Slashdot Mirror


Chinese Astronaut Makes It Back Safely

brindafella writes "SpaceDaily is reporting that China's historic first manned space mission has ended with the safe return of its first astronaut Lieutenant Colonel Yang Liwei, 38, who landed just before 6.30am Beijing time (2230 UTC 15/10) at the designated recovery zone north east of Beijing. The capsule has been recovered and opened and the pilot is very much alive, 'and doing autographs.' Furthermore, 'Premier Wen Jiabao was seen on television talking to Yang on the phone and smiling widely and clapping after he hung up.'"

46 of 540 comments (clear)

  1. Whens the next mission by The+Famous+Druid · · Score: 5, Funny

    Thats the problem with Chinese space missions, as soon as one has landed, you want another.

    --
    Quidquid Latine dictum sit, altum videtur (anything said in Latin sounds important)
  2. How fast will they move ahead? by friday2k · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Now, congratulations to the Chinese to jumping over this first hurdle of space exploration, but as the article also points out, their designs are based on 36 year old designs (with some upgrades). Now that this is done, how fast will they advance? Can they move full steam ahead, go to the Moon, to Mars, etc? Or will it take them another 15 years to do the next step?

    1. Re:How fast will they move ahead? by drudd · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Taking 15 years to the next step is only reasonable, provided they make that next step. I'd much rather China not follow in the US's footsteps and make hurried overly specialized design decisions just to make it to the moon, then stop just when the bugs started to be worked out.

      Slow but sustained development would be a terrific thing, unfortunately I think China's government is really only interested in the short term propaganda value, just like the US.

      Doug

      --
      Venn ist das nurnstuck git und Slotermeyer? Ya! Beigerhund das oder die Flipperwaldt gersput!
    2. Re:How fast will they move ahead? by isomeme · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It should be noted that US hardware for human space travel is also based on designs which are around three decades old (with some upgrades). Ditto Russian hardware.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a skull.
    3. Re:How fast will they move ahead? by quacking+duck · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Slow but sustained development would be a terrific thing, unfortunately I think China's government is really only interested in the short term propaganda value, just like the US.

      This story suggests this isn't just a short-term propaganda project. The author's analysis of the systems involved, that they included a lot of equipment that you wouldn't bother with on a one-off design, suggest that they put a lot of thought behind the system and they're in this for the long haul.

    4. Re:How fast will they move ahead? by TheHornedOne · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They have the advantage of learning from 30-odd years of American and Russian spaceflight research. They've acquired a lot from public sources, and, like any good country with a strong military-industrial complex, the rest by subterfuge. Plus we know (and I say this as a simple statement of fact), the Chinese are excellent imitators. I predict rapid progress.

    5. Re:How fast will they move ahead? by NSObject · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It should be noted that Linux software for computer operating systems is also based on designs which are around three decades old (with some upgrades).
      Ditto BSD software.

  3. Congratulations to China! by mOoZik · · Score: 2, Funny

    Congrats, China! You managed to put a man into orbit (and return safely to the Earth) without the benfit of stolen German technology! Space exploration is no longer limited to Russia and the U.S. - show them what you're made of!

    Go Forth And Conquer!

    why am i so excited? :D

    1. Re:Congratulations to China! by Yakman · · Score: 2, Funny
      Congrats, China! You managed to put a man into orbit (and return safely to the Earth) without the benfit of stolen German technology!

      Yay! Instead it was done with upgraded Russian technology!

      On a related note, my favourite story about Chinese space exploration is this:

      About 650 years ago, an inventive Chinese mandarin named Wan Hu tied 47 large rockets filled with gunpowder to his chair and, firmly clutching a kite in each hand, ordered his servants to light the touchpapers.

      He vanished in a cloud of sparks and blue smoke, according to legend, with many of his Ming dynasty contemporaries believing he was somewhere in the heavens.
    2. Re:Congratulations to China! by kfg · · Score: 3, Funny

      Their next project is going to be a "space elevator," constructed by standing on each other's shoulders.

      That should get 'em to Mars before us.

      KFG

    3. Re:Congratulations to China! by Col.+Klink+(retired) · · Score: 2, Funny

      In German and English
      I know how to count down
      And I'm learning Chinese
      Says Werner von Braun

      -- Tom Leher

      --

      -- Don't Tase me, bro!

    4. Re:Congratulations to China! by Luyseyal · · Score: 3, Informative
      http://www.audioasylum.com/forums/pi/messages/2788 .html

      [about the inventor of rockets being the American, Robert Goddard]

      >> Well, I don't know much about that so I won't confirm nor deny,
      >> but it sounds fishy to me. As far as I know, America hadn't even
      >> tested a rocket motor during the time that Van Brown (spelling?)
      >> was rolling V2's out onto the pad to launch at England.

      and then Steve replied:

      >> Goddard succesfully flew the first liquid fueled rocket in 1926.

      Steve is correct. History records Goddard as inventing the rocket, and that Wernher Von Braun copied these designs, infringing upon Goddard patents. In fact, if we hadn't been at war, and if Goddard hadn't died during the war, Goddard may have prosecuted these patents. But one thing is for sure - Von Braun admits to basing his work after Goddard's.

      versus

      http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/tg/stores/deta il/reviews/-/books/1560983868/202-9638315-4933460

      Excerpted from Aiming for the Stars by Tom D. Crouch. Copyright \

      (Robert) Goddard left Roswell in 1941 to work with U.S. Navy and Curtiss-Wright engineers on the development of jet-assisted-takeoff and variable-thrust, liquid-propellant rockets. By the spring of 1944 he was receiving detailed reports on a new German long-range rocket, the V-2. "The weapon is reported to be almost identical with the rocket we were working on in New Mexico at the time we changed over to war work," he wrote to Harry Guggenheim, "except that it is larger."

      Goddard provided the editor of the National Geographic News Bulletin with a list of his own patents for almost every aspect of V-2 design. "So closely do the mechanical features of the V-2 parallel the American projectile [Goddard's rocket]," the News Bulletin announced in January 1945, "that some physicists think the Germans may have actually copied most of the design."

      That, certainly, was the opinion of Robert Hutchings Goddard. On August 14, 1945, he died of throat cancer, convinced that his work had played a key role in the Germans' success. It simply was not true. The Germans had followed the same path as Goddard, quite unaware that he had been there before them. Under the inspired leadership of Wernher von Braun, they had surged past him without a backward glance, achieving Goddard's goal of sending a rocket to the edge of space.

      versus

      http://history.msfc.nasa.gov/goddard/history.html

      versus

      http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/6303 26140X?v=glance

      And so on...

      I'm just saying the history's a little muddied as to whether von Braun actually copied the patents or if their designs were similar based on reading the same literature, doing similar experiments, etc. (c.f., Newton and Leibniz).

      -l

      --
      Help cure AIDS, cancer, and more. Donate your unused computer time to worldcommunitygrid.org. Join Team Slashdot!
    5. Re:Congratulations to China! by LS · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It appears that you do not know that Tsien Hsue-Shen, the founder of China's space program, was a member of NASA's JPL and a protege of Theodor von Karman, and learned from Wernher von Braun.

      LS

      --
      There is a fine line between being a cultivated citizen and being someone else's crop. - A. J. Patrick Liszkie
    6. Re: Congratulations to China! by Moofie · · Score: 2, Funny

      I think that in order for something to be a penis-symbol, there should be an alternative way to design it so that it's NOT a penis symbol.

      There's no light without dark, right? Therefore, penis symbology only makes sense if, among several otherwise-equivalent designs, you choose the one that looks like a dick.

      Please design a viable rocket-powered vessel that looks like a vagina.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
  4. Response to Microsoft? by Anusien · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Is there anyone else that thinks this is China saying, "Screw you America, we don't need you and your restrictive anti-trust business practices?" I mean, all the recent events:
    China Open-Sources
    The Great Firewall of China
    China's Moon Launch

    Is it just me or is this China trying to assert its technological domninance, so to speak?

    1. Re:Response to Microsoft? by petabyte · · Score: 4, Insightful

      For god's sake:

      NOT EVERYTHING HAS TO DO WITH MICROSOFT.

      They put a man into orbit which is pretty impressive. I don't see an Apple "Spaceport" or Intel Pentium 4000Kilopascal rocket blasting off.

      Now while I agree that they probably want to assert their own technical dominance and avoid US interests (thats good economics). But China talking about "restrictive anti-trust business practices" ... I suddenly have pictures of Bill Gates standing in front of a tank at Tianamein. China doesn't care about Microsoft; it cares about its own self-interests. Exploring science leads to discoveries that help its people and *make money*. Its sad in these post 9-11 days the US has such a hard time with that.

  5. Lesser of Two evils... by OtakuHawk · · Score: 2, Funny

    I for one would rather have china than Bill. The former's food is better, for starters.

  6. Meanwhile... by tkrotchko · · Score: 2, Interesting

    We're spending all out money destroying Iraq and then rebuilding it.

    Not meaning to sound bitter, and I think its fantastic that the Chinese did this. I hope China goes to the moon or beyond.

    --
    You were mistaken. Which is odd, since memory shouldn't be a problem for you
    1. Re:Meanwhile... by CGP314 · · Score: 2, Funny

      I hope China goes to the moon or beyond.

      But not Europa. Attempt no landings there.

  7. Space.com Article by pHatidic · · Score: 3, Funny

    According to the article on space.com, the mission cost 1 billion. To quote, "Yang hurtled around the planet for the rest of Wednesday, making a planned orbit shift in midafternoon and stopping work only to rest and eat Chinese food designed especially for space travel." I for one think 1 billion dollars is well worth it for space chinese food. Along with space icecream, we can now have a complete and balanced space diet. I look forward to the day when the guy on the phone of the local chinese restraunt asks if i want my dumplings to be steamed, panfried, or 'space'.

  8. Re:brazil by cranos · · Score: 2, Informative

    Just to be a technical terry here but the creation of the warp drive was achieved AFTER the US and nearly every major nation on earth had been ripped apart by the third world war. As such the US no longer existed.

  9. Not a Hoax, but... by Henry+V+.009 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Did we get to see this guy before the launch? I am not advocating a conspiracy or anything, but I would bet that China had a backup prepared to make the media appearances if anything had gone wrong. They were certainly quite worried about having the launch televised.

  10. Re:Historic step up the mountain by quacking+duck · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Firefly, here we come!

    To those not in the know, Firefly's set in a future where China became one of the dominant superpowers, influential enough that all the English-speaking characters can easily communicate... well, curse anyway... in Chinese (and Serenity's system alarms are bilingual, English and Cantonese). Could be that Joss Whedon's idea for a background might not be so farfetched!

  11. Hopefully the start of another space race.... by Desmoden · · Score: 4, Insightful


    While it will take time for places like China to really catch up with us, it's not as long as some might think.

    The US space program is a MESS. Shuttle launches aren't even news worthy anymore unless they blow up. (no offense intended, those who died are still heroes in my mind). But without a challenge, our space program will continue to lag.

    We need more countries like China to catch up. We need someone to out pace us and kick start the US interest in space.

    Hopefull this will be the first step. ....or we could tell Bush there is oil on Mars =)

    1. Re:Hopefully the start of another space race.... by Cordath · · Score: 5, Insightful

      China is actually coming along nicely in a lot of ways. It's beginning to embrace capitalism. Socialism is a nice idea, but greed breeds innovation better. As China's economy heats up it's people are going to come into closer contact with the rest of the world and mainstream world ideas. The communist regime might not be overthrown, but its a safe bet they're going to gradually become more and more moderate. With China's vast natural resources and immense population their economy could easily dwarf that of the U.S. within a couple decades. Say what you will, 1 billion+ is a heckuva tax base!

      Keep in mind that skilled labour costs in China are a fraction of what they are in the U.S.. The resources of China's space program could easily dwarf those of NASA long before their economy grows larger than that of the U.S.. (This assumes both nations spend a similar proportion of their GDP on their space programs. China may well value it higher and spend even more...) As has been said, they don't exactly have to reinvent every wheel that has led NASA to it's current cutting-edge 1970's shuttle program either. There are plenty of capitalists, many of them in the U.S., who would only be too glad to do a little Cantonese consulting.

      This isn't necessarily how things will happen. However, if the Chinese don't do anything stupid their economic and technological superiority is functionally inevitable provided U.S. citizens don't start multiplying like mosquitoes. It's a simple matter of statistics unless you subscribe to some sort of white supremast movment and belive that Chinese minds are inherently inferior.

      Personally, I'm thinking it might be a good idea to start early on those Cantonese lessons. :D

  12. Time to fork slashdot by nmoog · · Score: 2, Troll

    Wow, these racist posts are getting pretty full on - racial slurs about black americans get modded down into oblivion and racial slurs about anyone else get modded to the stars.

    It seems like the time is right to split slashdot into us.slashdot.org and wholeworld.slashdot.org.

    Or maybe under14s.slashdot.org and over14s.slashdot.org

  13. Pics would be nice by DaleBob · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I wonder if any amateur astronomers have verified the launch? The media on this is so controlled by the Chinese gov't, skepticism is definitely in order (really for any story coming out of the Chinese media). It's all about independent sources. Unfortunately, NASA would never say, "We checked it out; they weren't lying!" Not a great thing for international relations.

    What I love is the report that the taikonaut was reading a flight manual during flight... "Now was I supposed to push the green button or the red button?"

  14. It's good to see... by iiioxx · · Score: 4, Insightful

    That courage and the American spirit of adventure is alive and well... albeit in China. In the US, we're still wringing our hands and calling for an end to manned space flight, because we lost a shuttle and seven fine astronauts - along with our backbone as a people.

    Kudos to the Chinese. It's about time we had some healthy competition in space. Let's get another Space Race started. Maybe that will get the US Congress and NASA off their collective asses and back into the game (and we might see a human on Mars inside of 10 years). Maybe we can drive a little rivalry to foster some nationalistic pride in the US again (but I doubt it).

    I know this: if the Chinese lost a capsule, they'd bow their heads in homage for a moment of silence, then get to launching another one, two weeks later. That's the kind of resolve that allows a nation to succeed. The rest of the world should take note, unless they want to be following in the footsteps of the Chinese for the remainder of the 21st century, instead of leading the way.

    1. Re:It's good to see... by simong_oz · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Kudos to the Chinese.

      Absolutely, couldn't agree more.

      Let's get another Space Race started.

      No, let's not. I know it's a pipe dream but I'd much rather see some real, proper international cooperation, and I'm sure many of the scientists working in this area would love to see this as well. With all the great minds working in this area (after all, 3 nations have individually now put humans into space) imagine what could be achieved?

      foster some nationalistic pride in the US again

      (bye bye karma ....) This is not meant as flamebait, but I can't think of any other nation on earth that has as much nationalistic pride as the US - too much nationalistic pride in fact. By all means, be patriotic (I know I am), but when you're so patriotic that you blindly assume your way is right and won't listen to anybody else, then you have a problem.

      I know this: if the Chinese lost a capsule, they'd bow their heads in homage for a moment of silence, then get to launching another one, two weeks later.

      a very appropriate response IMO - what better way to show that their lives were not lost in vain than to finish the job they loved so much (nobody can tell me that anyone would put themselves through that much selection and training with so much dedication without loving the job)?

      --
      "Because it's there." - George Mallory, when asked why he wanted to climb Mt Everest, March 18, 1923 (New York Times)
    2. Re:It's good to see... by sql*kitten · · Score: 2, Interesting

      No, let's not. I know it's a pipe dream but I'd much rather see some real, proper international cooperation, and I'm sure many of the scientists working in this area would love to see this as well. With all the great minds working in this area (after all, 3 nations have individually now put humans into space) imagine what could be achieved?

      Umm, absolutely nothing?

      It's a fact of human nature. Without competition, there is no urgency. Without that, an unlimited amount of time and money gets spent on looking for the "perfect" solution where in competition, a decision would be made because it has to be made. NOW. Even if it's not perfect, a reasonably good (or at least, not bad) decision now is infinitely superior to a perfect decision made at some unspecified time in the future. NASA itself is proof: given time and money, scientists will get nothing done. Given a hard limit on both and someone to race against, miracles occur. There is literally centuries of evidence, that competition gets stuff done, cooperation does not. It is a fundamental part of being human, that we love to compete and are motivated by worthy adversaries. Anyone who says anything different is a fool.

  15. Re:Congrats to China by geekoid · · Score: 2, Funny

    While I normally don't support ancient Egytians in just about any way (due to their human rights stances),congrats on the pyrmids!

    sheesh.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  16. 60's comments are silly... by Comatose51 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "Welcome to the 60's", etc. comments are simply pointless. First, I hate to break this to some of you, but our rockets haven't advanced all that much since Saturn V. The shuttle is still decades old and we have yet to start on a replacement. China doesn't have to catch up to the 21st century to level with us, all they have to do is get up to the 80's technology, which with their immense pool of college graduates, this won't actually take 20 years.

    Next, keep making those comments if it makes you feel better, but what are other nations supposed to do? Throw their hands up into the air and just simply accept the American lead and say "The Americans and Russians already beat us to it, what's the point of even trying?" God forbid the underdog from daring to dream big... How about doing something more useful like trying to advance our own technology? Maybe it's time to replace the shuttle with some 21st century technology and puts some gap between us and the Chinese?

    Lastly, who really cares where the technology and the help came from? Does China care now that they know how to do it? Let's face it, technology has always been built on top of the works of others. Let's not forget who were the first people to use gun powder and create rockets. China is going to built on top of the new knowledge and keep advancing.

    --
    EvilCON - Made Famous by /.
  17. Re:I wonder by Stonent1 · · Score: 2, Funny

    so who do you think is going to be the first to jump at declaring it a hoax?

    I vote for the Iraqi Information Minister...

  18. I hope by interstellar_donkey · · Score: 2

    I hope this starts the begginings of another space race. With our (America's) woefully old technology, hopefully the Chinese will catch up soon and force us to start really innovating again.

    Yes, there are valid reasons why America has been so lax in the development of space travel. Mostly the fact that we can't seem to justify the expense in light of the profound economic problems in our country.

    Of course, there is the opinion...my opinion...that in the long run, mankind's advancement in space is far more important then short term economic woes. And if it takes one of our (America's) uneasy neighbors to start making us nervous for us to get back on the ball in full ernest, then it's a good thing.

    --
    The Internet is generally stupid
  19. Re:Proof? by mek2600 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm sure that EVERY country that has the resources is going to closely watch what China does in space.

  20. Um... yeah... by devphil · · Score: 3, Interesting


    That's putting it mildly. Our "captains of industry" don't think any farther ahead than four or five months. Our politicians don't think any farther ahead than the next election.

    (Some of the other posts remind me of the Onion's sideline caption: 6,000-Year-Old Culture Now Considered a "Developing Nation".)

    All the researched, published, well-documented reports about modern China -- i.e., ones in bookstores, not slashdot; actual books, not single web pages and sound bites -- point to plans stretching over the next ten to fifty years, not just for space, but for China in general. They realize that almost none of the plans will come to fruition in their lifetimes, but that's okay, their descendants will put the finishing touches on and see it happen. We in the U.S. wouldn't dream of investing in something that won't benefit the same people investing in it.

    Analogy: In the minutes that China's rockets take to slowly lift off the ground, America is racing the quarter-mile in top-fuel hotrods and claiming they rule the world... while China's rocket gains momentum... and keeps gaining momemtum... and eventually covers distances the little modded hotrod can't even dream of. Yes, they're in for the very long haul.

    --
    You cannot apply a technological solution to a sociological problem. (Edwards' Law)
    1. Re:Um... yeah... by sql*kitten · · Score: 3, Informative

      They realize that almost none of the plans will come to fruition in their lifetimes, but that's okay, their descendants will put the finishing touches on and see it happen.

      Chinese long-term thinking goes both ways tho'. Let me tell you a story. In 1405, the Ming emperors were well on their way to establishing naval (and hence trading) dominance in the coastal Pacific. Under the command of Admiral Cheng Ho, a Chinese fleet of 250 vessels and 28,000 men explored as far as the Persian Gulf and Ehiopia. Let me put those numbers into perspective: 600 years ago the Chinese were deploying vessels of 180M in length, that is 30M shorter than the present-day British Royal Navy's flagship. Cheng's ships were big enough that for extended voyages, they could grow food on their decks! With that sort of technological superiority, the Chinese should have established a hegemony that would have persisted today.

      But in 1433, the new Ming emperor and his bureaucrats grew afraid of the rapidly expanding merchant class, who were growing wealthy through international trade, and began to pass laws to limit economic growth, to keep political power firmly in the hands of the Dynasty. By 1500 it was a capital offense to own or construct a vessel with more than 2 masts.

      In 1498, European explorer Vasco da Gama, in a single show, had managed to navigate to the Indian ocean. By Cheng Ho's standards, da Gama's ship was puny and his crew mere amateurs. Da Gama should have been patted on the head by vastly superior Chinese sailors and traders and sent back home. Only, there was no Chinese fleet anymore; the Mings had ordered it broken up. By 1502, Portugal in particular and Europe in general had asserted military superiority in the Indian Ocean and China had begun to turn inwards.

      Now, 600 years later, a European colony is the world's dominant economic, technological and military power, Europe itself is still incredibly rich and powerful by historic standards, and China is only starting to recover from a decision made by a weak Emperor in 1433. I predict that history will repeat itself, as soon as a new Cheng Ho leads the exploration of space, the Chinese political establishment will turn on him. That's how it works in China.

    2. Re:Um... yeah... by pmz · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Our politicians don't think any farther ahead than the next election.

      In the interest of keeping the USA a free nation, this is the strongest argument against implementing government-managed social programs, such as social security and nationalized health care. The only way for people really to watch out for themselves and their families is to either do it themselves or hire a private firm they can trust isn't in it for a quick buck. The government is always in it for the quick buck (or vote).

      In China, the government can plan for the long term, because the people have no individual liberty to do so for themselves, as well as not having the inaliable liberties described in the US Constitution. Hell, even Hillary Clinton's book was censored by the Chinese government without her permission (a good recent example). The Chinese government savors keeping its people ignorant and submissive, and, as a US citizen, I find that totally unacceptible.

  21. You lack a sense of historical perspective. by pr0ntab · · Score: 2

    China has always been crowded, and always been centrally administered/socialist, since 1500BCE and earlier.

    It's the only way they have managed to survive. Eventually as they continue industrializing (and reduce the population vs. land area, esp. in rural zones) conditions will improve.

    We want China to keep striving at "pointless" pursuits. It's a good sign, overall; regardless of the unpalatable practices (and that's your opinion) that many suffer under.

    --
    Fuck Beta. Fuck Dice
  22. Re:Proof? by ColaMan · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You can bet that any time anyone launches something orbital (or more importantly, suborbital) that NORAD (an thier Russian etc counterparts) will be looking long and hard at it.

    I'd be guessing that somewhere in their three ring binder for space launches there's a little note that says "ring this number and inform NORAD et al of time of launch". It'd be the polite thing to do, anyway.

    --

    You are in a twisty maze of processor lines, all alike.
    There is a lot of hype here.
  23. Re:funny coincidence by red+floyd · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Life imitates art...

    In Stephen Baxter's Titan, the Chinese launch their first manned ship around the same time as Columbia is destroyed upon re-entry!

    --
    The only reason we have the rights we have is that people just like us died to gain those rights. -- Cheerio Boy
  24. Re:Spirit of adventure? by EvanED · · Score: 3, Informative

    On the other hand, the US is not even 250 years old, whereas England has called itself that since I think no later than the 11th century, France the 1200s IIRC, and I'm not sure about Spain or Portugal or the other big exploration countries.

    "And let's face it: Russia was only steps behind America for much of that race."

    Russia was ahead for the first half or so; they were first to launch a satellite, the first to launch a man*, the first to orbit a person (which was for them wrapped up in the first manned flight, while for us it took until our third launch), and the first to perform an EVA. The first thing we were first at so to speak was inflight rendezvous, and that wasn't until Gemini 12. The first time we put ourselves clearly in the lead was Christmas 1968 with the flight of Apollo 8.

    *They were also the first to orbit a woman (maybe 1967? The late 60s come to mind), however as this is not a technological achievement I left it out.

  25. Re:I would like to be the first... by -brazil- · · Score: 2, Informative
    And then you wake up and notice how Goldman Sachs predicts China to overtake the US economically in 2039 "Within four years China will have overtaken Germany; Japan by 2015 and crossed the US by 2039 to become the world's largest economy ( All in U.S dollar terms)"


    Don't forget that China has 5 times the USA's population, 10 times Japan's and 16 times that of Germany. It's not at all surprising or threatening that their GDP would be bigger. However, that huge population won't be content with the lack of democratic controls or labour protection laws forever...

    --

    The illegal we do immediately. The unconstitutional takes a little longer.
    --Henry Kissinger

  26. Re:Taikonaut: greek word in roman letters?? by Monsieur_F · · Score: 2, Informative

    In France it happens that French cosmonauts (when taking part to a Russian mission) or astronauts (with NASA) are simply called "spationauts".

    (I think the word is for all Europeans, but I only know its use in French).

    --
    McCartney fans pay bus tickets. [...] Lennon fans too, with discretion.
  27. Re:China Effort in Perspective by amightywind · · Score: 2, Insightful
    The Russians managed three full orbits on their first try. We didn't do that until Glenn, our third flight.

    Gagarin flew 1 orbit. I think Leonov flew 17 on the second.

    The Chinese did have 4 unmanned test flights.

    The Chinese, as always, have a plan for future exploration. What plan does NASA have?

    The Chinese plan (rhetoric) sounds a lot like NASA's plans after Apollo. I don't doubt that there will be 2 lonely Chinese camped out in a minimal space station, no doubt of Russian design, within 10 years. To what end, besides flag waiving?

    And let's hope the Chinese do better than NASA, the latter having killed their astronauts with stupid bureaucratic decisions.

    Fly any test vehicle as many times as the shuttle has and you will have problems. The failure of the shuttle is not the bureaucracy so much as the lack of builtin robust crew escape and abort capability. Do you think there are no bureaucrats in China?

    --
    an ill wind that blows no good
  28. This is really great news by thepustule · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It is great news, and quite refreshing, to see someone actually moving *ahead* in aerospace.

    The entire aerospace field has been a complete disappointment since the 1970's.

    - the biggest, baddest civilian jetliner that still "rules the skies" is the Boeing 747 - from the late 60's

    - the giant B52s carpet-bombing the Taliban last year were from the 60's

    - We are witnessing the last flights of the Concorde - a monumental aerospace achievement - from the late 60's

    - the world's fastest air-breathing jet, the SR71 Blackbird - also from the late 60's - is now completely retired.

    - the fastest rocket plane - the X-15 - was retired in the 60's.

    - the aging Space Shuttle (NASA's pride and joy) is 1970s technology that didn't fly until the 80's

    America in general, and NASA in particular, have done nothing, and gone nowhere in aerospace in the last quarter century. Compare the 747/Concorde/Blackbird/SaturnV of 1969 with the Spitfire and V2 of 1944. Now that was progress!

    It's about time someone else has stood up with even the beginnings of a challenge to American dominance and arrogance in space. America deserves it - they've squandered a 25 year lead. I hope China makes it far. I hope they get to the moon. I hope they build New Beijing on the Lunar South Pole Basin. I am sick and tired of listening to the tired old American "who cares? we were there first" line. So what? What did you manage to do there? Run around, pick up stones, and leave? Good job! You couldn't even get back there now if you wanted to! How many of the engineers and scientists that put Armstrong on the moon are retired? How many of them are even still alive?

    America's best achievement right now is the International Space Station. Really, it's just another Mir. Nothing new. Barely outside our atmosphere. I mean come on! Maybe this new development will inspire some new ideas and dreams. Maybe it will propel us at least to the moon again. We need a kick in our proverbial backside.

    History will look back on the Kennedy-inspired moon shots as a false start. A sputter of something that failed even as it got going. Ok, but now it's time to let the adventure really begin! Let's get out there and DO something!