Slashdot Mirror


An Affordable Air Purifier For Dusty Computer Labs?

Alcimedes writes "Our lab has a serious issue with dust. I've had a number of power supplies stop working because of dust clogging up the fans, and it's getting annoying. So I'm looking into some kind of small (under $500) air filtration system, and was wondering if anyone else out there has already gone down this road. If so, what did you buy and would you buy it again? I'd prefer something where I don't have to keep buying filters, but that may just be a pipe dream." Anyone with cats knows the feeling. Can you suggest a reasonably priced answer to dust-borne failure?

95 of 552 comments (clear)

  1. air purifier by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    despite the hype, the sharper image "ionic breeze" actually collects a lot of dust, and doesn't require replacement filters. I have one near my computer at my house, and it definitely collects a lot of dust.

    1. Re:air purifier by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      thats funny, I've got an 'ionic breeze" next to my computer to, and my computer collects a lot of dust!

    2. Re:air purifier by spike2131 · · Score: 5, Informative

      I bought a product very similar to the iconic breeze, and it does wonders to cut down on dust in our home. The one I have is called the Gerry Air Purifier. That's "Gerry", as in the baby products company. It was marketed to be put in a nursery to filter air for newborns, but it works just the same as the one for adults, at a lower price.

      I didn't get it at Sharper Image, though, it was on special at Wal-Mart.

      --
      SpyDock: Scientific Python in a Docker container
    3. Re:air purifier by Monkelectric · · Score: 4, Informative
      Completley wrong my good sir. Consumer Reports tested the ionic breeze and *was unable* to measure its effectivness because its filtration was "below measurable levels" if it was doing anything at all.

      That being said the ionic breeze uses the *best* technology for air cleaning, but the lack of a fan makes it completley useless. There are other models out there that use the same technology and have fans.

      I would recommend spending the 5$ or so to get a copy of the air filters report from http://www.consumerreports.org (no I don't work for them, I'm just a fan:) (I seem to have lost my print copy of the article otherwise I'd tell you the recommendations). If you aren't familiar with consumer reports, basically they are a non-profit who buys everything from spackle compount to cars and tests it rigorously using the scientific method. Their reports include an overview of the different technologies involved, overview of pro's and cons, and a discussion of what devices are suited for what applications, and finally their *scientific* tests of the devices and their results. Devices are then ranked by overall score in each category measured (some categories can be objective like "ease of use"). In the case of air purifiers they put each purifer in a chamber with a known quantity of (measureable) debris, and after a ceartin period of time they saw how much/little was left.

      --

      Religion is a gateway psychosis. -- Dave Foley

    4. Re:air purifier by NewtonsLaw · · Score: 5, Funny

      You said:

      That being said the ionic breeze uses the *best* technology for air cleaning, but the lack of a fan makes it completley useless

      followed later by:

      no I don't work for them, I'm just a fan

      Hmmm... I see potential for a link-up here :-)

    5. Re:air purifier by GreatOgre · · Score: 2, Informative

      So did they just put them in a chamber with no movement whatsoever? The way I understand how the ionic breeze works is that uses the air flow already in the house so as not to require fans which are noisy.

      Now, you may say that the air in your house is still. Not so, the air just moves sooooooo slow that it feels still to use.

      But overall, I would say that unless their chamber had some air flow, it was not a very scientific test. Now, if they used several different air velocities during the tests, then they may have a point. Might have to scrounge up a copy of that report at the local library to find out for myself.

    6. Re:air purifier by cornjchob · · Score: 4, Informative

      No measurable levels of filtration?

      No effin' way.

      I'm in highschool, and my English teacher has an Ionic Breeze in his class--I have absolutely horrendous allergies and sinus problems, but as soon as I set foot in his class, it's beautiful. My sinuses clear up and I can breathe; it's incredible. And I was very skeptical at first (I mean, how seriously can one take those god awful commercials?), but when I took his apart to see the plates--man, just caked with dust. These things work, make no doubt about it.

      And there doesn't need to be a fan--the difference in charge pulls the air. It's actual physics, and it definately works. Take a plastic spoon and rub it a bunch of times against wool. Then, go to your nearest sink and turn on the water so that you have a nice, smooth flow. Hold the spoon next to the water, and it bends near the spoon. Same principal.

      --
      We now have confirmed reports from an informed Orange County minister that Ethel is still an active communist.
    7. Re:air purifier by chrysrobyn · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Completley wrong my good sir. Consumer Reports tested the ionic breeze and *was unable* to measure its effectivness because its filtration was "below measurable levels" if it was doing anything at all.

      The original poster claimed to have one installed, and claimed that it was pulling dust out of the air. You state that he's wrong because some magazine said so? I'm not quite sure what you're thinking. Perhaps you'd like to provide some evidence that the original poster's computer room is not actually cleaner?

      I've got one of these things. My wife can't breathe through her nose for 24 hours if I leave it turned off or if it's dirty. I have to clean it every week or two because it collects so much stuff it starts to make noise otherwise. Your post, and that of another here, actually dropped my opinion of Consumer Reports. Perhaps it's not that good for cleaning whatever lab setup they had, but perhaps it is good at my real world (read as "5 cats", in a room adjacent to the litter box, vacuum monthly, ceiling fan on during summer) scenario.

      Calling someone's personal observations "wrong" because they have a claim that disagrees with what you've read about is an interesting tactic.

      I've seen, first hand, how dirty a HEPA filter can get, how quickly. I've seen, first hand, how dirty an Ionic Breeze can get, how quickly. I'm not equipped to measure anything, but those Ionic Breeze blades sure do pick up lots within 24 hours (especially if you burn a scented candle). I'm not going to claim that the Ionic Breeze got all the particle sizes a HEPA does, but I will claim that, for my bedroom of moderate size where the door is never closed, the Ionic Breeze cleans the room well enough for my wife who's allergic to dust mites to breathe, and quiet enough for my picky ears to let me sleep.

      You can't tell us we're wrong, because Consumer Reports said so, and expect to be believed by any reasonable human being.

    8. Re:air purifier by GnarlyNome · · Score: 4, Funny

      I tried to ionize my principal in high school but the principle was wrong so i got detention instead

      --
      Diplomacy is the art of saying "Nice doggie" until you can find a rock. Will Rogers
    9. Re:air purifier by Hodr · · Score: 2, Informative

      Most of the "Effect" of the Ionic Breeze is actually the creation of ozone which makes the air "smell" fresh but actually does little to cleanse it.

      Try looking at any online opinion site (like epinions.com for example) and in nearly every case long time users of this product say its so inefficient that dust actually settles on and around it.

    10. Re:air purifier by Monkelectric · · Score: 4, Informative
      I'll reply to you since you were the only one who was polite :) There are two measurements of efficency for air filtersm;the percent debries removed and "Air exchanges per hour". An Air Exchange/hr is exactly what it sounds like -- the entire volume of air in the room must pass through the unit in one hour. The percent debris removed by electrostatic filters is *VERY* high, however, it makes no difference if no air reaches the filter to be cleaned. The HEPA standard is 6 ae/h (i'll abreviate from now on), and some high end models achieve 15 ae/h. The problem is of course the ionic breeze *ISN'T MOVING AIR*, and thus is hopelessy inefficent.

      Suppose for a moment you are correct and the ionic breeze does recieve some benfit from the normal movements of air in the house. There is no way that it could achieve the necessary 6 ae/h, and If thats not important to you -- you still must agree that a filter *with* a fan is almost infintley more efficent :) How many cubic meters of air do you think pass through an ionic breeze due to normal house currents? My 70$ honeywell moves 5000cubic feet of air per hour.

      Sharper image is selling the same old snake oil, and the people who attacked me are pretty much defending their shiny 500$ pieces of crap, and that saddens me :)

      --

      Religion is a gateway psychosis. -- Dave Foley

    11. Re:air purifier by ndogg · · Score: 3, Informative

      I won't don't that it works well, but have you used other products of this type to be able to compare?

      Perhaps the Ionic Breeze works well, but perhaps there are other filters that work many times better, and that's why CR rated the Ionic Breeze as poor.

      --
      // file: mice.h
      #include "frickin_lasers.h"
    12. Re:air purifier by Lord+Prox · · Score: 4, Informative

      I have had a major problem with dust in the air at my place. A new shopping mall is going in back of my place and the construction is hell. Earth movers, graters, if it's big n yellow is there. I finally got pissed and did something...

      1 Old cardboard box
      3 scrap box fans
      1 "filtree" by 3M furnace filter.

      Blend with duct tape and let simmer for 24 hours over lo heat and volia! Big reduction in dust

      Best of all clean up was a snap! The whole damn thing cost me less that 5 bucks so I just tosses it when I was done. With a little more work you could build a larger, more permanate version. Not a $500 ionizer (I have a good idea of what is in there and it ain't 500 bucks worth. More like 10-20, but you know market forces good marketing, what have you.)

    13. Re:air purifier by shepd · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Consumer Reports tested only what the Ask Slashdot question wanted to know (ie: Dust removal).

      A large byproduct of these ionizers is ozone. Which brings me to my next point: Does your wife find it easier to breathe outside just after a lightning storm?

      If so, it isn't the dust removal that's helping, it's probably the ozone. You might want to ask your doctor, though, if there's a danger of overexposure to ozone from these things. I doubt there is, but it is something to consider. You also may want to consider just using an ozone generator instead, which could be more effective.

      But let me repeat: You really need to talk to your doctor about this. Some scientists say ozone is dangerous, and some say ozone is not a problem. It's up to you and your doctor to decide if ozone is the best way to go.

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    14. Re:air purifier by HamNRye · · Score: 3, Informative

      It is about volume of air cleaned per second. I work in Air Filtration so hear me out. There are many similar air cleaners out there that use the same technology as the Ionic breeze. If they have a fan that pushes 265 CFpm through a filter, it will clean more air than a fanless model that pulls 20 CFpm through.

      The Ionic breeze works fine as long as you have something else circulating air, such as a ducting system or human movement. The way most of these filtration methods are tested is by placing them in a sealed container, and measuring how quickly they remove contaminate. That is one of the reasons fanless systems perform very poorly in the lab. That being said, it would most likely be perfect for a computer room that has tons of fans going.

      A far cheaper, and easier method is to go to your local air filter supplier, and get polyester filter material. We use BT1 (Blue Tint, 1" thick) and cover the grills of our intake fans. The stuff is incredibly cheap, does not overly restrict air flow, and will get most large contaminates out of the air. (> 1 micron). You can get a 20'x20' roll here for about 2 bucks.

      If you are interested in a system like the Ionic Breeze, try a Trion air cleaner. It uses the same electrostatic plates, but has a pre-filer that catches larger contaminate making the plates more effective (because they are working with smaller contaminate) and reduces the cleaning frequency. These are also fan driven models that will clean a larger amount of CFpm. They are generally $100-$200 cheaper than the Sharper Image product and can be found at Sears. However, electrostatic plates are generally designed to work with extremely small contaminate particles like smoke. I would assume that most computer rooms are worried about dust which is a 5 micron or greater particle. The poly pre-filters in front of intake fans shoud work best in these situations.

      Basic Air Filtration:

      1 Box Fan
      1 Roll BT1

      Cover the intake of the fan with BT1. Run fan.
      This Filtration system should run about $15. Get a fan with a high enough CFM rating that it will circulate the air in your computer room 2-3 times per hour. Change filter monthly.

      For an upgrade, get a pleated filter and a bigger fan. Pleated filters will reduce airflow by 10-15%, figure that into your CFM calculations. Pleated filters are also far more efficient.

      PDF on trion air cleaners: http://www.trioninc.com/pdfs/residential/02-0251.p df
      (Also has a diagram of how an electrostatic air cleaner works. ala Ionic Breeze)

      One final note: Do not use Ozone Generators. They don't get large particles, only smaller ones, and they are potentially dangerous.

    15. Re:air purifier by instarx · · Score: 2, Informative
      OK, I am what you are calling a HEPA engineer, although there really is no such thing. I have had some backbreaking aerosol physics and ventilation design courses in graduate school and designed and tested clean rooms for years. Here are some facts you should consider...


      The ionic cleaner works by producing charged ions and releasing them into the room. The theory is that dust particles attach themselves to these charged ions and are then attracted to surfaces such as walls and floors (and, I guess, computers and electronics). It is the number of ions released to attach themselves to particles that makes the ionic cleaners work, not the amount of air that passees through them. Some ionic cleaners have an oppositely charged plate that helps collect the charged particles, but mainly the particles get collected on walls. The mistake everyone is making is in thinking that ionic cleaners filter air when they do not - they just release ions. You do not need a large airflow to release zillions of ions.


      Air filtration systems on the other hand rely directly on the amount of air passing through them and the efficiency of the filter. To determine the efficiency of a filter you must define the particle size. A chickenwire filter is 100% efficient for tennis balls, but lousy for dust. A HEPA filter is by the way, 99.98% efficient for particles >=.03 microns.

      Air chages per hour is a particularly bad way to judge the efficiency of a filtering system. Air changes per hour is really a term of art used in the ventilation trades as a yardstick to meet general ventilation standards for different room types. One air change per hour does NOT mean that all the air is changed in the room every hour. Most people think that a filter passing 5000 cubic feet of air per hour will filter all the air in a 5000 ft3 room in one hour. Not so. Because the clean air is constantly mixing with the dirty unfiltered air you are essentially cleaning the same clean air over and over again. Therefore it takes a lot longer to pass all the dirty air through the filter. I could give the equation, but a good rule of thumb is 7 times the volume of the room in acph to filter 99% of the air at least once. In other words a 5000 ft3 room will need a filtering system cleaning 35,000 ft3 of air per hour. That isn't really that hard - only ~500 ft3/minute. BUt who says you need to filter all the air every hour? Put another way, a filter with a Q (flow rate) equivalent to 1 ac/h (5000cfm) will take about 7 hours to filter all the air in the 5000 cf room. Because it is a logarithmic function you get about 85% filtering in 4 hours.

      A big difference in ionic cleaners and filters is that ionic filters do best with very small particles while filters do best with larger particles. An ionic cleaner will remove many more particles than will a filter because it is easier to get a higher charge/mass ratio in small particles, but the filter will likely remove much more mass from the air. (Small particles don't weigh much).

      The best and cheapest thing for the original poster to do is to buy a floor fan or two and put some cheap trimable filtering material on the upstream side of the blades. Air conditioner foam filters for example. The pressure difference should be enough to hold it in place.

    16. Re:air purifier by Ronin+Developer · · Score: 3, Informative

      Ummmm...I would recommend that. The Ionic breeze works on the principle of charging dust particles and then attracting them to an oppositely charged plate. Some of the ionized particles get through. I'd have to think that injecting ionized air into your PC is not a wise idea. I'd have to question whether having them in the same room as your ocmputer equipment is a bright idea either.

      As for the guy who says that Ionic Breeze doesn't work isn't familiar enough with the technology. Electrostatic air filters have been in effect for years with forced air systems. However, with proper design it can charge air/dust particles and accellerate them out the other side. I did something similar as part of my ionic engine science fair experiment in 1982 (I used a 200,000 volt differential and iodine gase as my propellent). Worked quite well.

      What nobody is discussing is that these systems generate low to moderate amounts of ozone. While it's great to have in the upper atmosphere, ozone in your breathing air is quite corrosive to your lungs. If you suffer from ashma, I'd go with a filtration unit over an air ionizer.

      RD

    17. Re:air purifier by rhombic · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Do you realize that you just suggested to the poster that he should replace his currently working solution with the destruction/abandonment of five animals, engaging in household renovation, and otherwise altering behaviors that are enjoyable? (shakes head) slashdot. Jeez, the guy has anecdotal evidence that the breeze works for his wife. There can be all sorts of individual case reasons why it works in this situation, but it does. So why not accept that in this particular case, given lack of contrary evidence, the Ionic breeze is producing the desired results? Disregarding a datapoint without reason is just as bad science as asserting a general rule from an anecdotal response.

      --
      1984 was supposed to be a warning, not an instruction manual.
  2. Windex by eggsurplus · · Score: 2, Funny

    $2.99 about. Pretty cheap and effective.

  3. Sharper Image by BrianGa · · Score: 3, Informative

    The Ionic Breeze gets wonderful reviews. A friend of mine uses one in the house. I'm sure a few of them strategically placed could help your dust situation...no filters or bags to be replaced, so minimal upkeep. Link to follow: http://www.sharperimage.com/us/en/catalog/productv iew.jhtml?pid=175000&pcatid=1&catid=101

  4. HEPA filters by Zugok · · Score: 4, Informative

    That's what you need. I work in a cleanroom making IV infusions and we have HEPA filters in the ceilings of the clean rooms. Of course we have HEPA filters else where as well, but it start with the room. That's the expensive option. The next best would be a Dyson vaccum cleaner with a HEPA filter to really suck up all the dust out of your lab.

    --
    "I just can't sit while people are saying nonsense in a meeting without saying it's nonsense" J Watson, Sci Am 288:(4)51
  5. Common sense helps by cpct0 · · Score: 5, Informative

    There are a few air purifier that might do the trick for not a lot of money. I'd say the few parts you should first look at is WHERE does the dust comes from.

    If it's airborne, air purifier.

    If it's more like cat hairs (like in my house) simply elevate your computer from the floor. 1ft high and you will get 1/8th the dust you used to have.

    If it falls from everywhere, put your computer under something... and a good paint job can help too.

    I know it's all common sense, but usually you can remove most of your problems with common sense.

    Have a nice evening
    Mike

    1. Re:Common sense helps by cybermace5 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Common sense helps, but please realize that not everyone has it. Therefore, those with common sense need to make sure it is enforced on those without it.

      I have a specific example. I'm currently working at a place that prints a lot of mail. Hence, thousands of tons of paper, millions of chop cuts and trim pieces running through pipes. Paper dust is EVERYWHERE, despite a massive bag house where thousands of CFM are filtered out to the high 99's.

      Next to the baler, where all the trim paper goes to be disposed of, is a computer for recording waste tonnage etc.,. It is in a totally enclosed, forced-air filtered box, and the printer is in a smaller version.

      That's all well and good, but after changing about three filters, accepted maintenance procedure currently consists of removing the clogged filter. Period.

      Other PC's have not been treated as well. When I used to work in IT there, I opened many a computer that was half full of fluffy dust. Thankfully those were Pentium 100's, so it wasn't the hot 60's or any modern chip....

      Find some way to do it, then make sure it happens.

      --
      ...
    2. Re:Common sense helps by hazem · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Speaking of paper dust...

      I used to work in a university computer lab. A few years ago, the university required that we switch to recycled paper for the laser printers. When that happened, we found that our air conditioner's filters plugged up much more frequently with the dust, and had to be replaced every 4 months instead of once a year. My understanding is that the fibers in recycled paper are smaller than fibers of "virgin" paper. So, the paper sheds more of them while being processed.

      I don't even like to think about breathing it!

  6. Radioshack has something, and it actually works. by Sponge! · · Score: 5, Interesting

    http://www.radioshack.com/Content/Environizer.asp

    Suprisingly, for a radioshack product, they really work, and are a lot cheaper and easier to clean than "The sharper image's" ionic breeze thing...

    The $199 one should do a medium sized computer room.

    My opinion may be nullified by the fact that I work for RS, but I speak now of my own free will.

    --
    Sponge!
  7. First Things First by Gefiltefish · · Score: 5, Funny


    Since a large portion of the dust that we encounter comes from dead skin cells that are shed from our bodies, a clear solution presents itself:

    Convice some of those dirty bastards using your lab to wash once in a while.

    Need for air filter: GONE.

    1. Re:First Things First by Gefiltefish · · Score: 2, Funny


      I'll bet it's all you. Here's the experiment to find out:

      Wrap your self from head to toe in saran wrap. After a month wrapped in saran wrap, if you don't notice a drastic decrease in dust, I'll give you a dollar.

    2. Re:First Things First by BJH · · Score: 2, Funny
    3. Re:First Things First by Poeir · · Score: 2, Funny

      Not to mention the asphyxiation.

      --
      Sigs are like bumper stickers.
    4. Re:First Things First by Big+Nothing · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Actually, most of the dust on workplaces and in the home comes from textile fabrics. The first thing to do if you want to get rid of dust is to get rid of fabric; curtains, carpets, clothes.

      And everyone knows that a room full of naked computer geeks is just plain yummy. *cough*

      --
      SIG: TAKE OFF EVERY 'CAPTAIN'!!
    5. Re:First Things First by Alan+Cox · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Humour aside the first thing to do is to work out why the environment is so dusty to cause these problems. Is it lack of cleaning. If you are trashing systems for the lack of an hour a week with a decent vacuum its a bit silly.

      Similarly look for environmental issues - crumbling concrete floors for example.

      Failing that you could just buy fanless PC's in future 8)

  8. Who cares about dust? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    In a computer lab, I'm more concerned about the general flatulence and B.O. generated by most computer science majors. On a hot summer day, the smell can peel paint from the walls.

  9. Cats by Devil's+BSD · · Score: 3, Funny
    Anyone with cats knows the feeling. Can you suggest a reasonably priced answer to dust-borne failure?

    Scissors only cost a buck at Wal-Mart... Or you could go the more expensive electric haircutter route for about $15. Or, you could actually save money by getting rid of the cats.

    --
    I'm the Devil the Windows users warned you about.
    1. Re:Cats by jokercito · · Score: 2, Funny

      What?? Get rid of the pussy??? NEVER!

    2. Re:Cats by polymath69 · · Score: 4, Funny
      Yeah, can anyone suggest a cheap filter to remove cats?

      grep -v -w cats ?
      sed 's/cats//g' ?

      --

      --
      I don't want to rule the world... I just want to be in charge of mayonnaise.
  10. Cheap DIY by jhines · · Score: 2, Interesting

    One or more 20x20 furnace filters, and a box window fan. Some duct tape, or bungee cords.

    Should be about $25 at your local mart, in the spring and summer. Hard to find the fans in the winter.

  11. PMS by StikyPad · · Score: 5, Informative

    The military's solution is called Preventive Maintenance (or PMs for short - yes, it's real). It basically boils down to wiping off the dust on a regular basis, just like you would with the rest of your house. It's not fun, but it works, and it's well under $500.

  12. Re:Radioshack has something, and it actually works by Sponge! · · Score: 5, Informative
    --
    Sponge!
  13. HEPA filter by afidel · · Score: 2, Informative

    Get a HEPA filter with a washable dust prefilter. Walmart sells several and you can get them rated for 20X20 foot rooms for $200, if your room is bigger then get two and set aside whatever is left over for replacement filters. Plus if your environment is that bad you should be cleaning the area for the workers sake, equipment is cheap to replace, sick or disgusted workers are not.

    --
    There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
  14. paper towels by ejaw5 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've had to deal with dust accumulating inside my athlon box, occasionally cloging up the GPU fan.

    Here's what you do: "filter" all the intake holes in the side/back of your computer cases with paper towel sheets cut to size (Bounty works great for me, but dust can sometimes be a Brawny mess), both inside and outside wherever feasible. Air still flows through, but less dust comes inside. Haven't noticed an increase in operating temperature.

    --

    $cat /dev/random > Sig
  15. See if your manager... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    will spring for a french maid with a short miniskirt, high heels.

    1. Re:See if your manager... by Alien+Being · · Score: 2, Funny

      "What the hell is interesting about that comment???"

      Use your imagination!

  16. Panasonic for room air filters by cporter · · Score: 3, Informative
    Panasonic makes some small, effective air purifiers that have filters for odor as well as small particles down to 0.3 microns. I bought the F-P20HU1 for 600 sq ft apartment. Not sure about dust but it's great for seasonal allergies and kitchen odors. Panasonic claims life of 1 yr for odor filters and 3 years for HEPA.

    They're only about 6" deep with a front intake and top exhaust so you can push them right against the wall.

    List prices in the $199 - $239 range. Check out appliances.com or even better, Froogle for retail pricing.

  17. Particle Size by jbyron · · Score: 2, Informative

    HEPA filters are great for removing very small particles (like pollen) but they don't do anything for larger crudites. Hair and other dust settles so quickly that a HEPA wont get it unless the wind speed in your room is over 40 mph. And most HEPAs are rather noisy. For cat hair, a simple fiberglass filter near the computer will work fine. And a vacuum cleaner.

  18. .. but HVAC supplies plenty of dust. by mr.+methane · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Your HVAC system will continue to supply plenty of fresh dust, so without a large filtering system, it's hard to have much of an effect on it.

    I had a similar problem with a dusty store basement, and the solution was (please don't laugh) a chrome air cleaner (sized for a Holley 750 double pumper) attached to the blower fan. The automotive air filter was really cheap, replaceable, and quite effective. They have a big enough surface area that you have very little flow restriction. We did end up using a larger-diameter fan, which had a side benefit of making the server quieter.

  19. Electrostatic Air Filtration by MBCook · · Score: 5, Informative
    I would think that a form of electrostatic air filtration would do the best job. Sharper Image has two or three (here, or here) would be the kind of thing your after. There are different sizes, etc, but this is probably the best thing you can get. On top of this, you might want to invest in some of those fan filter covers for computer fans that are made of fabric or whatever to keep dust out. There are some here, here, and here. I would think that the combination of these things would keep you pretty low on dust. That said, make sure to clean the air purifier and check the fan filters every once in a while to make sure they're clear or else thing might end up worse than before. Once the room is clean (after the first week or whatever) and you've cleaned everything out, I'd imagine that you'd wouldn't have to check the fan filters much at all (maybe only when working on that specific PC) as long as you keep the electrostatic air filter going on clean.

    Also, see if you can talk to whoever in incharge of the heating/AC system in the building to see if there is anything they can do. Maybe Allergy Free has a filter that would work with the system or maybe you could get together the with the other groups of people in the building and buy an electrostatic air filtration system for the whole building. They work great on both dust and allergies. These are just wild ideas from brainstorming, they really aren't that realistic I guess. The first paragraph though will probably work well.

    PS: We have electrostatic air filters installed in our house. We also had them installed in the house we had before this one. Our family has allergy problems and when we clean them, you'd be amazed the colors the water turns from what comes off them. They really do catch alot.

    PPS: Or you could just watercool everything and run it all through one massive radiator. But this would be a bit more than $500. More pipedreaming.

    --
    Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
  20. Re:Sharper Image ("Wonderful Reviews"???) by logullo · · Score: 5, Informative

    IIRC, Consumer Reports gave the Sharper Image Ionic Breeze a hefty thumbs-down.

    You might look at air cleaners of the type used in woodworking shops... they'd be a bit louder than the Ionic Breeze (understatement), but they'd actually do something useful for the money spent.

  21. Radio Shack vs Sharper Image by fliptout · · Score: 5, Informative

    Yes, the Environizer sold by Radio Shack(made by Honeywell) is a pretty good product. There are two huge differences between the two air purifiers sold by RS and Sharper Image: 1. The Honeywell Environizers have a silent fan built in; the SI product does not. Having a fan means you can clean a much larger volume of air. 2. Price. RS has much lower prices, at least $100 less than the competition for a comparable product.

    I love my Environizer and recommend it to everyone who wants cleaner air.

    --
    A witty saying proves you are wittier than the next guy.
    1. Re:Radio Shack vs Sharper Image by Sponge! · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Not only that, but the Environizer's cleaning rod can be removed and jsut rinsed off... IIRC the ionic breeze thing needs to be wiped with a rag/paper-towel etc. Just make sure to read the instructions, there's a step int here to clean the wires so it doesn't buzz. You have to flip it upside down several times to slide a cleaning thing up and down the wires...

      --
      Sponge!
  22. Cats by antiquark · · Score: 4, Funny

    Anyone with cats knows the feeling.

    Yeah, can anyone suggest a cheap filter to remove cats?

  23. A Friedrich C-90A is your best bet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    At $499 it is just barely in your price range, but it is one of the top-rated small air cleaners. It is electrostatic like the Sharper Image model, but includes a large fan to move air over the plates, making in much more effective for a lab environment. I believe that it is rated for an area of up to roughly 500 square feet. You can just throw the electrostatic plates in the dishwasher once every couple of months, and you really don't need to replace the charcoal filters unless you are trying to remove odors. I have been using one for 6 months and am very happy with it. The downside is that it is very ugly-- looks like medium-sized pet carrier.

  24. FIltration by SeanTobin · · Score: 2, Informative

    This may sound a bit odd, but I've done it on a few computers (where the case permits) with abnormally good results.

    Take a coffe filter, cut to size, and tape it infront of/behind all the air inlets to your case. Even after a year of sitting on carpet in a dusty area, the interrior was devoid of fuzz and dust pup^H^H^H bunnies.

    Now, the last time I did this was in the pentium 133 area... Be sure to monitor processor temperatures for a few days to make sure you are getting adequate cooling.

    --
    Karma: SELECT `karma` FROM `users` WHERE `userid`=138474;
  25. Air Filtration by Sooner+Boomer · · Score: 5, Informative

    Don't know exactly how your computer room is set up, but here's what I did. There are two basic types of "filters" - mechanical and electrostatic. The mechanical filters work by trapping the dirt onto the filter. Throw away the filter, throw away the dirt. The electrostatic filters work by placing a charge on the dust particle. The particle is then attracted onto a nearby surface. This nearby surface may be part of the filter element (like with a permenantly-charged electret filter or a powered electrostatic filter), or it may get stuck to a nearby wall, ceiling, or piece of furniture. This is what happens with a lot of the "ionic" filters. The dust is out of the air, but it's not really removed from the environment. What I have on my central AC unit is a disposable pre-filter (like a conventional AC filter), a high-capacity HEPA filter (a cartridge that looks like a bunch of folded-up paper towels), and a powered electrostatic filter. I change the pre-filters monthly (they're cheap), change the HEPA filters once a year, and wash out the electrostatic element every 3-6 months. This keeps my computer and other electronics fairly clean, even with multiple cats. One way to tell is by the amount of stuff that gets attracted to the TV screen; not much. The only disadvantage to a powered electrostatic filter is the possibility of the creation of ozone.

    --
    Chaos maximizes locally around me.
    1. Re:Air Filtration by jred · · Score: 2, Funny

      The only disadvantage to a powered electrostatic filter is the possibility of the creation of ozone.

      Wait. Not to sound like a dumbass, but isn't this a *good* thing? I thought there was a shortage of ozone due to cars or cow farts or something like that...

      --

      jred
      I'm not a mechanic but I play one in my garage...
  26. Well actually, by labratuk · · Score: 4, Funny

    You've stumbled across the solution yourself.

    Obviously the dust is collecting in these machines. How do you 'remove' dust? You collect it.

    So, all you have to do is build a bunch of redundant computers*, and design them with really bad air flow, so dust gets trapped everywhere in them. Once a month, open up these machines and turn them upside-down over a dustbin (outside). Voila.

    *Imagine a Beowulf cluster.

    --
    Malike Bamiyi wanted my assistance.
  27. Don't Try This Method by handy_vandal · · Score: 4, Funny

    I once watched a co-worker use a shop vac inside a very dusty PC. The shop vac sucked a chip out of its socket ....

    --
    -kgj
    1. Re:Don't Try This Method by nelsonal · · Score: 2, Funny

      I think that shop vac might be interested in the story as a potential ad.

      --
      Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
  28. Re:Slightly off topic by Rick+the+Red · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Gee, if the environment is that bad, what about your lungs?

    But back to the topic, how about building a plywood or MDF box for your computer, with weatherstriping on the door. Size it to take a standard furnace air filter (intake), and put a bathroom ceiling fan in it to blow the hot air out. Shouldn't be too hard to make, shouldn't cost too much, and you'll know when the filter needs changing just by looking at it.

    Tip (and this applies to your furnace, too): Spray the filter with Endust. It'll pick up way more dust that way.

    --
    If all this should have a reason, we would be the last to know.
  29. Re:Slightly off topic by CliffH · · Score: 2, Informative

    I've built plenty of rackmount systems with filters in place (cloth and wiremesh). It's a pretty common thing for servers and wonder why it hasn't caught on for workstations and home systems yet. I'm sure the cases are out there with the filtering on them, I jsut haven't had a look for any yet. If anyone is going to have them though, check out Lian Li, Procase, Saturn, Enlight, Inwin, or just do a general search. WHat you're probably looking for is something with a removable, reusable filter. DO a goole search and I'm sure you'll find what you're looking for on the cheap (ie. stay away from Lian Li for cheap). Otherwise, nice lil DIY project if you have some time, patience, and a spare case you don't mind butchering.

    Cliff

    --
    sigs are like a box of chocolates, they all suck remove the underscores to email me
  30. Re:have you tried by doormat · · Score: 2, Funny

    Yes, and its nothing but trouble.. ;)

    --
    The Doormat

    If you're not outraged, then you're not paying attention.
  31. Try a pressurising fan by ColaMan · · Score: 4, Informative

    I'm not sure on your lab setup, but if the dust is *outside* the lab, try a pressurising fan setup.

    Get a 2 inch outlet cyclonic type air filter, typically used in tractors, bobcats and small motorised machinery.
    Hook it to the suction of a blower fan, outside your lab.
    Duct the exhaust of the blower *into* your lab.
    Try and close as many doors and windows as possible.

    The blower will pressurise your lab with clean air, which will try to escape out all the nooks and crannies in your lab, keeping the dust outside.

    Don't forget to check the filter every couple of weeks until you get a handle on the maintenance interval required, and don't get a cyclonic filter too big for your fan, as they need high airflow to spin out the dust particles effectively.

    This works for a coal lab of ours that is located very close to a 100,000t stockpile of loose,dusty coal. The dust is bad enough that if a blank piece of paper with a pen on it is left outside the "clean room" (still inside the building) you get a "shadow" of the pen on the paper in about 6-8 hours.

    --

    You are in a twisty maze of processor lines, all alike.
    There is a lot of hype here.
  32. Re:Sharper Image ("Wonderful Reviews"???) by afidel · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Consumer Reports is the best source of imformation about consumer level products around. They buy everything off the shelf so they don't get tweaked demo units, they do not accept advertising so they can remain unbiased, and they use repeatable scientific methods to test the products. Why would anyone not like them??? Just because you have had some kind of psychosematic aleviation of your symptoms does not mean that scientific principals are suddenly invalid.

    --
    There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
  33. Re:air purifier should be away from computers by mdfst13 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The way the ionic air purifiers work, you should move it *away* from the computer to get maximum effect. The way that you are doing it, when the device pulls dust back towards it, some (most?) of the dust will get diverted by the air flow of the fans. In fact, I would suspect that by putting the device *next* to the computer, you are actually increasing the dust flow to the computer.

    An ionic air purifier has two parts. One sends out charged ions which collide with particles of dust and impart a charge to them. The other is an area on the unit itself that has the opposite type of charge. I've never used one, so I don't know how effective they are. However, given the way it works, it seems logical to me that the best place for it would be away from the computer. The desired effect of the device is to pull dust into its area. Instead, it might be better to have it so that it pulls dust away from the computer. Besides, I would think that throwing electric charges (which is the basis of the ionic effect) around near a computer would be undesireable.

  34. Friedrich air purifier by kaybee · · Score: 5, Informative
    If you have a subscription to Consumer Reports, they did some tests of air filters. Contrary to other replies to this post, they found the Ionic Breeze to be next to useless. Maybe their test environment did not properly represent the real world, or maybe they are right. In any case, they said that the Friedrich C90A removed more dust than any other air filter that they tested. It operates with electricity like the Ionic Breeze, but has a powerful fan and more filter stages. No filters to buy, but it is definitely bigger and less attractive than the Ionic Breeze.

    Here is a link to purchase it: Friedrich C90A

    1. Re:Friedrich air purifier by sam+the+lurker · · Score: 2, Informative
      From Consumer Reports, February 2002
      You can also save the $72 annual cost of replacing the Friedrich's auxiliary carbon filter. Designed to remove odors, carbon filters have not been very effective in our tests. We found you can leave the Friedrich's original filter in place without losing cleaning performance.
  35. My solution by fruity1983 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Take the fans out of your computer, it wo

    --
    I am a viral sig. Please copy me and help me spread. Thank you.
  36. air filters / cleaners by mrbill · · Score: 3, Informative

    After doing extensive research on the subject, and looking at tons of stuff that was available, I ended up plunking down $250 last November on a Sharper Image Ionic Breeze, the "Compact" Quadra version.

    It hasnt completely reduced dust in our hosehold (we have unstained, un-sealed concrete floors, which are the #1 culprit, plus three cats), but its done an incredible job of keeping nicotine stains off everything in the computer room (my wife smokes). I put it next to her desk, and clean the "blades" every 3-4 days with a handi-wipe.

    Definitely worth the money, but they're not the perfect solution for everyone. I'll probably be buying a refurbished full-size version from their online store or eBay soon (I dont see paying full retail price again).

    Beware of stuff that is just negative ion/ozone generators - TOO MUCH ozone can be *really* bad for your health. The Ionic Breeze units put out a TINY amount (your laser printer, for example, probably puts out 10x as much), and the amount it puts out is well under federal health and safety standards.

  37. Re:Potential solution for many a dust-bunny host by DisKurzion · · Score: 2, Informative

    Make sure you use USED dryer sheets, or you'll find you're PC components covered in a weird film. Another plue is that it keeps your PC smelling fresh.

  38. Re:Sharper Image ("Wonderful Reviews"???) by outsider007 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Just because you have had some kind of psychosematic..
    if you're gonna use big words at least learn how to spell them.

    --
    If you mod me down the terrorists will have won
  39. cats? by maxpublic · · Score: 2, Funny

    Sell the cats to a Chinese restaurant. End of problem.

    Max

    --
    My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
  40. Re:Hope you use breathing masks... by ColaMan · · Score: 4, Interesting

    We *do* work in a coal mine and we *are* aware of "miners lung", thanks very much :-)

    Yes, we wear dust masks when outside collecting / grinding samples, and also have a 6 monthly respirable dust check, where we get to wear a minature version of what I've described above (battery air pump , cyclone, filter) around for a day to check on the amount of respirable dust we breathe in. Every 5 years you're required by law to have a chest x-ray to check for silicosis if you still work in the industry.

    It's generally only particles below 10 microns that you have to worry about breathing in, as they're the ones that *never* come out again. Particles bigger than 10 micron get removed via mucus and cilia in your nose/airway/lungs without much hassle. Luckily, 10 micron particles and below generally don't stay suspended in the air too long, they drop out pretty quick.

    And anyway, we try not to go outside the lab too much. (Ahhhh! the light! It burns, it burns!!) :-)

    --

    You are in a twisty maze of processor lines, all alike.
    There is a lot of hype here.
  41. Where is the dust coming from? by toybuilder · · Score: 2, Insightful

    All this talk of ionic and HEPA air filters is missing the first question: where is the dust coming from? Maybe you can take steps to reduce the ingress of dust into the lab. Maybe you need to punihs people for leaving the lab room door open to the dirty outside air...

    If it's a university computer lab in a realtively modern centrally-ventilated building, it might just be enough to have a positive-pressure airflow of filtered air to push the dust out of the room. You might be able to hang the charge to the Buildings & Ground's account.

  42. Some suggestions by gerardrj · · Score: 2, Interesting

    As others have mentioned, you don't state the size or "enclosedness" of your lab, but some thoughts anyway:

    1. Most (90%+) dust inside a home or office is generated by the shedding of human skin and hair or our clothing. Hence, most dust is generated within 5 feet of the fans sucking it in to the computer. In these environments you should have at least low density foam filters (think about the one on your hair dryer) on each intake fan. The case fans of your systems should be positively pressurizing the case so that all incoming air passes through a filter, not through any small openings.

    2. Try to keep the intake fans on the computer cases as high off the ground and as open/exposed as possible. Ex: don't stick the fan in a corner under a desk, this is where air currents will deposit the most dust. In that same vein, your HVAC intakes should be on the ceiling, not near the floor. Moving them can be quite inexpensive.

    3. Don't use ionizers. Ionizers are different than electrostatic filters. Ionizers are designed to change the balance of electrical charge in the ambient air (they spit out electrons). To me that's just a bad thing when highly sensitive electronic parts are about. The more out of balance the charges are, the more likely you are to experience static discharges, and we all know that kills computers.

    4. For larger labs/offices I recommend an electrostatic filter that gets built in to the HVAC system. These things are highly effective at removing the lightest/smallest of dust particles. They are a bit expensive to install, and aren't the easiest things to clean, but they do a great job and you probably have a cleaning/maintenance crew. These devices do put out a small amount of ozone but this is usually not a problem with the normal air exchange that takes place in an average building. If you have a VERY high efficiency(tight) building, consider having an indoor/outdoor air/heat exchanger installed, or have the power in the filter unit reduced so ozone production is minimized(this is usually a jumper setting in the power supply). Most U.S. buildings will not require such measures.

    5. Don't underestimate the effectiveness of a simple furnace filter at the air intake and/or exhaust points from your HVAC system. Paper is the best filter, but reduces flow the most. Foam filters are pretty good, especially the "charged" ones. The cheap "spider web" filters are useless, don't use them. They'll catch large debris, but not the stuff clogging up you case fans.

    6. If this is a very small room, one or more portable HEPA filters will help immensely. I install these in all the smaller server rooms that I work in. Run them continuously(24x7).

    7. If at all possible, have your cleaning crew use HEPA filters on all vacuum cleaners used in your lab. Otherwise, a significant amount of light dust will simply be blown out of the vacuum unit and in to the air where it can be sucked in to the computers. Even better than the HEPA filters is to use a built-in type vacuum system where exhaust air is routed outdoors.

    In my home, I use central electrostatic filters, a central vacuum, and keep my computers on the desk, not the floor. I have VERY little dust accumulation in my systems (or anywhere else).

    --
    Article X: The powers not delegated... by the Constitution...are reserved...to the people
  43. Re:Electrostatic air cleaners are health hazards by Rob+Simpson · · Score: 2, Informative

    Actually, the article you mention suggests that they do a pretty good job - it is ozone generators that are recommended against. It does warn that "ozone generators, negative ion generators, and certain other electronic air cleaners that are not listed by the FDA, or cannot otherwise prove that their ozone emission levels are lower than 0.05 ppm, may produce levels of ozone recognized as unsafe for humans and are not recommended for use in occupied spaces because of the risk of generation of ozone"; however, that depends on the air cleaner and is probably much smaller with devices not intended to produce ozone. (Anyone know if there are any results from such tests? Consumer Reports, maybe?)

  44. Living Air Classic by krsjuan · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The Living air classic is great. We've tried many different heppa filters over the years and haven't been completely satisfied either because of the total cost of ownership or because of the noise.
    A friend of mine had been raving about the Living Air Classic for a while so I decided to finally order one to see what the fuss was about. They range in price depending on the size of home you have but the one we have cost us around $400.00 and it can clear a 3,000 sq ft house in a few days. It's quite and doesn't need any maintence.
    The site is www.livingairclassic.com

  45. Clean Air Solution! by pyro_peter_911 · · Score: 2, Funny

    After living in Lubbock, Texas for six years and dealing with the effects of huge volumes of blowing dust in my computers, I finally discovered a solution to all of my dust problems.

    I moved to Austin.

    Peter

  46. HEPA vs. Ionic by rbrooks_na · · Score: 5, Informative

    HEPA filters were originally developed during World War II to prevent discharge of radioactive particles from nuclear reactor facility exhausts. They have since become a vital technology in industrial, medical, and military clean rooms and have grown in popularity for use in portable residential air cleaners. A true HEPA filter is defined as having a minimum particle removal efficiency of 99.97% for all particles of 0.3 micron diameter. The HEPA rating is determined using a test smoke with particles of 0.3 micron average diameter. To qualify as a "true" HEPA, the filter must allow no more than 3 particles out of 10,000 to penetrate the filtration media.

    Negative ion generators force high-voltage electricity to one or more needlepoints. Electricity is simply electrons in motion and since electrons repel one another, when they reach the needlepoint, they jump off and attach themselves to the molecules in the air forming negative ions. At that point the allergens and other particles are attracted to grounded surfaces where they can get rid of that extra electron, causing them to settle on , floors, furniture and other grounded surfaces, even on your bed. It's important to remember that a simple negative ion generator doesn't capture or collect the particles in the air, it simply causes them to precipitate out of the air.

    Electrostatic precipitators are used to scrub the air coming out of factories, but the same technology has grown in popularity in home ventilation systems and some room air cleaners. They are ionizers designed to charge and then collect particles from the air once they have been charged. First, the air is passed through an ionizer where the particles gain a particular charge. Then that air is passed between plates with the opposite charge that attract the charged particles. Electrostatic precipitators have one major drawback though; they rapidly loose effectiveness as dust builds up on the plates.

    They Ionic Breeze is essentially an electrostatic precipitator with no real means of circulating the air past the ionizer and then past the charged plates making it essentially useless.

    I run an Austin Air Cleaner in my computer room and it does an excellent job keeping it dust-free. The cool thing about it is that the filter needs to be changed only every 5 years and the pre-filter is vacuumable instead of replacable. I've found it to be a very cost effective cleaner compared to most HEPA-filter based air cleaners where you must change the pre-filters every three months and the HEPA filters every year.

  47. Re:Hope you use breathing masks... by neibwe · · Score: 2, Informative
    >"10 micron particles and below generally don't stay suspended in the air too long" You may have to worry about >10 micron particles. The larger sizes simply deposit at different locations.
    Size and density of particles, mist or aerosol - determines site of deposition. Maximum alveolar deposition at 1-5 micron size. Airway deposition 5-10 micron; nose 20 micron; fume 0.2 micron - not deposited (e.g. metal fume fever)[1]
    Smaller particles stay aloft a longer --not shorter-- period. Maybe that's why fresh outside air is suggested when a workplace has been contaminated by silicates or asbestos fibers?
    The first is that large particles tend to settle out of the air more rapidly than do small ones. The settling rate for sub-micron particles is so slow as to be inconsequential. These particles stay suspended in air and drift with ambient air currents. A 0.01 microns particle will sink through air at a rate of about 140 days to settle1 meter in air. A 0.1 microns particle will settle about 10 times as fast, and will require about 14 days to settle 1 meter. A 1 micron particle will require about one hour to settle 1 meter. The point is that these small particles remain in the air long enough to be inhaled, and they will remain in the air long enough to be swept around by ambient air currents.[2]
    Hope the info helps =D _____________ [1] Woolcock Institute of Medical Research. DISEASES OF THE RESPIRATORY SYSTEM NOTES from the Department of Medicine, University of Sydney [Online] citing "Chang-Yeung, M., Lam S. "Occupational Asthma". Am Rev Respir Dis. 1986. 133;686-703" [2] David Abrams, CIH. Airborne Dangers. [Online](05/01/1999)
  48. A bong by gregm · · Score: 3, Funny

    I was thinking... you could blow air into the bottom of a barrel of water, let it bubble up to the top and put it back into the room. I know from a really reliable source that water bongs get much of the nasty stuff out of pot and make the smoke much smoother. Of course I've never actually tried to clean the air in a room with one but it seems like it might work.

  49. Re:Hope you use breathing masks... by ndogg · · Score: 5, Funny
    Every 5 years you're required by law to have a chest x-ray to check for silicosis if you still work in the industry.


    Can't you spell the word out? For Pete's sake, it's only 45 letters long:
    pneumonoultramicroscopicsilicovolcanoconios is
    --
    // file: mice.h
    #include "frickin_lasers.h"
  50. Re: CFCs and Ozone by some+guy+I+know · · Score: 2, Informative

    If you get too much ozone in your office, you could always release som CFCs, which readily break down O3 and make it harmless.

    My understanding is that the CFCs themselves do not break down ozone.
    What happens is that, in the upper atmosphere, sunlight breaks down the CFC, releasing, among other things, chlorine (the first "C" in CFC).
    The freed chlorine is what breaks down the ozone.
    In your room, the CFC is not going to break down (at least not in any measurable amount), and so will not break down the ozone.

    OTOH, dumping Chlorox in a pan might have the desired effect :) , but this can cause other problems, as chlorine is poisonous.

    --
    Those who sacrifice security to condemn liberty deserve to repeat history or something. - Benjamin Santayana
  51. Re:Two points, 0.02c by anubi · · Score: 2, Funny
    I keep cats out of the computer room because they have an almost uncontrollable urge to pee on the monitor, keyboard, and CPU.

    Cat pee is extremely corrosive. One spray sucked up by the system would probably ruin it. ( remember, the fan exhausts air, so any contaminant sprayed around the case is going to go IN. )

    --
    "Prove all things; hold fast that which is good." [KJV: I Thessalonians 5:21]

  52. Re:Electrostatic air cleaners are health hazards by tgd · · Score: 2, Informative

    That link comes up a lot when people are asking about the Ionic Breeze and the like online. FWIW, I have four of them on 24/7 in my house to manage dust and allergens until I pony up the cash to put one in the HVAC system directly.

    That article talks about air cleaners, not air filters. These are ozone generating machines you'd use if, for example, someone took an explosive dump in your car. It uses very high amounts of ozone to physically removed odors and clean the air in there.

    Ionic Breeze's are electrostatic air filters, totally different beast. An electric potential between two ionizing wires in the back and three collector rods in the front pulls air through without any noise, and the dust picks up a static charge and sticks to the collector rods. Thats it. In terms of controlling dust, one big thing that Sharper Image doesn't mention, which may counterindicate their use in a computer lab, is that if your air is fairly dry, it puts a slight static charge on every damn thing in the room. Fantastic for controlling dust, because you can just vacuum it off the couch, but you're always zapping yourself.

    Anyway, my point is, there's nothing in common between these filters and what ALA is talking about.

  53. SUCKER BORN EVERYDAY by iridium1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I am not really surprised how many people think that devices without fans or filters work. Wake up people. It is the same physics that make the ions stick to particles that proves that a volume of air is required to pass thru a filter if you want your air cleaned if at all. All scientific studies show that a filter (glass or carbon) must permit some pollutants to pass through in order to work. The larger the volume of air, the harder to filter, the more displacement needed (the bigger the room, the bigger the fan needed). If you have a small computer lab that you need to keep clean, a real hepa filter rated for the volume of air in your room will help. I have a small honeywell filter that was allergist recomended, I also have 4 severs and a workstation always running in my office. They collect dust no matter what. I dust gear once a month. Stay away from fanless devices. It is like filtering your room with a piece of cardboard (i dont know if anyone remembers the N.S.A. scandel that involved air filters) I have to agree with all the posts for cleaning and vacuming. That is where you start. Keep the enviornment and the gear clean first. Filter the air second. Clean again third.

  54. Re:Doesn't make economic sense by anubi · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Sometimes we the managers in the business world see things differently than those in the trenches. It's what keeps companies running smoothly and profitably.

    One of the managers at a company ( which is no longer ) that I worked it looked at things like this.

    I am an engineer. This is how I see it.

    You lose a power supply. No big deal - but in the process of losing the power supply, you corrupt your system. Big deal. This could be very costly to recover from.

    Now, even if you were lucky and the system suffered no damage from the failing power supply, you have the time to account for to take the system offline, obtain, and replace the supply. Time is expensive. You are now losing on two paths: You can not use the machine, and you are expending time finding parts and fixing the machine.

    Personally, I find it much much more expedient to provide the infrastructure for trouble free operation than to let things fail and try to fix them. Yes, the power supply is cheap. So are engine bearings. But saving money by scrimping on oil changes is hardly a way to "keep companies running smoothly and profitably", rather, as an engineer, I see this the quickest way of running a company into the ground with soaring overhead maintenance costs.

    Given my own knowledge of the costs involved and failure statistics, I would opt for prevention, but should the company see fit to make me subordinate to someone who sees fit to override my judgement, I would obey, but find somewhere else to work, for the higher-ups are apparently clueless about the mountain of maintainance costs heading their way - and have no idea how much the management skills they hired is really costing them.

    I normally would not be so straighforward, truthful, and harsh in my reply, but you did post AC, so I feel you are fair game.

    --
    "Prove all things; hold fast that which is good." [KJV: I Thessalonians 5:21]

  55. ULPA is the *best* option by caveat · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ULPA (Ultra-Low Penetrating Air) filters are 1 to 2 orders of magnitude more effecient than HEPA (High-Efficency Particulate Arresting) air filters; ULPA is rated to trap 99.999% of particles at 0.12 micron while HEPA filters only catch 99.99% at .3 microns. OF course, for most airborne dust and bacteria, the difference is negligible, since they're in the single-to-tens-of micron size ranges - but ULPA is clearly the superior choice, and not much more costly than HEPA at all. Incidentally, you might want to consider ULPA filters if you make IV infusions - a lot of viruses are small enough to only be trapped in ULPA filters IIRC.

    --

    Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored. - Aldous Huxley
  56. Fans are NOT GOOD on ionic air cleaners!!! by caveat · · Score: 3, Informative

    Having a fan means you can clean a much larger volume of air.

    MORE air yes, but it's not going to be nearly so clean. Longwinded explantion that goes into theory follows:
    Ionic filters have a theoretical 100% efficiency for all particle sizes. How these ionic air filters work is an excercise left to the reader (apply - charge to incoming particles with a -1,000V grid, place a +1000V grid close by, all the ionized - charged particles stick to the + grid); there are scientific instruments to select a very specific size of dust particle that work on the same principle. Instead of two charged plates, they use a rod and sleeve electrode system with + in the center, and they have a very small exit slit at the bottom; the voltage across the rods is very carefully controlled along with the carrier gas flow rate (the dust has to be in some medium), and only one very specific size comes out the slit at the botton (+/- 1 nm). (TSI 3080 Electrostatic Classifier)

    The theoretical equation for this instrument describes the arc taken between the two electrodes for a given size particle in a given carrier gas at a given flowrate and voltage difference. The carrier flowrate is absolutely critical, a few tenths of a percent deviation will throw your size off by a few *tens* of percent. Assuming these ionic filters are going for 100% efficiency, and they aren't running some insane delta-V like -5000/+15,000, they need a fairly low flow rate to allow all the particles time to drift over to the collector (small particles won't move very fast through dense air in a relatively low electrical field - c'mon people, i know it's early, but think about it - smoke diffuses, water droplets from a spray bottle drops from the air a lot faster) - so to make my point finally, the Ionic Breeze uses the electrostatic air flow, which is actually probably a lot better than a fan-driven filter. The fanned filters can clean more air, but they're going to leave a lot of the smaller crap untouched...I actually wouldn't be surprised if a HEPA filter was actually more effective than a cheap ionic filter.

    --

    Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored. - Aldous Huxley
  57. Panty hoses by yourruinreverse · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I once read somewhere about an insanely simple and cheap solution: cover the inlets and outlets with pieces of your (wife's / sister's/ grandmother's) tights stretched over the in/outlet between the fan and the perforation in the casing. I've experimented with this myself, and although it is quite cumbersome to actually get it done, and more cumbersome having to remove the cloth periodically to clean it (with water and soap), it does actually keep a lot of dust out.

    --
    JeR
  58. Temprature Control? Ask Slashdot Hijack by Confessed+Geek · · Score: 2


    I'd like to hijack this thread for my own needs.

    I have a small basement room in our offices that I would like to turn into a server room. (10x12'). Unfortunatly it has no easy access to an external vent, and putting in the duct work would cost more than the computers it would contain.

    Is there an (affordable) environmental control unit that can be used in a space like this or am I trying to find a loophole in the laws of thermodynamics?
    -insert obligatory simpsons quote-

    Would an evaporative solution work? I'm totally HVAC ignorant.

  59. Water by jonadab · · Score: 2

    Water makes a *great* dust filter. The Rainbow line of vacuum
    cleaners runs their output through a water pan, and the result
    is a *lot* less dust (if you sweep at all regularly). Now, those
    things run a fair penny more than the $500 you were looking at,
    but you can probably take advantage of the same principle for
    well under $500. You need two things: a system for rotating
    the room's air so that any given bit of air makes it to your
    filter system periodically, and a filter system that takes the
    air and forces it down into a bucket of water. You do have to
    change the water, but that's easier and much cheaper than changing
    a traditional filter. (In theory you could rig something up to
    automatically change the water, but probably not inside of your
    $500 budget.) You can tell that stuff is being removed from the
    air because the water turns black.

    --
    Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
  60. Oreck by mattfusf · · Score: 2, Informative

    Oreck (the vacuum cleaner people) sell an excellent air cleaner. I've had one for a little over a year and it is amazing what a difference it makes in my house.

    The model I have has three filters; a reusable prefilter, a metal collector, and a carbon filter. The carbon filter needs to be replaced every few months (they are fairly cheap, $20-$30). The prefilter just gets rinsed off and the metal collector is cleaned every 4 or 5 weeks. Mine has a fan with 2 or 3 speed settings, at the "normal" speed it is quiet enough to not be noticiable.

    I think there are a few new models, but they all operate similarly.

    Matt

  61. You obviously don't have one. by Otto · · Score: 2, Informative

    Look, guy, it's all well and good to believe unbiased reviews and so forth. I'm not saying that I'd consider CR a source of such, but hey, you believe what you want.

    However, that's beside the damn point here. The guy has one. He says it works for him. To tell him he's been duped when he's the one cleaning the dust off the blades every couple of days is a bit ridiclous.

    That's all people are saying. Nobody's defending a "shiny piece of crap", they're defending the guy who makes personal observations and decides for himself rather than simply believing anyone and everyone else's opinions.

    As for "not moving air", you're wrong. You're just simply wrong. They do move air, just not as quickly as one with a fan. You can hold up a piece of silk ribbon in front of one of the things and see that for yourself quite easily. Or if you prefer, blow smoke at it. That works just as well. I admit that it doesn't move 6 roomfulls of air in an hour, but then that's the whole point. Some people need air filtering, but cannot deal with noise. If you need air filtering and don't mind noise, then by all means get a fan system.

    --
    - Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set him on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life.
  62. good air filters, HEPA, allergies, & some myth by arete · · Score: 4, Informative
    There's only one problem that I see with your inexpensive setup - not enough fan. Although, perhaps it's enough for your situation, putting in a larger fan could make much better use of that large filter media. You didn't specify, but the fans ought to suck from the filter, so they themselves are protected, too.

    A short description on filters: There is, roughly, how many particles they catch of different sizes and how much air they attempt to filter. (Back to the ionic breeze later) In general, the latter is actually the dominant force in really helping you.

    The HEPA standard is irrelevant (and no longer current) in any case where you might be standing in the unfiltered air. It's designed to keep radioisotopes from escaping laboratories. That doesn't mean HEPA filters are bad - but the HEPA standard is tremendous overkill in terms of what's important to you. A small HEPA filter, for instance, might have filtered 99.97% of very small particles out of 10% of the room air in the time another filter would have filtered out 80% of 90% of the air. (Math: about 10% vs. 72%)

    That said, traditional furnace filters still suck :) as they barely do any filtering at all. In fact, I have a box of 20x25 for sale at http://www.xig.net/sale/ near Chicago. Filtrete is a wonderful solution that doesn't cost very much - and while the parent post mentioned this, I'm not sure they put enough emphasis on it. I ended up replacing my furnace fairly soon after moving here for other reasons, and I have a Honeywell F50 electronic filter on my furnace. It's not even a very efficient filter compared to HEPA, but it uses the gigantic fan that's on my furnance, so in the end, it's better.

    There is a basic difference between electronic and physical media filters that _in general_ means electronic filters work better on smaller particles and media works better on big ones. The ideal solution typically is to put a large media filter in front of the electronic air filter - which is exactly what my F50 does. (There's a washable metal mesh filter) I believe this is the nature of the Ionic Breeze controversy - that it is ineffective on industrial debris in the air, but effective at pulling out allergen-sized particles. (Yes, allergens come in many sizes. But they're all pretty small. And, you're probably not allergic to dust mites, but to dust mite FECES - just in case you weren't sure it was tiny) I certainly think a fan might help it, but in my bedroom, for instance, it probably wouldn't matter because there's a ceiling fan and quite a bit of airflow (partially from ~ 12 case fans so it varies depending on exactly where...) My supposition is that it was designed with some sort of "average" room air circulation in mind.

    If your goal involves making it easier for someone to breathe, make sure you catch those pretty small particles - Filtrete at least, electronic ideally. If you have allergies, there are lots of other things that help tremendously - like (now NOT just plastic!) covers on your mattress, hardwood floors, washing bedding in hot water... (Perhaps I'll turn this page into a webpage. Heh. I'm happy to answer questions, though, in the meantime. If I do, it'll appear at http://www.xig.net/allergy

    Disclaimers and notes: I have a degree in Mechanical Engineering, I don't have an Ionic Breeze (they cost HOW much?), nor have I read the relevant Consumer Reports articles. I do think CR usually does great work, and I purchased my washer, dryer, and dishwasher from their reviews, but anyone can make a mistake. I do have pervasive airborne allergies, and have made a great many modifications to my surroundings to improve them.

    --
    Looking for freelance Actionscript (Flash/Flex) or ColdFusion work and/or freelance developers. Email me, put Slashdot
  63. Coffee Filters by byterbit · · Score: 2

    During Desert Shield/Storm, we airmen were faced with a similar problem. We also had no access to anything approaching a proper filtration system. However, we could get coffee filters since us zoomies can't be without coffee ('cept myself, the token tea drinker).

    We taped the filters over the preferred intake and plugged up the rest of the vents.

    Doubtless you may want something more elegant, but hey if it's an equipment room who cares.

    --byterbit


    --
    "Nothing in the world can take the place of persistence. Talent will not. Nothing is more common than unsuccessful men w
  64. good fans and computers up off the floor by sleepless+one · · Score: 2

    I look after about 1200 computers in public schools. I suggest you make sure that the computers are up off the floor, the higher the better. Buying computers with decent quality fans also helps of coaurse.