Slashdot Mirror


Using Sling Shot Power to Hurl Into Orbit

the_2nd_coming writes "space.com has an article about a new application of a very old technology. NASA is putting money into Momentum-eXchange/Electrodynamic Reboost tether technology -- MXER for short -- an innovative concept that if implemented would station miles and miles of cart-wheeling cable in orbit around the Earth. Then, rotating like a giant sling, the cable would swoop down and pick up spacecraft in low orbits, then hurl them to higher orbits or even lob them onward to other planets."

90 of 310 comments (clear)

  1. the bad boys of science. by sweeney37 · · Score: 4, Funny

    The key scientists behind this project are Dr. Bartholemew J. Simpson and Dr. Dennis "The Menace" Mitchell.

    Mike

    1. Re:the bad boys of science. by MouseR · · Score: 2, Funny

      any reference to the simpsons is given +funny automagically

      I didn't do it.

  2. Hmmmm by jeffkjo1 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Dennis the Mennis apparently grew up and got a job at NASA!

  3. Or perhaps by 1984 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Swoop down and clobber spacecraft in lower orbits, smashing them into tiny pieces that could go one to clobber other spacecraft. Or perhaps larger pieces that re enter in fiery displays of wasted millions.

    Or it might work. That'd be something.

  4. hm... interesting possibilities... by Wakko+Warner · · Score: 5, Funny

    I once used sling shot power to hurl little rocks at my neighbor's cat. Used the middle finger from a rubber kitchen glove, a cut-apart 2-liter soda bottle, and a pipe clamp.

    If they built one of those in space, they'd be able to scare the shit out of my neighbor's cat.

    - A.P.

    --
    "Remember when the U.S. had a drug problem, and then we declared a War On Drugs, and now you can't buy drugs anymore?"
    1. Re:hm... interesting possibilities... by Tablizer · · Score: 5, Funny

      I once [made a] sling shot....Used the middle finger from a rubber kitchen glove

      Bet your mom was pissed that dish soap ruined her commute-finger.

  5. Been there, done that by NetDanzr · · Score: 3, Informative
    From the top of my head, I can remember two identical proposals in sci-fi works:
    • The Fountains of Paradise by Atrhur C. Clarke
    • Mars Trilogy by Kim Stanley Robinson
    I'm sure there are more.
    1. Re:Been there, done that by podperson · · Score: 4, Informative

      Those both were space elevators -- a different technology NASA is also exploring.

    2. Re:Been there, done that by The_K4 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The elevators AND this "slingshot" have the same problem. Tension ripping the cable. This has the added fun of the acceleration mashing you into the rear wall...i hope they don't sling the craft TOO hard!

    3. Re:Been there, done that by crmartin · · Score: 4, Informative

      And, in fact, Tethers Unlimited, the company proposing this beast, was founded by scientist, engineer and science fiction writer Dr Robert L Forward. Sadly, Dr Forward died last September.

    4. Re:Been there, done that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      >>And, in fact, Tethers Unlimited, the company proposing this beast,

      Damn. I read that at Titties Unlimited, the company proposing the breast,

      I really, really need to get some lovin. Soon.

    5. Re:Been there, done that by Khasmo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Charles Sheffield's Web Between the Worlds deals with not only Elevators, but Slings as well.

    6. Re:Been there, done that by jovlinger · · Score: 2, Interesting

      He has lots of other cool ideas, such as using magnetic propulsion to levitate satelites by having them capture slugs fired from the ground, reverse their course, and fire them downwards again (== upwards momentum on both halves of the equation). I'd draw ascii-art, but your loving slashdot team have deemed that "lame" so you get none.

      Satelites that levitate above the poles by tacking with solar sails against gravity (higher the "orbit", smaller the sail needed).

      His book "indistinguishable from magic" is basically the worlds best anti-patent protection. more power (postumously) to him.

  6. SciFi does it again by PaulK · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It seems that the greatest two motivators of technology are SciFi authors, and sales people.

    This approach was used by Robert Heinlein in several books; it is a pleasure to see his vision honored.

    As for sales people, I can't count the number of times that I have had to create what they have sold.

    1. Re:SciFi does it again by foolish · · Score: 3, Informative

      Robert Forward was one of the principals at TUI [www.tethers.com] and was a contemporary of RAH, Clarke and Sheffield.

      So he actually figured out how to make the damn things work, and spent about a decade trying to pitch it to NASA... but the failure of a single stranded Tether experiment made them really 'gun shy' of the technology, even though the Hoyt/Forward tether is multi-stranded.

    2. Re:SciFi does it again by Daetrin · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Given that one of Heinlein's books is titled "The Man Who Sold the Moon," i think he saw both sides of the issue. However i'm not sure if sales people as motivators of technology was more of a "vision," or just a concession to reality.

      --
      This Space Intentionally Left Blank
    3. Re:SciFi does it again by BiggerIsBetter · · Score: 2, Insightful
      As for sales people, I can't count the number of times that I have had to create what they have sold.

      Well, it keeps you in a job.

      You can create all the software you want, but without the sales people to sell it, it doesn't put food on the table.

      /me imagines geek on street with "Will Code for Food" sign...

      --
      Forget thrust, drag, lift and weight. Airplanes fly because of money.
  7. Great, just great... by loucura! · · Score: 3, Funny

    Alien species put up huge fences to keep us outside of their garden, and now we're going to be shooting stuff at them...

    [Dennis the Menace]

    Hey Mr. Freeeblgwaaxx!1

    [/Dennis]

    --
    Black and grey are both shades of white.
  8. Are they serious? by curtlewis · · Score: 2, Interesting

    A bunch of whirling cables in space? I wonder how many satellites will happen to stray close enough to those cables to get the crap beat out of them.

    The Japanese have failed recently with using the slingshot for space purposes, although in a different application. They tried to use the Earth's gravity to slingshot a probe to Mars but screwed it up the first time causing a 5 year delay. It's coming around for it's last try now, but it's damaged and not very maneuverable and will likely wind up being a total loss.

    I'm trying to picture these windmill like cables floating around in orbit and all I get is an image of something from a Bug's Bunny cartoon.

    If they do go for it, I hope they put alot of research into making sure it works and isn't prone to failure and unexpected consequences.

    1. Re:Are they serious? by barakn · · Score: 4, Informative

      At least part of the cable has to be conductive. That's the Electrodynamic Reboost mentioned in insufficient detail in the article. They run a current through the cable, and the Earth's magnetic field then exerts a force on the cable that pushes it up into a higher orbit. Each cable will have multiple layers.

      --
      "I'm so moist I'm sticking to the leather." -Kermit the Frog on The Late Late Show
    2. Re:Are they serious? by shadowbearer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "I wonder how many satellites will happen to stray close enough to those cables to get the crap beat out of them."

      The chances of that happening are vanishingly small. I'd be more worried about orbital debris damaging the cable - but it seems they've already thought of that (multistranded). If the cable did get damaged, the worst that would happen is the satellite (if already "picked up") would get shot off in an unstable orbit.

      A plus with this would be you could use the power generated by a conductive wire thru the cable to power ion thrusters or similar to keep the cable rotating (air friction at the pickup would require some boost occasionally). Less need for solar cells :-)

      Like others have mentioned, gravity slingshots are a whole nother beast.

      I remember reading about this idea many many years ago - and I consider it something that will happen well before a space elevator will.

      SB

      --
      It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
  9. DOS? by stoolpigeon · · Score: 4, Funny

    "the ultimate dos-Ã-dos swing machine."

    I know the caption says it uses old technology- but I'm not trusting my space flight to something that runs on DOS.

    --
    It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
  10. Fishnets!!! by petronivs · · Score: 4, Funny

    "It's sort-of like a one-hundred kilometer long fish-net stocking in space, only it's incredibly strong, and it can withstand many years of bombardment by orbital debris," Hoyt said



    Say, if they make these smaller, maybe I won't have to keep buying pantyhose for my girlfriend!

    --
    This is the real signature
    (Beats those shadows on the cave wall, don't it?)
    1. Re:Fishnets!!! by overshoot · · Score: 5, Funny
      Say, if they make these smaller, maybe I won't have to keep buying pantyhose for my girlfriend!

      They last longer if you take them off first.

      --
      Lacking <sarcasm> tags, /. substitutes moderation as "Troll."
    2. Re:Fishnets!!! by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 2, Funny

      Anyone get what is wrong with this post?

      Yup, the girlfriend.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    3. Re:Fishnets!!! by Guppy06 · · Score: 2, Funny

      "maybe I won't have to keep buying pantyhose for my girlfriend!"

      "Girlfriend?" That may be what you tell the cashier, but we know better.

  11. Not while I'm aboard... by freeze128 · · Score: 4, Funny

    I don't think I would enjoy getting smacked upside the spacecraft by a cable going 25,000 MPH faster than me.

    Can anyone say whiplash?

    1. Re:Not while I'm aboard... by GigsVT · · Score: 2, Interesting

      A retractable lanyard might work, just hook the sling thing onto the lanyard type device which would reel out quickly at first and then slowly apply braking to the reel to accelerate the spacecraft. Then when you are ready to slingshot out, cut the lanyard.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
  12. Also by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    When probes from outer space attack the earth, we can use the slingshot to go back in time to retrieve the exact species of whale they're trying to contact!

    1. Re:Also by Tablizer · · Score: 2, Funny

      In the 1950's they thought that we would have nuclear and ionic space ship engines by now. Imagine their expression when someone from the 50's wakes up from a cryogenic sleep to instead see a giant slingshot aimed into space.

      "Damn! I told that egghead to set it to 2005, not 1905."

  13. With support of ACME Inc.? by OrangeGoo · · Score: 5, Funny

    Slingshots never worked out very well for the Coyote. Doesn't anyone pay attention to the great value of cartoons? Sheesh... how many boulders must fall on the heads of coyotes before someone gets it?

    On the other hand, rockets never worked for the Coyote either... maybe NASA is on to something! Is it possible... could cartoons be... unrealistic? Noooooo!

    1. Re:With support of ACME Inc.? by Tablizer · · Score: 2, Funny

      I ordered an ACME slingshot once and used it on my face. Boy did it hurt! Fortunately, my sister shouted, "It is ACME, not ACNE you dumbass dweeb!"

  14. not a sling shot by proj_2501 · · Score: 4, Informative

    A sling shot is not the same as a sling.

    A sling shot uses a rubber band to propel its payload.

    A sling uses the sudden stop of centripedal force.

    Sling shot = Dennis the Menace.
    Sling = David killing Goliath

    Slings are good for hunting small animals, apparently.

    1. Re:not a sling shot by proj_2501 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Chill out man, I'm just trying to make some karma same as everybody else.

    2. Re:not a sling shot by Tablizer · · Score: 2, Funny

      A sling shot is not the same as a sling....A sling uses the sudden stop of centripedal force.


      Shut up! You are ruining our jokes, Bastard!

    3. Re:not a sling shot by RevMike · · Score: 2, Informative
      Sling:

      1. Start with roughly 8 feet of sinew
      2. Add a small leather basket in the middle.
      3. Place a small stone in the basket.
      4. Hold one end of the sinew in the palm of your hand and the other between your thumb and forefinger. Adjust the length so that the basket is in the exact middle.
      5. Whirl it around your head. Release the sinew between your thumb and forefinger at exactly the right moment to cause the stone to fly off and hit your target.
      As you might imagine, doing this accurately is quite difficult. The only people that typically use the sling are shepherds, since they have the three or four hours a day to spend practicing. As a comparison, a bowman only needs about 30 minutes of daily practice to be highly skilled.

      Damn, I watch too much History Channel.

    4. Re:not a sling shot by shadowbearer · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Actually, I made and learned to use one for Eagle Scouts (a lot) of years ago. They're not too hard to learn - it's just a matter of timing. Took me maybe 3-4 hours to be able to put a marble into a target about 100 ft away, a few more hours to do so consistently.

      They can be devastatingly powerful. I put a small round stone about the size of a marble thru a pickup truck door once :-) Ooops. It didn't penetrate the vinyl interior but left a nice hole in the door metal, and we had to take the truck door apart to get the rock out. My friends' folks were understandably pissed.

      What works best for cord is something non-stretchable - makes you aim better - and small diameter, to cut air resistance. As I remember I used carpenters string (used for leveling, strong stuff) and a plastic shot pocket from a wristrocket.

      SB

      --
      It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
  15. Degrading Orbit by sublimusasterisk · · Score: 5, Insightful


    I noticed on one of the diagrams that the orbit of the slingshot itself degrades after each launch pick-up. Maybe the decrease in orbit isn't very significant, but would this system require self-adjustment? How would the system stay in service over the long term?

    --
    True believers seek redemption from the sin of death.
    1. Re:Degrading Orbit by foolish · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The tether system (more at www.tethers.com) decreases its potential energy after propelling the payload. Which is why they suggest a mix of tether technologies, one for the payload transport, and another electro-dyanamic propulsion. Brin wrote a story about the latter.

      What is kind of sad is that Dr. Robert Forward was one of the originators of the technology but he never got to see his work in space.

      Again, tethers.com explains it all much better than I can.

      --foolish

    2. Re:Degrading Orbit by overshoot · · Score: 2, Interesting
      The orbit degrades (loss of angular momentum) on each "toss up" and recovers on each "snatch." One of the cheap sources of angular momentum would be a mass driver on the Moon (think "The Moon is a Harsh Mistress") tossing rock or whatever down the chain. The stations on the chain snatch the falling rocks and recover both energy and angular momentum.

      Rockets would also work, but would be much more wasteful. Solar sails might work too, but I suspect you'd need some honkers to get adequate results.

      --
      Lacking <sarcasm> tags, /. substitutes moderation as "Troll."
    3. Re:Degrading Orbit by heli0 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Easy. Launch another sling above it...

      --
      Whenever the offence inspires less horror than the punishment, the rigour of penal law is obliged to give way...
    4. Re:Degrading Orbit by spun · · Score: 2, Informative
      What is kind of sad is that Dr. Robert Forward was one of the originators of the technology but he never got to see his work in space.

      Oh, man, I read your post and thought "Robert Forward is dead? I hope he's mistaken about that." Unfortunately, he died last year, and I for one will miss him for his unique style of hard science-fiction and his innovations in physics and space travel. He did a lot of work on tether propulsion systems. Unlike Arthur Clarke, he patented a lot of his inventions. I wonder if the company he set up will see any money from their use, or if he was just a little too far ahead of his time?

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    5. Re:Degrading Orbit by Fjord · · Score: 5, Informative

      This thing is definitely cool. The other posters were right in pointing out that it regains the energy via converting solar energy into momentum by applying a current to the Earth's Magnetic field. I just wanted to point out the purpose of the devices name:

      Momentum-eXchange: this refers to how the tether adds momentum to the spacecraft

      Electrodynamic Reboost: this refers to the mechanism that recharges the orbit

      The one poster is right about the momentum-exchange working both ways in that spacecraft coming back could tether down and reboost the device. However, in most cases the craft will be leaving a payload up there (such as a satillite, or even just burned fuel/oxygen) so it would never regain as much momentum as it lost. The electrodynamic reboost ensure it keeps flying.

      --
      -no broken link
  16. Cable Strength by crispy1083 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Is this something that can be done with conventional materials, or is this another carbon nanotube based idea that might never come to pass?

    1. Re:Cable Strength by foolish · · Score: 4, Informative

      The people making the tethers, TUI (www.tethers.com) are making it out of Spectra fibres. You can check out their website for the full gist, but they have fabrication down pat.

      So, yes, this is the real deal, not something 'down the road 5 years'.

      --foolish

  17. Brings a whole new meaning to the phrase by drgroove · · Score: 2, Funny

    "you've got your ass in a sling now!"

  18. Re:A waste of time? by alexre1 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Wasn't this the subject of an Aurthur C. Clarke SCI-FI novel? Apparently they found methods to create a super strong material that allowed them to make an elevator to space? It was a very interesting read, especially to us nerds. The book dabbled in some interesting physics, the methods required to create such an elevator (given that a strong enough material exists), etc. Anyone remember the title of this book? I vaguely remember 'paradise' as one of the words. Alex

  19. Borrowed from good sci-fi... by praedor · · Score: 4, Informative

    By Gregory Benford. In either "Great Sky River" or "Tides of Light" Benford (physicist and astronomer at UC, Irvine), can't recall which, there is an organism that does this...only its ends actually come much farther down into the atmosphere than NASA's proposal. This organism was even used by the main character in the story to hitch a ride into space.

    --
    In Bushworld, they struggle to keep church and state separate in Iraq as they increasingly merge the two in America.
    1. Re:Borrowed from good sci-fi... by Fweeky · · Score: 2, Informative

      Sure it wasn't "Beyond the Fall of Night"?

  20. A pinwheel? by Aardpig · · Score: 2, Informative

    IIRC, a similar-sounding device (known as the Pinwheel) appeared in "Beyond the Fall of Night", by Gregory Benford. This book was a sequel to the Arthur C. Clarke short story "Against the Fall of Night", which Clarke later re-wrote as the full-blown novel "The City and the Stars". All three tales are well worth a read!

    --
    Tubal-Cain smokes the white owl.
  21. Tether Snatch! by overshoot · · Score: 2, Insightful
    The proposal has been around in science fiction circles for decades. The engineering is nontrivial, but carbon filiament cable makes it possible. You also need an energy source at the waystations to make up for the transfer (think nuke here, solar ain't enough).

    In some ways the neatest thing about it is that it does away with the need for reaction mass, which is is nothing else an environmental improvement.

    --
    Lacking <sarcasm> tags, /. substitutes moderation as "Troll."
  22. What I don't get... by TamMan2000 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This thing is going to transfer momentum to the space craft it is boosting, right? Where is it getting it from? Something has to get that cable spinning, and I don't see how to get the tether started/respun after it has be put in orbit/used to boost without using just as much energy as you have saved by using it.

    I am sure I am missing something, but I don't know what, could someone fill me in?

    P.S. I did RTFA, doesn't explain it...

    --
    "I'll have a Guinness, no wait, make that a Coors Light" -Grad student I work with, who shall remain anonymous...
    1. Re:What I don't get... by Tazzy531 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      unlike on earth, there is no atmosphere in space. Once you give something a little momentum, it keeps spinning until a counter force. Now all you need is very short/small burst of power to get it started. And using the centrifugal force, the outside spins faster than the center.

      --


      _______________________________
      "I'm not Conceited...I'm just a realist..."
    2. Re:What I don't get... by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 2, Interesting

      it is about the amount of power needed not he amount of energy needed.

      power is damn expensive, so the less power you need to get that smae work done the cheaper it will be...to maintain the orbit of this thing and keep it spining will cost a hell of a lot less than it would be to keep launching chemical rockets which get the same work done but in a shorter time/distance. plus you have to carry all the energy with you withthe rocket but with a spining sling you have all that energy saved in the sling so you need less energy with you in order to rondevue with the sling.

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    3. Re:What I don't get... by Koushiro · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well, looking at this image, it looks like once the tether's orbit has begun to deteriorate, it will just keep falling until it burns up/hits Australia. Rather an odd form for a disposable propulsion system, though...

      --
      Karma: Oldschool
    4. Re:What I don't get... by madboson · · Score: 2, Informative

      That is true, but every time the teather enters the atmosphere, it will be hitting alot of resistance.

      --
      Mo00o
    5. Re:What I don't get... by bgspence · · Score: 2, Informative

      There are two ways to get energy to restore orbital momentum to the sling system. One is mentioned in the MXER tether discussion at tethers.com. You can use solar power and the earth's magnetic field to move the system like an electric motor in space.

      Another that doesn't seem to be mentioned is slinging things back to earth. You could toss the payload up and the expended payload vehicle down in separate tosses.

    6. Re:What I don't get... by Tablizer · · Score: 2, Funny

      This thing is going to transfer momentum to the space craft it is boosting, right? Where is it getting it from? Something has to get that cable spinning,

      A giant U-shaped magnet from ACME, of course.

    7. Re:What I don't get... by Richard_J_N · · Score: 3, Informative

      That's the electrodynamic bit. The conducting tether cuts magnetic field lines. This induces a voltage and causes a current to flow along it. (You emit ions at both ends to complete the circuit). Normally, that causes electromagnetic damping (like a dynamo). But, if you use solar cells to drive the current the opposite way, you can get a propulsion force... See here for more.

  23. This might not be as easy as it seems by jj_johny · · Score: 4, Interesting

    From an earlier experiment it is clear that there are forces that will wreak havoc on most equipment. Travelling that fast through even the thinnest atmosphere or magnetic field will do some serious stress on things.

  24. Hurl into orbit? by Columbo · · Score: 5, Funny

    Gives new meaning to "Projectile Vomiting".

    Heh. Alright, I'll go away now.

  25. news flash: King George II is DEAD by Jubedgy · · Score: 2, Informative

    I'm sorry, you must be confused. King George II lived in Germany and died on 25 Oct 1760 from a burst blood vessel. You should get current...I can understand being a few days behind the times, but 243 years?

    --Jubedgy

    --
    Si hoc legere scis nimium eruditionis hebes
  26. Re:A waste of time? by calyxa · · Score: 2, Informative

    _The Fountains of Paradise_

    I guess since /. is making me wait 20 seconds, I can go get the book and find other useful info, such as ISBN and date of publication...

    ah, good thing, too, as I'd forgotten the "The" in the title.

    copyright 1978, ISBN 0-345-25356-6

    -calyxa

    --
    Decay! Decay! Decay! -Helium
  27. Important differences by f97tosc · · Score: 4, Informative

    In the works you site they build an elevator all the way from surface to space; in other words it is extremely long.

    In this case, the craft is much shorter and already in space. Rather than lifting something all the way along a cable, you accelerate it by swinging a shorter cable and throw it off.

    From an energy perspective, you exchange rockets working inefficiently for a short time for solar-powered engines working efficiently but slowly for a long time. In the space elevators you mention, you rather use more conventional engines like in an electric train.

    Tor

  28. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2, Funny

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  29. Re:A waste of time? by Tmack · · Score: 4, Informative
    Maybe this stuff will be strong enough to overcome the limit. Its definately a step in the right direction. Im too lazy to run through the material engineering aspects of it all right now and actually figure the needed strength/weight ratio needed. Im sure its something insanely strong.

    Tm

    --
    Support TBI Research: http://www.raisinhope.org
  30. Pedantic note ... by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 2, Funny

    ... "sling" != "slingshot". They're two completely different things. Conflating the two is kind of like calling a canvas-sided trailer with some rusty tanks and piping a "weapon of mass destruction."

    --
    The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    1. Re:Pedantic note ... by hansroy · · Score: 2, Funny

      Conflating the two is kind of like calling a canvas-sided trailer with some rusty tanks and piping a "weapon of mass destruction."

      Worked for Bush

  31. Obligatory... by Lane.exe · · Score: 5, Funny
    Meep meep.

    --
    IAALS.
  32. The Jules Verne Gun by Jon+Abbott · · Score: 4, Interesting

    One similar device is the Jules Verne Gun -- essentially it is a huge cannon that fires things into space, at about 1000 g's. The idea originated from Jules Verne's book From The Earth To The Moon. Popular Mechanics had a write-up about it a few years back (check out the pictures on page 2!) -- apparently some guy at Lawrence Livermore National Labs is trying to build one that actually works. :^)

  33. Another fine product... by Rorschach1 · · Score: 3, Funny

    This thing doesn't happen to say 'ACME' on the side, does it?

  34. Seems kinda silly to me... by fudgefactor7 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    A sling that "falls" each time you use it is kinda wacky to me. Why not just build gigantic railgun instead and magnetically accellerate the spaceship (once in low orbit) instead?

    1. Re:Seems kinda silly to me... by WolfWithoutAClause · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Railguns can't reach orbital velocity (about 4.5km/s is the best that has been achieved) and have enormous problems with atmospheric drag of the projectile. Additionally railguns suffer from rail erosion with each launch.

      Further, guns of all kinds can't directly go into stable orbit around the earth- orbits necessarily go through the last point where a force was applied to the vehicle. This means that the vehicle intersects the ground unless a circularisation rocket engine or similar is employed.

      --

      -WolfWithoutAClause

      "Gravity is only a theory, not a fact!"
  35. Next Up -- Patented Childhood Memories by Eberlin · · Score: 2, Funny

    Heat things with a giant magnifying lens until the object smokes or pops. Nope

    Shoot bb guns at stop signs (not lights). Nope

    Slingshots...that's taken.

    Blow darts with straws and paper...hmmm, yes, giant air pressure pipe to launch space capsules into orbit.

    Anyone know a good modernized implementation of pouring salt on snails?

  36. Re:Damn NASA wasting money on garbage projects.. by Kenja · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What are you talking about, we're WAY more willing to sacrafice life then them.... Oh wait, you ment our lives. Never mind.

    --

    "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
  37. DON'T DO IT! by Xzzy · · Score: 5, Funny

    Don't these guys know anything about thermodynamics?!

    By launching a ship in this fashion, they will be STEALING momentum from the earth's rotation, degrading the planet's equilibrium and ultimately destroying the orbit and sending us to a firey death in the sun!

    This is obviously a "plan B" coming from those same wackos who want to send the moon crashing into earth by harnessing the energy in the tides.

    1. Re:DON'T DO IT! by FrankSchwab · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Ahh, but the question is, are they stealing momentum from the earth as it orbits the sun, or from the earth's rotation? One would spiral us into the sun. The other would lock one face of the earth towards the sun. (Wasn't there a SciFi novel with that theme? The beings lived in the twilight ring between the scorching desert hemisphere and the frozen dark hemisphere). Not sure either is a good deal. /frank

      --
      And the worms ate into his brain.
  38. Re:A waste of time? by Archfeld · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Yep, another poster already pushed the title but I believe it was a mono-molecular carbon fiber cable that they finally developed to support a "space elevator" application. Someday maybe :)

    --
    errr....umm...*whooosh* *whoosh* Is this thing on ?
  39. Can it be used with Sub-orbital delivery vehicles? by Ugmo · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Do you think this could boost payloads delivered from small non-NASA suborbitals like Rutan's:

    SpaceShipOne?

    It would be great if you could just fly up to the edge of space, chuck your payload up, have a tether catch it and then land. Very cheap compared to rockets.

    Also I wonder if the tether guys are working with: Carbon Fiber 60% stonger than steel

  40. Swing Low... by Mu*puppy · · Score: 3, Funny


    Swing low, sweet NASA slingshot,
    Comin' for to launch me to Mars;
    Swing low, sweet NASA slingshot,
    Comin' for to launch me to Mars.

    I looked over low orbit,
    And WHAT did I see,
    Comin' for to launch me to Mars,
    A band of "Hoytether" comin' after me,
    Comin' for to launch me to Mars.

    Swing low, sweet NASA slingshot,
    Comin' for to launch me to Mars;
    Swing low, sweet NASA slingshot,
    Comin' for to launch me to Mars.

    If you get there before I do,
    Comin' for to launch me to Mars,
    Tell all my friends I'm being slung too,
    Comin' for to launch me to Mars.

    --
    There's no wrong way, to eat a Rhesus...
  41. Runs in the family by Tablizer · · Score: 2, Funny

    Goliath's future relative in Houston walks outside to pick up the morning paper, and SWWWOOOOCK!!!

  42. Re:It only gets you halfway. by joggle · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Yes, for the typical orbit boost, a Homan transfer, you need both a boost to get you into an eliptical orbit to get to the higher orbit and another boost at apogee to make your orbit circular. However, that boost to get you into the eliptical orbit is huge compared to the boost needed to circularize the orbit at apogee, usually requiring an upper stage just for that purpose.

    If these tethers work as claimed, they could significantly reduce the cost of getting satellites into geosynch orbits and high earth orbits, not to mention interplanetary travel as you mention.

  43. Acme + Coyote = Space Propulsion by bastion · · Score: 2, Funny

    WOW!

    Wasn't this theory widely in use by a certain coyote?

    If memory serves (which it usually does just for someone else) he used the rubber bands first and rockets second, we seem to be at odds with the Acme Lab theories on propulsion.

    Everything you need to know you learned from Looney Toons (even that crossdressing habit you try to hide)

  44. what? by perrin5 · · Score: 2, Informative

    the question is still where do you get that force from. The point here is storing and transferring power in and from these 'rubber bands' to use to slingshot stuff. Fine, your answer tells me that I can get a strand moving with very little difficulty in space. This is not really true, since we are talking about centrifugal force, the force is similar to what we would have to apply at sea level. Yes it will stay longer, but you still have to apply the force.

    Where does that force come from?

    --
    hmmmm?
  45. Continuous repair of the tether by rossjudson · · Score: 2, Informative

    Making the tether out of a mesh is a pretty cool idea, but all you've done is extend the lifetime by some factor. What you really want to do is find a way to repair the damage relatively easily.

    Picture two mesh tethers between the endpoints. Each tether is made of a series of lines. The lines come out of the tether and are _unwoven_ from the mesh weave. They are then looped back around and _reweaved_ into the tether going back in the other direction. Each line within a tether is actually participating in a complete loop, there are back again. Each line is an unbroken circle.

    The tether is then _moved_ through the continuous loop, unweaving and weaving at each end. In this way the tether acts like a belt.

    If a break occurs, then movement of the belt/tether will eventually bring the break to one of the terminals, where it can be repaired. The weave localizes the damage and ensures that the line will not simply fly off into space. The repaired line is then rewoven into the loop.

    A belt-like tether like this can last indefinitely.

  46. Two great tastes that don't go great together by Daetrin · · Score: 2, Funny
    ...when orbital mechanics go awry...

    "You plastered your Teather System across my Space Elevator!"

    "You got your Space Elevator caught in my Teather System!"

    --
    This Space Intentionally Left Blank
  47. Expert on subject in the house by DanielRavenNest · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I am a rocket scientist. In fact I've worked both on space tethers and giant space guns
    professionally.

    Electromagnetic tethers work on the same principle as an electric motor - put a current
    through a wire in a magnetic field and you get a force. In earth orbit, you can make electrical
    contact with the ionosphere so that you have a
    one-way current in your wire, and thus a net force. The wire will accelerate one way, and the
    ionospheric plasma accelerates the other way, but there is plasma all around the earth, so you
    don't run out.

    The force you get is IL x B, where I is current
    L is the length of the wire, and B is the magnetic field. Since the strength of the
    Earth's magnetic field is a given, you can only
    play with the current in the wire and the length of the wire to get more force.

    The only consumable you have is a bit of gas
    that is ionized and squirted out to make your electrical contact with the ionosphere. It turns out you only need about 2% as much gas as a normal rocket would use for the same push, and only 1/8 as much as an ion thruster, so it is very mass-efficient. It can be powered by solar panels.

    The downside is it only works well up to about 600 miles. Above that the ionosphere gets too thin to be of much use. That's where the momentum exchange tether comes in.

    Vertical cables, or tethers, can be built in a wide range of lengths and spin rates. Any long vertical object in orbit tends to want to remain vertical because the Earth's gravity changes with the inverse square of the distance from the center of the planet.

    So the bottom of the object, being closer to the Earth's center is tugged by gravity more than the middle, and the top is tugged less. This is the same effect that causes tides.

    Left to itself, then, a vertical cable will stay vertical. The entire thing takes the same amount of time to orbit the earth. So the bottom end, which is moving in a smaller orbit, is moving slower, and the top end is moving faster.

    A free object in a lower orbit actually moves
    faster, thus if you let go at the bottom of
    the cable, you will find yourself at a suborbital speed and re-enter. Similarly, if you let go at the top end, you were moving faster than the local orbital speed, and are thus flung into a higher orbit.

    So if you are heading to, say, the Moon, you could ride up in a suborbital rocket that gets you to a landing platform at the bottom of the tether, ride an elevator to the top, then let go and get flung outwards.

    While you were riding up the elevator, the rest of the tether is moving down due to Newton's law. Thus the electrodynamic motor, which is typically 10 km long and attached to the much longer momentum tether, is used to make up the altitude lost.

    If the momentum exchange tether is short, i.e.
    hundreds of km long, the difference in gravity
    between the top and bottom isn't too great and
    you can build it out of ordinary strong materials. When it gets sizeable in relation
    to the Earth's radius, then you need materials
    somewhat stronger than what we have available
    in quantity.

    Because the Earth's orbit has both natural and
    manmade objects flying around, you need to be
    able to tolerate damage to the tether. At a
    minimum you need something like 6 cables, spaced
    far enough apart that no single object can
    take out more than 2 at a time (you can always
    get 2 if you are aimed just right), and you need a way to replace damaged sections and transfer the tension around the damaged area in the mean time. The Tethers Unlimited design uses a fine mesh of many strands.

    In the limit of a very long tether, you can get the bottom end to be stationary relative to the ground, and you get the space elevator. But it turns out that one that large, even using insanely strong nanotubes, weighs so much it would never make sense economically. A practical one would be in the 100s to a few 1000 km long.

    Daniel

  48. Yeah I just saw this on TV by neophenix · · Score: 2, Funny

    I believe this is the same thing that Wyle E Coyote tried to catch the roadrunner. Hopefully NASA will get better contractors than ACME

  49. Tempur-Pedic by mabu · · Score: 2, Funny

    Nasa is back to working on space stuff? I thought they gave it up to focus their energy on mattresses?

  50. cosmic trebuchet by technoCon · · Score: 2, Funny

    Has Ron Toms at Trebuchet.com been awarded a NASA contract?