Slashdot Mirror


Sinclair's Answer To The Segway

slumos writes "BBC News Online is reporting on Sir Clive Sinclair's reaction to the Segway. The British inventor thinks it's fine for factories, but not for crowded streets, and he's even planning some competition in the form of a top-secret follow-up to the Sinclair C5."

302 comments

  1. The real question is: by oscast · · Score: 1, Funny

    would make S. Jobs shit his pants?

    1. Re:The real question is: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The real question is: when you asked "would make S. Jobs shit his pants?" what exactly did you mean? That certainly isn't an English sentence.

    2. Re:The real question is: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Use your imagination. I'm sure a smart fellow like yourself can figure out what he meant. Otherwise I'll have to assume you're just a pedantic asshole, and we wouldn't want that, would we?"

      Actually, though, you do have a point - it IS quite hard to make out what he meant. Sorry for sounding like a jerk. I just haven't gotten laid in a few months.

    3. Re:The real question is: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the real question is what happened to the missing C4?

    4. Re:The real question is: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny
      I think the real question is what happened to the missing C4?

      It was used to blow up most of the unsold Sinclair C5's.

    5. Re:The real question is: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Broke your hand or something?

    6. Re:The real question is: by oscast · · Score: 1

      "would make S. Jobs shit his pants?" I left out the "IT" on purpose as a play on words... thinking it would have been somewhat obvious why. The reference to S. Jobs shitting his pants comes from his comment to Dean Kamenwhen Dean showed S. Jobs the segway and Steve said that it was ugly and that he could get designers that would cause you to shit your pants. However, now that I had to explain the joke... its not funny any more. [roll eyes]

    7. Re:The real question is: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Yes. Without the use of my right hand I haven't been able to consumate my relationship with it properly. But, keep in mind that this really does not mean anything:

      "shit his pants"

      Does that mean that he excreted his pants into being?

      Does it mean that he had previously eaten his pants (as a given) and is just now excreting them back into the world?

      Or is it an ignorant usage of language meaning:
      "shit IN his pants"?

      The last option would not make any sense since it would indicate that he is potentially incontinent due to his usage of the Segway. Or he is frightened by some quality of the Segway, in which case I would advise that he seek counselling immediately.

      If it means that he ate his pants, then counselling is still not out of the question. There are many mental illnesses that will cause a person to eat something that is not meant to be eaten.

      If it means that he actually produced a pair of pants whilst excreting digested matter, then I think it's time to say "stop the presses! Man shits pants into existence! New textiles on the horizon!"

      I am not a troll.

    8. Re:The real question is: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      it's a colloquialism... "I shit my pants laughing" or "I shit myself I was so scared"

      ...in niether of those examples is the content of the excrement an issue, the inappropiateness and timing of the movement is. It is assumed that the pants were on and the shit was stopped by the first available surface.

      and if I spelled the big C word wrong up there blow me.
      you are a troll. or a fucking moron.
    9. Re:The real question is: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There there now... You are apparently upset by your inadequacy in the humor department. It's ok though. Not everyone was meant to have a laugh at the expense of those with less intelligence. (Especially if there is NO ONE less intelligent than you.) Why don't you go watch an episode of the Man Show and massage your damaged ego.

      I am not a troll, but you ARE a moron. Accept it and move on.

    10. Re:The real question is: by mrd_yaddayadda · · Score: 1

      I don't think it was funny to begin with. ;)

      However, I'd be interested to see what Sir Clive can come up with. He did bring an awful lot of either innovative, inventive or first/early-to-market things about. However that was quite a while ago...

  2. Interresting to see the difference by Anonymous+MadCoe · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Between British and US engineering.
    Styles are different and I wonder what the differences would be.

    1. Re:Interresting to see the difference by BobTheLawyer · · Score: 4, Interesting

      it won't be British engineering, it will be Sinclair's engineering, which is always made of cheap standard parts rather than the expensive custom-designed bits and bobs that make up the Segway.

      So it will be cheap, but made of plastic and probably won't work very well.

    2. Re:Interresting to see the difference by azzy · · Score: 1

      But in 20 years people will be paying a lot of money for it on e-bay

    3. Re:Interresting to see the difference by gilesjuk · · Score: 1

      He's a clever man, but I think his designs are quite eccentric and ill thought out at times. The C5 for example had a very horrible driving position, I had a go in one once and began to hurt my back.

    4. Re:Interresting to see the difference by g_attrill · · Score: 2, Interesting

      When it was made, the C5 made some breakthroughs - for instance the body was the largest injection moudling ever and designed by Lotus.

    5. Re:Interresting to see the difference by Larsing · · Score: 1

      So it will be cheap, but made of plastic and probably won't work very well.

      A bit like the British railroads then..?

      --
      Ethics is what you say you do. Morals is what you actually do.
    6. Re:Interresting to see the difference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      So it will be cheap, but made of plastic and probably won't work very well.

      A bit like the British railroads then..?

      Yes, apart from the cheap aspect.

    7. Re:Interresting to see the difference by Bushcat · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well, all the British bits will be made in Taiwan, and all the US bits will be made in China.

    8. Re:Interresting to see the difference by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

      ...and the bit about being made of plastic.

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    9. Re:Interresting to see the difference by zebs · · Score: 1

      The C5 for example had a very horrible driving position, I had a go in one once and began to hurt my back.
      Yeah, but you did goto the Sinclair massage parlour, didn't you?

    10. Re:Interresting to see the difference by Larsing · · Score: 1

      I woldn't be too sure about that... ,-)

      --
      Ethics is what you say you do. Morals is what you actually do.
    11. Re:Interresting to see the difference by MSBob · · Score: 3, Informative

      Well, perhaps Sinclair's products weren't the sturdiest things around but they hit the right price point to allow for large consumer adoption. How many folk in say, West Midlands would have been able to buy a 2 grand Apple Mac for a personal computer? Speccy cost a tiny fraction of that and that's why it was such a hit. It wasn't perfect but for me it was a lot better than having no 'puter at all.

      --
      Your pizza just the way you ought to have it.
    12. Re:Interresting to see the difference by BobTheLawyer · · Score: 1

      I see my factually accurate post pointing out the stupidity of large-scale injection moulding got modded down to flamebait.

      When did Clive Sinclair become a slashdot member?

    13. Re:Interresting to see the difference by Library+Spoff · · Score: 1

      That's the sandwiches you are thinking of....

      --
      Acid House saves Souls
    14. Re:Interresting to see the difference by gilesjuk · · Score: 1

      Indeed, I'm not far from the west midlands and many did have speccies. I had the C64 myself, missed out on some good games to start with but the SID chip made up for that.

      Sinclair doesn't really have a market now, people expect cheap junk to be very cheap and work.

    15. Re:Interresting to see the difference by mrd_yaddayadda · · Score: 1

      I loved them, when I had my goes of them. :)

      Aviemore ski resort in Scotland bought a fair few of them for people to hire to get around in. Great fun.

  3. Followups by barbazoo · · Score: 5, Funny

    I would like to see a followup to the ZX-Spectrum.

    1. Re:Followups by turgid · · Score: 2, Informative

      You mean like the Loki super Spectrum?

    2. Re:Followups by Lars+T. · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Or like the SAM Coupe, which was actually sold (yet not made by Sinclair).

      (Okay, what's up with using accented chars in Slashdot posts anyway?)

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

    3. Re:Followups by turgid · · Score: 1

      Yes, it was quite a hare-brained scheme, bringing out a 6MHz (8-bit) Z80 machine in a day when everyone else was moving to the 68030 and 80486 and 25MHz and above.

  4. Sinclair's other attempts... by altgrr · · Score: 5, Informative

    I believe the article makes reference to Sinclair's other efforts at transportation: the Zike (a folding electric scooter) and the Zeta (a motor which attaches to a normal bicycle, harnessing energy when you go downhill and using it to propel you uphill at a stately 8mph, as I remember).

    These relatively unknown inventions were peddled in the small ads sections of newspapers for a long time. The electric scooter sold for about 500, the bike motor for about 200. But no, I don't know anyone who had one.

    --


    Like car accidents, most hardware problems are due to driver error.
    1. Re:Sinclair's other attempts... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
    2. Re:Sinclair's other attempts... by Meowing · · Score: 1, Funny
      the Zike (a folding electric scooter)

      Yikes, serious flashback time. "You can go on a zike bike if you like. If you like you can go in an old blue shoe. Just go go go, please do do do!"

    3. Re:Sinclair's other attempts... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He also makes motor addons for wheelchairs.
      One of the first people to make a really decent one.
      No-one cares about that though.

  5. Cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    .... but can I run linux on it?

    1. Re:Cool by M00TP01NT · · Score: 1

      No, but you can run into Linus on it!

  6. Oh what a surprise... by boomgopher · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Well, this is some another company bashing it's competition - ooh, what big news.

    But while we're on the topic of the Segway: Frankly, I'm surprised at all the negative reaction to the Segway, here (Slashdot) and elsewhere. I mean honestly, it's very innovative, compact, somewhat cheap, enviro-safe, etc. It could really compete with the automobile in many areas. And yet you get the mommy-types bitching about it promoting laziness, dangerous on sidewalks, etc. So nay-sayers, correct my misunderstanding: how exactly will the world be worse if Segways become massively popular? I see nothing but good coming from its adoption.

    --
    Your hybrid is not saving the environment. Its purpose is to make you feel good about buying something.
    1. Re:Oh what a surprise... by Mathew+Lankard · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I think the bashing stems to the fact that the Segway was made out to be some marvel of modern technology that was supposed to change the way the world moved around. This was according the the hype from the creators and the press. Do we have this marvelous creation? No. Do we have something that Bush can ride around on and look like a bigger idiot? Yes.

    2. Re:Oh what a surprise... by Lars+Arvestad · · Score: 5, Informative
      Well, this is some another company bashing it's competition - ooh, what big news.

      I don't think he bashed it! To the contrary, Sinclair said:

      I found it very enjoyable - a nice sensation once I got over the initial nervousness. It's very manoeuvrable, no trouble there at all. After a few minutes practice you can do anything you like.
      Later in the article, he says it is not suitable for British sidewalks, but has applications elsewhere, and I think that is correct. It is a vehicle comparable to a bike and belongs on the street.
      --
      Reality or nothing.
    3. Re:Oh what a surprise... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Who says the world will be worse if Segways become massively popular? careful where you are pointing that straw man.

      The problem is with your assertion that it is 'somewhat cheap' (read expensive) is cumbersome (want to carry it up to your flat to re-charge?) and offers few advantages compared with a bicycle.

      I use a bike for my commute into work, for quick trips to the shops (hey you can put panniers on it - where is the storage on a Segway?) and for pleasurabe jaunts into the countryside. By comparison the Segway isn't very versatile. ... no, I'm not a bike bigot I also drive a car. The Segway is a lovely concept, but doesn't give you enough USP bang for your buck.

    4. Re:Oh what a surprise... by rokzy · · Score: 2, Informative

      in UK it's illegal (IANAL) to ride a bike on pavement ("British sidewalk"), they're for roads.

      Segways should not be on roads.

    5. Re:Oh what a surprise... by Bloodmoon1 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Frankly, I'm surprised at all the negative reaction to the Segway... it's very innovative, compact, somewhat cheap, enviro-safe, etc. ... And yet you get the mommy-types bitching about it promoting laziness, dangerous on sidewalks, etc. So nay-sayers, correct my misunderstanding: how exactly will the world be worse if Segways become massively popular?

      I actually agree with you about the various merits of the Segway, yet I can say I abso-fucking-lutly hate it. Not because of what it is, but because of what it was made out to be. And I suspect my reaction is the same as many people, especially us /.ers.

      Personally, I only think good can come from the Segway and future rivals going into widespread use. I mean, at the very least it isn't really going to ever hurt anything even if they all fall by the side as a technological curiosity. However, I'm pissed because of the hope I had. I remember in the months before the Segway came out, it was hyped as IT. It was going to more or less revolutionize some major facit of modern life, if not all of it. The inventor, Dean Kamen, is a very intelligent man, and if anyone could live up to his own predictions for a device of his design, it would be him. So when he said stuff like, "It will change the way cities are built. They will be built around IT." (Or something like that, he did say it would forever change city design) I really believed him, and I think so did most of us, hence the hatred for the Segway. I personally was thinking, "Ok, it sounds REALLY far-fetched, but what if this is something really bad ass? What if this is cheap and easy nuclear fusion, teleportation, a viable personal air transport, (or any of a hundred other things I've only dreamed of)." IT really got my hopes up. And then the big day of the unveiling comes up and, anxiously I awaited, only to find out IT_IS_A_FUCKING_SCOOTER!? This had to be, by far, the absolute biggest let down of a product in the (at least recent) history of mankind. After months of hype and hope, we get an advanced toy/novelty that's over priced any damn way.

      So really, I think the deep, intense hatred of the Segway is not a product of the product, but rather a product of the crushed dreams brought on by the hype of the product. Had we only known Steve Jobs' initial reaction, I think the let down may have been softer and the backlash much easier.

      --

      Request: ECM unit, 1000 km fullerene cable, 1 tactical nuclear weapon. Reason: Birthday party for foreign dignitary.
    6. Re:Oh what a surprise... by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      I'm surprised at all the negative reaction to the Segway,

      Because it's just a toy. If you want to stand up while rolling along the pavement, use roller skates, a scooter, or a scateboard. All of which are much, much cheaper and more maneuvrable than the Segway. To go any distance, or carry luggage, use a bicycle.

      About as useful as the neon light case mods. Cute to look at, but when you come down to it, a waste of time and money.

    7. Re:Oh what a surprise... by radja · · Score: 1

      bikes should be on the road in most of europe, unless there's a bicycle-path. the sidewalk is for walking. segways shouldn't be on roads, so they're not well suited for euopean traffic.

      --

      No one can understand the truth until he drinks of coffee's frothy goodness.
      --Sheikh Abd-Al-Kadir, 1587
    8. Re:Oh what a surprise... by AntiOrganic · · Score: 1

      It's 10x more expensive than a relatively high-end mountain bike.

      It's 25x more expensive than a cheap mountain bike.

      I'd have nothing against Segways if they didn't cost so damn much. It's more a testament to what can be done with technology these days than what should. Kamen is a great guy (his brother taught music at my school until the douches fired him), and he's had some great ideas, but the Segway isn't really one of them.

    9. Re:Oh what a surprise... by vidarh · · Score: 1
      Newsflash: Groundbreaking devices based on new technology that cost a lot to develop almost always cost much until some of the costs have been recouped, and volume and reengineering allows for cost cuts.

      It's as if I'd been bitching about VCRs because they were expensive when they were launched, instead of wanting one but staying away until prices came down to reasonable levels.

    10. Re:Oh what a surprise... by __aamkky7574 · · Score: 2, Funny

      The fact is that they cost a fortune ("somewhat cheap"? Pur-leaze.), are slow but still unwieldy and make you look like King Dork McDork of Dorkania from the the planet Dorkeraan. They have all the disadvantages of a car (problems with parking, cost, lack of exercise) with the disadvantages of a bike (no weather protection, no passengers, relatively slow speed) and none of the benefits. In short, they are ridiculous. There is definitely a market for one-person medium-speed transportation systems, but this is not the solution.

      P.

    11. Re:Oh what a surprise... by vidarh · · Score: 1

      To me, my roller blades are the toys, just as I'd consider roller skates, a scooter, or a skateboard toys. On the other hand I'd love a Segway.

    12. Re:Oh what a surprise... by fohidac · · Score: 0

      i think, most importantly, why people have been negative about the segway is that you look like a twat when you're riding it. no amount of innovation can detract from the fact that you look like a twat when you ride it.

    13. Re:Oh what a surprise... by JimPooley · · Score: 1

      in UK it's illegal (IANAL) to ride a bike on pavement ("British sidewalk"), they're for roads

      That doesn't stop people from riding on the pavement though...!

      --

      "Information wants to be paid"
    14. Re:Oh what a surprise... by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      On the other hand I'd love a Segway.

      Notice you said "love to have". Not "find it useful".

    15. Re:Oh what a surprise... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It doesnt shield you from the environment.

    16. Re:Oh what a surprise... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or through red lights. Or behind me. Or at me.

      The next fucking cyclist who rides through a red light when I'm crossing the road will get me umbrella through his wheels.

    17. Re:Oh what a surprise... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, that's something that really pisses me off. I live in the US, in Texas. We've had cyclists here demanding that they be allowed to ride on the roads and be treated with respect as equals to automobiles. Then I see these jackasses running red lights all the time. They need to make up their damn minds. Either obey the road laws or get the hell off the road.

    18. Re:Oh what a surprise... by passthecrackpipe · · Score: 1

      What is impressive and life-changing about the segway is not the segway itself, but the technology it employs. The same technology that powers the segway also powers the IBOT, something like a wheelchair, delivering a previously unheard of amount of mobility to disabled users.

      --
      People who think they know everything are a great annoyance to those of us who do.
    19. Re:Oh what a surprise... by mikerich · · Score: 1
      The Segway is doubly screwed in Britain, since it cannot be legally used on the pavement and no insurer will cover it to be used on the roads. Even cycleways are out since the local bylaws forbid powered vehicles from using them.

      You might be able to use them if you have a nice long driveway.

      Best wishes,
      Mike.

    20. Re:Oh what a surprise... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The absolute worst thing any cyclist can do is to ride full pelt at a red light...and then hop onto the pavement so that they can continue on through the light. Bastards!

    21. Re:Oh what a surprise... by AndroidCat · · Score: 1
      That doesn't stop people from riding on the pavement though...!

      Yeah, pedestrians eventually stop them.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    22. Re:Oh what a surprise... by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

      mind you, you look like a twat when you a drive a 4x4 (SUV, whatever) and they're incredibly popular!

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    23. Re:Oh what a surprise... by 1u3hr · · Score: 2, Informative
      There is definitely a market for one-person medium-speed transportation systems, but this is not the solution.

      Maybe unicycles? Or more seriously, small-wheel, possibly folding bikes, such as Bikefriday or the Moulton. These have the advantage over Segways and conventional bikes of being portable, in the sense that youl can carry them inside, on an elevator, or a train to complete your journey.

    24. Re:Oh what a surprise... by CwazyWabbit · · Score: 1

      Actually, it was "I'd love a Segway" which sounds more nuptial to me.

    25. Re:Oh what a surprise... by paiute · · Score: 2, Interesting

      But while we're on the topic of the Segway: Frankly, I'm surprised at all the negative reaction to the Segway, here (Slashdot) and elsewhere

      Frankly, I'm surprised that you are surprised. It was hyped like it would be the equivalent of a personal jetcar. It turns out to be a powered walker. Great and imaginitive engineering, but it still is only a powered walker.

      I'm willing to let Grandma use it to get to the store from her assisted living apartment, but I don't want to share the sidewalk with obese Segway-riding bozos who should be walking - and are perfectly capable of walking.

      --
      If Slashdot were chemistry it would look like this:Cadaverine
    26. Re:Oh what a surprise... by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1
      Actually the bit about cities being designed around it is not that strange a notion. In holland where we the bicycle is used far more then it seems to be in the US, there is a city called Almere. It is a new city build in reclaimed land. During its initial layout it was decided to seperate car and bicycle traffic with the shortest routes being given to the bicycle and often the right of way as well.

      It worked very well, if you were a cyclist as me it sure as hell beat the standard approach of just try to fit in between the parked cars and speeding cars.

      Of course it is hated by all the car drivers who want to park their cars 1 meter from the front door even though they choose to live in a city designed around bikes.

      Just because most cities are now designed around the car doesn't mean there isn't room for communities designed around smaller forms of transport.

      --

      MMO Quests are like orgasms:

      You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    27. Re:Oh what a surprise... by pj737 · · Score: 1
      I'd have to agree that the Segway is way too expensive but 10X more than a "relatively high-end mountain bike"? I paid $1,400 for mine (20% off list) and I still have my buddies make fun of my not-so-great fork. 5X, maybe.

      What surprises me most is that there hasn't been any attempts to maim our president yet.

    28. Re:Oh what a surprise... by pj737 · · Score: 1

      The quote should read "haven't been" Duh.

    29. Re:Oh what a surprise... by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      No, those ARE the intended purposes of current 4x4s...

      Hence you both look like AND are a twat etc etc

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    30. Re:Oh what a surprise... by dmorin · · Score: 2, Informative
      Not because of what it is, but because of what it was made out to be.

      How long do you think it takes to change the world? It's not like overnight there's a billion of the things on the streets. Takes time to rebuild cities.

      I'm serious. Take one of his other inventions, the iBot. Or the portable dialysis machine. Don't you think that both were clunkier and more expensive than existing solutions? Both could be said to change the world for the people who need them. But not overnight. Not until they become so popular that they become the *only* thing, instead of just the next big thing. Once a person in a wheelchair has navigated a street curb or flight of stairs, or looked a standing person in the eye, do you think they could ever go back? I want everyone who compares Segway to a scooter or a bicycle to use a Segway for a month or so and then your opinion will matter.

      Look for Segways to gain popularity overseas first, where population (and hence, pollution and traffic) are bigger problems. In a few years people will be whining that we're behind the times on the whole Segway thing.

      Had we only known Steve Jobs' initial reaction, I think the let down may have been softer and the backlash much easier.

      Actually now that Codename: Ginger is out, it paints a much different picture. The story is told of how Jobs wouldn't get off and let other people ride, and when Dean made him, he sat impatiently by before grabbing it away and telling the person "Ok, get off now" so he could ride it again.

      Jobs' big contribution was to say "You'll never own this market, Asia will kill you. Put it in the public domain and slap a $100 royalty on every one built." But Dean wasn't having that.

      There are also some excellent stories about Jobs basically trying to buy the whole thing. Dean was trying to raise $50million in capital and Jobs basically showed up late, after most of it had been raised, and practically offered the whole figure by himself. Said that unless he was the main investor he didn't want to play at all.

      I'm not finished with the book yet so I'm not sure how much he finally bought in for. :)

    31. Re:Oh what a surprise... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Frankly, I'm surprised at all the negative reaction to the Segway, here (Slashdot) and elsewhere.

      Here's my problem with the segway:
      Segway - $5000.00
      1989 Ford Tempo (151k miles) - $350.00, OBO
      1998 Ford Ranger (2wd, ext cab) - $6300.00, 6.49% APR

      Pretty lousy bang for the buck, expecially since I regularly travel between states and need the range that's packed into my 400 mile gas tank.

      I'd pay $500 for a Segway, but not $5000. It's not serious transportation for a Young Rural Professional, and couldn't even get you around Washington DC or Raleigh -- even if you hauled it the 400 miles in the back of your pickup. I have much better uses for my hard work.

    32. Re:Oh what a surprise... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not only that... It is just _SO_ gay looking. It just screams "Look at me! I have no balls, whatsoever!". (Wait a minute, I'm posting as an AC -- so my balls aren't that big either, I guess!) For a few grand more, I'll take a Harley Davidson over that wussy pooper scooter.

    33. Re:Oh what a surprise... by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      ctually, it was "I'd love a Segway" which sounds more nuptial to me.

      Okay, I was unaware of all the accessories.

    34. Re:Oh what a surprise... by Shalda · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Segway is far from cheap. All it really has to offer is a novel form factor. There are already a plethora of Gas and Electric Scooters the do the same job far better for 1/10th the price. Or better yet, just buy a damn bicycle and get your fat ass some exercise.

      The drawbacks to the Segway are many: Able bodied people don't need it. Those who are unable to walk are usually unable to stand long enough to use it. It can't compete with the automobile. It hasn't got the range, speed, or storage space to do anything but replace walking. It's expensive. It costs as much as a lot of people spend on a used car.

      Segway adoption wouldn't hurt anything, but in most cases would provide no benifit. It has a 'cool factor'. It would also be ideal in some situations like sight seeing in Washington DC. Generally, though, it's a fancy waste of money. Many here on Slashdot seem to have written it off as cute but useless; a product that was hyped as being able to change the world, but unable to fulfill that promose.

    35. Re:Oh what a surprise... by Linker3000 · · Score: 1

      OK then, use a Segway to... Bring a flat pack closet home from the DIY store ...or... 1 week's shopping for a family of five ...or... Two kids to school ...or... Me and my notebook PC + documents to work (6 miles, most of it in country lanes--see next) ...or... Use one round our way where we're in the middle of narrow country lanes (in the UK) where even driving a car can be a life or death experience according to who's coming the other way....Throw in some classic British winter weather and..well.I don't think so. I'm sure the Segway's fun, has some really practical uses and also appeals to the gadget freaks...but it's not for the masses and no marketing strategy should ever try and convince us otherwise.

      --
      AT&ROFLMAO
    36. Re:Oh what a surprise... by Mac+Degger · · Score: 1

      That because they follow the old dictum:

      "Keep death off the roads...drive on the pavement!"

      --
      -- Waht? Tehr's a preveiw buottn?
    37. Re:Oh what a surprise... by jester · · Score: 1

      What will be worse with Segways all over ? ... well people would get fatter still due to the lack of the little exercise that they do get. There would be accidents on the footpath as Segways crash into people minding their own business. There is a reason why bikes are banned from footpaths - they must stick to the road for a start. I'd advocate having cycle lane facilities in big cities and Segways - THAT WOULD be a* good thing*

    38. Re:Oh what a surprise... by babbage · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Don't you know your Public Enemy songs? Tut tut...

      Don't!
      Don't -- don't!
      Don't -- don't!
      Don't, don't believe the hype!

      Flava Flav was right: the hype for anything is almost always wrong, and the bigger it is, the bigger the letdown.

      That doesn't mean that the Segway itself isn't a great idea, or that the idle predictions that the widespread adoption of such a machine could reshape the way cities are built.

      Look at what another commenter noted about the bike city in Holland, for example. I've been to Amsterdam, and even there the city has evolved into a place where multiple forms of transportation co-exist. Many of the major streets are 100 feet across, with multiple channels for different modes of transportation. The widest streets were laid out something like this (arrows indicate direction that traffic is permitted to flow, which may or may not be bidirectional):

      <--- wide brick sidewalk (perhaps 15 feet or 5 meters wide) --->
      <--- tarmac bike lane (2m) --->
      <--- narrower sidewalk for pedestrians (2 or 3m) --->
      X--- barricades to protect slower moving traffic (1m) ---X
      <--- space for parallel parked cars (3m) <---

      <--- a lane or two for cars & trucks to travel (3-6m) <---
      <--- a set of rails for streetcars / trolleys (3m) <---

      <--- narrow sidewalk for crossing, train platforms etc (2m) --->

      ---> another set of train tracks (3m) --->
      ---> another lane or two for cars going the other direction (3-6m) --->
      ---> more space for parallel parking (3m) --->

      X--- barricades (1m) ---X;
      <--- narrow pedestrian sidewalk (2 or 3m) --->
      <--- another bike lane (2m) --->
      <--- another wide brick sidewalk (5m) --->

      if you add it up, the whole thing ends up taking something like 40 meters, or ~120 feet. (It's been a couple of years since my visit, so the widths are rough estimates, but they seem roughly correct to me -- corrections welcome :-).

      Additionally, some streets had wide canals for boats to go back & forth, but most of these streets dropped the rail & bike lanes, and the overall width was generally similar to the non-canal streets. For streets not wide enough for all the lanes above, different lanes would be dropped at random: there's always be sidwwalks, but there might or might not be car lanes, rail tracks, bike lanes, canals, etc.

      Also, as an aside, everyone with a bike seemed to be a Pee-Wee Herman fan, which is just fantastic :-)

      Anyway, just imagine how much American streets would have to be re-engineered to support such a rich breadth of traffic. If Segways were to catch on in Amsterdam, maybe they could share that bike lane on either side of the street, or that mini sidewalk next to the parked cars could be converted for Segway-only traffic. Either way though, they have the basic framework such that a vehicle like this could find a niche somewhere. That isn't the case in any American city I've been to. If we ever bother to build streets as wide as the ones I saw in Amsterdam, they almost always end up being used for three or four lanes of cars

      What's that line about predicting the futur

    39. Re:Oh what a surprise... by op00to · · Score: 2, Informative

      This doesn't happen in the US because of the automobile industry lobby -- honestly! There are "standards" for building streets and roads (not the same thing -- roads are for cars, streets are for everyone). If you don't adhere to these standards (making sure theres enough room for cars, small/no sidewalk, no "dangerous" shade trees, straight, boring ROW) you won't get any money from either the state or federal coffers. Who sets these standards? It varies from state to state, but back in the 30's and 40's, the big auto companies lobbied state and federal governments to legislate bike and trolley lanes out of existence. What they couldn't legislate out, they bought (trolley companies who wouldn't die to do the quality of their service) and ran into the ground.

      The Netherlands, on the other hand, has not bowed down to automobile interests as much as the US has. The government also taxes its citizens very heavily to provide their advanced infrastructure. The US government is afraid to spend real money on anything but building new roadways that will give the perception of solving the traffic problems, while all they're doing is providing more capacity which will actually get congested faster than the previous roadway.

      What does this all mean?

      #1. The US isn't the Netherlands, nor is it Europe, the UK, or even Canada.

      #2. Due to the automobile culture in the US (sprawl development, big-box stores in the middle of nowhere), it is highly difficult to get people out of their cars.

      #3. Because of the sprawl development, most Americans travel further on more trips, on more dangerous roads than most other Highly Developed Nations.

      #4. It would take a huge influx of federal, state, and city money to make only ONE city segway-friendly. This would require new ROW's, new traffic patterns, and diminished capacity to move automobiles. Is it worth it? Who knows.

      #5. Because of the high cost (monetary, time, congestion during construction, etc) of completely overhauling current cities' transportation infrastructure, it is highly unlikely that the segway will be anything but a fun toy in the US.

      Also, the US will never look as cute as Amsterdam because we don't tax our houses by the width of their property frontage.

    40. Re:Oh what a surprise... by Lars+T. · · Score: 1
      Frankly, I'm surprised that you are surprised. It was hyped like it would be the equivalent of a personal jetcar.

      Well, at least it isn't as stupid an idea as a personal jetcar ;-)

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

    41. Re:Oh what a surprise... by op00to · · Score: 1

      Interesting analogy, but not quite correct. A VCR is primarily an entertainment good, and is marketed as such. Panasonic doesn't go around saying "This new VCR will change the way you live your life!"

      The Segway is marketed as a life-saving, ground-shaking, useful vehicle -- an "evolution in mobility", or so says their website. Nowhere do they market the Segway as an entertainment device, or a toy.

      A much more relevant (but still not terribly accurate) analogy would be to compare getting pissed off about the price of a segway to getting pissed off over the disparity in cost and features between safety equipment in American and European cars.

      Pretty much every European car comes with all kinds of advanced safety equipment. You've got to shell out the big bucks to see this kind of stuff in the US.

      It's rather silly to go around touting that you're going to revolutionize life as we know it, and then ask some outrageous amount of money as compared to other devices that do similar things.

      It really sucks to have this technology dangled in front of us, just to have it out of reach for the people that would really benefit from it (poor workers stuck in cities with no/poor public transport).

    42. Re:Oh what a surprise... by Watts+Martin · · Score: 1

      Actually, I don't think Kamen was the one making the grand claims--other people were. He was guilty primarily of keeping silent and letting those claims build up rather than standing up and saying, "Well, those are things I'd hope will happen long-term, but please don't expect world-shaking things from our first products, which will likely be limited in quantity and fairly expensive." He thought being "officially quiet" was a sufficient way of managing expectation and that the hype would be good, rather than creating a backlash.

      Having said that, I'm kind of surprised at the reaction, too. Even if the initial Segway doesn't go anywhere and even if the Segway company itself goes under, I'd really expect people to be able to look at this and imagine what it could be, rather than ripping it to shreds for its current limitations. I grant that when people circa 1979 looked at TRS-80's running Scripsit and printing on a 9-pin dot matrix printer and funky descenders, it'd have been difficult to imagine what word processing--let alone desktop publishing--would be like in fifteen years. Fortunately, not everyone assumed microcomputers would never catch up to Selectrics. I don't expect that in two or three decades we'll all be zipping around on our Segway HTs in Segway lanes--but I wouldn't at all be surprised if descendants of this technology become very commonplace in metro areas as personal public transportation.

    43. Re:Oh what a surprise... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are British roads not paved?

      That would explain rather a lot, though.

    44. Re:Oh what a surprise... by sapped · · Score: 1

      Interesting analogy, but not quite correct. A VCR is primarily an entertainment good, and is marketed as such. Panasonic doesn't go around saying "This new VCR will change the way you live your life!"

      No, but Sony did say that. Remember they won the court case brought against the VCR's because they said it would be used primarily for time-shifting. I.e. they were saying you would no longer be living your life the way you were before, when the TV execs determined when you could watch something.

    45. Re:Oh what a surprise... by smart_ass · · Score: 1

      > And yet you get the mommy-types bitching
      > about it promoting laziness

      Before going on about this ... try riding one around for a while. While recently in Dijon, France on business, I had the opportunity to ride a Segway (rented by the Tourism office for 12 euro for a 45 minute tour) I've heard people go on and on about laziness ... as you tend to have your legs somewhat bent at all times to absord energy coming on and off curbs, I found that while I can walk for more than a couple hours at a time without thinking much about it ... after a mere 45 minutes on a Segway, my legs were tiring.

      My $0.02 ... course those are Euro cents for the purpose of this post, and thus worth a hair more.

      --
      Ouch ... did I just say that.
    46. Re:Oh what a surprise... by 2short · · Score: 1


      But why exactly? Just because it's electrified and expensive?

      The Segway may be a niftier gadget, but on my roller blades I'll:

      - be faster
      - be more manueverable
      - be able to climb stairs (carefully)
      - be able to throw my transportaion gear in a backpack weighing just a few pounds
      - have my hand free
      - have thousands of extra dollars
      - be in better shape

      I can't come up with a single advantage for the Segway over rollerblades (well, ok, it has breaks, but hey, got to keep life interesting) and I certainly don't see how it comes anywhere close to being as useful as a bike. Even compared to a conventional powered scooter, the only advantage is less length, which seems little to get in exchange for cutting your speed by a factor of four and not being able to carry a passenger or cargo.

    47. Re:Oh what a surprise... by op00to · · Score: 1

      If being able to watch Three's Company at 9pm instead of 8pm changes your life, you should take a vacation.

    48. Re: Oh what a surprise... by gidds · · Score: 1
      Are British roads not paved?

      No, not as we would understand the term (i.e. with paving stones). They're usually tarmac (tar on compacted gravel) or concrete.

      Of course, some pavements are asphalt, too, but many are paved.

      --

      Ceterum censeo subscriptionem esse delendam.

    49. Re:Oh what a surprise... by scrytch · · Score: 1

      > Frankly, I'm surprised at all the negative reaction to the Segway

      It was hyped. Boy was it hyped. As a super-duper-tippy-top-sekrit project, then this revolution in transit is unveiled...

      And it's a scooter. It's a neat scooter, it's a high-tech next generation scooter. But it's a scooter all the same.

      Forgive us for being underwhelmed, and directing derision and scorn at this pompous windbag who touted it as the most amazing invention since the automobile.

      Are you starting to get the picture?

      --
      I've finally had it: until slashdot gets article moderation, I am not coming back.
  7. I'm Glad He's Doing This by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    A response to a product that is a total flop is REQUIRED. We can't just let the Segway sit around with it's monopoly of 50 units sold, can we??

    1. Re:I'm Glad He's Doing This by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The so-called revolutionary new personal transportation devices are nothing but glorified scooters. The segway was a flop because it is nothing but an overpriced self balancing scooter.

      What we need is a segway-type device with no wheels that hovers a few feet above the ground, is powered by flubber, and costs $50. I'd buy that!

    2. Re:I'm Glad He's Doing This by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why does it have to be powered by flubber? It proves you're an idiot...and for $50, you'd buy 100 segways; it would probably take that many to carry your bulk.

  8. Uh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    That would be the Sinclair QL then.

    1. Re:Uh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "That would be the Sinclair QL then."

      He'd like to see one - as in one which actually worked long enough to want to not send back - rather than simply read about one. Then again, if you got it working, you'd probably want to send it back and get a PC, Amiga or ST.

    2. Re:Uh by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1

      Mine still works. Well, appart from the serial ports. A bit of a bummer since I bought it to use as a terminal, but that's old Clive for you.

      Do you want to hear my "black watch" stories?

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
  9. Sinclair C6 by sardonic2 · · Score: 0, Funny

    Sinclair swipes the Segway prints some nifty stickers up that say Sinclair C6 and put them all over the Segway causing severe balance problems and all the Sinclair rebranded Segways flip the heads of large nations over the handle bars, backers of the Sinclair C6 pull out and the C6 is a failure.

    1. Re:Sinclair C6 by kikai+suki · · Score: 1

      Bush flipped himself over the handlabars... He hadn't switched the thing (segway) on when he tried to ride it. Hop on a bike without making it roll or putting your feet down and you'll expereience the same thing sideways... Go ahead... Try it.

  10. Who needs followups? by fleafan · · Score: 5, Informative
    ZX-Spectrum. Ha! That was one overpowered machine. We used to own a ZX-81 with 1K (one kilobyte) RAM, and a keyboard with no keys (well, at least not real ones).

    It didn't have a disk drive or tape deck, so if we wanted to play a game we had to type the program in (in BASIC) from scratch every time the computer was turned off.
    My dad used it for his budget at first, but since we had to keep everything on paper and re-enter the data anyway, he soon dropped it.

    Oh boy, those were the days.

    1. Re:Who needs followups? by fruey · · Score: 4, Informative
      There was a tape interface on it though. Nicking Grannie's little cassette recorder from her bedside, and then plugging in the grey and black wires from EAR and LINE respectively (or was it EAR and MIC?) whatever, and you could save to tape and reload later.

      This was standard equipment on our ZX81... although there was always that dreaded DODGY POWER LEAD which if someone so much as breathed on it, the computer would reset... those were the days.

      --
      Conversion Rate Optimisation French / English consultant
    2. Re:Who needs followups? by tsa · · Score: 1

      I had a game on my '64 in which you could shoot at ZX Spectrums (Spectra?) and when you hit them they showered you with rubber keys.

      --

      -- Cheers!

    3. Re:Who needs followups? by BiggerIsBetter · · Score: 1

      The dodgy power lead was indeed bad news, but how about the dodgy ram expansion? I remember using either an easer or a matchbox underneath to stop the thing wobbling and crashing the machine.

      --
      Forget thrust, drag, lift and weight. Airplanes fly because of money.
    4. Re:Who needs followups? by fruey · · Score: 1
      Ahh yeah... you could get a whole 16Kb with the RAM expansion. They cost about 40 quid if I remember right. Maybe that was the second hand price I paid. Yeah, that was even worse, if you finally got a 4K program typed in or something.

      I had hours of fun reliving all that on a ZX81 emulator on the Atari ST... I could just hit F5 to reset and imagine the DODGY power lead had been in effect...

      --
      Conversion Rate Optimisation French / English consultant
    5. Re:Who needs followups? by turgid · · Score: 1
      The ZX81's tape interface, and more importantly the ROM routines, were pretty poor. However the Spectrum vastly improved upon them.

      The poor old ZX81 spoke to the tape at 300 baud, and the screen went blank when loading and saving since the poor old Z80 processor had to do everyting. You could not save arbitrary blocks of memory, just a program and all its variables etc. so if you wanted to save data, you had to save the whole program as well.

      The Spectrum was more sophisticated. It spoke at 1500 baud, and could save BASIC programs and arbitrary blocks of memory (and the "display file" ie video RAM) making it much more useful. The ULA generated the TV picture so the screen stayed visible when loading and saving. The Z80 still generated the tones for the tape though.

      My ZX81 had an add-in FORTH (multi-tasking, real time) ROM from Skywave Software, Bournemouth, which had much improved tape handling software over the standard BASIC ROM. :-)

      As you say, those were the days.

    6. Re:Who needs followups? by fruey · · Score: 1
      You did get black and white squiggles on the TV when stuff was loading though. Not as nice as the Blue/Yellow loading lines of the speccy though. There was some red too in there, or something. Don't quite remember.

      Doooooo.... dit!

      Program: manic

      Doooooo.... didddlydlydidddlydidddlychorrrorrrchorrrdit!

      And a loading screen would appear! Seemed like magic to me at the time.

      --
      Conversion Rate Optimisation French / English consultant
    7. Re:Who needs followups? by BiggerIsBetter · · Score: 1

      I feel sorry for my Dad. I was just a nipper, and we used to get those magazines with programmes in them to type in. Poor old Dad would sit there for hours with me reading out each line while I typed them in on the calculator-like keyboard... only to have the RAM pack or Powerlead trash it on the last page. Man those games sucked.

      There was one machine code game that rocked though... somthing about flying over a city and bombing it, IIRC. Pretty impressive for it's day.

      We've sure come a long way since then.

      --
      Forget thrust, drag, lift and weight. Airplanes fly because of money.
    8. Re:Who needs followups? by AndrewHowe · · Score: 1

      The ZX81's screen didn't go blank while saving, it had loads of lines on it. This is because the tape output was actually connected to the display. The ZX81 wibbled the display and that went to the tape. Also when loading the input was reflected on the display. That wasn't technically necessary but the processor didn't have enough time to keep the display updated properly, and hey, nice squiggly lines.

    9. Re:Who needs followups? by IWannaBeAnAC · · Score: 1
      Yeah, bring back the days when you could actually type in the code from a magazine and (sometimes) end up with a quite playable game!

      Or, maybe not.... I think I prefer http nowdays ;)

    10. Re:Who needs followups? by turgid · · Score: 1

      OK, so you're a pedant. Point taken.

    11. Re:Who needs followups? by Procrasti · · Score: 1

      We used to own a ZX-81 with 1K (one kilobyte) RAM, and a keyboard with no keys (well, at least not real ones).

      It didn't have a disk drive or tape deck, so if we wanted to play a game we had to type the program in (in BASIC) from scratch every time the computer was turned off.


      Luxury!!

      We used to dream of 1k of RAM.... If we were lucky Dad would give us a toggle switch that we used to store our 1 bit programs on AND we had to share it in our multiuser environment... ahhh, but we were happy.

      Try and tell that to kids these days and they won't beleive you.

    12. Re:Who needs followups? by AndroidCat · · Score: 1
      he soon dropped it.

      Which brings up one advantage of the ZX-81: It was the computer of its day least likely to hurt if you dropped it on your foot.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    13. Re:Who needs followups? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Red & White bars on the leadin (Dooooooo...dit!) followed by Blue & Yellow bars for the code (Doooooo...didddlydiddlydiddlywhiiirr...)

      Some devious fast loaders changed this to their own routines which could produce any sort of border colours. I seem to recall an entire rainbow of colours for some Microprose games.

    14. Re:Who needs followups? by zebs · · Score: 1

      There was a game on the Amiga called ST Bash... a space invaders type game with Atari logos for aliens. IIRC it had a sample from Queens 'Another One Bites the Dust' as the title music.

      Atari scum ;-)

    15. Re:Who needs followups? by Richard+W.M.+Jones · · Score: 1

      I remember that bomber game! Wasn't it called B52 or something. Probably typed in from Your Computer ...

    16. Re:Who needs followups? by jbert · · Score: 1

      Top tip was to copy the tape save/load routines from the ROM to the RAM and tweak the timing constants. You could (fairly reliably) get up to 4500 baud that way.

      I'd forgotten that about the display. The ZX81 had the CPU generate the display (from an interrupt). There were "SLOW" and "FAST" keywords in the basic language. The FAST keyword spared the CPU the job of updating the display to get more cycles for processing (but of couse you couldn't see anything until you switched back).

      Contrariwise, the Spectrum had the ULA read the video memory and do the display. Now, ROM was 0K->16K, RAM was 16K-32K or 16K->64K (in two banks, second bank running from 32K->64K).
      The display memory was about 6-7K in the lower bank (starting at 16K I think).

      So...the lower RAM bank had both the CPU and ULA accessing it, which meant slower access times. So some Kewl Koders used to forgo the use of RAM below 32K to get faster games. I think the (legendary) Manic Miner and its derivatives used this approach.

      (Of course, the *right* thing to do would be to keep all code and live data above 32K and page stuff to and from the lower bank at low-performance moments, e.g. to load a level).

      Don't get me started on the fastest way to copy memory on a Z-80 processor... (LDIR? no....apparently disabling interrupts, shifting the stack pointer and push/popping was the way to go about it).

    17. Re:Who needs followups? by turgid · · Score: 1
      Don't get me started on the fastest way to copy memory on a Z-80 processor... (LDIR? no....apparently disabling interrupts, shifting the stack pointer and push/popping was the way to go about it).

      Hmmm... I've seen it done with lots of LDI instructions i.e. hand-unrolled loops.

    18. Re:Who needs followups? by CProgrammer98 · · Score: 1

      It was red/blue stripes when reading in the "header record", yellow/cyan when reading the program.

      I remember most games loaded a splash screen off tape and you can watch the image building up in a rather bizzare way - top row of pixels, then a row a third of the way down and then a row 2/3rd way down, then back to the 2nd row at the top... all very strange...

      --
      And the people shall be oppressed, every one by another, and every one by his neighbour Isaiah 3:5
    19. Re:Who needs followups? by jnik · · Score: 1

      Well, I played something like that on a VIC-20 (loaded from tape, wimpy me) called "New York Blitz."

      See, your plane is out of gas over NYC (which also happens to be toroidal these days, so you're ALWAYS over New York, even when you fly off the end of the city) but you JUST HAPPEN to have a million bombs. So what do you do? Flatten the city so you can glide to a safe landing, of course!

      Political and cultural ramifications are left as an exercise to the reader.

    20. Re:Who needs followups? by fruey · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and black and white first, with the colours coming in at the end! I think they did the order like that to make it look like the picture was gradually building, and you could try to work out what the finished picture would look like.

      --
      Conversion Rate Optimisation French / English consultant
    21. Re:Who needs followups? by fruey · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it's all coming back to me now... I've wasted most of my afternoon reminiscing about ZX-Spectrum tape loaders ! Multicolour loaders, they tended to crash more often though. The most reliable were Multiface saves. They'd just save a copy of whatever was in memory directly to tape (so you'd have a first generation copy) and you'd just load back directly to where you were when you saved, handy for stuff like Knight Lore by Ultimate.

      --
      Conversion Rate Optimisation French / English consultant
    22. Re:Who needs followups? by Richard+W.M.+Jones · · Score: 1

      Sounds cool. In the ZX81 version, "New York" was made up out of inverse video double-quote characters. Pretty realistic!

      Rich.

    23. Re:Who needs followups? by smithmc · · Score: 1

      ZX-Spectrum. Ha! That was one overpowered machine. We used to own a ZX-81 with 1K (one kilobyte) RAM, and a keyboard with no keys (well, at least not real ones).

      LLLLLLLUXURY! I did my first programming on a TI-57 calculator.

      --
      Downmodding is the refuge of the weak. Don't downmod, make a better argument!
    24. Re:Who needs followups? by corsetboy · · Score: 1

      the image loaded in that way because that's how the video memory was laid out... it was just a direct dump from memory to tape and back again.

    25. Re:Who needs followups? by who+what+why · · Score: 1

      First, it's good to hear the ZX81 references. One of our family friends was considered something of a computer boffin, and he advised my parents to get a ZX81 when I was about 4 or 5... I'd mostly just sit inthralled as my sisters spent all day trying to get "ZX Galaxians" to load, the space invader game. Later I tried typing in a few games, but the RAM was knackered and the tape player never saved anything. My mum sold it at a boot sale a few years ago. SOmeone picked it up for 5 quid I think. Wish I still had it though.

      I had a very similar game to the one you describe on the C64, called "Challenger" IIRC. Of course, being a spanky 64K colour game, it had many different cities, including Seattle and Delhi I think. I loved that game. Does anyone have any more info? This would be a great game for PDA/cell phones... (so I could play it on the toilet!!)

      Wish I still had the C64 even more. Emulation just isn't the same.

    26. Re:Who needs followups? by ncc74656 · · Score: 1
      I remember most games loaded a splash screen off tape and you can watch the image building up in a rather bizzare way - top row of pixels, then a row a third of the way down and then a row 2/3rd way down, then back to the 2nd row at the top... all very strange...

      Hmm...sounds like the effect of a hack Steve Wozniak used to cut one chip from the design of the Apple II.

      (Hi-Res graphics on the Apple II loaded in a similar manner. With images loading from disk, it was fast enough that it was often called the "venetian-blind" effect. I've never tried it with tape...borrowed the recorder from my 99/4A to sample sounds into my IIe back in the day, but I never did more with the built-in tape-write/read routines than try them once or twice to see if they worked. When you have a couple of floppy drives available (and a SCSI hard drive later on), you tend to not want to bother with tape.)

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    27. Re:Who needs followups? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My favourite ZX81 idiosyncracy was the fact that you had to buy a 16K RAM module to plug into a port off the back of the machine (which wasn't bad as the module was only $50 after a while), but the fact that if you accidentally jiggled the module, it would also reset or lock up the "computer". Ahh the days...

    28. Re: Who needs followups? by gidds · · Score: 1

      Nah, we found a much better solution: put the ZX81 on the far edge of a (small) table, so that the RAM pack hung over the edge! Now, if only there'd been a solution for all those dodgy saves to tape...

      --

      Ceterum censeo subscriptionem esse delendam.

    29. Re:Who needs followups? by warkrime · · Score: 0
      Poor old Dad would sit there for hours with me reading out each line

      My poor old dad would type them in for me, and while I was having fun in the other room playing with my toys.

    30. Re:Who needs followups? by BiggerIsBetter · · Score: 1

      That's hardly a bonding experience now is it?

      --
      Forget thrust, drag, lift and weight. Airplanes fly because of money.
    31. Re:Who needs followups? by Ambient+Sheep · · Score: 1
      It was red/blue stripes when reading in the "header record", yellow/cyan when reading the program.

      Close, but no cigar. It was red/cyan, then yellow/blue.

      (wishing I'd seen this story when it first came out)

    32. Re:Who needs followups? by CProgrammer98 · · Score: 1

      Blue/cyan - what's a few green pixels between friends anyway? :)

      But I stand corrected, thankyou.

      --
      And the people shall be oppressed, every one by another, and every one by his neighbour Isaiah 3:5
  11. Re:OMG by trash+eighty · · Score: 0

    sounds perfect for slashdot readers then :D

  12. Re:Hrmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When the C5 was first announced, Sir Clive said that the next model would be the C4, and the series would continue until the C1 saw the light of day - the C1 was rumoured to be a real car.

    But if you look at the C5 (plastic trike) and the Zike (c4) bike - it would appear that the machines in the series were getting smaller and slower....

  13. Gone googling... by register_ax · · Score: 5, Informative
    Sir Clive's C5 was "Driven by a combination of battery and pedal power, the C5 was declared a death trap by the Automobile Association because it was too small to be seen by lorry drivers."

    If it isn't safe, it fails for practical use. The segway circumvents this as being reliable sturdy (heavy) US alteration it seems. Of course I'm merely a young chap[sic] residing in the US who has never heard of it before now.

    Before I depart, I was wondering just how dangerous it was. Proceeding to google it, I found an interesting interview that appears to have taken place August 1986.

    Of course relational interests are too much so I had to look into the Clive Computer. I came across some interesting information since my inception was the NES ;-]

    1. Re:Gone googling... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The claims of it not being safe where unfounded. If you go around London today you'll see cycle couriers riding around on bicycles and tricycles where they sit just as you do on/in the C5. They are just as low, and with out the sheel of the C5, but noone says they're dangerous.

      I think the C5 simply came out 15 years too early.

    2. Re:Gone googling... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can't really use the term "sic" in a sentence of your own. It's supposed to be used to point out an error in a quotation which was the fault of the individual being quoted, rather than the person quoting. I can dig how you were using it...but thought you should know.

    3. Re:Gone googling... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      "...the C5 was declared a death trap by the Automobile Association..."

      I was wondering just how dangerous it was.

      Not nearly as dangerous as the previous model, the C4, which had a tendency to explode.

  14. GWB on the segway... by keplon · · Score: 5, Funny

    Even George Bush took a ride on one, although any White House endorsement was somewhat undermined when he was catapulted over the handlebars.

    That's what he would call bad driving strategery.

    1. Re:GWB on the segway... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't misunderestimate him!

    2. Re:GWB on the segway... by terrymr · · Score: 1

      GWB's fall looked exactly like the safety video demonstration of what happens if you try to ride a segway without turning it on first.

  15. Re:Donations on the C5 site by Valar · · Score: 1

    The Site for Sinclair C5 Enthusiasts Worldwide

    The Sinclair C5 was a commercial disaster. The Press hounded it as a dangerous joke.
    Only around 12,000 C5's were ever produced, many sold off abroad after the project folded.


    No, no, I don't think this is Sinclair's site. After all, very few people are proud of making 'commercial disasters.'

  16. hmm by spamchang · · Score: 2, Insightful

    i haven't RTFA, but segways seem like a good way to clog up sidewalks a la traffic jams. i mean, people slowing down and speeding up, the traffic compression effect all over again, just on the sidewalks. and they take up more space than your average human.

    1. Re:hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hell of a secret . . .

      'nuff said.


      Ok, so explain what he's working on to us. Please provide enough detail to distinguish it from the C5. kthxstfubye

    2. Re:hmm by Bushcat · · Score: 1
      WRT traffic compression, this is seen all the time in Japan, where bicycles are encouraged to use the sidewalk. Two or three bikes can totally gum up the crossing at a stop signal, simply because their acceleration curves are different to those of the foot-bound humans milling around them and trickling through the gaps, self-sorting into a kind of starting order when the signal changes.

      In this context, I think the problem is not that the Segway is good or bad, but that it acts differently. I could imagine it being much more successful in a country like the Netherlands, where pedestrians, cyclists and autos are all segregated.

  17. Sinclair products have always been cheap and nasty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What I can't understand is how he got in the news with this latest hollow promise. Nothing will come of it. No-one believes anything this old dottard has-been says, and no-one's going to invest a penny in his mad schemes any more.

  18. Engage brain before putting mouth in gear please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Sinclair C5 Enthusiasts site that asks for donations is a hobbyist site. It is not advertising anything.

  19. dodgy by freedommatters · · Score: 3, Funny

    the c5 was cool but if you rocked it too much the ram pack fell out so you had to restart the engine and go back to the start of your journey. pisser.

    1. Re:dodgy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And when you tried to use the horn or turn signals, it slowed to a crawl.

  20. Re:Americans do NOT need these transportation devi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Listen up, you fat, stupid, greasy American fuckers.

    That's fat, stupid, greasy, heavily ARMED with nuclear fucking weapons American fuckers to you, buddy. You should be afraid.

  21. He's missing out on a crutial market... by canning · · Score: 4, Funny

    If I were him I'd throw an over-sized muffler on it, a huge wing and some carbon fibre parts. Than offer bigger rims, lowering springs and an enormous stereo as aftermarket add ons.

    He'd sell alot more that way.

    --
    I love the smell of Karma in the morning
    1. Re:He's missing out on a crutial market... by Timesprout · · Score: 1

      I feel a movie coming on, The Gyroscopic and the Mildly Irritated

      --
      Do not try to read the dupe, thats impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth
      What truth?
      There is no dupe
    2. Re:He's missing out on a crutial market... by gratiartis · · Score: 1

      Oh but it has already happened ... in a small way.

      Or there's one on this page which did 150mph (0-60 in 5 seconds). Not quite the version that was available in the shops though ;)

    3. Re:He's missing out on a crutial market... by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      Ah to make them so they annoy other people as well.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    4. Re:He's missing out on a crutial market... by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      Stickers man...it's all about the Veeee-tech stickers!

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    5. Re:He's missing out on a crutial market... by greymond · · Score: 1

      Thats Honda's version.

  22. hmm by loraksus · · Score: 1

    and he's even planning some competition in the form of a top-secret follow-up to the Sinclair C5."

    hell of a secret . . .
    'nuff said.

    --
    1q2w3e4r5t6y7u8i9o0pqawsedrftgthyjukilo;p'azsxdcfv gbhnjmk,l.;/
  23. Sinclair C5 by LizardKing · · Score: 4, Interesting

    When I lived in Oxford, UK one of the members of the local LUG was also a Sinclair C5 fan. He occasionally uses his C5 to travel to work, having kitted it out with two flourescent flags on poles to make the machine a bit more visible. He also does long distance trips for charity once a year - I recall that the last one was an attempt to travel the length of the country. Spares are fairly easy to come by, one good consequence of Sinclair using off the shelf parts. The tyres for instance, are similar to those used on many prams(!).

    Chris

    1. Re:Sinclair C5 by jweatherley · · Score: 1

      Taht would be this guy and it looks like he's trying again. I hope he gets further than the last two attempts - he's never made it out of Scotland yet!

      --

      --
      Reverse outsourcing: it's the future
    2. Re:Sinclair C5 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes quite right, it's Chris Crosskey. Atari fanatic and glass table breaker. Also built a plastic robot called Rameses 2 which was on Robot Wars in the UK, and lost!!

  24. What ever happened to the Wafer Chip project? by Dante_J · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Forget the C5 or C6, and Segway.

    Clive Sinclair did have a few sharp ideas and one of them was the the wafer chip project:

    "What you have is a wafer of silicon a few inches in diameter and instead of chopping that up and putting all the bits that work into packages and then putting them all together again on a circuit board, you keep them on the wafer. The problem is that you've got to have some system to test for the good areas. Essentially we divide the memory up into blocks about the size of an ordinary chip and put a bit of extra logic on which uses a mathematical algorithm to connect up the good chips and not the bad. If one bit fails you can power-down and reconfigure it so it has an extended lifetime."

    This was a genuinely good idea. Reduce the cost of chip manufacture and extend the life of computers by many years. Just replace the odd power supply every 3 or 4 years. The reconfigure of faulty chips could even be done on the fly.

    Using this proposed method, Memory & Processor chips aren't just "Good" or "Dead", they can last many years in a very slow state of hardly noticable decay.

    Heat is a problem I hear you say for processors? Well if you have 20 of them on one wafer you don't need them to all be P4s.

    Intel will probably jump onto this idea when Moore's law starts to flatten out.

    Cheap slabs of ram and CPU, that don't fail all at once - yeah!!

    1. Re:What ever happened to the Wafer Chip project? by ColaMan · · Score: 1

      Memory chips already work this way - they have a pile of redundant circuits. When tested after being fabbed, a few of these are always put into use.

      And the 486SX(?) was (most times) a 486DX with a dud FPU.

      Whilst extending it to an entire chipset would be interesting, would the overhead of design/ cramming it all together/redundant circuitry/etc make it profitable? A dead CPU in your system 3 years down the track means you can get a new CPU+Board etc for the same price as you paid before for your old CPU alone, but 3X as fast.

      --

      You are in a twisty maze of processor lines, all alike.
      There is a lot of hype here.
    2. Re:What ever happened to the Wafer Chip project? by mikerich · · Score: 1
      Clive Sinclair did have a few sharp ideas and one of them was the the wafer chip project:

      Another was the lovely little Z88 portable computer - sort of a laptop but not quite. It had a 5(?) line LCD display, a semi-travel rubberised keyboard, applications in ROM and solid state storage. IIRC it ran off AA batteries which lasted for weeks (or so it seemed).

      They were as tough as old boots, mine travelled all around Europe with me without ever giving a problem. Eventually it met its maker courtesy of the British rain, but I still miss it.

      Best wishes,
      Mike.

  25. Re:why? by LordLucless · · Score: 1

    They must appeal to lazy-ass people who would rather get around in a wheelchair than walk

    Yeah, just like all them dicks who buy cars.

    --
    Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't an invisible demon about to eat your face
  26. Exqueeze me? by NeuroManson · · Score: 1

    Sorry Clive, 99.9% of those with an ounce of brain matter considered the Segway an utter waste of technology. Take our president, representative of that .1% who considered it worth using. It's a stupid rich boys toy, and an utter waste of time to use.

    Most people with an ounce of brains could buy an electric scooter with far more range and capabilities for $300 or less here, with enough room for cargo and with options not seen in the Segway, such as turn signals, a horn, a ca0rgo basket, and a headlight. That should be enough of a clue for most.

    --
    Just because you can mod me down, doesn't mean you're right. Shoes for industry!
    1. Re:Exqueeze me? by Kosi · · Score: 1

      I like the concept. If the price was not too high by a factor of ten, it would make at least a nice toy and IMO a real good alternative to (motor-)bike or car for shorter distances. I hoped that it would spread much better, so in the futurte the cities would make special lanes like those reserved for bicycles.

      btw, the words "brain" and "our president" don't fit into one sentence unless you talk about the lack of. :)

  27. Re:What happened to Wafer Scale Integration by Dante_J · · Score: 0

    More info on the Wafer Chip project AKA Wafer Scale Integration.

    During 1986, Sinclair Research (SRL) took the decision to divest itself of its computer business - which, inclusive of the then product range and 'Sinclair' brand name - was sold to Amstrad plc. The company itself then became a holding company for interests in a series of 'spin outs' covering electronics and other sectors. First among these in 1986 were the Winchester-based Shave Communications - a leader in the development of new communications products - and Anamartic. Established to design, develop and market a range of new memory and processor products using WSI (Wafer Scale Integration) technology, Anamartic shipped its first product in 1989 following a multi-million pound investment programme. It represented the 'first successful application of the wafer-scale technique worldwide'. At the same time Sir Clive also launched a third company, Cambridge Computer Limited, in which SRL initially retained majority control. Cambridge-based, it launched its first product, the best selling Z88 portable computer in summer 1987 and, during 1989, also entered the then new market for advanced satellite receivers.

    Well the Z88 was a mild success that developed into the Psion PDAs. A nice approach to portable computing.

    But what of the Wafer Scale Integration technology?

    Anyone know?

  28. Re:why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Automobiles have their usefulness. These hi-tech toys do not. Well, at least they're not a superior solution in any circumstance where they might in fact be useful. We need better methods of transporting a person for a short distance, slowly?

  29. What's so wrong with what we HAVE? by ai2097 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The major problem with Segways is that they don't fit into any of the current transportation channels that are available. They're too big and too fast for sidewalks, but they're too slow for bike lanes or the street.

    Personally, I bike to work every day (~3 miles, 1.5 uphill, 1.5 down) with a 3-day hiking pack on my back full of all kinds of crap (~25 lbs on average).

    Now, cycling has the same problem as Segways, to some degree; cycles are too slow for the road and too fast for the sidewalks. I usually end up on sidewalks because there are no bike lanes in my commute (or really anywhere in my city) and it's far too dangerous on the road.

    Now, where a bike has an advantage over a segway:
    - I can get off the bike and pass people at a walk.There's plenty of room for people to pass.
    - No charging (no electricity, no gas, just food+water in and CO2/organic waste out)
    - Keeps you healthy
    - Costs little to buy
    - Almost everything on a bike can be fixed with simple tools

    Now... why is there even a market for these things? With busses, taxis, personal cars and motorbikes for motorized vehicles? With bikes and, I dunno, feet for personal transport? Why do we need something completely incompatible with all of the useful pavement we already have down?

    As for using it to get around malls/ workplaces/ etc... you know all of the signs that say NO (insert whelled device here)? I'm sure that segways are not going to be allowed in these places before bikes are.

    Anyhow, my 2c.

    1. Re:What's so wrong with what we HAVE? by Urkki · · Score: 1
      The big difference with Segway compared to bike, in my impression, is that it can stop. And not only "can", but will stop "instinctively" because the driver instinctively stops leaning forward when there's something ahead. Well, of course a bike can stop too, but you have to put your foot to the ground then and go to "stop mode" so to say. With Segway there's no separate stop mode any more than there is when just walking, so it's much more agile, considering it can turn around in place.

      Also, with bikes, when you're on a high gear and going fast, stopping and then having to accelerate is a real bummer, especially if it's uphill. With motorized vehicles it's much less so (especially if there are no gears to worry about) since there's no extra effort involved.

      So I'd rather compare it to a wheelchair than to a bike or scooter.

      But still for most people I'd classify it as an expensive toy. But so are sports cars and motorcycles for most people, nothing but expensive toys ;-).

    2. Re:What's so wrong with what we HAVE? by kikai+suki · · Score: 2, Funny

      The problem with high performance cars is that they are too fast to drive in the city. City traffic tends to go from 30mph to about 8 but high performance sports cars go anything from 150 to 200+mph. You just can't use a car like that in the city, that's why you only see them whizzing by on the highway and their owners all have car-shaped holes in their garage doors because the things aren't capable of slower speeds.

    3. Re:What's so wrong with what we HAVE? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't follow the logic... you say that the segway doesn't fit current transport channels but then concede that bikes don't either. As a UK citizen who has made many trips to the US I have often found that walking does not fit current US transport channels! Sidewalk? what sidewalk?!

      This is how I see the Segway.... for every additional Segway rider there is (approximately) one less two ton, 12 foot long, 8mpg, pollution belching metal box on the road. This occupancy 'rate of exchange' is favourable to the Segway. Its just down to how well we can plan our cities to ease the transition. The segway is a disruptive technology after all.

      Naturally for journeys over 7-10 miles the metal box will be the transport system of choice. Though the distance criteria for selection will vary according to climate, comparative journey times (segway quite possibly being faster) and the cost of fuelling/insuring/taxing/parking the metal box.

      The big challenge the segway faces is that civil authorities typically respond to problems rather than opportunities. It is easier for them to respond to voices pointing out problems with a new device, rather than to work to take advantage of the opportunities the new device creates.

    4. Re:What's so wrong with what we HAVE? by squaretorus · · Score: 1

      and it's far too dangerous on the road

      You wooose! I cycled everywhere for about 12 years until I got fat and lazy and hardly ever jumped onto the pavement. Stay on the road, ride nice and fat, keep your pace up, and reserve use of that middle finger only for the REAL spastic drivers and your perfectly safe!

      better than killing a child on the pavement! - how could you sleep!

    5. Re:What's so wrong with what we HAVE? by AnswerIs42 · · Score: 2, Informative
      As for using it to get around malls/ workplaces/ etc... you know all of the signs that say NO (insert whelled device here)? I'm sure that segways are not going to be allowed in these places before bikes are. Don't work in many large workplaces do you? Go to any large or even midsized factory.. you are talking miles and miles of walking for managers, team leaders, support people.

      Segway would really work well in these environments, have a problem 3/4 of a mile away at the other end of the asspebly area? You can be there in 2 or 3 mins or less instead of 15 or so to walk.. thats the difference between making $500,000 or loosing $700,000 in down time.

      Postal workers that walk their deliveries would also find this to be a heart attack saver.

      You can get more police out of their cars and actually walking/segwaying the beat so they can get to know the community better.

      I agree that with the "common" person the segway is more of a useless toy, but there are so many nitch areas that it could easily be used to help.

    6. Re:What's so wrong with what we HAVE? by jeffhallman · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I work in DC. 15 years ago when I started here I used the combination of Metro and a folding bike to commute. The combination of pedalling and DC humidity meant that I often arrived sweaty, and had to take a shower and change clothes upon arrival. This was a major pain, since it meant I had to carry business attire back and forth to work, and I wasted at least a half hour per day showering and changing twice a day instead of once a day. Not only that, the Metro/bike commute itself took much longer than driving. Cold and/or rain made things even worse.

      Private automobiles really do have a lot of advantages.

    7. Re:What's so wrong with what we HAVE? by misterpies · · Score: 1

      Postal workers that walk their deliveries would also find this to be a heart attack saver.

      Sure, in fact using a Segway is so good for your heart compared with walking that I hear gyms are using them to replace treadmills. After all, every /.er knows that exercise kills!

      --
      The author of this post asserts his moral rights.
    8. Re:What's so wrong with what we HAVE? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You'd have to take a shower in the morning anyway, what's the difference between doing it at home and doing it at work? I bike to work in the California heat, and yes I get to work all covered in sweat. But I have a shower there and I step out of the shower and into my office as fresh as the morning dew whilst the endorphins are still flowing. How is that a "pain?" I love it!

    9. Re:What's so wrong with what we HAVE? by misterpies · · Score: 1

      Here in London many people have come up with a solution to the "carrying business attire back and forth" problem. They leave their business attire at the office...

      --
      The author of this post asserts his moral rights.
    10. Re:What's so wrong with what we HAVE? by bracher · · Score: 1

      because some cities won't allow bikes on commuter rail during the heavy commute window. if your office isn' within walking distance of a train station you're sort of screwed... but they will allow segways (at least for now).

    11. Re:What's so wrong with what we HAVE? by jnik · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Segway stopping distances are comparable to a bicycle.

    12. Re:What's so wrong with what we HAVE? by jnik · · Score: 1
      Now, cycling has the same problem as Segways, to some degree; cycles are too slow for the road and too fast for the sidewalks. I usually end up on sidewalks because there are no bike lanes in my commute (or really anywhere in my city) and it's far too dangerous on the road.

      Disagree with both statements :) Cycles aren't "too slow for the road." Through urban traffic I move just as fast as a car. So it takes me ten seconds longer to reach the next red light. Big deal. In suburban areas I'm moving a bit slower than the motorized traffic, so I yield to the right like any slower vehicle and am passed. Just like driving a junker car.

      And, except in certain circumstances, the road is safer than the sidewalk by a good margin. Most cycle/car collisions occur at crossings, intersections, driveways, etc., where the sidewalk is far more dangerous. Read Bicycling Street Smarts to learn how to ride safely and legally.

    13. Re:What's so wrong with what we HAVE? by homer_ca · · Score: 1

      Any factory or warehouse that big would already be using some kind of vehicle. Electric carts (similar to golf carts) cost less than Segways and haul a lot more people and cargo. Electric forklifts are common. Propane forklifts are clean enough for indoor use too. The Segway doesn't have a niche here.

    14. Re:What's so wrong with what we HAVE? by Omerna · · Score: 1

      "Postal workers that walk their deliveries would also find this to be a heart attack saver."

      Actually walking would be the heart attack saver. Riding around and getting no exercise is what causes heart attacks.

      --


      No sig for you.
    15. Re: What's so wrong with what we HAVE? by gidds · · Score: 1
      Indeed.

      Another compromise for shorter distances is rollerskates, especially inlines ('RollerBlades'). You can get detachable ones, where the skate part unclips leaving plain boots, for public transport, hills, &c. Like cycling, it's good exercise, and a lot of fun!

      --

      Ceterum censeo subscriptionem esse delendam.

  30. Re:why? by LordLucless · · Score: 1

    A couple of reasons:

    1) Running cars is expensive, what with registration, insurance, fuel, etc. Segways have no registration, little call for insurance and the "fuel" is cheaper. I know a number of people who only use their cars for driving to and from work and the local store, a 5 minute trip. Segways would be much cheaper in this instance.

    2) For people whose work involves a lot of urban/suburban walking, like the poor old postman, the Segway would be much better.

    2 reasons off the top of my head.

    --
    Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't an invisible demon about to eat your face
  31. Re:what's that white dot for? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    can i get a complite set of ALL slashdot articles ever writen please?
    i'm working on a phd (lingustics and date-mining).

    trying to determen how articles are percived and replyed to.

    examples...
    -most used words
    -abuses (ex. goatxxx)
    -Programm for instant automated reply (geek style) to submited articles
    -etc.

    thanks!

  32. Unofficial Sinclair web site by spudchucker · · Score: 1
  33. Hoping for a reasonable price by Kosi · · Score: 1

    As the Segway would be expensive even if you took the last 0 from the price tag, hopefully this machine will be available for a price which is not out of reality.

  34. Why is this news? by singleantler · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I can't see why this article rates a Slashdot story. Basically it's Sinclair saying he thinks the Segway is OK, but he might have something better in the pipeline. There's nothing about what that might be, it's just a piece to fill out the BBC technology section.

    Reporting on what he comes up with when it's actually launched, that's a story. Adding to hype about a product that effectively doesn't exist yet, surely that's just encouraging the sort of disappointment people felt about IT/ginger/the Segway when it was launched.

    --
    "What if they're using IE?" "I've dumbed Mozilla down to cope with it." - BOFH
    1. Re:Why is this news? by babbage · · Score: 1
      It's news to me because I've read all about Sinclair based on tipoffs from mailing list discussions with people in the UK (Americans have generally never heard of Sinclair, the C5, or Sinclair's computers). The catch though is that all the stories I've read about Sinclair to date have been written in the past tense, with a note of sadness about how he was this mad, failed genius back in the 80s.

      To be honest, until 10 minutes ago I thought the poor guy was dead.

      <pseudo-ed-wood> Sinclair? Ain't he dead? </pseudo-ed-wood>

      (cf. <real-ed-wood> Lugosi? Ain't he dead? </real-ed-wood>)

      So for me the good news here is that Sinclair is alive & well clearly Not Dead :-)

  35. Re:why? by singleantler · · Score: 1

    Running cars is expensive, but given the cost of the Segway you could run a car for a long time before the costs even out. And in a car you have the potential to drive much further should you need to, which the Segway doesn't give you. Really, for short trips walking or a bike is much cheaper than a Segway, or even ordering taxis.

    The Postmen in the UK use bicycles. They don't run out of power, and they're very cheap and easy to fix, can survive all weather, and aren't as likely to get stolen as something that costs $5,000+

    Really, the Segway is an impressive piece of engineering, though I was a lot more impressed by the motorised wheelchairs Kamen invented before it. Unfortunately there's just not really enough call for it to make the thing economically viable.

    --
    "What if they're using IE?" "I've dumbed Mozilla down to cope with it." - BOFH
  36. The Atari Jaguar by davidmb · · Score: 3, Informative
    Don't laugh - it's almost true (kind of).

    Project Loki was the design for a "Super Spectrum" that Sinclair came up with before Amstrad bought them out. Two ex-Sinclair engineers, John Mathieson and Martin Brennan, left and set up their own company called Flare, drawing on the Loki designs to produce a new multiprocessor games console. Atari brought the console to market as the Jaguar. More info here.

    1. Re:The Atari Jaguar by AndrewHowe · · Score: 1

      No, the Flare stuff ended up as the Konix Multisystem.
      The Jaguar was designed by the same people, but was a completely different design. For a start, it was 68000 based, rather than Z80.

    2. Re:The Atari Jaguar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh and when I say Z80, I meant the Flare 1, the Konix Multisystem was 8086 based.

  37. A solved problem by Moderation+abuser · · Score: 4, Insightful

    These guys are trying to solve a problem which simply doesn't exist.

    There are feet, there are bicycles, there are electric bicycles, there are go-peds, there are electric go-peds, there are electric scooters, there are petrol scooters, there are motorcycles, there are cars.

    All of the bases are already covered. Why would I want to spend a small fortune (4,500) on an segway when I can buy an electric go-ped with similar performance characteristics in a much more convenient package for 200?

    --
    Government of the people, by corporate executives, for corporate profits.
  38. I have seen the Segway niche... by scottme · · Score: 2, Informative

    and it excels in it.

    On a visit to Disney in Orlando last month, the parking lot attendants were whishing up and down the lanes on Segways, directing traffic, scooting over to their colleagues, and so on. This struck me as something the Segway is ideal for. If they had a better cargo carrying capability, I could also see postal workers using them, and maintenance people or anyone who has to cover long distances in factories, campuses, and the like.

    But as a means of serious personal A to B transportation? Forget it; bikes and cars beat it hands down.

  39. George W Bush is an idiot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Go ahead, believe that. Just sit back and think he is an idiot. That way he and those of us who support him while run rings around you and you will have no idea why.

    Bush Landslide Re-election 2004

  40. (OT) Editor fonts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > Using antialiased Andale Mono font in my editor makes me happy.

    I like Lucida Console at 12 (or 14, at higher resolutions). IMO cleaner than Andale Mono.

  41. Motorized Pogo Stick by Orthogonal+Jones · · Score: 1


    Or motorized unicycle. I would **LOVE** to see an aging baby-boomer on one of these, especially in San Francisco.

    I wouldn't mind paying for the pyramid scheme of Social Security if I could get my reality entertainment that way.

    Oh, hey -- that brings something to mind. Can we at least get rid of Social Security now that the workforce is overseas?

    1. Re:Motorized Pogo Stick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      San Francisco idiots have banned the Segway on sidewalks, and the state of California has banned Segways on roads. There will be no Segway use in San Francisco.

  42. C6 power supply? by AndroidCat · · Score: 2, Funny
    Perhaps we could combine this with a about getting power from blood?

    Add the optional forward ramming scoop for refueling, and you're good-to-go!

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  43. Who's the idiot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Re-election?"

    I think it would be a good strategery to crack open that histerical textbook. You forgot the 2000 election.

    1. Re:Who's the idiot? by Kosi · · Score: 1

      You forgot the 2000 election.

      In which he would and therefore should have lost if everything had gone as it should have had. Just think of all the people in Florida who were stripped of their right to vote just because their name was similar to some criminal's. Or all the absentee votes from the army (traditionally more republican), which have been illegaly counted after the election was closed.

      Just read the first chapter of "Stupid White Men" and you'll know how this man hijacked your pretty democracy (which is more an oligarchy anyway)!

  44. Big pieces of plastic suffer from fatigue. by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Exactly right. Big pieces of plastic suffer from fatigue. While aircraft aluminum begins to fatigue in 20 years, under continuous vibration big pieces of polyethylene fatigue and develop huge cracks in 20 days.

    The C5 showed that Clive Sinclair has little design sense. It put the driver in a position to see himself crushed as a car ran over him. Of course, hopefully the driver of the car would see the little flag on the C5.

  45. Spectrum + / 128 / +2 / +3 by patch-rustem · · Score: 1
    There's a whole series of follow ups starting with:

    Sinclair ZX Spectrum +

    Then Amstrad followed up further with:

    Spectrum 128

    Spectrum +2 and +2A

    Spectrum +3

    and like all good ideas the Speccy was cloned around the world.

    --
    Karma: Bad due to google bombing - Robert Watkins woz 'ere.
    1. Re:Spectrum + / 128 / +2 / +3 by Richard+W.M.+Jones · · Score: 1
      Original Spectrum 128's are quite rare because IIRC they were only produced for a few months before being replaced by the +/+2. (I have one in pretty good condition that my dad was still using through the 90s because it ran some old medical software). The case was made using the same molds as the QL.

      Rich.

    2. Re:Spectrum + / 128 / +2 / +3 by Ciderx · · Score: 1

      ahhh, but I bet you don't remember the Spectrum-compatible, Sam Coupe?

    3. Re:Spectrum + / 128 / +2 / +3 by spectecjr · · Score: 1

      ahhh, but I bet you don't remember the Spectrum-compatible, Sam Coupe?

      I do ;-)

      --
      Coming soon - pyrogyra
  46. Re:I submitted this almost two days ago! by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 0

    Stop your foul whining you filthy piece of distended rectum!

    --
    That was classic intercourse!
  47. It's traditional in August by 91degrees · · Score: 0

    It's called "the silly season". The government's on holiday, so is everyone else. There's a lack of news. Clive Sinclair fills up those column inches

  48. Nice try by Jeppe+Salvesen · · Score: 1

    However, I'd like to see more effort in fuel cell technology. If they can make the cars run on methanol, we could very well lose or reduce a LOT of problems - oil dependency, downtown pollution etc.

    I just wish Bush had the vision to launch a program that would make fuel cells more efficient and cheaper.. That way, oil would become much less critical on the long run. Wouldn't that be a greater achievment that throwing that camel fucker in Iraq?

    --

    Stop the brainwash

    1. Re:Nice try by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bush is an oil man, there's no way he's interested in moving away from oil dependency.

    2. Re:Nice try by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bzzzt! Wrong answer:

      Methanol is mostly produced from fossil fuel sources. So much for doing away with oil dependency by burning alky.

      Likewise, combustion byproducts of alcohols include tasty things like aldehydes and ketones, which are both more poisonous and more reactive than relatively inert unburned HCs and CO.

      Lastly, let's not forget that you need very nearly twice the volume of (fairly corrosive and quite hygroscopic) methanol to equal the energy stored in a unit of gasoline. This is OK for part of Europe with postage-stamp countries, but for people planning on driving 1000 KM+/day with 50-200 KM intervals between refuelling stations, it can get quite old to have to choose between range and trunk space.

      If you want to go renewable, fuel cells look the most like a win over the medium term.

  49. my guess at sinclair's C6 by *weasel · · Score: 1
    Does he think the humble but enduring push bike can ever be topped? "Just wait," he cautions, "until next year."
    so he's going to introduce an electric bicycle. something in the 5 kilo weight range, with a top speed of about 15-20mph. probably not even with gyros to help keep it upright, but possibly. most likely with pedal-power backup (maybe even charging the cells from regenerative braking or the pedals?)

    i've given up on hoping for hovercraft and such... stupid gravity.
    some sci-fi will always be a day away.

    --
    // "Can't clowns and pirates just -try- to get along?"
    1. Re:my guess at sinclair's C6 by Smidge204 · · Score: 1

      Why would you need gyros to keep it upright? Typically the wheels act as gyros that help balance you. In fact, throwing off that balance by leaning causes procession, which, if the wheel is free to pivot (like the front wheel is), will cause it to turn.

      That's how you can ride a bike without holding onto the handlebars - providing you have fairly good balance.

      An extra set of gyros would be redundant, heavy and wasteful in both materials and energy.

      Regenerative braking might not be all that fantastic either, since you're dealing with relatively small quantities of energy (unless you got a REALLY FAT guy riding it, and even then I don't think he'll get up much speed!)
      =Smidge=

  50. Bicycles have innovative "brakes" by ianscot · · Score: 1
    The big difference with Segway compared to bike, in my impression, is that it can stop... Well, of course a bike can stop too, but you have to put your foot to the ground then and go to "stop mode" so to say. With Segway there's no separate stop mode...

    If that's the big advantage, I'm thinking it's not worth the difference in coin. Never once in riding a bike have I said to myself "Now, to enter stop mode." Nor do I necessarily think the "lean back" method of stopping is better than a clear control. Ask W. Bush.

    (Where'd you learn about bikes, by the way -- on episodes of the Flintstones? "Put your foot to the ground"??)

    ...with bikes... stopping and then having to accelerate is a real bummer, especially if it's uphill. With motorized vehicles it's much less so (especially if there are no gears to worry about) since there's no extra effort involved.

    In the future we're going to heave our vast, spongy bodies onto Segways, hoist our leaf blowers, and go out to pick up the yard. You're right, the comparison really is to a wheelchair, isn't it?

    --
    "Fundamentalism" isn't about divine morality. It's about human authority.
    1. Re:Bicycles have innovative "brakes" by Urkki · · Score: 1
      Stopping and turning in place are advantages a bike or a scooter can't match at all. The alternative to segway in it's "natural" applications is walking. Wether it's advantage over walking outweights the cost is matter of application, as well as matter of how much money there is to spend.

      I expect the technology to mature, and in 10 years segway-style vehicles will be a viable alternative for small scooters too, not just walking. I mean, the advantages are clear (ability to stop and turn in place without moving), only the disadvantages (slower speed, slow to recharge, unproven technology) need to improve. But they will improve, like perhaps fuel cell replacing the batteries and enabling fast refuelling and more power without sacrificing range, and maturing technology allowing faster speeds safely.

      Using a segway now is akin to having a car a century ago; a toy for the rich, while real work was being done with horses. But it'll change, and it'll change a lot faster than it changed with cars I bet.

      ...
      And putting foot to the ground so you can stay upright with a bike when stopped may be something you take for granted. A friend of mine did, until he got his feet stuck in his "pedal hooks" (or whatever they are called) at a red light, and neatly just fell sideways. Fortunately no harm done, and it was great fun to watch, cartoon style indeed ;). But it clearly demonstrates that you have a separate "stop mode" for a bike, and if you fail to use it, the bike falls sideways :-D

  51. eGO Cycle by jwest · · Score: 2, Informative

    Try an eGO Cycle. It's a a battery-powered cycle that looks more or less like a bike but with a step-through design, uses mostly bike components for easy repairs, rides like a bike and uses bike lanes, but goes 25MPH (range 20 miles). With baskets you can easily get to work and go to the grocery. They're $1400, and no, I don't work for them.

  52. Wooohooo Sir Clive! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If someone can save the computer industry, that's Sir Clive Sinclair. That's a true genius. It's just amazing what he did with a Z80 processor and a couple of chips, for under 100 pounds. Namely, the brillant invention called the ZX Spectrum (I had a 48+, with its elegant black keyboard, and yes, I had a ZX81 before that. And I'm 22)

  53. I had one of these growing up by SengirV · · Score: 2, Funny

    It was called a big wheel. WTF?!?!?!

    --

    Prof. Farnsworth - "Oh a lesson in not changing history from Mr I'm-My-Own-Grandpa!"

  54. Has to be said... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Personally, I bike to work every day (~3 miles, 1.5 uphill, 1.5 down)

    At least the trip isn't uphill, both ways, aye?

  55. Yeah, but... by mwood · · Score: 1

    ...will it look as snazzy as a General Products #2 hull?

  56. Not a lot of people know this but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The reason that the C5 was called the C5 is because Alan Sinclair is a supergeek.

    The Sinclair Spectrum used a Z80 processor, and Mr. Sinclair was a hardcore Z80 coder back in the day...

    The instruction numbered 0xC5 is PUSH BC.... So it's really Sinclair C5 = Push Bike

    I've been impressed with that geekiness since about 1984 :)

    Yours
    AnonymouSCOward

    Argh.. I wonder what how much money the bastards will want to 'clean' my name :)

    1. Re:Not a lot of people know this but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice piece of trivia, here's another one : He's Sir Clive, not Sir Alan

    2. Re:Not a lot of people know this but... by mummers · · Score: 1

      He's actually referring to the other Sinclair. A recluse who is well known for having a brilliant mind set at 90 degrees to the rest of the universe.

      No relation whatsoever to the inventor, Sir Clive Sinclair, well known for having a brilliant mind set at 90 degrees to the rest of the universe.

      --
      --This isn't a man who is leaving with his head between his legs.
  57. Clive is no fool by reality-bytes · · Score: 1

    They only sold 5000 of the 12000 production run at 399GBP back in the day.

    I think Clive has cleverly held-on to as many C5s as he could and is now flogging them one by one on eBay for a massive markup.

    --
    Ripping an new rectum in the fabric of spacetime.
  58. Re:Americans do NOT need these transportation devi by Crash42 · · Score: 0

    I'm not. I'm more afraid of some idiot with a tiny bottle of god knows what.

    --


    ....Excuse me, but ... ah, forget it...
  59. Re:MODERATORS ARE SUXORS!!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ummm...hey, jackass, usually the editors, who have unlimited mod points, take care of the trolls like yourself, so you didn't actually waste anybody's mod points. Sorry to ejaculate on your parade.

  60. Not solved yet... by Dr.+Evil · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The problem is that cities are built wrong and people have funny goals.

    As I see it:

    • It takes too long to commute
    • Public transit is underdeveloped in most of North America
    • Anything larger than a skateboard has no place on the sidewalk and anything smaller than a good scooter has no place on the road
    • Bicycles and motorcycles are exposed to the elements
    • Most workplaces don't have showers and changerooms for the cyclists who travel more than 5k and work in an office
    • Anything which protects you from the elements and doesn't require human-power, is not manuverable enough to avoid being squashed, so it needs to be armoured and bulked up to protect the occupants from cars
    • Only an internal combustion engine is powerful enough to drive anything which isn't too big to be squashed, and...
    • For those walking on the sidewalk or riding on the streets, or just breathing in rush hour traffic, internal combustion engines are disgusting

    IMHO, the ideal would be to all but discard the car as a method of transportation and focus on public transportation, alternative methods of transportation and high speed networking infrastructure to encourage those who can to work from home.

    Workplaces should have (or locate near heath clubs with) safe bicycle racks, changerooms and showers, and the roads should have wide lanes so that those who really do need to drive don't try to sqeeze cyclists, inline skaters, slow scooters, segways and other junk off the road.

    But, that can't happen overnight... so you need some stupid new technology to inspire people to think about how dumb they all are spending hours transporting a thousand kilograms of metal and glass back and forth across the city on a daily basis.

    1. Re:Not solved yet... by dspyder · · Score: 1

      I agree almost entirely!

      I have been in the market for a car replacement for my work commute:

      Surface streets for about 12 miles, primarily 40 mph speed limit, lots of stop lights and two stop signs on the way, no lunch places within easy walking distance but several within a quick car hops distance, etc. etc. It's too hot during the summer (Sacramento, 100+) to ride a bike, especially carrying my laptop bag... and too cold during the winter. That and I do carpool with a coworker to save gas and costs every day.

      The GEM is (was?) the closest solution for me. They got the price about right (considerably less than a car, cheap enough to avoid having to finance it) and it has enough range and practical storage and passenger handling (two or four). However, they're not legal on 40mph roads, even though most of the time we're travelling around the GEMs 25mph top speed.

      The Segway isn't the right solution either, but it would allow me to use the bike lane at any speed. 12 miles is pushing its range though, right? Biggest problem for me is that it's still $5000 for a scooter. Love the technology, love the idea, hate the price. I'll wait for the Henry Ford mass-produced Model-T version.

      So yeah, you're absolutely right.... the problem has not been solved yet!

      --Darren

  61. I swear anyone runs over my foot with a segway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    will find that unit under a truck on 7th ave.

  62. Recumbants by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    "...having kitted it out with two flourescent flags on poles to make the machine a bit more visible."
    Riders of recumbant bikes have been doing that for years. The recumbant configuration (that the C5 was based on) has a lot of advantages. As well as being very comfortable, the superior aerodynamics make them the fastest bikes around. Period.

    The disadvantages are less control, an inability to get out of the saddle and use the power in your arms when climbing, and the fact that you are indeed less visible to the people who prefer to travel by burning dead dinosaurs. Hence the flags.

  63. you want to move convientely through the city by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Buy a bike. They are cheap in comparison, have only a few working parts (less to break), much more manueverable and fast, and less likely to get you ass kicked. You have been sitting all day writing code. Do you really need a machine to move you around at walking speed? That is why god gave you legs (far superior to any segway design). I just don't get the point. And the price tag is insane. You can get a crappy car for that price, and it will go a hundred times faster.

  64. his reply? by grasshoppah · · Score: 1

    MY reply to segway was... "hahahaha! waaaaaaait... what???"

  65. Too fast for sidewalks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You must have never seen a Segway.

    The only one I've seen was being operated by a woman shopping in Ikea. It worked just fine. And if the locals on sidewalks in your town are slower than typical female shopping, they must get regularly overtaken by glaciers and drifting continents.

  66. Aah, the younger generation by panurge · · Score: 1

    Cannot see the point of the Segway. Actually, there are lots of older people with limited mobility (arthritis etc.) who are not completely disabled. My father, for instance, who can walk about a mile, slowly (he is over 80) and would not be seen dead in a wheelchair. In fact, he has a lot of difficulty getting into and out of cars. Besides, he doesn't need a wheelchair. In the small town he lives in, there is relatively little sidewalk traffic during the day and he could easily get right round the town on a Segway. A golf cart or battery wheelchair is not the answer for people like him. A Segway would give them mobility with dignity (OK, didn't work for Bush Junior, but I bet his father would have more success with it.)

    --
    Panurge has posted for the last time. Thanks for the positive moderations.
  67. Here you go... by ashitaka · · Score: 1
    --
    If you don't want to repeat the past, stop living in it.
  68. I thought the Segway was "interesting".... by greymond · · Score: 1

    Until I saw the $4,000 price tag on Amazon. I don't understand why it is so expensive. It's a simple slow motorized stand with wheels. I bought a Gas Powered Go-Ped and a larger Carb for it allowing me to travel at about 40-45mph (stock was 30-35mph). The Go-Ped cost me $500 (Including extra parts otherwise it would have been $450). They even make models that can have seats on them if you want to sit instead of stand for an extra $75-$100. Currently in San Jose you are allowed to ride Go-Peds legally in the bike lane, someone told me that the Segway was not allowed on side walks because it moved to slow? I don't know if that is true or not, but I don't know nor have seen anyone who owns one. With so many other less expensive (and better IMHO) alternatives I don't see the point in getting a Segway. Even for older people the price of a decent Bicycle can be found in the $400-$600 range.

    1. Re:I thought the Segway was "interesting".... by NineNine · · Score: 1

      WTF is a "Go-Ped"??

  69. Dont use a race bike if you cant handle it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you cant ride a bicycle Im sure you can find lots of ways to harm yourself, for the non moron segment of the population stopping and putting their foot down is not a problem though.

    1. Re:Dont use a race bike if you cant handle it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      An AC implying that somebody is a moron. How... original.

  70. It won't save people from heart attacks... by Shivetya · · Score: 1

    If anything it will contribute the laziness that pervades society, and worse, will further exaggerate that problem many government employees.

    --
    * Winners compare their achievements to their goals, losers compare theirs to that of others.
  71. Unrealistic view of Segways application by Shivetya · · Score: 1

    Segways are no more of a replacement for automobiles than bicycles. Face it, no one is going to put up with rain, cold, or other weather. Businesses sure don't put up with much of it in regards to employee availability unless it borders on life threatening.

    Combine that with the fact you have no real storage, no protection from other hazards (read:dogs, etc), and zero phyiscal protection and its a dead issue.

    We require children to wear helmets to ride bicycles, how long before we require Segway riders to have similar attire? Who pays for accidents on Segways?

    All these elements conspire against this type of transportation. Seqway is an expensive toy that is only ideally suited for use by government employees. The government can void laws as well as create them to suit its needs, and it certainly doesn't care about costs.

    --
    * Winners compare their achievements to their goals, losers compare theirs to that of others.
  72. Re:MODERATORS ARE SUXORS!!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    We all know Michael Sims, Slashdot's resident Nazi, likes to spend all day censoring posts, while jacking off to goatse.cx and tubgirl

    No, no, no! You have it all wrong! I like to go around modding idiots like you into obvliion because you are being idiotic. If that makes me a Nazi in your eyes, I'm fine with that. But at least get your accusations right.

  73. Try this by christoofar · · Score: 1

    My company (The SCOOTER Store) manufactures an inexpensive scooter that doesn't cost an arm and a leg ($999) to use, has accessories, and you can sit down in the thing and go several miles in it, and it folds up and fits in your truck. We also sell the traditional stuff (scooters and power chairs) directed at Medicare recipients and those with private insurance who need it to improve their mobility. The PTVs are designed for more everyday outdoor use. They would be perfect for NOC employees who have to move around from terminal to terminal all the time... :-)

  74. Oh dear.. by njan · · Score: 1

    Bandwidth Limit Exceeded
    The server is temporarily unable to service your request due to the site owner reaching his/her bandwidth limit. Please try again later.
    Apache/1.3.28 Server at www.sinclairc5.com Port 80

    poor sinclair.. always disappointing. ;) ..so much for british engineering. :)

    --
    I am a viral sig. Please copy me and help me spread. Thank you
  75. The Harley Davidson version by ch-chuck · · Score: 1

    HD also has an answer to the Segway - it uses a much more powerful engine, and this really neat completely mechanical balancing mechanism based on the gyroscopic effect: two large turning wheels keep the unit upright, and when you lean to one side or the other, the front wheel, which is pivoted, actually turns into the direction of the lean, simultaneously providing a turning and self righting function.

    It's amazingly fun! You ought to ride one someday.

    They come in models that go fast enough to keep up with the fastest hiway traffic, and are quickly and easily 'recharged' at any widely available automobile service center.

    --
    try { do() || do_not(); } catch (JediException err) { yoda(err); }
    1. Re:The Harley Davidson version by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And looks like trashy Americana and doesn't perform very well, dispite what all HD die-hards would have you believe.

    2. Re:The Harley Davidson version by BigBadBri · · Score: 1
      Philistine.

      It looks and sounds like a proper motorcycle should - perhaps the only thing that sounds better is a Ducati 916.

      Bet you ride some flimsy Jap poseurs bike without real handlebars.

      And I'm not even an American, I'm a Brit.

      --
      oh brave new world, that has such people in it!
  76. Not a Bicycle Replacement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bikes are good for exercising, commuting/running errands, and sightseeing.

    Segways are only good for sightseeing.

    I see the occasional Segway in Manhattan. Not on the streets or sidewalks, like the photos in the press release show. On the bike paths. Yes, for $4500 you too can ride around bike paths without actually getting any exercise. (If you don't mind getting dusted by all the cyclists, that is.)

  77. slahdotted by adamscottphotos · · Score: 1

    http://www.sinclairc5.com

    Bandwidth Limit Exceeded
    The server is temporarily unable to service your request due to the site owner reaching his/her bandwidth limit. Please try again later.

    --
    So quit your job, pack your bags, and move on out to snow country!
  78. Something like this? by BarryHaworth · · Score: 1
    While Sinclair insn't giving anything out, perhaps it will be something like this design . Chris Townsend's "Mantic" design is something like an electric scooter, but a bit more stylish, and (according to the article) weighs 10 kg, folds up for easy carrying, and will cost ~$A 1000 (~ $US 650). Much cheaper & lighter than the Segway, similar speed and range, and almost as easy to use.

    What's not to like?

    I am a Statistician. One false move and you are a Statistic.

    --
    I am a Statistician. One false move and you are a Statistic
  79. Why not just... by spike+it · · Score: 1

    Why not just put a third wheel and an electric motor on razor scooters? It'll be chaper, balance just as well, and will appeal to wide audiences just as the original razor scooter did.

  80. Needs a better code name. C6 won't cut it. by WoTG · · Score: 1

    Something like That, or how about Garlic.

    Hmm, somehow I don't think that very many people will get that joke. Ah well, I've already typed this far, might as well hit submit.

  81. Sinclair C5 by icewitch · · Score: 1

    You killed it! Slashdotted the site. You swines.

    --
    bored and underpaid
  82. Re:Sinclair products have always been cheap and na by mrd_yaddayadda · · Score: 1
    "No-one believes anything this old dottard has-been says, and no-one's going to invest a penny in his mad schemes any more."
    Hmm. I think you do the man the tiniest bit of disrespect to disregard him quite that casually...
    • Invented world's first pocket calculator
    • Developed the digital wristwatch
    • Developed the pocket TV
    This is ignoring his bringing of the computer to Joe Public in a pretty affordable way (Sinclair ZX80/81/Spectrum marketed as some Timex or other in the US).

    His comments are probably as worthy of listening to as Dean Kamen's. Oh and if you want to have a go at him, you might have to get through any person using a continuous drug infusion device, commonly used by people as insulin pumps now...
  83. It's a housing problem in reality. by Moderation+abuser · · Score: 1

    If people are commuting, you have a housing/planning problem. The resulting transport problems are just symptoms.

    --
    Government of the people, by corporate executives, for corporate profits.
  84. Re:Hrmm by Ambient+Sheep · · Score: 1
    When the C5 was first announced, Sir Clive said that the next model would be the C4, and the series would continue until the C1 saw the light of day - the C1 was rumoured to be a real car

    I thought it was the other way round, that he was going to build up through C10, C15 until finally the C20, which was going to be the proper car.

    That's actually where his marketing really broke down, in my view. In the specialist press he'd mentioned these plans, and that the C5 was simply a first step to test the waters. However in the mainstream press it was announced that Sinclair would be bringing out an electric car...so when it appeared everyone just laughed. Also, as has been said many times before, launching it in January was not clever. Had he launched it as a fun summer-type thing in July, it might have done better.

    Or it might not.