Slashdot Mirror


KDE 3.2 Alpha 1 Finally on FTP

An anonymous reader cut-and-pastes from the announcement: "Stephan Kulow finally managed to get the last bits of the KDE 3.2 Alpha 1 codenamed 'Brokenboring' including KDevelop 3.0 Alpha 6 on the ftp server (the mirrors should soon pick it up). There won't be any binary packages for this release because the KDE 'P(a)i' release is coming out soon. Everyone using it is asked to compile it with --enable-debug, so we can get valuable feedback. There is a new unstable version of Konstruct to install it."

54 of 285 comments (clear)

  1. Re:So... by Trigun · · Score: 2, Funny

    Both, all the boring parts are broken, and all the broken parts are boring.

    It's trying to compete with XP for the desktop.

  2. Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Building the alpha version with an unstable Konstruct... I opt for both.

  3. KDE most impressive open source project - ever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The progress that these guys have made in 5 years and the sheer volume of quality code is simply amazing. What are these guys doing right as compared to all the other projects? They even stick to their development and release schedules better than most commercial companies. And despite everyone calling for the death of C++, KDE is the shining example of what can be accomplished in that language. I seriously doubt it could have been constructed in any other language and produce as quick and relatively error-free code as these guys have produced.

    1. Re:KDE most impressive open source project - ever by RoLi · · Score: 3, Interesting
      What are these guys doing right as compared to all the other projects?

      In my opinion, the KDE guys are just a bunch of hackers that do it for fun with not much political, religious and legal considerations.

      Technical considerations are always number 1 for KDE. As an example, KDE has chosen QT because of it's clean design - despite the license which could have been interpreted as incompatible (or just evil) by some at that time. (Today it's GPLed)

    2. Re:KDE most impressive open source project - ever by RoLi · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Yet, it pales in comparison to the accomplishment that "could have been" if they had collaborated with the Gnome team (or verse visa) to create one standard desktop.

      Which is? IMO KDE delivers a complete desktop without any major shortcomings. Could you come up with an example?

      Also GNOME was started because at that time QT was not GPLed and the goal was to replace KDE/Qt.

      "Replace" means "destroy" in the software world which isn't a very good start for cooperation.

    3. Re:KDE most impressive open source project - ever by TomorrowPlusX · · Score: 5, Insightful

      So?

      The moc is a hack that brings key c++ functionality to even the most mediocre c++ compilers. What's wrong with that? Sure, the syntax is different, but at least then there's no confusion about what's going on.

      Have you ever tried to do *heavy* templated c++ code and have it be cross-platform? Have you written complex code relying on functors and it work on dozens of different c++ compilers? Good luck, chief.

      All the moc does is use preprocessor trickery to make sure that functor mechanisms are completely functional regardless of compiler. Sure, it hides string invocation of methods in a SIGNAL() and SLOT() macro. Big deal. It works, beautifully, and between KDevelop and KDE's autoconf scripts, it's all hidden.

      If you don't like the moc, why don't you go out and fix all the compilers for all the platforms that Qt runs on.

      --

      lorem ipsum, dolor sit amet
    4. Re:KDE most impressive open source project - ever by 10Ghz · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Yet, it pales in comparison to the accomplishment that "could have been" if they had collaborated with the Gnome team


      Then talk to the Gnome-team. After all, it was the Gnome-folks who set out to reinvent the wheel. KDE was started before Gnome was even a twinkle in de Icazas eyes.

      And besides, "standard desktop" on Linux is not possible. People will run whatever suits their needs, you can't force them to run some "standard desktop". Besides, competition between the two desktops is a GOOD thing!
      --
      Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
    5. Re:KDE most impressive open source project - ever by JimDabell · · Score: 4, Informative

      Yes, in case people aren't aware, KDE, like most projects that use the Qt toolkit, rely on a preprocessor to do a little of the work. Specifically, the C++ language is extended slightly to cover the concept of slots and signals, which is a very expressive way of coding up a GUI application.

    6. Re:KDE most impressive open source project - ever by swillden · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yet, it pales in comparison to the accomplishment that "could have been" if they had collaborated with the Gnome team (or verse visa) to create one standard desktop.

      I disagree. The two desktops compete (even though they say they don't), trying to keep up with one another, stealing each other's good ideas and enhancing them with their own. The result is much faster progress on both that would have been achieved by either individually.

      Further, it's a mistake to think that both GNOME and KDE are drawing on the same limited pool of development talent, for two reasons. First, the set of C programmers and the set of C++ programmers are pretty much disjoint. Sure, the syntax has common roots, but philosophy and approach are worlds apart, and pushing the camps together would just create massive infighting. Second, competition generates excitement, excitement generates interest and *interest* is what drives open source development.

      Your statement holds the implicit assumption that if a KDE didn't exist, the KDE developers would have been hacking on GNOME, and vice versa, but I'd be surprised if there would be more than a bare handful for whom this is true.

      Now we have two competing desktops with the users sitting on the sidelines waiting for a winner.

      Who's sitting and waiting? Both environments are very usable (IMO, both are far superior to Windows), and users are free to pick the one they want. Or, in the case of the newbie or the corporate desktop, have one picked for them.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    7. Re:KDE most impressive open source project - ever by Xerithane · · Score: 3, Informative

      You're defending moc when your parent was dissing C++.

      He was even dissing the variances in multiple C++ compilers. That is the reason for moc. You need moc to make sure that it all compiles no matter what your compiler is. There are still a lot of things that are different between compilers (g++ supports array indexing with unsigned longs, VC6 doesn't, for example) and moc takes care of a lot of those.

      It makes C++ easier for doing cross platform development.

      Tell you what, next time I hear someone slagging off the Windows kernel, I'll explain at great length why Windows Media Player isn't as bad as they're making it out to be.

      The only reason why you would be doing that is because you don't understand what moc does.

      moc generates C++ code, sparky.

      --
      Dacels Jewelers can't be trusted.
    8. Re:KDE most impressive open source project - ever by RoLi · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Well, the most obvious one is that's something of an all or nothing proposition. You're either a KDE app (which almost always means C++) and have access to the infrastructure provided, or you aren't. That poses problems for Wine, OpenOffice, Mozilla - not to mention all the desktop neutral software out there like XMMS, Gaim, mplayer and so on.

      Well that is pretty much the nature of the beast: Of course only KDE-aware apps can use KDE-specific features.

      But I agree that for example GTK-prgrammers could have written wrappers to use KDE-dialogs etc.

      That's one side of it, a valid side. But really, the KDE guys made it inevitable when they chose to give two fingers to the philosophy that had made the free software movement possibly in the first place. Having built an entirely free software platform, there were a lot of people who weren't pleased with the idea that it might be compromised by Qt.

      While I agree that the original Qt-license was not perfect, I think KDE has chosen a right balance between being open and getting things done - which also made Linux successful in stark contrast to all the GNU-fanatic projects like the Hurd. So yes, Qt's former license was a concern, but not big enough IMO to stop using KDE.

      This kind of I-only-care-about-licenses-if-it-concerns-me and get-things-done attitude is exactly what Linux and KDE have in common and which is to a great part reason for their success.

      A similar example are binary-only modules in Linux, which were allowed by Linus but most likely not by RMS.

    9. Re:KDE most impressive open source project - ever by IamTheRealMike · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Hmm.. well, desktop-neutral software is neither an issue for KDE or Gnome, so that point is moot.

      Maybe not for the KDE or Gnome projects, but the point is certainly not moot for their users, who often wish to use these apps and have them integrate nicely.

      And, incidentally, they're both horribly bloated and sluggish applications. Frankly, I think KOffice and Konqueror/KHTML have a better long term future, especially now that KOffice will be using the OpenOffice XML document formats and Apple is helping to develop KHTML for their own browser

      That's nice, but my (desktop neutral) project website stats show Konqueror usage to be about 3-4% typically, with Gecko based browsers taking about 60% and the rest being Internet Explorer, so it's not there yet. The hypothetical desktop of the future is nice, but the desktop of today is dominated by Mozilla and OpenOffice, for better or worse.

      OpenOffice and Mozilla are both projects where old, tangled proprietary code was thrown at the community. KOffice and Konqueror, in comparision, are fresh starts.

      Well, I would quibble with that on two points, the first one being that Mozilla was in fact a fresh start itself, and the code, while not always a thing of beauty, isn't as bad as is often made out (I've written patches for Mozilla). OpenOffice, yes, quite probably, but then again it takes time and effort to accrue all those features and filters, and there's no guarantee that had KOffice gone through years of development and got all the features of openoffice that it too would not be seen as bloated and complex.

      On the other hand, the apparent technical and usability advantage of KDE at this point does make me question why GNOME still needs to exist as a seperate project. Is there truly a good reason to not roll them into one unified desktop environment at this point?

      Certainly, there are many. For one, not everybody agrees that KDE has a technical and usability advantage. I know quite a few people who find Gnome easier to use, more elegant UI wise and so on, and I know quite a few people who find the KDE frameworks more technically elegant than Gnomes.

      More to the point, attempting a merge, or cutting off one project, would lose the community a lot of dedicated and smart hackers, a loss we really can't afford.

    10. Re:KDE most impressive open source project - ever by arose · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Fluxbox? If you want a window manager get Ion.

      --
      Analogies don't equal equalities, they are merely somewhat analogous.
    11. Re:KDE most impressive open source project - ever by Tukla · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm impressed! What other techniques do you use to cope with your minute penis?

  4. Brokenboring? by essiescreet · · Score: 4, Funny

    This is awsome, with a name like this how can it be anything other than... er... great, hmmm, what a name.

    1. Re:Brokenboring? by JamesKPolk · · Score: 2, Informative

      The name does fits in with other KDE alpha release names, like Krash.

      Anyway, Brokenboring comes from a proposal that was made during the KDE 3.2 development cycle. "Brockenboring" was the name given to the proposal, and a detractor quickly turned that into "Brokenboring."

      See http://lists.kde.org/?l=kde-core-devel&m=105655450 429442 for the proposal and http://lists.kde.org/?l=kde-core-devel&m=105722962 907440 for some of the criticism.

  5. a native port of kde on osx by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    anyone know if someone is working on a native port of kde to osx?

    1. Re:a native port of kde on osx by Ranger+Rick · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Depends on what you mean by "native". KDE is already working with X11 on OSX.

      We're still working on making it build with Qt/Mac.

      --

      WWJD? JWRTFM!!!

  6. Don't let the source code compilation scare you! by nighty5 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The KDE team have done a fantastic job at providing the necessary tools for even a slightly tech savvy user to upgrade to the latest development release.

    Checkout Konstruct to learn how to run a simple script to download, verify, compile and install the components to get KDE working on your machine.

  7. Doesn't work for me.... by stephenry · · Score: 5, Funny

    I try to download it the other day, but my KBrowser was having KTrouble downloading the KFiles from the KFtp.

    1. Re:Doesn't work for me.... by mblase · · Score: 2, Insightful

      FWIW, Apple users have the same reaction to "iAnything". As do Windows users to "Anything XP" (or "Anything 2000", or "Anything95", or "WinAnything"....)

    2. Re:Doesn't work for me.... by TheRaven64 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, and think fo the portability problems this creates. If someone wants to make a truely cross-platform port of Foomatic, they'd have to call it kigFoomatic XP, which is just ugly.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  8. :: SIGH :: by xanadu-xtroot.com · · Score: 5, Funny

    Man, and 3.1.3 finally finsihed compiling on my 233-MMX just yesterday...

    O-well...

    --
    I'm not a prophet or a stone-age man,
    I'm just a mortal with potential of a super man.
  9. Re:Screen shots by !the!bad!fish! · · Score: 5, Informative
    Here, that wasn't very difficult you know.

    --
    Kids today are tyrants. They contradict their parent, gobble their food, and tyrannize their teachers. - Socrates 400 BC
  10. Live CD with this alpha release? by d-Orb · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I think it would be advantageous to provide a Live CD with the alpha/beta releases, so that people can get into debugging the code straight away (I for instance, cannot download, compile and use KDE easily due to disk space, bandwidth problems. I could however, use a Knoppix version with the alpha release to test around).

    Searching around shows the DragOS Project, but I haven't had time to check it. Does anyone know of similar efforts?

    1. Re:Live CD with this alpha release? by Vexalith · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It strikes me that maintaining an entire Linux LiveCD distribution might be a little too much even for the KDE developers. It could also lead to nasty places, like an "official Linux distribution" for KDE, which is not a place I want to see any desktop environment head towards.

    2. Re:Live CD with this alpha release? by IceFox · · Score: 2, Informative
      Have you checked out dragos? What is DragOS? It is yet another distro based on Knoppix, but DragOS features CVS version of KDE.

      -Benjamin meyer

      --
      Do you changes clothes while making the "chee-chee-cha-cha-choh" transformation sound?
    3. Re:Live CD with this alpha release? by Hieronymus+Howard · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Anyone who isn't capable of compiling an alpha release certainy shouldn't be considering using one.

      HH

  11. Lame K name jokes here! by LMCBoy · · Score: 4, Funny

    Everyone who's going to post a lame joke based on the fact that many KDE apps start with "K", please post them under this thread.

    Here, I'll start: "hey, didja ever notice how a lot of KDE apps start with 'K'?! What's the deal with that? Ha! Ha! Ha! Those KDE guys aren't very 'K-creative' Ha! Ha! Get it??" There, that's about the best one I've ever read, actually.

    --
    Liberal (adj.): Free from bigotry; open to progress; tolerant of others.
  12. Re:Rough? by LMCBoy · · Score: 2, Funny

    Yeah, good thing we do write decent well-documented code, huh?

    --
    Liberal (adj.): Free from bigotry; open to progress; tolerant of others.
  13. Will this have the Dreamweaver killer Quanta 3.2? by Surak · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Eric Laffoon recently made comments in his story about meeting Wil Wheaton statements about GUI capability in Quanta 3.2. If, so the 3.2 release could be a very important milestone for KDE, because it will mean that Dreamweaver finally has competition on Linux for those web developers still stuck on using WYSIWYG html editing tools.

  14. Kolab groupware by esarjeant · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Kolab is looking interesting, and if you combine this with Kontact you could just have the real Lotus Notes killer. With MS Exchange support, the extensibility of Kontact would make it easy to integrate in a Lotus Notes environment as well.

    Ostensibly these look to be part of KDE 3.2, has anyone done the download/compile/install yet that can confirm/deny this.

    This is great stuff, btw. I'm excited that KDE is tackling these kinds of applications, I may just switch back from Moz once the kinks have been worked out.

    --

    Eric Sarjeant
    eric[@]sarjeant.com

    1. Re:Kolab groupware by unborn · · Score: 2, Informative

      Exchange support is not even in the works (yet):

      http://developer.kde.org/development-versions/kd e- 3.2-features.html

      It's marked red there still. I can also attest that there are no signs of Exchange support in CVS ( thanks to my distro providing easy compiles, I update every week ).

  15. Re:Good for technically uninclined. by Vexalith · · Score: 4, Informative

    Quite the opposite opinion here. KDE is great for those who like to fiddle with settings, but I'm seeing here another release with yet more options to fiddle.

    I like the ability to customise, but it has to be said some of the menus in konqueror and konsole and various other core parts of KDE are a bit messy at the moment. I see they're working to improve the situation in konqueror's file management mode but I still think a lot more could be done.

    A lot of the options in kcontrol could be better grouped and so be more intuitive and obvious, without removing things completely. If the devs could do this, then I'd might switch, since for me KDE now looks good (with Plastik, hopefully the default in KDE4) and is much faster than it used to be.

  16. Re:Follow the money. by Roberto · · Score: 2, Informative

    Canopy doesnt fund Troll Tech.

    Canopy owns some 6% or whatever of Troll Tech.

    Maybe you are not familiar with how corporations work, but usually, the company pays dividends to the stockholders (or not), but the company doesnt send the stockholders the companys bills.

    Canopy did finance Troll Tech once, when they bought the shares. Around 1998, IIRC. You know, when Caldera was still a Linux company.

  17. Microsofts Nightmare. by Qbertino · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I had a close look at post 3.0 KDE at the LinuxTag earlier this year. I'm still very much a windowmanager fan with E, Fluxbox and Windowmaker on my favorites list. But after I had a guy from the KDE booth show me all the stuff that I can change and activate to get KWin (KDEs WM) away from the default of emulating MS Windows crappines and closer to E/Windowmaker/Fluxbox usability features I thougt I'd give a pure KDE enviroment a chance on Debian Woody with KDE 3.1. It o\/\/nZ0Rz nearly every other desktop I've worked with.
    The conlusion is that with a proper setup there is no doubt what so ever that KDE kicks MS Windows up and down the street usability wise in every possible detail. It takes me about 30 seconds to get any Windows desktop user conviced that MS days as a monopoly are counted.
    Further on: Ralph Nolden showed previews of what brewing with the 3.2 version of KDevelop and some other goodies. Apart from built-in support of something like a dozen and more programming languages there is a lot of stuff that will cause me to migrate from 3.1 to 3.2 asap.

    To me it's quite evident: If OSS is the hauting horde of MS executives sleepless nights, the current and future KDE is the chief Boogieman of them all.

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
    1. Re:Microsofts Nightmare. by fault0 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yes, and in kde 3.2a1, with khotkeys2, you can even define mouse gestures and attach dcop scripting calls, keystrokes, mouse movements, etc.. etc.. to any KDE app.

      You could, for example, define a mouse gesture to tell kwin to close the current window. Or, you could define a keystroke a tell kdevelop (or any app using dcop) to open a new project and add a bunch of files to it.

      Oh yeah, media keyboard support is also better in this alpha.

    2. Re:Microsofts Nightmare. by fault0 · · Score: 2, Informative

      > Last I tried KDevelop, it kept crying for the documentation packages, which my distro didn't install because you apparently need the source code to have them. Bizarre.

      The new kdevelop in kde 3.2a1 has been pretty much rewritten from almost scratch. It's actually been in development for nearly 3 years.

      > to that mess of a menu

      The kmenu has also been cleared in up 3.2. Not only does it have a reduced amount of catagories, but it it follows the freedesktop menu standard (with GNOME (2.6?) and others), and it also has catagory headings for usability :)

  18. Not so altruistic by alexhmit01 · · Score: 3, Informative

    1. I love KDE - when we run Linux desktops, they are Mandrake/KDE desktops

    2. The KDE project is a quality project, I never liked GNOME's politics. The KDE team had the "harmony" project to create a GPL'd Qt replacement, just in case, the GNOME team could have worked on that instead of going after KDE in a holy war.

    3. We have one developer licensed on Qt (triple platform) and one other that is probably being added to Qt development.

    HOWEVER

    The KDE team was a bunch of Trolltech guys. At least in the beginning, those pushing KDE development were from Trolltech.

    The Trolltech team was out to create a cross-platform API and push it. KDE was their way of creating a Unix desktop using their libraries. The whole plan was to make Unix desktops credible (this was in the days where engineers would have a Solaris Workstation for engineering, and a Windows desktop for Groupware/Productivity apps), so that they could sell Qt. This was also before MS Office completely owned the market (remember, Office 95 was their first big hit, and it wasn't until the time of Office 97 that MS had a defacto productivity monopoly b/c Wordperfect died).

    The KDE team was formed by Trolltech to create a marketplace for a Unix/Win32 cross-platform toolkit.

    In addition, Motif/CDE had an established market. Trolltech was pushing Qt/KDE as a replacement, going after the entrenched Unix market. The goal was to push to Engineering focused Motif/CDE out for a Qt/KDE environment that would do productivity AND Engineering. That would let corporations build their internal applications (where people spent a LOT of time) in a cross-platform manner, for the engineers to be able to use.

    Alex

  19. KDE Developers Anonymous by ThyTurkeyIsDone · · Score: 4, Funny

    [This is an update of my earlier post on this subject, which I won't link to because this is much better. Mod me up if you want to protest against the gnaming kraziness; don't mod me down if you're humor-challenged.]

    KDE Developers Anonymous

    Hello group, my name is Klark and I'm addikted to the letter K... As is the kase with many of you, I've always been krazy about komputers and like many of my fellow komp sci students, I was looking forward to a suksessful kareer in the field of information and kommunikation teknology... but my troubles started when I diskovered open source software and the wonderful kommunity around it and got kwite seriously into KDE development... At first I didn't komprehend the effekt this would kome to have on my life as a koder - it wasn't really konspikuous initially when I started to spell more and more kommon words with a k, sometimes even with a kapital K... But then my kolleagues began to wonder why I kouldn't spell korrektly. They asked me, "Are you on krack? Kut the krap!"... some even went as far as kalling me kompletely krazy! What kould I do? I must admit, I'm a kolerik person, even kwick-tempered you might say... okkasionally I would get inkredibly angry and kuss and kurse at my ko-workers... People should judge me by the kontent of my karakter instead of just kriticizing what they konsider kurious spelling! Other times, I would just retreat into a korner and kry kwietly by myself... However, it wasn't until they kicked me out of my kalligraphy kourse at kommunity kollege and I lost my job on akkount of my unkooperative konduct that I finally realized I had to kome to terms with my problem... so here I am, this is my koming-out... I know my kase is a komplex one, but I do hope it is kurable...

  20. To the whiners about one unique desktop by vadim_t · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Stop whining. It WON'T happen.

    Windows has one GUI because it's made by one company with one central management. KDE and Gnome are different teams, that work in different ways, use different languages and have different ideas. To expect that just because you think one desktop is needed that they'll leave whatever they're doing and start coding your ideal desktop is foolish. Deal with it, most OSS developers work on things because they like working on them, not because they're working for the common good.

    Besides, there can't be a perfect WM. I don't want KDE 3 on a P166, there I'd use IceWM or Enlightenment. I don't want IceWM on my dual Athlon either, where I can use that extra power for something useful. I also don't like Gnome, while many Gnome users probably hate KDE.

    Heck, how does anybody expect that we can somehow get independent developers to agree on one unique project when the world still hasn't managed to agree on one unique measure system?

    It's odd really. In the poll that's here right now the options are in kg, and half of the posts in it is whining: "But where Americans! Why isn't it in pounds?". Then go to a KDE discussion and somehow now half of the discussion is whining about that we need a single standard.

  21. Re:KDE's connection to SCO. by RPoet · · Score: 4, Informative

    KDE is made by Trolltech, a Canopy Group company.

    KDE is not made by Trolltech, but by a network of around 200 regular contributing individuals around the world. Two or three of these work on Qt for Trolltech, and contribute to KDE in their spare times.

    (Yes, I've been trolled, so what)

    --
    "Oppression and harassment is a small price to pay to live in the land of the free." -- Montgomery Burns.
  22. Not true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Matthias Ettrich and Warwick Allison (just to name a couple of KDE developers) were open source KDE developers first and only after their great acheivements in KDE were they hired by TrollTech. The same is true for most of their other employees - they cut their teeth on the open source KDE platform first. The original KDE team was pretty indifferent to licensing issues and they only cared about using the best written GUI software platform available at the time, namely Qt.

    TrollTech is not the self-serving evil company you make it out to be. They actually care about writing quality code - and it shows in their products.

    And no, I'm not a TrollTech employee. I've just used their software in the past commercially and was very impressed by it.

  23. For the non-technical by Telex4 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    For those like myself who can't program in C++, but who can install this alpha version, or any other versions before 3.2 final, there is a lot you can do to help KDE:

    * Report bugs. If you find something crashes, doesn't work as you'd expect it to, or there's a feature you think is missing, report it at http://bugs.kde.org.

    * Submit documentation. Lots of apps in KDE will have out of date documentation, or none at all. If you understand how to use just such an app, consider writing documentation for it and submitting it to KDE.

    * Submit translations. If American English isn't your native language, consider translating the text in applications to languages you feel confident with.

    More can be found at: http://www.kde.org/support

  24. I love TrollTech by alexhmit01 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    When did I call TrollTech evil? I am a happy customer, sending them thousands of dollars/year, and using Linux desktops based upon KDE?

    They DO care about writing quality code. They also have HEAVILY supported KDE development to create a market for their API as cross-platform.

    What about that is evil?

    The fact that the resulting desktop is made available for free under the GPL makes it great. They provide for "free," albeit restricted for development, environemtn, to push their product.

    What a great side effect of the invisible hand! In their creation of a market, everyone gets free benefits.

    The only thing that I would like from Qt is a better RAD environment to work with. One of our project upgrades was going to be moved from Cocoa to Qt, which was cancelled because certain limitations in using Qt for RAD development. I look forward to new versions of Qt, they keep getting stronger.

    BTW: as a commercial licensee of Qt, I am REALLY happy that a lot of the KDE core is on Trolltech's payroll. Each version of Qt incorporates more functionality that was handled at the KDE level, and KDE is upgraded to use the new Qt. That makes the features available to those of us wanting Qt's cross platform benefits.

    The Qt/Mac GPL release was also great (although, obviously, with Panther including X11 in the OS, they had no choice, as Qt/X11 on Panther would hit the dreadful "good enough" level without Qt on board). I look forward to the Qt/Mac KDELIB port being in the main tree, and being able to install KDE apps under OS X for my power use.

    Alex

    1. Re:I love TrollTech by platypus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      When did I call TrollTech evil? I am a happy customer, sending them thousands of dollars/year, and using Linux desktops based upon KDE?

      Indeed, you never even implied them to be evil. But you still got the KDE history wrong. QT existed before KDE and was choosen by the KDE founder(s), none of whom were a Trolltech employee (AFAIK).
      Later on, some of the KDE developers got hired by Trolltech, though.
      But the reason for KDE's existance was never that it might be a marketing tool for QT.

  25. Re:Hear. Hear. by RazzleFrog · · Score: 2, Informative

    Canopy owns 4.1% according to Trolltech. I hardly consider that a significant influence even with one guy on the board.

  26. Re:portage woes and fp by Sir_Stinksalot · · Score: 3, Informative

    Just curious have you ever used Gentoo? I mean its not just the optimizations, that make gentoo great, its the fact that you can get up to date software faster than the mojority of distros. CVS and experimental software are a breeze. And the fact that you can just type a command and come back later with it working is great. I have a knoppix system install on my laptop and so I am familiar with the apt-get system. It is nice when you set it to use the ultra-unstable software so you can actually use something recent but _I_ still _think_ its a bit more of a pain to use apt than portage. Gentoo is actually faster installing small programs than most distros since I dont even have to know where to get it. And the large stuff like KDE well I just go to bed and at the latest its ready to roll when I get back from work. I am not trying to convince you to use Gentoo just trying to say your statement sounds quite ignorant. And if you use Debian the way it was designed you won't get KDE 3.2 for another 3-5 years.

    --
    "We can no longer live as rats... we know too much." -Secret of NIMH
  27. Re:Don't let the source code compilation scare you by infolib · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Another route is Knoppix with KDE CVS. Never tried it though, YMMV, yada yada...

    Btw I don't think KDE should take all the honour for Konstruct. After all it was "inspired by GARNOME" - good to see idea exchange across the major Free desktops.

    --
    Any sufficiently advanced libertarian utopia is indistinguishable from government.
  28. Re:Will this have the Dreamweaver killer Quanta 3. by manyoso · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Yes, it will be in there and Nicholas is working on VPL support. That is the WYSIWYG functionality that we're all awaiting. Both Quanta AND KDevelop have _drastically_ improved in 3.2.

    Also, keep an eye out for Juk (KDE's answer to ITunes) in this new release. It is an incredibly cool jukebox program that has automatic tagging and vFolder playlists.

  29. In another 5 years? by 3.5+stripes · · Score: 2, Funny

    Well yeah, about the same time longhorn comes out you mean?

    --


    He tried to kill me with a forklift!
  30. Re:Screen shots by twener · · Score: 3, Informative

    Just visit the screenshot pages of the major/new applications: Kontact (2, 3, 4), JuK, Kgpg, KAddressbook, KBruch, Kig, Kopete, KVim, KCacheGrind, Umbrello, KDevelop, Plasktik,

  31. Re:portage woes and fp by Sir_Stinksalot · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I am not a Gentoo fanboy and your right I don't understand all of the cflags I use but I try. I don't push gentoo on everyone I meet. As a matter of fact to a newb I reccomend JAMD or SuSE. Gentoo is for those that want to learn but not go full bore with LFS. I personnally use Gentoo because its easy to install stuff without dependancy probs and I can get up to date stuff. Debian is cool like I said I use Knoppix (installed) on my laptop which is a Debian unstable easy to install and use distro. But at home I have bandwidth and horsepower to spare so I use gentoo which works for me. But please use what works for you. If interested in Gentoo try it but don't give up on it til you got it installed and functioning all the way just like any distro you want to try. But I got to say if you want to run Debian try out knoppix and install it to the harddrive its sweet fast and easy.

    --
    "We can no longer live as rats... we know too much." -Secret of NIMH
  32. Re:Good for technically uninclined. by standsolid · · Score: 2, Interesting

    To tell you the truth, I don't really use KDE for it's amazingly straight-forward and simplistic user interface that most users (including non-technical) can really appriciate. I don't even use it for it's incredibly nice built-in tools like Kmail for email. Nor do I use it for the fast, lightweight, renounded KHTML engine you find in Konqueror -- the same engine used in Apple's Safari webrowser. Not only do I have KDE users making sure they can open their banking accounts online, but i have the 15 other mac users to do that for me to ( :D joke ppl ). I use Konqeror's KIO Slaves to get my work and play done faster, better and easier. I use karmera:// to get all my digital images, fish:// to get around nfs bullcrap, audiocd:// to rip my audioCDs to ogg quickly.

    You know, you may not call me a "technical user", but I do a couple "technical" things. KDE enpowers me to write scripts that interact with my KDE programs using dcop. Quick and easy GUI automation -- even for the "non technical users". Oh and have you EVER programmed FOR KDE? it's simply amazing! Very easy to use and a robust toolkit to use. Much easier to learn than GTK(2) or MFC were.

    Now you make call me names and tell me i sould use *box -- but you are missing an amazing featureset using tools that you just happen to pick up and add to your "desktop environment". It might be time for you, oh great master of GNU/Linux, to give KDE another try.

    <sarcastic>
    it's not that hard to install it, all you have to do is open a "command line thingie" on your uber-blackbox system and type in "sudo urpmi kde"... unless that's for the "real techies" -- in which case you can use Drake's control center
    </sarcastic>

    dont' call my Desktop n00b, n00b

    love, standsolid

    --
    WTPOUAWYHTTOTWPA
    What's the point of using acronyms when you have to type out the whole phrase anyways?