Slashdot Mirror


Protein-Packed Hard Drives Promise High Capacity

Digimax writes "The New Scientist has an interesting article on a technology being developed by NanoMagnetics which involves using a protein responsible for storing iron in the body to store data on a hard drive. Is this the start of the BioTech revolution?"

142 comments

  1. -1, Redundant by CraigoFL · · Score: 3, Funny

    Insert joke about protein-packed keyboards here...

    1. Re:-1, Redundant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Customer Service Rep: Sorry...we cannot access your account, our harddrive is suffering a hormonal imbalance.

    2. Re:-1, Redundant by GnarlyNome · · Score: 1

      So thats why my kid was trying to stuff a slice of Pizza in the drive slot.

      --
      Diplomacy is the art of saying "Nice doggie" until you can find a rock. Will Rogers
  2. OLEDs? by mboso · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Weren't they here first?

    1. Re:OLEDs? by Boogaroo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Actually the first "BioTech" would probably be something along the lines of the smallpox vaccines that were manufactured by injecting horses and then taking the serum from the blood for the antibodies.

      In the harddrive case, it's a mechanical good. In the smallpox case, it's a medicine. Both are certainly ways to use biological means for manufacturing.

      If someone can think of an earlier biotech, please feel free to let us know!

    2. Re:OLEDs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cheese, wine... Farming, hunting...

    3. Re:OLEDs? by opello · · Score: 1

      we already have "biotech"

      it's called genetically engineered corn

    4. Re:OLEDs? by DocDendrite · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Actually the first "BioTech" would probably be something along the lines of the smallpox vaccines that were manufactured by injecting horses and then taking the serum from the blood for the antibodies.

      If someone can think of an earlier biotech, please feel free to let us know!
      200 years ago it was observed milk maids exposed to cows did not develop smallpox. By innoculating uninfected individuals with the exudate of the cowpox corpustle an immunity was conferred. In fact, today's smallpox vaccine "DryVax" is comprised of elements from this cowpox virus (called Vaccinia).

      On a similar vein, the first noted instance of BioWarfare being employed occured during the Middle Ages. Plague (Yersinia pestis) infected bodies were catapulted over the high walls of fortified strongholds. The hope was that the contagion would spread to the inhabitants.

      -DD

      p.s. I see a lot of biology misinformation on slashdot. I'd like to qualify my post by stating I am a fourth-year PhD student in Molecular Biology. Should anyone wish to correct or amplify my statement please have more expertise than having read "Hot Zone" or "The Coming Plague." Thank you.
  3. I'm downloading as fast as I can, Cap'n! by coupland · · Score: 5, Funny

    It seems to me that if hard drive capacities continue to grow at their current rate, in a few years they will have outstripped the porn industry's ability to fill them.

    Pun unintentional...

    1. Re:I'm downloading as fast as I can, Cap'n! by Buzz_Litebeer · · Score: 1

      Never underestimate the industries ability to find women willing and able to have naked pictures of them taken doing all sorts of extremely interesting things which we might want on our hard.... drive...

      --
      If you don't vote, you don't matter, so don't waste your time telling me your opinion
  4. Great by Cipster · · Score: 4, Funny

    Now we'll have a new excuse for crashes:
    Sorry boss I don't have that document, my hard drive just mutated...

    1. Re:great by shadowbearer · · Score: 1
      --
      It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
    2. Re:Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mutated? No way, mine caught SARS!

    3. Re:great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ha ha, you fat fucking cult freaks! He's dead, deal with it, stuff your lard asses and keep believing the weight's coming off "any day now!"

    4. Re:great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > now even my hard drive is on the atkins diet.

      I'm just surprised I haven't seen any FAT/FAT32 jokes yet.

  5. Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    CowboyNeal's brain is a protein-packed harddrive.

  6. solid state by Pharmboy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Yea, this is all fine and dandy, but doesn't help with speed.

    The real revolution waiting to happen is solid state hard drives that are affordable. Until we get rid of the moving parts, hard drives are going to be very very slow, relatively speaking. For the desktop, this is more important that storage space, since we already have 240gb drives that few can fill.

    --
    Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    1. Re:solid state by Blaine+Hilton · · Score: 1
      Do we really need more speed right now, or storage? I think the hardware needs to slowdown a bit so bigger programs can be created to use this. Remember that hard drives can be put in RAID arrays to increase speed too.

      Go calculate something

    2. Re:solid state by eenglish_ca · · Score: 2, Informative

      We need to go to a 64 bit architecture so that we can can avoid the more than 1 byte sector issue aswell because that takes considerable overhead. In addition, the chemical reactions used in a protein drive would make it much faster than the reading and writing to a magnetic driver.

      --
      Checking out my form of escapism.
    3. Re:solid state by vadim_t · · Score: 1

      Sure we do. It seems that now the CPU is rarely the bottleneck anymore, and instead it's the PCI bus or the hard disk. For example, I upgraded from a Duron 850 to an Athlon MP 2000+. But the time KDE takes to load didn't decrease very noticeably, because now it spends reading the disk all the time during loading. Now if I close it after that, and start it again it loads noticeably faster than before.

    4. Re:solid state by VendingMenace · · Score: 1

      yeah, speed is important, but really only for high end stuff. I think that perhaps you are missing the point of super-high density information storage systems. I mean, sure you would want solid state storage for your desktop and laptop, where size isn't super critical, but what about the guy that wants to carry around the entire library of congress in his watch? i know that is kinda a stupid example, but i think the point is clear. Stuff like this will be great to carrying around mass amounts of information in a itty bitty living space.

      SWEET!

    5. Re:solid state by ciroknight · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The problem is the computer industry is focused on updating the old instead of innovating for new. It took nearly 10 years before anyone even CONSIDERED moving from x86, and still half of the market is still stuck there. Personally, I think Netburst was a nice move from x86, but it wasn't enought, just a marketing scheme to get back control of the market. Anyways: I look forward to seeing new innovative techniques at advancing speeds, hopefully dropping the entire current archtectures and moving on. Just because most people want to upgrade their computers one piece at a time over the span of 5 years doesn't mean that they shouldn't be forced to upgrade all at once every now and again, it helps the economy and overall, helps drive new innovation. So in reality, I hope solid state devices do come into standard, but now is not the time. We need to get the rest of computing up to that level of readiness before we can take the next step in storage. Otherwise the storage will outrun the ability for computers to fill it.

      --
      "Victory means exit strategy, and it's important for the President to explain to us what the exit strategy is." G.W.Bush
    6. Re:solid state by mosch · · Score: 1
      Nah, we're not even close to approaching capacities that we don't know what to do with. 240gigs isn't enough to hold the average dvd collection, and it certainly isn't enough to hold much HD video. Never underestimate man's ability to store shit.

      As for solid state, it's cheap, so long as you pretend the year is 1990.

    7. Re:solid state by Pharmboy · · Score: 1

      but still, anything with moving parts is going to be slower than anything without, generally speaking. I work with large files, my harddrive is absolutely the bottleneck. 64 bit architecture is not a god send, however. If you only need 32 bits to get the job done, you are forcing the cpu and memory to drag the other 32 bits around while doing nothing. I think AMD and IBM have the right approach, a hybrid that allows 32 and 64 bit apps to run at par speeds.

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    8. Re:solid state by Pharmboy · · Score: 1

      yeah, speed is important, but really only for high end stuff. I think that perhaps you are missing the point of super-high density information storage systems. I mean, sure you would want solid state storage for your desktop and laptop, where size isn't super critical, but what about the guy that wants to carry around the entire library of congress in his watch? i know that is kinda a stupid example, but i think the point is clear. Stuff like this will be great to carrying around mass amounts of information in a itty bitty living space.

      No, i dont think its a dumb example at all, its just a different application. Even there, the 'watch hard drive' has moving parts and is more fragile than a solid state device, however. but I can see applications where you have super high density (storage) and where solid state is more imporant. I handle large graphics, so solid state would make my computer literally 3 to 4 times faster. These are files from 10gb to 400gb in size.

      Movie production, animation, databases, would benefit from solid state. Solid state will be much smaller in the short run, regardless. Google might love the extra speed of solid state, but because of the sheer volume of material they store, they will still use traditional hard drives for many years to come. A smaller company might prefer solid state, because it could afford all their web site data on a, say 10gb drive. May keep the OS and libs on a traditional, and just use the hard drive for actual data.

      Solid state is ALREADY taking off, in small ways. My Nikon coolpix 990 uses a 256mb flash card, my printer accepts smart sticks (never used it though). Those of us that handle large media files will benefit. Even in the hobby area, I record tv shows and bust them down to mpegs, to watch later on my pc. These are often 5 gigs in size, with 2x that used as swap to edit the commercials out.

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    9. Re:solid state by ottffssent · · Score: 1

      That depends of course on your definition of "affordable".

      Desktop applications won't benefit much at all from SSDs (with a 15,000RPM SCSI disk, my Athlon XP2200 is nearly always the bottleneck), so we're talking about business needs. Most businesses get along just fine with arrays of SCSI disks. Only a select few applications are random enough in their accesses throughout a large dataset that an SSD would benefit performance.

      For home or small business use, SSDs won't ever catch on because they'll always be more expensive than mass storage for negligable visible gain. Any motherboard made in the past 2 years or so can easily handle 1.5G of RAM, and many will take more, but your average user has something like 128-256M. Part of the problem is braindead OSes which use the disk to cache RAM rather than the other way around, but even so most users clearly aren't willing to pay the price for the RAM, let alone the manufacturing, design, validation, etc. to make an SSD.

    10. Re:solid state by Pharmboy · · Score: 1

      for most people, it makes more sense to store
      DVDs on the disks they came on. Assuming you bought them. But even then, MOST of us need speed more than more space. If all else fails, I can easily add an external usb2 or firewire hard drive cheap enough, but that isnt going to make the computer FASTER. The hard drive IS the bottleneck for anyone doing more with their computer than surfing and email.

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    11. Re:solid state by JDevers · · Score: 2, Informative

      In what way is Intel's NetBurst NOT x86? New bus topography comes and goes but the instruction set stays the same. I would say that x86-64 is a much more significant change to the core architecture than NetBurst which is basically marketing speak for a slightly different bus layout combined with a very deeply pipelined CPU.

    12. Re:solid state by dupper · · Score: 1, Interesting
      240gb drives that few can fill

      I've had to delete more than most people have ever had.

    13. Re:solid state by Pharmboy · · Score: 4, Informative

      More ram incurs more overhead. After a point, it ends up slowing your box down if you are not actually USING the extra ram.

      Even with a 15k scsi drive, if you handle large files, which is becoming more and more common, the hard drive is going to be the bottleneck. Even if you only handle small files, the access time for a hard drive is generally 100 times slower than the access time for ram, regardless of how you RAID it, or the spindle speed. That is a lot of idle time when loading large files, or accessing lots of small files. Granted, SCSI helps because it takes the load off the cpu.

      I can't possibly see how your athlon 2200 is the bottle neck, except when you are doing cpu intensive stuff. If I am pulling a filter in Photoshop, yea. Raytracing, etc. I expect that. But I use photoshop every day, and the amount of time I spend pulling a filter is still much less than loading and saving files.

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    14. Re:solid state by mlush · · Score: 3, Interesting
      The real revolution waiting to happen is solid state hard drives that are affordable.

      Solid state hard drives are already affordable. (as a price point on flash RAM USB key drives are about 1$/Mb). Say a 128Mb of Flash RAM cache on a 20Gb hard disk could provide instant access to frequently used files and come to think of it, would be able to defragment itself. I guess would not cost more than $200 (?)

      Does such a product exist? and if not <Bangs table> Why not??

    15. Re:solid state by Pharmboy · · Score: 1

      what i have seen in solid state drives start at $2000 for very small, and $10,000 for not as small. Just like ram, when you get into larger sizes, you don't get the same "$ per mb" savings you would expect, because the volume is so low.

      As a point of comparison, compare 1gb vs 256mb ram prices.

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    16. Re:solid state by yintercept · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Generally things go faster as they get smaller. At the nano-level, I suspect that the the difference between "solid state" and "mechanical" blurs a bit.

      As for the speed thing, different storage types have different merits. A great deal of information is accessed rarely. Look at the newspaper. Today's edition will be read by several hundred thousand people...the service delivering this page needs to be fast.

      The archives of yesterday's news has a different dynamic. The June 7th, 1981 sports section might be accessed once or twice per year. The indexing device for the archived paper still needs to be fast...the data itself needs to be on a slower, reliable media.

      The true art in computer design isn't just having the fastest components, but having the components matched to their tasks.

    17. Re:solid state by wideBlueSkies · · Score: 4, Insightful

      >>Just because most people want to upgrade their computers one piece at a time over the span of 5 years doesn't mean that they shouldn't be forced to upgrade all at once every now and again, it helps the economy and overall, helps drive new innovation.

      Does this sound like the line of thinking over in Redmond or what?

      Holy shit. Someone should be forced to upgrade? WTF? Why should that be? Should I be forced to give up my classic 1974 Chevy Impala because it's not 'up to date'?...because there are newer and more efficient engines available? Why is a computer any different?

      I don't mean to attack the author personally, but I don't like this kind of thinking.

      --
      Huh?
    18. Re:solid state by schmink182 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Should I be forced to give up my classic 1974 Chevy Impala because it's not 'up to date'?...because there are newer and more efficient engines available?

      Maybe. Less efficient engines are horrible for the environment. Should the atmosphere have to suffer because of your Impala?

      Okay, I was obviously exaggerating there, but I just wanted to show how it's not exactly as black and white as you think.

    19. Re:solid state by violent.ed · · Score: 0

      Should I be forced to give up my classic 1974 Chevy Impala because it's not 'up to date'?...because there are newer and more efficient engines available? Why is a computer any different?

      upgrading your car & upgrading your box are two totally diffrent things. Your '74 Impala still gets the job done no matter how old it is (as long as it runs the way it should)... it gets you from point A to point B in a resonable amount of time. Your computer on the other hand may not be able to handle the stuff that you want it to do, and therefore an upgrade is necessary to git it to do what yu want it to.

      Kinda like if you wanted your Impala to beat a 1000HP+ funnycar that has a Nitrus system. yu just wont win ;) or even qualify for that matter (hence the Minimum Specs for GameX to run)

      --
      - You're not paranoid, they really are after you.
    20. Re:solid state by DarkFyre · · Score: 1

      Sure, sure. But Flash RAM can only be written/erased a few thousand times. People got pissed when hard disk warranties went down to a year - how will they feel when a disk wears out in months?

    21. Re:solid state by ciroknight · · Score: 1

      *err i made a boo boo this morn, i meant Itanium LOL sorry :p

      --
      "Victory means exit strategy, and it's important for the President to explain to us what the exit strategy is." G.W.Bush
    22. Re:solid state by rabidcow · · Score: 1

      But Flash RAM can only be written/erased a few thousand times.

      iirc, it's a hundred thousand to a million times. Mind you, I'd still perfer much higher for mass storage.

      People got pissed when hard disk warranties went down to a year - how will they feel when a disk wears out in months?

      What part of the drive do you write to that often, other than swap space?

      As for swap, think about it. If memory is cheap enough to use as mass storage, would you need swap?

      re mlush's price point, "as a price point on flash RAM USB key drives are about 1$/Mb":

      CF cards are under $.20/MB

    23. Re:solid state by kesuki · · Score: 2, Informative

      His point, was that brain dead operating systems could be using ram to speed up the hard drive -- instead of using the hard drive to pretend you have more ram.
      More ram does and does not incur more overhead.
      your computer already has to deal with the overhear of being able to address 4 GB of memory. It's 32-bit and that's how much memory it can address. Unless you've got more than 4 GB of RAM installed the overhead is _already_ built into the system.
      This is part of why the 64-bit Opteron with it's 40-bits of addressable and 48-bits of virtually adressable space adds a slight overhead, and slightly lower memory perfomance than a 32-bit athlon at the same clock speed.
      Yeah, being able to address 1 TB of ram is kinda silly if you don't even need to address 4 GB, since there is a performance penaltry in being able to address 1TB. That's why the opteron doesn't have a 64-bit addressable memory space It only needs 1 TB for today's 4-8way server applications.
      But adding more ram only incurs boot time overhead in 'checking' that ram to make sure it's good.
      It doesn't decrease performance anywhere else, because the adressable range is already designed into the system. so the performance hit is already there.

    24. Re:solid state by Have+Blue · · Score: 1

      Don't forget Amdahl's(sp?) Law either. Everything gets optimized sooner or later, if only because everything else has already been optimized.

    25. Re:solid state by VendingMenace · · Score: 1

      yeah, i totally agree...solid state is SWEET! i mean its gotta go that way eventually. it is so easy to use and, as you say, fast. but there are aplications where speed is not the most critical aspect, and for stuff like that i think that storage devices that use small molecules will provide such amazing inforamtion density that they cannot be ignored..but that is just my two sense.

    26. Re:solid state by Viol8 · · Score: 1

      I was running Linux on a 486 until 2 years ago when the motherboard died. It did everything I
      needed at a perfectly acceptable rate even running mpegs under xwindows. This constant ungrade
      cycle for PCs is simply because Windows is such a badly written piece of crap it needs virtual supercomputer MIPS
      to run at any acceptable speed.

    27. Re:solid state by Viol8 · · Score: 1

      Agreed. I see no reason why a person should be forced to upgrade simply to keep some companies
      profits in the black and pay out huge dividends to shareholders. I'll upgrade when *I* want
      to , not when some overpaid suit thinks I should.

    28. Re:solid state by Pharmboy · · Score: 1

      More ram does and does not incur more overhead...

      But adding more ram only incurs boot time overhead in 'checking' that ram to make sure it's good.


      Need to check your facts. Try running 98 or ME with over 256mb ram. Also, on ANY system, the more ram, the more OS overhead. Its a price worth paying if you use it. but if you put 16gb of ram on your moms email machine, it would slow it down because the os keeps track of something it doesn't use. It doesnt manage memory it doesnt have, only memory it does.

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    29. Re:solid state by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > Should the atmosphere have to suffer because of your Impala?

      That's assuming the atmosphere suffers at all from the Impala. I understand the exaggeration, but I think it's all-too-common for people to assume that something is more complex than it really is. Life changing decisions aren't all that hard unless the person making the decision decides that it is hard.

    30. Re:solid state by Oriumpor · · Score: 1

      at about 220gigs you run out of all that kazaa has that isn't porn

    31. Re:solid state by kesuki · · Score: 1

      You need to check your facts.
      Explain how memory that is neither writen to, nor read to, incurs any form or performance hit???
      Unless you've recompiled your kernel, so as that it uses a smaller address space than 32-bits then there would be no performance difference. And if you recompiled, to say use 24-bit addressing, and the hardware was doing 32-bit addressing the perfomance hit would be for using 24-bit addressing, since the hardware was expecting 32-bit addresses for ram.
      Modern hardware is designed to address 4GB... aka 32-bit addressing of memory.
      Just because the address is
      000000f0 doesn't mean you can truncate it to f0.
      same performance hit for supporting 32-bits of addressable memory. Doesn't matter ig you have 8 MB of ram, or 4 GB, every processor since the 486 has been using 32-bit memory addressing. The hardware initially was truncating those addresses, because they could only manage a smaller amount of ram. But today's motherboards are fully 32-bit addressable. Which means you'll get no perfonace difference between having 64MB from having 4 GB.
      (although technically some boards are still shipping that can only handle 2 GB (31-bits) of addressable space)
      Explain to me how neither 'reading nor writing'
      ram incurs a perfomance hit, through what you call 'managing memory.' Obviously there must be something causing the operating system to read or write that 'unused' ram to incur a perfomance hit, like perhaps that kazza software you've got installed...

      In the win98(first edition) limit of 256MB (28-bit) (98SE and ME are 512MB (29-bit) -- talk about getting facts straight!) the problem there is software related.
      the performance hit isn't actually from having more ram, but from how the OS screws up upon finding out it has more ram that it was built to handle.
      The opteron actually has ffffffffff (40 bits) of addressable space with virtual adressable space of ffffffffffff (48-bits) Instead of today's computers capability for 32 bits (ffffffff)
      And yes, there Is a perfomance hit for going up to 40-bit Just check the operton ram benckmarks on tomshardware.com
      That perfomance isn't just because the opteron samples are new -- they're because ram has an extra 8-16 bits depending on if it's installed physically or virtually.
      There is virtually no performance saving by software only addressing part of the 32-bits that the hardware does.
      Especially since there is then an enormous perormance hit when an application like photoshop decides it needs to address more bits of memory than the system was set up to address. if that doesn't just crash and lockup the whole system! like windows 95 used to all the time, because they were stuck on the whole 'what program could ever need more than 24-bits(16MB) of memory!'
      Anyways, The hardware has been adressing 32-bits of memory since the 486 came out, and the perfomance hit has been built into the architecture since then. only highly tweaked memory controllers that could only address say 26 bits (like my old K-6 board) had perfomance issues with more than 64 MB (in this instance) RAM.
      Why, I've still got a laptop that can only address 25.5-bits (I'm assuming that's really 26-bit, but the slots can only handle 32MB per slot, with half soldiered on permanently) of ram (48MB, thanks COMPAQ)
      But Really, a modern motherboard (like an Nforce2) won't have any perfomance hit between 256MB and 2GB and all the motherboards 'worth buying' for the past 3-4 years have all been in that category.
      Albeit not all motherboards sold in the past 3-4 years have been capable of addressing 32-bits of memory, but the ones worth buying have.

    32. Re:solid state by chainsaw1 · · Score: 1

      You don't change magnetic fields with chemical reactions (at least in this case). The encapsulating of the magneticly active particle in the hard disk is a chemical reaction. The field that particle has will have to be manipulated in some other way (which, according to the article, was TBD due to the small size of the particles).

      The most a chemical reaction can do to a magneticly active element/molecule is make it non-magnetic, or to undo the previous reaction.

      --
      - Sig
  7. Hmmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Use number 4,597 for Tofu!

    Tofu: It's what's for dinner.

  8. Re:slashdot is fucking stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ummm, no. Anarchists wear black.

    Fascist pigs wear red, white and blue.

  9. many choices by ciroknight · · Score: 2, Interesting

    is it just me, or is there a LOT of different ways to make a high capacity hard drive these days.....

    --
    "Victory means exit strategy, and it's important for the President to explain to us what the exit strategy is." G.W.Bush
    1. Re:many choices by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      I prefer punch cards myself.

      Sid Dabster is so cool.

  10. Distributed folding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And here I thought that this was refuring to the 35 DF sets I have stuck on mu HD because the server is down.

  11. Funny quote from article by 1nv4d3r · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Aligning individual magnetic grains is a problem for all of us," agrees Mayes.

    That quote struck me as funny. Like he's talking about world hunger or something. He's got a point, though...I do have a real problem getting individual magnetic grains lined up--in fact I can honestly say I've never successfully done it.

    If I come up with something more insightful to say, I'll post it to this afternoon's dupe.

  12. Yummy by Your_Mom · · Score: 3, Funny

    Hard Drives, now part of your daily balanced breakfast...

    --
    Objects in the blog are closer then they ap
  13. Excellent by Timesprout · · Score: 1

    So in a few years I will be able to blame my forgetfulness on burning protein when I work out. So my woman can either have me fit, trim and forgetful or sporting a splendid beer belly and able to remember those 142 yearly special occasions/aniversaries every woman seems to have .... well maybe remember some of them anyway

    --
    Do not try to read the dupe, thats impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth
    What truth?
    There is no dupe
  14. Heh by Otter · · Score: 4, Funny
    Is this the start of the BioTech revolution?

    Yup, recombinant protein therapies and artificial livers were cute, but biotech hasn't yielded any _real_ products until someone started making larger capacity hard drives!

    I was about to indignantly jump onto my molecular biologist high horse, and started laughing instead. Can't really criticize -- as far as I'm concerned, all that mysterious stuff physicists do seems impressive but it's nothing to me until I can stop worrying about downloading one SHN file too many.

    1. Re:Heh by timeOday · · Score: 1

      But based on results thus far, wouldn't you agree "biotech" has been overhyped? A "revolution" would be something that the average person would notice.

    2. Re:Heh by bj8rn · · Score: 1

      Well, then we should call it something else, until people notice it - biotech revolt, for instance. Or, inspired by Star Wars, the biotech rebellion. "Join the biotech rebellion today! Fight for a better biosphere!"

      --
      Hell is not other people; it is yourself. - Ludwig Wittgenstein
    3. Re:Heh by Otter · · Score: 1
      I wouldn't disagree with that (although just as the original vision of nanotech was very different from a protein hard drive, biotech has accomplished a lot that wasn't in the original hype).

      Just laughing at the tone of "We have a new hard drive technology! Now _that's_ a revolution!"

    4. Re:Heh by Xeth · · Score: 1
      Yup, recombinant protein therapies and artificial livers were cute, but biotech hasn't yielded any _real_ products until someone started making larger capacity hard drives!

      It's not technology until it's been applied to getting more porn.

      --
      If your theory is different from practice, then your theory is wrong.
    5. Re:Heh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Thought I'd throw in a simpsons quote...

      Lindsay: Yes. For example, no one was showing up for jury duty, so we made the experience more exciting by synergizing it with his comic book collection.

      Moe: [reading] You have been chosen to join the Justice Squadron, 8 a.m. Monday at the Municipal Fortress of Vengeance. Oh, I am *so* there.

    6. Re:Heh by Idarubicin · · Score: 1
      A "revolution" would be something that the average person would notice.

      Well, alternatives were considered to Biotechnology Revolution, but they were rejected. We didn't think it would be as dramatic if we called it the Biotechnology Occasional-Flurry-of-Media-Hype or the Biotechnology Steady-Flow-Of-Incremental-Improvements.

      Think about it--who here watches CSI? Show me one episode where some sort of DNA testing and matching didn't play a role*. Now tell me...when did that happen? Even the shiniest new technologies get absorbed into our collective subconscious after a little bit of media coverage. We don't really remember what life was like before those technologies, and don't think about the changes.

      *(Rhetorical question; if such an episode exists, I don't need to hear about it.)

      --
      ~Idarubicin
  15. Gym Food by T-Kir · · Score: 0

    Ahh, protein bars that are used for 'intelligent' purposes, instead of 'muscle heads' ;-)

    And for those of you who think I'm slagging off people who go to the gym, I'm joking (plus I'm a gym regular myself).

    --
    Are you local? There's nothing for you here!
  16. Re:slashdot is fucking stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ever heard of Mussolini's blackshirts?

    And what about the Gestapo? Huh?

    Oh, and Anarchists are just commies who can't grow armpit hair yet.

  17. Protein sticks by MMaestro · · Score: 1

    So will Slimjims because the new data sticks for these hard drives?

  18. Says nothing about speed by arvindn · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The article is silent on the question of how fast data can be read from the device - both in terms of bandwidth and latency. I would imagine that anything that's protein based would be awfully slow, and hence suitable only for long term data storage. But if it takes days just to fill the disk its probably useless. In any case, disk sizes have already gotten to the point where only a small fraction, perhaps 5% of users fill them to anywhere near their full capacity. So unless the internet becomes the primary medium of distribution of movies or something like that I don't see these kinds of devices having more than a niche market.

    1. Re:Says nothing about speed by KilerCris · · Score: 1

      So unless the internet becomes the primary medium of distribution of movies or something like that I don't see these kinds of devices having more than a niche market.

      whoa, it isn't??!?

    2. Re:Says nothing about speed by dtldl · · Score: 1

      You can always trust M$ to fill anything, echoes of a 640k related quote. And if you rtfa then the technology is based on existing hard drive technology, the protiens are just used to coat the surface of the platter with a higher density than is possible otherwise. Aaand since its based on existing technology, you can expect similar or faster speeds since speed has increases along with density.

  19. protein HD by e**(i+pi)-1 · · Score: 1

    > Is this the start of the BioTech revolution?"
    At least you will be able to eat the plates before giving the rest away to prevent revealing their secrets.

  20. Vicorian era holdback by spineboy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'll paraphrase William Gibson

    "Doesn't it seem weird to have these high-tech computers with little spinning discs inside them. It seems like a hold out of some Victorian technology - like a more modern record player."

    Solid state has to be the way to go - no more waiting for your computer to "boot up", just turn it on and it's running your desktop, right where you left it last. Sure solid state SEEMS expensive now, but remember how much a 40 MEG hard drive cost 15 years ago? We just need to throw money at it and the price will drop. I mean come on chips are CHEAP - they're in everything

    --
    ..........FULL STOP.
    1. Re:Vicorian era holdback by airuck · · Score: 1

      "Solid state has to be the way to go - no more waiting for your computer to "boot up", just turn it on and it's running your desktop, right where you left it last."

      Absolutely. We already have it in PDA architectures where it makes obvious sense for a number of reasons, including intermittent use and low power consumption. Will we one day look back with amusement on big power supplies, power hungry cpus and disks, and large volume cases with amusement? Probably, but I am still pretty impressed with what we have now.

      --
      First entomology, then virology, and finally bioinformatics systems. Bugs follow me wherever I go.
    2. Re:Vicorian era holdback by Pharmboy · · Score: 1

      What is holding it back is critical mass, until people DEMAND it, no one will fully develop it, and until it is developed and produced in great quantities, you can't expect the 'economy of scale' to kick in.

      It WILL the future, SOME type of solid state storage. Just like VCRs, video cams, etc., its expensive at first until sales reach a point that the manufacturers see enough demand to develop it further, and reap the benefits of the volumes. Then competition will kick in, which will drop the prices. Ironically, this means two years AFTER everyone wants it, but it is coming. Its the last of the moving parts in a computers (fans not included).

      Personally, I would settle for a nice 10gb solid state drive for doing work, and batch it all back to a traditional hard drive after I am done working, as a stop gap measure. They have drives this size, but they don't publish prices generally (any vendor) and it falls under the "if you have to ask, you can't afford it" catagory, still.

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    3. Re:Vicorian era holdback by Fweeky · · Score: 2, Funny
      Will we one day look back with amusement on big power supplies, power hungry cpus and disks, and large volume cases with amusement?

      The way things are going, we'll look back and laugh at the problems we thought *we* had, before trying to find the leak on our Liquid O2 cooling system to soak up the 10MW of heat coming from our desktops, while handling our Palmtops with oven gloves.
    4. Re:Vicorian era holdback by Viol8 · · Score: 1

      "No more waiting for it to boot up , just turn in on...".

      Hmm , you mean like a commore 64, vic 20 , spectrum or any of a dozen other 8 bit computers that
      had everything in ROM before hard drivers became popular? I agree. :)

  21. Is this the start of the BioTech revolution? by echorun · · Score: 1

    No

    --
    The human condition is to not accept the human condition.
  22. Digesting information by dfn5 · · Score: 3, Funny

    In the future people won't read books, they will eat their hard drives. Information never tasted so good.

    --
    -- Thou hast strayed far from the path of the Avatar.
    1. Re:Digesting information by Kufat · · Score: 1

      >In the future people won't read books, they will eat their hard drives.

      I guess I'm ahead of the curve on this one!

    2. Re:Digesting information by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hahaha in teh future i will hav all knowledge in my protine and u will lern by eating my com u will suk my cok to go to skool and u must swollow to lern!!!!!infomation never tasteds o good lozl!!!!!

  23. Interesting. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now we are going to get spam for hard drive refills. Fortunately, it could be combined with those spams that claim to increase your ejaculation by 547%.

  24. great by mattkime · · Score: 4, Funny

    now even my hard drive is on the atkins diet.

    --
    Know what I like about atheists? I've yet to meet one that believes God is on their side.
  25. Does this mean... by imaniack · · Score: 1

    those muscular jocks can serve as data storage devices in the future?

  26. Re:slashdot is fucking stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ummm, no. Fascist pigs wear red, white, and black.

  27. Increasing current capacity by ciroknight · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This reminds me of an idea I came across once. Why not build a hardware gzip chip (Like the one on these PCI cards and embed it on the controller for the harddrive. While this may slow down speeds a little, we can get a lot more data on current drives. Even though this may be counter productive right now, later on with these SUPER fast disk drives we could really cram some data onto them :)

    --
    "Victory means exit strategy, and it's important for the President to explain to us what the exit strategy is." G.W.Bush
    1. Re:Increasing current capacity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice idea, until you get a single bit of corruption and end up losing the entire drive.

    2. Re:Increasing current capacity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except most big harddrives are full of mp3 and divx, not exactly gzip material...

  28. I can see the tag line now... by Captain+Beefheart · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Western Digital--nutritious and delicious!"

  29. Brings a whole new meaning... by jwbing · · Score: 1

    ... to getting a computer virus.

  30. Meh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Is this the start of the BioTech revolution?"

    No, that happened over a decade ago. But hey, who needs history?

  31. New Scientist article sucks by Muhammar · · Score: 5, Insightful

    New Scientisct article writen by somebody ignorant in material science: skips the important stuff and dwells on marginal. The company site more informative.

    Magnetic particles in storage media must be evenly spaced and right size. This protein is used as a mold and spacer for making and placing the magnetic particles. The protein is spherical, has cavity which can be filled with magnetic stuff and forms crystal-ordered-like monolayer on support surface. Burning the protein leaves the magnetic particles in caramelized yuck. All this done in with external magnetic field. And since we are baking it well above Curie temperature of the magnetic material, cooling will produce the particles nicely magneticaly aligned.

    [To organize apricot pits, place a baking tray covered with apricots in oven pre-heated to 475F for 2 hours, and do not stir.]

    --
    I doubt that we will ever figure out - and I suspect that even if we did figure out we couldn't do much about it
    1. Re:New Scientist article sucks by TheRealRamone · · Score: 2, Informative

      Agreed. Here's what the company's website says:

      Technology Overview

      Hard disk drives currently store information at densities up to 70 billion bits (or gigabits) per square inch, with data stored as microscopic magnetic patterns arranged in circumferential tracks on a media. At extreme magnification, individual bits of data are revealed to be composed from grains of different sizes and shapes. The density at which information can be stored is restricted by how cleanly these patterns can be represented. Current production technology is limited by coarse granularity as well as the presence of some very small grains which spontaneously lose their memory - the superparamagnetic effect. These limitations will likely only allow for a possible tripling of storage capacity in the future. To significantly extend storage capacity, data patterns would ideally be recorded on orderly and uniform grains.

      NanoMagnetics grows tiny magnetic grains within hollow protein spheres called "apoferritin", which are 10,000 times smaller than the diameter of human hair. The resulting nanoparticles are limited in size by the inner cavity of the spheres, producing highly uniform material which we call DataInk(TM). Importantly, DataInk(TM) is produced using mild and inexpensive chemical techniques.

      The resulting particles can pack closely, like oranges on a grocery shelf. Films of DataInk(TM) are baked (or "annealed") to optimize their magnetic performance, and to also carbonize the protein spheres. What remains is an ordered assembly of uniform, magnetic grains. This type of media is ideal to expand the storage capacity of hard disk drives, as it is able to support smaller and smaller patterns. Using individual grains to represent bits of data, this protein-derived media could ultimately extend densities to between 5,000 and 10,000 Gbits/in2.

      Current Status Since our Series A round in 1999, NanoMagnetics has sustained a 1700% annual increase in areal density. At this rate, we will overtake industry's anticipated areal densities by Q3 2003. Leveraging on our compelling progress, NanoMagnetics will aim to qualify DataInk(TM)-enhanced media, then partner with one or more hard disk manufacturers for the next generation of drives. NanoMagnetics' phenomenal series of milestones and their dates are as follows:

      August 1999 - 75 bpi or 0.002 Gbits/in2 August 2001 - 0.7 Gbit/in2 December 2001 - 2.2 Gbit/in2 June 2002 - 6.0 Gbit/in2 August 2002 - 12.1 Gbit/in2

      The Company is currently preparing to scale up the manufacture of DataInk(TM) and is working with a number of key industry players.

    2. Re:New Scientist article sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [To organize apricot pits, place a baking tray covered with apricots in oven pre-heated to 475F for 2 hours, and do not stir.]

      I'll have to remember that, looks like the tree is gonna give us tons of 'em this year.

  32. My hard drive by smileyy · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    My hard drive is already filled with protein, but that has more to do with muzzle velocity than it does with any sort of research or experimentation.

    --
    pooptruck
  33. New Scientist... by JDevers · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm going to point out something that no one else seems to have noticed yet. This is an article in New Scientist, that should be enough said who ever actually read it. The have a real penchant for investigating off the wall oddball ideas then writing up the issue with just enough slant that one who reads it takes the same mentality as those who think cars which run on water have been made but are being held back by the big car manufacturers and oil companies. Virtually every issue of New Scientist has at least ONE grand convoluted conspiracy theory. I'm not saying there is no basis at all for this, just that New Scientist isn't exactly a reputable news source much less something approaching a peer-reviewed scientific journal. They are much more like Scientific American but don't even approach that level of credibility.

    That said, go ahead and debate it all you want. I just think (as a molecular biologist...more DNA focused than applied protein mechanics like this, but still fairly well versed) that by the time all the "bugs" for this are worked out we'll have leapfrogged the whole idea of magnetic media Winchester syle drives. This is the equivalent to making a perfect artificial diamond point for a record player, by the time we had the tech to do it the world had already moved onto CDs or other media for the overwhelming majority of uses of said records...People still make record players, but they are a niche market to say the absolute least.

    1. Re:New Scientist... by Muhammar · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The technique is very clever, but it is fringe. This is a very small company developing new technology. They may win big, but right now they do not have anything marketable and won't have too soon. They operate on private financing and have to advertise their cutting-edge proprietary technology breakthrough whatever to attract investment to keep going.

      I worked for a company like this, so I take it with some scepticism.

      --
      I doubt that we will ever figure out - and I suspect that even if we did figure out we couldn't do much about it
    2. Re:New Scientist... by Alric · · Score: 1

      With no sarcasm and much sincere desire to obtain quality information, I ask you, JDevers, what should I read instead of New Scientist?

      I read New Scientist infrequently, but it always seems interesting to me. I subscribe to various programming journals for my profession and The Economist for general global issues, and I would really like to subscribe to a couple general science magazines. In particular, I would like a magazine that covers all aspects of emerging science and technology, something that has in-depth articles providing real substance, understandable to those who have a strong science background but do not work in the topic's field. Also, I have been trying to find a computer journal that covers new hardware, without excessive hype.

      Rarely I stop by the local college library, but I never find exactly what I want. And my professional/familial time commitments pretty much demand home delivery of a magazine. And I don't want to spend an excessive amount of money on a journal that I read for personal edification, not professional; for my budget, my limit on a subscription fee is around $100 per year.

      If anybody has some good suggestions, I am eager to be enlightened.

    3. Re:New Scientist... by JDevers · · Score: 1

      I would suggest either Discover or Scientific American. Discover is more like New Scientist in format but less fringe. Scientific American is a bit more article oriented.

      I wasn't really trying to bash New Scientist, just trying to display that what they write about isn't exactly always on the scientific horizon. I know that it isn't a journal and isn't intended to be and also that scientific "prospecting" is a somewhat valid idea, but I just think that New Scientist does it a bit more than they should.

  34. Read the label, Vegans. by desertfish · · Score: 3, Funny

    It sounds like these proteins come from either humans or animals. I'm surprised their source was not revealed in the article.

    Looks like animal-friendly consumers will need to read the ingredients labels on hard drives, as well as motherboards?

    1. Re:Read the label, Vegans. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was about to say the same thing.

      One research vendor notes it's "widely distributed throughout the animal and plant kingdoms," but off the top of my head, I'd guess the most readily available source at present would be from cattle byproducts. It's not like computing doesn't contribute to fossil fuel use and deforestation as it is, but this adds a fun new ethical twist. (Brings to mind the whole 'BSD daemon T-shirt in Texas' story.)

      Of course, if it *is* so common, it might still be cheaper to grow/engineer a bacterium to produce it once demand kicks up, given purification costs. The question then is, is it more or less ethical to use the relatively 'vegetarian' (if not vegan?) bacterium-produced protein, when the byproducts of animal slaughter are causing waste disposal problems of their own?

  35. Mmmmm by ZorMonkey · · Score: 3, Funny

    Soon our PCs will be more nutritious than most junk food. I suppose that makes recycling them more efficient. Consume and flush!

  36. They're made out of Meat by billstewart · · Score: 1
    http://terrybisson.com/meat.html

    You've seen the story by Terry Bisson, no sense repeating it here....

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  37. ...mostly because this is a dumb idea by sultanoslack · · Score: 2, Insightful
    • hard drive space is cheap
    • hard drive speed is not
    • we can make hard drive big enough that they are not a limiting factor for 99.99% of applications
    • hard disk IO speed is a limiting factor for most application

    Add to this the fact that most data either is (a) speed critical or (b) does not compress well. i.e. database data you normally want very quickly, same for applications. The things that fill modern home computers are media files, which are already heavily compressed.

  38. Not the desktop... PVRs by tukkayoot · · Score: 1
    If I got hooked up with a broadband Internet connection, given software bloat what it is, I'm pretty sure that I could fill a 625 GB hard drive in a couple years time, but that's not really what important. I'd probably rather have a solid state drive for speed, sure, but there's nothing to say I couldn't have both. Maybe one day "small" 10 GB-ish solid strive drives will act as cache for terabyte protein drives.

    But even ignoring the desktop, big drives like this would be great, even if they are somewhat sluggish. If you can get the prices down to affordable levels, you can stick one of these things in a TiVo, ReplayTV, what have you, and keep all of your favorite movies, every season and every episode of your favorite TV shows, as well as all the big sports events, stored on one box using nearly lossless compression.

    Personally I think that's pretty cool.

    But I'll believe all of this when I see it. I'm just a layman, but I don't see anything that's convincing me that we're going to see a huge leap in hard drive technology any time soon.

  39. Oh great, computer maintenence gets harder! by G.I.+Suck · · Score: 1

    Now I'm going to have to feed my computer every 8 hours to make sure it gets enough protien. I'll also will have to get a litterbox for when its done, too! Maintaining a pet is bad enough, but jeez....

  40. Hype by sillybilly · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Biotech is another hype industry that will go bust. Biological beings need a constant expanding of energy just to repair and upkeep their organic shape. A lot of complex organic compounds degrade without this constant repair work going on. So a real biotech harddrive will either be "alive," and have a mechanism to upkeep itself, replicating damaged parts, or it would not be true biotech, but a news on the level of "tiny magnets encapsulated in a polymer or organic binder" - so what? I wonder what the lifetime of such a device would be - personally I prefer inorganic storage devices, even if they themselves have short lifetimes: flash cards can only be written to for a few thousand times, CDR ink degrades in a decade or two(depends on light exposure), and harddrive magnetic media starts to forget after a decade. Now throw proteins into the coctail and see how long they last. I wonder.

  41. one problem here.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Heat issues. neet to keep the hard disk temperature in check exactly. like our own internal body temperature, if we get too hot, proteins start to denature causing death, i believe this happens at 106 degrees farenheight or so. In terms of the HDD this would cause data loss.

  42. Copying nature is worth 1 billion years of R&D by cyko500 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    We've had computers around for a while and have some of the smartest people working to make them even better using the latest and greatest technology, but why not just copy nature? Life has been on this planet for a billion or so years. Evolution has had much more time than us to make this run effiecient. Our bodies are far more effiecient than anything we can design even with the obviously "poor" . Things we have just barely now come to understand have been going on in nature for quite some time. Nature has also had a long time to weed out the crap. Despite that our macrodevelopment could be improved, on the molecular level living creatures on this planet are damned effiecient. If we take the effiecient molecules that nature has created and combine them with our much better designing skills (nature does some stupid shit.... like making the trachea and esophagus join at the pharynx which allows us to choke to death) we will get some kickass new technology. What will be a REAL technoevolution is when we figure out how neurons actually store memory. That will allow us to make hard drives, RAM, and processors a single unit which will be 1000x faster and have 1000x the storage capacity at minimum. Not to mention the fact that computers will then be able to learn (put some Actual Intelligence in those games) and the intefacing possiblities would be kickass.... I doubt that'll be in my lifetime, though, with the moral issues and whatnot. Sorry about the mindless rant, I'm a med student... :)

  43. Old stuff to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Our lab was doing research on protein HD's a long time ago in the air force. These guys are just taking the ground research to a production level.

  44. Atkins approach to storage by MoFoQ · · Score: 1

    Yup...it's the late Dr. Atkins' approach to data storage; proteins.

    I wonder if protein shakes will increase storage capacity. :-p

  45. Heh by Cybo2002 · · Score: 1

    "Mom!! The Hard Drive Is Growing Mold Again!!!!"

  46. For a new generation of hard drives.... by wo1verin3 · · Score: 1

    ... will come a new Generation of viruses

    * Captain Janeway, I strongly suggest we insert the Nanovirus in the cubes central plexus.

  47. Because the read/write method doesn't change! by YuppieScum · · Score: 3, Informative

    The process is about how to organise and homogenise the arrangement of magnetic particles on the disc surface.

    Reading and writing is still done the way it is today (mangentically) but, with a more regular magnetic matrix, greater storage densities can be acheived...

    --
    This sig left unintentionally blank.
  48. Protein sticks-If it breaks? You keep both pieces. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "So will Slimjims because the new data sticks for these hard drives?"

    The catch phrase you DON'T want to hear.

    "Snap into a SlimJim".

  49. and viruses and bacteria by zogger · · Score: 1

    ..and how would viruses and bacteria effect this new media? Seems like you'd need a clean room to assemble these things at a level 4 facility threshold to keep them prisitine clean. And because drives need to be vented in some small fashion now, seems like it would be almost impossible. I have a hard enough tiome keeping BIG things out of my gear. Yesterday I dug out an old HP printer to see if I could get it to work on an old computer I have for a project to run away from my regular machine. WELL, seems mr mouse decided to move in, there's acorns and bits of fluff and other rodentia sign in there! I pick it up off the junk/backup pile, hear this rattling going on. I go WTF is this? Turn it over, clunk clunk, oak tree potential. Sheesh!

  50. We keep working... by Jace+of+Fuse! · · Score: 2, Insightful

    We keep working on newer faster computers, better and better AI, and we keep trying to find machines that are fault tolerant and self healing.

    You watch, before it's over with all of our machines and computers are going to be genetically engineered creatures that are alive.

    We'll have giant brains in vats, and giant beasts of burdon doing our labor. We'll grow our homes instead of building them, and we won't need highways because we'll fly around everywhere we go on giant birdlike creatures.

    Everything will be organic save for some things that are still best served by mechanical means. Having said that, nearly all of our lives will involve some kind of biotechnology, except for food. All of our food will come out of some kind of machine.

    --

    "Everything you know is wrong. (And stupid.)"

    Moderation Totals: Wrong=2, Stupid=3, Total=5.
  51. -1 karmawhore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Especially since it has absolutely NIL to do with the topic.

  52. technology advance by sewagemaster · · Score: 1

    current:
    fill hard drive with porn
    rub hard drive a few times
    protein comes out of hard drive

    future:
    fill hard drive with protein
    rub hard drive a few times
    porn comes out of hard drive

  53. My Mac could(and can) do this by SuperBanana · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Solid state has to be the way to go - no more waiting for your computer to "boot up", just turn it on and it's running your desktop, right where you left it last.

    Years ago I added a whole 32 or 64MB of ram(I can't remember which) to my 660AV, and it was enough to do a couple of interesting things(ie, have enough left over to run applications 'n stuff :) One was load the ROM into RAM, which sped up things dramatically, since so much of MacOS was ROM-call based(remember the Toolbox?). Back in the day, that was a big deal; now's pretty common-place. The second thing was I could start up(and run) the system off a ramdisk, if I got the system folder small enough(that became easier as memory prices dropped etc.)

    I booted my 660AV that way- timed it at 6 seconds flat, from when the bootloader started to when the system stopped loading the finder etc. That's faster than the time from when Lilo starts decompressing the kernel to when init gets launched on my 1.4ghz athlon.

    1. Re:My Mac could(and can) do this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      From cold, no tricks, my 040 amiga booted in 13 secs with 4M. Using the RAD: (persistant-through-reboot-ramdisk) you could reboot in less than 5.

      Compared to this the mac (from cold) hadn't found its happy face yet, which can be as long as a minute on some macs... and the x86 was still looking for it's devices.

  54. ok, but how long will it last? by Temsi · · Score: 1

    Since it's a protein, isn't it going to break down at some point? Or will I have to start feeding my hard drives now?

    --
    -- This sig for rent.
  55. Hard Drive or Light Snack?? by Dareth · · Score: 1


    You college roomate gets the munchies:

    Dude, that was a hard drive??? You mean I ate all your porn! Way Cool!!!

    --

    I only look human.
    My mother is a halfling and my dad is an ogre, so that makes me an Ogreling
  56. Re:Because the spin rate doesn't need to change! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's sort of a holy grail for disks, magnetic, or optical, and even 3-d holographic media.

    The disk could use a smaller head than is now used, of course, and also seems to call for a different PR equalization ideal, and different digital modulation/ECC overhead. I guess it could use a multitrack modulation code and a multitrack convolutional turbo code if bringing down head size is a problem. Since it's proteins, which may have many lengths or many bends, it may also have finer control of timing variation or it could also allow finely-graduated multilevel coding, which makes the coding and modulation rates lower in theory.

  57. Packed with Peanuts, Terradrive Really Satisfies! by FauxReal · · Score: 0

    Just remember to scan your drive for mold or bacterial infections. Also, we off no warranties against rouge computer systems' misuse of bioengineering data, or if pets eat your drive platters. Platters can be used for a quick on the go snack for traveling businessmen. *FDA approval pending.

  58. Re:Because the spin rate doesn't need to change! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oops. I meant the coding overhead is lower (so the coding rate would actually be higher in theory). The spin rate could be lower, too, even while the data rate goes up.

  59. Wonderful by Nintendork · · Score: 2, Funny
    Now I'll have to worry about STDs when I mount a volume. Anyone know when the final release of Norton Virtual Condom is expected? How about an iCondom for the Mac users?

    -Lucas

    1. Re:Wonderful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      mmmmmmm translucent!!

  60. In Russia... by iplayfast · · Score: 1

    you know the rest.

  61. Coming soon by metamatic · · Score: 1

    Isn't "Protein-Packed Hard Drive" the title of a gay porn movie?

    --
    GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak