Slashdot Mirror


Real Life EMF Experiences?

ilander asks: "I've been looking to buy my first home recently and found one that seemed perfect. The one downside is that there are power lines directly overhead (in the yard) as well as a high tension power line tower in the empty lot in back, less than 200 feet away from the house. So does anyone have any personal experience working/living near power lines? Aside from the possible health risks, which may or not exist (depending on who you ask), will I run into any problems with my monitors and TVs? What about DSL, cable and my 802.11b network? How about digital satellite reception? Any help is appreciated!"

163 comments

  1. Well, on a positive note... by revmoo · · Score: 3, Funny

    The government mind-rays will be scrambled by the high-energy power lines.

    --
    I would expect such blatant racism on Fark, but on Slashdot? Mods please ban this asshole.
    1. Re:Well, on a positive note... by heliocentric · · Score: 1

      The government mind-rays will be scrambled by the high-energy power lines.

      What makes you think the power lines aren't the real antennas and the higher doses of the mind rays are the real cause of these health issues? Everyone knows electricity flows from the wall though the power of elves.

      --
      Wheeeee
  2. Real-Life EMF Experiences? by kurosawdust · · Score: 3, Funny
    Yeah I have an EMF experience, happened when I was ten - it's pretty much how you'd think it was...Everyone was standing around waiting for them to play 'Unbelievable', then standing around waiting for it to end

    That and buying a Jesus Jones album are my two great regrets from childhood..

    1. Re:Real-Life EMF Experiences? by Pieroxy · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I remember some news in france a while ago, where a little village was suing EDF (French version of PG&E, but belong to the government) because they came up with a statistics that leukemia rates were just 1200% higher than anywhere else in France... Scary. Of course, it might just have been a hoax.

      Ready to bet your life on the fact that it was? I am not. Let's say there is a 10% chance that these guys were right. Would I risk my life and the ones of my family just because the house in question is a little nicer than another one? No thanks.

      I basically think you've got to reorder your priorities. Mine is order this way: Life first. House second. TV/Computer third.

    2. Re:Real-Life EMF Experiences? by jjshoe · · Score: 1

      I agree. Now prove beyond a doubt that power lines are a risk.

      --
      -- botsex is {grep;touch;strip;unzip;head;mount} /dev/girl -t {wet;fsck;fsck;yes;yes;yes;umount} {/de
    3. Re:Real-Life EMF Experiences? by Atomizer · · Score: 1

      I was just disappointed when I found out EMF didn't stand for what we all think it does. One of their song had lyrics that went like:

      E - Ecstasy
      M - Mother fucker, Mother fucker
      F - From us to you

      I went from thinking they were maybe a little geeky to knowing that they picked the name cause it sounded cool. Sorta like AC/DC.

    4. Re:Real-Life EMF Experiences? by dasunt · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Part of the uselessness called 'science' that they teach in schools deals with electrical current and magnetic fields.

      IIRC, the strength of an electrical field is 1/(distance^2). If we have two distances, we can calculate the drop in the magnetic field as follows: (1/(d1^2)) / (1/(d2^2)) or, more simply: d1^2 / d2^2. Therefore, the difference between living directly under the power lines (assuming that the power lines are 50ft up in the air) and the difference between living a few houses away (say 200 ft) would be 2500/40000 or 5/80ths (about 6%). Living a few more houses away (say, 200 more ft) would result in a drop of 2500/160000 or about 1.5%

      The point of all this math and science is that if power lines can cause cancer, it should be rather easy to detect - cancer rates would be high under the power lines, and fall off sharply.

      I have never seen a study with this result, so its probably safe to assume that power lines do not cause cancer.

    5. Re:Real-Life EMF Experiences? by Pieroxy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I don't care about proving it. I life my life the way I want. If one day they prove to me that there is no risk, I'll gladly go and live under a high-tension power line. Until then, when in doubt between two houses, one of which being a "potential" risk, I'll go with the safe one. Maybe stupid.

      Think about this one: I give you two glasses of water. One looks clean, the other one looks yellowish. But I garantee you that the yellowish one is as safe as the other one. However, you may choose freely either one of them. Are you going to go with the yellowish water? You would be crazy.

      Why taking this risk - as small as it may be - when you have equivalent other alternatives ?

    6. Re:Real-Life EMF Experiences? by Pieroxy · · Score: 1

      The question is: Is there a point in living under a high tension power line?

      Even if there is, let's say, a 3% risk of all this stuff to be true, what is the point in taking this risk? Life is at sake in this matter! There is plenty of other houses around! It's not like you're refusing to do something cool or something...

      Plus, you will hardly find any relevant statistics about that. People move very often, and if there is any bad effect from it, it is clearly long term. In the village I was mentionning, only the old people (That have lived under the line for 50+ years) were affected, not everyone. And only one specific part of the village (The higher part) where the lines were very close from the houses.

    7. Re:Real-Life EMF Experiences? by jjshoe · · Score: 1
      I life my life too. Why would i be crazy?


      If you only give me two glasses of water i will drink them both. Infact the color of the water doesnt realy bother me as i am accustomed to drinking well water which can have a tint at times. They say y2k is an issues, so lets stock up like morons with no basis to be the laughing stock for the future. There is always a risk no matter how visible that risk. What may appear to be a better option is not always the better options. Unless you understand %100 of both options, there is no way you can say x is better then y

      --
      -- botsex is {grep;touch;strip;unzip;head;mount} /dev/girl -t {wet;fsck;fsck;yes;yes;yes;umount} {/de
    8. Re:Real-Life EMF Experiences? by Pieroxy · · Score: 1

      Man, in the glass example, you can't take both !! ;-)

      Anyways, my point is: If in doubt between two houses, if you like them equally and one has a high tension line just over it, then just go with the other one.

      Of course, it might be worse for other factors, but you get to decide with what you know, as always.

    9. Re:Real-Life EMF Experiences? by ebbe11 · · Score: 3, Funny
      But I garantee you that the yellowish one is as safe as the other one. However, you may choose freely either one of them. Are you going to go with the yellowish water? You would be crazy.

      Maybe not. The yellowish water might be beer.

      --

      My opinion? See above.
    10. Re:Real-Life EMF Experiences? by BenjyD · · Score: 1

      But you can justify anything that way. "I heard about these people whose house fell down and killed them. I'm living in a tepee, not one of those dangerous houses."
      The point is, the chance of the figures being right is *not* 3%. The strength of the magnetic fields is small, especially compared to all the electrical equipment you already have in your house. I would worry about incidence of meteorite strikes in the area before power lines.

    11. Re:Real-Life EMF Experiences? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have never seen a study with this result, so its probably safe to assume that power lines do not cause cancer.

      Well then, that settles it, doesn't it?

      If one person has never seen something, then it's obvious that it's a myth.

      Hmm, that means that planes don't fly, dogs don't bite, and rats have never carried the plague!

      Wow - how simple you've made the world!

    12. Re:Real-Life EMF Experiences? by Gaijin42 · · Score: 1

      The funnier part about AC/DC is that in addition to being an electrical term, it was slang for being bisexual at the time, and the band had to keep denying they were a gay band (like queen!)

    13. Re:Real-Life EMF Experiences? by joto · · Score: 1
      Think about this one: I give you two glasses of water. One looks clean, the other one looks yellowish. But I garantee you that the yellowish one is as safe as the other one. However, you may choose freely either one of them. Are you going to go with the yellowish water? You would be crazy.

      You mean everyone drinking lemonade is crazy? Do you want to talk about it?

    14. Re:Real-Life EMF Experiences? by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 1
      Now prove beyond a doubt that power lines are a risk.

      Imagine yourself in 1950. Seems like everyone smokes. Manuy doctors are still advising some of their patients to smoke cigarettes. Someone tells you that smoking may be unhealthy. "Prove it beyond a doubt", you say, puffing away. And they go to work on the problem, and thirty years later it's pretty well established that smoking causes a high cancer risk. Unfortunately, by the time it's proved, there's a large tumor in your lung. Oops.

      In the real world, we have to act on incomplete information. When a gun is pointed at us, we do not have the luxury of waiting until is is provem to be real, functional, and loaded before we decide to hit the dirt, even if ducking means paying a price by ruining our nice clothes in the mud.

      People smoked tobacco for thousands of years, but it's only been for the past few decades than the health consequences have been understood. Meanwhile there are factors in our environment that have only been around for decades - EM fields, new chemicals, GM crops, et cetera. It will take a long time before the health effects, if any, of these factors are fully understood. In the meanwhile, avoiding excess exposure to them seems a prudent course.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    15. Re:Real-Life EMF Experiences? by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 1
      IRC, the strength of an electrical field is 1/(distance^2)...if power lines can cause cancer, it should be rather easy to detect - cancer rates would be high under the power lines, and fall off sharply.

      You assume a simple proportional relationship between field strength and risk. That's not necessarily the case; the exposure/risk relationship could be much more complicated. (Consider for example the "fatal current" in cases of electricution, where in some instances you're more likely to survive a higher current.)

      Which is not to say any such effect does or does not exist; just that we can't assume such a simple relationship between exposure and risk.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    16. Re:Real-Life EMF Experiences? by Pieroxy · · Score: 1

      There is a huge difference between living in a teepee and not living under a high tension line. Living in a teepee is doing a HUGE concession on you quality of life. Not living under a high tension line is not. What is the freaking big deal? Why don't no one get it? If you are to choose between two houses, why not taking the one not under a high tension line? You have nothing to loose.

      I'm not saying, take no risk. But rather measure them. Why taking a risk for no reason? Even if the risk is small, or tiny?

    17. Re:Real-Life EMF Experiences? by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      Living in a teepee is doing a HUGE concession on you quality of life. Not living under a high tension line is not.

      High tension lines in the back yard can mean a huge difference in the price of a house, mainly due to people thinking like you. This price difference can easily mean the difference between your three children having to share a bedroom or not. That's a pretty serious quality of life difference.

    18. Re:Real-Life EMF Experiences? by HeghmoH · · Score: 1

      This got scored funny, but it actually has a very good point.

      Without people trying weird unsafe yellowish funny-smelling water, people never would have invented beer. And what a sad world it would be today.

      If everybody took that attitude, we'd still be living in caves and eating our meat cold. Oh, but we'd be safe!

      --
      Mod down posts with a "Free Mac Mini/iPod" sig, they're spam!
    19. Re:Real-Life EMF Experiences? by The+Clockwork+Troll · · Score: 1
      That and buying a Jesus Jones album are my two great regrets from childhood..
      "Right Here Right Now" is the feature song in K-Mart's current advertising campaign (the same campaign in which Martha Stewart is the featured felon).

      The lesson here being, for recording artists, there is a fate worse than obscurity.

      --

      There are no karma whores, only moderation johns
    20. Re:Real-Life EMF Experiences? by The+Clockwork+Troll · · Score: 1
      The funnier part about AC/DC is that in addition to being an electrical term, it was slang for being bisexual at the time, and the band had to keep denying they were a gay band (like queen!)
      Tell me about it!

      We had the same problem in high school when we started our band, "Man-on-Man Action" (it was obviously a reference to melee combat).

      --

      There are no karma whores, only moderation johns
    21. Re:Real-Life EMF Experiences? by fredmunge · · Score: 1

      AC transmission lines do set up small electric and magnetic fields that roll off inversely proportional to the square of the distance, and the power in those fields rolls off inversely proportional to the cube of the distance. Great pains are taken to keep them efficient e.g. they don't lose power by radiating it or dissipating it. By comparison 100,000 watt broadcast stations ARE radiating ALL that power and at much higher frequencies. I've been personally irradiated with non-ionizing EM near fields most my 49 years...and I'm ju ju ju ju just...fi fi fi fine bbbbbbbbbbzzzzzzzzap!

    22. Re:Real-Life EMF Experiences? by nathanh · · Score: 1
      But I garantee you that the yellowish one is as safe as the other one. However, you may choose freely either one of them. Are you going to go with the yellowish water? You would be crazy.

      Maybe not. The yellowish water might be beer.

      And the clear water might be *shudder* Budweiser.

    23. Re:Real-Life EMF Experiences? by AB3A · · Score: 1

      Life is at stake in everything you do every day. Choose your risks.

      Let me put this risk in perspective: Do you use an electric shaver or a hair dryer? Do you use headphones? Do you use electric heaters? Do you ride a subway or electric train? Do you watch TV? Do you use a toaster or an electric stove? What these things have in common is that they all will present at least as much EMF as those power lines and in some cases orders of magnitude more.

      In other words, the risk of close proximity to high power lines is swamped by the daily use of so many other electric devices. While we're at it, consider that if you're an ice skater and you decide to twirl around, you'll also get an exposure to EMF from nothing less than the earth's magnetic field.

      Is there a risk to living near power lines? Sure. You can't prove conclusively that something is "safe." Someone will always think of a new "threat" and you'll have to prove conclusively that this "threat" is acceptable. However, you ought to put this risk in perspective of the daily exposure you receive from other sources.

      People have been suspecting electric fields of having a biological effect of some sort for at least the last century or so. Besides RF heating effects (such as those exhibited by a microwave oven), no study has ever conclusively shown that such a link exists.

      The most egregiously poor indicators of risks come from those who conduct Epidemiological studies. You have to look at epidemiological studies with at least some skepticism. Epidemiology is good for seeking new areas of investigation. But it does not prove cause and effect. In fact, it can have spurious associations of all sorts.

      As for all those other houses you mention: they could just as easily be built on old landfill property, in an area with naturally occurring arsenic or asbestos, at higher elevations where cosmic radiation is stronger, or in an unknown or undocumented earthquake fault line.

      In the scheme of things you could worry about, EMF shouldn't rate very high. I think your perspective on this issue is very lopsided and misinformed.

      --
      Nearly fifty percent of all graduates come from the bottom half of the class!
    24. Re:Real-Life EMF Experiences? by PopCulture · · Score: 1

      then again, it might be urine as well. ever seen "dumb and dumber"?

      --

      Here's to finally giving Bush his exit strategy in November
    25. Re:Real-Life EMF Experiences? by SillySlashdotName · · Score: 1

      Let me put this risk in perspective: Do you use an electric shaver or a hair dryer? Do you use headphones? Do you use electric heaters? Do you ride a subway or electric train? Do you watch TV? Do you use a toaster or an electric stove? What these things have in common is that they all will present at least as much EMF as those power lines and in some cases orders of magnitude more.

      Some problems with your point.

      First, if I use any of those things (I do) I don't use them ALL THE TIME I AM HOME, while the power line EMF is pretty much 24/7 (except on the east coast where it has an annoying tendency to not be on all the time... ;) ).

      Second, if I use an electric razor/hair dryer/headphones/heater/TV/toaster/electric stove now, then moved into a house under a power line, I would probably still be using the electric razor /hair dryer/headphones/heater/TV/toaster/electric stove. It is not an either/or situation.

      As a worker in a healthcare environment, I am most able to compare it to an x-ray Tech. When I get an radiological exam done - for example a wrist x-ray - I am sitting almost under the emitter head, possibly with a lead apron on my lap, but the tech has left the room and is behind at least one layer of radiation shielding. Why is it OK for me to be basically totally exposed to the ionizing radiation but the tech has MANDATED safety procedures to limit their exposure? (Oops, sorry, gave away the answer!) It is because I am getting a short, (relatively) high exposure (maybe like using an electric razor?), and the tech is getting long term low lever (like power lines?) exposures.

      Point I am trying to make is there are two components here, one being intensity of exposure, the other being length of time of the exposure.

      Long term exposure to high levels of ionizing radiation and RF radiation are generally agreed to be harmful to humans, but I don't know of any definitive studies that have been done.

      Low level, limited exposure to ionizing or RF radiation is generally agreed to not have much effect on humans, but given the ubiquity of both, how would we be able to know for certain?

      That leaves high level with short time exposure, and low level with prolonged exposure. You seem to be saying that high levels for limited time isn't known to harm anyone, so low levels for prolonged times won't either. I am saying "not necessarily, the one doesn't imply the other."

      I do agree with your last statement, with the admittedly minor change of In the scheme of things you should worry about, EMF shouldn't rate very high.

      --
      Acts of massive stupidity are almost never covered by warranty. --me.
    26. Re:Real-Life EMF Experiences? by xjqkojqxj · · Score: 0

      Actually, with a long linear source like a wire, the dropoff is 1/d, i.e. inverse linear. With a point source it's 1/(d^2).

    27. Re:Real-Life EMF Experiences? by AB3A · · Score: 1
      Long term exposure to high levels of ionizing radiation and RF radiation are generally agreed to be harmful to humans, but I don't know of any definitive studies that have been done.


      Well, I don't know of any definitive studies, either, but I DO know of a shocking number of studies done with poor controls and later demonstrated as irreproducible.

      Please understand, I don't disagree with your assessment of ionizing radiation. However, besides the well known and well defined effects of thermal heating from non-ionizing radiation, there is no hazard known. And if there were, it would be worthy of a Nobel Prize, not just in medicine, but probably in Physics and Chemistry as well.

      There simply isn't any known theoretical basis to be seeking a link between Cancer (for example) and EMF. Now if hotter climates tended to cause more cancers than colder climates, I might tend to get concerned about RF radiation. But to my knowledge, there are no such links. Ergo, the risk, if indeed there is one, must be close to the statistical noise floor.

      Gosh, people ought to find better things to worry about...
      --
      Nearly fifty percent of all graduates come from the bottom half of the class!
    28. Re:Real-Life EMF Experiences? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      if it is "yellowish " it is not beer.
      Do you here me Coors? it's not beer.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    29. Re:Real-Life EMF Experiences? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But not the Jesus Jones performance of said song.

  3. Well... by Zelet · · Score: 3, Funny

    Sure - I'll die a slow and painful death from cancer, but will my TVwork? :)

    --
    ...And when they came for me, there was no one left to speak out for me." - Martin Niemoeller (1892-1984)
  4. Health by daigu · · Score: 2, Informative

    You may want to ask how it might impact your health. Google it to find articles like this one in Wired.

    1. Re:Health by Zachary+Kessin · · Score: 1

      Well I would personally look in peer reviewed medical Journals not Wired. Wired is an OK magazine, but they are not experts in public health.

      --
      Erlang Developer and podcaster
    2. Re:Health by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      aH HeLl nAh, AlL ThAt shIeT AbOuT EmF FrOm CeLl FoNs AnD TvS aNd MiCrOwAvEs AnD pOwErLiNeS HaViN AfeCks On uS TeEnAgErS EeS a BuNcH o BulShIeT.

  5. Kokomo Hum by MacBrave · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Residents of Kokomo, Indiana have complained of a hum for years. Supposed causes ranged from power lines, to defective machinery, to just stress.

    Mysterious Kokomo Hum

    I grew up near Kokomo and still have relatives that live there. However none of them have ever complained of the hum.

    1. Re:Kokomo Hum by Creepy+Crawler · · Score: 0

      Actually it's the boredom there..

      Just kidding ;-)

      If I remember, a local tv station in Indianapolis (WISH - 8) said it had to do with the big metal foundry near the center of town. They were somehow emmitting large amounts of ELF (extremly low frequency) noise that made other objects vibrate at other frequencies. Hence the "humm".

      --
    2. Re:Kokomo Hum by heliocentric · · Score: 1

      Ever study Aeolian vibration in power lines? That makes for an interesting hum.

      --
      Wheeeee
    3. Re:Kokomo Hum by Saint+Mitchell · · Score: 1

      I grew up there and I've never heard it. Then again I've had people from this town swear they saw 2 foot long rats when they tore down the steel mill. Maybe you can only hear it if you drink a 12 pack of Budweiser (pronounced butt-wiser in Kokomo dialect) every day.

    4. Re:Kokomo Hum by kableh · · Score: 1

      Kidding? I spent 3 days there for a work a couple years back. It was 30 degrees and rainy the entire time, and I swear I never saw the sun. I'm from Florida dammit! Climbing above the clouds in the jet as I left that place was one of the greatest feelings ever =D.

    5. Re:Kokomo Hum by MacBrave · · Score: 1

      I have cousins who have also swore that they have seen 2+ foot long rats in Kokomo. Only this was over at Foster park near the city pool......

    6. Re:Kokomo Hum by Saint+Mitchell · · Score: 1

      Yeah, not far from where they dug up all that waste years and years ago then put a fence around it.

    7. Re:Kokomo Hum by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      Perhaps they have notch deafness. Be exposed to a continuous noise of a specific frequency and eventually you become deaf to that particular frequency.

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  6. At the old house by MImeKillEr · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Our first house was in close proximity to overhead powerlines. They were less than 200 ft away. More like less than 50.

    The three years we lived there, we didn't notice anything strange health-wise.

    I recall seeing some people do the following (not sure if this is indicative of possible health issues):

    1.Take a florescent light bulb - like the overhead lights in most garages and offices. Make sure its dark out.

    2. Stand under the powerline.

    3. Grab the light fixture with both hands - one at either contact point (the metal ring around the outside, not the pins).

    4. See if the light glows.

    The theory (I guess) was that this indicated power/voltage/whatever was 'bleeding' from the powerlines. The folks who did this swore this was proof that the area wasn't safe to live in.

    YMMV.

    --
    Cruising the internet on my TI-99/4A @ a whopping 300 baud!
    1. Re:At the old house by Trelane · · Score: 4, Informative

      Inductance. An AC (alternating current) electric line will generate a changing magnetic field (magnetic field first goes in one direction, then the other).

      You have a changing magnetic field. You create a circuit (albeit one at several megaohms) when you touch the light like that. Indeed, you make a big loop.

      You can find the equations for inductance in any elementary physics book. Essentially, the faster the change in magnetic field, the larger the loop the circuit forms, the larger the magnetic field change per unit time (e.g. larger oscillating magnetic field), the higher the electromotive force (voltage) induced.

      Note that emv ~ dB/dt * A (B and A are vectors). That is, assuming your circuit is a 2D object (e.g. circle), then you should orient your circuit such that the magnetic field is perpendicular to it. This will give you the maximum effect.

      Again, refer to college physics textbooks for more information on the subject.

      Synopsis: good for scare-mongering (but remember, scare mongering's Good when you agree with the goals of the scare-mongering (e.g. nuclear power dangers) and Bad when you don't (e.g. Bush's terrorism stuff)!) but otherwise fairly pointless, unless the induced voltages and/or B/E-fields are scientifically proven to be dangerous to humans. To my knowledge, it's currently a wash. Note that statistical data for a region is questionable, since many factors enter in! (The prime exampe for correlation-does-not-prove-causation amongst my professors is the study that showed that, the more electric poles per square mile, the higher the murder rate. (Of course, the primary factor is that the denser the electric poles, the more densely populated the region)).

      --

      --
      Given enough personal experience, all stereotypes are shallow.
    2. Re:At the old house by fawcett · · Score: 1

      YMMV.

      And, depending on how close you stand, YVMV. (your voltage may vary. ;-)

    3. Re:At the old house by AJWM · · Score: 1

      this indicated power/voltage/whatever was 'bleeding' from the powerlines.

      Heh, you want to see power bleeding from the powerlines, check out the transmission lines alongside US 1 in the Florida Keys. (My in-laws have a place down there).

      Partly due to the moisture in the air, and the salt buildup on the insulators, and for all I know they're running the lines something above original design voltage to get power to Key West, but if it's quiet you can hear the crackle, and at night you can see 6-inch (at least) sparks streaming off the lines at the insulators just like a mini Tesla coil. I hate to think how many kilowatts are being wasted that way along the length of the line.

      --
      -- Alastair
    4. Re:At the old house by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try this one on for size...
      Live in a very dry climate (ie, the far north)
      Have a fuorescent light.
      Turn off the lights
      If the Fluorescent light is not already glowing, wipe it with a polyester cloth.
      You'll never need a nightlight.
      It's got nothing to do with proximity to power lines.

  7. Common Sense Check... by bpd1069 · · Score: 1

    If you can light sabre duels in your backyard with flourescent tubes that may be a clue that the house may not be safe...

    but then again, given the overall attitude you may think thats a selling point...

    I just hope you don't have any small children... And if not, get a vasectomy

    --
    --
    1. Re:Common Sense Check... by Cecil · · Score: 1

      And if you live in Northern Canada, beware going outside at night. If you can see the sky spirits glowing red, that is a clue that they may be very angry with you.

      In other words, when you have a peer-reviewed scientific study to show us, then you may start criticising people for doing something that may or may not be unsafe. Until then, your baseless superstitions are just that: superstitions.

    2. Re:Common Sense Check... by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      nice FUD there...

      electrical fields EVEN very strong ones dont harm you.

      Why is there no change in cancer rates or health problems with high voltage electricians and linesmen who work mere inches for extended periods of time fro mthe wires and therefore are in a field that is 10,000 times stringer than anyone else is in.

      why is there no increase in medical problems with people who live near or under power lines? sorry, the govt cant be covering it up too many people live near/under power lines everywhere in the world.

      i wouldn't fly a kite with metal string near them, or want them to fall.. but those are the only two dangers....

      except that your property value will not go up very fast if at all.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    3. Re:Common Sense Check... by t · · Score: 1
      I can't believe that no one has brought up birds. They sit their asses on the power lines all night in some areas. The result? Those damn pigeons seem to be multiplying like rabbits.

      Also, the only real and verifiable danger that i know of is from those big mylar ballons. Highly conductive and they have a bad habbit of smacking into powerlines. My bro told my of an incident near his house just a couple of weeks ago in Seattle. It sounded like a large explosion, but the bad part is that the remains of the balloon rain down. The fire dept on the scene says it happens all the time. So I wouldn't want to buy a house with a wooden roof in a neighboor hood with a park/lots of kids with powerlines.

  8. Yeah.... by cybermace5 · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...I do. And the third hand is indeed as useful as many seem to believe.

    --
    ...
  9. Resell Value by Hungus · · Score: 4, Insightful

    BIggest issue I see is resale value. How long you plan to stay will affect things also. You may well be convinced that there are not problems with the power lines but it will be difficult to convince someone else to take it off your hands in x number of years.

    --
    Bad Panda! No Bamboo for you! In matters of importance ACs will not be responded to. Want to say something critical,OK
    1. Re:Resell Value by styrotech · · Score: 1

      Yep, the actual effects will most likely be less than the potential imagined/assumed effects in the mind of the next buyer.

      If that sentence makes sense.

    2. Re:Resell Value by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bah. If you like the place, live there. When you tire of it, turn it into a rental property. If you can come close to break-even (and it's not constantly falling apart or getting trashed), it'll be a nice piece of equity that will grow for you while you move onto something else. The "image" issue will not be as significant to renters as it will be to buyers. Yes, you may want to or have to sell it eventually, but my assumption here is that it's located in a market that is "normal" enough to appreciate over the medium-to-long term (say, 10 years) while the mortgage gets paid down for you.

      But then if over the years it's finally "proven" that EMF is harmful before you get a chance to sell, well, um, then all bets are off.

  10. I have by slothman32 · · Score: 4, Informative

    I lived 15 years or so 200 feet from high voltage lines. And 500 from a substation. My family and my neighbors are fine. Of course I post on Slashdot so I guess that answers you question. I don't think anything happens from being near them. I didn't even care about it when I found out something might happen.

    --
    Why don't you guys have friends or journals?
    1. Re:I have by crazyphilman · · Score: 1

      I had the same experience, only with a longer period of time. I grew up about a hundred to a hundred and fifty feet away from an O+R easement with some huge, high-power powerlines running through it (they brought electricity down to NYC from upstate). The towers are a good two hundred feet tall, maybe taller, with several layers of high-power cables on them, spread out over about a hundred feet. I mean these towers are HUGE.

      Anyway, growing up I never noticed anything weird. Our radio reception and TV reception was fine, cell phone reception is good nowadays, and my parents are currently using a satellite receiver without any problems. We never developed any weird side effects, either.

      There WAS one benefit: when I was a kid, I'd wait for huge numbers of birds to gather on the tower, then I'd shoot a BB gun at one of the hollow steel arms of the tower, making a loud "BING!" sound. The birds would fly all over the place, freaking out in general, crapping all over the tower, etc. I'd go "Huh huh huh... THAT was COOL" and do it again. Hours of amusement!

      BING! HUH HUH HUH...

      --
      Farewell! It's been a fine buncha years!
  11. do an experiment by jayrtfm · · Score: 2, Funny

    1) purchase house
    2) purchase rats
    3) in a spare room build 2 rat cages, one that is also a faraday cage.
    4) treat both groups of rats the same. no fair giving extra snuggles to the ones in the faraday cage
    5) every year, have a vet check both groups of rats. If there is no difference, then chances are you don't have a problem. If the group NOT in the faraday cage has more health problems, move asap.

    1. Re:do an experiment by pocopoco · · Score: 1

      The sample size is kinda low...what if one of the rats in the Faraday cage was a delinquent and ate the rest of them? ^^

    2. Re:do an experiment by tsa · · Score: 1

      Why not build a Faraday cage around the whole house? If only for the coolness factor... As an additional bonus your mobile phone doesn't work in your home so your boss can't find you there!

      --

      -- Cheers!

    3. Re:do an experiment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You didn't say what to do if the ones in the Faraday cage are worse off than the ones in the normal cage. I suppose you could do the scientific thing, say, "That's not what I expected, I must have made a mistake," and repeat the experiment.

    4. Re:do an experiment by jayrtfm · · Score: 1

      I thought that the "scientific thing" to do when the experiment does not confirm the theory is to change the theory

  12. Real life induced charge by chrisatslashdot · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I worked my way through college installing sprinkler systems for lawns and landscapes. We used a 16' metal trailer with an expanded steel deck, a steel pipe rack, and several metal lockers. On one job we parked the trailer under high voltage powerlines and got a sizeable shock if we touched the trailer with damp boots or sweaty hands.

    I have also head of people filling a 55 gallon drum with coils of copper wire and stealing power from high-tension wires.

    --


    Simple people talk of people, better people talk of events, great people talk of ideas.
    1. Re:Real life induced charge by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I have also head of people filling a 55 gallon drum with coils of copper wire and stealing power from high-tension wires.

      Very clever - I'd heard of 'clothes lines' but not drums full of coils. If they were burried with just the ends exposed they'd be pretty hard to track down.

      So, what kind of electricity do you get out of such a drum? Is it clean enough to run through an inverter onto your home grid? Heh, in a reverse-metered state you could sell it back to the electric company (install a solar panel for cover).

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    2. Re:Real life induced charge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too bad the cost of all that copper probably negated any savings made on their power bill =P

    3. Re:Real life induced charge by chrisatslashdot · · Score: 1

      Conditioning the power to a useable form would probably be a big problem. IAMENAEE (I am a mechanical engineer not electrical engineer) but the barrel of copper would essentitally act as a transformer with the single pass of transmission wires acting as the primary coil and the drum acting as a secondary. You would also have to deal with 3 phase power on the primary side. Maybe if the lines carrying each phase were physically separated enough you could position the drum to work off a single phase. I would assemble a bank of lead-acid batteries, rectify the stolen electricity and use it to charge the batteries. Then invert the DC power from the batteries or possibly use the DC directly for lights, a radio or some other application. Without getting out the ole physics book I'd have to guess that only very small amounts of useable power could be generated from this setup. This is almost certainly illegal and without a doubt quite stupid.

      --


      Simple people talk of people, better people talk of events, great people talk of ideas.
    4. Re:Real life induced charge by elp · · Score: 1

      Real men steal power South African township style.

      Find an old steel shopping trolley and hook it up to the nearst pole. Legend has it that it makes a great heater in winter. True several people get electocuted every year but they are just wimps.

      (Yes its a true story. The electricity supplier "claims" that over 80% of the power use in some townships is illegal.)

    5. Re:Real life induced charge by notcreative · · Score: 1

      I work for a power company.

      Not only is it illegal and stupid, but if there's a ground anywhere on the line (happens pretty frequently) then there will be a "fault," which means a huge surge of current through the line, which means a huge induced current in your hill-billy (i.e. son of the soil) setup, which means meltdown and other Badness. Just say no.

  13. Electric fence? by TheSHAD0W · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It was a particularly cold night in winter and I was walking out to open the gate to the yard; there'd been a sleet and the fence was coated with ice. Except... When I walked up to the lock, I noticed that one length of chain between the gate and post was free of ice. When I touched it, it was noticeably warm.

    I went back to get my meter, unhooked the chain, and measured the voltage between the gate and post; it measured a wonderful 2.7 volts. Silly me, I then switched the meter to measure current. What as I thinking, using a cheap multimeter across enough current to heat up a heavy metal chain? Luckily I only blew its fuse.

    I called the power company and told them about the stray voltage problem; within a few days they'd established a new ground and my fence is now down to 1/2 volt.

    1. Re:Electric fence? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I work for a wireless ISP. One of our installations operates between two FM stations and an AM station. It's the kinda place where if you want to go more than 15 feet up a tower you've gotta be wearing a metal hazard suit and wearing an RF monitor it's an even bet about who gets your balls first, the RF or OSHA.

      One visit to the place I noticed someone had laced heavy copper wire around the entire perimeter of the fence and added a copper ground rod near the gate.. Scratched my head, did my thing. On the way out, asked one of the NOAA guys we share the tower with about the wire and about who the paranoid mofo that did it was. He went to his truck and grabbed some polaroids he had taken over the last winter. Trees coated with ice, snow plastered everywhere including stuck to the sides of the gear shack.

      Then he pulled out a pic of the tower across the way, and pointed out the difference. One fence coated with ice, one fence not.

    2. Re:Electric fence? by merlin_jim · · Score: 1

      One could deduce current from voltage... as a matter of fact, any voltage across a heavy chain is going to be huge amounts of current. A heavy chain 2 feet long has practically zero resistance; so if the power is coming straight from a low ESR source to the chain, the current is going to be limited by the power source's ESR. If it has to go through a length of wire or something first, that will be the limiting resistance...

      --
      I am disrespectful to dirt! Can you see that I am serious?!
    3. Re:Electric fence? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He detached the chain before measuring the voltage; that is, he measured the open circuit voltage. Incidentally, if you did this and then switched the meter to current mode, you'd burn up the meter with even a small amount of power, because in ammeter configuration the multimeter acts as essentially a short; thus using the meter this way would cause a current surge through the internals, likely shorting them out or melting a coil or something.

  14. Do the math by Coppit · · Score: 2, Informative
    Back when I took electromagnetics as a physics undergrad, we actually computed the effect of a powerline about 20 feet from you. In the end, the thermal noise in your cells drowned out any EM effect from the powerline.

    Despite all the people who want to sue to make a buck, there is *no* scientific evidence that living near power lines, using cellphones, or sending your kids to a WiFi enabled school will hurt anyone.

    1. Re:Do the math by heliocentric · · Score: 1

      there is *no* scientific evidence that ... sending your kids to a WiFi enabled school will hurt anyone.

      Won't anyone think of the CAT5 industry! Please, think about the CAT5 industry, please!

      (This political message brought to you by the Friends of the CAT5 Industry)

      --
      Wheeeee
    2. Re:Do the math by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >> Back when I took electromagnetics as a physics undergrad, we actually computed
      >> the effect of a powerline about 20 feet from you.

      When was this? I want to know how you knew when I was 20 feet from a powerline! Are you following me??

  15. I've seen nice gardens under them by bluGill · · Score: 1

    The hype would make you believe that power lines harm plants and the like. I've seen with my own eye someone who planted a nice garden in the base of a high tention power line. It did very well, limited only be the care the owners gave it.

    There was a lot of worry about power lines 10 years ago or so. Many studies have been done, and the conclusion is always there is no statistical harm. Ignore the alarmists, and buy the house if you like it. If the lines give it a lower value enjoy your lower house payments. (and hope that the hype dies in a few years and your house thus goes up more in value than others when it is time to sell - good luck)

    1. Re:I've seen nice gardens under them by Kevin+Stevens · · Score: 1

      crappy anectodal evidence I know, but one of my best friends has high tension lines running through his backyard, about 40 feet from his house and has been living there for about 15 years (They get tax incentives and power discounts). It is a running joke that the grass directly underneath the four corners of the tower is a perfect neon green almost year round(In reality, its really crabgrass). But to throw in my two cents on health problems, the mother had a stroke a few years ago, but the rest of the family has not had any unusual health issues.

  16. I've had real life EMP experience, though.. by pedro · · Score: 2, Interesting

    A few months ago, during a rather spectacular thunderstorm, we a lightning strike _very_ close to our house.
    Most of our NIC cards' and our router's ports got toasted, while leaving the internal circuitry of our computers utterly untouched.. they ran flawlessly both before, through, and after the incident. No reboots, no power glitches.. nada. The cards passed diags fine; the router would boot up ok, too.. except..
    None of the lights indicating CAT5 connectivity lit up. Some component substitutions eventually revealed that all of the rj45 interfaces had been smoked.
    A final, glaring clue that the lightning bolt's EMP was indeed the culprit was the fact that a 30" tv that had been on in the room at the time now exhibits _severe_ orange and green casts all the way out to the corners of the crt at right angles to each other. The mask is now MAG-MO-TIZED in a major way.
    I'm gonna need a really muscular degausser. :)

    --
    Brak: What's THAT?
    Thundercleese: A light switch.. of TOTAL DEVASTATION!
    1. Re:I've had real life EMP experience, though.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please mod parent as Troll, Offtopic or Flamebait.

      Any topics of discussion related to electromagnetic forces is relevant in this thread.

      Incidentally, this post is also offtopic, and should be moderated so once the parent is properly taken care of.

      Thank you.

    2. Re:I've had real life EMP experience, though.. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Incidentally, these days APC guarantees lightning protection on even their smaller UPSes. If you have a lot of lightning strikes I highly recommend picking some up and protecting all the equipment you care about with them. I'm skeptical about their ability to protect hardware from lightning but if they don't, APC will supposedly give you a bunch of money :)

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re:I've had real life EMP experience, though.. by netringer · · Score: 1
      No, you didn't have an EMP experience.

      A lightning strike is not EMP, it's an E experience in abundance. EMP=Electromagnetic Pulse as in waves going through the air like radio waves. A lightning strike is extremely high-voltage electric current discharging to and from earth ground in random in ways through wires, conductive objects, and the air.

      The best protection from lighting strikes coming in power and phone lines is a surge protector that has a good ground reference (heavy solid conductors to a good earth ground) installed where the services enter the building.

      --
      Ever dream you could fly? Get up from the Flight Sim. I Fly
    4. Re:I've had real life EMP experience, though.. by n1ywb · · Score: 1

      It's probably the optoisolator right in the front end, between the rj-45 jack and the rest of the card. A similar thing happens to modems, the little isolation transformer blows out. When I used to do ISP tech support, every time a line of thunderstorms would roll through we'd get a half dozen calls from people who's modems were acting perfectly normally except that they suddenly were getting "No Dialtone". That transformer gets popped and thats what happens.

      --
      -73, de n1ywb
      www.n1ywb.com
    5. Re:I've had real life EMP experience, though.. by rco3 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Guess again, chief. A lightning stroke is a piss-pot of current flowing down the equivalent of a big-assed antenna. The effects of this include, as you said, current flowing all over the place from direct injection. However, the effects also include large radiated magnetic and electric fields.

      Do you know what happens when a conductor sits in a moving magnetic field? Current. Depending on how close you are, possibly lots of current.

      I, personally, have participated over the last year and a half in experiments involving measuring the currents induced in power lines by nearby (50 m, 30 m, 15 m, 7 m) lightning strokes. It's there. It's real. The electric and magnetic fields are real, too. Not only that...

      but we've seen evidence (good evidence) of X-rays and gamma rays associated with lightning.

      If you're going to make strong, definite comments like, "No, you didn't have an EMP experience" you should probably make sure you have a solid understanding of the subject. Unlike this one, for example.

      Yes, I AM a lightning scientist.

      --

      Ce n'est pas un vrai mouvement de robot!
    6. Re:I've had real life EMP experience, though.. by netringer · · Score: 1
      OK, mine was a lousy explanation.
      What I meant was the original poster was decribing a lightning STRIKE. I have witnessed the damage from lots of those in my career, mostly from the fun lightning has with the potentials between phone lines and power lines.

      I have always been under the impression that the damage comes when the actual bolt jumps into a power line or phone line somewhere in the neighborhood. If EMP inducing the current is a common cause of lightening damage then I have learned something.

      --
      Ever dream you could fly? Get up from the Flight Sim. I Fly
    7. Re:I've had real life EMP experience, though.. by rco3 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well, that's one of the things we're studying. We have a section of power line set up - not energized or attached to the grid - which we strike directly and indirectly, i.e. very close to the line. We trigger lightning with rockets so that we can exert SOME control over where it hits.

      Florida Power and Light want to know how bad their lines (and their customers' houses) get damaged by nearby strikes. They've been paying us to find out. It's extraordinarily cool, actually. We launch rockets trailing a wire into a thundercloud, and trigger lightning. For the indirect stuff we have a rocket launcher mounted on an old, tired FPL bucket truck that we can drive around and park wherever we want to launch.

      The upshot is that nearby strikes don't induce as much current as direct ones inject, but it's enough to screw stuff up. It usually is induced in the power distribution, not in the house.

      Oh, and let me apologize for getting snippy. I've been at the school ALL freakin' day, trying to get the thesis (yes, lightning) finished this semester, and I haven't eaten. I get mean when I'm hungry.

      --

      Ce n'est pas un vrai mouvement de robot!
    8. Re:I've had real life EMP experience, though.. by AJWM · · Score: 1

      a 30" tv that had been on in the room at the time now exhibits _severe_ orange and green casts all the way out to the corners of the crt

      Aha!

      A couple months after moving into our present place we had a lightning induced surge that tripped all the GFIs, fried a couple of phones and zapped my wife's computer mobo and internal modem. Also the garage door opener.

      Around that same time, I noticed a magnetized area on the screen of an old 26" TV monitor that we only occasionally use. I never made the connection, I'd assumed that the move might have messed it up. But yeah, could have been the EMP.

      (BTW, I managed to "sweep" the magnetized area to one corner of the screen with a permanent magnet. One day Real Soon Now I'll put together a degaussing coil and do a proper job.)

      --
      -- Alastair
    9. Re:I've had real life EMP experience, though.. by pedro · · Score: 1

      Thanks for supporting me on my assessment of our situation.
      I'm still somewhat bewildered at the notion that a twisted pair could be induced with enough current so as to induce sufficient voltage to pop the protections inherent to an ethernet cable. Variations in the quality of the twist could explain it, but MAN, would that initial burst of pure magnetic potential have to be HUGE!
      Apparently it was, though. The affected TV is chroma-influenced all across its' expanse.

      --
      Brak: What's THAT?
      Thundercleese: A light switch.. of TOTAL DEVASTATION!
  17. 802.11b by keldog728 · · Score: 2, Informative

    I live less than 200 feet from high tension power lines and have never experenced any problems with the wireless network in my house.

    The only real problem I had was putting an addition on my house. In my town, it is against bylaws to put a permanent structure closer than 100 feet from power lines. When my wife and I were in the process of putting one on we had to have our yard surveyed four times, and even then we had to change our plans. The foundation of the new addition is now 100' 1" away from the lines. You may want to think about this, or check your town bylaws if you plan on adding to the house in the future.

  18. Some links by Gudlyf · · Score: 2, Informative
    Fine, how about this one?

    There's also a site called Power Line Facts that may be helpful. Like they say, go buy a power meter, then do another house inspection. If the meter's reading 4mG or higher, run away. Fast.

    And what's Power Line safety without a blog?

    --
    Trolls lurk everywhere. Mod them down.
    1. Re:Some links by JabberWokky · · Score: 2
      I for one would not trust California's government website either. There are government mandated signs all over the place saying "The State of California has determined that..." and then make a wide varity of claims regarding cancer, health risks and moral issues.

      Science by legislation is one of the more worrisome aspects of California.

      Remember, this is a state that has billboards all over the place proudly proclaiming that they are "nuclear free". My SO and I joke that that's a very very negative statement.

      --
      Evan

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
    2. Re:Some links by hubie · · Score: 1
      Before you read too far into the Power Line "Facts" site, you might want to consider that the Earth's static magnetic field is on the order of .2-.6 G, depending on where you live. The field varies 0.1 G on the timescale of a day simply as the result of the Earth rotating under the magnetosphere. There are high frequency variations in the field on the order of tens of miligauss just from interactions with the solar wind on the magnetosphere, and much larger variations from solar flare events.

      If you are going to run away fast from a 4 mG field, I'm afraid that you don't have too many places to run towards. Perhaps if you build an enclosure using mu-metal, or some other magnetic-shielding material, then you'd have a magnetic "bomb shelter" into which you can hide.

      Miligauss fields are so far down in the noise that making connections between that and developing cancer is, from a scientific standpoint at least, wholly irresponsible and entirely bad science. There might be other reasons, personal or political, to make these claims, but they cannot be based on sound scientific principles.

    3. Re:Some links by fuzzybunny · · Score: 1

      The CA department of health (or OSHA, I'm not sure what's called what there anymore) started requiring restaurants and other hospitality industries to put up visible signs saying something to the extent of,
      The State of California has determined that this facility contains chemicals and substances which could potentially cause reproductive harm.

      Great. Why not say "substances which could cause heart disease" (hamburgers), "substances which could cause liver failure" (wine), etc.

      The Golden Gate Restaurant Association got a bunch of places to print and post signs with the above nonsense on it, along with the text,

      The Management therefore discourages all reproductive behavior on these premises.

      I never found out whether this applies to brothels.
      --
      Cole's Law: Thinly sliced cabbage
    4. Re:Some links by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 1
      the Earth's static magnetic field is on the order of .2-.6 G, depending on where you live.

      First, comparing a static or slowly-changing field (even with transients) with a constantly varying 60 Hz field isn't reasonable.

      Second, arguing from theory is not a good scientific approach. "X can't cause cancer because of equation Y" - denying observations that don't match theory - is not the scientific method. Using the scientific method would be analyzing the epidemiological evidence. Problem is that the "signal" of disease is so weak to start with (leukemia, fortunately, being rare) that looking for changes in it is extremely difficult, and firm conclusions can't yet be reached. Nor are they likely to be soon.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    5. Re:Some links by hubie · · Score: 1
      What I'm arguing is that the stated danger levels of 4 mG are two orders of magnitude lower than the background field. You'll see miligauss variations just running or driving around within this background field due to local geological variations. But I also pointed out that for time scales that are comparable to 60 Hz powerlines that you still get stronger field variations form the solar wind/ionospheric interactions.

      My second statement says nothing about arguing from theory. What I'm arguing is that for anyone to draw connections with cancer from data based on field levels that are orders of magnitude lower than terrestrial field variations is not based on science. That is pulling data out of the noise to prove something while at the same time selectively discarding the other noise terms. That is bad data analysis coupled with ignorance of the environment in which the data are collected. Again, if one holds a belief in EMF induced cancer for whatever reason, that is fine to a point; all I'm saying is don't say that this belief is grounded in any kind of believable scientific analysis.

    6. Re:Some links by Nathaniel · · Score: 1

      They should set up signs next to those that read "gun free".

    7. Re:Some links by ForestGrump · · Score: 1

      Prop 65?
      Supermarkets have signs warning that the premisis continas chemicals that can kill you... blah blah blah.

      Truthfully, nobody pays attenation to the signs. So what good are they?

      Gasoline is highly toxic, blue toilet water prolly isnt good either.

      but I pump gas and don't worry about it. Dog drinks out of the toilet.

      Anyway, I'm not dead and nor is the dog.

      Warn away! nobody is paying attenation.
      -Grump

      --
      Is it true that more people vote for the winner of American Idol, than vote for the president? -Ali G.
    8. Re:Some links by SillySlashdotName · · Score: 1

      Using the scientific method would be analyzing the epidemiological evidence. Problem is that the "signal" of disease is so weak to start with (leukemia, fortunately, being rare) that looking for changes in it is extremely difficult, and firm conclusions can't yet be reached.

      In addition, the "signal" of the 'power line EMF' is also being lost in the other radiations or disease causing agents people are beng exposed to - ionizing radiation, RF radiation, EMF radiation from other-than-power-line sources - as well as the chemical and biological toxins and unknowns - out-gassings from construction materials, household chemicals, industrial chemicals, industrial and household pollution; shoot, sunlight is known to increase your chances of contracting cancer!

      [A]nalyzing the epidemiological evidence would be the way to go -- if there was a way to filter all the other factors out. Unfortunately, epidemiological evidence is not the best at allowing that kind of filtering, and at best can olny say whether something is 'probably' a causitive factor. True 'scientific method' would be to form a hypothesis, then perform experiments to test that hypothesis, changing theories or hypothesis as new data is discovered, and developing new experiments to test the new theories.

      Epidemiological analysis is NOT scientific method, it is statistical analysis at best.

      --
      Acts of massive stupidity are almost never covered by warranty. --me.
  19. One word: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Leukemia.

    My sister-in-law's child got leukemia living under power lines. I'm am like so totally sure that was a coincidence, right-o.

    You'll be fine if you don't:

    1) plan on having any babies
    2) plan on ever reselling the place.

    1. Re:One word: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      My sister-in-law's child got leukemia living under power lines. I'm am like so totally sure that was a coincidence, right-o.
      Normal people (who are not making up bullshit stories and posting anonymously) call such a person a niece or nephew.
  20. Go for it! by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1


    Think how many hot dates you'll get when the girls find out why everyone calls you "Sparky".

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  21. Real-life cliche by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are LOTS of houses on the market. Keep that in mind. It's a cliche, but you'll find there are other nice things out there.

    We saw a place with power lines, and took a pass for reasons of concern about resale value. I know, that sounds self-fulfilling, or circular, but it is reality. Later on we realized it was also (in a stealthy, hidden sort of way) near two freeways and one of those nice fragrant water reclamation plants.

    We bought a nice place, same money, no freeway noise, but convenient freeway access, no fragrant water reclamation plant nearby, no power lines, close to everything... we are happy.

    Hold out for what you really want.

  22. Radio interference from power lines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    As a amateur radio operator I have heard people that have found radio interference being generated from overhead power lines. Most of the interference has been in the lower frequencies, low as in AM broadcast radio, HF amateur, maybe up to TV and FM broadcast. The causes were something like failing insulators, damaged transformers, and branches falling onto the wires. In most cases a call to the power company would result in a quick fix. It is unlikely to affect higher frequency devices such as WiFi, satellite TV, and cell phones.

    One current concern is the possible use of Broadband over Power Lines (BPL). A form of BPL proposed to the FCC would occupy frequecies from 2Mhz to 80Mhz being carried down the medium and low voltage power lines. Since power lines were never intended to carry such high frequencies the amount of "leakage" is likely to be quite high. The leaked RF energy would likely cause all kinds of trouble for electronics in your home. Computer monitors, TVs, radios, etc. all have internal circuits that work at these frequencies and are unlikely to have sufficient shielding since BPL would be allowed much higher levels of leaked energy than seen previous if the law changes go into affect. More info can be found on the American Radio Relay League website (www.arrl.org).

  23. Consider this by chud2049 · · Score: 1

    Take a lookt at the Power Lines and Cancer FAQ and decide the risks for yourself. Then remember that you are sitting in front of computer monitor with a flyback transformer producing 20-30kV, and it is 2 feet from your head.

    1. Re:Consider this by clickme · · Score: 1

      That's why I use a laptop!

  24. My experiences by Cecil · · Score: 1

    I spent the majority of my childhood in a house about 40 feet from a lot-sized 45kV to 120V transformer substation. The 45kV lines went above my front yard. I never noticed any ill effects health-wise (but then, with the amount of pollution-related health problems in Southern Ontario I'm not sure I ever would've noticed anyway)

    Never had any problems with EMF or anything either. Several TVs, fluorescent lights, a few miscellaneous wireless devices (outdoor temperature monitor for example) and none of them ever acted odd.

    We did have one problem though. One year they decided to "upgrade" the transformer by replacing the old transformer with two brand new ones. Ever since then, the AC in the house has occasionally (usually hours or days between incidents) developed a slight harmonic flicker that fades in and then back out over the course of about 5-10 minutes. I can see the lights flicker, personally, but no one else ever could even when I pointed it out to them. Confirmed the harmonic with my Dad's oscilloscope, though.

    I'm not sure whether it was simply a result of the two transformers occasionally getting out of phase with one another or what, but I personally would've recommended a UPS for any sensitive equipment in that house. My grandmother lives there now, and runs her computer directly off the socket, and has never had a problem though, so *shrug*.

    For what it's worth.

  25. Easement and noise by semanticgap · · Score: 2, Informative

    If the powerlines run over that property, then most likely the power company has an easement, which roughly (I'm no lawyer) means that should something happen, they can wheel a crane into your backyard to do work, and you will have to live with it. And if they have to take the fence down, or nock out part of your house to get there, they will. (Though they will fix it later). You will really have to check this out with the local government, and it may not be that simple.

    Another thing is that power lines make noise. It may not seem like much during the day, but it may drive you nuts at night.

    I'd stay away from it for just those two reasons.

    1. Re:Easement and noise by DavidYaw · · Score: 1

      they can wheel a crane into your backyard to do work, and you will have to live with it. And if they have to take the fence down, or nock out part of your house to get there, they will. (Though they will fix it later).

      In many cases, there is a separate easement to allow them access to the easement that contains the power lines. There might be one house that the whole side yard is an easement to allow them access.

      Unless you violate the easement (by building on top of it), they can't do anything to your house.

    2. Re:Easement and noise by MImeKillEr · · Score: 1

      Another thing is that power lines make noise. It may not seem like much during the day, but it may drive you nuts at night.


      Moreso when it's rained. At least, the power lines behind our old house did.

      Quite annoying.

      --
      Cruising the internet on my TI-99/4A @ a whopping 300 baud!
    3. Re:Easement and noise by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      And if they have to take the fence down, or nock out part of your house to get there, they will. (Though they will fix it later).

      no they wont.

      if you build on an easement and they need to destroy something to use it... your fault for building where you were not supposed to.

      been there, dont that.. they drove the bulldozer over a freinds fence and destroyed his pond,sprinkler system and grass.. when confronted, he was handed a paper with legal information and the power companies lawyers info that basically said... your fault for being in our way, you're lucky we dont bill you.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    4. Re:Easement and noise by notcreative · · Score: 1

      The noise thing is VERY IMPORTANT. Here's why:

      Right now there's a powerline in NW WA state that used to carry 230kV. It was rated for 500kV, and the transmission company had an easement for 500kV. For years they ran it at a lower voltage, because they could. Now they have some congestion issues, so they bumped up the voltage to 500kV. Bam, "lots" of powerline noise. It's the same amount of noise as any 500kV line, but the people nearby moved in while it was being run at 230kV, so they think that the noise is unreasonable. Trouble is, the easement allows 500kV, which means the neighbours are Screwed. This strikes me as unfair, since when I buy a house I wouldn't think to check the powerline easement to see if there's a higher voltage rating, or to ask what the voltage on the line was currently (no pun intended). Anyway, you might want to do both of these things to avoid a Screwing.

  26. Staistics by MarkusQ · · Score: 1

    I'm am like so totally sure that was a coincidence, right-o.

    Congradulations. In my experience, non-mathematicians who try to argue with statistics generally invest a great deal of effort clothing their flawed arguments in something that looks vaguely like math, only to hurt their own arguments more than they hurt their opponent's.

    You have somehow managed to get most of the negative effects of faulty statistical reasoning without having to bother with all the psuedo-math stuff.

    Impressive.

    -- MarkusQ

    1. Re:Staistics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Congradulations.

      Charming.

      >You have somehow managed to get most of the negative effects of faulty statistical reasoning without having to bother with all the psuedo-math stuff.

      >Impressive.

      Did I mention statisics? (Or, for you, maybe I should call them "stadistics"). No, I did not mention statistics.

      It's a sample of one, and an opportunity sample at that. Can't really draw any conclusions based on that. Including your conclusion that, duh:

      Baby contracted leukemia | power lines
      therefore:
      power lines could not possibly have caused the leukemia

      (Hmm, maybe you're thinking that because the sample population is so small, that's your proof that the events are not correlated? Think again.)

      I don't think your point has been proven, sorry.

      As I said before: I am, like, so totally sure that was a coincidence, right-o.

      "Pardy" on, dude.

    2. Re:Staistics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MarkusQ attempted:
      >Congradulations.

      Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. This is not statistics, it is basic logic.

      We have A. We have B. Are A and B correlated? If you claim they are not, you are just as wrong as the person who claims they are. The correct answer would be to say you don't know.

  27. Life examples by GiMP · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I don't know what the science is, but I know the following:

    My aunt, uncle, and cousins lived next to (what I believe was) a cellular-phone tower. My aunt died of breast cancer, my cousin developed a beign tumor on his chest, and my uncle now has cancer (I believe testicular).

    Then again, it could be coincidence.

    1. Re:Life examples by Zathrus · · Score: 1

      Wow. That's amazing.

      I do know the science, and I also know the following:

      My parents, sister, and myself have never lived near any high voltage wires. My father died of liver cancer, my mother is recovering from breast cancer, and my sister has had severe arthritis since the age of 35. Oh, and I have a benign lump on my thumb.

      Maybe that whole "coincidence" thing has more to it than you know.

      Or it could have something to do with other lifestyle habits -- I'm sure my father's smoking two packs a day didn't help at all.

    2. Re:Life examples by HeghmoH · · Score: 1

      Jane in Austin, Texas, deleted this mail without forwarding it to any of her friends. Two days later she was involved in a head-on collision with a tractor trailer. She died after five days in the burn unit.

      Bob in St. Louis, Missouri, forwarded this mail to sixteen friends. Five days later he won sixty million dollars in the lottery.

      --
      Mod down posts with a "Free Mac Mini/iPod" sig, they're spam!
    3. Re:Life examples by smithmc · · Score: 1

      Maybe that whole "coincidence" thing has more to it than you know.

      Let's not forget that things like this can often run in families, too.

      --
      Downmodding is the refuge of the weak. Don't downmod, make a better argument!
  28. My dad used to do this all day by octover · · Score: 1

    My dad used to study EMF all day at the local power company. This continued after being bought out by a bigger power company in the region, and then stopped when a overseas power company purchased them. Basically his job was to know what EMF was proven to do.

    I can't recall all the details now, he doesn't do that anymore, but near as anyone can prove, it doesn't really effect you. There are no health risks that can be linked specifically to EMF. A lot of people throw up EMF health risks to prevent new power lines coming up in their neighborhood, never mind that is causing serious problems for the surrounding area (brown outs and the such). He spent a lot of time going to city council meetings and the like showing people that their health concerns were invalid. In reality they are more worried about their property value.

  29. Mod parent Offtopic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is about power lines, not modding!

  30. Re: How about digital satellite reception? by shepd · · Score: 1

    How is receiving a satellite signal going to irradiate you more or less than not receiving it, assuming you don't stand behind the dish? :-)

    Technically, I suppose receiving the signal will expose you to _less_ radiation. Not that the levels are particularly high anyways, considering how little power satellites have available to them in the first place.

    If your cable TV cable is actually emitting any measurable signals from anywhere but the termination point, phone the FCC. It won't emit them for very much longer, you can rest assured.

    --
    If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
  31. from the free electricity dept... by Big-mad-Gregor · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This may be an urban legend but it was recounted to me by my university lecturer.

    A while ago here in blighty there was a court case which involved a gentleman who lived under a power line. The gentleman in question was accused of stealing electricity from the power company and they were trying to prosecute.

    He had facilitated the alleged theft by placing one half of a step down transformer in the loft(attic)of his home and fed the output into his electricity supply. He had been gleaning free electricity like this for years.

    The court case was dropped when the court explained to the power company that to succesfully prosecute they would have to admit that electro-magnetic radiation was entering the house and therefore existed at points beyond the transmission line previously claimed as safe.

    If the power company had pursued the case then it would have opened a flood-gate of suits relating to cancer etc.

    --
    Error: sig not found, Please reboot Universe and contact your local system administrator.
  32. EMF & Cancer by vandan · · Score: 1

    I read recently - possibly in a New Scientist magazine - that some researchers had discovered something frightening about EMF radiation. They said that the radiation itself doesn't appear to cause cancer directly, but that when the body is exposed to EMF radiation, it stops repairing damaged DNA sequences so vigoroursly.

    Sorry I don't remember too much more about it.

    If I were you, I would err on the side of caution and stay right away from the damned things.

  33. Just once by JamesP · · Score: 1

    When walking under a power line with my glasses on.

    Nothing spectacular, just a slight humming and vibration...

    --
    how long until /. fixes commenting on Chrome?
  34. Don't worry about it by ajs318 · · Score: 1

    Either it will kill you, or it won't.

    If it doesn't kill you, you're fine. Resale value shouln't be an issue. If you can't see yourself living in that house forever, then it obviously isn't the right house for you anyway ..... if you know you'll want to move sooner or later, you would do better to rent, or even squat.

    If it does kill you, you don't have to worry about the resale value anyway.

    Remember the inverse-square law ..... if light {and, by extension, all electromagnetic radiation ..... "light" is just the name we give to the band to which our eyes respond} travels in straight lines, then it follows that the power density per unit surface area must vary inversely with the square of distance. So, at two metres away from the source, the field strength is 1/4 of whatever it was at 1 metre; at 10 metres, it's just a hundredth of the strength at one metre.

    I am personally convinced that people want things to be bad for them. They just seem to be happier that way ..... I don't know why and I've given up trying to explain, I just lump it all together under "perversity of human nature" and wait for someone else to come up with a better theory.

    --
    Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
  35. choose life :) by zap42hod · · Score: 0

    Forget the interference, I've lost an entire line of relatives who lived in a house approx 150ft from a high-tension power line.
    Only one of them turned close to 50, one died to cancer before he was 30.
    It was back when the problem wasn't recognized yet (at least here in former soviet union) and they were'nt the only ones in the neighbourhood. Although it seemed that some families had better reisistance, so it's probably genetic.

    1. Re:choose life :) by presearch · · Score: 1

      So what your saying is:
      "In the former Soviet Union, power lines kill YOU!"

    2. Re:choose life :) by zap42hod · · Score: 0

      So what your saying is: "In the former Soviet Union, power lines kill YOU!"

      No, but it seems that YOU have "a saying" like that ;)

  36. debunked by confused+one · · Score: 1
    OK, DOE did a lot or research on this. After all, we have kids. Some of us live near power lines and power plants. Some of us work around this power distribution equipment all day long...

    It all started with one scientist who claimed he had evidence back in the '80s that the EMF did cause problems. So, lots of studies have been done. Tons of studies. All of them came up with the same results: Nada wrt EMF. No effect at "safe" distances.

    To qualify "safe": That means you're far enough away that there's not going to be lethal discharges to your body or lethal currents developed in metal objects your wearing or touching (like a car). So, if you're far enough away not to get shocked, your a "safe" distance away.

    What DOE found was that the stories were all coincidence. If there was a neighborhood next to a power line with unusually high number of cancer cases, it was because the people were living next to or on top of a chemical dump site. It was the chemicals in the ground from other neighboring industry.

    So, they went back to the original scientist and asked to review his data. He'd made it all up. He saw it as a way to boost his funding so he could work on other pet projects. He's been totaly discredited.

  37. Not only that...... by ONOIML8 · · Score: 1

    As someone mentioned about SCO, the court will want to see that you've taken steps to protect the thing you've lost. So if you came into my court I would say "Mr. Power Company, did you know he could get free power like that just by living there? Did you attempt to purchase the property? No, then have a nice day"

    --
    . Quit playing Monopoly with Bill. Switch to one of many non-Microsoft products today.
  38. To answer the question.... by rtgree01 · · Score: 1

    My friend lives in a house next to some power lines... He has a 802.11b network that works well.... DSL also has no problems... I've not seen anuthing weird on TV's or monitors (CRT or LCD).... and we set up a satellite dish that pointed through the power lines and got a good signal. They use a standard over the air antenna for local channels, so that works as well....

  39. power/voltage/whatever? by Gothmolly · · Score: 1

    How can a post with "power/voltage/whatever" be given a +5 rating? And one with "The theory (I guess)" in it as well? The parent was simply an argument from ignorance!

    --
    I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
  40. Life "examples" by Gothmolly · · Score: 2, Insightful

    And do they smoke? Drink lots of caffeine?
    Eat meat?
    Excercise?
    How's your family history of this?

    -1, FUD

    --
    I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
  41. Two things... by Muad'Dave · · Score: 1

    If you enjoy amateur radio or shortwave listening, the RF 'hash' coming from the lines will swamp weak signals.

    The power company probably has an easement across your property, and can demolish any obstacle in the way of fixing their lines. On the other hand, I know some folk who have effectively gotten the power company to pay them for the loss-of-use of their land.

    --
    Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
  42. Not Kites. by kabocox · · Score: 1

    Well that cuts down the kite flying options.
    Public Service Notice: Kites and Power Lines don't mix!

    1. Re:Not Kites. by exhilaration · · Score: 1

      Dude, serious question, what if you use a cotton or nylon line to fly your kite? Those don't conduct electricity, right?

  43. Re: How about digital satellite reception? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Technically, I suppose not being a fucking troll won't make you any less of a conceited prick, but why not take the chance?

    That's right, friends: David Shepherd is a fucking troll.

    He declared that he could build a computer that would be as good as but cheaper than any Mac. When challenged, rather than admitting his mistake, or even taking a swipe at it, he just turned and ran away.

    David Shepherd is an anti-Apple zealot and a troll. Don't believe a word he says.

  44. Chemical danger not electrical by vlm · · Score: 1

    Look at the nasty chemicals the power lines use, such as creosote and god knows what else in the wood power poles to prevent rot, incredibly toxic weed killers, nasty PCB based cooling oils in the transformers...

    The chemical waste spread underneath and along a power line will kill you dead, the EMF effect, if any, is unimportant.

    --
    "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
  45. I've been here 10 years.... by marcus · · Score: 1

    ...with power lines over the back yard.

    So far the only problem has been stepping in the doggie-do. Seems like everybody in the neighborhood walks their dogs in the right-of-way.

    --
    Good judgement comes from experience, and experience comes from bad judgement.
    - W. Wriston, former Citibank CEO
  46. Transients on HV lines by Walt+Dismal · · Score: 1

    There are transients (spikes) on high voltage lines all the time. At a high enough potential, the lines can accelerate particles electrostatically and magnetically. This gives rise to random bursts of sprays of ions. I would not care to breath around that. Who knows what it does to living tissue?

    1. Re:Transients on HV lines by DAldredge · · Score: 1

      Kind of like all those cosmic rays that pass thru us all the time?

    2. Re:Transients on HV lines by Trelane · · Score: 1
      Who knows what it does to living tissue?


      Do a study. That's what science is about. "Who knows" statements are scare-mongering until backed up with sufficient evidence.
      --

      --
      Given enough personal experience, all stereotypes are shallow.
  47. Living near high output sources by Zathrus · · Score: 1

    I seriously doubt you'll have any problems with satellite reception, TVs, or anything else. The power drops off squared with respect to distance. Others have pointed out more realistic issues with buying such a house though -- the biggest is easements and easement access (I once considered a home that had many easements on it, and they were a major reason for why I didn't purchase. That and the fact that cutting a 12" hole into an engineered wood I-beam violates the manufacturer's guarantees), one of the others is that while it may not be an issue to you, it is to many people -- that will affect your future sales price, and is probably affecting the current sale price. If it isn't, then it certainly should (check comparables).

    In a similar, but not identical vein, when I was in college I lived in a dorm constructed adjacent to the college radio station broadcast tower (40 KW). The tower was 100 feet from the nearest section of the dorm, and I was in a room that was opposite the nearest dorm room. We had absolutely no problems as things go. The people across the hall (in the closest dorm room) eventually gave up on an answering machine -- their tape kept on getting overwritten by whatever was playing from the broadcast tower. They also had problems with cordless phones. Very odd.

  48. Cousin's husband is an epidemiologist by John+Harrison · · Score: 1
    While he was getting his Phd he mentioned to me that he had seen evidence that claimed that whether power lines had an effect depended on whether they run north-south or east-west. Something about an interaction with the earth's magnetic field. I have no idea how this would work.

    Of course I can't remember which one was bad and which was harmless. He even insinuated that the power companies knew this and that they would selectively choose areas for study where the lines ran in the harmless direction, thus "proving" that there were no ill effects.

  49. Something to be aware of by jparker · · Score: 1

    There's a case near Seattle right now where several people bought homes near a power line without knowing that it was slated to carry a lot more power than it was currently. When the change was made, it created an audible and annoying hum. ( link)

    Moral of the story: Check with whomever owns and operates those lines and see if there are any changes scheduled.

  50. Re:Sad news- entrepeneur Bill Gates dead at 48 by The+Clockwork+Troll · · Score: 1
    More news trickling in; the cause of death has been determined:

    IRQL_NOT_LESS_OR_EQUAL

    --

    There are no karma whores, only moderation johns
  51. Yet another worry to add to the list by ilander · · Score: 1

    Oh great, as if there weren't enough things to consider about living next to a tower, now I gotta worry about some nutjob loosening all the foundation bolts! http://www.bayarea.com/mld/mercurynews/news/708789 5.htm

  52. Test it with an AM radio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you're being bathed in EMF, this will wreak havoc with AM radio reception, and perhaps sooner than anything else.

    Take a portable radio and check to see how close to the lines you have to get before starts noticeably wiping out numerous AM radio signals.

  53. You could say that about anything by siskbc · · Score: 1
    Even if there is, let's say, a 3% risk of all this stuff to be true, what is the point in taking this risk?

    While that makes sense in individual cases, it becomes folly when extended to everything in your life. What if I said that whatever you're having for dinner has a 3% chance of givnig you cancer if you keep eating it? What if I said your specific model of car has a 3% chance of having a rather dangerous, undiscovered defect?

    The problem is that there are very few things in life that have been tested safe to within the 97% confidence threshold, particularly when one considers that there's at least a 3% chance that we didn't know how to properly test something.

    If you let a 3% chance of danger with regard to something keep you from using it, you might as well be fitted for your bubble now.

    --

    -Looking for a job as a materials chemist or multivariat

    1. Re:You could say that about anything by Pieroxy · · Score: 1

      Dude, I am tired of people answering my post and not reading it. I am not going to live under a Teepee in northern oregon because of high-tension lines!

      Can you read my post once again (or, say, once)? I am saying that if I have a choice between two houses and I am in doubt, then I'll go with the one that is not under a high tension line. That's all, it's that little thing that will help me decide, it's not anything that will drive my life.

      You are also mentionning dinner. It's not like I could avoid having dinner, could I? You comparison is utterly offtopic.

      For the car one, it is good. Do you remember all the fuss a couple of years ago about firestone and Ford explorer? I learned one thing about it: When faced to your security vs. their $$$, both Ford and Firestone will choose their $$$. That said, if one day I am in doubt between a Nissan Terra and a Ford Explorer, I'll go with the Nissan.

      Under the same circumstances, they will probably make the same decision, but I'm not sure. In case of Ford, I know that their $$$ are before my safety.

      Of course, if Ford was to release an SUV a lot better (or that better fits my needs) than Nissan, then I'll still go Ford.

  54. Yeah a big issue by elmos_dog · · Score: 1

    Well every time i ride my bike under powerlines a spark goes from the main bar on the bije and shocks my nads. Id say that is a big concern. It doesnt feel good at all.

  55. Experience with substation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The only experience I have had was we were located in a building and on a wall that was less than 20 feet from a power substation. If you were sitting next to the wall, you could see the image on your monitor continously waver (kind of like a subtle version of the windoze symbol). Another 10 feet away and you noticed nothing.

  56. No problems here-- by nothingtodo · · Score: 1

    I live in a new house about 250 feet away from hi power lines and has not affected anything in my house. I cannot hear any noise from the lines either. A far as resale value goes, if there's a housing shortage, proximity to power lines probably wont be an issue. Besides, power lines provide great places to ride off-road vehicles.

    --
    -- After all is said and done, more is said than done.
  57. Mobile phones v power lines.. by Open+Council · · Score: 1

    if its the radiation that you're worried about then you should worry at least as much about mobil phone because, even if they radiate on low power, they are held very close to your brain. surely the inverse-square law would suggest that more of you are likely to get a fried-brain that way. i've noticed quite a few of those worried about the possibility of danger from power lines do smoke cigarettes. with cigarettes damage to your body rises from a possibility to almost a certainty .. yet that doesn't worry them..

    --
    Paul
    www.opencouncil.org
    Open
  58. Danger from living near power lines by billstewart · · Score: 1
    Maybe the electromagnetic radiation from power lines won't hurt you, but in much of the US, there are risks from living near power lines because of herbicides used to keep the right-of-way clear underneath them. Maybe they've backed off on that, but it used to be very common.

    On the other hand, that doesn't affect WiFi-equipped schools, unless they're built on chemical waste dumps like the school that cause the Love Canal problem.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  59. It's all fine and dandy until you discharge static by danpbrowning · · Score: 1

    Have you ever discharged a little static and zapped yourself or a friend? Well, if you live under the power lines, you better wear a rubber suit everywhere you go in your house, becuase if you let *that* electrical current out... *BZZZZAP* ... and there wont be much left of you, or your new house.

    --
    Daniel