Slashdot Mirror


Executive Secretary In Every Computer

An anonymous reader writes "BusinessWeek Online just ran an interview with a researcher from Sandia National labs whose team has developed an alternative approach to artificial intelligence. They have come up with a software program that models a computer user's behavior and gives the user advice, corrects his errors or saves files according to the user's own logic. The idea is for computers to learn how to use with users -- instead of vice versa. The software has already been tested with air traffic controllers."

74 of 320 comments (clear)

  1. I apparently already have this function.... by sweeney37 · · Score: 5, Funny

    gives the user advice, corrects his errors or saves files

    His name is Clippy, and I hate him.

    Mike

    1. Re:I apparently already have this function.... by Junks+Jerzey · · Score: 5, Funny

      His name is Clippy, and I hate him.

      Why doesn't someone write an agent to predict what the replies will be to a given Slashdot story? It could be done as an elementary school project.

    2. Re:I apparently already have this function.... by Znork · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Indeed, this sounds exactly like Clippy. I read an article on Clippy a few years ago. Clippy was a great idea, that was supposed to help in just these ways. During R&D it worked very well.

      Then MS marketing got involved. They decided that Clippy didnt get activated enough. Clippy in its research version might have popped up once a month when a user really needed help. However, once a month would not justify the expense of development and marketing, nor could it be hailed as a great new feature if the users almost never saw it.

      Enter the new and marketing improved Clippy any MS office user over the last decade has had the misfortune to experience. Junk the I part of AI, and just make an annoying paperclip instead of a helpful tool. I can only imagine how the researchers felt about having their nice idea turned into something like what Clippy got to be.

      Maybe we'll see a real implementation of this kind of technology at some point in time. But I'll bet any commercial application of this is more likely to get written by popup ad companies, and jog the ATC guys elbow by suggesting which airline he should be using or something...

    3. Re:I apparently already have this function.... by PrImED73 · · Score: 2, Funny

      gives the user advice, corrects his errors or saves files
      And gives "executive stress relief", then ill be impressed.

      --
      --Mods giveth, Mods taketh away--
    4. Re:I apparently already have this function.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting
      His name is Clippy, and I hate him.
      This got modded as funny, but it would've been better modded as insightful. Nothing slows a salty computer user down more than a computer that stops every eight seconds to ask him a question or worse, start some processor intensive image manipulations when said user is trying to get actual work done.

      What would really be useful is an OS where everything is controlled through scripts I write myself. Applications, through the OS, would be controlled by scripting, too. Then I can tell the computer how I want it to act, instead of it having to learn what I'll probably want, then guess at it.

      It scares me that this sort of software is needed for air traffic controllers. Those guys should know the software they're using inside and out, frontwards and backwards. I expect an ATC to be able to fix any problems with the computer (even though the better solution is to move the ATC to another machine and have a tech come in and repair). The stupidity of the average computer user is infecting all levels of software design :(
    5. Re:I apparently already have this function.... by swilver · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You'd have to wonder why these researchers would even believe that using neural networks or whatever form of AI they come up with will even work, when not even a real human person sitting next to me working on the same program or document can accurately anticipate my needs...

    6. Re:I apparently already have this function.... by bruce_the_moose · · Score: 2, Interesting

      MS has been trying to add "helpful features that learn to adapt to how the user works" for years, clippy being the most notorious example. I hate them all. Many times my colleagues have heard me yell at some office program, "don't be so damn helpful!" I really don't want everything I type that has an atmark in it turned into a clickable email link.

      This company will likely be purchased by MS shortly, and their overhelpful time wasters incorporated into the operating system (along with a few egregious security holes, of course). And once that happens, my first question to MS tech support will be, "how do I turn this useless feature off." Shortly after win2k machines started becoming common in my office, a "how to turn off personalized menus" FAQ became very popular."

      Whyizzit smart people are wasting time and money on projects like these? Computers should behave like Forest Gump, and do "whatever the hell it is I tell them to" and no more.

      --
      To reduce crime, make fewer things against the law.
    7. Re:I apparently already have this function.... by sholden · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I take it you have personally advanced the state of the art more than this.

    8. Re:I apparently already have this function.... by JediTrainer · · Score: 3, Funny

      Clippy in its research version might have popped up once a month when a user really needed help.

      Like in this situation?

      --

      You can accomplish anything you set your mind to. The impossible just takes a little longer.
    9. Re:I apparently already have this function.... by Zog+The+Undeniable · · Score: 5, Funny

      If (icon==hardware) then beowulfClusterJoke() If (icon==yro) then welcomeNewOverlordsJoke() If (icon==borg) then ???Profit!Joke() If (rnd>0.3) then sovietRussiaJoke() else lameFpAttempt()

      --
      When I am king, you will be first against the wall.
    10. Re:I apparently already have this function.... by Kwiik · · Score: 3, Funny

      void lameFpAttempt()
      {printf("

      Step 1. Become overlord of Soviet Russia
      Step 2. Beowulf cluster
      Step 2. ???
      Step 3. Economic improvement!\n");}

      --
      Vehicle Stars used car search is my current project
    11. Re:I apparently already have this function.... by danila · · Score: 4, Interesting

      May be someone can write a module for Alice integration with Slashdot. I think the dialog-based parsing engine would work just great after some tweaking.

      An alternative approach would be to first parse Slashdot archives to get a lot of posts, articles and moderation data and then use Bayesian theory to decide which sentences/keywords should be included to produce highest moderation based on the words in the blurb (or the linked article, but parsing that would be against /. spirit).

      It can be further enhanced using the poetry evolution engine. If we limit the system to very short posts (cliche jokes or smartass oneliners), it might work quite well (feedback, of course, would be the moderation).

      Any volunteers?

      --
      Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
    12. Re:I apparently already have this function.... by lildogie · · Score: 2, Funny

      > Then MS marketing got involved.

      "Hey, it looks like you're trying to innovate.
      Would you like some help?"

    13. Re:I apparently already have this function.... by berenddeboer · · Score: 2

      Clippy is still an amazing marketing feat. You might not like it, but it was a selling point to upgrade. And nowpeople are paying again for the new version without Clippy, because it . Isn't that just a brilliant marketing strategy?

      Compare that to the attempts of RedHat: first they lure people into buying the SCO enabled enterprise version, and now people want to buy the next version without SCO code. And no one is cheering.

      --
      If I had a sig, I would put it here.
  2. Clippy by mrpuffypants · · Score: 4, Funny

    "It looks like you're trying to land a plane. Would you like lunch?"

    "It looks like you're trying to talk to a pilot. Would you like to write a letter to him?"

    "It look like you're trying to turn me off. Dave. Don't do that Dave."

  3. I like chicken, I like liver! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Whoah, Glad they tested it with air traffic controllers first. I wouldn't want any drastic mistakes or anything to happen that might send a plane into the ground.. or anything.

    1. Re:I like chicken, I like liver! by jhigh · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I was thinking the same thing. The article said something about 90% accuracy...isn't 10% inaccuracy kind of concerning when you're talking about air traffic control??

      --
      Social Engineering Expert: Because there is no patch for stupidity.
  4. tested with ATC? oh crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
    "It looks like you're trying to direct a plane into land. Would you like me to help you?"
    • Yes please.
    • No, I do not need help landing planes.
    • No, and don't show Crashy again.
    Click here for other automated flight controller assistants.
    1. Re:tested with ATC? oh crap by ax_42 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Your shareware copy of LandingGear 2.0 has expired, please contact www.ohshit.com to buy a full licence.

  5. Great if I can force specific things on it.... by Lumpy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I want to force it to always save to the mapped E: drive... not where the user wants to save it.

    The biggest problem is the user that saves things willy-nilly, relies on editing a spreadsheet in an email and never saves it specifically, etc....

    Unless it can be told to force certian behaivoir upon the user to be in line with corperate requirements.... I dont see it as useful and more of another PITA app that makes my life more difficult as a Net/sys admin

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    1. Re:Great if I can force specific things on it.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, imagine if the user doesn't need to know or care where the file is physically stored. They just close the word processer, and it's automatically saved.

      The next time they start it, the same document they were last working on is loaded. If they want to work on a different one, they just click a button and select it from a list.

      Underneath, the App/OS can conspire to actually save the files to your all importent e: drive, but that doesn't mean the user needs to care.

    2. Re:Great if I can force specific things on it.... by BryanL · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Exactly my thoughts. Something like this sounds like it will reinforce bad user habits. Maybe we need software to teach new users effecient and effective ways to use their computers.

  6. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  7. What are you doing, Dave? by tds67 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    What happens when the user is a sick, twisted and sadistic person. Will the computer adapt to that kind of user?

    1. Re:What are you doing, Dave? by Talthane · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If the technology reaches that stage, then sadly, a legislator somewhere will most likely have insisted it has so-called safeguards to (a) stop it file sharing, (b) 'protect the children' or(c) to 'help' any war on terror still going on at that time.

      The upshot being your software's safeguards recognise you are a sick and twisted soul and the program informs on you (can you imagine Outlook flashing up a box saying "I'm sorry, Dave, but I have decided to report your activities to the police because you are a terrorist"?).

      Total Information Awareness by the back door, eh? And then you could even have some country decides to use the software safeguards to predict whether a user is a political dissident...

      Maybe you can't stop the march of technology (as he says in the article), but you could direct it with a little more forethought.

      --
      "This is why men never share their feelings; because women always remember." -Just Shoot Me.
    2. Re:What are you doing, Dave? by allanj · · Score: 3, Funny

      What happens when the user is a sick, twisted and sadistic person. Will the computer adapt to that kind of user?


      If it does, my guess would be that it'd use 'vi' as the default editor for anything.

      --
      Black holes are where God divided by zero
  8. Nighmare Scenario ! by CmdrGravy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Great, so now Technical Support / Helpdesk staff will have to learn the individual way everyone's PC is deciding to work when talking people through how to do things !

  9. think lewinsky by kraksmoka · · Score: 4, Funny
    can we all agree that using technology to replace secretaries and interns defeats the purpose?

    on a serious note, just having word and excel has replaced many thousands of secretaries already. can anyone out there say that typing is solely a clerical skill like it was 20 years ago?

    --
    "You never want a serious crisis to go to waste." - Rahm Emanuel
    1. Re:think lewinsky by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      can anyone out there say that typing is solely a clerical skill like it was 20 years ago?

      It's not just a clerical skill. My thief has a +17 typing ability...

    2. Re:think lewinsky by arth1 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      on a serious note, just having word and excel has replaced many thousands of secretaries already. can anyone out there say that typing is solely a clerical skill like it was 20 years ago?


      These days, *handwriting* is becoming a clerical skill. Some places have already stopped teaching kids handwriting in lower grades, and rely on computers instead. Heck, some "new adults" have problems filling out a cheque, because it requires a line of handwriting!

      Also, the new generation is generally unable to do simple math, and *requires* the cash register AI to tell not only how much cash to return to the customer, but which coins. If they don't have this luxury, they struggle.
      (I often buy breakfast at McDonalds, for $3.70. More often than not, I get three dimes in return instead of a quarter and a nickel.)

      My prediction is that the trend will continue, and the more advanced everyday AI becomes, the more people will rely on AI instead of skills and reasoning. Today's kids might not know what 12x12 is, but tomorrow's kids will have problems with a doorknob, as they'll be used to doors opening by AI.

      Regards,
      --
      *Art
    3. Re:think lewinsky by BCSEiny · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Doesn't anyone see what is going to happen. Those who have read dune (which is a lot of people on slashdot i would bet) would know this exact same thing happened in the dune universe. Eventually humanity got tired of having computers take over everything and they destroyed all the computers. This same thing will eventually happen if we do not stop the complete integration of computers into our daily lives. It is my opinion that young kids should not be allowed to use a computer (or calculator) for many years up till about high school and then sparingly. The inability to do math in our heads will be the beginning of our downfall. I have an unbelievable amount of friends who are willing to turn over all tasks to a computer. I find this very sad. "Fear is the mind-killer..."

    4. Re:think lewinsky by Wvyern · · Score: 3, Funny

      I was gonna say, will this secretary have big boobs? We all want one with big boobs or again, whats the point!

      --
      "Sheep just follow the easiest path and run from scary noises and intimidating creatures." - Me
  10. Bad Logic by darkstar949 · · Score: 2, Funny

    But if the program mimics its users logic does that mean that we will have tech support being called by computers for stupid reasons?

    1. Re:Bad Logic by Rick.C · · Score: 2, Funny
      But if the program mimics its users logic does that mean that we will have tech support being called by computers for stupid reasons?

      Yes, but at least it won't be because the power cord isn't plugged in.

      --
      You were 80% angel, 10% demon. The rest was hard to explain. - Over The Rhine
      "Math in a song is good."-Linford
  11. Scary ... by iMMersE · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I was thinking about this this very morning, about how my computer should know that I am trying to save a file with a given extension or content and default to a certain directory.

    Of course, the annoyance would start when you change your way of doing something, or the computer pre-empts an action which you don't intend to do - You'd have to spend time fixing such problems and wait while the computer re-trains itself.

    Sure enough, the article doesn't mention these problems, and how they would be avoided or overcome.

    --
    codegolf.com - smaller *is* better.
    1. Re:Scary ... by bamurphy · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I remember reading a while ago about the comparison between the computer-learns-human style of doing things vs. human-learns-computer.

      The examples I believe were the current Palm OS with its logical if somewhat odd "grafitti" system. It was compared to the old Newtons which attempted to learn the user's handwriting, as well as the new tablet pc's.

      Basically the long and short of it was that the order of % correctness went newton > tablet > palm. Although the tablet pc's do a pretty good job interpreting, they still "make mistakes" when someone's writing gets really sloppy. On the other hand after a minimum of time the average user can use graffiti with a high level of accuracy and can understand the malformations of a sigil that might produce an error while being made.

      All in all though it seems most of these attempts to "learn" what a user may do are misplaced. I try to keep my "websites" directory very well organized, as well as my "print work" directory, but both vary in structure from each other, even before my own mistakes and idiosyncratic files. And my applications directory is a completely different story... and lets not even get started on consumer media. Shouldn't this all be handled by XML soon anyway?

      We've still got the world's best massively parellel computers in our noggins. Pattern recognition OWNZ.

  12. Microsoft style by towaz · · Score: 4, Funny

    Probable would work sort of like this.
    Mr clippy

    --

    --
    "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - Voltaire
  13. Computers that learn from the user? by metalhed77 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Does that mean that when my mom calls me up for tech support that I'll have to teach her and her computer where the any key is?

    --
    Photos.
  14. Huh? Air traffic controllers!? by zonix · · Score: 4, Interesting
    The idea is for computers to learn how to use with users -- instead of vice versa. The software has already been tested with air traffic controllers.

    Not exactly comforting, if you ask me! I expect air traffic controllers to know their systems and how to use them. What happens when this software has learned to compensate for one traffic controller's particular errors, and then suddenly another traffic controller takes over his/her station?

    z
    --
    What would an EWOULDBLOCK block, if an EWOULDBLOCK could block would? -- me
  15. Can you imagine a Beowulf cluster of Clippies? by heironymouscoward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Helpful software everywhwre? Sweet Jesus!

    It's almost as bad as the polite elevators ("Which floor would you like to go to today") in the HHGTTG.

    Software should be like God made it: rude, difficult, and flaky. The users need their daily dosage of pain and whom are we to deny this to them? It's the endorphins, man!

    --
    Ceci n'est pas une signature
  16. Think of the poor TV writers... by ArmenTanzarian · · Score: 2, Funny

    Where's the office comedy going to go without a sassy (often latino, to spice things up) secretary? If windows starts sassing me or using a big thick fake accent, I'm fdisking.

  17. I need help... by KingRamsis · · Score: 3, Funny

    " The idea is for computers to learn how to use with users -- instead of vice versa. "

    can someone put that in a "in soviet russia" joke ? I tried but I was too confused.

    1. Re:I need help... by commodoresloat · · Score: 2, Funny
      It looks like your trying to troll slashdot. Would you like me to help?

      • Generate "In Soviet Russia" jokes
      • Generate ??? Profit jokes
      • No thanks, I don't need help with this task
  18. I can see it now. A typical work day... by Rudy+Rodarte · · Score: 4, Funny

    08:08 AM -- It looks like you're browsing /.
    Would you like me to refresh the site 10 times a second to give you a few fr1st p05ts?
    09:17 AM -- It looks like you're browsing /. ...
    Again.
    Would you like me to answer your phone and tell everyone that you are in a meeting?
    09:45 AM -- It looks like you're browsing /. ...
    Again.
    Would you like me to call your wife and tell her you are working late?
    And so on...

  19. Oliver: the new Nomenclator by handy_vandal · · Score: 4, Interesting


    Remember oliver, the electronic personality extender predicted by Alvin Toffler in "Future Shock" ...?

    There's an interesting passage about olivers in John Brunner's excellent novel, "The Shockwave Rider":

    "... so-called olivers, electronic alter-egos designed to save the owner the strain of worrying about all his person-to-person contacts. A sort of twenty-first-century counterpart to the ancient Roman nomenclator, who discreetly whispered data into the ear of the emperor and endowed him with the reputation of a phenomenal memory." (pp. 41-42)

    --
    -kgj
  20. wonderful :( by scovetta · · Score: 5, Funny

    Great, now the percentage of women working in tech companies will go from 15% down to 2%. Good job, ass.

    --
    Wer mit Ungeheuern kämpft, mag zusehn, dass er nicht dabei zum Ungeheuer wird. --Nietzsche
  21. Air traffic controllers? by Kegetys · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "The software has already been tested with air traffic controllers." Nice, safe place they found to beta test their stuff. Something going wrong there is not going to cause any trouble, right?

    1. Re:air traffic controllers? by Lodragandraoidh · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The next killer app, in my opinion, is the application that allows you to not only save content, but also the context (or contexts, even - human beings don't keep things in their head under one strict association - there are multiple pointers to the same information) behind that word doc, picture, etc.

      I would love to be able to quickly find items that I need that were saved years ago. Almost every day I have to find such things on my disk, and having a searchable interface (particularly for binary encoded files, such as executable or graphics files - which have little searchable text inside of them) that works would save hours every week.

      Instead of only having a limited amount of information, filename and directory, you would be able to search over multiple hierarchies as well as descriptive text - even for binaries. This would put the user in the driver's seat, allowing her to build relationships within the data that have meaning to her.

      --

      Lodragan Draoidh
      The more you explain it, the more I don't understand it. - Mark Twain
    2. Re:air traffic controllers? by zedmelon · · Score: 2, Funny

      No, I didn't RTFA, but the blurb was enough.

      Air traffic controllers...

      I'm sure glad that every time new software gets developed and people need guinea pigs for testing, they choose
      non-critical users
      running non-critical applications
      on non-critical systems
      performing non-critical services.

      --
      Mom says my .sig can beat up your .sig.
    3. Re:air traffic controllers? by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 3, Funny
      " The next killer app, in my opinion, is the application that allows you to not only save content, but also the context (or contexts, even - human beings don't keep things in their head under one strict association - there are multiple pointers to the same information) behind that word doc, picture, etc."

      Exactly, and this context could be applied to many things. For example, when I download torrents of anime now, I always save them to the same folder which is my holding area for anime I download, which I later move to its correct folder upon viewing. If my computer could sense that I was downloading anime (yet again) and direct it to the proper folder, that would be great. If it could generate a list of what I've viewed completely, what I've partially watched, and what I haven't watched yet, that would be amazing.

      Even better, sometimes a series gets moved around in my folder because it has a different file name than others of its kind because it was subbed by a different group. I do not rename the filenames because I like to keep them the same for when I send to others, yet if my computer could figure out that a file was part of a certain group of files even though it had a different filename, that would be a great boon to my productivity.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
  22. a few aspects by jlemmerer · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Wired News has a similar article. Maybe you could just combine the new AI with the cute exterior ofClippy. On the other hand side it would be interesting how much space you have to allocate for the AI database. as far as i remember A.L.I.C.E. needed a quite large AIML file to be just somewhat intelligent. If now the computer should also remeber patterns in behavior and not just talk to you (Alice is a pure chatbot) then in my opinion you need quite large amounts of data to be stored. This could be useful for larger companies with a dedicated AI Server to help their employees (if we talk about AI in a network, why not call ist SKYNET), but on a normal desktop? I think that's too much.

    And to focus on another problem: if this thing learns about you behavior, don't you mind about your privacy? We are all paranoid about cookies and other spyware, and then some people actually want us to deliberatly install it? Just imagine: Your boss next to you because you want to show something to him and then the computer asks: "Hi XY, you haven't visited ./ today, normally syou surf it for ours during work. Can I help you get there?"

    --
    ".Sig Stealer" was here
  23. Wired Article by jetkust · · Score: 3, Informative

    here is the wired article about it. It's basically 2 pages of "This technology is nothing like Clippy."

  24. I'll take a swing... by mekkab · · Score: 2, Funny

    In soviet russia, Versa Vice!


    Not what you were expecting? ;)

    --
    In the future, I would want to not be isolated from my friends in the Space Station.
  25. Fun parts... by RyoSaeba · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Thanks to our software, when you stop the simulation and ask the computer and the operator, "What do you think is going on right now?" about 90% of the time you get the same answer from both.
    I don't know for you, but i think 90% is way too low for anything good to happen.... Imagine spam filters having only 90% success, thus missing 10% of spam... no fun, he?
    The systems we're building now require rigorous collection of data from a person to create a model
    Another way to say they can't yet analyse what a user is doing, s/he must be doing it in precise ways... So the user will have to adapt for the software to learn :-)
    --
    Tsuyoikoto ha taisetsu da ne, dakedo namida mo hitsuyousa (Strength is an important thing, but tears too are necessary)
  26. From the Article by barryfandango · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "some fear that the concept suggests an ominous encroachment out of a sci-fi movie. Cognitive psychologist Chris Forsythe, who leads the Sandia team, insists that the machines are designed to augment -- not replace -- human activity.

    This sort of writing is the result of either a sensational and poorly informed writer, or a company hyping its product way beyond its capabilities. AI has not even reached the Bronze Age yet, and the idea that a concept like this threatens to make humans obsolete is laughable.

    --
    In all matters of opinion, our adversaries are insane. -Oscar Wilde
    1. Re:From the Article by dasmegabyte · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Why is it laughable?

      Robots have replaced workers in factories.

      Dictation programs have replaced secreataries and typists.

      Tools like Google, SQL and mapping software do a better job of researching information than people do.

      Machines perform very well in tasks where we boss them around. They don't perform equally well when they have to perform a lot of decision making. This is an attempt to bring them to a more passable level. And since technology is always replacing people, I think designing technology with the vision of augmenting a person's computer usage is very noble. And it's something that's very important to point out when we've got doom and gloom pundits everywhere.

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
  27. Article on Wired by elem · · Score: 2
    There is also an article about this on Wired News - here

    Its an interesting read.

  28. Why can't computers just do what I tell them? by tuffy · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I don't understand the whole line of research that believes computers need to be more "clever". Perhaps the assumption is that the user is an idiot, won't be getting any smarter, ever, and could use a bit of patronizing hand-holding in order to get anything done. But my thinking is that if such a "clever" system is necessary, the computer system hasn't been designed correctly to begin with.

    I want my computers to present me with clear and unambiguous output. In return, I will give them as much unambiguous input needed to get the job done. Save the "clever" AI for Doom 3 and let me get back to work.

    --

    Ita erat quando hic adveni.

    1. Re:Why can't computers just do what I tell them? by MountainBoiler · · Score: 2
      I don't entirely disagree with you.

      However, since I like to play devil's advocate, have you ever made a mistake?

      If what we told computers to do was so 'error free', then it would be a lot easier to write programs. Most people tell computers to do the wrong thing a fair amount. I would even hazard to say (that today) all people tell their computer to do the wrong thing at least some of the time.

      People create/study computer languages to make it easier to tell the computer the right thing to do. This is just a higher level of abstraction.

      Imagine 'Kompil-E' - the Visual Studio assistant pointing out "Dave - you don't want to leave that buffer overflow in your code, do you?"

  29. going nuclear by misterpies · · Score: 3, Funny

    >>The software has already been tested with air traffic controllers.

    Why did they bother testing it with air traffic controllers when they could have launched it straight onto some low-risk industry, like nuclear power? (Then again maybe we don't want software imitating Homer Simpson's logic.)

    --
    The author of this post asserts his moral rights.
  30. shutting off? by agurkan · · Score: 4, Insightful

    One nice thing about a good secretary or a personal friend is they will realize when they become annoying and tune themselves down. I think it is essential for this kind of software. Giving advice constantly will inevitably lead to wrong and/or unwanted advice at one point.

    --
    ato
  31. It looks like.. by mrwonka · · Score: 2, Funny

    your computer was just turned on. Would you like to...

    A. Porn
    B. Slashdot

  32. testing vs. implementation by lone_marauder · · Score: 2, Funny

    So they tested this technology with air traffic controllers to determine if it was safe to implement for PHBs. I believe I would have chosen a different test group.

    --
    who are those slashdot people? they swept over like Mongol-Tartars.
  33. Helpful! by whterbt · · Score: 3, Funny

    It looks like you're trying to land an airplane!

    Would you like to find out...

    • ...how to turn on the runway lights?
    • ...information on the runways?
    • ...how to use Print Preview?
    • ...more about Microsoft(C) ATC(TM) 2000?
    • ...how to turn me the f*ck off?
    --
    Too late to be known as Bush the First, he's sure to be known as Bush the Worst.
  34. Not new. by teamhasnoi · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Open Sesame (1993!) by Charles River Analytics for the mac did stuff like this: would 'learn' when you did things and open programs for you, where you saved files, how often you rebuilt the desktop, ect.

    You could also direct it by voice command. I had this program back in the day, heady stuff at the time.

    Here's a pile of other stuff on Software Assistants.

  35. Sounds like an old joke... by Halloween+Jack · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...that was originally told about Hollywood types, but can be adapted to IT quite easily.

    OK, so this IT company is having its annual retreat somewhere out in the desert, and an engineer and a marketdroid get into an argument about something. They wander off into the desert, and are so into it that they don't realize that they're walking directly into a sandstorm until it's too late. They stumble around blindly, and by the time the sandstorm lets up, they're completely lost.

    A few hours later, the sun's directly overhead, vultures are circling, and the two are on their knees, begging God to save them and promising to lead virtuous lives if they could just get something to drink--and *ping*, there's a pitcher of ice-cold beer sitting on a rock. The engineer staggers forward, croaking "We're saved!"

    The marketdroid holds him back and strokes his chin, saying "No, wait--the color's all wrong. Tell you what, let me piss in it first to make it look better."

    --
    I looked into the abyss, and the abyss looked into me--and we both winked.
  36. It exists: The Brain by aunchaki · · Score: 2, Informative

    The next killer app, in my opinion, is the application that allows you to not only save content, but also the context

    This already exists. It's called The Brain and it's a replacement for standard filesystem browsers. It lets you file and browse anything (files, websites, binaries, etc...) and make your own interconnections between any objects based on your own [twisted] logic.

    I've wanted to try it, but it's Windows-only. I've thought about building a simple MySQL app that does something similar, but it wouldn't have the cool 3D Java/ActiveX/whatever object browser that's mocked up on the front page of their website.

  37. Re:redirect "my documents" by Troed · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Software Error. Of course a document opened from Outlook should be ... READ ONLY ...

    Yes, my Mom lost a lot of work she had put into making revisions to a document sent to her by a coworker. She called me up and explained how she had done ... and it was exactly that. It's a serious software and usability flaw in Outlook - and although you can train users to avoid it the real fix is to correct the error in the software.

  38. Sony and DARPA are working on similar technology by smartalix · · Score: 3, Informative

    As it has been pointed out, the concept of an intelligent computer assistant is not new. In addition to the other projects mentioned, Sony is working on a project they call the "Sensing Computer", a PDA-sized device that will contain a software agent that will memorize your data and your usage patterns in everything from your passwords to your friends names and birthdays to your favorite ice cream, and will prompt you when you need info and/or are dealing with the world around you.

    Darpa is working on a project under its total information awareness program called "lifelog", where a computer model will be developed of your likes, dislikes, behavior patterns, and everythign about you so that a computer model can be built. This model could then be used to predict behavior or spotlight devations from the norm that may indicate criminal or terrorist activity. Kind of like a predicitive "Big Brother" AI. If this technology comes to pass, it will make Orwell's nightmare look like a shopping mall in comparison.

    --
    Read a preview of my novel CYBERCHILD at www.smartalix.com/cyberchild
  39. But Boss, I REMEMBER you said... by PonyHome · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Yeah, this was obviously written by somebody who has never BEEN an Executive Secretary (or administrative assistant or whatever). You try telling your boss that what he wants today is EXACTLY THE OPPOSITE of what he wanted last week and see how far it gets you. In order to REALLY bury your job be sure to keep notes and feed his own words back to him.

  40. Mimics uers? i can see it now by geekoid · · Score: 2, Funny

    Dave, I noticed you opened up the cd tray, would you like some coffee?

    Dave, I don't have an any key.

    Dave, your boss has sent an email, should I make it look like you replied afer normall working hours?

    Dave, I noticed several banners and pop-ups, so I click on them for you.

    Dave, Based on the web sites you visit, I have ordered you some penis enlargement pills.

    Dave, I just made you rich by emails the Minister of Finances widow your bank account.

    Dave, Based on your emails, I ordered you a package from Hormel.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  41. clippy controlling air traffic? by chochos · · Score: 2, Funny
    The software has already been tested with air traffic controllers
    It looks like a 747 is about to crash. Would you like to...
    • point it to a nearby mountain?
    • point it to a nearby airport?
    • play again?
  42. Killer App? by medscaper · · Score: 2, Funny
    The next killer app, in my opinion, is the application that

    Oh, I'd say AI that lands a plane is killer app enough for anyone.

    --
    Any sufficiently well-organized Government is indistinguishable from bullshit.
  43. oh great by Transcendent · · Score: 2, Funny

    The idea is for computers to learn how to use with users -- instead of vice versa.

    I can just imagine tech support phone calls:

    Tech: Ok, now tap Ctrl-Esc to bring up your start menu.

    Customer: Oh... I usually don't do that.

    Tech: Ok then, just click on it with your mouse.

    Customer: My start menu dissappeared because I never click on it.

    Tech: Then what DO you do?

    Customer: Oh I forget... Apple-Shift-V? Wait... no...

    Tech: .... Ok, then just double click on "My Computer".

    Customer: Oh! That! I usually just pound on the left side of my keyboard until it comes up, but I broke it yesterday so I only have the mouse. But I never used my mouse before to do that so moving it just shuts down my computer.

    Tech: ::click::