Slashdot Mirror
Slackware 9.1 Released
ThatComputerGuy writes "Slackware 9.1 is now officially released. This is another great release, featuring GCC 3.2.3, GNOME 2.4.0, KDE 3.1.4, ALSA, and Kernel 2.4.22. Check the official announcement for the full feature list. Note that ftp.slackware.com will not allow ISO downloads starting with this release; instead, the first distribution of the ISOs will be via BitTorrent."
ISOs for 9.1 won't be available via the main Slackware FTP site due to bandwidth limitations, so BitTorrents have been set up to distribute the load.
Torrent for Disc 1
Torrent for Disc 2
The 9.1 4-disc CD set is also available from the Slackware Store. I usually place my order for the CD set and download the ISOs so I can have it available to me immediately until the nice disc set arrives in the mail.
-- Give him Head? Be a Beacon? :P)
(If you can't figure out how to E-Mail me, Don't.
"Who downloads P2P downloads terrorism!"
1)download an old ISO (8.1 or 9.0 are just fine)
2) install and run swaret (see freshmeat)
3) you now have a Slackware 9.1 box.
Been following -current and the 9.1 betas and RCs. Stable, ultra fast and simple as ever, with stacks of the latest software. The addition of two fully-fledged package management tools (Swaret and Slackpkg) is the icing on the cake; there's little to fault here (although GNOME 2.4.0 doesn't seem totally rock-solid yet).
Then again, Dropline GNOME for Slack provides one of the best and most attractive GNOME installations out there, and they'll update to GNOME 2.4.1, 2.4.2 etc.
If you're tired of all the frills in Red Hat, Mandrake and SuSE et al (good as those distros are), and want something clean, speedy and stable as hell, give this Slack a go.
Linux: Release distro with more holes than Windows. Watch fanboys not care. Make Microsoft joke.
I just got started with Slackware. 8.1, I got from the back of a magazine. Been having a blast...for about 2 weeks, now 9.1 is out. Accursed upgrade cycle! On the other hand...Long live Slack!
If Mr. Edison had thought smarter he wouldn't sweat as much. --Nikola Tesla
William Scott Lockwood III = the suck.
I, for one, welcome our new Slackware 9.1 using overlords.
To NULL or not to NULL.
Ive put the ISO's online at ftp.oranged.to
disk 2 was corrupt so its still on its way but if you want the discs go for it.
I've tried just about all of them except for Slackware, and am wondering if it offers a significantly different experience than, say, Debian
or Gentoo - from an administrative as well as end-user perspective. Thanks!
The difference between stupidity and genius is that genius has its limits.
Is that Pat keeps it simple. Slack has made adminning my boxen so much easier than Red Hat, Suse, etc.
I advise anyone searching for a distro to try Slackware out, once I found it a few years ago, it's all I run-- including on my home pc.
Thanks again, Pat, for making my life easier.
Acquiescence leads to obliteration
Is there any reason to use Slackware, besides 31337 penis erlargement ?
I mean for pure open distros we have already Debian with it's superior apt. And there are thousands of other commercial distros too.
So what makes Slackware special enough to give me a serious reason to use it ?
And always remember: you are competing with OpenBSD, too.
Owner of a Mensa membership card.
If you're having a blast, then why curse the upgrade? 8.1 will continue to work for as long as you want it to, so don't upgrade until you feel like it.
Hello folks,
/. I think I am a
/. editors rejected my submission to
You may know me from my website: goatse.cx.
Yeah that's good ol' me right there on the front page. I checked my server
logs last week and observed a lot of traffic to and from
popular and much liked person around here. Thank you!
Okay now to the main reason I posted this comment. It may be slightly OT,
but I don't know what else to do. The
Ask Slashdot. Ofcourse, I could've suggested a poll option, but I doubt
that would've made it past them either. So here is what I would like to
ask, in a nutshell.
I have been thinking of starting a subscription based service to my
website. You know the rising cost of living nowadays, not to mention my
ever increasing bandwidth bills (I'm getting famous!). I have also been
asked to add flash/animated versions of my popular pictures. I intend to
read up on some Web page development stuff, or if the cashflow works out,
even hire a programmer -- my small contribution to the US and world
economy!
But to achieve all this, I would need to gather some statistics. How many
of you would be interested in subscribing to my website for, say,
$10/month? It's a rough figure, but the details can be worked out later.
For now, I need to know the general response from you guys -- to see if
the idea is feasible. It would help if the votes are lined up neatly in
this thread. Thanks!
And lastly, any ideas/suggestions/feedback about my website is welcome!
Thanks again people, looking forward to hearing from you, and keep
visiting!
GX
A lot of folks in here have been asking why Slack still has suck a cult following. It's a fair question; Slack doesn't get a great deal of exposure with the mainstream distros taking all the column inches now.
In a nutshell, Slack delivers Linux as it should be. Whereas distros like Red Hat and Mandrake deliver an "experience" (which is certainly good for newcomers), Slack says "Here's lots of great Linux stuff, packaged up and guaranteed to work out the box. Now make yourself a cool system!".
Slack's focus is on stability and simplicity. Instead of massively-patched packages, complicated init scripts and wizards galore, Slack goes all out for an easy to administer installation. It's very reliable; 99% of the time, only tested and stable releases are included.
Additionally, Slack's bootup time is half that of Red Hat 9. In general use it's much snappier too.
Above all, Slack isn't ideal for newcomers but if you've got some Linux experience under your belt, and want a system you feel YOU'RE in control of, download and give it a try.
Agreed, or run Swaret and have you system updated to 9.1. (or run Gentoo and always be up to date) Sorry, it had to be said!
CB
free ipod and free gmail!
Slackware is a distro that has been made by just one developer, and you can notice that (for good).
We you should use Slackware:
1) Free Beer: You can just download it.
2) Free Speech: Run Only GNU.
3) Free Mind: Many Distros install the software and then install themselves!!, Slackware install the software and then you can forgot you are running it, 'cause it won't get on the middle. You can use your GNU System without stupid modifcations or distro-specific bullshit automagic config tools. (But if you want them, they are just there, and they are the best).
I Think an important concept in Slackware is this:
Slackware config tools are basic. They do a minimal setup; if you need a config tool, you will be happy with them; some people think that just making a front end to configure a config file just wrapping the options from the Option=Value Format to the input/check/click/etc format; and that is just stupid. If someone doesn't know what an option means, he won't be able to configure it, doesn't matter if it has colors and graphics all around.
So Slackware keep it simple. Their config tools asks you for the minimal. That is enough for people who require a config tool. And if you need to go further, I think you will be more confortable using vi.
I think the only thing missing in Slack is ports and other kernels (It would be nice to run Slackhurd ; )
WTF am I doing replying to an AC at 5 A.M on a Friday night?
You should all probably wait for the upcoming 2.7-based distros, where the whole kernel is scheduled to be written by the kernel hackers themselves! ...we removed the [accused for IP infringement] code from 2.6 because it was 'ugly' -Linus Torvalds.
Hmm...lets see. I tried using Mandrake, and SuSE, and Redhat.
Well, the Redhat 9.0 installer was broken out of the box, so that was a no-go. Can't say if the actual system was fine, since it crashed three times in a row and then I deep-fried the CD.
Mandrake looked kinda cool, had nice tools. Unfortunately, the configuration tools were broken. They worked MOST of the time. Didn't really cut it. I was better off doing it by hand, because then I never broke anything, and I could still make any changes I wanted. (I never did find a way to set up dual-head)
SuSE was the only one with real power. That was kinda nice. Good configuration and everything. But that proprietary tool-set threw me off, since I wasn't apparently allowed to give friends free copied of the CDs. That made it not acceptable.
Then there was Debian. Real good, I guess. Happens to have the worst installation ever. Gives you some base stuff, then a completely counter-intuitive package manager which is virtually impossible to use. Now, people tell me things like I should use the X version of the package installer...oh, wait. I'm setting up a server without X. But, just go to the websites of things, and then find the packages, and then...Wait a second, if I use Slackware, I've already got them installed in the easy to use incredibly light text-based installer.
Of yeah, and what happens when you happen to want to install a box just to share out storage, and you happen to want your install to be...oh...30 megs? Wait, RedHat says that's impossible, same with SuSE and Mandrake. Where does all their shit come into that package? Can't say Debian is that bloated, as I stopped dealing with its crap a while ago.
Oh, and if you're only referring to dependency checking, I've never really cared. I just install it, run it, and see what causes the seg-fault. Of course, some project managers also list what they depend on, in which case I just download what I need without some stupid app holding my hand through it. And, don't tell me its because I'm an old hand at Linux or something, because I've just been using it upwards of a year, and I had never touched a command-line before then. And the Slackware installer was still better in my opinion (it has never crashed, the others have).
So, starting with this release Slackware will decrease their market share exponentially. Bit Torrent is not a solution for most people. I hate to see this.
Single CD. Makes for easier copying, sharing, storing, replacing, everythinging...yet still manages to have More packages I want than anything but Debian, which has almost everything I don't want.
It all sounds very cool, but aren't the Slackware lot overdoing it a bit on 'stability', when they still include Apache 1.3 in the base install when 2 has been stable for what, two years now? Arguably, 2 is more secure now than 1.3. Even if the 1.3 branch is still supported and patched, 2 has been the focus of most developers for a long time now.
I remember starting on Slackware in 1995. Not hard to install, well it was fun so I guess I didn't mind the effort ... but X let me down cos I was using some weirdo video card that must have been handcrafted by a bunch of orcs. Ahem, anyways, I've been using Redhat since 4.2 with the occassional digression to Mandrake ... and you know ... the more bells and whistles the harder it seems to be to do anything constructive. I just spent way too much time trying to figure out how to customize the menus ... I gave up ... the obvious way of using the "add menu item" just plain doesn't work. And then I went to change the names of the workspaces and it didn't work .. because it seems that when you make the changes it is not stored in the same xml file that it reads from ... sheesh ... yeah I know this a gnome problem not redhat (or maybe I should just go back to KDE) ... but you'd think Redhat would check these things. All I kept thinking was , if this was Enlightenment (may it rest in peace) or WindowMaker it would be simple. And I started thinking very wistfully of Slackware. Hmmm.
I would've gone Debian, but since I'm on a dialup I can just imagine how little time it would take me to hate apt-get. And I've tried Suse, nice and consistent ... but I dunno irritating.
So I'll probably give Slackware another go.
Bitter and proud of it.
Slackware is above all a very focussed distribution. It aims to give you a fairly complete, simple and stable operating system for 486+ computers, that can be easily customized by yourself. In the past, there were also Alpha and Sparc versions, but now I think only Intel is officially supported. Slackware does not attempt to include every open source software package under the sun. There is sendmail, but not postfix, qmail, exim etc. There is mysql but not postgre, firebird, etc. There are a few window managers, as opposed to dozens. It does include the usual development tools and the most common libraries. If you want something not provided in the default distribution, you are expected to download and compile/install it yourself. The result is that the complete distribution can more or less be managed by a single person. Of all the major distributions, Slackware has probably the smallest development team. If the Mandrake or Gentoo company (yes folks, Gentoo is not a non-profit org like Debian!) were to fold next month, it is not easy to continue the distributions, because they need a reasonable amount of supporting infrastructure and developers. If Patrick Volkerding quits next month, I can maintain my own Slackware tree reasonably well, because I have a reasonable overview of how the entire distribution works.
Pa Gert Fylkings speciella vis
Move sig!
What happens to slack if Pat dies?
IIRC slack is Pat's HD image
Now I mostly use RedHat, which reminds me... does anyone have any idea (roughly) when *RedHat* 9.1 is due out?
Going to have to start upgrading some of these RedHat boxen before support dries up after New Years :-(
I have never used slackware but I have read a lot about it. One problem that this distro seems to have is that you have to download a completely new ISO every time a new one comes out, similar to the RPM distrobutions. This is very ineffecient IMO. Most slack users I know and have read about just reinstall and than add all their old configs and such like .bash_config. Maybe I have been reading the wrong info, but this a major flaw in any distro that is to be considered for widescale deployment. Please don't get me wrong, we owe a lot to patrick for things like a BSD like init and such as well as a great distro!
Shouldn't all you guys who talked about getting the LAST release already have slack and just need to upgrade?
It seems every release the same people claim to be downloading the iso. Shouldn't you guys already have 9.0 and just need to upgrade to 9.1??
I know this is a troll but I've always wondered how every release, the same people rush to say they are dling yet they said that the last week. I just simply upgrade freebsd when a new version comes out, I don't have to download the whole iso.
Anyway, flame on I suppose.
I don't want to run BT to get a dam iso.
Sorry to hear about BW limitations but thats real world stepping in.
Slack is nice I love it and would run it again if
I wanted to run linux.
Dam having to install BT and then go through that crap to get a ISO.
I don't know why but Slashdot doesn't like my stories... I sent them the Slackware Linux 9.1 annoucement and they rejected it... OSnews posted mine on 2003-09-27 00:07:36 (before someone sent it to Slashdot)... BTW Slashdot doesn't have any Slackware icon/subject. Anyway, what a nice surprise; Slackware Linux 9.1. I have tried several OSes and Slackware Linux remains the 2nd (speed, stability, simplicity). FreeBSD is the 1st. However, Slack is really nice. n0dez
No, actually it didn't have to be said. Why must people bring up Gentoo in every discussion? I can almost see the point of bringing it up here, but not quite.
i'm downloadin the ISOs finally giving slackware a try. i rembember seeing some sites for slackware users, but when i look in the "other sites" links on slackware.com all i can find is the general linux sites everyone knows about. have these slackware sites disappeared? or does slackware.com just not link to them? i also looked in the "propaganda" page thinking maybe they were there.
thanks
Now that DVD burners are becoming more prevalent, and nearly all computers are now shipped with DVD-ROM drives, is there any thought of distributing Linux on DVD media?
I am only aware of Debian-DVD which allows you to create your own DVD install media. I think maybe Redhat might have had something similar as well. Any other distributions?
Gentoo is actually so *bleeding* edge that they managed to stuff a broken GCC in their release-stream a few weeks back... It'll be some time before slackware does the same ;-)
Actually you don't even need swaret-- though it makes things easier I'm sure. Just download everything you need from slackware-current, and
/var/log/packages will reflect your new version.
upgradepkg --install-new *.tgz (the install-new gets packages that you may not have earlier versions of installed.)
Voila-- you're done, and you have a totally current system. And done more easily than any of the rpm based systems, IMO.
Remember, the version number in Slackware is just a snapshot in time. Unlike Redhat where the rpm version names of different programs vary from each release, you can pretty much upgradepkg any named package and
Acquiescence leads to obliteration
I've had trouble getting NVidia's driver to install on Slackware versions 8.0 and 8.1. Has anyone gotten this to work with a more recent version?
The box that I'm typing this message from was originally installed w/8.0. I made the leap to 8.1, then 9.0, and I'm currently on -mostly-current (I pick 'n' choose). All upgrades, with no reinstall. I tried an upgrade from Solaris 2.6 to 7, but had to run a fresh install of 7 after a month or so. Upgrade experiences in windows-land were similar. In short, the *only* OS that I've been able to upgrade w/out reformatting and starting from scratch is slackware.
And before I get flamed for not being able to upgrade windows or solaris, the point I'm trying to make should be more of a reflection on slackware's ease of upgrade than my incompetance in solaris or windows administration. You may want to point out to the slack users you know that there's usually an upgrade.txt file on the CD to walk you through the upgrade. No problems here so far.
Does samba 3.0.0 come with this release? It's not mentioned in the feature list.
As a matter of interest, what is on Disc 2? Slackware has come on one CDROM (for the binary/install stuff) for some time now. I have been so used to keeping a separate directory for sources in addition (or complementary) to the distro, I wonder if I need the second CD iso. Anybody have any information on this?
I maintain a few dozen slackware boxes at work, and quite a few of our staff run slack at home,
so I've been using rsync to maintain a copy of the latest rev + slackware-current. The problem is, SF
seems to have stopped offerring rsync, and there are no rsync mirrors listed on the getslack page
anymore. The main site is way too busy for reliable rsync, so i'd rather use a mirror...
Anyone have any suggestions?
And if you're reading this Patrick, thanks.
I got into Linux back in '94 or thereabouts with Slackware, but had flings with RedHat, Mandrake and Debian between 1989 and 2001. Eventually, I got tired of their respective idiocies and went back to Slackware, and I don't regret it.
You should be seeding the torrent if you already have the ISOs! Make it faster for everybody else :)
rsync mirrors are in the swaret docs.
Of course, if you know of other ones not listed there, feel free to share here...
There'e enough to learn and use in Linux without getting bogged down in learning about a particular distributions proprietary packaging scheme.
I've tried and used several releases of all the major RPM-based distributions (RedHat, SuSe, Mandrake), installed Debian more than a few times, spent a l-o-t of time on Gentoo installs.
What has caused me the biggest headaches in each of these distributions? Problems with their packaging systems. Every blasted one of them has managed to put my machines in a broken state.
Yes, sometimes chasing down and compiling some obscure piece of code can be frustrating if I'm using Slackware and installing from source. But, I know how to do that, the concept is simple, and if it goes wrong, I know I can trace the problem and fix it.
If RPM or apt or emerge or whatever goes belly-up, fixing the problem means I have to take time to learn about that packaging system. Why should I?
-- Slashdot: When Public Access TV Says "No"
perl -e 'print $i=pack(c5, (41*2), sqrt(7056), (unpack(c,H)-2), oct(115), 10)'
9/23/2003 19:14 : Gentoo: openssh Multiple PAM vulnerabilities
/tmp which could allow local user to overwrite arbitrary files.
- Portable OpenSSH versions 3.7p1 and 3.7.1p1 contain multiple vulnerabilities in the new PAM code. At least one of these bugs is remotely exploitable (under a non-standard configuration, with privsep disabled).
9/17/2003 21:56 : Gentoo: sendmail Buffer overflow vulnerabilities
- Fix a buffer overflow in address parsing. Fix a potential buffer overflow in ruleset parsing. This problem is not exploitable in the default sendmail configuration.
9/16/2003 19:39 : Gentoo: openssh Buffer management error
- ll versions of OpenSSH's sshd prior to 3.7 contain a buffer management error. It is uncertain whether this error is potentially exploitable, however, we prefer to see bugs fixed proactively.
9/16/2003 15:50 : Gentoo: exim buffer overflow vulnerability
- There's a heap overflow in all versions of exim3 and exim4 prior to version 4.21. It can be exercised by anyone who can make an SMTP connection to the exim daemon.
9/15/2003 8:28 : Gentoo: mysql buffer overflow vulnerability
- Anyone with global administrative privileges on a MySQL server may execute arbitrary code even on a host he isn't supposed to have a shell on, with the privileges of the system account running the MySQL server.
9/2/2003 17:17 : Gentoo: 'atari800' buffer overflow
- atari800 contains a buffer overflow which could be used by an attacker to gain root privileges.
9/2/2003 9:34 : Gentoo: 'gallery' cross-site scripting vulnerability
- Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in search.php of Gallery 1.1 through 1.3.4 allows remote attackers to insert arbitrary web script via the searchstring parameter.
9/2/2003 9:33 : Gentoo: 'mindi' temporary file vulnerability
- Mindi creates files in
9/2/2003 9:33 : Gentoo: 'eroaster' temporary file vulnerability
- Previous eroaster versions allowwed local users to overwrite arbitrary files via a symlink attack on a temporary file that is used as a lockfile.
9/2/2003 9:32 : Gentoo: 'phpwebsite' SQL injection vulnerability
- phpwebsite contains an sql injection vulnerability in the calendar module which allows the attacker to execute sql queries.
9/1/2003 23:09 : Gentoo: horde Remote session hijacking
- An attacker could send an email to the victim who ago use of HORDE MTA in order to push it to visit a website. The website in issue log all the accesses and describe in the particular the origin of every victim.
9/1/2003 23:07 : Gentoo: vmware Insecure symlink vulnerability
- The previous GLSA 200308-03 was wrong when it stated that vmware-workstation-4.0.1-5289 would fix the problems described in the advisory.
9/1/2003 23:07 : Gentoo: pam_smb Remote buffer overflow vulnerability
- If a long password is supplied, this can cause a buffer overflow which could be exploited to execute arbitrary code with the privileges of the process which invokes PAM services.
8/25/2003 17:41 : Gentoo: vmware-server env variable vulnerability
- By manipulating the VMware GSX Server and VMware Workstation environment variables, a program such as a shell session with root privileges could be started when a virtual machine is launched.
8/14/2003 16:17 : Gentoo: semi Insecure temp files
- The (1) semi MIME library 1.14.5 and earlier, and (2) wemi 1.14.0 and possibly other versions, allows local users to overwrite arbitrary files via a symlink attack on temporary files.
8/14/2003 8:36 : Gentoo: multiple vulnerabilities
- There are multiple vulnerabilities in Gentoo Linux source tree.
7/19/2003 18:06 : Gentoo: nfs-utils Denial of service
- Local or remote attacker which is capable to send RPC request to vulnerable mountd daemon could execute artitrary code or cause denial of service.
7/19/2003 18:06 : Gentoo: gnupg Unauthorized acess
- gpg needs to be setuid to make use of protected memory space, however the setgid bit all
"Sufferin' succotash."
Long Live The good ole SLACKWARE! I'll drink to that!
Slackware needs something akin to Kudzu or HardDrake. Automatic hardware detection would be a HUGE benefit to Slackware.
I first tried Slackware with version 7.1, it was clean, fast, wonderfully stable and streamlined, but it took me far too long to set up the hardware that Mandrake recognized right after installation. The setup for X windows was a bit trickier than Mandrake's as well.
I started off with Linux using Redhat 4.2, I was a big Redhat fan until I tried Mandrake 6.0, I've been a Mandrake loyalist ever since. I tried a few other distros (Storm, Turbo, SuSe) along the way since, but nothing has been able to win me back over from Mandrake.
I picked up Slackware 7.1 used for $15 with the full set of CDs and the books. I was very impressed with it. But for my needs, it's the third best choice.
Slackware would be great for a rackmount server that is rarely opened, but for a desktop system that is upgraded fairly often, I just don't see it making much progress.
LK
"Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
Perhaps Microsoft will catch on and release official torrents for Windows from now on :)
That would make it a lot faster for us.
It's just a copy of the 9.0 announcement, witty comments and all, with all the version numbers changed (most incremented by 0.0.1) and a couple sentences added mentioning new features.
I will now go download this and install it over the top of FreeBSD.
BitTorrent package is avaible only on slack 9.1 (current/extra) and it needs python 2.3 (only avaible on 9.1) to work, i think that BitTorent use should have been better planned
Debian may have superior package management, but it still sucks. The open dislike of new users, the ridiculously outdated stable release, the 3 year development cycle, the endless political bikering that gets in the way of development. Debian will never rise above a pet project for people who spend more time installing and configuring their operating system than getting any real work done.
We all know that those vulnerabilities are for all of the packages in the Gentoo portage tree. Oh no! - nethack, seti@home, maelstrom and ut2003 security issues!.... Oooh I'm scared! You should read the trolling FAQ. Your shit is just way too obvious. Although maybe that is the point?
So far, I think their Alpha Slackware is their best pixmap. So far, my DEC Alpha has the following distributions on a 4.5GB harddrive (despite the 18GB harddrive RAID with a mounted /home and /usr/local directory):
Debian 3.0r0
RedHat 7.1
SuSE 7.1
Slackware 9
LinuxFromScratch
netBSD
GNU/HURD
Slackware is nice, a complexity rivaled only by LinuxFromScratch.
Yes and if you run those programs on any other distro you'll have the same security holes. Gentoo just puts out adviseries more often than the average Distro. I doubt you'll see Red hat putting up adviseries for nethack or vnc. Most distros just put out adviseries if the program has a remote root exploit in it and it's included by default on their installation discs.
This single phrase from the announcemnt shows why slackware is really unique:
"Each Slackware package follows the setup and installation instructions from its author(s) as closely as possible, offering you the most stable and easily expandable setup."
Accursed upgrade cycle!
which is not an issue when you're running something like Gentoo or Debian. People bring up Gentoo because it's relevant, regardless of if you like it or not. Speaking of, have you even used Gentoo?
Regards
CB
free ipod and free gmail!
i just wan u guys to try archlinux....
it's nice
I used Slackware 9.0 for the past 4 months, and found some problems. USB mouse issues, USB drive issues, nforce2 problems (I couldn't enable DMA, and my hdd speed transfered at 3.39MB per second, and it 6.6MB per second if I tweaked with -c3 -m16 via hdparm), and misc annoyances that seems to be misconfigured (such as sendmail). I decided to whack (fdisk) my Linux partition and rebuild with 9.1! Wow, am I amazed. Mozilla's fonts actually don't SUCK when i read slashdot, USB devices work happily, my hdd is in DMa mode and x-fers at 34MB per second. Before anyone asks, yes, I did try upping my kernel to the latest stable and still had these issues. Granted I could have fixxed the Mozilla issue myself, however I'm lazy and it wasn't _that_ important enough for me to care. Above all, it supported my nforce2 happily without me having to tweak my stuff. It also allowed me to configure my rc.M startup for software, which was very nice!
"Do or do not. There is no try." -- Master Yoda (Half man, half muppet)
To the point: If RedHat, Mandrake or Debian distribute those applications, are the holes still specific to Slackware? If so, it seems a bit harsh to saddle Pat Volkerding with the burden of shame for other people's errors.
Given that no non-trivial program is ever bug-free, and that the bugs you list have all been fixed, your argument is nonsensical.
I send all the best regards to the Slack team as always :) Maybe they could have waited for kernel 2.6.0 to come out, include it in Slack 9.1 and then release it. It would be a more juicier fruit then...
There is nothing that is as stable as slackware. After all, it has been around since the dawn of linux.
If you compare the crash statistics between say RH and Slackware, you'll see the difference. After all, crashes=downtime, and downtime=lost money if you're a company. If you're a private person, crashes=cursing, and cursing=CHA penalty, and that means higher barter prices.
GAAH! MY PRINTER IS ON FIRE!!! PUT IT OUT! PUT IT OUT!