Slashdot Mirror


National Do Not Call List Opens for Registrations

prockcore writes "The National Do Not Call Registry is up and running. Sign up so most telemarketers cannot call you starting October 1st. There are exemptions though, like for charities and political organizations." Note that many of the states which have opened their own registries will be sharing that data with the national list, so you may not have to re-register - check and see what your state is doing.

102 of 599 comments (clear)

  1. Needs email address to register... by sdo1 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'm not particularly pleased that the US government now has a growing database tying email addresses to phone numbers.

    (for those that didn't bother to read it, they require a valid email address to register your phone number online)

    I guess I'll be creating a throw-away yahoo or hotmail address for this...

    -S

    --
    --- What parts of "shall make no law", "shall not be infringed", and "shall not be violated" don't you understand?
    1. Re:Needs email address to register... by slide-rule · · Score: 4, Insightful


      They are supposed to be releasing a phone number to call in after a week (or few). I plan to make use of that myself, as the CT do not call list has served me and my wife quite well. (We only get called once a year from a local sheriff's office asking for money.) The online version no doubt alleviates a flood of call volume from people who aren't so worried about the e-mail address thing, so more power to them.

    2. Re:Needs email address to register... by notque · · Score: 4, Funny

      they require a valid email address to register your phone number online

      They said valid, but they didn't say mine!

      bgates@microsoft.com

      --
      http://use.perl.org
    3. Re:Needs email address to register... by Talking+Goat · · Score: 3, Insightful

      And as such, that's the exact reason I won't be registering with it at all.
      Simply put, it's yet another database being compiled by the government, and to be for such a frivilous matter as telemarketers, I don't see the need.

      Do like I do: when I telemarketer calls, put them on hold... and forget about them. Or goof on them, al la Ed Norton in Boiler Room.

      --

      + G to tha Izzo, A to tha Tizee, Talking Giz-oat, Ya'll Bettah Feel Me... +
    4. Re:Needs email address to register... by dki · · Score: 5, Informative

      You can register by phone as well, without giving out an email address. Info on how to register by phone is here.

    5. Re:Needs email address to register... by squarefish · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I think you're a little paranoid about the wrong things. What will the email do for them that the other info they obtain by your phone # doesn't? Chances are that by just supplying your phone # and prior to that they already know where you live, work, eat and sleep. Do you really think they haven't already tied your internet use to your phone/ip/address if they really wanted too?

      even though we generally don't have any privacy and our civil liberties are slowly being axed by the current administration- at least we can have sex any way we want now

      not for the super rightwingers: this is good for everyone.

      --
      Creationists are a lot like zombies. Slow, but powerful and numerous. And they all want to eat our brains.
    6. Re:Needs email address to register... by BurKaZoiD · · Score: 2, Funny

      I don't get called at all. I had my phone turned off. I swear to Gawd, I used to get at least five phone calls a night from solicitors. Now, I get none!

    7. Re:Needs email address to register... by Gorm+the+DBA · · Score: 4, Informative
      Except that what they are doing is sending a confirmation message to that e-mail address and requiring you to click on a link contained in the e-mail, so you need to be able to retreive the e-mail. Supposedly, unless you confirm within 72 hours, the registration is not valid.

      So, unless you call up Bill and have him forward it to you, that strategy wouldn't work anyhow.

      On the other hand, I'm still waiting for my confirmation e-mail, so I don't know for sure exactly how this is working, it all came from their instructions.

    8. Re:Needs email address to register... by fubar1971 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Here's a good idea. How about if the Fed takes your supplied email address and creates a "Do not SPAM list."

    9. Re:Needs email address to register... by erpbridge · · Score: 2, Informative

      If you are in CT (as I am), the state says they'll be merging their registry into the federal one automatically. You don't need to re-register.

    10. Re:Needs email address to register... by saden1 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      All my phoning is done through my cell phone. I see no benefit of having a lan line. No unsolicited calls. Of course if you go over you minutes the cell phone company will take you to the bank. I found out that the hard way but since then I've never gone over my minutes.

      --

      -----
      One is born into aristocracy, but mediocrity can only be achieved through hard work.
    11. Re:Needs email address to register... by ackthpt · · Score: 2, Funny
      They are supposed to be releasing a phone number to call in after a week (or few)

      And it'll probably require you to call in from that number, so Bob Effbeeaye will know exactly where you are at that moment!

      Our only hope is if they turn it over to private industry, like Comcast, which is apparently run by such a lot of bureaucrats that nobody knows where anyone is, what their status is and nothing gets done without a bunch of phone calls which eventually get you to some guy named Fred who works out of a broomcloset in Cincinatti and is the only one in the whole company who can actually get anything done (and he's not an employee, but a social engineer who got bored of highschool and decided to pretend he has a job.)

      If the FBI, CIA and other assorted snoops can't unravel something like Enron, you know it's because bureaucracies don't interface well.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    12. Re:Needs email address to register... by bief · · Score: 5, Informative

      "If you live in a state west of the Mississippi River (including Minnesota or Louisiana), you can call toll-free, 1-888-382-1222 (TTY 1-866-290-4236), from the number you wish to register." -- From the FTC's web site

    13. Re:Needs email address to register... by macaddict · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I think you're a little paranoid about the wrong things. What will the email do for them that the other info they obtain by your phone # doesn't?

      And didn't Microsoft just prove the reliability of using something as impermanent as domain/e-mail to identify someone? Phone numbers are just as reliable. Seven months after getting a new phone number, we still get calls for the previous user--at least a quarter of the telemarketing calls are directed at them.

      The government (from city up to federal) already knows things like a person's SSN and address. A home address is a bit more useful for aiming the mind control satellite than a Yahoo account! ;-)

    14. Re:Needs email address to register... by brakk · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Wouldn't it be easy to setup a script to register EVERY phone number by giving it an email of phone#@whatever.com, then auto reply to the incoming messages?

      Just leave out a few people you don't like (billg) so they will be getting flooded because they are the only ones left.

    15. Re:Needs email address to register... by eah · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's working. My confirmation email took quite a while to arrive.

    16. Re:Needs email address to register... by derch · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And what good will a db linking email to phone numbers be?

      The gov't already knows how much you make, where you live, your employment record, and who you're related to. They have easy access to your school records and most likely know how intelligent you are. They know what car you drive, what charities you give to, and your run-ins with the law. And if they've ever suspected you of anything, then they know your cohorts, political beliefs, your keystrokes, and what you say on the phone. If they were ever worried about who belongs to a particular address, they already had tools to easily find out.

      It's one more bit of information which is a little disturbing, but accounting for the breadth of knowledge they already have, an email address is insignificant. Especially when creating an anonymous, legal, throw-away address circumvents any linking.

      I'm not really directing this at you, it's directed to the idiot moderators who thought your comment deserved modding up.

    17. Re:Needs email address to register... by derch · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Boy everyone likes to poke fun at the republicans.....well, they may not have had to do that if Clinton would have been taking care of Osama instead of playing with his cigars and Monica Lewinsky. Then again, if his daddy would have taken care of Saddam, we would not had to do it this time.

      Then again if the Clinton administration hadn't been hampered by impeachment hearings over blowjobs, maybe they would've dealt with Osama bin Laden. Then again if Reagan hadn't increased covert operations in Afghanistan, the Taliban may not have come to power. Then again if whoever hadn't supported the Shah, then Islamism (NOT Islam) may not have gained such a foothold. Then again if WWI and WWII hadn't happened, then the US wouldn't be such a world power and Sept 11 wouldn't have happened. Then again if the Ottoman empire had truly embraced Westernization, perhaps Europe and by extension the US would be Islamic. Etc, etc, etc... 20/20 hindsight and shoulda-woulda-coulda count for diddly squat.

      The truth still stands that the current administration has eroded our civil rights.

    18. Re:Needs email address to register... by rodney+dill · · Score: 5, Funny

      I fooled them I registered with a false name, false phone number, AND a false email address.

      Now if I could just get my phone to stop ringing.

      --

      Use your head, can't you, use your head,
      You're on earth, there's no cure for that
      - S. Beckett
    19. Re:Needs email address to register... by milkman_matt · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Of course if you go over you minutes the cell phone company will take you to the bank. I found out that the hard way but since then I've never gone over my minutes.

      Boy do I feel your pain.. I figured I didn't make that many calls so I canceled my land line and went cellular... 1 month later I owed them upwards of $300, but I hadn't gotten 1 solicitor since then!! ... I'm not sure if it was worth it. :)

      -matt

    20. Re:Needs email address to register... by milkman_matt · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Doesn't DirecTV require a land line for its initial setup or otherwise?

      DTV requires a phone for the INITIAL setup, but nothing after that.. maybe you can just get a long phone cable and plug it in at a neighbor's? IF You have the DTV TiVo, though, it wants to call out nightly, so you'll need a phone line. According to DTV, if TiVo doesn't call them once a month, they cancel your service entirely...

      -matt

    21. Re:Needs email address to register... by Aadain2001 · · Score: 2, Informative

      You'd be scared shitless if you truely knew just how much information the government has/can get on you. Tieing your phone number(s) to an email address is nothing.

      Here is a great example: we have NO idea what the NSA does because there are no checks or balances in place for them. Through some nifty loopholes, the group was founded with almost complete autonomy and no oversight. The only real tie they have is through funding, and even that is classified! Some estimates by people in the know say that half of the world's computing power is actually in the direct control of the NSA. They have the ability to record and analize EVERY phone conversation in the world in real time and are rumored to be able to break PGP (hence why they stopped blocking it from being legally exported).

      Now, after knowing the power that they have, do you really think that you linking an email address to a phone number is really something to worry about?

      P.S. I am not a lunitic (I just play on on /.), I got this from many reputable news sources. I'd post exactly which ones, but I don't have the list handy. Email me if you really want the list.

      --
      Space for rent, inquire within
    22. Re:Needs email address to register... by mjh · · Score: 2, Informative

      Man, I love TMDA. I'll just generate an expiring address. The one that I'm giving them will only work for 7 days.

      --
      Key to financial independence: Spend less than you earn. Save and invest the difference. Do it for a long time.
    23. Re:Needs email address to register... by neitzsche · · Score: 2, Informative

      I use spamgourmet. http://www.spamgourmet.com

      --
      "God is dead." - Frederik Nietzsche
  2. already slashdotted by mt2mb4me · · Score: 2, Funny

    already slashdooted and no posts, i love the gov'

    1. Re:already slashdotted by ldspartan · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It was down before the "there will be a story here" tag went up on /., so there's no blaming this site for it.

  3. Fastest Slashdotting ever? by frieked · · Score: 4, Funny

    Wow, slashdotted before the article was even posted to non-subscribers...
    I think this is a new record: Slashdotted in negative 37 seconds

    But seriously, I like screwing with telemarketers heads too much to put my number on this list anyway.

    --

    I have often regretted my speech, never my silence.
    -Xenocrates
    1. Re:Fastest Slashdotting ever? by Fishstick · · Score: 2, Interesting
      No, it was slow right after CNN gave out the URL this morning @ 8:30.

      Somehow I think that had a little more to do with it (being broadcast to millions nationwide) than being posted on /.

      I noticed that the pages are .aspx -- kind of surprised me a little.

      according to netcraft:
      OS, Web Server and Hosting History for donotcall.gov

      unknown Microsoft-IIS/5.0 27-Jun-2003 206.16.196.198 CERFnet
      --

      There is much cruelty in the universe, John.
      Yeah, we seem to have the tour map.

    2. Re:Fastest Slashdotting ever? by SanLouBlues · · Score: 2, Funny

      They just didn't anticipate the load. Who would have thought it would be such a popular website?

      OR

      It's a scheme. If the site is always down, the telemarketers can't possibly check it to know who not to call! That's why they hosted it on a 386 with the a Paradox database.

    3. Re:Fastest Slashdotting ever? by opti6600 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Here's my best one yet...

      "Hello sir, may I please speak to whoever is in charge of the major decisions for this household?"

      "SATAN MAKES THE MAJOR DECISIONS IN MY HOUSEHOLD!"

      "Uhh...have a nice day!" *click*

      or then there's the classic "turnaround"

      "Good afternoon sir, I'm calling from..."

      "Hi there, would you like to contribute to the Pinecrest Police annual funding drive? We'll even throw in a sticker showing your generous contribution if you act now! You can donate as little as $20, it's that simple!"

      "Er..." - this is where they try to figure out why they, the telemarketer, have just been given a sales pitch

      "If you're not sure about $20, we could lower the minimum contribution just for you to $15, and we'll even throw in a license plate badge!"

      "No thanks" *click* - now they know how you feel

      Ahh, screwing with telemarketers...

      Best regards,
      Jordan

  4. If you find the site slow ... by jmays · · Score: 3, Informative

    The site has been heavy hit all day ... even before the coming slashdotting!

    --
    KARMA TAG! You're it.
  5. Yes... by mgcsinc · · Score: 5, Insightful

    All I can say is Thank God! More than a simple annoyance in our home lives, the telemarketing industry is a severe drain on the resources of this country. Much like the bureaucracies of Europe (not to mention Canada) which are so widely criticized, the US telemarking industry provides a means of artificial employment for innumerable workers in this country, with people attempting to sell unwanted products in vain, going from job to job as telemarketing franchises are born and die, contributing nothing to the actual economic output of the country. Goodbye telemarketing, and good riddance...

    1. Re:Yes... by gregoryb · · Score: 2, Insightful

      > with people attempting to sell unwanted products in vain

      I'm not sure it's all in vain. Somebody has to buy the crap, otherwise you'd think it wouldn't be so widespread and companies would quit using it as a method of advertising.

      Unfortunately, I'm sad to say that my age 80+ grandparents have bought way too much of the junk sold by telemarketers, and I'm sure there are others like them out there.

    2. Re:Yes... by dave-tx · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I'm hoping this will work better than the do-not-call list in Texas. Maybe other Texans have had better luck, but I'm still swamped with calls that fall under the "legal" umbrella (such as shady real estate dealings that somehow claim they fall under the non-profit clause). Hey, at least the national list doesn't make you fork out a couple bucks to sign up, unlike the Texas list.

      --

      >> "What would the robut do? Frame someone!"

  6. Call me daft if you wish... by jaiteend · · Score: 2, Interesting

    But, signing up now seems a bit absurd. It would be like giving the telemarketters three months time to use my number until then. I think that I might just wait until, oh say, October 1st.

    --
    and the Irishman took the fly in his hands and yelled, "spit it out!"
    1. Re:Call me daft if you wish... by samael · · Score: 2, Informative

      They have three months to put all new entries into their systems. No matter when you sign up there's a three month window until it takes effect...

    2. Re:Call me daft if you wish... by frieked · · Score: 2, Informative

      Why don't you read the site before saying anything:
      All consumers whose numbers are on the registry by August 31, 2003 will notice a downturn in telemarketing calls starting October 1, 2003. Consumers who register after September 1, 2003 will notice a drop in telemarketing calls within three months of the date they register.

      --

      I have often regretted my speech, never my silence.
      -Xenocrates
  7. National Call List? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Is there a national call list? I am lonely and would like to get more phone calls please.

    1. Re:National Call List? by wren337 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Just wait till everyone else signs up for Do Not Call; tens of thousands of telemarketers in their death throes will be calling the remaining 30% of phone numbers. Your phone will be off the hook!

  8. Too bad... by nhaze · · Score: 4, Interesting

    this doesn't affect market researchers calling you. Don't get me wrong i'm not complaining, but it would be great if we could somehow get them under the umbrella.

    1. Re:Too bad... by notque · · Score: 2, Insightful

      this doesn't affect market researchers calling you. Don't get me wrong i'm not complaining, but it would be great if we could somehow get them under the umbrella.

      Could we also add ex-girlfriend's to the list?

      --
      http://use.perl.org
    2. Re:Too bad... by yintercept · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I recall that there are exemptions for certain types of research. For example, the BLS has phone surveys on employment research.

      However, a blanket exclusion of "market research" would pretty much nullify the entire program since marketers would just make every call a "research call."

      "Have you every wanted to make a million dollars with no effort?"

      "Have you ever heard the magic three letters 'MLM'?"

    3. Re:Too bad... by mark_lybarger · · Score: 2, Insightful
      those legal schmucks always paint themselves into a wall with thier wording. this leave phone calls available for any reason outside of what's explicitly defnied above?
      good evening Mr <i>name here</i>,

      i'm conducting a telephone awareness campaign to merely to make people in your neighborhood aware of a really really big sale that Mr. Bob's Ford company is having this weekend.
      that or it will be illegal for church members to call and invite visitors to come back and visit with them again to their church as they are clearly inducing a charitable contribution.
  9. more information here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    You can't register here, but much more info at: http://www.ftc.gov/donotcall/

  10. Automated??? by SuperDuG · · Score: 4, Funny
    I say we start a campaign. Take a phone book and add every number in that phone book to the do not call list.

    Here's my next question, where the hell is my http://donotemail.gov ???

    Scum of the earth, scum of the earth.

    --
    Ignore the "p2p is theft" trolls, they're just uninformed
  11. West of the Big Muddy by Anne_Nonymous · · Score: 4, Informative

    you can also call 888.382.1222, east of the Mississippi can call the same number after 7/7/03. Don't forget to ask if they want to switch to AT&T.

  12. In Other News.... by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 2, Funny
    Many employees from telemarketing companies were 'laid off' today and mysteriously were seeking jobs working for the National DNC registry. Oddly enough, when asked what position they were looking for, they all answered "anything that works directly with the database of names and their numbers, preferably on a computer with a CD-Burner."

    --
    Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
  13. Yes there is a national call list by benthar · · Score: 4, Funny

    Simply sign up for an AOL account. Or put a valid phone number in your Yahoo E-mail Account. Or you could even go so far as to fill out all of those "Enter to win a car" contests at the local Mall.

  14. If charities are exempt by pulse2600 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I can't wait to see companies buying time on charity organization's phone calls. Imagine this:

    1) Company makes donation to charity
    2) Charity promises to advertise company during charity's fund raising calls
    3) Company claims donation on their taxes
    4) ????
    5) Profit!!! (or in the case of the charity: Non-Profit!!!!!)

  15. Spam Gourmet - Disposable addresses by Flamesplash · · Score: 5, Informative

    You should check out Spam Gourmet instead of creating whole yahoo or hotmail accounts. It has worked really well for me.

    --
    "Not knowing when the dawn will come, I open every door." - Emily Dickinson
    1. Re:Spam Gourmet - Disposable addresses by killmenow · · Score: 4, Informative

      I use spam gourmet with much success as well. I also use privacy.net which works pretty well, too.

  16. Blah. by nege · · Score: 3, Informative

    No. Placing your number on the National Do Not Call Registry will stop most, but not all, telemarketing calls. Some businesses are exempt from the national registry and still can call you even if you place your number on it. Exempt businesses include:

    * long-distance phone companies
    * airlines
    * banks and credit unions; and
    * the business of insurance, to the extent that it is regulated by state law.

    Uhm...yea the exempt list manages to get exempt just about 80% of all my telemarketing calls. woohoo! Not to mention the local paper (Times Dispatch) that calls every week, but manages to also tie in your subscription to a charity. I guess I'll go get a fake email addy and sign up anyway.

    1. Re:Blah. by segfault7375 · · Score: 5, Informative

      From a CNN article:

      The FCC voted 5-0 Thursday to add its authority to the do-not-call list and to plug holes in its protections. The registry will now also block telemarketers from industries whose calls the FCC regulates, including airlines, banks and telephone companies.

      Nice!

    2. Re:Blah. by bluetea · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You're wrong about that.

      The FCC (as opposed to the FTC) regulates calls made by the industries you list. The FCC recently voted to support the registry, so that loophole has been closed.


      This CNN article mentions it.

  17. What about. . . by LordGibson · · Score: 2, Insightful

    My concern regarding this list is how it may be used by the exempt entities. All of these political and non-profit organizations are free to interrupt my dinnertime at will. What's to keep them from harvesting this uber-list to augment their dialing pool? I may just wind up with more telemarketing calls after I jump on this registry than I ever did before. Granted they'll be "for a good cause" but I prefer to choose my own causes, thank you very much!

  18. This is a new thing? by LinuxGeek · · Score: 4, Funny

    I have had several ladies tell me that I was on their don't call list. How can one get this entry cleared?

    --

    Kindness is the language which the deaf can hear and the blind can see. - Mark Twain
  19. either that or... by mblase · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...the telemarketers DoS'ed the site first. Bastards!

  20. i did this two hours ago by circletimessquare · · Score: 3, Interesting

    i filled out their online form 2 hours before this slashdot story was posted, and i haven't gotten an email from them yet

    is this in line with everyone else's experiences?

    i'm not actually surprised, their site is hammered, i'm just wondering if i am the rule or the exception ;-)

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  21. My brother is a part time telemarketer... by Kadagan+AU · · Score: 4, Informative

    He hates his job, but it pays him... They get around the do not call list because they're not "technically" telemarketing. They give away something for free. Free demonstrations. ;-) All that they do over the phone is try and get people to accept a free demonstration of some product. The sales people who go do the demo are the ones trying to sell stuff. I wonder if many other companies will be using techniques like this now?

    --
    This space for rent, inquire within.
    1. Re:My brother is a part time telemarketer... by stanmann · · Score: 3, Informative

      I think you will find that the FTC will determine that like someone "giving a survey" about buying a product with a sales pitch at the end, that the phone call is initiating a sale, and therefore prohibited, but I could be wrong. I couldn't find a place to submit this question, but this

      Q: Who is covered by the National Do Not Call Registry?

      A: The National Do Not Call Registry applies to any plan, program or campaign to sell goods or services through interstate phone calls. This includes telemarketers who solicit consumers, often on behalf of third party sellers. It also includes sellers who provide, offer to provide, or arrange to provide goods or services to consumers in exchange for payment.

      would suggest that you are engaged in a "program or campaign" to "arrange to provide goods or services to consumers"

      --
      Food not Bombs is a nice platitude but it breaks down when you notice that the Bombees are usually well fed
  22. concerned about email? register by phone. by twiggy · · Score: 2, Informative

    For all of you complaining that they require a valid email address - If you're that concerned, you can just wait until July 7th when you can register by phone, rather than using the 'net...

    Of course.. you'll have to speak to an actual human being.. but hey, you can't win 'em all ;-)

    --
    http://www.babysmasher.com
    http://www.openingbands.com
  23. Re:Never woulda thunk it by FearUncertaintyDoubt · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Political organizations are exempt?

    Shocking!

    This is probably a good thing from a certain point of view. If they had tried to restrict political calls, then the whole regulation might have been tossed out on 1st Amendment grounds. It certainly would have clouded the issue, and would have very like have been challenged.

  24. 108 per second by Aging_Newbie · · Score: 2, Informative

    According to radio news the site this morning (before Slashdot) was registering 108 people per second, not a bad rate.

  25. Exemption Explanation by unfortunateson · · Score: 4, Informative

    Someone above quoted the FAQ that lists the exempt industries. (He also left off the second part: "You may still receive calls from political organizations, charities, telephone surveyors or companies with which you have an existing business relationship.")

    I think it sucks too, but there's a reason for it: The Federal Trade commission is the one creating this list, and only those industries regulated by them are controllable by this list. For instance, phone companies are regulated by the FCC.

    *&$% Congress should have plugged this hole by unifying a do-not-call across the various regulatory agencies.

    You can bet that congressional campaigns were probably specifically exempted by the bill, though.

    --
    Design for Use, not Construction!
  26. 9:45 GMT-5 and slashdotted already by dkh2 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I guess we're going to have to wait a few hours on this.

    BTW, The e-mail address is so they can verify. You MUST respond to their e-mail within 72 hours or the registration is cancelled.

    Next step, a national Do Not Email registry.

    --
    My office has been taken over by iPod people.
  27. Read their privacy policy... by aksansai · · Score: 2, Informative

    I personally do not care that they have my email address. To not be interrupted four times while sitting at my table for dinner is priceless. Besides - what makes you guys think that the government has no clue what your email address is??

    Their Privacy Policy states: "If you contact us via the Internet, we also collect your email address to confirm your registration request. We will store your email address in a secure manner, separate from your telephone number. We will not share your email address with telemarketers." That's good enough for me.

    --
    Ayup
    1. Re:Read their privacy policy... by BDew · · Score: 4, Funny

      Ah, yes, but this only shows your lack of sophistication. Believing the government, how quaint. This would be a much better response, guaranteed to get you boatloads of positive moderation:

      "The DoNotCall registry has a privacy policy which states that the e-mail address is only used for confirmation and will be stored separately from the phone numbers. Fortunately, I am too wise to fall for this dastardly scheme thought up by the evil genius of Dick Cheney and Karl Rove. Because of my vaunted sophistication, I know for certain that this is a fig leaf to cover the insertion of this data into the TIA database run by the war criminals Don Rumsfeld and John Poindexter. Further, thanks to my superior intellectual ability, I am sure that the oil barons who control GWB will use the e-mail addresses for spamming in an effort to make even more money. The only way for us to be safe is to hope that Howard Dean is elected this year. And, of course, to make sure that the Supreme Court doesn't get a chance to rig the election again. Until that happens, I will be much too smart to include myself on this purported "DoNotCall" List, which I think will be sold by the Republican Party to the highest bidder."

      See, that wasn't so hard! Now you too can comment on political issues here at Slashdot and reap the ever increasing karma rewards!

      --
      "Fifty million Americans can't be wrong," said Rep. Billy Tauzin. Gore - 50,999,897 Bush - 50,456,002
  28. It sucks by giminy · · Score: 3, Informative

    Exemptions:

    - Charities
    - Companies you have "done business with" (ie you bought something from them)
    - Long Distance companies
    - Insurance companies
    - Banks (including credit card companies)
    - Airlines
    - Political fundraisers
    - Overseas telemarketers


    It's all Right here. In my opinion it's hardly worth registering. "Professional" telemarketing companies could become phone number resellers. Professional telemarketers would get the list from the do not call registry, then sell the list to private companies' in-house telemarketers. Since it's legal for most private companies to call you still, and they now have a list with your correct phone number, your calls may increase, not decrease.

    --
    The Right Reverend K. Reid Wightman,
    1. Re:It sucks by MImeKillEr · · Score: 2, Informative

      There are ways around this as well :

      1) Telling them to remove you from their list. Get the name and phone number of a supervisor. Record the date & time. Ask to speak to the supervisor. Inform the supervisor you're telling them to remove you from their list. Failure to do so is punishable by a $500 fine. I had to go this route to get a long-distance company to stop calling me. I've not received a call from them in more than a year. You can also record inbound calls (depending on your state) without letting them know you're doing so. You can use this as evidence that you informed them not to call you again.

      I may have to go this route with another company and actually sue in small claims court to get the $ if they call again.

      2) Privacy manager. We've got this package from our carrier (AT&T?) that blocks calls from phonebanks that don't publish their number to callerid. They get a VRU-type prompt that asks for their passcode or for them to state their name. Enter a passcode & my phone rings. Say your name & the system calls me. I have the option of letting you talk to me, dumping you to callnotes or hanging up on you.

      3) Anonymous call blocker. 'Nuff said.

      --
      Cruising the internet on my TI-99/4A @ a whopping 300 baud!
    2. Re:It sucks by Atlantix · · Score: 4, Informative

      The original exemptions are due to the FTC not having control over airlines, banks, and phone companies. Those industries are regulated by the FCC. If you read this article at CNN: http://www.cnn.com/2003/ALLPOLITICS/06/27/do.not.c all.ap/index.html, you'll find the following quote:

      "The FCC voted 5-0 Thursday to add its authority to the do-not-call list and to plug holes in its protections. The registry will now also block telemarketers from industries whose calls the FCC regulates, including airlines, banks and telephone companies."

      So by the time it goes active (october 1) this thing WILL be useful.

      --Atlantix

  29. Equivalent service in the UK by floydigus · · Score: 2, Informative

    The equivalent in the UK is the telephone preference service.
    You can sign up here. Use links from this page to set yourself up on the mailing preference service (door spam) the faxing preference service (fax spam) and email preference service (spam spam spam spam, spam spam spam spam).

    --

    All things in moderation; including moderation

  30. Telemarketing will never die. by $criptah · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The do-not-call list is a nice idea, but it is going to be worthless due to some exceptions. For example, any company that can affiliate itself with a political or a charity organization is automatically allowed to contact you. That brings me to a question: why does the law allow for political and charity organizations to do telemarketing on the first place? If I want to donate money to a charity, I will do so without them telling me. If I want to support a politician and/or a party, I will do so upon my free will. Also, telemarketing companies will not give up their business easily; I suspect that we are going to face more spam in our inboxes and flyers in our mail. Moreover, by registering our numbers with the government we provide it with a list of valid phone numbers: expect more political soliciting. Unless there is a way to stop all unwated phone calls related to telemarketing/charity/politics people will not win.

  31. I'm going to miss them when they're gone... by Angerson · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's kind of sad that they'll be going away, really. Oh how I'll miss that ever-present 10 second pause before they say hello. Or how they talk to my answering machine for a few minutes before they realize no one is there (with the general interest in telemarketing I could understand the confusion). And of course who can overlook the sheer amount of interesting stories they can provide a person.

    For example like the time I answered the phone only to find a telemarketer in the midst of conversation with her "girlfrient" Brandy in the next cubicle. This one didn't even bother to say hello, just kept on talking. At least she was kind enough to eventually tell me to, "Hold on minute, will you?" Or perhaps the one time I kindly the told the telemarketer that I wasn't interested in their offer and he promptly told me to screw off in his own expletive-ridden way. My favorite, however, was the time I told one I was actually interested in their product just for kicks.

    Sales Drone: "Excuse me, sir? Did you say you were interested?"

    Me: "Yeah, that's right."

    Sales Drone: "No one is ever interested, sir. I'm not even sure how to make a sale."

    (Sets phone down and yells to his associates)

    Sales Drone: "Anyone here ever make a sale before!?"

    (Short pause)

    Sales Drone: "I'm going to have to get you a manager. Can we call you back?"

    Seriously, will anyone miss these people?

  32. Slashdotted - Check out FAQ here: by LookSharp · · Score: 4, Informative

    I snagged a copy and emailed it on before it got posted to Slashdot:

    Tell Me More About the National Do Not Call Registry

    Q: Why would I register my phone number with the National Do Not Call Registry?

    A: The National Do Not Call Registry gives you an opportunity to limit the telemarketing calls you receive. On October 1, 2003, when the National Do Not Call Registry will be enforced, most telemarketers will be required to remove the numbers on the registry from their call lists.

    Q: Who manages the National Do Not Call Registry?

    A: The National Do Not Call Registry is managed by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), the nation's consumer protection agency.

    Q: Why was the National Do Not Call Registry created?

    A: The registry was created to offer consumers a choice regarding telemarketing calls. The FTC's decision to create the National Do Not Call Registry was the culmination of a comprehensive, three year review of the Telemarketing Sales Rule, as well as the Commission's extensive experience enforcing the Rule over seven years. The FTC held numerous workshops, meetings and briefings to solicit feedback from interested parties and considered over 64,000 public comments, most of which favored creating the registry. You can review the entire record of the Rule review at www.ftc.gov/bcp/rulemaking/tsr/tsrrulemaking/index .htm.

    How Does Registration Work?

    Q: How soon after I register will I notice a reduction in calls?

    A: If you register by August 31, 2003, you will start receiving fewer telemarketing calls by October 1, 2003. If you register after September 1, 2003, telemarketers covered by the National Do Not Call Registry will have up to three months from the date you register to stop calling you.

    Q: I've already registered on my state's do not call list. Do I need to register on the National Do Not Call Registry?

    A: The answer depends on where you live. Most of the 26 states will that currently have active do not call lists will transfer numbers from their lists to the National Do Not Call Registry. A few will not. You can find out which states are transferring their do not call lists to the National Do Not Call Registry at www.ftc.gov/donotcall. If you live in a state that is transferring its do not call list to the national registry, you do not need to re-register. On the other hand, if you live in a state that has its own do not call list, but the state is not transferring numbers to the National Registry, then you need to register your own number on the National Registry. If you are uncertain whether you are on a state do not call list and wish to limit your telemarketing contacts, you can register with the National Do Not Call Registry.

    Q: When I register my phone number, how long until it shows up on the National Do Not Call Registry?

    A: After you register, your phone number will be available for telemarketers to remove it from their call lists by the next day. Telemarketers will have up to three months to get your phone number and remove it from their call lists.

    Q: How long does it take after I delete my phone number for it to be deleted from the National Do Not Call Registry?

    A: After you delete your phone number, it will be removed from the National Do Not Call Registry by the next day. But telemarketers have up to three months to access information about your deletion and add your number back to their call lists, if they choose to.

    Q: If I registered by phone, will I receive a confirmation?

    A: No, but you can verify that your number is on the registry online or by calling the registry's toll-free number, 1-888-382-1222; for TTY, call 1-866-290-4236.

    Q: I received a phone call from someone offering to put my name on the National Do Not Call Registry. Should I let them?

    A: No. The FTC will not allow private companies or other such third parties to "pre-register" consumers for the National Do Not Call Registry. Web sites

  33. Big deal... by Iamthefallen · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You do realize that any product you buy will now have a clause stating that by buying or registering the product you also sign up to receive special offers from them, their affiliates and whomever else they sell your information to? Explicit permission can be given in many ways, but few of them are actually explicit.

    --
    Wax-Museum Fire Results In Hundreds Of New Danny DeVito Statues
  34. Damn you Slashdot! by indros13 · · Score: 2, Funny
    I had just finished reading the story in my local paper online and was proceeding to go to the site so I could get on the list...

    ...That's funny, the site isn't working, just like when Slashdo...

    ...of course! It's the top story on Slashdot. I guess I'll just have to sign up lat...*ring*

    Damn!

    --
    Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
  35. move to canada ... by eyefloater · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ... won't the telemarketing companies simply be able to move across the border and set up shop there? toronto's already a hotbed for telemarketing boiler rooms calling across canada and the states, this just might make things worse here.

  36. What benefit does it have over state NC list? by Mustang+Matt · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If I'm already on the Missouri list and it's been nearly 100% successful, why would I need to be on the national list? Missouri isn't sharing it's data according to the site and I'm kind of glad because that would probably lead to "charities" from out of state calling me.

    --
    The man who trades freedom for security does not deserve nor will he ever receive either. - Benjamin Franklin
  37. National "The Document Contains no Data" list by siskbc · · Score: 3, Funny
    They are supposed to be releasing a phone number to call in after a week (or few).

    Yeah, but that's even worse! Then they'll have a *phone number* to link to my ph....oh. Nevermind.

    Hey, is it just me or did we manage to /. the registration site? Their server seems to be curled up fetal on the bottom of the rack right now. Good job guys.

    --

    -Looking for a job as a materials chemist or multivariat

    1. Re:National "The Document Contains no Data" list by mink · · Score: 2, Informative

      Bush was on the radio saying over 100 people per second are registering.

      --
      Well I've wrestled with reality for thirty five years doctor, and I'm happy to say I finally won out over it.
    2. Re:National "The Document Contains no Data" list by blair1q · · Score: 2, Informative

      This time it wasn't just /. it was also the AP.

      So yes, the registry is massively hosed right now.

      They are supposed to send out a pair of emails "within a few minutes" to be used to confirm the registration, but I haven't seen any.

      This is why they should have had an "opt-in" registry instead. The user volume would have been 30 per day instead of 30 million.

  38. Resist temptation to flood the list, please by unfortunateson · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I just had another thought.

    Some enterprising young /.er is probably thinking right now that it's less than ten billion total phone numbers (by the time you screen out non-US area codes, toll-free and service numbers it's probably on the order of 6 or 7 billion), a bunch of random domains and e-mails can be created to add EVERY SINGLE phone number to the list, and even automate the e-mail reply with a procmail line. (Actually, since business phone numbers aren't covered by the DNC list, it's probably less than 3 billion possible numbers.)

    Don't.

    No, really.

    If the registry is a complete set of the US phone system, some telemarketer will sue claiming that there's false data in there, and that the majority of the people on the list never opted out.

    They'll have to scrap the whole thing, and start over again with an even-more-invasive registration procedure.

    --
    Design for Use, not Construction!
  39. Monkeys! by Marc2k · · Score: 2, Funny

    Sweet, I was wondering what to do with my 1 Billion monkeys and computers. They really haven't produced anything of worth lately, "Blurst of times"? what the shit is that.

    --
    --- What
  40. Re:Wrong by bluethundr · · Score: 2, Funny

    bgates@microsoft.com

    That's not his email address. sorry. ;)


    That's okay. I just used steve@apple.com instead!

    --
    Quod scripsi, scripsi.
  41. September Rush by RabidChipmunk · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Everyone is talking about the exemptions. No-one is talking about the delay.

    If you sign up before August 1st, telemarketers have to stop calling you in October. This suggests that telemarketers should/will use the list as a "call now" list during September. Similarly, if you sign up after Aug 1, they have three months to call you as many times as posible.

    Yes there has to be some delay, but three months?

    I'm not saying they will all do this, but I bet some will.

    --
    This is not a political statement. This is not legal advice. It's a frick'n Slasdot post. However: I'm Running For
  42. A National DO NOT /. list by adzoox · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I bet there are some websites that wish there was such a thing as a national do not /. list. I have seen some people post really nasty messages after a site was linked by /. staff. Such as this one. For about a week this website had a "F*** You /." message on it.

    --
    Yell & scream & rant & rave... it's no use... you need a shaaaave ~ Bugs Bunny
  43. You're GIVING your number to exempt orgs. by AtariDatacenter · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Think about this for a second, folks. You're helping the government compile a list that anyone but 'protected telemarketers' can call. The regular telemarketers have to grab the list, and weed the numbers out of their databases.

    Now think about this. The government is supplying a list of telephone numbers. There exists 'protected telemarketers'. If you were a protected telemarketer, what would you do?

    You got it. Download the list, and you've got yourself a database of active telephone nubmers to start calling. All for free. "Thanks for giving us your number, chump. Now me and my buddies can call all we want."

    1. Re:You're GIVING your number to exempt orgs. by FurryFeet · · Score: 2, Funny

      They already have your number. This is not like email harvesting.
      And they'd have to be particularly dense to use that strategy. "Let's see, here is a list of people who have specifically and in no uncertain terms stated that they do not like to be called by telemarketers. Let me call them and try to sell them something".
      Really, like selling Windows licenses at a Linuxfest. Good luck.

    2. Re:You're GIVING your number to exempt orgs. by sgt_getraer · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's a little more complex than that. What I found curious is that in the FAQ, even though a company may be exempt (like a long distance company), they cannot contract out the work. So if AT&T is calling you direct it's a-ok, but if they outsource it to Joe's Sweat Shop Call Center that can be dinged for the fine.

      From my experience working for a satanic market research firm, almost no-one does their own calling. Looks like it has the potential to wipe out quite a few calls and force telemarketing to be more expensive to the exempt companies. These are both good things.

    3. Re:You're GIVING your number to exempt orgs. by phriedom · · Score: 2, Informative

      Okay, Mr. Paranoid, here's a data point then: I am on a state no call list, and have been for 5 or 6 years now. I get called 3 or 4 times a year by two charities who pick up donations curbside because I have told them "You can call me next time you have a truck in the neighborhood." I get maybe one charity cold-call per year, and they don't call back when I tell them I'm not interested. Charities don't get a high-enough success rate on cold-calling to make it pay, so they just don't do it much. I get probably one survey call per month, or less. My wife gets several automated phone messages from politicians in the 3 or 4 days before each election, so a couple calls per night for about one week worth out of 104. I'm registered Green, so I don't get political party phone calls.

      Bottom Line: IT WORKS and it is cheaper than commercial solutions. You're not giving them any information they don't already have. There is no downside.

      --
      Don't moderate flamebait as Troll. Know the difference or you will be Meta-moderated.
  44. Does not start until October 1! by artemis67 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Until October 1, telemarketers are free to call without checking the "do not call" list.

    You know that these marketing companies are going to be pressuring their clients to jump on their service before the deadline, to get the most bang. Expect a deluge of sales calls in September.

  45. So what's to stop by earthforce_1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Offshore telemarketers and spammers from mining the do not call database? These people are scum anyways, and as long as they are not operating within the US, it seems to me that the US government has just handed them a bonafide list of valid phone and email addresses.

    --
    My rights don't need management.
  46. A script that is theoretically possible ;-) by eludom · · Score: 2, Informative

    Theoretically, one could write a script that:

    foreach $phonenumber (range of numbers)
    create email alias for $phone number
    sign up $phonenumber with donotcall.gov
    reply to confirmation email via HTTP
    end

    then fire it off for your favorite range of
    phone numbers (your local prefix, a random
    prefix). You could vary the timings, maybe
    add calls to reverse white pages to get the
    names right...randomize where you
    sign up the email addresses, etc.

    Note that I'm just pointing out what is
    *theoretically* possible...not advocating
    that anyone actualy commit fraud to reduce
    junk calls.

    ---eludom

  47. Weak registry by Pionar · · Score: 2, Informative

    I would recommend that anyone in Indiana just keep their number on the state's registry. Not only is that the recommendation of AG Steve Carter, but also of everyone I've talked to that is familiar with the federal legislation.

    A state lawmaker friend of mine has told me that while Indiana's registry exempts only charities, newspapers, insurance agents, and realtors (and even he is suspicious about the last three - strong lobby?), the federal list exempts many groups, including long-distance phone companies, airlines, and insurance agencies.

    In other words, the FTC did what it does best, appear to help consumers while pandering to corporate pressure.

  48. Re:Never woulda thunk it by merky1 · · Score: 2, Funny

    For some reason I don't think the freedom of speech should include the ability to irritate. If it is a "right" to use telemarketing, then it should also be a right to stand in the lobby of some mega-corporation touting a "free willy" sign. Both are invasions of property.

    --
    --WooooHoooo--
  49. kill the ringer by jhagler · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There has been much discussion about whether it's worth it to shut off your land line and go totally cellular or to just put up with the telemarketers. I think there's a relatively simple solution most people are overlooking...turn off your ringers.

    Giving up my land line wouldn't really be an option for me, my cablebox uses it, my home burglar/fire alarm uses it, TiVO uses it, and ADSL uses it so giving it up really isn't an option. A couple other posts mentioned services, pizza guys and UPS, who specifically require a land line for confirmation. So, I kept my phone line and only turn on the ringer when I are specifically expecting a call on that line, the rest of the time the ringer is off and anyone who wants to reach us uses our cell numbers.

    This way I have the best of both worlds, all my equipment that needs a phone line has one, we can talk to our family and friends whenever we want, and telemarketers get endless ringing that we never hear.

    --
    Never underestimate the power of human stupidity -RAH
  50. ...And it doesn't display in Mozilla by mengel · · Score: 3, Interesting
    The pages are all made by MicroSoft Visual Studio 7.0:


    <html>
    <head>
    <title>National Do Not Call Registry</title>
    <meta content="Microsoft Visual Studio 7.0" name="GENERATOR">
    <meta name="keywords" content="National Do Not Call Registry, telemarketers, FTC, Mobile Phone, Home Phone, Registration, Do Not Call" />
    <meta content="C#" name="CODE_LANGUAGE">
    <meta content="JavaScript" name="vs_defaultClientScript">
    <meta content="http://schemas.microsoft.com/intellisense /ie5" name="vs_targetSchema">

    <link rel='stylesheet' type='text/css' href="css/style.css">
    <script src="WebTrendScript.js" language="Javascript1.1"></script>

    </head>

    Which currently doesn't show up in Mozilla *at all*.

    Now does Microsoft intentionally make their Visual Studio stuff (not to mention the latest PowerPoint, etc.) generate almost-HTML that don't display in Mozilla? You be the judge...

    --
    - "History shows again and again how nature points out the folly of men" -- Blue Oyster Cult, 'Godzilla'
  51. Re:Spam Gourmet - Thank you!! by lscotte · · Score: 2, Informative

    Thank you! I hadn't heard of this particular one previously. I've been creating domains in dhs.org or dyndns.org, and then creating aliases on my mail server. This lets me disconnect mail addresses (and domains should it need to get drastic), but I generally like the Spam Gourmet concept better, and it doesn't require any mail server setup.

    I guess the only comment I have is to use watch words, so some spammer doesn't register "haha.99.you@spamgourmet.com" or whatever. Sure, you can manually delete it, but they could keep creating new ones. Having a watchword (or prefix) that you change every once in a while solves this.

    Good stuff. Thanks!

    --
    This post is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License.
  52. when all else fails, have fun with telemarketers by Cnik70 · · Score: 2, Funny

    If a non-profit organization calls you, remember that the people they hire to do this crap read from scripts and are under orders to not hang up untill they try every angle on you. Take this opportunity to ask them what they are wearing. Tell them how much telemarketers turn you on. And above all feel free to scream wild orgasmic yulps as every offer they make gets you hotter and hotter....

    --
    -Cnik
  53. Re:Never woulda thunk it by Buzz_Litebeer · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Acually, he has a point. When you use someones phone, or use there e-mail, you are invading their property with your e-mail/phone call. They pay for the service, and it is up to them how it should be used. You should not have to allow "anyone" to send you anything into your home BECAUSE you pay for a service. You SHOULD have the right, the liberty, to define what does and does not enter your home. When you watch television you are allowing whatever those people want to come into your home, and it is up to you to decide whether you want to turn it off or not.

    When you have a phone you are not requesting the information that people send to you, you are using it as a communications device.

    When a company starts sending unsolicited material, in volume, that might be construed as an invasion of property, a denial of service against your phone so to speak.

    YOU PAY FOR THE PHONE, you should have the RIGHT to say "i dont want MY phone to be used this way"

    because it is YOUR phone, YOUR service.

    if someone signed up for a "i dont want to be part of a gallop poll" list then yes by god that person shouldnt have the gallop poll ringing their house.

    it is not freedom of speech to FORCE someone to listen to, or receive content. It is freedom of speech to ALLOW someone to say there peice, but it is NOT freedom of speech to make someone listen to it.

    That is a captive audience, and thats what telemarkters, TV, and Spammers, all want.

    IT IS NOT THE RIGHT of SPAMMERS, TV, TELEMARKTERS to have a captive audience, or even a "partially captive audience" (ie forcing you to at least allow them to try to talk to you). They can send there message as much as they wwant, but they should not necessarilly be allowed to do it using private infrastructure (the phone to your house).

    The problem is, TV, spammers, etc, are all trying to get into the mode where it is required you listen to someone elses "free speech" or "corporate speech" so that they can try to sell you products. But it is stupid because once you receive the information you paid for, you should be able to block, stop, or edit it for how YOU want to view it.

    but that is becoming illegal, alreayd is illegal in some venues.

    This is really a great victory for privacy advocates because it says people can stop others from using their property, and their infrastructure to annoy them without the ability to stop them.

    --
    If you don't vote, you don't matter, so don't waste your time telling me your opinion
  54. DDoS attacks against a Federal server! by lorenlal · · Score: 2, Funny

    AP - Redmond, WA
    The national "Do Not Call List" website opened for business today promising the citizens of America freedom from dinnertime solicitations. Unfortunately, the server has come under massive attack from what can only be assumed to be terrorist telemarketing OSDN subordinates. The cell, identified by a cryptic symbol of a forward slash followed by a period have admitted responsibility for their actions, and continue to hammer the server.
    A local anonymous CFO admitted that he himself has had trouble with this organization before, then excused himself to read his email from support@yahoo.com.

  55. Encorcement... by rufey · · Score: 2, Interesting

    In order for the FCC/FTC to enforce the do-not-call list, they are going to have to get complaints from us the consumer. When filing a complaint, the consumer must be able to report either the company name or telephone number that belongs to the telemarketer. Even though its the law that telemarketers need to provide this information up-front, often they don't. If the consumer doesn't know who to complain about, then how is the FCC/FTC going to impose fines on any telemarketer?