Slashdot Mirror
Opera Releases Version 7 For Linux
Wee writes "I happened to notice this morning that Opera 7 for Linux has been released. New features include fastforward and rewind, the ability to take notes in conjuction with web pages, a cookie manager, a password manager, and a very serviceable integrated email client called M2 (which was previously only available for the Windows version). Version 7 of Opera also represents a complete code rewrite, from the rendering engine up, and the improvements are fairly significant. Mirrors for debs, rpms and tarballs are on Opera's download page."
All of that new functionality, and I still can only send the equivalent of postcards -- Opera's M2 Email client doesn't have any support for PGP or GPG at all.
:)
While their initial betas were pretty shaky, this "gold" build is very stable and looks terrific. Once they get the PGP/GPG thing sorted out, I'll have to evaluate it against Mozilla and see which I like more
"To make a mistake is only human; to persist in a mistake is idiotic." Cicero
No, but its definitly worth paying for.
"Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
True it may not be open source, But No one claimed that it was free software. Heck, the title for slashdot even says, News for nerd, Stuff that Matters. It dosent say, all free software.
Great. By releasing this newwer version of Opera, they are helping them get themselves more credit in the browser market. This will make it harder for designers to make the point that IE is the most used browser, so we will target only them, an idea of the past. Its hurting the Microsoft monopoly. I support this move all the way. It will make content more execessable to Linux users, but in the process will force people to make their information accessable to everyone without IE by weaning away from their IE only technologies (like VBScript, ActiveX controls, ASP.NET objects designed just for IE, and a number of other MS only techs). I don't personally like Opera but I use Mozilla (mostly the Firebird/Phonix version).
No.
I used to use Opera a lot. Primarily due to the fact that I could have it open up with all my web pages at once. Now that I can do this with Mozilla, I no longer use Opera. The only thing I still miss are the mouse gestures.
Warning! The slice of pizza I had for lunch wasn't free either.
Some things are just worth paying for.
It gets a lot of play because it's a cool piece of software and a lot of people use it. Their licensing model is about the very opposite of Microsoft's: use it for free and look at a small ad (that your eye will not notice after a week), or pay a bit and don't see the ad. I somehow can't see Microsoft adopting this.
No, it's not free. So what? This is a geek news site that discusses things of interest to the community, not a Free Software site. You don't complain when articles about Unreal Tournament and Neverwinter Nights get posted, do you?
As a user of Opera since v.3.something, I'm nothing but impressed by how it's improved. It's a lot better at getting to most sites, especially if you tell it to pretend to be IE in the agent string. I don't do online banking, so I can't say how well it works everywhere. I sometimes have to use IE on a page it doesn't like, but it's damn rare.
What if life is just a side effect of some other process and God has no idea we exist?
I'd have to venture that part of the problem, if you want to call it that, is that a good portion of users that use "fringe" browsers don't WANT flash, and so don't encounter any problem. I certainly don't need advertisements barking at me, so I would consider having Flash not work a bonus.
Just a thought.
"Oh my God. This is terrible. This is the end of my Presidency. I'm fucked."; ~ Donald J. Trump
It looks like they have indeed given up on working on the Mac version.
? pl atform=mac
http://www.opera.com/products/desktop/index.dml
I don't think a lot of Mac users will miss it, however. With Safari doing the things that people would have bought Opera for, its a tough sell. Of course, Opera could have made it better for themselves by making a browser that wasn't dog slow on the Mac.
Yeah, Opera's also A LOT better than Mozilla. (Less buggy, more advanced e-mail filtering, less crash prone, you cango back and forward by just using the "z" & "x" keys instead of giving yourself carpal tunnel from using a mouse etc etc.
Finally Opera is free if you don't mind a banner ad.
Some people think television is "free" even though they pay double for things at the supermarket that have been advertised on TV!
I've only got the Windows version to go on at the moment but Opera 7 can window every which way you like. Tabs, subwindows or top level windows in whatever mixture you choose.
In this respect Opera have done a great job in sidestepping any doctrinal war and just letting each user work however suits them best.
Boffoonery - downloadable Comedy Benefit for Bletchley Park
The sites that used JS/DOM rendered correctly but were very sluggish. For example, try to navigate the menus at the PGA Tour website in Opera 7 and in another browser such as Mozilla or IE. Opera is so slow it's nearly unusable.
What a fool believes, he sees, no wise man has the power to reason away.
Not trying to be a troll here.. I really liked Opera 6.x, but I always found the fonts difficult to read, so I ended up using Mozilla more frequently. Have there been many (any?) improvements with 7.11 that don't require a lot of adjustments to the default settings?
In 6.11 for Linux, you can go to File -> Preferences and in the first listing on the left (General), the very first option is to "Open windows inside the Opera workspace" -- if I understood your post correctly, unchecking that should provide the result you're looking for.
This is something I have been waiting for forever. I mean I dont mind the plain opt for scroll, but the opt-mod in transparency is JUST KICK ASS when attached to the left scroll device feature. Man it used to be gustures, but I can really see this taking aff as more users find ways to use it!
I found that an advantage of Opera gestures is that you use them by clicking the right mouse button. In Mozilla you have to use the left mouse button if you want to get anything usable out of the gestures which is still a bit awkward. Configuring them for the right button combines the gestures with the context menu which just doesn't work. Also Opera captures the gestures much better than Mozilla that doesn't figure out the gesture pretty often.
Who cares if they can be found in Mozilla or not? This article isn't about Mozilla - it's about Opera.
In any event, Opera is still much, much faster than Mozilla, and it looks like it always will be.
The real question here is: what makes Mozilla more appealing than Opera? That it's free and open source? Big - fucking - deal.
Max
My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
the dominant browser drives website innovation
The dominant browser drives website *stagnation*. It's the maverick that drives innovation - in *any* area of human endeavor.
Max
My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
How does this have anything to do with this?
You can get Opera for free much in the same way you could perhaps get some free pizza (beer is a more commonly used example). Sure, there are some ads, but who cares?
The original poster almost certainly wasn't referring to that kind of freedom.
He wants the Pizza recipe. He wants to be able to give it to his friends too.
Free software is really worth paying much more than proprietary.
I hope you realize you are asking for two different things:
1) Opera implements more standards.
2) Opera renderssall the pages that IE does.
For sure Opera can render things TODAY that IE cannot. However, for some reason very few people are using the features not supported by IE