Slashdot Mirror


Fastest US Supercomputer Runs Linux

jgercken writes "The Department of Energy's Pacific Northwest National Laboratory has brought online a 11.8 teraflops supercomputer based on the Linux operating system, comprised of ~2,000 Itanium processors, and assembled by HP. Touted to be the fastest unclassified computer in the US, its main duties will be atmospheric chemistry, systems biology, catalysis and materials science."

314 comments

  1. Yes... by MikeXpop · · Score: 4, Funny

    But does it run Linux?

    ::ducks::

    --
    Etiquette is etiquette. He kills his mother but he can't wear grey trousers.
    1. Re:Yes... by eu_neke · · Score: 0

      Only if you push it...

    2. Re:Yes... by Cpt_Kirks · · Score: 4, Funny

      and, wait for it...imagine a beowolf cluster of these!

    3. Re:Yes... by TedCheshireAcad · · Score: 0

      ...Only in Soviet Russia.

    4. Re:Yes... by unc_samurai · · Score: 1

      Say it with me, people... In Russia, the cluster imagines you!

    5. Re:Yes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wow! me too!

    6. Re:Yes... by McAddress · · Score: 2, Funny

      but more importantly, can it be /.'ed?

    7. Re:Yes... by Gleng · · Score: 5, Funny

      I don't think even the Death Star could /. this bitch.

      --
      "Proudly Posting Without Reading The Article"
    8. Re:Yes... by Nunar · · Score: 5, Funny

      Linux? Come on, let's get to the important stuff...

      Will it run SETI??

    9. Re:Yes... by abradsn · · Score: 1

      Soviet Russia -- has been broken up into several other countries for quite a while now.

    10. Re:Yes... by TCM · · Score: 1

      A cluster of soviet countries imagines you!

      --
      Of course it runs NetBSD. BTC: 1NT7QvbetmANwaMzhpVL6
    11. Re:Yes... by Doug+Neal · · Score: 1

      I refuse to buy one until it supports the Ogg Vorbis format.

    12. Re:Yes... by quigonn · · Score: 1

      That's not important. Will it have enough storage space for my pr0n collection?

      --
      A monkey is doing the real work for me.
    13. Re:Yes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I like the way this thread is going. Looks like we've got all of our favorite cliches out of the way.

      I recommend that the script for submitting stories automatically posts a "beowulf" post, a "welcome our new [variable] masters" post, SCO post, and Yakov Smirnov post. Just get them outta the way quick.
      Although I suspect some of you won't appreciate this, judging by how much you enjoy doing it yourselves.

    14. Re:Yes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No no, I think an even more puzzling questions is, could it be even possible to run SCO UnixWare.

    15. Re:Yes... by MrTangent · · Score: 1

      6) Profit!!!

    16. Re:Yes... by slittle · · Score: 1

      I find your lack of faith disturbing.

      (what? somebody had to say it...)

      --
      Opportunity knocks. Karma hunts you down.
    17. Re:Yes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And how much for the SCO licenses?

    18. Re:Yes... by pmz · · Score: 1

      I don't think even the Death Star could /. this bitch.

      Destroying the Earth isn't sufficient?

    19. Re:Yes... by Surt · · Score: 1

      What makes you think it doesn't automatically post those comments? They're all there, on every such story ....

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    20. Re:Yes... by MoronGames · · Score: 0

      Since when is SETI important?! F@H us far more important than SETI!

      --
      hey!
    21. Re:Yes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whoah... holy FUCK! that was a GREAT joke!

    22. Re:Yes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I for one welcome our clichebot script overlords. Where else can one find The Simpsons, SCO and Yakov Smirnov as an ongoing coversation?

  2. SCO by TedCheshireAcad · · Score: 4, Funny

    Whoa, that's gonna cost them in SCO licenses.

    But seriously, I wonder what kind of stand governmental implementations of Linux are taking on the fiaSCO.

    1. Re:SCO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SCO has already said that HP doesn't need to worry about licences....

    2. Re:SCO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hopefully the DOE will put their nuclear weapons capabilities to good use!

    3. Re:SCO by eu_neke · · Score: 0

      But they havent said anything about the hoards of marketroids in reserve...

    4. Re:SCO by Zork+the+Almighty · · Score: 2, Funny

      Licences! We don need no stinkin' licences!

      --

      In Soviet America the banks rob you!
    5. Re:SCO by rootofevil · · Score: 1

      by my calculations thats approximately eleventy billion dollars. muahahahaha!!!

      --
      turn up the jukebox and tell me a lie
    6. Re:SCO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SCO knows how to play the lawsuit game.

      The US Government is that last entity you pick a fight with, not the first.

    7. Re:SCO by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      Sadly, another 11 billion $ being added to the deficit would not even be noticed.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    8. Re:SCO by rootofevil · · Score: 1

      yea thats true. tell em ill take a check, and they can just make it out to "cash" if they want

      --
      turn up the jukebox and tell me a lie
    9. Re:SCO by darqchild · · Score: 1

      not eleven billion dollars.. eleventy billion. As in 110 billion

      --
      What? Me? Worry?
    10. Re:SCO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Given their history, I wouldn't worry as much about a lawsuit with the US Government as about one with IBM.

    11. Re:SCO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, that's a spectacular gambit. Like going for checkmate in four moves. Sometimes it works, but if it doesn't....

      I woulda picked New Zealand or Brazil before IBM. That company doesn't just have money and a veritable armada of able lawyers, they're also mean. They'll bite, punch you in the sack, whatever. It's like in Punch-Out! you didn't just start at Mike Tyson, you worked your way up.

    12. Re:SCO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Yes, they should switch to Windows. It would be cheaper

    13. Re:SCO by tkg · · Score: 1

      $110 billion / 2000 processors = $55 million per cpu.

      SCO is raising their licensing fees again? Sheesh.

    14. Re:SCO by tomhudson · · Score: 2, Funny

      Nah, just RIAA math , 'cause these are FAST cpus.

  3. PEAK Performance by OverlordQ · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If you notice this is based on PEAK Performance, aka Theoretical Max, not the best they've gotten out of it . . .

    --
    Your hair look like poop, Bob! - Wanker.
    1. Re:PEAK Performance by Raleel · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, they've done very well with it, it performs very close (at least as far as supercomputers go)

      --
      -- Who is the bigger fool? The fool or the fool who follows him? --
    2. Re:PEAK Performance by plj · · Score: 1

      If you notice this is based on PEAK Performance,

      So, which of their models it is based on?

      Oh, wait...

      --
      “Wait for Hurd if you want something real” –Linus
    3. Re:PEAK Performance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As our professor said:

      The peak performance is the performance that the manufacturer _guarantees_ it won't exceed.

  4. What about the Powerstack? by tcd004 · · Score: 5, Funny

    They clearly aren't considering the Powerstack 5000

    tcd004

    1. Re:What about the Powerstack? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Excellent. Thanks!

  5. What about the classified ones? by Blaine+Hilton · · Score: 4, Interesting
    They say this is the fastest, "unclassified" supercomputer, immediately I think:
    1. Who has the classified super computers?
    2. What companies do they buy them from?
    3. If they were bought from public company how do they buy it without people knowing about it, especially after the additional scrutiny since Enron and Worldcom?

    Also after reading the whole press release I'm stuck with a few measly pictures of a bunch of HP rack servers running a processor that I won't be able to buy (let alone afford) for awhile longer. There is no mention about how much heat the thing produces, or how much energy it takes to run it. I hope the Ph.D.s running the whole thing realize that while they are trying to do stuff for the "Department of Energy" they are releasing so many thousands of pounds of junk in the land/air/water to run this giant supercomputer.

    1. Re:What about the classified ones? by Chess_the_cat · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I was just about to post the same thing. What are these 'classified' computers and where are they? What can they do? Who uses them and for what? Is there a supercomputer underneath the Pentagon that is on the verge of self-awareness? How much more advanced can these computers possibly be that they have to be classifed by the government? I need to know!

      --
      Support the First Amendment. Read at -1
    2. Re:What about the classified ones? by dspeyer · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The National Security Agency (NSA) owns many extremely powerful computers. No one knows what operating systems they run, which ones are clustered together, or what they do with them. It is widely speculated that they are trying to brute force public keys used by foreign governments, which would be in line with their official purpose, but no one knows for sure.

    3. Re:What about the classified ones? by Mr_Matt · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Who has the classified super computers?

      That's, um, classified. :) I could tell you, but then I'd have to kill you and all that. :)

      --


      But what does my opinion matter, I just vote here. It's not like I have any money or anything.
    4. Re:What about the classified ones? by SugoiMonkey · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "but no one knows for sure" No, not even the people running them.

    5. Re:What about the classified ones? by _Quinn · · Score: 1

      Some (most that I know of, but that's a biased sample for obvious reasons) "classified" supercomputers aren't classified because of their hardware, but, for instance, because they run the nuclear bomb simulation codes, and must _not_ be accessible from outside its lab. I understand it's relatively common to run, e.g., LINPACK benchmarks during the set-up and initial tuning phase, before any of the classified applications are installed, and report the results. I believe this is the case for ASCI Q, which the last Top500 list put at ~13 teraflops (max, peak 20).

      I think this is the same machine that was ranked #8 in the last Top500 list, but with more (the rest of its) processors installed.

      - _Quinn

      --
      Reality Maintenance Group, Silver City Construction Co., Ltd.
    6. Re:What about the classified ones? by DarienJax · · Score: 1
      There is no mention about how much heat the thing produces, or how much energy it takes to run it. I hope the Ph.D.s running the whole thing realize that while they are trying to do stuff for the "Department of Energy" they are releasing so many thousands of pounds of junk in the land/air/water to run this giant supercomputer.

      I'm trying to remember the specifics on energy usage. A slight more informative article mentions 60 times the cooling capacity of a normal house. And they are looking at ways to reduce the cooling requirements/power consumption with a nifty dynamic cooling system I worked on this summer. As for the energy required to run it, well, there's not much they can do about that if they want the processing power.
    7. Re:What about the classified ones? by bohnsack · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not really. The top500 list lists LANL's ASCI Q at 20.48 Peak TFLOPS and LLNL's ASCI White at 12.29 Peak TFLOPS.

    8. Re:What about the classified ones? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny
      It is widely speculated that they are trying to brute force public keys used by foreign governments

      Nonsense, they are just trying to figure out how to make the perfect cup of Earl Grey tea.

    9. Re:What about the classified ones? by Ctrl-Z · · Score: 4, Funny

      Especially not the people running them.

      --
      www.timcoleman.com is a total waste of your time. Never go there.
    10. Re:What about the classified ones? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SCO put them under double secret probation.

    11. Re:What about the classified ones? by odenshaw · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      I bet the power used for this is negligible compared with driving your fucking SUV!

    12. Re:What about the classified ones? by stoborrobots · · Score: 0, Troll
      as some AC pointed out below, you can have classified supercomputers that people know about...

      2 classified supercomputers in the US, dedicated to nuclear weapons research...

    13. Re:What about the classified ones? by dspeyer · · Score: 4, Interesting
      That's probably true. The story I hear from people (mathematicians) who worked for the NSA is that they were given a problem (they can't say what) with no obvious applications to anything and told to work on it. It was speculated that some of the problems had no applications at all (yet) and were given to confuse enemy intelligence. Could be true....

      In any case, I'm sure the sysadmins were told to build a computer with given specs, on a given budget and timetable, and not to worry about the actual software that would run on it.

    14. Re:What about the classified ones? by delirium+of+disorder · · Score: 1

      Its pritty much commmon knowledge that at least some NSA boxes are running Unicos.

      --
      ------ Take away the right to say fuck and you take away the right to say fuck the government.
    15. Re:What about the classified ones? by JordanH · · Score: 3, Funny
      • No one knows what operating systems they run,...

      No one?? Really??

      *Boggle*

    16. Re:What about the classified ones? by fgodfrey · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Well, I work for one of the companies that sells "classified" computers to the government. Typically, the sale itself isn't classified (especially since Cray is a public company) and sometimes, there's even a press release (that's one of ours from this spring). What "classified" usually means is that access to the system and the data on the system is classified. I don't have a security clearance, hence I can't look at, say, a crash dump from one of those sites. So, for your questions:

      1) The NSA, Army, various other US and foreign government agencies.

      2) Cray, SGI, IBM, HP (look at the Top 500 list for a good reference) and others. The Top 500 even lists a number of systems as "classified".

      3) Uh, well, people *do* know about them.

      --
      Go Badgers! -- #include "std/disclaimer.h"
    17. Re:What about the classified ones? by DanThe1Man · · Score: 3, Funny

      It is widely speculated that they are trying to brute force public keys used by foreign governments

      So can foreign governments sue them for violateing the DMCA?

    18. Re:What about the classified ones? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All the people using them have been shot. It's that secret.

    19. Re:What about the classified ones? by Aliencow · · Score: 2

      That would be a DMCA violation...but they are over it I guess.. The other day, I was wondering if it was legal to crack your own passwords in USA, for security checking ?

    20. Re:What about the classified ones? by sinserve · · Score: 1

      They are ultra-secret Quake servers.

    21. Re:What about the classified ones? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is a bunch of crap. Brute forcing sufficiently strong keys is, practically speaking, physically impossible. Exploiting flaws in the encryption (such as using an algorithm for prime factorization of large numbers (which I sorta doubt the NSA has)) might be a possibility.

    22. Re:What about the classified ones? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because, you know, it's not like this thing could ever be used to save MILLIONS of pounds of pollution from being produced. Computer power, especially at this level, is always about geek egos, NEVER about getting amazing/usefull things done.

    23. Re:What about the classified ones? by Kasoni · · Score: 1

      No they are the computers being used to make and test the next in the quake series, not being used as a server for them, how stupid would that be?

    24. Re:What about the classified ones? by The+Tyro · · Score: 1

      They're using those to play "Global Thermonuclear War"

      --
      Even if a man chops off your hand with a sword, you still have two nice, sharp bones to stick in his eyes.
    25. Re:What about the classified ones? by fishbowl · · Score: 1

      People who know classified information don't disclose it. Penalties for doing so still include execution!

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    26. Re:What about the classified ones? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, there you go. Excellent footnotes, by the way. Fucking wanker.

    27. Re:What about the classified ones? by Methuseus · · Score: 1

      Damnit, why hasn't anyone modded the parent funny yet?!?!?!?!?!??!?!?!?!?

      --
      Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity, though I'm not yet sure about the universe. - A Einstein
    28. Re:What about the classified ones? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Remember to destroy passwords daily, forget why."

    29. Re:What about the classified ones? by McAddress · · Score: 1

      I can tell you what OS they are not running. But the Bill Gates would have to kill you.

    30. Re:What about the classified ones? by Gherald · · Score: 1

      > They're using those to play "Global Thermonuclear War"

      No dude, that was the 60's. Today its mosty Tic-Tac-Toe and the occassional game of chess.

    31. Re:What about the classified ones? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OH step off.. jesus.
      Go pick some fucking flowers, ya poser.

    32. Re:What about the classified ones? by varslot · · Score: 1

      This reminds me of a sf-film: "The Cube". An no. Sf does noe mean that the subtitles were done in serif fonts.

      --
      There arises from a bad and unapt formation of words a wonderful obstruction to the mind. (Francis Bacon)
    33. Re:What about the classified ones? by Sphere1952 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Let's see... We know that NSA sponsored SELinux; which you can download from them. I understand that many people have checked it out and found no backdoors. Why would an agency with the job of breaking into people's computers help write a version of Linux you can't break into?

      --
      Big Brother Bush is doubleplus ungood.
    34. Re:What about the classified ones? by SphynxSR · · Score: 1

      The computers aren't classified at the begining. So say this current super computer will start out unclassified, then could be classified. So they buy everything unclassified, you may never now something went classified to what ever level. It is a bit more involved moving it over obviously.

      --

      I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every minute of it.
    35. Re:What about the classified ones? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Brute forcing sufficiently strong keys is, practically speaking, physically impossible.

      Which just means that the NSA has impractically powerfull computers. :-)

    36. Re:What about the classified ones? by Sphere1952 · · Score: 1

      From press release: "key applications in computational mechanics, battlefield weather forecasting, and biological process modeling that are of great importance to the defense of the United States"

      The military isn't allowed to HAVE biological weapons, so they're going to COMPUTE biological weapons instead.

      --
      Big Brother Bush is doubleplus ungood.
    37. Re:What about the classified ones? by carpe_noctem · · Score: 1

      I betcha the aliens that built them know what they're running...

      -puts on tinfoil hat-

      --
      "Quoting famous computer scientists out of context is the root of all evil (or at least most of it) in programming." - K
    38. Re:What about the classified ones? by the_consumer · · Score: 1
      Is there a supercomputer underneath the Pentagon that is on the verge of self-awareness?

      Someone needs to keep Yog-Sothoth company. Every time they let a human near it, the poor shmuck's mind gets pulped.

      --
      "If you're thinking what I'm thinking, you're right." -
    39. Re:What about the classified ones? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, we only know it doesn't have any OBVIOUS back doors. Maybe the NSA has something more clever up its sleeve? But it is the nSa, so its primary job is to ensure the security of the American information infrastructre. In this case that conficts with the goal of cracking secrets.

    40. Re:What about the classified ones? by Darth+Fredd · · Score: 1

      Ever heard of the NSA?

      You can bet your sweet ass that the NSA has something 3 times more powerful in their basements..

      The NSA is more secure then the pentagon. You get a badge that tracks you around the building, and have to answer to security cameras, if you don't work there. ..and who works there..?

      --
      "The most looniest, zaniest, spontaneous, sporadic Impulsive thinker, compulsive drinker, addict"
    41. Re:What about the classified ones? by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1

      I hope the Ph.D.s running the whole thing realize that while they are trying to do stuff for the "Department of Energy" they are releasing so many thousands of pounds of junk in the land/air/water to run this giant supercomputer.

      Your desktop PC uses more energy when it's on than when it's off, too. Why don't you do Mother Earth a favor and shut down?

      In fact, why don't we ALL stop wasting energy on our computers and appliances, and just lie motionless in bed 24 hours a day???

      There's no hypocrisy here, except for what you're erroneously perceiving.

    42. Re:What about the classified ones? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hope the Ph.D.s running the whole thing realize that while they are trying to do stuff for the "Department of Energy" they are releasing so many thousands of pounds of junk in the land/air/water to run this giant supercomputer.

      You tree-huggers give me a PITA. How the hell do you suppose some of these problems are going to get solved? Through the increased activities of a bunch of anti-progress Luddites? Or through the increased study and scientific investigation by Ph.D's? My money is on the Ph. D.'s!

    43. Re:What about the classified ones? by Leon_Trotsky · · Score: 1

      What a great idea. A luddite revolution for the new millenium. It all starts with the first power button! I'll just reach down and

      --
      Ohhh! Pay Dirt! A pair of half-eaten choco-pants!
    44. Re:What about the classified ones? by Zigg · · Score: 1

      Why I'm taking this bait is beyond me, but...

      I see "biological process modeling". I don't see "biological weapons modeling". Besides, wouldn't it be a good thing to know everything possible about said weaponry if it helps develop a defense of some sort?

    45. Re:What about the classified ones? by Valar · · Score: 1

      But that would be a critically flawed process. In order to build a cluster efficiently, you need to know what you'll be doing with it. I guess they could be told, get the most FLOPS you can on this budget, or the most IOPS on this budget or whatever, but there is still optimization done beyond that.

    46. Re:What about the classified ones? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does this mean to spam the nsa I should encrypt the mail with triple des first

  6. But the true test by DaLiNKz · · Score: 5, Funny

    Can it run Quake II properly with 200 bots set to godlike abilities? ;)

    --
    I've left to find myself. If you happen to see me, please, keep me there until I return.
    1. Re:But the true test by unc_samurai · · Score: 2, Funny

      (Insert WHOPPR voice)
      Shall-we-play-a-game?

    2. Re:But the true test by kdsolutions · · Score: 1

      WOPR

      --
      Error 666 - Satanic SCO code found in your Linux kernel.
    3. Re:But the true test by Alien+Being · · Score: 1

      War Operations Play and Response

      Imagine a cluster of IMSAI's.

    4. Re:But the true test by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you like Stephin Merrit?

    5. Re:But the true test by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Imagine a Beowulf- never mind

    6. Re:But the true test by glenebob · · Score: 1


      Excellent!
      </MontyBurnsVoice>

  7. Fastest Unclassified... by Bonker · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Makes you wonder for a second what they're doing with the [SECRET - EYES ONLY] hardware.

    My guess is that they're working on NP-hard, but useful problems, like finding ways to crack hard encryption via shortcuts that work half the time.

    --
    The next Slashdot story will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and slashdot the links early!
    1. Re:Fastest Unclassified... by magores · · Score: 2, Funny

      Quick porn, and lots of storage for the really good pics.

      Thats my guess.

    2. Re:Fastest Unclassified... by evilviper · · Score: 1
      like finding ways to crack hard encryption via shortcuts that work half the time.

      That's easy. I can crack 50% of all encrypted material, in half the time...

      Some of you may need to think about that for a minute before you get the joke.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    3. Re:Fastest Unclassified... by TheLostStooge · · Score: 1

      My guess is they are trying to see if they can get the mouse pointer to be able to hide from the xeyes.

      --
      .adios/losers ~snake
    4. Re:Fastest Unclassified... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That made me laugh. :)

      xeyes is spy software! I mean, just look at those suspicious eyes...

  8. Maybe they can spare some CPU time... by pVoid · · Score: 4, Funny
    for the actual power grid to avoid the catastrophic meltdowns we just recently had... instead of frolicking about with the bees and flowers.

    1. Re:Maybe they can spare some CPU time... by Blaine+Hilton · · Score: 4, Funny
      Perhaps they were testing the system, and that is what caused the whole power grid to fall apart...

      Should I be making and wearing that tin-foil cap now?

    2. Re:Maybe they can spare some CPU time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. Just continue to stuff it into the spaces between your teeth and you'll be fine.

  9. Its main duties... by Brian+Dennehy · · Score: 3, Funny

    will be atmospheric chemistry, systems biology, catalysis and materials science.

    And the occasional game of Doom III... at a frame rate of 24 fps (if you're lucky).
  10. Strange by Timesprout · · Score: 5, Funny

    Being the Department of Energy I though they would have used AMD chips so they could use the excess heat to drive a power plant.

    --
    Do not try to read the dupe, thats impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth
    What truth?
    There is no dupe
    1. Re:Strange by DAldredge · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The Itanium 2 draws about 124 watts.
      The Opteron draws about 85 watts.

      My math skills may not be that great, but it looks like the AMD chip uses 31% less power than the Itanium 2.

    2. Re:Strange by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I though they would have used AMD chips so they could use the excess heat to drive a power plant.

      Let's see.
      Use excess heat to drive a power plant. Excess heat comes from power produced in a power plant.
      Hmmmmm.

      A. Smith, we need more power to crush Neo and Morpheus. Go produce some more humans for extra power generation. But wait, you'll need to liquefy even more humans to produce the energy needed to sustain those extra humans.

      Lisa, in this house we [whack]

    3. Re:Strange by hattig · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The 89W figure for Opteron is the maximum for the 130nm node - i.e., probably at 2.4 GHz.

      At current speeds the Opteron is consuming under 70W.

      The P4 and the Itanium 2 both draw more power than AMD processors though. The AMD is hot joke went south when Intel dropped the cooler PIII processors.

    4. Re:Strange by afidel · · Score: 1

      FLOPS/Watt the Opteron is comparable to every other processor out there, the G5, Itanium 2, Opteron, POWER4, etc all use about the same amount of power per instruction. Check out their Specfp_base2000 scores and compare them to average thermal power output, they are all in the same ballpark give or take about 10%. Check out my post Here for some concrete numbers for the G5 and Opteron.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    5. Re:Strange by evilviper · · Score: 1

      It seems like I'm saying this every day on /. now... (and getting moded up most of the time, ironically)

      Intel P4 processors produce MORE heat than equivalent AMD XP processors, AND P4s have a maximum heat tolerance of about 20C degrees less than the equivalent AMD XP processor.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    6. Re:Strange by RzUpAnmsCwrds · · Score: 1

      At 135 watts each (and the largest die size of any major microprocessor), the Itanium does a fine job of being a space heater. Better than any AMD chip.

    7. Re:Strange by Kynde · · Score: 1

      Being the Department of Energy I though they would have used AMD chips so they could use the excess heat to drive a power plant.

      What's this? Why AMD? So the power plant would be worse than it would be itaniums? Doh. You schmuck, itanium 2 draws more energy than any amd chip so far.

      --
      1 Earth is warming, 2 It's us, 3 it's royally bad, 4 we need to take action NOW
    8. Re:Strange by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More Intel FUD! This has been addressed so many times I won't bother quoting the stats.

      Just tell me why, Intel, you expend so much energy spreading FUD rather than on improving your product to compete with the superior AMD chip?

      We could use the hot air from Intel FUD to drive TWO power plants!

    9. Re:Strange by 4of12 · · Score: 1

      FLOPS/Watt

      I really like your criterion for evaluating performance.

      How do some of the lesser known CPU's stack up in this comparison?

      I'm thinking here of things like Transmeta, other mobile chips, XScale and maybe some of the newer DSP chips (if they are capable of running all the SPECfp2000 tests).

      --
      "Provided by the management for your protection."
  11. Fastest Linux-based supercomputer by DarienJax · · Score: 2, Informative

    The headline for the Slashdot article is a bit misleading. It's the fastest non-military supercomputer in the US; it's the fastest Linux-based supercomputer in the world (at least, it's supposed to be). It's not the fastest supercomputer in the US, though.

    1. Re:Fastest Linux-based supercomputer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      OMFG has slashdot gotten so fscking lazy as to not even read the SUMMARY now!?

      Touted to be the fastest unclassified computer in the US, its main duties will be atmospheric chemistry, systems biology, catalysis and materials science.

      1. NEC's Earth Simulator, 41 teraflops, Japan
      2. Hewlett-Packard's ASCI Q, 20.5 teraflops, Los Alamos National Laboratory (Classified, Nuclear Weapons testing)
      3. IBM's ASCI White, 12.3 teraflops, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. (Classified, Nuclear Weapons testing)
      4. Fujitsu's Primepower, 12 teraflops, National Aerospace Laboratory of Japan.
      5. Hewlett-Packard's Itanium2, 11.8 teraflops, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory.

      But then again that chart goes of R(peak) instead of R(max)

    2. Re:Fastest Linux-based supercomputer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OMFG has slashdot gotten so fscking lazy as to not even read the SUMMARY now!?

      Where have you been the past couple years?

    3. Re:Fastest Linux-based supercomputer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Well according to the "top 500 computers" site, There are only 2 computers more powerfull then the department of energy's, The NEC Earth Simulator of Japan(which simply blows all other computers away) and the HP-developed Ascii Q of Los Alamos fame.

      Oh and by the way, The number 3 was also running linux.

      Hehe, I still have a old 486 that I use as a file server and that operates well while running Linux. And I've seen wrist watches that run linux.

      So from those to the current #3 fastest computer in the world. Now that's what I call SCALABILITY.

    4. Re:Fastest Linux-based supercomputer by whereiswaldo · · Score: 1


      What ever happened to HP's super huge cluster of machines sitting in their stores? I thought that was going to be leveraged into some kind of grid? Speaking of grid, any news from IBM on their grid technology? Or has it faded away as I predicted? Heh.

    5. Re:Fastest Linux-based supercomputer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those are either classified or not in the US.

  12. Too bad, by pair-a-noyd · · Score: 1, Interesting

    sorry to hear that HP had something to do with it.

    I used to really like HP, they used to make great laserjets, great ink/paintjets, excellent scanners, etc...

    But then they merged with Compaq and kicked out the founder. And now, the most evil of evils, they are sleeping with SCO...

    Once again, sad to hear that HP was in on this...

    1. Re:Too bad, by Cooper_007 · · Score: 1
      Maybe you should take another look at the article that initially gave you this idea.

      Now look at this slashdot comment for a small explanation.
      This section sums it up nicely:

      It seems rather clear that management at SCO talked to legal, who probably advised them that SCO's claims are frivolous and will not hold up in court, and not to pay. Ergo, HP claims it does not infringe on SCO's copyrights.

    2. Re:Too bad, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This was a premerger HP contract, any many of the compaq people who have worked on this were once digital employees.

  13. Well.... damn by herrvinny · · Score: 0

    Well... damn, I'm just drooling over the thought of that much computing power.... Wonder how much $ for my own supercomputer....

    1. Re:Well.... damn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  14. Licensing by wideBlueSkies · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Did HP buy licenses for this setup? Could this be why SCO says HP is in the 'clear'?

    wbs.

    --
    Huh?
    1. Re:Licensing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think HP ponied up the cash to SCO, not with the trend towards embedded linux. This particular cluster would cost big numbers under the SCO terms, even the 'discounted versions'. But even the $35 embed cost would stop it being used in printers, cameras, print servers and all the other things HP sells.

      Assume the lawyers looked at the claims and decided they were bogus, like every one else.

  15. Kinda makes you wanna.... by niko9 · · Score: 1, Funny

    jump up an say "Well smack my ass and call me Sally!"

    1. Re:Kinda makes you wanna.... by primus_sucks · · Score: 1, Funny

      Can you post some links to that please!

    2. Re:Kinda makes you wanna.... by innosent · · Score: 1

      Actually, "Smack my ass and call me Sally" is a well known hot sauce line from a local restaurant chain here in Orlando. Check out Tijuana Flats for more information. BTW, one of them "Chet's gone Mad", is the hottest food additive (not a condiment) in the world at 1.5 million scoville units, and "The Slap Heard Around the World" is the hottest sauce.

      --
      --That's the point of being root, you can do anything you want, even if it's stupid.
  16. Uh OH by dieMSdie · · Score: 2, Redundant

    Imagine the royalties SCO will be demanding here . . .

    --
    Don't throw your computer out the window, throw the Windows out of your computer!
  17. They've brought it online... by MoThugz · · Score: 4, Funny

    Now, let's see if we can /. the world's fastest linux powered unclassified computer.

    Got URL?

  18. Yay! by Bridog · · Score: 4, Funny

    RC5-1024 here we come!

    Call me back in about 200 years.

    --
    Most likely the #1 Unfunny Meta/Moderator on /.!
  19. IBM outperforms HP by TheRealRamone · · Score: 1

    IBM's Asci White exceeded 12.3 TFlops 3 years ago!

    1. Re:IBM outperforms HP by Best_Username_Ever · · Score: 1

      HP is claiming the fastest Linux Supercomputer, not the fasted Supercomputer. The IBM computer you mentioned runs AIX, which is not Linux. The fastest supercomputer was built by by NEC. The fastest Linux supercomputer has just been built by HP.

    2. Re:IBM outperforms HP by natet · · Score: 1

      A couple of things to consider. Ranking on top500 is not by theoretical peak, but by the actual observed performance using a particular benchmark (in this case, linpack, a linear algebra benchmark). Previous iterations of the PNNL supercomputer achieved 83% back in December at 128 nodes, and more recently 79% earlier this summer with 700+ nodes. If the PNNL computer at full strength can achieve 75% it would rank at #3 on the most recent top500 list. Now HPC (High Performance Computing) being the type of environment that it is, you can bet that the current list won't remain static, but it is entirely possible that the PNNL computer will rank in the top 5. Not bad for a little lab in the Pacific Northwest.

      And, before you ask, yes I work there, which is probably why this response sounds so biased...

      --
      IANAL... But I play one on /.
  20. Re:Odd.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    BSD rocks all over Linux. They are going to hook this thing up and watch it get owned in 28 minutes.

  21. why does it always seem... by neo8750 · · Score: 0

    ...like all the super computers that we hear about usally is made or in someway is related to HP? do they like to fund these projects or is it just that i never noticed anyone else?

    1. Re:why does it always seem... by afidel · · Score: 1

      You just never noticed anyone else. In fact about 1/2 of the supercomputer top 500 is comprised of IBM POWER series systems. This was higher about 2 years ago but more comodity clusters are making the list pushing out the older POWER3 based systems.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    2. Re:why does it always seem... by randyest · · Score: 1

      Like the fastest one in the world, made by NEC, a Japanese company, with no connection to or assistance from HP? Oh, guess not.

      HP does have connections to 2 of the top 5, but none of those has been touted recently, AFAICR. Which one(s) were you thinking of?

      --
      everything in moderation
    3. Re:why does it always seem... by evilviper · · Score: 1

      It seems that way because it was that way (up until very recently).

      Compaq had Alpha, and Alphas powered the fastest computers in the world. They year that HP merged with Compaq, those two companies resources were combined, and HP pretty much owned the top500 supercomputer list. Unfortunately, that didn't last long, primarily because of the long-touted death of the Alpha, the best general-purpose processor ever created.

      HP is doing a lot of this work, because they are a big company, and after merging with Compaq, they are the biggest company around.

      IBM does a lot, but it doesn't seem like they were even trying to get the fastest number-crunching computers... That is, that's how it looked until the 64-bit PPC processor was announced, which gives them a major advantage (faster than the fastest x86 processors, but using up half as much power).

      Other companies have entered the fray, now that HP/Compaq dropped the ball, and HP's lead is falling incredibly fast. They are dropping every good processor they had, and switching everything to Itanium, as if it's the end-all, be-all. No doubt they helped pay for this thing, just for the press attention it would give them. Their support for the Itanium is looking like a very very bad mistake, so any positive press they can get, promises to help them a great deal.

      I don't believe their efforts are sustainable however, as AMD has such a lead over Intel in heat, power, tolerances, and price, that it's doomed in the long term if Intel doesn't pull off something amazing very soon.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  22. Pacific Northwest??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd say watch out for someone from Redmond accidentally spilling a cup of coffee on them supercomputers.

  23. The surefire way to get Slashdot's attention... by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ... is to run Linux on it.

    "It's solving complex problems and moving 11.8 terraflops, but the real interesting bit is that it's running Linux!"

    1. Re:The surefire way to get Slashdot's attention... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HA HA HA! ha! ha ha ho he ho he he, oh, wait, that's not funny. at all. go away sycophant. all the Smithers positions at /. are full.

  24. slashdot this one, i dare you by Raleel · · Score: 5, Informative

    http://www.emsl.pnl.gov/mscf

    a more direct link to info about the facility. EMSL is a scientific user facility, designed to be a collaboration point and resource for environmental and molecular sciences (Environmental and Molecular Sciences Laboratory).

    You can read about what the computer will be used for, what stuff is inside it, even see the job status. It's pretty neat stuff. The folks over there should be quite proud of what they've done. Yes, I work at PNNL :)

    It is a demon of a machine. It's huge. It's very fast. I hope some good life/world saving chemistry comes out of it.

    --
    -- Who is the bigger fool? The fool or the fool who follows him? --
    1. Re:slashdot this one, i dare you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, then, hurry up and post your HPL scores! C'mon I'm waiting... doesn't this thing go any faster? I thought it was supposed to be _fast_. BTW, have you considered running ganglia g3 and if so, will you be joining the global name space eventually? Also, I can't tell what resource manager you're running, but if it's PBS, Sara (www.sara.nl) has put out a very nice web based job view based on a python back end that integrates into the ganglia cluster view. PS, I'm extremely jealous.

    2. Re:slashdot this one, i dare you by rampant+mac · · Score: 1
      "I hope some good life/world saving chemistry comes out of it."

      Right on, man!

      *scratches beard*

      *toke*

      "Hey man, is that freedom rock?"
      "Yeah man!"
      "Well turn it up!"

      Oh, wait...

      --
      I like big butts and I cannot lie.
    3. Re:slashdot this one, i dare you by juan2074 · · Score: 1

      Hell, I worked there when it was still called PNL and William R. (Bill) Wiley was the Director, before the EMSL was conceived.

  25. duh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Of course it runs Linux...

    Windows is the name of the toy a kid waiting to get kicked out of the sandbox plays with. The toy has lotsa spoiled food and candy on it, so it attracts bugs and is very unsanitary.

    All the other children except him share...

  26. I wounder how fast by earthforce_1 · · Score: 1

    It could recompile its own kernel?

    --
    My rights don't need management.
    1. Re:I wounder how fast by brsmith4 · · Score: 1

      ever heard of ... um... binary releases? They have those you know. Troll.

    2. Re:I wounder how fast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A cluster really isn't intended to spread compile operations out across multiple nodes. So really its how fast can a 2 cpu 1.5ghz itanium compile its own kernel. Answer is it depends on the kernel config, but I doubt if its even 5 times what a uni processor IA32 could do for the same config.

  27. Grid Computing and AI by Will+the+Chill · · Score: 0, Interesting

    We've got a related project called 'GridShell' that may be of some interest to the readers. Basically, it gives a slick WebUI as a front-end to an AI Grid Computing interface. As an added bonus, we've included our new implementation of the AWESOME new programming language 'SequenceL', which will AUTOMATICALLY and INTELLIGENTLY PARALLELIZE and DISTRIBUTE ITSELF across pretty much any Grid of Grids or Clusters or SuperComputers or whatever. You can check it out now at http://gridshell.sourceforge.net

    Thanks!

    -Will MacBraswald, Jr.
    Creator, GridShell

    PS - Why didn't the /. editors want to post a story about this?

    --
    Creator of RPerl, Scouter, Juggler, Mormon, Perl Monger, Serial Entrepreneur, Aspiring Astrophysicist, Community Organiz
    1. Re:Grid Computing and AI by Creepy+Crawler · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Well first, your site has that spark of a "I'm a Tesla Alien Abduction Genius Who Will Solve Everythin gWith Cold-Fusion" genius. That frankly make me seriously consider whether I should even click on the next link.

      Then you have (DONATE HERE) banners that (NO HERE) make your site really (GIMMEE) hard to read. The more massive projects dont beg like that. If you cant/wont support it, that's what the GPL was for.

      And lastly, the style presented reminds me of the magazine, OMNI. There's that feel of spoofery/hokey kind of "I'm code-God" that just makes me want to click that nice xkill on that window.

      It may be a good project, but the presentation really sucks. Even the basic Black text on white with simple images looks cleaner/better than that.

      --
    2. Re:Grid Computing and AI by randyest · · Score: 1

      WTF? This snake oil is on sourceforge? Your website reminds me a lot of this, but just not as cool (or funny). You know, another poster said it nicer, but I'm going to be blunt(er): nix the ABSOLUTELY AMAZING OUTSTANDING SUPERFRAGILISTIC carny huckster snake-oil salesman copy on that site, please. I couldn't stand it enough to see if you do bring TRUE AI TO THE DESKTOP or not. And now my eyes and head hurts.

      --
      everything in moderation
    3. Re: Grid Computing and AI by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1


      > We've got a related project called 'GridShell' that may be of some interest to the readers. Basically, it gives a slick WebUI as a front-end to an AI Grid Computing interface. As an added bonus, we've included our new implementation of the AWESOME new programming language 'SequenceL', which will AUTOMATICALLY and INTELLIGENTLY PARALLELIZE and DISTRIBUTE ITSELF across pretty much any Grid of Grids or Clusters or SuperComputers or whatever.

      Does it automatically decide which words go in all-caps? Could be a useful language for spammers and netk00ks...

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    4. Re:Grid Computing and AI by Gleng · · Score: 1

      Oh my god, I'm literally in tears after reading realultimatepower.net. I haven't laughed so much in ages, thank you!

      --
      "Proudly Posting Without Reading The Article"
    5. Re:Grid Computing and AI by sco08y · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'm not EVEN going to look at it until YOU put in more exclamation points!!!!!!!!! and BOLD TEXT!!!!!!!!

      The RADICAL NAVIGATION BAR is absolutely AMAZING!!!!!!!!! That kind of NATURAL CAMOUFLAGE of VITAL NAVIGATION ELEMENTS is a SUPER-COOL way to design GROOVY WEB SITES!!!!!!!!!

    6. Re:Grid Computing and AI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And have you even seen the phony navigation images? Just follow the links a couple of clicks in... oh god, it burns!

    7. Re:Grid Computing and AI by nothings · · Score: 1

      You couldn't figure this out from the all-caps boldfacing and suchlike in the post itself? OUR AWESOME NEW LANGUAGE SOLVES ALL PROBLEMS SO YOU DON'T HAVE TO!

    8. Re:Grid Computing and AI by Creepy+Crawler · · Score: 1

      >>>>You couldn't figure this out from the all-caps boldfacing and suchlike in the post itself? OUR AWESOME NEW LANGUAGE SOLVES ALL PROBLEMS SO YOU DON'T HAVE TO!

      Yeah, that's what I'm saying. on his sourceforge site, there's some 45 MB tar.gz file there. Evidently his project is something. What that something is, I'm sure as hell ain't wasting a 45 MB on it.

      But since I'm not going to see what it is, I can't say for sure it's garbage. I said that HIS site led me to believe that it probably is garbage.

      And yes, I did give him the benefit of the doubt, as it doesnt _look_ auto-generated. I figured I'd just point out why "His article wasnt accepted". He deserved that much, if anything.

      --
    9. Re:Grid Computing and AI by boots@work · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Why didn't the /. editors want to post a story about this?

      About a project whose webpage is nearly free of content aside from a plea for donations, whose most significant announcement is "02/17/2003: GridShell website created!!!", and whose demo seems to be hung? Beats me, that sounds like the crap they usually post :-)

      Bringing True Aritificial Intelligence to the Desktop TODAY


      You should go easy on the bold, capitals and exclamation marks. They make you sound amusing like a viagra spammer. (Or was that your intention?)

      But aside from that, what's "True Artificial Intelligence"? Something that can pass a strong Turing test? Now that would be news.

      Here's a clue for free: why not put on your home page a description of the project that is not just a string of buzzwords?
    10. Re:Grid Computing and AI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slashdot poll.

      Would you buy a used car from this man?

    11. Re:Grid Computing and AI by Kynde · · Score: 1

      Lol, what a site that really was!

      I actually went as far as his sourceforge site, no mailing lists, but there was one source tar ball... 42Mb! Heh, well, I figured with that kind of web page it's gotta be good, so why not download it aswell. I wanted to see some actual code.

      The tar ball container usr/local/lib/site_perl/, 43Mb of 44Mb opened were some skinsets that were definitely worth the peek. They reminded the web pages quite a bit. And understandably there was also loads of perl code, quite a bit of it actually. I did take few quick peeks at various modules, but if you ask me Kernighan was right about perl being a write-only language. Then this jewel caught my eye, the CHANGELOG :
      08/25/2003:
      GridShell v0.97
      Lot's new, including JavaScript Scaleable ImageMap Web-based User Interface, and new SequenceL Language Integration!

      02/26/2003:
      GridShell v0.857
      Still working on data command syntax data structures and command execution routines. First public source release!!!

      Poor guy, there actually is quite a bit of perl code written there (143 files and 24145 lines including comments that). That's effort wasted since it's quite apparent that he has a bright future ahead as a web designer.

      I must have visitided more than a hundred serious sourceforge sites during the years, but I've never laughed this much. Thanks to the parent post for pointing this out.

      --
      1 Earth is warming, 2 It's us, 3 it's royally bad, 4 we need to take action NOW
    12. Re:Grid Computing and AI by labradort · · Score: 1

      You guys are missing the whole point. That web space was created *by* the artificial intelligence. It just happens to have a K-TEL sales pitch personality. This was the simpilist AI model to implement for the pilot. The Dan Rather personality upgrade is in the works. Return to the website later to see how the content and web design improves.

  28. I for one by slugo3 · · Score: 1

    welcome our new supercomputer overlords

  29. Re:Odd.. by agent+dero · · Score: 1

    FreeBSD, holding the best SMP support, can only support at the moment 16 CPUs, I read the mailing list, and I don't think they work on 16+ CPU set-ups that much, let alone the Itanium port isn't as prevelent as the i386, and/or Alpha.

    Wishful thinking, but not possible at the moment, sorry

    --
    Error 407 - No creative sig found
  30. No, it now runs SCO Unix.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who do you think actually forked out money for a license to be saved from SCO?

    1. Re:No, it now runs SCO Unix.. by tankdilla · · Score: 1

      Sun did.

      --

      -Look lively. LOOK LIVELY!!! --Mr. Shmallow

    2. Re:No, it now runs SCO Unix.. by N3WBI3 · · Score: 1

      If they did it would be about 1.4 Million Dollars..

      --
  31. New AI hyper-computing software by yandoobies · · Score: 0, Redundant

    a related project of some interest is GridShell. It provides an intelligent WebUI on top of easy Grid, Super, or Cluster access. Also included is the new Self-Parallelizing Artificial Intelligence Language 'SequenceL.' All GPL'd and written in Object Oriented Perl.

    Go to the following address for immediate access:
    http://GridShell.SourceForge.net

    -Yandoobies

  32. Guarantee by oobar · · Score: 3, Funny

    I will personally bludgeon to death anyone who posts a "Beuwulf cluster" joke to this story. Let's just get that out of the way...

    1. Re:Guarantee by Creepy+Crawler · · Score: 2, Funny

      FINE.

      I wonder if we could make these SMP enabled??

      (dons anti-bludgeoning device)

      --
    2. Re:Guarantee by kdsolutions · · Score: 1

      perhaps you missed where Cpt_Kirks already did that?

      --
      Error 666 - Satanic SCO code found in your Linux kernel.
  33. Compiling by Molina+the+Bofh · · Score: 1

    Gee, I need to get my hands on such a beast. I'll probably have a better Internet experience.
    Intel says that a P4-M can achieve 50% greater performance in Internet experience. Cool. With 11.8 teraflops, Internet experience will be what, like 99999% greater ? Gee, that sounds better than an orgasm.

    --

    -
    Roses are #FF0000, Violets are #0000FF, find / -name '*base*' |xargs chown -R us && mv zig greatjustice
    1. Re:Compiling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "get my hands on such a beast. I'll probably have a better Internet experience"
      I suspect most slashdotters "get their hands on" the other "beast" for a better Internet experience.

    2. Re:Compiling by juan2074 · · Score: 1

      Uh, maybe you need to experience a real organism--with a woman.

  34. that sounds good by toddhunter · · Score: 5, Funny

    But according to Apple the G5 is 10% quicker under their latest benchmark tests.

    1. Re:that sounds good by error502 · · Score: 1

      And nowhere will they compare it to the G4.

  35. Hot damn by ArmorFiend · · Score: 2, Funny

    I wonder what kind of FPS they get in TuxRacer...

  36. The fastest computer in the US, eh? by lavalyn · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    But how many frames per second does it get on Doom III?

    --
    Doing the Right Thing should not be preempted by making a buck.
    1. Re:The fastest computer in the US, eh? by kdsolutions · · Score: 1

      approximately... 3.14159... err... uhmm... hey... this framerate is the most accurate representation ot PI I've ever seen!!!!!

      Hey boys! Looks like we've already made a major breakthrough with this thing! Err... wait... DAMNIT! I died before I could get a screenshot! Hope i get the same framerate next time.

      --
      Error 666 - Satanic SCO code found in your Linux kernel.
  37. the japan supercomputer by 2057 · · Score: 1

    why is it that no one takes the example of the earth simulator in japan and puts it to use? the earth simulator uses less proccessors and is three times faster than any other supercomputer yet people still waste money on building 2000cpu systems, i mean shit ive needed a new computer for about 4 years, and u could've given me something...

    --
    For The Best Jazz/Hip-hop fusion > COlD DUCK
    1. Re:the japan supercomputer by Sciamachy · · Score: 2, Funny

      Shouldn't that be "Earth emulator", since as we all know, the Earth is itself a very powerful supercomputer built to find the Question that fits the Answer to the meaning of Life the Universe and Everything (42)...?

  38. Re:Odd.. by Kyle+Hamilton · · Score: 1

    The problem is that BSD is a better OS then Linux but it is harder to use and requires more of that good old do it yourself attitude none of this pre made junk ;-)

    --
    Linux is like living in a teepee. No Windows, no Gates, Apache in house.
  39. machines paid for with public funds do not count by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    machines paid for with public funds do not count as anything of note... ever.

    too much politics and not enough "bottom line"

    instead i prefer to study all the machines listed in www.top500.org

    and then i discount all the sites running clusters paid for using taxpayer dollars

    www.top500.org is a fascinating list.

  40. Re:Odd.. by afidel · · Score: 1

    The press release doesn't say WHICH HP Integrity servers these are based on but for cost reasons I doubt it is the Superdome variant so these are probably only 4-Way nodes connected together with Quadrics interfaces. In that roll the BSD's should be just as capable. Of course the interface cards may not be supported under *BSD and there may be libraries that would not run flawlessly under BSD's linux emulation layer but those should mostly be flaws that can be overcome.

    --
    There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
  41. Re:Ooooooo, I know what's up! by puppet10 · · Score: 1

    Wasn't that the plot of Superman 3?

    --
    -------- This space intentionally left blank --------
  42. sweet. i am in the same town as the computer by Einsdot · · Score: 0

    my dad works there. wish i could go and see it. hm.

  43. Tin Foil Hat Time by Gleng · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Hehe, I guess that's what seti@home's *really* doing.

    I'm joking, I think.

    --
    "Proudly Posting Without Reading The Article"
  44. but what I -really- wanna know is.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    cat /proc/cpuinfo | grep -i bogo

    ? :)

  45. Ya but . . . by _pi-away · · Score: 1

    I bet it still gets the weather wrong.

    --

    "The crows seemed to be calling his name, thought Caw."
  46. Offtopic??? OK, Try This by Lucas+Membrane · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Good that it runs linux. If it ran Windows, millions of people might live.

  47. You left out by TubeSteak · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    CowyBoy Neal you insensitive clod!!

    --
    [Fuck Beta]
    o0t!
  48. I, for one... by kdsolutions · · Score: 3, Funny

    ... welcome our new 11.8 TFLOP overlord.

    Hello, HAL.

    --
    Error 666 - Satanic SCO code found in your Linux kernel.
  49. But does it run SCO? by Axe · · Score: 4, Funny

    We all know it is a superior system. And with $1.5M in licensing fees they will collect for this particular installation, they will develop it even further.

    --
    <^>_<(ô ô)>_<^>
  50. what distribution does it run? by slovin8 · · Score: 0

    Is it some custom Linux dist from HP? or one of the standard ones (SuSE, Redhat..etc) ?

    1. Re:what distribution does it run? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My friend's brother's girlfriend works there, she said it runs the BSD distribution.

  51. Thus the name retard by codepunk · · Score: 1

    Hmm what is the name of this site again, could it be slashdot.?

    I think you may have accidentally posted to slashdot when you really ment to post to your AOL buddies on the I LUV Windows list.

    --


    Got Code?
    1. Re:Thus the name retard by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "I think you may have accidentally posted to slashdot when you really ment to post to your AOL buddies on the I LUV Windows list. "

      Or he was just commenting that Linux (or Unix) was a no brainer for a project like that.

      You guys get too defensive of Linux, it's not necessary. It's earned itself a good rep. That doesn't go as far when you act as though everything's a fight with Windows.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
  52. Fastest at least until... by Glock27 · · Score: 4, Informative

    that 10,000 Opteron Cray supercomputer comes online...although I guess that system may not be unclassified.

    --
    Galileo: "The Earth revolves around the Sun!"
    Score: -1 100% Flamebait
    1. Re:Fastest at least until... by megalomang · · Score: 1

      Ahhh, the story of AMD's PR department...

      "The system we make in [today + X number of years] is faster than the system you make today."

  53. A Tad Late by DaveAtFraud · · Score: 1

    There are already two of them. Interestingly, the first one has been modded down to -1 while the second has been modded up to +4. I guess some moderators are as humor challenged as you.

    There is also the obligatory "In Soviet Russia" comment as well as expected SCO licensing joke. So far, the only thing that's missing is a CowboyNeal joke but those generally only show up on polls.

    But I can make up something really lame concerning CowboyNeal and super computers if you like...

    --
    They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither safety nor liberty.
    Ben
    1. Re:A Tad Late by onomatomania · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry, if you still find the beowulf jokes funny, it's you that are humor-challenged. Move the fuck on, it's old.

  54. FNP by Trolling4Dollars · · Score: 1

    No no no! You're supposed to say "I'm sooooooooo naked!" to get the first Naked Post. First Naked Post!!!! Remember kids, you don't have to be first to get a Naked Post, you just have to be NAKED!!!!

  55. I have a few questions about Windows on this thing by rkuris · · Score: 2, Funny

    First, how many reboots would it take to install any MS OS?

    Second, does MS even RUN on something like that (i.e., is it even POSSIBLE to utilize the processors)?

    And, finally, how long would it take for it to be infested with SoBig?

    --
    Get rid of everything Micro and Soft: Buy Viagra and/or Linux
  56. well said by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    nt

  57. Just waiting by duffhuff · · Score: 1

    I'm just waiting for these guys to shoot to the top of the Seti@Home rankings. Or maybe Folding@Home.

    Who would want to do some boring chemical simulations when they can be cock-of-the-walk amongst geeks. Topping @Home would be like having a 12" wang in the locker room, but I guess you'd still have trouble picking up women, as it requires speaking and all.

  58. Did they release the source? by G3ckoG33k · · Score: 1

    In light of the SCO case, I wonder if they have released the source for the OS for that machine, as required by the GPL. This may be a case to test HP's stand in that case.

    1. Re:Did they release the source? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, you've read the GPL, right?

      Who, exactly, did they give the binaries to outside of that lab? What? You don't have them?

      Then you don't get to have the source either.

      You only HAVE to supply the sourcecode to those who receive the binaries.

      RTFGPL.

    2. Re:Did they release the source? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is some software on the system which isn't covered by the GPL (the intel compiler for one) but all the essential kernel mods, library's and demons are GPL'ed (or LGPL)

  59. gridshell == vapourware by nuonguy · · Score: 1

    Look at the GridShell sources At version 0.97, the CVS repository has nothing in it but the files that CVS creates. All of that took only six months! To quote the most eloquent Homer Simpson: BORING!

  60. They don't have to if they don't RELEASE it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No wonder no one knows about GPL -- no one understands it! If these folks don't release it -- i.e., they simply use it for their-lonesome-selves, they don't have to RELEASE their source! Get with the program, Mister! (bang! bang! shoot 'em up, to the moon!)

    1. Re:They don't have to if they don't RELEASE it by G3ckoG33k · · Score: 1

      Maybe I'm wrong here, but didn't HP "sell" them that machine, with that OS? From what I understood, the system was not developed by "their-lonesome-selves". Or am I "splitting hairs"? Really, how is PNNL + HP = inhouse? Yes, I sure hope I am missing something essential here.

  61. Single System Image by rf0 · · Score: 1

    DOes anyone know (as I can't work out from the article) if this is a Single System Image ala SGI Altix hardware or it is a cluster? Would love to see the interconnect spped

    Rus

    1. Re:Single System Image by natet · · Score: 1

      I work on this beast. No, it isn't an SSI. It is a cluster of 972 dual processor Itanium nodes. Coincidentally, we also have a 128 way Altix on site as well...

      As for interconnect, we use Quadrics Elan 3 currently, with plans to move to Elan 4 in the near future. I'm not sure what I can say number wise, as we are under NDA for a lot of such things...

      --
      IANAL... But I play one on /.
    2. Re:Single System Image by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Each elan3 card can do just under 2 gigabit per second. The great thing about elan is the swtiches which allow every node to talk to every other node at once and get full bandwidth.

  62. It's expensive ... VERY expensive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Nuff said!

  63. A Brief History of Supercomputing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    In the dim times there was one company called Cray that built big, expensive custom designed vector supercomputers. It took forever to build one so Cray could always insure they were profitable because they always new how many orders they had well in advance and could staff and spend appropriately and they were pretty much the only game in town.

    One day SGI got tired of doing just fluffy graphics and built the MIPS R8000 which was probably the first really successful CMOS supercomputer on a chip. They completely carved up Cray from the low end up and eventually pushed them into a merger from hell that nearly destroyed both companies.

    Around this time the Department of Energy had to give up setting off nuclear bombs to see if they actually worked and got in the business of funding these massive supercomputers mostly to simulate bombs and then some other stuff too. Unfortunately the DOE changed companies and architecture with each new contract. They managed to suck SGI, Intel, IBM, Cray, HP and countless others in to this prestige contest and I doubt its been particularly good for any of them. You see these are one off systems, that require a massive very custom engineering effort and the R&D effort seldom pays off. Its just not a good way to do business spending massive engineering effort when your usually lucky to sell one system. If you get a second one you usually have to start from scratch and do it all over again.

    They are great for prestige and maybe some of the R&D effort does translate into the companies product line but, IMHO, I think a smart, well managed computing company wouldn't touch these with a ten foot pole. Microsoft sure doesn't seem interested in pouring any effort in to trying to land one of these contracts.

    If the U.S. government had a clue they would find a way back to pouring all their money in to Cray to develop the specialized vector processors and find a new little Cray Jr. company to specialize in building the giant Linux clusters and encourage companies like IBM and HP to get out of this massive distraction from their core business.

    1. Re:A Brief History of Supercomputing by SmackCrackandPot · · Score: 1

      One quote I remember from a supercomputer sales division: "Buy a supercomputer system from us, and the office building comes free".

    2. Re:A Brief History of Supercomputing by Seanasy · · Score: 1
      They are great for prestige and maybe some of the R&D effort does translate into the companies product line but, IMHO, I think a smart, well managed computing company wouldn't touch these with a ten foot pole. Microsoft sure doesn't seem interested in pouring any effort in to trying to land one of these contracts.

      ?! They're selling hardware. Millions of dollars worth. A well managed computing company better jump at the chance for millions of dollars in government contracts. And, Microsoft doesn't make hardware. Therefore, they don't make supercomputers. If they could convince any hardware vendor to put Win2k on a huge cluster they would. Windows just can't handle the big iron.

      Was that a troll?

    3. Re:A Brief History of Supercomputing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This history predates the rise of the beowulf cluster. Nowdays most of the new supercomputers are merely big stacks of rackmounted PCs with fast interconnects running Linux. If you look at The Top500 trends you will see that the number of intel supercomputers in the top 500 is up to 119 from 56 six months ago, and that the number of clusters has gone from 93 to 149 over the same period.

  64. Re:Ooooooo, I know what's up! by pair-a-noyd · · Score: 1

    The comment was not redundant.
    When I posted it there were no similar posts.
    Jeez you mods are off base....

  65. Re:Odd.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Eh? Hard to use? If hard is a good, logical layout of the system, excellent documentation and (horrors) an install program that's merely text-based? More realistically it's a better engineered version of Unix than Linux - but without the unwanted crap.

    90% of the stuff I need are in premade packages, the last 10% in the ports tree that needs compiling automagically (and although the ports tree contains thousands of pieces of software that works on FreeBSD - as simple to install as "cd /usr/ports/[program]; make install").

    I know you're only poking fun at it, but someone from the Linux crowd might actually believe you. :(

  66. When will they be in-stock with Amazon? by Redshift · · Score: 1

    ..... when I first read the story my eyes played tricks with me - I could have sworn it said "bought online", not "brought online"!

  67. yes, virginia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    there are a lot of really fucking stupid people with mod points on slashdot. so what else is new?

  68. License feed by DarlFromSCO · · Score: 0

    Yay ! that's another 1.399 million dollar for me !

    --
    IP law confuses me. I am persuaded slashdot readers who read this sig now legally owe me 699$
  69. I disagree by Begemot · · Score: 1

    The original article says the fastest open system. If that matters then the title is misleading.

  70. The classified computers are for the impossible... by raehl · · Score: 1

    ...developing a Windows system that doesn't crash.

  71. The Pacific Northwest? by ratfynk · · Score: 1

    I wonder how fast it runs in Utah. The Darryl effect of cocaine and higher elevation might effect slow it down a little.

    --
    OH THE SHAME I fell off the wagon and use sigs again!
  72. I, for one, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    wonder what is still legal in the US...

  73. Re:Offtopic??? OK, Try This by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Congratulations.

    You're a moron.

  74. It's not vaporware; there's code. Wierd code. by Animats · · Score: 3, Funny
    There's a huge download available, and it's in Perl, so you can try to figure it out. The download is huge because it has "skins", and they're all stored as large PNG files.

    This seems to be something you run via a CGI server, so multiple copies of itself interact via that route. I think.

    Check out EULA.txt in the sources:

    • Further, you may not access or use our Services if you are, or are directly related to, an employee/member of any or all of the following entities:
      • Microsoft (software production company)
        SCO (software licensing company)
        AOL/Time Warner (media conglomerate)
        Disney (media conglomerate)
        McDonalds (fast food chain)
        Taco Bell (fast food chain)
        Bayer (pharmaceutical production company)
        DuPont (plastics production company)
        Anheuser/Busch (alcohol production company)
        De Beers (diamond trading company)
        Dell (computer production company)
        Intel (microprocessor production company)
        Exxon/Mobil (petroleum trading company)
        Texaco/Chevron (petroleum trading company)
        The Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA)
        The Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA)
        ABSOLUTELY ANY Local, State, Federal, or International LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCY
        ABSOLUTELY ANY Local, State, Federal, or International INTELLIGENCE AGENCY
        ABSOLUTELY ANY Local, State, Federal, or International MILITARY FORCE
        ABSOLUTELY ANY Bank, Credit Union, Insurance Agency, or other primarily finance-related institution
        ABSOLUTELY ANY Illuminist, Non-Human, Facist, or Evil organized institution

    GridShell v0.97, feauturing MORE INTELLIGENCE

    1. Re:It's not vaporware; there's code. Wierd code. by stor · · Score: 1

      Is this guy related to the "Freedows" dude?

      Cheers
      Stor

      --
      "Yeah well there's a lot of stuff that should be, but isn't"
    2. Re:It's not vaporware; there's code. Wierd code. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about viral Linux commune hippies?

  75. Sliding in by a shoe-lace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The surefire way to get Slashdot's attention...is to run Linux on it."

    I'm running Linux on my tennis shoes.

  76. Can you imagine ... by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

    ... the price of a SCO license for a Beowulf cluster of these?

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  77. Beowolfing an Apple orchard. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I know your trying to be funny, but why aren't there any Apple based clusters, or grids?

    1. Re:Beowolfing an Apple orchard. by Detritus · · Score: 1

      One problem is that Apple does not support ECC memory on their systems.

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
  78. SCO? by raehl · · Score: 4, Funny

    McBride: We have learned that your government secret agency is using Linux IP in violation of our intellectual property rights.

    Secret Government Agency: We have learned that SCO owes billions of dollars in back taxes, and that you have an affinity for barnyard animals.

    McBride: But I havn't been on a farm in 40 years!

    Secret Government Agency: That's not what these pictures generated by our new Linux supercompter say.

  79. And it uses Itanium2 CPUs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Everyone is picking up on the fact that this supercomputer runs Linux, but no one seems to have commented on the fact that it uses Itanium2 processors.

    Now I wouldn't consider that point newsworthy, were it not for the constant FUD levelled against the Itanium.

    The reason for the FUD is obvious -- it's because the Itanium-ready version of Windows is still mostly 32-bit code, which means that Windows' performance sucks on an Itanium CPU. Linux, on the other hand, gets the full 64-bit boost, with more to follow as the compilers are improved. Thus, Microsoft is afraid that, if the Itanium becomes popular, lots of people will see Linux performing much better than Windows.

    That's also why Microsoft-friendly journalists and posters have been working so hard to promote AMD's Opteron. It's nothing against AMD, of course, but AMD compromised, and catered to Microsoft's failings, by dedicating part of the Opteron's real estate to native 32-bit support. As a result, Windows performance doesn't suck quite as much on AMD's 32/64-bit Opteron, as it does on Intel's fully-64-bit Itanium.

    This supercomputer should put an end to the "Itanium is slow" and "Itanium is going nowhere" FUD. But I emphasized "should" because it probably won't -- FUD writers have never cared about facts.

  80. Re:Ooooooo, I know what's up! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tomorrows news. Dept. of Energy install Bonzai Buddy on new supercomputer. A new round of blackouts strikes America.

  81. Imagine.... by peterpi · · Score: 1

    ... a beowulf cluster of those! Sorry.

    1. Re:Imagine.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      fucking hell /. gets some dumb asses posting the same mindless drivel....

  82. icc or gcc? by forgoil · · Score: 1

    I wonder if the important software is compiled with icc or gcc. I guess it could be fortran code (apparently popular still;)) and then icc should shine even more. IA64 is not the easiest CPU to make a good compiler for.

    All the FSF nerds would scream their heads off, but I would like to see a scientific release of linux, compiled with iNTELS compilers and set up and optimized only to crunch the numbers (and anything needed because of that. Slow disk access surely can't be a good thing for instance, while desktop smoothness isn't worth it).

  83. wow! by NickRipley · · Score: 2, Funny

    and Linux is also running on the slowest computer in the US: my old 486 with 4 megs of RAM.

    ha ha

    --
    http://cassettefetish.com
  84. Teraflops schmeraflops! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    How many bogomips, dammit?!

    1. Re:Teraflops schmeraflops! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is from a lower end Itanium2 machine than what they are using, but you might be somewhat disappointed:

      processor 0
      vendor GenuineIntel
      arch IA-64
      family Itanium 2
      cpu MHz 900.000000
      BogoMIPS 1346.37

      processor 1
      vendor GenuineIntel
      arch IA-64
      family Itanium 2
      cpu MHz 900.000000
      BogoMIPS 1346.37

      BogoMIPS are bogus, they are related more closley to clock speed than to actual performance. Here is one from my desktop P4:

      processor 0
      model name Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 1.80GHz
      stepping 2
      cpu MHz 1794.232
      cache size 256 KB
      bogomips 3578.26

      I suspect the MCR cluster is (when you combine all nodes) the fastest machine in the world in terms of BogoMIPS. Just remember when the machine boots you wont actually see it claiming to have millions of BogoMIPS, this is a cluster of hundreds of 2 CPU machines (just plain ordinary Itanium servers), not a large SMP machine with thousands of CPUs in it.

  85. Cray by Detritus · · Score: 1
    Years ago, I noticed a listing in the phone book for a Cray field office in Laurel, Maryland. That is very near the NSA at Fort Meade, Maryland. I've heard rumors of acres of Crays in the basement of the big NSA building on Fort Meade. It would be interesting to read some of Cray's old annual reports, to see how they dealt with reporting sales of supercomputers.

    The NSA used to tell its employees to say they worked for the Defense Department, if asked who their employer was.

    The NSA has a front organization called the "Maryland Procurement Office" that they use when they buy stuff or request bids on contracts.

    --
    Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
  86. Imagine a Beowulf Cluster of power plants by po8 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Its main duties will be atmospheric chemistry, systems biology, catalysis and materials science.

    IOW, studies in dealing with the power consumption of 2000 Itanium processors.

  87. Atmospheric Processing? What a Waste! by Dr.+Shim · · Score: 0

    I'd do something useful with that kind of processing power. Like... Half-Life, or... Or... TuxRacer?

    I suck. :(

    --
    People discover the meaning of life between getting piss drunk and the following hangover.
  88. what did they do with all the old cpu's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    it says here (http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/61/32523.htm l - couldn't see anything in the posted article on this) that they achieved this speed by upgrading from 1ghz to 1.5ghz itanium's. What did they do with all those old CPUs? and who paid for the upgrade PNNL or HP? Those things aren't cheap, they cost $800+ each.

  89. Could of been more powerful for the $ spent by Bruha · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I wonder how much more powerful it could of been if they designed it with Opteron processors or had waited until next summer when the release of XDDR Ram that runs in the 3ghz range would of been out.

    Keep in mind as main memory speeds catch up with processor speeds and can easily run in 128 & 256 bit configurations that the signifigance of chip cache will become less and less. If the memory standards commttee's can keep memory speeds in line wiht processors then we can see some great advances in supercomputing. Along with cheaper processors due to the lack of onboard cache's since the processors would be able to use the main memory for such purposes.

    Only stopgap into truely fast computing is the hard drive and that is quickly coming into it's solid state future as well.

    I would guess at 2006 for 10ghz PC's with the only moving parts left being the dvd player and cooling systems which at that time will probably have to be more advanced than even liquid unless we make thsoe processors run at that speed with todays power outputs.

  90. Cluster's aren't supercomputers. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Never were, never will be.

    1. Re:Cluster's aren't supercomputers. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what if you take all the systems and put them into a huge metal box? is it a supercomputer then?

    2. Re:Cluster's aren't supercomputers. by RAMGarden · · Score: 1

      Is Seti@Home a supercomputer?

      --
      --- Nothing is secure.
  91. But will it play doom3? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    sure, but will it play doom3? :/

  92. RTFAS by Ender+Ryan · · Score: 1
    Read. The. Fucking. Articles.

    There is absolutely 0 evidence that HP is "in bed" with SCO, and indeed, the article that prompted that notion actually said something to the opposite effect that was misinterpreted.

    From the looks of things, HP has told SCO to "fuck off", and is continuing to roll out Linux installations.

    Cheers.

    --
    Sticking feathers up your butt does not make you a chicken - Tyler Durden
  93. Distro? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What distro of Linux are they running?

  94. Anyone find it odd... by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

    ... that the Department of Energy would use a system based on 2000 Itaniums?

    Sheesh, that's 260000 watts for just the processors alone!

    I'll bet that thing could be one HELL of a counter-strike server!

    --
    Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
  95. Re:What about the classified ones? I know, I know! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They're running SCO Unix, obviously. These are the supreme architects of "hey, we think we know what's in the code, but we can't tell you..." ROTFL :-)

  96. Thousands of pounds of junk by Vexar · · Score: 1
    That 'junk,' specifically, would be nuclear waste (which they store, because the Nevada governor doesn't want it moved out of Washington State) or it would be water. The PNNL either gets its power from the nuclear reactor they designed and built (which I doubt), another one nearby which isn't circa 1948, or one of the many hydroelectric dams along the Columbia river.

    Secret labs always have contractors, like Batelle, SAIC, TRW, Northrop-Grumman, and the like. Those folks probably know.

  97. hmmm... by vraddict · · Score: 0

    I want one.

  98. Just a ratings stunt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm beginning to think that websites publish articles about xxxx running linux just to get slashdotted, thereby increasing their hits :) Let's face it, if something out there runs linux or somebody switches to linux, or somebody's relative realizes he/she likes linux, there will be an article about it and it will be posted on Slashdot.

    1. Re:Just a ratings stunt by RAMGarden · · Score: 1

      Tru.

      --
      --- Nothing is secure.
  99. We Need a Better Benchmark by radulovich · · Score: 2, Insightful

    As these things get faster, we'll need a better benchmark. A TERAFLOP??? Come on - can anyone really put into words what this can actually do?

    How about running SETI on it for a day (or an hour) and seeing how many units it can crank out? Then we would finally have something comparable to our own lives that we can comprehend.

    I doubt that many people know how many M/G/Tflops their own computer is, but many more probably know how long it takes to run a SETI unit.

    As a side note, I'm working on a project for my employer to put in a PETAbyte size storage solution. Now I know a petabyte is a million gigabytes, but it's much easier to think of it as seven years of medical images for each of the 30 hospitals we have. :)

    -Mark

  100. Thats good and all but... by bitshifter0101 · · Score: 1

    does that mean it can crash alot faster?

  101. Alpha 21364 ev7 hardware: can anyone point to it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I can't find anything about the ev7. DEC, aka Digital, sold its soul to Compaq when it was working on the ev7, all durring its verry powerful ev6 line of products. Although I use a ev5, or 21164 line of Alpha hardware, because it is comparably faster than a Pentium3 1GHz; I can't find any information on ev7 21364 hardware being used. I know that Compaq simply butchered and sold parts of the ev6 to Intel and AMD where the subjective intellectual property was used to save and extend those architectures of what they are today, and then sold the remnants ofDEC's ev6 and ev7 soul to Hewlette Packard; where are the Alpha HP system performance ratings? Per-capita comparison and then a nice equal hardware-to-hardware comparison would be nice. The Alpha platform was the first 64bit CPU on the Desktop, it was the most expensive, and it was the highest performing in all legitimate floating point mathematics tests. Where is the info? Is it that ev7 Alpha tech is so expensive from HP that not even Ted Turner can build a cluster of them? What is up with this? When nobody compares it with Alpha, in-deed the only logical comparison as Alpha is technically on the high-ground, there is somthing exremely wrong. I read a computing article referenced from (google cached URL)AlphaLinux.org, article in German about how the Itanium2 performs less than an Alpha; and I quote from the AlphaLinux.org website, "Itanium-2 is far behind Alpha when it comes to SAPS (SAP benchmak) 2003-02-27 11:47:10 http://heise.de/newsticker/data/as-25.02.03-000/ (German)". The original article is here, and with babelfish I have converted it in broken/babelenglish as shown below...


    Itanium-2 ranks with SAP bench mark far behind alpha

    With the TPC bench mark before a few days could NECs Itanium-2-Server Express5800 still as the fastest system of its class shine, but with the SAP SD bench mark values for animal 2, published today, he ranks with the throughput value of 13.920 SAPS only in the third number of the larger 32-Prozessor-Server. At the point further clearly the alpha processor stands in the AlphaServer Model gs 1280 (1150 MHz) with 23.220 SAPS before Power4 in IBM p690 (1.3 GHz).

    Whether in view of the large Vorsprunges of 67 per cent the next Itanium-2-Generation (Madison) can up-get, must be doubted nevertheless. According to Intel the Madison is faster on average only about 50 per cent than the current McKinley.

    Criticism harvested meanwhile the Itanium-2 also from Linux Guru Linus Torvalds, which criticized the enormous binary code necessary for Ia-64 in Linux Mailing cunning above all . Also c't it had already deplored (Bodycheck, c't 13/2002 P. 104) that the IA-64-Code produced so far by the compilers is well three times larger than the 32-Bit-Code. The comparison, with AMDs x86-64 the programs become only longer around approximately 15 per cent.

    32-Prozessor-Server and SAP SD bench mark for 2-Tier-Konfiguration

    Server SD user Mittl. Responsezeit SAPS

    HP alpha server GS1280 . _ . _4500. . .1,63s 23220
    IBM p690 . _ . _ . _ . _ . _ . _ .4128. . .1,89s. . .20830
    NEC Express5800. . _ . _ . _ .2750. . .1,85s. . .13920

  102. And it would all have been impossible without SCO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As we all know, Linux was made by a bunch of high school kids that could not possibly make an OS that could run on this kind of HW.

  103. No one by quintessent · · Score: 1

    The top intelligence at the NSA is all run by Artificial Intelligence units. People have been deemed too unreliable. The human leadership of the NSA is all just a front to hide the real decision-makers.

    Of course, now that I've told you, I'll have to kill you.

  104. SuperCPU by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought it was being used to take out SPEWS and them send us info on Viagra!

  105. Re:Alpha 21364 ev7 hardware: can anyone point to i by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    French-German men: build your many powerful chips 'EuroAlpha 1.0.0-1' made in Taiwan for Europe !

    open4free

  106. Cluster by z3r0w8 · · Score: 1

    Man! I bet you could crunch some mpeg's on that!

    --
    -----
  107. 2000 Italian Processors? by asternick · · Score: 1

    Now that'sa nicea computer!

    1. Re:2000 Italian Processors? by RAMGarden · · Score: 1

      +1 Funny.

      --
      --- Nothing is secure.
  108. silly.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did anyone really think it would run across 2000 windows machines? ... paint that picture!!