Slashdot Mirror


Hybrid/Electric Vehicles: Should I Buy?

nissin writes "I'm ready to buy my first vehicle, and would like to hear your experiences with either hybrid or electric vehicles. Are they a good alternative to conventional vehicles, or just a geek toy? Do they perform well in the city? How about on long road trips? I am also interested in hearing about other alternative, yet practical, forms of transportation that I may have missed."

103 of 2,117 comments (clear)

  1. We are american... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    we do not buy ecological vehicles!

    1. Re:We are american... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      My SUV runs on baby seals!

    2. Re:We are american... by Thud457 · · Score: 3, Funny
      Lissen hear, bub! I didn't claw my way to the top of the technology tree just to drive an electric car!






      If you electric car panseys were smart, you'd start promoting EV dragraces. You're sure to get BillyBob onboard when an EV starts winning at "NASCAR".

      --

      the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  2. Not me but a friend.. by grub · · Score: 5, Informative


    A friend in another city has a hybrid. According to him the pickup is slow but the fuel economy is great. Pure electric would be super if you didn't have to make long trips and always had an electrical outlet to charge when parked.

    Pet Peeve #843287: SUV drivers that whine about the price of gas. You bought that overpriced penis extension, learn to live with the consequences.

    --
    Trolling is a art,
    1. Re:Not me but a friend.. by Mr_Silver · · Score: 5, Funny
      Pet Peeve #843287: SUV drivers that whine about the price of gas. You bought that overpriced penis extension, learn to live with the consequences.

      Pet Peeve #1: All Americans who whine about the price of gas. If you really want to whine, come to the UK where our Government has turned taxing petrol into an art form.

      --
      Avantslash - View Slashdot cleanly on your mobile phone.
    2. Re:Not me but a friend.. by CaseyB · · Score: 5, Funny

      Pet Peeve #843289: The fact that ALL SUV owners have a canned speech to rationalize the fact that they needed to buy their overpriced penis extension.

    3. Re:Not me but a friend.. by sg3235 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yeah, as soon as those tonka toys get enough power to pull my trailers and haul my family at the same time, I'll be able to get rid of that gas guzzler. My pet peeve is people who think they understand my motive behind owning an SUV!

    4. Re:Not me but a friend.. by El · · Score: 4, Informative
      Subarus (Outback or Forester) get better traction, are safer, hold just as much, and get 25mpg... next excuse? Unless you're towing something or regularly have more than 5 passengers, you don't really need an SUV.

      Oh, and Ford is coming out with a hybrid SUV (Explorer?) in 2004.

      --

      "Freedom means freedom for everybody" -- Dick Cheney

    5. Re:Not me but a friend.. by pmz · · Score: 3, Informative

      Montana winters (4-wheel drive), cargo capacity for musical gear, room for additional passengers (though admittedly, I frequently drive in it alone), and easier access in and out (I am rather tall).

      The Subaru station wagons are fair compromises for people who would otherwise buy an SUV. They are cheaper (in the $20Ks, not $30Ks), get decent gas milage relative to an SUV, handle amazingly well with their 16" low-profile tire and good suspension, etc. The only drawback is that tall people (taller than 6'1" or so) will probably find the driver's seat uncomfortable.

    6. Re:Not me but a friend.. by Larry_Dillon · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I just puchased a '87 Subaru 4wd wagon for $1400 for most of the reasons you just mentioned:

      1. Montana winters
      2. Room for passangers
      3. Room for cargo
      4. Doing my part to NOT FUND OIL WARS

      What I really hate about all of the "super trucks" is trying to see past them at intersections.

      SUVS: Safer for the owners, more dangerous for everyone else on the road.

      --
      Competition Good, Monopoly Bad.
    7. Re:Not me but a friend.. by TheCarp · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Of course SUV drivers don't have a higher survival rate than other cars, they are just more likely to kill others, and not a single bit more likely to survive themselves.

      And the idea that an Economy car is "undersized" is absolutly silly. If anything they are apropriatlysized for the general use case. Thats transporting 1 or 2 people (which is about what you see in 95% of cars on the road at any given time... SUV or otherwise).

      Frankly in the long run its cheaper and safer for EVERYONE to drive an economy car, and rent a larger vehicle when you NEED one. You know that MAYBE once a year or every two years that you might move, or maybe that weekend or two you actually go camping.

      Biut whatever, once oil price hit where they really should be, I imagine the much touted "Market forces" will take care of the SUVs so im not too worried. And I will still be tooling around in the most practical vehicle I have ever owned...
      my motorcycle... 40 MPG in the city, 50 on the highway, small enough to make room and I NEVER have to look for parking.

      Not to mention it can fit between traffic in a jam, out accelerate ANY 4 wheeler (taking off or comming to a stop), and lets face it... get the biggest fucking SUV penis extention you want...

      When it comes right down to it... everyones watching ME ride down the street, you in your SUV are just another boring fish in the sea of SUVs and other cagers... and with all that... an empty tank still only costs me $5 to fill.

      -Steve

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    8. Re:Not me but a friend.. by einstein · · Score: 5, Informative

      I'm purchasing at 2004 Prius, and the 0-30 acceleration is VERY good, but it loses some umph in to 30-60 range, because that's when the ICE (Internal Combustion Engine) kicks in for a boost.. I think up until 52 mph, you're usually just on the electric system.

      that is where the complain comes from though.

      From my test drives of the 2003 Prius, this is not as bad as the accelerator of a 4 cycle ICE automatic... in fact, I thought it was quite better.

      and given that the 2004 is more powerful, AND more fuel efficient, I think it should definitely be a consideration if you're looking at a new car.

    9. Re:Not me but a friend.. by TopShelf · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Crippling??? Puh-lease... I get so sick of hearing people complain about the price of gas. Over the labor day weekend, one of the generic TV anchors here in Indy made a comment like, "yeah, with prices this high I'm staying home this weekend."

      I'm sorry, but the price of gas has very little to do with the total cost of going on a trip. Let's say you've got a car that gets 20 mpg, and you want to head to the beach for the weekend (say, 800 mile round trip). You're looking at 40 gallons of gas, so if the price jumped 50 cents a gallon, you're out a whopping $20. Will that make or break your vacation plans? Hardly.

      For all the moaning and groaning, the bottom line is that people's habits haven't really changed much. Look at fuel economy standards, which haven't really gone anywhere in the last 15 years. I say, creep up the gas tax until habits change and people actually start focusing on fuel economy. There are plenty of good things that money could go towards (reducing budget deficits, improving & investing in civil infrastructure, etc.).

      --
      Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
    10. Re:Not me but a friend.. by einTier · · Score: 4, Informative

      Sure, it has maximum torque at zero RPM (the torque curve is actually flat), but generating that power takes a lot of juice, and delivering it to electric motors without completely draining the batteries hasn't really been solved yet. So, while the car will feel faster than it actually is, it will still be quite slow unless you're willing to trade off a lot of battery life.

      For the record, using Car and Driver's data, here's the 0-60 and 1/4 mile times for the hybrids and a few comparisons (Ford Escape /Mazda Tribute Hybrid not tested).

      Toyota Prius: 13.0 0-60 and 19.2 1/4 mile
      Honda Insight: 11.1 0-60 and 18.3 1/4 mile

      Hummer H2: 10.7 0-60 and 17.6 1/4 mile
      Honda Civic: 9.3 0-60 and 17.2 1/4 mile
      Mazda Protege: 9.2 0-60 and 17.0 1/4 mile
      Toyota Corolla: 8.2 0-60 and 16.4 1/4 mile
      Ford SVT Focus: 7.8 0-60 and 16.1 1/4 mile
      MazdaSpeed Protege: 6.9 0-60 and 15.4 1/4 mile
      Honda Accord: 7.0 0-60 and 15.5 1/4 mile
      Mini Cooper S: 7.0 0-60 and 15.5 1/4 mile
      Mitsubishi Eclipse GTS: 6.7 0-60 and 15.2 1/4 mile
      Subaru Impreza WRX: 5.4 0-60 and 14.1 1/4 mile
      Chevrolet Corvette: 4.5 0-60 and 13.1 1/4 mile

      So, yes, these hybrids are indeed slow. Slower, in fact, than almost any car you can buy. With the exception of the Corvette, which I put in for comparison only, all of the above cars are within a few thousand dollars of either hybrid, and most are cheaper. Just a thought.

      --
      -------------------------------------------------- $665.95 -- retail price of the beast.
    11. Re:Not me but a friend.. by WegianWarrior · · Score: 5, Informative

      Pet Peeve #1: All Americans who whine about the price of gas. If you really want to whine, come to the UK where our Government has turned taxing petrol into an art form.

      Now, I don't know how much y'all pay for the petrol / gas in the UK, but here in Norway about 80% of what we pay at the pump end up in the coffers of the goverment - taxes, excise duty on petrol, VAT, VAT on the taxes and the CO2-tax...
      I visited the US (West Virginia to be spesific) this summer, and I commented on how cheap the petrol was; just 1$49 for a US gallon (3.7 liter), while back home I pay the equalent of 4$90 for a US gallon (the price at the pump today was 9.49 kroner / liter). So honestly, the people in the US has nothing to complain about as far as the cost of gasonile goes... in fact, if the cost of it was higher in the US, we might see more sensible cars rolling of the productionlines, and less of the gas-guzzling SUVs.

      --
      Everything in the world is controlled by a small, evil group to which, unfortunately, no one you know belongs.
    12. Re:Not me but a friend.. by jefeweiss · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I think that this makes a lot of sense. Taxing gasoline at a rate that pays for road maintenence and construction would make the automobile compete on a more level playing field. Conservatives seem to complain an awful lot about the subsidization of Amtrac or passenger rail service(at least in America,) but the subsidization of the automobile costs a lot more. In a free market the cost of externalities (hidden factors) would be decreased so they could compete on a purely economic basis. Right now taxpayers (some of whom don't drive) pay a lot of money that doesn't show up in the cost of operating a car. I could even go as far as to say that the cost of the war in Iraq should be passed on almost entirely in the form of gasoline taxes. I know, I know freedom and WMD and all that kind of crap. Yada yada yada. It's just kind of odd that everytime a Texas oil millionaire becomes president we go invade Iraq. Maybe I'm just being paranoid.

    13. Re:Not me but a friend.. by yerricde · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "Petrol" is two letters shorter than "gasoline" and is less ambiguous than "gas".

      --
      Will I retire or break 10K?
    14. Re:Not me but a friend.. by Galvatron · · Score: 3, Interesting
      2 issues: first of all, if you don't patronize the cheaper gas stations, they won't compete on price. Hence, all gas will get more expensive. A limited form of this is one reason why gas prices always fall more slowly than they rise.


      Second, while I agree that going out of your way isn't worth it, what I, and most people I know, do is that they will generally try to remember to fill up their tank when they happen to be near a station they know to be cheaper.


      For me at least, I don't care about 2 or 3 cents, but often there will be $.10 or even $.20 differences. That's more like $1.50 per fillup, and if you fill up your tank a couple times a month, it can add up to about $35 or $40 per year. Not a lot of money, but not something to just throw away for no reason.

      --
      "The question of whether a computer can think is no more interesting than that of whether a submarine can swim" -EWD
    15. Re:Not me but a friend.. by FuzzyBad-Mofo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I for one think a good start to the SUV problem is regulation. Hear me out:

      1. SUV's are classified as trucks by the EPA
      2. SUV's are classified as passenger vehicles by the DMV (at least in every state I've seen)
      3. Some of these monsters approach the weight limit necessary for a CDL (commercial driver's license), yet require nothing more than a standard driver's license to operate.

      Now the upshot of the truck/passenger vehicle classification dualism is that SUV's are exempt from having to meet milage and emissions standards for passenger vehicles. Therefore most SUVs have more horsepower for a comparable displacement. Yet since they're licensed as a passenger vehicle, the SUV gets cheap car plates and registration. This simply must stop! Either it's a car, or it's a truck. They can't have it both ways.

      Secondly and perhaps more controversially, I believe that a new license class should be created for large SUVs. There are simply too many people unqualified to handle a 7000+ pound vehicle treating these things like big sports car! When I wanted to ride a motorcycle, I had to get a special certification on my license, and so should it be for large SUVs.

    16. Re:Not me but a friend.. by Quasar1999 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Except that it costs us $87 Billion up front for the cheap gas...

      --

      ---
      Programming is like sex... Make one mistake and support it the rest of your life.
    17. Re:Not me but a friend.. by at_kernel_99 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Pet Peeve #1 People who think because there gas prices are too high, they think every bodies should be that high.

      Ignoring the fact that other countries might be able to get drill there own oil, and get a better deal because there population is higher, and thus can by in larger 'bulk'.

      You're kidding, right? The reality is that we essentially burn subsidized fuel in this country. In other countries, the tax man adds a bit to the cost of fuel. Go figure, Western Europe and Scandinavia seem to put more focus on population health and a clean environment than profits in the auto and oil industries. Charging extra for the fuel does a couple things, it is a disincentive to waste fuel. It helps pay for some of the hidden costs associated with burning fossil fuels.

      The US is not serious about reducing emissions. We are also not charged the true cost of fuel. By that I mean that we, as consumers, do not pay for the cleanup costs, or the healthcare costs that petroleum based fuels cause.

      This URL explains, a little bit, about how the cost of gasoline effetively hasn't changed in the US in the last 30 years. If you only go back 25 years, its arguable that the cost has dropped, and significantly. The price per gallon in the US first hit a dollar in the late 70s. As long as I've been driving (17 years), its barely changed. Compare that to the changes in wages. Or the change in real estate values. Or the cost of the vehicles we're driving. Gas is CHEAP CHEAP CHEAP.

    18. Re:Not me but a friend.. by CommieLib · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well, let's examine this whole "SUV - penis envy" meme rationally.

      Mom and Dad and the 2.7 kids go out to buy a car. 1.7 of those kids are still in carseats, so the sedan goes out the window. Is it possible? Yes, but not desirable. So we're looking at something that has more space.

      They all walk past the minivans because of the enormous stigma built up against them by young men, reluctant to be labeled as married with children. Ditto x 10 station wagons. So we're looking at Explorers, Envoys, etc.

      A quick look at shows that the fuel economies of a 2002 Ford Winstar are roughly the same as an Explorer (17/23 vs. 17/21) (there may be some wide divergence between other models, this is Slashdot quality research). Even the Expedition is only a few mpg lower. So why are minivans spared the ire?

      I think really what all this is about is culture. There are two cultures in America, the urban and the rural. Urban culturites find themselves immeasurably superior to the rurals. This is somehow hard coded into the human genome, because you can find it all the way back to Ancient Greece.

      Sure, a couple of arguments get pitched up about fuel efficiency, traffic, parking spaces, but when you feel that bitterness, that resentment about seeing an SUV, what you're really resenting is the declared culture of the driver.

      It works both ways by the way. I'm a rural, and it makes me sick to see a Hummer decked out with leather interior. It's as much a cultural violation to me.

      Anyway, this whole penis envy thing comes from the culture clash. You see similar attitudes towards other rural tokens such as guns, pickup trucks, etc. I think it comes from a feeling that rurals are closer to a level of basic survival ~ basic masculinity, and a resentment of that. So when you see a rural token, AND see that token as a false one, you make this whole pocket Freudian association.

      Don't own an SUV: can't afford one. I would own a Hummvee if I could. Only the H1, though; the H2s look like school buses to me.

      --
      If your bitterest enemies are people who hack the heads off civilians, then I would say you're doing something right.
  3. Waiting it out by wawannem · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Personally, I am going to give the technology a few years to mature. I remember reading recently about GM dropping a line of Hybrid cars because the EPA in California banned a particular type of appliance required for re-charging the vehicle. I think it will soon take hold, but I am giving it a bit of time for many of these details to be sorted out.

    1. Re:Waiting it out by bman08 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Those were electric cars. The EV1 in particular, I think. It had nothing at all to do with the EPA and everything to do with the charger bursting into flames. On the upside, Electric cars park free at meters in L.A.

  4. Wait by Armbrust84 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Wait a few more years, you will be grateful. The advantages of having new technology early are many, but so are the drawbacks. I understand that this is not a "new" technology in the strictest sense, but it is not a mature one. I am waiting, and I would advise you to do so also.

  5. Expensive by sys$manager · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Considering a hybrid is something like $40,000 canadian, and I just bought a 1987 Honda Civic for $900 that gets 40+mpg and runs perfect, I would spend my money elsewhere. But I'm cheap.

    1. Re:Expensive by Deadplant · · Score: 5, Informative

      Canadian prices:

      Honda Insight = $26,000
      Honda Civic hybrid = $28,500 (approx)

      Plus if you're in ontario there's a $2000 sales tax rebate for hybrids.
      The rest of the country get's a $1000 rebate.

  6. Prius rocks by nate1138 · · Score: 5, Informative

    As the proud owner of a Toyota Prius, I can definitely recommend one. I'm not too hot on the looks, but the mileage rocks, and it's been very reliable so far. And it isn't as pokey as you may expect a hybrid to be. You may also want to look at the Honda Insight (If it is still being made).

    --
    Where's my lobbyist? Right here.
    1. Re:Prius rocks by geekoid · · Score: 3, Funny

      "I'm not too hot on the looks, but the mileage rocks, and it's been very reliable so far"

      um, I dont think this is the place to put your personal ad.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  7. Good review by friends by X · · Score: 5, Informative

    2 of my friends have hybrids (one the Insight and the other the Prius), and they both like them. They are great on the city streets, very quiet and lots of pickup from a standing start thanks to the electric motors. For longer trips, you'll love the quiet, the fuel economy, and the insane distances you can go without needing to fill up your tank. The downside tends to be that they have poor pickup at freeway speeds.

    The other big issue is the feel of the ride. Some people love it, others don't. They have low-friction tires and stiff suspensions (to minimize the amount of energy loss). This tends to make the car ride more like a sporty car (you feel every bump) than a luxury car (soft suspension smooths out the bumps). Some people love that, others hate it.

    Overall, I'd suggest taking it out for a spin, and see whether you like it. They are practical cars though.

    --
    sigs are a waste of space
    1. Re:Good review by friends by MerlynEmrys67 · · Score: 3, Interesting
      I've had a Prius for 18 months. It is the best car I have ever owned... Fill it up once a month.

      The downside is the insane distances it can go while doing long distance driving. Try going 500 miles between fillups (better than 7 hours) without stoping to empty YOUR tank.

      I don't know what people are complaining about pickup... I've not had any problems... but then I am not a leadfoot to start with and tend to keep it under 70 MPH anyway

      Wierdest thing to happen to me in a Prius... Going over the Grapevine N of LA... going up at 70 MPH engine whining away... get to the top of the hill and start going down - and the engine cuts off. Complete silence. Very spooky going 70 with the engine off

      --
      I have mod points and I am not afraid to use them
  8. Electric vehicles by RelliK · · Score: 5, Funny

    Electric vehicles can't go very far or very fast, and when you drive one people will think you're gay.(*)

    (*)Sponsored by the gasoline industry of America.

    --
    ___
    If you think big enough, you'll never have to do it.
    1. Re:Electric vehicles by SheldonYoung · · Score: 5, Funny

      A note for future reference:

      When posting on a family site please don't put gay and (*) in the same sentence. Thank you.

  9. You know, car magazines can answer this by drinkypoo · · Score: 4, Interesting
    So why ask slashdot? The moral of the story seems to be that hybrids are ugly (except, arguably, the toyota prius) and slow (the prius is the best of them in this regard) but get great mileage. They get better mileage in town than on the freeway, because of regenerative braking. Oddly enough they are not all that aerodynamic. In spite of its "futuristic" (read: ugly) lines, the Honda Insight has a .24 CD, and my '89 Nissan 240SX has a .26 CD. But anyway...

    Hybrids get great mileage, and they work. What's not to like? Buy a Prius, or a hybrid Civic. Or, wait a couple years, because Toyota is supposedly going to sell everything in a hybrid model by 2005.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  10. Re:CNG Vehicles by garcia · · Score: 3, Insightful

    and what good would that do in this era? Have you noticed the cost of natural gas lately? Did you know that it is going WAY up?

    Buy a smaller car that gets great gas mileage (ie Saturns are a good example) that doesn't cost much money (Saturn SL-series cars (before the ugly Ion's) were under 12k).

    That's my worthless .02

  11. 2003 Honda Civic Hybrid by rednaxela · · Score: 5, Informative

    I have a 2003 Honda Civic Hybrid and I love it. Average about 45 mpg. Use it to commute on the DC beltway - plenty of pickup for merging and passing. Have taken 2 4-6 hour trips with the car, and it's just fine - like driving a regular Civic. Really, the only noticeable difference between the Hybrid an the regular Civic is that you can feel the car nose forward just a bit as you press down on the brake pedal and the generator that is driven by the brakes kicks in. You should also note that you can take $2000 off your adjusted gross income on your 2003 taxes, and many states provide addtional incentives. Excise tax was waved in Maryland ($2000), and you can drive in the HOV lanes in Virginia without a second passenger. Bottom line - it's a great car, and a good deal to boot.

  12. Check out the TDI Volkswagons!! by starfighter_org · · Score: 5, Informative

    If you look at the fuel efficiency info on the EPA site, you'll notice that the TDI (Turbo Diesel Injection) Volkswagons can get around 50MPG. They start easy in the winter, unlike the older diesels. Check out www.tdiclub.com. I just got a 2000 TDI Beetle and it's awesome. Also, there are a few modifications that give you loads of extra power from the engine. Some will even increase efficiency and give you more power. These are great cars, go check em out.

    1. Re:Check out the TDI Volkswagons!! by Dave+Muench · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Mod the above comment up.. TDI Volkswagons are great. Anyone who thinks they are noisy or slow should go drive one and drop their 1980's preconceptions. Diesel is available nearly everywhere (you just have to know where to look) and pollutes far less (not just what comes out your tailpipe, but the refining process is simpler as well). TDI VW's also only require oil changes every 10,000 miles, saving you time and money there as well.

      http://www.tdiclub.com/

      Hybrid electrics are a joke, a stopgap technology until something better comes along. Don't bother.

    2. Re:Check out the TDI Volkswagons!! by Insightfill · · Score: 4, Informative
      Agreed. While I ultimately bought the Honda Insight for my daily commute, I looked at the TDIs for quite a while.

      I visited a friend in Tucson once for a long weekend. He had the Jetta TDI at the time and including him, there were five of us in that car touring the city for days. With mountains. The car didn't even breathe hard.

      After 400 miles, the car still had half a tank left.

      People often look at cars as strictly a numbers game, but the TDIs (and hybrids and electrics) can be foolers. All get their pull from very strong, early torque. A good electric job with "only" 60 horsepower has tremendous torque early on, and can seriously give most Mustangs and Camaros a run for the money up to about 30MPH, which is how lots of us suburban/city people live: 0-30-0-45-0, etc.

      Another exmaple of great torque early on are VW's 1.8T engines, which are rated for (depending on model year) 150-190 horsepower, but are incredibly strong right off the line. The turbo is actually ALWAYS engaged, but engages gradually more as the revs climb, giving the engine a very flat torque and power curve. "Turbo lag", as the term normally means, doesn't exist.

      It's often said that people "buy horsepower but drive torque." Something to remember.

      For quite a while, the Insights were besting Miata's and many other "small" cars in class "H" races, I believe, not through big engines, but strong, early torque and very tight handling. I haven't kept up, lately.

    3. Re:Check out the TDI Volkswagons!! by PD · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Hybrid electrics are NOT a joke. What makes you think that you could make an even better hybrid if you had a little TDI engine in it?

      Check out the Volkswagon Lupo. 90 MPG, without hybrid. Now, imagine cutting the size of that engine in half, and making it a hybrid. That'd probably push it over the 100 MPG mark, while cutting emissions. Pretty decent.

  13. Try the Prius by Travoltus · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If you like getting 55 MPG, that is. :)

    Alternative fuels are necessary for national security, in my opinion.

    1) The US defeated Japan and Germany chiefly by starving them of oil. The Japanese and Germans had jet fighter planes sitting on the tarmac, ready to pulverize the best we had in the air, but they had no oil to fly them. One day the same thing could happen to America.

    2) The environmental impact of fossil fuels, of course, is horrible.

    3) With alternative fuels, we wouldn't need to be in the Middle East at all.

    Alternative, renewable fuel resources will take us a long way towards national and personal independence.

    --
    --- Grow a pair, liberals... stop letting the Republicans bully you!
  14. Get a Prius! by HTMLSpinnr · · Score: 5, Informative

    I own a 2002 Prius, and have pre-ordered a 2004 (new and improved). In short, I love my car. It's got plenty of power for your daily commute, and with my 20-25 miles per day driving, I can easily go two weeks or more between fillups. I've also made the trip from Southern California to Phoenix AZ on 6-7 gallons. It's also beneficial to know that I'm not polluting nearly as much as the big SUV's I share the road with, since the current model is SULEV rated, and the new one also carries the AT-PZEV rating for partial zero emissions.

    The current model doesn't carry a whole lot, and you can't tow with either generation, but for most of us, that's not a regular issue. The new version is a hatchback with fold-downs eats, so it solves the "carrying stuff" issue.

    There's plenty of Yahoo! Groups and other forums on electric or hybrid cars. A couple I personally hang out on and post alot of good geek info:

    http://autos.groups.yahoo.com/group/2004-prius/
    http://autos.groups.yahoo.com/group/toyota-prius/

    See you there!

    --
    $ man woman *
    -bash: /usr/bin/man: Argument list too long
  15. I flip over my Explorer! by randomencounter · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Being more maneuverable and closer to the ground, compact cars are generally safer for people inside _and_ outside the car.
    People who believe that SPUTES are safer really need to get a grip on reality.

    --
    Forget diamonds, copyright is forever.
    1. Re:I flip over my Explorer! by WatertonMan · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Someone ought to rate the parent up. I was about to say the same thing. The fact is that most SUV deaths don't occur in rollovers. People are hyping the rollover problems of SUVs because they don't like SUVs not because it is a big problem.

      The real problem is akin to the problem of bike helmets. True story. When more people started wearing bike helmets injuries went up, not down. Why? Because they gave a false sense of invulnerability and safety. So people began driving more recklessly. It wasn't the bike helmets were inherently more dangerous. (Although recent studied have commented on neck twist injuries due to helmets) It was how people started driving their bikes.

      Same with SUVs. The problem isn't the inherent safety of the SUV for those who drive halfway intelligently. It is the fact that people don't drive well. They think 4WD somehow makes them invulnerable in snow. Around here we have a lot of California students. First snow I like to sit at a particularly sharp turn and watch Californians in their SUVs go off the road because they are too dumb to drive slow on the icy snow.

      The fact is that cars are a tool. They can be used well or poorly. I have a nice Pathfinder because I want to be able to drive to the places I enjoy hiking, biking and climbing. A lot of those you need 4WD to get to. I enjoy being able to go skiing and ice climbing without having to worry about the snow as much.

      I complain about gas because I think a 20 cent increase in two weeks is freaking psycho. I'd probably complain the same if food or electricity went up that much. I can't afford two cars so my SUV is my primary vehicle. And while I want it for my weekend recreation I have to commute in it too. And that does add up.

  16. Ars Technica had a great review already by JustAnotherReader · · Score: 4, Informative

    Ars Technica did a really good review of the Honda Insight. You might find it informative.

  17. Re:Getting a lot better by Not_Wiggins · · Score: 3, Informative

    I've heard that starting with next year's models, a lot of manufacturers are going to offer both Hybrid fuel system cars, but also in "traditional" body styles. Of course this is a rumor so... YMMV (pun intended). ;)

    I have a bud who owns one and loves it (the Toyota hybrid). While the mileage isn't as good as they advertise it to be, it certainly is up there... almost as good as the old Geo Metro 3-cylinder car. ;)
    And you can't beat how cool it is when you're sitting at a stop light and the car is absolutely silent. 8)

    --
    Diplomacy is the art of saying, "Nice doggie!" until you can find a rock.
  18. Re:Deathtraps by RazzleFrog · · Score: 3, Informative

    OK - Listen to this - Ford Escape Hybrid. Summer 2004, though.

  19. My experiences by JoeBuck · · Score: 3, Informative

    I've been driving a 2003 Toyota Prius since April. I'm very happy with it.

    It has decent acceleration, about the same as other cars I've driven. It's comfortable, quite roomy for a small car, the back seat has decent leg room. I get 45-48 miles per gallon, closer to 45 during hot periods when I use the A/C a lot. I paid about $21K, including options (I didn't get the GPS system). There's also a tax credit for hybrid vehicles that you should look into.

    The acceleration from a standing start is quite good because both engines (electric and gasoline) pull. The gasoline engine cuts off at stops, and in slow stop-and-go traffic only the electric motor runs, which is why the Prius gets better fuel efficiency in city driving than on the highway (the EPA rating is 52 city, 47 highway).

    The 2004 Prius appears to be a substantial improvement: it's larger, but gets even better fuel efficiency.

  20. Get a (modern) Diesel: VW TDI by opkool · · Score: 3, Informative

    Right now, TDIs are:

    * fun to drive (german engineering)
    * available from small Golf, sedan Jetta, wagon JettaWagen or trendy NewBug
    * very safe (tons of safety features by default)
    * lotsa torque (you drive torque, not horsepower)
    * great mileage (EPA certifies 49 hwy, 42 city)
    * you can run on BioDiesel (all or mixture of BioD + diesel)
    * soon, Diesel in the US will be very clean (extra low sulphur diesel, like in Europe and Japan)
    * diesel is proven technology
    * 700 miles on one tank (some guys get 1000 miles)
    * diesel fuel has waaay stabler price (no high huckups) than gas
    * low maintenance (no sparkplugs, longer oil change intervals...)
    * engines made by Audi engineers
    * you can easily tinker the engine yourself :)

    Check out http://www.tdiclub.com

    I own a TDI and is just great.

    Peace!

  21. more on hybrids by glassesmonkey · · Score: 4, Informative

    I'm not sure how the pickup is slow.. The beauty of electric DC motors is the constant acceleration. I'm sure the set points in the current profile that hackers will one day be able to get into the cars to change the performance curves.

    For more geekier chemistry on electric/hybrids, here's Princton's chemistry website about hybrid electrics

    Pros:
    At a stop light, they are silent and no emissions. Silent start-up and DC-motor acceleration until the gas engine kicks on. Cool reuse of breaking energy into charging batteries instead of boring friction and heat in conventional cars. Can be used as a power plant, say, in power outages, or maybe one day, cars plugged into grid can run gas engine to produce electricty during peak times. And they sell pretty well

    Cons:
    From a cost point of view, they'll never beat out the super-efficient gas motors mini-cars. Battery life and cost of replacement (currently >= value of older hybrid vehicle). The impact on environment for spent toxic chemicals. Engine repairs. (I'm not sure if you've ever look in one, but they are jam-packed with every inch filled and basically unserviceable in terms of the ever fewer small jobs you can do yourself). Oh, and you *MUST* use specially licensed high-voltage service techs, which are few and far between currently. Will cause gas prices to rise -- see econ 101 supply vs. demand

    1. Re:more on hybrids by vondo · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Will cause gas prices to rise -- see econ 101 supply vs. demand.

      How's that again? You must have taken a very different econ class from any I ever did.

      The "supply" of oil is a function of the price. Higher prices mean more oil becomes economically recoverable. If the demand for oil drops, the oil that is cheapest to pump gets pumped. The rest sits in the ground.

      Of course, the problem is that the cheapest oil to pump isn't governed by free market forces, it is price controlled (OPEC), so requiring less isn't necessarily going to mean much downward pressure on the price, but it certainly won't cause the price to go up.

      Maybe you are thinking of economies of scale, but oil production is so far beyond the point where that is changing.

  22. Toyota Prius Reliability by 511pf · · Score: 3, Informative
    In the compact segment it was the remarkable Toyota Prius that took top honours with 4.5/4.7 and 63/60 mpg. This car is reliable too - a Vancouver-based Prius taxi was recently taken off the road with over 332,000 km on the clock and no major repairs. It was only taken out of service because Toyota in Japan wanted to strip it down and check everything out (the driver was given a new Prius at no charge). Perhaps even Toyota was amazed at this vehicle's astonishing durability, but some credit must go to driver, Andrew Grant.
    http://www.canadiandriver.com/articles/tw/thrifty. htm
  23. Re:Some Hybrids make me wonder... by pmz · · Score: 3, Interesting

    What if you made a full internal combustion car with a lightweight aluminum chasis, a variable speed transmission, low resistance tires and sleek aerodynamics?

    This has pretty much been done. Aside from the full CVT, I believe this kind of car is called one of "Saturn S Series", "Honda Civic", "Toyota Corrola", etc. These cars pretty much all have a spaceframe chassis, small 4-cylinder engine, smaller tires, etc, and they represent just about the best mass-produced conventional cars can do without becoming a "Toyota Echo" or "Geo Metro".

    I personally have no problems with the idea of a hybrid car. However, all we need, now, is economies of scale bringing down price. The relative simplicity of a hybrid car (electric + smaller gas engine) should allow up-front costs and maintenance costs to go even lower than current cars (eventually, that is).

  24. Re:Prius rocks (and I've got a Honda) by nate1138 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I've got a 2003 Prius, and I wish I had waited a year. Still, the mileage and range kicks ass. The civic is pretty sweet to, though. Especially if you are into modding your car. All the aesthetic and suspension bits from the regular civics fit the hybrid (just no drivetrain parts). The prius has very little aftermarket support.

    --
    Where's my lobbyist? Right here.
  25. Re:Weird brakes by mrv · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Whenever you switch from one car to another, you
    have to get used to the new car.

    Compared to most other vehicles, the Toyota Prius'
    brakes can seem a little "grabby." After a short
    time driving, you get used to it.

    Heck, I'd rather have "grabby" brakes compared to
    "mushy" brakes any day, for safety reasons!

    --
    -mrv
  26. Definitely get a Honda Civic Hybrid by Jerk+City+Troll · · Score: 5, Informative

    My girlfriend got a 2003 Civic Hybrid with a CVT (Continuously Variable Transmission) last April. This vehcile is phenominal. As soon as I have the money, I will be getting one myself.

    With proper driving technique, I've gotten it as high as 52.6mpg (average). (There is an instantaneous mpg meter beneath the average gauge that shows you what you're getting as you go over hills and so forth--it really helps you adjust your driving for maximum efficiency.) Without much thought, it usually averages between 43-46mpg. With a 12.7 gallon (it might be 13) tank, I've gone as far as 620 miles.

    The engineering is quite nice, the car has been very reliable. The ride is remarkably smooth and the acceleration is silky. Handling is amazing. One nasty downside is the car is very light, so it hydroplanes easier than most vehicles. I would highly recommend getting AA-AAA rated tires (like Falkens) if you drive in wet areas a lot. They will help reduce this.

    The interior is great too. If you didn't know it was a hybrid, you would think you were driving a regular car (albeit the console is very slick, kind of a retro look). It's a very spatious, full-sized sedan. The backseat floor does not have a hump in the middle and is also quite generous space-wise. I cannot say enough about the interior: it's a very decent size.

    A quick summary of how it works: you have a small, 1.3L gasoline engine (I think 52hp). Right on the drive train, just before the transmission is the electric motor (that contribute an aditional 41hp for a total of 93). When electricity is "pumped" into the motor, it obviously reduces the load on the engine. This is used for acceleration and hill climbing. When idle, the electric motor does what all motors do when pushed externally: it generates power to charge the battery. The brakes are regenerative. When you stop at traffic lights or stop-signs, the engine stops to save gasoline. Since it has solid state ignition, it has zero turn-over, so it starts instantly (as soon as you let off the brake).

    Apparantly, there are also a variety of hacks that can be done to cause it to favor the electric motor more for those of us who are really light on the gas pedal. I haven't really investigated this, so consider them rumors.

    My recommendation: get one ASAP. You will not be disappointed with this car. It could use a few extra trimmings, but even in its simplicity feature-wise, it's a very enjoyable car. My girlfriend calculates it will pay for itself in a matter of 5 years. Nothing much more to say. At least go test drive one.

    Oh, and we also looked at the Toyota Prius. Those things suck ass. They are very rough to drive. The computer screen is always full of motion and it's very distracting without lending much usefulness. Furthermore, it's cramped inside and the vehcile controls are just... bizarre. The engine compartment is also very cramped. Doing work on that vehicle would require taking a lot of shit apart, ergo it may be very expensive to service. Handling sucked. Overall, the Toyota Prius is just as shitty as its Echo counterpart.

    One last note: you may want to hold off on a hybrid from anyone though. Honda has plans to market a fuel-cell powered electric car in the US within the next couple of years. Those will be far more interesting I think, if they ever actually reach dealerships.

    Disclaimer: I do not work for Honda in any way. They just happen to make a spectacular hybrid vehcile.

    1. Re:Definitely get a Honda Civic Hybrid by Jerk+City+Troll · · Score: 3, Informative
      A Civic is a full-sized sedan. Uh-huh.

      All modern Honda Accords and Civics use the same frame and base. The only difference is the shell and the luxuries. Also, try getting into one. They're quite large.

      But you didn't look at the new Prius. When it comes out, it will raise the bar when it comes to hybrids. It's much bigger (it is a true mid-size car) and has more horsepower, yet still gets 50 mpg.

      It looks cool. It's hard to get much information from that Flash crap though. Is there anywhere I can go to just get information, not a marketer's wet-dream manifested by a cheasy Flash animation?

      However, it seems my primary complaint with the Prius remains in effect: the car tries too damn hard to be futuristic.

      Joe Consumer doesn't want a car that looks and feels like it's from 50 years in the future. Joe Consumer doesn't want an Enterprise shuttle craft. That is not going to turn on most people except for geeks and early adopters.

      I see hybrids as a direction with a specific purpose: reduce gasoline consumption as much as possible. This has many benefits which I will not elaborate on besides saving money and the environment. The Prius does not work to encourage the masses to accept electric cars. The masses don't want to know it's an electric car. They really don't care. Basically, Toyota is pushing TECHNOLOGY TECHNOLOGY TECHNOLOGY. Honda is pushing a practical, attractive car (oh, and by the way, it's electric and gets good gas milage). The Prius is loud and obnoxious. The Civic Hybrid is subtle and calm. See my point?

      Toyota needs to offer a car that's offering these features and doesn't appear to be from the sapce age. That will attract many more people to the offerings. Right now, the perpetuate the stereotype (myth) that all electric cars must have this insane tear-drop shape and other crap. Sure, it may be better for aerodynamics, but people don't want that.

  27. Re:Getting a lot better by pixelpusher220 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Actually I just bought a 2003 Civic Hybrid on Sept 1st. And I can't really complain about much. No the pickup isn't spectacular. It's a 4 cylinder engine and a small one. Total HP is somewhere around 90 *I think*. You don't buy this for power.

    500 miles on a tank of gas IS pretty spectacular, when said tank is only 13.2 gallons. 42 mpg average so far, with a mix of commuting and highway driving. That figure is still rising too. I did about a 100 mile round trip highway, and got 53 mpg. Damn nice on the wallet.

    The Civic Hybrid is just that. A Civic. The only significant difference is that you can't fold the rear seat down because that's where the battery pack is mounted vertically behind the read seat. Trunk space? you couldn't even the tell battery pack was there if it wasn't pointed out to you. Plenty of space for normal people.

    The dealer readily admits they aren't entirely sure how long the battery pack will remain useful. So it comes with an 8 yr 80k mile warranty on that system; independant of the vehicle warranty. I got a 6 yr 100k total vehicle warranty so it's good for as long as I realistically plan to have it.

    Geek factor: I'm finding it's cool being able to watch (& feel) the electric assist kick in. Or the engine shut off while I'm braking to a stop. The engine shut off is selectable; there's an 'econ' button on the dash. If it's not selected then the engine won't stop. Summer and needing AC are the main reason for that. The AC doesn't run if the engine isn't running. The fan still works but it can get warm. Having the option is a nice touch.

    I'm still in the 'new car' mode of figuring things out, but this has a whole knew paradigm of stuff to figure out. The dash gauges are a pretty informative mix of what's going on. It has a instant mpg bar that goes up n down as you drive, as well as displaying the overall mpg for a trip mileage. (2 of these). One I have on total vehicle mileage so I can see what I'm getting as I continue driving. The other I use for various trips to see what different types of driving produce fuel economy wise.

    All in all I'm very happy with it so far.

    --
    People in cars cause accidents....accidents in cars cause people :-D
  28. That was just a summary: here's answers. by Jerk+City+Troll · · Score: 3, Informative
    Are they a good alternative to conventional vehicles, or just a geek toy?

    They are a great value. Your mom would be proud of you.

    Do they perform well in the city?

    If driven properly, you should see as high as 46-48mpg in city driving. If you drive with little concern for economy, you usually get around 43-45mpg.

    How about on long road trips?

    Again, driven carefully, I've gotten as high as 52.6mpg on my girl's Honda Civic Hybrid. That is accomplished by driving around ~55mph and slowing a bit when climbing hills. If you drive aggressively (say, 65-70mpg constant), you get around 47-48mpg. They can certainly keep up with traffic, mind you.

    Remember, this experience is with a Honda Civic Hybrid, not a Prius. Your milage (arf) will vary.

  29. Honda Civic Hybrid by dsz · · Score: 5, Informative
    I very happily own a hybrid vehicle - a 2003 Honda Civic Hybrid - and would recommend it highly to the right kind of person.


    First, the good news: I drive my car about 40 miles a day (driving commutes suck!) and get around 55 miles per gallon. My commute is about 70%/30% highway to city driving. When I drive it around the city (which I generally try _not_ to do - Boston is bike-friendly enough, plus I live near the T), I get mileage closer to 50 mpg, and when I've gone on longer roadtrips it's up near 60 mpg.


    More good news: It's a real car. It seats five. It has a reasonable sized trunk (not huge, though). With a few exceptions, it's very similar to the non-hybrid Civic, so my car is comfortable, well equipped (CD player, power everything, ABS, etc.) and pretty well designed. I wasn't interested in the Insight 'cause it's small and somewhat awkward and not what I call a "real" car.


    The not-so-good news: The one large complaint I have about the car is that the back seat does not fold down (that's where they stashed the batteries).


    Some economics: I spent a little less than $20K on my car. The hybrid is about three or four thousand more than the regular Civic. I'll get a $2000 deduction on my 2003 income tax (giving me about $600), and I'll save some (but not tons) on gas vs. the regular Civic that probably adds up to over about $1500 over 100,000 miles. So basically, I break even. If I had bought a used car, I would've spent far less money, even in the long run.


    I think I made the right decision when I bought my car because:

    • I wanted a car
    • I wanted to pollute less and use less gasoline than the average car
    • I wanted to support hybrid technology and send the message to auto makers that people were interested in these cars
    • I happened to have enough money to do the above


    So, the bad news is that supporting hybrid technology and being good to the environment (while still owning a car) is an expensive proposition right now. The good news is that the more and more people are buying the cars and that if you can afford them, they're quality automobiles.


    I'd be happy to answer questions about the Civic or my decision-making process. I also collected some links and made some notes about the car - you can see those here.

  30. I own a 2003 Honda Civic Hybrid by Scottaroo · · Score: 3, Informative
    Greetings:

    I took a job which requires about 150 miles of travel per day, so I purchased the car for basic transportation. I purchased the manual transmission model due to personal preference, YMMV (literally) with the automatic model. On average, I get between 52 and 58 mpg on basic highway driving at 65 mph. Air conditioning will take 5 mpg off of that. Traveling at 75 mph will drop another 5 to 8 off of that. Wind and weather conditions can effect the mileage as well. Stop and go driving in town with the air on will net me 35 to 40 mpg. Drafting semis on the Interstate at 75 mph will get you 60+ mpg.

    I'm a big guy - 6'4" and 250 lbs, and I fit in the machine pretty well. I have about an inch of headroom left. I can get the seat far enough back, but no one but a child would be able to sit behind me.

    I paid less than $20000 for it - plus there is a one-time $2000 tax-deduction, so that's a bonus.

    I've put about 16000 miles on it so far. It drives and handles like any other 4 cylinder basic transportation car I've ever driven. The torque is better, though, so I don't feel like I'm going to have to get out and push while trying to get onto the Interstate.

    Some nits: It takes 0W20 oil, which I've had trouble finding. The good news is that oil changes are only every 5000 miles. It doesn't have much cargo capacity - total weight is only 800 lbs. You can really tell the difference when you have it full. The rear seats don't fold down like a standard Civic (the batteries sit on the rear axle), so the trunk is a little confining. I would only rate it at one-dead-body.

    Overall, it's been great regular transportation. I liked it alot better than the other Honda hybrid. That car was smaller and lighter and got pushed around on the Interstate. This is a regular Civic in most every way except the powertrain.

    --
    ----------
    If your answer is Microsoft, you obviously didn't understand the question.
  31. Re:Getting a lot better by Golias · · Score: 5, Funny
    If you are considering a hybrid vehicle, there are two words you need to examine closely before going through with it:

    repair costs

    What makes hybrids affordable is that there are massive government subsidies reducing the price of the car. This masks the fact that many of the parts for these cars are enormously expensive. A hybrid Civic that gets into a minor city-street collision with a minivan or SUV is probably going to be so expensive to repair, that the insurance company will want to total it out.

    If the long-term potential costs of maintenance and parts doesn't scare you off, and you don't expect to haul a boat trailer or something, then the hybrid cars can be a terrific way to go. Fantastic gas millage and a super-quiet ride. The inventor of regenerative breaks should get a medal.

    Personally, I'll stick with my Crown Victoria for now. It may drink gas, (I get about 20 MPG from my highway and city driving combined) but it's safe, it seats six, and has a trunk big enough to easily fit three dead hookers. More, if you chop 'em up and put them in bags. Plus, the V8 is powerful enough to tow a lot of stuff when I need to, and the suspension is so smooth, it's like driving a hovercraft. Best of all, the reputation for being an "old man's car" means cheap insurance in spite of being almost the same car that the cops are tearing around town in.

    The Crown Vic LS is like a Lincoln town car for half the price, and is the most under-rated car of the last decade, IMHO.

    If you really want to get a hybrid car, consider looking for a used Toyota Prius, perhaps sold by some Yuppie asshole who only bought it to be trendy, and wants to trade up to a Mini Cooper S now that Minis are considered the New Hotness.

    --

    Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

  32. Diesel is Dirty by doctor_no · · Score: 3, Informative

    Diesals are cheap, so if you only care about saving money it's a good alternative, BUT if you care about the enviroment it's far worse than petrol and hybrid alternatives.

    It is true that modern diesel engines produce a lot less carbon dioxide than before, so some people claim diesels are enviromentally friendly, but diesels produce much more of smog-forming nitrogen oxides and toxic particulate matter (or soot) into the air we breathe than petrol counterparts. These particles, because they are small enough to be inhaled deep into the lungs, can cause or exacerbate a variety of serious health problems.

    Even with the EuroIV(2005) and EuroV(2008) regulations, diesels are still much larger pollutants than petrol engines, and release more arsenic, lead, sulfur, and other particulate matter into the enviroment.

    1. Re:Diesel is Dirty by doctor_no · · Score: 3, Informative

      Here are the facts:

      1.) To meet SULEV standards, that current Petrol hybrid Toyota, meets you need to make less than 0.5 g/kWh of nitrogen oxides pollutants, for Diesel EuroIV standards that will be enacted in 2005 the minimum is set at 3.5 g/kWh. Most diesels cars on the road don't even meet these EuroIV standards today. Even the best Diesel standards produce six times more nitrogen oxides than the Hybrid cars discussed.

      2.) low-sulfur diesels aren't widely available in the US, the country that produces the most pollutants from automobiles in the world.

      3.) Bio-diesels are great but aren't available almost anywhere.

      4.) 90% of particulate matter produced by diesels are less than 1 micron in size, thse small particles are not easily exhaled, and stay inside the lungs for long periods of time, corroding cells and ultimately leading to tumor growth (http://www.vpirg.org/campaigns/environmentalHealt h/dieselExhaust.html).

  33. Re:Let's stop this before it starts by Jace+of+Fuse! · · Score: 4, Funny

    Pet Peeve #843290: The new trend of prefixing comments with "Pet Peeve #i+1"

    Pet Peeve #i+2 - I fed my Pet Peeve today. He ate everything. I was so proud. Then I shaved him and took him outside to play, where he was suddenly run over by some insensitive clod in an SUV.

    --

    "Everything you know is wrong. (And stupid.)"

    Moderation Totals: Wrong=2, Stupid=3, Total=5.
  34. Current US hybrid choices by mrv · · Score: 4, Informative

    2000-current Honda Insight, 2-seater:
    http://www.hondacars.com/models/model_overview.asp ?ModelName=Insight

    2003-current Honda Civic Hybrid 5-passenger compact sedan:
    http://www.hondacars.com/models/model_overview.asp ?ModelName=Civic+Hybrid

    2001-2003 Toyota Prius 5-passenger compact sedan:
    http://www.toyota.com/prius

    2004 Toyota Prius 5-passenger midsize liftback:
    http://www.toyota.com/prius/minisite/index.html
    (for those who dislike Flash, info here:
    http://www.toyota.com/prius/minisite/html/printabl e.html and here http://www.toyota.com/prius/minisite/specs/specs_b ody.html )

    if you live in Japan there is also the hybrid
    Estima (7-8 passenger minivan similar to the Previa),
    and the mild-hybrid Crown large sedan.

    if you can wait a year or so, Ford should have out
    their hybrid Escape (info: http://www.hybridford.com (Flash only),
    a "small" SUV/CUV that actually has towing capacity.
    Lexus should also have their RX330 hybrid (the
    RX400H) small SUV/CUV out (see http://www.lexus.com/about/hybrid/index.html
    with Toyota shortly following with the hybrid
    Highlander cousin.

    I've also heard of the GM/Saturn Vue, the Nissan
    Altima (I think that's the model), and the Toyota
    Sienna, as next on the block with hybrid powertrains
    (i.e. full/assist hybrids).

    --
    -mrv
  35. Re:2003 Honda Civic Hybrid - Me too by pichuco · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Got the same car. Love it. Not too long ago I read some article (in Ars Technica) about how driving the HCH changes the way you drive. It's absolutely true. I'm from a country where people drive with intent to kill. Stop signs are taken as suggestions. Always drove fast, recklessly and (my wife would argue) stupidly. I was brought up that way, sorry. Anyway, since I got the HCH my only goal while driving is to maximize the mileage. This model comes with an instantaneous mileage reading and a cumulative one. So now I rarely go over 68 mph. I'm getting 57~58 mpg on the road, and around 48 in the city (I have the manual shift one - another cultural hangup). There's just one thing that I started doing that is definitely moronic. I tend to lock on big semis and tailgate them to improve the mileage even more. Feel like Lance Armstrong. Except he's not retarded, I think. Anyway the technology on these guys is pretty awesome. You get to a stop sign, and the engine stops. Start rolling again and the engine starts as you press the accelerator. A thing of beauty. Plus it's really quiet, and if you choose to ignore it, you would never know that you are not driving just a regular Civic. Finally, you get an obnoxious smug feeling when the idiots on the SUV zoom by you. (Though you could hit 100 mph if you were not so compulsively trying to break the barrier of 60 mpg).

  36. Re:Getting a lot better by arivanov · · Score: 3, Interesting

    They are still CRAP (TM). They will continue to be crap until they are 100% fuel cell driven or batery driven. If your main engine is electric having breaking recouperation makes sense. If it is hybrid it only adds weight, complexity and increases maintenance costs and it cannot recoup more then around 20% of the used energy ().

    For example the new Toyota Prius delivers lower MPG then the Daihatsu Sirion which is made by the same Toyota group (51 best vs 57 best). It is also slower and more sluggish (14 s to 62 compared to under 9.0). It also has higher emissions (almost twice worse on all counts). All of it while carrying the same amount of passengers and having only 30 liters more luggage space. It has a huge maintenance bill as the battery cells last only around 40-50 thousand miles and it has high ongoing maintenance as well. It is also a bomb. There are very few things that are more suicidal then sitting on a shorting battery in an accident with a fuel tank nearby.

    Also I will not even compare it to a modern diesel. The new Audi A2 TDI which once again carries the same number of people and has the same luggage space (320 or so liters) can deliver 80mpg with even less emissions then the Sirion. That is VW which I hate. Still it is the diesel king, but Peugeot, Mitsubishi and several others are not that far behind with figures in the 50-60 MPG with corresponding emissions for a small family car. They also beat the crap out of the Prius on maintenance, acceleration and overall driving experience.

    Hybrids are not the answer. They help develop technology which is useful for fuel cell or fully electric vehicles, but they are definitely not the answer. So I think they should be sponsored even further so that technology can be developed. But I will not buy one. I will chose something less polluting.

    --
    Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
    http://www.sigsegv.cx/
  37. Re:Getting a lot better by mentin · · Score: 5, Interesting
    42 mpg average so far ... damn nice on the wallet.

    Do the math: let's say you drive 12k miles a year, this is 285 gallons of gas. So you pay around $500 a year for gas. A regular sedan owner with 21 mpg would pay twice as much, ie $500 a year more. In 10 years he will pay $5k more. Person who bought hybrid already paid ~$4k more when he bought the car, and will pay at least ~$1k more for more expensive service.

    So from the point of view of money, hybrids do not worth it - and would be considerably worse if automakers were not forced to sell them (some percentage of total cars sold should be hybrid or electric in U.S.).

    I think hybrids are great for environment and a cool techno gadget, but hopes of saving on gas - forget about it. Not in the U.S. where gas is still very cheap (compare with Europe).

    --
    MSDOS: 20+ years without remote hole in the default install
  38. I prefer hydrogen. by GMontag · · Score: 3, Funny

    I prefer my hydrogen powered Jeep, but maybe that's just me.

  39. Environmental Mafia by ElectricMayhem · · Score: 5, Funny

    Trunk space? ... Plenty of space for normal people.

    And with the 500 miles off of a single tank of gas, there is no credit card trail at gas stations on the way to drop off the body. Efficient and practical.

  40. Re:Getting a lot better by mithras+the+prophet · · Score: 5, Informative
    What makes hybrids affordable is that there are massive government subsidies reducing the price of the car.
    Not that there aren't massive government subsidies reducing the price of oil, of course... $167 billion this year?
    --
    four nine eighteen twenty-7 thirty-nine forty-7 fiftyeight sixty-nine seventy-9 eighty-8 one-hundred-and-nine one-twenty
  41. Diesel-Electric Hybrids Are Coming by meehawl · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Whatever about the mileage improvements of a gasoline-electric vehicle, many posters have already pointed out that current clean-burning modern diesel cars already get 50-70 mpg. All the major manufacturers (yes even the American ones, though of course the Europeans are ahead in diesel technology) are bringing out diesel-electric hybrids over the next few years. This innovation should add around 50% to the mileage of typical diesel cars. Within 10 years we will see 100mpg diesel-electric hybrids.

    --

    Da Blog
  42. Re:A couple of thoughts... by NaugaHunter · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Let's see...

    1999..........$0.899
    2003..........$1.799

    Yeah, it can't possibly double by 2007. Why, we'd have to get involved in a war in the Middle East and have accidents at offshore oil rigs and have problems with the Alaskan Pipe line and have an energy company-friendly administration that won't release oil reserves...

    --
    R: That voice. Where have I heard that voice before? B: In about 365 other episodes. But I don't know who it is either.
  43. Re:Why are there no diesel-electric hybrids? by Jon+Abbott · · Score: 4, Informative

    Check out the eCycle, a diesel-electric hybrid motorcycle that gets 180MPG (no typo). The only disadvantage I see is that they aren't out yet... :^)

  44. Re:Some Hybrids make me wonder... by JesseL · · Score: 4, Informative

    He means low rolling resistance tires. Rolling resistance is primarily due to the sidewalls of the tire flexing (resulting in friction within the tire) as it rolls. This resistance can be reduced by stiffening the sidewalls and using rubber compounds that are more elastic in the sidewalls. To see an extreme example of rolling resistance try pushing your car accross level ground with the tires inflated to the reccomended pressure, then do it again with the tires inflated to half their nominal pressure. Big difference huh? This is why underinflated tires can overheat and catastrophicly fail cough*firestone*cough.

    --
    "Prefiero morir de pie que vivir siempre arrodillado!"
  45. Buy a Motorcycle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    It's a fuel efficient penis extension...

  46. You note the cost. Interesting point... by Jerk+City+Troll · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Yes, Civic Hybrids are fairly expensive vehicles for what you get. It's a matter of weighing the appropriate price-performance ratio.

    It should be interesting to note that while Honda sells these for about 20,000$, Honda manufactures them at 30,000$ (according to a salesperson at Herson's Honda in Rockville, MD).

    So while it's good that we're supporting hybrid technology and trying to encourage auto manufacturers, they may not move forward as quickly as we'd like. Perhaps with increased popularity, they'll produce a higher volume and refine the manufacturing process? Who knows.

    Unfortunately, according to the same salesperson, Honda is interested in selling these vehicles so they can reduce the average vehicle emmissions of all cars they sell. This allows them to legally sell more SUVs and other gas guzzlers (hence they are willing to make a 10,000$ write-off on every Civic Hybrid). Nothing for free it seems. What a lousy trade-off.

  47. Re:Getting a lot better by scenic · · Score: 4, Informative

    You're forgetting the great tax benefits you get with owning a hybrid.

    --

    politics, food, music, life: FatMixx

  48. Re:Getting a lot better by BrainInAVat · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I've had my Civic Hybrid for a week now. I'm getting about 40 mpg with a lot of city and heavy traffic driving (Newark, NJ). It's slowly but steadily going up, though. Earlier this week it was 38 or so.

    The engine shut-off isn't quite what it's cracked up to be. Yeah, when you stop at a light or in traffic the engine shuts off. But if you creep forward a bit the engine won't shut off the next time you stop. You have to get up to a certain speed or go a certain distance/time (not sure yet what the rules actually are) or next time you stop the engine stays on. And it doesn't even recharge the battery at that time. It's very frustrating because I sit in a lot of stop & go traffic and you can't just stay put when all the cars in front of you are rolling. You let off the brake and the engine kicks back on, and the only way to ensure it turns off next time is to let a big gap form between you and the car in front of you then gun it and step on the brake. Not a thing you want to be doing in heavy traffic.

    I'm not yet 100% convinced a hybrid was the best choice. The gas mileage is great and the ultra low emissions is nice, but I passed up on a lot of frills to get them. (You can get the top model Civic practically maxed out for less than the hybrid.. you give up a sun roof, fog lights, fold-down rear seats, and more). But for all intents and purposes, even the hybrid is just a regular car. It's spunky enough. I've had no trouble getting up to speed on the highway or keeping up the speed. Even with such a "weak" engine it still goes pretty fast. And besides, it's one of the only cars that gives you that 'holier than thou' feeling. So maybe I'm 80% convinced. Ask me again in a couple of weeks.

    --
    Anything less than perfection is failure.
  49. Re:Check out the TDI Volkswagons! by sstaton · · Score: 3, Informative
    The technology is actually called Turbo Direct Injection, named for the manner in which diesel oil is dispursed into the combustion chamber to maximize combustion, thus extracting more thermal energy and leaving less unoxidized fuel and other nasty things in the exhaust. Unfortunately, as many posters have noted, in the United States the quality of diesel fuel is poor (high sulfur) and thus even with the better fuel economy, there's probably more nitrous pollutants coming out of the TDI engine than even a light truck puts out (maybe, with CAFE set on "stun" for trucks and "kill" for passenger cars, it's hard to tell).

    I test drove all three (Civic, Prius, TDI) but chose a Golf TDI because it was less expensive than either the Civic Hybrid or Prius, and VW's ergonomics are far better than the Civic and Prius (the new Prius is going to be a far better experience than the initial version). Plus, with VW cars you can get the Monsoon sound upgrade for a nominal fee (8-amp, 8-speaker CD/Tape/FM/AM) in all models. The Golf TDI comes in two flavors (GL, GLS) and the Jetta TDI comes in both sedan and station wagon, also in GL and GLS trim. That's right, a real, honest to God station wagon that isn't half bad and can really haul a decent load.

    The TDI will gladly haul you at over 100 MPH if need be, and I typically get 43 MPG driving in D/FW traffic well above the posted limits and/or in horrendous sprawl-induced jams. Stick with the five-speed unless you simply cannot drive a standard ... the extra mileage will make you smile. I usually drive 560 miles between fillups, and I often have a gallon or more left in the tank at that point (VW's ad claims 750 miles between fillups ... that's possible if you drive 65 MPH and hit no traffic on Interstates).

    P.S. The typical diesel gas pump is a filthy mess unless you buy diesel at the pricier pay-at-the-pump stations that actually offer it (usually there are only one or two diesel pumps). Truck stops have the best prices ... usually ten to twenty cents per gallon below the national brand stations, but they're really nasty to fill up at (and no one in an eighteen wheeler, let alone a "dually" pickup, can see your TDI).

    --

    The two most common things in the Universe are dark matter and stupidity.

  50. And in comes the gov't assist with a tax break... by the-matt-mobile · · Score: 3, Informative

    In 10 years he will pay $5k more. Person who bought hybrid already paid ~$4k more when he bought the car, and will pay at least ~$1k more for more expensive service. However, in the states we get a nice $3k (I think that's the right figure) tax exemption which means you're in the black after only the second year of ownership.

  51. Re:Getting a lot better by Bradee-oh! · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "The dash gauges are a pretty informative mix of what's going on. It has a instant mpg bar that goes up n down as you drive, as well as displaying the overall mpg for a trip mileage. (2 of these). One I have on total vehicle mileage so I can see what I'm getting as I continue driving. The other I use for various trips to see what different types of driving produce fuel economy wise."

    My parent's 1988 Ford Aerostar had all that. My dad's 95 VW Jetta had that, as does my brother's 2000 Jetta. I'm sort of amused that most people haven't had this kind of thing for years.

    I think you missed a key point - he's not talking about mileage, he's talking about a REALTIME miles-per-gallon display. That is the instantaneous mpg your vehicle is traveling at a moment in time. I have a 2000 Jetta with every option, and unless he added it afterwards, your brother does NOT have this option. :)

    On a different note on this feature, the only cars I've seen with a real-time mpg display before the hybrids started coming out was all the BMWs (that I've driven) for the last decade or so. It is a very handy feature that I think more cars SHOULD have. It's amazing to see how little changing your highway speed in a BMW M3, for example, makes the different between a constant 20mpg on the highway and between a constant 25-30mpg.

    It's also very amusing to watch your realtime mpg when you're jaunting around a racetrack. If you want to see how hard you're really driving the car, it's alot more telling to watch the mpg instead of the speedometer or even the tach. I still get a thrill everytime I blip the throttle to downshift to third at turn 11 at Thunderhill and watch the mpg dial spike from 20 to almost zero in an instant. :)

    --
    "This is Zombo Com, and welcome to you who have come to Zombo Com" - www.zombo.com
  52. Get real! by El · · Score: 4, Informative

    A hybrid Civic that gets into a minor city-street collision with a minivan or SUV is probably going to be so expensive to repair, that the insurance company will want to total it out.
    A Honda Civic Hybrid that gets into a "minor" collision is going to use the exact same parts to repair as a non-hybrid Civic!!! Meaning there is less chance of it getting totaled, because it cost more!!! The only non standard parts are the engine, batteries, and dashboard. The batteries are in the safest place in the car -- behind the rear seat. If your batteries and dashboard are destroyed, you've got bigger problems then replacing your car -- you're most likely dead. "Minor" collisions rarely require replacing engines; if you're in a collision that requires a new engine, your car is probably totalled regardless of whether or not it is a hybrid!

    --

    "Freedom means freedom for everybody" -- Dick Cheney

  53. I drive one by jACL · · Score: 5, Informative

    Have had it for a year, and learned a lot about them.

    There are three hybrids being sold right now:

    - Honda Civic Hybrid
    - Honda Insight
    - (2003) Toyota Prius

    The Hondas use a gas engine as their primary engine with an electric engine (which doubles as a generator during braking) as a secondary source of acceleration. Think of this arrangement as a gas engine with a massive-battery-powered electric supercharger. If the electric engine fails, the gas engine will still get you there -- it just accelerates slower.

    The Prius is the other way around -- its primary engine is electric, and a secondary gas engine gives it the acceleration. In the Prius, it is possible to drive (with very little gas pedal pressure) on electric alone -- something the Prius owners call "Zen driving." If the gas engine fails, you can still drive on the electric.

    Reliability:
    I know people who own both a Honda Civic Hybrid (HCH) and a 2003 Prius. I personally own the HCH. I would have no hesitation in buying one again. I average 54 MPG in the summer, and 45 MPG in the winter. Range is ~600 miles per tank; I drive 50 miles a day, and fill up twice a month. I have heard that it is possible to get ~700 miles/tank in a Prius, but have never got a first hand report of that.

    The Honda had one early bug with deep, cold weather -- very occasionally, the electric system would shut down and not restart until the car was shut down and restarted. A flash of the computer firmware fixed it. Many people reported this problem. It also had an issue with a squeak in a support pillar, fixed by shimming with a business card. Maintenance visits are scheduled for every 10000 miles. Gas mileage is better on the highway (51 mpg) than the city (49 mpg).

    The 2003 Prius has had more problems. Issues were with "highway wandering" -- it feels like the car wants to migrate around the road -- and shaking of the steering wheel at low speeds. Cause: the entire power steering rack needed to be replaced. There's also the gas engine failure called the "Big Hand" that's fixed with a similar car reboot, but it's caused by the Accelerator Pedal Assembly needing to be replaced. Many people report that they've had both of these problems. Maintenance is more frequent at 7,500 miles. Gas mileage is better in the city (51 mpg) than the highway (49 mpg).

    I don't know anyone who drives a Honda Insight. Supposedly they still make ~1500 of them a year, but rumor has it that Honda is going to be dropping them.

    Near-term and Farther-out Models:
    The Prius has been out longer than the HCH, and is getting a technological refresh in 2004. The 2003 Prius and the HCH are both 4-seater compacts, but the 2004 Prius will be a mid-size, with better mileage (59 city, 51 highway) and better acceleration (0-60 in 10 instead of 12). There is currently a waiting list for them.

    Cars/Trucks/SUVs due to be released as hybrids in 2004:

    Honda Accord,
    Honda CR-V,
    Ford Escape

    2004 or 2005:
    Chevy Silverado
    Saturn Vue
    GMC Suburban

    Here's an in-depth look at Hybrid technology from the Union of Concerned Scientists (Google HTML translation here).

    Here's the best description of what it's like to drive one.

    There is a federal tax deduction of $2000 for buying a new hybrid. Several states also offer their own tax deductions or credits -- check here to look them up. Some states (but not all) also let you drive them in their high occupancy lanes, even though you may only have one driver in it.

    Oh, by the way -- I know that the 2003 Honda Civic Hybrids are

    --
    "It remains to be seen if the human brain is powerful enough to solve the problems it has created." Dr. Richard Wallace
  54. Re:Getting a lot better by amanpatelhotmail.com · · Score: 5, Insightful
    So from the point of view of money, hybrids do not worth it

    I would disagree. A hybrid car can save money in some other ways too:

    • Oil Change period. 10,000 miles compared to 3,000 miles of a regular car.
    • Tax Benefits ($2,000 deduction) if eligible.
  55. Why I read Slashdot by JonTurner · · Score: 3, Funny

    >>it's safe, it seats six, and has a trunk big enough to easily fit three dead hookers. More, if you chop 'em up and put them in bags.

    Chop 'em up? Why, I never would have thought of that!

    You know, it's just that sort of practical use-it-every-day knowledge that keeps me coming back here to Slashdot! Thanks, guys!

  56. Re:Getting a lot better by randyest · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I think you missed a key point - he's not talking about mileage, he's talking about a REALTIME miles-per-gallon display. That is the instantaneous mpg your vehicle is traveling at a moment in time. I have a 2000 Jetta with every option, and unless he added it afterwards, your brother does NOT have this option. :)

    Maybe you have every option for the model you seleced, but I can assure you that the top-end (US models, at least) VW Jettas have had both instantaneous and average MPG displays since 1998 at least (my 1998 Jetta had it, as did my 2000, and so does my new 2003 Jetta GLX).

    I can't recall the acronyms for the older sub-models, but in the case of 2003 Jettas, you can't get the "dash computer" (which includes the MPG displays among other cool features, such as miles remaining in tank, trip time, etc.) unless you get the GLX model, which really has no options (I think you can pay for 17" rims vs. the standard 16", but that's not really an option, more of a dealer-provided aftermarket thing, I believe). You get V6, leather, sunroof, power everything with memory, monsoon stereo, automatic climate control, trip-tronic automatic transmission, alloy rims, etc. with the GLX whether you like it or not, and several of those features are unavailable on lower-end Jettas.

    To bring this a little bit back OT, I'm surprised that the mileage isn't better than the 30-50 the opsted noted. I get 29-31MPG avg in the city with my V6 Jetta (and I am an acelleration-addict), and almost 40MPG on highway trips. I thought the hybrids were much better.

    --
    everything in moderation
  57. Re:Real Question: mpg vs total vehicle weight by tchuladdiass · · Score: 3, Informative

    Basically, the main thing that the hybrid does for you is it lets the car re-capture the energy wasted in breaking, and apply that to taking off again. Which is why the Honda gets better milage in city than highway (most cars do better on highway milage).

  58. Wimp! by TheConfusedOne · · Score: 3, Funny

    You need the Hydrogen BOMB powered Jeep Orion. :-D

    --
    --- I wish I could hear the soundtrack to my life. That way I'd know when to duck.
  59. Re:Do the math by BeCre8iv · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "In 10 years he will pay $5k more. Person who bought hybrid already paid ~$4k more when he bought the car, and will pay at least ~$1k more for more expensive service."

    Factor in the effect of T.W.A.T on oil prices over the next decade as big oil 'investment' goes up in smoke - the savings look far sweeter.

    Also factor in the fact hat whatever % of your drive time is dead slow or sat still if you city drive - which still burns gas as you chug at the lights - mileage is not the best starting point.

    And here is what people dont get - ITS NOT ABOUT THE MONEY!

    You cant put a price on our childrens future.

    --
    This perpetual motion machine Lisa made is a joke, it just keeps getting faster and faster. - Homer
  60. Return the suburban by jtheory · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Me, I have to scope my vehicle for the worst case scenario (seven passengers and a trailer) and then live with the surplus capacity the rest of the time.

    Wow, I know what you mean. I'm still making payments on the personal jet. Gotta visit Europe sometimes, after all.

    Seriously, you're over 25, right? Price out rentals, and see how it adds up against the purchase price and gas prices of the SUV. Try out hotwire.com, and/or sign up with the various rental agencies to get their cheapest online prices. If your vacation every year is to spend a month on the road with you, the spouse, and your 5 kids, what you're saying could make sense.

    If you usually *fly* somewhere for your vacations, though, it doesn't make sense. If you only need the trailer twice a year, to schlep your kid's stuff to college and back, it doesn't make sense.

    I obviously don't know your personal situation... but there are actually surprisingly few people out there for whom an SUV is really logical. But how many people really have the self-awareness to just skip the rationalizations and say, "it is worth $xxxxx, angry stares from the tree-huggers, and a greater risk of killing someone to me to avoid driving a station wagon or minivan, and/or to feel bigger than anyone else on the road."

    --
    There are only 10 types of people: those who understand decimal, those who don't, and, uh, 8 other types I forget.
  61. Americans are pansies by Moderation+abuser · · Score: 3, Funny

    That's the only conclusion I can come to after reading this thread. America is a country of scaredy cats.

    No wonder the Iraqi's are kicking your arses now that it's down to the nitty gritty.

    --
    Government of the people, by corporate executives, for corporate profits.
  62. Re:Getting a lot better by Lawbeefaroni · · Score: 4, Funny

    My 1989 Mercury Grand Marquis had that. It was a sticker on the dash that said "Bad."

    --
    "When it rains, it pours." --Morton's Salt
  63. Re:but what about his point? by plastik55 · · Score: 4, Informative

    5) I drive a large (Dodge Ram 1500) truck specifically because I'd prefer to be the stronger car in an accident. I don't wanna die unless I have to. so sue me :)

    Please, please, read the statistics, you're more than twice as likely to die in a Dodge Ram 1500 as in a safe 4-door sedan. The safety record on pickups is simply atrocious.

    --

    I have a positive modifier on Troll. When I mod someone Troll their karma should go UP!

  64. Re:Getting a lot better by Elroy+Jetson · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Indeed. Driving style can make a HUGE impact on fuel economy. I've got a 2001 Insight with the CVT transmission. If I drive like Joe Sixpack in his '84 Mustang (crushing the gas on every takeoff and waiting 'til the last second to brake), I get around 45mpg. On the other hand, I've had trips where I've averaged over 90mpg. The major keys to high gas mileage on my Insight are:

    1. Try to maintain a constant speed.
    2. Accelerate evenly when taking off, using a moderate amount of electric motor assist.
    3. Try to maintain a steady cruising speed between 35 and 45mph. The mpg bar will show you know when you've found the "sweet spot".
    4. Gas mileage is noticeably higher in warmer weather.
    5. Maintain large following distances, avoid hard braking, and roll through stops whenever possible. If you start braking early enough for that stop light, it could turn green while you're at 12mph instead of sitting at a dead stop.
    6. Use the hardest, lowest rolling resistance tires you feel comfortable with (the stock Bridgestone Potenzas are good for me). Keep them properly inflated; underinflation decreases fuel economy.
    7. Above about 30mph, you get better mpg with the windows up and air conditioner/vent in "economy" than with the windows down. Never use "auto" mode, since it disables the Insight's auto-stop feature.

    Contrary to popular opinion, using a higher-grade gasoline has shown no noticeable affect on fuel economy.

    My lifetime mpg over ~22,800 miles is 59.7mpg, including a trip from Louisville, KY to Seattle, WA and back by way of Montana. Through Snoqualmie and Lookout Pass. In January. With stock tires & no chains. As long as you don't try to plow through snow deeper than about 5-6", you should be fine through the winter.

    Final note: don't forget to check with your accountant for a possible tax break (both state and federal) on your "green" vehicle. Being able to write off a couple thousand in taxes can make that $20,000 Insight a hell of a lot more appealing.

  65. Re:Getting a lot better by avi33 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    plus it's socially responsible, and high ground level ozone levels leads to more asthma hospitalizations.

    Not that anyone seems to give a rat's ass about the air we breathe, all the arguments here are about horsepower and saving money.

  66. Breaking? by FireballFreddy · · Score: 3, Funny
    lets the car re-capture the energy wasted in breaking

    Then you should buy an American hybrid. American cars break all the time. ;)

    --
    SQUEAK, the Death of Rats explained.
  67. Hybrids don't beat good driving habits by cgleba · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Driving non-agressively in my 1997 2.2L standard
    2-door Dodge Neon I get 41 highway and 33 city -- and the car was very cheap to buy, there are no modifications and the car has 132hp and a .34 CD (not spectacular at all).

    In the end, the Prius, for example, can only do at most 10% better then that so it does not justify twice the cost. I bet if I made my Neon as aerodynamic as the Prius (.26 CD) and put on the same tires (less rolling resistance) I could get near the same gas mileage as the Prius.

    Gas mileage is also *heavily* dependant on driving style due to the laws of conservation of energy -- the top things overall that I found increase it are:

    1) Standard transmission -- almost all cars with a
    standard get better gas mileage then an
    automatic.
    2) Drive 55 -- Going from 75mph on the highways to
    55 increased gas mileage by 26%!
    3) Anticipate lights (let the car roll to slow
    down when you see a red light ahead of time
    rather then breaking at the last minute) saves
    a lot, too.
    4) Coast down hills
    5) Accelerate slowly

    If you follow these rules and buy a compact car you'll get near the hybrid's gas mileage with no fancy technology.

  68. Hybrids are a Practical and Useful Option by pgrady7 · · Score: 3, Informative
    I've been driving a 2001 Toyota Prius that the wife and I picked up in September 2001. It's a very good compact with reasonable power, fantastic gas mileage, high reliability, and certain location-specific advantages. As to your specific questions:

    Are they a good alternative to conventional vehicles, or just a geek toy? If you didn't know it was a hybrid, you wouldn't see any difference.

    Do they perform well in the city? Other than getting used to not hearing the engine run while driving in slow traffic, you won't notice a difference.

    How about on long road trips?No difference from any other car. The numbers on the car are roughly 115 horsepower for 2765 pounds empty weight

    FYI, the location-specific advantage deals with how certain states classify hybrids with respect to high occupancy vehicle (HOV) restrictions. My current state, Virginia, allows me to pay a little extra for my registration and with "clean special fuel" plates run HOV with only the driver in the car. I understand California does something similar.

  69. Geek car? you want an RX-8 by Schmucky+The+Cat · · Score: 3, Funny

    If you want a geek car, you want the Mazda RX-8.

    Slate posted an article explaining why it's the geekiest car on the road a month or so ago, so I won't re-has the articles.

    http://slate.msn.com/id/2087172/

    Of course, if all you want is a slug car then go all out with your bad self and those hybrids. Hybrids are for suburban mommies, not geeks.

    Put a poster up of the cutaway for a rotary engine - then watch your workmates come talk engineering with you.

  70. Further advice by winterdark40 · · Score: 3, Informative
    I own an identical vehicle. The above advice is great, and I would add:
    1. If you can buy an Insight with manual transmission instead of automatic, do it. The former has a very low fifth gear that greatly improves mileage on high-speed trips. It's not uncommon for stickshift Insights to get 80-90 mpg where the automatic version would get 65-70 mpg.
    2. If you need power, you can hit a switch on the steering wheel to go into "Second Mode." This tells the computer to work the engine harder instead of resorting to battery. You lose efficiency but get much more power. That small engine is surprisingly potent. Second Mode kept me from bleeding off my battery on the Pennsylvania Turnpike, and I always use when I need strong acceleration at highway speeds.
  71. Awsome troll! by GMontag · · Score: 3, Informative

    You are confusing natural gas with propane. Natural Gas is just scrubbed methane. Methane is produced from innumerable sources, and is absolutely renewable; while it is often found in the same pockets as oil reserves, there is no reason at all that natural gas has to be obtained by mining; any decaying plant or animal waste will produce ample quantities of methane.

    LOL! Now that is the best troll that I have seen in quite some time! I usually do not respond to them, but some people migh fall for the parent comment.

    Propane is certainly not a gas that came straight from the ground. It requires more processing than gasoline. It is no more renewable than it's parent source and was created by a fellow who thought gasoline companies were ripping everybody off.

    Natural Gas is the stuff that comes from the ground and is non-renewable.

    Methane is "renewable" and the EPA also identifies it as a "greenhouse gas" (for those of you who believe in that greenhouse nonsense).

    Now, if you have the instructions to a gas grill, see what those instructions have to say about propane, methane and naturel gas. They usually say the three are not interchangable or that modifications must be performed before switching.