Slashdot Mirror


Searching for Keyboards Loaded with Features?

halfgeek asks: "I was just considering how keyboard-centric I've managed to make my setup, even under the mouse-hungry Windows GUI (no shouting; I regularly SSH to my Linux routing box for experiments, bring up VMWare when I need some X, and can't live without Cygwin). Almost everything I would want to do can be done without moving a hand to the mouse. I can open up an SSH to my server with Win+Shift+V, bring up a calculator with Win+C, run a one-shot console command with Win+0, open up the MW dictionary website to a highlighted word by hitting Ctrl+C (to copy) and then Win+Enter (to look up the contents of the clipboard). (Much of this is implemented with Perl programs and WinKey.) I also make frequent use of the volume knob and mute button built into my Logitech keyboard. If there is any good route to finding the keyboard I want with all the features I'm thinking of at a justifiable price, whether prefabricated or a wicked mod, I would just love to know about it." There are quite a few options the submitter is looking for, but it basically boils down to is this: the more keys, the better. What keyboards have you found, in your browsing travels, that have been stuffed full of useful features?

"I'm aggravated over having the mouse still so separate from the keyboard, and I've been looking through the available options along the lines of keyboards with built-in touchpads. The closest I've found to what I want seems to be the Adesso WKB-120, but this is by no means the ideal choice. It does have three basic properties I want: One, it doesn't have the ergo-split form I so despise. Two, its touchpad is situated in the right place, just below the space bar. Three, it's all one piece, so I can keep the board off the desk and on my knees, where it belongs, eh. But it also appears to have those three intensely undesirable and horribly misplaced power management keys, and lacks the volume knob, mute button, and media controls. An illuminated keyboard would also be cool, but I'd take standard beige; it's just that my current black keyboard is hard to see in the dark."

131 comments

  1. Woohoo by Praetor11 · · Score: 1

    I love when I hear about people trying to get rid of the mouse. I like it, but I feel much more handy using the keyboard and shortcuts. Hurray to you, sir!

  2. I challenge you to a game of Quake! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Then lets see whose mouse will run rings around you.

  3. IBM trackpoint keyboards. by FrenZon · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I love my trackpoint (nipple) pointer that juts up in the middle of my keyboards - while it's not as accurate as a mouse or even trackpad, it's good enough to click on links or select the words/fields I need, with an absolute minimum of movement - I hate having to move my thumb down to a trackpad on a laptop, and then having to move it ALL the way across its surface a few times to get what I want.

    I lament how trackpoints are disappearing off laptop keyboards these days.

    1. Re:IBM trackpoint keyboards. by The+Clockwork+Troll · · Score: 5, Funny
      I love my trackpoint (nipple) pointer that juts up in the middle of my keyboards
      The technical term is "clit mouse" - I shit you not.

      It is a not-so-accidental abbreviation of "cute little thumb mouse".

      --

      There are no karma whores, only moderation johns
    2. Re:IBM trackpoint keyboards. by Knife_Edge · · Score: 1

      "I lament how trackpoints are disappearing off laptop keyboards these days."

      I can't second that, I hate those things. Maybe they are better when you get used to them, but I have had to spend zero amount of time learning to use the alternative, the trackpad. That is, IF the trackpad is a good one (most seem to be). I used one that was supposedly based on heat sensing on a friend's Dell laptop, and it was the most utterly unresponsive thing ever.

      Brushing aside this isolated experience, I would like to make a generalization. Generally, I think trackpads take much less motor control and concentration than the alternative trackpoints, which are like a shortened, miniature joystick. Maybe you can develop skill with trackpoints, but it is not worth developing when the alternative is so much easier immediately. Undisputably you are making much larger muscle movements with the trackpad, but these still fall into the realm of the small and convenient. Whereas trackpoints respond to much more minute motions and therefore take greater skill to control, making them tedious to work with and master. You even mention in your post that they are less accurate too!

      I speculate that the reason trackpoints are starting to disappear is because most people find them annoying for the reasons I stated.

    3. Re:IBM trackpoint keyboards. by zombie-m · · Score: 1
      "I lament how trackpoints are disappearing off laptop keyboards these days."

      I can't second that, I hate those things. Maybe they are better when you get used to them, but I have had to spend zero amount of time learning to use the alternative, the trackpad.

      Actually, my Toshiba laptop has one of those things, and I absolutely hate it. Don't think I haven't tried getting used to it, because i've had it for over 2 years, and never could learn to like it. I have to hook up a regular mouse to be productive on my laptop. Or just do everything from the console, which is what I usually do.

    4. Re:IBM trackpoint keyboards. by einTier · · Score: 4, Informative
      Personally? I love them. Cannot stand the trackpads. I can't imagine any geek liking them over an extended period of time. Why? Let me count the ways.

      1. Trackpads are imprecise. Very imprecise. I can get incredible precision out of my trackpoint, nearly as good as I can with a mouse. To achieve the proper granularity out of the trackpad, I've got to jack up the sensitivity, which leads to the other problem.
      2. There's not a 1:1 relationship with the screen. To move the pointer across the screen (unless it's a banzai run, and sometimes not even then), you've got to drag, lift, drag, lift, drag, lift, rinse, repeat. I feel like I'm using a mouse on a desk about two inches square. If I get pointer to the point where I can move it quickly, I can't get the fine control I need.
      3. With all that lifting and pushing, inevitably, I get a nice 'click' when I didn't want one. God forbid I should touch down on the pad with a double touch, then I might really do something I didn't want.
      4. The touchpad is under my thumbs. Who in the world thought this was a good idea? OK, yes, I know that you can set it to turn off the touchpad when you're typing -- but it's still a hack, and you shouldn't have to do it. Even when it's 'turned off', it's still possible to do actions you didn't intend, particularly if you pause for a second to study your code. It's just another imperfection of the touchpad.
      5. This is kind of a continuation of the above, but one of the things I love about my trackpoint is that I can use the mouse and never take my hands off the keyboard. It's the best of both worlds. On the few occasions I need to use the mouse, it's right at my fingertips. I don't have to move my hands or anything except move my index finger over a bit and my thumb down.

        I know there are others, but it's 2:30, and that's all I can think of for now.

        I find most people who have trouble with trackpoints have problems for two reasons. Number one, they don't realize that the harder you push, the faster the pointer moves. Slow pushes give you great precision. Hard pushes zoom the thing across the screen. Number two, most people aren't used to pushing on something that doesn't move and getting a response. The stalk isn't supposed to move, but it will record even the slightest brush of your fingertips.
      --
      -------------------------------------------------- $665.95 -- retail price of the beast.
    5. Re:IBM trackpoint keyboards. by Jutegard · · Score: 1

      If you use a trackpoint, try turning off "mouse acceleration". Gives you a much higher precision.

      I think a combination of point and pad works best, actually. I have a "dualpoint" Dell with both trackpoint and touchpad and I use the pad for scrolling (slide the thumb along the edge of the pad). You can also map things like "minimize window" etc. to the corners of the pad. Very convenient.

      (Yes, Emil. It really is!)

    6. Re:IBM trackpoint keyboards. by Tower · · Score: 1

      My Thinkpad has both the trackpoint and the pad (disabled by me). If the pad wasn't right where my thumbs go, causing all sorts of bad accidental things, it might be more useful, and the middle button of the trackpoint allows that to act as a scroll stick anywhere on the screen.

      Which reminds me - I have an IBM mouse with the Thinkpad that I use at the replicator strip and it has three buttons in the standard arrangement, and a scroll nub - countoured and larger than the trackpoint so it is useful and not in the way, and it doesn't try to act like the third button itself (like the wheels which I, to this day, cannot stand). A very nice comprimise, allowing full function without any ergonomic change from the "old-style" three button mice.

      That being said, I like my Logitec Trackman Marble (no wheel) better than the others.

      --
      "It's tough to be bilingual when you get hit in the head."
    7. Re:IBM trackpoint keyboards. by Knife_Edge · · Score: 1

      "4. The touchpad is under my thumbs. Who in the world thought this was a good idea? OK, yes, I know that you can set it to turn off the touchpad when you're typing -- but it's still a hack, and you shouldn't have to do it. Even when it's 'turned off', it's still possible to do actions you didn't intend, particularly if you pause for a second to study your code. It's just another imperfection of the touchpad."

      What are you talking about? My thumbs go on the spacebar... Do you have giant thumbs? ;) You aren't the only person who mentioned this, but pardon me if I say it sounds ridiculous. Maybe you have a laptop with one of those slightly-smaller than normal keyboards. I hate those too, incidentally. They cause all sorts of problems, not only with thumbs going on the touchpad (apparently), but also typing.

    8. Re:IBM trackpoint keyboards. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well, I'll speak up. I have the same thumbs problem. It's not that my thumbs aren't on the spacebar and I don't have giant thumbs. -- and my laptop has an almost full sized keyboard (sony grx600k). BUT, I inadvertantly hit the touchpad at times because of how sensitive to touch it is. I find myself periodically hopping to another window or jumping within my text because the edge of my palm/base of thumb barely grazed the touchpad. I prefer a touchpoint -- but do have to admit the touchpad on my laptop is the best touchpad I've ever had and it's ALMOST in the right spot to keep me from hitting it on accident.

    9. Re:IBM trackpoint keyboards. by sahala · · Score: 1
      I'm going to second the parent. There's definitely a small learning curve when getting used to the trackpoint, but in my opinion it's well worth it.

      I started using the clit mouse on an IBM Thinkpad but liked it so much that I bought similar but full-sized keyboards for my desktop. It might not be hard to track down an old-skoool IBM keyboard WITH a trackpoint built in. It's really nice to be able to keep my hands in one place.

      One problem I found. During extended coding/work sessions my wrists would hurt from mousing with the trackpoint. But because trackpoint movements are so short and limited it's easy to overstress one particular area. In my case it was the area right behind my thumb a few cm. below my knuckle(yeah...bizarre). Solution: frequent breaks, which should be the case anyway. Also switching mouse hands helps. These problems, however, are not unique to the trackpoint.

      Anyway here's a quick froogle search...

      Have fun.

  4. The most useful keyboard for me. by AtariAmarok · · Score: 3, Insightful
    The most useful keyboard for me is a standard keyboard:

    Nice standard wide space bar, without the never-used Windows keys

    Backslash above a regular-height enter key (no double-high enter key with the backslash in any of 5 other locations).

    Standard layout, not the "think before you hit every key" (un)natural keyboard.

    The superior tactile click of the IBM keyboard from the PC-AT era. I don't think these are around any more, and nothing still even comes close.

    If there is one thing that should be standard, it is a keyboard layout. Extras are fine, as long as they are outside of the regular key area, which should be left alone. It is pretty unreasonable to have to learn different touch typing for different keyboards: the basics should stay the same. Nothing more frustrating than trying to hit the blackslash and then realizing it is one of those perverse Logitech or E-One keyboards that has "more enter key" where the backslash is.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
    1. Re:The most useful keyboard for me. by moosesocks · · Score: 1

      In fact, the IBM keyboards witht eh tactile 'click' are indeed still produced (IBM sold off their keyboard division years ago, and they are sold under a different name). You can buy one at PcKeyboard.Com. They even offer an updated model with the additional Windows 95 keys (winkey and context menu), and a pointing stick (like the ones found on IBM thinkpads).

      A detailed article on the old IBM keyboards can be found here

      --
      -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
    2. Re:The most useful keyboard for me. by calcifer · · Score: 1

      is it possible to get a keyboard that fits in my ps2 port, but doesnt have the goddamn windows key?

    3. Re:The most useful keyboard for me. by stanmann · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yes.. Try Ebay look for IBM PS/2 Model M type keyboards... Built like a brick(literally can be used to put a nail into a board). and no Windows key.

      --
      Food not Bombs is a nice platitude but it breaks down when you notice that the Bombees are usually well fed
    4. Re:The most useful keyboard for me. by Emil+Brink · · Score: 1

      The superior tactile click of the IBM keyboard from the PC-AT era. I don't think these are around any more, and nothing still even comes close.

      Since others have already pointed out current sources for this keyboard, and I can't really comment on that since I haven't ordered anything from them, I guess it's up to me to just point you to The Article, in case you hadn't read it. Whoa, that became a very long sentence.
      --
      main(O){10<putchar(4^--O?77-(15&5128 >>4*O):10)&&main(2+O);}
    5. Re:The most useful keyboard for me. by Nadesico_God · · Score: 0

      They are still made by another company listed on a different reply, but you can still purchase the old keyboards (with ps/2 connectors) from any numbers of auction sites (ebay... EVIL), Its kind of funny, just a week or 2 ago i purchased a vintage 1985 IBM Model-M Keyboard for $2 from a garage sale, I was sick and tired of the other keyboards i am now using on my other machines, they just don't feel right when you type iwth them

    6. Re:The most useful keyboard for me. by Rudeboy777 · · Score: 1

      What in God's name do you need to have such a conveniently located backslash key for? Do you do a lot of DOS shelling? (yuck) Or is it for intro C programming courses require you to print out a multiplication table using a for-loop?

      --

      From hell's heart I fstab at /dev/hdc

    7. Re:The most useful keyboard for me. by mvdw · · Score: 1

      Vegetarians eat Vegetables, BEWARE the man who claims to be a Humanitarian.

      Why? Because he would eat Humanitables?

    8. Re:The most useful keyboard for me. by Zathrus · · Score: 1

      If you code in a C-like language the \ key is essential in escape sequences. Similarly it's used for escape sequences in shells and shell scripting. Oh, and looky -- what's the shift of \? Yeah, the pipe. If you do any amount of command-line usage then you'd know why | is so important.

  5. There's only one answer, no need for a thread: by FFFish · · Score: 4, Informative

    PCKeyboard, who own the rights to the venerable IBM high-tactile keyboards (aka "the wing of death").

    They also have myriad options and some extremely programmable/configurable keyboards.

    --

    --
    Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
    1. Re:There's only one answer, no need for a thread: by zulux · · Score: 1

      Not only to they have the modern version of the IBM Model M - they have one that has a trackpoint just like an IBM Laptop. I'm using one right now.

      It's clicky as hell, costs me $99, and I could bludgeon someone to death with it.

      Best. Keyboard. Ever.

      --

      Moneyed corporations, non-working 'poor' and criminal prisoners are turning productive citizens into tax-slaves.

    2. Re:There's only one answer, no need for a thread: by Trixter · · Score: 2, Informative

      They may own the rights, but you can get original IBM 101-key keyboards from ebay regularly for about $12. I own 7 myself (Best. Keyboard. Ever.) for all my machines.

      My co-workers hate me, BTW. They claim the noise is deafening, but an average of 100 words per minute can't be wrong! :-)

  6. Loss of trackpoints by AtariAmarok · · Score: 1

    "I lament how trackpoints are disappearing off laptop keyboards these days"

    I recall seeing the first "touchpads" appearing after being used to all kinds of Toshiba's and Thinkpad's with little rubber eraser trackpoints.

    I was told that Toshiba owned the trackpoint technology, and charged a lot for it, so it was cheaper to put touchpads in laptops.

    Touchpads would not be so bad if not for the "missfire glitch" where bumping the pad with your thumb acts like a mouse click. I've lost many lines of text due to this problem. In most, you can turn this off. I can't imagine why anyone would want a stray finger movement to fire off mouseclicks like this. IMHO, you should click something when you want to click a mouse button.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
    1. Re:Loss of trackpoints by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      get a Mac. OS X has an option for touchpad clicking

    2. Re:Loss of trackpoints by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure, I'll replace all my harware and some software over a minor annoyance. "Get a Mac." is not the answer. Perhaps you don't realize how stupid that sounds. There are legitimate for switching platforms, but this certainly isn't one of them.

    3. Re:Loss of trackpoints by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1
      I was told that Toshiba owned the trackpoint technology, and charged a lot for it, so it was cheaper to put touchpads in laptops.

      Actually, IBM holds the patent. They also hold the trademark on "Trackpoint".

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
  7. Focus Electronic by Drakon · · Score: 4, Informative

    I use a keyboard from Focus Electronic called the FK-8200
    I sincerly regret not waiting for the FK-9200 to become available, since it has a trackball in the center of the keyboard.
    This keyboard is great.. it has a built in calculator, a clock with batteries for when the machine is off, and 12 macro keys that can be mapped to just about anything..

    1. Re:Focus Electronic by ffsnjb · · Score: 1

      I have a couple old AT Focus keyboards with the trackballs on them, but the trackball is where the arrow keys are on a normal keyboard. One of them will quit working after about 20 minutes, so it sits around unplugged until I need it for a quick job on a normally headless machine. Otherwise, they're ok.

      Nothing beats this Packbell keyboard (model 5131C) I've been using for the last 10 years, on 5 machines, though. I hope to find a couple new ones sometime, as this one is starting to get flaky. I don't feel like buying a POS Packbell off eBay just to get another used kayboard, though.

      --
      "Why do you consent to live in ignorance and fear?" - Bad Religion
    2. Re:Focus Electronic by The+Limp+Devil · · Score: 1

      Where do you buy them? I couldn't see any online store or listed retailers.

    3. Re:Focus Electronic by wik · · Score: 1

      I second any recommendation for Focus keyboards. I used one for years (until mine finally broke :( ). I don't remember the model, but mine had a great clicky feel (though not a rough, tough spring like the IBMs). The only thing that bugged me was that the caps/scroll/num-lock keys didn't click, and I had a bad tendency of accidently turning on the silent capslock.

      --
      / \
      \ / ASCII ribbon campaign for peace
      x
      / \
    4. Re:Focus Electronic by prestwich · · Score: 1

      I've had a Focus 5001 that I picked up at a radio rally for £3 many years ago; it was my main keyboard for a long time - function keys down the left as well as accross the top, calculator in built and diagonal arrow keys!

      I'm now on an original IBM keyboard

  8. Touchpad clicking by AtariAmarok · · Score: 1

    "get a Mac. OS X has an option for touchpad clicking"

    I think it is more a situation of the hardware driver for the pad itself than the actual OS. In any case, no need to go Mac just to avoid the problem: most Wintel/LinAMD/whatever laptops and notebooks allow you to turn it off these days.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
  9. The Model M is The One True Keyboard by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1

    There is only one keyboard, the Model M. All others are false pretenders.

    Repeat after me: Model M - the one true keyboard. All hail Model M.

    Model M

    If you turn over your keyboard and find that it does not say Model M on the bottom, you are not a true human being.

    It's not hard to find your own. Ebay lists them all the time. I pulled 12 of them out of an insurance company dumpster last year.

    Model M!

    1. Re:The Model M is The One True Keyboard by seinman · · Score: 1

      I've found a hoard of Model Ms at a thrift store. $3 each! Needless to say, i'd never pass up an opportunity like that.

    2. Re:The Model M is The One True Keyboard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's the kind of keyboard I grew up with, and the one I'll take with me to the grave =)

      But seriously, the keyboard I have looks exactly like the Model M, but the logo is on the right side. Is it still considered model M?

      - a.c.

    3. Re:The Model M is The One True Keyboard by Carpathius · · Score: 1

      Any keyboard that doesn't have the control key in the correct place -- just left of the 'a' key -- couldn't be considered the "one true keyboard".

      Sean.

    4. Re:The Model M is The One True Keyboard by aderusha · · Score: 1

      word to the model m.

      i refuse to use any cheap-o plastic pansy ass keyboard when i can use my tuff-as-nails steel ibm clicky to beat the hell out of anybody who dares enter my cave...

      cheap, indestructable, and the keys come off real easy to throw in the dishwasher occasionally.

    5. Re:The Model M is The One True Keyboard by stanmann · · Score: 1
      It's the kind of keyboard I grew up with, and the one I'll take with me to the grave =)
      will you be able to find a computer that will work in that kind of extreme conditions. :)
      --
      Food not Bombs is a nice platitude but it breaks down when you notice that the Bombees are usually well fed
    6. Re:The Model M is The One True Keyboard by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1

      Mapping keys is a software issue. If you can't map keys some reason, PCKeyboard sells a model M type keyboard under the name Linux 101 that comes out of the box with the control key next to the a.

    7. Re:The Model M is The One True Keyboard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      looks exactly like the Model M, but the logo is on the right side.

      Original PS/2 style. Mine says "MODEL: M" right on the bottom.

    8. Re:The Model M is The One True Keyboard by pthisis · · Score: 1

      Any keyboard that doesn't have the control key in the correct place -- just left of the 'a' key -- couldn't be considered the "one true keyboard".

      Just left of the 'a' key? That's where the escape key goes. ctrl goes in the lower-left where you can hit it with the edge of your palm without moving your hands off the home row.

      I bet you use emacs, too. ;-)

      Sumner

      --
      rage, rage against the dying of the light
    9. Re:The Model M is The One True Keyboard by Carpathius · · Score: 1

      I normally don't reply to heathens who believe the escape key goes next to the 'a' key, but I couldn't let *anyone* even consider I might be an emacs person. vi, is, of course, the one true editor. :-)

      Sean.

    10. Re:The Model M is The One True Keyboard by Carpathius · · Score: 1

      Oh, I can and do map keys. But it sure confuses other people who use my keyboard -- especially those young enough to have learned on what is now a standard keyboard.

      I did glance around the site and didn't notice the keyboard you mention -- it's hard, though, to justify spending much more than about $20 on a keyboard, since, as you say, keyboards can be mapped.

      Sean.

    11. Re:The Model M is The One True Keyboard by pthisis · · Score: 1

      Hmm. Interesting. escape next to caps lock makes vi even better, if that can be believed.

      Sumner

      --
      rage, rage against the dying of the light
    12. Re:The Model M is The One True Keyboard by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1

      You can see it here

      There are two layout variations - as to whether you buy or remap, that's your choice of course.

    13. Re:The Model M is The One True Keyboard by The+Bungi · · Score: 1
      The keyboards that used to ship with the circa ~1998-00 Compaq Deskpro boxes are pretty good. They have great spring feedback, are quieter than the clickety ones and don't take much space up in the ole' desk.

      I use them at work and have three new ones at home, bought from a second hand computer store here in town. I figure I'm set to about 2015 or so - assuming the PC doesn't transmogrify into a mind-controlled device or something like that.

    14. Re:The Model M is The One True Keyboard by GiMP · · Score: 1
      The model M is the best keyboard ever.

      With that said, there are a few drawbacks which are very unfortunate:
      • They are only in PS/2 flavor.. no ADB, USB, etc.
      • They are no longer manufacturered
      • They only come in beige (or yellow, depending on age and environment).
      • Corded only, no wireless.


      I would die for a black, wireless, usb IBM model M. Maybe I should hack one. I suppose the USB problem could be solved via an adapter.
    15. Re:The Model M is The One True Keyboard by Bawko · · Score: 1

      Hallelujah, Brother!!!!
      I have read the Model M postings with great interest, having used nothing else for over 5 years now. I used to go through keyboards like toilet paper - coffee spills, drops, and just plain cheap quality would insure it! No more - I found 3 Model M keyboards (including 2 half size models without the numeric keypad - Excellent!) in thrift stores, and I have NEVER looked back. Hail to the ruler - the undisputed champion of the keyboard gladiatorial arena! Model M! Model M! Model M!

      P.S. The half size version carries IBM part number 1391472, if anyone is interested. Truly an excellent keyboard - and takes up less deskspace!

      --
      Government is the monopoly on the legal (socially accepted) use of coersive force. Think about this next time you vote.
    16. Re:The Model M is The One True Keyboard by CyberBill · · Score: 1

      I've got like 30 of those keyboards in my basement. Sorry boys but my logitech "Internet Navigator" will stay. I am thinking of removing the Windows and the "Right Click" buttons(whatever the hell its called). Its got 19 extra buttons as well as a scroll button. :) The good thing is that theres a bunch of ways to hack the program controling everything to make it do whatever ya want. AND is USB. AND it doesnt weight more than my computer. :)

      Bill

      --
      -Bill
    17. Re:The Model M is The One True Keyboard by IntlHarvester · · Score: 1

      IBM made a Model M in ThinkPad Black with a TrackPoint. Check eBay for the "TrackPoint II".

      --
      Business. Numbers. Money. People. Computer World.
    18. Re:The Model M is The One True Keyboard by GiMP · · Score: 1

      WOW!

      Not only is it black, but having a mouse built-in would make it the perfect canidate for adaption to wireless :)

  10. Aren't the combo keys better? by chjones · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I like the ideas---I, too, have a Logitech keyboard (specifically, the Cordless Elite Duo) with volume, mute, etc. keys built in, and several shortcuts set up in (at least) a similar way.

    Other than the volume and mute, and the wheel on the left side, though, I find the many additional buttons along the top almost as distracting as a mouse. Right now, they're essentially all mapped to different websites, and I still have to look at them and pick out the right one before hitting it.

    Maybe it's because of too much Emacs, but I don't even think about my ctrl- or alt- keystrokes.

    Don't get me wrong, I love your ideas; out of curiosity, have you tried using all the "miscellaneous" buttons and specifically liked those better?

    --

    Christian Jones
    Medicine. Mathematics. Mediocrity.

  11. Keyboard Hall of Shame by AtariAmarok · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Enough about the best and most useful keyboards. How about the worst ones?

    Here's a couple to start with:

    The first Macintosh. I think Apple was so awestruck with the new idea of the GUI that it looks like the keyboard was a mere afterthought with the the first Mac. What they ended up including was designed to encourage mouse-usage; with its heavy-force keystroke requirements and its almost rudimentary nature.

    the Atari 400
    Anyone remember saving $400 over the price of the full-keyboard Atari 800 by getting one of these things? It spawned a cottage industry of replacement keyboards.

    TRS-80 Color Computer. The keyboard on the "ColorTRaSh" was eventually improved, but the earlier models had Fisher-Price written all over.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
    1. Re:Keyboard Hall of Shame by morzel · · Score: 1
      You can easily add the Sinclair ZX-80 and ZX-81 to your list. And let's not forget the IBM PCjr, shall we...

      --
      Okay... I'll do the stupid things first, then you shy people follow.
      [Zappa]
    2. Re:Keyboard Hall of Shame by Kusanagi · · Score: 1
      The keyboard on the "ColorTRaSh" was eventually improved, but the earlier models had Fisher-Price written all over.

      I wasted a few years of my childhood with one of those blasted things. Any wonder I could never touch-type until I replaced it with an IBM XT with the Model M keyboard. Been using the Model M ever since. :)

      --
      -Major Kusanagi, Section 9
  12. Windows is the best mouseless UI there is by farnsworth · · Score: 3, Insightful
    even under the mouse-hungry Windows GUI

    Are you insane? I don't care for Windows, but it is the most advanced mouseless UI there is. You can do everything without even having a mouse plugged in at all. The same cannot be said for gnome/kde or X in general. Granted, Windows is decidedly not a CLI, like your ssh sessions, but it's still the best there is if you don't like to use a mouse.

    I recall reading something about how some beta of windows 95 or NT 3.x failed a DOD acceptance test because a lot of it depended on the mouse, so Microsoft spent considerable time making it work fine in case of mouse failure.

    --

    There aint no pancake so thin it doesn't have two sides.

    1. Re:Windows is the best mouseless UI there is by Drakon · · Score: 2, Interesting

      In ION under X I don't have to touch my mouse. ever.
      just FYI
      It's basically the 'killer app' that's keeping me on linux... I can run Xchat, Gaim, Phoenix (or whatever it's called now), ZINF, etc, ad nausium. Putty is actually a better terminal than many of the linux ones, and I can do most of my development on a shell into another box. Windows is Free, and so is Linux. The only differences are (a) Xwin32 is much harder to crack than Xfree86 and (b) windows's Window Managment SUCKS.

    2. Re:Windows is the best mouseless UI there is by Atzanteol · · Score: 2, Informative
      The same cannot be said for gnome/kde or X in general.
      I beg to differ: http://ratpoison.sourceforge.net
      --
      "Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge"

      - Charles Darwin
    3. Re:Windows is the best mouseless UI there is by cerberusss · · Score: 1
      I don't care for Windows, but it is the most advanced mouseless UI there is
      Mod parent higher, because he's SO RIGHT. The other day I wanted to check whether you could call up a context (rightclick) menu in nautilus with the keyboard. And it's just not possible!!

      And so far, I haven't found a decent file manager which clones Windows Explorer. All they do is add more and more useless features. (But that's personal taste).

      --
      8 of 13 people found this answer helpful. Did you?
    4. Re:Windows is the best mouseless UI there is by lpontiac · · Score: 1
      I recall reading something about how some beta of windows 95 or NT 3.x failed a DOD acceptance test because a lot of it depended on the mouse, so Microsoft spent considerable time making it work fine in case of mouse failure.

      I suspect it's because originally, Windows was an on-the-shelf software product which ran on DOS. People would have to make a deliberate choice to get Windows. Lots of PC owners didn't have mice, so requiring one would probably have made Windows less appealing.

      Contrast with the X Window System, which was generally provided with your machine by Sun/Digital/etc. Every workstation/X-Terminal shipped came with a mouse, so there was no need to take the mouse-centric UI and make it keyboard friendly. Ditto for Apple machines.

    5. Re:Windows is the best mouseless UI there is by Bazzargh · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Are you insane? I don't care for Windows, but it is the most advanced mouseless UI there is.

      My Dell laptop's touchpad is knackered to the extent I have to turn it off permanently, so I have plenty of experience of using windows without a mouse (in the office I use a trackball). While quite a lot of features are available without the mouse, it isn't particularly easy to use and in general 'skinnable' apps (ie anything that isn't using standard windows widgets, increasingly common) suck bigtime.

      I find the best thing to do when I'm unplugged from my mouse is to fire up xemacs full screen. Its no longer my day-to-day tool of choice, but emacs has so many built in features I can pretty much get by without using anything else, and mouseless operation is trivial - its what it was designed for.

      For example, there is nothing in windows like C-h k (describes a single key binding) or C-h m (describes the current mode's key bindings)[1], or even a hint that will describe the key binding for actions you take.

      Windows may well be the best mouseless UI that was originally designed to be used with a mouse but its not even close to being the best mouseless UI.

      -Baz

      [1] I know windows-space is roughly equivalent if you have intellitype, but its not a default feature of windows, and doesn't show app-specific bindings.

    6. Re:Windows is the best mouseless UI there is by 3eyes · · Score: 1

      mac os... by far the best ui without a mouse, need i say more john

    7. Re:Windows is the best mouseless UI there is by arvindn · · Score: 1
      Are you insane? I don't care for Windows, but it is the most advanced mouseless UI there is. You can do everything without even having a mouse plugged in at all. The same cannot be said for gnome/kde or X in general.

      Yes it can. I do everything using the keyboard, including moving and resizing windows under X (with sawfish.) I kid you not! Care to show me how to do that in windows? Of course, gnome's philosophy from gnome2 onwards is "you can do only what we let you to, because we know better than you", and I don't think you can use KDE without a keyboard either, but there's really nothing you can't do under X. To put it simply, what you really need is a WM that is both programmable and allows keys to be bound to arbitrary actions. Windows doesn't have the concept of a user-visible WM independent from the application, so there's and inherent limitation to what you can do.

    8. Re:Windows is the best mouseless UI there is by kiwimate · · Score: 4, Informative

      Yes it can. I do everything using the keyboard, including moving and resizing windows under X (with sawfish.) I kid you not! Care to show me how to do that in windows?

      With pleasure.

      Use the ALT-space key combination. This will bring up that window's control menu, including options to Restore (switch between full screen or windowed view), Minimize, Maximize, Close...and Size or Move. If you select Size or Move, you can then resize the window or move the window around the screen using the arrow keys. When done, press the Enter key. Presto -- all without a mouse.

      You're welcome.

    9. Re:Windows is the best mouseless UI there is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Care to show me how to do that in windows?

      Do you feel stupid now?

    10. Re:Windows is the best mouseless UI there is by Jman314 · · Score: 1

      I don't care for Windows, but it is the most advanced mouseless UI there is. You can do everything without even having a mouse plugged in at all.

      Hmm, I wonder if this has anything to do with the mysterious two keys on my keyboard that look suspicously like the Windows logo...

      Getting back on topic, I don't really care for advanced features. My keyboard just has to be full sized. I hate keyboards that cut the shift, backspace, or even the enter key to make their design fit in a smaller space, or to make room for that blasted Windows key. This may be necessary for laptops, but it shouldn't for desktops!

    11. Re:Windows is the best mouseless UI there is by smeenz · · Score: 1

      You're not the only person in the world that knows those keys. I can't remember the last time I used the close/maximise/minimise icons on the window.. I do everything with the keyboard

      maximise - alt-space,x
      maximise - alt-space,n
      close - alt-f4

      In addition, most applications allow you to move between sub windows opened within the current window with ctrl-f6, and to close them individually with ctrl-f4.

  13. No sweat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    (no shouting; I regularly SSH to my Linux routing box for experiments, bring up VMWare when I need some X, and can't live without Cygwin)


    I know what you mean. When I'm not getting my arms bloody up to the elbows gutting innocent homeless people, I attend the opera and donate 0.5% of my income to the church, so I'm ok.

  14. roundup by yarbo · · Score: 4, Informative
    1. Re:roundup by Brett333 · · Score: 1

      This article seems to have been passed over without much viewing. All of the keyboards are really interesting designs, but I would like to point out one in particular. The TouchStream ST. Granted, it does have a pretty heavy price tag, ~$300, but if I had the money this is what I would buy. It completely gits rid of the need for a mouse, and it has a wealth of gestures that make your life a lot easier.

      Here is the link for the portion of the article about this awesome keyboard.

    2. Re:roundup by yarbo · · Score: 1

      I think the TouchStream ST is also my favorite of the roundup. $300 is a lot of money for a keyboard though.

  15. Build it yourself by Knife_Edge · · Score: 1

    Good lord, man! Listen to all your complicated specifications! I especially like the last one, whinging about how your current keyboard is black and that makes it hard to see in the dark. Want a super-1337 keyboard but can't touch type, eh? What are you doing that could possibly justify a ultra-custom keyboard? Oh, never mind, it appears you are adjusting the volume of your PC sound system, even muting it! Wow, it is pretty important to be able to do that quickly and efficiently, as it directly affects your productivity writing Perl scripts to automate tasks that each take 1/100,000th of the time it takes to produce the script. Clearly, you are planning for a future of repetitive, yet complex computing tasks that require more than a mere conventional keyboard and mouse interface. I advise that you begin working as hard as you can, nights and weekends, on the construction of a complete super keyboard system. Ultimately, it should be scriptable enough that you will just write a master script that performs all your daily work for you by invoking other scripts. And how will this master script be triggered? With a single button, my friend, a single button.

    Actually, I'll write the master script for you, it shouldn't be all that complex.

    1. Re:Build it yourself by 3eyes · · Score: 1

      You know being able to see the keys in the dark is a real pain. Even when u know where 95% of all the keys are sometimes you just want to orientate yourself or locate that funny character or maybe even the ~ on a Mac. And changing volume, and moving between music tracks is something i do all the time. [alt gr + right arrow]. It is far quicker than selecting winamp and pressing next and then going back to the other app.
      Get over yourself the world is bigger than programming and that trusy old IBM keyboard you have from 88...

    2. Re:Build it yourself by billygmicrosoft.com · · Score: 1

      That's what the bumps on the j and k kley are for....

  16. extremetech has an article about this by aditseng · · Score: 1

    ExtremeTech has a story Keyboard Craziness and Mouse Madness has a few interesting keyboards and mice beyond the ordinary.
    New is also this article about a keyboard without a keyboard.

    --
    Didn't you hear - I come in Six Packs
    1. Re:extremetech has an article about this by quiddity · · Score: 1

      very trippy. looks like a game of psychic shuffleboard.

      --
      .
      . hmmm
    2. Re:extremetech has an article about this by quiddity · · Score: 1

      and the interface maps look like a streetfighter afficianado's dream come true.

      --
      .
      . hmmm
  17. Good program to use the extra buttons on a USB kbd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Slightly off-topic....

    I have a USB keyboard (an ACER 6511-uv) with some extra buttons along the top, but I don't have software to use them. I also have Compaq laptop with some extra buttons, that has awful software. Does anyone know of a program that will allow me to assign my own programs to those extra (non-standard) buttons?

    Both windows and linux solutions accepted... :)

    Thanks...

  18. Magic Keyboard? by Night0wl · · Score: 1

    I'd just like to mention I can do all of what you've said without a fancy keyboard or magic software, save one plugin for winamp.

    For my SSH / Command / Calculator I use any of the following,

    Win, R, Enter, Then one of the following
    putty -ssh
    calc
    command

    I can even start up winamp using a shortcut placed in the windows dir pointing to the exe, named winamp. Also for putty, I just copied the exe to the win dir as well.

    For mousing I use the built in Mouse key's, converting the num-pad to mouse directions. 2k and XP have this naturally.

    For volume I use Winamp Shortcutter. It adds functionality to use Ctrl-Shift for the standard winamp functions. I don't use WMP, or Winamp v3.

    Now, admittedly my keyboard is fancy, it has three buttons between the numbad and the other keys. Below the del/ins/etc buttons, above the arrow keys. One for browser, One for email client, and one for searchign (i.e. F3, useless)

    So, one doesn't really need a mystical creature of a keyboard for added functionality.

    --
    Computational Madness in a round package.
    1. Re:Magic Keyboard? by 3eyes · · Score: 1

      comand prompt >> windows key + r then cmd then enter that should save you a few key presses. :D

    2. Re:Magic Keyboard? by pboulang · · Score: 1

      Depends on what is being done. Those are two separate things. (open each and note the differences up to an including the copyright notice)

      --

      This comment is guaranteed*

      *not guaranteed

  19. Re: trackballs? by jago25_98 · · Score: 1

    don't seem to be trackballs on laptops either these days.

    perhaps a nice spinnable optical one on the left or right swappable would be nice

  20. keyboards by magical1 · · Score: 1

    I have used many keyboards of my time, the PCjr chicklet keyboard, the mushy non springed Atari 1040STFM Keyboard, the IBM PS/2 keyboard (which I love the tactile feeling) and the keyboard I am tying on, a el-cheapo fujitsu... I figure why spend a fortune on a keyboard, as long as it feels good (which this keyboard I like the feel) .. sure it has lame windows keys, but in the end if you gum it up or spill your pop on it its only a throw away. I laff at people that still want to buy keyboard condoms when the price of the keyboard is cheaper than the condom. Has anyone seen what the condoms look like after a long life?? considering we use condoms once people try to make that piece of molded plastic work forever, I think they'd be better off buying a new keyboard a year rather than investing in the condom. As to all these stupid shortcut keys, they are gay, we have enuf shortcuts, let alone keys to do things... Its bad enuf that my laptop has these keys, and that my girlfriend insisted that I migrate her microsoft keyboard so she can hit the 'calculator' button when she wants the calculator up --- barf.. one key email --- barf.. I mean maybe if they produced something functional like a 'hold your hand feature (cause if you need the shortcut keys you might aswell have that feature aswell) ' then I might buy one with shortcut keys... Maybe the only features I consider useful is usb hubs, and cordless ones.

  21. Speaking of keyboards by DeadSea · · Score: 1

    Does anybody know how to get all those extra keys (volume, forward, back, search, my computer, calculator, etc) to do something useful under linux?

    1. Re:Speaking of keyboards by jmertic · · Score: 1

      Try LinEAK or you can use xmodmaps if you have a really wierd keyboard ( although LinEAK supports most keyboards out there and is extendible easily)

    2. Re:Speaking of keyboards by damiam · · Score: 1

      acme is native GNOME2 (although it should work with KDE) and provides an excellent gui for configuring/using those keys.

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
  22. PI Engineering's X-Keys by Zocalo · · Score: 2, Informative

    PI Engineering make a range of rather nifty "keyboard extenders" for all those keyboard macros. I've got my eyes on an X-Keys "Stick" or two, but want the USB version which has been "coming soon" for a few months now, so should be imminent. The only drawback is that the management software utility is Windows only, although you can still program the keys directly or use a Windows PC and then tranfer the keyboard to a Mac/*NIX box. Since you have Windows anyway that shouldn't be a major problem in your case though. They seem open to developing custom solutions though, so *might* be prepared to provide the info necessary to develop a *NIX version of the programming tool. In my experiences with programmable keyboards however that's only really of use to people who need to either bulk program the things or flip between application specific macro sets.

    --
    UNIX? They're not even circumcised! Savages!
    1. Re:PI Engineering's X-Keys by diesel_jackass · · Score: 1

      those prices in USD? if they are then they're a little ridiculous don't you think? $80 for 16 keys?

    2. Re:PI Engineering's X-Keys by bitty · · Score: 1

      those prices in USD? if they are then they're a little ridiculous don't you think? $80 for 16 keys?

      Well, let's see here...

      Let's assume that you've already found a circuit board layout so you don't have to do much if any planning. Parts for the whole thing -- electronic components, buttons, case, etc. -- you find a great deal on and pay no more than $10.

      Now let's say you're good with your hands and are able to put the thing together in two hours. I'm not talking about a half-assed job with the buttons mounted on a cardboard box, but a finished product that's solid and looks at least halfway decent. I don't know about you, but my spare time (the little I have) is worth a hell of a lot more to me than $35/hour, especially when I could be spending it with my wife.

      I was planning on building a device exactly like this for myself, but I'll gladly pay the $90 it's going to cost for the 20 button version (I'll probably find it for less after a few minutes of searching), because it's what I'm looking for, and I can be doing more valuable things with my time.

    3. Re:PI Engineering's X-Keys by diesel_jackass · · Score: 1

      I'm not arguing than those with a fatter wallet than I will easily be able to justify the cost. However, in the end you are still getting 16-keys for $80. A mass produced strip of buttons like that should be very inexpensive. You could easily go out and buy a whole new keyboard with at least as many of those extra keys for far less than $80.

    4. Re:PI Engineering's X-Keys by Zocalo · · Score: 1
      Yeah, it's an expensive solution in that context, no doubt about that, $5 plus tax and shipping per key in-fact. However, when a keyboard dies it's almost always the QWERTY/space keys that fail, not the FN keys, so if we assume we go through three QWERTY keyboards to one X-Keys (probably harsh on the X-Keys) then you could look on it as $80+3 standard keyboards instead of 3 programmable keyboards. Here in the UK I can get a Cherry QWERTY for the equivalent of $20, so that's a total of $140. I can get a Cherry programmable (PS/2) for $59, which would be $177 for three. In addition:

      • You don't need to sacrifice quality of the QWERTY keyboard to gain programmability; you can match it with an IBM/Cherry/whatever for the bulk of your typing needs
      • You can position it almost anywhere you like, although above the Fn keys on your QWERTY keyboard is most likely best ergonomically
      • You can move one X-Keys between several PCs as required, with all your macros in-place
      • It works on Apple and Sun kit if you are so inclined
      • You might not actually have to pay for it yourself, if you can justify it to your boss :-P
      Also, I have yet to find a decent programmable keyboard with a good tactile response, decent build quality and a USB interface, and believe me, I've looked. And no, I don't want a "multimedia" keyboard - I want a boatload of Fn keys I can label and attach *long* macros to that I can change on the fly.
      --
      UNIX? They're not even circumcised! Savages!
  23. Windows Explorer....decent? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "And so far, I haven't found a decent file manager which clones Windows Explorer."

    I don't find Windows Explorer to be that decent; I avoid using it except when I have to. Typically, I can start a DOS session, cd, run or copy the file, and exit out of the session int he time it takes just to start Windows Explorer and start the maddening hunt-and-squint to find the files to work with.

    1. Re:Windows Explorer....decent? by cerberusss · · Score: 1
      Typically, I can start a DOS session, cd, run or copy the file, and exit out of the session int he time it takes just to start Windows Explorer
      Well, for me DOS is just too clunky. For me, it takes longer than using the Explorer. When I use Linux (which is the main OS for me), I always have a shell open because it's so darn quick. But DOS just doesn't have the userfriendlyness of the bash shell.
      --
      8 of 13 people found this answer helpful. Did you?
  24. Re:Good program to use the extra buttons on a USB by Yottabyte84 · · Score: 1

    there's lineak however the year old verion i use (0.3.2) stops working not long after being loaded. 0.5 probably works a lot better.

  25. The Commodore Pet by RocketJeff · · Score: 2, Interesting
    While those are bad keyboards, the worst of all time has to be the one on the original Commodore Pet - it had tiny keys laid out in straight rows/columns and they were laid out alphabetically (not qwerty or Dvorak). If you knew anything about typing, it was painful to use!

    The later versions of the Pet had standard keyboards - it made the Pet into a good, usable computer.

  26. You've already got it by Apreche · · Score: 1

    Logitech. Logitech makes the highest quality mouses and keyboards. This discounts special purpose mouses and keyboards like digitizers and those keyboards that can withstand being tossed in the crack of doom. I reccomend you get whatever the current ultra elite super cordless mouse-keyboard wireless combo is. I believe the current one has a mouse that sits in a cradle a recharges when you aren't using it. That's a good thing if you don't use it often.

    --
    The GeekNights podcast is going strong. Listen!
  27. Trackballs by mindhaze · · Score: 1

    I miss the old laptops with trackballs, man, those were great. You had speed, precision, and all of it came in one tiny package. I mean, take an MS ergo keyboard, put a trackball in the middle, three buttons below it, and you'd have one SWEET keyboard, especially if it's the new M$ Wireless ergo keyboard.

    'nuf said.

  28. Touchstream Keyboards by Argot · · Score: 2, Informative

    I repeatedly drool over Touchstream keyboards. I can't justify the expense, but the entire keyboard is a touch-sensitive surface (like those laptop glide pads), and has an absurd number of macro functions (including ones for emacs).

    1. Re:Touchstream Keyboards by DeDmeTe · · Score: 1

      I too have found myself drooling all over it. It looks like a great idea. I find it hard to drop $350 on a keyboard I may end up hating. Plus, wonder what kind of learning curve is involved to get proficient with it?

      --
      -Guns kill people like spoons made Rosie O'Donnell fat-
  29. Sun Type 5 USB keyboard by pastie · · Score: 1

    I find these a joy to use, and although they don't have a built-in trackpad, they have a load more function keys down the left-hand side which you could program to perform whatever functions you like. These work fine under Linux, and I'm assuming they can be made to work with Windows too :)
    Also, they have Super/Hyper/Meta modifier keys, so you'll have a load more keys you can use for your bindings that way too (no windows keys though, but I'm sure you could use one of the extra modifier keys as such if you so wished).

  30. X and windows by Telastyn · · Score: 1

    cygwin now has a usable X server for windows, so VMware is a little excessive. Just ssh into your other machine and export X to your windows machine. (Putty has X forwarding that works if your ssh client doesn't provide support for it)

    There's a few nuance/quirks, but far less than VMware

  31. No Caps Lock by jkidd · · Score: 1

    I just want a keyboard without a caps lock. I break it off my PCs, Suns, and Xterminal so I don't hit it when I aim for the shift key. Really ruins a Unix CLI.

    1. Re:No Caps Lock by xluap · · Score: 1

      I think the keyboard can be programmed, and maybe it is possible to program a key to do nothing.

    2. Re:No Caps Lock by smeenz · · Score: 1

      The keyboard itself doesn't get programmed.. however the keyboard driver can usually be configured to remap things. It has a table that coverts scancodes into ascii codes in any case, so changing things is just a matter of changing values in that table.

  32. features? how about a whole personal computer? by 1nv4d3r · · Score: 1

    With an Apple II, the keyboard had all the features of, well, an Apple II.

  33. Model M is KING !!!!!! by Bawko · · Score: 1

    Hallelujah, Brother!!!!
    I have read the Model M postings with great interest, having used nothing else for over 5 years now. I used to go through keyboards like toilet paper - coffee spills, drops, and just plain cheap quality would insure it! No more - I found 3 Model M keyboards (including 2 half size models without the numeric keypad - Excellent!) in thrift stores, and I have NEVER looked back. These things were made in an era when QUALITY, DURABILITY, and RELIABILITY actually meant something - not just words on an advertising brochure. Coffee spills? Drops? Dust and Dirt? Pr0n induced spoojing? Don't make me laugh! These keyboards laugh off abuse that would obliterate mere mortal boards. During a recent move, one of my precious Model M's went flying out the back of my pickup truck - bounced 3 times on the street (scattering keycaps) and came to a sliding asphalt stop. Retrieving it, I gathered the keycaps and re-assembled it. It still works great!
    All hail the ruler - the undisputed champion of the keyboard gladiatorial arena! Model M! Model M! Model M!

    P.S. The half size version carries IBM part number 1391472, if anyone is interested. Truly an excellent keyboard - and takes up less deskspace!

    --
    Government is the monopoly on the legal (socially accepted) use of coersive force. Think about this next time you vote.
  34. No one has brought up those awful power buttons... by sllim · · Score: 1

    I bought a Microsoft ergonomic keyboard a couple years ago. I can touch type and I actually find that my touchtyping speed improves with ergonomic.

    Anyways....
    On the upper rt corner is a key marked 'sleep'.
    Should have been marked 'Blue Screen of Death' cause that is what it caused.

    At the time I had an awful computer desk and the only way I could really get things done was with the keyboard on my lap. I can not tell you how many times the upper right corner would find it's way underneath the desk and then.... BLAM BSOD time.

    You would think I could turn that feature off somewhere, in the bios, inside windows, in the keyboard drivers. But I never found anything.

    Finally one day I had had all I could take and I could take no more.
    I pulled out a phillips head and an exacto knife.
    Someone was getting surgery.

    I opened up the keyboard and examined the button and the circuit pads. I decided my best bet was to physicaly cut the rubber button out of the rubber pad.

    That sleep button? Not a problem no'mo.

  35. music notation keyboard by ratfynk · · Score: 1
    I once saw a Yamaha midi/organ device that had a built in special music notation function keys, standard qwerty keyboard, as well as a music (piano) keyboard. What a monster! Bach would laugh. The pupose was to link to a dos music notation interface that came with it. Must have cost a fortune back then for the poor sucker that bought it! It even had a dot matix printer output.
    I can not for the life of me remember its name.
    It was in a pawn shop. I guess the original musician that owned it must have realised its faster to write things down by hand than use computers for writing music, if you are musicaly literate. Maybe he got wise to how much better Mac was for music notation back in the late 1980s.


    Anyway that was the funkiest keyboard setup I have ever seen. Maybe the best thing possible would be an interface that alows the mouse to remap the keyboard on demand for program functions. You know a picture of the keyboard layout on the screen while a program runs, with function call tracking and remapping. It would be hard to impliment for proprietary ware binary fixed macros.
    I am sure the Windows programmers at Microsofts Old Spaghetti Factory in Redmond could create one for us for the right dollars.
    There is limited keyboard remapping in XP, guess thats why it runs like a dog on 128 of ram after you customise it!


    At least if you do not like the macro choices in Open Software you can easily find and change them, then recompile the source. Then if it breaks the flow you can db the glitch, if your good at that sort of thing.
    If you are really good then you can pipe in new macros to functions etc.

    --
    OH THE SHAME I fell off the wagon and use sigs again!
    1. Re:music notation keyboard by halfgeek · · Score: 1

      That reminds me of this crazy garbage I ran across in my search: This Creative Labs keyboard with a nice set of "extra keys". Man.

  36. Re:No one has brought up those awful power buttons by davidstrauss · · Score: 1
    You would think I could turn that feature off somewhere, in the bios, inside windows, in the keyboard drivers. But I never found anything.

    The controls are in the Power control panel. Under "When I press the sleep button". Also, the BSoD problem is probably your OS and not the keyboard itself.

  37. Unbeatable MultiKeyboard... by Multiproximus · · Score: 1

    I guess this should take care of both kinds of keyboards... OpenSynth eKo

    --
    Made with massively parallel wetware.
  38. The Northgate OmniKey is the Holy Grail by hirschma · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Sorry, as nice as the 'M' is, there is no comparison to a Northgate Omnikey, especially the Ultra .

    I still have one. It weighs over 10 pounds, so it doesn't move. The feel of the keys is heavenly - perfect amount of force to depress, and a wonderful click when you do. All the keys are where they should be, including a superior diamond pattern for the cursor keys.

    If you haven't used one, you don't know what you're missing. Northgates are still the golden standard for anyone who knows.

    jonathan

    1. Re:The Northgate OmniKey is the Holy Grail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Northgate is very good, however I never liked having the capslock next to the space bar and all those function keys along the side are a refuge from the days of WordStar etc.

    2. Re:The Northgate OmniKey is the Holy Grail by Bawko · · Score: 1

      Greetings Jonathan,
      I used to own a Northgate Omnikey Ultra, and although I agree with you that it is a sturdy, heavy duty keyboard with good keypress action, the layout never appealed to me. I have ALWAYS preferred the enter key to be the standard height (no "extra enter key where the backslash belongs" nonsense). Also, the cursor key layout, although innovative, never really won me over. I ended up selling my Northgate to a friend, who ended up scrapping it when it stopped working about 4 months later. Just another example of the quality and realiability of IBM Model-M keyboards - I bought all of my model M keyboards in used condition at thrift stores LONG before I bought the Northgate, and all 3 of them are still working great! Wish I could say the same for my friend's Northgate, he was rather pissed when it failed on him after owning it for such a short time.
      Best regards,
      Bawko

      --
      Government is the monopoly on the legal (socially accepted) use of coersive force. Think about this next time you vote.
  39. I cant belive no one has linked to this yet.... by Cyno01 · · Score: 1

    All hail Thinkgeek, they have some crazy keyboards, built in gesturing, zero force w/ gestures, even ones with customizable sections. They seem a bit pricey however, and theres a bit of a learning curve for zero force and gestures, but they may be what your looking for.

    --
    "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
  40. split IBM keyboard by chocolatetrumpet · · Score: 1

    anyone know of a split "ergonomic" style keyboard with ibm style clicky keys?

    --
    Spoon not. Fork, or fork not. There is no spoon.
    1. Re:split IBM keyboard by cdrudge · · Score: 1

      Good god. Not only do you want the migraine from the click-clack and carpel tunnel from having to press hard on the keys...but now you want it split in an "ergonomic" style. You truly are a sadist. I suppose next you want it to support DVORK chording.

  41. Hey, duder. by halfgeek · · Score: 1

    I love your biting sarcasm, SMARTEY MAN.

    You make it sound as if this is a productivity issue. It really isn't. It might be someday, when I'm out of college and unemployed with my useless CS degree, frantically tweaking resumes. It's really more of a combination between the "I like inventing shiny toys" problem and the "I don't feel like leaning forward to mess with my speakers" problem. I can touch type, but some of my less frequently used Winkey shortcuts haven't exactly been committed to muscle memory. In any case, my eyes provide a much more "efficient" realignment to home than do the ridges on F and J, LOLOLO ROFFLE, and my observation about the blackness of the keyboard is simply an acknowledgement of a previous buying mistake. Actually, buying the cordless set was probably a mistake... I'm constantly replacing batteries but seldom exploit the cordlessness. The volume knob and mute button are in fact the only media keys on my board I ever really use. I might use play, pause, et cetera, but they invariably open the wrong application. And I write the scripts because I am a frequently bored programmer who enjoys an intellectual challenge more than a mundane physical motion. I actually started programming today to figure out the Win32 mixer API (the volume and mute parts) so I could write my own controls program, maybe controllable with some momentary-close switches rigged into ripped-open Gravis pad, or some more shortcut combinations. To some degree, it's hack for the sake of hack.

    Read my post again. Do I really sound whiny? If so, it's only because it doesn't quite make sense to me that almost every special keyboard out there only has one extra feature, and hardly any have two. And I don't mean to whine about it, because it's not killing me to make all the mouse motions (most of which are only necessary because of bad programming by people who don't bother to program key sequences). I just like to have the power to do something about it, you know?

    By the way, if you still insist that this is a productivity issue, I want you to know that writing this stuff in Perl is ridiculously easy and my MW script saves me a whole ten impatient seconds every time the thought crosses my mind to look up a word I haven't seen in a while or to clarify a meaning or pronunciation. Trust me, it happens ridiculously often.

    1. Re:Hey, duder. by Knife_Edge · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I think once you spend a certain amount of time on slashdot, you eventually turn into a troll. This descent into trollness is followed by your being driven from the site, and eventually suicide in the manner of the WIPO Troll. Seriously, I laid into you so hard because I am guilty of the same silliness to a great degree. I just made a couple of new shell functions today (these are going to save me some real time though). But, worse, I am dvorak typist. Observe my advocacy of that strategy elsewhere in the comments on this article. I have to restrain myself from buying programmable footswitches, mouse pointers that track the focused led strapped to my forehead, etc.

      As long as you recognize that most of the customizations and modifications we make to the interfaces to our machines serve no purpose other than our own amusement, I'm ok with it. I wasn't quite sure what your intentions were from the article. So I ribbed you real good to make sure. Good luck finding your perfect keyboard! Just don't be surprised if you discover it doesn't exist, and that someone finds it funny that you are constantly disappointed that technology can't do more for you. Sometimes you just have to be content with what you have, which is really quite a lot.

      In closing, take a moment to reflect on how good your life truly is. Peace.

  42. Dear God! by halfgeek · · Score: 1

    Man, this FK-9200 looks like exactly, exactly what I want. If it isn't the last one I try, it'll at least be the first. Thanks a zillion for the tip!

  43. ultra-light touch keyboards? by maztec · · Score: 1

    While someone else is asking about keyboards. I may as well throw out what I've been searching for also (almost the complete opposite): Optional items are marked with an *. 1) 100% silent SOFT TOUCH -- almost a breeze could set it off, but NOT touchless or gesture (they drive me insane). 2) NO EXTRA KEYS. I want the normal keyset without any of those crappy windows add-on keys. *3) Wireless (preferably with a beeper on its stand so I can hit the button and the keyboard BEEPS at me to tell me where it's at. I have a bad habbit of losing wireless keyboards) 4) NO always-on LIGHTS! And definitely no lights that are ever always on except when capslock/numlock/scroll lock is actually on. 5) Split Key/Ergonomic 6) Full Sized 7) DURABLE!!! It had better last me more than 1 year, or have a really good warranty with a reliable company. (I type way too much) *8) Dvorak/Qwerty Swappable (hardware, not software, so yes, one extra button or key combo on the keyboard for swapping between dvorak and qwerty layouts) I had my dream keyboard once, but it died after 4 years. It was basically the filaments inside a normal keyboard, rollable, and had a slight bubble for all the keys and the home row was in braille. It was also swappable between Dvorak and QWERTY. It was extremely light touch, if I blew on it it'd type (once in a while a problem, but rarely). I loved it, but the company had gone out of business since the time I'd purchased it (I believe they went out of business in 98 or so). The really nice thing about the keyboard was that it was really thin, but came with a gel-pad that you could mold to any shape you want and put underneath it, it slowly conformed to a shape that matched your typing patterns over time and essentially became ergonomic just for you. Ok, I'll go back to dreaming for a keyboard I love now. I'm tired of loud clicky keyboards and have no idea why anyone would ever want one with a "nice solid keystroke" -- sorry, but that's not for me (I love silent laptop keyboards, but they tend to be too cramped). Anyway, soft touch makes a huge difference w/ my carpal tunnel *groan*.

    1. Re:ultra-light touch keyboards? by dotgain · · Score: 1

      Looks like the ENTER key is broken on your current keyboard!
      *ducks*

    2. Re:ultra-light touch keyboards? by maztec · · Score: 1

      Actually, it's some oddity between Slashdot and Mozilla is all I can figure. None of my posts have break lines unless I intentionally place in the "br" tag.

      As noted. I forgot to change my default formatting to plain text, heh. So \n is there, you just can't see it!

  44. YAYA by halfgeek · · Score: 1

    I've been reading Slashdot for a while (and only relatively recently registered a username), and I've made a futile effort to be a voice of reason in multiple Perl vs. Python vs. Everything Else flame wars. This is also a technical challenge for my own amusement...

    Paranoia makes it easy to take offense to something not truly intended to be offensive. Every day I stay in my room I lose a little more touch with reality. Man, I gotta get some friends.

    But, yes, life is good, PYFGCRL typist. Pretty awfully good. Ciao.

  45. Gateway Anykey, if you can still find them. by Gldm · · Score: 1

    These were great back when they were still being made. I'm sure they were sold under other names, but this is the only one I still remember. Everything fully programmable, including macros, 8way arrow pad with space in the center, and double set of function keys, both across the top and down the left side. Since you could assign any key to any value you wanted or a macro, you could make them do whatever you want. I used to reprogram them to dvorak before I gave up on it. Sometimes you run into these in the used parts bins for $10 at computer shows.

    --

    Introducing the new Occam Fusion! Now with sqrt(-1) fewer blades!

  46. Re:No one has brought up those awful power buttons by mrcpu · · Score: 1

    I think a dab of epoxy would've been a heck of a lot simpler and just as effective.

  47. Old keyboard with trackball by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I had an older keyboard (10 years ago) that put a larger trackball on the right of the number pad and the 3 "mouse keys" on the bottom left of the keyboard. It was by far the best layout I've ever run across. Very natural to use and was great for playing Doom.

    It's key was the split of the trackball and the mouse buttons. The right hand pointed the cursor and the left hand did the clicking. If someone would introduce one of those again with an Ergo keyboard, I'd pay $500 easily.

  48. Illuminated Keyboard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Illuminated Keyboard Check out www.eluminx.com

  49. well... by FaultMachine · · Score: 1

    Come on, everyone knows that guitars get the chicks :D