Slashdot Mirror


Pirate Hunter

Peter Wayner writes: "One of the greatest mysteries of today is whether a pirate is good or bad. On one hand, Disney campaigns against digital piracy while making a movie ( "Pirates of the Caribbean") pushing a theme park ride that celebrates life under the Jolly Roger. On one hand, we celebrate Talk Like a Pirate Day, while on the other hand this fine, upstanding investment company was fined $19.7m for copyright infringement and no one used the word 'Pirate.' This is the world that greets the paperback edition of Pirate Hunter, Richard Zacks's excellent history of the late so-called pirate, Captain William Kidd." Read on for the rest of Peter's review. Pirate Hunter author Richard Zacks pages 426 publisher Hyperion rating 8 reviewer Peter Wayner ISBN 0786884517 summary The life and times of an real pirate.

While Kidd's name may be synonymous with piracy in our culture's muddled collective memory, the book establishes that the sailor was nothing of the sort. If anything, he was framed by powerful forces trying to maintain a struggling business model. Why does that sound familiar?

This book is a wonderful example of what a talented writer and a relentless researcher can do with records that date from the 17th century. Kidd was born in Scotland in 1654, lived to see the 18th century, and recorded some of his daily life in log books that were sometimes sketchy and sometimes voluminous. By synthesizing the information from Kidd's papers, various British archives, ships logs, correspondence and other ephemera, Zacks was able to build a detailed narrative around Kidd's last major voyage. Did you know that in 1699, the going price for fine silks and other exotic fabrics was about 3 yards per piece of eight? Or perhaps that Cotton Mather preached to Kidd on January 21, 1700 on Jeremiah 17:11? I shudder to think what someone will be able to do with the Wayback machine.

By 1696 when the book begins, Kidd was one of the wealthiest landowners in the United States living in a river front mansion near Wall Street. His block and tackle helped build Trinity Church where his family sat in the fourth row each Sunday. Kidd married well and his wife gave him a child. Kidd was, according to his marriage certificate, a gentleman. Still, as Richard Grasso found out, this wasn't enough to stop the political winds from turning an seemingly honest dollar into ill-gotten plunder.

The pirate world, on the other hand, was a different place from the tip of Manhattan. The men on a true pirate ship sailed hard, tortured the weak ships they could find, and then spent their earnings on rum and women in sketchy ports of call that asked no questions. It was, according to the dreaded pirate Bartholomew Roberts , "A merry life and a short one."

Still, despite the disrespect for the rules of property, the pirate life offered many other socially advanced customs that outdistanced the civilized world where the Kings and Queens proclaimed they ruled by divine right. Zacks points out that pirate ships were run as strict democracies and the captains could be deposed at any time by a recall election known as a parlay. "All food and liquor was to be shared equally, a mind-boggling concept for sailors long used to watching officers dine and guzzle for hours on end," he notes.

So why did Kidd leave his comfortable New York home and head to sea again? Zacks establishes that Kidd was given a commission by four lords in the British admirality. Kidd received a new ship, a crew, and the instructions to capture any of the pirates who were plaguing the British East India companies. Kidd was to be a pirate hunter, a fighter for good, not evil, who would conveniently split his takings with his four backers. Some details of the commission were kept secret because the backers were going to keep the treasure and avoid giving the goods back to the rightful owners who lost the treasure to the pirates in the first place. This was a cousin to the doctrine proclaiming that two wrongs make a right.

The book sails through Kidd's voyage in exquisite detail. It's a pirate story that sometimes wilder and sometimes slower than any fiction writer could offer. Somewhere along the trip, the rumors begin to circulate that Kidd had turned pirate. Zacks suggests the whispers began as an act of treachery by one of his old partners who did dabble in piracy. The partners could cover their own tracks by blaming Kidd. The rumors fed into the Royal Navy's faulty intelligence network which dutifully hyped the size of the pirate world in order to serve its own ends.

Along the way, it becomes clear that piracy was as much a different political system as a violent crime against property. When the laws and strictures of society grow too binding, men might slip them off and sail into the sunset. Piracy was a decision to forgo the social contract that most had never signed in the first place, in most cases because the social contract offered by the official government was not particular gracious. Zacks compares life on a pirate ship to life under the British flag when the opportunity presents itself.

Who received a greater share of the wealth? Which class structure was more rigid? Who was responsible for more privation and inhumanity? It's impossible to do the calculus, but Zacks makes it clear that the pirates understood something of what Bob Dylan's theorem that you must be honest to live outside the law. At one bitterly ironic point, the black so-called pirates on Kidd's ship are treated with much more respect than the white ones, but only because the captors know that the black ones will fetch a nice price at the slave market in London.

In Kidd's case, the question of his piracy oscillates in a mechanism of a war between political factions. Zacks suggests that the English East India company, which was sort of the Microsoft of the day when sea trade was high tech, fanned the rumors of Kidd's departure from fair society to ingratiate itself before the Grand Moghul in India. Kidd's commission to take so-called pirate ships put him at odds with the work of the trading company which launched merchant ships skirting their own set of rules.

So the book evolves on two levels. The men fight with guns and ships that are all just extensions of lawyers and corporations. Kidd's struggle to gain a fortune, repay his backers, and return to his wife in New York gets caught in the middle of the greater evolution of English law, American rebellion, French imperialism, and old fashioned greed, . Was he a pirate or gentleman? Does he plunder enough pirates to repay his backers? Does he survive to clear his name? It would be a shame to ruin this fine story by revealing the ending of the book. Of course, the deeper questions of the true nature of piracy and its hold on our imagination, continue to resonate today.

Peter Wayner is the author of Policing Online Games , a book about pirate hunting of a sort, and Java RAMBO Manifesto , an exploration of how to live without a database. You can purchase Pirate Hunter from bn.com. Slashdot welcomes readers' book reviews -- to see your own review here, read the book review guidelines, then visit the submission page.

191 comments

  1. Pirates... by Bondolo · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    ...yar

    --
    -- "Most people prefer a popular myth to an unpopular truth"
    1. Re:Pirates... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A pirate walks into a bar with a steering wheel attached to his crotch...
      The bartenders asks about it and the pirate replies "Yar! It's driving me nuts!"

  2. QOTD= True meaning of this book by lostindenver · · Score: 2, Funny

    Per slashdot quote machine when I read this review: "This novel is not to be tossed lightly aside, but to be hurled with great force". -- Dorothy Parker

  3. Re:Ninjas by slothbait · · Score: 2, Funny

    Why even bother talking about it? Ninjas kick pirate ass all day long.

    I'm being off topic but I must be said.

    vikings > ninjas > pirates

  4. Why pirates are bad by Zanek · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Pirates have always been considered bad in the strictest sense. They are those that take property of others.
    What Disney et al have done is romantize the Pirate for movies and the like to sell a product.
    They glamorize it, make it look cool, fun, exciting, and package it
    like anything else. All we have here is the new commercialization of something old which was bad now made to seem cool
    We've all seen that happen before . Think about it:-)

    --


    Help pay for my wedding! Go to my kickass website
    1. Re:Why pirates are bad by notque · · Score: 1

      Pirates have always been considered bad in the strictest sense. They are those that take property of others.
      What Disney et al have done is romantize the Pirate for movies and the like to sell a product.
      They glamorize it, make it look cool, fun, exciting, and package it
      like anything else. All we have here is the new commercialization of something old which was bad now made to seem cool


      So what you're saying is that the copy of Winzip that I just cracked will not make me handsome, and cool? ..... Disney has hoodwinked us all!

      --
      http://use.perl.org
    2. Re:Why pirates are bad by mrtroy · · Score: 1

      That sounds like non-pirate talk to me!

      Get him boys!

      --
      [I can picture a world without war, without hate. I can picture us attacking that world, because they'd never expect it]
    3. Re:Why pirates are bad by ePhil_One · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Pirates have always been considered bad in the strictest sense.

      Pirates at various times were commisioned by governments such as England as a means to wage war on enemy nations, such as Spain. They would even turn a portion of their booty over to the King in return for the ships and safe havens he provided. Since they weren't military, but private citizens, they weren't subject to the "Rules of War" which would have frowned on attacking merchant ships on the open seas (part of why Germany's U-boat campaign was frowned upon).

      Of course, England thought of these chaps as "Privateers", and were important but still looked down upon.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisted little posts, all alike.
    4. Re:Why pirates are bad by gfxguy · · Score: 1

      I think you mean:

      Yaarrr, that's be soundin' like land-lubber talk, ifs ya asks me! Go get'em lads!

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
    5. Re:Why pirates are bad by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 1
      Pirates have always been considered bad in the strictest sense. They are those that take property of others.

      Ah, but what if those "others" claim to the property is questionable, if those others are thieves or aristocrats? If pirates are robbing a slave-trading boat that just sold a bunch of humand for a hold full of gold, for example, I know who I'm rooting for.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
  5. Hakim Bey: TAZ by handy_vandal · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Hakim Bey has written some interesting things about pirates, and Temporary Autonomous Zones. Excerpt:

    Pirate Utopias

    "THE SEA-ROVERS AND CORSAIRS of the 18th century created an "information network" that spanned the globe: primitive and devoted primarily to grim business, the net nevertheless functioned admirably. Scattered throughout the net were islands, remote hideouts where ships could be watered and provisioned, booty traded for luxuries and necessities. Some of these islands supported "intentional communities," whole mini-societies living consciously outside the law and determined to keep it up, even if only for a short but merry life."

    http://www.gulfislands.com/momo/TAZ.html

    --
    -kgj
    1. Re:Hakim Bey: TAZ by Courageous · · Score: 1

      booty traded for luxuries and necessities

      If I were a lonely horny pirate, I'd probably be trading some luxuries for some booty myself.

      C//

    2. Re:Hakim Bey: TAZ by I8TheWorm · · Score: 1

      Careful, or you'll be the next upstanding investment company was fined $19.7m for copyright infringement. :)

      --
      Saying Android is a family of phones is akin to saying Linux is a family of PCs.
    3. Re:Hakim Bey: TAZ by gobbo · · Score: 1
      Dang, didn't know that site was still active; should be defunct, and now it's going to get a small /.ing... oh well.

      My favourite rant/quote from that [H.Bey's Pirate Utopias]:

      Captain Bellamy

      Daniel Defoe, writing under the pen name Captain Charles Johnson, wrote what became the first standard historical text on pirates, A General History of the Robberies and Murders of the Most Notorious Pirates. According to Patrick Pringle's Jolly Roger, pirate recruitment was most effective among the unemployed, escaped bondsmen, and transported criminals. The high seas made for an instantaneous levelling of class inequalities. Defoe relates that a pirate named Captain Bellamy made this speech to the captain of a merchant vessel he had taken as a prize. The captain of the merchant vessel had just declined an invitation to join the pirates.

      I am sorry they won't let you have your sloop again, for I scorn to do any one a mischief, when it is not to my advantage; damn the sloop, we must sink her, and she might be of use to you. Though you are a sneaking puppy, and so are all those who will submit to be governed by laws which rich men have made for their own security; for the cowardly whelps have not the courage otherwise to defend what they get by knavery; but damn ye altogether: damn them for a pack of crafty rascals, and you, who serve them, for a parcel of hen-hearted numbskulls. They vilify us, the scoundrels do, when there is only this difference, they rob the poor under the cover of law, forsooth, and we plunder the rich under the protection of our own courage. Had you not better make then one of us, than sneak after these villains for employment?

  6. I read this months ago by ellem · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It isn;t a wildly diff't story and Dafoe's but is was a great read and it DID remind me a lot of Pirates! which kicks ass.

    The big flaw is is that it is _too_ apologetic of Kidd. No, he didn't mean to be a Pirate, but he was.

    --
    This .sig is fake but accurate.
  7. I Agree by 4of12 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    A pirate has come to mean something too cudly and innocuous. In fact, the loose use of the term to describe otherwise ordinary people engaging in distribution of material copyrighted by others has done much to diminish the proud tradition of "pirate".

    From now on, all official RIAA pronouncements will obide by a new naming scheme. Opponents of RIAA will be referred to as "digital terrorists", "hackers", and "pedophiles", preferably in the same sentence.

    --
    "Provided by the management for your protection."
    1. Re:I Agree by dbIII · · Score: 1
      A pirate has come to mean something too cudly and innocuous
      This is all too true, but what happens to the language. In my country "larrikin" used to mean a murderous gang member, but now means someone that is unconventional and possibly funny. Another example:

      "You have murdered me, you naughty man" - William Shakespear

  8. Thanks for the great review! by JLSigman · · Score: 1

    I'll have to go get this from the library.

    --
    -jls
    Techno-pagan
  9. This is journalistic bullshit! by Thud457 · · Score: 0
    WTF is this shit?!!!!

    He's no pirate!

    This dirty murdering scumbag didn't illegaly copy a single song or movie! All he ever did is rob some ships, kill some sailors and rape some innocent civilians! And he calls himself a pirate?!!!!

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  10. There is a big difference by slyxter · · Score: 0, Funny

    between a "Slash your throat and rape your wife" pirate and a "Burn a copy of windows XP" priate.

    1. Re:There is a big difference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So which was Kidd? Technically I think he was the former, but in spirit, it seems he was the latter.

      Also, Tuesday is a different day of the week than Wednesday, but they are both days of the week.

    2. Re:There is a big difference by Mechanik · · Score: 1

      between a "Slash your throat and rape your wife" pirate and a "Burn a copy of windows XP" priate.

      Yes, but at least the former has gotten laid at some point...

      And don't get me started on the third kind of pirates, namely the ones that slash your wife and rape your throat...


      Mechanik

    3. Re:There is a big difference by slyxter · · Score: 0

      Also, Tuesday is a different day of the week than Wednesday, but they are both days of the week

      Fair enough, but if you got kicked in the nuts every Tuesday and a free beer every Wednesday would you feel that Tuesday was the same as Wednesday?

    4. Re:There is a big difference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      laid !== rape

    5. Re:There is a big difference by fenix+down · · Score: 1

      What about the ones that burn your wife and rape your XP?

  11. Re:Ninjas by wankledot · · Score: 0

    Now come on, what could a viking possibly be able to do to a ninja?

    Ninjas are quicker, quieter, deadlier, and just all around better.

    Unless you're talking about Beowulf here, in which case, he might pose a threat to some ninjas. (Yes, beowulf is more than cluster software, for those of you playing along at home.)

    --
    My sig is blank, I typed this by hand.
  12. Pirate's Progress? by tsanth · · Score: 3, Insightful

    After reading the bookseller's reviews, I didn't find any references to modern-day piracy.

    Contrary to the review given here, I don't see anything about the book "evolving on two levels"; rather, I see a biography.

    I mean... I'll still give it a read at the bookstore (and maybe pick it up), but I think it'd be prudent to know that I'm getting myself into a biography, not some veiled reference to today's legal issues.

    1. Re:Pirate's Progress? by pimpinmonk · · Score: 1

      Agreed. It's open to interpretation, surely, but it reminds me of how every single book in high school ended up to actually be about the fall of man from grace just because a character would "fall" at some point in the story, no matter who fell or how. See, now that you think about it, it makes sense, but un-think about it, and you can see that it could just be that the character fell down and went boom. Similarly, the parallels to modern "piracy" surely make sense but we can't assume that it's the author's intent. This review, to me anyway, read more like a paper than a review--he draws facts from the biography and analyzes it in context of another, current issue.

      But yeah, I don't think this is quite a "The Crucible" or anything similar, or at least not by intent of the author.

  13. Psychic! by cK-Gunslinger · · Score: 2, Funny

    Without even reading anything more than the story blurb, I deduce that this book got a rating of... 8!

    [checks rating]

    Ding! Ding! Step right up folks, a winner every time. =P

  14. sugarcoating... by Cedric+C.+Girouard · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Disney's ability to sugarcoat things is a well known one...

    They've been doing it forever... Ghost's, pirate's, even lions... I for one have seen a lion feed, and trust me, it's not a cuddly thing...

    I shudder to think of the next Disney huggy-feely movie... Something like "My dear serial-killer..." or "The pedophile King" ... These guys could probably make Saddam into a model neighbourg...

    Now if you'll excuse me, I'll go wash my twisted mind with bleach...

    --

    Marriage is considered capital punishment for the theft of a goat in some third world countries...

    1. Re:sugarcoating... by SirLanse · · Score: 1

      He is the Sultan of Agrebah.
      Disney also wants to insult Catepillar and call it all slapstick fun.

    2. Re:sugarcoating... by CitznFish · · Score: 1

      all i read was "blah blah blah"

      Lets all jump on the Disney hate bandwagon! :rolleyes:

      --
      'mmmmmmmmm.... forbidden donut'
    3. Re:sugarcoating... by fenix+down · · Score: 1

      That's actually a pretty funny idea. Disney Hannibal Lechter. That would kick ass. He could do a little song about stapling somebody's intestines to the ceiling. And he could have a little crazy dog for his sidekick. Kinda like Johnny the Homicidal Maniac only without the good writing.

  15. Re:Ninjas by cK-Gunslinger · · Score: 1

    And where do Robot Ninjas fit into this Hierarchy?

  16. "My name was Robert Kidd, as I sailed. . . by kfg · · Score: 2, Interesting

    . . .as I sailed,
    My name was Robert Kidd, as I sailed.
    My name was Robert Kidd, and God's laws I did forbid,
    And much wickedness I did, as I sailed."

    Captain Kidd was no pirate. He was a privateer. Still, if you are the victim of such there is little to tell between them.

    Many pirates were gentleman themselves and often acted to higher level of ethics and morality than their privateer cousins.

    Privateers were no choir boys. They killed. They stole. They simply did it under the aegis of "law."

    But certainly Kidd was no pirate and was ill used by his powerful patrons. In the words of Woody Guthrie, "Some rob you with a six gun, some with a fountain pen."

    I know how the story ends already. My family comes from one of the areas where Kidd is reputed to have buried his treasure. There's nothing really new in this book that can't be found elsewhere. Still, it's a good telling of the story for those unfamiliar with it.

    KFG

    1. Re:"My name was Robert Kidd, as I sailed. . . by Piquan · · Score: 1

      Captain Kidd was no pirate. He was a privateer.

      Who commissioned him? I'd have thought that the British certainly would have considered that a significant datum.

    2. Re:"My name was Robert Kidd, as I sailed. . . by kfg · · Score: 1

      Lord Bellomont, Governor of New York.

      Backers included Sir John Somers, Keeper of the Great Seal and Sir Edward Russell, First Lord of the Admirality. The King himself promised backing but never delivered it.

      This was a private business deal to hunt pirates, but before he sailed he was also issued letters of marque, one to hunt pirates and one to prey on French shipping. I have a photo of one of these as it still exists. The one to hunt pirates was a direct commission from the King and issued under the Great Seal.

      His papers were impecable.

      Kidd, as did all privateers really, made some ill considered moves in his campaign though, and had the bad luck to have these moves become public political embarassment to the men who backed him, and indeed applied great pressure against him to take the commission when he tried to back out of it in the first place.

      KFG

  17. Re:Ninjas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dude! Vikings == pirates! Ninja > vikings/pirates.

    NINJAS ARE TOTATALLY AWESOME! THEY EXIST TO FLIP OUT AND KILL PEOPLE!

    Click here to learn more.

  18. This is silly. by MythoBeast · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Why is it that this guy thinks that the seagoing pirates were good guys? Certainly we've romanticized that kind of pirate, but this is a form of social blindness purposefully done in the name of entertainment.

    The original pirates were just guys who lived outside the law by stealing whatever they could from those who went outside law's reach. We've romanticized them because of their freedom.

    In a few specific cases, those who we call pirates were actually acting in protest of (or in the pay of) one government or another. Today we have Terrorists vs. Freedom Fighters, but back then they had Pirates vs. Privateers. No real difference if you're on the wrong end of things.

    --
    Wake up - the future is arriving faster than you think.
    1. Re:This is silly. by s20451 · · Score: 1

      Well, not exactly. In the new world, the colonial powers couldn't afford to pay for standing navies to enforce their claims and beat up on the enemy of the week. So many pirates were private military contractors, who carried out the bidding of the various powers in exchange for a (large) percentage of whatever they plundered.

      Didn't you ever play Pirates by Sid Meier? Damn, I was addicted to that game for, like, two years. The best part was having to duel some snotty major over the governor's hot daughter.

      --
      Toronto-area transit rider? Rate your ride.
    2. Re:This is silly. by HardCase · · Score: 1

      So many pirates were private military contractors, who carried out the bidding of the various powers in exchange for a (large) percentage of whatever they plundered.

      For what it's worth, those guys were privateers; they carried letters of marque that were supposed to legitimize what they were doing. Of course, legitimacy depended upon which side you were on ;-)

      -h-

    3. Re:This is silly. by Merk · · Score: 1

      This guy gets the silly idea that seagoing pirates were not bad guys by doing something called "research". If you'll even read the review it says that Captain Kidd was hired to hunt pirates but due to some political maneuvering and backstabbing he was declared to be a pirate and got in real trouble as a result.

      He also says that certain pirates were just people fed up with the English colonial system, so they decided to live outside its laws. If people who live outside the laws are bad, then what of the people who started the American revolution?

      The guy's whole point is that pirates were neither jolly people with parrots on their shoulders who lived a carefree life, nor were they evil people who raped and murdered just for the fun of it. They were somewhere in the middle, living brutal lives, but they were also trying to escape the oppressive British (or French or Dutch) rule, and were caught up in the politics of their time.

    4. Re:This is silly. by timeOday · · Score: 1
      To me, the reviewer doesn't seem to be justifying the pirate's crimes so much as making the point that the institutional injustices of the British Empire at the time were even worse. Call it "defense by charge of hypocrisy," like when we try to justify fileswapping by pointing out how the RIAA's member corporations steal from the public by fixing prices.

      None of which makes the thought of being victimized by a real (historical) pirate any more appealing.

    5. Re:This is silly. by renoX · · Score: 1

      >So many pirates were private military contractors,

      These were called "corsaires" *not* pirates!

      Confusing both is like calling a soldier a hitman, technically soldiers are payed murderers like hitmen, but I'm sure that hitmen would feel insulted if you said that they were just soldiers ;-)

    6. Re:This is silly. by MythoBeast · · Score: 1

      This guy gets the silly idea that seagoing pirates were not bad guys by doing something called "research".

      I think that we differ in the definition of the term "bad guy". Just because a person is sanctioned by some government to murder and steal doesn't mean that they are the good guys. Government sanctioned thugs are still thugs.

      Admittedly, both pirates and american revolutionaries were people who wanted to live under their own law. This alone isn't enough of a differentiation until you identify whether "their law" involves killing and pillaging as a way of life.

      The guy's whole point is that....They were somewhere in the middle, living brutal lives, but they were also trying to escape the oppressive British (or French or Dutch) rule, and were caught up in the politics of their time.

      The only real difference between a hero and a villain is how they react to injustice. Heros try to fix it, villains create more.

      Actually, the author's point was that Captain Kidd was someone caught up in political scheming, not that all pirates were that way. Most pirates are really just seagoing highwaymen.

      --
      Wake up - the future is arriving faster than you think.
    7. Re:This is silly. by Jayjay75 · · Score: 1

      From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pirate

      A pirate is a robber attacking from a ship or boat. Pirates usually attack other vessels, usually with the intention of looting their cargo, but may also attack targets on shore. They were termed buccaneers if they operated in the West Indies. See also piracy in the Caribbean.
      Piracy is significant in international law because it marks one of the first cases where the doctrine of universal jurisdiction was invoked.

      Privateering
      A privateer or corsair was similar in method, but had a commission or a letter of marque from a government or king to capture merchant ships belonging to an enemy nation. The famous Barbary Corsairs of the Mediterranean were privateers as were the Maltese Corsairs, who were authorized by the Knights of St. John. The letter of marque was recognized by international law and meant that a privateer could not be charged with piracy, although this was often not enough to save them. The letter of marque was banned under international law in 1854.

  19. Umm.... no. by jared_hanson · · Score: 1

    On one hand, we celebrate Talk Like a Pirate Day...

    The only people who know about Talk Like a Pirate day are those doing research for arcane book reviews. I have never heard of this day, much less celebrated it. I am testing my resolve and not clicking this link. Somehow I don't think it will take much. I don't think my life would be bettered greatly by learning about talk like a pirate day.

    --
    -- Fighting mediocrity one bad post at a time.
    1. Re:Umm.... no. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're wrong. I heard about it a few weeks back on the radio. There were two women that wouldn't stop making lame pirate jokes.

    2. Re:Umm.... no. by urbazewski · · Score: 2, Insightful
      The only people who know about Talk Like a Pirate day are those doing research for arcane book reviews.

      Or those who read Dave Barry or listen to NPR.

      --
      foldplay your photos won't know what hit them.
    3. Re:Umm.... no. by MrCam · · Score: 1

      Or people who read Dave Barry's Syndicated column.

    4. Re:Umm.... no. by __aafutm5472 · · Score: 1

      I have never heard of this day, much less celebrated it.

      You're new here, aren't you?

    5. Re:Umm.... no. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I have never heard of this day, much less celebrated it.

      Well, some things just can't be helped. Run along, now.

  20. On the Lowry vs. Legg Mason Judgement by RevMike · · Score: 1
    Juries hand out large awards like this all the time. What typically happens in any lartge civil cases is this:
    1. The defendant promises to appeal
    2. The defendant tells the plaintiff that they won't pay a dime unitl the appeals are over, which could last many years
    3. The plaintiff's attorney knows that the defendant can move assets off-shore, file bankruptcy, etc in an effort to dodge paying the judgement.
    4. The plaintiff and the defendant negotiate a post-judgement settlement, where the plaintiff pays a smaller amount immediately, rahter than dragging the process out.
    I predict that the defendant here is going to walk away with 2 or 3 milion, not the 19 million that the jury awarded.
  21. It?s a matter of semantics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    One of the greatest mysteries of today is whether a pirate is good or bad.

    When the individual does the stealing, it's is called piracy. When governments do the same thing, its called policing, military intervention, or taxation.

    1. Re:It?s a matter of semantics by mike_mgo · · Score: 1
      Ah, so insightful.

      Of course I don't know of too many bridges built by pirates, or fire departments they fund or many of the thousands of other useful things that governments do. Sure governments and beuracracies are wasteful, and should be held to task for that, but to equate taxation with theft is such simple-minded thinking that it's laughable.

    2. Re:It?s a matter of semantics by Helter · · Score: 1

      No, it's really not. It doesn't matter what a thief does with the money, if he takes it without permission it's theft.

      That's what the government does, under the flimsy justification of a "social contract" that nobody alive today has signed, and which they break regularly and with impugnity.
      No simple-mindedness, the government takes your money by threat of force. They don't even do it equitably, just like a common theif, the more you have, the more they take. The wealthiest half of the US population pays 96% of all taxes.

    3. Re:It?s a matter of semantics by __aafutm5472 · · Score: 1

      The wealthiest half of the US population pays 96% of all taxes.

      Off-topic, but one of the bosses here put out an article in our quarterly newsletter stating that the wealthiest 1% of the US pays more taxes than the bottom 50%. He even gave us some numbers.

      Turns out, though, that the lowest portion of the bottom 1% make 11 times the amount of money as the bottom 50%, but only pay 9 times more in taxes.

      In other words, if you took the bottom 50% and increased their salaries to be in the top 1%, but also left their tax rate the same, they'd be paying more taxes than the top 1% do currently.

      It's not exactly the response the boss was looking for, especially since a decent portion of his employees are in the bottom 50%.

    4. Re:It?s a matter of semantics by pyros · · Score: 1

      Do you think a thief takes effort to steal the same value of goods when they break into a $4M mansion as when they break into a $200/month government housing project? How do you suggest to maintain the budget with a flat tax? The poorest half is literally unable to pick up the difference. Do you know anyone who is going to volunteer to pay taxes if not required by law? I don't, I know I wouldn't. But then we wouldn't have funding for the military to defend us, or for public education, or public health care. It's a trade-off that the majority of the population thinks has more benefits than problems. If you're so fed up with it, move to another country, or by a boat and live in international waters.

    5. Re:It?s a matter of semantics by mike_mgo · · Score: 1
      The wealthiest half of the US population pays 96% of all taxes.

      Well holy shit. Check this out. (This data only up to 1994, but it was pretty stable over the last 50 years so I'm assuming it is still representative.)

      Considering that the top 20% of income earners earn nearly 50% of the money and the top 40% earn over 2/3 of the income this is not all that surprising. The bottom 40% only earn 15% of the income. Obviously you're against progressive income taxes, but even most diehard conservatives and libertarians recognize that the very lowest income earners should have a tax break so that they can do things like buy food, so sure, the burden will be shifted to the top. If you're going to quote these end of the world statistics to us, at least paint the whole picture for us.

      I'm not sure what you propose in place of our "flimsy social contract" but a defense of it is a bit too complicated to attempt here.

    6. Re:It?s a matter of semantics by paulbd · · Score: 1

      i think you mean that in aggregate the top earning 1% make 11 times more than the lowest earning 50%, but only play 9 times more in taxes. the way you had written it out makes no sense.

    7. Re:It?s a matter of semantics by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 1
      It doesn't matter what a thief does with the money, if he takes it without permission it's theft.

      If you eat dinner at a restaurant, and try to leave without paying the bill, and the restaurant uses force (say, by getting a cop to hold you until you pay) to make you pay, is that theft? Nope. You owed a debt, the money was no longer yours. Defining what's "yours" and what's "mine" and what's "his" is far from trivial.

      If you - directly or indirectly - enjoy the benefit of various public goods, you incur a debt.

      We'll elimiate taxes when we can eliminate government. As a Zenarchist, I look forward to that day, but I know it's a long long long way off. Meanwhile, might as well render onto Caesar what is Caesar's.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    8. Re:It?s a matter of semantics by Helter · · Score: 1

      So? They don't recieve government services in proportion to their salary.

    9. Re:It?s a matter of semantics by Helter · · Score: 1

      How convenient, the *majority* get to decide how much a small *minority* pay in taxes... So basically, they get to vote for expensive programs, then when the bill comes they simply vote for someone else to pay it.

      Ever hear of the tyranny of the majority?

    10. Re:It?s a matter of semantics by Helter · · Score: 1

      That argument would work if taxes were payed in proportion to the government services that are rendered, but they're not.
      If you eat dinner at a restaurant, and when you're done the manager comes over and says "I couldn't help but notice that you make quite a bit of money... The folks over at table 30 don't make very much, so you'll be paying for their meal as well as yours", then when you refuse they hold you down and take the money out of your pocket, yes, that would be theft.

      I'm not arguing for the elimination of taxes, I'm pointing out that they're a lot closer to theft than the person I was replying too wanted to admit.

    11. Re:It?s a matter of semantics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Possibly 96% of all income taxes, but definitely not 96% of all taxes. Property taxes, sales taxes, alcohol, cigarette, etc.

    12. Re:It?s a matter of semantics by fenix+down · · Score: 1

      Those poor, starving, fithy rich people.

    13. Re:It?s a matter of semantics by fenix+down · · Score: 1

      You're perfectly free to not make ridiculous ammounts of money, you know. You've decided that it's better to be rich and taxed than broke and tax-free, and you're quite right. But if you've changed your mind for some reason, feel free to quit your job whenever you're ready.

    14. Re:It?s a matter of semantics by paulbd · · Score: 1

      do you have any evidence of this? not anecdotes, actual numbers to demonstrate that those who own substantial capital, earn substantial incomes and probably own significant property - that these people do not receive a disproportionate share of government spending? appeals to "aw, c'mon - they don't get welfare etc." aren't adequate to support this claim - welfare is a small fraction of government expenditure.

    15. Re:It?s a matter of semantics by Helter · · Score: 1

      Most if not all of those taxes are state, not federal taxes, but I do believe you're correct anyway. I think those numbers come from the income tax.

    16. Re:It?s a matter of semantics by fenix+down · · Score: 1

      That policy was written on the door when you came in, Helter. They even wrote down a nice scale on the door showing exactly how much someone at your income level would have to pay. Even if you happened to go in without having the chance to read the scale and the policy, they have it written on the placemat and the waiter reads it to you before you order. Just because this restauraunt has the best food and the cleanest dishes doesn't mean you can't go right across the street to another one.

      You might find the system to be stupid and wrong-headed, and you're completely right to complain about it, but it's not theft. It's perfectly possible to be born in the US and leave for someplace with a friendlier tax system without paying for any kind of progressive policy at all.

    17. Re:It?s a matter of semantics by Helter · · Score: 1

      I can't quite tell if you didn't understand the point, or just realized that you couldn't respond to it...

      How does that have anything whatsoever to do with the iniquities inherent in the system? I say "It's unfair that a group of people can elect to provide services for which they'll be forcing a different group to pay" and you say "those rich people didn't *have* to be rich".

    18. Re:It?s a matter of semantics by Helter · · Score: 1

      Ok, so you're basically saying "put up with inequality in the system or get the hell out?"

      Gee, do you think that's what black people should have done too? Should they have just moved to another country that was more "black friendly?" Was it any less oppression because it was codified? That's pretty much what your argument comes down too... "you know that it's happening, therefore it's not theft". Huh? how does that work?
      Sorry, but "you can always go somewhere else" doesn't fly as an argument. It's equivalent to me saying "well you didn't have to buy that nice car" as a justification for carjacking you, it completley ignores the fact that it's your car and you have every right to it. Well guess what, I'm a citizen and have every right to live in this country without having my income molested by the *majority*. The people at large don't own the US, the land is privately held. Nor to the people at large have a claim to the privately held wealth of it's citizens. Certain services are neccesary for the security and functioning of the country, and they should be paid by all who are capable. However, when people vote for taxes that they will not have to pay, they're voting for theivery. They're ordering food at a restaurant and then deciding that someone else should pay for it.
      That's why it was expressly forbidden in the constitution.

    19. Re:It?s a matter of semantics by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 1
      That argument would work if taxes were payed in proportion to the government services that are rendered, but they're not.

      Arguable. The rich benefit immensely from having a government around to keep the poor from barbecuing them ("eat the rich, the poor are tough and stringy").

      The state creates and defends many artificial "property rights" - patents and trademarks, mineral rights, water rights - that obviously benefit those it designates as owners. Its reserve banking systems, chartering of corporations, and issuing of bonds, certainly benefit the well-off more than the poor.

      National defense benefits only those with at least some means. If you're living in a cardboard box, it doesn't much matter if the Canadians invade and put us all under the rule of the Queen of England, or whatever wacky system those Canucks use. (And you'll notice the demographics of those who actually end up getting killed when the fighting starts.)

      On the other hand, I would like to see more of a shift away from payroll taxes to usage taxes. It is less intrusive, and it makes economic sense to make people pay the true cost of their activities. Maybe raise the capital gains tax, make it progressive, issue use-tax vouchers to low-income families (sort of like how ).

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    20. Re:It?s a matter of semantics by pyros · · Score: 1

      uh, wrong. Laws are written by Congress, not the general public. So even if 75% of all people nationally say they want law X, if those 75% are repsented by only 49% of Congress, they still loose. So an even smaller minority than the oppressed wealthy decided who would pay how much. And Congressional reprensentative are most likely all in that wealthy half. There are a number of safety measures in place to protect against the tyranny. they may not always work as designed, of course, but they're always evolving with us. If you don't like it, you can run for office or communicate your malcontent with your elected representatives. Or you can go live somewhere else.

    21. Re:It?s a matter of semantics by Helter · · Score: 1

      Not quite, laws are written and passed by *representatives*. A bill can't get through both houses without a majority in each and the approval of the president, or a supermajority. In either case that equates to the support of the majority.

    22. Re:It?s a matter of semantics by Helter · · Score: 1

      The fed. doesn't keep the poor from barbequeing the rich first of all. Police are provided by state and municiple governments. Further that's not a service provided to the rich, it's a service provided to everyone. If you've lived in both bad and good neighborhoods you'll also know that it's a service that's taken advantage of far more in poor neighborhoods than rich ones.

      property rights, both real and artificial benefit whoever takes advantage of them. They benefit the poor person who attempts to create wealth by protecting them against others just as much as they protect the wealthy. Do you pay more for a soda depending on how much you enjoy it? No, so why would you more for a service simply because you were able to better use it than others? And if that IS how you're going to assign taxes, wouldn't that require that low income families who recieve government assistance pay higher taxes? Also, things like mineral and water rights are again generally not federal in nature.

      National defense benefits everyone. In fact, it benefits those without means even more than those with. Those with means have the ability to provide for their own protection, and a far greater chance of favorable treatment from an invading force. Poor people are the ones who get raped, murdered, and impressed into service. If you're living in a cardboard box you've a much higher chance of being killed by fighting in the streets. The demographics of those who actually end up getting killed when fighting starts are skewed because the poor take advantage of our need for national defense far more often than middle to upper classes do. The military will provide a)training b)salary c)room and board to just about anyone who wants it. That's quite an improvement over what the ghetto offers (and I know because that's where I live).

      I'd like to see a move away from all progressive taxes entirely. Punishing people for producing wealth is asinine. Tally what the government needs to function and apportion it to the states according to their populations. Low income families should be offered partial or full exemption, but I think that if taxation was done equally we'd see a huge drop in taxes as people realized that well, they don't want those services if they actually have to *pay* for them.

    23. Re:It?s a matter of semantics by pyros · · Score: 1

      but it's a majority of the representatives, not necessarily of the general public. The general public don't actually vote on anything except for who gets to vote for laws and presidents.

    24. Re:It?s a matter of semantics by Helter · · Score: 1

      and they don't actually get to vote for the president either. But you don't seem to understand what the term "representative" means. Congressmen and Senators are voting *for* their constituency. It's not perfect, but claiming "oh, it's just the representatives voting not the population" is bunk. If the representatives don't vote according to the wishes of the public they're representing they don't get reelected. It's the voting public that tells the representatives how to vote, and if they don't follow that lead they get fired. A vote from a representative represents the vote of those people.

    25. Re:It?s a matter of semantics by wurp · · Score: 1

      Punishing people for producing wealth? People are taxed for the money they take from others, not for the wealth they produce. Much more money is taken because we don't have any choice but to give it than we give because we get a good value.

      You seem to be arguing from a fairness point of view - to complete that point of view all money from inheritance should be put into a common pool, no one should be allowed to give gifts beyond some token value, and anyone who dupes or forces other people to give them money should be punished. Those things are too hard to do (and I daresay you wouldn't like the results if they were done), so progressive taxation is used. In fact, the very highest income earners pay immensely less proportionately than the lowest (I'm talking about the upper 1 in 10,000).

      It sounds to me as if you were born into the part of the bell curve with more, and you want to justify your outrage at having some of it taken away to support the people who put you there (or whose ancestors helped put your ancestors there). That doesn't sound very bloody fair to me.

    26. Re:It?s a matter of semantics by Helter · · Score: 1

      Actually, I was born into the part of the bell curve that earns less, and I'm still on that part of the bell curve. I live in a ghetto and earn so little yearly that most years I get a full refund on taxes (though within a few more years that should start changing). I don't like the system because it's inequitable and allows, even promotes rampant social irresponsibility. The people just keep voting themselves bread and circuses... (if you don't know what that's from, take a look into roman history)

      How would it be "fair" for someone to not be able to pass on their accumulated wealth however they see fit when they die? It's their wealth, they should be able to do whatever they want with it! And how is it fair if gifts are limited? These things aren't fair at all... Fair is allowing peoples private property to be left unmolested by the state. Would you think it "fair" if your neighbors decided that upon your fathers death they were going to take the family house from you? People who dupe or force others to give them money already are punished, for fraud and theft. So what was your point?

      The highest income earners pay less proportionate to WHAT? Their income? So what, that's not a reasonable method for determining someones tax burden...
      Taxes are taken to fund government services, services that are implemented at the behest of the people, through their representatives. Why should a majority vote enable the populace to enact measures that they themselves won't have to pay for? What sense does that make? Should I be able to add an addition to my house and make my neighbors pay for it?

      "Punishing people for producing wealth? People are taxed for the money they take from others, not for the wealth they produce. Much more money is taken because we don't have any choice but to give it than we give because we get a good value."
      That doesn't even make sense to me. "we don't have any choice but to give it than we give because we get a good value" huh?
      and what do you mean people aren't taxed on the wealth they produce, they certainly are. Can you show how they're not?

      "and you want to justify your outrage at having some of it taken away to support the people who put you there (or whose ancestors helped put your ancestors there). That doesn't sound very bloody fair to me."

      Unless we're talking about slavery, people are paid for their work. If 100 people work for someone who gets rich, unless he defrauds them in some way, how is it that he should owe them anything but the agreed upon wage? Sounds more like it's fraud the other way around to me... You're saying "you paid these people for work that got you rich, and even though you paid them just as much as you agreed to, they're going to take more by way of government intervention". Gee, sounds like someone wants to renegotiate the contract after the work has been done to me...

  22. Re:Ninjas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't think so Tim. Vikings are certainly greater than pirates, they sailed over half the world looting and plundering and are pretty much a sect of pirates themselves.

    Ninja on the other hand are hardcore badasses. These guys were technically born into the japanese peasant class, but learned combat\assassin techniques in secret. Not hampered by the codes of Bushido as the samurai were they were brutally effective at assasinations and spying. A knife in the dark is worth a thousand swords at dawn.

  23. Pirate Hunter! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Aw, look at this one 'ere. Isn't 'e a beaut! The famous Blackbeard pirate is known to rape, pillage, and loot small Caribbean villages in the spring through the fall. Now, I'm goin' ta' go pick up him up to show the viewers at home a better view. Don't ever try to this at home.

    Easy now... easy now... WHOA!

    As you can see, the Blackbeard has a dangerous sword which 'e uses to scare off larger predators, like the British Navy. Danger, danger, danger!

    Hold on right here while I jam the thumb up his butt...

  24. what is good? by adelayde · · Score: 1

    Questions for me are, w.r.t. software and music piracy:

    1. Are restrictive copyrights good?
    2. Are patents good?
    3. Is control over free distribution of knowledge, information and deeds by large faceless corporates and non-elected, non-governmental organisations good?
    4. Is the extortionate price of CDs, videos and software good?
    5. Is the exploitation of developing and third-world workers in the production of consumer media goods for the West a good thing?
    6. Is the fact that a large percentage of the price of software/music actually goes towards marketing, packaging and generally profiteering, rather than the actual product in question a good thing?
    7. Is the fact that the actual people who do the work (programmers and artists, or just artists if you see programmers that way) get a relatively small proportion of the finanical benefit from the sale in comparison to the monolithic behemoths that punt the stuff out to the ever willing consumer good?

    Then I ask myself whether piracy is a good or bad thing and I would answer that it is all bad.

    1. Re:what is good? by Eponymous+Coward · · Score: 1

      It all depends on your point of view (producer or consumer) and how wide you want to cast your definition of good and bad. What may be good for a small group of people, may be bad for society as a whole.

      It's also hard to universally condemn piracy, or rather infringement of copyright or patent. For example, there are some very poor nations that violate the patents held by drug makers to make medicine available to their (mostly) poor population.

  25. At least try to make sense by CitznFish · · Score: 1

    I hope most of us realize that Pirates of the sea are not the same pirates that copy financial newsletters and illegally distribute them. there is a difference, something the original poster failed to recognize. Just goes to show /. will post the dumbest crap submitted and ignore all my hard work. Maybe I'll run up the skull abnd crossbones and raid their office

    --
    'mmmmmmmmm.... forbidden donut'
    1. Re:At least try to make sense by Eponymous+Coward · · Score: 1

      Do you really doubt that people confuse the two? Presented with no context, the word pirate is ambiguous. But then, so is the word pitch.

    2. Re:At least try to make sense by CitznFish · · Score: 1

      replying to your own reply is just silly ;)

      --
      'mmmmmmmmm.... forbidden donut'
    3. Re:At least try to make sense by Zeriel · · Score: 1

      See Monty Python, "The Crimson Permanant Assurance".

      --
      "America has done some terrible things. But I know that Americans don't cheer when innocents die." -Dave Barry
  26. Dude, Dave Barry wrote about it. It's his favorite by westfirst · · Score: 1


    Read this , or this. Arrrr, Polly want a clue?

  27. Re:Ninjas by sonicattack · · Score: 1

    Ninjas are sweet!

    Ninja arts is the true application of Real Ultimate Power)!

    :)

  28. Are biological viruses good or evil? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Kidd was to be a pirate hunter, a fighter for good, not evil...

    What a joke. The world doesn't operate according to laws of absolute morality.

    All the good and evil talk makes me think of George Bush.

    Totally infantile.

  29. The pirate hunter.... by Kenja · · Score: 1

    Here we find the pirate in his native environment, once a proud ocean going species, the modern pirate makes his home in basements and subsides on a diet of instant Raman. Bereft of social skills, the pirate will often take on a female persona in an attempt to trick other males posing as females into online chat room lesbian sex. The best way to rile up a modern pirate is to introduce a real female into its habitat. Crikey, looks like he wet himself.

    --

    "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    1. Re:The pirate hunter.... by CitznFish · · Score: 1

      404 funny not found

      --
      'mmmmmmmmm.... forbidden donut'
  30. ...going limp... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    HARRRRRRRR!!!...

  31. All political in the end... by ssclift · · Score: 1

    If you are Dutch, then Piet Hein is a national folk hero. If you are Spanish or Portugese then he was a rapacious Dutch pirate stealing colonial income.

    If you're Canadian, then the Brig the Sir John Sherbrooke was a warship, if you were American, a pirate ship. Vice-versa for the Syren.

    As with acts of war anywhere, perspectives can differ even amongst folks supposedly on the same side.

  32. Arrr matey by AtariAmarok · · Score: 1

    It may not be insightful, it may not be funny, and I'm sure it is not a troll.

    However, we can't let nearly 40 comments in a Pirate item slip by without even one "Arrr matey" comment, can we?

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
    1. Re:Arrr matey by HarveyBirdman · · Score: 1
      However, we can't let nearly 40 comments in a Pirate item slip by without even one "Arrr matey" comment, can we?

      Yes. Yes we can.

      --
      --- Ban humanity.
    2. Re:Arrr matey by Alex+Belits · · Score: 1

      Same way as we can have 128 comments without even one reference to Captain Harlock -- despite mentioning glamorization of pirates by Disney, attempts to escape the suckage of society, and other closely related stuff.

      And someone said that Slashdot is a nerds site...

      --
      Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
  33. Re:Ninjas by IWantMoreSpamPlease · · Score: 1

    Don't forget the ultimate:

    guys with guns > vikings > ninjas > pirates

    --
    So rise up, all ye lost ones, as one, we'll claw the clouds.
  34. Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    On one hand, Disney campaigns against digital piracy while making a movie, "Pirates of the Caribbean"

    I know maybe the poster thought this was clever, but it's really a complete non sequitur.

    Welcome to a world without editorial oversight. It's not pretty.

    Then again, the world *with* editorial oversight led to the Los Angeles Times becoming the propaganda arm of the California Democrats, and spewing forth political assassination pieces. If you thinki not, you haven't been paying attention to the recent insider details leaking out. And have you noticed how all those serious charges against Arnold, with talk of civil cases and even criminal charges, have all dried up and vanished?

  35. You book you want to read... by Gareman · · Score: 1
    You book you want to read is "Under the Black Flag: The Romance and the Reality of Life among the Pirates." This book discusses the reality of pirates.

    The reality is that pirates were most often very bad people who murdered and tortured anyone who did not give up without a fight. Some people had no choice of becoming a pirate, facing death. They were executed nontheless when caught. Other people were sanctioned by their government to be pirates; they were called privatees. Most pirates were ex navy men looking for adventure, easy money, and an egalitarian form of leadership. Pirate ships often had direct democracy, while naval ships had brutal dictatorships (the captain). Also, as pirate ships were often crewed by ten times the number of naval vessels, due to economic constraints, life was sifnificantly easier.

    1. Re:You book you want to read... by cindy · · Score: 1

      Another book is "The Sweet Trade" by Elizabeth Garrett. This is a fictionalized account of the lives of Mary Read and Anne Bonny, two female pirates. While this is essentially a "bodice ripper" romance novel, it is based on real people and events and a lot of research went into it. It portrays pirates as dysfunctional sociopaths who seem much more like outlaw bikers than Errol Flynn (or Johnny Depp). The certainty of an early and violent death hangs over everything they do and drives both the "lust for life" and the cruelty that many of these people were known for.

    2. Re:You book you want to read... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The book being reviewed seems like it has a lot in common with Captain Kidd and the War Against the Pirates . I'll haev to look this book and compare them.

      Modern piracy is still going on, and is a big problem, as a quick glance through some of the links at the IMB will show. And I'm not talking about script kiddies stealing the code to Half-life 2. I'm talking the old fashioned "guys with guns threaten to kill everyone on ship, take all valubales, and maybe carry out their threat" type of thing.

  36. Wait, was it.... by MImeKillEr · · Score: 1

    ..stagger, stagger, crawl, crawl, tumble?

    Or stagger, crawl, tumble, tumble, stagger, crawl?

    5 points to the first one to get the reference.

    --
    Cruising the internet on my TI-99/4A @ a whopping 300 baud!
    1. Re:Wait, was it.... by One+Louder · · Score: 1

      Yellowbeard?

    2. Re:Wait, was it.... by MImeKillEr · · Score: 1

      Give that (I'm assuming you're male) man 5 karma points!

      --
      Cruising the internet on my TI-99/4A @ a whopping 300 baud!
    3. Re:Wait, was it.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yellowbeard.

  37. 3 hands? by d0ggi3 · · Score: 1

    lucky bastard...

  38. I think I speak for everyone... by pebs · · Score: 1

    yarrrrrrrr

    --
    #!/
  39. Jose' Gaspar! by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 1
    They forgot Gasparillia day

    Gasparillia Day is an annual party, akin to Mardi Gras, that celebrates when the Tampa Bay area was invaded by pirates. Much debauchery is to be had!

    I have beeds! Show me your Tits!
    Oh.. Sorry...flash back.

    --
    There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
  40. Re:1 H3r3By... by Alex+Belits · · Score: 1

    7|-|i5 iz n0+ +41kin9 1ik3 4 pir8, +hi5 iz 741|i|\|9 1ik3 4 14/v\0r!

    --
    Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
  41. "on one hand" by mcb · · Score: 1

    your use of "on one hand..., while on the other..." sucked. at first i thought you had 3 hands.

    1. Re:"on one hand" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      How does that Dead song go? Shake the hand that shook the hand, Of P. T. Barnum and Charlie Chan.

      Don't know what's lamer. The idea that someone wrote a book about pirates in 2003, Slashdot posts a review of said book, or the fact the person submitting this story begs the question of pirates as one of "the greatest mysteries." LMAO!

  42. errr... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You might want to adjust your hierchy, unless you don't consider flintlock pistols and cannon to be "guns".

  43. Pirate Philosophy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am a free prince and have as much authority to make war on the whole world as he who has a hundred sail of ships and an army of a hundred thousand men in the field. And this my conscience tells me; that there is no arguing with such sniveling puppies who allow superiors to kick them about the deck at pleasure, and pin their faith upon the pimp of a parson, a squab who neither practices nor believes what he puts upon the chuckle-headed fools he preaches to.

    --Black Sam Bellamy, pirate captain

  44. millidollars? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    ...this fine, upstanding investment company was fined $19.7m for copyright infringement...

    Is "m" for milli? Is $19.7m equal to 1.97 cents?
  45. One of the greatest mysteries of today... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is how many hands does this critic/author have?

    On one hand, Disney campaigns.... On one hand, we celebrate Talk Like a Pirate Day, while on the other hand....

  46. That's a dumb point... by Mustang+Matt · · Score: 1

    >>
    Disney campaigns against digital piracy while making a movie, "Pirates of the Caribbean", pushing a theme park ride that celebrates life under the Jolly Roger

    Give me a break... And the studios that create films about horrible murders but are against murdering people are hypocrites too right?

    Dumb.

    --
    The man who trades freedom for security does not deserve nor will he ever receive either. - Benjamin Franklin
  47. This time they've gone too far by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Disney's ability to sugarcoat things is a well known one...

    They've been doing it forever... Ghost's, pirate's, even lions


    They sugarcoated goatse? That's just too much! They shouldn't be showing that to kids!

  48. Captain Kidd's Cat by cybermace5 · · Score: 1

    I remember reading this book long ago. It was published in 1984, actually. Well written; would probably be an interesting read now even for a children's book. You might find it at a local library (send the kid in to get it, don't want to scare all the little kids in that section of the library).

    It tells pretty much the same story about Captain Kidd, through the eyes of his cat. While no one really knows how far Kidd went, there are enough ambiguities to make this at least one possibility. We probably will never really know...the lure of incredible wealth is certainly very strong.

    --
    ...
  49. MOD WAYYYYY UP!!! by gregarican · · Score: 1

    LMFAO! This is the best post so far on this topic. Two enthusiastic thumbs up!

  50. Re:Ninjas by sonicattack · · Score: 1

    That was so funny, I almost kicked my mom in the face when I read it!

  51. s/doubt/think by Eponymous+Coward · · Score: 1

    but hopefully you get my point anyway...

  52. Re:Ninjas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, what about Fembots (think: Austin Powers)?

  53. Typo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    741|i|\|9

    Of course you meant to type "741|{i|\|9"

    One little "{" makes all the difference in the world.

    1. Re:Typo? by Alex+Belits · · Score: 1

      "Plain text" option doesn't convert "<" into "<".

      --
      Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
  54. Pirate Utopias by drfrog · · Score: 1

    I too have become intriuged by the pirates and cosairs of old

    a book i must recommend is
    pirate utopias
    moorish corsairs and european renegadoes
    by peter lamborn wilson

    the most surprising thing ive read so far is that they had a form of democracy before england!
    england sent emissaries to Sale only three years before the protectorate/commonwealth form of government was instituted back in england!

    so if piracy is all bad, then democracy must be to!!Right? ;)

    long live anarchy!

    --
    back in the day we didnt have no old school
    1. Re:Pirate Utopias by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I may be wrong, but I believe democracy originated in ancient Greece. Some of the city states of that time,(Sparta comes to mind), were democracies.

  55. Re:Pirates...Woah! by uberdave · · Score: 1

    It was, according to the dreaded pirate Bartholomew Roberts , "A merry life and a short one."

    You mean there really was a "dread pirate Roberts"?

  56. Yeah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, a butt pirate.

  57. Here's your clue by bug-eyed+monster · · Score: 1

    Along the way, it becomes clear that piracy was as much a different political system as a violent crime against property.

    For some reason, this article's author is trying to compare (equate?) sea piracy of old to today's computer piracy. The above quote explains why that's a Bad Thing. Sea pirates were violent people, killing, hurting, destroying. Computer "piracy" is usually reduced to making and distributing copies, limiting the supplier's income. Unlike sea pirates, computer pirates don't storm Microsoft's or RIAA-members' buildings killing the employees.

    As far as companies being fined for copyright infringement... In Canada the rule of thumb was (maybe still is, not sure) that piracy by individuals was a soft ok since it was for private use, whereas piracy by businesses was bad since it was for financial gain. That always made sense to me.

  58. same price at amazon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ref: This book is the same price at amazon.
    Spend $14 more to get free shipping.

  59. Actually by appleLaserWriter · · Score: 1

    There was a story about Talk Like a pirate day on the Airport Network edition of CNN.

    I didn't ask the security people what they thought about this...

  60. No way by Perianwyr+Stormcrow · · Score: 1

    ninjas > all

    --

    What we call folk wisdom is often no more than a kind of expedient stupidity.-Edward Abbey

  61. Taxation is theft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Taxation is indeed theft. It is a lot like mugging. If you don't believe me, go ahead and stop paying taxes. You will find the threat of violence for not complying with the "gimme!" soon enough.

  62. Rather lackluster writing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    While I did find the information in the book quite interesting I do not feel the writing was truly up to par with the material that was being presented. It was written in a way that was rather haphazard and disorganized, while at the same time it really did nothing to hold my attention and beg me to continue reading. I don't know how much of it was the author's style or poor editing, but I don't feel that this book deserves a rating of 8. I'd say more about a 5. If you enjoy books along the lines of a historical genre I can think of three off the top of my head that have good content and are written rather well.

    1) Close to Shore by Michael Cappuzo
    2) Devil in the White City by Erik Larson
    3) The Professor and the Madman by Simon Winchester

  63. Pirates? Ninjas are the way to go by DumbWhiteGuy777 · · Score: 1

    Consult my sources if you disagree. Ninjas > Pirates

  64. Three Hand Monte by the_consumer · · Score: 1
    On one hand, Disney campaigns ... under the Jolly Roger. On one hand, we celebrate Talk Like a Pirate Day, while on the other hand this fine, upstanding investment company...

    I, for one, welcome our new three-handed pirate overlords.

    --
    "If you're thinking what I'm thinking, you're right." -
  65. Greatest mystery of today? by nonetheless · · Score: 1
    Who killed JFK? How can we block the HIV virus? Is there (other/any) intelligent life in the universe? Does (a) god exist? Pirates: good or bad?

    Uh huh.

  66. Way to burn those modpoints! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nice to see you got the trollditional kneejerk downmod for that!

  67. Re:Ninjas by NihilSmurf · · Score: 1
    Now come on, what could a viking possibly be able to do to a ninja?

    Ninjas are quicker, quieter, deadlier, and just all around better.


    Oh, I think not:
    • Vikings come in hoards, ninjas fight alone
    • Vikings can go berserk, ninjas can merely feign death
    • Vikings have longships and explored all the way to America, while ninjas barely made it to Korea
    • Ninjas fight for a Lord to accomplish subtle political goals, while vikings rob and pillage for the hell of it.
    • No way could the leathery hide of a viking be penetrated by a flimsy shuriken
    • A ninja could try to escape with a grappling hook, but vikings have axes and war-hammer to smash down trees and walls.
    • ...and ninja smoke bombs are useless since vikings fight blinded by rage anyway
    • Ninjas don't talk, while you can't get vikings to shut up.
    • Ninjas don't drink, or if they do, it's thimbles of sake, but vikings drink mead and ale straight from the barrel, and it makes them mean!
    • Ninjas are asexual, but vikings have wenches. Oh man, do they have wenches!
    • Vikings have way more facial and body hair than ninjas
    • Have you seen World's Strongest Man competition on ESPN? Lots of vikings, not so many ninjas.
    Now, I don't want anybody to say I'm anti-ninja or anything. Ninjas are great. Much better than say, Legionnaires, Hoplites, or Longbowmen. They are also better than Corsairs, Magyars, Macabees, Hobbits, Mumluks, and Zulus. But, they are not better than Vikings.
  68. Pirates vs. buccaneers and corsairs by chthon · · Score: 1

    Could it be that the word pirate has undergone some devaluation through the machinations of these people. Everybody speaks of pirates, but to be a pirate you had to get a an official letter from one of the seafaring nations in that time, England, France or Holland. Pirates were a weapon in the many conflicts in the Carribean between those nations. Buccaneers and corsairs, on the other hand, were the people who fled from society. I think that, in a sense, Kidd was a pirate, but not in the sense that these days people describe pirates as the boarding, murdering and looting lawless man of the sea. Jurgen

  69. Answers to your questions by AtariAmarok · · Score: 1

    "1. Are restrictive copyrights good?"

    If applied to country music, yes. Anything that hampers the propagation of this is good.

    "2. Are patents good?"

    If it's good enough for Doc Emmet Brown, it is good enough for me.

    "3. Is control over free distribution of knowledge, information and deeds by large faceless corporates and non-elected, non-governmental organisations good?"

    Have you ever had a look at Steve Ballmer? Sometimes a faceless corporation is preferable!

    "4. Is the extortionate price of CDs, videos and software good?"

    See answer to #1. Also, the higher the price on a "Dharma and Greg Season #1" DVD, the better.

    "5. Is the exploitation of developing and third-world workers in the production of consumer media goods for the West a good thing?"

    It depends on how well-developed these workers are.

    "7. Is the fact that the actual people who do the work (programmers and artists, or just artists if you see programmers that way) get a relatively small proportion of the finanical benefit from the sale in comparison to the monolithic behemoths that punt the stuff out to the ever willing consumer good?"

    If a minimal reward provides a disincentive for "Artists" to create country music CD's and shows like "Dharma and Greg", well.... .yes. Reward them as little as possible.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
  70. What, you only mostly liked it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    "Two enthusiastic thumbs up!"

    Don't you mean three?!!!

  71. What do you mean? by AtariAmarok · · Score: 1

    "Turns out, though, that the lowest portion of the bottom 1% make 11 times the amount of money as the bottom 50%, but only pay 9 times more in taxes."

    This is hard to parse. The bottom 1% makes 11 times as much as the bottom 50%? I don't get it: the bottom 1% is part of the bottom 50%.

    What it seems like you are saying is that:

    Group A makes X amount of money
    Group B (a subset of group A) makes 11 times X amount of money.

    It seems impossible. It is like saying:
    "Jim, Betty, and Sally made a total of 30 cookies."
    AND
    "Jim made a total of 180 cookies"

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
  72. Re:Pirates...Woah! by Winter · · Score: 1

    You mean there really was a "dread pirate Roberts"?

    Which of course is a reference to the Princess Bride...

    --
    main(i){putchar(177663314>>6*(i-1)&63|!!(i<5)<<6)&&main(++i);}
  73. Ninja Museum by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When I went to Japan I actually visited a real Ninja hideout that's been turned into a museum in Iga, Mie prefecture. It had trap doors, secret passages and hidden panels in the floor to hide weapons. Ninjas lived in comuninal camps and trained together. They made bombs and other weapons and usually were hired to assinate people. They could definetely kick some Viking ass that's for sure. I've got a great video of a Ninja demo from the museum and I'd say no one could survive an attack by a Ninja.

  74. To quote myself from my youth.. by Jettamann · · Score: 1

    ... "I ras rorn on a pile a shit!"

    --
    - No Sig for you!
  75. To qoute by Bendebecker · · Score: 1

    The Curse of Monkey Island" "I want to be a pirate!"

    --
    There's a growing sense that even if The Future comes,
    most of us won't be able to afford it.
    -- Lemmy
  76. Isn't there a Peter Jackson pirate movie? by AtariAmarok · · Score: 1

    I heard something about a Peter Jackson pirate movie that came out on DVD this year. At least I think it is a pirate movie: it features a character named Treebeard.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
  77. Pirate Utopias = many mirrors by handy_vandal · · Score: 1

    Dang, didn't know that site was still active; should be defunct, and now it's going to get a small /.ing... oh well.

    According to this Google search, Pirate Utopias is mirrored at many sites.

    --
    -kgj
  78. Re:Pirates...Woah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    try Black Bart

  79. So it all comes down to "become a pirate" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    " I don't, I know I wouldn't. But then we wouldn't have funding for the military to defend us, or for public education, or public health care. It's a trade-off that the majority of the population thinks has more benefits than problems. If you're so fed up with it, move to another country, or buy a boat and live in international waters."

    So that's what it boils down to? Don't like, then ship out and hoist the jolly roger. Argghhh!

    1. Re:So it all comes down to "become a pirate" by pyros · · Score: 1
      So that's what it boils down to? Don't like, then ship out and hoist the jolly roger. Argghhh!

      I know you were joking, at least I think you were, and I thought it was funny. But I just meant be self-sufficient in international territory. I can't think of any legally inhabitable land that isn't within any nation's borders. Right now I can think of nothing better than to have a nice private island with solar/wind-power for electricity and a nice boat. Grow fruits/vegetables and fish for food. Do a bunch of SCUBA diving and lazing around on the beach.

  80. Re:Ninjas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Now come on, what could a viking possibly be able to do to a ninja?"

    Eat him.

  81. I read it by Apreche · · Score: 1

    I read this book awhile ago. If you want to know what real pirating was like, check it out. It is very very interesting. Rober Culliford is the freakin' man.

    --
    The GeekNights podcast is going strong. Listen!
  82. PC by Chris+Y+Taylor · · Score: 1

    I prefer the term privateer.

  83. Privateers & Letters of Marquee by spun · · Score: 1

    As anyone who has played the great old C64/Apple-II era game, "Pirates!" knows, the key to making a fortune was to pick your enemies carefully. The Caribbean was divided amongst the British, French, Dutch, and of course, the Spanish with the lion's share of the good stuff. When any of these nations went to war with another, assuming you were on good terms, you could get a letter of marquee, which granted you the right to plunder enemy ships. Of course, to the enemy, you were still a pirate, and bad reputations last longer than wars. I would play privateer for a while, trying not to piss off anyone too badly, until I had a fleet built up, then sack and plunder all up and down the Spanish Main.

    On a different tack, we romanticize pirates for the same reasons we romanticize the Mob, Bank Robbers, and Robin Hood. We like people who live by their own rules, who take life in their own hands, damn the risks, and live it. We wish that we could live like that. Maybe not the killings and the plunder, but at least telling the boss where he can shove it.

    Part of us knows that the rules only apply because we let them. But the rules (even then, I suppose) are many and confusing, and we yearn to live by a simpler law, like "I've got your back, and you've got mine."

    Notice all these types are underdogs, too. We like our heroes outside the law, not above it. When a Lord or a CEO says "The law does not apply to me," well, that's just oppression, mate, a cold, hard, everyday sort of thing. When a pirate says it, that's rebellion, the little guy saying, "Oh yeah? I can play that way, too!" and we love him for it, because we wish we had the courage.

    --
    - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
  84. Wilson! by AtariAmarok · · Score: 1

    "....Right now I can think of nothing better than to have a nice private island with solar/wind-power for electricity and a nice boat. Grow fruits/vegetables"

    We'll give you your choice of Ginger or Marianne, an ice skate for those occasional dental needs, and your new best friend the white volleyball. Don't open up those boxes with wings on them, whatever you do, and if a crate labelled "Plastic Explosives" washes up one morning, push it back to sea. You have what you need, now move along.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
  85. What about the Spanish? And this justifies my... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    constant call for a new domain ending in .arg
    Alex ``too lazy to create an account'' Dominguez

  86. This justifies my call for a .arg domain! by jabali · · Score: 1

    And what about the Spanish?

  87. An excellent book... by gordgekko · · Score: 1
    An absolutely excellent read. I got the book when it came out last year and I think Zack did an excellent job of making his case about William Kidd.

    At the risk of seeming like a traffic whore, I reviewed the book myself last year here.

    --
    You want to know who isn't running Firefox 2.x? They spell it "definately" and "rediculous".
  88. An excellent book by radtea · · Score: 1

    I read this book a while back, and was really impressed by it. It is probably the best book on "the golden age of piracy" I've encountered--much better than Johnson's.. err.. Defoe's.. err.. whoever's.."General History" and vastly more readable than the (admitedly more scholarly) "Under the Black Flag" by David Cordingly.

    "Pirate Hunter" is much more than a biography of Kidd--it is a vivid re-creation of the life and society of European pirates at the turn of the 18th century.

    It also contains food for thought for techies who think that if they do a good job they'll be rewarded for it. The contrast beween Kidd, who believed himself innocent, trusted the system, and was hanged; and Robert Culliford, who believed himself guilty, worked the system, and walked free, is an object lesson to all virtuous people.

    If Kidd had understood the veniality of the majority of nominally decent people whom he dealt with he might still be alive today.

    --Tom

    --
    Blasphemy is a human right. Blasphemophobia kills.
    1. Re:An excellent book by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If Kidd had understood the veniality of the majority of nominally decent people whom he dealt with he might still be alive today.

      Wow. Imagine all the wrinkles he'd have by now.

  89. Re:Pirates...Woah! by uberdave · · Score: 1

    Um... No, there was no Black Bart in the Princess Bride.

  90. Re:I Agree Too by 3Suns · · Score: 1

    Here's to that.

    "Piracy" implies brutally violent armed robbery, in a place where policing and other preventive or retributional measures are essentially infeasable. That is, Spain couldn't police the Caribbean or the African coast, so pirates had relative immunity unless their weatherweary prey somehow got

    Software and Copyright "piracy" barely qualifies as theft. The only thing the victim loses because of the crime is a potential sale. No violence, malice, or brutality is involved. Not even greed, really - it's more laziness that motivates information "pirates". On the other hand, information "pirates" do operate in an environment where policing is an essentially intractable problem. The interweb is developing in to a chaotic, increasingly anonymous system of ephemera. Finding individual users is like trying to chase a rat through a sewer, or a dwarf through a maze of twisty little passages, all alike. Or a real pirate on the high seas. Current attempts to police the internet are ineffective to the point of humor.

    So how did imperial governments defeat their pirate problem? They settled the New World.

    --

    -3Suns

    ~~~~
    The Revolution will be Slashdotted
  91. Re:Pirates...Woah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Of course. No one would surrender to the Dread Pirate Wesley.

    But yes, there really was a pirate by that name, though he's often called the "Great" Pirate Roberts. Here's a link which can also serve as an object lesson in how not to choose backgrounds, fonts, and colors for a web site.

  92. A mystery? To who? Morons? by DirkDaring · · Score: 1

    "One of the greatest mysteries of today is whether a pirate is good or bad."

    Give me a break already. Yeah - everyone belives that pirates are /good/. They also belive that bugs can talk, we can shink people, and walk into our closet and go into another dimension. Now if you will excuse me, I have a date with Snow White and I'd hate to keep her waiting.

  93. Ninja Pirate by enclothe · · Score: 1

    Man I feel left out now. Is there no room in the world for a Ninja Pirate?
    Ninja Pirate

  94. You have no idea how it works by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "If the representatives don't vote according to the wishes of the public they're representing they don't get reelected."

    However, they can lie all over the place in ads and charm their way into office again and again and again, despite voting against the wishes of the public. The public pays attention to campaign promises, and they rarely pay attemption to the voting records.

    "It's the voting public that tells the representatives how to vote, and if they don't follow that lead they get fired."

    You wish.

    "A vote from a representative represents the vote of those people."

    No, a vote from a representative represents a vote from a representative.

    1. Re:You have no idea how it works by Helter · · Score: 1

      Gee, I only work on political campaigns year round... I suppose I wouldn't know how they work.

      But I guess that's what I should expect from someone who doesn't even understand the word representative.

  95. doodiehead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My lesbian will kick your Ninjas ass