Slashdot Mirror


JBoss Group Developers Walk Out

An anonymous reader writes "According to The Inquirer, 'seven consultants for The JBoss Group publicly announced the immediate termination of their contracts and the foundation of their new company, Core Developers Network.'"

313 comments

  1. So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Who are the JBosses now?

    1. Re:So... by muckdog · · Score: 2, Funny

      Tony Danza of course!!!

    2. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You sir are, well funny. Thats it.

    3. Re:So... by Joe+U · · Score: 1

      No no no...it's:

      Who is the boss of you?

      ME! I am the boss of you!

    4. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Meet the new JBoss... Same as the old JBoss.

    5. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      JBoss is the boss. These guys just want to make a buck doing the consulting stuff without sharing the profits with the brand builder. Typical capitalists, show you free in one hand, sell you high priced consulting gigs with the other.

    6. Re:So... by r4lv3k · · Score: 1

      Hey who let RMS in here? We don't all get our daily rice and peanut butter rations on our hippie commune dirt farms you know!

  2. hrm by thesadjester · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Is everyone everywhere quitting now?

    Will techies be able to get jobs now? Cool.

    --
    -gabe
  3. What is Core Developers Network? by Gortbusters.org · · Score: 3, Informative

    From their site...

    We are pleased to announce the founding of Core Developers Networkâ, a new services company supporting enterprise open source Java software. Core Developers Network is a partnership of peers with the guiding principles of integrity, openness, and fairness. Its charter is to provide a commercial infrastructure to enable open source contributors to deliver their professional expertise to the marketplace, independent of their contributions to open source projects.

    Many of our partners are core developers with cvs commit privileges on the JBoss project, and this enables us to offer a wide range of services geared towards the JBoss server, including professional documentation, training and expert support.

    The focus of Core Developers Network, however, is wider than just JBossâ, and we have partners with cvs commit privileges on other projects including Jetty, Apache Jakarta, and XDoclet. Direct support is available today for these projects, as well as 3rd party support for several other Core Technologies.

    We are committed to having the same level of involvement in our current projects that we have had in the past. This means that we will continue to work on the JBoss project itself. In addition, we will continue to support the JBoss project via the jboss-development and jboss-users mailing lists maintained by SourceForge.net, as well as any other open public forum. Unfortunately, the forums on jboss.org are a commercial venue for the JBoss Group LLC, and therefore we will not be participating in them.

    A few of our partners have offered support through the JBoss Group LLC in the past, but for various reasons have concluded that their professional aspirations would be better served outside of the JBoss Group LLC. In order to ensure that customers previously supported by our partners continue to receive the same level of high quality support, Core Developers Network is offering these customers a limited amount of free support during this transition period.

    We want to emphasize that our partners will continue to provide the same responsive, high-quality technical support as we have always done. The founding of Core Developers Network simply signals the natural emergence of competition in the marketplace. We hope that broadening the range of service options for open source projects will raise the level of support available and lead to even greater adoption of these Core Technologies.

    Please look for us at JavaOneâ booth 1705!

    Core Developers Network

    --
    --------
    Free your mind.
  4. These guys like Java... by Gortbusters.org · · Score: 4, Funny

    6:30 am -- I scrape myself off of Dain's couch and grab the laptop. Dain is perched over a cup of coffee, wearing his "code poet" shirt. My luggage and tripod are by the front door. On our way out to the car I ask myself "are we really going to go through with this?"

    --
    --------
    Free your mind.
    1. Re:These guys like Java... by SphynxSR · · Score: 5, Funny

      The real question is what the tripod was for? And did it have anything to do with him on the couch.

      --

      I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every minute of it.
    2. Re:These guys like Java... by janda · · Score: 2, Informative

      "tripod", also known as "wheelie", also known as "that thing with the little wheels you strap you luggage to".

      --
      Karma: Food Fight (Mostly affected by Date Plate).
    3. Re:These guys like Java... by SphynxSR · · Score: 1

      Great now what am I going to do today. I just learning something new.

      --

      I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every minute of it.
  5. ahem they did not walk out by linuxislandsucks · · Score: 4, Informative

    As of today's date they are still coding on the JBoss porject..

    There servered their consulting contracts JBoss group only..

    People really should master the skil of reading sometime soon..

    --
    Don't Tread on OpenSource
    1. Re:ahem they did not walk out by DWIM · · Score: 3, Funny
      As of today's date they are still coding on the JBoss porject.. There servered their consulting contracts JBoss group only.. People really should master the skil of reading sometime soon..

      Indeed. And their spelling, too, while they're at it.

    2. Re:ahem they did not walk out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Wouldn't that be "writin"

    3. Re:ahem they did not walk out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      An obvious troll.

    4. Re:ahem they did not walk out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People really should master the skil of reading sometime soon..

      And perhaps also the skill of spelling.

    5. Re:ahem they did not walk out by dmccarty · · Score: 5, Funny

      ...right after they realy should masster the skil of speling!

      --
      Have fun: Join D.N.A. (National Dyslexics Association)
    6. Re:ahem they did not walk out by joerg · · Score: 0, Troll

      I suck your linux dick wrote: > People really should master the skil of reading > sometime soon.. They Can read. No one doubts that they can read.

    7. Re:ahem they did not walk out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I love how linux fags all feel it is their god given responsibility to point out everyone elses' typos.

    8. Re:ahem they did not walk out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I love how linux fags all feel it is their god given responsibility to point out everyone elses' typos.

      Uh, that's "God-given"...
  6. is this even legal ? by ramzak2k · · Score: 2, Interesting

    wouldnt Marc Fleury got these developers under an NDA agreement by which they wouldnt be able to work on a similar project for a different company ?

    Sounds like a nice good legal brawl brewing up.
    Download jboss before it is too late !

    --

    Siggy Say, Siggy Do
    1. Re:is this even legal ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It's not really an NDA (non-disclosure agreement) that would have that kind of clause but is more of a non-competition agreement. You're point, however, is a very one! They could very well have such a clause in their consulting contracts. On the other hand, I like to think that they've done their homework and either avoided this sort of clause at the negotiation stage or have determined that they have solid legal footing on which to stand.

      In any case, good luck to them with their new business. Let's hope your dire predictions aren't played out. *runs off to download JBoss* ;)

    2. Re:is this even legal ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's an open source project, how can a GPL license be coverred by a NDA?

    3. Re:is this even legal ? by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      It's not really an NDA (non-disclosure agreement) that would have that kind of clause but is more of a non-competition agreement.

      According to the linked article, they're in California, which is famous for its rather anti-NCA attitude. I'd be surprised if anything could be done about this.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    4. Re:is this even legal ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      GPL only covers code. Design documents and so on could be NDA'd.

    5. Re:is this even legal ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      it's an open source project, how can a GPL license be coverred by a NDA?

      From the GPL FAQ:

      Does the GPL allow me to develop a modified version under a nondisclosure agreement?

      Yes. For instance, you can accept a contract develop changes and agree not to release your changes until the client says ok. This is permitted because in this case no GPL-covered code is being distributed under an NDA.

      You can also release your changes to the client under the GPL, but agree not to release them to anyone else until the client says ok. In this case, too, no GPL-covered code is being distributed under an NDA, or under any additional restrictions.

      The GPL would give the client the right to redistribute your version, but in this scenario the client will choose not to exercise that right.

      By the way, JBoss is licensed under the LGPL, but the same argument applies.

    6. Re:is this even legal ? by RabidChipmunk · · Score: 1

      Acording to their website, their US ops are based in Minnesota.

      http://www.coredevelopers.net/contact.jsp

      --
      This is not a political statement. This is not legal advice. It's a frick'n Slasdot post. However: I'm Running For
    7. Re:is this even legal ? by WaxParadigm · · Score: 1

      Actually, most courts in the nation are not friendly at all to non-compete agreements and they're likewise not so friendly to NDAs when those NDAs act as non-compete agreements (ones that say "you can't use knowledge you gained on the job to do something similar for someone else"). It isn't just CA (though they may be more-so). It's a basic idea that has plenty of president: restricting the free market and trying to ensure your dominance by NDAs and non-competes effectively stifles competition and is something that will not often be enforced.

  7. My Contracts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So are the contracts I had with them still valid? Are they now with the new company or retained by JBoss Group?

  8. Am I missing something? by Cruel+Angel · · Score: 1
    Like perhaps why this is a big deal? As far as I can tell, some techs have violated their contract, and formed their own business. Am I wrong?

    Why is this /. worthy? It's just a breach of contract, probably mixed with bad management, big egos, and stealing customers.

    --
    Two Rules For Success:
    1) Never tell people everything you know.
    1. Re:Am I missing something? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ofcourse it is news worthy atleast for those who are using this in their work ofcourse.

    2. Re:Am I missing something? by slasher999 · · Score: 1

      Agreed. I think the waitress at the local coffee shop quit last week. Should I have submitted a story? It's tech related since they used a PC based POS system. Seriously though, I suppose if one has an interest in the project (although I don't recall ever hearing of it before) this could be considered /. worthy.

    3. Re:Am I missing something? by Randolpho · · Score: 1
      Why is this /. worthy?
      Free advertising for an open source startup company? Isn't that something /. is well known for? :)
      --
      "Times have not become more violent. They have just become more televised."
      -Marilyn Manson
    4. Re:Am I missing something? by rfsayre · · Score: 1

      I dunno, did she give notice?

    5. Re:Am I missing something? by spacecowboy420 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Those who use Java for anything that requires an app server realize this is a signicant post. JBoss is one of the best open source app servers available. Basically, if you use Java, you understand the point. This isn't to say that Java is the best, or that everything else sux, but if you are interested in programming, Java should be on your radar - last I checked, programming and programming languages are a relevant "nerd" topic. If a significant Perl/C tool was affected this way, I doubt there would be any questions as to the validity or significance of this story.

      --
      ymmv
    6. Re:Am I missing something? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did she take all the coffee, sugar and cream with her when she left?

    7. Re:Am I missing something? by The_Spide · · Score: 1

      I think the real question is does she have a
      website and/or blog discussing why she quit.

      Rememeber a story is useless without a link :)

    8. Re:Am I missing something? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do we need links to stories... nobody reads the stories!

    9. Re:Am I missing something? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but that's because Perl and C are, like, used for work and stuff. Java's just a giant circlejerk for people who enjoy pretending to work.

    10. Re:Am I missing something? by spacecowboy420 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well, pretending to work got us a $150,000 PO last week from a MAJOR semiconductor manufacturer. So if "pretending to work" will get us a PO of that size in this economy, I'll stick to pretending.

      --
      ymmv
    11. Re:Am I missing something? by The+Bungi · · Score: 0, Flamebait
      I ask the same question on every inane M$ bashing fest that gets posted here - apparently when there's trouble in Open Source paradise the standard response is to say "please move along, nothnig to see. No big deal. And why did this get posted anyways??".

      Beautiful.

    12. Re:Am I missing something? by wolpert · · Score: 5, Interesting
      Yes, you are missing something. JBoss as a product is the best J2EE open-source server available, and a product that competes with WebLogic and WebSphere big time. (And quite well, I might add, with the clustering support working in most environments just fine.) The consulting group was the method for supporting the open-source product, so this may impact development, though I'm unsure as to how much impact it will have.


      This is like saying, oh, some Apple developers left to start BeOS. Hopefully with better results. Is that news? (Now, I know the folks say that they plan to continue work on JBoss, but we'll see how long that lasts, or if the end up forking JBoss too.)


      Its kinda like XFree86 being forked... only different. ;-)

      --
      Virtually, Edward Wolpert
    13. Re:Am I missing something? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Agreed. I think the waitress at the local coffee shop quit last week. Should I have submitted a story? It's tech related since they used a PC based POS system...

      ... and they even serve Java! (No, Patrick. That's point of sale, not what you think! Even though it probably does ran Linux...)

    14. Re:Am I missing something? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're totally missing something...

      Organizations adopting JBoss as their appserver typically care dearly about support. And now the JBoss Group LLC looks like they don't have shit for consultants to support it...this could represent a problem for JBoss's ongoing adoption in the enterprise.

      Yes, i know the Core Developers Network is going to provide support and consulting...in biz 1 bigger company is better then two very small companies trying to survive.

      Imagine if you will...that you're a CTO/CIO of a large company...and you're considering moving to JBoss. No CIO/CTO who cares about thier job is going to move to an app server with a support staff of 7 people...no matter how much they save over weblogic...

      So yes this is totally /. worthy...as it pertains to OpenSource's adoption in the enterprise...

    15. Re:Am I missing something? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And it would be java news. So, why did she quit anyway?

      These guys listened to Billy Idol and Nirvana. Jesus, that's fucked up.

    16. Re:Am I missing something? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like it's just some guys who want to steal some customers to me. Marc's too nice to have shackled them with non-competes up front. And people who think JBoss Group are nothing but bad managers are way off base.

    17. Re:Am I missing something? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Yes you are missing something very important. Many larger corporations have policies that makes it hard to accept open source software because of the lack of a support organization.

      With JBoss these companies could satisfy the PHB's by purchasing support contracts from JBoss group, thus allowing a superior open source product to take the place of BEA Weblogic, IBM Webshpere etc.

      The benefits are obvious (open source plus you are not being robbed by BEA/IBM and the likes)

      With the better part of the JBoss support organization gone, lack of commercial support is yet again an obstacle for deployment of a great open source product

      It doesn't have to be Linux to be /. worthy.

    18. Re:Am I missing something? by philhy · · Score: 0

      Saying it's the best J2EE open source server available is hardly the same thing as saying it's the best J2EE server (your implication). It does compete with BEA in terms of cost, but Weblogic is a helluva nicer and more polished product. In a lot of aspects, JBoss is a clunky developers tool.

      --
      --
  9. Meet the JBoss ... by eric2701 · · Score: 5, Funny

    same as the old boss.

    1. Re:Meet the JBoss ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Man, that is just too funny.

    2. Re:Meet the JBoss ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I realize that it somewhat resembles the lyrics to a song by The Who, but what's funny about it?

    3. Re:Meet the JBoss ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because that was one of the songs I grew up with - it was on Top 40 radio. I keep thinking of Roger Daltrey singing the "JBoss" line over Townsend's fuzz guitar and Moon's drumming.

    4. Re:Meet the JBoss ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Townsend's[sic] fuzz guitar
      Is that what the little boys call it?
  10. More marketing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can't seem to find anything on either site that clearly says what they do. Do they know what they do, or do they just know the buzzwords?

  11. Now we're doing, by Dot.Zeile · · Score: 3, Funny

    JPHB project....

    1. Re:Now we're doing, by axxackall · · Score: 1

      I know PHP and PhD. But what is PHB and why is it linked to Java?

      --

      Less is more !
    2. Re:Now we're doing, by Prof.Phreak · · Score: 1

      I think he means "Pointy Hair Boss" from Dilbert - shoulda been rated as funny, but many didn't catch the joke.

      --

      "If anything can go wrong, it will." - Murphy

    3. Re:Now we're doing, by beowulf_26 · · Score: 5, Funny

      SWEET! The D&D Player's Handbook is going to be available in Java?! I'm so excited, I don't even know what that means? Hopefully, they'll port it to XML and other buzz-worthy technologies soon. Haha, stick it to WotC

      God, I'm a dork. I (futily) hope someone else finds this amusing.

      --

      --I hate big sigs.
    4. Re:Now we're doing, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      VBoss (VB bosS)

    5. Re:Now we're doing, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, it seems at least one other person did, but they're probably as lame as you so that's OK.

    6. Re:Now we're doing, by WWWWolf · · Score: 1

      Old news - well, PCGen at least used to have PHB data and do the character generation in Java (making the difficult process far more difficult, at least in 4.x =), not sure if they do now since I heard they're going to charge for data files...

      And yes, looks like they are going for XML file formats! Woohoo.

      (Disengaging "almost-geekier-than-thou" mode =)

    7. Re:Now we're doing, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I "futily" hope you'll learn to spell better.

    8. Re:Now we're doing, by beowulf_26 · · Score: 1

      I was actually screwing around toying with the idea of writing the PHB in java, and have it be readable, not necessarily executable.

      Lol, sadly, I know all too well of PCGen and can't stand it. In fact, my friend and I started a project "currently in planning" that one day will be better than PCGen.

      http://xrl.sf.net is the project but it's not much to look at.

      After lurking on the pcgen-xml mailing list for a while, we decided to do our own thing because we didn't like the static direction pc-gen was moving towards, cause it'll almost always be locked into a d20 system.

      Then again, since I don't think there's a high enough demand for something like that, we'll never get it done. It's more fun to play RPGs than to write impossible software for a few people who play RPGs.

      --

      --I hate big sigs.
  12. whatever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you can tell they really think they're pretty important.

  13. motivations for new company? by bolthole · · Score: 4, Interesting

    In quickly scanning through the scant info they have on the new core developers site, it looks like they have a slightly adapted "internet bubble business plan":

    1. Dedicate self to just doing "Open Source" work
    2. ???
    3. Profit!

    Yeah, okay, they are associated with existing projects. But the site makes it sound like they are running a business, but they as yet have no proven business *product* unique to themselves.

    1. Re:motivations for new company? by markhb · · Score: 4, Informative
      They're consultants on JBoss and a range of other FOSS items; hence, they themselves (more specifically, their expertise) are the product. If the conventional Open Source business plan is summarized as:
      1. Write and distribute free software
      2. Sell support for the software
      3. Profit!!!

      then think of it as forking step 2.

      Remainder of my .sig: be the majority of voters.
      --
      Save Maine's economy: write stuff down. All comments are exclusively my own, not my employer.
    2. Re:motivations for new company? by more+fool+you · · Score: 4, Informative
      you didn't "scan" very well.

      Documentation - Subscriptions
      Training - From core developers
      Support - Including remote development

      Yeah, okay, they are associated with existing projects. But the site makes it sound like they are running a business, but they as yet have no proven business *product* unique to themselves.
      I'd say attending training delivered from the core developers is not something that is offered very often.
    3. Re:motivations for new company? by penguinblotter · · Score: 0, Offtopic


      So Ballmer is off-base when he says software is not reaching commoditized status?

      Ballmer Memo to Troops

      Ballmer also disputed suggestions that software and other aspects of information technology are reaching commodity status. "There is an interesting debate emerging in the industry today about the value of information technology," he wrote. "Some pundits are suggesting that IT no longer matters; that what was once a transforming technology has reached the end of the road in terms of innovation, that it ceases to be a source of business advantage once everyone has it, and that customers should just optimize for costs and outsource IT for efficiencies.

      Does television hardware/software rule now, or does television service and content rule?

      --
      Mind the gap
    4. Re:motivations for new company? by dtfinch · · Score: 1

      Between steps 1 and 2, there should be "Recruit programmers who will work for free"

      Almost everyone involved benefits from it somehow though. People who support open source software often use it in their day to day work, which earns them money. It's often easy to customize it or add new features. Working on it can be a valuable learning experience. They get to meet and work with other programmers. And it looks good on their resumes.

    5. Re:motivations for new company? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget step 4 - Get delisted and declare bankruptcy.

    6. Re:motivations for new company? by penguinblotter · · Score: 1


      How is this offtopic?

      The parent says:

      1. Write and distribute free software
      2. Sell support for the software
      3. Profit

      We're a services company writing and using open source software, and collecting revenue for the service. If the software is commoditized (OS & apps), the place to make money is on services. See IBM, who has more than 50% of revenues in Gloabl Services.

      The JBoss guys from the article want to make some money consulting (fork step 2). I merely thought Ballmer was not seeing the forest through the trees on services revenue.

      --
      Mind the gap
    7. Re:motivations for new company? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh no, the old
      1. XXX
      2. ???
      3. Profit!!!
      joke is scoring interesting. 'bout time to be leavin' /.

    8. Re:motivations for new company? by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 1
      Hey - for what its worth, good link. Thanks.


      The JBoss guys from the article want to make some money consulting (fork step 2). I merely thought Ballmer was not seeing the forest through the trees on services revenue.


      Ballmer strikes me as a smart guy. I suspect that he doesn't miss the issue. Rather, he is trying to induce his own reality distortment field. He is trying to affect reality through the shere force of will and spin.

      Note that he refers to Open Source software as "non-commercial." Oddly enough, there is considerable commercial activity around such software. Using such a term seems less about being descriptive and more about attaching emotional baggage to one's competitor.

      Sure. Ballmer sees the trees. He knows all about the trees. He'd just prefer if everyone else ignored them and remain on the revenue path he and his company has planned.
    9. Re:motivations for new company? by miu · · Score: 1
      Yeah, okay, they are associated with existing projects. But the site makes it sound like they are running a business, but they as yet have no proven business *product* unique to themselves.

      The weblog makes the entire thing sound like a bunch of kiddies stating "hee hee we screwed our last employer with a mass walkout". Hardly seems like a good reputation with which to start a consulting company.

      --

      [Set Cain on fire and steal his lute.]
    10. Re:motivations for new company? by rjamestaylor · · Score: 1
      try:

      Those who would surrender essential liberty for a little temporary security may deserve neither, but usually vote

      --
      -- @rjamestaylor on Ello
    11. Re:motivations for new company? by arkanes · · Score: 1

      What, every company has to offer something unique? And proven? I guess we don't need any more new buisnesses then...

    12. Re:motivations for new company? by prisoner-of-enigma · · Score: 1

      The only problem with this plan is that many, many companies out there are either trying this model or have already tried it unsuccessfully. There are some that are making money with this model, but they aren't making too much and many are losing their shirts. There's just too much competition for what is essentially a commodity: technical development knowledge.

      In a day when one job opening for a mid-level developer making $30K a year will draw 500 resumes, some from former development Director's or VP's, I see them have a very hard time trying to position themselves with valuable, unique knowledge. Of course, I that could just be the cynic in me...I wish them luck. Nobody likes being treated like dirt.

      --
      In the end they will lay their freedom at our feet and say to us, Make us your slaves, but feed us. - Fyodor Dostoyevsky
  14. some faces to those names by ramzak2k · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Here are the faces behind those names in the article.

    --

    Siggy Say, Siggy Do
    1. Re:some faces to those names by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nerd-o-rama

    2. Re:some faces to those names by miniver · · Score: 2, Informative

      Check again -- as of 6/5 2:00 AM EDT, it looks like the JBoss Group declared these guys to be non-persons. No pictures, no names, no mention whatsoever.

      --
      We call it art because we have names for the things we understand.
    3. Re:some faces to those names by GrassyKnowl · · Score: 1

      Jan Bartel of Australia is still listed, although she is not a core associate of the rebel group.

  15. Who? what? when? why? how? by Laplace · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If someone could answer those five basic questions about this story, many of us would appreciate it. Thanks!

    Journalism? We don't need no stinkin' journalism!

    --
    The middle mind speaks!
    1. Re:Who? what? when? why? how? by JLyle · · Score: 4, Informative
      Who? what? when? why? how? If someone could answer those five basic questions about this story, many of us would appreciate it.
      I will try.

      JBoss is a very popular, open-source application server for the Java 2 Platform, Enterprise Edition (J2EE). And although the JBoss software is free, there is a commercial consulting firm, the JBoss Group LLC, which provides support, etc. for JBoss users. The Marc Fleury referred to in the Inquirer article is the founder and CEO of the JBoss Group.

      Dain Sundstrom (the "Dain" from the Inquirer article) is one of the core JBoss developers. He was also working as a consultant for the JBoss Group. He and several other consultants for the JBoss Group have jumped ship to start their own consulting firm, providing support for JBoss as well as other enterprise open source Java software.

      The story is a big deal to JBoss users for a number of reasons. For one, a lot of commercial companies are use the commercial support provided by the JBoss Group as justification for going with an open source software solution (as opposed to one of the much more expensive commercial application servers). This was a relatively large loss of personnel for the JBoss Group and it thus raises questions about the reliability or stability of commercial JBoss support. Another important question is how this defection will affect these core developers' standing in the JBoss development group. Obviously, it won't be pretty, but will be they be kicked out altogether?

      As for the background (the why), I don't have an answer for you. I don't know if grievances have been publically aired leading up to this, and I wouldn't have been paying attention if they had been. So I'm interested to see what details, if any, emerge over the next few days.
    2. Re:Who? what? when? why? how? by isomeme · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If Fleury is smart, he'll keep them on the core commit team and wish them all the best with their venture, and quietly hire replacements -- there's plenty of good J2EE talent around. That makes him look like a mensch, scores community brownie points, helps the public image of OSS, and (the real reason) does nothing to frighten paying corporate clients away from The JBoss Group. If he does *anything* that looks like flinching about the loss of a few developers, corporations will flee to the waiting arms of BEA or IBM, because it will prove to them that the whole thing was a house of cards to start with.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a skull.
    3. Re:Who? what? when? why? how? by gbjbaanb · · Score: 1

      Its absolutely true that companies often can only justify going with OSS because there's a service company to support the product (and anyone who thinks that OSS just works and doesn't need fixes obviously hasn't realised that these service companies make money).

      The JBoss group wll be OK, hire a few more developers, pay them less, get them trained, no difference from yesterday. Sure, the developers who left think that because they know the code they're indispensible, and it'll 'hit them hard', but the reality is often just the opposite.

      I think that the breakaway group will find it difficult to get going, especially as the JBoss group has an established track record, for business people that's number 1 on the checklist. techies come way down that list.

    4. Re:Who? what? when? why? how? by JanneM · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, having a second outfit offering services around the JBoss framework can be seen as a good thing by the customers. They can get quotes from more than one place, and there is the assurance that even if one of them folds, the other is still there, able to pick up the work.

      Indeed, if these guys are smart, they will do a deal with each other making such a thing formal. Both outfits can then show their customers that they have a ready backup plan for them in case something would happen to the firm.

      --
      Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
    5. Re:Who? what? when? why? how? by 4of12 · · Score: 1

      raises questions about the reliability or stability of commercial JBoss support.

      Thanks for the informative post.

      I still have one question that I haven't seen answered, yet, though.

      Exactly how much did Sun have to payM-DelM-DelM-DelM-Deldid they expect to make as independent consultants - the splintering JBoss group?

      --
      "Provided by the management for your protection."
    6. Re:Who? what? when? why? how? by JLyle · · Score: 1
      I still have one question that I haven't seen answered, yet, though.

      Exactly how much did Sun have to payM-DelM-DelM-DelM-Deldid they expect to make as independent consultants - the splintering JBoss group?
      Heh, +1 Funny. To fill in the blanks for anyone who's still reading this thread, 4of12 is referring to the longstanding feud between Sun Microsystems and the JBoss Group over whether JBoss can claim to be J2EE certified. It does seem clear, however, that JBoss is a problem that Sun would like to see go away. But for the full story, just google for "jboss j2ee certification".
    7. Re:Who? what? when? why? how? by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      More importantly, what's the race of the reporter writing the story? If it's not "caucasian", then omissions and errors of this sort should be forgiven in the name of newsroom diversity.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    8. Re:Who? what? when? why? how? by BC+Guy · · Score: 1
      Seems like it would take only a minimum of spin control to make this into a "Look how far and fast the market is growing - it just spawned another high-talent consulting firm".

      Regardless of how much of a "blow" to JBoss Group this might be, unless it sinks them (not likely) it's good for the industry in every aspect.

    9. Re:Who? what? when? why? how? by danpbrowning · · Score: 1
      That makes him look like a mensch
      Hmmm... that's the first time I've heard 'mensch' from an English speaker (vs. German) -- I guess I need to hang out with high society a little more often. Or maybe it's just the high tech subculture that has been favoring German lately? Uber, anyone?
      --
      Daniel
    10. Re:Who? what? when? why? how? by isomeme · · Score: 1

      I was using it in its Yiddish sense, actually, although it's of course borrowed from German.

      http://www.bartleby.com/61/97/M0219700.html

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a skull.
    11. Re:Who? what? when? why? how? by Fnkmaster · · Score: 1

      Aaron Brown used the word "mensch" on CNN last night (to describe Sammy Sosa, I believe), which indicates that it's seeping into the common English language. In English, it originated as a loan word from Yiddish. It's commonly used in New York City, among Jews and non-Jews alike, and can be heard in areas where a lot of New Yorkers live or where a lot of Jews live, like South Florida. If you live in other areas, like the West Coast, or the Midwest, you may never have heard it before. Its use in English (and I think in Yiddish) generally implies that somebody is a nice, kind-hearted, likeable person, not just a "person" or "man" which is the literal meaning in German, I believe.

    12. Re:Who? what? when? why? how? by liloldme · · Score: 1

      a slight correction, JBoss does not claim to be certified (which requires a payment to Sun) only that they are compatible to the J2EE API that Sun publishes.

    13. Re:Who? what? when? why? how? by fm6 · · Score: 1

      A lot of which is covered in these articles, none of which Simonker bothered to link. Slashdot editors are getting lazier and lazier.

  16. But can the site survive a slashdotting... by Erisian+Pope · · Score: 2, Funny

    That hurts. Not only did they have to throw together a site in secret, as soon as it hits the net it has to face slashdot. I will be truly impressed if it survives.

    Those servers that are about to die, I salute you.

    1. Re:But can the site survive a slashdotting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      considering they helped build JBoss, i'd be surprised if it didn't survive a good old fashion /.ing

  17. Who? by signe · · Score: 4, Interesting

    So why is it that I only recognize one or two of the names of these "core developers"? And the ones that I do recognize, only barely. They don't seem to be the people that I know are involved with the core development and operations of JBoss and the JBoss Group.

    In fact, it sounds like they're just being antagonistic, and using /. to get some publicity. I don't understand why it's not possible for both CDN and JBoss Group to thrive and serve the community. But they seem to think that they can only exist by killing the other "fork", if that's even what it is. Competition is good for the industry, even open source. But CDN looks like they're just trying to cast JBoss Group in a bad light (disparaging their stats).

    Oh, and as I remember it, it wasn't just their call to terminate their contracts with JBoss Group for providing support. JBoss Group was non-renewing the contracts anyways, because they had decided that it was a better idea for them to be the support company themselves. They didn't terminate the contracts immediately when they started their own support offerings, but they did make the decision to not have any new consultants, and to start thinning out the ones they did have.

    -Todd

    --
    "The details of my life are quite inconsequential..."
    1. Re:Who? by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I don't understand why it's not possible for both CDN and JBoss Group to thrive and serve the community.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    2. Re:Who? by toddhunter · · Score: 3, Informative

      Well I certainly do recognise the names and they are guys who do major work for jboss and jbossweb (jetty). Listed here And they say they will continue to do so. Go to the jboss forums and search for a few of them to see how much they know about jboss.
      Seems they just want to earn some money doing their own support, probably because they don't like the Jboss group model, or were not getting ahead with them.
      I doubt this is a big deal. Probably just here on slashdot because
      a) People like to wind up Marc Fluery
      b) See above

    3. Re:Who? by loconet · · Score: 1

      They seem to be quiet involved in the related projects to me.

      --
      [alk]
    4. Re:Who? by kingkola · · Score: 3, Informative

      From their website:
      " Dain Sundstrom
      Dain is the author of CMP/JBoss, an implementation of the CMP 2.0 specification for JBoss 3, and is the leading the JBoss 4 persistence team. Dain has 7 years of experience in enterprise computing working with companies such as United Health Care, McKesson, Corporate Express, MCI and McDonalds.
      David Jencks
      David is the author of the distributed transaction manager and the JCA subsystem for JBoss, as well the author of the JMX tags for XDoclet. David has written JCA adapters for the Firebird database and for clients such as FMG, and has worked with webMethods on the integration of JBoss into the webMethods Integration Platform.
      Greg Wilkins
      Greg developed the Jetty http server and servlet container, which is the default web container in the JBoss server. Greg has 18 years of experience in enterprise computing working with companies such as Cisco, Telstra and the London Clearing House and he sits on the experts panel for the java servlets specifcation.
      James Strachan
      James is a co-founder of the Jelly, dom4j, jaxen and saxpath projects. He is also a member of the Apache Jakarta Project Management Committee, and sits on several Java Specification committees. James has over 15 years of enterprise computing experience working with companies such as SpiritSoft, PaceMetrics, Rabobank, CSFB, NEON, Nomura Research Institute and JP Morgan.
      Jeremy Boynes
      Jeremy is a member of the JBoss 4 Persistence Team, and maintainer of CMP/JBoss. Jeremy has over 20 years of enterprise computing experience working with companies ranging from the Fortune 100 to Silicon Valley startups including BT, Sequent Computer Systems, Cisco and Bravanta.
      Jules Gosnell
      Jules spearheaded the integration of Jetty into JBoss in November of 2000 and has since been deeply involved in both projects. Jules has 12 years of experience in enterprise computing ranging from Toshiba's Research and Developement Center in Tokyo to the London Financial sector, including clients such as Nomura, Credit Suisse, UBS Warburg, and major eCommerce players such as LastMinute.com.
      Remigio Chirino
      Remigio is the principle developer of JMS/JBoss, and developed the first iteration of the Aspect based infrastructure for JBoss 4.0. Remigio has expertise in designing, building and deploying enterprise messaging systems."


      They look pretty significant in my view, but maybe its just me. CMP, Dist. XA , JMS, Jetty all seem kinda important, especially in the corporate environment.

    5. Re:Who? by beowulf_26 · · Score: 1

      Is that quite or quietly?

      --

      --I hate big sigs.
    6. Re:Who? by verloren · · Score: 1

      I know one of the people involved indirectly, and whatever else they're doing they're not "being antagonistic, and using /. to get some publicity". They knew it was going to be a /. story (inevitably), but just waited for it to appear. No publicity sought.

      Cheers, Paul

    7. Re:Who? by liloldme · · Score: 1
      they may look significant, and they certainly would want themselves to appear significant but anyone actively following the JBoss development knows that it is not true

      especially the last part about hiram chirino is laughable

  18. The moral of the story is... by mkozlows · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    ... never make open-source development an important part of your business, because if you do, your developers can walk out and sell the code you paid them to develop.

    (Unless you sign them to non-competes, which I can't believe the JBoss Group didn't do.)

    1. Re:The moral of the story is... by HornyBastard77 · · Score: 1
      Unless you sign them to non-competes, which I can't believe the JBoss Group didn't do.

      How can a company have no-competes for open source development (or consulting)? That would go against the open source license, wouldn't it?

    2. Re:The moral of the story is... by Dr_Marvin_Monroe · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Unless of course, you take good care of them and allow each of them to have a little room to grow and a little bit of sun.....

      You see, most people would put up with a job that's demanding and requires long hours IF it was rewarding in some way (money helps, but it's not the whole picture)....the sheer venom that I read in that article means they were mad....they wanted to hurt JBoss group as much as they felt they were wronged....

      I suspect that the pressure has been building for some time, this isn't just a "..hey, lets form our own business!" daydream.

    3. Re:The moral of the story is... by larry+bagina · · Score: 1
      a software license (commercial EULA, MIT, BSD, GPL, etc) covers the software

      A non-compete agreement covers the employees.

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    4. Re:The moral of the story is... by HornyBastard77 · · Score: 1

      Agreed. But if a company releases code (or works on code that is) under an open source license (say GPL) that allows anyone to use, modify, distribute, etc. the software, can they bar their own ex-employees from doing that by invoking a non compete agreement? Would that not be against the license?

    5. Re:The moral of the story is... by jmt9581 · · Score: 1

      I think that the original statement meant that the JBoss Consulting Group (which formerly employed the people who walked out) had a non-compete agreement with their employees. IANAL, but I think that the signing a non-compete agreement would relinquish your right to compete against the JBoss Group in Consulting. You're still free to do whatever else you want with the source code, as long as you don't violate your non-compete agreement with the JBoss Group.

      --

      My blog

    6. Re:The moral of the story is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      the employees could still use, modify, and distribute the software, they just couldn't be paid to consult about it (or whatever it is they do).

  19. Who cares by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It is an anonymous submission about someone setting up in business. Sounds like self promotion and a moderator should just delete it.

    1. Re:Who cares by ktorn · · Score: 1

      I submitted the JBoss story (not anonymous) 4 hours ago and it got promptly rejected (probably some automated system, 'cause it was too fast). Weird that they'd publish this now.

      Regarding who cares, how about all the J2EE application developers out there?

    2. Re:Who cares by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On the one hand, Slashdot rejects critical media related stories like FCC receiving 2.8 million $ from the companies that they should regulate - how can there be an objective control?

      On the other hand, they write about the FCC making it easier for media industry to buy smaller competitors - but that's only half of the whole story and missing quite some important information.

      Maybe they need someone to point out links between news snippets and to show them the whole picture?

  20. Arrrrr Captain - the techies are revolting !! by plierhead · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I guess these guys are about to find out whether the collective sum of their egos adds up to more than the use of the name "JBoss".

    My guess is it doesn't - I don't know much about what JBoss group, but my guess is they do pretty much the same old EJB consulting for customers that everyone else does. Building yet another Customer object for yet another client. Not the sort of thing that requires the world's greatest experts in transaction management, object persistence, etc. etc.

    As long as the JBoss group can quickly fill in for these guys with warm bodies who know how to write "Hello world" (any Java programmers on the bench and eager for work right now ? Yep, thought so) then their customer contracts will just keep trucking along. Then these guys and their break-away will be faced with the dilemna that JBoss Group has solved - making money.

    --

    [x] auto-moderate all posts by this user as insightful

    1. Re:Arrrrr Captain - the techies are revolting !! by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 2, Insightful

      My guess is it doesn't - I don't know much about what JBoss group, but my guess is they do pretty much the same old EJB consulting for customers that everyone else does. Building yet another Customer object for yet another client. Not the sort of thing that requires the world's greatest experts in transaction management, object persistence, etc. etc.

      Well, no. They have their own high-performance OSS EJB container that is known for implementing standards quickly. There's something to be said for this.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    2. Re:Arrrrr Captain - the techies are revolting !! by GrassyKnowl · · Score: 1

      JBoss is also kind of a religion. It is tough to displace a religion.

      As I see it, the renegade group will not harm JBoss, but rather make it even better. The source code is not being forked. From the end-user point of view, all that is happening is that there is a new entitiy adding to the JBoss development.

  21. Tripod???? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sounds like there were making a porn a site

  22. i think it was the name by ramzak2k · · Score: 1

    anything with a boss in the name has a you know, pointy haired, pricky feeling to it. They had to leave.

    --

    Siggy Say, Siggy Do
    1. Re:i think it was the name by cant_get_a_good_nick · · Score: 1

      The new groups is going to be called PointyHairedJBoss? Is Scott Adams gonna sue?

  23. Re:jemployee... by Randolpho · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Don't you mean jApathetic?

    --
    "Times have not become more violent. They have just become more televised."
    -Marilyn Manson
  24. sentance? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what the fuck is a sentance ?

    are you sure you don't mean "sentEnce?" I don't understand the schmucks who post on slashdot to criticize others' writings when they can't construct a proper sentence with decent grammar or spell themselves!

    1. Re:sentance? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Haha, I trolled you!

    2. Re:sentance? by Opie812 · · Score: 1

      t h e m s e l v e s woo-hoo. I did it.

      --
      I'm not a nerd. Nerds are smart.
  25. Integrity? Openness? Who are they trying to kid? by Dossy · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Integrity

    Without personal integrity, relationships are worthless. Without relationships, everything else is equally worthless. We hold both sides of our business relationships to equally high standards of integrity.

    Openness

    Once you have integrity, openness follows. We're dedicated to the free exchange of information. We keep our business dealings open with one another and with the public. Of course, there are legal and practical limits to openness in business, but we favor honesty to secrecy.

    This seven person exodus doesn't exactly sound like the most open or fair thing to do to The JBoss Group. But, maybe I'm wrong ...

    -- Dossy
  26. JBoss? by praetorian_x · · Score: 5, Funny

    _looks up from work on tomcat_

    _thinks to self: People still care about EJBs? Who knew?_

    _goes back to work on tomcat_

    (I exaggerate, for comic effect, of course)

    Cheers,
    prat

    1. Re:JBoss? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You work on Tomcat? Work harder. Tomcat fucking blows, and I mean that in the nicest possible way. Tomcat 2.x sucked. Tomcat 3.x sucked. Tomcat 4.x sucks. And I'm sure Tomcat 5.x will suck too.

    2. Re:JBoss? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the alternative is...??

    3. Re:JBoss? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jetty seems a happy alternative...

    4. Re:JBoss? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tell me about it. I use the international handicap symbol as my icon for Tomcat, it's so goddamn slow.

  27. All for it... one question though by joelparker · · Score: 5, Insightful

    As a former enterprise software Sun employee,
    I wish the Core guys well. They do good work.

    One question though: what about the business?

    An lot goes into hiring enterprise consulting,
    beyond good coding skills-- think of accounting,
    insurance, scheduling, dedicated team reps, etc.

    More importantly, my number one consideration
    was trustworthiness-- including dependability--
    so a mass walkout seems like a difficult launch.

    Cheers, Joel

  28. Re:Agreed -- Who Cares by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who Cares --- you know how many shitty contracts I've walked out of and.. as always..who cares...

  29. Well, here I am at Equifax... by PHAEDRU5 · · Score: 0, Troll

    I've been promoting JBoss against WebSphere and WebLogic, and right now I'm looking like a moron.

    Dear Marc, message to you: you're SOL, here.

    Is this a French thing? You know, fucking your buddies.

    --
    668: Neighbour of the Beast
    1. Re:Well, here I am at Equifax... by dieman · · Score: 1

      Actually, from what I've felt from the JBoss site and third person accounts, I wouldn't have delt with the JBoss people if it depended on my business either.

      This fork-of-developers is great, I hope that java technologies gain from it and prove themselves based on merit, not ego.

      --
      -- dieman - Scott Dier
    2. Re:Well, here I am at Equifax... by ClubPetey · · Score: 1

      You should be promoting Resin. http://www.caucho.com

      --
      Si hoc legere scis nimium eruditionis habes
    3. Re:Well, here I am at Equifax... by cwinters · · Score: 1

      Why's that? This isn't a code fork. Unless marcf is a dingdong (and he ain't), almost certainly the same people will continue working on JBoss, the open source project. It just affects JBoss Group, the company founded to do consulting, training and other support for JBoss.

      I doubt this will have too much effect on the code because making JBoss better benefits both the JBoss Group and the Core Developers Network. In fact, from a PHB perspective this might be a better world since you've got two notable consultanting groups to choose from for JBoss support/training. In a year or two it could even lead to a virtuous circle of increasing demand for JBoss support/training which either attracts more developers to both or spawns an entirely new company.

      Who said open source can't work?

      --

      Chris
      M-x auto-bs-mode

    4. Re:Well, here I am at Equifax... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought it was a greek thing...

    5. Re:Well, here I am at Equifax... by Ozric · · Score: 1

      Yea.... well I was dealing with Weblogic problems all day today. Strange .... I knew somthing strange odd going on in Java land.

  30. techy jobs by SHEENmaster · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    If you have no skill but don't mind pretending that you do visit the public high school of Jefferson County, TN.

    The techs there spent a week with no results trying to get an OS X box on the school lan (DHCP, http proxies on 10.0.0.1 and 10.0.0.2; they configured neither.)

    Other duties would include leaving the proxy servers running warez copies of NT 4 on service pack 3. Wasting tax payer money on piece of shit security packages is optional.

    --
    You can't judge a book by the way it wears its hair.
    1. Re:techy jobs by fussman · · Score: 1
      [joke]How did you find out what I do for a living?
      [/joke]

      It's not hard to configure such things on MacOS X box. I configured both things and more in about 30 minutes time. Now having these things work on a mac three days later is another horrifying story.

      --
      Support Israeli punk bands. Man Alive.
  31. What the... ? by Gord.ca · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The article was big on dramatic narration at the expense of explaining what's really going on...

    Why did these guys do it? Did they decide they'd have more fun at their own company? You'd think, with a move like this, they'd have serious grievences with JBoss Group. Either that or they're being backstabing bastards. I'll assume the first...

    --
    The opinons expressed are those of the voices in the author's head and are not necessarily those of the author.
    1. Re:What the... ? by mantis78 · · Score: 1

      It sounded as if they did it for the excitement (or drama) of it ;P

    2. Re:What the... ? by PizzaFace · · Score: 4, Informative

      The author of the Inquirer article wrote an earlier article three weeks ago about what a jerk Marc Fleury, the head of JBoss, was. There was also an article a few days ago in Open Enterprise trends, about new profit-sharing and stock-purchase plans at JBoss, which might have been either a cause or an effect of dissension there.

    3. Re:What the... ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll assume the latter.

  32. no big deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    from the list of the members, only two are actively working on core parts of JBoss. The others work on integration with Jetty. That's not a big deal, since Jboss also uses Tomcat and jboss/tomcat integration is supported actively by the developers using JMX. The consultants have experience, but doesn't seem like it cripples JBoss in any way. If anything, the mix of developers provides an even mix of skills, rather than an outright gutting of the core JBoss developers.

  33. Nice logo. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Lets hope www.apple.com doesn't mind.

  34. This just in... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
    The focus of Core Developers Network, however, is wider than just JBossâ...

    We are moving our focus from Java to PHP, and whill henceforth be known as PHBoss.

  35. No, the real question.... by Nick+Driver · · Score: 4, Funny

    The real question is what the tripod was for? And did it have anything to do with him on the couch

    I think the real question is: Is Dain's last name "Bramage"?

    Inquisitive minds just gotta ask.... ;-)

    Sorry I couldn't resist.

    1. Re:No, the real question.... by Jade+E.+2 · · Score: 1
      Inquisitive minds just gotta ask.... ;-)

      Come on, when replying to a story posted by 'The Inquirer', at least quote 'Inquiring minds want to know...' correctly.

      (Yes, I know they're not that Inquirer, they even use the other spelling, but still...)

    2. Re:No, the real question.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, I think it's Bread.

  36. California by Groo+Wanderer · · Score: 1

    From what I understand, they are only in California for Java One next week, most of them are not based in California.

    -Charlie

  37. No real surprises here by toddhunter · · Score: 4, Insightful

    All they are doing is starting their own company in order to make money supporting JBoss and a few other techs. Just like anyone else could. The only difference is that these guys actually have a lot of credibility around jboss, and hence someone might actually hire them.
    No real drama here.

    1. Re:No real surprises here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Just like anyone else could.

      But "anyone else" could spin off a company without spewing a bunch of hostile, unprofessional tripe to the world like a spoilt child.

      As it happens, I'm going to have a difficult time convincing my department to move from the (very expensive, already paid for) Weblogic server to JBoss. I had some momentum going in that endeavor, but I think the JBoss folks just sucked all the wind out of my sails with this. I perceive it an immature, unprofessional tantrum, and I'm very open-minded about these things. To PHB's, and more to the point, to my non-PHB bosses, this is going to look like a good reason to stick with Weblogic.

      Had they kept their mouth shut, and done this with a professional sounding press release instead of that hostile blog entry, I could have spun it as a good thing. I can't do that now, and I'm not even sure I would want to. Up until now, I've judged JBoss solely on the quality of its design and construction. Now I see a whole new risk factor -- corporate political battles being dragged out into public view. No thanks.

      I'm not interested in debating the merits or applications of the J2EE platform on /.

      The discussion so far indicates a wide range of ignorance and misunderstanding about what J2EE is, when and where the appserver is needed, etc.

      But this incident is probably going to stop one large enterprise from migrating away from BEA to JBoss. I wouldn't count on any banks or brokerage firms doing it now either.

  38. Hey! Ben! by PHAEDRU5 · · Score: 1

    How's the view from that skyscraper at 285 and 400?

    Glad you got yours before it all went oear-shaped.

    --
    668: Neighbour of the Beast
  39. Java Rebels! by rinkjustice · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There's more name dropping in that timeline article than I've ever read in my life... Winamp, Code Poet t-shirt, Nirvana, Nintendo Advance etc... what are they trying to say? That they're cool? Are these brand names supposed to make me associate them with somebody special? Are they Java-coding rebels?

    Ok, I'm half kidding, but the article is hardly newsworthy or even understandable to me.

    1. Re:Java Rebels! by nonderivative · · Score: 1

      uhhh? go to google news, type "JBoss" and tell me that again.

    2. Re:Java Rebels! by ishmaelflood · · Score: 1

      "Ok, I'm half kidding, but the article is hardly newsworthy or even understandable to me"

      Oh. Good. I thought it was just me.

    3. Re:Java Rebels! by mbonar · · Score: 1

      Didn't Sun just agree to let JBoss have the compatibility toolkit which would allow them to certify J2EE complaince? Does that spell sell-out?

      --
      ... There's no such thing as time; we invented it.
  40. Yes with ease by Groo+Wanderer · · Score: 1

    I just got a call from one of them telling me to look on slashdot. I asked about this very thing, and he told me the numbers (and asked me not to repeat them). They were scary low. I'll see if I can get them to post the statistics, but since the site is hosted on JBoss, it put the power of that server in a whole new light for me. If you guys are reading this, and I know you are, post the numbers, it would be interesting. At worst, it is easy Karma whoring :)

    -Charlie

    P.S. The 'Now you understand the power of the .NET architecture' got strained laughs.

    1. Re:Yes with ease by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so you are saying that this article was one of the paid advertising ones?

    2. Re:Yes with ease by leomekenkamp · · Score: 1

      Excuse me, but I haven't got the slightest notion what you mean by ... this very thing...; there is no quote or referral to another posted item. Could you please enlighten me in what you are referring to?

      --
      Wenn ist das Nunstueck git und Slotermeyer? Ja! Beiherhund das Oder die Flipperwaldt gersput.
  41. Hey, Hank! Hey, Rob! by PHAEDRU5 · · Score: 1

    So, there you are at Agris, trying desperatlry to drag them from 1985 to 2003, and the mirage starts to dissipate (you know, "It's all gotta work with JBoss").

    What now?

    --
    668: Neighbour of the Beast
  42. I've got a more basic question by Trepidity · · Score: 1

    What the hell is JBoss?

    Their site's slashdotted, so I can't find out there, and the story (and comments) don't really give any hints, beyond the fact that it apparently has something to do with Java.

    1. Re:I've got a more basic question by Manic+Ken · · Score: 1

      And if I remember correctly, they were running on w2000....Though they started integrating nukes, their PhpNuke-like java portlet kind of thing, including AOP(patented by Xerox)...what a mess... ;)

    2. Re:I've got a more basic question by ParamonKreel · · Score: 4, Informative

      JBoss is an open sourced Enterprise Java Server, simialar to BEA Weblogic or IBM's WebSphere. JBoss isn't truly certified as J2EE compliant yet because as a free software package they're not forking over the dough to Sun for the compliance testing.

    3. Re:I've got a more basic question by dszd0g · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm not sure why the first post got a +4 informative as it was just a cut and paste of the CDN Web page.

      JBoss (project page project page is a Java Application Server for Enterprise Java Beans (EJB's). They are working on a free implementation of J2EE. It includes JBossServer which is the application server, JBossCX for JCA, JBossCMP for persistence, JBossMQ for JMS, JBossMail (obvious), JBossSX for JAAS, JBossTX for JTA/JTS, and more that you can see on the project page.

      There is always the Google cache too.

      --
      This message is encrypted with Quad ROT-13 to protect the author's copyright under the DMCA.
    4. Re:I've got a more basic question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      JBoss is a J2EE application server.
      Blah...

    5. Re:I've got a more basic question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, so it's just Java. Who cares...

    6. Re:I've got a more basic question by joerg · · Score: 1

      dog wrote: > I'm not sure why the first post got a +4 > informative as it was just a cut and paste of the > CDN Web page. So you are jealous, because you didnt get these 4 points?

    7. Re:I've got a more basic question by Ryosen · · Score: 1

      Yes, it's just Java.

      In the same way that Quake is just C.

      Don't be a tool.

      --

      Ryosen
      One man's "Troll, +1" is another man's "Insightful, +1".
    8. Re:I've got a more basic question by aminorex · · Score: 1

      I know that some PHB might very well get hung up
      on the lack of cert, so that there is a good case
      for acquiring cert, but I think it's worthwhile to
      point out that the *major* reason for getting a
      product certified is to insure portability. But in
      the case of an open-source application server,
      there is another, arguably more important
      portability layer: The *imported* API, taken
      from the implementation platform, rather
      than the *exported* API delivered to the
      applications.

      With JBoss, cert or no cert, you are guaranteed
      application portability because it is pure Java,
      and your application server will move with you.

      In practical terms, J2EE cert means very little
      to a JBoss developer, because (1) it is real
      compatibility that matters, not certification,
      and (2) there is a huge comfy safety net inherent
      in the use of an open-source delivery platform.

      --
      -I like my women like I like my tea: green-
  43. and this matters because? by f00zbll · · Score: 3, Interesting
    the guys leaving hi-jacked the source code. Oh wait, JBoss is open source, therefore absolutely no measurable damage to the quality or stability of the product. If anything, it means they have to work harder to prove themselves, which means they have to continue to actively contribute to JBoss, because forking JBoss and giving it a new name makes it harder for them. But in order to build a solid reputation, they have to shine within the JBoss developer community and work well with the others. The message on their home page was politically safe and doesn't criticize Jboss or the developers.

    nothing to see here. move on.

  44. Painful but Ultimately Better for All by SilentMajority · · Score: 1

    This is probably going to be tough for the JBoss group but ultimately, I think competition will force them to improve and become better--if they pull through this hurdle.

    Competition helps keep companies (and people too) from slacking or falling short of doing their best.

  45. Visual Studio Banner by ASAPnetworks · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I know this is off topic but you know that visual studio .NET banner with the elite if else statement? Is it just me, or should the else statement read "doItAlone" and not "goItAlone"? Jebus, M$ Can't even get their ad-code right, nevermind OS!@#

    --
    in the bonds, ppka
  46. I love JBoss! by ilander · · Score: 2, Funny

    He was the coolest villain on Jayce and the Wheeled Warriors!

  47. Fluery is a stupid french prick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am not suprised. I was involved in ejboss (before it was jboss). Fluery has complete disdain for the developers associated with jboss. He treats them like slave labor, throwing them chewed bones while he keeps the meat for his own greedy french ass. He has this sickening sense of superiority. I am just suprised it took this long.

    Mark, you reap what you sow asshole.

  48. The New Company Should've Been JBoss Gnomes! by AlabamaMike · · Score: 1

    They hide their intentions, grab your code, and then carry it to their new hideway!
    Beautiful business plan!
    bwahahahaha
    -A.M.

    --
    Pimpin' all the Karma Hoes!
    1. Re:The New Company Should've Been JBoss Gnomes! by asr_man · · Score: 2, Funny

      Does that mean JBoss will sue them for $1B and send threatening letters to 1500 of their customers?

  49. the speculative answer by djupedal · · Score: 1

    But then he would have to be associated with BJoss, and yes, my dain is bramaged, thank you for noticing.

  50. Obviously they've been planning this for a while by Call+Me+Black+Cloud · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Not only because they have a pretty website but also because of this:

    Please look for us at JavaOneâ booth 1705!

    You don't just whip up a booth & promo material in a weekend (as someone who has worked booths I know it's a royal pain). This year I'm attending JavaOne as a developer...I'll definitely be stopping by to see what they've got. No good swag I'm sure...they're probably too poor yet...

  51. Why /. still sucks by Johann · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    • 2003-06-04 18:34:06 What's up with JBoss? (articles,news) (rejected)
    --
    "You're gonna need a bigger boat." - Chief Brody
    1. Re:Why /. still sucks by dbCooper0 · · Score: 1

      Get over it. I did.

      --
      db
      Cig:
      ôô
      /`
  52. Now I'm not a mac-o-phile... by Ayanami+Rei · · Score: 1

    but PLEASE... spare me the OSX fud.

    we hacked together a Sun-compatible automount on top of the unsupported amd + NIS, and it's been working fine for a month.

    Now that's some scary shit.

    (oth, we avoid the mac tools as much as possible, except when you have to touch netinfo; maybe that's why we were okay)

    --
    THIS THING CAN TURN ON A DIME, MACROSSZERO STYLE ALSO FUCK BETA, ~NYORON
  53. Re:Integrity? Openness? Who are they trying to kid by mantis78 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    That journal did not say anything about their reason for leaving but you are definitely right on the point about their audacity to list "openness" on their site after what they did no matter what the cause.

  54. What if it was M$? by Manic+Ken · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I have been thinking (dont mock me...), and I was thinking if the name of the company who distributed a free appserver a la J2EE, but was little diffrent, not complient, did things little different, had som proprioty API's (Yeah, like Xerox AOP) was (the name of the corp remember?) was M$?? Hell would break lose. You (incl M$ lovers)tell me where my thinking went wrong...

  55. Where is www.jboss.org by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... it's not responding now...

  56. Evil by AvantLegion · · Score: 2, Funny
    The consultants are so mad, they anonymously posted a story to Slashdot to get JBoss's web server slashdotted. How devious.

  57. news? by xbytor · · Score: 1

    Sounds like a bunch of water-cooler talk to me. This kind of thing happens all the time and no attempt to hype this event it will make any more that gossip.

  58. Re:FP? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who fucking cares?!

    Not sure you weren't marked as insightful. Judging by the lack of interest and positive moderation on the rest of the comments, I'd say you nailed it on the head. No one cares.

  59. Which one will be the slimmer J2EE?? by mnmn · · Score: 1


    WE've tried Tomcat, but it is not a complete J2EE 1.2 or higher. JBoss has big requirements too, for our measly Pentium 200 64MB ram with Linux. I am hoping for a COMPLETE test platform J2EE setup that is not designed for distribution or clustering, and can run happily on a small system (well, happily for a Java application, which is still too slow). These two split developer groups will likely aim for different niches, and I wonder which one will be Postgresql and which MySQL.

    --
    "Give orange me give eat orange me eat orange give me eat orange give me you." -Nim Chimpsky
    1. Re:Which one will be the slimmer J2EE?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can't even run "Hello, world." in Java on that kind of machine. Either switch languages, or buy a new computer.

    2. Re:Which one will be the slimmer J2EE?? by GunFodder · · Score: 2, Informative

      How about SunONE App Server 7 Platform Edition?

    3. Re:Which one will be the slimmer J2EE?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      of course its not complete j2ee 1.2 or higher.. tomcat is just a webcontainer.

    4. Re:Which one will be the slimmer J2EE?? by jester · · Score: 1

      You've tried Tomcat ?

      Damn right it isnt a full J2EE. It doesnt even try to be. It handles servlets and JSP and that is all it is ever intended to handle. A J2EE server handles SO MUCH more ... transactions, EJB container, JMS, Mail, etc, etc.

    5. Re:Which one will be the slimmer J2EE?? by SlowMovingTarget · · Score: 1

      JBoss allows you to configure the server piecemeal. So if you don't need a JMS implementation, don't configure it. If you don't need distributed transaction support don't configure it... etc. JBoss/Jetty with dead-basic support for web and EJB can be slimmed down fairly well. Granted, you probably will have to pay for the doc to figure out how to do it (~$15).

      Your other recourse is to try out something like OpenEJB OpenEJB runs as a component deployed to Tomcat.

  60. Timing related to JBoss certification problems by sbszine · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I wonder if the timing of this 'walkout' has anything to do with the Sun / JBoss compliance spat? They have been having an ongoing battle (not in court as yet) about whether JBoss can use the J2EE brand without being certified as compliant by Sun.

    Maybe the Core Developer folks are hoping to steal some business from their old employers using an easily certified fork. Perhaps they even hope to get some mileage from CIOs worried by the SCO thing.

    --

    Vino, gyno, and techno -Bruce Sterling

  61. Re:[OFF-TOPIC] Well, here I am at Equifax... by rsax · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    I've been promoting JBoss against WebSphere and WebLogic, and right now I'm looking like a moron.

    Snip

    Is this a French thing? You know, fucking your buddies.

    You know, promoting JBoss aside, just you reiterating that "the French didn't buy our BS about weapons of mass destruction so they're backstabbing us" crap makes you sound like a moron.

  62. JBoss 4.0 DR1 available! by pajama · · Score: 2, Informative

    JBoss 4.0 DR1 (Developer Release 1) is based on Aspect Oriented Programming.

    Check it out!:
    Aspect-Oriented Programming and JBoss
    JBoss 4.0 Developer Release JBoss
    JBoss Aspect Oriented Programming
    Download it now!

  63. forgive my ignorance... by Trepidity · · Score: 1

    ...but what exactly is a Java Application Server? Is this something like Novell's products ("Novel Application Launcher" and whatnot) where apps are served from a central server but executed on the local CPU?

    1. Re:forgive my ignorance... by johnnyb · · Score: 4, Informative

      An application server is a set of tools that do a lot of the scalability work for you. For example, let's say you have a database that 100G big. You have classes/objects that map to all of this data, each referencing each other. Now to instantiate an object, it will require data from the database. It also likely has a pointer to another object which is tied to the database. So, you have three choices:

      * Have instantiation of one object bring half the database into memory

      * Write code that intelligently loads and unloads references seamlessly from the database on demand (_lots_ of work)

      * Get someone else's code to do it for you

      Option 3 is the application server. Remember also that if you have your application spread across 13 servers, and all of them need access to the same object, where is the object going to live? If you have 13 copies of it, what happens if an instance gets modified - how do the other 12 instances know to reload their data? If you keep it on one server, how are you going to handle load balancing intelligently?

      The purpose of application servers is to have a canned infrastructure capable of handling these problems well. There are many other plumbing considerations that application servers keep track of, such as nested transactions, being able to remap data items onto different tables/attributes, being able to set the environment of an application through a simple text-based descriptor, etc.

      Usually I've found that for smaller-scale projects, application servers are overkill. However, for large-scale projects, they keep your project from becoming the ultimate hack-job. The trade-off probably hits when you have about 3 front-end webservers. For some items it hits as soon as you need 2 servers, for the load-balancing/synchronization problems.

    2. Re:forgive my ignorance... by KingRamsis · · Score: 4, Informative

      The purpose of application servers is to have a canned infrastructure capable of handling these problems well. There are many other plumbing considerations that application servers keep track of...

      you missed the point by a mile, the main purpose of the application server is to hold your business logic tier in a multi tier application, so you have a database-vendor neutral application, and the option to use multiple clients like web, standalone desktop applictions, mobile devices etc..etc.., scalability and mangeability are just bonuses...

    3. Re:forgive my ignorance... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      For most people, changing database happens once in a blue moon and multiple devices are pointless overkill, but everybody needs scalability and manageability.

    4. Re:forgive my ignorance... by greenrd · · Score: 1
      Option 3 is the application server.

      Eh? I think you are confused about what app servers are. I thought that was what O/R mapping tools like JDO, and OO/OR databases, did. If all J2EE app servers can do that, then why did Sun reinvent the wheel with JDO?

    5. Re:forgive my ignorance... by johnnyb · · Score: 1

      I am not familiar with JDO. However, if it is simply an object/relational mapper that is not what I was talking about. What I was talking about was an interface for object activation/deactivation, not mapping objects to databases. In the scenario I described, the object/relational mapping was done by the programmer - J2EE is responsible for activating/deactivating objects as needed and where needed.

    6. Re:forgive my ignorance... by johnnyb · · Score: 1

      you missed the point by a mile, the main purpose of the application server is to hold your business logic tier in a multi tier application

      ----

      You don't need an application server to do that. You need an application server to manage the scalability requirements on an n-tiered application.

      It's easy to separate the business logic from the presentation logic from the database logic just using OOP. However, that doesn't help you scale your business logic across multiple servers. An application server's job is to assist in helping your n-tiered designs _scale_, you don't need them just to do the design.

      You can do everything you say simply by using CORBA to communicate among the tiers and a good object model. To scale the middle tier you need an application server.

    7. Re:forgive my ignorance... by timjdot · · Score: 1

      I agree, application servers is a broad definition looking for identity. Surely the old web servers simply served up web pages and some scripted content so App Server was coined to delineate those servers that knew how to run in a cluster and, to a lesser extent, run objects. Also, in the last half of the 90's companies had lots of heterogeneous systems so an App server had to have connector for each of them and bring it into a unified "middleware". The Entity Beans and other data caching on the AS is of debateable need when other tools such as a db provide alot of this as well; yet one could argue similarly for db connection pools - doesn't Oracle etc. already pool the connections internally? Now if your example had said "5TB rather than 100s GB then you would have a good reason to use a cluster of servers as now you are outgrowing the load Oracle can handle and maybe even an MPP db like Teradata will barf once you get into the 50 TB. How big is the web? (7,500 terabytes ref: http://www.howstuffworks.com/news-item127.htm) Uh, so perhaps the web is one big cluster of App Servers. The biggest db ever. Cannot do that with any RDBMS on the market. JBoss ain't pretty and that is the #1 problem. If it takes a WebLogic or WebSpehere expert more than a day to figure out how in the heck to get beans running under JBoss then I think the #1 problem is clear. Selling the docs rather than providing an Open solution (from the documentation viewpoint) is a bad strategy. Anyone from JBoss listening? Tim

      --
      Expect Freedom.
    8. Re:forgive my ignorance... by KingRamsis · · Score: 1

      You can do everything you say simply by using CORBA to communicate among the tiers and a good object model. To scale the middle tier you need an application server.

      sure, you can but not as elegant as EJBs, and if you are developing for a thin client JSPs talk very well with EJBs. not the case with your CORBA hack you will need to find a way to make your web scripts talk to your CORBA backend easily.

      It's easy to separate the business logic from the presentation logic from the database logic just using OOP.

      ofcourse this is also possbile (heck anything is possbile it is all zeros and ones at the bare metal) but you will run into an integration nightmare, your database not talking well with your objects ? or maybe you need to write a ton of code to make it work? ... what??!! your boss wants you to switch the database vendor right now ?

      J2EE application servers provides you with an environment where you can model your business tier easily and get data in/out easily, scaling this is a bonus and an extra feature, till today vendors implement clustering differently, and you cannot cluster different application servers (say JBoss and Oracle 9iAS) which proves my point because if it that what app servers are built for then it should have been standardized first thing.

      nuff said...

    9. Re:forgive my ignorance... by johnnyb · · Score: 1

      "sure, you can but not as elegant as EJBs, and if you are developing for a thin client JSPs talk very well with EJBs. not the case with your CORBA hack you will need to find a way to make your web scripts talk to your CORBA backend easily."

      ---

      The reason you _need_ EJBs is so you can spread out your objects and let the application server manage them. Writing CORBA or RMI objects with Java is a piece of cake. The application server component is needed to manage the scalability, not the tiering.

      ---

      "what??!! your boss wants you to switch the database vendor right now ?"

      ---

      1) I have never, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever in my entire life heard of this happening.

      2) It usually isn't much of an issue anyway, as long as the vendor your switching _to_ isn't MySQL.

      ---

      "J2EE application servers provides you with an environment where you can model your business tier easily and get data in/out easily, scaling this is a bonus and an extra feature"

      ---

      I find that strange considering it was never difficult.

    10. Re:forgive my ignorance... by tolan-b · · Score: 1


      yes you can

      anyway, ejbs really aren't very elegeant in terms of persisting data. things like o/r bridge from jakarta or cocobase offer similar functionality without the (coding and runtime) overheads of local and remote stubs.

      where ejb does come into it's own is in the area of scaling... if you're using them for that then by all means take advantage of the persistence mechanisms too, but they're not worth it on their own.

      also, where do you get the idea that you only write the business logic? you also have to handle controllers and views. unless i've massively understood what business logic is all this time and it's not the 'model'.

    11. Re:forgive my ignorance... by KingRamsis · · Score: 1

      from your link:

      we could hope to use their smart multicast invalidation of CMP entity beans (e.g. Read-Mostly pattern with automatic invalidation).We couldn't do that. We started off by looking at writing this kind of code ourselves, using JMS to communicate updates to data in the cluster. This is a lot of work, and the kind of work that you don't want to have to do. Hopefully, you will be able to use the vendor features.

      no comment...

    12. Re:forgive my ignorance... by KingRamsis · · Score: 1

      god... i hate long debates :-) here goes...

      The application server component is needed to manage the scalability, not the tiering.

      no the AS provides other services, like the environment itself, the EJB model itself, and other services like persistence. this model and environment was designed to be automatically scalable.

      1) I have never, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever in my entire life heard of this happening.
      you just did...it happend with me once, our client couldnt finalize the deal with Oracle and we had to switch after 3 months of development.

      2) It usually isn't much of an issue anyway, as long as the vendor your switching _to_ isn't MySQL.

      with a CORBA C++ server that is almost impossible without major re-work, may be with Java the impact is minimal, but your code will be spread out amounting to more re-work.

    13. Re:forgive my ignorance... by dubl-u · · Score: 2, Informative
      The purpose of application servers is to have a canned infrastructure capable of handling these problems well. There are many other plumbing considerations that application servers keep track of...
      you missed the point by a mile, the main purpose of the application server is to hold your business logic tier in a multi tier application, so you have a database-vendor neutral application, and the option to use multiple clients like web, standalone desktop applictions, mobile devices etc..etc.., scalability and mangeability are just bonuses...

      Don't be silly.

      Even if one isn't ever going to change your database, and even if you will have only one type of client, using an application server can be helpful, because of the (hopefully) solid infrastructure they can provide.

      And even if one isn't using an application server, it's good design practice to design things in a tiered fashion. You can, and should, keep the business logic pretty separate from the interface code. The same goes for the persistence layer. There's no reason to drop $100k on an app server just to keep your code separate.

      That said, I have so far never actually seen a use of EJBs that wasn't a giant clusterfuck. I'm in the middle of rewriting a web app that was built with EJBs, and it's pathetic; using their expensive app server and their expensive Sun hardware, they can serve maybe 60 pageviews a minute.

      I'm tearing most of that cruft out and just using Hibernate, a great open-source object/relational persistence layer. One need notdto anything weird to one's objects (no special interfaces, no common base classes, no weird methods). It's swell.

      But had I my druthers, I'd have used Prevayler. Their whole dataset is maybe 1 GB. For that, you don't even need a database; you can just keep it all in RAM.
    14. Re:forgive my ignorance... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the main purpose of the application server is to hold your business logic tier in a multi tier application

      Nah. You're both right. It's not until you have an n-tier app that the scalablility and concurrency issues get heavy enough to justify the app server.

    15. Re:forgive my ignorance... by sqlgeek · · Score: 1

      Those who preach database-neutrality are exactly the same folk who end up giving J2EE a bad name, performance-wise. At a minimum you should isolate the database in a DAO layer that allows you to push logic down to stored procedures in the DB as needed, and within the capabilities and features of the DB in question. A truly performant and scalable design pushes as much data logic into the DB as possible and performs as much business logic as possible in the app server.

      For example, if your db of choice handles analytic functions but you perform these calculations in an EJB anyway then you're shooting yourself in the foot. There's a reason that people spend money for DB2 or Oracle, don't waste it needlessly.

      Cheers,
      Scott

    16. Re:forgive my ignorance... by knightwolf · · Score: 1
      My experience generally agrees. After looking at the neccessary code to write EJB's, setup and maintain the App server with it's extra resources, it was easier to develop "sorta" EJB objects that are just loaded elsewhere.

      Example: Create a book database. Your "front end" is in html through servlets, with Book objects being the data pulled in. The Book data is pulled from "BookFactory" objects. The code to load the BookFactory is all that would need to change - the BookFactory itself could later be moved to the Application server if needed, and the BookFactory is what talks to the database to create and return the "Book" objects. With EJB's there might also be some work to do on the BookFactory, but not as much.

      Keep in mind that keeping the code in a single VM can sometimes be much more beneficial than relying on network traffic to load objects and references, and as such only once the machine is unable to handle the load does an App server with load balancing support come into play. Start as small as needed, then buildup.

    17. Re:forgive my ignorance... by KingRamsis · · Score: 1

      I agree with you 100% actually our views dont conflict
      I was working on a data-intensive application and I insisted to move all data-intenstive logic to the database (Oracle), so we have a stored procedure written in PLSQL to update those computed aggregates instead of shitfing data in and out of the middle tier, but sometimes you are implementing a commerical solution that is required to run on different DBs this is viewed as a business/technical advantage in those cases you design a dumb database that acts like a data store only, and put all your logic in the middle tier. this might not be the best you can get but it offers a strategic business advantage and you hope that the hardware will catch up...
      hope i was clear this time.

    18. Re:forgive my ignorance... by Fnkmaster · · Score: 1
      Unfortunately, EJB is a pretty terrible model for scalability. It provides no tools for real workload partitioning or control of object distribution, at least as part of the specification standard. Ugh. And EJB-centric apps seem to almost universally be slower than anything else. People rarely stop to think "why do I want these two different things to be remote objects that interact with each other" and "where should these remote objects actually be located relative to each other". An app server framework needs to encourage/force developers to consider these issues, not try to encourage them to ignore them and make each and every object a separate EJB that talks to other EJBs.


      An app server should provide reliability and scalability to an enterprise application without costing so much in terms of performance overhead for base-case scenarios that the system is just a resource hog. Maybe the EJB spec is better these days, I gave up on it after 1.1.

    19. Re:forgive my ignorance... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      YES! YES! YES! "Database Neutral" is code for "I don't know what the fuck a database is, so I ignore the benefits of putting the logic at the lowest level where it belongs"

    20. Re:forgive my ignorance... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      CORBA? You moron. CORBA and 'simply' don't belong in the same sentence. My god, give me a socket and I'll blow your crap CORBA implementation out of the water. Why has CORBA failed? Because it is overly complex and sucks to use. You are a twit.

    21. Re:forgive my ignorance... by johnnyb · · Score: 1

      How on earth can you find CORBA to be complicated? Using the wrong tools? Have the wrong teacher? It is amazingly easy! Given a CORBA server, here is how to build a client:

      Step 1 - create header files from CORBA definition file

      Step 2 - Build client code exactly as if this were a local library - the only exception is creating the reference, which you will have to agree on some mechanism (actually, if you use the CORBA naming service, this is easy as well).

      Step 3 - Build and run!

      Steps to build a client for other servers:

      Step 1 - Decide on communication protocol - this is a huge deal, and it must take into consideration everything that the CORBA community has already taken into consideration

      Step 2 - Build a library for your client so that you can use the communication protocol in a simple fashion. Again, the CORBA community already has this figured out, and you would likely end up simply re-implementing a broken version of CORBA.

      Step 3 - Write your code, but you'll also have to spend time cleaning up problems you find you missed in the first two steps

      Step 4 - build and run - oops, have to clean up my communication protocol up even more. Oh yeah, forgot that I need to pass around a context. Now I need to change my communication protocol - there goes my library - I need to totally rewrite it to take care of the fact that I thought it was as simple as opening a socket!

      Now, some people confuse the amount of features available from the CORBA runtime to be complicated. Well, you don't have to use them, but if you need them, they are wonderful. Context passing is simply amazing. Also, for servers, the Portable Object Adapter makes writing very complex services very easy.

  64. Re:Help! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You couldn't bring it down, because you are failures. Face it, you tried to be script kiddies, and you couldn't even do that right. There is no hope for you. Please die repeatedly.

  65. ummm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    was that an advert or a newspiece? what a bloody waste of electrons.

  66. Fun, Fun by rimu+guy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    JBoss has been garnering a lot of publicity lately, at least in Java circles. It has been quite the center of controvesy, in an otherwise boring world.

    First there is the bust up with Sun. JBoss wanting J2EE certification and Sun be a bit difficult (basically saying they wouldn't pass).

    Then there was the 'best application server' http://www.sys-con.com/java/readerschoice2003/vote .cfm 'vote rigging' issue. One year accussing Oracle of cheaping because they asked their employees to vote, and the next year JBoss does the same (asked its mailing list members to vote for JBoss).

    Now of course there is this new company split off from JBoss LLC.

    Still to come: will JBoss LLC removing CVS commit rights from the coredevelopers group? Will JBoss LLC go out of business?

    We'll see..

    In the mean time: at least people are hearing about this great product (developer tiffs aside). No such thing as bad publicity, right? Hopefully, too many people won't be scared off. Then where would all my new customers come from?

    - Peter.
    RimuHosting - JBoss Hosting on Linux VPS

    1. Re:Fun, Fun by dash2 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Y'know, it might be just me, but I am not sure it's a good idea to call your company Rim U Hosting. That level of service seems a little extreme. I'd be fine with just having my website hosted.

    2. Re:Fun, Fun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      No kidding. I guess that's called "Value-Added Services"... although I've never seen it taken this far either.

      From their main page:

      Read on to find out more about our Virutal Private Server plans and how they can be your hosting solution.

      I was also wondering if this private server that seems to have vir[ut]al capabilities is related to their rimming services?

  67. Re:Agreed -- Who Cares by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 3, Funny

    Really. This won't affect my ASP.NET/IIS/C# contract one wit.
    Only doing what they pay me to do. If they want my opinion, I tell 'em straight up - it all sucks. That invoice is due now.

    --
    This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
  68. not good PR, folks by ThreadDeath · · Score: 1

    The open source community does not need this. Not at all. Sure, fork code, start your own company, create competition, all fine. But the tone is hostile. Rupp clearly expresses the desire and the ability to damage the JBoss Group. This send a clear message to corporate decision makers: stick with BEA, IBM, Oracle, etc...

    thread

  69. What about existing JBoss.org support contracts? by rkuris · · Score: 1

    So if I have a contract with them to get a core developer, one would think that this contract might be hard to keep... they promised access to the core developers. Sounds like another lawsuit brewing here for those premium support JBoss customers!

    --
    Get rid of everything Micro and Soft: Buy Viagra and/or Linux
  70. Read the article carefully, folks by dbavirt · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The article says "The JBoss Group has been forked." The group, not the code.

    The CDN web site puts a lot of emphasis on CVS commit access into various open source projects, include JBoss itself. This does not sound at all like a code fork.

    1. Re:Read the article carefully, folks by IPFreely · · Score: 4, Funny
      The article says "The JBoss Group has been forked."

      It sounds more like they've been knifed.

      Maybe they'll get lucky and get spooned too.

      --
      There is nothing so silly as other peoples traditions, and nothing so sacred as our own.
  71. so now... by maxpublic · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    ...some geeks dramatic, self-involved narration of what people do every day (i.e., generally called "quitting") is worthy of Slashdot headlines? And concerning the article itself, just about the only factoid I could derive from it was that someone has read a bit too much Gibson, and taken it to heart.

    Yeah, 'cyberpunks' rule. Phhhhpht!

    Max

    --
    My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
    1. Re:so now... by glwtta · · Score: 1
      self-involved narration of what people do every day (i.e., generally called "quitting") is worthy of Slashdot headlines?

      I am always curious about statements like this - what exactly, in your opinion is "worthy" of a slashdot headline?

      Whenever you start associating words like "worth" with /.'s content, just repeat this simple phrase: "blog for geeks, blog for geeks, blog for geeks..." it should help put things in perspective.

      --
      sic transit gloria mundi
  72. Commercial Support for OpenSource by MyHair · · Score: 5, Insightful
    For one, a lot of commercial companies are use the commercial support provided by the JBoss Group as justification for going with an open source software solution (as opposed to one of the much more expensive commercial application servers).
    I've been wondering about this a lot lately. A couple of my buddies and I are kicking around the idea of starting up a service company which would include a small centralized server farm to be used for most/all customer server needs.

    Just last night I installed JBoss/Tomcat to kick it around and consider it for our possible future business.

    I keep going back and forth about commercial suppport. I keep thinking "gee, in a business where business revenue relies on the server software perhaps we should go ahead and pay the big bucks for a commercial product with support." Then I realize I currently work in a large company that pays for commerical products and the vendor support reps are clueless and we have to eventually figure out the problems and fix them ourselves anyway. (Disclaimer: I'm a network admin, not a developer, so my vendor experiences are with implementation and operational issues.)

    Okay, what about liability then? I've heard before that you want to feel there's someone to sue if something goes wrong. But who's ever sued Microsoft (or IBM, Sun, HP, BEA, Oracle) because of lost business revenue due to their products?

    What do you really get from paying the big boys big money?

    I have a sneaking suspicion I'd come out way ahead financially and operationally if I take the money I save on huge up-front licensing and ongoing per-seat licensing and split it between the business and a support fund, and if we run into a problem we can't handle it's time to hire one of the developers of the software to fix it for us, or in the case of JBoss use the Core Developer's consulting service.
    1. Re:Commercial Support for OpenSource by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      " But who's ever sued Microsoft (or IBM, Sun, HP, BEA, Oracle) because of lost business revenue due to their products?"

      The largest bank in Denmark (http://www.danskebank.dk) sued IBM because a bug in their DB/2 database took out the core sharetrading system for about a week. This is a couple of months ago now.

    2. Re:Commercial Support for OpenSource by pcraven · · Score: 1

      You get good sales people for that money. Don't ever underestimate the value of good sales people. As developers, we may not like them. But their job is to push a product, and if you are selling a product, that is a really good thing.

    3. Re:Commercial Support for OpenSource by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What do you really get from paying the big boys big money?

      You? You get a shiny piece of paper to stick in a file folder. It's not really going to change anything for you.

      The benefit is for your clients. Most major corporations will only do deals with companies that have all that verndor support stuff in place. I know, my company's gone through the same thing. We ended up biting the bullet and getting a JBoss support contract for a few tens of thousands in order to secure a client project worth millions.

    4. Re:Commercial Support for OpenSource by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      you could always get Errors and Omissions insurance. It's a kind of malpractice insurance for service companies/professionals.

    5. Re:Commercial Support for OpenSource by gorzek · · Score: 1

      Software vendors get sued all the time for downtime caused by defects in their products. It just doesn't tend to make the news because it's strictly between the companies involved. These lawsuits usually end in settlements (either of money or service.) They're not really a big deal. You just don't hear about them a lot because the interested parties have nothing to gain by airing their dirty laundry in public.

    6. Re:Commercial Support for OpenSource by dubl-u · · Score: 1

      What do you really get from paying the big boys big money?

      I have a sneaking suspicion I'd come out way ahead financially and operationally if I take the money I save on huge up-front licensing and ongoing per-seat licensing and split it between the business and a support fund, and if we run into a problem we can't handle it's time to hire one of the developers of the software to fix it for us, or in the case of JBoss use the Core Developer's consulting service.


      In my experience, that's not a bad way to bet.

      I think the large-company support contracts are tuned for supporting the average large corporation developer, who may be moderately smart, but has no bravery whatsoever. What you're buying is the right to ask a lot of dumb questions and have them answered by a patient and friendly person.

      Through perseverance, one can also eventually get real problems solved via large-company support contracts, but generally the level of effort required is so large that it's eaiser just to sort things out on your own. Unless you are an important client, of course, in which case you can lean on your sales rep to lean on support. But you don't get that kind of pull from buying a support contract on its own.

      I find that open-source developers are a much better deal. One, they're people who are doing the work because they wanted to; paying them to do more work on it is a happy thing for all concerned. Two, they do not have large bureaucracies or sales teams to feed. And three, $10k to your average open source developer is an amount of money that merits notice. Places like IBM and BEA find more than that just by looking under the couch cushions.

    7. Re:Commercial Support for OpenSource by mthyen · · Score: 1

      Okay, what about liability then? I've heard before that you want to feel there's someone to sue if something goes wrong. But who's ever sued Microsoft (or IBM, Sun, HP, BEA, Oracle) because of lost business revenue due to their products?

      What do you really get from paying the big boys big money?


      What you are paying for is someone to point a finger at when things go bad. Find a bug in the software provided by your vendor and you get to lean on them to fix it. One rarely sues but can always threaten to not renew contracts or to not upgrade or to not be referenceable customer or to switch to a competitor. That will generally get the attention of the vendor.

    8. Re:Commercial Support for OpenSource by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So in return for giving them money you get ... the right to threaten not to give them more money. Great.

    9. Re:Commercial Support for OpenSource by mthyen · · Score: 1

      If you look at paying for software as a one time thing, then yes. However, a lot of these deals are ongoing concerns. Deals cover several years and so on with support and consulting revenue. For a lot of software companies, that continual stream of money is what keeps the company going. Thus threatening that stream will make them jump.

    10. Re:Commercial Support for OpenSource by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      Find a bug in the software provided by your vendor and you get to lean on them to fix it. One rarely sues but can always threaten to not renew contracts or to not upgrade or to not be referenceable customer or to switch to a competitor. That will generally get the attention of the vendor.

      Nah - the typically guy who is deploying the product doesn't care about all that. They can just tell their boss "see - I took the most conservative route possible so it wasn't my fault that things went wrong". If he went with a cheaper solution the assumption would be that he cut corners and he'd be fired.

      There is an old expression - "Nobody got fired for buying IBM." It has an element of truth to it...

      Most employees of big companies don't want their company to have the best and most cost-effective solution. They want the solution least likely to get them fired. The solution that gives them somebody to point a finger at is usually the right solution...

    11. Re:Commercial Support for OpenSource by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably a better idea to use Zope, its much quicker and easier to code in python with better performance and results than java. Sure java is easier than C++, but its not the best solution, python really is! Unless you're writing games for cell phones. You even have distributed Zope Enterprise objects for clustering.

  73. How do you make money doing open source? by yaphadam097 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    JBoss is still around and will be for a long time. What is interesting about this is not the impact on the JBoss app server (virtually zero, IMO) but the impact on the JBoss Group's attempt to turn their skills into a money making enterprise. Open source works, we know that, but what is interesting is that so many novel attempts have been made to turn open source into a way to make money and most seem to dismally fail. This is yet another example of that.

  74. NDA and such by SamMichaels · · Score: 1

    With all the talk of an NDA and contracts and all that nonsense, I figured I'd point out that my old school district, Central Dauphin or "CD", has been using the C and D with apple seeds as a logo for quite some time. I think they have prior use to that logo of theirs.

  75. An idea! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why marcf doesnt lisence the code under BSD ?
    securing that the project will stay alive
    (even if netcraft confirms the opposite),
    and at the same time provide the ground for
    more interesting forks!

  76. Minor Players by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When you compare the Core Developers members to the JBoss team, you'll see that the guys who "walked-out" are minor players.

    This is basically a lot of hype, and a dirty trick to get some publicity.

    No one in their right mind would trust these guys with a support contract.

  77. Has the JBoss group expressed displeasure by jhannes · · Score: 1
    As far as I can see, there is no evidence for JBoss Consultancy and the Core Developers parting with bad blood between them.

    Why would having two organizations instead of one commiting their business idea to open source Java enterprise development be a bad thing for the community?

    1. Re:Has the JBoss group expressed displeasure by IPFreely · · Score: 1
      Why would having two organizations instead of one commiting their business idea to open source Java enterprise development be a bad thing for the community?

      It's not a bad thing for the community. But business competition rarely is. Better still, it sounds like the code base will remain intact (rather than split). The difficulty for JBoss Group is that the JBoss Group made their money by selling documentation on the JBoss product, and selling services such as training and support. You have to make money somehow.

      What this split does is make another company that is also selling documentation, training and support. And this company has better connections with related projects (jetty, jakarta) and more specialization in the internals of JBoss itself. Now the same number of potential customers are split between two different companies. If JBoss Group is lucky, they will loose less than half of their customer base. If they are not, they could loose enough customer base and sponsership to force them out of business.

      Of course, as with any open source project, the software will survive. But it will most likely be primarily developed and supported by Core Developers.

      So, is this going to turn into another MySQL/NuSphere spat?

      --
      There is nothing so silly as other peoples traditions, and nothing so sacred as our own.
  78. Worst OSS project... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I won't even give any reasons for this statement: JBoss is the worst managed OSS project. If you have been dealing with their forums etc you know what I mean. JBoss the software is great, the project could be the crown jewel of the OSS movement but something has gone terribly wrong.

    Yes, I use JBoss and bite the bullet.

    1. Re:Worst OSS project... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree, and this paid documenation thing sucked
      from the first time.
      Isnt postgresql an equally large/important project
      that it gives away fine writen docs, (among
      numerous other OSS projects)
      and not the crappy docs i made the mistake to buy from jboss....

      I think the guys used OSS as a marketing trick,
      and nothing more.

  79. Kudos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Providing consulting services for JBoss, in and of itself, is far too limited, in my humble opinion. The exodus of core members to form a new consultancy with a broader scope addresses one of the major problems with software acquisitions: integration.

  80. Core Techie Leaving BEA Weblogic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    [for immediate press release]

    Today Anonymous Techie, a developer who has worked on core aspects of the BEA Weblogic Server version 7.0 announced that he was leaving to set up his own Weblogic consulting business.

    Industry commentators wondered just how this would affect BEA and just how much it would jolt industry confidence in the product. With Anonymous Techie no longer contributing to the code base BEA would have to take up the slack by hiring someone else. A task complicated by the wealth of J2EE talent out their. Bill Klein Jr, the head of personel said "it will be a nightmare sorting through the thousands of CVs we have received from very good people". With BEA tied up in recruiting industry gurus were predicting that competitors could steal a vital technical lead. Klein comments that "it is in the natural course of events for one of our employees to hand in his notice, this industry thrives on change and fresh blood will be a good thing, we wish Anonymous Techie well". But many in the adrenalin charged world of IT view this as an act of treachery and think that contracts should be respected for life.

    Customers were thought to be departing in droves: Deepak Shah of Bangalore consulting said "I bet the farm on JBoss, now I'm left with egg on my face and Chicken Balti on my trousers. I'll have to immediately start porting all my code over to Websphere, or worse than that, use .NET. What this industry needs is stability. This is an intolerable situation!"

    When asked to comment, BEA CEO Alfred S. Chuang dismissed the report with "I've never even heard of the guy!". Brave words but privately he must be wondering about the future viability of the his consulting business with one of his key developers offering support services in direct competition to BEA.

    BEA stock rose $2.19 on the news.

  81. Parent is a troll; posting with a shill account by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't waste your time with the JTroll.

  82. Are You Hiring? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If so, please reply with contact for me to send CV. Thanks.

  83. some insight... by HBI · · Score: 5, Interesting

    My girlfriend used to do web site updates for the Jboss group (actually, she worked for Marc Fleury and his wife, listed as Nathalie Mason-Fleury on the website, director of marketing). She was responsible for most of the bio information going up on the site, as well as doing updates to same, updates for whatever conventions they were hosting/doing, etc. She was fresh out of a 4 year CS degree and needed a job and in this market, she took this web jockey gig.

    The Jboss crew uses a CVS repository to manage their web site. It sounded fairly dumb to me when I heard it, but I suppose they feel the need for control and verification of who is making what change to the site. Now, she had never done any work with CVS before - she codes a bit in real languages but hasn't worked on any large projects. So she had to ask some help from the Jboss people on how to use CVS.

    The developers, Dain for instance, were incredibly helpful. She was able to snag them on AIM at just about any hour of the day or night for whatever little questions she had about their (often malfunctioning) repository. Marc Fleury and his wife, on the other hand, were not. They were demanding, placing calls in the wee hours for changes, and expecting 1-2 hour turnaround whenever they called. When asked questions, more often than not, Mr. Fleury would take a fit on her. She asked the developers about this and one in particular volunteered that "He's an asshole to everyone, not just you".

    Eventually she stopped dealing with them because they just sucked too badly to work for. Low pay, rude behavior and weird hours make for a bad mix. I'm sure they hired someone else who was more masochistic perhaps.

    A close friend of the Fleurys (she knows them socially in Atlanta) made the comment recently that Marc owns his own company because he would find it impossible to work _for_ anyone else due to his attitude. I suggest that the recent defections might have something to do with the aforementioned.

    On a positive note, Mr. Fleury has found a way to make money off of an open source project. I suppose that deserves kudos. I've known a few businessmen who, while they knew how to make money, were unable to keep the business operating long term because they made strategic errors or alienated people. I suspect Mr. Fleury is going to fall into that category. Maybe he'll learn some lessons for his next business (he's the kind of guy who will assuredly hit the ground running no matter what happens)...

    --
    HBI's Law: Frequency of calling others Nazis is directly correlated with the likelihood of the accuser being Communist.
    1. Re:some insight... by figa · · Score: 1
      Philip Greenspun and Marc Fleury should team up and rewrite JBoss in tcl!

      Whenever a company has multiple family members as executive officers, you know you're in for trouble.

    2. Re:some insight... by cant_get_a_good_nick · · Score: 1

      Marc Fleury == Theo De Raadt? Just in this case people bolt from OpenBSD to make NetBSD?

    3. Re:some insight... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The developers, Dain for instance, were incredibly helpful. She was able to snag them on AIM at just about any hour of the day or night for whatever little questions she had about their (often malfunctioning) repository. Marc Fleury and his wife, on the other hand, were not. They were demanding, placing calls in the wee hours for changes, and expecting 1-2 hour turnaround whenever they called. When asked questions, more often than not, Mr. Fleury would take a fit on her. She asked the developers about this and one in particular volunteered that "He's an asshole to everyone, not just you".
      This may be all totally true, but at the moment it's sounding my baloney-alarm. Why? Because Fleury was her boss and Dain was her co-worker. It is not atypical to be mad at your boss for making you work, yet cordial with your co-workers whom you put upon yourself. She's mad that Fleury would call her at weird hours with demands. But at the same time she's happy that she can call Dain at weird hours with demands. One wonders what Dain thinks of her .
    4. Re:some insight... by HBI · · Score: 1

      She didn't call them - she got them on AIM.

      If they weren't awake and responding they wouldn't be there. They're all geeks anyway - even she is one. She's up at 2am chattering away on IM or writing stuff most of the time anyway - it's just a little presumptuous to expect a web site change at 1am on a Friday. It happens she doesn't drink, but I would probably be half in the bag by then...

      --
      HBI's Law: Frequency of calling others Nazis is directly correlated with the likelihood of the accuser being Communist.
    5. Re:some insight... by ill_e_ace · · Score: 1

      Did anyone else hear the interview with Marc Fleury on the linux show from a couple of months ago? At best, he came off sounding like quite an odd fellow. Just listening to the interview was painful enough; I can't imagine working for him.

      Here's the link to the show archive if you want to listen. The interview with him starts about 3 or 4 minutes into the show.

    6. Re:some insight... by JasonAsbahr · · Score: 1

      Excuse my ignorance, but why it is bad to use version control for a (presumably) large website? Seems like a reasonable idea, given that you might have multiple people editing it from geographically distant places.

    7. Re:some insight... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I would probably be half in the bag by then...

      What? Your girlfriend is an old woman?

    8. Re:some insight... by HBI · · Score: 1

      It seemed fairly silly when they were specifically hiring one person to do all their updates.

      --
      HBI's Law: Frequency of calling others Nazis is directly correlated with the likelihood of the accuser being Communist.
  84. gimme a break by kvhaz · · Score: 2, Insightful

    That web site should have its internet connection stripped for publishing what might be the silliest goddamned story I've ever read. From the tone of it, you'd think these guys were parachuting into combat.

    And the scarier part is that noone else seems to notice how pathetic it is.

    1. Re:gimme a break by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was laughing out loud while I read it, especially after looking at some of their pictures

    2. Re:gimme a break by Hezaurus · · Score: 1

      Who's the pathetic here? What's wrong with a bit of overenthusiasm? Perphaps as a person who lost all passion to code the article will appear as annoying.
      Don't know about you. I think it's great when people have great time. :-)

      --
      No matter how fast light travels it finds the darkness has always got there first, and is waiting for it. (T. Pratchett)
  85. Re:Integrity? Openness? Who are they trying to kid by 10am-bedtime · · Score: 1

    in a similar critical vein, i would say openness is a prerequisite for integrity, not the other way around. that is, if a system (or group of people) has openness, whether or not there is integrity can be judged by the observer rather than being a quality that must be blindly accepted on faith.

  86. JBOSS, I have a better idea by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 3, Funny

    JDICTATOR. It doesn't order your java software to perform it routinely tourtures a random sample of javasoftware as a warning to others. It fights performances issues "to the Pain". So far it just consists of C code with big ears that gets picked on a lot, so look out, it will have a chip on its shoulder when it gets loose.

    --
    Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
  87. urgh by Ryosen · · Score: 1

    My response was to the AC that said "Oh, so it's just Java. Who cares..." and not to ParamonKreel's comment above. Just thought I should point that out to keep the fuzzies nice and warm.

    --

    Ryosen
    One man's "Troll, +1" is another man's "Insightful, +1".
  88. Interesting by andy1307 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Stephen Hobbs, USA
    CFO/Controller
    After college, Stephen spent almost 7 years in the US Navy, working as a Russian linguist before becoming a SEAL in SEAL Team 2, the Navy's Special Operations branch.

  89. Re:jwho cares? by abigor · · Score: 1

    One day, you'll learn about these things called "companies" who have "data" on many "servers" and who need to perform "transactions" with "objects" scattered around everywhere. Have fun!

  90. A Good Cleansing Sometimes Helps by slackjawedyokel · · Score: 2, Insightful

    As a coder who's been watching the EJBoss... I mean JBoss... code, since it didn't work, I'm completely confident this project will carry on. JBoss isn't going away. Even if all the core JBoss developers dropped off the face of the planet, there would be others to pick up the cause and offer support. This is a classic example of why OSS works and works well.

    --
    -- damon@sicore.org A929 9798 86F9 5AD7 7BD5 E6AD 37A2 DF9B 5EDD C02E http://www.sicore.org/publicKeys/damon.txt
  91. Re:BUSH = RECESSION by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please move to eurocuntland so you can be a good little socialist with all of the rest of the lazy eurotrash.

  92. Am I a point, very one at that? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    You're point, however, is a very one!

    Hmmh. I'm not one to pick nits, but I have trouble parsing your statement. Perhaps all my base are just belong to you, very one!

  93. Re:BUSH = RECESSION by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where are those WMDs there Rummy booster?

  94. MOD PARENT DOWN -1 REDUNDANT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    cos it's really not funny and everyone who read it can see it's a typo. besides, this is slashdot, nobody gives a fuck.

  95. This means.... by Tank · · Score: 1

    All your BOSS are belong to us!!!

  96. Wasted *no* time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gee, these folks wasted no time getting this Core Developers Network started. This site looks like its been up and running for awhile...

  97. an ugly start for an otherwise interesting venture by bluePhase · · Score: 1

    Seems they don't know much about PR. Their announcement really makes them sound like pricks.

    What they should have done is been much more diplomatic. Talked about personal differences from a business standpoint, but emphasized their devotion to the JBoss project.

    Instead, they basically said, we're leaving and this really f***s up JBoss, hahah:

    "The JBoss Group has suffered losses before and come out strong. But have they ever sustained an attack of this scale? No way. Neither Sun nor BEA could have pulled off something this personally damaging to Fleury's company. The pressure that pulled them apart had to come from within."

    It took me a while to realize that they would be providing competing services to the same code-base. At first read, it sounded to me like they were intentionally trying to undermine the whole notion of an open-source J2EE server. Makes them sound like immature ego-driven 455h013s. Hell, they are immature ego-driven 455h013s. Not for leaving the Fleury's company but for pissing on them on the way out the door. BEA and perhaps MS will have a field day with this, and use this as evidence that you can't trust the long-term viability of open-source projects, outside of that anomaly Linux. That's not true, but the cutesy little ball-buster CDN published sure adds fodder to such bogus arguments.

  98. No, they just smell bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it actually sounds like a "regret minimization framework" move. The question is whether the regret would be not putting their skills to the highest and best use or not kicking Fluery's ass.

  99. I love the way the JBoss homepage renders NOT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    under Mozilla

  100. Re:Obviously they've been planning this for a whil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Could be a rumble in San Francisco next week with the JBoss group right across the street at the Sony Metreon.

  101. hmmm... I'd say the admin is a retard. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If he can't get a OS X connected to DHCP, he better look for another job better suited for him... like typing on a Win98 box

  102. JClever. by Chromodromic · · Score: 1

    That was a funny Joke.

    --
    Chr0m0Dr0m!C
  103. seems like this was coming... by mabhatter654 · · Score: 1
    seems from the previous posts that this was a while in the making.

    You've got a cash-strapped company, temp workers, and a boss with an attitude--you can expect this to happen.

    Most small business owners are in business because they can't cut following someone else's rules. It's good for starting businesses, but bad for keeping them. My experience is that when the boss utters "you don't have to work here" one too many times, it's the other 6 employees nearby that take the advice rather than the intended one!

    It sounds like self-preservation as much as revenge. After all, if he's not renewing contracts, then eventually your dinner stops! They choose to gang up and go out with a bang rather than a whimper.

  104. Headline: Microsoft provides cash infusion to CDN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Redmond: In an unrelated story, Microsoft announced today that it was giving a cash injection to a bunch of Java addicts in order to wean them off their addiction, on the condition that they swear off the juice entirely, and switch to .NET.

    Microsoft representative Jay Ghost stated that this had nothing to with the current rift between CDN and a notorious bunch of rebels called the "JBoss Group", it was rather to provide a stronger bulwark against the scourge of so-called "open source" fanatics, who are trying to topple the very foundations America is based on, of massive profit, of monopoly, of big business. "We welcome CDN to the fold", says Jay. The developers will be at J#Zero, showing off their dazzling new product, and they are eager to meet you.

  105. Dear Marc, by PHAEDRU5 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Thanks for all the moderation.

    Maintenant, s'il vous plait, rentrez en France (oui, avec votre famille).

    Bon voyage.

    --
    668: Neighbour of the Beast
  106. Re:Hey! Ben! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is JBoss in Atlanta? I'm assuming your talking about 285 and 400 in Atlanta? My view of them is quite nice.

  107. Re:Hey! Ben! by cameronsto · · Score: 0

    And which skyscraper are you talking about?

  108. Pascal notation? by r4lv3k · · Score: 1

    Shouldn't it be called jBoss?