area of the car so you don't need to sacrifice comfort to get space.

    Also, imagine not having to carry a huge case onto an airplane hoping it'll fit under the seat, you could easily put this into a bag with other stuff you want to carry on. And if the 60W of power doesn't seem like enough -

    Tested configurations. The PW-60 has been tested on a EPIA -800Mhz, 512Mb RAM, two IBM 120Gb hard drives while decoding a MPEG movie. Recommended configs: C3 processor, 1 regular size hard drive, any amount of RAM.

    Seems like it can handle the power consumption required to be a gaming PC. And you'd only need one 40GB hard drive (won't have MP3s or movies or anything, just games.)

    1. Re:Almost great for lan parties by luzrek · · Score: 1
      Each hard disk takes about 17 watts, so that is more than half. The EPIA-M motherboard with an Eden processor (admitadly slower and less power consuming than the 800Mhz C3) draws about 6 watts, leaving 60 - 34 - 6 = 20 watts for the RAM. The figure is probably more like 10-15 watts left for the ram because of the difference between the C3 and Eden.

      I've been running an EPIA-M with a 600 Mhz Eden + CDRW/DVD drive + 7200 RPM harddrive + TVEncoder off of a 40 Watt power supply for about a month and there havn't been any problems.

      --

      Galium Arsenide is the material of the future, and always will be.

    2. Re:Almost great for lan parties by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dude...get a shuttle with a barton 3000+ and a radeon9800pro and your set. forget this non-mainstream-processor-for-gaming-shit

    3. Re:Almost great for lan parties by Dolly_Llama · · Score: 2, Funny
      The trunk in a '69 chevelle is large but we need a months worth of clothes

      Dude, you're going to a lan party. Skip the extra clothes and the hygiene supplies. You'll fit right in.

      --

      Somewhere, something incredible is waiting to be known. -- Carl Sagan

    4. Re:Almost great for lan parties by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >>we need a months worth of clothes

      Never heard of a laudromat I guess.

      Tide is your friend.

  28. Re:Obligatory by uberdave · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Don't forget the ever popular "Imagine a beowolf cluster..." Hey, that might not be such a bad idea. At a rough guess, eighteen of these fit in the same space as a mid sized tower.

  29. Re:Obligatory by DustMagnet · · Score: 1
    Actually it's not as simple as that. There are many reports that the closed source binary only driver VIA provides are not all the great.

    Sorry I can't be more specific, I'll be installing RedHat 9.0 this weekend on an EPIA M9000, but I've only been doing research so far.

    --
    'SBEMAIL!' is better than a goat!!
  30. Router by Dante · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I wonder why no-ones talked about using this as a router? My biggest problem with a regular pc is size noise, and power consumtion. price would be the limiting factor no?

    --
    "think of it as evolution in action"
    1. Re:Router by GlassHeart · · Score: 2, Informative
      I wonder why no-ones talked about using this as a router? [...] price would be the limiting factor no?

      Maybe because routers cost $50 to $100, and come with easy configuration tools? This thing costs five to ten times more, so it doesn't make much sense to use it solely as a router.

    2. Re:Router by MoreDruid · · Score: 1

      For that kind of money I can go out and buy a real Cisco 806 router which is optimized for this use... Of course you can't run a web/ftp/whatever server on a Cisco router, so that's a lot of money for this little box.
      At home I use an old PIII 450MHz @ 300MHz with a heatsink and 256MB RAM ... microATX casing, silent WD 13GB HDD... perfect as a router/webserver/proxy, and if you buy these kind of specs right now, you'd pay about what, 100$?

      --
      The best weapon of a dictatorship is secrecy, but the best weapon of a democracy should be the weapon of openness.
    3. Re:Router by Dante · · Score: 1

      "Maybe because routers cost $50 to $100" Not in my world what routers are you talking about? would you trust a $50 with shiny GUI, on a commercial site, like a clients?

      Imagine maintaining it? would your shiny 50$ router be a dependable firewall? with 2.5.x how about world class VPN/IPsec?

      --
      "think of it as evolution in action"
    4. Re:Router by phallstrom · · Score: 1

      Try soekris for a small, queit compact-flash based router... I'm about to try one and a friend uses them all the time for vpn's without problems...

      www.soekris.com

    5. Re:Router by Dante · · Score: 1

      Hot damn thats cool! thanks for the tip. Ok I stand corrected: then why not use one of these?

      --
      "think of it as evolution in action"
    6. Re:Router by GlassHeart · · Score: 1
      what routers are you talking about?

      $50 routers, obviously. :)

      would you trust a $50 with shiny GUI, on a commercial site, like a clients?

      No. I'm not sure I'd trust a PC either, though.

      Imagine maintaining it? would your shiny 50$ router be a dependable firewall?

      They tend to be easier to maintain than PC firewalls. Most home users simply use the default setting, where all ports are shut down.

    7. Re:Router by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or load LRP, Freesco, or a BSD on CF card and use any old x86 box.
      http://pigtail.net/LRP/hd/index.html
      Works nicely.

    8. Re:Router by pi_rules · · Score: 1

      You read my mind. I paid about $500 bucks (well, traded work for equipment really) for the Cisco ethernet router I have in my apartment. It's a little on the geeky side, but it's nice having Cisco equipment laying around so what little knowledge I have about IOS doesn't get lost.

      I would prefer doing this with a PC and OpenBSD at some point in time because, well, it'd be cool -- but I don't want another fan running. I never even thought of taking a mini-itx or similar system and building a router out of it.

  31. How to cut out French internet nodes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is there any way to force your networking (browser, ftp, etc.) to reject any IP packets that have touched any connected machines in France?

    The reason is that I don't want to get pussy juice all over the innards of my computer. The reason for THAT is that I don't want it shaking like a leaf in the wind every time I look at it mean or shout at it 'cause I just fumbled a make menuconfig or something.

    1. Re:How to cut out French internet nodes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try any decent firewall coupled with a list of IPs culled from RIPE. Keep paper towels around for when you miss one.

    2. Re:How to cut out French internet nodes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Personally, I have always thought that pussy juice was a good thing.

  32. Blurb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From the blurb:

    "Also, by using the PW-60 high efficiency 12V DC-DC converter (also available at mini-box.com), the M-100 can run for about 12 hours from a single 12V/7ah battery."

  33. Re:Obligatory by luzrek · · Score: 1
    They can run Linux, but sometimes sound is an issue (although that is basically fixed now, thanks to ALSA). The VIA EPIA-M motherboards support direct MPEG-2 playback so they can play DVDs back pretty much regaurdless of processor. Hauptpage and others now make tv-encoder cards which do direct MPEG-2 encoding so that can also be made pretty much processor independant. The review which was featured on slashdot (maybe there has been one more recently) featured the previous generation of EPIA motherboards.

    If you look I think you'll find that quite a few of the "super-small" computers are running on the EPIA-something motherboards and you can check those out independantly.

    --

    Galium Arsenide is the material of the future, and always will be.

  34. $500 cost vs $400 for a 2.4ghz dell 4550 desktop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    hmmmmmm.....will i either buy
    1. a limited machine to toy with for $500
    or
    2. a replacement for my old desktop

  35. Tasty Emulator Box by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's been my plan for a while now to build up one of these boxes for use as an uber-emulator. Stuff every console and arcade emulator software you can find on it, buy four USB controllers, and carry it around to your friends houses. The VIA board even has TV-out, which makes it perfect for this. It's a gaming, movie, and music-playing machine the size of a DIN radio!

    Also, the checker cube boxes (www.checkercube.com) are slightly more affordably priced.

    1. Re:Tasty Emulator Box by christofferphreaky · · Score: 1

      well i have a 933mhz c3 cpu and ran xmame with metal slug and the system would not give more than 15fps or someting like that, my 700mhz duron would delivere maybe like 60fps full throthle ;).
      Anyone else may have greater luck with the c3 cpu, would be interesting to know.

  36. even cheaper on ebay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    $10+$7 shipping, but there are multipacks of 5 for $50 or so...

  37. Re:Obligatory by luzrek · · Score: 2, Interesting
    assuming the volume of a "standard" beige box PC is the same as mine, we could probably get about 20 of these into the same volume. This would end up drawing about 120 watts of power, but if we assume that each processor is equivalent to about a 300 Mhz Intel machine (pessamistic estimate since that is less than 50% efficiency and the EPIA-M is actually a well integrated MB) it would have about twice the processing power of a 3Ghz Intel machine. This ends up being much more efficient power wise than the equivalent Intel solution (by about a factor of 2).

    Cost wise, the EPIA-M MB's are actually pretty good since they can do the boot-off network thing so you only need one harddrive. You will need to buy a lot of RAM though. The total cost would probably end up pretty close to 4000$, much less efficent than a single processor/motherboard computer.

    You'ld also be able to drive about 20 monitors off of the cluster of EPIA's. Try building that into a single board computer, I bet it costs more. Really though, who needs to drive 20 monitors?

    --

    Galium Arsenide is the material of the future, and always will be.

  38. Re:Obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The parent post was listing known obigatory statements in order to make a whimsical statement about Slashdot trolls. You, on the other hand, are unable to comprehend such simple concepts as humor and, therefore, I must conclude are severly retarded.

  39. Soekris by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Soekris makes a much better choice for low-power networking hardware. I run an IPSec secured wireless access point/router/firewall/QoS manager/etc on the net4521 and a 200mw 802.11b adapter. This one isn't mine, but pretty, isn't it. As soon as a HostAP driver supports 802.11a/g I'll be set to add another PCMCIA card, what a cheap ugprade.

  40. Too small for an HTPC by YetAnotherName · · Score: 1

    Is there room for an HDTV tuner card and a DVD drive? Didn't think so.

    But then again, who cares what your HTPC looks like? You're watching the TV/projector screen, not the PC. Stick the whole thing in your equipment closet and run cables. And with a big enough case, you can add extra cooling fans, prolong the life of your equipment, and not worry about noise at all.

  41. Ugh by DrMrLordX · · Score: 1

    Why did they waste their time with crappy C3 and C2 processors? The performance on those cpus is awful. You'd almost be better off building a small form-factor PC using notebook parts. It might cost more, but damn, who wouldn't rather have a Centrino in there or something along those lines? Or maybe Transmeta cpus should be used. Whatever. Anything aside from these Cyrix holdovers.

    1. Re:Ugh by WasterDave · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure about being a Cyrix leftover. The new (shiny) nehemiah core is a Centaur/IDT Win-Chip left over, and performs about 20% better.

      Dave

      --
      I write a blog now, you should be afraid.
    2. Re:Ugh by cheshiremackat · · Score: 1

      When was the last time you used one? (C3) The new processors are alot better than they used to be, they are reasonably fast, and most importantly cool (as in temp)...

      Seriously, consider the design... Via Epia-M M6000 is TOTALLY fanless... when was the last time you could buy a computer that doesn't need a heatsink fan that has 600 mhz PIII power?

      These boards have enough power to run XP (or Linux although without MPEG-2 Support, for now), decode MP3s and decode DVDs and most divx files. Seems like a cool choice to me.
      Seriously, what else do you need this to do? I agree the onboard graphics are gonna suck if you want to play games... but your not... you going to play DVDs and Mp3s if you buy this thing.

      I read on mini-itx.com about this guy who attached a (12x4 line) LCD screen and an IR reciever... Winamp has plugins that allow for remote control... he has the track name scroll by, and he can control DVD and MP3 playback from a remote control... no keyboard needed...
      and if he needs to do anything intense, add a KB and use the TV out...

      These things seem pretty well designed to me.

      _CMK

      --
      Bad spellers of the world untie!
  42. Along the same lines - Hush Mini-ITX by henele · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Which you can check out here.

    It comes with a hard drive, and uses the 933Mhz Epia solution without needing a fan. Granted, the case gets a little warm (as the whole thing effectively acts as a heatsink), but that doesn't stop it from being very cool :)

    For a review of the gold version, click here.

  43. Nothing Revolutionary by istartedi · · Score: 2, Informative

    Don't get me wrong, this is a nice application for VIA's mini-itx boards. Of course, it suffers all the problems of any mini-itx based solution: too slow for video (see Tom's Hardware review) and no DVI or LVDS output. That's something that's been lamented on mini-itx.com. VIA keeps teasing us by putting an LVDS header on the board without any socket. I suspect it's the laptop keiritsu or some other industry mafia that is preventing us from getting a good cheap board with digital video interface, but of course I can't prove it.

    When they have fanless MoBos that can drive digital displays directly and play DVDs properly, then we'll start to see some really cool low power media boxes. Until then, what you've got is early adapter technology, with all the attendant shortcomings.

    What's really sad is that this is something that Transmeta could have done pretty well, but the management has its head too far up you-know-where to realize it.

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
  44. Yes but... by Dot.Com.CEO · · Score: 1
    Does it run Windows?

    (oh the comedy!)

    --
    Mother is the best bet and don't let Satan draw you too fast.
    1. Re:Yes but... by GnarlyNome · · Score: 1

      Young Man go wash your mouth out with soap1

      --
      Diplomacy is the art of saying "Nice doggie" until you can find a rock. Will Rogers
  45. Re:Obligatory by Pharmboy · · Score: 3, Informative

    You'ld also be able to drive about 20 monitors off of the cluster of EPIA's. Try building that into a single board computer, I bet it costs more. Really though, who needs to drive 20 monitors?

    Its friday and we are debating a beowolf of mini computers. Im married, whats your excuse? :)

    The point is this isnt a good beowolf. Get a blade server if space is a concern. 20 of them, with NO hard drive is $5000. (they sell for $495 w/o HD and a 533 cpu) Not counting single monitor, switchbox, etc. I can get two 3ghz, or more importantly I can buy 1.3ghz athlons with 40gb drives for $279 each, shipping and all, close to half the price, so I could get 10 of them, having more power, for half the money if space isnt the concern.

    In a nutshell, these are great one and a time, but not a cluster. Now get out of the house dammit!

    --
    Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
  46. Low power server by Mundocani · · Score: 1

    This thing looks like just what I've been looking for. I run a home server which serves up my personal web site, email and MP3s. I want to replace my current server because my home office runs off of solar power, but at 90 Watts while idle, my current server draws too much power to allow me to run the solar during the winter months (the filter for my garden pond also runs off of the system 24 hours a day). Reducing the server to 10 watts when idle would be great. The idea of leaving the solar on all year is really exciting to me (it's hard to explain why this would be such a thrill, it's just one of those geeky things :-)

    Are there any other very-low-power boxes I should consider as well?

    1. Re:Low power server by RatBastard · · Score: 1

      I run my home server off of the 500Mhz Via mini-itx board. It consumes very litte power and works well enough to fling files about with. I don't have hard numbers on the power consumption, but my electric bills have gone down since I upgraded from the old Pentium 233MMX system it replaced. You can get the 500Mhz boards for about $95.00 at Mwave.com. Or anywhere else that seles Via EPIA motherboards.

      --
      Boobies never hurt anyone. - Sherry Glaser.
  47. Too expensive by mnmn · · Score: 1


    I have been looking for a very low cost x86 microcontroller or board for developing simple thin clients for education in poorer countries. So far all offerings are more expensive than traditional desktops including all the incarnations of PC-104 that Ive come across.

    This thing is $500+ and openbricks link is broken. I wish elan-486 was still around, I cant even find a distributor to send me a single sample of any elans. And I really have to check out geode, wish someone would offer a complete system on a board with flash and bios etc.

    --
    "Give orange me give eat orange me eat orange give me eat orange give me you." -Nim Chimpsky
  48. Re:Obligatory by ejaw5 · · Score: 1

    Really though, who needs to drive 20 monitors?

    c'on, this is slashdot. of course, the obvious is to fullscreen pr0n across the 20 monitors, and the processing power of the bewolf cluster results in smooth 200FPS 1 million+ pixel detail.

    --

    $cat /dev/random > Sig
  49. If you want a small system dont spend $500 on this by linuxguy · · Score: 1


    Get one of these :
    http://www.casetronic.com/Product/PCcase/2699/C S-2 699.html
    [Very very small case for about $90]

    and one of these :
    http://shop.store.yahoo.com/kmexpress/mb-epia-1 g.h tml
    [Same type of the product as in the mini-box but
    faster processor]

    You'll have a better computer at about half
    the cost.

  50. Using a laptop instead of one of these? by dimension6 · · Score: 1

    I hope this isn't too offtopic...
    This unit would be a terrific centerpiece for my home theater / audio system, but since I already own a laptop, I don't really want to purchase another piece of equipment (more money+space). I'm considering using my laptop (1.5Ghz, ATI Radeon Mobility 16MB, S-Video out and VGA-out to get HDTV: nothing incredibly special, but it works well) as the centerpiece, but I'm just wondering if anyone else is doing this. I'm going to need a decent sized LCD or plasma panel display (ideally around 22"-30") that has a built-in HDTV tuner, since I haven't found out any kind of TV tuner that would work with my laptop (no, the USB ones don't work with HDTV, and the picture quality is quite bad anyway). I will also need some kind of remote control (RF would be the best). I will plug it into my sound system, and simply use the computer's remote control to adjust volume/change tracks/etc. Also, would it be wise to purchase a higher quality external sound card? Any feedback at all would be very helpful (this pertains to the Mini-Box and like devices as well!).

  51. get a better tailor, it doesn't fit by frovingslosh · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Looks tailor-made for a home audio/visual system.

    Hardly. At $500 for a tiny box that can't even hold a CD or DVD drive, and extremely restricts what else you can do with it, it seem a very expensive tiny toy.

    For not much more you can get a decent laptop, which would include a DVD drive/cd writer, an LCD display, hard drive, TV out and all the rest and take up about the same amount of space while the laptop is closed. Or just get a much less expensive small desktop system or put together your own.

    There might be some valid use for this little thing at that price, but only in very specific dedicated applications, and certainly not for a home audio/visual system.

    --
    I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
  52. But it's got Macro-Vision built in! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But it's got Macro-Vision built in!

    Standardized Embedded Solutions for Total Mainboard Connectivity
    Form Factor
    - Mini-ITX
    - 170mm x 170mm
    - Micro ATX Chassis Compliant
    Processor
    - VIA Eden(TM) 800Mhz processor (533 versions also avail)
    - 100/133MHz Front Side Bus
    - low power consumption
    - Optional Fanless
    - VIA C3(TM) E-Series processor (EBGA package)
    - 100/133MHz Front Side Bus
    - 128K L1 and 64K L2 cache
    Chipset
    - VIA Apollo PLE133
    - VT8601A North Bridge
    - Featuring integrated AGP 2X graphics
    - VIA VT8231 South Bridge
    TV-Out
    - Integrated Macro Vision 7.01
    - High quality scaling and filtering
    - S-Video or Composite video output
    - Supports NTSC/PAL TV formats
    Main Memory
    - Two 168-pin DIMM memory sockets
    - PC100/133 SDRAM support
    LAN
    - VIA 10/100 Ethernet LAN onboard
    Graphics
    - Integrated AGP2X with 2D/3D Graphics Acceleration
    - Motion Compensation for DVD playback
    - VIP port for video overlay function
    Audio
    - VIA VT1612A AC'97 onboard
    - 3 Audio Jacks - Line-Out, Line-In and Microphone-In
    - Sound Blaster, Sound Blaster Pro Compatible
    - Digital I/O compatible with consumer mode S/PDIF
    Expansion Slots
    - ATA/100/66/33 Support
    - 1 PCI slots
    Onboard IDE
    - ATA/100/66
    Front I/O ports
    - 2 USB jacks
    - RCA line in
    - Front loading, bootable Compact Flash (any size)
    Back I/O Ports
    - 3 Audio Jacks - Line-out, Mic-in and Line-in
    - Four USB ports (two USB ports located at rear side)
    - 1 EPP/ECP parallel port
    - 1 16C550 compatible serial port
    - 2 External PS/2 Compatible Keyboard /Mouse ports
    - 2 TV output ports (S-Video or optional RCA TV out)
    - 1 S/PDIF out (optional and multiplex with RCA TV out)
    - 1 RJ-45 LAN port
    - 1 PCI slot (Note: support for two PCI devices
    - 4 GPIO, software controllable
    Power Supply - 60 watt DC-DC converter

  53. Re:$500 cost vs $400 for a 2.4ghz dell 4550 deskto by murgee · · Score: 1

    or... you could always grasp the fact that a 2.4GHz PIV tower isn't always the best solution. C3s suck for normal desktop apps, unless you *really* want something small/hidden. But then, I'm feeding the trolls. stupid me.

    --
    mrg
  54. Better-looking system... by Polo · · Score: 1

    For a home-entertainment system, this MSI system looks a LOT nicer.

    It has a lot of audio stuff built in, and you can even power it on separately from the PC. And it has a remote.

    I think this is going to give the shuttle systems a run for the money.

    1. Re:Better-looking system... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How loud are the fans in that thing?

      And yes, this response took me, initially, less that 20 seconds to type. Too bad it got rejected and I had to type all this filler to pad out my time.

  55. Digital sound? by CreateWindowEx · · Score: 1

    Why not just get an optical PC-CARD or USB adapter and go digital out straight into your receiver? Those are pretty cheap, and since it's digital there theoretically shouldn't be any loss. Since you're thinking of springing for an HDTV plasma display, I'm assuming your receiver can do Dolby Digital or DTS 5.1 already and should have decent D-A converter on it.

  56. Re:$500 cost vs $400 for a 2.4ghz dell 4550 deskto by GnarlyNome · · Score: 1

    Yes you are

    --
    Diplomacy is the art of saying "Nice doggie" until you can find a rock. Will Rogers
  57. Small, 2GHz or better, FireWire, and rugged? by Animats · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    What's available that's small, over 2GHz, rugged, and has a FireWire controller?

    This is for a robot vision system, so we need both the MIPS and the ruggedness. Right now, we have some Shuttle boxes, but they're a bit big and not ruggedized enough. The PC/104 and mini-ITX people are mostly stuck below 1GHz; the fastest PC/104 machines out are 1.3GHz mobile Celerons. (I went to the Embedded Systems show yesterday to check this out. Disappointing.)

  58. Forget it with Linux by subStance · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I have exactly this motherboard (EPIA-M series), and have been trying to run linux on it as a home a/v pc. It runs really well under Win2k, but for linux there's no X DRI driver, and the mpeg2 decoder hardware is inaccessible (and VIA won't release specs to OSS devs).

    VIA's linux support for this thing sucks *seriously*. They have binary only drivers that don't work, and don't respond to open-source developers (even VIA's own forums are filled with people who complain about not receiving any reply to linux requests).

    Alan Cox has made comments in the past referring to the strangeness of VIA: (paraphrase from memory) "any vendor that doesn't push chip specs at O/S developers is strange in my book". This doesn't stop with the O/S.

    They're protecting the internals of this thing hard, and they're isolating the free O/S userbase in the process.

    --
    Servlet v2.4 container in a single 161KB jar file ? Try Winstone
    1. Re:Forget it with Linux by WasterDave · · Score: 5, Informative

      There's a castlerock driver in xfree 86. Now. Finally.

      We're talking five days ago, mind. So don't feel so bad :)

      Two things of interest:
      1, The driver is a result of via and Alan Cox working together.
      2, Alan has been using an epia as his main box, and I quote:
      "I have two boxes with the relevant hardware. One of them is my desktop box and I've been running the driver as my main desktop for a couple of weeks now."

      Seal of approval, if ever I saw one.

      Dave

      --
      I write a blog now, you should be afraid.
    2. Re:Forget it with Linux by subStance · · Score: 1

      You magical magical man .... thank you. I'll download it immediately.

      --
      Servlet v2.4 container in a single 161KB jar file ? Try Winstone
    3. Re:Forget it with Linux by Eamon+C · · Score: 1

      I was under the impression that the new source code is just the Slim driver (no MPEG-2 decoding) with some changes by Cox. I'm still holding off until VIA supports MPEG-2 decoding in Linux. Although this is definitely a step in the right direction, it's not quite enough.

  59. Re:Obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your cost figuring is all wet. 70W/cpu * 20cpus is a lot of power. I sure as hell would'nt want to pay the utillity bill! 3W/cpu definatly looks more attractive.

  60. Re:power consumption/size by EinarH · · Score: 1
    Interestingly, a desktop harddrive consumes about 17 watts in typical operation. So the 10 Watt figure is likely optimistic and/or when no peripheral devices are being used.

    Maybe I'm nitpicking but I think 17 watts is a bit high. A Seagate Barracuda V (typical harddrive for a homebox/mediabox setup; high capacity, low price and low noice) has these power requirements:
    +12 VDC +/-10% (amps typ operating) 2.8
    +5 VDC +/-5% (amps typ operating) 0.844

    Power Management (watts)
    Seek 13
    Read/Write 12
    Idle 9.5
    Standby 0.7

    If I remember right Fujitsu have a series of harddrives with even lower power requirements; down towards 10 watts as max power consumtion.
    Or you can get a hard-drive made for mobile computers; they have power consumption below 6 watts (lower capacity though).

    --

    Melius mori in libertate quam vivere in servitute.

  61. Not perfect. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    One caveat, here- as you can plainly see, these have no supporting chipset between the card and the mainboard. This means no (safe) hotplugging, kids.

    *Good* adapters have a chipset that hangs between the IDE bus and the CF slot, which basically just ensures the signals are buffered properly, and only linked through to the bus when the card is seated properly. I gather they also appear as some sort of ATAPI-style device (allowing the system to handle/manage hotplug media presence appropriately), which means that Linux and *BSD may not (always) support them properly.

    What this means is that adapters like these are fine for 'embedded' use- where you just want to replace a hard drive with moving parts (love the 'snap-on' idea!), and bury it inside the case- but poor for use as a reader for cards from your camera/palmtop/mp3 player. People have blown out their onboard IDE controllers trying to hotplug with 'straight-through' adapters like these; they've also done it with poorly-designed IDE 'hot'-swap trays. It might work in software- free *NIXes are quite resilient, and give you tools to rescan/reset the IDE bus while running- but that doesn't mean your hardware was designed to tolerate it.

    So, that said, anyone know of a cheap, properly buffered adapter that's known to work with FreeBSD?

  62. CF as a replacement for Floppy disks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why don't we use CF cards as a replacement for floppy disks?

    I would have, but al CF-IDE adapters I have found don't support "hot" insert of CF cards.

  63. 3dnow, SSE are float engines by autopr0n · · Score: 1

    And so, now that the chips have them their float enignes are even fast. On intel chips, integer multiplication actualy uses the floating point hardware, IIRC.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  64. Smooth DVD movies by DustMagnet · · Score: 2, Informative

    There was a more recent review on Tom's Hardware. Your link from last July. The new M series boards play DVD and MPEG4 smoothly. I think this M-100 box is using an older model.

    --
    'SBEMAIL!' is better than a goat!!
  65. Ogg-only Player by edgarde · · Score: 1
    Wandering from the point cos I have no car, but I'd buy an Ogg-only portable, especially one firmware-upgradable when the MP3 license comes in. I'm one of those guys. I figure one can sell 10-20 such units to us Ogg snobs while raising $$ to pay Fraunhofer.

    This window of opportunity closes when the first useful, cheap mass-market Ogg player -- comparable to Muvo, say -- hits the market.

    1. Re:Ogg-only Player by evilviper · · Score: 1

      Personally, I don't need MP3 support for any players I might buy, at all. That's besides the point though, as it's simply a matter that I don't think he will get enough buyers for an Ogg-only version, to recoup his costs.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  66. Sorry, C3 @800 != PIII @600 by MarcQuadra · · Score: 1

    Sorry, benchmarks be damned. I've got a 500MHz PIII and an 800 MHz C3 sitting right next to each other. The PIII kicks the C3's ass in EVERY application. I'd rather run an underclocked PIII (which might be able to go fanless if clocked low enough) than deal with the C3 anymore.

    The C3/EPIA seems cool, but you can find similar solutions from Intel, built with higher quality and easier to service and support. I used to be a C3 fan but I can't even play a Nintendo emulator on an 800MHz C3 without it choking up, Microsoft Office is laggy on it, and the integrated components all seem second-rate.

    I think VIA would be much better off scrapping the C3 and integrating Intel Ultra Low-Volt PIII chips on their boards. It's either that or implement a HUGE 'backside cache' like Apple did with the G3 series, an 8MB L3 memory cache sitting under the CPU would probably help things out a lot.

    Also, for linux applications, the C3 has no GCC target so ALL code runs unoptimized on it, the PIII (i686 +mmx +sse) has much more mature compiler support and GCC produces much better results on the Intel chip, this will only get more apparent when GCC 3.3 debuts with a VERY well thought-out PIII scheduler, and the C3 will still be using "-march=i486 -mmmx -m3dnow -msse".

    --
    "Sometimes, I think Trent just needs a cup of hot chocolate and a blankie." -Tori Amos on Nine Inch Nails