Slashdot Mirror


Windows Media Player 9 for Mac OS X Available

corsa writes "I found Windows Media Player 9 for Mac OS X on Microsoft's site today. I downloaded it and have it running under Panther. It seems to play WMV9 files, at least the few I've tried so far."

70 comments

  1. Ultimate in Downgrades by michaelnz · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I've already downloaded and installed this and it is without a doubt one of the worse releases of a piece of software I've seen. In the past my copy of Media Player would at least run some of the videos that QuickTime wouldn't, now nothing. I've tried running every WMV file I could get my hands on and none of them play. It seems that Microsoft has chosen to go with less functionality, not more.

    It's an interesting move for Microsoft, especially after the release of iTunes for Windows. Apple is doing it's best to convert Microsoft users by offering them incredible software. Microsoft is offering Mac users shitty knockoffs of Windows software.

    I'm guessing this is a gambit to make Mac users realize they can't have the cross-platform operability that OSX seemed to bring about, that if they want to use Windows files they should run Windows. Ultimately I think the frustration that people will feel towards the new Media Player will cause even more resentment towards Microsoft. Apple's attitude that you lure more flies with Aqua than you do with water is definately the winning strategy.

    If you don't already know (and chances are if you're reading Slashdot you do), you should be using VLC. It does everything this crappy Windows port does and more.

    1. Re:Ultimate in Downgrades by darkov · · Score: 1

      Actually, I read Slashot to get these sorts of tips.

      Does the old version (6.3?) still work after you install this?

    2. Re:Ultimate in Downgrades by mccalli · · Score: 2, Informative
      Apple is doing it's best to convert Microsoft users by offering them incredible software. Microsoft is offering Mac users shitty knockoffs of Windows software.

      Oh come on, even as a happy OS X user I have to say that this bit is slanted. iTunes for Windows doesn't follow any of the guidelines for Windows software - it is, to use (some of) your phraseology, a knockoff of Mac software. Not integrated into the Windows look and feel at all.

      So Microsoft made similar decisions for their media player under OS X. Fine. You can argue the quality of the two apps reasonably and objectively, but saying that MS's non-integrating WMP for OS X is a Windows knockoff, but saying that Apple's non-integrating iTunes is "great software" is pure advertising nonsense.

      View the software on its merits. It might still fail, but at least you'll have tried the correct approach.

      Cheers,
      Ian

    3. Re:Ultimate in Downgrades by Artifex · · Score: 3, Funny
      I've already downloaded and installed this and it is without a doubt one of the worse releases of a piece of software I've seen.


      Wow! So it's like Quicktime for Windows?

      --
      Get off my launchpad!
    4. Re:Ultimate in Downgrades by Domini · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Actually I tend to agree with the previous poster.

      I've installed it and I cannot even seem to play an AVI. Ok, let's see... integration with look and feel: iTunes for windows has ALL the functionality that the Mac version has. It is not a crippled product.

      WiMP for Mac on the other hand does not play the same files as WiMP for Windows. It does not have the visulisations, library support, options, enhancements (audio/video... not UI), it's UI is sucky... all the things that make WiMP for Windows a killer app is not present in the Mac version!

      Argh!

      I love WiMP for Windows (Check out the Media Player Classic project on Sourceforge!) I love iTunes (even for Windows). But as excited as I were about WiMP9 for Mac.... it sucks.... a real disapointment!

      I do not think I'm biased... I love MS for Games/Video, Mac for Mail/Web/Music/Work and Linux for Programming.

    5. Re:Ultimate in Downgrades by Artifex · · Score: 2, Informative
      iTunes for Windows doesn't follow any of the guidelines for Windows software - it is, to use (some of) your phraseology, a knockoff of Mac software.


      Don't forget Quicktime for Windows. Recent editions are better, but only some versions will play some movies, and so forth.

      Also, I wonder if the poster saying that Microsoft is offering sucky programs for Mac users knows about Office X. I haven't heard bad things about that, yet.
      --
      Get off my launchpad!
    6. Re:Ultimate in Downgrades by 1010011010 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Office X. I haven't heard bad things about that, yet.

      Stupid filename-length limit.

      --
      Napster-to-go says "Fill and refill your compatible MP3 player", which is a lie. It's not MP3. It's WMA with DRM.
    7. Re:Ultimate in Downgrades by michaelnz · · Score: 1

      Nope, the old version doesn't work once you've installed the new one! Don't bother upgrading is my suggestion. I've scoured the Microsoft site looking for an old install and can't find one. Of course WMP9 incorporates itself so much into the system I'd be worried if I installed the old version if it'd ruin things.

      Well, maybe I'll give it a try, anyone got a link to the old version? I have a feeling though hate I'll hate myself in the morning.

    8. Re:Ultimate in Downgrades by Artifex · · Score: 1
      Stupid filename-length limit.


      What's the length? 64? I can live with that, actually.

      In my opinion. anything approaching that length makes messy lists, is very unwieldy, and should be put in subdirectories. Though I can understand your preference otherwise.

      If you tell me it's 11 or 16 or even 32, though, I'll agree it's annoying.
      --
      Get off my launchpad!
    9. Re:Ultimate in Downgrades by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you blind or something? There isn't a single media player for Windows that follows ANY of the Windows UI guidelines! WMP breaks them far worse than iTunes does. In iTunes, things are arranged in a sensible order, the playlist editor works, and it's easy to use in general.

      For a long time, I tried to get WMP to work for me and I just couldn't. In all seriousness, I couldn't find a way to create a playlist other than using Personal DJ, and that's only available with Plus!. There was the one default playlist, and no more. In iTunes, you just hit the plus sign at the bottom of the playlist list and it makes a new playlist.

      I haven't downloaded or installed WMP for OSX yet, and from what I've been reading here, I won't be.

    10. Re:Ultimate in Downgrades by greenhide · · Score: 1

      I think you misunderstood the point of the parent poster. He wasn't complaining that the new version didn't integrate with the Mac look-and-feel. In fact, that's Microsoft's selling point -- that it features that nifty brushed-steel appearance.

      View the software on its merits. It might still fail, but at least you'll have tried the correct approach.

      I'm not sure what you mean by trying the "correct approach" here but if I'm judging a piece of software, I generally judge it by what it can do. Unless the parent poster is lying through his/her teeth, it sounds like the player can't do simple, normal things like, oh, play media files (funny -- isn't it called "Media Player"?) Considering that, this is a pretty shitty knockoff of the Media Player for Windows, which does in fact play media files.

      iTunes is "great software" because it is great software. Every Windows user I've talked to who has downloaded the program loves it. The same, it seems, cannot be said for the Media Player. Consider that the Media Player for the Mac offers Microsoft no possible revenue source other than the slight possibility of undermining Apple's control over media playing under OS X (doubtful). My first reaction when hearing about this upgrade was, "Why are they even bothering to make an upgrade for their player?"

      --
      Karma: Chevy Kavalierma.
    11. Re:Ultimate in Downgrades by mccalli · · Score: 1
      I'm not sure what you mean by trying the "correct approach" here but if I'm judging a piece of software, I generally judge it by what it can do.

      Which was my point, yes. The parent poster dismisses WMP's ignoring of Mac interface standards with the comment that it is "just a Windows knock-off" whilst simultaneously calling iTunes ignoring of Windows standards "great software". That's double standards, to me.

      Now a number of people replying to my post have talked about functionality - that's not the point I was making, and I agree with them in their complaints. Those are well-grounded issues to do with file playback etc. - no need for cheap shots like the Windows knock-off crack.

      Cheers,
      Ian

    12. Re:Ultimate in Downgrades by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow! So it's like Quicktime for Windows?

      Thats the dumbest comment I've ever read.

    13. Re:Ultimate in Downgrades by greenhide · · Score: 1

      Right, but I still think you misread the parent poster. I don't think he mentioned the appearance of the program, once. I don't think it was the Mac interface standards that he was having a problem with. It was the bad functionality that made it a bad "Windows knock-off". In this case, it is a "knock-off" because there was a primary Windows version first, and a secondhand Mac version next, which didn't work as well. Interface had nothing to do with it.

      --
      Karma: Chevy Kavalierma.
    14. Re:Ultimate in Downgrades by 1010011010 · · Score: 1

      The limit is 31.

      --
      Napster-to-go says "Fill and refill your compatible MP3 player", which is a lie. It's not MP3. It's WMA with DRM.
    15. Re:Ultimate in Downgrades by bojan · · Score: 1

      we're getting into a really bad situation here.

      Windows users have software that Mac users have, like iTunes, and it works perfectly.

      Yet Mac users do not have the software that Windows users have. IT's as if Windows is a better platform?

      LEt's not get into Logic Audio and Final Cut Pro and Shake arguments. I use them daily on one of my Macs, and I don't run Windows anymore, ever since OS X came out.. but if this trend continues, it makes me worried.

    16. Re:Ultimate in Downgrades by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, moderate it down -1, speaking the truth about Apple.

      QT is a steaming pile of shit. At least it doesn't disable your computer for booting like iTunes for Windows did, or erase your hard drive like iTunes 2.0 did.

    17. Re:Ultimate in Downgrades by bojan · · Score: 1

      no, quicktime for Windows has worked reliable for me without a single hitch.

    18. Re:Ultimate in Downgrades by ManxStef · · Score: 1
      iTunes for windows has ALL the functionality that the Mac version has. It is not a crippled product.

      Almost true, but it's got the exactly the same problems as Quicktime for Windows, mainly that it doesn't behave like a normal win32 app.

      Firstly, it's got a shiny metal skinned interface which goes again the Windows interface guidelines. Pretty it may be, but it doesn't look like a normal app.

      More importantly, click on the maximise button and it.... doesn't maximise. Double-click on the title bar and it ... doesn't behave like the maximise/restore button as it should. Minimizing to a smaller player is nice, but why Apple had to go against the standard convention in such an odd way is beyond me.

      Don't get me wrong, I like iTunes: it's pretty much equivalent to the "CDex and Foobar2000" combo but without the complexity or hassle (assuming that you're not in the US and therefore can't use the iTunes store). But to ignore the OS Interface Guidelines is just stupid, and more to the point confusing for users. Maybe I should send Apple my old copy of "The Windows Interface Guidelines for Software Design" ;)

      P.S. Saying all of that, Windows Media Player 7/8/9 aren't exactly the shining pillars of interface conformance either (talk about waste of screen real-estate), which is one of the reasons I think they're all so bloody awful. Give me Media Player 6 anyday, at least you know where you stand with that one! :)

    19. Re:Ultimate in Downgrades by ce25254 · · Score: 1
      Office X. I haven't heard bad things about that, yet.

      Unable to print multiple pages per sheet unless your printer driver does it for you.

    20. Re:Ultimate in Downgrades by Domini · · Score: 1

      I do not really expect any products to hold to the interface design guidelines of the destination OS. It would be cool, but it's not ideal. The biggest thing that bugs me about iTunes for windows is that it does not minimize when I double click on the titlebar... (used to iTunes on OSX)

      Other than that it's just the tray icon which could have been done better. They did not remove anything though.

      PS: CDex rocks... been using it for ages. I just find that iTunes does exactly the same as CDex with a lot of configuring and tweaking. ;)

      PS: I'm also a fan of MP 6.4, and recently came across this:

      http://sourceforge.net/projects/guliverkli/

      It's basically a killer-app version of MP 6.4 with plug-in support to play realmedia (with subtitles!) and quicktime... It's awesome... check it out!

    21. Re:Ultimate in Downgrades by Domini · · Score: 1

      Windows does not have a free development environment. Windows does not have ease of use. I really don't care if Windows have more software than Mac if I do not need that software.

      I basically use something if I have a need for it. I never owned a Mac until recently... and I was quite impressed. As a person who has used AmigaOS/Linux/BSD/Windows/OS2 and many other OSes, I have no real loyalty... each one of the have their plusses and negatives. It just seems that OSX has more plusses these days... ;)

    22. Re:Ultimate in Downgrades by ManxStef · · Score: 1
      It's basically a killer-app version of MP 6.4 with plug-in support to play realmedia (with subtitles!) and quicktime... It's awesome... check it out!
      Thanks for that, will go take a look :)

      Only one problem with CDex: it doesn't do AAC encoding very well, requiring external encoders, and they're not that good apparently - the PsyTel one is the better of the two but not as good as the encoder that comes with Nero (which is by the guy that coded PsyTel), or the Quicktime/iTunes one (according to the posts of read over at HydrogenAudio anyway). But other than that I agree, it does rock!

    23. Re:Ultimate in Downgrades by bojan · · Score: 1

      agreed. I only have one loyalty, and that's to myself and my family. If a platform lets me do what I wish to do, then that platform is it for me.

      Currently OS X lets me write music and edit short films, while at the same time allowing me to work on unix code.

    24. Re:Ultimate in Downgrades by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

      I was windows user (xp) and I moved to Apple G5...

      Man, believe there is nothing similar between QT for Win and OSX/OS 9... Same versions.

      Windows one loses every credibility because of UI lag, to be spesific...

    25. Re:Ultimate in Downgrades by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

      "The limit is 31."

      so as far as I remember, they use limits of Pre OSX (Os 9 etc) on a product branded "X"?

    26. Re:Ultimate in Downgrades by danielsfca2 · · Score: 1

      > Office X. I haven't heard bad things about that, yet.

      Bad Thing:
      Crashes most every day that I use it. It's on my short list of software I plan on replacing.

      Another Bad Thing:
      Office X will be obsolete as soon as the DRM'd Office '03 files start making the rounds. And since Office X was the last version of Office for Mac, there won't be any (legal?) way to read those new files without running a copy of Windows (either using MS Virtual PC, remotely logging into a Wintel box, or physically using a Wintel box). Next, expect Microsoft to change the Terminal Services/RDC protocol and obsolete their Mac client for that as well, to make sure you have to use the clunky, slow solution (VPC), or actually switch to Windows.

  2. And this even exists because? by heapacreep · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It seems to me that microsoft might only be releasing this as just another piece of software for the MacOS, unless of course, they will be using it as part of a music store like the itunes version, just crappy and with a bad file type. We all know how that would go over within the mac community. It also does not seem like they would be releasing this to steal the thunder from another product's new release, so here is the question...WHY BOTHER? Quicktime already exists, and there are many other better file codecs and ecoders for that matter out there than the .wma junk...

    --
    --Shut up and get a mac--
    1. Re:And this even exists because? by Doc+Squidly · · Score: 1

      I beleive you. Just as Quicktime sucks on Windows, I wouldn't be suprised that Media Play 9 sucks on Mac. Hopefully this will be taken a sign for M$ & Apple to keep these programs on their own OS's, where they belong.

      --
      I think I think, therefore I think I am.
    2. Re:And this even exists because? by sickb0y.lvlp! · · Score: 2, Interesting

      being a win user for years, i've never found that qt sucks in win.. except for IE crashing with it a few times.. not that it doesn't do that otherwise ;)

    3. Re:And this even exists because? by bojan · · Score: 1

      what can I use to convert WM9 files or certain encoded AVI images over to Quicktime aside from this POS software?

    4. Re:And this even exists because? by heapacreep · · Score: 1

      You can try using VLC Player/Encoder/Everything... which pretty much is a quicktime type player that does EVERYTHING and then some. Just check out the file type compatibility chart, it supports everything I can think of and even runs on such operating systems as BeOS, which by the way, probably supports this "out of the box" as BeOS was pretty much built around digital media... Dave

      --
      --Shut up and get a mac--
    5. Re:And this even exists because? by bojan · · Score: 1

      Wicked! Thank you.

      I'm rather disappointed that it's never the best technology that wins, but rather the one far from it... BeOS was so superior....

      anyway.. thanks a lot!

  3. Eventuality by HebrewToYou · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The true goal of MS is to only write for only one platform. They will soon cut off the Mac BU's ability to update Office v.X and force users to purchase the *new* Mac Office suite: Virtual PC and Office for Windows. Windows Media Player 9 ain't that bad, but the fact that MS refuses to update the UI just reinforces what I wrote above. WiMP is just a horribly media application for the Mac....and for good reason.

    --
    I'm not popular enough to be different.

    Homer Simpson, The Simpsons

    1. Re:Eventuality by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 1

      They will soon cut off the Mac BU's ability to update Office v.X and force users to purchase the *new* Mac Office suite: Virtual PC and Office for Windows

      I think you meant to say "Microsoft Word 6.0"

      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
  4. Application folder change by CoolMoDee · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I installed it yesterday and the installer changed the icon on my Applications folder from the default to the stuffit exapnder icon. This release is truely rushed. The wmv file i threw at it, it couldn't even play it. MPlayerOSX had no problems playing that same file.

    --
    Jisho - A Japanese English German Russian French Dictionary for the rest of us.
  5. if it doesnt work for porn... by redwood2 · · Score: 4, Funny

    I downloaded this this afternoon and every chunk of porn I threw at yielded the same results:
    mozilla launching to a page about media rights or something...
    hmmmm...

    It has since been deleted.

    Cig? Don't mind if I do...

  6. Die, die, die by Squozen · · Score: 5, Informative

    WMP for OS X sucks, pure and simple. On a 1.25Ghz CPU with 1Gb of RAM running a fresh install of Panther, WMP 9 started struggling on a local file after 20-30 seconds, stuttering and skipping frames. Use VLC and hope that they integrate all the annoying Microsoft proprietary codecs soon.

    Interestingly, RealPlayer isn't bad at all on the Mac. I held off on installing it for quite a while after seeing all the baggage that came with a Windows install, but it's pretty clean and seems to stream video well.

    1. Re:Die, die, die by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Have you tried copying a 17 meg file while it is playing?

    2. Re:Die, die, die by nege · · Score: 1

      will vlc play wmv files? This is the only thing I seem to be missing.

  7. Crap, crap, crapapple! by Randy+Wang · · Score: 0, Redundant
    Of course, we shouldn't forget that Microsoft has quite some reputation for making crap for OS X.

    Exhibit A, being Internet Explorer, a shady alternative to Safari that comes packaged with OS X... when, sitting right next to it is a faster, smaller, and more functional program for the same purpose - Safari. Not much of a blow for Microsoft functionality, there.

    Exhibit B, being Microsoft Virtual PC 2004 - a previously wonderful piece of virtual machine software produced by Connectix, which will no longer support Linux in the new version, as described here

    And, finally, WMP9, a decidedly crap piece of software, as described by all those unfortunate enough to use it. Pity, poor fools.

    --
    --- Egads, I glow in the dark!
    1. Re:Crap, crap, crapapple! by ayersrj · · Score: 1

      They just released info for Virtual PC 2004 for PC, which says it will take Linux Installs, they're just not supporting them. Lets hope for at least the same for the Mac Version, and hope we get the free upgrade everyone else gets too in PC Land.

  8. Re:Why? by johram · · Score: 1

    Lets see what's new: With WMP 9, your web browser is able to play WM files right within the browser. Unfortunately, MS didn't go far enough in working on these plugins -- so far only Safari, and (two "dead" browsers) Netscape and Mac IE are supported.

    OK, MSN Explorer for Mac is supported, too, but for example, WM is as dead as before in Camino 0.7+. I bet I'm not alone in wondering what's the thinking behind the plugin development for browsers which development has been abandoned.

    --
    "Fighting for peace is like fucking for chastity."
  9. where do you want to go today? by glassesmonkey · · Score: 1

    Welcome brothers to the DRM "revolution"!

    1. Re:where do you want to go today? by ceejayoz · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Yeah, 'cuz... like... iTunes Music Store lets you distribute your paid-for-download songs to everyone without limits, right?

    2. Re:where do you want to go today? by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "Welcome brothers to the DRM "revolution"!

      Just like the desktop UI, Microsoft did not invent DRM.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    3. Re:where do you want to go today? by profet · · Score: 1

      What are you talking about?

      Microsoft didn't even include Windows Media Rights Manager V7

      which means you can't play any videos off of NHL.com and other sites.

      Apparently Microsoft feels that DRM isn't important enough to put on their Mac products.

    4. Re:where do you want to go today? by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      Pretty much (assuming you mean technically, not legally - you still need to negotiate with the copyright holder before redistributing the content.) It does require you burn them to CD first though.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    5. Re:where do you want to go today? by GlockToTheHead · · Score: 1

      Why don't you just buy the CD then? You get a higher quality product for only like 2 extra bucks at most if you don't shop at expensive record stores.

      Much less if you buy used, most of the time beating the price of iTMS.

      I realize that it's the convenience thing in iTMS that everyone loves, and the fact that you can get one song off an album without buying the whole album. Of course in those cases I think you need better taste in music because if one song is worth buying but the rest aren't the artist probably is trash. This is the kind of bullshit that makes me want to put a Glock to the head all those whiny lazy fucks.

    6. Re:where do you want to go today? by squiggleslash · · Score: 1
      Why don't you just buy the CD then?
      Well, you answered your own question:
      I realize that it's the convenience thing in iTMS that everyone loves
      Really, that's it. Surf, find, download, you got it. As opposed to search Amazon, order, wait a week. Or search local record stores, not find it, get sore legs.

      Ultimately it's convenience vs quality which means there's room for both. I still order CDs from Amazon, and I download the occasional track via iTunes, because it's something I want to hear now.

      This is the kind of bullshit that makes me want to put a Glock to the head all those whiny lazy fucks.
      Dude, you need to relax. ;-)
      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
  10. Conspiracy? by ZxCv · · Score: 3, Informative

    Maybe Microsoft is just out to get you. I installed this new version on Saturday, and while its interface could use some work, I found the media support to be a million times better than the last version of WMP for OS X. It not only played the files that the last version wouldn't, but several files that had audio or video glitches when played with the last version now played flawlessly. Perhaps your installation got screwed up? Try reinstalling it, and more importantly, deleting its existing files from ~/Library/Preferences before you reinstall (this second part actually fixed an issue on my friend's machine).

    And, while VLC is great, I have still come across a number of files (Windows Media in particular) that it won't play correctly or won't play at all. My best solution has come down to keeping updated versions of QuickTime, RealOne, Windows Media Player, VLC, and Mplayer around. In my experience, this has been the only way to make sure I can play every media file I come across.

    --

    Perl - $Just @when->$you ${thought} s/yn/tax/ &couldn\'t %get $worse;
    1. Re:Conspiracy? by Artifex · · Score: 1
      My best solution has come down to keeping updated versions of QuickTime, RealOne, Windows Media Player, VLC, and Mplayer around. In my experience, this has been the only way to make sure I can play every media file I come across.


      I keep a Windows build of mplayer, patched for Tivo files, around for that reason, also. Amazing how many video compression schemes have been abandoned in the last few years.
      --
      Get off my launchpad!
  11. RealPlayer: Surpisingly Refreshing by michaelnz · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I agree, RealPlayer has done a great job with their Mac player. It's small, doesn't hog system resources and an easy install. Everything that WMP should have been.

    Isn't it odd when RealPlayer comes off as more professional than Microsoft... Well, maybe not that weird.

    1. Re:RealPlayer: Surpisingly Refreshing by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

      "Isn't it odd when RealPlayer comes off as more professional than Microsoft... Well, maybe not that weird."
      "
      Its because Real _has to_ sell Realone subscription, or Realplayer to live...

      Wmedia's plot is to takeover entire streaming scene...

      Also, Real is really professional, if they weren't, they couldn't race with OS bundled wmedia AND wmedia server.

  12. Less functionality than version 6.3 ?? by Ineffable+27 · · Score: 2, Informative
    I don't hate this program as much as some of you, but it's a big disappointment. No wonder there's no mention at all of its release on the Microsoft Mac site. Strangely, some of my files which version 6.3 final (for Classic OS) can play just fine, are a no-go with this new version. According to the discussion on MacRumors.com, OS X lacks support for a particular audio codec used in a lot of WM files, which is causing some of the incompatibilities.

    However I'm not complaining too much, because some WMV files which VLC could not play for me, run fine. (I haven't tried MPlayer for OS X so I can't comment on that.) And on my 1 GHz G4, it's reasonably fast, and not crash-y. Ugly interface by Apple standards, but actually better than I might have expected. Much less ugly than the Windows version of the player.

    --
    "He'd be a broader guy if he had dropped acid once." - Steve Jobs on Bill Gates
  13. Defininately a decent upgrade! by beetle496 · · Score: 1
    I was mad because the last WiMP file I wanted to play didn't have audio on the Mac. I couldn't be bothered with the uninstall instructions as my "Open Recent" list (in WiMP/File) was a collection of problematic links, and I was too lazy to write them down! I only used WiMP as a last resort, but if QT couldn't open a file, usually 7.1.3 wouldn't either, or the movie would play but without sound. Still, I kept it around.

    I just ran the Installer over 7.1.3 (the latest previously available for OS X). No reboot was requested (isn't that odd for a MS product) but it would not run. So I re-installed 7.1.3 (again, without any sort of uninstall) and now I had audio for that BBC program! I re-installed 9 (again, not bothering with the uninstall) and the video still plays. So, I am happy as this version fixes at least some things!

    --
    I paid the going retail price for a Windows screen reader and got a free Unix computer!
  14. Avoid WMP altogether.. by DoctorScooby · · Score: 0, Informative

    MPlayerOSX kicks ass. MPlayer rules on every platform I use it on and plays nearly every format possible, especially with the add-on codecs (soon to be Slashdotted). I don't even need Quicktime anymore except for sentimental reasons.

    1. Re:Avoid WMP altogether.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod Parent UP!!!

    2. Re:Avoid WMP altogether.. by BlackBolt · · Score: 2, Informative

      MPlayer RULES! I just recommended it to my friend this weekend - he wanted something that could play pretty much everything he threw at it and save him from the jumbled mess that is windows media player. The only problem is that the Win32 version I got my friend uses keyboard controls for everything (FF, REV, etc.) which sucks. The OSX version has a much nicer GUI -- ie, it actually HAS a GUI.

    3. Re:Avoid WMP altogether.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's pretty funny that a guy whose sig says "Easy Way to Stop Bad Moderation " and has a link to ideas on solving the "mods on crack" problem would be modded to -1 on an informative post like that (what total idiots those guys are). Thanks for the MPlayer link, btw. It's working great so far.

    4. Re:Avoid WMP altogether.. by bersl2 · · Score: 1

      Most players which I have used can play different types of media, and recover most types of errors in the file; MPlayer takes everything and just plays.

      BTW, give the parent the mod up.

  15. Clearly a minimum effort for anti-trust issues by foniksonik · · Score: 1

    Seeing as how WMV9 was only available on Windows and Microsoft is pushing it as a format for many media industries... doesn't this seem like a minimum effort to fend off claims that they are once again using Windows to establish a monopoly, this time on DRM media consumption?

    IF they use their market penetration to convince vendors, ie: force vendors, to use WMV9 as their preferred format for streaming and DRMed media then they could be accused of monopolizing that industry through anti-competitive means.

    --
    A fool throws a stone into a well and a thousand sages can not remove it.
    1. Re:Clearly a minimum effort for anti-trust issues by bojan · · Score: 1

      I thought that method of "penetration" was called rape?

  16. Here's the link to older version by beetle496 · · Score: 2, Informative
    For me, this version (9) plays audio on some movies that were previously silent, so I like it.

    The parent in this thread was asking about 6.3, available only for Classic. The installer left my Classic version of Windows Media Player 7 alone, so I can't imagine it effecting 6.3. Yes, after the install WiMP 7 for OS X disappeared, but that was the point wasn't it? I never followed the debate about 6.3 having advantages over 7.1, so I can't comment there.

    As has been pointed out by others, the Mactopia site still lists the previous (7.1) version, so you should at least be able to return to that. I don't know where you can find 6.3 (if that's what you really need), but here's the answer to the parent question:
    Windows Media Player for Mac OS X
    WindowsMediaInstaller.hqx
    Windows Media Player 7.1 for Mac
    WMPlayer7_1_EN.hqx

    --
    I paid the going retail price for a Windows screen reader and got a free Unix computer!
  17. c'mon, wtf?!?!?! by Box+Checker · · Score: 1

    i still can't play my drm porn files. wtf?!?! the faq basically says "tough luck." blah. that's ok, i've plenty of drm free porn! speaking of which... it's time to box the clown.

  18. Mplayer for the mac by fsterman · · Score: 1

    Although according to some the developers and install (www.linuxworld.com/story/32880.htm) are not the best things in the world Mplayer has done a lot of good work with the codecs (for instance VLC doesn't play a lot of my WM movies). Thankfully for Mac folks devros javol klokan-pp and team have trimmed the install to that magical DMG mount, drap, drop. Check it out at VersionTracker (_much_ easier than sourceforge website) www.versiontracker.com/dyn/moreinfo/macosx/16623 P.S. Sorry about not using but for some reason they were not showing up and I am late to class@@

    --
    Is there anything better than clicking through Microsoft ads on Slashdot?
  19. The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly by Go+Aptran · · Score: 1
    I give it a B+

    I did not have a previous version of Windows Media Player installed on my Mac so I did not experience any of the upgrade annoyances that seem to be plaguing some of the posters. The reason for this is because the previous version's installer kept crashing and I never managed to get it to work. The current installer seems to actually install. Microsoft has already exceeded my expectations, which were not very high to begin with.

    The Good: So far, it's played every single .wmp file that I've thrown at it without any problem whatsoever, and I can finally listen to the archived radio shows on my favorite radio station KEXP.ORG. Since I pretty much only use Safari now, the lack of support for Camino is not as irksome to me as it might be to others.

    The Bad: It changes the file association for the files that it plays from the default (VLC on my Mac) to Media Player without asking. It also quits the application when you close the window that you're playing... rather than just closing the window and leaving the app open. Not very Mac-like behavior...

    The Ugly: It's kind of ugly looking. I can hope that someone will come up with a skin that better approximates that OS X look pretty soon.

    --

    "Under the spreading chestnut tree, I sold you and you sold me."

  20. Doesn't work at all on UFS by skybrian · · Score: 1

    If you've installed OS X on a UFS filesystem, the Media Player installer hangs.

    The release notes do say Media Player doesn't work on UFS, but I was hoping to install it on the HFS+ partition I keep around for such things. There's no way to tell Media Player to install anywhere other than the Applications folder, and apparently no way to move the Applications folder to another drive, so I guess I'm stuck.

  21. Windows UI standards? hah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    The parent poster dismisses WMP's ignoring of Mac interface standards with the comment that it is "just a Windows knock-off" whilst simultaneously calling iTunes ignoring of Windows standards "great software". That's double standards, to me.

    There are windows UI standards? Hah, that's the biggest load of crap I've heard in awhile.