Slashdot Mirror


GameCube Dropped To $99 At Online Retailer

JFMulder writes "Retail partners Amazon.com and Toys 'R Us announced today that they were dropping the Gamecube console price down to $99. Even though Nintendo is probably losing money now on the GameCube, this is the move that Nintendo may be hoping will close the little gap between Xbox and GameCube in worldwide sales, and help it gain a solid lead over Microsoft in the coming months." A Reuters story mentions further indications that an official announcement is on its way, and all on Nintendo's 114th birthday, too.

118 comments

  1. 114th birthday by Darkstorm · · Score: 1

    So can anyone explain to me how Nintendo has been making video games for longer than we have had computers?

    Even the original tube type calculator didn't appear to somewhere in the 1950's? Now if they are just talking about some person whose name is Nintendo they should really just say so.

    As for me my ps2 still working just fine.

    --
    If ignorance is bliss, the world is full of blissful people
    1. Re:114th birthday by Snowspinner · · Score: 5, Informative

      Nintendo started as a playing card company, and slowly evolved into a video game company as the technology came into being.

    2. Re:114th birthday by NiceGeek · · Score: 1, Redundant

      I believe Nintendo started out making playing cards back in the day.

    3. Re:114th birthday by Darkstorm · · Score: 1

      Ok, that makes sense. But you would think someone would have mentioned it. It implied that they had been making video games for a long time.

      Today is the 114th birthday of our favorite video game company!

      --
      If ignorance is bliss, the world is full of blissful people
    4. Re:114th birthday by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's take this apart.

      Today is the 114th birthday of...

      I deduce from this statement that one hundred and fourteen years have passed since the (birth / creation / what have you) of...

      our favorite video game company!

      The company that we like the most that produces video games. From contextual clues, I would believe that this is Nintendo.*

      There's nothing worse than a chump who needlessly extends a thread just because he can't accept that he made a dumb or ignorant comment.

      *(Contextual clues are supplemented by the overwhelming high quality of Nintendo's games.)

    5. Re:114th birthday by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "So can anyone explain to me how Nintendo has been making video games for longer than we have had computers?"

      You see, Nintendo often makes more than one game at a time, so by applying a Rosen'esque algorithm, you can arrive at that number by multiplying the number of years the company has actually been around by ...

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    6. Re:114th birthday by evslin · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure when they mentioned that Nintendo was founded in 1889 they were assuming everyone would figure out for themselves that Nintendo started out doing something else before moving to video games.

    7. Re:114th birthday by Gothic_Walrus · · Score: 1

      For years, they made playing cards in Japan. IIRC, it was sometime in the 1970s that Nintendo began producing electronic games and, eventually, video games. Do a Google search for "History of Nintendo" and you'll probably find a much more detailed account.

      --
      Goo goo g'joob.
    8. Re:114th birthday by PainKilleR-CE · · Score: 1

      http://www.dojomediaserver.com/specials/Famicom/ti meline.html

      They go from the first company to mass produce plastic playing cards in Japan to the first company to produce micro-processor controlled arcade games in Japan.

      Anyway, it has some sparse details, but is interesting.

      --
      -PainKilleR-[CE]
    9. Re:114th birthday by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You might want to try thinking for yourself someday. Way to be stupid, guy.

    10. Re:114th birthday by zonker · · Score: 0

      ibm of couse didn't start out selling pc's and mainframes in 1888 either...

  2. This makes the difference for me. by Sevn · · Score: 1

    A have a girlfriend that loves the cartoonish Mario style games. I couldn't justify a Gamecube before, but I can now. Thanks Nintendo.

    --
    For every annoying gentoo user, are three even more annoying anti-gentoo crybabies. Take Yosh from #Gimp for example.
  3. OK, but... by waaka! · · Score: 1

    what's to stop Microsoft from cutting prices too, If they're already losing money with each XBox they sell?

    1. Re:OK, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...not wanting to lose even more money? *shakes head*

    2. Re:OK, but... by DS-1107 · · Score: 1

      Unless MS can cut the costs they would loose yet more cash per console. Besides that even more people would get it and chip it then before, and they would loose even more cash. But perhaps it is a loss they would gain on in the end - but probably not before the next box comes out 2005-2006. I would welcome a price cut on the X-Box as then I would see a reason to buy it - as it really lacks some quality games(that I'm intrested in). Now I would chip it, so me buying it would probably just hurt MS :&.

    3. Re:OK, but... by Daetrin · · Score: 1
      Given how narrow the gap is between Xbox and Gamecube sales right now, it is quite conceivable that there will be a point in time where the people who bought XBoxes just to chip them or install Linux on them and never buy any games will be enough to ensure Micorosoft's lead over Nintendo by a very narrow margin and continue to claim they are 2nd in the console wars and have the press believe them (as long as nobody looks anywhere besides America and Europe.)

      The PR value of that is worth far more than the money they're losing on the sales of those XBoxes.

      Buy it if you want, don't buy it if you want, but don't kid yourself that you're hurting Microsoft by buying it. That myth is a crock founded upon ignoring all market values other than the strict cash value of the hardware and the money exchanged for it.

      --
      This Space Intentionally Left Blank
    4. Re:OK, but... by rhuntley12 · · Score: 1

      Microsoft seems to be competing more with PS2 then with Gamecube. I think if they drop the price, Sony and MS should follow suite. Plus, you get more bang for your buck with PS2 and XBOX then with a GC. Not trying to knock GC for all those getting up in arms, it just doesn't have any features. I'm talking like PS2 innate DVD player + huge selection of games + online, compared to Xbox's hardware and capabilities + Xbox live. I do like my Gamecube somewhat, so don't get your panties in a bunch, I'm not knocking it. /shrug

    5. Re:OK, but... by PainKilleR-CE · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Microsoft seems to be competing more with PS2 then with Gamecube.

      How is Microsoft competing more with PS2 than with GameCube when the XBox sales are much closer to the GameCube's sales than to the PS2's sales?

      The simple fact is that Microsoft is #3 worldwide, and if Nintendo can get a decent increase in sales in the US, Microsoft will be #3 here, as well. Microsoft set their system up to compete with the PS2 (DVD playback, online capability, etc), but that's not what they are currently doing.

      --
      -PainKilleR-[CE]
  4. question by MORTAR_COMBAT! · · Score: 1

    the original NES was $99 if I remember correctly. How much were NES games back in the day? I don't remember them being $50 each, the way GameCube games are now.

    --
    MORTAR COMBAT!
    1. Re:question by Darkstorm · · Score: 1

      I remember atari 2600 games comming out at $40 to $50 each. I thought it was ridiculous then, somewhat still do now.

      --
      If ignorance is bliss, the world is full of blissful people
    2. Re:question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I remember Mario 3 being $50 when it first came out. I think that was unusually high for a NES game, however. I think they were more in the $25 - $30 range.

    3. Re:question by JFMulder · · Score: 1

      I think the original NES cost a little more than that. I remember my parents buying me the NES/Mario/DuckHunt/Zapper bundle for 200$ at the time.

    4. Re:question by JFMulder · · Score: 1

      Obviously, I forgot to mention those were canadian dollars.

    5. Re:question by dogbowl · · Score: 1

      I *distincly* remember saving up $30 to buy Zelda and Mike Tysons Punch Out, back in the day.

      Also, I've got some new in the box 2600 games with price tags around $30 as well. Of course, thats a pre-crash price. I've got numerous new 2600 games with price tags of $2.99 on them too.

      As for the systems, I beleive that the 2600 was $300 when it was first released, and for some reason I think the NES deluxe set (with ROB) was $200 originally.

      --

      These pretzels are making me thirsty.
    6. Re:question by apezaholic · · Score: 2, Informative

      Nes, Snes, N64 and gamecube all launched at $200. Games have always cost about 40-50 bucks too.

    7. Re:question by Jerf · · Score: 1

      I don't remember them being $50 each, the way GameCube games are now.

      An Intellivision game (one generation back from the Nintendo) could be produced by one person in a few months.

      A modern game requires resources comparable to a major motion picture.

      I don't know what the Intellivision games cost, because those days predate any concept of money I might have had. But it's rather impressive how much more $50 buys then it used to, even over the NES days. Personally, I consider video games a steal. (Especially when you buy them for less then $50.)

      At least the good ones.

      50$ isn't that bad, really. If you want cheap games you need to go with computers, or scrounge for used consoles. (Professional used game stores used to be viable options but they seem to have jacked their prices up a lot. I honestly wonder if tripling the prices has been a gain for them.)

    8. Re:question by evslin · · Score: 1

      I remember seeing Toys R Us ads having the Nintendo priced at $150 in 1988. Games were $30-$40, though I seem to recall Robin Hood: Prince Of Thieves going for $50. That was one of the later titles so pretty soon afterwards prices were slashed so the SNES could move in for good.

    9. Re:question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I remember correctly, they had a few different bundles. The NES by itself was $99-ish, I think the NES + lightgun was $150 and the NES + lightgun + robot was like $200.

    10. Re:question by MMaestro · · Score: 1
      $99 for the NES? Definately not. I'm sure it at least $150 at one time. As for games, I think $50 was the standard.

      Course you have to take inflation into account. $50 in the 80's was worth a lot more back then than now. Which is why there is discussion about raising prices, but us consumers will never let them. (Read : warez)

    11. Re:question by rhuntley12 · · Score: 1

      I paid $108 with tax in Seattle for NES + Mario 1 + Duck hunt. Funny how I remember that exactly. If your paying $50 for any GC game your getting ripped. Blockbuster had brand new prime titles for $20 not long back.

    12. Re:question by PainKilleR-CE · · Score: 2, Informative

      the original NES was $99 if I remember correctly.

      It depends on when you got it. If you were a very early NES owner and got the package with the robot (the only one available at the start), it could have been as much as $400. My parents bought the bundle with the light gun (not the orange one) and Duck Hunt/Super Mario Bros. cart. for $115, about 3-5 years after the system was released.

      How much were NES games back in the day? I don't remember them being $50 each, the way GameCube games are now.

      It depended on the game and when you bought it, just like it does today, except that some cartridges cost more to produce, and were therefore more expensive. Ultima:Exodus, Final Fantasy, and Dragon Warrior were each around $60 when they were first released. Most games started at $50. In the last 3 years before the SNES was released, games in the $20-35 range became much more common, though rarely for new games.

      --
      -PainKilleR-[CE]
    13. Re:question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      yeah... they were $60, $70 and sometimes $80 a piece.

      Really I wish this mentality would die. Prices aren't increasing, during the last wave, Sony successfully drove down the pricing model with no indication of it rising (in the console model).

    14. Re:question by Metal_Demon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I remember when gas use to cost 75cents a gallon. Videogames are actually getting cheaper when you think about it. As inflation goes up videogame prices don't. Consoles are deffinately cheaper. Finally now with this price drop I will have all 3 consoles. Not that I don't have too many games to play right now already.

      --
      Trust Your Technolust
  5. Losing Money? by Snowspinner · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Actually, I doubt Nintendo is losing money on the Gamecube. Most sources will say that Nintendo was turning a very small profit on the Cube when it launched at $199, and that was a couple of years ago - the prices on the components have fallen off considerably since then, as electronics tend to do, and production efficiency has increased. I'd guess that if Nintendo is taking any kind of loss on the GC, it's only since the price cut to $99, and it's very, very slight.

    1. Re:Losing Money? by QueenNina · · Score: 2, Informative

      I hope Nintendo's losing money, because the retailers that sell the consoles are. Right now, if you just buy a console without any accessories or games, my store loses money. One accessory or two games will break us even, and one controller, one memory card, and three $40-50 games will make us enough of a profit to pretend it actually does something for the store.... Not a high-profit industry at store level. :) So if Nintedo's selling it to us at a price higher than we have to sell it for but they're making money, I'll be mad. :)

    2. Re:Losing Money? by Snowspinner · · Score: 1

      I confess, I have a bit of trouble believing that. If that's true, why do retailers like KB Toys offer additional game bundles? And, for that matter, why would stores stock the Gamecube at all? Considering its allegedly sluggish sales and your claim that retailers lose money on it, I'd expect it to be dropped. Provide some linkage?

    3. Re:Losing Money? by smic · · Score: 0

      we do lose money
      i work for toys r us in canada, and all the systems cost the company $5 more then what we sell them for
      like a ps2 for $249.99 retail costs us $254.88 or somthing close to that
      the games though are like $60 retail, and costs us from $25-40 dollars average
      the bundles are to encourage future shopping at that particular store, if you got a deal from them once you are more likely to go back for more
      its kinda like fishing, hookem with a deal get em when the come back

    4. Re:Losing Money? by BTWR · · Score: 1

      It might be a stupid question, and probably the answer is some legal "resale" law, but if everyone sells ps2s for $250 and you buy them for $255, why not just go down the street and buy your ps2s for $250 yourself (at some tax-free province/state like America's Delaware)? That way, even if you still sell them for $250, you'll lose $5 less.

      Actually, if you bought it down the street, you could now sell yours for $245. You'll be losing the same $5 you were before, but now you'll have the best price in town, so you'll sell much better.

    5. Re:Losing Money? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But then there's sales tax, if nothing else.

    6. Re:Losing Money? by BTWR · · Score: 1

      hense why I said "go to a tax-free province, like Delaware is in the USA"

    7. Re:Losing Money? by smic · · Score: 0

      tax free province?
      this is canada
      home of the over taxed

    8. Re:Losing Money? by zonker · · Score: 0

      you know what, it's retail stores that are half the problem. sorry, i don't know anything about your particular store or how you operate things so i don't mean to aim this directly at you, but please read on. :)

      retailers pressure moms and dads into buying the more expensive system selling them on such things like "this one has better graphics" or "this one has more games" or simply "this one is better". then, they hammer on the gamers by feeding them fud like "yeah, you want to buy this system because that other system doesn't have any games for teenagers or adults".

      i find it hardly fair to walk into a game store and find the crew all wearing xbox necklace-nametags, for instance, and assume that that person isn't going to try to upsell the customer to that product (or whatever product is going to net them the highest dollar sale they can get out of that person, even more so if that store is commission-based). also, i find it incredibly interesting that retailers place the gamecube in the back of their store in the corner next to the bargain bin stuff (from the gamecube's launch i've noticed this in many major retailers), where the ps2 and xbox are much more prominently placed. while i can reason the ps2 being promintently placed from a shear items-sold point of view, the xbox and the gamecube have very similar sales numbers.

      isn't it also very interesting that in the ads in sunday newspapers that many of the big electronics stores (circuit city, best buy, compusa, etc.) will often highlight a certain system over another. in fact, they will often leave the gamecube out of their ads altogether. i noticed when zelda came out, a few of the stores would simply show zelda, but not feature a shot of the system at all. i'm not saying there's a conspiracy here, but jeeze... it seems awfully fishy.

      sony and ms have spread so much fud about nintendo in the past few years that everyone is willing to believe any rant that comes out of their mouths. i won't be so naive to say that nintendo hasn't done similar in their past, but come on... most notably lately is all of the press that has been going on saying that gamecube is going down. the same kind of fud that's been said about apple for the past 20 years (sorry to use a tired example, but is it not true?). the more it is said, the more likely it may happen. we are talking about a difference between marketshare and mindshare. xbox and gamecube share very similar marketshare, but xbox seems to have won out highly on mindshare. how? i suppose the same way that windows has won out on linux mindshare (though i'd imagine the numbers are a lot closer marketshare wise if you were to consider *every* system and device that runs linux compared to windows).

      if you aren't making money off the gamecube, then you aren't doing your job to sell gamecube. instead of sitting behind your counter and ignoring your customers (babbages, gamestop, software etc., etc. etc. etc.) try suggestion selling, try figuring out what it is that the customer wants and trying to find out what would best suit their needs. ps2 isn't for everyone, xbox isn't for everyone and of course, gamecube isn't for everyone.

      and i'll say this (from being heavily entrenched in retail) if you simply sit back and assume that the products will sell themselves, then you don't belong in retail, you should be selling hotdogs on a hotdog stand because that doesn't require any communication or qualifying with the customer other than asking whether or not they want mustard.

  6. Depends what $99 includes by jvmatthe · · Score: 5, Insightful
    If it's $99 for a Cube and nothing else, then this is not a terribly significant event. Before it was $149 for a Cube and a game (Zelda, e.g.) or $149 for a Cube and GameBoy Player (GBP). Each of those extra items is roughly $50 retail, so the Cube itself could have been thought of as being $99 for a while. Regardless, they can now advertise is as $99 and people may actually think that it's a new deal. In a sense, it is, since now they can pick the game to go with their new cube (instead of having to buy a specific one) but the net effect is still that the Cube cost $99.

    Now, if in fact the $99 price still includes either a game or a GBP then this is a significant deal. Honestly, with the GBP the Cube becomes a great little system to have. I recently finished Castlevania: Aria of Sorrow entirely on the GBP and that was a GREAT experience. Other GameBoy, GameBoy Color, and GameBoy Advance games also benefit from the big screen format, although you may finally realize how awful some of that 8-bit sound was on your older games. Those older games are relatively cheap to get used, so you can get by inexpensively on those. Add in Animal Crossing and other great games on the Player's Choice list and then you're talking a good time. Heck, you can even play Soul Calibur II, if you want.

    Sure, you won't be playing Halo 2 or the next Grand Theft Auto, but there is still some good gaming to be had on that cheap Cube.

    1. Re:Depends what $99 includes by Ondo · · Score: 1

      (http://curmudgeongamer.com/)
      If it's $99 for a Cube and nothing else, then this is not a terribly significant event.


      This is what it is, at least at Amazon.com.

    2. Re:Depends what $99 includes by evslin · · Score: 1

      That would kick ass if it did include the GBP. I've been wanting to check out Final Fantasy Tactics Advance but I'd rather not use a GBA and can't justify paying $150 for a system I'd play maybe 3 or 4 games on.

    3. Re:Depends what $99 includes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Honestly, with the GBP the Cube becomes a great little system to have."

      Honestly, there are people who think it already is. :)

      But really, I've had a Cube since launch. Even if I'd known that 2 years later I'd be able to get it for half price, there's no way I wouldn't have still bought it right then and there. I've played enough fun games on it in that time to make it worth what I paid for it, and being able to play the crossplatform games with a comfortable controller is good. Wavebird is the only wireless controller I've ever liked using, because it's shaped exactly like the official wired pad.

      Talk about the PS2 though, and it's another story. I waited for it to get down to $200, and in the time that it took to get it down to that price from $400, I didn't miss out on any good games. Seriously, reading all the PS2 websites until the price dropped, I didn't miss anything worth owning at all. I like the system's set of games now, but in Sony's case it's like they had to cut the price before companies would make any good games for it or something.

      XBox, I don't have one. Microsoft can sell them at $50 like PSOne and I still wouldn't have one, because there are no fun games on it, unlike PSOne. What the heck is the hold up? Microsoft normally chases after markets like a hooker trying to meet quota, but apparently "people who like fun games" isn't a market they want, only "people who like the same played-out robot games and bloody shooter games you can get for your PC". Those games must be easy or cheap to make or something, because it would be depressing that people would want to stick to making those dark kinds of games for so long on the PC, then would want to keep doing it on a console system.

      OOPS, Carmack reads this site sometimes, doesn't he? :)

    4. Re:Depends what $99 includes by Tom7 · · Score: 2, Informative


      I really enjoy "Super Smash Bros. Melee" and Metroid Prime. But I bought it for the GameBoy Player; all these SNES remakes and updates are exactly what I've been missing ever since "3D" took hold... (I second your recommendation for the Castlevania games, by the way).

    5. Re:Depends what $99 includes by DrEldarion · · Score: 1

      Even if it doesn't include a game, the real good news is that when this drops to $99, the refurbished ones will drop as well. Pick up a refurb one at EBGames.com, get some used games at the same place (using the coupon code AFF25 for 25% off!) and you get a REAL deal.

      -- Dr. Eldarion --

    6. Re:Depends what $99 includes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just one game will make the purchase completely worthwhile:

      Super Smash Brothers: Melee
      "It's MY hammer, bitch!"
      "Pikachu just knocked you the fuck out!"

      Assuming you're a social gamer and not a stereotypical cave-dwelling RPG player, anyway.

    7. Re:Depends what $99 includes by Froug · · Score: 1

      Super Smash Bros: Melee is an absolute riot with four players. Everyone cracks up when someone gets the donkey kong hammer. Complete mayhem.
      Come to think of it, a lot of Nintendo's games tend to be in that same boat. Mario Party 4, F-Zero GX, Final Fantasy: Crystal Chronicles, Mario Kart: Double Dash... They're all primarily social games.

    8. Re:Depends what $99 includes by shoptroll · · Score: 1

      Yep. Look at it this way. Cube = 64's 4 player ports + SNES-ish Pad Design + Optical Discs (which is why the 64 lost in the first place). Throw in GBA paraphernilia (link cable and the player) and you got probably Nintedo's most robust system to date. And there's a network adapter coming at some point according to the information on Mario Kart Double Dash

      --
      Insert Sig Here
  7. Anybody ever hack these? by OneBarG · · Score: 1

    I know all sorts of stuff has been done to PS2 and X-box, but what about GameCube? Anything interesting that we can do to it now that it's "under" $100?

    --
    I'm starting to think this isn't the best place to promote my Anti-Sig Campaign.
    1. Re:Anybody ever hack these? by MORTAR_COMBAT! · · Score: 4, Informative

      It's really too bad, but Nintendo really did a bang-up job of making the system very difficult to hack.

      It's too bad, because the system itself is a great little system - standard PowerPC-based processor, ATI graphics - well suited to simple programming.

      However the disc format being 'backwards' - the disc spins in the normal way but is read from the outside-in instead of the inside-out like other discs - makes it difficult to even read and write a disc.

      However software exists which makes a good effort at reading the discs, so it is only a matter of time before we'll see Linux or NetBSD running on the thing.

      But it's really too bad that it is so difficult, because Nintendo could have sold the devices at $199 for a nice profit, including a Linux disk or something, making it a simple browse the web from the set-top solution, etc.

      --
      MORTAR COMBAT!
    2. Re:Anybody ever hack these? by Guppy06 · · Score: 4, Funny

      " I know all sorts of stuff has been done to PS2 and X-box, but what about GameCube?"

      <FLAMEBAIT>

      You see, unlike those other two consoles, the Cube is fun right out of the box. :)

      </FLAMEBAIT>

    3. Re:Anybody ever hack these? by MORTAR_COMBAT! · · Score: 1

      Uh... the new PowerMacs are the best personal systems on the planet.

      --
      MORTAR COMBAT!
    4. Re:Anybody ever hack these? by Ty · · Score: 1
      However software exists which makes a good effort at reading the discs, so it is only a matter of time before we'll see Linux or NetBSD running on the thing. But it's really too bad that it is so difficult, because Nintendo could have sold the devices at $199 for a nice profit, including a Linux disk or something, making it a simple browse the web from the set-top solution, etc.

      And how big do you honestly think the "I wanna buy a cube to run linux/etc on!" market is? A couple hundred? A couple thousand? I'm sure these people are worth basing their pricing structure on, rather than the hundreds of thousands that buy the console to play games..

    5. Re:Anybody ever hack these? by edwdig · · Score: 1

      But it's really too bad that it is so difficult, because Nintendo could have sold the devices at $199 for a nice profit, including a Linux disk or something, making it a simple browse the web from the set-top solution, etc.

      Several companies tried business plans like that around 99 or so. It didn't work.

    6. Re:Anybody ever hack these? by rhuntley12 · · Score: 1

      Theres modchips that just let you play imported games. I don't think there is really much interest in hacking the GC, it died off pretty quick. And the price tag of the Panasonic GC is just outrageous, and that is what will be hacked first. It plays regular DVD's, but costs about $400 if I remember right.

    7. Re:Anybody ever hack these? by bluGill · · Score: 1

      True, but linux is free, so once you have the distribution set up duplication is nothing. They can include linux in every gamecube box, use it or not.

      If you have USB ports (PS2 does, but don't know about GC) a cheap keybaord makes kword (free) work, and support a few USB printers. They might even manage to force printer manufactures to go to a standard driver if they define a standard for USB printers that attach to their box, and there is no way to attach them otherwise. (That would be nice, but farfetched) Nothing as good as a real computer, but it is free (as in beer), or so close to free that they don't care. All that, and good enough for most school reports and web browsing.

    8. Re:Anybody ever hack these? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to mention how Sega tried to be everything at once too. DVD wasn't economical to base the system on at the time, but other than that, Sega was actively trying to make the Dreamcast a box that you'd have connected to your PC monitor with a VGA box, it had a keyboard, mouse, etc. It came standard with a modem and the Broadband Adapter allowed you to use a high-speed internet connection. Sega provided the web browser in the box too, and made deals with ISPs around the world trying to be a gaming portal like Xbox Live (their subscription numbers for Sega.net were even better than XBox Live's are).

      Less than 3 years later, and the Dreamcast was a $50 device down from $300, was hacked to all hell and its games copied so easily, is no longer supported, and its maker turned into a software company because of it.

      I think that given Sega's example of how NOT to do things, Nintendo was smart in pushing the GameCube as the only games-only offering out there right now, other than their own GameBoy Advance systems. They also did their homework on deterring hackability, which I'm sure has hurt system sales since hackers, game copiers, and friends of hackers/game copiers aren't buying Cubes, but it's made sure that the only people buying Cubes are the ones who will be BUYING GAMES for it. That must be why Nintendo's GAME sales numbers are high, despite their U.S. CONSOLE sales numbers.

    9. Re:Anybody ever hack these? by MORTAR_COMBAT! · · Score: 1

      The GameCube does have keyboard accessories, as well as broadband and modem adapters. The GameCube would make a really great thin client running a Knoppix CD if it could ever be hacked.

      --
      MORTAR COMBAT!
  8. Okay, so it's not #1... by NanoGator · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ... doesn't mean it wasn't successful. How much cash did Nintendo rake in?

    Now I'd be worried if Nintendo was shaking up its executives...

    --
    "Derp de derp."
    1. Re:Okay, so it's not #1... by burns210 · · Score: 1

      exactly!
      even though Nintendo was number 3 in US sales, they made a profit on all their gamecubes(along with the zillion plus gameboys, advanced and sp that are flyign off the shelves) while the Xbox was number 2 and LOST money on every sale.

      Granted, MS came in saying they could lose 2 billion, just to get their foot in the door, get a feel for the market, and get some fan base for the xbox 2 release.

    2. Re:Okay, so it's not #1... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "even though Nintendo was number 3 in US sales, they made a profit on all their gamecubes(along with the zillion plus gameboys, advanced and sp that are flyign off the shelves) while the Xbox was number 2 and LOST money on every sale."

      Nintendo WAS NOT #3 in US console sales. GameCube was. Taking GameBoy Advance and GameCube together, Nintendo was #2 in US sales (units moved), compared to Sony at #1 with their PS2 and PSOne. And unlike any other system in the US, GameBoy Advance is a high-margin system, so Nintendo's financials are stellar.

      "Granted, MS came in saying they could lose 2 billion, just to get their foot in the door, get a feel for the market, and get some fan base for the xbox 2 release."

      Right. Microsoft's plan all along with the Xbox was to buy potential customers for version 2. "First one's always free."

      Oh, Microsoft! When will you stop your zany antics? *sigh*

    3. Re:Okay, so it's not #1... by burns210 · · Score: 1

      yes. I don't know where, but there was a quote from a higher up in Microsoft in an interview(sounds shady, since i don't know the details, but just give me the benefit of the doubt), that MS did say they had 2 billion dollars that they said they could lose with the xbox.
      they set 2 billion aside and said "we are gonna make a gaming console, we will probably lose money on it, since we haven't done this before, but that is ok, we will make up for it in games, and future console sales"...

      what is so great about the ps2? one of its major selling points is backwards compatibility with a boatload of ps1 games. that is what MS is doing. they are creating the xbox1, losing money in it, but building up games, developers, and experience. the xbox2 will have enough of an existing game base(through backwards compatibility) that is will mostly negate the "ya, xbox is nice, but ps2 has a lot more games!" mentality.

  9. I Think They Jumped the Gun by Acidic_Diarrhea · · Score: 1
    If you go here you'll see that the console is marked as being currently out of stock. Now I am sure that Amazon/Toys r Us has a few Gamecubes lying around (and if you go to Amazon.com and search for the Gamecube, you can find them for the regular 149.99 price) so they must have accidently let that price go live. Nintendo hasn't announced the price yet, so the retailers aren't supposed to start selling it. So it's going to be a few more days.

    Anyway, I'm planning on buying one. I already own a PS2 and would really enjoy some of the exclusive games that the Gamecube offers. It seems like it's nearing the end of its life cycle, which is actually a decent time to pick up a system. Now I can get all the great games for it at a less than new price.

    --
    I hate liberals. If you are a liberal, do not reply.
    1. Re:I Think They Jumped the Gun by shoptroll · · Score: 1

      Agreed. I've been doing the Nintendo/Sony dual system thing since the PSX and N64. Sony for RPGs and square-soft fanboyage and Nintendo for some solid good ol fun. And with the Nintendo planning on rolling out the network adapter for Mario Kart Double Dash, hopefully they'll be able to compete on equal grounds with the Xbox (provided the peripheral makes it here)

      --
      Insert Sig Here
    2. Re:I Think They Jumped the Gun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I work at a nation wide retail chain. Yesturday I looked through our Sunday circular for next week and noticed that were advertising a price cut on Game Cubes. The new price was $99. So no later than this Sunday, 9/28 this price will be official.

    3. Re:I Think They Jumped the Gun by ryan89 · · Score: 1

      I work at a Best Buy and I sneaked a peek at next week's ad. It is in there for $99.99 after a $50 price drop. Since the ads are printed about 6 weeks in advance, the retailers have all known about this for awhile. Im amazed this didnt leak sooner.

    4. Re:I Think They Jumped the Gun by PainKilleR-CE · · Score: 1

      The network adapter is available, it's just a little hard to find in stores. You should be able to find it online fairly easily. (hey, how else are people supposed to play Phantasy Star Online?).

      I've seen the modem adapter far more often than the network adapter, but that might be more of an indicator that the modem adapter isn't selling as well (since cable and DSL have pretty good subscriber numbers in my area).

      --
      -PainKilleR-[CE]
  10. Nothing really by Daetrin · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Microsoft can drop the XBox's price if they're willing to take even more losses, and they probably will. However once you get below $100 you've crossed a certain psychological threshold. Even if the price difference between an Xbox and a Gamecube is no greater than before once Microsoft makes it's own cut, the Gamecube will probably be perceived as a better deal now that it only has two digits in its price (and even though in many places taxes will push it back above $100, it's the sticker price that counts, which is why you always see things for $X.99 of course.)

    I don't know if that perceived value will make up completly for the deficiencies, real or imagined, of the Gamecube vs. the Xbox, but it will certainly help.

    --
    This Space Intentionally Left Blank
    1. Re:Nothing really by Xerxes+of+Zealot · · Score: 1

      The $100 dollar threshold you speak of really could mean next to nothing to a multi billion dollar company. I dont see microsoft having any real concerns about losing terrific amounts of money. If xbox had more quality games the $100 would mean less than nothing. I do own an xbox and i definetly wish that there were more good games for it.

    2. Re:Nothing really by Acidic_Diarrhea · · Score: 1
      That really depends on the multi-billion dollar companies. Some companies care very much about the bottom line and a shift in profits of that magnitude ($149 to $100 IS HUGE - have you seen that commercial, which I believe is for some Microsoft product, where an IT worker is proud because he's found a way to save a nickel - realizing that saving a nickel a billion times, is a lot of money) will affect that bottom line. Microsoft has committed to the X-Box division losing money for this round of consoles but I would doubt very much if they will accept losses into the second or third generation. At that point, the X-Box might be (and just hypothesizing here, the X-Box 2 might break all sales records ever) abandoned in favor of a set-top box marketed more towards families than gamers. Ultimately, I think Microsoft wants to be selling you products both for your office and your living room.

      In short, you're right that MS isn't concerned over losing large amounts of money on the X-Box but they aren't going to just lose indiscriminate amounts.

      --
      I hate liberals. If you are a liberal, do not reply.
    3. Re:Nothing really by Daetrin · · Score: 1
      The $100 dollar threshold you speak of really could mean next to nothing to a multi billion dollar company.

      I'm confused about what you mean. The $100 threshold is significant to the consumer. It's not particularly significant to Microsoft or Nintendo except in the response it elicits from the consumers.

      If xbox had more quality games the $100 would mean less than nothing.

      Do you mean the $100 price of the GameCube? You seem to be putting forth what is almost a tautology. Yes, if the XBox were enough better than the GameCube, it wouldn't matter what the price of the GameCube was. But likewise, if the GameCube were enough better it wouldn't matter what the price of the XBox was either.

      The reality is that the GameCube is perceived as having less vaule than the XBox by a large number of people. The reasons for this are many and have been debated in this and other forums a number of times. Many people agree that the XBox has a limited number of games and many of them suck. Many people agree that the GameCube has a limited number of games and many of those games aren't very "mature." Those of us who have tried the GameCube and like it say that the games are fun and they have good gameplay, and that whether or not they have lots of blood and guns and sex isn't the important thing. Those of us who don't like the GameCube say they can't stand such "kiddy" games.

      If the people who like the GameCube are right, then there is no real difference in value between the GameCube and the XBox (at least not in favor of the XBox) and the reason the price is lower is because the hardware is cheaper, and because people think the XBox is cooler. In that case if Nintendo can find the right price and package to get people to buy the system in the first place, they will realize that as well.

      --
      This Space Intentionally Left Blank
    4. Re:Nothing really by DarkZero · · Score: 1

      I don't know if that perceived value will make up completly for the deficiencies, real or imagined, of the Gamecube vs. the Xbox, but it will certainly help.

      Well, it's definitely not imagined, since this is a North American price cut and North America is the area where the GameCube is losing ground to the Xbox. It's really no different than the Xbox price cuts in Europe and Japan that aren't being passed on to North America. If the customers in a region aren't buying the console in sufficient numbers, the price is lowered in that region.

    5. Re:Nothing really by PainKilleR-CE · · Score: 1

      In short, you're right that MS isn't concerned over losing large amounts of money on the X-Box but they aren't going to just lose indiscriminate amounts.

      I think their primary concern is keeping the amount coming in higher than the cost of the hardware. Even if they're losing money on the advertising and R&D, they won't take it below cost.

      Frankly, I don't think Nintendo will be losing money at $100, either, at this point. They've been making money off the Cube from the start, and it's been selling at $150 with either a game or a $50 accessory for some time now.

      Of course, at the moment the link in the GameSpot article is showing them as out of stock...

      --
      -PainKilleR-[CE]
  11. Actually... by KaiEl · · Score: 2, Informative

    "Even though Nintendo is probably losing money now on the GameCube, this is the move that Nintendo may be hoping will close the little gap between Xbox and GameCube in worldwide sales, and help it gain a solid lead over Microsoft in the coming months."

    Actually, Nintendo doesn't want to close the gap between XBox and Gamecube in worldwide sales... because that would make their lead smaller. I get my facts from this GameSpy article which Slashdot linked to less than a week ago.

    GameCube worldwide sales: 9,550,000
    XBox worldwide sales: 9,400,000

    Granted this is not a "solid lead," but it is a lead, and one that Nintendo would want to extend, not close. If you're talking about Europe or America, Nintendo is in third, but in Japan, they're in a commanding second. Any comments about worldwide sales should reflect this.

    -Kyle Orland
    The Video Game Ombudsman

    1. Re:Actually... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      X-Box is still in a better position because it has a strong US presence, while the Gamecube has no real strong market. So game publishers are beginning to neglect it in favor of the market leaders.

    2. Re:Actually... by PainKilleR-CE · · Score: 1

      X-Box is still in a better position because it has a strong US presence, while the Gamecube has no real strong market. So game publishers are beginning to neglect it in favor of the market leaders

      You're neglecting some issues, too, though. Nintendo is still a Japanese company, so their decisions turn primarily on 2 things:
      1) profit
      2) the Japanese market

      Sega was the same way, and despite the DreamCast having a good start in the US, they dumped support because it did poorly in Japan. (Sega also had other issues because they relied much more heavily on the arcade market than Nintendo does, and Nintendo has an extremely profitable arm in the handheld market, with the GBA-SP selling more units than Sony sells PS2s).

      Japanese developers are also looking at the Japanese market, and publishing accordingly. Soul Calibur 2, even in the US, is selling best on the GameCube, proving that something other than the platform was causing poor sales of previous multi-platform titles (in North America the week of Sept. 17th SC2 sold over 57,000 more units on the GC than the XBox, for $2.8 Million more in sales, and the PS2 version sold almost 2,000 fewer units than the XBox version, and these account for 3 of the top 6 games on the North American charts, with the PS2 version at #6, and Madden PS2/XBox at #1/2 (remember that Madden PS2 has online support while Madden XBox does not; Madden GC is #11, and I don't know why it doesn't have online support), and NCAA Football 2004 at #5). European charts don't break up sales per console, though I'm sure the developers know where the splits lie.

      The GC is also the only console showing an increase in sales over the previous year. While a decrease is expected with the PS2, and generally accepted as saturation (with umpteen million consoles sold to date), the XBox isn't anywhere near the PS2's sales, nor far enough ahead that it could maintain a significant lead while losing sales if the GC continues to show increasing sales.

      All of that being said, the real proof will be in the next year, especially during this holiday season. The next generation consoles are expected to be released in 2005/6, so the market will slow down in 2005, but people will most likely capitalize on low prices through 2004. Most people should not be expecting any of the three names to disappear before those consoles have been on the shelves a while.

      --
      -PainKilleR-[CE]
  12. Look at it this way by shoptroll · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Let's look at it this way

    1) M$ just got done in an interview proclaiming that Nintendo wasn't an issue anymore. If Nintendo wants to beat out the Xbox they're going to have to do it by pushing more boxes out than XBox. This will guve them what... a $100 advantage to the XB, which M$ probably can't afford to drop any lower since they're already losing money on each console manufactured

    2) Nintendo has already cut production of new units and are trying to clear out the warehouses. Simple supply and demand here.

    3) Nintendo has a lot of hot stuff coming in November. A lot of people aren't really in the know but this is probably a pre-emptive shot in the upcoming Xmas console battle.

    4) This also puts the GC on the same value as the GBA, which should prevent Nintendo from "shooting themselves in the foot" (not really happening though) with the price difference between GC and GBA SP. (My next guess is a buy one get one half off deal if this doesn't work.)

    5) If Nintendo is still doing the free game with purchase deal then microsoft is seriously going to be in a lot of hot water. You're talking a $150 difference in the setup fee for a GC vs. Xbox.

    --
    Insert Sig Here
    1. Re:Look at it this way by Daetrin · · Score: 1
      1) M$ just got done in an interview proclaiming that Nintendo wasn't an issue anymore. If Nintendo wants to beat out the Xbox they're going to have to do it by pushing more boxes out than XBox.

      So they don't need to do anything all since they're already pushing more units than Microsoft? :)

      !^@$%@%1 Microsoft FUD.

      --
      This Space Intentionally Left Blank
    2. Re:Look at it this way by shoptroll · · Score: 1

      Well thats in japan...

      In America and I think Europe (which AFAIK Nintendo has been giving the proverbial shaft for a while (they just got Animal Crossing recently I believe)), Xbox is trouncing on the 'cube by a good amount.

      --
      Insert Sig Here
    3. Re:Look at it this way by Daetrin · · Score: 1

      Yes, but if you look at the worldwide sales figures, Nintendo is ahead overall by a small margin of 100,000 units or so. Not anything to get really excited about, but enough to make a mockery of Microsoft's FUD that they're in second place.

      --
      This Space Intentionally Left Blank
    4. Re:Look at it this way by AvantLegion · · Score: 1
      >> which M$ probably can't afford to drop any lower since they're already losing money on each console manufactured

      I love when someone talks about what Microsoft can't "afford" to do.

      NEWS FLASH: Microsoft loses money on EVERY PRODUCT NOT NAMED "Windows" OR "Office".

      The Xbox's situation is neither new nor special.

    5. Re:Look at it this way by Jerf · · Score: 1

      This will guve them what... a $100 advantage to the XB, which M$ probably can't afford to drop any lower since they're already losing money on each console manufactured.

      This is Microsoft here... the only reason they're not giving them away free in cereal boxes is that it would be egregious product dumping and found illegal. (Well, maybe not the only reason, there are issues of consumer expectations and such, but Microsoft has the cash and the apparent desire.)

      This also puts the GC on the same value as the GBA [Jerf adds SP, the GBA is IIRC $60 or $70], which should prevent Nintendo from "shooting themselves in the foot" (not really happening though) with the price difference between GC and GBA SP. (My next guess is a buy one get one half off deal if this doesn't work.)

      Thinking as a consumer this seems a bit odd somehow, though I can't put my finger on it. Putting the two side-by-side, it really seems like the GBA SP ought to be cheaper. There's the size thing, and the power thing.

      Note I'm deliberately being fuzzy; I understand from an economic viewpoint intellectually, I'm saying that this feels wrong.

      Give the SP a $10 or better, $20 price drop, or bundle an extra controller or cheap-ass but high-quality super-star game like a Zelda (remember the physical games are dirt cheap which is why those bundles work economically in the first place) and raise the GC price $10 or $20 and it would feel more, more, I don't know but the closest word that comes to mind is honest.

      In fact, given that Nintendo has tons of first-party content, and that the discs themselves are cheap, go ahead and ship in the Gamecube box a couple of old Nintendo megahits, like Lugui's Mansion and/or Mario Sunshine; I know it won't look good on paper but I think Nintendo needs to consider the marketing value. Consoles build "mindshare" not by traditional ad campaigns but by being used; they are unusual that way. If people who frugal enough to be attracted by this price drop end up going home with one game (and worse, it sucks...) Nintendo can lose badly, perhaps worse then if they never bought a system at all. It's time to pull out the stops.

      Of course this won't happen. ;-) (And maybe it shouldn't; I have neither the data nor the desire to do a full economic analysis. But I do think it may be time for Nintendo to make a gutsy move or two that conservative analysis says won't succeed; "conservative analysis" says the Gamecube is doomed, so it's time to throw out that playbook.)

    6. Re:Look at it this way by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "NEWS FLASH: Microsoft loses money on EVERY PRODUCT NOT NAMED "Windows" OR "Office"."

      Or "Optical Mouse", or "Keyboard", or "Network Card", or "MSN", or "MSNBC", or....

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    7. Re:Look at it this way by Baby_with_a_nailgun · · Score: 1

      Nintendo will be releasing Animal Crossing in Australia. It doesn't look like it will ever be out for Europe

    8. Re:Look at it this way by PainKilleR-CE · · Score: 1

      This is Microsoft here... the only reason they're not giving them away free in cereal boxes is that it would be egregious product dumping and found illegal. (Well, maybe not the only reason, there are issues of consumer expectations and such, but Microsoft has the cash and the apparent desire.)

      Not to mention that a lot of parents might be pissed when the cereal box weighs more than their kids. Supermarkets might be a little irritated that the cereal boxes are taking up 250% of the space they were previously taking up, too. hmm, come to think of it, Microsoft might have a harder time giving them away in cereal boxes than they do selling them.

      --
      -PainKilleR-[CE]
    9. Re:Look at it this way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You believe incorrectly - last year the GC was 100K units ahead of the Xbox in Europe, and there are no concrete sales sales figures for 2003.

      There are estimates from 3rd party research firms, but those are not based on actual sales numbers - they're making a guess based on some methodology they won't disclose (see the SPA debacle over Mac sales a couple of years ago to see how wildly inaccurate these estimates are).

      E.g., according to that gamespot article in the six months from Jan 2003 to June 2003 the GC went from 1.5 million units to 1.6 million while the Xbox went from 1.4 million to 2.3 million. So in six months, the GC only sold 6% more units than they managed in the entire previous year. While the Xbox managed to sell 64% of the previous year, again in half the time.

      Given that Zelda sold 300,000 copies on the first weekend in Europe, and there really hasn't been a corresponding big game release for the Xbox, those numbers sound slightly dubious to me...

  13. MOD PARENT UP!!! +1 FUNNY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    HA HA! Mod this guy up. I own a PS2 and that shit is still funny. He owns you!

    Guppy06, if moderators slap you for this, it just goes to show you that these kids don't know humor. Of course, all moderators are 13 year old kids anyway, so that's to be expected.

  14. Death Knell by Jack+Comics · · Score: 1

    I'm not much into video games, so I may be completely off the mark here... but isn't lowering a console's price point below $100 a death knell? The only two recent consoles that have gone that low are the PS One and the Dreamcast. PS One had a replacement already (the PS 2), before it reached the $99 point, but we all know how the Dreamcast turned out...

    --
    "We are all in the gutter, but some of us are looking at the stars." - Oscar Wilde
    1. Re:Death Knell by BTWR · · Score: 3, Insightful

      isn't lowering a console's price point below $100 a death knell?

      While Dreamcast's $50 price was bad publicity, the Genesis, NES and SNES all went for below $100 during the middle part of their generations.

    2. Re:Death Knell by edwdig · · Score: 1

      Well, when I bought my SNES (about halfway between the releases of the SNES and N64), it was either $100 for the system by itself, or $130 for the system, 2 controllers, Mario World, and another bonus game that varied depending on the store. I got it with Mario Paint and the mouse, but I also saw it Mario Kart bundled. I think there was a version that had Mario All Stars + Mario World all on one cart.

      I know I bought my N64 at $150 a year after release. I'm pretty sure it dropped to $100 a year after that, which would be the same point in the console's lifespan that the GameCube is at now.

    3. Re:Death Knell by shoptroll · · Score: 1
      I think that was Mario All-Stars + Mario World on two carts. To my knowledge there wasn't any cart that had both games on it.

      I know that for a long time Nintendo was giving Mario All-Stars away for free via a mail-in for anyone who got Super Mario World with their system.

      --
      Insert Sig Here
    4. Re:Death Knell by edwdig · · Score: 1

      A quick search on Ebay brings up this auction

      http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&it em =3048434152

      Both games, on one cartridge.

    5. Re:Death Knell by AllenChristopher · · Score: 1

      Quite the opposite. The system will be priced at twice the cost of a high-end new game, and bundled with a game. At that point it's practically "if you need a GameCube to play a game, we'll let you grab one from the pile."

    6. Re:Death Knell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well you obviously don't know shit. When you say "to my knowledge", you may as well say, "I don't really know much of anything due to my tiny head BUT..."

  15. Another price drop? by Mike+Hawk · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Two things immediately pop into my mind with this news...

    #1 I remember someone at Nintendo taunting Microsoft for their Sega GT/JSRF bundle deal saying that bundles and price drops are an insult to early adopters. Well, insult on then.

    #2 I think of the fast food industry. They also did the price war thing. Then prices hit like $0.49 and customers realized that if they can sell it for so cheap it must be a piece of crap. The consoles might run into that soon. Hmmm, these consoles are $149 and this one is only $99. Whats wrong with this one that it is so cheap?

    1. Re:Another price drop? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Mikey Mikey Mikey, if a PS2 costs $200 and an X-Box costs $200 and a Gamecube costs $99 and a GBA: Sp costs $99 and the N-Gage costs $300, then the N-Gage must be the best!!!

      Now if I could just figure out a way to hook it up to my TV...
      then I'd be able to play some sweet Tony Hawk Pro Skater...

    2. Re:Another price drop? by edwdig · · Score: 1

      #1 I remember someone at Nintendo taunting Microsoft for their Sega GT/JSRF bundle deal saying that bundles and price drops are an insult to early adopters. Well, insult on then.

      I think you're mistaken. They've always offered bundles, and would regularly cut the price of their systems over their lifetimes.

  16. sold out? by fireduck · · Score: 1

    Either Amazon/Toys R Us made a premature announcement with no gamecubes in stock, or they've sold out of their entire inventory.

  17. $99? Feh. by Thedalek · · Score: 1

    Can't recall where it was originally pointed out, but if Nintendo gave away a system to everyone in America, they would make a signifigant amount of money.

    270 million people in America, how many do you think will become loyal N-fans from getting a free system? Better still, how many do you think will purchase 1 new game within the next 30 days after getting a free system? Even better than that, how many do you think will continue to buy games?

    The video game industry already works on loss-lead economics (since manufacturers are losing money on the system hardware). They're just not pushing the equation far enough.

    It wasn't really an issue when this was first pointed out to me, since Nintendo was -the- video game company at the time (the SNES was clear leader versus the Genesis), but now, with the GameCube lagging behind the PS2 pretty badly, they might want to consider throwing some free systems around.

    On the other hand, Nintendo will probably start de-emphasising the 'Cube, and focus almost entirely on the GBA, since they do have clear dominance (currently) in that market.

    --
    Happiness is relative, Based upon the way we live.
  18. FUD? Huh? by shoptroll · · Score: 1

    BTW, what's this FUD?

    --
    Insert Sig Here
  19. Re:FUD? Huh? by Daetrin · · Score: 1
    What's the term or what's Microsoft's implementation of it?

    FUD means "Fear, Uncertainty, Dismay" it's a term for marketing strategies based on spreading (usually) false information designed to make people have negative opinion about a competing product.

    I'm using the term slightly wrong, in that Microsoft isn't directly targeting Nintendo, but is doing so by reference. Microsoft is taking the data for America and Europe, and ignoring the data from Japan and probalby a few other places, and using that selective set of data to construe their "facts."

    Microsoft would be correct to say that they are #2 in America, but they never say that. Thay always say plain out that they are #2, implying an overall dominance. For whatever reason (i suspect large amounts of cash spent on marketing have something to do with it) the news people have picked up on this and started to refer to Microsoft as #2 in the same unqualified manner.

    The point of this of course is that some people allow themselves to be influenced by the popularity of something. If A is more popular than B, A must be better, and they'll go buy A. When the press buys into the same mentality the effect cascades. When just about every journalist talks about how the XBox is in second place ahead of the GameCube, it presents a kind of doom and gloom atmosphere, which is why i consider it to be a mild form of FUD.

    --
    This Space Intentionally Left Blank
  20. Re:FUD? Huh? by nelsonal · · Score: 1

    Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt. I think it is originally from a Digital exec who was refering to IBM's marketer's speak on DEC's products. It seems to have taken on the meaning of any marketing message that makes you think worse of other companies products. As a side note this is what is always blamed when the less elegant solution wins.

    --
    Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
  21. Game prices by grotgrot · · Score: 1

    Quite frankly I couldn't care less how much the console costs. The game prices are what annoys me. I refuse to pay more than $30 for a game unless it is really really good. As a GameCube owner, I am now down to buying about one game every 6 months because of this.

    1. Re:Game prices by prockcore · · Score: 1

      I refuse to pay more than $30 for a game unless it is really really good. As a GameCube owner, I am now down to buying about one game every 6 months because of this.

      Go to blockbuster. Blockbuster always has amazing deals for GameCube games. I picked up Metroid Prime brand new for $19.99.

    2. Re:Game prices by DeionXxX · · Score: 1

      I agree... I go there all the time to get oldies-but-goodies for my Xbox and GC. Heh, I bought a game for $6 once (Agressive Inline) which I played more than a game I bought for $50 (Mech Assault). I also use their GamePass thing and rent games for as long as I want for $20/month. Its nice because sometimes you feel like playing a party game (when friends come over) but other times you feel like playing a single-player game like an RPG.

  22. Inflation by Prien715 · · Score: 1

    I remember buying games typically from $10-30 though the high rollers were sometimes as high as $40 (I remember picking up the original Final Fantasy for $10 at Toys'R'Us ironically). But there has been inflation since the 1980s.

    There are other factors on both sides. Games now have addins inconcievable a decade ago. That copy of Starcraft you bought also helps pay AT&T to maintain Battle.net. While games are bigger and more complex than ever, tools have made it easier (programming a console game 100% in assembly is a thing of the past), media has gotten cheaper, and games are generally selling more (allowing the amortized cost to be less).

    --
    -- Political fascism requires a Fuhrer.
  23. Re:$99? Feh. by rhuntley12 · · Score: 1

    What I always find entertaining is how Nintendo abused everything during their topdays....Kind of makes Microsoft not look so bad...But then, maybe not. The Nintendo and SNES actually kicked ass.

  24. Remember: by Gothic_Walrus · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The real profits are made by the software, not the hardware. Even if Nintendo is now losing money on the GCs (not bloody likely), they'll still be selling plenty of games to keep the GC owners entertained. Since Nintendo still has some A-List titles to release (such as Mario Kart and Mario Golf), they won't be suffering anytime soon.

    --
    Goo goo g'joob.
  25. I don't care about Nintendos financial status... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...because Metroid Prime (which is GameCube only BTW) doesn't let me. Hey, PS2 and XBox owners... Do you know a game for your console that is so cool that you have no time to care about Nintendos financial status? I don't think so ;-)

  26. Re:$99? Feh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, I've heard more than once that it isn't so much that Microsoft fucks you in the ass, it's that they don't offer the decency of a reach-around.

  27. Rip-off europe by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1
    Damn a 99 dollar console? The GBA-SP goes for 139 euro over here. Wow that exchange rate is a killer. What you say? Dollar is worth less then the euro? Guess europe is once again getting ripped off then.

    Oh well. Not like I was going to buy one anyway. Just wondering where the hell the price difference comes from. And please don't say thing like sales tax or wages. The tax difference ain't that big and the damn things are produced in china.

    Just pissed off because I pay nearly twice for HD what americans pay. I am okay now.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:Rip-off europe by PainKilleR-CE · · Score: 2, Informative

      Just wondering where the hell the price difference comes from. And please don't say thing like sales tax or wages. The tax difference ain't that big and the damn things are produced in china.

      VAT and import duties can be something like 15-25%. The price difference, after currency exchange, between a GBA-SP on Amazon.co.uk and amazon.com is ~50%. I'd imagine there's also a difference in cost associated with producing 220 power adapters for the rechargable battery pack (and the batteries themselves may be different), if that is needed for units sold in the EU (since Japanese and US consoles sell with 110V power adapters). There may also be associated costs with getting the device approved for the EU, which would of course be passed on to the consumers in that area.

      All of that being said, the device is priced based on the combination of costs for building the device and getting it approved and shipped to the location, as well as what the market would bear. Even if the exchange rates changed drastically, Nintendo's prices wouldn't react very quickly, which could work for or against you. (in fact, if Nintendo's prices did fluctuate with the exchange rates it would probably look bad to most consumers, though it would happen if the market could manage a more direct path from the producer to the consumer, especially since even the US price is subject to exchange rates and possibly import taxes).

      --
      -PainKilleR-[CE]
  28. Gotta love the analysts: by ivan256 · · Score: 1

    "Senior analyst Billy Pidgeon of the Zelos Group commented on the price drop, saying"

    In other words, "Some random guy with no real insight into Nintendo's productions costs says...". Talk about pulling things out of your ass.

    With guys like this out there, it makes you wonder if it's just a conicidence that 'analyst' starts with 'anal'.