Slashdot Mirror


LCD Screens Almost Paper-thin

DarklordSatin writes "Nature.com has an article up about new LCDs that are thin enough to roll up and can display black and white at 96 dpi. More coverage by Wired and Scientific American. Thanks go to Arstechnica for the heads up." Wow. Let the speculation for new uses begin! Update: 05/10 14:59 GMT by CN : Whoops, this is really a dupe of an older story that slipped through because I only searched for LCDs. Ah well, it's still cool.

185 comments

  1. yeah coool by lexcyber · · Score: 3, Interesting

    What is the primary appliance for this device?

    --
    - To understand recursion, we must first understand recursion -
    1. Re:yeah coool by kingkade · · Score: 3, Informative

      Anywhere you would need a thin screen. e-newspapers, bathroom walls, clothes that have a display pattern, easy to move signs/signals, etc. Read the article for petes sake, lex!

    2. Re:yeah coool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

      How about a wireless pocket sized computer, something like that that Personal Server Intel touted a while back. You could use a thin-film flexible circuit and transceiver to "talk" to it. Super-thin touchscreens won't be too far off either. Then you can add wireless broadband 'net access to the Personal Server, and you've effective got the world in your pocket.

    3. Re:yeah coool by lexcyber · · Score: 0, Troll

      I was rushing to get a first post - no time to read no stinkn' article!! =)

      --
      - To understand recursion, we must first understand recursion -
    4. Re:yeah coool by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      What is the primary appliance for this device?

      Commercial-enabled toilet paper?

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    5. Re:yeah coool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No folded paper. Looks like we are back to scrolls folks. Guess the greeks had it right after all.

    6. Re:yeah coool by Exiler · · Score: 1

      Wiping my ass with marketing, now there's something I'd pay money to do.

      --
      Banaaaana!
  2. How many electric trees by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Are going to be destroyed every day for newspapers?

    Save the Electronic Rainforest!

    1. Re:How many electric trees by blahlemon · · Score: 1

      Electronic, reuseable paper. I've been mentioning something like this to the people I work with for months. Not that I'm in research and development. But imagine, in you are in a place that absolutely has to have paper records, what better way to keep them then on electronic paper? Ideally the paper would have some type of port so you could dump the info into a word processor of some type. And even if the paper cost 10 times as much as regular paper, over time it would pay for it's self; fiscally and ecologically.

      --
      It take more faith to believe in evolution than it takes to believe in God
  3. Cool by Hadur · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Not a flame here, but I would rther see the price of LCD screens go down than their size.

    1. Re:Cool by Chicane-UK · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Agreed..

      I work in a job as a Computer Technician, and people keep saying to me they really want to get an LCD screen 'because it looks cool' - fair enough I suppose, but why pay for a 17" mid range LCD screen over a 21" Natural Flat top of the line CRT monitor? Ok, it saves on some desk space..

      Its a no brainer for me.. i'd still put my money on CRT every time.

      --
      "Hey! Unless this is a nude love-in, get the hell off my property!!"
    2. Re:Cool by Squareball · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well with advancments like this, the price will go down. One day LCDs will be paper thin high resolution color that are like $20.

      As to uses.. well thank god that I won't have to have all the pr0n mags laying around any more! ;) Soon we'll just subscribe and it'll be accessed on our paper thin LCDs! w00t ;)

    3. Re:Cool by kingkade · · Score: 1

      Well with advancments like this, the price will go down. One day LCDs will be paper thin high resolution color that are like $20.

      Yes, maybe the price will go down, but these screens would be great for places like subways, or presentation displays for offices.

      As to uses.. well thank god that I won't have to have all the pr0n mags laying around any more! ;)

      Tying everything to pornography (and especially spelling it that way) get quite annoying after a while, and it is usually jsut not real funny anymore.

    4. Re:Cool by jkrise · · Score: 1

      "I would rather see the price of LCD screens go down than their size."

      Unfortunately, we may never get to see this.. ever. I guess we should count ourselves lucky (I'm talkin humanity here) that useful innovations such as the telephone, the CRT - TVs,the CD, the electric motor etc. happened WELL BEFORE the rank business opportunists have rushed in.

      Else we should be paying $100 for a filament bulb, and it'd be promoted over the 20c version as being beneficial to nature, bio-degradable etc. Very little innovation these days seems to focus on lower prices for customers and concern for the environment.It's ironic Nature.com is sending in this submission!

      --
      If you keep throwing chairs, one day you'll break windows....
    5. Re:Cool by obsidian+head · · Score: 3, Informative

      LCDs allow your working space be more changable. This is the same reasoning behind Apple making desktop computers easier to carry; you don't want to be chained to the same desk. Plus, LCDs are much better on the eyes -- if you really start using them, it's painful to go back to CRTs.

    6. Re:Cool by Eevee · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Funny. I have people asking for flat panals because they want their desks back. That 'desk space' it saves is important because we don't get much of it.

      In a large organization, you often have more control over what computer equipment you buy than you do over how the office space is arranged. In a cube farm, a 21" monitor often takes up too much space--particularly if management has never heard of ergonomics so you're forced to balance the keyboard on the little strip of desk right in front of the monitor.

    7. Re:Cool by eggstasy · · Score: 1

      Maybe because my crappy old 15 incher already takes up way too much desk space, to the point of my keyboard not fitting in front of it?
      I'd love to get an LCD. The image looks so much better, but I can't afford even half of it.

    8. Re:Cool by natron+2.0 · · Score: 1

      I agree as well.

      I, personally, prefer CRTs for gaming, but my wife has been begging me for a LCD for a long time to coserve desk space. I am just waiting for the prices to drop.

    9. Re:Cool by ackthpt · · Score: 1
      Dunno where you expect them go go, but there are, depending on features you want, 17" LCD's in the low $300's I can't quite find it in me to complain bitterly about that being high. Heck, I probably paid that for a 15" CRT once.

      On dupes and cool... the stages:

      1st time: "Yow! Cool! Rolling around in nekkid cool!"

      Dupe 1ce: "It's still really cool!"

      Dupe 2nd: "Kinda cool, but what else is new?"

      Dupe 3rd: "Hey nice banner ad."

      Dupe 4th: "Ok, 'Fonz', it's cool if your say so."

      Dupe 5th+: [NO CARRIER]

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    10. Re:Cool by blahlemon · · Score: 1

      There is a simple solution to that, mount a keyboard tray under your desk. One of the ones that is easy to recess.

      --
      It take more faith to believe in evolution than it takes to believe in God
    11. Re:Cool by targo · · Score: 4, Informative

      why pay for a 17" mid range LCD screen over a 21" Natural Flat top of the line CRT monitor?

      The ratio might come down once US manufacturers also start figuring the cost of recycling into the price. In Europe it is mandatory for computer makers to take back their old stuff, and recycle it in a reasonable way, as opposed to the US where most old computers end up in basements or landfills. Of course, it makes prices higher but in the end, everybody wins.
      And recycling a CRT is much more expensive than recycling an LCD, so the price difference is smaller.

    12. Re:Cool by geeber · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Advancements like this won't help LCDs at all. E-ink NOT an LCD. LCD stands for liquid crystal display. This has nothing to do with liquid crystals; it works by rotating small particles with light and dark colored sides.

    13. Re:Cool by Eevee · · Score: 1

      Except keyboard trays aren't computer supplies, they're office furniture. So they come out of a different pool of money. (Yep, they're that stupid.)

    14. Re:Cool by los+furtive · · Score: 1

      I have a 19 inch CRT, and the aformentioned keyboard tray. Even with the tray the screen is still too damn close to my face because I can't push it back any further. In addition, it takes up so much desk space I don't have room to lay documents or books out. I'm debating moving to a 17 or even 15 inch LCD just so I can get some sanity back, Unreal Tournament be damned!

      --

      I'm a writer, a poet, a genius, I know it. I don't buy software, I grow it.

    15. Re:Cool by Bios_Hakr · · Score: 1

      Yes, it looks cool. It also runs cool. That means that it wastes less energy. Check out the power requirements. I bet you'll find that it is cheaper to run a 17" LCD (about $450 right now) than to run a 17" CRT (about $70). If you go into the TCO, it also means less energy spent on cooling your workplace, and more efective work area per desk.

      The down side is eye strain. A cheap LCD can be a real killer on the eyes.

      --
      I'd rather you do it wrong, than for me to have to do it at all.
    16. Re:Cool by smilingirl · · Score: 1
      Yeah, it saves a LOT of desk space. Especially when you live in a dorm that was built in the 60s and has a built-in desk made before anyone ever imagined desktop PCs. First semester, I had an old CRT monitor, had to place it sideways on the desk just to fit it, and had to sit on my bed and type from the side of the desk at an incredibly odd angle. For Christmas, I got a new computer with an LCD monitor, and I can actually sit in my desk chair and maybe even fit a piece of paper on my desk too!!!

      I actually like how the LCD's look better now. The color just seems to be sharper or something, I dunno. I love my preciousssss computer. =)

      --
      The Present is the point at which time touches eternity. - C.S. Lewis
    17. Re:Cool by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      Since when does an LCD image look better than a good CRT?

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    18. Re:Cool by GigsVT · · Score: 2, Informative

      Around here a lot of monitors get donated to goodwill, which has no idea how to price them.

      I picked up a 17 inch MAG for $5 yesterday. Even if the monitors I buy from them are bad beyond economical repair, I will usually strip the circuit boards with a torch to get the components. The HOT is a nice fast and high power transistor (assuming it isn't burned out).. Lots of nice power circuitry in the power circuits, usually a few low voltage 78XX regulators are in there too. Even if I scrap for components it usually justifies the $5 price.

      The CRT itself does usually wind up in a landfill eventually though. On the plus side, most monitors are easily repaired. A lot of probelems that cause people to ditch a monitor are trivial to fix.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    19. Re:Cool by blahlemon · · Score: 1

      If you are that close to the screen you don't need a 19" monitor. Your straining your eyes too much. The 17" or even a 15" (although I wouldn't go that small) would be easier on you.

      --
      It take more faith to believe in evolution than it takes to believe in God
    20. Re:Cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      since always. compare two monitors. LCS is much crisper image.

    21. Re:Cool by Omega+Leader-(P12) · · Score: 1

      Report that discomfort to your Health & Safety commitee in writing. There is almost always a pool of money reserved for fixing health and safety problems (by law in Canada if it is reported, they HAVE to fix it). Where I work we are very streched for cash and money must come from the proper departmeal pool. But H&S has the last laugh. 3 days and I had a new mouse, new keyboard and a person to set it up properly.

      If they have it in writing and they are audited for H&S then they are in big trouble if they haven't addresses a problem.

    22. Re:Cool by MikeFM · · Score: 1

      That's why I'm thinking about getting an LCD monitor for home. I have a nice little mini-itx system that takes up little space and little electricty and a big freaking monitor twice it's size that sits here gulping down electricity. A good LCD would put my computers total electricty needs below that of many monitors alone.

      It'd also free up desk space and make it much easier to move the whole setup around when I feel like it. I use this system as my on-the-go server. Throw it in the car and wherever I go it can act as a server for me. It has WiFi hooked up so just plug it into the ethernet and it's ready to act as my gateway. A LCD would eliminate hauling a big ass monitor with it. :)

      --
      At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
    23. Re:Cool by sevensharpnine · · Score: 1

      [...] the CRT - TVs,the CD, the electric motor etc. happened WELL BEFORE the rank business opportunists have rushed in.

      How about the personal computer? It's a related field, and it became popular after the "business opportunists" rushed in, as you say. A modern PC costs roughly half what a comparable PC did ten years ago. The free market (usually) insulates us against the long-term price fixing you're worried about. Even if LCD's stay at their high prices, it'll be a somewhat isolated incident in the tech field.

      --
      "God is a comedian playing to an audience too afraid to laugh." -Voltaire
    24. Re:Cool by Squareball · · Score: 1

      Now see this is where your basic lack of understanding capitalism shows! If Company A sells an LCD for $500 and $400 of that is pure profit, Company B is going to come along and sell an LCD for $300, thus creating a price war. The product will keep going down in price until the point at which the profit/cost ratio actually matters. This is why Coca-Cola doesn't cost $8 a case. If they charged that much, people would just buy another brand.

    25. Re:Cool by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      Except keyboard trays aren't computer supplies, they're office furniture. So they come out of a different pool of money. (Yep, they're that stupid.)

      They cost $5-10 (at least the ones I see at the computer supply shops here). Buy one yourself. If you think they might object to the kind that is screwed under the desktop, just get the enclosed type that you sit the monitor on. Steal some office supplies, instant coffee, toilet paper, etc to even it up.

    26. Re:Cool by stephanruby · · Score: 1

      So is the display quality as good as LCDs?

    27. Re:Cool by eggstasy · · Score: 1

      Since when have people owned good CRTs?
      CRTs are like keyboards, you buy the cheapest kind so you can spend money on what actually matters, such as a decent graphics card that can run modern games at an acceptable speed.
      I don't even have a monitor, this one is my girlfriend's spare. Mine died years ago.
      Most people buy the cheapest speakers because they don't care about the expensive one's added quality.
      With monitors it's the same.

    28. Re:Cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm debating moving to a 17 or even 15 inch LCD just so I can get some sanity back, Unreal Tournament be damned!

      I've played UT on several different LCDs, and all of them looked pretty good to me. I'm not really a gamer, but modern LCDs probably aren't as bad as you think. You should go into some stores and see if you can demo any games on one of them.

    29. Re:Cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
      In Europe it is mandatory for computer makers to take back their old stuff, and recycle it in a reasonable way,

      Is it? What if the maker is out of business since long? I've still got a vintage "Wearnes automation" monitor that I need to get rid of, but the town wants 18 Euro for recycling costs. Of course, if I was a merkin, I'd just abandon it on a street corner, or in a forest...

    30. Re:Cool by RzUpAnmsCwrds · · Score: 1

      Wow, you managed to bash the US, inflate Europe, and make a valid point all in a single post! That's worth six points.

      I see that you cower behind spam filtreing. Minus one.

      Your user ID is above 200,000. Minus one.

      You use Hotmail. Minus four.

      You include a website. Plus two.

      Your Slashdot cumulative score is +2, which will get you a 1 in 10 chance at winning a Slashdot clasic ballpoint pen (actual retail value $0.39).

      Thanks for playing!

    31. Re:Cool by be-fan · · Score: 1

      The LCD will save your eyes. I've been using a high quality LCD for about a year, and I can stare at it for hours on end without my eyes getting tired. When I switch to a CRT for awhile, I can just feel the radiation burning into my retinas. Also, LCDs automatically have perfect convergence and perfect geometry, which is important for a lot of engineering applications. Throw in the space savings (and heat reduction), and it's a no brainer, if you can afford it.

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    32. Re:Cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can totally vouch for that. I bought an Apple Studio Display (17"; I'm not made of money) back in August, and last week the backlight failed on it. Apple's gonna fix it for free, of course, but I still have to live without it for a week or so. So I borrowed a really nice Sony Trinitron CRT from a friend.

      God, I can barely stand it. An hour of sitting in front of this fuzzy, flickery thing gives me such a fucking headache.

      I really wouldn't have believed there was such a difference between (digital) LCD's and CRT's if I hadn't seen (and felt!) it with my own eyes.

      Hurry up, Apple!

  4. Whoa by A+Proud+American · · Score: 2, Funny

    One can only imagine the bragging rights you'd have smoking a 32-bit True Color blunt...

  5. Uses by brejc8 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Let the speculation for new uses begin!
    I always wanted to wallpaper my house with something that I could change at a flick of a swich.
    At night it would turn into little moons and stars.
    In the morning it would reflect what the weather is like.
    During the day I could watch tv or browse the web on any wall in the house.
    Or even implant cameras in the other rooms so it would look like you have see through walls.

    Ah well back to the reals world.

    1. Re:Uses by DJPenguin · · Score: 5, Funny

      At night it would turn into little moons and stars.
      In the morning it would reflect what the weather is like.


      Hmmm... that already happens in my room! OH! My mistake, I left the curtains open.

    2. Re:Uses by Pingular · · Score: 0

      Or even implant cameras in the other rooms so it would look like you have see through walls. Or you could just not get any walls?

      --

      When anger rises, think of the consequences.
      Confucius (551 BC - 479 BC)
    3. Re:Uses by blahlemon · · Score: 1
      How would you keep up the roof? Without internal support it would be a pretty small house.

      Besides that I think the point was to have the ability to turn the "wall-less" appearance on and off at will.

      --
      It take more faith to believe in evolution than it takes to believe in God
    4. Re:Uses by f97tosc · · Score: 1

      It might be useful for a e-book sort of thing, where it's unlikely you'll be reading faster than four pages a second.

      This is unlikely. The main reason why ebooks have failed so miserably is not that current versions are too thick, but rather that they are simply uncomfortable to look at for long periods of time.

      What is needed for ebooks is very high resolutions and frequencies, or some e-ink like technology that is based on reflecting light rahter than emitting it.

      For the same reason, I don't believe this technology will work for newspapers.

      Tor

    5. Re:Uses by MegaT · · Score: 1

      This wouldn't be so great. You'd probably find yourself constantly buying wallpaper upgrades.

      And what if your house was hacked? You might wake up to find yourself living in the firey pits of hell as someone's idea of a joke.

      Ugh.. what if you were forced to view adverts on them? What if you were taunted by the pilsbury dough boy in the middle of the night?

      Think I'll stick with emulsion, thanks.

  6. Two Words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Dynamic Wallpaper. And not the kind on your computer desktop either.

    Imagine being surrounded by thousands of ever-changing images of Bettie Page all the time.

    mmmm

  7. That's just great. by grub · · Score: 4, Funny


    Now I'll have to wear my glasses when I go to the can or I might accidently wipe my arse with my LCD display.

    --
    Trolling is a art,
  8. Uses by darkov · · Score: 5, Insightful

    At a refresh rate of 4Hz, it's not much use as a monitor, I think they currently use this stuff for signage displays and the like. It might be useful for a e-book sort of thing, where it's unlikely you'll be reading faster than four pages a second.

    The big question is how much does it cost and how durable/stable is it?

  9. Obvious...? by m00nun1t · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "Let the speculation for new uses begin!"

    Isn't the first use for every new technology a new way of accessing, displaying or making pr0n?

    1. Re:Obvious...? by kingkade · · Score: 1

      Your sig is so appropriate for your banal post...it's also quite ironic it that you try for a ;funny'; mod in making fun of others who jump to using the 'porn' angle to get a 'funny' mod. This is speculation, obviously. Oh wait: ;)

    2. Re:Obvious...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah, u r right. i even can imagine contact lenses, made using this technology, uploading new pr0n and bring it straight to your eyes. you will see definitely the better world ;)

      also, on the other side, they can change the color of your eyes, that can be unusial and beautiful somehow.

      but first is more cute, of course ;)

    3. Re:Obvious...? by Esion+Modnar · · Score: 1
      Isn't the first use for every new technology a new way of accessing, displaying or making pr0n?

      Hmmm... I'm trying to think of how the wheel was first used for pr0n.

      ...or the cotton gin...

      ...or the internal combustion engine...

      ...or the warp engine (oops, not invented yet)...

      --

      They say the first thing to go is your penis. Well, it's either that or your brain. I forget which...
    4. Re:Obvious...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...or the internal combustion engine...

      man, it's itself a pr0n device. One who invented this definitely was a pr0n-paranoid ;)

    5. Re:Obvious...? by Angry+White+Guy · · Score: 1

      The internal combustion engine was originally designed to run vibrators and heavy-duty enema pumps. Only later did somebody think to put it into a car, and even then it was to make 'pimp-mobiles'.

      A little history lesson for you...

      --
      You think that I'm crazy, you should see this guy!
    6. Re:Obvious...? by realdpk · · Score: 1

      The warp engine would be used to see the new Enterprise-esque horny Vulcan porn, of course.

    7. Re:Obvious...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The internal combustion engine was originally designed to run vibrators and heavy-duty enema pumps.

      ...thus the origin of the term "diesel dikes" - they were the early adopters of this technology....

    8. Re:Obvious...? by ColaMan · · Score: 1

      Allow me:

      cotton gin : used to help collect cotton , which is used to make cloth, which is then draped suggestively over nekkid models.

      internal combustion engine: used primarily along with the wheel to propel props (eg. sports cars) which are then covered suggestively in nekkid models.

      See? No matter how you look at it, it all comes back to porn :-)

      Or maybe it's just the amazing way the human mind can turn a perfectly useful object into porn.

      --

      You are in a twisty maze of processor lines, all alike.
      There is a lot of hype here.
  10. It's only wafer-thin... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    And finally, monsieur, a wafer-thin screen.
    </french accent>

    1. Re:It's only wafer-thin... by Gleng · · Score: 1


      Fuck off, I'm full...

      --
      "Proudly Posting Without Reading The Article"
  11. This is not LCD. by warlock · · Score: 4, Informative

    A quick glance at the linked article would be sufficient to figure out they're not LCD. I'd be very surprised if they made LCD displays that could be rolled like that!

    1. Re:This is not LCD. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's TFT technology though.

    2. Re:This is not LCD. by korgull · · Score: 1

      It can be produced in a TFT factory, right.
      It doesn't use LC, so it's no LCD.

      What is really nice is that there's no power needed to keep the information displayed. power is needed to change the information. Ideal for ebook stuff.

    3. Re:This is not LCD. by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 1
      Yes, this is why I will never pay for /.

      As much as I like /. It's editorial are a complete joke. If this was any other site, they'd atleast correct the completely false title, if not remove the dupe that shouldn't have been there in the first place.

    4. Re:This is not LCD. by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      I think that /. needs to start moderating whole articles. The editors need to have karma too, so when a dupe is posted, the (Score:-1, Redundant) mod will actually hurt editors. Fall below Terrible editor karma, and hit Excellent user karma. They can appeal the editor karma eviction, but a /. poll will determine whether he stays/goes.

  12. Is it just me? by alwsn · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Maybe it's just me, but I've been visiting slashdot for 3+ years now, and I keep seeing articles about new, paper thing, cheap displays that will revolutionize everything, and really small, cheap, huge(storage capacity), solid state storage devices.

    I look forward to new stuff as much as anyone, but in those 3 years, hard drive storage and monitors keep making slower (in comparison to what is mentioned in articles such as these), but steady process.

    I no longer trust articles saying 'everything will be different in a year.' From my experience, it won't be different and revolutionary, it will just be slightly better.

    1. Re:Is it just me? by roseblood · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Funny didn't I see a story
      recently about how hard drives
      where leaving CPUs in dust when it comes to capacity/price ratios?

      --
      There are lies, damned lies, and statistics.
    2. Re:Is it just me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's spelled "were", you fucking twit, and the original poster was comparing the actual improvements in storage space and display quality to the excessive hype of slashdot articles, not to the growth of CPU power.

    3. Re:Is it just me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Maybe it's just me, but I've been visiting slashdot for 3+ years now, and I keep seeing articles about new, paper thing, cheap displays that will revolutionize everything...

      It's really just the same story, duplicated over and over and over and over and...

    4. Re:Is it just me? by MikeFM · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I usually see these new tech articles and think to myself "Wow, things will be really different in 5-10 years." Asking for it to change dramaticly in even 2-3 years is asking a lot. Also as you say a lot of the changes are incremental so you fail to notice they are taking place. It's now pretty affordable for the average yokel (me) to have a terabyte of disk space at home, a tiny computer that is quiet, a nice lcd screen, and broadband. For the most part 3 years ago that stuff was available but cost a lot more. These new technologies are creeping out the door - mostly being sold to other companies - but they are emerging as real products. They still tend to cost a lot and be hard to find but they are showing up.

      Also it should be noted with development guys that they either take one of two personalities.. the cautious "It'll be ready in 30 years." guys and the gungho "Tomorrow we're all going to have jet packs." guys. Obviously the later make more interesting news sources because only ubergeeks plan 30 years into the future. I guess I'm both. I'm very gungho about what I'm doing now but am already looking into what I might be working on in 30 years. Nobody quotes me for articles though. :)

      --
      At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
  13. A cool use... by Flounder · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Walls covered with these displays on the inside that can display anything. No need for windows, just make the displays show what's outside. The appearance of glass walls without the privacy issues. The only thing missing will be natural sunlight and opening a window for a breeze. But you can make any s**thole apartment seem to be a cabin in the woods, or beachfront property, or floating 150 miles above the planet's surface.

    --

    No boom today. Boom tomorrow. There's always a boom tomorrow. - Cmdr. Susan Ivanova

    1. Re:A cool use... by jez9999 · · Score: 1

      This is a rather dumb idea. Without UV radiation that comes from the sun through windows, humans would become very ill or die. I'm sure there are other health issues with not having any natural light as well, not least for the eyes.

      Also, can you imagine what would happen if there was a power cut? "Oh shit, the sky went out again!"

    2. Re:A cool use... by JFMulder · · Score: 1

      No need for windows
      No need for Windows? Damn, Microsoft is destined to buy this competitor and bury it in their "they provided an alternative so we put them in the ground" graveyard. :p

    3. Re:A cool use... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah, finaly i can code in space, or something like that ;)
      or even in a brothel ;)

    4. Re:A cool use... by sleeper0 · · Score: 1

      let me get this straight...

      You think a cool use for a very thin black and white display that updates very slowly would be to put it on your wall, mount a camera outside, and replace your windows?

    5. Re:A cool use... by Angry+White+Guy · · Score: 1

      Ain't technology great. Replace your windows with linux, replace your windows with very thin black and white displays...

      We'll show Bill Gates what for! NO MORE WINDOWS!

      --
      You think that I'm crazy, you should see this guy!
    6. Re:A cool use... by grahamlee · · Score: 2, Informative
      Without UV radiation that comes from the sun through windows, humans would become very ill or die

      I can assure you, having done practicals in Atmospheric Physics involving UV spectroscopy, that glass is opaque to UV light, by and large. Hint to anyone taking a Physics degree: you're not too lazy to throw the detector out the window, then pull it back in when the spectrograph is complete...

    7. Re:A cool use... by MikeFM · · Score: 1

      Once they get to true color high-res steroscopic electronic wallpaper I plan on making my walls look like I'm swirling through space around planet sized naked women. Maybe I'll give my house voice commands like something off Star Trek so I can tell the house how to fly around these ladies. "House, 'Fly closer to Katie.. up, up, stop and hold orbital pattern around the left breast. Okay, take us to the Betty-quandrant - speed alpha warp.'" Why browse porn when you can float in space amongst it. Just don't get sucked into a black ho (are you man enough?).

      --
      At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
  14. Just what the spamsters were waiting for by warmcat · · Score: 2, Funny

    Similar technology could even make clothes that double as video screens

    New! Look bigger in jeans!

  15. in case of slashdotting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Slim screen can be rolled but not folded
    Ultra-thin display brings e-newspapers a step closer.
    8 May 2003
    MICHAEL HOPKIN

    One newspaper that updates itself with the latest headlines every day - that's the vision of US researchers who have unveiled an ultra-thin electronic-ink display screen1.

    The screen is less than 0.3 millimetres thick, flexible enough to be rolled into a tube just 4 mm across and can be viewed from almost any angle.

    This is good, but not quite good enough for an e-newspaper, admits one of the device's creators, Yu Chen of the E Ink Corporation in Cambridge, Massachusetts: the display is still too thick to be folded in two.

    The screen uses an electronic network called a thin-film transistor array. This can supply opposing voltages to different areas of the display. On top of the array is a conducting layer containing millions of tiny capsules of charge-sensitive pigment - some black, some white.

    A negative voltage moves the white particles to the surface; a positive one brings black ones to the fore, creating an effect like print on a page. The pattern remains for around 10 minutes after the voltages are removed, making this a cheaper alternative to other electronic displays.

    Similar technology could even make clothes that double as video screens. This would need a display that refreshed itself every 15 milliseconds. The new screen currently takes around a quarter of a second. "The main challenge is to increase the speed - I think it's very doable," Chen says

  16. What use? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    What use? PORN offcourse, what else?

  17. Predator by gmenhorn · · Score: 1

    Predator (not the UAV) here we come! This could be used to create a display that could be worn as shirt/pants (as mentioned in the article) along with the technology used in the upcoming Matrix film (Burly Brawl scene) to render the current scene on the clothes, albiet a static scene. Upcoming super accurate GPS technologies such as the military's DAGR could be used for the positioning. Invisibility is around the corner.

    1. Re:Predator by rusty0101 · · Score: 1

      Here is the problem. Unless your cloths appear as a representative of something that normally appears where you are, in the shape you happen to be, (bush, pile of sand, or dirt, etc.) the display has to project a different image in every direction that someone happens to be.

      It would be easier to build the technology described in "The Free Lunch" (by Spider Robinson) that uses cameras to find lenses (including organic eyes) and projectors to project a replacement image of the location appropriate to that lens that does not include the object being obscured.

      The questions then becomes how do two of these systems interact if they come within sensor range of each other? and how does the system deal with magnification? Can one system obscure the fact that it exists to another system? Can systems be built to recognize each other and ignore the projections of each other? Can one be set up so that it recongizes friend or foe, and flags foe for the user?

      If someone is using a 10x scope, or a 1000mm lense on a 35mm camera, is the image that is projected to the lense appropriate for the magnification involved?

      One other question is what is the range of the sensors? Will it project at ranges of 50 and 50,000 meters? Will it handle lenses that are on satelites or high flying platforms (U2, SR71, other varients) appropriately? What will the effect of walking in and out of sensor range be? Will you see someone until you get to within some distance of them, they disappear, only to re-appear once you get back out of sensor range?

      Will the black or silvered lenses of highway patrol officers shades prevent such a system from hiding the fact that you are traveling at 95 kph in a 50 kph zone?

      I would think that for objects in motion the image projected, or if you insist on this being clothing covered in lcd panels then displayed on your attire, would always lag behind the actual background of your environment. It would take a significant amount of computational horsepower to create images appropriate to each of 365 degrees horizontally, much less the thousands of potential camera images (considering just three cameras each cardinal degree, stacked on top of each other is 1096 cameras and that doesn't even come close to the number that may potentially be pointed in your direction.)

      At that point the question is what is "good enough"? If the projection or display can make me look like an innocuous bush, or (if I move on hands and feet, or knees) like a dog, or a statue of Sadam (probably not a good idea) is that "good enough"?

      Maybe it is. Maybe it isn't.

      -Rusty

      --
      You never know...
  18. finally...technology in the bathroom by thomas_klopf · · Score: 4, Funny

    We know we're finally in an information age when we can start leaving technology in the bathroom...

  19. Doormats! by John3 · · Score: 2, Funny

    This would be so cool on a door mat. Set up a CCTV system that scanned a person's face when they rang your doorbell. If they're a friend the doormat LCD says "Welcome!". If it's a pair of guys in white shirts with ties and name tags then the doormat displays "Bug off!"

    --
    "We make our world significant by the courage of our questions and by the depth of our answers." Carl Sagan
    1. Re:Doormats! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Oh, great... Mormons."

      -Homer Simpson

  20. Why not an electronic newspaper? by Oculus+Habent · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Sure, you can't fold it, but you could roll it up in to a 1" tube that contains batteries, communications, etc. Carry a 1-foot long 1" diameter tube that rolls out into a 19" screen. And it could be much smaller if you wanted.

    This would be perfect for "paperback" e-books. Even with the quarter-second refresh time on the screen it would acceptable for "turning the page". Or you could produce a book of the screens, and have the pages fill in with whatever you are reading.

    How about electronic blueprints? Dynamic wall art that you can move around easily? Status displays on pillars in the airport?

    If they can reduce the refresh time it would be incredible. Imagine a roll-up 19" screen for crowded server closets.

    --
    That what was all this school was for... to teach us how to solve our own problems. -- janeowit
    1. Re:Why not an electronic newspaper? by Eskarel · · Score: 1
      I personally dislike the idea of eBooks to an almost irrational degree.

      To begin, I like the feel of an actual paper book. There's something about holding a book in your hands and feeling the paper which makes it more worthwhile. I can't read long works on a computer screen despite my familiarity with said screen and the large amount of time I spend using it in any given day. I also like the ability to guage how far you are in said book by actually physically looking at the book and seeing how much of it you've managed to get through(this is one of the only ways I can sometimes motivate myself through some of my course related readings.

      You could argue that this problem could be solved by generating a book of the screens as has been previously stated. However this has several major drawbacks. If you have a book which can display any written work, you have to delve into the issue of copyright control and DRM which are not currently as much of an issue with books as with digital media.

      Something like this also brings up the issue of government involvement. The government(at least in the US) already wants to accumulate all the information about you it can, and since about the only feasible way of managing something like this would be through some sort of centralized electronic distribution network, eBooks would make such information gathering much more effective.

      True eBooks could also make distributing your own work much easier(assuming they make these things open for everyone), but IMO the costs don't outweight the benefits.

  21. Uses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    This would need a display that refreshed itself every 15 milliseconds. The new screen currently takes around a quarter of a second.

    The best use I can think of is to give these out to all my competitors at the next LAN party. Then I will reign supreme despite my limited skillz and total lack of eye-hand coordination.

  22. That was NOT offtopic. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Off topic? I beg to differ.

    This tech has huge potential to change the way we use media. Currently, you can subscribe to an "online" edition of your daily news paper, but people don't because they like to have A Paper to read. But Imagine if you could buy the media once, then have a daily update downloaded to your e-Paper each morning. Think how many Real Trees could that save on a larger scale.

    That's just one application, same applies to magazines, and texts as well. No more obsolete classroom books - just buy and download the update from the publisher. Getting the best of both the electronic and old-skool media worlds has loads of benefits. Saving trees may be one of them.

    This is a Good Thing.

    /poorboy.

    1. Re:That was NOT offtopic. by Tyreth · · Score: 1

      Considering what's involved in making a RAM chip, is it possible that these will cost more in terms of the environment than they will save?

  23. My Use for This... by naelurec · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I am a musician (pianist) ... Currently I play at a church and for each service, I have to pull music from 5 different books + sheet music, etc..etc..

    Needless to say, first, its a pain to carry around those books with me, flipping through them during a service, finding particular songs, etc...

    So back in 1999 when I bought my Visor Deluxe PDA, I thought it would be cool to scan in all of that sheet music and have the PDA hooked up to some e-paper sheets (probably two of them) and then use a foot switch to "turn the pages" ..

    The setup would be very cool, small and portable. Before a service, I'd simply download the lineup into the system and everything would be ready to go. No carrying around the books, no page flipping, etc.. Heck .. given the way I play the piano (music laying flat on top of the piano), it could possibly make it look like I memorized all the music to the congregation :-)

    Of course, I heard about e-paper back then as well.. and so far, no products.. so by the time it *IS* released, i might already use something like a tablet PC ....

    1. Re:My Use for This... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why have a foot switch to turn pages? Have the thing scroll the music automatically, keeping time with the music. You could even make it "smooth scroll", so that you can always see a bit of what's coming up, instead of suddenly jumping to the next page.

    2. Re:My Use for This... by paul248 · · Score: 1

      Or you could add some large speakers to the PDA, and pre-record all your music; then you don't even to turn pages at all. And you wouldn't need a piano.

  24. Dupe by x+mani+x · · Score: 4, Informative

    This is a dupe of a recent story. At least the articles it points to are different. Same product, though.

    -Mani

    1. Re:Dupe by ehiris · · Score: 1

      I also know another source that I will submit tomorrow. The only reason it might get rejected is that it is on a Microsoft owned site.

  25. Clothes as displays? by vidnet · · Score: 5, Funny
    Similar technology could even make clothes that double as video screens.

    I hope they add an alpha channel to those!

    1. Re:Clothes as displays? by Have+Blue · · Score: 1

      An alpha channel could be done by using a slanted cell with an opaque front slope (except for a transparent "window" where you want the pixel to be) and a transparent back slope, and using a mixture of transparent and opaque particles. When the pixel is on, the opaque particles move to the front surface at the top of the slant and block the transparent area. When the pixel is off, the opaque particles move down the slant to an "alcove" off to the side and light can pass through the transparent particles and out of the transparent back of the tube. It wouldn't be perfect (distortion would make each pixel look like it was made of frosted glass), but whatever is behind the pixels would look no worse than a color image of itself displayed on the screen.

  26. Cheap enough to use as? by unfortunateson · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The two goals, which in my mind are separate directions, are speed and independence from wires.

    If I can 'print' an e-book, I don't care about refresh rate. But is a 300-page e-paperback cheaper than buying, say 50 paperbacks? 20 paperbacks? Or is it silly to even think of having 300 pages of this stuff, and I'd just 'leaf' through pages like I do on my PDA currently? Maybe I'm old, but I still like the page-flipping aspect of books, especially if I want to flip back to find when a character that just stepped out of the wings first showed up.

    If this stuff is as durable, and as cheap, power-friendly and fast as LCDs, I'd be happy to drop a fair chunk of my PDA's weight. Cell-phone screens sound like another perfect application.

    Now for the more far-out stuff:
    How about rewritable MTG cards?
    Medical 'patches' that tell you when they need replacing, or can monitor glucose or other body functions.
    Devices when you need to measure bend

    --
    Design for Use, not Construction!
    1. Re:Cheap enough to use as? by Hanji · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I still like the page-flipping aspect of books, especially if I want to flip back to find when a character that just stepped out of the wings first showed up.
      I think that's a really good point. Getting a good, intuitive, interface is going to be really important to getting e-books adopted, IMO. With a paperback, you can mark a page with a finger, and flip back to find something earlier. If you have an idea of where something was earlier in the book, you can flip through and find it pretty quickly, just by reading little snippets of pages to figure out where you are in the story. E-books are going to need some kind of nice, easy-to-understand-and-learn interface that offers equivalent functionality if e-books are ever to become common.

      --
      A Minesweeper clone that doesn't suck
    2. Re:Cheap enough to use as? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
      I think you would have multiple pages but less than in a book, certainly. For one thing it is unlikely we will have e-paper the thickness of ordinary paper in the next few years, so you simply won't be able to put as many leaves in the book. I suspect what we'll end up with is a book with some 10-50 pages in it (the more the merrier, I expect them to come in varying sizes) and you'll treat it more or less like a real book. It'll have some kind of gesture recognition, if in no other way than to provide you a little virtual palmtop computer (with a keyboard or a big stroke recognition area like graffiti) if they manage to work touch sensitivity into the sheets. Otherwise, flip to the back cover, and the input hardware will be there, perhaps even an actual little keyboard and a glidepoint? Anyway that's all open for debate regardless.

      The point is, you don't gain anything by having 300 sheets. You can't possibly look at that many at a time - looking at about 10 sheets is pushing it even if you fold the book so that the covers are touching, at least at this resolution.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  27. Re:upcoming slashdot headlines by Angry+White+Guy · · Score: 2, Informative

    From the article:

    The screen is less than 0.3 millimetres thick, flexible enough to be rolled into a tube just 4 mm across and can be viewed from almost any angle.

    So the thickness can be given as 0.3 mm with any accuracy.
    Googling for toilet paper thickness, single ply is about 0.004 inches thick, and with a conversion of 25.4mm to an inch, you get 0.010mm thickness, for a grand total of 30 times the thickness of toilet paper (minus quilting).

    Also, the screens are black and white, raising and lowering white and black dots, so there is no backlighting necessary. So you just need the controller width plus enough room to move the dots.
    Put some effort into your trolls :)

    --
    You think that I'm crazy, you should see this guy!
  28. Interesting by A+Proud+American · · Score: 0, Insightful
    From Webopedia.com:
    LCD displays utilize two sheets of polarizing material with a liquid crystal solution between them. An electric current passed through the liquid causes the crystals to align so that light cannot pass through them. Each crystal, therefore, is like a shutter, either allowing light to pass through or blocking the light.
    So, how will this end up affecting LCD technologies as screens get increasingly thin, increasingly more mass-produced, and forced to endure more wear-and-tear as a part of being on everyday devices now (even kids' toys)?
    1. Re:Interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well if you read the article you will note that the screen is not actually lcd, and would save me having to reply.

  29. Not impressed by m4g02 · · Score: 0

    Im still waiting for my flying car and my trip to the moon (3rd class). They cant buy time with a small flexible screen, not for me, no sir.

    --
    Sigs are for morons... Wait a minute...
  30. A use.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what about placemats at a table for food, or something like that? If a protective coating is supplied underneath, kids (and even adults) could play games, read the news, and even see advertising all at the same time. It could also introduce a much easier way to pay bills.

  31. Not LCD.... by WareW01f · · Score: 5, Informative

    Here is what the display is made of... And here is the last ./ story. Come on guys! Don't get my hopes up like that!

    As a side note, I was at Epcot and got to see Xerox's Gyricon (now marketed as 'SmartPaper') up close and personal. The only issue was that the person at the booth barely knew how the stuff worked and did not have so much as a magnet to show it change. Someday...

    1. Re:Not LCD.... by mindriot · · Score: 2, Informative
      The only issue was that the person at the booth barely knew how the stuff worked and did not have so much as a magnet to show it change.

      From the Gyricon link you gave:

      17. Can SmartPaper(TM) be tampered with electronically?
      No. Due to the way signs are constructed, they can not be tampered with by magnets, static electricity, PDAs, cell phones, or other electronic devices.

      So I suppose he rather had something like a strong coil?

  32. easy on the eyes by dokewalker · · Score: 1

    I would say one of the real problems with online newspapers is that people would rather read something on paper then on a computer screen, I know I would. This might be a bit more like regular paper in that respect, although I would have to see it to say for sure.

  33. Sure it isn't OLED? by Trollificus · · Score: 1

    Are you sure this is an LCD?
    Although I don't know many of the specifics, it sounds a lot like an OLED display. UDC has been working on this for quite some time.

    --

    "People should be allowed to keep midgets as pets."
    - Gov. Jesse Ventura

    1. Re:Sure it isn't OLED? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not OLED at all. It's a pigment based display.

  34. One use... by geesus · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Instead of painting a wall, you could just place paper thin LCD on it, use the wall as a TV or whatever floats your boat. I'd patent the idea but im a poor boy in a rich mans world.

    --
    Gnome wasnt built in a day.
  35. Not quite a window by Albinoman · · Score: 1

    Ive seen a few people talk about using it to replace a windows. I think you could liken it more to a poster. Remember its not like youll see the image in 3D.

  36. Look, moderator. by HEbGb · · Score: 1

    Take it up with the Slashdot editors. I'm pointing out their idiocy, which, in this case, is well deserved. Why are you defending them?

  37. Folding, bending. by j1mmy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The point of these displays (as stated in the article) is to create a one-page newspaper. They can currently roll it up pretty well, but it can't be folded. What I want to know is why you would fold it.

    If it's a one-page newspaper, you've only got one page. It can be the size of an 8.5x11 piece of paper. It's an entirely different presentation medium and they're still thinking in terms of traditional papers. The biggest failure of the traditional newspaper (as an interface) is that you have to do all the folding and whatnot. Most papers can't be held with one hand without folding them up a bit. It's a hassle, plain and simple.

    If you've got one sheet of electronic paper, of a reasonable size, you can hold it in one hand and just read it.

    I can see how folding would be useful for storing the paper, but I don't see that as a critical issue.

    1. Re:Folding, bending. by Unregistered · · Score: 2, Insightful

      i would hate this if it couldn't be forlded. it' would be too easy to break. what if someone sits on the roll, or bumps in to it. I think it's more of a durability thing. would you want to carry something that fragile on the subway?

    2. Re:Folding, bending. by sexydawg · · Score: 1

      What happens when you spill your coffee on an electronic newspaper? Or when you want to cut out an article about somebody you know on the front page? How would you do the crossword puzzles?

  38. but of course... by Hooya · · Score: 1, Funny

    in that iLoo (or whatever the hell that portapottie with connection to the net was called). cruise the net, look at pr0n and then fold it up and wipe your ass.

  39. Main Application: disposable PDA's by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    Well they would be more like terminals at that point, wireless so you can access your data from anywhere, on any unit you happen find laying around, like a sticky pad.

    And be so cheap, that if you loose it.. no big deal.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  40. Re:Sorry, slashdot editors are total fu*king idiot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "I've HAD IT."

    Then leave. Seriously. Understand the fact that the reason there may be a lack of "journalistic integrity", as you call it, is because they aren't journalists. Relaying news does not make you a journalist just as telling you what the weather is like doesn't make you a meterologist.

    Besides, I don't think you've "HAD IT". The fact that you responded to your post because of some moderation proves that not only have you not "HAD IT", but you stick around and reload over-and-over again just to see if your comments get responded to or moderated. Get a fucking life. Sitting here and pointing out mistakes, as they are bound to appear on this site, no matter who the editors are, is useless.

  41. Feh. by dynayellow · · Score: 2, Funny

    I've invented a paper-thin material than can support an INFINITE number of dots per inch! It's dirt cheap and uses exisiting technology!

    Oh wait, that's just some paper I had lying around...

    1. Re:Feh. by p00ya · · Score: 1
      ... than can support an INFINITE number of dots per inch!
      Accepting the license for hyperbole, the resolution on normal paper is by no means infinite. I'd give a few reasons for this (some probably innacurate):
      • Just like most analogue devices don't have 'infinite' accuracy: take an analogue wrist watch for example. Even if the second hand sweeps, very few watches will be accurate to more than a few milliseconds. By no means infinite.
      • The closer you look at paper, the less uniform it becomes (a magnifying glass for poor quality paper, a microscope for higher quality leaf) as individual fibres will prevent a clean image from being printed upon it.
      • Look closer still (under an electron microscope), and you'll notice that your paper is FULL OF HOLES! If you're using an ink, then there's a fundamental limit to the pitch between two dots (namely the size of the ink molecules, and the structure of the cellulose layer).
  42. Back to the future.. by Chicane-UK · · Score: 1

    Maybe the newspapers in Back To The Future : Part II don't seem so far fetched now.. remeber the headlines & articles used to change and you used to get embedded video and stuff? Might not be quite paper thin, but I guess the technology will continue to evolve.

    Couple that with some kind of inbuilt WiFi reciever (complete with city wide WiFi network) and there it is.

    --
    "Hey! Unless this is a nude love-in, get the hell off my property!!"
    1. Re:Back to the future.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uhhh, I don't remember any newspapers with embedded video or anything like that in BTTF II. The newspapers in 2015 weren't dynamic in any way, and they were still printed on regular paper. They only changed to reflect the new reality, when Doc/Marty/Biff made changes to the past. That's it. I suggest you watch the movie again and pay a little more attention.

    2. Re:Back to the future.. by realdpk · · Score: 1

      Remember the newspapers from 1984? Whenever they had to disappear someone, they had to go around and recover any newspaper articles (amongst other things) that referred to them, and then re-issue the articles w/ someone else's name (or not at all).

  43. My Beef with LCD's... by blahlemon · · Score: 1
    ...is that I never seem to get a good a refresh on one as I to with a standard CRT. Any games that I play that have fast moving objects (simulators, FPSers, etc.) aren't handled very well by the flat panels...

    At least that has been my experience. Has anyone else experienced something different? Any models you could recommend?

    --
    It take more faith to believe in evolution than it takes to believe in God
    1. Re:My Beef with LCD's... by Rolo+Tomasi · · Score: 1

      I recently bought an NEC LCD1760NX, which has one of those new 16ms panels. I have to say, I'm impressed by the speed. I had a Samsung 172T before, and fast games like e.g. Counter Strike were unplayable. Not so with the NEC, there's almost no difference to a CRT. The downside is, it uses a TN+film panel. Compared to high-class panels like the PVA panel in the 172T, the viewing angle isn't stellar. You get used to it, though, and the NEC has a really great foot that allows you to adjust the position of the monitor perfectly. The contrast is a bit worse than on the Samsung, but only slightly, and still much better than on a CRT.

      --
      Did you know you can fertilize your lawn with used motor oil?
  44. Errr... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "unlikely you'll be reading faster than four pages a second"

    Errr... I don't think that's much of a problem. Who the fuck reads faster than four pages a second?

    Think before you post, children.

    1. Re:Errr... by mattrix2k · · Score: 1

      Think before you post too ... he says it wouldn't be a problem for e-books.

    2. Re:Errr... by blahlemon · · Score: 1

      How big is the page? How big are the letters? How many words per page?

      --
      It take more faith to believe in evolution than it takes to believe in God
  45. Farewell Horizontal by handy_vandal · · Score: 4, Interesting

    How about programmable animated tattoos using skin-mountable biofoil?

    The idea appears in K.W. Jeter's Farewell Horizontal, an engaging novel about motorcycle gang warfare on the outer face of a miles-high cylinder.

    --
    -kgj
  46. For invisibility, use this technology instead by The+Jonas · · Score: 1

    Check out "Optical Camouflage Technology" at this link. I heard there were some recent improvements made to it to get rid of the green tint. Here is another link.

  47. LCD is dying, by noogle · · Score: 1

    CRT for ever.

    --

    I'm smarter than the average bear.

    1. Re:LCD is dying, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you the iraqi information minister?

  48. Is Research Frozen? by Goldfinger7400 · · Score: 1
    I had an opportunity to see one of these first-hand at UIUC's Engineering Open House. It appeared to be the very same type of unit pictured in the article. I was instantly impressed, of course, but when I inquired about the technology the representative said that they're company had more or less gone broke, and the technology had little chance of being further refined.

    This is a golden opportunity for investors, if true.

  49. Refresh Difficulties by Goldfinger7400 · · Score: 1

    From personal experience with these displays, it looks like they fade to black before updating their information. At least at this stage of development, this would limit usage as a video monitor.

  50. It's sad when... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    even cowboyNeal doesn't read his own website.

  51. Forget the LCDs by ryanvm · · Score: 4, Funny

    Forget the LCDs - the real story here is that a Slashdot editor made an attempt to prevent dupes. ;-)

    1. Re:Forget the LCDs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What I don't get is why they have to rely on searches to detect dupes. Can't they just try reading their own site? Most of us that actually read Slashdot have no difficulty spotting the dupes.

  52. Future error message by jetmarc · · Score: 1

    > Or is it silly to even think of having 300 pages of this stuff

    PAGE CAPACITY OVERFLOW - download aborted.

    Your book doesn't support more than 504 pages.

  53. e-book reader from Matsushita by soramimicake · · Score: 3, Informative
    How about an application like this e-book reader (Japanese news release and pictures). Here is a CNET article that talks about it.

    Basically, it is 2 XGA displays at 180dpi that doesn't require refresh, so can last a few months on 2 AA batteries. It reads contents stored on an SD card. The weight is only 500 gram. I like physical books compared to bulky PDAs with small screens, but something like this could become serious competition to them.

  54. msnbc has purty pictures of it by circletimessquare · · Score: 2, Informative

    http://msnbc.com/news/910466.asp?0cv=CB20

    it reminds me of pictures of the first transistors at bell labs- all bulky and ungainly

    but in it's picture you see the future gleaming bright ;-)

    oops! my post is a karma-whoring dupe! sorry! ;-P

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  55. Do the editors understand? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do the editors understand that "I searched for LCD" is not an acceptable excuse? Do they understand that the reason dupes are so annoying is that we all check slashdot every fifteen minutes and remember at least the last few days worth of headlines? The people who actually *work* there aren't even as interested in it as the readers themselves? *That's* what's galling. There *is* no excuse for posting dupes, except perhaps "I was away from computers for the last week" yet even then a real slashdot reader would go and check out all the missed stories just to catch up.

    Furthermore, if the slashdot editors don't read the site, and they don't really write anything, WHAT EXACTLY the fuck do they do? This is not a flame - I'm actually curious if the editors comprehend that this is why people hate dupes and won't accept today's excuse. You shouldn't have to search at all - all of us know it's a dupe within two seconds of seeing the headline.

    1. Re:Do the editors understand? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just out of interest, have the slashdot staff ever called themselves editors?

      I can't remeber them doing so.

      So why do people get pissed off when these guys don't live up to a title they never claimed to have?

  56. But you were paper thin... by Fromeo · · Score: 1

    You cut your little finger on the edge of the knife...

    1. Re:But you were paper thin... by Blaine+Hilton · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Now they are going to start considering books weapons and banning them from planes.

      --
      Have something to calculate?

  57. E-paper LCD vs. Organic LED by BreakdancecrewDotCom · · Score: 1

    I look forward to the upcoming competition between these two technologies in the next few years. They both look promising in many ways. As far as I can see, the only difference between them visibly is that OLED is self-illuminated, and E-Paper is not. OLED appears a year or two ahead of E-Paper since color has been developed, and some cell phones, digital cameras, and car stereos, are beginning to implement it.

  58. Programmable tat's. by MikeFM · · Score: 1

    Actually, a couple years ago somebody did that. They had a calculator embeded in their skin as a tat.. and it really functioned. Boy would I have liked to have that in school. No more of my professors lame remarks "You won't always have a calculator with you so work the problems out by hand." If I remember right it used a similar kind of ink and had some method of implanting circuits under the skin. I was very impressed with the idea at the time but I haven't really heard anything more about it since.

    --
    At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
    1. Re:Programmable tat's. by Galvatron · · Score: 1

      As I recall, the ink it used was completely normal, it was the circuits under the skin that made it work. I think the LCD screen was just high contrast enough that you could see it through your skin (just like you can see blue veins and stuff). Given the difficulty involved in implanting artificial devices into people without getting rejection, it's not too surprising the we haven't seen anything practical come of it.

      --
      "The question of whether a computer can think is no more interesting than that of whether a submarine can swim" -EWD
  59. Re:Sorry, slashdot editors are total fu*king idiot by MikeFM · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If you can do better then go forth and do so and make yourself some cash and get a little fame. If not then get over it. You don't have to pay to read - if you want to bitch then subscribe.

    --
    At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
  60. Paper thin LCDs by Overly+Critical+Guy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Paper thin LCDs?

    Oh, that's right; you didn't read the article. And everyone making their lame LCD jokes didn't either. A quick glance at the article will reveal to you Slashbots that it's not LCD.

    Okay, so it was a dupe and the editor points it out. But did he even read the article? The headline is completely wrong. Slashdot has been quite bad this year.

    I'll either be ignored, modded down, or the self-righteous Slashbot defenders will jump on me, declaring it a-okay for Slashdot to post incorrect headlines and misleading summaries because I can go somewhere else. Most of those people are actually subscribers attempting to justify their payment of money to these people.

    Next.

    --
    "Sufferin' succotash."
  61. Harry Potter photo albums by vanyel · · Score: 1
    As I was re-reading the article, this line struck me:
    They also hope to boost the speed at which the screen switches to a new "page" of text, from the current quarter of a second to at least 10 times as fast, so it can display video.
    With that, the animated photo albums from Harry Potter would become a reality... As Clarke always said about magic and technology... ;-)
  62. Contrast by jhines · · Score: 1

    My tax guy, with an office with west facing window, much prefers the LCD over a CRT, because he can see what he is doing when the sun hits it.

  63. First, laptop screens by Otto-matic · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Before we postulate on the sci-fi products that will be available in a decade, why not implement this technology into current portable units? A laptop computer with a screen that actually folds out or extends horizontally when the lid is opened would make for great, expansive portable computing. It seems this is imminently more immediate than a producing auto-updating newspapers and the like. Imagine a 12-inch Powerbook G4 with a wide-screen cinema display based on this paper-thin technology. I understand that this requires waiting for a 24-bit version of this 2-bit display, but i think it's worth considering. I wonder what would be the possibility of making this technology interactive? Developing a touch screen version of the same display would open up a world of possibilities. I also seem to remember a fantastic implementation of similar tech in the movie "Red Planet." The computers, voice and touch activated were built like scrolls. The screen was retractable from within a small cylinder. I know we all agree that the possibilities are seemingly endless... Wow. Otto

  64. Have we forgotten something? by feagle814 · · Score: 1

    There's a big error here: This thin display is NOT a liquid-crystal display. Stop calling it that.

  65. the iLoo? by lpret · · Score: 1

    I could see it in the iLoo. I do I do.

    --
    This is my digital signature. 10011011001
    1. Re:the iLoo? by _ph1ux_ · · Score: 1

      I dont know about you - but the first thing i am going to do in the iLoo is pey all over the keyboard and mouse!

      er scratch that - Im just not going to enter the iLoo at all.

  66. Hey by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just modded you down -1, overrated. Sorry, but you're not funny, insightful, informative, or interesting. I think everyone else here concurs with me, and hopefully they will take action to mod this piece of trash post straight to oblivion.

    Also, I looked at your site; goddamn, keep your clothes on, fatty.

    Posting anoymously to save my precious karma..."

    1. Re:Hey by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      piece of trash? Are you Pat Beaver, or what?

    2. Re:Hey by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey dumbass.. if you post after you mod you lose the mod point.
      Fucking newbie.

  67. The RIAA will come down on you like a ton of briks by TheMidget · · Score: 1

    you filthy pir8, you! You are not allowed to copy sheet music without paying $$$$ to the rightful copyright owners! If everybody did this, the poor composers would starve!

  68. Calculator Tattoo by handy_vandal · · Score: 1

    They had a calculator embeded in their skin as a tat.. and it really functioned.

    Far out! This would be a great SlashDot item ... anyone got details?

    --
    -kgj
    1. Re:Calculator Tattoo by MikeFM · · Score: 1

      Actually, I think it was a Slashdot item -- a really long time ago. Google turned up a couple projects but they don't look like what I remember. I'm not sure if it's my memory that is foggy or just that the project isn't indexed by any of my search terms. :)

      --
      At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
  69. Electronic paper? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Id much rather see a rigid version of the same thing, that has a stylus and pressure sensitive overlay that feel like a decent pen and paper.

    give me that, and ill settle for an 1/8th of a second refresh on 96dpi black and white in a heartbeat. like a never ending scroll of paper to work on, with the entire thing savable. not to mention being able to chop out stuff you dont want easily.

    maybe i could actually finish projects without having a 3 inch stack of discarded notes and ideas on the floor, and also save myself searching through them when i cant find the good page.

  70. Allllright.. by anethema · · Score: 1

    Ok, for one, this isnt LCD. It is E-Ink that everyone has probably heard about. LCD doesnt work by brirng black or white particles to the fore.

    For two, instead of some 4Hz, two color rollable (not foldable) thing, why wouldnt you want to look at full color, super thin, high refresh rate OLEDs ?

    Here is a picture of a OLED monitor..kind of makes lcd look chunkey hey?

    Oleds are of course also flexible.

    --


    It's easier to fight for one's principles than to live up to them.
  71. Had to Search for LCD? by msheppard · · Score: 1

    So this is cowboyneal admitting he doesn't read slashdot?

    M@

    --
    Krispy Cream is people
  72. thin displays by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    LCD? what's replacing the glass?

    or did they see OLEDs instead?

  73. playing cards ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    We could create a deck of playing cards from
    this material.


    They could be operated by bluetooth or by wlan.


    I got this idea from a crap tv-serie Mission Impossible and I think the idea is awesome. Unfortunately there has not yet been any technology for that yet.


    jkekoni@cc.hut.fi

  74. Saving desk space by Bazman · · Score: 1

    How many people use this mythical 'extra desk space' that an LCD apparently gives them? Surely its just that empty space behind your LCD screen where the bulk of your CRT used to be? Its an invisible, hard-to-get-to space which isn't somewhere you really want to put stuff!

    The only saving is that now you can have a thinner desk and have the LCD up against the wall - but that only means the pointy-hairs can squeeze more of you into the same cubespace.

    Baz

  75. ebooks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    These screens provide orders of magnitude improvement in both display quality and power consumption. Meaning you could build a device that would be an inch thick, last ~month on two AA batteries, and look almost as good as paper. A device with flash cards and usb1 would probably cost ~$400USD. Add 802.11b (and a bigger battery to deal with it) for another $150.

    The 802.11b model could be used to auto download/update content. It could sync up to a PC base station that is running an app that constantly spiders content, providing a virtually unlimited supply of sorted, free, and interesting, things to read.

  76. How does it compare to... by 2bStealthy · · Score: 1

    ...paper?

    http://www.virtual-ed.org/SPNstream.mov

  77. e-newspapers are a bad idea! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If we go the route of e-newspapers, how the heck am I going to potty train my puppies? the newspaper is dirt cheap and extremely useful in the training of puppies. And what about the Paper mache market? They'll be crippled.

  78. suck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    my thick cock, you fuckhat

  79. Re:The RIAA will come down on you like a ton of br by naelurec · · Score: 1

    well considering it is used in a church that has a site license for the music, i don't see this as a problem.