Slashdot Mirror


Linux 2.6.0-test11 Kernel Released

An anonymous reader writes "Linus Torvalds has released his final 2.6.0-test kernel, calling it the 'Beaver In Detox'. Following this release, Linus says that 2.6 development will be led by Andrew Morton. The kernel's name refers in jest to the previous release, which Linus had named "Stoned Beaver". It contains a fix for the aic7xxx driver, proper error handling in do_fork(), some firewire fixes, and correction of a few skbuff leakage points. Download it from a kernel.org mirror."

253 comments

  1. Fork it all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    proper error handling in do_fork()

    So you could say the previous version was forked up?

    1. Re:Fork it all by Directrix1 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      OK, does anybody know if framebuffer support is fixed yet?

      --
      Occam's razor is the blind faith in the natural selection of least resistance and in universal oversimplification. -- EF
  2. More Information by anaphora · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Check out this for more information.

    1. Re:More Information by golan · · Score: 5, Informative

      Also check out this to see stats about the different 2.6.0-testX versions compile warnings and errors by John Cherry from the OSDL.

    2. Re:More Information by squiggleslash · · Score: 2, Informative

      Also, if you're at all unsure of the process used to develop the 2.6.0-testX kernel, there's a handy diagram here...

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    3. Re:More Information by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Looks bogus. Surely there must be some "contributors" in the "marketplace"

  3. Man, this Linus guy, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    he's a comic genius as well!

  4. Fork it all and Let Scitech Sort it out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.linuxdevices.com/articles/AT4396090607. html

  5. names by bersl2 · · Score: 1, Funny

    So will the release of 2.6.0 now be called "Beaver in Rehab?"

    1. Re:names by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Given the Gnu/Linux philosophy, 2.6.0 should be called Open Beaver.

      Simon

    2. Re:names by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
      Haven't you seen Half Baked? No one needs rehab for getting stoned.

      On a side note, Linus "went on to note that he'll be too busy eating for the next few days to check his email." I know it's Thanksgiving and all, but no one eats a whole weekend away unless they're...

      No way, dude! Far out! Linus has the munchies, man!

    3. Re:names by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, no, I have not seen Half Baked.

    4. Re:names by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe he means mrs. torvalds.

    5. Re:names by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Open Beaver? Longhorn? could a merge be possible here?

    6. Re:names by ratpack91 · · Score: 1

      but then a month down the road some really horrible bug will turn up and it will be called "Beaver in Relapse"

    7. Re:names by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you ever sucked dick for a linux kernel?

    8. Re:names by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I suspect it's gonna be Beaver in Relapse.

    9. Re:names by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I suspect it will be Beaver in Relapse.

    10. Re:names by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I know it's Thanksgiving and all, but no one eats a whole weekend away unless they're..."

      ALIEN! Unless their alien. Linus is a Swedish speaking guy from Finland. Those people don't know what Thanksgiving is, or, when they come to the US they have no idea how to behave. It's outlandish, but an idea.

    11. Re:names by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think it'll be Beaver in Relapse.

    12. Re:names by Spacejock · · Score: 1

      Uh-oh, sounds like Linux is going to get screwed.

    13. Re:names by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Haven't you seen Half Baked? No one needs rehab for getting stoned.


      Rehab for getting stoned is called 'Psychiatric Ward'. Happened to quite a few friends of mine.

    14. Re:names by jo42 · · Score: 1


      "Hairy Beaver"

    15. Re:names by be-fan · · Score: 1

      AKA the Robert Downey Jr. kernel :)

      Yes, I posted the same joke on OSNews, sue me...

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
  6. Names make a difference! by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 5, Funny

    Some may scoff at changing a release name to suit customers and corporate supporters, but it is a simple and useful thing to do.

    I suggest the next release should go a step further. Something smooth, something that rolls off of the tongue, something like "Clean Shaven Beaver"

    1. Re:Names make a difference! by GreyWolf3000 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I personally think people that find "stoned beaver" to be "inappropriate" need to lighten up a bit. You know, just kick back, relax, chill out...

      Ok, that was going a bit far, but it would be nice if corporations respected Linus' right to "codename" his releases any damn way he pleases.

      --
      Slashdot: Where people pretend to be twice as smart as they really are by behaving like children.
    2. Re:Names make a difference! by oasisbob · · Score: 1
      Some may scoff at changing a release name to suit customers and corporate supporters, but it is a simple and useful thing to do.

      Yes. Anyone who doesn't have enough of a sense of humor to appreciate the name "Stoned Beaver" shouldn't be using a developement kernel. Most people don't know what Linux is. Why would they care the the code name for 2.6.0-test10 is? If the debate was over the code name for kernel 2.6, then, well maybe it would be different.

      Besides, forrest creatures using drugs is funny.
    3. Re:Names make a difference! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      Besides, forrest creatures using drugs is funny.

      Speaking as a forrest creature who has recently come out of rehab for prescription pain medication, I find that statement to be offensive.

      Please, moderators, make sure justice is served and silence this dangerous opinion.

    4. Re:Names make a difference! by wampus · · Score: 1

      I much prefer "Wide Open Beaver."

    5. Re:Names make a difference! by Lovepump · · Score: 3, Funny

      I get the impressions most slashdotters would like any old beaver, stoned or not.

    6. Re:Names make a difference! by cpeterso · · Score: 2, Funny


      Linux 2.4 had the Greased Weasel, so shouldn't Linux 2.6 have a Greased Beaver?

    7. Re:Names make a difference! by tyrione · · Score: 1

      How about "Stuffed Beaver?"

    8. Re:Names make a difference! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know, if they just compiled the kernel using -m686-mmx -funroll-loops, the Linux kernel would run 5-10% faster and would be... aw frick. This isn't unrelated. Damn. Ok, I'll try and think of something else.

    9. Re:Names make a difference! by Saeger · · Score: 3, Funny
      Trying. To. Relax. But. Can't.

      Human Resource #761965B:
      Corporatization of Personality: Complete.
      Humanity Remaining: None.
      Political Correctness Rating: 9.93
      Sphincter Hardness (Mohs Scale): 10.1

      --

      --
      Power to the Peaceful
    10. Re:Names make a difference! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Greased Yoda

    11. Re:Names make a difference! by DataPath · · Score: 1

      See earlier post - successor to greased weasel will be clean shaven beaver

      --
      Inconceivable!
    12. Re:Names make a difference! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I personally think people that find "stoned beaver" to be "inappropriate" need to lighten up a bit.

      Or you could say that they need to light up a big one.

    13. Re:Names make a difference! by Troed · · Score: 1

      About the only countries I know of where "Stoned Beaver" wouldn't cause raised eyebrows are the USA, Canada, the UK and the Netherlands. In Sweden, using cannabis is considered to be as dangerous as injecting heroin.

      I thought it was the same in Finland in people's minds - but maybe that's why Linus gave it that nickname in the first place ...

    14. Re:Names make a difference! by GreyWolf3000 · · Score: 0, Offtopic
      For real? It's actually less dangerous and physically addicting than alcohol. I bet you already knew that. For certain people, it's dangerous to their lifestyle, but it doesn't pose any physical danger.

      Apparently the US government spread a bunch of lies in the 30's, claiming that marijuana was as dangerous as heroin. This was done just to make it illegal in the US. Maybe other countries are still listening to those false "studies."

      --
      Slashdot: Where people pretend to be twice as smart as they really are by behaving like children.
    15. Re:Names make a difference! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...[marijuana] doesn't pose any physical danger

      I wouldn't go so far - if you smoke enough of it, it will have some detrimental physical affect on you. Just like too much of anything isn't good.

      Mostly, I think that letting it become too much a part of your life can be dangerous. I've seen people lose their friends because they just don't care about anything they're so friggen smoked out. What a waste. Meanwhile their friends actually do something with their lives.

    16. Re:Names make a difference! by GreyWolf3000 · · Score: 1
      Well, I should have said immediate physical danger. Alcohol has immediate physical dangers attached to it. Speed has immediate physical dangers. Heroin and crack have immediate physical dangers. Smoking marijuana has no such dangers attached to it.

      Until we start realizing that it's true dangers lie in it's effects over time, we will never be able to solve the real problems it presents. Of course, to do so means we have to admit that marijuana can be used responsibly like caffeine and alcohol. That is something parents don't want to do.

      I am not for the legalization of marijuana per se, and I believe the true dangers are even greater than the fake ones we've created. I do find it disgusting that our federal government sees it as an issue, as the "drug war" itself is a battle states and communities need to wage, not Washington.

      --
      Slashdot: Where people pretend to be twice as smart as they really are by behaving like children.
  7. For those who don't RTFA... by HoldmyCauls · · Score: 3, Informative

    No word on a resolution for the problem with pre-empt, at least none that can be seen with a search for "preempt" in the page. :-P

    --
    Emacs: for people who just never know when to :q!
  8. hood ornament? by ciaran_o_riordan · · Score: 1

    After the last article about Linus, I was expecting "Beaver as hood ornament"

  9. Let me get this straight by niko9 · · Score: 2, Funny

    BSD is always dying, and now the Tux has hit rock bottom on sex and hard drugs?

    Linux must be a fan of the Sex Pistols.

    1. Re:Let me get this straight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BSD may be dying from neglect, but it looks like Linux is risking death from a drug overdose.

    2. Re:Let me get this straight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BSD is always dying

      No, BSD is like a Goth band, it's followers are groupies who dress all in black. People think the scene is dying - but really they just want to be left alone because nobody understands them, everything is so grey, yet Linux is a gaudy unfashionable color clash because of it's popularity.

      /bsd fan

    3. Re:Let me get this straight by bronaugh · · Score: 1, Funny

      Take it tux?

      That little devil is up to more than meets the eye...

  10. Re:Fuck by blixel · · Score: 4, Funny

    I just compiled test10!

    Slacker. I've been running test10 for several day now.

  11. For those who didn't read the parent... by blixel · · Score: 5, Funny

    No word on a resolution for the problem with pre-empt, at least none that can be seen with a search for "preempt" in the page. :-P

  12. Re:Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, damnit!

  13. How cool is Linus? by Eberlin · · Score: 1, Funny

    There's no way this isn't going to sound like an absolute fanboy post but oh well -- how cool is this guy? Doesn't seem at all smug, great sense of humor, and not afraid to tell the world he's got a turkey affinity...not to mention some freudian obsession with beavers all of a sudden. He seems more people-esque instead of acting like a mega-deity (which he is), which is awesome.

    Man, if I had my choice in operating systems, I'd want this guy coding it! Oh wait, I do...and sure enough, he does. /me fades into the background while doing the "We're not worthy!" chant.

    1. Re:How cool is Linus? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's not a mega-deity. He's just a man that wrote a kernel.

    2. Re:How cool is Linus? by atrader42 · · Score: 1

      I suspect there are quite a lot of single geeks out there with a "freudian obsession with beavers"

  14. Re:Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is it really necessary to have every test release on the front page?

    As opposed to posting it on the Slashdot backpage?

    But seriously though - check your preferences and remove the topic from your view.

  15. Stop this filth by MrEd · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's no wonder that the Linux Kernel development process isn't being taken seriously, what with the childish drug references and sexual innuendo being spouted. We need a wholesome, filth-free name to call the 2.6.0 release. I propose 'squeaky clean beaver'.

    --

    Wah!

    1. Re:Stop this filth by red+floyd · · Score: 1

      No, it should be something to do with Leave it to Beaver.

      --
      The only reason we have the rights we have is that people just like us died to gain those rights. -- Cheerio Boy
    2. Re:Stop this filth by Epistax · · Score: 1

      No no, linux needs the squeeky image, but also a bold one, thus I suggest Polished Turrets.

    3. Re:Stop this filth by omega9 · · Score: 1

      grep -Hirn "shit" /usr/src/linux/*

      --
      I'm against picketing, but I don't know how to show it.
    4. Re:Stop this filth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Hirn", the new fashion word. Hirn, I say. Hirn. That'll teach them a lessohn.

    5. Re:Stop this filth by iplayfast · · Score: 1

      I did it just out of curiousity. There's a lot of shit still in there!

    6. Re:Stop this filth by eeyore · · Score: 1

      To the pure, all things are pure
      --
      E

  16. Re:Question by grasshoppa · · Score: 4, Funny

    Is it really necessary to have every test release on the front page?

    Yes, as it happens, it is.

    --
    Mod me down with all of your hatred and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
  17. Newbie comment by Murmer · · Score: 5, Informative
    If you're a new to all this, and you're a little intimidated by all the options you get from running "make menuconfig" or "make xconfig", here's a tip - if you're running Knoppix, or have one of your current kernels around in /usr/src, you can pull over your old configuration files from /usr/src/kernel and just copy them in the new kernel's source directory, if you're willing to compile the source.

    Then run xconfig, make sure you've got console support compiled in (this point is key) and off you go. make, make install.

    It's worth saying again, no matter how many times it's been said, that Linus and his band of merry coders are doing incredible work. On older machines, like my humble P2/266 laptop, a recompile actually feels faster, a lot faster in fact. If you're running older hardware, it's worth it to give these test kernels a try for that alone, if nothing else.

    --
    Mike Hoye
    1. Re:Newbie comment by FueledByRamen · · Score: 4, Informative

      Actually, what you really should do, instead of "make xconfig" after pulling over the old config file, is "make oldconfig". It's a version of the (original, text-based) config that only asks you about configuration items that weren't defined in the file - like if a new feature (and thus a configuration item) is present in the newer kernel. BTW, the name for the kernel config file is .config (it's invisible - note the dot)

      --
      Every cloud has a silver lining (except for the mushroom shaped ones, which have a lining of Iridium & Strontium 90)
    2. Re:Newbie comment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Known gotchas.
      ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
      Certain known bugs are being reported over and over. Here are the
      workarounds.
      - Blank screen after decompressing kernel?
      Make sure your .config has
      CONFIG_INPUT=y
      CONFIG_VT=y
      CONFIG_VGA_CONSOLE=y
      CONFIG_VT_CONSOLE=y
      A lot of people have discovered that taking their .config from 2.4 and
      running make oldconfig to pick up new options leads to problems, notably
      with CONFIG_VT not being set.

    3. Re:Newbie comment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For that P2-266 you may wish to try the -embedded option.

  18. The pre-empt problem: by ciaran_o_riordan · · Score: 5, Informative

    A full discussion of the pre-empt problem can be found here:
    http://kerneltrap.org/node/view/1679

    This is probably what has been happening to me.
    I tried up to -test9, but after a few (2-10) hours, my cpu and disk access would shoot up and RAM usage would slowly increase. I dropped to a tty, typed the username "root", but the cpu load was so hight that login timed out before I was even prompted for a password!
    So I had to kill the power on my machine while I could hear that my disk was fully active. I was not a happy camper.

    1. Re:The pre-empt problem: by bronaugh · · Score: 1

      The _load_ was too high? Holy shit...

      I've had machines usable with load averages WAY over fifty; I think the highest I've ever personally recorded was about 600 (at that, the machine wasn't really usable -- 15 minutes for chars typed to appear on screen). Oh. And that was with 2.4 or early 2.5... not 2.6 :)

    2. Re:The pre-empt problem: by gid · · Score: 1

      weird, I've been running 2.6.0-test9 w/pre-empt on my linux box, it does quite a bit of server stuff, plus I use it as a workstation for a couple hours a day maybe, no problems at all

    3. Re:The pre-empt problem: by Daniel+Serodio · · Score: 5, Informative

      If you really, absolutely must kill the power, use the "Magic SysRq" key! Alt+PrintScreen+S will sync the filesystems, and Alt+PrintScreen+U will remount them read-only.

      See /usr/src/linux/Documentation/sysrq.txt.

    4. Re:The pre-empt problem: by jesdynf · · Score: 2, Informative

      That's /if/ you compile it in, and if my memory servers there's some cautions against doing that needlessly.

      --
      Yahoo! Pipes are awesome. How awesome? http://pipes.yahoo.com/jesdynf/slashdot
    5. Re:The pre-empt problem: by IntergalacticWalrus · · Score: 0

      You had to shut down your machine while the hard disk was active? OH NO! THAT'S ALMOST KIND OF SOMEWHAT DANGEROUS FOR YOUR DISK! Seriously, how many decades it's been since hard drives DON'T break when you shut the power during accesses? One, two...?

    6. Re:The pre-empt problem: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I doubt it was the hard drive he was worried about, but rather the data that may or may not have been written to it yet.

      Ext2 in particular is really good at getting *totally* screwed if it's shutdown in the middle of a write.

    7. Re:The pre-empt problem: by Joe+Tie. · · Score: 1

      That sounds like a useful feature to have. Hopefully I'll not need it, but just in case - anyone recall what this is called or where it's located in the kernel configuration?

      --
      Everything will be taken away from you.
    8. Re:The pre-empt problem: by MaufTarkie · · Score: 1

      or IF your KVM doesn't remap the Print Scrn/SysRq key for it's own use. I recently found out that the KVMs at work do that (in the middle of a crisis), and I was none too happy. It never passes the keypress to the OS. *grumble*

      --
      Without you I'm one step closer to happiness without violence.
    9. Re:The pre-empt problem: by SpaceLifeForm · · Score: 3, Informative

      It's under the hacking submenu, 'Magic SysRq key'.
      Also known as CONFIG_MAGIC_SYSRQ in your .config.

      --
      You are being MICROattacked, from various angles, in a SOFT manner.
    10. Re:The pre-empt problem: by Wolfrider · · Score: 1

      --What did you end up doing? You should still be able to attach a kbd directly to the box...

      --
      .
      == WolfriderV6 == I'm willing to admit that *I just might* be wrong... Are you??
    11. Re:The pre-empt problem: by pclminion · · Score: 1

      Yeah, like the guy is going to go unplugging/plugging keyboards into a running production server. Right. You do realize you can blow your motherboard away like that, right?

    12. Re:The pre-empt problem: by Abcd1234 · · Score: 1

      Riiight... and if I stepped on the San Andreas fault in just the wrong way, I could cause an earthquake!

      Seriously, the odds the frying a board by hot-plugging a keyboard into it must be very low... I know I've done it many *many* times with absolutely no problems. Honestly, have *you* ever fried a MB this way?

    13. Re:The pre-empt problem: by MaufTarkie · · Score: 1

      That's exactly what I did, after hunting for a spare keyboard. Now I keep a keyboard tucked away in a nook for this very purpose.

      --
      Without you I'm one step closer to happiness without violence.
    14. Re:The pre-empt problem: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have in fact fried a MB that way. Board boots up, everything works except the keyboard, any keyboard!!! Given this is an oldish MB (Pentium 2) but i'm not going to make that mistake again.

  19. Re:Question by m_chan · · Score: 0

    > Is it really necessary to have every test release on the front page?

    I got a test release story submission accepted for the back page once. Boy I was ticked! It didn't generate any comments, not even a Frsty! No one ever looks at the back side of their monitors, I guess.

  20. crap by Qwell · · Score: 0
    I just compiled 2.6-test10 last night, and never got a chance to test it.

    Sounds like I'm gonna have something fun to do this weekend though.

    --
    As of 10/06/03, I hate COBOL developers.
    1. Re:crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have ball sucking in your sig and 'he' is the fag?

  21. Re:Fuck by angryelephant · · Score: 2, Funny

    I was seriously planning a quiet night at home compiling test 9 right before I read this. I was going to stop at the store on the way and pick up a nice bottle of wine, one of those claim jumper tv dinners that feeds a small army, maybe some candles. release 11 - good grief, this changes everything. # times i have recompiled the kernel in the last week - 3 # times i have gotten busy with the girlfriend in the last week - 0

  22. Hmmm.... by Durin_Deathless · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It looks like they are going to ship the kernel without the latest framebuffer things. Last time I made a non -mm kernel, the framebuffers were completely hosed, and I don't think the changes have been merged yet. Am I looney or correct on this?

    --
    You should use AdiumX on your Mac.
    1. Re:Hmmm.... by fishbowl · · Score: 5, Interesting

      You are correct. I've given up, and now I assume that FB consoles are something that nobody but me wants or uses. Others are happy with 80x25 consoles and use some sort of XTerm. I prefer 160 column framebuffer consoles, and this is in fact one of the main reasons I run linux.

      I thought it was only broken for my radeon card though. I also thought I was the only person still using a radeon 8500LE who wants to use consoles at fbset 1280x1024-75. This has not worked in any 2.6 kernel, whereas it does work well on 2.4. I've reported it. I've tried the patches that were posted, but it doesn't fix the problem I've reported. I gave up.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    2. Re:Hmmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's GPL'd. Write your own patches and help the entire community!

    3. Re:Hmmm.... by slittle · · Score: 1

      I run at 132x60, in textmode. I find the performance of framebuffers pretty lame, particularly at anything higher than what I can get in text mode. Is FB even 2D accelerated? (using Matrox G200 and various GeForce boards and the relevant drivers).

      --
      Opportunity knocks. Karma hunts you down.
    4. Re:Hmmm.... by fishbowl · · Score: 1

      I have the skills to do some things, but writing video drivers isn't among these.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    5. Re:Hmmm.... by evbergen · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well, the kernel guys have a point in that such things should run in userspace, simply because they can.

      If X can run in user space, so can a simple set of high resolution graphics-based virtual terminals.

      Personally I think the whole terminal/console handling should be in userspace. Sure, if the vt process dies, you're screwed, but it's easier managed and restarted if it lives outside the kernel. The net risks of having to cycle your box may actually be lower, and support for new frame buffers could move a lot faster than kernel development.

      --
      All generalizations are false, including this one. (Mark Twain)
    6. Re:Hmmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, I'd love an 80x25 console. But it comes up as 120 or something. My rage128 ibook sucks for nethack right now ;/

      But yes... there are lots of issues in 2.6 which don't seem to be getting fixed. Again, my ibook crashes (at application level, not kernel) VERY often, with SIGFPEs and other issues. I figure it's the corruption/pre-emption thing. Some other issues, too... just look at the must fix list :(

    7. Re:Hmmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Others are happy with 80x25 consoles and use some sort of XTerm.

      I presume you meant "are happy with 80x25 consoles or use some sort of XTerm".

      I still don't understand why a framebuffer console is any different from a screen-sized XTerm, apart from it having a much smaller selection of fonts, fewer localisation options, and very poor mouse support. But each to his own I suppose.

    8. Re:Hmmm.... by fishbowl · · Score: 1

      "I still don't understand why a framebuffer console is any different from a screen-sized XTerm"

      It's different. I don't want to argue about that.

      The important point here, is that a serious bug appears to be going into a production kernel, and I don't understand why that's acceptable to anyone.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
  23. Re:Question by red+floyd · · Score: 2, Funny

    I thought you had to run Windows to use Front Page?

    --
    The only reason we have the rights we have is that people just like us died to gain those rights. -- Cheerio Boy
  24. Re:Fuck by WiKKeSH · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    you should know that compiling a kernel and sex are mutually exclusive. ;)

  25. Re:Fuck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    er.. not at all - The secret is to just let the machine do the work, while you take care of the other business....

  26. What are you talking about? by alex_ant · · Score: 0

    It's only the odd ones!!

  27. Re:Question by marauder404 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I agree. Announcing minor and test versions is only news worthy to the people that are following progress closely, who are likely to know about it anyway. And those people that don't follow it closely are only interested in hearing about major changes since the last time they checked up on a project.

    For example, the launch of Windows 2000 didn't even make a story on Slashdot when it launched in February 2000 even though a development kernel release did. I realize a large portion of Slashdot doesn't use Windows, but it's still significant news for every nerd.

    C'mon Slashdot ... get back to you roots. Show me stuff that matters.

  28. Clean Shaven Beaver by Tumbleweed · · Score: 4, Funny

    Now _that's_ a smooth name that just rolls off the tongue... :)

  29. Re:Fuck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    You're so right.

    I can take care of the business of compiling the kernel without distraction, now that they have machines that can 'do the work' for the GF.
    There are even pay-per-view websites devoted to these things...

  30. How about by TCaM · · Score: 2, Funny

    'Clean Shaven Beaver'

  31. Sorry Tux, Here comes Bux. by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 4, Funny

    Looks like Tux has been replaced in Linus' heart. Thats Great! I've always prefered Beaver meat to Penguin. Plus, you can make the coolest hats out of Beaver pelts. Now we just need a name for the little fellow. How about Bux?

    --
    Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
    1. Re:Sorry Tux, Here comes Bux. by kriox · · Score: 1
      Some people have weeeeeeird fetishes...

      ---
      Kriox

    2. Re:Sorry Tux, Here comes Bux. by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 2, Funny

      I've further decided that the Name Bux should be pronounced "bucks" to emphisise the money that you will save using Linux 2.6. It will help us market it to the big wigs who need cute woodland creatures and catcy marketing slogans.

      Such as:

      Is your company thowing money out with windows? Get Bux now! He'll show you the eightfold path to saving major bucks.

      --
      Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
    3. Re:Sorry Tux, Here comes Bux. by kinnell · · Score: 4, Funny

      Wouldn't Fux be a better name for a beaver mascot?

      --
      If I seem short sighted, it is because I stand on the shoulders of midgets
  32. Re:Question by unixbob · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The reason that this made the front page is that it's the test release prior to the first "production" release of the 2.6 kernel which we have waited 2years + for. Seems only right that this should be on the homepage. Same as todays earlier story on FreeBSD 5.2.

    --
    The Romans didn't find algebra very challenging, because X was always 10
  33. At least Linus by Nonillion · · Score: 4, Funny

    At least Linus didn't call it the "SCO, fuck your mama" build ;)

    --
    "I bow to no man" - Riddick
    1. Re:At least Linus by damiam · · Score: 1

      I bet he's saving that for 2.6.0 final.

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
    2. Re:At least Linus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Wouldn't that be the 2.4 "greased weasel" build?

      Darl reminds me of a greased weasel sometimes...

      Often, actually...

    3. Re:At least Linus by staed · · Score: 2, Funny

      Think SCO's gonna try to force a renaming of it to "Stolen Beaver"

  34. Re:Question by Nucleon500 · · Score: 3, Informative

    You wouldn't think so, but there is a good reason for it. To make a sweeping generalization, Slashdotters want to see Linux succeed, and we have the technical knowledge to compile kernels and make informative bug reports if needs be. Publishing this story on Slashdot will entice more people to test the new kernel, thus ensuring that the 2.6.0 release will be Bug-free(tm).

  35. Re:Question by jjhlk · · Score: 2

    Remember how important audience is. While you and many other slashdotters might not care about test releases, still more probably do.

  36. Re:Fuck by fiftyLou · · Score: 5, Funny

    # times i have recompiled the kernel in the last week - 3
    # times i have gotten busy with the girlfriend in the last week - 0


    Huh. How ironic is this.
    Number of times I have recompiled the kernel in the last week - 0
    Number of times I have gotten busy with your girlfriend in the last week - 3

    ;-)

  37. (obSubjectInsertLameBeaverJoke) by Tuross · · Score: 1

    Beaver with Botox

    I just don't wanna know.

    --
    Matt
    1. Read Slashdot
    2. ???
    3. Profit
  38. Seriously though... by Pizaz · · Score: 1

    I agree with you, but would take your proposition even further. After the beaver has finished his drug rehab program, it needs to find God. Let us all pray for 'Born Again Beaver.'

  39. newsflash? by l00sr · · Score: 1

    Please, the tenth post about the 2.6.0 kernel almost coming out was enough for me. Make it stop.

    1. Re:newsflash? by julian_m · · Score: 1

      go to: 100sr preferences --> click Homepage --> on section 'Exclude Stories from the Homepage' select Linux or Operating Systems and click save

  40. Re:Question by The+Z+Master · · Score: 1

    I disagree. I do not follow Linux kernel development closely, but as a Linux user, the release of 2.6 is very exciting. Reporting each test release helps build the suspense and gets me interested at looking at changelogs and whatnot to see what's going on.

    As to minor releases, they often fix problems that are relevant to me. Since I do not regularly check kernel.org (it's the same most of the time), I appreciate the news.

  41. Please mod down. by jared_hanson · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    These are not funny.

    --
    -- Fighting mediocrity one bad post at a time.
    1. Re:Please mod down. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I, for one, welcome our new unfunny moderator overlords.

    2. Re:Please mod down. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      in soviet russia, you moderate unfunny kernel overlords

  42. But he did! by jared_hanson · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I think you need to reread the name:

    Beaver In Detox

    Now, let your mind slip a little bit further into the gutter, and I think you will see that he did name it what you said. It's just a little more thinly veiled.

    I think his reason for making it vague was that SCO needs to have everything in the open to see things (think GPL code). By making it more vague, they are less likely to be in on the joke.

    --
    -- Fighting mediocrity one bad post at a time.
    1. Re:But he did! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      never looked at it that way, i think you are right there, very witty on their part.

    2. Re:But he did! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      me non-native English speaker. pleese explain joke. me speaking not good England.

  43. My dad's windows pc ate my dam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was designing a dam on Windows, and it was lke beep beep beep beep... and it was like.... half of the dam was... gone.
    got.

  44. Re:Question by gid · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Indeed, unfortunately, this article is cluttered up with people saying slashdot != freshmeat (as usual), and lame beaver jokes.

    I think there's one discussion about the pre-empt stuff being fubarred, but that's about it, kinda disappointing there aren't more people taking about the kernel itself. I'm still running test9 on my main box, was gonna compile test10 today, good thing I didn't, or else I'd be one of those ever popular "dang I just compiled version x - 1 an hour ago" people.

  45. The importance of publishing test releases by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    When you put 1 milion monkeys with keyboards in a room, open source occurs (taken from the Bazaar and the Cathedral), or a result of similar quality.

    Since most open source development is not done by professionals nor professional organizations, there is no formal QA process. As such, Linux is in dire need of testing. Especially with all the unproven claims of stability made in its regard.

    It is therefore very important that as wide a variety of people as possible download it and hose their systems so that bugs get reported in newsgroups where people will get laughed at for not reading every bit of manual out there.

    I think that the people posting complaints about this story were either ignorant of the open source development process, or just trolling.

    Thank you.

    1. Re:The importance of publishing test releases by hattmoward · · Score: 1

      I can't speak for all open source projects, but in the case of the linux kernel, it is mostly developed by middle-age professional developers. Don't get me wrong, we need lots of testing, but you're promoting the myth that linux is developed by thousands of ugly teenagers. I, for one, welcome our teenage overlords.

      Oh, about those claims of stability, you can check the linux counter project or netcraft's survey site.

    2. Re:The importance of publishing test releases by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      *Right* .. since the Linux kernel is so piss poorly written thats why its the only threat to microsoft ....

      I am running test10 with no problems at all, but yet, i go to use an 'official' release of any microsoft product and get nothing but security flaws, theres your 'formal QA proccess' at work for you.

      I do agree that Linux needs to publish test releases, its the only way to iron out any problems. Its better than a handful of developers with closed source code, then what you get is Windows and consistent security flaws. To say its not done by professionals
      or professional organizations( BTW Redhat, IBM and other big companys have contributed) is just ignorant.

    3. Re:The importance of publishing test releases by Hieronymus+Howard · · Score: 2, Informative

      Since most open source development is not done by professionals nor professional organizations, there is no formal QA process. As such, Linux is in dire need of testing. Especially with all the unproven claims of stability made in its regard.

      Have you looked at the email addresses of the kernel contributors. Most of them seem to be @intel.com, @ibm.com, @hp.com, @redhat.com, @sgi.com etc. etc.

      Maybe ten years ago they were teenagers, but mostly they are now professional developers who are paid to work on the kernel by their employers.

      HH
      --

    4. Re:The importance of publishing test releases by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      how in the world did this troll get modded to +2?

    5. Re:The importance of publishing test releases by I+don't+want+to+spen · · Score: 1

      What, no @microsoft.com ? Oh, right...

      --
      Don't go to a brothel if you want to buy broth
  46. What are the changes... by aled · · Score: 1

    of this release compared to Windows XP?

    Sorry, could help it :-)

    --

    "I think this line is mostly filler"
    1. Re:What are the changes... by ChipMonk · · Score: 0
      For starters, it's fully customizable.

      It's much more virus-resistant.

      And it's got a permanent discount of 100% off the Windows XP retail price.

  47. Thank you by pardasaniman · · Score: 1

    I've been running Gentoo with gaming-sources (has pre-emptive patch)... I get the same problem.... particularly when running OpenOffice, and compiling fishyfudge in background. It happened right in the middle of the "emerge" process and my disk was doing stuff, when it happened.. I too was severely bugged.

    1. Re:Thank you by Nucleon500 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I really wish some of the "save oops to disk (or high memory, or floppy)" patches went into the mainline kernel. Lets face it - everyone runs X, and nobody has a serial console, so most people won't see the oopses. And even if they do, few people want to copy them down by hand. This really limits the amount of useful bug reports the kernel developers are getting.

      After these patches become mainstream, somebody could make an automated system to ask the user to describe the problem, then send a bug report with the oops, .config, dmesg, etc.

    2. Re:Thank you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or what about applying the patch to switch to text mode with some information about the ooops, with a let's say blue background.
      As an added feature, what about dumping some information about the state of the machine in some file, and call it "minidump".

      Errr, nobody would do that, right?

    3. Re:Thank you by caluml · · Score: 1

      Or: Linux has crashed - would you like to upload your core file to ftp.kernel.org to aid the developers? Yes/Yes ?

      No
      Uploading ..............





      Lameness filter encountered. Post aborted! Reason: Please use fewer 'junk' characters.Lameness filter encountered. Post aborted!Lameness filter encountered. Post aborted!LameneLameness filter

    4. Re:Thank you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem with dumping Oopses to disk is that when an Oops occures, the kernel is in an unstable state. Attempting to write to disk at this point could completely trash your data; what if the Oops was in the VFS or filesystem?

      An option to dump Oopses to a serial line, or via. a simple line printer protocol might be appropriate though; there is much less chance of damaging anything.

    5. Re:Thank you by Mark+Bainter · · Score: 1
      Lets face it - everyone runs X, and nobody has a serial console, so most people won't see the oopses.

      Er, the majority of my linux boxes not only don't run X, they don't even have it installed. And my desktop /does/ have a serial console, (as do my servers) I know I'm not alone in the first, and I really doubt I'm in that rare of company on the second.

      --
      "No nation could preserve its freedom in the midst of continual warfare."
      --James Madison
    6. Re:Thank you by pclminion · · Score: 1
      The reason the oops dumper is a bad idea is this possible sequence of events:

      1) Kernel bug causes it to accidentally write random garbage all over itself. The oops dumper is part of the code affected.
      2) The kernel crashes and invokes the oops dumper.
      3) The corrupted oops dumper happily trashes your entire disk.

      You'll NEVER convince a core kernel developer that this is a good idea. The ONLY good thing a kernel can do when it determines that it has been corrupted is simply STOP RUNNING.

    7. Re:Thank you by Nucleon500 · · Score: 1

      Congradulations, you run servers. But the majority of desktop users (who are more likely to run testing kernels anyway) do run X and don't have serial consoles. I do think an oops dumping system that didn't require no X or a serial console would get a lot more dumps back to the kernel developers.

    8. Re:Thank you by Nucleon500 · · Score: 1
      Using the VFS layer, which is likely dead anyway, isn't a good idea, but there are still safe ways. There are some patches that use their own minimal system to write to swap partitions on IDE disks. Safer still, there could be an option (not default) to dump to a floppy using a self-contained system. Probably safest would be to write the dump somewhere in RAM that won't be erased during a warm boot, and save that memory on the next boot until userspace can save it somewhere.

      When the kernel crashes, it doesn't just stop, it makes some effort to tell you how it crashed - I just think if it were easier to get dumps without manual copying or special hardware, more dumps would be returned. At least the "save in RAM" technique could go in mainstream or distro kernels - what's the possible harm in that?

    9. Re:Thank you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You could save it in the VGA graphic memory

  48. OBVIOUSLY YOU FAIL TO UNDERSTAND THE JOKE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You stupid IDIOT. Obviously you HAVE NO FUCKING CLUE do you?

    Maybe if you ACTUALLY READ the LAST kernel release notes you MIGHT COMPREHEND why that was so fucking funny!

    BEFORE you run you stupid self important yap why don't you make sure you HAVE A FUCKING CLUE FIRST!

    You really look like a TOTAL CLOWN and an idiotic NEWBIE.

  49. JARED HANSON = NON-RELEASE NOTES READING NEWB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    get a clue you loser.

  50. ACPI? by brain_not_ticking · · Score: 1

    Will this test kernel have better support for acpi on my hp ze4430us? Somehow I doubt it. test9 and 10 both freeze when I try to monitor my battery charge...now how useful is a laptop if you don't know how long it will stay on?

    1. Re:ACPI? by Nucleon500 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Unless one of the people working on the ACPI subsystem have your laptop, they have no way of knowing about the problem. So submit a bug report - if the fix is a one-liner, it might still go in.

    2. Re:ACPI? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Use APM instead? I've never bothered with ACPI since everytime I wanted it it was still under development. APM and my laptop recharge status display work fine together.

    3. Re:ACPI? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please report errors to the corresponding maliling list, http://www.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/cpufreq. It's very active, perhaps a fix is already available (but has to much impact for 2.6.0)

    4. Re:ACPI? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is it with ACPI that causes so many problems? By the sound of things, ACPI must be one of the most poorly defined standards ever. I'm even including the ATA specifications in that!

    5. Re:ACPI? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have the same laptop, and ACPI works like a breeze on a stock 2.4 kernel. I tested 2.6 a few times, and it worked in test3, I'm sure of that, so I wonder if something else is maybe the problem, like the local APIC or how is it called.

      In reply to another comment: this laptop has no APM, so you really *need* ACPI.

    6. Re:ACPI? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In what way is the ATA specifications bad? Enlighten me!

    7. Re:ACPI? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He never said bad, just poorly defined, meaning chipset mfgs get to play fill in the blanks when creating their chipsets, meaning supporting all the different ones out there becomes trouble.

  51. this test goes to 11? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    why don't they just make the tests bigger and make the highest one 10?

    1. Re:this test goes to 11? by qartis · · Score: 0

      It's sad that such a clever and offbeat reference went unnoticed. I wish I had mod points :)

  52. Beaver is a symbol of CANADA by variable26 · · Score: 1

    This kernel is ours!!!

    O Canada!

    Today, thanks to conservation and silk hats, the beaver - the largest rodent in Canada - is alive and well all over the country.

    1. Re:Beaver is a symbol of CANADA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So what kind of beaver is the symbol in your flag?

    2. Re:Beaver is a symbol of CANADA by TeknoHog · · Score: 1

      What about the badger? Can someone tell me what is symbolizes, so that I know who to blame for this (i.e. the unreleased Badgers on Shrooms kernel).

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    3. Re:Beaver is a symbol of CANADA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's a beaver that had been hit by a truck. Left all pread out and red and such.

      And on our money, that's a royal beaver, they just couldn't fit the whole picture on the coins, so they only put her head. Strange, I know. Rumour has it there are some twenties in circulation that show the whole picture though, the queen, spread eagle, in all her glory.

    4. Re:Beaver is a symbol of CANADA by jo42 · · Score: 1


      No. You wrong. Mapre Reaf is symbor of Canada. Eh.

    5. Re:Beaver is a symbol of CANADA by tntguy · · Score: 1

      We don' need no steenking badgers!

  53. LET ME CLARIFY by jared_hanson · · Score: 0, Troll

    It WASN'T funny there, and IT isn't FUNNY here.

    Now DO you UNDERSTAND?

    --
    -- Fighting mediocrity one bad post at a time.
  54. Re:Fuck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How did you get busy with his girlfriend negative three times?

  55. Re:Please. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think it wouldn't be that hard to have bitkeeper automatically post to Slashdot each time a patch is committed to the kernel tree. That would rawk.

  56. YOU = HUMOR IMPAIRED DORKUS MOLORKUS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since it was LINUS TORVALDS HIMSELF who original mention BEAVER OVERLORDS I guess you have taken your self importance so far that you are now DISSING THE FATHER OF LINUX as UNFUNNY?!

    You are a FUCKING IDIOT EXTRAORDINAIRE.

    The original poster was making an ALLUSION to the comment MADE BY LINUS HIMSELF mentioning a BEAVER OVERLORD e-mail address. So by combining a tired slashdot GAG with the BEAVER OVERLORDS from LINUS it combined to create A HUMOROUS PLAY ON WORDS. A HUMOR HACK if you will. I'm sorry your BRAIN IS TOO FEEBLE to catch it. Try to THINK REAL HARD until you experience a strange involuntary movement in your lips also known as A SMILE.

    NOW FUCK OFF.

  57. Re:Fuck by deniable · · Score: 1

    It involves imaginary numbers, but it's a complex situation.

  58. Re:Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    OS X and Windows X whatever users should just deselect Linux related stories from their preferences. Thank you, the management.

  59. Re:Fuck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It involves imaginary numbers

    So the girlfriend is pessimistic, and fiftyLou is pretty drab and boring?

    You know, the square root of the negative one?

    Oh, never mind. I failed humour in school.

  60. I really can't believe... by gonerill · · Score: 0, Redundant

    That no-one has suggested Longhorn and Beaver should go head-to-head. But perhaps I should be browsing at -1. Or -5.

    1. Re:I really can't believe... by Jugalator · · Score: 1

      -5 !?

      Jeez, I wonder what's going on at that level! :-O

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    2. Re:I really can't believe... by jo42 · · Score: 1


      Remember kids,
      Longhorn == Cowpies
      Linux == Beaver
      We have both holes covered.

  61. Re:Fuck by dolson · · Score: 1

    Whoa, they have classes for humor now? Hmm...

  62. Re:Question by Joe+Tie. · · Score: 1

    While this might end up sounding like a usual "go linux m$ux lol!!!!" post, I do honestly think kernel test releases are more important than Windows releases. Not so much for the importance to the end user, but because test releases depend on a community to locate bugs, and if possible help to track down the problem before the kernel gets a stable release. Windows on the other hand, there's really nothing for us to do with other than use it. Which is all fine and good, but it rates much lower on the 'stuff that matters' scale for a geek site than having a chance to help in the development of an operating system.

    --
    Everything will be taken away from you.
  63. *BSD vs Linux by Atheist+90210 · · Score: 0, Troll

    I'm sure this question has been asked before, but I'd like to get the opinion of the folks here -- what's the reason for the (seemingly) better coverage/popularity of Linux vs *BSD? Is it the development model? Better architecture? More hardware support? Cuter mascot? ... On the other hand, I'm drunk and maybe just imagining all of this...

    1. Re:*BSD vs Linux by merdark · · Score: 1

      Coincidence really. And the GPL tends to make selfish and/or anti-corporate types happy too.

      Of course, if you mean "to the none geek crowd", then it's most definatly simply the fact that media picked up on Linux and not BSD. Therefore companies picked Linux instead of BSD in order to ride the free media hype.

      Of course, I don't like Linux and think it's been waaaay over hyped, so I'm probably biased.

    2. Re:*BSD vs Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Yes. If anything, Linux is the most anti-corporate OS in existence. Which is why you'll never find the likes of SGI, IBM, HP, Compaq, Dell, Intel or AMD ever supporting Linux. No siree, they're all far too busy with the work they've commited to for BSD.

      I've also never heard "Giving away code for free" described as selfish. Taking someone elses free code and keeping it for yourself, now that sounds selfish.

      Biased? Noo, not you!

    3. Re:*BSD vs Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would say it is because of the GPL. I know that I would not release software under a BSD style license, because then anyone (even M$) can take my code, improve/mutilate it, and not let anyone else see it. I don't want people to just leech off of MY hard work. The GPL prevents that, while the BSD license promotes that.

  64. In Linux Land..... by alexborges · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    .....The Beaver F0rkS YOU!

    --
    NO SIG
    1. Re:In Linux Land..... by Crypto+Gnome · · Score: 1

      You say that like it would be a bad thing.

      --
      Visit CryptoGnome in his home.
  65. Is fdomain driver still actively maintained? by pedro · · Score: 2, Informative

    My only need for scsi is for my venerable old hp scanjet 4 and a cd burner, so this ancient future domain isa card works just dandy.
    Unfortunately, the driver segfaults under 2.6.0-x. It worked a treat with 2.4.
    Anyone else had this issue? Should I make a formal bug report? Is it a hassle to do so?

    --
    Brak: What's THAT?
    Thundercleese: A light switch.. of TOTAL DEVASTATION!
    1. Re:Is fdomain driver still actively maintained? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      It's a known issue that many older drivers are busted. You could report it, but they'll probably just tell you to fix it yourself and submit a patch.

    2. Re:Is fdomain driver still actively maintained? by Wolfrider · · Score: 1

      --If you have any hope of wanting it to WORK again, file a bug report.

      --
      .
      == WolfriderV6 == I'm willing to admit that *I just might* be wrong... Are you??
  66. hmmm by odiado · · Score: 0, Troll


    kernel mantainer and diana biographer... amazingly multifacetic guy

  67. It's all blue... by LnxAddct · · Score: 1, Troll

    I mean I heard all these great things about this 'Linux' so I downloaded the new kernel thingy. I went into 'My Documents', double clicked it and my computer said that it wasn't an executable. It was the wierdest thing though cause it did execute and my screen turned all blue. It wasn't very functional, but it reminded me of windows exactly. The only it could do was restart my computer, but hey you gotta start somewhere.

  68. non-patched distro kernel by G3ckoG33k · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I know several distros have their kernels heavily patched (e.g. RedHat). Does anyone know if there is a distro which leaves the kernel totally untouched? Or, perhaps RedHat and a few others are unique in their capacity to actually fiddle with it.

    1. Re:non-patched distro kernel by Azar · · Score: 3, Informative

      Slackware is a completely vanilla kernel. Most others (but not all) tweak the kernel one way or another.

    2. Re:non-patched distro kernel by Pop69 · · Score: 2, Informative

      You can download and install a vanilla kernel in Gentoo and the Slackware kernel is unpatched out of the box apart from the occasional security issue like ptrace.

      As you say, most other distros are patched to within an inch of their life.

    3. Re:non-patched distro kernel by benson+hedges · · Score: 1

      for gentoo, you can emerge (use) the "vanilla-sources" which is the completely plain stock kernel, or the "gentoo-sources", that are not as sota as the vanilla ones, but heavily patched.

      --
      Karma : Soylent Green (Mostly due to eating junk food and mocking religion)
    4. Re:non-patched distro kernel by ajs · · Score: 1

      The RedHat SRPM is a totally vanilla kernel tar ball with patch files for all of their changes (and the ones that they apply from other sources).

      Just "rpm -i kernel*.src.rpm" and then look in /usr/src/redhat/SOURCES for your kernel tar ball and patch files. The order in which the patches are applied is all laid out in /usr/src/redhat/SPEC/kernel.spec, and you can apply them with "rpm -bp /usr/src/redhat/SPEC/kernel.spec"

    5. Re:non-patched distro kernel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like others have said of other distros, Debian can easily build and install a vanilla kernel for you. If you build it normally, it'll work fine. But Debian simply makes it easier by managing your patches (that YOU choose) and tracking installed kernels with its packaging system.

  69. Re:Why did George W Bush diddle his daughter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hey, did ya hear about href tags? all the kids are using em these days. might want to get a degree in compute science and learn all about em...

  70. sound reasoning by jared_hanson · · Score: 1

    Because I think Linux is a good kernel, and Linus is a great engineer, I must always laugh when he makes a joke. Nope, two completely separate things.

    You are a FUCKING IDIOT EXTRAORDINAIRE.

    (PS: You need to get the sac to post non anonymously.)

    --
    -- Fighting mediocrity one bad post at a time.
    1. Re:sound reasoning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you gentlemen, because I for one, found this thread quite entertaining :)

  71. On the same token... by bonch · · Score: 1

    On the same token, respect people who demand a little professionalism and happen to dislike something that's fighting to be taken seriously being called "Stoned Beaver."

    1. Re:On the same token... by ccp · · Score: 1


      I tried hard, but I can't respect the assholes.

      Cheers,

    2. Re:On the same token... by GreyWolf3000 · · Score: 1

      If "Stoned Beaver" is a quality product, then it will be taken seriously anyways.

      --
      Slashdot: Where people pretend to be twice as smart as they really are by behaving like children.
  72. Which begs the question by bonch · · Score: 1

    Then why did all the other test releases get headline news?

  73. Just wait a few days. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...and if there's another release in a few days, then we call it "stubble!"

  74. Torrent by teoruiz · · Score: 5, Informative

    As usual, I set a torrent here.

    --
    "Res publica non dominetur"
    1. Re:Torrent by alsutton · · Score: 1

      I got permission denied so I've set up a link at http://www.distributedbandwidth.info/torrentmap/ex plorer.jsp?cat=Lin260.

    2. Re:Torrent by teoruiz · · Score: 1

      You're right. It's fixed.

      --
      "Res publica non dominetur"
  75. Re:Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > but it's still significant news for every nerd.

    No way. I couldn't care less.

  76. test10 crashes with "head -1 /proc/net/tcp" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Just yesterday I managed to crash my test10 box by doing a "head -1 /proc/net/tcp". Didn't see this mentioned in the test11 patch but will try it ASAP.
    Anyone else got such a crash?
    I'm on AMD with pre-emption enabled. System pretty stable except when I played too much with USB host driver.

    1. Re:test10 crashes with "head -1 /proc/net/tcp" by pchenden · · Score: 1

      Yes,
      I have an AMD duron type 8 CPU and I'm running kernel 2.6.0-test11.
      I have the same behaviour - head -1 ... tcp crashes my system badly.
      I haven't experienced any other problems than this one.

    2. Re:test10 crashes with "head -1 /proc/net/tcp" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok, surfing for porn is one thing, but trying to get head from TCP? You, sir, have issues.

  77. Re:Question by msh104 · · Score: 1

    yes! linux is about progres and develepment... and we want to see that! but DO skip the final version. we don't need to see the final result. we want to see the progres, not the end of it!!

  78. This was posted yeasterday: by GNUALMAFUERTE · · Score: 1, Funny

    http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=03/11/26/015725 5
    We should add a "Torvalds makes you happier everyday" section.

    --
    WTF am I doing replying to an AC at 5 A.M on a Friday night?
    1. Re:This was posted yeasterday: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, yesterday the test only went up to ten, but then the Linus et. al. thought "10? Where do you go from there?" So they made it go to 11. 11 is higher then 10, so they made it go to 11.

    2. Re:This was posted yeasterday: by GNUALMAFUERTE · · Score: 0

      i know that, you are not the only one suscribed to announce, that's why i made this joke.

      --
      WTF am I doing replying to an AC at 5 A.M on a Friday night?
  79. Re:Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    For example, the launch of Windows 2000 didn't even make a story on Slashdot when it launched in February 2000 even though a development kernel release did.

    C'mon Slashdot ... get back to you roots. Show me stuff that matters.

    They did.

  80. Initio SCSI driver support status by Srdjant · · Score: 1

    ARGH! I'm just waiting for the Initio ini9100 driver to be fixed in the 2.6.0 tree, and then i'll be moving to 2.6.0.

    Dammit, somebody fix that driver!

    1. Re:Initio SCSI driver support status by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Christ, fix your own damn driver. This is open source, you know.

  81. How to report kernel bugs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Go to bugzilla.kernel.org, create an account and post all the info you have about the bug. Don't be afraid of posting huge blocks of text (and if you think it's too large, you can add it to the bug report as an attachment). Post dmesg output, kernel configuration files, the output of programs like lspci -v or cat /proc/interrupts, and everything else you can think is useful.

    Since what you getting is probably a panic or a oops, if it does not have already the symbolic function names, run it through ksymoops to add the missing data, and post the output.

  82. Debian's release names... by theantipode · · Score: 0

    Is it really appropriate to run the Beaver kernel on a distro that has release names taken from Disney characters?

    Though I suppose Woody wasn't a good name either. Nevermind, they'll go great together.

    --
    When I am king, you will be first against the wall
    With your opinion which is of no consequence at all
  83. Obligatory Gentoo... by MarcQuadra · · Score: 2, Interesting

    In Gentoo you can 'emerge vanilla-sources' instead of 'gentoo-sources' for a plain-jane vanilla kernel. To work with developmental vanilla kernels you just 'emerge development-sources'.

    If you're into manually tweaking kernels and packages I highly recommend Gentoo, you'll learn tons about Linux just by installing it.

    --
    "Sometimes, I think Trent just needs a cup of hot chocolate and a blankie." -Tori Amos on Nine Inch Nails
  84. mod parent up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    mod it up dang you!

  85. Re:Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For example, the launch of Windows 2000 didn't even make a story on Slashdot when it launched in February 2000 even though a development kernel release did. I realize a large portion of Slashdot doesn't use Windows, but it's still significant news for every nerd.

    No, it is not. Go surf microsoft.com if you feel otherwise.

  86. Pre-Empt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    AMD and Pre-Empt is a bad combo. Memory errors and corruption happen often.