Slashdot Mirror


Bacteria Powered Batteries

Agent Provocateur writes "SpaceDaily reports on a battery that is powered by chemical reactions caused by bacteria. A Pentagon-backed project, University of Massachusetts researchers Swades Chaudhuri, an Indian, and Derek Lovley, an American, say the battery's source is an underground bacterium that gobbles up sugar and converts its energy into electricity. Their prototype device ran flawlessly without refuelling for up to 25 days and is cheap and stable." The chemistry behind this thing isn't really that complex - keeping the bacteria alive and kicking during that time is prolly the tougher part - you can read more on Al Jazeera, and USA Today. Now, what about replacing this battery?

107 of 337 comments (clear)

  1. Flux Capacitor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Is it on the back of a Delorean?

    1. Re:Flux Capacitor by erpbridge · · Score: 5, Informative

      Right movie, wrong reference. You're thinking of "Mr Fusion", the thing Doc threw trash (banana peels, beer, and the can itself) into to power the Delorean.

      Flux Capacitor was inside the car, in the back seat area, and was shown as a Y shape.

    2. Re:Flux Capacitor by T-Kir · · Score: 4, Funny

      And that little top-up of food generates 1.21Gigawatts, phew! I wouldn't like the idea of Mr. Fusion digesting all the leftovers of Sunday lunch from a large family! :)

      --
      Are you local? There's nothing for you here!
    3. Re:Flux Capacitor by Xaoswolf · · Score: 5, Interesting
      Did you know that the flux capacitor was at one time listed listed in the Marine Corps Comm. Elec. student handbook in the section for different capacitors? They snuck it in as a joke while writing the book, and it actually made it past the editors and into print. Not sure how long it was there, I think at least three years beore they printed the new books.

      Any Marines out there able to give a few better specifics?

      Kinda off topic, but hey, it's still funny.

  2. Finally.... by dirkdidit · · Score: 5, Funny

    Now I finally have a use for all that old pizza stacked up in the corner of my room......

  3. Don't count on seeing it in your home anytime soon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    "A clean green technology? Commie hippie anti-capitalist root-eating sons of socialists!" ::CEO starts having a heart attack::

  4. Similar by elykyllek · · Score: 5, Informative

    Similar to this Vehicle?

  5. hmm by \\ · · Score: 5, Funny

    i wonder what the bastard will smell like.. if it isn't pleasant, might take a while to gain acceptance.

    then again, if it smells like garbage, maybe it could attract flies, and maybe the flies could feed it.. ah, that would be funny.

  6. Carnivorous Robot by qurob · · Score: 5, Informative
  7. I have the superpower by squarefish · · Score: 5, Funny

    to turn leftover food into gas!

    --
    Creationists are a lot like zombies. Slow, but powerful and numerous. And they all want to eat our brains.
  8. Web page of the team leader: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative
  9. Prior Art by AndroidCat · · Score: 5, Funny

    I've been running my fridge that way for years now!

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  10. Leftovers? by bo-eric · · Score: 4, Funny

    Can you run your fridge off what's closest to the back in there?

    --

    -- Free speech is only free if your time is worth nothing.
  11. Using myself to fuel the car by jukal · · Score: 4, Funny
    Weight Watchers beware!

    Scientists say 50 grammes of sugar would keep a 40-watt light bulb lit for eight hours.

    Now, what I will do, is to just connect this liposuction device with me and their innovation, turn my fat into hydrogen and fuel my car. I assume my excess kgs of excess fat will take me to whereever I want. Haha! Here we come McDonald's!

  12. Great for UPS!!!! by dr.Flake · · Score: 5, Funny



    Imagine,

    a stack of left over pizza suspended by a magnet waiting above "the Pit". when the power drops, the pizza drops.... voila, instant power back-up...

    Need more power???, just add pizza.

    --
    Why are other peoples sig's always more witty ???
  13. Use in remote places by Diver777 · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I can definatly see a possible use for such a product in remote locations, such as while camping. Like the article points out
    "Scientists say 50 grammes of sugar would keep a 40-watt light bulb lit for eight hours"
    which is pretty damn good for having to carry a little bit of sugar (as well as the device) with you on your camping trip. The less you need to carry, the better!
    --
    The reason Santa is so jolly is that he knows where all the bad girls live.
  14. I don't get something -- by Whispers_in_the_dark · · Score: 5, Interesting

    "It has to be able to use raw materials, rather than giving it refined fuel."

    Huh? I for one would happily buy one if it could run my 40W max laptop for 8 hours on an ounce and a half (about 50 grams) of refined sugar. Why does it need further refinement before use?

  15. picky by stud9920 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Mr Fusion doesn't feed the DeLorean, it powers the Flux Capacitor, as the whole plot of episode 1 revolved around the lack of plutonium. The DeLorean itself is powered by gas (which again is the whole plot in episode 3)

    1. Re:picky by satsuke · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yes, lets keep our fictional facts straite.

  16. Could the Colis be outcompeted? by jeorgen · · Score: 5, Funny
    Leftovers contain bacteria. What happens if the bacteria in the leftovers outcompete the battery bacteria. Would you need to treat the battery with antibiotics?

    /jeorgen

    1. Re:Could the Colis be outcompeted? by Megane · · Score: 5, Funny
      What happens if the bacteria in the leftovers outcompete the battery bacteria.

      It sure would bring a whole new meaning to the words "dead battery".

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
  17. Thanks, but I'll wait for Mr Fusion by chegosaurus · · Score: 5, Funny

    A colony of e-coli bacteria? Like I don't already have enought of that shit floating round my kitchen.

  18. Huge implications by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting
    This is some serious tech advance, but there's just one last step to make.
    From the article:
    Team leader Chris Melhuish told New Scientist magazine said that although the new MCFs run on sugar cubes, the team aims to move on to carrot power.

    "It has to be able to use raw materials, rather than giving it refined fuel."

    Inside the battery, which is the size of a personal CD player, a colony of E.coli bacteria produce enzymes which break down carbohydrates and release hydrogen.

    Chemical reactions inside the cell strip electrons from the hydrogen atoms to produce a voltage that can power a circuit.

    Scientists say 50 grammes of sugar would keep a 40-watt light bulb lit for eight hours.


    This I want to power my car. And laptop. And house appliances (not just so that I can pour coffee on my computer to recharge the battery)


    This solves the hydrogen-storing problem in the hydrogen powered vehicles: no more dangerous concentration of hydrogen, instead you get a small tank containing bubbling "mud". Not quite inflammable in case of a collision.
    Add to this that it's hardly polluting (just as much as taking a dump in a bosquet, I'd say), and it even helps reducing the amount of houseold garbage (Powerplants recycling garbage, anyone ?).


    The main aspect of this energy source is that it completely suppress the need for combustion. Instead it uses slow, catalyzed, controlled chemical processes that use a lower amount of initial energy. No more smoke.


    Maybe I'm overstating all this, but it definitely looks cool. And it's cheap, too. Carrot-powered car, coming our way !

    1. Re:Huge implications by Paladin814 · · Score: 5, Interesting
      Maybe I'm overstating all this, but it definitely looks cool. And it's cheap, too. Carrot-powered car, coming our way !

      This has more meaning then you might think for the economy. The idea that a country will not have to import oil any longer to maintain its power systems / gas requirements is just as important as the savings for the individual from not having to go to the gas station.

      This would put farmers back to work producing carets in every country in the world, even giving 3rd world countries an exportable resource. Not to mention the environmental effects of having thousands of caret crops producing oxygen on top of a mass reduction of toxins being thrown into the air.

      With this, every 3rd world country that does not have pollution laws will find it cheaper not to pollute, and everyone could meet the Kyoto protocol. I can just imagine the new commercials coming out from the "Juice Man" now. With him dumping his carets into a juicer and drinking the juice, putting the pulp into his car...

  19. airline food... by coreman · · Score: 5, Funny

    will suddenly be in demand on long flights

  20. A few considerations by archeopterix · · Score: 4, Insightful

    1. The article says that to obtain 40 watts of power you need many such cells. I wonder exactly how many. More than will fit into my laptop case?
    2. Besides sugar, the cell needs some mysterious 'redox chemicals'. How expensive they are? Can they be produced environmentally-friendly? Are they safe to store? So, this might or might not be a great invention.

  21. When will is use leaves and grass clippings by aashenfe · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I wonder how much unused energy I rake off my yard every fall and send to the city compost pile.

    What I need is a back yard composter/fertilizer dispenser/generator that I can throw leaves, grass (actually I mulch these now), kitched scaps (sugar cubes, carrots, etc).

    I sell the extra energy back to the power grid, and spread the fertilizer on my yard.

    No wait, this would make to much ecological/economic sense, I must be some kind of hippie, tree hugger, freak.

  22. That's nice and all.. by JeffSh · · Score: 4, Insightful

    But localizing the energy production is a bit silly.

    With this method, you run into the same problems that we have with automobiles and other gas powered devices. They are less efficient than large scale counterparts, which leads to waste energy, lost in poor engines, and exhaust.

    It seems to make more sense to be to centralize the "compost" and generate electricity that way. This would keep bacteria in one place, and minimize the lost energy. It really wouldn't be any different than a power plant.

    infact i'm pretty sure that's already been done. What are the benefits to localizing the energy generation? I can't see any. People will have to clean the devices, organic matter doesn't rot away into nothing. There are components to the waste generated by the bacteria organisms. you cant really stick in food and have it *all* gone ..

    i see problems that are going to be difficult to fix. We already have a huge waste management system. It wouldn't be that much of a stretch for waste management to begin compost of organic waste and become power stations with the tech available. then the generated energy can just be stored in traditional batteries. it doesnt seem that these organic batteries offer any improved life over chemical batteries at all.

  23. Osmolarity by bluveinr · · Score: 5, Informative

    The reason raw sugar won't work, is because it will kill the ecoli. The water content in the bug is much higher than that in the surrounding media(pure sugar in this case). The water will will move towards the region of the high sugar content (following the gradient of high water concentration to low). This will dessicate the ecoli and kill them.

  24. Batteries that poop by timeOday · · Score: 4, Funny
    Using such low-density fuel,there will be waste...

    Be sure your batteries get plenty of fiber to avoid constipation.

  25. Are you mad? by delphi125 · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Silly... less efficient than large scale counterparts... I can't see any [benefits to localizing the energe generation]

    I don't even know where to begin! Converting organic matter to electricity on demand on a portable scale - and you dismiis it as silly!

    I'm a bit rusty on my recycling but:

    1. Primary: re-use for original purpose (e.g. second-hand clothes)
    2. Secondary: re-use for alternative purpose (e.g. clothes as wiping rags)
    3. Tertiary: reclamation of materials (e.g. clothes as paper fibre)
    4. Quaternery: reclamation of energy (e.g. burning the clothes to warm you up)
    So unless you like eating someone elses left-overs, want to replant the seeds of the tomato they've eaten, or make a halloween pumpkin, you are left with energy or land-fill. Silly energy!?

    I simply don't understand the argument that it is more efficient to gather the waste to a central location (by truck?), burn/convert it there, transmit across a high voltage line to your house, charge a NiCd, etc, than to stuff your leftovers in a CD size case and get energy provided by nature's best organic catalysts in the middle of no-where, or at the bottom of your loo.

    Or were you planning to hook up all of Africa to the American grid? This would be ideal for families in developing countries to run a lamp bulb (or radio, or even a computer) off after 6 p.m. on the equator.

    Gaah, nuff said.

  26. My battery died... by pcraven · · Score: 5, Funny

    Now when we say our battery died, we'll mean it literally.

    1. Re:My battery died... by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 4, Funny

      Lysol is now considered a terrorist substance capable of striking out electricity infrastructure!

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    2. Re:My battery died... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      That must be why Al Jazeera is covering the story.

  27. 'Cheap and stable' by Channard · · Score: 5, Insightful

    While this development certainly sounds interesting, calling something cheap and stable based soley on a prototype wihout major major long-term testing seems to be jumping the gun a little.

  28. Bacteria power! by denisdekat · · Score: 2, Funny

    Finally my B.O. is more than just a pretty smell...

    1. Re:Bacteria power! by dcphoenix · · Score: 2, Funny

      That'll be how you recharge them. Once they die, just stick them under your arms for five minutes. Either that or leave them in my kitchen for a few seconds.

    2. Re:Bacteria power! by xanadu-xtroot.com · · Score: 2, Funny

      leave them in my kitchen for a few seconds

      Wouldn't any of our Computer Desks make for a better enviroment? I guess if you look at it that way, the battery would almost never die...

      --
      I'm not a prophet or a stone-age man,
      I'm just a mortal with potential of a super man.
  29. Hidden cost of health care by Trigun · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What happens when these batteries rupture, bringing cultured bacteria to the surface to wreak havoc on all living beings?

    I'm telling you, it's SARS from cars. /tinfoil

  30. One more piece to the puzzle by Mycroft_514 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This sounds like a neat power source for nano-technology. Power the nanobots off the sugar in the bloodstream.

    And some get entered just to remove sugar from the bloodstreams of diabetics. Where do I sign up for that? (I'm a type II diabetic already, this could stave off more drastic treatment for years.)

    1. Re:One more piece to the puzzle by djeaux · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Well, if a massive bacterial infection sounds like a good cure for diabetes, you might want to sign up for my new cure for the common cold: a shot of malaria. ;-)

      But the idea of sugar-powered nanobots is pretty nifty, so give yourself a triple word score & I can avoid the "M" word. Seems that those nanobots would need some pretty sophisticated membrane technology, though...

      --
      "Obviously, I'm not an IBM computer any more than I'm an ashtray" (Bob Dylan)
    2. Re:One more piece to the puzzle by Dot.Com.CEO · · Score: 3, Insightful

      No offence intended, but rather than waiting for nano-robots to cure you, perhaps you should eat proper foods and exercise. That would stave off more drastic treatment for years, certainly.

      --
      Mother is the best bet and don't let Satan draw you too fast.
    3. Re:One more piece to the puzzle by Mycroft_514 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Many people have genetic pre-disposition to diabetis. I'm one. Exercise will and does help, but the big problem is the trauma to my system (cancer) has caused some of my system to start to slow down. Net effect is diabetis.

      My brother had part of his pancreas burned out, thus causing diabetis. This was much better than periodic temporary paralysis.

      So, before you spout off on "diet and exercise", you might check into the facts.

      Oh, and my mother was a type I diabetic, from age 10 onwards. Her diabetis was brought on by German Measles, as best as current medical science can tell. The immune system was thrown out of wack by the GM and attacked her pancreas. This is one method that can cause diabetis.

    4. Re:One more piece to the puzzle by Dot.Com.CEO · · Score: 5, Insightful

      As I said, no offence had been intended. I sidestepped diabetes by apparently a very very narrow step last year. My sugar levels were pretty high and I managed to put them down to normal levels through a sugar-free diet and regular aerobic exercise. I also know people who have diabetes and they simply don't care, which is weird enough since the consequences can be grave, if not lethal. One of them reflected what I thought was the point of your post "there will eventually be a cure so why should I diet", something I find stupid, especially since he's fast approaching 200 kilos. It was that attitude I was replying to, not the specific of your situation - you actually have my sympathies as well as my apology for any offence perceived.

      --
      Mother is the best bet and don't let Satan draw you too fast.
    5. Re:One more piece to the puzzle by LINM · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Once we can make nanobots, I'm sure we'll be able to copy the electicity creating process of the bacteria in a significantly more efficient and more controllable nano-design (without needing much of the unneeded material in a bacterium: a lot of wasted overhead).

      In addition to type II diabetes, would also be great for obesity and those who just want to eat more. Super-size me!

      --

      Hunger is the best sauce.

    6. Re:One more piece to the puzzle by HiThere · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Doesn't it rather depend on what the bacteria do? I can practically guarantee that you have several massive bacterial infections currently. Fortunately almost all such infections are either non-harmful, or even benign (as in one step short of symbiotic).

      There would be nothing particularlly strange about designing a bacteria that could eat sugar and churn out insulin, with the levels of insulin dependant on the level of sugar. Of course, you'd need to design it to be extremely resistant to mutations, because I can thing of several mutations that would benefit the bacteria, but not the colonized individual. (And you'd probably also need to design it to be suseptible to some particular unusual anti-biotic. Preferably one that isn't used for any purpose besides removing mutated colonies.)

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  31. Scary. by cybermace5 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Walk away from the conference table for a few seconds, when you come back there are no doughnuts left! Just a laptop and cell phone sitting there innocently. They'll never tell....

    --
    ...
  32. The Matrix is Real by toofanx · · Score: 5, Funny

    . . . for the bacteria.

  33. Jolt! by nherc · · Score: 3, Funny

    So, that case of Jolt will now keep BOTH you and your laptop going for that all-nighter! Very convenient.

    --
    'He was a dreamer, a thinker, a speculative philosopher... or, as his wife would have it, an idiot.' - Douglas Adams
  34. Obligatory Beowulf reference by Crypto+Gnome · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The downside, however, is that it's a slow process. That cup of sugar could take weeks to digest. Still, a slow but steady trickle of electricity can be used to charge up a battery, which can then discharge large amounts of power when needed.

    Obviously stacking a large cluster of these in a battery type configuration would solve the voltage/current supply issue.

    --
    Visit CryptoGnome in his home.
  35. I can see the commercials no by yoshi1013 · · Score: 3, Funny

    "Just a spoonful of sugar makes the cell phone turn on, the cell phone turn on..."

  36. All I know is by Multiple+Sanchez · · Score: 3, Funny

    When the bacteria take over, there is gonna be MAJOR payback.

    1. Re:All I know is by jaf · · Score: 4, Funny

      Can't believe nobody said it yet, but

      I for one welcome our new bacteria overlords..

      --
      -- jaf
  37. Are nationalities that important? by Jon+Abbott · · Score: 4, Insightful
    ...researchers Swades Chaudhuri, an Indian, and Derek Lovley, an American...
    My question of the morning -- what is the point of providing the nationalities of these researchers in the article description? Is it supposed to affect how we view the research that has been conducted?
    1. Re:Are nationalities that important? by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 2, Funny

      That's just to overcome everyone's assumption in the US that unless stated otherwise, it was invented here, back in WWII.

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    2. Re:Are nationalities that important? by NihilSmurf · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Excellent point. Notice that the Al Jazeera version mentioned the nationalities, but the USA Today version didn't.

      I wonder whether Swades Chaudhuri is an American born in India (or of Indian descent), or an Indian citizen? It isn't relevant to the research, but it could reveal Al Jazeera's spin.

      Also notice how Al Jazeera said that was a "Pentagon-backed" project at the top of the article, while USA Today said it was DOD funded way down at the bottom.

    3. Re:Are nationalities that important? by bug-eyed+monster · · Score: 2, Interesting

      In most countries outside the Western hemisphere, there are still few immigrants from non-neighboring countries (unless of course they come from the colonizing countries). So the idea of nationality is still very strong and significant. Al Jazeera would have mentioned the nationalities even if the researchers were Chinese and French.

      Also, outside North America the Pentagon is the symbol of American military and people use "Pentagon" and "American army" interchangeably, most of them haven't even heard of "DOD." You say potehto I say potahto...

      Basically, the contrasts you see are simply due to differences in cultures. Peace.

  38. I'll save a fortune! by stu_coates · · Score: 2, Funny

    If this comes through my fridge could be self powering by using that really old yoghurt that's in it! ;-)

  39. Home brew power by grub · · Score: 2, Funny


    My underwear could generate a few megawatts.

    --
    Trolling is a art,
  40. 83%? by adeyadey · · Score: 5, Interesting

    83% Efficient? Thats impressive, if true. If you think that a typical car engine is only 20% efficient. Maybe one day you could run your car on Glucose..

    --
    "You lied to me! There is a Swansea!"
    1. Re:83%? by simong_oz · · Score: 2, Informative

      You can't compare the two - a car engine, ie. internal combustion engine, works on a heat cycle and so it's thermal efficiency (which is different from mechanical efficiency) is limited by what is known as the carnot cycle efficiency (=[Th-Tc]/Th; google for "carnot cycle" if interested further). The carnot cycle efficiency for internal combustion (petrol/gasoline for the Americans ;-) !) engines is about 59% (going from a hazy memory here), average car engine efficiency is more like ~32% so the efficiency of a car engine is not as bad as everyone thinks.

      On the other hand your bacteria are working on chemical processes, where the chemical conversion processes (should be) much much more efficient. I've got no numbers to back it up, but my feeling is that 83% is not a particularly high efficiency for a chemical conversion process.

      --
      "Because it's there." - George Mallory, when asked why he wanted to climb Mt Everest, March 18, 1923 (New York Times)
    2. Re:83%? by adeyadey · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well done, I was waiting for you to spot that.. :-)

      The 83% does not include the loss in any electric motor, nor in any of the other circuitry/mechanics..

      I suppose where you live as to the % you get out of a car engine - manufacturers figures are usually very optmistic. In some citys you spend a lot of time in jams, with the engine idling over. Someone commputed the average speed in London of traffic to be about 11 mph. I would guess 32% is rarly achieved by a normal petrol car user in London.

      THen we get into the whole electric vs petro-electric vs hydrogen/electric etc.. Electric hybrids seem best in cities, as you can switch off the big petrol/hydro/fuel cell an idle around on batteries at low speeds, and recharge using regenerative braking..

      But if the efficiency v size/weight is good, no reason why the power cell cant be bio. Biggest problem is that you can just switch it on/off - big run up/down time..

      --
      "You lied to me! There is a Swansea!"
    3. Re:83%? by cactopus · · Score: 2, Funny

      83% Efficient? Thats impressive, if true. If you think that a typical car engine is only 20% efficient. Maybe one day you could run your car on Glucose..

      Damn... and then putting sugar in someone's gas tank won't be a way to disable their car...

    4. Re:83%? by adeyadey · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You forget - the sugar would be from a bio source, so to make it the plant would have absorbed CO2, H2O and power from the sun & used photosythesis to make Sugar. When you burn the sugar you release that same CO2 back into the atmosphere, but there is no net increase in CO2!

      The problem is probably economic, It means a lot of land to grow enough sugar to fuel lots of cars, and a lot of power harvest and to transport it about. Probably better to use solar cells/wind power & get the electric direct that way..

      --
      "You lied to me! There is a Swansea!"
  41. Bio-cybernetics? by SealBeater · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I wonder how safe these bacteria are? Not in any fearful way, but could they
    be used to power an artificial heart, getting the sugar from the body? Perhaps
    power artificial limbs?

    SealBeater

    --
    -- Its survival of the fittest...and we got the fucking guns!!!
  42. Deja Fuel? by greenhide · · Score: 4, Informative

    There was an article on this nearly a year ago. As soon as I saw this, I assumed I was looking at a dupe. However, the earlier battery was developed in England, and part of the goal was to eventually have the battery run not off of pure sugar, but rather garbage. As you can imagine, witty comments about Mr. Fusion and the general cleaniness level of geeks ensued.

    --
    Karma: Chevy Kavalierma.
  43. Batteries for Christmas! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Instead of kids needing batteries for toys, they'll all be going, 'mommy, can I have a pet battery for Christmas?'.

    Now your Mighty Morphin' Power Ranger really does have power, and it really morphs too, albeit into a green blob of goo that will probably stain the carpet and be toxic to eat.

  44. Chemistry question by rzbx · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It doesn't state how much sugar it needs, nor the cost for electricity based on sugar prices. Any chemist know how 83% efficiency translates into cost and amount of sugar needed for a certain amount of power consumption?

    --
    Question everything.
    1. Re:Chemistry question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      You don't need a chemist for that. Simply take the Calories per gram of sugar (google: 2.44 Calories (kilocalories) per gram).

      83% of that is ~2 Calories.

      1 kilowatt is equivalent to 14.34 kilocalories per minute, which is about 7 grams per minute.

      So, about 420 grams of sugar (a bit under a pound) is needed to produce 1 kilowatt.

      However, as the article states, it takes a long time to produce the energy (how long i don't recall, nor feel like looking), so essentially to charge up a chemical battery for the potential of 1 kilowatt, you would need to have the bacteria metabolize around a pound of sugar. But this is a function of the number of bacteria, and probably the efficiency of getting the sugar distributed to the bacteria depending on size.

    2. Re:Chemistry question by Insightfill · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Well, in the US, sugar (crystal, cane, etc.) prices are kept artificially high through protectionism. Maybe these germs can run off of corn syrup?

      It got so bad that American companies were importing iced tea mix to extract the sugar and get around the tariff. That soon got caught. Some American companies actually would have a Canadian branch/company convert sugar to molasses, import the exempt molasses, and convert it back to sugar. That got caught, too.

      The price difference got bad enough that the LifeSavers are now no longer made in the US, but Canada. I wonder how longer before an enterprising company imports the LifeSavers to extract the sugar.

      I guess the question of economics depends, as usual, on where you live.

    3. Re:Chemistry question by ramk13 · · Score: 2, Informative

      (from http://members.nuvox.net/~on.jwclymer/rq/)
      The molecular weight of glucose is 180 g/mol. The calculated heat of combustion is 2830 kJ/mol, or 3.8 kcals/g.

      2830 kJ/mol / 180 g/mol * 0.83 = 13 kJ/g
      1 kWh = 60 min * 60 s/min * 1000 J/s = 3600 kJ
      3600 kJ / 13 kJ/g ~= 280 grams of sugar for 1 kWh or power
      Can't find a good price for sugar, but 1 kWh of electricty is not more than 10-15 cents in the US. I have a feeling that half a pound of sugar is way more than that...

    4. Re:Chemistry question by eric2hill · · Score: 2, Funny

      Just use LifeSavers as the battery. Instead of a pair of double-A's, get a roll of double-mints.

      --
      LOAD "SIG",8,1
      LOADING...
      READY.
      RUN
  45. Re:Spirits Within by ampathee · · Score: 2, Funny

    yeah they did that in that other movie too
    i think it was called The Matrix :p

  46. I can hear the radicals now... by mblase · · Score: 4, Funny

    Free the battery bacteria!
    No slavery for electricity!
    How many Rhodoferax died for your Walkman today?
    Single-celled life forms are people too!


    Et cetera, et cetera....

    1. Re:I can hear the radicals now... by sielwolf · · Score: 2, Insightful

      All wackiness aside, this is an interesting point. Of course the article is sparse but I assume the battery allows for A) the bacteria to consume as much sugar as they wish, and B) allows them to reproduce as often as possible. And as far as I can tell, that is the sum purpose of existence for these little guys.

      So then the question of 'slavery' all comes down to perspective: is it slavery when there is in fact no limitation on your lifestyle? Or is the 'sense' of slavery enough (i.e. to feel enslaved is to be enslaved)? As far as I can tell the bacteria wouldn't care. So I'd think this woul be best characterized as a symbiotic relationship.

      Anyway, I'm waaayy OT but thanks for opportunity to post-jack.

      --
      What is music when you despise all sound?
  47. HEH! by CheeseEatingBulldog · · Score: 3, Funny

    Coffee sweetners become the new unleaded.

    --

    It's always funny until someone gets hurt. Then it's just hilarious. -B.Hicks-
  48. Unreleased picture of prototype... by ryanvm · · Score: 2, Funny

    Amazingly, I've been able to obtain this confidential photograph of their prototype.

  49. Don't hold your breath by Rolken · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "Where we are now is where solar power was 20 or 30 years ago." So we have a few more decades to bicker about it while they make a working device.

    1. Re:Don't hold your breath by thogard · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Solar is not almost useable. If there are power shortages this summer we are getting solar planels on the roof.

  50. This won't fly, literally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Now when they x-ray your laptop at the airport, either:

    a) your batteries will all die or
    b) they'll mutate into a super hero or villan and take over the city.

    Regradless, this is just another typical slashdot "Technology of the FUTURE!" article about something that we'll never hear about again. 99% of all "new technology" articles on slashdot just sort of fade away.

  51. Re:Nice technology - wrong forum to highlight it o by AlecC · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I know this will be modded OffTopic, but I think it important to reply to this (and I have karma to burn).

    It is important to see the other man's point of view. One of the problems in Iraq at the moment is incomprehsnsion between the US forces and the locals. I agree that Al Jazeera does reflect an anti-US viewpoint. However, it does not create such a viewpoint - it reflects that of the world in which it lives. AJ is not killing US soldiers - is just speaks the same language as people who are. If you disregard all Arabs as "anti US terrorists", you will never achieve enough understanding if the Arab world to retire from Iraq gracefully.

    Apart from the fact that the AJ piece is an amost exact dupe of the SpaceDaily article, it is an entirely impartial report about a piece of US innovation. It makes the US look good. What is bad about quoting an Arab source saying good things about the US? You need that - Arabs don't read the New York Times, they read Al Jazeera.

    --
    Consciousness is an illusion caused by an excess of self consciousness.
  52. applicable on humans? by dharash · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The process that is core to this experiment(breaking down of sugar ) takes place in our bodies also.
    How long will it take for researchers to come up with a method to tap the extra energy in human beings(that usually gets converted to fat)? And then, when your cell goes dead - you'll have to eat more sugar :-)
    Further imagine what would happen if some major energy company decided to couple this knowledge with genetic cloning? Welcome to the real world!

  53. it all depends on the dose... by jlemmerer · · Score: 2, Insightful

    even if we use "harmless" bacteria, nobody knows how they will influence our health and above all - the ecosystem - if they really are cultivated in large masses to satisfy the market for battery's. so what if the "living battery" is depleted, how do you prevent the bacteria from spreading like a wildfire and eventually mutating in something harmful? before this tech should go into large scale production, massive, and i emphazise the word !massive!, tests about the implications on human immunesystem and the ecosystem of this sort of bacteria should be conducted

    --
    ".Sig Stealer" was here
    1. Re:it all depends on the dose... by jandrese · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Are you planning to eat these batteries or something? I'd imagine the bacteria would be prevented from spreading by being outside of it's natual habitat, underground.

      I've got a scary fact for you. All of the surfaces around you are covered in bacteria. Even that chair, even your bottle of soap, even the water faucets. You cant get away from them. They're everywhere. If you aren't in a full fledged panic yet, you might remember that humans have lived with bactera for as long as their have been humans. The vast majority of them are harmless to humans.

      It's also unlikly that a company would release a battery that killed everyone who bought it, and traditional batteries aren't exactly nice to the environment, so the bar is not set very high for these things to be more eco-friendly.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    2. Re:it all depends on the dose... by jlemmerer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      well i know that bacteria are everywhere... but nobody (except pharma and wmd company's) actually produced them in great masses an released them in an everyday product. also bacteria are very well known for the fact to mutate rather rapidly and spread REALLY fast.

      --
      ".Sig Stealer" was here
  54. Battery Abuse by niko9 · · Score: 2, Funny

    So if I catch someone recharging a half discharged battery do I report them?

  55. Strange definition of "tiny amount of current" by vadim_t · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The prototype made by Lovley and Chaudhuri cranks out only a tiny amount of current -- enough to run a calculator or Christmas tree lights.


    A calculator uses really tiny amounts of current compared to Christmas tree lights. My calculator hasn't had a battery charge in years, and my watch has a calculator in it too. Christmas lights got to use hunderds of times more power in comparison.
  56. Someone tell the Wachowski brothers.... by mblase · · Score: 4, Funny
    We've now got a solution to the whole Matrix enigma. The machines can just unplug all the humans and harness bacteria instead.

    I can imagine the new movie already....
    "You are the One-Celled, Neo."
    "You bacteria are a disease, a plague on this planet... but I guess you already knew that...."
    "Somehow he's found a way to copy himself. 'Mitosis,' I think he called it."
  57. Ok, bacteria aren't yeast, but by e-gold · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'm still wondering if this variety of battery would have any ethyl alcohol output...

    I could use a laptop battery that puts out a nice little shot of vodka for the end of the day. This feature could also motivate users to take very-good care of their bacteria.
    JMR

    --
    Try e-gold - (contact me). I'm NOT e-
  58. well... by mantera · · Score: 2, Funny


    I wonder if this means energy plants in the future will be pretty rotten places.

  59. Effects of heat? by popo · · Score: 2, Interesting


    Interesting story. Given that the power is generated by bacteria, my first question would have to be: Is an optimal temperature required for bacterial function / electrical generation?

    Maintaining a warm environment for the sake of the bacteria would certainly rule out plenty of uses from cars to flashlights, and most importantly: that little light that goes on when you open your freezer.

    --
    ------ The best brain training is now totally free : )
  60. Great! Now my battery can get a virus too. by G4from128k · · Score: 5, Insightful

    As biological systems, these battery bacteria should be susceptible to a host of illnesses -- viruses (called bacteriophages), mold, other bacteria, etc.. Swiping a packet of sugar from the restaurant to fuel a laptop might get you some extra surfing time (about half an hour according to my back-of-the-envelope-calcs) or it may get you some nasty battery disease. Will we need public service announcements on practicing safe laptop recharging?

    Sugar may be cheap, but sterilized sugar solution in a handy refill cartridge will cost a pretty penny. And, yes, it only means more sweet spam.

    --
    Two wrongs don't make a right, but three lefts do.
  61. Dear god, kill me now by Rogerborg · · Score: 2, Funny

    Just as I was getting set up to rant, I discover that "prolly" is now a recognised acronym for "probably".

    To newspeak is good. I did plus ungood thoughtcrime.

    --
    If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
  62. yoghurt for starters by wadiwood · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Yoghurt contains mass produced bacteria.

    Most soft cheeses like Camenbert and Brie depend on bacteria for their production.

    Bacteria is used in most sewerage treatment plants.

    You're hatching them in your gut and every day you shit them. Multiply that by everyone in your city, the world etc and be very afraid. Ie you are mass producing them.

    Did you know living in an environment artificially depleted of bacteria (eg too much bleach), can increase your chances of things like Asthma?

    Bacteria are used every day by farmers to control other pests like mould and fungus and caterpillers (dipel). (Ironically penicillin is a fungus to control bacteria). Bacteria are also important to good quality soil and natural recycling of vegetation and animal manure.

    It probably wouldn't be a good idea to eat your phone battery, but that's no reason to be afraid of it.

    Bacteria only multiply out of control in very favourable conditions. That's why they say you should keep your food refrigerated or boiling ie keep your food at temperatures not conducive to growing toxic bacteria like some salmonella.

    I suppose you still eat chicken or eggs? The salmonella is not completely eliminated, only minimised...

    And bacteria doesn't generally "spread" really fast without help.

    --

    -- it must be true, it's on the internet.
  63. Re:Nice technology - wrong forum to highlight it o by AlecC · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Women are not allowed to drive in Saudi Arabia.
    Al Jazeera comes freom Qatar, where women are allowed to drive - as they are in Iraq and most of the rest of the Arab world.

    You prove my point - you are treating the Arab world as if it was a monolithic whole, then apply the worst of the worst to the whole. Of cvourse Al Quaida and Saddams thugs are murderous thugs. Bu they are no more typical of the whole Arab world than the Klu Klux Klan are typical of the USA.

    --
    Consciousness is an illusion caused by an excess of self consciousness.
  64. Re:Al-Jazeera by barryfandango · · Score: 4, Funny

    Have you read USA Today before?

    From Al Jazeera:

    "The bug in question is Rhodoferax ferriducens, which was found in airless sediment deep below ground at a terrestrial site at Oyster Bay, Virginia, and identified as a promising candidate for oxidising simple sugars."

    USA Today:

    "Bacteria are tiny living things. So tiny you can't even see them with your eyes! You need a microscope to see them. Microscopes help scientists see very small things."



    note: usa today quote made up for fun's sake.

    --
    In all matters of opinion, our adversaries are insane. -Oscar Wilde
  65. Re:PROLLY!!!???!!! by canajin56 · · Score: 2, Funny

    wats ur prob? lngwg alwys evolvs. lemme ax u somfin, do u use cntractns? prolly do, sinc u sed "I'll". dis is no diffrnt, u only sav 2 lttrs.

    Ow. That sprained my language center.

    --
    ASCII stupid question, get a stupid ANSI
  66. Arthur C Clarke beat them to it - again by Alain+Williams · · Score: 2, Informative

    Arthur C Clarke talked about this years ago in one of the Rendezvous with Rama trilogy - technology from the giant spiders IIRC.

  67. Bacterial Matrix by defishguy · · Score: 3, Funny

    Somewhere, there is a tiny bacteria named NEO being offered a blue pill.....

  68. Mr. Fusion by ThenAgain · · Score: 3, Funny

    One step closer.

  69. It was the Simpsons, and it was ants by Cappy+Red · · Score: 3, Informative

    It was the episode where Homer became an astronaut. He was up on the shuttle, and he ended up breaking an ant farm and releasing all the ants. So the ants were floating around in the microgravity, and when Kent Brockman was relaying the story on the news, the picture that came in from the shuttle was an ant on the camera, and many floating around in the background.

    (A page on the episode, with the quote)

    So Kent Brockman says:
    "Ladies and gentlemen, er, we've just lost the picture, but, uh, what we've seen speaks for itself. The Corvair spacecraft has been taken over -- "conquered", if you will -- by a master race of giant space ants. It's difficult to tell from this vantage point whether they will consume the captive earth men or merely enslave them. One thing is for certain, there is no stopping them; the ants will soon be here. And I, for one, welcome our new insect overlords. I'd like to remind them that as a trusted TV personality, I can be helpful in rounding up others to toil in their underground sugar caves."

    Great episode. A very good one to watch, if you get a chance.


    *honks*

    --
    This is my sig. It's prescription, I swear. I need it for reading things... on the other side of things
  70. Re:Nice technology - wrong forum to highlight it o by PeteyG · · Score: 2, Interesting

    But it's extremely unfortunate and in poor taste that Slashdot choose to highlight it using Al Jazeera as a news source. This news outlet is the largest voice of anti-US sentiment in the Arab world and is a particularly offensive forum to highight while our soldiers are still dying in that area of the world.

    Uhm... it's unfortunate yes. But ONLY because Al-Jazeera is such an unreliable source of accurate news.

    --
    no thanks
  71. That's not actually theoretical by Effugas · · Score: 2, Informative

    Of course, this was the concept behind the Dracucell, which theoretically will be able to extract about 100W from the bloodstream (though actual efficiencies will be quite a bit below that).

    I suspect Dracucells will do wonders for the diabetic population.

    --Dan

  72. Nothing new about this by mesocyclone · · Score: 2, Informative

    I built a bacterial fuel cell (from their description, identical except for the bacterial species) as a high school science project in 1964! We just used some bacteria from the Kansas River.

    It worked... dump in sugar, get out current.

    I think what is new here is the high level of efficiency.

    --

    The only good weather is bad weather.

  73. existing robot runs from bacteria fuel-cell by rtv · · Score: 3, Informative
  74. Al Jazeera is one source among many by ianscot · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Funny -- I read their story first, mostly to see if I could spot any particular bias or overriding point of view. I will say, the Al Jazeera project clearly identified the Pentagon's connection to the project:

    In a Pentagon-backed project, University of Massachusetts researchers Swades Chaudhuri, an Indian, and Derek Lovley, an American, say the battery's source is an underground bacterium that gobbles up sugar and converts its energy into electricity.

    They didn't go on to show any especial suspicion about that, they just noted it. Later on, at the end of the article, they described the Military applications -- "the US Department of Defence was interested in it for powering underwater microphones and sonar to spot passing ships and submarines." They were quite positive, all told, describing the batteries as remarkable for a proof-of-concept. They mentioned applications in impoverished areas, using batteries working from sewage for example.

    On the other hand, USA Today didn't mention the Pentagon connection, describing the scientists only as being "at the University of Massachusetts-Amherst." The USA Today story was considerably shorter, lacked Al Jazeera's detailed description of how the thing worked ("...each side containing a graphite electrode and separated by a membrane. On one side was R ferriducens swimming in a glucose solution, which it broke down into carbon dioxide (CO2) and electrons. The electrons were transported to the nearby electrode...") and just generally read much more superficially.

    I wouldn't describe the Al Jazeera story as amazingly well-written -- it included some grammatical slips that read as if they'd been made in translation -- but it was a more complete bit of reporting by far, and showed no determined bias other than noting the military connection in a neutral way, IMHO.

    I'd bet the story's submitter included that Al Jazeera link because it's just plain better. Take a look yourself.

    (And as far as the world news thing goes, you should try to understand why it is that the Arab world watches this channel rather than the Western World's channels, which they see as bought and paid for by US corporate interests. It is a point of view, and you might want to understand it even if you don't agree.)

    --
    "Fundamentalism" isn't about divine morality. It's about human authority.
  75. Lysol should have a field day with this one. by Frobozz0 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Lysol. Kills 99% of airborne bacteria. Now with patented Dura-kill for those tough to reach batteries.

    --
    "Politicians find new names for institutions which under old names have become odious to the people."