Slashdot Mirror


Just In Case 3G Isn't Speedy Enough

Roland Piquepaille writes "Will we soon be able to download music or videos on our cell phones? Yes, with the arrival of the next 3.5G technology, as reports Jennifer L. Schenker in this International Herald Tribune article. "NTT DoCoMo Inc., the Japanese company that introduced the first third-generation digital mobile phone service in the world, is preparing to pioneer wireless services that are at least 40 times as fast." DoCoMo will use "a technology called HSDPA, for high-speed downlink packet access, also known as 3.5G, [which] is expected to deliver data at as much as 14.4 megabits a second." This new technology will not arrive in Europe before 2006 at least. Check this column for a summary."

140 comments

  1. 14.4 by FrostedWheat · · Score: 4, Funny

    Yea, so my 14.4 modem isn't useless after all! What's that you say .. megabits? What's that?

    1. Re:14.4 by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1
      Funny, but it doesn't seem so long ago that I was using a 300 baud modem (about the same size as a cash register) and thought that was really cool.

      Seriously, though: who is going to bother downloading muzack on to their cell phones? It's not like they have good enough sound reproduction to make it worthwhile.

    2. Re:14.4 by Ciaran_H · · Score: 1

      Have you heard the sound on the newer phones? They're actually pretty darn good - at least, compared to older phones. Believe me, the first time you hear a ringtone on one of these newer phones you'd think it's some sort of mini-computer.

    3. Re:14.4 by LNN · · Score: 1

      14.4kbps modems are underestimated. They are several times faster than light! Let me tell you how:

      See, I was accidently phrasing that a little program I was making would become faster than light. I started figuring about what speed is that really? And how do I measure it for a program? Naturally, the tricky questions should be answered with a simple answer, for that is the way to explain complex problems and give the evolution a helping hand.

      So, what I started out doing was to find any connections between speed as in getting from point A to B and the speed commonly referred to in context of programs. It might sound like a pretty hard task to investigate this, but actually, the only thing I did was to look at the units we measure speed in. For light, we use metres per second. For some tasks we only use seconds to measure the speed, and for some other tasks we use another unit per seconds to measure it. One of these other units is the bit.

      Now, we all know that the distance to our moon is quite a bit. In average that is about 384'000 km from earth, thus defining 1 bit = 3,84 * 10^8 m.

      We also know that the speed of light (we assume it's constant for now, although there are other theories as well) is 299792458 m/s. Actually, that is the exact numbers, as the definition of a metre is the distance light can travel in vacuum in one 299792458th of a second.

      Now, to find out how fast a program needs to be to be faster than light, we only have to know how many bits per second the light travels, so we set up the expression:

      l = 299792458 m/s / 3.844*10^5 m/bit = 0.779 bits/s

      Given this, and with a little margin to be on the safe side (the distance between Luna and Earth is not constant), we can agree on that 0.8 baud should be more than enough to be faster than light, thereby proving Einstein's theories wrong by simply using a common modem. Bad luck I guess. With a decent connection, making that program fast enough should not include too much of a hassle.

      To sum it up, a 14.4kbps modem should provide speeds averaging around 11231 times faster than light!

    4. Re:14.4 by stoops · · Score: 1

      plug headphones in... there's no reason it should be any worse than a tiny mp3 player

  2. 14.4? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Aaaahhhh!!!11 Horrid flashbacks from a decade ago!

    1. Re:14.4? by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 1
      Hey, keep in mind that even today there are people out there who still get 21.6 kbit/s on their regular dialup connection because they live on a terrible phone loop outside the range of DSL, cable, and don't want stupid one-sided satellite internet that limits the number of connections (i.e. TCP connections) you can have for 2-way servive.

      Actually I am 'fortunate' enough to be able to get a 31.2 kbit/s connection on my crappy phone loop. This 14.4 Mbit business makes me feel sad.

  3. All this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    And I still can't make a cell call from home....

    1. Re:All this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      how many people actually use or own these phones.... I cant stand trying to read web pages or email on the tiny little phone screens... I'll wait until a PADD is developed... or until something between a PDA and a Tablet PC is developed for under $200.
      BTW: service pricing is still so stupid that the only reason to have any of the features is to show them off... and your friends will start to get pissed when you alienate them at a bar by browsing the web instead of talking about the latest guy/chick that walks in.

    2. Re:All this... by geggibus · · Score: 2, Funny

      Home sweet home.. i don't need a cell phone... i never leave this room.. 12 fans for all the fresh air i need.. Enough keyboards to make a comfortable bed and some old pizza boxes for growing "vegetables" in .. the healthy slashdot lifestyle...

  4. eh? by RobertTaylor · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Will we soon be able to download music or videos on our cell phones?"

    Us Brits (ok I am welsh really!) have been able to do this already. Three a mobile company here in the UK has been selling handsets and access for a while that provides music/maps/video downloads and calls.

    "In Europe, we are now using GPRS, or general packet radio service, also known as 2.5G. And we are limited to 30 kilobits a second."

    Note this bloke is from france which is in europe, but a backwater in most things! ;)

    Note that the testbed for the DoComo handsets is in Cambridge...UK.

    All together now... God save our gracious queen....

    1. Re:eh? by BenjyD · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Three a mobile company here in the UK has been selling handsets and access for a while that provides music/maps/video downloads and calls.

      And nobody is buying them. The salespeople standing outside the Three shops in London look more desperate everytime I walk past. The introductory special offers have been extended in an attempt to boost flagging sales.

      Mobile phones and SMS meet a basic need for communication, 3G and video phones don't really add anything to this. Look at the desperate advertising campaigns from Three etc trying to convince us that it's cool to be able to see someone while talking. Nobody is advertising 3G as 'useful' or talking about features - it's all image.

    2. Re:eh? by pacc · · Score: 1

      Don't push 3G too much, its too expensive for both the customers and operators but to protect their investments the necessary upgrades from GPRS to EDGE has been stopped, it would have been to competitive to 3G.

      HSDPA is a similar upgrade to 3G as EDGE is to GPRS, when it becomes a reality will probably depend on how successful the networks will be in the future...

    3. Re:eh? by donscarletti · · Score: 1
      Wow, I now have "Elgar's Pomp and Circumstance" running though my head...
      ... and I am not even english.

      "Land of hope and glory, mother of the free..."

      And for that matter! Rule Britania, Britania rules the waves, we... I mean they shall never never never never be enslaved!

      That's why you don't get many Australians performing at the Proms!

      --
      When Argumentum ad Hominem falls short, try Argumentum ad Matrem
    4. Re:eh? by pubjames · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Note this bloke is from france which is in europe, but a backwater in most things! ;)

      That's right! We in the UK have an increadible insight into France and the rest of Europe, due to the unbiased, honest reporting of our wonderful press. Those Europeans are trying to take away 1,000 years of British sovereignty, because, erm, they're jealous of us. Or something. No, I've got it! They're backwards and so need to reign the UK in with silly straight banana rules to be able to compete with us. After all, the UK has the largest economy in Europe, because we don't have silly European laws. Probably.

      God bless the Queen. And Bush.

    5. Re:eh? by Tsuzuki · · Score: 1

      It rained today. (I'm in Australia.) The "Three phone" users on either side of my desk lost their reception for half the day. How useful! :)

      I won't switch to 3G myself until I'm forced to - I have been a very happy prepaid mobile user for about five years now and I'd like to keep it that way. The cost of a new handset and contract are just too prohibitive right now.

    6. Re:eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Mobile phones and SMS meet a basic need for communication, 3G and video phones don't really add anything to this.

      Yes! Thank you! I've been saying this even before anybody launched a 3G service. I saw the pre-promo materials from several companies. We even got to listen to a talk from a head-honcho at Vodafone. All of it was crap then, and its still crap now.

      Just look at the 3 adverts currently running on T.V. There are two classes; stupid and smutty. Thats the only angles they have for video messaging! No demand, no defined target market. Way to go on those multi-billion 3G contracts guys.

    7. Re:eh? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1
      I got a mobile about 4 years back, and at the time it seemed really useful. Now, I almost never carry it around with me. The times when I am not at home are mainly the times it isn't convenient for people to phone me anyway, so if I do carry it then I just leave it turned off, which seems silly. The only advantage I see in a mobile phone is that it costs a lot, so discourages people from phoning me unless it's important.

      On the other hand I'm probably an atypical /. reader since I don't really like any form of communication that isn't face to face.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    8. Re:eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Note to self: Scroll down the page slower.

      I swear this said 'God bless the Queen's Bush'...=)

    9. Re:eh? by spike+hay · · Score: 1

      On the other hand I'm probably an atypical /. reader since I don't really like any form of communication that isn't face to face.

      Haha, you're not the only one. I finally broke down two years ago and got an el-cheapo Nokia with a Tracfone plan from Wal-Mart. Never carry the thing around. I hate being on call all of the time.

      --
      If you don't understand any of my sayings, come to me in private and I shall take you in my German mouth.
    10. Re:eh? by Ranx · · Score: 1

      If you want to stay on your little island: go ahead.

      And btw, Germany is by far the biggest economy in Europe.

      --

      Me
    11. Re:eh? by glesga_kiss · · Score: 1
      The problem is that 3G doesn't offer anything yet. Video messaging is a nice idea, but the point (and popularity) of SMS is short snappy messages like "running late, see you at 2" or "fancy a drink".

      Video messaging is the opposite of that, it's more bother for both parties than even simply calling them. You need to record your message and look like a prat, while sending an SMS is discrete. Then the reciprient has to watch the message, and I'd like to see someone hold a phone in a position that can both see and hear the message in a noisy location.

      However, laptops, PDA and Smartphones combined with 3G are another thing altogether. In a few years it will be a bit more interesting but for now it's very limited with the handsets currently about.

    12. Re:eh? by evilviper · · Score: 1
      God bless the Queen. And Bush.

      God bless BUSH! Damn straight!

      Don't forget about the T&A as well... God bless them all!
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    13. Re:eh? by pubjames · · Score: 1

      If you want to stay on your little island: go ahead.

      And btw, Germany is by far the biggest economy in Europe.


      Hey Bozo, I was being sarcastic. I was writing in the style of a British euro-hater. It's called "humour".

    14. Re:eh? by The+Ribena+Kid · · Score: 1

      Personally I'd go and buy one right now, if only the handsets weren't so chunky. I want the features, but I'm not prepared to walk around with a brick in my pocket. The smallest one they offer is the NEC e606 which is 109x53x32mm... too big.

    15. Re:eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And they're expensive - that's the main thing. And we've been burnt too many times with new technology...

  5. 2006 eh? by RajivSLK · · Score: 5, Funny

    This new technology will not arrive in Europe before 2006 at least.

    Japan now and in europe in 2006 -- early extrapolations of this trend indicate that this technology will splash into the north american market as early as 2032.

    Lets keep our fingers crossed.

    1. Re:2006 eh? by pe1rxq · · Score: 4, Funny

      And a few years later (around 2040 when the rest of the world long forgot this whole thingy) an American company will start the PR machine for something called SUPER-DUPER-CDMA-MADE-IN-USA which will give comparable results (slightly better than a defacto standard from years ago), is incompatible with anything ever made.....
      Then ten years after that George Bush the third will invade some third world countries because they still don't use SUPER-DUPER-CDMA-MADE-IN-USA... eh... no,no make that making weapons of mass destruction and being a saveheaven for some 12-year old cyber-TERORIST who defaced the whitehouse website.

      Jeroen

      --
      Secure messaging: http://quickmsg.vreeken.net/
    2. Re:2006 eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      2032? Well, I hope they are using more than 16-bit to calculate their dates, 'cause that's way past the 2028 crash!

    3. Re:2006 eh? by RzUpAnmsCwrds · · Score: 1

      Funny how the US has a 3G network deployed (yes, Sprint's network is "3G", but just barely) while the uber-slow, high latency GPRS is still the standard in Europe.

    4. Re:2006 eh? by putzin · · Score: 1

      Eh, it will probably be Jenna Bush, she seems to be the one who would most likely be the next Bush in the White House. She will continue in the Bush tradition of invading Iraq a year or two after the innaguration party in which Ashton Kutcher proves he's not an idiot by dancing shirtless on the second stage. She will also claim that her administration invented cellular technology, and then give a contract to rebuild the Iraq cellular infrastructure to a bankrupt company with NO experience in building cellular networks. Should be fun. I'm waiting for the Bush twins in Stuff or Maxim.

      --
      Bah
    5. Re:2006 eh? by evilviper · · Score: 1
      an American company will start the PR machine for something called SUPER-DUPER-CDMA-MADE-IN-USA which will give comparable results (slightly better than a defacto standard from years ago), is incompatible with anything ever made.....

      As much as I hate evil big corporations, it actually seems that it works the opposite direction.

      How well does your television work in Europe? Tried renting some videotapes yet? How about all your electrical devices? Have fun trying to plug them in, and even more fun why you accompish your goal, and find out the voltage is different.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    6. Re:2006 eh? by pe1rxq · · Score: 1

      Voltage different?
      All of europe uses the same (230V used to be 220V)...
      Unless you buy braindead american equipment there is no problem in plugging it in...
      Television also works well here... we don't use that junk called NTSC :)

      Jeroen

      --
      Secure messaging: http://quickmsg.vreeken.net/
    7. Re:2006 eh? by evilviper · · Score: 1
      Unless you buy braindead american equipment there is no problem in plugging it in...

      How's that? 99% of American electrical devices support 110-125v. Computer power supplies are just about the only devices that support both 110v and 220v. Besides that, the plugs are different anyhow, so they need to be changed even for computers.

      So, even the best American equipment needs a converter to be plugged-in anywhere outside the US. But the capabilities of electrical equipment was NOT the issue here.

      Television also works well here... we don't use that junk called NTSC :)

      Exactly! TV started in America, and when it was intorduced overseas, everyone just had to use an incompatible video standard. Just as the electrical system was first introduced in the USA, used 2-pronged plugs, and was 110v... For some reason, all of the world had to use an entirely different standard, just for the heck of it.

      As for your (joking) implication that PAL is better than NTSC, I should remind you that, although PAL is a slightly higher resolution, it has a lower refresh-rate, which basically negates any benefit. Also, the way film is converted to PAL is to basically speed-up the frame-rate, which means some movies that are just fine in NTSC, can be unwatchable in PAL. It is entirely possible that the technology has improved, but the point is that the world choose an inferior system, rather than adopt one compatible to the USA.

      When it comes to the electrical system, there is some minor advantages to having higher voltages, but I have a hard time believing they were incompatible with the US just for the sake of such a minor benefit.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    8. Re:2006 eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IF you care to look at the dynamics of the advent of electricity, you will see that the need for longer transmission lines in the US vs the desire for easier transmission in Europe was the motivating force that decided which voltage was adopted. Now that the EU has concerns that are similar in nature to the US, interconnection of power grid, and long transmission lines, they may actually re-think their very hasty state centric decsions. Try researching before opening mouth.
      http://services3.ieee.org/organizations/pe s/public /2003/may/peshistory.html

      http://americanhistory.si.edu/csr/powering/backp as t.htm

  6. In Europe? No way.. by fille · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "All European operators are eventually expected to move to 3G networks to ensure that there is enough capacity to handle voice and increased data traffic."

    I don't think it will be introduced in Europe in the near future. Even WAP is a total disaster here. When will these people learn that we don't need 14.4 Mbits on our cellphone? We just want to make a call and send SMS. Japanese people may like the newest gadgets but in Europe, people do not get excited by this technology..

    1. Re:In Europe? No way.. by Max+Romantschuk · · Score: 1

      I don't think it will be introduced in Europe in the near future. Even WAP is a total disaster here.

      It's more of a chicken and egg problem really. WAP sucks for multimedia (Good things can be done with WAP, but they are rare). The 3G technology doesn't exist because there is no real market, but the market can't exist without the technology.

      Camera phones are becomming more and more visible, and MMS messaging is beginning to show... I would speculate this could very well help fuel an increased demand for faster technologies. Time will tell though...

      --
      .: Max Romantschuk :: http://max.romantschuk.fi/
    2. Re:In Europe? No way.. by pointwood · · Score: 1

      I'm not so sure about that (of course, it depends on the definition of "near future"). Lots of business people use GPRS or "High Speed Data" (or whatever it is called) to connect to the company network from anywhere and GPRS isn't *that* fast.

    3. Re:In Europe? No way.. by zmooc · · Score: 1

      I DO want 14.4mbit on my phone. It means that I can watch video, do real videophone, choose the music I want to listen to realtime (instead of having to decide at home when writing your memorystick or whatever). The problem is that operators are aiming at the low-bandwidth-market with those new technologies. Which is utterly stupid. As soon as operators start to understand we DO want such speeds as long as it's affordable, this will take of.

      --
      0x or or snor perron?!
    4. Re:In Europe? No way.. by fille · · Score: 1

      I don't know. Some phone companies nearly went bankrupt by developing GPRS networks (and buying very expensive licenses) that did not yield enough revenues. Maybe business users are interested in this technology but the market might be rather small. And cheap broadband and wireless internet access will become a competitor too.
      Overall, I don't think enough customers (and certainly not consumers) will turn up to pay back the (huge) sunk costs..

    5. Re:In Europe? No way.. by fille · · Score: 1

      Hmm, that's possible but I'm not sure that a big majority of consumers would like this functionality. And this would be necessary to pay back the sunk costs of these networks.
      Moreover, most services for a cell phone are quite expensive. Even a short message (SMS) costs 20 Eurocents, I think. Continuous broad band access (e.g. for music) will be much more expensive, I suppose. This will limit the adoption by a large group of consumers anyway.
      I would like see the introduction of such cheap services but I don't think it's economically viable..

    6. Re:In Europe? No way.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Repeat after me:


      Early adaptors need open standards.

      Early adaptors need open standards.

      Early adaptors need open standards.

      Early adaptors need open standards.


      This was the mistake made with WAP. It could have been easy - it could have been free - it could have been open, but NO - some dude at the general WAP consortium thought it better to keep all the information (semi-)proprietary, and try and make a buck off everyone involved - the programmers, the service providers, the users. If this dude had learnt anything from the open source movement, which was already somewhat hip by then, it was that such an attitute JUST DON'T WORK !!

    7. Re:In Europe? No way.. by pointwood · · Score: 1

      Nope...not GPRS networks - what lots of companies have paid insane amounts of money for is UMTS licenses == 3G networks.

    8. Re:In Europe? No way.. by 3.5+stripes · · Score: 1

      First hey need to have more bandwidth, without a serious infrastructure, 14.4 Mbits won't mean shit, if the rest of the network is still slow.

      Really, there's barely enough to go round now, what happens when all these people start wanting real time video calls, etc?

      --


      He tried to kill me with a forklift!
    9. Re:In Europe? No way.. by necrogram · · Score: 1

      I Hate to tell you, but the, there is a segement that would love to recieve 14.4Mb over cellular, The public saftey community. We are currently evaluatng some the newest offerings from the likes of Verizon, Sprint, and Cigular, and to behonest, the bandwidth offered by the new tech looks to nice.

    10. Re:In Europe? No way.. by fleabag · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I used to think the way you do - but now I think 3G will be different. A lot of these 3G contracts have no monthly charge, and no contract - you pay for the data. The device costs about £200.

      So what?

      1) I agree that photo/video messaging is pointless, and people won't buy it.

      2) How much is a 2Mbit "always on" PCMCIA card worth in your laptop? Granted, the costs at the moment per Gb are pretty ugly - but they won't be for long.

      3) How about any device where security and resilience are not paramount, and data throughput is not too high? Think embedded sensors, because the 3G chipsets will be given away before long. Vehicle tracking for example?

      4) What about the areas of the world that cannot get broadband? (pretty much anywhere that is > 3 miles from a phone exchange). Satellite broadband is an option in the UK - 3 G is already as cheap as this for light use.

      If you think outside the "mobile phone" model, the possibilities are limitless once there is sufficient volume to get the price down.

    11. Re:In Europe? No way.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can talk about WAP not being good enough, but data transfer rates are not just for WAP.

      There are going to be loads of apps running on the handsets by 3.5G and those apps will be syncing with servers at the network. Apps such as Instant Messaging, your email and work inbox / calendar, Traffic updates, Stock Tickers and Corporate apps. All these take background bandwidth that at present is just a bit too slow.

      That's not to mention that with data rates like the ones mentioned in the article you will be able to do proper VOIP....packet based and much cheaper for the networks to operate.

    12. Re:In Europe? No way.. by TheRaven64 · · Score: 2
      A lot of these 3G contracts have no monthly charge, and no contract - you pay for the data.

      Which is exactly why I wouldn't buy such a system. In the bad old days of dial-up connections to the Internet, this was more or less the case (okay, so you payed for time online not data, but in principle it's the same). The main freedom I enjoy from broadband is not the high data rate (although that's nice) but rather freedom from the feeling that it is costing me money all the time I'm using it. I can't enjoy using the Internet, or use it productively if I'm thinking about the cost rather than what I'm reading.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    13. Re:In Europe? No way.. by necrogram · · Score: 1

      the system is nowwhere near this speeds wth the currrent rollouts i'm seeing. the cards are roughly 500 to 600 USD with fees around 80USD a month for unlimeted usage. As to details, i'm not at liberty to devulge too many details, but the current data system used the public safty community in my state has vehical tracking enabled, and this system is starved for bandwidth. some of stoped thing of wireless as voice and toys moons ago

    14. Re:In Europe? No way.. by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 1

      ...and what of the batteries? Phones keep shrinking, batteries provide less run-time. The concept of the NETWORK makes sense, it's just that having a phone as the interface requires too many compromises.

    15. Re:In Europe? No way.. by evilviper · · Score: 1
      4) What about the areas of the world that cannot get broadband? (pretty much anywhere that is > 3 miles from a phone exchange).

      Since when did broadband mean xDSL???

      I know tons of people more than 3 miles from the telco, and are speeding right along on their cablemodems. I'm sure they could also get ISDN, Frame Relay, have a T-1 installed (and possibly share it with neighbors), etc. Even 802.11 is broadband... No wires required.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    16. Re:In Europe? No way.. by spoco2 · · Score: 1

      Exactly... cost is the issue... it will be for a very long time... the first time a user of one of the 3G phones gets their monthly bill and it's $500 (or 500 pounds, whatever)... they'll pretty soon drop back to using their phone as a phone and not some streaming media server... why anyone would want to pay oodles of money to watch jerky video playback on a pissweak little screen on a phone that'll run out of batteries inside of a couple of hours of that kind of use is beyond me.

  7. Where are the applications? by nnnneedles · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It would be nice to have an mp3 player that you could travel with and continuosly download music to without having to dock it to a stationary PC.

    other than that and multiplayer gaming, what cell phone applications possibly need this bandwidth?

    They are having a hard time coming up with useful applications for current cell phones with gprs as it is.

    --
    Will code a sig generator for food
    1. Re:Where are the applications? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      maybe this will set the stage for the long promised videophones?

    2. Re:Where are the applications? by chiasmus1 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The students I teach here in Japan have cell phones that can do all sorts of things. Many of my students have been downloading music for a while. Almost all cell phones come with a built-in camera. They do email, web browsing and more.
      In Japan it is common to have a box attached to your door bell so that you can answer a phone inside the house and talk to the person. The cell phones have also been hooked up to the doors so that if someone rings your doorbell and you are on a trip in Tyoko you can answer and tell them to go away or something like that. It is good for tricking robbers into thinking you are home.
      Bandwidth is not something you need to build up when you need it. You want to have it there so that you do not need it. It is always better to be safe than sorry, right?

    3. Re:Where are the applications? by KilerCris · · Score: 1

      Give it an ethernet jack so I can plug my laptop in...Wireless broadband internet connection... w00t! w00t!

    4. Re:Where are the applications? by Ko5mo · · Score: 1

      There is only one industry that is on the up while everything has been down for the past couple of years.

      I suspect this same industry is/will also be driving these cell networks.

      You guessed it, it's the p0rn.

    5. Re:Where are the applications? by vought · · Score: 1
      Give it an ethernet jack so I can plug my laptop in...Wireless broadband internet connection... w00t! w00t!

      But then it wouldn't be wireless, would it?

    6. Re:Where are the applications? by KilerCris · · Score: 1

      Ok. Fine. Bluetooth in the phone and bluetooth in the laptop. Put them near each other and turn on the phone and pow...very wireless broadband net access

  8. i hate to be a buzzkill by gTsiros · · Score: 5, Insightful

    but we'd prefer broadband in our home for less than a kidney/month and have it *now* instead of 14Mb in our cellphones in 3 years.

    How come greece sucks so much that we're the only goddamn country in europe that still hasn't got dialup.

    i pay fucking E100/month for sucky dialup.

    you really think this 3g shit is going to make us happy?

    get lost.

    --
    Looking for people to chat about multicopters, coding, music. skype: gtsiros
    1. Re:i hate to be a buzzkill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ONE HUNDRED EURO? That's gross. Here in Germany I pay considerably less for a 2MBit cable connection.

    2. Re:i hate to be a buzzkill by non · · Score: 1

      because greece is in kokalistan, foo! seriously, when your ministry of telecoms is 0wn3d by a tycoon, and his companies have surpluses of ISDN modems, when do you think you're going to see broadband; when the ISDN modems run out. incidentally Deutche Telekom statistics show 30 million ISDN subscribers for 3 million DSL subscribers.

      additionally, service rates for dedicated _anything_ are astronomic in greece. Ote.net, the national telephony provider, quoted a rate of approximately 750 for 64kB. that would buy you a T1 in the usa. similar service elsewhere in europe costs half that much (400 in the UK).

      so here's the answer. get together with a bunch of friends who live in your neighborhood and set up wifi, or wait a long, long time.

      --
      ...vividly encapsulates that post-Watergate/pre-punk/coked-up moment when you could trust no one, least of all yourself.
    3. Re:i hate to be a buzzkill by Dot.Com.CEO · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Do you know why Greece does not have broadband? Because Greece does not have a cable TV network. The only network capable of high-speed internet belongs to the phone company that, after decades of despotic state rule finds itself in a free economy. IIRC the proposed ADSL prices go something like 150EUR for a 256/64 connection. While ok for most people (I guess you wouldn't mind paying that much, for example), it is WAY overpriced for everyone else. And I won't even start speaking of Greek connectivity, it is hilarious. When I was visiting Greece last year I was told that the main connection to the Internet was a 10Mbit line!

      Just for comparison purposes, here in Portugal I have a choice between cable Internet for about 50eur (768/128) or ADSL (various speeds, up to 1024/256). The 1024/256 option costs about 200eur, including modem and fixed ip. And you are connected to the European backbone (my isp is Via.networks, they OWN their own backbone).

      Anyway, and to the point, wireless broadband is the only way that Greece will get true broadband...

      --
      Mother is the best bet and don't let Satan draw you too fast.
    4. Re:i hate to be a buzzkill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      after decades of despotic state rule finds itself

      Years of despotic rule? I thought the Germans left at some time in the 1940s... ;-)

    5. Re:i hate to be a buzzkill by isorox · · Score: 1

      Anyone know 2.4Ghz regulations in greece? ERP, commercial use, etc?

    6. Re:i hate to be a buzzkill by isorox · · Score: 2

      Where do you live?

    7. Re:i hate to be a buzzkill by murat · · Score: 1

      And i thought my 35/month for cable (and friend's 25/month for ADSL) was expensive. :) (Living in Turkey)

    8. Re:i hate to be a buzzkill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In english it is called socialism.

  9. Yeesh by TrancePhreak · · Score: 1

    I wish I had that kind of connection via land.

    --

    -]Phreak Out[-
  10. Docomo by Hido · · Score: 1

    Well I mean at this moment in time I got a mobile which does already have most of those nifty features. I do video conference, video mail, surf the web, record video (mind you with a 128MB flash rom I do 2 hours worth) and got many other new features. Only thing that is missing is a mp3 player in it, then I could get rid of the one I got now and just use the mobile :)

    --
    Havin' it large, livin' the life, Welcome to the land of the rising sun.
  11. Re:In Europe? Very possibly by Porag_Spliffing · · Score: 0
    Japanese people may like the newest gadgets but in Europe, people do not get excited by this technology..


    They do get rather excited though by the prOn.

    --
    Maybe you live in interesting times
  12. 3G is a gimmiky flop by jocks · · Score: 5, Informative

    We have had 3G introduced here in the UK and so far it is awful. The handsets are expensive, the service is expensive, the battery life is very poor, the phones don't play mp3/ogg, the reception is extremely bad and you cannot get "The Internet" on the system either (they don't like you talking about that).

    Call it what you like and make it as fast as you like but no-one is biting. It is an expensive technology conceived and financed at the height of the .COM boom which will never make its money back.

    Our biggest telecoms company wrote off the £9-billion license cost last week to try and stimulate the market. Guess what...no change.

    The first commercial vendor of 3G (a company called "3") has already resorted to pron to try to raise interest.

    Save your money, buy more memory or a bigger screen, or send your money to Ethiopia, but don't waste your cash on this junk it will only disappoint.

    1. Re:3G is a gimmiky flop by RobertTaylor · · Score: 3, Informative

      The point the article makes is that the technology is yet to be with us - which is wrong.

      Its just the government crippled the mobile sector by making huge windfall taxes on the 3G licences. The billions must be made back somewhere, and currently even normal GSM services are expericaning a price hike.

      Technology is here, pricing is wrong. Bloody men in suits stopping things. Again.

    2. Re:3G is a gimmiky flop by jocks · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I disagree with you. I think the technology is poorly conceived. Don't get me wrong, it is brilliantly done and very, very clever but it still does not "work". There is no way that I would make a call to my missus in a public place, shouting at a handset held two feet from my face. There is no way I would take out my expensive phone and make a video call in the pouring rain. There is no way I would make a video call whilst walking because I would end up bumping into people, standing on dog turds or falling down stairs. I cannot use the phone in bright light because of the ill-conceived TFT screen.

      Basically I can only fully use the phone inside, in privacy. I'm sorry, I have a life.

    3. Re:3G is a gimmiky flop by CvD · · Score: 1

      So is this the much touted Vodafone Live? Or a real UMTS rollout?

    4. Re:3G is a gimmiky flop by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1
      I'm sorry, I have a life.

      That's okay. I'm sure if you spend enough time on /. you can be cured of that...

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    5. Re:3G is a gimmiky flop by RobertTaylor · · Score: 1

      "is no way that I would make a call to my missus in a public place, shouting at a handset held two feet from my face. There is no way I would take out my expensive phone and make a video call in the pouring rain. There is no way I would make a video call whilst walking because I would end up bumping into people, standing on dog turds or falling down stairs."

      Surely that is more the concept of video telephony being wrong, rather than the technology being faulty.

      Even with ultrafast, micro well coveraged phones there is no way to do what you say without the problems you state.

      Evidently video calls are not for you, that is not a reason to slag off the *technology*.

    6. Re:3G is a gimmiky flop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      We have had 3G introduced here in the UK and so far it is awful. The handsets are expensive, the service is expensive, the battery life is very poor, the phones don't play mp3/ogg

      I don't know if you'd classify Sprint PCS as "3G" but it seems plenty fast enough for me. Tops out around 128kbps which is plenty to browse the web on my laptop or send pictures. Why hell, just last week I met this supermodel and she wanted to model a swimsuit for me. To prove it to my friends I snapped a quick picture on my camera phone. Then this one time I saw Ozzy Osbourne bowling at the local alley so I snapped a picture of him and me drinking a cold beer. It was sweet.

    7. Re:3G is a gimmiky flop by Ranx · · Score: 1

      september 5th, 1890

      A car?

      I will never drive a car. There are no gasstations,
      only bad roads and they brake every now and then.

      Cars are gimmicks for rich people who have nothing better to do.

      I'll stick with my horse.

      --

      Me
  13. Wi-Fi? by apetime · · Score: 4, Informative
    I'm not that familiar with the new technology that DoCoMo is testing, but the impression I've gotten from the press lately is that most wireless companies are working Wi-Fi coupled with Voice over IP into their current and future plans.

    I've even seen some documents out of DoCoMo themselves that suggest they're thinking of moving toward a system that allows smooth roaming between high-bandwidth (1 Gbps) hotspots and a wide-area cellular system for a future 4G network.

    Can anyone familiar with this standard enlighten me as to how Wi-Fi and related technologies figure in it?

    1. Re:Wi-Fi? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll
      > but the impression I've gotten from the press
      > lately is that most wireless companies are
      > working Wi-Fi coupled with Voice over IP into
      > their current and future plans.

      Wow, really?
      Voice over telephones ?

      ...You're pulling my leg, right?

  14. funny how by ViVeLaMe · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    This new technology will not arrive in Europe before 2006 at least.
    And the US are so backwater that they're not even mentionned, just like Africa.

    --
    i had a sig, once..
  15. Too bad DoCoMo is so expensive... by interactive_civilian · · Score: 3, Interesting
    This sounds really freakin' sweet! Granted I don't need this for my phone, it would be great for my mobile internet connection. Currently, I am using DDI Pocket's Air H" system (warning that is a Japanese page) and This little number from Fujitsu plugged into my iBook to get 128kbps access from anywhere in the Yokohama/Tokyo/Chiba area. It is nice, and the speed is decent enough considering I can use it anywhere.

    But, 14.4Mbps?!?!?! AWESOME! That is faster than my AirPort card! Unfortunately, if DoCoMo follows the same pricing methods as it did for FOMA (their 3G service), then this is something I will never be able to afford. They don't have a flat rate unlimited connection plan, but rather charge based on the amount of data you download (I pay DDI Pocket 10,000 yen per month for unlimited access and I probably abuse it...expensive but worth it for the mobility IMO).

    PLEASE, DoCoMo, give us a decently priced flat rate unlimited connection plan. I would seriously consider paying around 15,000 yen per month for something like that at this speed.

    BTW, I am currently a DoCoMo customer for my phone service. It isn't too expensive and my only complaints are the 500 character mail limit and the slow connection for iMode (my phone is 2 years old and only connects at 9600bps). But the coverage is AWESOME...and good thing for me since I will be spending a few months travelling around Japan by bicycle and I don't want to be caught without a signal in an emergency situation (speaking of which, any /.ers in Japan want to give a poor American traveler a place to crash for a night? email me).

    --
    "Empathise with stupidity, and you're halfway to thinking like an idiot." - Iain M. Banks
    1. Re:Too bad DoCoMo is so expensive... by 3.5+stripes · · Score: 1

      Nothing personal, but you pay 10,000 yen for 128kbps, but you think something that increases the bandwidth by a power of 3 (or 6 or whatever) should only cost you 5,000 more a month?

      Damn you're optimistic :)

      --


      He tried to kill me with a forklift!
    2. Re:Too bad DoCoMo is so expensive... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Maybe you haven't noticed since you already have wireless, but DoCoMo has been advertising their wireless service called @FreeD (warning, japanese w/annoying flash with music). Granted it's only 64kbps but it's unlimited for Y4880/mo. I'm thinking about getting this since anything's better than the dialup i'm using now.

      - David

    3. Re:Too bad DoCoMo is so expensive... by Bios_Hakr · · Score: 1

      I also use AirH. 128k is definately their "ideal" speed, but I average more like 80k~90k with peaks into the 120k range. It is nice to be able to surf from anywhere, but paying 9000 yen/month hurts. The service also suffers from serious lag. there is no reason that a wireless service should have 500ms of lag between me and my default gateway.

      I wonder how long till the new service is rolled out in Tokyo?

      --
      I'd rather you do it wrong, than for me to have to do it at all.
  16. The real problem... by IO+ERROR · · Score: 1

    ...with downloading pr0n to my cell phone is the screen is so small that all I can view are the thumbnails!

    --
    How am I supposed to fit a pithy, relevant quote into 120 characters?
    1. Re:The real problem... by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1
      The real problem with downloading pr0n to my cell phone is the screen is so small that all I can view are the thumbnails!

      I suddenty have a vision of the next set of adverts for 3 targetting people with a thumb fetish...

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  17. One thing's certain... by archetypeone · · Score: 0, Troll

    I'm gonna have to keep my tin foil hat.

    Only users lose Windows.

  18. Please, place your bets... by asciimonster · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Ok, when is this going to be introduced in Europe? Let's make it a bet. I bet 100 slashdollars (the virtual currency used here at slashdot) that it will not be introduced before 2015.

    The reason I'm saying this is that most introduction dates for new communication technologies are far too optimistic.

    For instance, UMTS was supposed to be introduced by now. Haven't seen it yet. That miscalculation nearly bankrupted KPN Telecom (the Dutch telephone co.). Every home a (A)DSL connection? It's coming but not quite. Every youth an i-Mode? Nope.

    Problem is: introducing a new communication protocol usually requires a new infrastructure and that requires a lot of money. And when it is all about investing people (and especially europeans) like too wait for the competitor to make that investment.

    Hence my skeptisism.

    1. Re:Please, place your bets... by mcrbids · · Score: 1

      Let's make it a bet. I bet 100 slashdollars (the virtual currency used here at slashdot) that it will not be introduced before 2015.

      What about inflation?

      Are you betting 100 slashdollars today, or 100 slashdollars as of 2015? Remember, there is inflation and the associated cost-of-living increases!

      --
      I have no problem with your religion until you decide it's reason to deprive others of the truth.
  19. I'll be impressed ... by TheGrayArea · · Score: 5, Insightful

    When we can get less dropped calls and actually get decent cell phone coverage away from the interstates. Check out the cell maps of the major carriers, they all hug the lines created by interstates. You go to a rural area like I'm from and the coverage is crap. IMHO the feature set of cell phones is starting to creep into the "that's cool, but I don't think I'll ever need it" category. The camera phones have got to the be worst.

    --

    This space for rent.
    1. Re:I'll be impressed ... by ipjohnson · · Score: 1

      Try upstate NH ... there are practicaly counties I can't even get analog.

    2. Re:I'll be impressed ... by twaltari · · Score: 1

      Some of us have had total network coverage already for years. Coverages in Europe and in USA differ by an order of magnitude...

  20. Absolutely nothing new here ... by BillsPetMonkey · · Score: 2, Informative

    According to the investor relations PDF here (in Japanese!), HSPDA was released in March 2002 as part of the FOMA initiative.

    It also says the maximum data transfer rate is 14Mbps. Which is not the same as throughput.

    --
    "It's not your information. It's information about you" - John Ford, Vice President, Equifax
  21. So where did it all go then? by Realistic_Dragon · · Score: 3, Informative

    Sure, these handsets are 14.4 odleplexes of bandwidths per second, on paper.

    I have had a chance to play with a next gen DocoMo handset, and the video - while strictly geek appeal only and something I would deliberatly turn off for every day use so I don't have to shave - was watchable only until you started moving, then it just breaks up. The faster you go the worse the picture - by the time you get up to car+ speeds you are restricted to voice only calls.

    They also seem to have a massive latency, far worse than my 14.4k/sec CSD dial up mobile connection, and that's only 1p/min. 3.5G might be good for the odd small file or even some streaming formats, but for SSH it blows.

    It would be interesting to find out what compression they use for it - probably something that is as light on the CPU as possible, but that really shows in the transmission quality.

    The telecomms industry could do with starting from the ground up (rather than building off the technologically suspect CDMA or GSM systems) with a new, open standard 100% packet based network with IP6 support - then and maybe then the internet (and related services) on a mobile level could become a killer app. Until then they would be best off sticking to voice calls and massivly overcharging for SMS.

    --
    Beep beep.
    1. Re:So where did it all go then? by tengwar · · Score: 1
      The telecomms industry could do with starting from the ground up (rather than building off the technologically suspect CDMA or GSM systems) with a new, open standard 100% packet based network with IP6 support - then and maybe then the internet (and related services) on a mobile level could become a killer app. Until then they would be best off sticking to voice calls and massivly overcharging for SMS.

      Oh boy, flame on.

      It might be worth having a rummage on 3GPP to see what's really going on. Yes, there will be support for packet switching, but also for circuit switching - because that's an efficient use of the bearer for voice traffic. There are measures to improve latency. 3G also has to deal with mobility management (moving from cell to cell), roaming, and session maintenance while switching between UMTS and GSM/GPRS. None of it is simple, and IP6 only addresses a tiny fraction of these issues.

  22. Prices by baaa · · Score: 4, Informative

    Uau, just think of this: my current operator charges 0,02 per 1024 bytes with GPRS connections. (Portugal, Optimus)
    That's right, you read it correctly, it's 0,02 per 1024 bytes!

    At these prices 14.4Mbps is almost 2000 /sec.

    --
    Jesus Christ, I hate those christians!!
    1. Re:Prices by toriver · · Score: 3, Interesting

      At these prices 14.4Mbps is almost 2000 /sec.

      UMTS (3G) and later aren't volume-priced as GPRS is, but are "always-on" that you pay blood per month (probably 200 or so) to use, plus charges from service operators.

      Still, I have no idea who will buy UMTS or 3.5G devices, though - I spend 90% of my time in the vicinity of an internet-connected computer, I am not interested in paying a fortune just to be able to use a small set of services when I'm not.

    2. Re:Prices by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the typical pricing schemes that I'm familiar with (I work for Drei, a 3G operator in Austria in the IT billing area) have a flat rate which is capped at a certain number of MB/month, after which you pay per MB.

      Anyway right now the devices really suck but maybe when the devices get cheaper and better the technology will become more popular. I think it has a lot of potential -- I can get 400Kb/s+ internet connections from my device, and the Drei coverage in Vienna is getting pretty decent...

  23. Bulletproof argumentation there by corgi · · Score: 2, Funny

    Nicely argumented view. I especially like your references to numerous studies on the subject. And thanks for making it clear to me that I don't want mobile wideband-applications.
    Phew, I think I'd better go crawling back to the local landline monopoly and beg them to re-install a landline connection.

  24. Don't expose news as old. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It won't get you mod points. ;-(

  25. 14.4? Man Im on HST! by ahollis · · Score: 1

    16.8K HST to be exact.

    Ahh and the arms race to get to 19.8!!!

    Suck it down NTT!

  26. "....but what is good for ..." by phrantic · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I can only talk from my point of view, but enough all ready with

    -You can play your MP3s on it
    -You can watch video on it
    -You can teach it to knit
    It's supposed to be a phone....
    The only free time i have is when I cycle to work on a bicycle in the rain I don't even listen to that much music in the first place.

    I'll put my hand in my pocket and buy a phone when it stops me getting wet when i cycle to work or when it makes my work easier.

    I was blown away when in early 1996 i saw a hand held, web enabled, colour touch screen, digital camera Sharp Zauras in Japan for 40,000 JPY (400 USD/Euro), actually i think the black and white one was that much, but it blew me away at the time and everything else since has been a bit dull.

    --
    --My sig is bigger than your sig--
  27. smoke and mirrors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    GSM/GPRS might be loosing the technology war but they are certainly winning the propaganda war.
    Now NTT is entering the propaganda fray.
    3G is here! S. Korea and the US are running it and it is winning the hearts and minds of all that use it. Substance usually (not always) wins over pure BS and CDMA will have a huge user base before the rest of the world (Europe and Japan) get their 3G up, running and cost effective. Now the euro 3G is said to be ready by 2006, what happened to 4Q02? The last stand of GSM will be for operators to screw with CDMA interoperability with existing networks (see the post about India's CDMA network.)
    The GSM/GPRS/UMTS lie will eventually come to light.
    FYI: Lucent built the NTT 3G demo Systems. I know, I was there!

    1. Re:smoke and mirrors by Howpostsgetratedsuck · · Score: 1

      I'm glad someone finally has the guts to speak out! How can all the tech media not have pointed this out in the last few years?

  28. When capitolism works.. by Loco3KGT · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You get this. Companies advancing technology to offer better services to stay ahaead of their competition.

    It's a damn shame not a lot of this happens in the U.S. anymore. :-(

    --
    Blessed be he who reads this post, Cursed be he who tells my boss.
  29. No monthly fee?? You are joking? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here, they talk about 70-80$ a month plus 2$/MB. Me thinks... That is quite different.....Suppose I could dig up some links...

  30. We have this already by Bruha · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Verizon Wireless is testing EVDO (Evolution Data Only) in the beltline area of Washington State.

    While it does not promise 14 megabit speeds (What you gonna run slashdot off it?) it will do 600Kbit while moving and 2.4 megabit stationary.

    I think also there's an expansion out in San Diego also.

    http://www.google.com/search?q=EVDO&sourceid=moz il la-search&start=0&start=0&ie=utf-8&oe=utf- 8

    Edumacate yourself :)

    1. Re:We have this already by necrogram · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The word from the Big V is they are also testing in the Baltimore area. Since Big V is in the process of getting a migration from CDPD to Rx1TT going, i dont see EVDO become wide spread untill 2008 or so.

    2. Re:We have this already by IPAQ2000 · · Score: 1

      you should try this , we have many GPRS users who are extremely
      satisfied now after upgrading to HiPerExchange
      Alternative to Outlook
      Scaleable and super fast web-based access Exchange
      on- or offline, Try it for free
      www.HiPerExchange.com

  31. HMMMM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And all I want is a good cell phone plan

  32. I just have one question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do you cycle to work?

  33. At 14.4 Mb/s... by Markus+Registrada · · Score: 5, Funny
    The battery life for these things will be about three minutes.

    Assuming that by the time the networks get built we can use fuel-cell batteries, then the problem will be heat build-up. Can you imagine a phone with a fan? Heat pumps are little help, because they can only move heat from inside to the case, and you can't have the phone getting too hot to hold. "Are you happy to see me, or is that a 4G phone in your pocket?" I suppose ice fisherman could use them to keep their hands warm.

    Before these things could become practical we would need asynchronous-logic chips or spin-coupled logic, both over a decade off.

    The days of defrauding investors are far from over.

  34. I just love the Greek phone company. by arcanumas · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Please don't be a liar ;). We DO have dialup. It's just that when your line is on PCM (if you don't know what it is , consider yourself lucky) and you complain about not being able to connect to the Internet, you are told that:
    "all you 'rich' assholes want Internet. You are LUCKY to have a phone! Now get out!"
    Nice? And then the chief technician (of a 200.000 people area in Athens) comes and tries to be a 'techie' , only to make you understand that his knowledge of modems is stuck to the ones seen in 'Wargames' (seriously).
    But we have ISDN you might say... well.. when the 2 technicians came to my house to do the installation, i was told that the 'idiot' electrical engineer had made it impossible for the line to work. I told them to leave the Network Terminal device and get out, then i installed it myself. (And i am not a techie).

    But they are not just ignorant idiots, they are also cheating bastards. When the phone company (OTE) started selling special low rate numbers for Internet connectivity (EPAK) they only sold to their subsidiary (OTENET) and not to other ISPs. All they paid was a 150000 Euro's fine (small money to what they gained. Customers of OTENET paid less money on they phone accounts than other ISP's).

    The stories i can tell you about the phone company in Greece would make most slashdoters cry in agony with the prospect of ever coming to the banana country.. err.. Greece.

    But! to be fair, the Mobile phone infrastructure is actually quite good!. 3G is coming, and GPRS (2,5G) has been here for years.

    --
    Slashdot Sig. version 0.1alpha. Use at your own risk.
  35. Sell the right way... by splerdu · · Score: 1

    Give some sort of a bundle, like free subscription to club strip. Nothing will get those 3G phones rolling like the idea of having pr0n (sorta) on the go!

  36. Doesn't Sprint Already do this? by ONU+CS+Geek · · Score: 1

    I have the Sprint Pocket PC CDMA phone from Toshbia, and I'm in their area where I can get their "Vision" services. I can stream mostly classical/digitally imported to my cell phone with no issue. It's stereo, I can play it back in stereo, or use it as my "Other XM" when I'm driving through the city. I can also stream videos from my server with no issues. I can ssh into boxes with no issues (aside from the lack of keyboard).

    Although I hate sprint PCS with a passion, I will admit that the Service is ok...as I generally get the same speeds showing a full signal or a limited signal, and my phone makes it through a 10 hour workday plus a commute.

    --

    I disable sigs...do you?
  37. Is this really the way forward? by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Japan might have a market for it, but I have difficulty believing anywhere else does.

    Simple question:
    If I can't use my cell phone in the basement, on the elevator, wherever... how can I continue to put more and more important data on its network?

    The phone companies will never have an incentive to serve my basement (at work)... so what I really need is some kind of inexpensive repeater... 802.11x or whatever.

    Since the idea of active repeaters (as opposed to remote antennas in a high-rise to improve reception) is so contrary to the way the telephone industry works, how are we ever going to get "cooperating networks," where the data flows on the best possible path?

  38. Actual information... by jfanning · · Score: 1

    If you search at most of the mobile network manufacturers you can find actual real hard info about this system. For example this PDF white paper at Nokia.

  39. Internet radio? by toddestan · · Score: 1

    Now if they made a way for that phone to talk to my car's stereo, so I could recieve streaming audio while I drive, now that would be cool.

    Otherwise, I see very little point in these phones.

  40. Coming soon! 14.4mbps phones capped to 9600 baud! by Gldm · · Score: 1

    Yeah like this is ever going to fly. At least not in the US, assuming it even gets a chance to be done over here in the first place.

    Cause I mean, why give people decent connection speeds when you can rape small businesses out the ass with 1980s telecom pricing plans? A T-1 has to be $1000/month FOREVER, so nobody can have that kinda upstream for less.

    Oh and since AT&T will force a 19.2k upstream cap, and the greedy and desperate wireless companies will disallow normal TCP connections unless you pay for their "wireless adapter kit!" i.e. we unlock TCP on your phone from a laptop for $100-200 or whatever we think we can assrape you for, it'll be pretty much useless.

    Sometimes I think we'll have random 802.11 boxes covering the entire country before any kind of unlimited wireless internet even gets concieved at any price.

    To be honest the idea of Big Brother watching everything we say and do doesn't scare me as much as Big Uncle wanting a cut of everything we buy and use. I mean survellance can miss a 300,000lb jet going 500mph the wrong way down the hudson corridor for an hour, but if you're one second out of those free night and weekend minutes you're nailed!

    --

    Introducing the new Occam Fusion! Now with sqrt(-1) fewer blades!

  41. Hdspa is WIDEBAND ! Big war coming. by zymano · · Score: 1

    This has the potential to fuck up all local wideband broadband startups. I can foresee the federal & corporate businesses cracking down on small and free wideband usage. These guys know that 3g sucked and couldn't compete with wideband so they incorporated it and now will try and force wideband users out of the market potentially. This is a big potential conflict when Corporate owned government and small and small and free enterprises collide . You can kiss free WIDEBAND access good bye!
    more info here at the register on hdspa

  42. Groovy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In the meantime can we fix the problem with dead spots I have in my town right now?

  43. What for? WAP pages and video-calls? by freitasm · · Score: 1

    This kind of bandwidth is used by mobile phones for video-calls and streaming. This is all "lifestyle" applications. It's 14.4mbps but how many people connect this to a laptop or PDA? The point is, too much bandwidth, too little application.

    Most of the time video-calls will show someone's ear...

    Telcos want to deliver content. Voice was the content, data is the content, but they want to control it, like MyO2 or Vodafone Live! services, "walled garden" services.

    Of course other services with "bursts" of data benefit of this: courier drivers, warehouse transfer, etc. But people with need of data in specific locations like hotels, airports and other end up using wi-fi.

    They're not competing technologies, but complement each other.

  44. 14.4 megabits? by OutRigged · · Score: 1

    Well shit, who needs a 14.4 megabit connection on thier cellphone? Screw that, tell me how to hook it up to my computer.

    --
    RaGe
    We're all just noise on the wires..
  45. Can i have my $100 billion back please by Whitecloud · · Score: 1

    3.5G?? 40 x as fast??? bwahhahaha! The global auctions of 3G spectrum netted billions worldwide, crippling Telco's, and we still have yet to see this technology (except in Japan) because the costs to the consumer are massive. Yet forget all that, whens 3.5G coming out?

    --

    Do you need a website upgrade?

  46. The Meter by dementis_canis · · Score: 1
    Im interested to know where you got your figure of 299792458 m/s from.

    According to Stephen Hawkings Brief History of Time,
    the meter is defined to be the distance traveled by light in 0.000000003335640952 seconds, as measured by a cesium clock
    --
    rhubarb, rhubarb, rhubarb...
    1. Re:The Meter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, from junior high, I remeber the meter being defined as the distance of the earth either long or lat (cant remember that part) divided by 1000, or something similar.

    2. Re:The Meter by LNN · · Score: 1

      I said a meter is how long light can travel in 1/299792458 seconds. Firing up kcalc, i quickly see that your number is quite accurate with this.

      1/299792458 = 3.3356409519815e-09
      says kcalc.

      It seems to me that Hawking has not included all the decimals. Except for that, we're talking of the exact same definition. Cheers!

    3. Re:The Meter by LNN · · Score: 1

      Once upon a time, the distance from north pole to the equator was set to 1000 metric miles. that is 10'000'000 m. Then they approximated that distance, made a iron bar of it and put it in Paris. Nowadays we know that that meter wasn't as long as we wanted it to be. Tough luck.

  47. Um, laptops? by cybpunks3 · · Score: 1

    Laptops are the future of computer hardware. Apple knows it. The rest of the industry is starting to catch up. People want internet on the go. Wireless internet access in the home/workplace is taking off, but people are going to want internet everywhere.

    Is it not hard to see that there is a void there that cellular networks can fill?

    Once you are using a laptop or uber-PDA on a cellular internet then you are going to use up as much bandwidth as you are given, so let's not be stupid enough to say that nobody is going to want broadband speeds on cellular networks.

    If they can offer something fast, and more importantly, something affordable, it will be a huge market. It could be as huge as this first wave of cell phone adoption that we've just gone through.

    If it's kept too expensive and limited, though, then it will NEVER take off.

  48. Re:Coming soon! 14.4mbps phones capped to 9600 bau by RzUpAnmsCwrds · · Score: 1

    Sprint PCS Vision. 500 anytime minutes, unlimited night and weekend minutes, unlimited minutes to other Sprint phones, no roaming, no long distance. Unlimited 150 kilobit data service.

    $45 per month on your phone. You can hook it up to your PC if you want..

    T-Mobile Sidekick. 200 anytime minutes, 1000 night and weekend minutes, no roaming, no long distance. Unlimited GPRS data service. Java based, free SDK available. AIM native client. Native email client. And one really cool microbrowser. $40 per month.

    Two ways to get unlimited data for under $50 per month. Looks like the US isn't so bad after all.